Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.D. Public & Institutional Zoning District Text Amendment, 10-13-TA 1 , 4 ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY COUNCIL City Council Work Session: January 11, 2012 Tentative Planning Commission Meeting: February 28, 2012 Tentative City Council Meeting: March 20, 2012 AGENDA ITEM: 10 -13 -TA Public & Institutional AGENDA SECTION: Zoning District Text Amendment 1760 g PREPARED BY: Jason Lindahl, A.I.C.P. AGENDA NO. Planner ATTACHMENTS: Stakeholders Contact List, Comments APPROVED BY: from the City Attorney, Draft P/I District, Draft R -1 District, Draft Zoning Map, Draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan Map. 04.) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize staff to formalize the proposed zoning text, zoning map and land use map changes detailed in this report and direct the Planning Commission to hold an open house and public hearing on this issue. SUMMARY Staff is in the process of drafting a series of zoningordinance changes related to public and institutional uses. This item was initiated by staff as one in a series of zoning ordinance changes to implement the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. This memo details the rational for the recommended changes, recaps staff's work with the Planning Commission on this issue, details the proposed changes and summarizes staff's meetings with stakeholders. BACKGROUND In the last few years some neighboring Dakota County communities have experienced issues with privately owned land guided or zoned for some type of public activity. Specifically, Burnsville, Eagan and Mendota Heights all had privately owned golf courses that wanted to redevelop but had limited marketability because of their public /institutional land use or zoning classification (see attached comments from the City Attorney). While no such case is present in Rosemount; staff believes it is prudent to review the Public and Institutional district to ensure it meets both the goals of the Comprehensive Plan as well as limits the City's potential exposure to litigation. PREVIOUS PLANNING'COMMISSION ACTION Staff began discussing this item with the Planning Commission in 2010. Those initial meetings focused on potential legal issues outlined above, the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, and deficiencies with the existing P/I — Public Institutional zoning standards. Those discussions resulted in the Planning Commission directing staff to prepare a zoning text amendment that was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and reinforced the City's existing practice of locating major public institutional uses (Rosemount High School,Dakota County Technical College, and larger park facilities) in the P/I District while allowing other minor public institutional activities (churches, elementary and middle schools) as conditional uses in residential districts. During the summer of 2011, staff met or had phone conversations with all property owners that could be impacted by the proposed ordinance changes. During these discussions staff explained the ? i 1 ' 1 reasoning behind the proposed changes, their potential impact and allowed opportunity for feedback. 'Generally the feedback was positive with most questions relating to potential non - conformities (see 1 Discussions with Property Owners & Potential Non - Conformities section below). The property owners appreciated the City offering to discuss the proposed changes prior to the formal public 1 hearing process. Based on the discussions noted above, staff made additional revisions to the proposed text amendment and brought this item back to the Planning Commission in October and December of 2011 for further review. After some discussion and minor language adjustments, the Commission endorsed the following timeline for action on this item: Public and Institutional Ordinance Amendment Timeline Date Action Involved Parties January 2012 City Council Work Session City Council February 2012 Open House and Public Hearing with Planning Stakeholders and PC Commission March Present Final Ordinance Amendment to the City Stakeholders & City Council Council for Action Spring 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Metropolitan Council *timeline subject to change. ISSUE ANALYSIS Implementing the proposed changes will involve amending the Public and Institutional and residential zoning districts as well as changes to both the zoning and land use maps. These items are attached for your review and comment. A summary of the proposed changes to each item is provided below. Proposed Changes to the P/I — Public and Institutional District 1. Assign the following as permitted uses: college or universities; public or governmental services, including, city offices ;public administration buildings and the like; public auditoriums, civic centers, community centers or the like; public athletic complexes or community parks as designated in the Comprehensive Plan, owned and operated by a governmental unit, including recreational facilities and structures consistent with the public area; and secondary schools. 2. Create an accessory use category including fences, off -street parking, and signs. 3. Add an interim use section including temporary classrooms and the like. 4. Add specific development (setback, lot, height) standards. 5. Add specific site and building (architecture, building materials, pedestrian circulation, lighting, parking lot, and landscaping) standards. Proposed Changes to the Residential District 1. Reclassify public or private parks: from conditional to permitted uses and create site and building standards for parks with buildings, exterior lighting, or parking. 2. Assign the following as conditional use: golf courses and elementary, special education (i.e. District 917 Affiance Education Center) and middle schools. 3. Both existing and new conditional uses would be subject to the P/I site and building`(architectural appearance, building massing, permitted materials, pedestrian circulation, lighting, parking, and 2 landscaping), buffer yards, lot, parking and building height standards. Zoning and Land Use Map Changes In addition to the zoning text changes detailed above many properties would also need rezoning and re- guiding on the future land use map (see attached maps). Overall, churches, elementary and middle schools would be rezoned from Public and Institutional to a residential zone with a conditional use permit. Churches, private parks (such as those in Glendalough or Harmony), elementary and middle schools would be re- guided residential on the City's Future Land Use Map. While public Parks would also be rezoned to residential as a permitted use but would retain their current PO — Parks and Open Space land use classification. Other zoning or land use changes to note include: 1. City Hall, the Library, the Steeple Center and the former St. Joseph's school site would all be rezoned DT — Downtown to comply with the current DT — Downtown land use classification. 2. The CAP (Community Action Partnership) Agency site at 145 Street West and`Biscayne would be rezoned C -1, Convenience Commercial and re- guided NC — Neighborhood Commercial. Rezoning and re- guiding this site for commercial uses within an existing residential neighborhood is acceptable to staff because it would allow continued use of this site as a private non - profit office but existing C -1 standards would prohibit future redevelopment of the site to incompatible uses' (auto repair, gas stations, drive - thrus). Future redevelopment would allow another office use on site should the CAP Agency ever relocate. Discussions with Property Owners & Potential Non - Conformities During staff's meeting with stakeholders, it was explained'that the new ordinance standards were designed to minimize non - conformities to the greatest extent possible. Those that are created will be addressed under state law. According to that law, non - conformities can be repaired, replaced, "restored, maintained or improved but cannot be expanded without meeting the new standards. Should the City approve the new ordinance standards making a non - conformity, the standards would only be applied when the individual property owner chose to make site improvements' Staff analyzed each of the affected sites using the proposed zoning changes to determine resulting non - conformities. The majority of the resulting non - conformities relate to the architectural, pedestrian circulation and parking lot design standards. The balance of the new standards will impact the size, height, or screening of future development but can be adjusted to a given site. Staff analysis found the most notable non - conformity resulting from the proposed changes will occur at the Rosemount Methodist Church (14770 Canada Avenue). Given this site is located within an existing residential neighborhood it fails to meet the current minimum distance standard to a Collector or Arterial Road. It should be noted that under the state law reference above this issue would not prohibit repair, replacement, restoration, maintenance, improvement or expansion of the existing facility within the churches' existing property. However, it would prohibit any expansion of the property's boundaries or access further away #o the south) from a Collector or Arterial Street. This is an unlikely issue as the property abutting the church to the south is a City park. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION b . Staff requests the City Council review and coinment on the proposed changes to the P/I - Public and Institutional and Residential districts as well as the Zoning and 2030 Comprehensive Plan maps detailed above. Based on the comments and direction from the City Council, staff will formalize the draft documents and proceed with the timeline above. 3 L 4 ._ I cn a.) rn ,� Q A Q Q Q c-'• V Q Q A ct CI ov a a a a a � � O a a a cn a 4 O o o o o �' o o o o o o r--, p ^r-I p+ Cc) PP PC1 p p.4. G 4 4 O 4 p P o p �, O � U ( 1 U P' � , 01(0' rn 0 U CI P'UP41UPI,U P41Ur �UPp 42(..)p-,Up-tUP•,Up_iUp-, G 4 2U o � � � � O L O O O Ln ai ■ O O W O u O b -°Z mZ Ln et O t" -7 " 0 0 0 O O O � 4' O Q o Q O U O o p o O • 0 pp ,o ir) o o p q 0 cl oEO.EOE E E . Ana•- -'E r'. of i•, 4 oo a) O a , o a, N , in a (, © a) oo a) Ln a) O a) o v c, a) rn rn N_ 00 CA G, rn CI) M rn rn O rn M n 1:3 O O O N O M O o O O e n O o 0 "ri b.0 ad 4-0 rn . rn � m -19 A., o O y O ,, O O •.,• C C t O N O E w F ° 0 0 3 0 0 v a4 P-, 0 p ,� cl , 0 O ,..1) •- v) •- rn .-a . 4:1 rn • rn •i7 rn ^� U v, U .1:1 rn 'O CA ri «I a) '4 a) c73 cd a) a> ca O et b 4 OC O be O.° cl 4 bC • d/0 o 4 be U) - ' b U A el b bA � . O U v O v p .O O U U , O v O u U U y , U , rn U 4 u ,..E U • • ., 0 • u •° o B B 1 B .,' a B g g 6 B B B o o.. o o °x a,x 0 ;_E ° x a, ,x o ° t-o g. °x °x 4 p.O O�O� O z-6 a FO E a p N O N .- ,,,L, � G1 m 0 ON O in M N a) in N N N U 4 (V 10 d- 'i O M N i (V co M Lfl N M 1 O 1 o :� N M N 77 •-, 77 .—, O .-1 O N N N M .--I - .-I N In .0 cn M . O cn cn cn N ill in N v') L— sn M Lc) .•-1 G■ Lc) V V V -, V M 0' 0 v V o0 V o0 i "G a) , 4-C3 u • p O 0 o n a, O O p Q s, a) O y s o s, zi V .4 t •4 (. 0., ,,. V 0 x o v) ° o 4 V Q o • `" W ci' C.5 U1:alPaap. ° ',a, "c:C1 000a4 — O aQO2- o : o x o (..) U O • 4- 6 A " c 0 a. o O o o o '� v • . n '. o • a, l' 0 0 0 a, v '� a, H cs p c v coo c ° x c °: ° b ° ' U U ci) 4 04 a an L) v' v' W R4 W a' g Z A . . , . H . , 0 " 1 : 1 c t VI ° cl --• CI -. = = 4--+ .4.. 1 4- 2 l) - , 4c2 1.-. . t, o 1 p_ cl.) , 0 H 4- 2 p-, X pc) 745., P-I ' P-■ P-1 ., .. . , L ,-, H . el et . P-■ .-, P-I •,., g ,H., 0 ces L.-) •"' 4.. o 4 0 o 0 2 2 NU -4-' 4., .,.. o .., P U . P-1 cii x ' 4 ‘C cn -ci b_N 00 N --- c l Lo ..o :- .c=:) -5 4 cn clJ 0 t ) W tr) <-1 ct 4 i n cl L.r) 4- C) P--I :4 " L') ' Z 0 , il t r aq Q . 11 -. ) t Ln ') i ti ci, If) a) ... X ..., , Z ..ca ..s 0 • r ) • .4 0 CI) 71- 0 . 1C) .••■ 0- ,_, 5 0 _ p0 ?-1 LJ, Lr) . 4 U 0 rz4 ct , Lt E 'c'2) 0" ,.. r) Lt) h E .0 00 - C1 -4-:+ 7i 0 C: 4-- 00 . - N C/D en P4 en ct) —i P4 cv a./) X Ct 4. CID (/) , Cn t) 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 7 0 " cn .0 cn . cr) 1= cn -1 cn cn cv 0 or-1 cl u el a.) Ct: kr, 4 4::kk 1 b.0 4 CZ cn e V) 613 4/4 6,0 CU . •.• • CI Ct 0 • . c l ) ouu g o -6 0 u 0 u , g xu ., (.,3 0 u u ,.. .),. u , u 7 . 1 S U 0 4 cy • .--1 c..) • —1 e.)., • - CI) • ■••1 (I) • ,-.1 C) • ■ .1.1 .. 1 1 5 0 0 0 4 --- 0 4 0 . 0 .. -- -4. 4 4.... , P-■ 0 p-, 0 P-4 O p. 0 0 , , o . .. . co ,-.) m 0 t- in ` , c. i Ln oo , 00 U p_ cl 71- —, c-N ,-, en , ,-I C) ,--, ,..,-) ,--, 0 00 Ln 00 Ln in L( -.I- in N tr) ,-, L r) ,--, .--■ ,--4 4 0 \ 0 \ \ r-I \ .0 4- \ N--I ,.. 71 ` f 4- 1 Csi N : . CL) C.) c) • 49 ,0 . ') • c d 0 4 7.', • (1) *-8 - ct P--, = 4. pc1 ea 0 0, a) 0 el Pci rz 4 •F cu o 4 - 4 A '—' 471 PC1 lj g -1--M • I CA , U U •a (L) u 8 ,,..> ,„, = ,, s „ ci.) •--, ,i._ . u • ‘., N _1,,.) ..-- , ..-. -,' 1 -0 cd m c=4 0 p. cn 4. 0 .., 0 1 t' 4■I 4. 6 0 .. 4. >l 0 1 0 t' 0 Q 4.4 • "0 0 0 0 Cn -1. . M ( L ) C.I.) • VI 4 = o ..q m rz, , ;-, p., . .-: : .4_, 4. • " ,g i - i „ , .40 • . • .. 4 1. • . f 4 ' 0 't • C.) 0 uetuQt.3.00 ^etE elm— 'no 4-I cet • . 0 cu ea •,-, U f:c.) F- 4 4., 4 A • ,..„- 1 1 0 F A DATE: April 21; 2010 ' FROM: Charlie LeFevere, City Atfoney TO: Jason Lindahl, City Planner RE:. Public and Institutional District Zoning Text Amendment • The city has under consideration changing the guide plan and zoning code for properties zoned "P" (Public and Institutional). This is, at least in part, a reaction to cases in other area cities challenging similar land use regulations. In the past few years, there have been at least two cases involving requests to reguide golf courses to residential uses. In the case of Wensmann Realty v. City of Eagan, 734 N.W.2d 623 •(Minn. 2007), a golf course was guided "P" (Park Open Space and Recreation). In the case of Mendota Golf LLP v. City of Mendota Heights, 708 N.W.2d 162 (Minn. 2006), the guide plan classified the golf course as "GC" (Golf Course). In both cases, the landowner requested that the comprehensive plan be changed to low density residential. When the cities denied the applications, the landowners appealed: In both cases, the landowners challenged the denial°on.the ground that the decision of the city'was unreasonable, arbitrary and capricious. In both cases the court decided that the decision to deny the requested guide plan amendment was not arbieraiy. However, in both cases, a second question was left unresolved due to the procedural status of the cases at the time they came to the court. The question that was left for "further possible court proceedings was whether the refusal to reguide the property, although a rational and defensible land use decision, was,nevertheless a regulatory taking. A land use control cm be lawful and defensible, but if the effect of the regulation is the taking of property without compensation, the government maybe required to amend its land use' control, or compensate the landowner for the property taken. Whether any regulation constitutes an unconstitutional regulatory taking is not always easy to determine. The question is essentially whether the landowner is left with a reasonable use of the affected property. All land use regulations should have a lawful and reasonable purpose, and any land, use regulation could constitute a regulatory taking if the effect of the regulation is to deprive a landowner oral' reasonable use. This issue is not unique to "public" or "public and institutional" zoning. However, it does seem likely that public or institutional zoning is more likely to result in a challenge than more common residential, commercial, or industrial land use designations because of the limited number of uses to which the property can be put in public and institutional zones. The park or park and recreational land use designation of the golf courses in both the Eagan and Mendota Heights cases was sustained as a reasonable land use regulation. However, it would be advisable to be mindful of the regulatory taking issue, particularly in the case of privately' owned property that is zoned for these kinds of quasi -public uses. w * There is probably less reason to reguide or rezone publicly owned property in many cases. If the city intends to keep city hall at its current location, or if public land zoned for park purposes is expected to be kepf as a city park for an indefinite period of time, I'see no reason why the city should go through an effort to fmd some other land use designation for the prOperty. On the other hand, if there is a reasonable possibility that property that is currently zoned for public and institutional uses may be put to some different land use in the future, it may be a good idea to plan for that alternate land use at this time. Let me know if you have anffurther questions on'this. Charlie Charles L. LeFevere Kennedy and Chartered 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (612) 337-9215 Fax: (612) 3379310 clefevere@kennedy-graven.com 4 r h C City of Rosemount Ordinance No. B- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT ZONING ORDINANCE B RELATING TO THE R -1, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TEXT AMENDMENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESO TA, ORDAINS that Ordinance B, adopted September 19, 1989, entitled "City of Rosemount Zoning Ordinance," is R. hereby amended as follows: / y "4, nr /"'s Section 1. Rosemount Zoning Ordinance B Section ..1 -4 -5 is hereby amended as follows: � \' 11 -4 -5: R -1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT:' \ \ A. Purpose and Intent: This is a.low density residential'district that is intendeduto accommodate newer single = family detached Y housing' development within the metropolitan urban service area. Dwelling units within this district areintended tobe °connected to the public sewer and \ water systems. (Ord. B -22, 9-24-1992; amd' Ord: B -96, 12-2:1997) B. Permitted Uses: '~ f" ,s' q 1. Essential serv faciliti except electrical and switching stations. / Licensed child daycare for twelve (12) or 'ewer persons. Unlicensed child daycare shall ti4 comply with the requirements for customary home occupations in section 11 -2 -16 of this title.` 3. Public or \ private parks. L 'Any park with a building, exterior lighting, or parking shall be subject to 11- 4 -18.G! r \ �, 4. Residential facilities,'' licensed by the state of Minnesota, serving six (6) or fewer persons. 5. Single - family detached dwellings, subject to ,section 11 -2 -15 of this title. (Ord. B, 9 -19- 1989) C. Accessory Uses: 1. Cemeteries, accessory to churches and or places of worship. 4 1 ! G y ' 2. Community Gardens, provided the site has an approved conditional use permit (CUP). Community Gardens are not permitted with residential uses. , 3. Construction office, temporary. , 4. Gazebos and screened porches. 5. Home occupations, subject to section 11 -2 -16 of this title. i 6. Private detached garages. �/'• .l . . „' / t .t 7. Private outdoor recreation customarily associated w ith an individual residence. Swimming pools shall be subject to sec tion 5 -3 -1 of this ' 8. Recreation vehicle storage, subject to section 8 -2 -5 of this code. %,.. t 9. Roomers, a maximum of two (2) per dw uni , / ' `. vh, ,� r 10. Sales office, temporary. \ '',., ~�, ' �., •y a te ` a.. ,,h 11. Satellite dishes.and solar collectors; subject to section 11.2 -12'of this title. (Ord. B -96, 12- 2- 1997; °'amd:''Ord B -141, 7 -20 -2004; Ord.;B= 145;11 - 3.2004) M ,\.. �' d in 5 J -/ . 12. Signs as regulated by Section 11- 8- 6.B.. \ - —_.� _� 4. D. Conditional Uses:., The following uses are conditional uses in. the R -1 district and subject to 1, the °Minimum 12ot Requirements and Setbacks in Section 11- 4 -18.F (except Minimum Lot ' Area), the Site and Building Standards in Section 11- 4 -18.G an d the Conditional Use Permit standa .. � ds in Section 11-10-7. ,_ 1. Child daycares, Montessori c,chools, u d or nursery facilities within' a churches, places of i worship, f or econdary educational institutions schools. 2. Churches and places of worship regardless of religious affiliation. Churches and place of minor arterial or principal arterial street. a. The property must have direct access onto an Arterial or Collector street or access to a local street within five hundred feet (500') of the local street's intersection with an Arterial or Collector street. ' - F R 3. Elementary and - : - :. :. - , .- . -..: . ....... middle or special needs schools. 4. Golf courses. and structures consistent with the public arca. 6. Transmission facilities greater than one - fourth (1/4) mile in length. r . 7. Other uses similar to those listed in`Section D as determined by the Board of Appeals and Adjustments and approved by the City Council; subject to issuance of a conditional use permit. / , ' `, " jl ' .f 7/ .4 l E. Uses Permitted By PUD: �\ °•� ..1 'A`,. 1. Single - family detached dwelling cluster developments. All developments °including common open space are required,,to have hoineow ers' associations in accordance with subsection 11 -2 -18N of thi's,ti't1e:-.. ' '-.._ \ • S'., F. Minimum Lot Requirements,And Setbacks: (See 'also. subsecti 11 -5 -2C, "Supplementary Yard Regulations ",.of this title.) ' ` 1` ii • \, " ,� �•w . 1. Minimum lot `area: ) -1 , �. �` gyp ,,` ,, 3' a. Interior lots: Ten „thousand`(10,000) square feet. - 4, V y \ �� ” . , \ b Corner lots Twelve thousand (12,000) square feet. ,, \ \ ' 2. Minimum lot width: ti 5. `.,. \. \ `�., ! a. Interiorlots: Eight (80'). �, 4 '\' / b. Corner lots: Ninety five feet (95'). . 3. Minimum lot depth: One hundred twenty five feet (125'). 4. Minimum front yard setback: , a. Principal structure, including garage: Thirty feet (30'). 3 b. Accessory structure: Thirty feet (30'). c. Established principal and accessory structures: Where forty percent (40 %) or more of the lots on any block are developed with buildings, if the average front yard is less than the required front yard, the average or twenty feet (20'), whichever is greater, shall be the required front yard. 5. Minimum side yard setback: a. Principal structure: Ten feet (10'). b. Accessory structure: Ten feet (10'). (Ord;!B 6, 1" - '1997) c. Surface parking, including driveways : feet (5'). (O d. B.- ;114, 3 -6- 2001) 6. Minimum rear yard setback: ( \ s\\.z , a. Principal structure: Thirty feet (30). �\ b. Accessory structure: w G (1). One hundred"twe (120) sgir e feet ,IE'ssk. ' feet (5'). / (2). Larger than than hunlirFd twenty (1 0) square feet: Thirty feet (30'). (Ord. B -96, 12-2 - 2 `' °► fix. (3). Surface pa ng, e driveways: Five feet (5'). (Ord. B -114, 3 -6 -2001) 7. um gross dens: 2.5dw =: g units /acre. 8. Maximus `building height: ff a. Principal stcture: Thirty five feet (35). b. Accessory structure: Eighteen feet (18'). 9. Maximum lot coverage: Thirty percent (30 %). (Ord. B -96, 12 -2 -1997) 4 t Section 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. ENACTED AND ORDAINED into an Ordinance this day of , 2011. CITY OF ROSEM.O�UNT William H.Dr t ,'Mayor . - ATTEST: .,1'\ //)-(/' \ \ - \\ Amy Domeier, City Clerk »., -\/ 'r \\:). F 's\ %, "-- - -' . Publis the R ose u nt 'T , Pages t his ` _ day of , 2011. \\\, \ \ \ \ , ., k P. ro 5 E } 'City of Rosemount X ' , Ordinance No'. B- a. 4. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT ZONING ORDINANCE B RELATING TO THE P - PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT TEXT AMENDMENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT'M'' INNESOTA, ORDAINS that Ordinance B, adopted September 19, 1989, entitled "City of Rosemount Zoning Ordinance," is hereby amended as follows: < / \ . \\ c Section 1. Rosemount Zoning Ordina B, Section -18 is Hereby amended as follows: ' ,,- •4 11 -4 -18: P — PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL.+DISTRICP \ 1 A. Purpose and_Intent: This district is'primarily intendedlto accommodate major public and institutional uses of a governmenta cultural;.recreational, public service and healthcare nature that serve the ene community. Where available, structures shall be serviced by the public - `sewer and water systems: `':„, \i,„ \ B. Uses Permittedy B N. \ / -,,, � {: 1. Colleges . or - universities. �,.,� ��,) t 2 •• F All public and i istitutional uses, facilities and structures. (Ord. B, 9 19 1989) Public or g overnmental services, including, luding, city offices, public administration buildings and the l ike. ° �` °•' 1k ,, , i 3. Public auditoriums, civic centers, community centers or the like. t \ \ ..t ' 4. Public Athletic =Complexes or Community Parks as designated in the Comprehensive Plan, owned and operated by a governmental unit, including recreational facilities" and structures consistent with the public area. 5. Secondary schools. C. Accessory Use: The following uses shall be permitted accessory -uses: . 1. Community Gardens. 4 1 I ; 2. Fences as regulated by this title. 3. Off street parking as regulated by this title. 4. Signs as regulated by this title. f D. Uscs Permitted By Conditional Usc Pcrmit (CUP): In accordance with section 11 10 7, "Conditional Usc Pcrmits (CUP) ", of this title: Conditional Uses: The following uses are ,, conditional uses in the P district and are subject to the ,so nditional use permit provisions in Section 11 -10 =7. 1: Cemeteries in accordance with the standards of section 11-10 -10 of this title. • 1 ` �,,,� •',, v., 5 2. Commercial recreation, both indoor and outdoor by agrecment,orlease with a • Sponsoring govcrnmcntal property owner :for a faccility,,that i3 jointly ' z3cd by private and govcrnmcntal entities. ,,,, °,.. * N,, ' '\•�, ' ( �. , ,' 3. Inflatable domes, stadiums 'and`structures such a a, subject to: a. Domes that 'are incompatible with residential districts shall be located a minimum of five hundred' °feet (500') from' any, residential district or' "use. (Ord: B, 9 -19 -1989; amd. , Ord. B -130, 6 -17 -2003) ..,, -.„ . �' 4. Other uses similar - Co .those listed,in Section D as determined the Board of Appeals ,r' and - Adjustments and approved "by the<City Council, subject to issuance of a conditional f use permit. N \•., 's, \ , .." + _,,r \ , '., , ti s lr . E. Interim Uses: 4 \ 4t 1. Temporary classroom type structurefor use by public or private institutions for up to a three (3) year.term.. ,` \ \ R / ` w ,t y 2. Other uses similar"`to those listed in Section E as determined by the Board of Appeals y and Adjustments and approved by the City Council, subject to issuance. of a conditional use permit. ` F. Minimum Lot Requirements -And Setbacks: 1. Minimum lot area: Forty (40) acres. 2. Minimum lot width: Three hundred feet (300'). 2 3. Maximum lot coverage: Seventy percent (70 %). 4. Minimum front yard setback: Thirty feet (30'). 5. Minimum side yard setback: Thirty feet (30'). 6. Minimum rear yard setback. Thirty feet (30'). 7. Parking setbacks: ) a, Minimum front yard setback: Twenty feet (20'). 1 \ b. Minimum rear yard setback: Ten feet (10')./ / �m �• c, Minimum side yard setback: Teri` feet (10'). d. When there exists an easement for a' shared private, roadway or drive, the required setback is ten feet (10') from the easement °,/ 8. Buffer yard: A buffer yard equal to thirty feet (30').or two (2) times the height of the building, is greater; shall required l side or rear property whichever s a be e u ed a on any s de o ea o er g• g 'area g Y P p t3' line abutting any residential use. This area shall_contain landsca in and bermin to provide g Y s , � p g g P a ninety percent -(90 %)'opacity screen to alheight f at least six feet (6') and shall not contain any structures; parking, off'street loading Or storage. Should and berming be found ineffective by the eitytrthe city may approve screening walls and /or decorative fencing, as anralternative. Sc'reening walls shall be constructed of the same .materials as the principal building and shall not extend more than twenty five feet (25') / without a change ix architecture "to reduce their mass and appearance. \ 9:, Maximum buildingTheight:. Fifty feet (50'). G. Site and Building Standards: To prevent urban blight and ensure quality long lasting construction' that does not detract from adjacent properties and is compatible with those throughout the district, all sites and buildings shall comply with the following standards, as well as applicable sections: of this title: A 1. Architectural Appearance: While variation in materials and colors that support the general theme may be allowed, the overall building should have "360 degree" architecture. Any variations shall focus the highest level of architectural detail, material variation, facade articulation, or roofline enhancements on those elevations that face a public right -of -way. Nonearth tone materials shall be limited to architectural accents. The color of the nonb`rick or stone portion of the building shall match the predominant brick or stone color portion. 3 4 1 4 . I a. Entry Features: Primary entrances facing a public right of way or abutting a required parking area shall be accented by visually pleasing entry features. This feature shall ` extend a minimum three hundred (300) square feet around a single entrance. Should t the building have more than one entrance facing a public right of way or abutting a required parking area, this feature shall extend a minimum one hundred fifty (150) square feet around each individual entrance. 2. Building Massing: Facades shall be articulated to reduce their mass and scale and provide visual interest consistent with Rosemount's identity, character, and scale. Large uninterrupted building walls or elevations are prohibited. Corner architectural elements are encouraged to define the edges of a building:'A building more than one hundred feet (100') in width shall be divided into increments of no.rnore than thirty feet (30') through the articulation of the facade. This shall be / through combinations of the following techniques: r N. N. 'a. Divisions or breaks in the materials. ,, � � \° 4 ,,-, `, / ! � 'p b. Arcades, entry features, window bays, or 'the like. 1 c. Variations in rooflines'o 'siope plane`'`•..,, �'` � ' .; e,_ 4,. ;,... d. Variation in building, plane o t back � ,r '' ```, , ''''',,� t \ \ \ ' -� , i M. j' e Equivalent techniques approved by the city. , ..�s�r.��` `\' \ q . -, ' 3 PermittedMaterials:,The exterior wall. surfaces of all buildings shall be constructed of at ,least fifty percent (50 %) b f. rick dr natural s tone. The remaining fifty percent (50 %) of the -..., \ Wall surface may.be.specialty integral colored concrete block (including textured, ` burnished, and rock faced block);tile (masonry, stone or clay), architectural textured concrete panels cast in, place, or better. EIFS or masonry stucco may be used for ban and/or architectural accents totaling no more than ten percent (10%)' of the non- glass; or stone portion of the building. Unadorned concrete is prohibited. N. \ ,s ' 4. Pedestrian Circulation: Appropriate provisions shall be made to protect pedestrian areas from encroachments by parked or moving vehicles. Clear and well lighted walkways shall extend throughout the site and parking area(s) connecting building entrances to adjacent public sidewalks and any parking facilities located on the site. , a. A walkway at least six feet (6') wide shall extend along any facade featuring a primary entrance and any facade abutting a parking or maneuvering area. - 4 b. A continuous and permanent barrier concrete curb not less than six inches (6 ") above grade shall separate internal sidewalks from parking;'loading, stacking and maneuvering areas, 5. Lighting: Exterior lighting shall be consistent in character throughout the entire site. a. Light shall be directed toward the ground. Externally lit signs, display, building and , aesthetic lighting must be lit from the top and shine downward. Lighting must be shielded to prevent direct glare. ., e R , / �, b. The level of lighting shall not exceed 0.51um at any residential use proper "ty line or 1.0 lumen at any nonresidential use property line..., • N c. The maximum height for exterio'r°lig shall not ex following: • 1. The maximum height for ball field'lights is eighty °(80) feet:, The minimum setback for such lights shall be no'less the of the`light. 2. The maximum heighefor- all'other- exterior lights is thirty (30) pfeet. The maximum height of such lights within one hundred (100) feet of a residential use or districtshallbe twenty feet (20'') d. All nonessential lighting will be required to be turned off after business hours, leaving only'the necessary lighting' for site,security. � 6:' Parking L ts: To reduce the impact oflarge expanses of paved surfaces, provide a more p edestrian friendly environment and 'provide adequate room for `snow storage, all . rki an areas includin drivewa s and drive aisles) shall be screened and landscaped. A ,., g (• g d Y ) ed. P Trees, 'shrubs, flowers'and ground cover needed in these areas shall be in addition to the minim number of trees and foundation plantings required by this title. y a. Screening wLandscaping and berming shall be a primary source for screening parking areas. Should landscaping and berming be found ineffective by the city, I the city may approve screening walls and /or fencing as an alternative. Screening walls shall be constructed of the same materials as the principal building and shall not extend more than twenty five feet (25') without a change in architecture to reduce their mass and appearance. The screening source (landscaping and berming or walls and /or decorative fencing) shall provide a minimum fifty percent (50 %) opacity screen to a height of at least four feet (4'). 5 , 4 b. Landscaping: A minimum of ten percent (10 %) of the parking area shall be landscaped. This landscaping shall be located on islands, peninsulas or the like within the perimeter of the parking area. 1. The islands or peninsulas shall be a minimum eight and one -half feet (8.5') wide and extend the length of the adjacent parking stall(s). The City Council may approve altered dimensions to insure sufficient area for the proposed landscaping to mature. 2. To ensure this landscaping is' properly dispersed; 'a minimum of one island, "penin or the like shall be located within each six thousand (6,000) square feet of vehicular use area , 3. A minimum of one tree shall be required for each two hundred fifty (250) square 'feet or fraction thereof, of required landscape area Deciduous trees shall have a clear trunk of at least five feet '(5') above the ground 'and a °caliper of at least two and one -half inches,(2.5 "). Coniferous trees shall be at least four' feet (4') in height. The remaining 'area shall be landscaped with shrubs or ground cover (not to include rocks or gravel except as a mulch "around shrubs and ground cover) not to exceed two feet (2') in height., `• 7. Landscaping: All'areas of land other'than °those occupied by building or hardcover shall be landscaped with a combination Of turf and plantings.' Rock or mulch may only be used as an accent, material around sod of plantings. Trees, shrubs, flowers and ground cover needed iri these areas shalhbe in addition to the minimum number of trees and foundation plantings required by this .title.' ' - , , - : - - . �'� - - :. - - - :.. ' : .. Portions of the site may be exempt from these requirements `\ where future development or- expansion is planned. These areas shall either be graded and "seeded with prairie grass in accordance with the city of Rosemount, grading ,requirements or remain'as undisturbed natural areas containing existing viable natural vegetation`that can be maintained free of foreign and noxious plant material and will not produce soil erosiori'due to potential increases in storm water runoff. 4 Section 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law." ENACTED AND ORDAINED into an Ordinance this day of , 2011. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 6 fi . A . .. ' .. . . . . • 4 ..., A , S .., ' 1 William H. Droste, Mayor ATTEST: •, "7"7" , .'" I' m, '' r 2..)— Amy Domeier, City Clerk Amy . . ' . / . d 4 of :.. Published in the Rosemount Town Pages this day of L , 2011. \ , `,..., . ,. . ,,,, N . \ \ ;4,r.'• ' \ \ \\ / ) N. 4 ,. \ \ ... ■ • '‘.1 / ., ....", A, ,. ., ,...., \ .., \ .N • . \ A. .. ..... -,... S S \ '' `N '''''''' . ...' "..., "'■ 4 ". \ -... S. ) , / ." ..../ 1' .. (' / \ .,.-- ,,. N, \ „...,......----..„,„ e . .---. . \ , ...) ( \ • ,. ' ' '1, \ t . \ s \ \ \ \ \ \ t \ N ., ) ) . .4„..e” I ! & \ / ,' 1 , % 1 ' I , L 1 1 ... r 7 . , ROSEMOLINT r Residential: Commercial: Industrial: Other: �PUD The Zoning Designations on this Map should be interpreted in light O RR Rural Residential �C1 Convenience Commercial BP Business Park �AGP Agricultural Preserve�Mississippi River Critical Area MNRRA Corridor Of the accompanying text and polices contained in the complete Rosemount Zoning Ordinance. Zoning Designations subject to R1 Low Density Residential �C2 Community Commercial IP Industrial Park OAG -Agricultural -•-Railroad change as part of the City'S ongoing planning proCess. O R1A Low Density Residentiai OC3 Highway Service Commercial O GI Generai Industrial PI Public/Institutional R2 Moderate Density Residential �C4 General Commercial HI Heavy Industrial FP Flood Plain R3 Medium Density Residential WM Waste Management R4 High Density Residential O W- Water Data SourCes: O ROW Right-of-Way Dakota County Land Surveyors and O�ce of Geographic Information Systems City of Rosemount Community Development and Engineering/Public Works Departments ________._..r.._. i. ��.,ii�+�r�r.. //f, L.,��'' l-. I i i I %i...� f I i �l r..� i ��.i ���i J r �C,(� `.r` C 1 i i i r i I 5 I� j /i f j r' 'i I ;J r j �3 j a J r�,�� i �i p s k i e 1..._, m t_ �L ;r i I i�r i� l r .._i 1 ��`1; i� i �i i i i/ i I f� f Y Y;' i r M i f `.//.,i� i i r �i 1 i ..i, �_�^I I I 1` //I�j i--������F /,/,'ri; i`� t i• .t. l r I 1 _S`, �t� i'" F .;--E-�� i i fi i t�^ a I I �I r i h i`-� t�_ ;�F` i i S j i h i --t— /t i ,t�a K=--� r— r a ���V��\ V�`ti �1 ,t/,�,� i i y� :Y+ '��\�4�'. I --'a. A e i r \1 -T_ II I �J` �I F 4 ���^:-y 11'� E �i' j 1 j�',� i �S�`�vr I E �I l" i t �.A 1 i '4�%� i i i i �v� ��i.�� i i i J� i" i �i ..,k j_ y j /,l i .�i :a .,�r:.w ;T ��:n i i��. r �ji .A�� y n r ..u,.�_ -i.s_.._ �A. s':s_ /i n I �AV�.,,. .�i ...x i r.� �_s A I t _y� r.�. 73 r.. I I� A i i/, i' .AA\��'�:�°"`� `\\VA�� �'�i��. i� l�+ 7�' I i i /f,, v .y� i f %3 a Ci I t1 j i /i `a I i. I �����ti` I ��1' l J, i i 1 I J t�.�..is.�� i e. j T 1. i U `'i t �li _"__.IL' I .'t�J Q i �i i i 1 i, i I 1 3 u s I i u� i�'% i i i" I �n i r c 1 i T i �I 1 �'4! -J������� R i i --I 1 i i I i I I M I 4 Y I I i sz I I I, I �I i J i r 1 1 l `y" II 1 i �C!�*.,'�' C`` I i �A !i i I i i i A J I I i i y i I� i„� I .._.._.._.._.r.._.�. "�_��"_"_"_.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._'(T� I �__.._._.._.._'_'"_"_"""^'_"_'�.�._._.�.�_�._.._._.�...._.�.._..,._..z......+...r.._.�' _""_"""._.l '_"_""'_"'_"'.._.._"".._._.._.._._..l G NORTH December 2011 Path. TiGIS�Ciry\Maps\ease Maps�Zoning Map�Zomng t1x17 Uptlates.mxd RosEMOUN AG Agriculture �AGR Agricultural Research HDR High Density Residential GI General Industrial DT Downtown RR Rural Residential PI Public/Institutional WM Waste Management NC Neighborhood Commercial LDR Low Density Residential PO Existing Parks/Open Space �2020 MUSA Line RC Regional Commercial TR Transitional Residential BP Business Park �2030 MUSA Line CC Community Commercial MDR Medium Density Residential L� Light Industrial ry I r f „i°� r; I i ,,i J I I—y M G j 1; ,1 I ..0 M J f p l\ y i 1 I 1 j 4_1._L 1 ^y f J �r-� c�.-� i I S.__ I I i �.�.,1r I 7 I yt \n T y I 7 i-' i 1 q i',.. i �\�v I I t j I x v k��. �f i X^�� i I L 1 1� Y? C �r I j I y_ j I ,i� r T r, i 1 i fl x., a 4 sy r"1 �L t'�`�. a __,,-_��,-�__r �'I .S I r i I q i l a r N �t t i I I ;`y;� i 1 I r_ i rc ,n T '.r i i �."r i� i �t i i i it i i 0:5 O S 5 �N�es NORTH December 2011 Path�. T�.�GIS\City\Maps\Base Maps\Land Use Map\Land Use Comp Plan Updates 11x17.mxd