HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.j. Glendalough Pool and Boathouse Final Plat and Site Plan U.S. Homes (Lennar), 07-34-FP & 07-35-SPrI
4kOSEMOUNT
CITY COUNCIL
Citv Council Meetina Date: September 20. 2011
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA ITEM: Case 07 -34 -FP & 07 -35 -SP
Glendalough "Pool and Bathhouse Final
ACAENDA SECTION:
Plat and Site Plan
U.S. Homes (Lennar
PREPARED BY Jason Lindahl, AICP
AG NDA NO.
Planner•
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Renewing the 2007 Final Plat
APPR D BY:
and Site Plan Applications, Revised Plans,
10 -16 -07 City Council Excerpt Minutes,
City Council Approval'Letter Date, 10 -19
07, Resolution 2007 -94 Approving Final
Plat Staff Report Dated 10- 16 -07,
Engineer's Memo Dated 09- 15 -11.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion, to approve a resolution renewing the 2007 Final
Plat and. Site Plan for the second private neighborhood. pool and bathhouse in
Glendalough, subject to the original conditions of approval.
SUMMARY
Applicant & Property Owner(s): U.S. Homes (Lennar)
Location:_ Northwest Corner of Coachford Avenue and Carrach
Avenue
Area -in Acres: 1.7 Acres
Comp. Guide Plan Desig: TR ;Transitional Residential
Current Zoning: R -1, Low Density Residential and Evermoor Planned Unit,.
Development (PUD)
The applicant, U.S. Homes, requests renewal of the final plat and site plan applications approved in
October of 2007. These approvals would allow construction of the second private neighborhood
4 pool and bathhouse in Glendalough. The applicant's recently revised plans are consistent with the
original approvals from 2007 and `staff recommends renewal of the final plat and site plan:
z
BACKGROUND
In September ,of 2007, the applicant submitted both final plat and site plan applications for the
second private neighborhood pool and bathhouse in Glendalough. The Planning Commission held
a public hearing to review these applications on September 25, 2007. Minutes from that meeting'are
attached for your reference. The Planning Commission approved the site plan and recommended
the City Council approve the final plat. The City _Council reviewed the staf f reports for both items
and approved the final plat October 16, 2007.
U In November of 2007, the applicant decided >to delay the project. At that time they were informed
that the site plan approval was good for one (1) year from the approval date (September 25, 2007)
i
a .. i .
r
while the final plat approval was good for two (2) years from the approval date (October 16, 2007).
The applicant resubmitted a building permit for this project,on September 6, 2011. These plans are
nearly identical to those granted site plan and final plat approvals in 2007. Therefore, staff
recommends the City Council fenew the original site plan and final plat and all associated conditions
approval. Renewing these approvals will allow the project to continue through the administrative
building permit and grading permit processes and insure that the original' conditions approval remain
in place.
ISSUE ANALYSIS
The original final,plat and site plan staff report provided to the City Council in October of 2007 is
attached for your reference. The Engineering Department has provided anew memo based on
current standards and fees. The revised plans are very. similar to those approved in 2007 with the
following exceptions:
CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION z
Staff recommends renewal of both the final plat and site plan applications for the second private
neighborhood pool and bathhouse in Glen'dalough. Staff finds the revise&plans are very similar to
those approved in 2007. The most notable changes are that the pool was shifted to the east creating
more open space between -the pool and the-adjacent home sites to the west`and eliminating the
landscaped pergola to the east. The original plans also included a tot lot that has been changed to a
gazebo /picnic shelter as a result of creating a larger playground in another area of Glendalough.
Staff is agreeable to these revisions and recommends renewal-of the 2007 final plat and site plan
approval subject to the original conditions.
4
1. The pool was shifted to'the East: The purpose for the shift was to allow for greater open space
and.a larger buffer between the pool and the adjacent home sites to the west. According to' the
applicant, the homeowners association is considering adding a sport court in this area sometime
in the future. This shift also necessitated removal of the landscaped pergola on the east end of
the site.
r
r
2. The tot lot has been changed to a gazebo /picnic shelter. According to the applicant, Lennar and
the homeowners association agreed to make a larger investment in the playground located in
Oudot C, Glendalough 7` Addition in exchange for creating a location for larger scale picnics
on the second pool site.
m
P
2
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2011 -
A RESOLUTION RENEWING THE FINAL PLAT AND SITE PLAN FOR THE SECOND
PRIATE NEIGHBORHOOD POOL AND BATHHOUSE IN GLENDALOUGH
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an
application from U.S. Homes Incorporated requesting final plat and site plan approvals concerning
the parcel legally described as:
Oudot C, Evermoor Glendalough 6th Addition, Dakota County
r ..
WHEREAS, on September 25, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed
the Site Plan and Final Plat; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved the site plan and adopted a motion to
recommend that the City Council approve the final plat subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on October 16, 2007, the City Council reviewed and approved the request for final
plat approval.
WHEREAS, on September 6, 2011, U.S. Homes Incorporated resubmitted these plans and a
building permit for this project; and
WHEREAS, staff reviewed these revised plans and found them similar to those approved in 2007;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
renews the 2007 final plat and site plan approvals for the second private neighborhood pool and
bathhouse in Glendalough, subject to:
1. Conformance with the original conditions of the 2007 final plat and site plan
approvals.
x ro
RESOLUTION 2011 -
e
ADOPTED this 20th day of September, 2011 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. ..
William H. Droste, Mayo °r
ATTEST:
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
Motion by: Second by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Member absent:
w
Y
ti F'
M
9
S
2
3
T <V
A u -
3 ^,
d
O
g$ r
9 9 n
� ail
w-
W
w �
r • I
r
O
O
O
O `-
p
3
O
O
% c
&..
.O_
N
N T
y
N
a o
�
D !
a �
1
x
CL
CD
r • I
r
_ . ...
. �
2 �
| � `
. �
�
�
$�}
..
. tMM .
•�!! !
{ \�
ej(
\ § \ ^
!
\�$
` \ :
/) \
§f[! E
(�
|
O
CD
�
_
�i
;i
� �= -
r-
]�
�i
b
; i.
CD
3 � s
Fes '1
c
��I9E�IS■@
I,.
@I�9
@9�N��0
III
i
isi���������
n «:
° -1
R1� r olm
3 � R •Q � 1 . � m
. o
RL
O O ! J
t 5 �
I I o F
�" kk
a
f
43 YS
r -
P 4J�
pN
w r
O
O
¢
O
Ci 17
8g8
W II
R
iy
}�i5K
n ft
I
I
�a
i
v
n
m
N
a'
g
�
0.'
S
3�3
O
I t
m
$ j
F
t 5 �
I I o F
�" kk
a
f
43 YS
r -
O
w
� n
CD �.
O
P�
e
e v
lA NI '
o S
o �
n �
m
3
d
F 1i
f A a+
A�+
5 0 • � 1 �di , '
£ ma
W ti. "
A�' £
4
3�
P 4J�
pN
¢
7
Ci 17
-k
W II
R
iy
}�i5K
n ft
I
v
n
�
S
O
I t
d
�
01
I
N
p
W
O
w
� n
CD �.
O
P�
e
e v
lA NI '
o S
o �
n �
m
3
d
F 1i
f A a+
A�+
5 0 • � 1 �di , '
£ ma
W ti. "
A�' £
4
3�
I
7
F
to
m
I
d
n x
O
a _
9+� F
s °I
4�� 3
a
d �
7 b
O Y
d 4�-
m
m gg g
m
{5
0 �'J
TRAl
§ 3,
�p a
A +
v
d
A
n
d
0
K
4
p
0
¢
7
Ci 17
-k
W II
�
,p
I
7
F
to
m
I
d
n x
O
a _
9+� F
s °I
4�� 3
a
d �
7 b
O Y
d 4�-
m
m gg g
m
{5
0 �'J
TRAl
§ 3,
�p a
A +
v
d
A
n
d
0
K
4
p
0
w
O
7 1
l o
------- - --- ---
---------
--------------
-----
J
hJ
O
O
w
O
Excerpt Minutes
ROSEMOUNT CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS
OCTOBER 16, 2007 -
CONSENT AGENDA
Council Member Sterner pulled item 6.d. Charitable Gambling Premise Permit Renewal for Baseball
Association 191. ,
Motion by Baxter. Second by DeBettignies.
Motion to approve Consent Agenda items 6.a. through 6.c. and 6.e. through 6.g.
a. Minutes of the September 12, 2007 City Council' Work Session Proceedings
b. Minutes of the September 18, 2007 City Council Proceedings
c. Bills Listing
d. Charitable Gambling Premise Permit Renewal for Baseball Association 191'
e. Final Payment — Connemara Trail /Azalea Avenue Reconstruction, City Project #415
y f. Glendalough 8th Addition Final Plat, 07 -34 -FP (Resolution 2007 -94)
g. Rezoning of South Rose Park 3rd Addition Property (Former Celadon Property), 07- 18 -PUD (Resolution
2007 -95) (Ordinance B -192) `
Ayes: DeBettignies, Droste, Sterner, Baxter
Nays: None. Absent: Shoe - Corrgian. Motion carried.
t
3
F�
Excerpt Minutes
Planning Commission Regular Meeting
E September 25, 2007
5.b. Glendalough 8 Addition Final Plat and Club House and Pool Site Plan Review (07-
34-FP, 07- 35 -SP). Planner Lindahl presented this item. The applicant, U.S. Homes, requests
final plat and site plan approvals to allow construction of a private neighborhood pool and bath
house. Staff recommends approval of both the final plat and site plan for Glendalough 8th
Addition. By ordinance, the Planning Commission approves the site plan while the City Council
approves the final plat. Staff's recommendation for approval is based on the materials submitted
by the applicant and the findings made in the staff report which Mr. " L dahl reviewed. The
recommendation for approval is subject to the conditions listed in-the, report.
Commissioner Palda asked how many people lived in the neighborhood. Mr. Lindahl replied he
did not know how many people but that there are 252 lots CommissionerTalda expressed his
concern with the lack of parking for the pool house. Mr. Lindahl replied'thatthere is no parking
requirement in the City code for this type of use. He "further stated that considering this will be a
private neighborhood facility, it is assumed the distance people will travel is limited:_ The
engineering and public safety departments have renewed this .a'nd'' ave determined here is enough
room for short term parking and drop off areas. Mr.. L, ahl stated that the Commission could
certainly make a recommendation for more,parking areas if'they feel it's necessary. Project
Engineer Dawley added that there is offstreet parking on the.surrounding frontage areas in
addition to the lots adjacent to the site.a��'' ..,. -., a.
'e'
Applicant, Jay Liberacki, from "Lennar Corporation; thebuilder`,in.Glendalough, approached the
Commission. Mr. Liberack stated this,project ha' 'e a learning process: He stated Lennar
should have platted this' area several years ago when additional easements for the underground utility
pipes could have been taken care of� He stated they`are having the engineer put the easements on
the plan. Mr. Liberacki'shared Lennar's comments on the required conditions contained in the staff
report. With` respect_ eo Condition #4, Mr:'Liberacki stated Lennar does not typically cut or remove
sidewalks;, they moveRunder diem , ,.With respect to Condition #5, Mr. Liberacki stated the draintiles
will ber emoved rather'ihan With respect to Condition #9, Mr. Liberacki stated
that if a photometric plan is,requwredao'show the lighting, Lennar will simply eliminate all exterior
lighting. He further commented that the "Prelunulary Plat" title ui the staff report is inappropriate
because "he feels "it is a "final" plat. Continuing with the required conditions, Mr. Liberacki stated
with respect to proposed doublef!row of trees to be used for screening, due to the emergency
'overflow requirements ..Lennar' will reduce it to a single row of trees. Mr. Liberacki stated that none
of their neighborhood have trash enclosures. They use trash receptacles that are
emptied on a timely basis; and Mr. Liberacki stated that Lennar will not be installing trash enclosures
at this site. With respect to not being allowed any signage on the site,'Mr. Liberacki stated Lennar
would like at least four signs that say it is a community park for Glendalough residents to keep out
out public attendance. In response to the requirement that landscape areas are to be irrigated,
Mr. Liberacki questioned if this meant staff would need to review the irrigation plans and wondered
if City staff has more expertise than Lennar's irrigation contractor. In conclusion, Mr. Liberacki
stated that if the sidewalks and play areas could be designed and constructed without the whole site
plan process, it would be appreciated.
I
Chairperson Messner suggested going through Mr. Liberacki's items of concern individually.
Chairperson Messner asked Mr. Liberacki to explain the issue with Condition #4 regarding the
draintile system. Mr. Liberacki replied that the draintile system goes around -the edges of the flower
beds so plants are not sitting in water. He stated that the City Engineer proposed the draintile go
under the sidewalk but if it requires Lennar to remove sidewalks, they will simply remove the
draintile completely. Project Engineer Dawley clarified that Lennar's plans did not note whether or
not the sidewalks were going to be removed or if the plan was to go underneath the sidewalks. The
City would definitely allow Lennar to go under the sidewalk if they are able to; staff simply wanted a
notation of it on the plan.
Chairperson Messner asked Mr: Dawley to clarify Condition #5 regarding the cleanouts. Mr.
Dawley responded this is a recommended action because it is,a`privately maintained draintile system,
r r - .�
but it is mainly a suggestion.
Commissioner Schultz asked Mr. Liberacki how eluninating the lighting would,be wise from a safety
standpoint. Mr. Liberacki stated the residents could decide at a later date if they would like lighting.
Mr. Lindahl added there is no minimum requirernenffor lighting`'but that it's for -the„ safety and
protection of the residents more than anything else D'owncastylighting and a photometric plan are
standard requirements for any site plan that has lighting. ^ Mr. Liberacki stated the lighting would be
eliminated by Friday.
Mr. Liberacki stated that with respect to Condition # 11, Lennar's plans will not be
complete until next spring so if this condition'is a requirementof the ° site plan being approved, then
it will not be approved until next spring. Mr�Lindahl clarifi ' ed,tl'kt the general standard for
landscaping is that it is irrigated so it will survive and strive. Staff did not see any notation on the
landscaping plans with " respect to irrigation. Mr:'- Liberacki stated that all sod and plants will be
irrigated.
�R s n
With respect to . the r'ow of"trees between,..the poolhouse and the adjoining homes, Mr.
Liberacki stated it will'probably be'reduced to one row of trees due to the underground piping. He
stated though that Lennar may talk t6%the abutting homeowners to offer putting some of the trees
on thei - property to proviA addidorial s'creen�ing. However, Mr. Liberacki added that he feels parks
should be inviting to homeowners rather than screened from view. Mr. Lindahl stated his concerns
with the lands'cap'ing being reduced and that staff would like,to work with Lennar to maintain a
screen of some kind'rather than have it eliminated or reduced. Chairperson Messner stated he
would prefer to review''the landscaping if there will be a huge reduction.
Chairperson Messner asked Mr. Liberacki what Lennar's other pool sites currently have with respect
to trash' enclosures. Mr. Liberacki responded they have decorative garbage cans with iron closures
on the top; there are no trash enclosures or dumpsters. Mr. Lindahl stated that staff is requesting
more information from the applicant`as to where trash will be stored in between the time it is in the
containers to when it is hauled. Mr. Liberacki stated they use a maintenance company that comes to
each site to test the water and remove the trash; the trash is not stored anywhere on site.
Chairperson Messner stated that some note to that affect on the would suffice.
With respect to signage, Mr. Liberacki stated that Lennar doesn't want any signs with the name of
the park on it, but signs that say the park is for residents of Glendalough only. The sign does not
need to be big and will not be gaudy.
Mr. Liberacki stated that this is a walking neighborhood with sidewalks on both sides of the streets.
He further stated that Lennar would'not want to require parking at the neighborhood facility.
The public hearing was opened at 7:17p.m.
Mike Leppones, 13321 Carrach Avenue, approached the Commission and asked if there'were any
plans for a play area for children on the site and questioned the starting time for construction. Mr.
Lindahl showed on the site plan where the proposed tot lot would'be located. Mr. Liberacki could
not give a date certain for construction and stated he would discuss this later with the resident. Mr.
Leppones also commented that he has lived in the area for six months and he doesn't feel there is a
need for'additional parking at the new facility.
There were no further public comments.
MOTION by Palda to close the public hearing:,. Secoind Schwartz.
Ayes: 4. Nays: None. Motion approved. Public hearing was closed at 720p.m.
Chairperson Messner stated he was in favor`of leaving Condition #5 regarding the_draintile system
4,
cleanouts.
Chairperson Messner suggested, amending the, photometric plan,requirement to say a plan'is
required "if lighting is included ". Mt. Lindahl 'stated that if the applicant chooses to withdraw the
lighting, the condition not be applicable anyway.
Chairperson Messner asked Mr. Liberacki if there is,currently signage at the other pool sites. Mr.
Liberack'rephed fil ere -is. Mr: Lindahl stated thatif''the applicant feels it is important to have
reasonable signige ioinsure the patrons of this site are residents of Glendalough, staff can
probably accommodate this °request 'This type of use is not as detailed or complicated as a
I' site as far as signage requirements are concerned.
commercia
Chairperson Messner asked Mr. Lindahl of his opinion on the trash enclosure item. Mr. Lindahl
replied that staff`would be satisfied with something in writing from the applicant explaining how
the trash will be maintained. Staff s concern is to prevent the trash from lying around or not being,
contained .
MOTION by Schwartz to recommend the City Council approve the Final Plat for
Glendalough 8`" to allow the creation of Lot 1, Block . 1, Harmony 8`" Addition, subject to
the following conditions:
• Conformance with the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memo, dated
September 19, 2007.
• Payment of all applicable fees.
Second by Schultz.
Ayes. 4. Nays: None. Motion approved.
MOTION by Palda to approve the site plan for the Glendalough 8th Addition private
TM pool and bath house with associated landscaping, paths, and open space, subject to the
following conditions; as amended:
• Approval of the Final Plat for Glendalough 8th Addition and conformance with all
conditions of approval.
• Issuance of a building permit. a
•. Submittal of a lighting and photometric plan•in conformance with all lighting
standards, prior action on the final plat by the City Council.
"' ., f
aetian on the final plat by the Gity GottneR. /-
� ` 51 4.
• Demonstration that all landscape areas will be,1rrigated,_and applicant will work
with staffin amending the landscape plan�to'provide''fo'r some level of screening
along the northwest side of the site.
Second by Schultz.
Ayes: 4. Nays: None. Motion approved. ,
.;
As follow -up for this item, Mr. Lindahl stated the final plat will continue for City Council approval
on October 16, 2007. The site plan is approved,by the Commission and does not go to the
Council.
d
R
October 19, 2007
x=
Mr: Jay Liberacki
U.S. Homes Incorporated ,
935 Wayzata Boulevard East
Wayzata, MN 55391
RE: Glendalough 8th Addition Final Plat
Dear Mr. Liberacki:
At its regular meeting on October 16, 2007, the City Council approved the - above referenced
application, subject to the conditions listed in Resolution No. 2007 -94, a copy of which is enclosed
for your reference.
If you have any questions, please contact Jason Lindahl at 651 - 322 -2090. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Kathie J. -Hanson
Planning Secretary
651- 322 -2051
Enclosures
a.
,, t
a '
1
1
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2007- 94
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF
GLENDALOUGH 8 ADDITION
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an
application from, U.S. Homes Incorporated requesting Final Plat concerning the parcel legally
described as:
Outlot C, Evermoor Glendalough 6th Addition, Dakota County
WHEREAS, on September 25, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed
the Final Plat for Glendalough 8th Addition; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend that the City Council
approve the Final Plat subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on October 16, 2007, the City Council reviewed the request for Final Plat approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves Final Plat for Glendalough 8th Addition, subject to:'
1. Conformance with the conditions outlined in -the City Engineer's memo, dated
October 11, 2007.
2. Payment of all applicable fees.
3. Conformance with all site plan conditions outlined in the Planners memo, dated
September 25, 2007.
ADOPTED this 16 day of'October, 2007 by the ity Council of the' C' f Rose m unt.
William H. Droste, Mayor
ATTEST: I
W�/lXi
% w
9:
4 ROSEMO UNT
G PLANNING COMMISSION
City Council Meeting Date: October 16,, 2007
EXEC "UTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA ITEM: Case 07 -34 -FP
i
Glendalough 8 th Addition Final Plat
AGENDA SECTION:
a U.S. Homes Incorporated
PREPARED BY: Jason Lindahl, AICP
AGENDA NO.
Planner
ATTACHMENTS: Except Minutes from the 9 -25 -07 Planning
APPROVED, BY:
Commission meeting, Resolution, Site
Map, Evermoor Glendalough 8 t h Addition
Final Plat, Engineering Memo Dated
/
October 11, 2007.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve a resolution approving the Final
for Glendalough 8 th , subject to conditions.
N
SUMMARY
Applicant & Property Owner(s): U.S. Homes Incorporated
Location: Northwest Comer, Coachford Avenue and Carrach
Avenue
Area in Acres: 1.7 Acres
Comp. Guide Plan Desig: TR, Transitional Residential
Current Zoning: R -1, Low Density Residential and Evermoor Planned Unit
Development (PUD)
The applicant, U.S. Homes, requests final plat approval for Glendalough 8` Addition, creating the
property that will contain the second private neighborhood pool and bath house for the
Glendalough neighborhood. This private neighborhood amenity is located and designed consistent
with the land use, zoning and original Evermoor PUD agreement standards for this site and staff
recommends approval of the project.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
The Planning Commission reviewed this item. alone with ,a site plan application for a new private
•
Mr. Mike Leppones of 13321 Carrach Avenue was the lone resident to speak during the public
hearing. Mr Leppones had questions relating to the site plan about the recreational play equipment
on site and when construction would start. Mr. Liberacki explained that the site would include a
private tot lot similar to the one at the existing private pool but could not give a precise date
regarding when construction would begin.
Aftei some general discussion of the site, the Commission voted unanimously to approve the site
plan and recommend the City Council approve, the final plat, subject to the conditions outlined in
the staff report. Site plan conditions that were raised in the September 25, 2007 Planner's staff
report that have yet to be resolved include:
1. Submittal and approval of a revised landscape plan that reduces but still maintains the screening
on the west and southwest sides of the site. This plan shall demonstrate that all landscaping for
this site will be planted on the subject property.
2. Submittal and approval of a cost estimate and letter of credit for one hundred twenty five (125)
percent of the cost of the landscaping illustrated on the approved landscape plan.
3. Submittal and approval of a utility plan.
These items must be submitted and approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit.
Final Plat
Land Use & Zoning. The subject property is guided TR, Transitional Residential and zoned R -1;
Low Density Residential with the Evermoor PUD. The proposed private neighborhood pool and
bath house use is consistent with the permitted uses in these districts as well as the performance
standards outlined in the original Evermoor PUD.
Lot Standards. As illustrated on the final plat, the subject property is consistent with the minim
lot standards of the TR, Transitional Residential land use, the R -1, Low Density Residential zoning
and the original Evermoor PUD. Initially, this project was planned for the adjacent block to the
south. As`part of the Glendalough Phase II plan review (Glendalough 7` in May of 2006, the
applicant relocated the pool and bath house one block north to Oudot C, Glendalough 7 Addition.`
This was done to place the pool and bath house in a more centralized location as well as provide a
greater buffer from traffic on Carrach Avenue. Now, the applicant proposes to final plat the subject
property as Lot 1, Block 1, Glendalough e Addition. I . 11
Engineering Comments. Upon review of the revised Glendalough 8` Addition HOA Park
Grading Plan, Layout Plan, and Planting Plan, received October 11, 2007, and the Evermoor
Glendalough 8th Addition Plat — undated and received October 11, 2007, the Engineering
Department offers the following comments:
1.. The existing utilities and proposed connections to tlie bathhouse should be shown on
the grading plan (water, sanitary sewer).
2. NPDES permit is the responsibility of the developer /contractor — documentation shall
be forwarded to the City prior to permit issuance.
3. As shown in the revised submittal, proposed trees and shrub locations are satisfactory
If locations are revised per Planning Department direction, the proposed trees and shrubs
on the north end of the site should not interfere with the overflow route from Coachford
2
Way to the north or located above the existing storm sewer system.
Estimated Fees
o Trunk Sewer Area Charge
= 1.7 acres @ $1,075/ac = $1,828
o Trunk Water Area Charge
= 1.7 acres @ $4,860/ac = $8,262
'o Sewer Connection -Fees — SAC units are calculated by MCES
■ MCES Fee - $1,675/SAC
■ City Fee - $1,200 /SAC
o Water Connection (WAC), 1" Meter= $7,370
o Storm Connection (STAC)
=1.7 acres @ $2,200 /ac = $3,740
Trunk Storm Water Area Charges have bee_ n paid in full by the developer for the entire development
with the Glendalough 6`' Addition plat
Park Dedication The Parks and Recreation Director finds that this site provided the required park
dedicatiori as part of the overall requirement for the Evermoor development and no additional
dedication is required at this time.
CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval the Glendalough 8 Addition final plat, creating the property that will
contain the second private neighborhood pool and bath house for the Glendalough neighborhood.
This application was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission at their September 25,
2007 meeting. At that same meeting, the Commission also approved the site plan for the pool and
bath house. By ordinance, the Planning Commission approves the site plan while the City Council
approves the final plat. Staff's recommendation for approval is based on the materials submitted by
the applicant and the findings made in this report.
0
3
Excerpt Minutes
Planning Commission Regular Meeting
September 25, 2007
°.5.b. Glendalough 8 Addition Final Plat and Club "House and Pool Site Plan Review (07-
34 -FP, 07= 35 -SP). Planner Lindahl presented this item. The applicant, U.S. Homes, requests
final plat and site plan approvals to allow construction of a private neighborhood pool and bath
house. Staff recommends approval of both the final plat and site plan for Glendalough 8`
Addition. By ordinance, the Planning Commission approves the site plan while the City Council
approves the final plat. Staffs recommendation for approval is .based on the materials submitted
by the applicant and the findings made in the staff report which Mr. Lindahl reviewed. The
recommendation for approval is subject to the conditions listed in � fepo rt.
Commissioner Palda asked how many people lived in the,neighborhood. Mr.-Lindahl replied he
did not know how many people but that there are 252 lots. Commissioner Palda expressed his
concern with the lack of parking for the pool house Mr- Zindahl replied that there is no parking
requirement in the City code for this type of use. He further stated that considering this will be a
private neighborhood facility, it is assumed the distance people will travel is limited. The
engineering and public safety departments have reviewed this and have determined there is enough
room for short term parking and drop off areas. Mr. Lindahl stated that the Commission could
certainly make arecommendation for more p arking areas if they feel it's necessary. Project
Engineer Dawley added that there is off street parking on the surrounding frontage areas in
addition to the lots adjacent to the site
Applicant, Jay Liberacki, from Lennar Corporation the butlder.in Glendalough, approached the
Commission. Mr. Liberacki stated this project °has been a learning process. He stated Lennar
should have platted this area several years ago when additional easements for the underground utility
pipes could have been taken care of. He stated they are having the engineer put the easements on
the plan. Mr. Liberacki shared Lennar's comments on the required conditions contained in the staff
report: With respect to Condition #4, Mr.' Liberacki stated Lennar does not typically cut or remove
sidewalks; they move under them. With respect to Condition #5, Mr. Liberacki stated the draintiles
.:
will be removed rather tl an include cleanouts. With respect to Condition #9, Mr. Uberacki stated
that if a photometric plan is to show the lighting, Lennar will simply eliminate all exterior
lighting. He further commented that the "Preliminary Plat" title in the staff report is inappropriate
because he feels it is a "final" plat. Continuing with the required conditions, Mr. Liberacki stated
with respect to proposed double row of trees to be used for screening, due to the emergency
overflow requirements, Lennar will reduce it to a single row of trees. Mr. Liberacki stated that none_,
of their neighborhood` pool facilities have trash enclosures. They use trash receptacles that are
emptied on a timely basis and Mr. Liberacki stated that Lennar will not be installing trash enclosures
at this site. With respect to not being allowed any.signage on the site, Mr. Liberacki stated Lennar
would like at least four signs that say it is a community park for Glendalough residents to keep out
outside public attendance. In response to the requirement that landscape areas are to be irrigated,
, outside
Liberacki questioned if this meant staff would need to review the irrigation plans and wondered
if City staff has more expertise than Ler nar's irrigation contractor. In conclusion, Mr. Liberacki
stated that if the sidewalks and play areas could be designed and constructed without the whole site
plan process, it would be appreciated.
s =s
•
Chairperson Messner suggested going through Mr. Liberacki's items of concern individually.
Chairperson Messner asked Mr. Liberacki to explain the issue with Condition #4 regarding the
draintile system. Mr. Liberacki replied that the draintile system goes around the edges of the flower
beds so plants are not sitting in water. He stated that the City Engineer proposed the draintile go
under the sidewalk but if it requires Lennar to remove sidewalks, they will simply remove the
draintile completely. Project Engineer Dawley clarified that Lennar's plans did not note whether or
not the sidewalks were going to be removed or if the plan was to go underneath the sidewalks. The
City would definitely allow Lennar to go under the sidewalk if they are able to; staff simply wanted a
notation of it on the plan:
Chairperson Messner asked Mr. Dawley to clarify Condition #5 regarding the cleanouts. Mr.
Dawley responded this is a recommended action because it is a privately maintained draintile system,
but it is.mainly a suggestion. r:..
Commissioner Schultz asked Mr. Liberacki how elimiriatirig the lighting would be wise from a safety
standpoint. Mr. Liberacki stated the residents could decide at a later date if they would like lighting.
Mr. Lindahl added there is no minimum requirement for lighting',but that it's for the safety and
protection of the residents'more than anything else. Downcastlighting and a photometric plan are
standard requirements for any site plan that has lighting. Mx. 'Tiberacki stated the lighting would be
eliminated by Friday.
Mr..Libe`racki stated that with respect to Conditi8n`411,.Lennar's irrigation plans will not be
complete until next spring so if this condition is a requirement of the site plan being approved, then
it will not be approved until next spring. Mr: Lindahl clarified that the general standard for
landscaping is that it is irrigated so it will survive arid strive. Staff did not see any notation on the
landscaping plans withrespect to irrigation. Mr. Uberacki stated that -all sod and plants will be
irrigated.'
z,
With respect the double to "trees between the poolhouse and the adjoining homes, Mr.
Liberacki . d it will probablybexeduced to one row of trees due to the underground piping. He
stated though that Lennar may talk to the abutting homeowners to offer putting some of the trees
on their I property to provide additional screening. However, Mr. Liberacki added that he feels parks
should be inviting to homeowners rather than screened from view. Mr. Lindahl stated his concerns
with the landscaping being reduced 'and that staff would like to work with Lennar, to maintain a
screen of some kind rather than have it eliminated or reduced. Chairperson Messner stated he
would prefer to review the landscaping if there will be a huge reduction.,
Chairperson Messner asked Mr. Liberacki what Lennar's other pool sites currently with respect
to trash enclosures. Mr. Liberacki responded they have decorative garbage cans with iron closures
on the top; there are no trash enclosures or dumpsters. Mr. Lindahl stated that staff is requesting
more information from the'applicant as to where trash will°be stored in between the time it is in the
containers to when it is hauled. Mr. Liberacki stated they use a maintenance company that comes to
each site to test the water and remove the trash; the trash is not stored anywhere on site.
Chairperson Messner stated that some note to that affect on °the plan would suffice.
K,
• 0
With respect to signage, Mr. Liberacki stated that Lennar doesn't want any signs with the name of
the park on it, but signs that say the park is for residents of Gleri'dalough only. The sign does not
need to be big and will not be gaudy.
Mr. Liberacki stated that this is a walking neighborhood with sidewalks on both.sides of the streets.
He further stated that Lennar would not want to require parking at the neighborhood facility.
The public hearing was opened at 7:17p.m.
Mike Leppones, 13321 Carrach Avenue, approached the Commission and asked if there were any
plans for a play area for children on the site and questioned the startrnk for construction. Mr.
Lindahl showed on the site plan where the proposed tot lot would.blocated. Mr. Liberacki could
not give a date certain for construction and stated he would discuss ,this later with the resident. Mr.
Leppones also commented that he has lived in the area for six months and he doesn't feel there is a
need for additional parking at the new facility.
There were no further public comments.
MOTION by Palda to close the public hearing: Second by Schwartz.
Ayes: 4. Nays: None. Motion approved: Public hearing was closed at 7:20p.m.
Chairperson Messner stated he was in favor ° of leaving Condition #5 regarding the draintile system
cleanouts.
Chairperson Messner suggested amending the photometric plan "requirement to say a plan is
required "if lighting is included ". Mr.Lindahl stated that if the applicant chooses to withdraw the=
lighting, the condition:would not be applicable anyway.
Chairperson Messner asked Mr. Liberacki if there . is currently signage at the other pool sites: Mr.
Liberack replied there is. Mr. Lindahl stated That f the applicant feels it is important to have
reasonable signage to` the patrons of this site are residents of Glendalough, staff can
probably accommodate this request',- his type of use is not as detailed or complicated as a
commercial site as far as signage requirements are concerned.
Chairperson Messner asked Mr,Lindahl of his opinion on the trash enclosure *m. Mr. Lindahl
replied that staff would be satisfied with something in writing from the applicant explaining how
the trash will be maintained vStaff s concern is to prevent the trash from lying around or not being
contained.
MOTION by Schwartz to recommend the City Council approve the Final Plat for
Glendalough 8` to allow the creation of Lot 1, Block 1, Harmony 8` Addition, subject to
the following conditions:
Conformance with the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memo_ , dated
September 19, 2007.
Payment of all applicable fees.
Second by Schultz..
4
{
Ayes: 4. Nays: None. Motion approved.
MOTION by Palda to approve the site plan for the - Glendalough 8` Addition'private
pool and bath house with associated landscaping, paths, and open space, subject to the
E ' following conditions, as amended: w
Approval of the Final Plat for Gl' ndalough 8` Addition and conformance with all
conditions of approval.
• Issuance of a building permit.
Submittal of a lighting and photometric plan in conformance with all lighting
standards, prior action on the final plat the City Council.
Demonstration that all landscape areas will be:irrigated,and applicant will work
with staff in amending the landscape plan to provide for some level of screening
along the.northwest side of the site.
Second by Schultz.
Ayes: 4. Nays: None. Motion approved."
As follow -up for this item, Mr. Lindahl stated the final plat, will continue for City Council approval
on October 16, 2007. The site plan is approved by the Commission and does not go to the
Council.
� xti
N � M-! ..
11
"i
� r
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2067-
. i
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF
GLENDALOUGH 8 ADDITION
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an
application from U.S. Homes Incorporated requesting Final Plat concerning the parcel legally
described as:
Oudot C, Evermoor Glendalough 6th Addition, Dakota County
WHEREAS, on September 25, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed
the Final Plat for Glendalough 8th Addition; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend that the City Council
approve the Final Plat subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on October 16, 2007, the City Council reviewed the request for Final Plat approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves Final Plat for Glendalough 8th Addition, subject to:
1. Conformance with the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memo, dated
October 11, 2007.
2. Payment of all applicable fees.
3.' Conformance with all site plan conditions outlined in the Planners memo, dated
September 25, 2007.
ADOPTED this 16 day of October, 2007 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
William H. Droste, Mayor
ATTEST:
a
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
d.
Motion by: Second by:
Voted in
Voted against:
Member absent:
OUA C, 616ndalough 6th.Ad'A. On
~
r
,
~
,
�m
ITE
I
^
T. '
'
.��
Copyright 2007, Dakota County - Map Date: September 11, 2007
°
2
D/G. %• COPY
suercr ro aurar
wnwur rronrE
l
e 8
S
Y
t 3 1p
a' pp a$ gg --$ ago It a �
i 4 $ ZP '
I
1
1
\ I
M
1 1 y
,
Y
r O (1
It E g 1
F if
g Z.
IN
fi
Gig
�t �t ts'T.T ,r � t r Il l •F 1
W a S
A a 1j.
i Q
111'1111 !�
0
0
o� a
Zia $
h' 3
4 Ys
b
X71
CD I R
UQ o
w d C1
E 1
® I
o � f
V� 'I
4ROIEMOUNT
PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 11, 2007
TO: Jason Lindahl,,City Planner
-CC: Eric Zweber, Senior City Planner
Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director
Andrew Brotzler, City Engineer
Kathie Hanson, Planning Department Secretary
FROM: Morgan Dawley, Project Engineer
RE: Glendalough 8th Addition Site Plan Review and Final Plat
Upon review of the revised Glendalough W Addition HOA Park Grading Plan, Layout Plan, and
Planting Plan, received October 11, 2007, and the Evermoor Glendalough 8th Addition Plat —
'iindated and received October 11, 2007, the Engineering Department offers the following
comments:
'-1. The existing utilities and proposed connections "to the bathhouse should be shown on
the grading plan (water, sanitary sewer).,
2. NPDES permit is the responsibility of the developer /contractor — documentation shall
be forwarded to the City prior to permit issuance. M
3. As shown in the revised submittal, proposed trees and shrub locations are satisfactory.
If locations are revised per Planning Department direction, the proposed trees and shrubs
on the north end of the site should not interfere with the overflow route from Coachford
Way to the north or located above the existing storm sewer system.
Estimated Fees
• Trunk Sewer Area Charge
= 1.7 acres @ $1,075 /ac = $1,828
• Trunk Water Area Charge
= 1.7 acres @ $4,860/ac = $8,262
• Sewer Connection Fees — SAC units are calculated by MCES
■ MCES Fee - $1,675 /SAC
■ City Fee - $1,200 /SAC
• Water Connection (WAC), 1" Meter = $7,370
• Storm Connection (STAC)
=1.7 acres @ $2,200 /ac = $3,740
4
a
Trunk Storm Water Area C ges have been paid in full by the develo rr f6f the entire development
with the Glendalough 6"' Addition plat. Should you have any questions or comments regarding the
item listed above, please contact me at 651 - 322 - 2022.
LI
I.
r
4ROSEMOUNT
PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 15, 2011
TO: Jason Lindahl, City Planner
CC: Eric Zweber, Senior City Planner
Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director
Andrew Brotzler, City Engineer
Kathie Hanson, Planning Department Secretary
FROM: Phil Olson, Assistant City Engineer
RE: Glendalough HOA Park
Upon review of the revised Glendalough HOA Park Grading Plan, Layout Plan, Site Plan, and
Construction Details, revised August 30, 2011, the Engineering Department offers the following
comments:
1. The existing utilities and proposed connections to the bathhouse'should be shown on
the grading plan (water; sanitary sewer).
2. NPDES permit is the responsibility of the developer/ contractor - documentation shall
be forwarded to the City prior to permit issuance.
3. A grading permit is required prior to any site grading. The grading permit and review
fees are based on the amount of grading completed. Additionally, a bond or surety is
required in the amount of $3000 /acre.
4. Trees and shrubs shall be planted a minimum of 10 feet from the existing storm sewer
system. The proposed trees and,,shrubs located along,the south lot line of Lot 1 and Lot 2
should be relocated so they do not interfere with the overflow route from Coachford Way to
the north or the existing storm sewer system.
Estimated Fees
o Trunk Sewer Area Charge
1.7 acres @ $1,075 /acre
= $1,828
• Trunk Water Area Charge
= 1.7 acres @ $6,500 /acre
= $11,050
• Sewer Connection Fees — SAC units are calculated by MCES
• MCES Fee - $2,230 /SAC
• City Fee - $1,200 /SAC
• Water Connection (WAC), 1" Meter =
$9,800
• Storm Connection (STAC)
=1.7 acres @ $2,270 /acre =
$3,859
t,
Trunk Storm Water Area Charges have been paid in full by the developer for the entire development
with the Glendalough 6 Addition plat. Should you have any questions or comments regarding the
item listed above, pl "ease contact me at 651- 322 - 2015.
5
F
11
a
n
d
B
a
n
B