HomeMy WebLinkAbout13264 CARLINGFORD LNIll
�G
(965.9 %V77o ((
[966.8 — — � 1 '24 „w I
I 77- 08 I I )I
969.0)
969.8]
(9 61.4, 3 �i
5= D `s2 5 k U, `°
I"A EMENT p n l� X964 11xN
EP
r
°i x[963.2] 96 3] 5
J N ( C
0 to -I'
N I N I nT n
\/ n / n K I T O° 1964 4] 964.71 (964.8]
Vr'\vM1 N 1
N rn
11 ran nnnnnn _ _ — _. if1C t. O� I • CJ
CARLINGFORD LANE
Bearings are on assumed datum
Scale: T =30'
SANITARY SERVICE INVERT ELEVATION
PER CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT = 952.04
LOT 3 =
11,165 SQ. FT.
HSE /GAR
= 1,926 SQ. FT.
PORCH =
140 SQ. FT.
DRIVEWAY
= 847 SQ. FT.
Total Impervious = 2,913 SQ. FT.
OR 26.1 %
OF LOT AREA
ADDRESS= 13264 CARLINGFORD LANE
s
V
Lot 3, Block 1, GLENDALOUGH
=
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
CD ,�
o�
4TH ADDITION, Dakota County, Minnesota.
®N
Z
a
—
Z y__ By:
°
N
i
Date: ¢' i<o 2
W
v
We hereby certify that this is a true and correct survey of the above
.
N
described property and that it was performed by me or under my
the
Cc
0
< o
direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Surveyor under
160
laws of the State of Minnesota. That this survey does not purport to
F
2'
show all improvements, easements or encroachments, to the property
V
z
3
except as shown thereon.
DRAWN
BY
(930.0) Denotes proposed elevation
Signed this 9th day of Junes % , 2012. anmes R. Hill, Inc.,
pLM
E
DATE
Harold C. Peterson, Minnesota L.S. No. 12294
Notes:
1. Building dimensions shown are for
horizontal & vertical placement of structure
only. See architectural plans for building
& foundation dimensions.
2. No specific soils investigation has been
completed on this lot by James R. Hill, Inc.
The suitability of soils to support the specific
house proposed is not the responsibility of
James R. Hill, Inc. or the surveyor.
3. No specific title search for existence or non-
existence of recorded or un- recorded easements
has been conducted by the surveyor as a part
of this survey. Only easements per the recorded
plat ore shown.
4. Proposed grades shown were taken from
the grading & /or development plan prepared by
WESTWOOD Professional Services, Inc..
Existing Garage Top of Block=
Existing House Top of Block=
Existing Lowest Floor=
Existing Top of Block
at Egress Window=
966.5
966.5
958.5
961.65
Bench Mark: 961.36 -TNH -Lot 1. Block 1_
Proposed Garage Floor @ Front= 966.1
Proposed Garage Top of Block= 966.5
Proposed House Top of Block= 966.5
Proposed Lowest Floor= 958.5
Proposed Top of Block 961.7
at Egress Window=
7/26/12 Re -stake
F v6eyved as noted: 0
=
CD ,�
o�
l�t:
Z
o U
—
Z y__ By:
°
o �
y
i
Date: ¢' i<o 2
o
28
M 0
F
e
p Denotes set spike
160
® Denotes found magnetic nail
p Denotes set iron monument
V
® Denotes found iron monument
x[927.6] Denotes as —built elevation
DRAWN
BY
(930.0) Denotes proposed elevation
pLM
E
DATE
Denotes proposed drainage
6/9/12
tc Denotes top of curb
REVISIONS
Bench Mark: 961.36 -TNH -Lot 1. Block 1_
Proposed Garage Floor @ Front= 966.1
Proposed Garage Top of Block= 966.5
Proposed House Top of Block= 966.5
Proposed Lowest Floor= 958.5
Proposed Top of Block 961.7
at Egress Window=
7/26/12 Re -stake