HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.h. Approval of AUAR Reimbursement Agreement }
.,
4 4 RESEN4OU14TETR
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CITY COUNCIL
City Council Regular Meeting: December 6, 2011
•
AGENDA ITEM: Approval of AUAR Reimbursement AGENDA SECTION:
• Agreement Consent
PREPARED BY: Kim Lindquist, Community Development AGENDA NO. 1
Director
ATTACHMENTS: Reimbursement Agreement APPROVED BY:
OD/
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the Reimbursement Agreement between
the City and University of MN for work associated with the UMore AUAR
DISCUSSION
Over the last several years the City and University have been working toward development of the
UMore property located in Rosemount and Empire Township. The two parties have agreed to conduct
an Alternative Urban Areawide Review for the entire site, including a portion of Dakota County land
located in Empire Township. The City will take the lead on the project and is the Responsible
Governmental Unit and will coordinate with the University and Empire Township.
The agreement reflects the anticipated tasks necessaryto complete the AUAR and the amount paid to
the City's consultant. The City and University have set up a scope of work that defines project tasks
and estimated cost between HKGi and WSB, along with some sub - contractors. The division of work
was based upon the local knowledge and previous work of each of the consultants. The agreement
requires payment of invoices from the City, consistent with the anticipated scope and also some
additional AUAR related work beyond the defined scope. The City Attorney has reviewed the
agreement and all modifications to it have been made and agreed to by the University.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Reimbursement Agreement
L
k•
` 1
j '
7 4
1
1
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
This REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agree "), is entered into effective
January 1, 2011 ( "Effective Date "), by and between Board o Regents of the University of
Minnesota (the "University ") and City of Rosemount (the "City "
i ,
RECITALS .
y WHEREAS, the University owns approximately 5,000 acr of land commonly known
as UMore Park within the City and Empire Township; and
WHEREAS, the University's Board of Regentsappr`oved a con , pt. master plan for
UMore Park for the residential, commercial, ustrial, institutional and recreational
development of UMore Park; and
i i \ \ 7
WHEREAS, development of UMore Park (they " ',Mare"Park Development ") requires
environmental review under Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4; and
1 WHEREAS, the method for environ ental review o th ',UlyIore Park Development will
be the preparation of an Alternative Urban Ar,c Revi iUAR "), as provided in
Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410; and
,.„
WHEREAS, purse o -the provisions of Minneso ° Rules Section 4410.3610 and an
agreement between the``City an Aire Township, the City has been designated to serve as the
Responsible Governunental Unit (the "RGU ") in connection with the preparation of the AUAR;
and
I
Wq A e, City; as`RGU, ill
' he ' responsible for the preparation, publication, and
distribution of the A —. § sand for reviewing and commenting upon materials prepared by the
Univ ' and its consultants; and 77
W the City and University have each engaged their own consultants to assist
them in this process; and 1
, WHEREA the <City and University have allocated responsibilities among their
consultants for preparation of the technical analysis and reports that will be included in the
AUAR; and '
WHEREAS, the University has agreed to reimburse the City for certain fees and costs it
is required to pay to its consultants in connection with the AUAR; and
WHEREAS, the University and the City desire to enter into this Agreement to
memorialize the specifics of the allocation of responsibilities and the University's commitment
regarding its reimbursement of certain of the City's expenses related to the AUAR.
421404
1
E
1
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual obligations of the parties
contained herein, it is agreed by the parties as follows:,
AGREEMENT
4
1. Term of Agreement. The term ( "Term ") of this Agreement shall commence on
the Effective Date and continue until terminated by mutual consent, but shall in no event extend
beyond December 31, 2013.
2. UMore Park Development Project. The Unive plans to develop UMore
Park as a sustainable community that integrates nvir '' . ' -
cultural and economic
t to rates a onme s6c�o
Y g ,
opportunities with a specific focus on innovations in renew: 7J e enei y,e,ducation, technology,
lifelong learning, health and wellness, land use, the nat environment and regional economic
development. UMore Park planning and developmen strives to integrateUersity academic
strengths in ways that create innovative models that . - be replicated elsewhere foster economic
-development and enhance the quality of life for, citi ns in and around the City , . p R osemount.
3. Environmental Review. The City has detered that preparation of an AUAR is
an appropriate and permissible form o 1 nvironmental revi o the UMore Park Development
and that the process set forth in MinnesotaRules Section 441 0 are applicable. The City is
the RGU for the AUAR. A single AUAR te , 11 ")e prepared° or the entire UMore Park
Development. The AUAR will designate the UMo e�9 k- Develop ent, together with 120 acres
owned by Dakota County in Empire Township contiguous to the UMore Park Development, as
the stud i,
ru
y area and analy.„ ° aamum three lternative development scenarios proposed by
the University, one Hof which :, , be based an the Concept Master Plan approved by the
University's Board of Regents o December 6 ; 2008. The °Rosemount City Council will
approve the development, scenarios prior to work commencing on the AUAR. A map depicting
the study area issattached as E�hit.A., ` ° $
.„
C onsultant . fh City has retained WSB & Associates, Inc. to perform
,/ t, hnical analysi's4,and writin vices for the City in connection with the AUAR as
,,a
eibed in the wor'kplan . schedule set forth in letters dated December 16, 2010
which re attached to his Agreement as Exhibits B and C. The City has approved the
work planand schedle The University agrees that these are reasonable. The University
t is respons. -:for feeharged by WSB as provided in Section 4, below.
b. Univer ; \\<;" Consultant. The University has retained Hoisington Koegler Group,
Inc ( "HKGi) perform technical analysis, writing and project coordination services for
the University in connection with the AUAR. The work plan approved by the City
contemplates that HKGi will take the lead on certain technical analysis and will represent
the University at certain meetings as the AUAR is developed. The allocation of
responsibilities to HKGi is set forth in an attachment to Exhibit B. The University is
responsible for fees charged by HKGi.
I
f
I .
1 k .
i
c. The City and University each reserve the right, in their sole discretion, to retain
different or additional consultants. The City shall notify the University of any proposed
change in or addition to its consultant team and consider the University's views in the
matter.
d. Project Management Team. The City shall form an AUAR Project Management
Team ( "PMT ") to implement preparation of the AUAR. The University shall be
represented on the PMT by members of the University staff and of the 1-IKGi staff.
e. Schedule. The City will use its best efforts to compl -, atheAUAR in accordance
with the schedule attached to Exhibit B.
f. Cooperation; Consultation with University. Thei City and e University intend to
work cooperatively to economically and efficieWcomplete,A AUAR that fully
satisfies the requirements of the law. Toward that end, he City shall'allow the University
to fully participate in the development of _ " : AUAR 4and provide to o te LJn' . ersity for
review and comment the draft, revised and dal versions of the AUAR, documents.
including the plan for mitigation, which the Ciity to submit for � nvironmental
Quality Board (the "EQB ") review or to distribute, .t least fifteen (15) business days
before submission, distribution arm ublication. Thee = shall provide to the University
copies of all comments and objcons received b�y.�' e City from the public or
governmental units and agencies t the and final AUAR 'documents promptly after
their receipt and allow the University -to fullartici ate ipVtile preparation of responses
to the comments and objections. The . C shall��s rly provide in advance to the
University for re comment and $updates and reports the City will submit to the
EQB under Rule 10.3610 Subps. 7 an 8.
- 4. Reimbursent' ent O bligation. The par to this Agreement are both accountable
to the public foic beir expenditures - arid, accordingly, the City will prudently manage the process
of develop' , th ,AUAR so'askto. that - -the costs borne by the University are reasonable.
The University agrees; w thin thirty t3») days of its receipt of each of the Invoices (as defined in
Paragph, 4 below), to reimburse the eitc for the reasonable out -of- pocket costs and expenses
that'the`City pays to WSB, di its other outside consultants, including engineers and planning
professional,'for such consultants' work related to the AUAR (the "Reimbursable Costs "). If
this Agreement.i terminated hbefore the AUAR is adopted, the University agrees that it shall
reimburse the City the Reimbursable Costs the City has incurred for services rendered on or
before the termination ate.Reimbursable Costs do not include costs and expenses of City staff,
including the costs aiidd expenses of Andrew J. Brotzler when he is acting in his capacity as
Director of Public Works / City Engineer.
5. Invoicing. The City agrees to provide the University, within thirty (30) days
following the end of each calendar month during the Term, detailed written invoices and
supporting documentation identifying the Reimbursable Costs that the City incurred during the
prior month (collectively the "Invoices "). Requests for travel and subsistence expenses must be
supported by documentation which clearly indicate prudent use of public funds. Within fifteen
(15) days of its receipt of an Invoice, the University may request, in writing, that the City furnish
i
additional information to explain or substantiate any of the costs for which the City seeks
reimbursement.
6. Estimates. The University and City agree that the estimate of $224,000 provided
by WSB in Exhibit B for administration, coordination, project management, public process
coordination and technical analysis in connection with the AUAR is reasonable. The University
and City also agree that the estimate of $5,000 - $30,000 provided by WSB in Exhibit C for its
work on development scenarios to be studied in the AUAR is reasonable. The University
acknowledges that the estimates are based on information available as of the time they were
provided and that neither the City nor its consultant has guaranteed tat the AUAR can be
completed for the amounts or within the timeframes set forth in- Exhibits B and C. The City
agrees that it will use its best efforts to manage the wor a fits consultants so as to keep
Reimbursable Costs for the AUAR within the estimates. T "City will notify the
University in writing when it becomes aware that the : stimate(s) ., r are likely to be
exceeded, and will provide revised 'estimate(s) and a detaited explanation basis for the
change with such notification. The City shall giv good faith consideration o 'anyobjections
received from the University regarding any incredein Reimbuiiable Costs over the
M ;\,M1 ,.
7. Independent Contractors. The partie subject to the University's
obligations in Sections 3 and 4, that eah,party is solely re ible for payment of all wages,
benefits, taxes, and insurance on behalf'of itemployees, contractors + or agents relating to the
AUAR..Nothing contained in this Agreem: t can or be inteippyd as creating an employee
relationship between the parties and no emp ogee orntctor of either party shall be considered
an employee or contractor of the other party. I
,,,,—,7-77„ %,,,,,i
8. Mergel ?' Counterparts. The entire Agreement between the parties is contained
here and this Agre n supersede all oral ag em pts and negotiations between the parties
B
relating to the subject matter. This' Y :Agreement mayke executed in any number' of counterparts,
each of which shall be deem original; but ll of which shall constitute one and the same
instrument
9 fi T r - rnent may be modified or amended only in writing � Y Y g and
ga Modi
tures by the parti
uponn vs:.
10. Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are deemed severable. If any part
of this AgreemenVt irendered void, invalid, or unenforceable, such finding shall have no effect
on any other portion rofthi greement.
11. Headings and Captions. The headings and captions contained in this Agreement
are for convenience only and are not intended to alter any of the provisions of this Agreement.
12. Controlling Law. The laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all questions
and interpretations concerning the validity and construction .of this agreement and the legal
relations between the parties and performance under it.
13. Third Parties. This Agreement is between the University and the City as the only
parties and no provision of this Agreement shall in anyway inure to the benefit of any third
person (including the public at large) so as to constitute any such person as a third party
beneficiary of the Agreement or of anyone or more of the terms hereof, or otherwise give rise to
any cause of action in any person not a party hereto.
Date: December 2011 BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE
THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
rt
By:
Its \\
f ///:.\\. \-\\
/ \\:,„,,,,,,,,,,„
Date: December , 2011 4-NC-: Y OF ROSEMOUNT
i
By. '\
Its:
I �y
I
/ '''"''''' \ Y
' N„ 4,.,, ,...,....„.../
Nk
z
R �\
4 '`
. , i \ /of
I
T - '.� - t: •� S' - "rte -'� u'•r a 't;'s:
k F f __ T lti � tom
.+'r ...�.�'.: •.+!•M +, .............
ft 4► r t # �i t ire
�� C• �N •�ed`� { a �yt'ia;r!b , � %• tit ;! .� r,��!. - `r � ... +�4•r �•�o,, ,+� y �ri ;
t v $ .u"Lg((��t...rrqy,� 4EE+� / •.,r r �/�j y.' r f J ""'•- t . - ^ t. ,r
�r 1�1JJL(�1 !`L j- # ✓47 "� r � � ` Ht+� f•� tom\'+ Fj
!1; � : r), . ta. y y '' r T.•... .'t.. r
t r i e fa r eft 4i. t^`j
+ �� {'"� ,rrDy - ^ • y { j� - � "y'a4s + � �{ Pi, .c�'"Y �` ✓•5'f�;
x ( �5. -•4 •"I��Q'r - t to
°� � ; c * I r..t ,,,ssyyy
#„ 'rr . a ..Z� l/ #^ A y_ �� %.�W " -- J
- t o '.�T° ;�,. Lw - �� _ s
d -
�, .....'Yt a�� P , �'t f •.,
J ti
' N
ra.^ r � ,r. +} M. �,..•� . �r:.� !! � �'F • • �. 'K._= _ J�}e �, '�.'' . `�-+ {t
1 � .6 •rb ` �l 1 � t` •� ��.�_, f � 9 �r !'� *�6+rYZ. 7� l ...s { r.. �1�'+'r'n •
+ �� ' Y' "`�1 '{ } �� ��� �"t �t r � � ".� t � :.�' rI � �lv.• -
` i� a y � y �'tJ7 , 7 � •� • �.r'�"q�"t •.� �� - _ . ttt 1. �- r �- erw,_r
i� •'� .�F n 'w
' +n�'�?. t �w rt 1 ,� + -i' �'•. �a+ F ' — �'��f+ �.1• t•7. a _
' 1(�xJJL �.v ,et .ia k.,.,. �. it _ R 3 -i•s -
{ erlll R � 1 .. ...y _ -. � ... ' t � t « 3 r ' s � • 1 ` �r:� F +'� . � +t>s
. 't � � A . r • � p � 5z�� #«• sra . _.r� �3r, .,'�., , ' � ,,.
_,--�• � J. • � 4 er � ^s•T s��,e � r f. 1tL. �w vv 1 , ppi; � ' 1 1
+ �� yi` a k � � a .. t _ -. Z ; � t �! J �� -�.' r�� : j�4 r 4 1 �Y � . �ar -�i�.� w 3 • �, ..�
r• � ^ _ �, � wf � T4 _ - r �„ ♦ .0 r � r ♦ + � c �,l .�.r1«�, 1�y� 1��
� / ..''F:i.� _.` �`" . _,. r. � ✓`�/ w� h6� d,' r;'i/� ril�"r � ^4� �M i .fi' 'i {�`y �i�.aa t ��� 'i ° - • p 1.
h � Ff r� � 1 - r . , �'t� • r i .F' .r�.r. 4. ' '. �i '1. �•,b�... (t��� { .� '.+- ✓•• � _ 4!y. ' k L 7' �� i
?�'
{
4 :� 7J �,cr�''•Y�'.E. •��fi14 x � - .�J' � 3 � �q E �'�i ��� ma y , . J � --
r ,
t
My.} •�";M�r;�r; t,Y! ;- r°'�1rr, _��.r_ - '.'• T ' r
S g # —ri
.. .��#� x! f� { ' t f 6sn LL!•LM;a1!tt'•S+. e : r..warv. ..rsnlr .�7j .� } ,Y'
J r �. ' ':ot t t es4..•+ - 4. e,•..''.4 a r -:� D •'."°'arf :wee `'" E !�: t - .
J t
___ P? -
+'
i s _
"'4 iCl� •Y * ... ' - YC,ya'r♦ v j
y •.ta J �... t 1 � � •. f:v
�,,,r yt �y - < ►+sl r '' d # � •� 1• �' • '
.i !""2, � � ' � f ir •1 9�•�' ° - • „11�® P ? i ,.. """" L�L/ l�.:
h c r _ •.�./ � , �
t'� I � ,•'L -� � i � ; rte .. � ;� ��y„43 �:�, . ; • r e ""- , d kr � j -...r� I
� . v e". ,:'•- �„' � � � � � "�.'
t, � <' �� � F � � y � X � ���rt p 1.`. 7 1 • I ^ .i s t¢ "
� `�'' �
" �„ --tltl// ,,
1:e? i 91: ijfl
y . f _ r , s >.= t' •. *: ,.'._�I
'+11' 't 4��ti' j _� ' f }} � b r� ��r..l+ ; , � a Y.:r4:aa•!
�„ t• . 4- e..K..+•.rr��'� - �aM�� , C� T •i ` ' \ t � ".y+►�"'�` �.3Cw.c r J.� � .:'� kt
� ^• ir. -,. t t �, �: � ' ` _ � � � '����5 1jJ�'• , �Q' -�i�,. �wy., i r ,v ^
,� a� ;� u R'" • �`" � ., f r� r # .+i �y � + x t 1*i:t,4.� " �. , Y'i• 1 r.:` Y`. a _ .�. .Q.ai'"•1►��
it�r: +t...L .. t `,u! •s ': �
{
4ROSEMOUNT
SPIRIT OF PRTD'E AND PROGRESS
i .
EXHIBIT B
ws$
I RC.
December 16, 2010
Ms. Kim Lindquist
City of Rosemount
2875 — 145 Street W
Rosemount, MN 55068
Re: Proposed Work Plan for UMore Alternative Urban Areawide Review
Dear Ms. Lindquist:
Outlined below, please find a work plan to complete an Alternative Urban Areawide Review
(AUAR) for the proposed UMore Development. The City is the Responsible Government Unit
(RGU) to complete this AUAR. This work plan has been developed based on discussions from
the past several months and the results of the meeting between City Staff and the UMore team
on November 17, 2010. This work plan and the attached cost spreadsheet constitute WSB's
scope of work for this project with the City. If the City wishes to authorize this scope of work,
please sign at the bottom of this letter and return one copy tows, This work will be completed
in conformance with the scope of work, cost spreadsheet, and WSB's Professional Services
Agreement with the City of Rosemount..
Some of the general assumptions used to develop the scope of work and cost are outlined
below:
• All tasks will address the environmental impacts of three development scenarios and
compare to the "no build" conditions.
• The UMore team will develop the development scenarios. This scope of work and costs
do not include that effort by WSB.
• Available existing background information in the form of studies, memos, or, reports
that has been, prepared by UMore and its consultants will be used to the greatest extent
possible.
• This work effort assumes that as tasks /individual section analyses are complete, the
AUAR section will be completed and reviewed with the PMT. One round of review and
revision for each section is included in this effort.
• This work effort assumes one round of review and revision of the draft AUAR and
mitigation plan with the PMT.
.. r
{
I 1aS7aaud .n1DocautwimiWok_m„ICIE:.J2JdJ .,o; no. L&
B -1
F y
{
December 16, 2010
Page 2 of 7
• This work effort assumes one round of review and revision for the final AUAR and
mitigation plan with the PMT.
• The preparation of supporting maps and figures are included with the scope of work for
each task that will require, maps or figures. A map template will be developed by WSB
and shared with the UMore team to aid in figure preparation for UMore team tasks.
• City Staff will work with and coordinate with Empire Township Staff in the development
of the AUAR.
Task 1 — Project Management and Meetings
This task includes the project management and meetings to be completed throughout the
development of the AUAR. This effort corresponds to the "Administration, Coordination,
Project Management" and "Public Process" sections of the attached cost estimate.
} The Project Management Team (PMT) will be led by the City of Rosemount and include City and
Township Staff, designated UMore /U of M staff, WSB, and - HKGi.,. This task assumes a maximum
of 13 meetings throughout the AUAR process with the PMT with preparation and attendance by
two WSB Staff at each meeting.
The Agency meetings will be led by the City of Rosemount with technical assistance from WSB
or others as needed. This effort assumes up to ten focus meetings with specific agencies. This
task includes preparation and attendance at these meetings by two WSB staff.
Planning; Commission, City Council, and public meetings will be led by the City with assistance
from WSB and others as requested. The task assumes four Planning Commission /City Council
meetings with up to three WSB staff and four public meetings with up to four WSB staff. This
task also includes preparing contributing information for City website updates and meeting
notices.
The City will take the lead on document production, distribution, and comment collection.
WSB's work effort involves preparing the AUAR document to provide to the City for production,
distribution, and to post on the. City's website.
Task 2 — Describe Development Scenarios, Project Magnitude, Land Use and Cover Types
(AUAR Items 6, 7, 9, 10)
Up to three development scenarios and supporting figures will be developed by the UMore
team. This task only includes WSB's work to review and incorporate AUAR Items 6, 7, 9, and 10
and figures into the AUAR document provided by the UMore team.
Task 3 Prepare List of Permits /Approvals (AUAR Item 8)
This item will be developed per the AUAR requirements.
xiv1azs- ooumm�,w x :unemima wwx aIo.tine- &R.
B -2
December 16, 2010
Page 3 of 7
Task 4 - Evaluate Fish, Wildlife, and Ecological Resources (AUAR Item 11)
Available background information and past studies completed by the U of M will be reviewed.
It is our understanding that a review of the full UMore study area has not been completed
and /or a past study prepared. Therefore, this task also includes a field review of the site by
WSB's, biologists .to assess fish, wildlife, and ecological resources in areas where no past
information or study is available. From the existing information and the field review, the
impact of the development scenarios on these resources will be summarized in the AUAR.
Please note that the scope of this work does not include delineating wetlands or conducting
function and values assessments.
Task 5 — Evaluate Project impact on Water Resources and Stormwater Management (AUAR
Item 12 and 17)
As part of this task, a detailed evaluation three development scenario on water quantity and
quality will be completed This will include incorporating the three development plans into the
City's existing storm water model and evaluating the scenarios with the City's policies and
future conditions storm water management plans. This evaluation will take into account the
redevelopment area and external drainage area tributary to the project site for the water
quantity model.
The water quality model developed for the project area will include evaluating the existing and
proposed discharge rates, runoff volumes, and potential impact to downstream water bodies.
This effort does not include a groundwater analysis, modeling; or study. The three concept -Level
t - storm water management plans to address potential storm water impacts will be developed as
part of the AUAR process.
Task 6 — Evaluate Project Impact on Water Supply and Wastewater (AUAR Items 13, 18)
As part of this task, the impact the three development scenarios on wastewater and water
supply will be evaluated. Available information from Empire Township regarding wastewater
and water supply will be obtained. This evaluation will be discussed in the AUAR and a
Mitigation plan that outlines municipal infrastructure improvements will be included. For the
purpose of this evaluation, it will be assumed that the City of Rosemount will supply water to
the area and wastewater will be directed to the MCES interceptor along Biscayne Avenue: This
work includes:
• Estimating water demand and sewer flows per scenario based on land use map.
• Updating the City of Rosemount's'computer model of the water distribution system to
evaluate each scenario in terms of system pressure and available fire flow.
• Studying topography of planned area to determine extent of gravity sewer.
• Estimating water infrastructure needs: including trunk mains, water towers, wells, and
water treatment facilities.
• Coordinating with MCES to confirm capacity in interceptor along Biscayne Avenue for
each scenario.
• Estimating wastewater infrastructure needs including lifts stations and trunk mains.
K:{01B19-0fL4bremlWcsL9rbMttd Bork PlcoutUR- 111610 -.as rev % do,
B -3
December 16, 2010
Page4of7
• Developing water and wastewater infrastructure phasing plan for each scenario.
• Coordinating the evaluation with Empire Township:
Task 7 — Address Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures (AUAR Item 16)
The AUAR will address erosion and sedimentation control impacts anticipated by the
development scenarios and analyze the potential for any site specific erosion control concerns.
Task 8 — Evaluate Geologic Hazardous and Soil Conditions (AUAR Item 19)
This task includes WSB's work to review and incorporate the analysis completed by the UMore
team regarding geologic hazards, contamination, and soil conditions.
Task 9 — Evaluate impact on Traffic (AUAR Item 21)
As part of this task, the impact of the development scenarios and other identified new traffic
generators on traffic will be evaluated and discussed in the AUAR. It is assumed that the base
traffic model from the City's Transportation Plan and the UMore Park, Sand and Gravel EIS will
be used to complete this task. A discussion of potential mitigation measures will also be
included in the AUAR. The following outlines the subtasks that will be completed:
A. Data Collection
WSB will conduct traffic counts at the impacted intersections and driveways adjacent to
the study area. Some intersection counts have been completed with the Umore Sand
and Gravel EIS and for the'traffic modeling conducted in conjunction with preparation of
the Cities Transportation Plan. The counts for the AUAR will include turning movement
counts and directional counts at key intersections and driveways. The intersection
turning movement counts will be conducted for the AM (6:00 -9:00 a.m.) and PM (3:30
6:30 p.m.) peak hours. New counts will be conducted at those intersections where the
existing counts are more than 2 years old. It is assumed that up to 6 turning movement
counts and 10, 24 hour daily counts will be conducted.
B. Traffic Generation / Distribution g°
Based on the development scenarios, a traffic generation model will be prepared for the
anticipated land uses in the study area The traffic distribution will be determined
based on the information provided in the City's Transportation Plan and the Umore
Sand and Gravel EIS. In addition, other possible development areas will be evaluated to
determine their potential traffic generation and impacts to the transportation system.
This information will be used to develop the traffic forecasts for the entire study area.
C. Traffic Forecasts
Based on the existing traffic volume data collected, traffic generation from the proposed
development, traffic generation from other adjacent developments, and any other
anticipated additional background traffic growth not associated with the study area
traffic forecasts will be developed for the impacted roadways in the study area The
City's Transportation Plan and the Umore Sand and Gravel EIS will be used to determine
K 10187) 00l4d MWzslStibivNd Work_ PlmulLlR- 171610 -ios rev lax
•
B -4
r ..
i
is
December 16; 2010
Page 5 of 7
these forecasts. These forecasts will be for the existing conditions, full build -out
conditions, and a future year 2030 forecast.
D. Traffic Analysis
Traffic analysis will be conducted based on the forecasted traffic volumes on the
impacted roadways. This analysis will use the existing Synchro /Sim Traffic network
completed as part of the Umore Park Sand and Gravel EIS. The analysis will include a
capacity and Level of Service (LOS) Analysis at each impacted intersection and for the
system, travel speeds for the impacted roadways and entire system; and a Queuing
Analysis showing the required length of queues at each intersection.
E. Development of Mitigation Alternatives
Based on the traffic analysis, mitigation alternatives will be developed and analyzed for
each studied roadway. This will include development access scenarios, as well as
additional roadway improvements required to accommodate the future traffic
projections
Task 10 — Air Quality and Noise Analysis (AUAR item 22, 23, 24)
This task will include study level analysis of the air quality and noise impacts for the AUAR study
area. Based on the future traffic projections, a Study Level Noise Analysis will be conducted to
determine the noise impacts. Air Quality and Noise Analysis information from the Umore Park
Sand and Gravel EIS will be used as a base for the AUAR analysis.
F ,
Noise modeling for up to eight receptors will be conducted. Background monitoring from the
Umore Park Sand and Gravel EIS will be used as the basis for the AUAR noise modeling. Noise
monitoring will be conducted in the areas not covered by the UMore Park Sand and Gravel EIS.
It is assumed that monitoring will be conducted at up to two additional locations. Potential
mitigation will be developed to accommodate future noise levels if required.
A hot -spot Air Quality Analysis will be conducted at the identified critical intersections. This will
include a study -level analysis of the one -hour and eight -hour carbon dioxide concentrations
with the existing and full -build traffic from the proposed development. It is anticipated that
two receptor will be analyzed.
}
Task 11 Evaluate Sensitive Resources and Adverse Visual impacts (AUAR Item 25, 26)
This task includes WSB's work to review and incorporate the analysis and figures completed by
the UMore team regarding sensitive resources, cultural resources, prime farmlands,
parks /trails, scenic views, etc (as identified in the EQB's AUAR guidance).
Task 12 — Evaluate Compatibility with Local Plans (AUAR Item 27)
This task will include an evaluation of the compatibility of the development scenarios with the
City's Comprehensive Plan, the Vermillion River Watershed Plan, Empire Township plans, and
x101429- 041a01„m :Aemimd_ r_ar arx- rvOOO- bs..vJ &,,
B -5
< a
4
December 16, 2010
Page 6 of 7
other 'relevant plans. This task will also include a discussion related to the need to update the
Comprehensive Plan for the different development scenarios, if applicable.
Task 13 — Identify Impact on Public infrastructure and Services (AUAR Item 28)
As part of the AUAR, any new or expanded public services required as part of development in
this area will be discussed and evaluated. Required changes in the water and wastewater
supply, treatment distribution, and storage facilities will be evaluated. Discussion regarding
the infrastructure needed for storm water management and traffic impacts will also be
included. Information for this item will be developed based on the previous tasks in the AUAR.
Task 14 — Evaluate Cumulative Potential Effects (AUAR Item 29
ff ( 29)
Cumulative impacts from past projects, the proposed projects, and reasonably foreseeable
projects will be evaluated. This will include using the information in the UMore Gravel Mining
EIS.
Task 15 — Prepare Summary of Issues (AUAR Item 31)
As required by the EQB guidance, an executive summary that summarizes the issues and
analysis of the AUAR will be prepared and included in the AUAR.
Task 16 — Prepare and Submit Draft AUAR and Mitigation Plan
This task includes compiling the information prepared in the previous tasks into the draft AUAR
and mitigation plan based on the guidance provided from the Environmental Quality Board.
This task assumes one round of review and revision with the PMT. Once distribution of the
AUAR has been authorized by the City Council, the draft AUAR will be submitted to the required
agencies for a 30 -day review.
Task 17— Respond to Comments, Revise theAUAR, Update the Mitigation Plan, and Resubmit
for Review
This effort will involve revising the AUAR document and mitigation measures based on the
comments received during the 30 -day review process and responding to these comments. This
task assumes that the comments will not require additional significant analysis as part of the
AUAR. This task assumes one round of review and revision with the PMT.
Once distribution of the revised Final AUAR has been authorized, the agencies will have 10
working days from receipt of the revised AUAR to review the final document. If no objections
are filed, the City can adopt the AUAR document and mitigation plan.
Task 18 — Adopt AUAR and Mitigation Plan
This task includes preparing the documentation for the City Council to adopt the AUAR and
mitigation plan. By adopting the AUAR, the City adopts the mitigation measures outlined in the
AUAR and agrees to abide by these measures as development occurs. It should be noted that
the AUAR is required to be updated every five years until all development is approved within
the study area.
X10181➢-0MdNrilLberi4dmlmd rk PImrsVLIR- 121610 -- ie01.do.r
B -6
December 16, 2010
Page7of7
The cost to complete this work is $224,000 as detailed on the attached spreadsheet. A sample
timeline is also attached. This timeline is dependent on scenario development and assumes the
scenario development will take 3 -4 months. If scenario development takes Ionger, than the
AUAR timeline will be extended accordingly. The timeline also assumes the PMT is proactively
moving forward and review times are no more than, one week.
If the City wishes to authorize this work in conformance with our Professional Services
Agreement dated June 2009, please sign one copy of this letter below and return to my
attention. Please feel free to call me at (763) 287 -7196 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Andrea M. Moffatt
Senior Environmental Scientist
1 hereby authorize the above scope of work, schedule, and cost.
Signature
Date
r ianaalamnr&Doal uenma wa x_rlaa,¢rx- t2 ,o rev t az
B -7
I
I
S.
I 4 .
2011 .2012
k Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr
cenario Development*
Project Kick -Off Meeting
City Officially Orders AUAR 1111 II EN
PMT Review and Input if f I illlifGfit(f err r111 ii fiii111111 i f(i i ffl1111■i Miiiii
Public Meetings ----- " .-- --,,,.,,,, -- gook
Minneniiiin. Liiiiiiiii� ®.
UAR.Development _ .._ ^".�».,.ii
rwir;N;ms r.rrrw � r�rrer. wr�rrWr
Distribution of draft AUAR •—
0-day Comment Period
Respond to Comments and
Revise AUAR - ..,,,,.e.>,»
Adopt AUAR rrt
WA
' Timeline for scenario development will be variable. For purposes of the AUAR timeline, we have assumed 3-4 months. The AUAR schedule will be adjusted forward
Timeline assumes. PMT is proactively moving forward and review time for sections of the document is no more than one week
1
r '
9
. f \ 4t4 y , g?
O
1
1
B -8
m
d
Th. e e e Ir T e .re e es with r ev.nmrrnunx Ixlla final 7W 70, ,NN 0 ,044 Txr .0ry. x 000 net emonw Mr eapp b e. se wwiwr that. eatel dend rm Patin. PlanMruthel 00 .take Mr
I Inn
bs rod IwxNe na aM MtlnE rill. pwTrrmN tYrwaubba. ha wnrlKKiN la OrbO » pdwe,NM m mw WI be aanxalebar aPPnnlaxrdq an IbataN.t elx wAWR mxr: Mrtdenemb HEAtr lead Mr tw an Pwb otMmbm
Tack 1St* Task' !Clay " ISKTO Ncs.s ..... .flEmWrp"W$BCast'. - . TOO OPE R7aisumstiao*;,;:'.
SMewe Maiirienanmman.ence for 077 074. mmweon of relevam auAR pmelmes. inclu
PmIDa P P 5 malty .Oreedupon milestone: a 00000. Penn. 00 .
sM.wxwaM m, eon.em eno
City and .0.1.0 .11.01 to mem U of Id Assumes role saver. M above
Schedule Maintenance/Adherence for u m M 5 S' P _ P schedule S m
• w.f meenno b1a.d by mon7lN meed0ps
(max edngs)w. up tolwp(2)i.rvouax cand%7NN
Coy Ml lead meecinos.nf... assisance mainline, C am
PMT Meetings P 5 h 5 from W9x ant 1.01 as needed. C 41S TOO issues veers prep an
Assarnes up to l togs wit, sWOfiC
Adlxm, r r y h e a o r � age.. 07700 P r o m Me PM 000fo, s.
rran
COaaaon 747200
, erM coordination/00MM xiclax meetings for
PPM( PP( . AR doesPans S coordinator. bllwln Mr
w 0.1
C0V 0ad xn ssl
Meetings assivunde. mnmen Includes peps and attendance per., des
P .'Ent AOryMe.r.s P S A 5 horn W. and Ph0. as heeled. C 414400 a MI.(2144.4.4 •
NM, and W58.I provide Me Coy teal Assumes b urveNS yNI be pmNEetl M cop/ ready.. rns la repro! k N Na pall
electronic Oa5rment Produdon P 5 . 5 5 C i t y u a s RCP. prod c ma 5 54000 41.1413 an U .and final s
ASSLIMeS nmbuppl yet be Covered by lire Cash a A.
.cumentEl.n.onfOrrm,laelon P City ae ROIL dud drambMethe document . AUAR a. Mrtgonan Man aps below .
• es City wile aced comments and d2Mwwo
All cummenbwi77 addressed to Coy as •04 a technical authority as needed. AUAR revisions
City all collect and dim0bum M 04Prp01iate arid responses b comments .1 be covered in 0'7700 AUAR
Comment0lleeio7 and Menagem000 - P 5 5 5 IeMniCal aummm. as needed S E0 a..
Cunt. leaelmennps v. deealass4lanc0 soap. sac.. lemponmeMal, and ecorion. amps to
from 453 aM MAO,. neeaed red W53 team
Caws, anti Cammss0w. Assurtsp M
MaNOp Cdmmismn, C.C.. Meetings C 67,700 member et lour newrgs.lndlpes prep and elP:Mwa.
P S S S
Public PrcOxsa a lead M M*0 needed 1 assistance
Assumes four...WEI V458 wauld pro, de AU4R process and social, environmental. and economic issue expertise
Pudic Mee7n00 P 5 5 S C. 015400 M prof M/50 staff
U 014440sary 00aN ra0mn477 5 9 p 5 rem .adwdco0Ninale meetings r:m001
s - so attendance dry w58ia needed.
AUPA.lpe prepared oy Cry (or W58 Assumes W38'P assistance., cop... information
Items for Vedia.PreisReleacemtb pertanapts AUAR P S, 5 5 directed by tM Crly)aM reMeMrt sad PPM a S 57.000 end re`.. Mesa releases end wets. updates.
0700 51x70000* (Upper Sectlen Total Only) 0.4,500
- OwVmens: II All tasks pill address the ennronmenbl.
impacts of dle
1 MIMTKbxka( ttree development scenaws. 7) Each to elf APAR prepare, on,
ProOesr 3)Anaesez tort EErnme Toowns. are n nmryinm... each
5 0 40 EA
7 Proposer 4 5 5 9 C 40 NA
3. RCP 5 - C 770
P N
• Reeser MrAPAR P 5 5 5 C SO MA
Map ternolare mll Pa pea by W58',
address specific AUAR 0uemoravde Map cam7e0rated arm eacr, AUAR 007000
. derelw amp.. met
5 Moores and maps section s C 40 ,
• m of uenario denowrm is El Nvv58's scope
for the R. The City. involvel ass needed an an
ousa ea tycrrya o77 The Ana salsrtert
S on, City here is okra' assumes
e Describe sae nano% - 9 v pp ism. 0 s5on complete e ovided dARK5i .
Assumes compiere tea submated to in. for res.. and
incorporaPon into Poe AR 0040 dine on toured 02st0
Project msg.,. 5 P de is relatedto scan anus C 41,100r based on current lee schedule
and.. PPM .I prow:. mfom onL NM a'lmred as pad of the prepared. 0 PAL 0 AUAR due awn
e Pemnne and ePPrevars P 5 app revels C V reylwse
Assumes text est base on
0 land use P C aver sce00 wed Mantillas
W55 for revere M
incorporation voo UAR win we 00,00. dams
10 Cover NPes 5 P C 41,500 based on current lee &Med.
.13 mil review, surnnume, and 11 fpm w0pliiea14 ecm004ni remmces P 0 7 010000 Me AUAR. Task 0n'N0 n g
es held work ma,
W513
includes comp.,. al su.ce water duality (Tp P.TSS)
and volurne 0Nss up to Mee
Analysis Mke into a :P.C. and
m0
.40wor water managementrew0emena
include oropn.aterwelbyssmsmemt
17 Physical impacts on win. 0
resources P 5 C 53600 Assumes One reur.u4mrpon
ASSurn. Mat e Crty of Rasem0Jnl Ma s2Op0 water to 00
0 na
0 00 model., be
7 0
..stem 7770 r,.M waterdisS. r in
r sem. M. me
la Water use 5 C s,s 300 Township's wafer syvm_
14 Water related lend use management r 7 e So w`
16 Weer pd.. tae 5 C 60 A%%'+"<sq ws not require
5 MPCES Per. Nnl address 7077x000 v3 acres. Assumes.
aro,elsfar memr simnpons or mrp Pone imoects..
6osion Control and tfi. Erosion and eedimmb00 C E3 ]00 Gaysequrements(referenced m%AUTAR1an consistent
17 war quad, -m ermnoh ,d3 C 30 Rarer la lum17 cost for Plys .lrmapv on ware. Resources
4B WdbrquefiM.sterntei s % • y updated .wNa mprelersm sewer
C 56,500
documents and
Assumes designate e .dig a re background final rmprwldee to
VPSE for adds time on tour, bass eased on current
4h dud
13 Ce.0 sod amnions 5 P C 53700 .. lea
d parent a•aeade ate and traffic
CIN has
modeling M. use An update to the data rasa be cm . m
% aWN=e entopmed IMO= Mw
.. tit. w prev ere. 214". eneaaaryme mg danmxaiNVb m dgNW
71 Traffic s c sal am
seals r— thr Assumes an ...le to available nodefiw data to ...se
z
...Paled ils No add !monitoring assurn. Includes
cessary meemps dud oon00 70 amdowon
.500
p lan
72 Vero. retated as
Station sour. air em000170 P
mania.; and road.. data to
Assumes • ate modeling to amhme meaated
mm 0 ludeS&
necessary v 7070
Men
o. Our odars,reinr _ s10 7700 as rridOngn Na
70 Senses. resaurcee 0 0 -- PPG, MI ImON0 croup C eNbfque ne004.MW54701 re00w
nw"nu adpt win an 00
p s00y. 4,50 Pe on an Pour Oesi022000 %n
70 Adverse vOwM Mee= 0 P C 51 eon current lee schedule
•
AUAR Respensibia, • Twp Add 10 1 10. Mbrev70101105
W513 yell nvlew and sunun6ve I. Clys Comwehermve
o. Errors Ta p mm Plans. am other
Men an*c m amr. documents torarMype sea
1' Conpattibly Wn pans E5,50o Me AUAR.
Asslmees Pas. a Summary of venous secdons.05 and
o wn•+�entm^tr<sMaol dunce
18 Impact on wnas.rtme and puOAC Sewices S C Ee,WO + ^,.lac.
mmes'lomnCrywl sentry adds local
23 Currulaave poMwnl elects 5 C 00,000. pampres'M. Dr Ulm WOp ns o l w inclusion
pM r rMam ed er Y Im n
A bawd. b mew elmH n
30
Omer pozndal envrvmre^nl imparts P 5 C 10
an hourly rate Eased on 0urreMla schedule
Assumes summery.. be 3,pared dmrtana final rarm
lor R, foeowed by tl trezl revision Nrme Final
AUER Summary.. on¢ aY daP.55
3e Sum., or Issues far summarcl . L 82.0 semr+s are finalize,.
F. salt as melee d mnais not
re 000300 as a 5
000000 eopng ElW
neemM. 0nA w N .e4men does not 0031y. Me UMwe piped.
Assumes one Me PMT,
MA Cee en .of I document P
lasPs also assome one ream.. and revision by Uor MN as
swoons a, compered AI MAE. assocrUed mt
M0333Yion3100 p ed apprentices documented
OraIAUAR 6 D000033men Ran. 5 eevelopr.ntpm 013000
Assures CM of Rosemount yell coE31 comments and
to MO ed
00 3 as need.
Me Drab /WM and Orel
M d
with de RAT in Wang ary am the U Alll s
sNdes
of Mto De. enpegcd q<mnpaion plan d kmdrwh me wepannn of Me AUAR basks.. be
Fine R5Finat ganoo Ran 5 development process
811500 pwm!erRdnme MAP pranerfetl In the aopentl¢a
As.rnes assistance .th prep./beef the Mk
nai MAR Ampdon and M.P.^Rin rdr qr C 81.000 eswtne Cdunerle g nPan adopt Me MI
Council
was TOTAL (AMR Seabee aM) 0tees00
4. 045 esponseoay Erato run lemme research andwuno of Me sermon Mr prep.. modinauon and public process eMtylml take Me lead and di. in others as Medea
S. Secondarc apmvdlM E31Mrml0,43 *e review and born.. on d. 1orpolermard.Mian and 3.. 004303 mury mil he inw40300 renue06004 CM
ib01y Endry33lpronde pad MMem..n relevmtm 3M endues m *e n me pose. endow.. Ee coped aY narnra¢.IS and p.c.. in a0 00e.1( 000300. e
0043 era aemm pct 6 04031 04 530
s a oa
aa am
2011 -
Bi lling ; '
Rat e/Hour
Principal $134.00
Associate $126.00 trl
Sr. Project Manager /Sr. Project Engineer $121.00
Project Manager II/Project Engineer III/Engineering Specialist IV $112.00
Project Manager /Project Engineer II /Engineering'Specialist III $1.05.00
Project Engineer /Registered Land Surveyor /Engineering Specialist II $96.00
Graduate Engineer II/ Engineering Specialist I/Sr. Construction Observer $86.00
Graduate Engineer/Engineering Technidan V/Construction Observer $76.00
Engineering Technician N /Scientist III $68.00
Engineering Technician III/Scientist II $ 62.00 +.
Engineering Technician II /Scientist I $56.00
Engineering Technician I $49.00
Office Technidan II ;. $62.00
Office Technician I $33.00
Survey (Two- Person Crew /GPS Crew) $140.00
Survey ( Three - Person Crew /Expanded GPS Crew) $167.00
Costs associated with word processing, vehicle mileage, cell phones, reproduction of common
correspondence and mailing are included in the above hourly rates.
Reimbursable expenses include costs associated with plan, specification and report reproduction,
permit fee, delivery cost, etc.
Rate Schedule is adjusted annually.
WSB as
au
B-11
EXHIBIT C
AL
WSB
December 16, 2010
Ms. Kim Lindquist
City of Rosemount
2875 —145 Street W
Rosemount, MN 55068
Re: Proposed Work Plan for UMore Development Scenarios
Dear Ms. Lindquist:
As requested at the November 17, 2010 meeting, we have prepared a general scope of work to
assist the City with the UMore development scenario review. Work will only be undertaken at
the request of the City. If more detailed cost estimates or work plans are needed once the
scenario development is underway, we can provide that information to the City.
The scenario development review will include providing technical review and information to the
City as requested to develop three development scenarios. It is our understanding the U of M
and HKGi will be developing the scenarios. WSB's work could include providing technical
analysis of land uses with respect to City infrastructure, ordinances, and City policy, This work
could also include attendance at City Staff, stakeholder, Council, Planning Commission, and
public meetings as requested. Written technical memos or review memos are also anticipated
as part of this work effort.
While the exact work effort and cost cannot be determined, this work effort could range from
$5,000- $30,000, depending on the timeframe of the scenario development and the technical
review needed by the City. However, the costs associated with this work will be on an hourly
basis based on our 2011 rate schedule (see attached).
If the City wishes to authorize this work in conformance with our Professional Services
Agreement, please sign one copy of this letter below and return to my attention. Please feel
free to call me at (763) 287 -7196 if you have any questions,
Sincerely,
WSB & Assodates, Inc.
tuna 1nup.a/dgi%d.NarkJ.aux -woo so. aermi sdr
C - 1
December" 16, 2010
Page 2 of 2
` 7 7 76(
Andrea M. Moffatt
Senior Environmental Scientist
I hereby authorize the above scope of work, schedule, and cost.
Signature
Date
r
Itfonao-aue.i.nna,o„e..,a.a work_ ra„viR• nieio. Jos K.ncrioa .a:
C -2
MN
MO MN
2011 Rate tt
Billing
Rate,/Hour
Principal $134.00
Associate $126.00
Sr. Project Manager /Sr. Project Engineer $121.00
Project Manager II/Project Engineer III/Engineering Specialist IV $112.00
( Project Manager/Project Engineer II /Engineering Specialist III $105.00
Project Engineer /Registered Land Surveyor /Engineering Specialist II $96.00 `.
Graduate Engineer II /Engineering Specialist I/Sr. Construction Observer $86.00
Graduate Engineer /Engineering Technician V /Construction Observer $ 76.00
< I
Engineering Technician IV /Scientist III $68.00
Engineering Technician III/Scientist II $62.00
.;`Engineering Technician II /Scientist I $56.00 '.
Engineering Technician I $49.00
Office Technician II $ 62.00
Office Technician I $33.00
Survey (Two - Person Crew /GPS Crew) $140.00
Survey (Three - Person Crew /Expanded GPS Crew) $167.00
Costs associated with word processing, vehicle mileage, cell phones, reproduction of common
correspondence and mailing are included Mille above hourly rates.
Reimbursable expenses include costs associated with plan, specification and report reproduction,
permit fee, delivery cost, etc.
Rate Schedule is adjusted annually.
WSB ma
A11111111111111111l an
C -3