HomeMy WebLinkAbout7.a. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment for Alternative Energy Systems�ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PLANNING COMMISSION
Planning Commission Meeting Date:
Tentative Planning Commission Public Hearing Date
Tentative City Council Meeting Date:
June 25, 2013
July 23, 2013
August 20, 2013
AGENDA ITEM: Case 13 -27 -TA
AGENDA SECTION:
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment for
New Business
Alternative Energy Systems
PREPARED BY: Jason Lindahl, AICP
AGENDA NO.
Planner
7.a.
ATTACHMENTS: Pictures of Existing Solar Collector
APPROV Y:
System In Rosemount
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Discuss and provide comments.
SUMMARY
Staff recommends updating the City's zoning standards for solar collectors. Rosemount's existing
solar collector standards were last updated in 1993 and should be revised to address changing
technology, establish consistent.standards, and implement the City's goals to become a more
sustainable community. Updating these standards could also position Rosemount to take full
advantage of Minnesota's new solar energy law which provides incentives for installing solar panels
and requires major utility companies to generate a portion their electricity from solar energy.
Completing this process is also consistent with the GreenSteps Cities best practice encouraging
installation of renewable energy systems. Staff assumes these amendments will also be consistent
with the STAR Communities program we will be starting later this year. Staff requests the Planning
Commission review and comment on this information.
BACKGROUND
Recently, there has been renewed interest in solar energy as a result of falling prices and improving
technology. Last fall more than 25 residents attended an informational workshop on solar energy
hosted by the City. This past spring, the State of Minnesota passed a new solar energy law requiring
major utility companies (Xcel Energy but not Dakota Electric) to produce 1.5 % of their electricity
from solar by 2020. The law also included financial incentives for individuals and businesses to
install solar panels and allows community solar systems where individual consumers can lease or
purchase small sections of a larger solar array.
Staff is currently aware of three existing solar panel systems within the City of Rosemount. Pictures
of each system are attached for your reference. The residential system is located on the home of
Debra White at 3441 Upper 149th Street. The other two systems are located at St. Joseph's Church
and the Ames soccer complex at Dakota County Technical College.
There are two types of solar energy systems: photovoltaic and thermal. Photovoltaic systems use
sunlight to directly generate electricity. Solar thermal systems use sunlight to provide heat for
domestic hot water or space heating. Thermal systems can be either passive or active. Passive solar
thermal uses siting principles or building components like concrete or stone to absorb and store heat
from the sun. Active solar thermal systems use collectors and mechanical components to
supplement a building's heating needs.
ISSUE ANALYSIS
Legal Authority. Zoning ordinance amendments are legislative actions in that the City is creating
new standards to regulate the development of certain type of structure or use. Under the law, the
City has wide flexibility to create standards that will insure the type of development it desires.
However, decisions made under a legislative action must still be constitutional, rational and related
to protecting the health, safety and welfare of the public.
The primary issue to consider when developing solar collector regulations is balancing reasonable
solar access with potential negative impacts on surrounding properties. Typically, solar access is less
of an issue in large lot suburban or rural areas. However, properties in developed areas with tree
cover, relatively dense development patterns or tall buildings may have limited access to their solar
resources. Below staff outlines potential use, attachment and performance standards to balance
these concerns.
Use Classification. Currently, solar collectors are listed as permitted, accessory or conditional uses
in various zoning districts (see table below). A key feature of the ordinance amendment will be to
create a simplified and balanced use classification system to appropriately locate solar collectors.
The most common zoning practice is to limit solar collectors to accessory uses in urbanized areas.
This would require the subject property to have some other principal use in a building other than the
solar collector (like a dwelling unit in a residential district or a business in a commercial district).
Limiting solar collectors to accessory uses within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) is
consistent with the siting of existing systems in town and the most appropriate use classification for
solar collectors in Rosemount.
Solar Collector Standards
Section
Standard
Agriculture and Residential Districts
Accessory Use
Downtown, C -3 and C -4 Districts
Accessory Use
Business Park District
Conditional Use
LI — Light Industrial District
Permitted Use
Supplementary Regulations
Deviations from Setback and Height Standards
In some limited situations it may be appropriate to allow solar collectors as principle uses. Allowing
solar collectors as principal uses is more common in rural or industrial areas and would permit large
solar farms without any other principal building. As mentioned above, Minnesota's new solar law
now allows community solar systems where individual consumers can lease or purchase small
sections of a larger solar array. While local governments still control zoning for these facilities,
industry leader believe the new law will create a market for properties that allow solar collectors as a
principal use.
Another option would be to investigate allowing solar collectors as an interim use in certain areas of
the community, where development is outside of the comprehensive plan time horizon. This could
allow a reasonable return on the investment because it would be in a time horizon of 20 or so years,
similar to some of the mines currently operating in the City. Further research should be done to
assess the cost benefit of a long -term, yet interim system.
2
Staff would like feedback from the Commission regarding permitting solar collectors as a principal
use or interim use outside the MUSA.
Attachment Method. Solar collectors can either be roof - mounted on a building, like at St. Joseph's
Church or the White residence, or ground - mounted like the system at the Ames soccer fields at
DCTC. Like the use discussion above, the most common zoning practice is to require roof - mounted
systems in urbanized areas while allowing either roof or ground- mounted systems in agricultural, rural
or industrial areas. Staff finds this practice consistent with existing facilities and should be carried over
to the new solar collector standards.
Performance Standards. Each zoning district includes performance standards which regulate the
siting of structures (setbacks, height, lot coverage, etc.) on a given property. Currently solar collectors
are subject to the performance standards of the zoning district in which they are located but are
allowed some additional height and setback encroachments under Section 11 -5 -2: Supplementary
Regulations. Staff believes continuing the practice of requiring solar collectors to meet the
performance standards of the district in which they are located is the best way to insure compatibility
with surrounding properties. However, the revised solar collector standards should also include
specific standards to address factors unique to solar collectors such as screening, roof coverage, glare,
setback encroachment, and height. Additional discussion should be surrounding the permission to
vary from the ordinance standards to encourage and facilitate installation of solar collectors. The
ordinance should attempt to strike a balance between making solar energy more convenient for
property owners, and also ensuring compatibility with surrounding land uses particularly in residential
areas.
Deviations. Should a property owner be unable to reasonably access their solar energy resource, they
may apply for a variance as outlined in Section 11 -12 -2. According to Minnesota statute 462.357,
subdivision 6, variances may be granted when an applicant establishes that there are "practical
difficulties" in complying with the zoning ordinance. The statute goes on to specifically cite that
"practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar
energy systems."
CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION
Recent improvements in technology and changes to state law have sparked renewed interest in solar
energy systems. Rosemount's existing solar collector standards were last updated in 1993 and
should be revised to address changing technology, establish consistent standards, and implement the
City's goals to become a more sustainable community. This memo describes the different types of
solar energy systems, the existing systems in Rosemount and outlines the issues to consider when
drafting regulatory standards. Staff requests the Planning Commission review and comment on this
information. Staff will use this information to create a draft ordinance for review at a future
meeting.
3
f-
el
I
TIN
L I
^ 4
a«
. } ° { :\
�� §\ � �
.y�� :�:
y: �< <2 \ ®2�