The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About8.a. Case 13-21-PP; 13-22-PUD Request by Lennar Corporation for the Approval of the Bella Vista Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan with Rezoning4 DIN OSEMOt.., NT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY COUNCIL City Council Meeting Date: July 16, 2013 AGENDA ITEM: Case 13- 21 -PP; 13 -22 -PUD Request by Lennar Corporation for the Approval of the AGENDA SECTION: Bella Vista Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Old Business Development Master Development Plan with Rezoning PREPARED BY: Eric Zweber, Senior Planner AGENDA NO. 8.a. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance; Resolutions; Planned Unit APPROVED BY: Development Agreement; Wetland Conservation Act Record of Decision; Excerpt of Draft Minutes from May 28, 2013 Planning Commission Meeting; Location Map; Development Plan; Preliminary Plat; Grading Plans; Utility Plans; Landscape Plans; Tree Protection Plans; Temporary Access for Phases 3 & 4 Plans; Bella Vista Revised Wetland Mitigation dated June 26; Wetland Impact Exhibit; Wetland Buffer Averaging Analysis; Table IX -1: Wetland Management and Protection Requirements; 2030 Roadway Functional Classification; Park Dedication Sketch; City Engineer's Memorandum dated June 25; Park and Recreation Director's Memorandum dated June 13; Fire Marshall's Memorandum dated May 20. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt an Ordinance amending Ordinance B City of Rosemount Zoning Ordinance for Bella Vista. Motion to adopt a Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat for Bella Vista. Motion to adopt a Resolution approving the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Master Development Plan with Rezoning for Bella Vista. Motion to approve the Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan Agreement for Bella Vista and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the Agreement. Motion to Approve the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision for Bella Vista and authorize the Mayor to Sign the Decision. ISSUE Lennar Corporation has requested a preliminary plat, planned unit development (PUD) master development plan and rezoning to R -1 PUD: Low Density Residential Planned Development Plan named Bella Vista to develop 158 single family homes on 142.6 acres. JULY 2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING The City Council reviewed the Bella Vista application and request at their July 2 meeting. Following the staff presentation, Joe Jablonski from Lennar spoke to the City Council about his concern regarding the limitation on the development of phases of 3 and 4, which are contingent on construction of Autumn Path. Some of Autumn Path is proposed for construction on the McMenomy family property, located directly east of Bella Vista. Lennar has been having conversations with the McMenomy family but the prospects of a mutually agreeable solution to the Autumn Path extension are not likely. Mr. Jablonski requested that the Bella Vista applications be delayed to the July 16 meeting to work toward a solution that would allow Lennar to construct phases 3 and 4 in a timely manner. Since July 2, Lennar has submitted plans that show a temporary access that would be constructed across Lot 15, Block 6, from the south cul -de -sac of Street B to Bonaire Path. The temporary access would be constructed to City standards and dimensions, a 34 foot wide back -to -back roadway. The temporary road installation does not impact nearby wetlands or mitigation proposed in the area. Staff is supportive of this design to allow construction of Phases 3 and 4S provided that Lennar pay for the temporary access and its eventual removal. Lennar would still be responsible for a minimum of one -half the cost of Autumn Path. The condition requiring Autumn Path construction to develop Phase 4N remains because that access is needed access lots on the east side of Horseshoe Lake. Lennar has indicated that these changes generally resolve the Autumn Path issue that prompted them to request the applications be delayed to July 16. Staff has revised the conditions within the Preliminary Plat Resolution to allow the temporary access to Bonaire Path. MAY 28 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING During their May 28 meeting, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing regarding the Lennar proposal of the Bella Vista neighborhood. The only resident that spoke during the hearing was Arthur (Terry) McMenomy, one of the property owners to the east. Mr. McMenomy stated that he and his family are not interested in the extension of Autumn Path and they are not interested in paying another assessment for their property as they did for the 2006 improvement of Bonaire Path. Senior Planner Zweber responded that he understood that the family members are not interested in paying for the extension of Autumn Path, but if they sold their property to a developer, then the developer would need Autumn Path extended to develop the McMenomy property. In 2006, the McMenomys were negotiating the sale of their property for development with Pulte Homes. During the Planning Commission discussion, Commissioner Husain inquired about the location of and noise from the railroad track; who is responsible for the roads, sewer, and water quality; and if there is a concern about impacts from the Flint Hills Refinery. Staff responded that the railroad track is about a half mile away and has a quiet zone designation; that the improvements will be paid for by the developer; and that the PCA has four air quality monitoring stations around the refinery to monitor environmental conditions. Commissioner Weber inquired if there is a concern about the high water table and the numerous wetlands. Staff responded that there are a number of conditions that require more detailed grading plans during the Final Plat submittal. Chair Powell inquired if there would be a public beach at Horseshoe Lake; why Autumn Path has a serpentine path; about the storm water lift station at Horseshoe Lake; if a traffic study had been done for this development; about the City well development; about the street and infrastructure improvement of Bacardi Avenue; and the wetland replacement plan. Staff PA responded that a public beach is not planned for the park on the southeast shore of the lake, but may be considered when the property to the northwest develops as that shoreline is more conducive to a beach use. It was also explained that the serpentine alignment of Autumn Path would save large Burr Oaks on the property line and roughly puts half of the road on Bella Vista and half on the McMenomy property. The lift station would control the water level in Horseshoe Lake to prevent flooding which addressed the question about Horseshoe Lake. It was explained that a traffic study was conducted with CSAH 42 /Akron AUAR and reviewed in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Staff noted that the City is looking for multiple well sites in the area due to proximity to the water tower; that a feasibility study will be conducted shortly to determine the cost and extent of the Bacardi improvements; and that the wetland technical evaluation panel meeting was scheduled for May 29. The Planning Commission unanimously (4 -0 with Commissioner Miller absent) recommended approval of the preliminary plat, PUD, and rezoning with the 34 staff recommended conditions. Chair Powell requested future conversation and consideration of a beach along Horseshoe Lake and evaluating if there is a more sustainable storm water system than the lift station. SUMMARY Approximately 160 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Bacardi Avenue and Bonaire Path was owned by Adam LaFarve but has been foreclosed on by the mortgager. The properties encompassed all of Horseshoe Lake and the northern half of Mare Pond. Mr. LaFarve had his house on 20 acres of land on the northwest shore of Horseshoe Lake and that parcel has been sold by the mortgage holder to a private resident. The remaining parcel (142.6 acres) was farmland encompassing three- quarters of the Horseshoe Lake shoreline and the northern half of Mare Pond and was foreclosed by Klein Bank. Klein Bank has been negotiating the sale of the property to Lennar for the development of a single family subdivision. The preliminary plat includes a total of 142.6 acres of land and has about 2,200 feet of frontage onto Bacardi Avenue and 1,550 feet of frontage onto Bonaire Path. The preliminary plat illustrates 158 lots on the 142.6 acres of land in five phases. The 142.6 acre property includes twenty (20) waterbodies of approximately 32 acres. In addition to the waterbodies, Lennar is proposing to dedicate 8 acres of parkland to the City, which would permit approximately 3 acres for park facilities after removing the wetlands, gas line easements, stormwater ponds, and wetland buffers. Dakota County is negotiating with Klein Bank to acquire a 9 acre shoreland easement around Horseshoe Lake and a 32 acre greenway easement over Outoot E in the southwest corner of the development. The City will acquire ownership of the shoreland and Outlot E property after the County purchases the easement. Including Horseshoe Lake and 3 acres of collector right -of -way, the City will take position of 66 of the 142.6 acres. The net acreage for development (home sites, local roads, and associated infrastructure) is 76.6 acres, or 54% of the overall property. Lennar has stated that the houses will be generally two story homes with three car garages. Staff has provided a recommendation that front facades include the same enhancements as are required in Prestwick Place: a minimum of a three and one half (3.5) foot high wainscoting of brick or stone; a front porch with railing; a side entry garage; or 30% non -lap siding such as shakes or board and batten siding. The development design includes preserving a minimum of a 45 foot wide wooded, natural corridor around Horseshoe Lake and maintenance of the wooded area adjacent to Bacardi Path. Plans for the design of the Autumn Path extension on the east side of the property meanders to save the existing heritage bur oak trees in the windrow between the Lennar development and the McMenomy property to the east. 3 The proposed development would surround two exception properties on the south side of the development. The western 14 acre exception property is owned by Christopher and Sarah Sorsoleil and the eastern 15 acre exception property is owned by Norman and Sharon Brucker. The plans show a ghost plat of the two exception properties that could provide an access from Bonaire Path in the location of the joint property line and an access from Street B on the western property line. A sewer and water stub will be provided to the Brucker property at Street B and there is an existing waterline in Bonaire Path to provide looping. A sewer stub will be installed near the southwest corner of the development near the City well site that could be used to supply service to the Sorsoleil property. The ghost plat shows that Sorsoleil and Brucker properties can be developed together with the two accesses and the internal loop road and meet all the City design standards and requirements. The exception properties can also develop independently provided they maintain two access points at the joint property line. The longest temporary cul -de -sac length if the Sorsoleil developed independently, before Brucker, would be about 1,200 feet in length. This would be shorter than the proposed temporary cul -de -sac for Street G in Phase 4N of Bella Vista. Pulte Group 2011 Marshes ofBloomfteld Request In 2011, Pulte Group requested a 182 lot subdivision on 156.4 acre development. The Pulte proposal included both the Klein Bank property and the western exception property owned by the Sorsoleil family. The Lennar proposal is only for the Klein property resulting in a 14 acre reduction in area and a reduction of 28 lots. The revised layout also reduces two streets to the exception properties that results in reduced wetland impacts as compared to the Pulte plan. The remainder of the development is identical to the Pulte 2011 proposal. Surrounding Land Uses North - Agriculture and Large Lot Single Family Houses (Low Density Residential Designation) West - Agriculture and Large Lot Single Family Homes (Transitional Residential Designation) South - Single Family Residential (Low Density Residential Designation) East - Agriculture (Low Density Residential Designation) Background Owners: Residential Developers: Preliminary Plat Acres: Comprehensive Plan Design.: Current Zoning: Requested Zoning: Klein Bank, current owner; Lennar Corporation, future owner Lennar Corporation 142.6 Acres LDR: Low Density Residential AG - Agriculture R -1 PUD: Low Density Residential Planned Unit Development Residential Density 0 Gross Additional City Acquired Net Units per Units Acres Collector Park and Open Acres Acre RiRht-of-way Space Bella Vista 158 142.6 3.0 66.0 76.6 2.06 0 Single Family Housln,Q 1 20 foot front yard setbacks on lots that have rear yard wetland conservation easements Phasing Lennar has proposed to develop the subdivision in five (5) phases of 28, 44, 40, 20 and 26 lots each. Phase 1 is located on the western edge of the development along Bacardi Avenue. Phase 1 will create a double cul- de -sac of Street K and Street S to serve the 28 lots. Phase 2 of the project will develop the rest of Street H and a portion of Street E to access the lots on the south and west shore of Horseshoe Lake. In discussions with the City Engineer and the Fire Marshal, they are comfortable allowing proposed Phases 1 and 2 to be developed with the singular access from Bacardi Avenue. It is requested that temporary turn - arounds be constructed at both ends of Street E after the development of Phase 2. Phase 3 of the development could not develop until Autumn Path was constructed to the intersection of Street E, the temporary access from the south cul -de -sac Street B to Bonaire Path, or the exception properties developed and provided site access to Bonaire Path. Phase 4S (Street EE) could develop with this same connection to Bonaire Path as needed for Phase 3 provided the installation of the temporary sanitary sewer lift station identified in Phase 4N. Phase 4N cannot develop until Autumn Path would be completely constructed to the north boundary of the development and the temporary sanitary sewer lift station is operational. At the Planning Commission Public Hearing, Terry McMenomy stated that his family is not interested in Autumn Path being installed or paying an assessment for the installation of Autumn Path. Autumn Path is shown on the McMenomy property at the intersection with Bonaire Path for three reasons: first, the alignment of Autumn Path south of Bonaire Path; second, the wetland located on the Lennar side of the property line that could be impacted road development while no wetlands are located on the McMenomy property in this area; and third, to save heritage burr oak trees that are located on the property line. Lennar is concerned that if the McMenomys would not participate in the construction of Autumn Path, then Bella Vista would be limited to only 72 of the 158 lots. Phase 3 is not expected before 2016 and the McMenomys are considering offers from the developer which may resolve this issue by 2016. The developer could potentially gain access through the exception piece, realign Autumn Path, or through a temporary access across Lot 15, Block 6 from the south cul -de -sac of street B to Bonaire Path. For the present, the concept of a temporary connection through Lot 15, appears to be a workable solution. The Council at that time will have to determine the best course of action. Street and Sidewalk System The proposed development includes one access onto Bacardi Avenue about 1,300 feet north of Bonaire Path. Bacardi Avenue is currently a gravel rural section road. Bacardi Avenue will be upgraded to an urban section when an existing 15" truck sanitary sewer line is extended to allow construction for the first phase of development. The sanitary sewer line is at the corner of Bacardi and Bonaire and will be extended north, with the Bacardi right of way to serve the eastern portion of the project. 5 R -1 Low Density Res. Zonmi Proposed 75 -foot Wide Lots Minimum Lot Width 80 Feet 75 Feet Minimum Lot Size 10,000 Square Feet 9,250 Square Feet Minimum Front Yard Setback 30 Feet 25 Feet / 20 Feet' Minimum Side Yard Setback 10 Feet 7.5 Feet Maximum Lot Coverage 30% 30% 1 20 foot front yard setbacks on lots that have rear yard wetland conservation easements Phasing Lennar has proposed to develop the subdivision in five (5) phases of 28, 44, 40, 20 and 26 lots each. Phase 1 is located on the western edge of the development along Bacardi Avenue. Phase 1 will create a double cul- de -sac of Street K and Street S to serve the 28 lots. Phase 2 of the project will develop the rest of Street H and a portion of Street E to access the lots on the south and west shore of Horseshoe Lake. In discussions with the City Engineer and the Fire Marshal, they are comfortable allowing proposed Phases 1 and 2 to be developed with the singular access from Bacardi Avenue. It is requested that temporary turn - arounds be constructed at both ends of Street E after the development of Phase 2. Phase 3 of the development could not develop until Autumn Path was constructed to the intersection of Street E, the temporary access from the south cul -de -sac Street B to Bonaire Path, or the exception properties developed and provided site access to Bonaire Path. Phase 4S (Street EE) could develop with this same connection to Bonaire Path as needed for Phase 3 provided the installation of the temporary sanitary sewer lift station identified in Phase 4N. Phase 4N cannot develop until Autumn Path would be completely constructed to the north boundary of the development and the temporary sanitary sewer lift station is operational. At the Planning Commission Public Hearing, Terry McMenomy stated that his family is not interested in Autumn Path being installed or paying an assessment for the installation of Autumn Path. Autumn Path is shown on the McMenomy property at the intersection with Bonaire Path for three reasons: first, the alignment of Autumn Path south of Bonaire Path; second, the wetland located on the Lennar side of the property line that could be impacted road development while no wetlands are located on the McMenomy property in this area; and third, to save heritage burr oak trees that are located on the property line. Lennar is concerned that if the McMenomys would not participate in the construction of Autumn Path, then Bella Vista would be limited to only 72 of the 158 lots. Phase 3 is not expected before 2016 and the McMenomys are considering offers from the developer which may resolve this issue by 2016. The developer could potentially gain access through the exception piece, realign Autumn Path, or through a temporary access across Lot 15, Block 6 from the south cul -de -sac of street B to Bonaire Path. For the present, the concept of a temporary connection through Lot 15, appears to be a workable solution. The Council at that time will have to determine the best course of action. Street and Sidewalk System The proposed development includes one access onto Bacardi Avenue about 1,300 feet north of Bonaire Path. Bacardi Avenue is currently a gravel rural section road. Bacardi Avenue will be upgraded to an urban section when an existing 15" truck sanitary sewer line is extended to allow construction for the first phase of development. The sanitary sewer line is at the corner of Bacardi and Bonaire and will be extended north, with the Bacardi right of way to serve the eastern portion of the project. 5 It should be noted that the applicant only controls the eastern half of Bacardi Avenue with the western half controlled by a variety of property owners located west of Bacardi. The City Engineer is beginning the feasibility study for Bacardi Avenue to determine the cost of the improvement and the amount of land needed for construction to an urban section. Ultimately, the City Council will need to determine the cost share that would be expected from the property owners on the west side of Bacardi Avenue. Lennar will be responsible for one -half of the construction cost of Bacardi Avenue upgrade. Bonaire Path was improved to an urban roadway in 2006 and Mr. LaFarve was assessed for that improvement. The Comprehensive Plan also shows a minor collector roadway connection to Bacardi Avenue that runs south of Horseshoe Lake. Due to the low density of the development and the impact that the collector would occur to the existing wetlands, staff is supportive of removing the minor collector from the south side of Horseshoe Lake. With development of the existing homestead site in the future, a determination would need to be made if the minor collector would be re- routed north of Horseshoe Lake, or if the proposed major collector east of 126th Street would provide sufficient connectivity. The development proposes an access onto Bonaire Path at the location of Autumn Path, which is classified as a minor collector in the Comprehensive Plan. Another access to Bonaire Path would be constructed in the future during the development of the exception properties. Lennar would be responsible for half of the cost of the Autumn Path extension, which will include the cost of construction and right of way acquisition. Similar to Bacardi Avenue, the property owner does not control the land to the east which is needed to extend Autumn Path. The development includes seven local roads, three of which are proposed to be permanent cul -de -sacs and three are proposed to have temporary cul -de -sacs until the neighboring properties develop. Two of the permanent cul -de -sacs (Street K and Street S on the west side of the development) meet the City Code because the cul -de -sac at the north end of Street K and the south end of Street S limits impacts to the wetland and woodlands. The third cul -de -sac (Street EE) exceeds the Subdivision Ordinance (Section 12 -3 -1 K) limitation of 700 feet and access to no more than 15 single family lots. Street EE is proposed to be approximately 1,000 feet in length and provide access to 20 single family lots. Staff is supportive of a PUD deviation from the City Code for three reasons. First, east of Street EE is the future Autumn Path that is designated a minor collector which requires limited access. Second, there are gas line easements both north and south of Street EE which limits the number of street crossings. Third, the future Autumn Path to the east and the regional trail to the north would provide emergency vehicles additional access to a number of lots on Street EE. The temporary cul -de -sac on Street B would provide a future street connection to the Brucker property. It is in this area where a temporary connection to Bonaire would be created to permit development of Phase 4S. Conditions of approval recognize this connection is temporary only, as it does not meet spacing requirements and would only be installed if Autumn Path could not be constructed to facilitate development in a timely manner. The temporary cul -de -sacs on northwest side of Street E and the west side of Street G will serve as street accesses to the former LaFarve homestead when that property develops. All local streets will meet the City standard of a 60 foot wide right -of -way, 32 foot wide street curb -to -curb, and a sidewalk on one side of the street. Staff is supportive of the local street system as designed. Due to the number of wetlands and the location of pipeline easements, access to site buildable area is compromised. Staff believes the road and lot configuration provides enough developable lots to be economically viable while balancing impacts on the site natural resources and not compromising public safety. A Lennar has revised the plans of the Street S cul -de -sac since the Planning Commission meeting to install a sidewalk from the cul -de -sac to the regional trail through Outlot D as recommend. Wetlands The property has twenty (20) existing waterbodies: two of which are designated as a wetland and a lake. The City's Wetland Management Plan (WMP) classifies wetlands into four categories in decreasing quality: preserve, manage 1, manage 2, and manage 3. Of the twenty wetlands, four (4) wetlands are labeled preserve, zero wetlands are manage 1, eleven (11) wetlands are manage 2, and five (5) wetlands are manage 3. The higher quality the wetland category, the larger the wetland buffers required by the WMP. Additionally, the higher the quality the more effort required to avoid impacts, and the larger amount of wetland mitigation required if impacts cannot be avoided. WMP Table IX -1: Wetland Management and Protection Requirements is attached to the Executive Summary and describes the standards for each type of wetlands. There are four (4) wetlands impacted by the proposed preliminary plat, three (3) wetlands are completely filled and will not exist after the project, and one (1) has a small impact on the northwest edge with the majority of the wetlands remaining. The partially impacted wetland is classified as manage 2 , while two (2) of the fully impacted wetlands are manage 2 and the remaining fully impacted wetland is manage 3. Staff believes that the preliminary plat is laid out to try to avoid wetland impacts. Further the other site constraints, pipeline easements and their locations, site topography, existing vegetation, size and location of preserve wetlands and lakes, makes total avoidance of wetlands while allowing economical development of the property improbable. Finally, the plan limits impacts that do occur to the lowest quality wetlands. The total wetland impact is 0.42 acres. Under the WMP, manage 2 and manage 3 wetlands require new wetlands created to mitigate the impact at a two to one (2:1) ratio which would require 0.84 acres of new wetlands. Lennar has proposed to fulfill the mitigation through 0.70 acres of new wetlands 0.16 acres of credit through upland wetland buffers for a total of 0.86 acres of mitigation. The Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) recognizes credits through upland buffers and the Rosemount Wetland Management Plan would allow up to 50% of the mitigation through upland buffer. The Lennar proposal provided only about 20% of the mitigation through upland buffer. Staff is supportive of the proposal particularly since an additional buffer credit (the remaining 30 %, or 0.26 acres, allowed) may be considered in the future if all of the created 0.70 acres of wetlands are not deemed acceptable at the end of the five (5) year monitoring period. Staff is supportive of this wetland mitigation design and has prepared a WCA Record of Decision to be approved through the fifth motion recommended above. Development around wetlands requires a conservation easement be placed over the naturally vegetated area around a wetland as a buffer to provide water quality benefits, reduce the risk of erosion, discourage human interference, and provide wildlife habitat. Preserve category wetlands require a seventy -five (75) foot wide buffer, while manage 2 and manage 3 wetlands require only a thirty (30) foot wide buffer. Understanding that all buffers may not be maintained equally around the entire wetland during development, the WMP allows for buffer averaging. Buffer averaging would allow a buffer to be reduced on one side if it is expanded on another side of the wetland. The applicant has prepared two exhibits to request approval of buffer averaging. The first is an exhibit showing 16,292 square feet of buffer impacts caused by roadway and utilities and proposes 39,398 square feet of additional buffer to allow averaging. The second exhibit shows all the wetland buffers that are on individual lots and interior to the lot but not contained within the required ten (10) foot rear yard drainage and utility easement. The applicant is requesting to average this total area of 20,900 square feet of wetland buffer by establishing 68,373 square feet of additional wetland buffer. VA Staff is comfortable approving the wetland buffering associated with the road and utility installation. As mentioned previously, the site is constrained to the point that some wetland impacts, and wetland buffer impacts, are needed to permit a financially feasible development. Staff is also recommending accepting the household wetland buffer average. For similar reasons, development of the site is difficult and prompts some impacts. Further the buffers impacted, and subsequently created, are over and above what was impacted on a per wetland basis. In other words, any wetland where a buffer was reduced has an expanded buffer on its perimeter that is greater than the area impacted. The only exception is in the far north where Street G affects the buffer but the wetland is almost wholly contained on the property to the north. In this instance the developer does not have enough land around the wetland to expand the buffer. Wetland buffer monuments will be installed at the edge of the ten (10) foot rear yard drainage and utility easements to provide a clear, linear edge to maintain the natural wetland buffer vegetation. The ten (10) foot buffer does not further limit homeowner's abilities to develop their property because structures (other than fences) are not allowed within the drainage and utility easement. Additionally, staff has prepared a condition that prohibits fences within wetland buffer and that a conservation easement will be required over the buffer area further reinforcing that no private structures should be placed in the buffer. A recommended condition of approval is that structural setbacks to wetland buffers would be reduced to twenty (20) feet. Shoreland District The development has two lakes that are regulated by the City's Shoreland Ordinance: Mare Pond located on the south side of the development and bisected by Bonaire Path; and Horseshoe Lake on the north side of development. About 75% of the Horseshoe Lake shoreline is located within this development and the remaining shoreline is located on the property to the north. Both lakes are classified as Natural Environmental Waters and require the most strict development standards in the Shoreland Ordinance. Sewered Natural Environmental Waters Develo ment Standards The City's Shoreland Ordinance has been approved by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and any deviations or variances to the Shoreland Ordinance must be approved by the DNR through their planned unit development (PUD) standards. The DNR reviews and approves a PUD based on how much shoreline is publicly owned, how much of the shoreline impact zone (the area within 75 feet of the lakes) is disturbed, and how much open space is within the development. To accommodate these standards, the developer will dedicate a minimum of forty -five (45) feet surrounding the lakes to the City, has limited the grading or other impacts to the shoreline impact zone to less than 50% of the zone, and has proposed only 134 lots within the 1000 feet of the shoreline when 438 lots would be allowed. Based on these considerations, staff is supportive of Lennar's requested PUD standards but conditions the approval of the preliminary plat on the DNR approval. Tree Preservation The City has a Tree Preservation Ordinance that classifies trees into three different categories and has progressively greater replacement rates for the higher value tree types. Trees that are softwoods less than twelve (12) inches in diameter or hardwoods less than six (6) inches in diameter are not significant and do not need to be saved and would not require replacement. Softwoods greater than twelve (12) inches in E:3 Shoreland Ordinance PUD Request Minimum Lot Area 10,000 square feet 9,250 square feet Lot Width 110 feet 75 feet Building Setback from OHWL 150 feet 75 feet Building Setback from Street 20 feet 20 feet Lowest Floor Elevation above OHWL 3 feet 3 feet The City's Shoreland Ordinance has been approved by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and any deviations or variances to the Shoreland Ordinance must be approved by the DNR through their planned unit development (PUD) standards. The DNR reviews and approves a PUD based on how much shoreline is publicly owned, how much of the shoreline impact zone (the area within 75 feet of the lakes) is disturbed, and how much open space is within the development. To accommodate these standards, the developer will dedicate a minimum of forty -five (45) feet surrounding the lakes to the City, has limited the grading or other impacts to the shoreline impact zone to less than 50% of the zone, and has proposed only 134 lots within the 1000 feet of the shoreline when 438 lots would be allowed. Based on these considerations, staff is supportive of Lennar's requested PUD standards but conditions the approval of the preliminary plat on the DNR approval. Tree Preservation The City has a Tree Preservation Ordinance that classifies trees into three different categories and has progressively greater replacement rates for the higher value tree types. Trees that are softwoods less than twelve (12) inches in diameter or hardwoods less than six (6) inches in diameter are not significant and do not need to be saved and would not require replacement. Softwoods greater than twelve (12) inches in E:3 diameter and hardwood trees between six (6) and twenty six (26) inches in diameter are significant trees. It is expected that some significant trees would be removed during development and 25% of the total site caliper inches of significant trees can be removed without replacement. The significant tree caliper inches removed beyond 25% of the total need to be replaced at a rate of 0.5 calipers inches per 1.0 caliper inches removed. Hardwood trees twenty seven (27) inches in diameter or greater are classified as heritage trees and all are encouraged to be preserved. No heritage trees can be removed without replacement and the replacement trees removed must be replaced at a rate of 1.0 caliper inch per 1.0 caliper inches removed. Lennar had originally proposed to remove seven heritage trees. The Tree Preservation Ordinance (11 -6 -3 E.8.a.) requires all practical alternatives be taken to save heritage trees. The Planning Commission recommended that three significant trees ( #5053 on Lot 28, Block 10; #10783 on the edge of Pond 8; and #12316 on the boundary of Lots 25 and 26, Block 10) on the edge of the grading boundary be saved by changing the grading boundary. Lennar has revised the grading plans to save these three heritage trees totaling 95 inches and additional 88 inches of significant trees which reduces the planting of 61 replacement trees. Tree Preservation 1,790 inches of tree replacement is required for the trees that are removed for the development. The development of 158 lots requires that the developer plant one tree per lot at a minimum two (2) caliper inches per tree. This landscape requirement has a total of 316 caliper inches. The total tree installation requirement for the development is 2,106 caliper inches. The applicant proposes to install 686 trees for a total 2,106 caliper inches. The distribution of tree types is in the table below. Trees Installed by the Developer Tree Type Significant Trees Heritage Trees Total Inches 18,975 671 Inches Removed 8,072 126 Removal Allowance 4,744 n/a Replacement Required 3,328 126 Replacement Ratio 0.5/1.0 1.0/1.0 Inches of Replacement Required 1,664 126 1,790 inches of tree replacement is required for the trees that are removed for the development. The development of 158 lots requires that the developer plant one tree per lot at a minimum two (2) caliper inches per tree. This landscape requirement has a total of 316 caliper inches. The total tree installation requirement for the development is 2,106 caliper inches. The applicant proposes to install 686 trees for a total 2,106 caliper inches. The distribution of tree types is in the table below. Trees Installed by the Developer Tree Type Size Number Caliper Inches Ornamentals 2 inches 55 110 inches Deciduous 2 inches 158 316 inches Deciduous 3 inches 266 798 inches Deciduous 4 inches 76 304 inches Coniferous 6 -8 ft tall 3.5 in 51 178 inches Coniferous 10 -12 ft tall 5 in 80 400 inches Total n/a 686 21106 inches Landscaping The City Code requires that one tree be installed per single family lot developed, which would require 158 trees at a minimum size of two (2) caliper inches. Because of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, the developer is also required to install an additional 1,790 caliper inches of trees which they are fulfilling through planting 528 trees resulting in a total of 686 trees being planted. The landscape design for the subdivision will generally plant two trees per lot and focus the remaining landscaping to the Bacardi Avenue and Bonaire Path accesses, the City park and the edges of the development. Staff is supportive of landscape 0 plan but has provided two recommended conditions. First, that the trees be planted outside of the public right -of -way (except for the entry medians) and are to be maintained by the individual homeowners. Second, that the trees be planted in locations that do not interfere with the public infrastructure. Stormwater Management This property is unlike many of the recent developments within the City. The City requires that stormwater systems have both a ponding (retention) and infiltration system. On most properties within Rosemount, the sandy soils provide adequate infiltration to meet the City requirement. On this property, the clay soils do not infiltrate stormwater adequately to meet the City standards. The developer has found only one area (rear yards of Lots 12 through 29, Block 5) on the eastern boundary of the property that appears to have sandy enough soils to provide infiltration. A percolation test needs to be conducted to confirm that the infiltration requirements can be met. Results from the developer's soil borings indicate that favorable percolation test results will be obtained. The developer recognizes that they need a strategy to get the site stormwater to the infiltration area. Upon full completion of the development, the majority of the site would flow by gravity to the infiltration basin, but Streets G, K, and EE would flow towards Horseshoe Lake without infiltration. In order to meet the infiltration requirements for this area and the site, it will be necessary to install a storm lift station from Horseshoe Lake to the infiltration area. In addition, the City's Surface Water Management Plan identifies the future development of a system to facilitate drainage from properties west and north of the property to Horseshoe Lake. The need to accommodate this stormwater and the intent to construct a lift station from Horseshoe Lake to the south has been discussed with the developer. The cost of this system from Horseshoe Lake to Mare Pond will be funded by the City and the system between the City force main and the developer's infiltration basin will funded by the developer. Additionally, the stormwater lift station will not be available until Phase 2 and therefore there is no infiltration during Phase 1. To address that issue, until the stormwater lift station is constructed, annually Lennar will need to measure the water elevation in Horseshoe Lake and pump a determined volume of water from the lake above the normal water level into the infiltration area through a portable pump. The remaining components of the stormwater system are generally acceptable. It appears there are some emergency overflows that need to be evaluated at a finer scale than 2 foot contour grading plans can provide, but that should not impact the layout of the lots or roads within the preliminary plat. Detailed stormwater comments from the City Engineer have been provided to Lennar's design engineer, Westwood. Parkland and Regional Trail Corridor The City Code requires that parkland be dedicated to the City at a rate of one (1) acre of land per twenty five (25) units developed. Lennar's proposed 158 unit preliminary plat would require 6.32 acres of parkland. Lennar is proposing to meet this requirement through the dedication of approximately 8 acre park on the south shore of Horseshoe Lake, but Lennar will not receive full credit for the 8 acres because much of the parkland has limitation due to gas line easements or wetland buffers or because it was purchased through Dakota County funds. The result would be a dedication credit for 0.65 acre leaving 5.67 acres of dedication being paid through fee in lieu of parkland dedication. The Horseshoe Land Park contains a connection to Street EE at the intersection of Street E, a minimum of a 45 foot wide corridor around the lake, and includes the island in the eastern half of the lake. The park is intended to be more passive than active recreation and will not contain a soccer or baseball field. The Parks and Recreation Commission will design the final park plan and determine the final parkland dedication. 10 A gravel or wood chip trail is proposed along the west, south and east shore of Horseshoe Lake and the Parks and Recreation Commission has recommended a floating boardwalk to the island within the lake. The previous owner had installed a gravel path about 10 feet wide all the way around the lake. Lennar is proposing to grade and develop portions of the existing trail but the trail can be relocated to the 45 foot buffer around the lake. The adopted regional Rosemount Interpretive Trail corridor is identified to run from the intersection of Bacardi Avenue and Bonaire Path in the southwest corner of the development to the park along the south shore of the lake. This trail will be a segment for the regional trail connecting Downtown Rosemount with the future Flint Hills Athletic Fields located at the northeast corner of Akron Avenue and Bonaire Path. To assist the development of this regional trail, Dakota County is using its funds or leveraging other funds to purchase the land around the trail alignment. Dakota County will be purchasing easements over Oudot D and Oudot E and then Klein Bank will transfer ownership of these two oudots to the City upon the recording of the Final Plat. Dakota County will be purchasing a shoreland easement over the buffer around Horseshoe Lake and a greenway easement Oudot D and the rest of Oudot E. The shoreland easement would have limitations for only passive recreation, water oriented or stormwater uses. The greenway easements would be less restrictive and would allow most public uses including sanitary sewer, stormwater or municipal water uses. Dakota County staff is recommending that the construction funds for the regional trail be placed in the County's Greenway CIP for 2015 or 2016. Dakota County has also stated that they will take over maintenance of the greenway once a regionally significant portion of the trail is constructed beyond the Bella Vista development. Rezoning and Planned Unit Development Lennar requests to rezone the property to R1 PUD: Low Density Residential Planned Unit Development. The property has a comprehensive plan designation of LDR: Low Density Residential and the description of LDR on page 66 of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan states the R1 is the appropriate zoning. The Zoning Ordinance states that a PUD is appropriate when the area is larger than ten (10) acres and contains unusual physical features of the property itself or of the surrounding neighborhood such that development as a PUD will conserve a physical or topographic feature of importance to the neighborhood or community. The Bella Vista proposal with its twenty wetlands and two lakes contains the environmental features that the City desires to conserve. PUD Standards Larger than 10 Acres? Yes Conserves Environmental Features? Yes Within the Density allowed in the Comprehensive Plan 1 to 5 units/ac)? Yes 2.06 Subdivision Modifications to Increase Conservation? Yes Setback reductions to Mitigate Impacts? Yes Legal Authority A preliminary plat and rezoning request is a Quasi - Judicial decision for the City Council meaning that the City Council is acting as a judge to determine if the regulations within the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance are being followed or if the Code deviation requested within the Planned Unit Development is appropriate. The Comprehensive Plan states that R1 proper zoning for the 11 property. The zoning area deviations are less than a 10% reduction from the City Code and the setback deviations are less than 20% reduction and staff finds this appropriate in exchange for 45% (66 acre) of the development and 100% of the shoreline in public ownership to preserve the lake, shoreline, tree stands and wetlands. Additional Public Works, Parks and Recreation, and Fire Marshall Comments The City Engineer's, Park and Recreation Director's, and Fire Marshall's Memorandums are attached to this Executive Summary. The major issues raised in these memorandums are included within the Executive Summary. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve of the Zoning Ordinance; Preliminary Plat; Planned Unit Development (PUD) Master Development Plan with Rezoning to R -1 PUD: Low Density Residential Planned Unit Development; PUD Agreement; and WCA Record of Decision. 12 City of Rosemount Ordinance No. B- 228 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE B CITY OF ROSEMOUNT ZONING ORDINANCE Bella Vista THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance B, adopted September 19, 1989, entitled "City of Rosemount Zoning Ordinance," is hereby amended to rezone property from AG — Agricultural to R -1 PUD — Low Density Residential Planned Unit Development that is located north of Bonaire Path and east of Bacardi Avenue within the City of Rosemount legally described as follows: Outlot A, MALLARD POND 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, DAKOTA COUNTY, Minnesota. Section 2. The Zoning Map of the City of Rosemount, referred to and described in said Ordinance No. B as that certain map entitled "Zoning Map of the City of Rosemount," shall not be republished to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the said zoning map on file in the Clerk's office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this Ordinance and all of the notation references and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made part of this Ordinance. Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. ENACTED AND ORDAINED into an Ordinance this 16`'' day of July, 2013. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT William H. Droste, Mayor ATTEST: Amy Domeier, City Clerk Published in the Rosemount Town Pages this day of , 2013. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2013 - 63 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR BELLA VISTA WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount received a request for Preliminary Plat approval from Lennar Corporation concerning property legally described as: Oudot A, MALLARD POND 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, DAKOTA COUNTY, Minnesota. WHEREAS, on May 28, 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount held a public hearing and reviewed the requested application; and WHEREAS, on May 28, 2013, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested applications, subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, on July 2 and July 16, 2013, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the Preliminary Plat for Bella Vista, subject to the following conditions: 1. Recording of a Master Development Plan Planned Unit Development Agreement at the time of Final Plat recording. 2. Approval of the Wetland Conservation Act Record of Decision by the City Council. 3. PUD deviation for Street EE for a cul -de -sac length up to 1,050 feet and direct access of up to 20 single family lots. 4. Phase 1 and 2 can be developed with access from Street H and Bacardi Avenue. 5. Phase 3 cannot be developed until one of the following roadway connections occur: a. Autumn Path is constructed to the intersection of Street E; b. The temporary access is constructed across Lot 15, Block 6 from the south cul -de- sac of street B to Bonaire Path to the City standards for a 34 foot wide back -to- back design; c. Or Street B is constructed to Bonaire Path through the exception parcel(s). 6. Phase 4S cannot be developed until one of the roadway connections for Phase 3 is constructed and the temporary sanitary sewer lift station should be installed concurrently. 7. Phase 4N cannot be developed until the entirety of Autumn Path is constructed and the temporary sanitary sewer lift station is installed. Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 are unbuildable until Street G is constructed to the west and the temporary cul -de -sac is removed. 8. Lot 10, Block 5 is unbuildable until Autumn Path to the east is constructed. 9. Lots 14 and 15, Block 6 are unbuildable until Street B is constructed to the west and the temporary cul -de -sac is removed. 10. Lot 1, Block 3 and Lot 1, Block 10 are unbuildable until Street E is constructed to the north and the sanitary sewer is provided from the north. 11. The grading plan shall be modified to accommodate the Bella Vista Revised Wetland Mitigation plan dated June 26, 2013. 12. Drainage and utility easements with storm sewer infrastructure may contain fences but shall be required to include gates to provide truck access; shall prohibit sheds or other accessory structures; and shall prohibit landscaping that would impede drainage. RESOLUTION 2013 -63 13. Conservation easements shall be recorded over all wooded areas, wetlands, wetland buffers, stormwater ponds, and stormwater buffer strips. Fences are not allowed in conservation easements. 14. An eight (8) inch sanitary sewer stub shall be extended from the manhole over the existing manhole in Bacardi Avenue into the outlot in a location south of the future City well. 15. Create and record a restrictive covenant on the retaining wall located on private property that ensures that it is the homeowners cost and responsibility to maintain the retaining walls. 16. Payment of $8,715 for the prorated portion of the 42 -52 AUAR costs. 17. It is understood that this preliminary plat includes multiple phases that may occur over a number of years. Upon recording of one final plat within the first year of preliminary plat approval the preliminary plat will be valid for all subsequent plat phases; so long as each subsequent final plat phase must be consistent with this preliminary plat. 18. Approval of the Shoreland Ordinance Planned Unit Development by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 19. Compliance with the conditions and standards within the City Engineer's Memorandum dated July 11, 2013. 20. Compliance with the conditions and standards within the Park and Recreation Director's Memorandum dated June 13, 2013. 21. Compliance with the conditions and standards within the Fire Marshall's Memorandum dated May 20, 2013. ADOPTED this 16`' day of July, 2013, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. ATTEST: Amy Domeier, City Clerk William H. Droste, Mayor 2 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2013 - 64 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH REZONING FOR BELLA VISTA WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an application from Lennar Corporation requesting a planned unit development (PUD) master development plan with rezoning concerning property legally described as: Outlot A, MALLARD POND 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, DAKOTA COUNTY, Minnesota. WHEREAS, on May 28, 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount held a public hearing and reviewed the requested application; and WHEREAS, on May 28, 2013, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested applications, subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, on July 2 and July 16, 2013, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Master Development Plan of Bella Vista and the Rezoning from AG — Agricultural to R1 PUD — Low Density Residential Planned Unit Development, subject to: 1. Deviations from the R -1 zoning district are granted to allow a 75 foot minimum lot width, 20 foot front yard setbacks for Lots 3 through 5, Block 2; Lot 1, Block 3; Lots 1 through 5, Block 4; and Lots 1 through 4, Block 11 with wetland buffers; 25 foot front yard setbacks for all remaining lots; 7.5 foot side yard setbacks; and 9,250 square foot minimum lot size. 2. Deviation for Street EE for a cul -de -sac length up to 1,050 feet and direct access of up to 20 single family lots. 3. Approval of the Wetland Conservation Act Record of Decision by the City Council. 4. The home design front elevation shall include a minimum of three and a half (3.5) feet of brick or stone wainscoting, excluding doors, windows or the wall behind the front porch; a front porch with railing that extends at least 30% of the width of the front elevation, including the garage; a side entry garage; or no more than 70% lap siding, excluding doors and windows. 5. No trees shall be installed in the street right -of -way. All trees installed on private lots shall be installed between the house and the street right -of -way. 6. Trees installed on individual lots shall be planted in a location that does not interfere with curb stops or individual sewer or water connections. 7. Relocate any landscaping within the 25 foot sight triangles at intersection of Street H and Bacardi Avenue. 8. Wetland buffer averaging is allowed for the roadway and lot buffer averaging analysis. All areas within the wetland buffers that do not have natural vegetation shall be seeded and established with a wetland buffer seed mix. RESOLUTION 2013 -64 Conservation easements shall be recorded over all wooded areas, wetlands, wetland buffers, stormwater ponds, and stormwater buffer strips. Fences are not allowed in conservation easements. 10. Structural setbacks for lots with wetland buffers located on them are reduced to twenty (20) feet from the wetland buffer. 11. Fences are not allowed in wetland buffers. 12. Minimum building setbacks from the OHWL mark of Horseshoe Lake and Mare Pond shall be 75 feet. 13. Payment of $8,715 for the prorated portion of the 42 -52 AUAR costs. 14. Approval of the Shoreland Ordinance Planned Unit Development by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 15. Compliance with the conditions and standards within the City Engineer's Memorandum dated July 11, 2013 including charges associated with road construction within the project and adjacent to the project and removal of temporary infrastructure. 16. Compliance with the conditions and standards within the Park and Recreation Director's Memorandum dated June 13, 2013. 17. Compliance with the conditions and standards within the Fire Marshall's Memorandum dated May 20, 2013. ADOPTED this 16`h day of July, 2013, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. William H. Droste, Mayor ATTEST: Amy Domeier, City Clerk DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS BELLA VISTA MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS DECLARATION made this 16th day of July, 2013, by U.S. Home Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Declarant "); WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of the real property as described on Attachment One, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Subject Property "); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is subject to certain zoning and land use restrictions imposed by the City of Rosemount (hereinafter referred to as the "City ") in connection with the approval of an application for a master development plan planned unit development for a residential development on the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the City has approved such development on the basis of the determination by the City Council of the City that such development is acceptable only by reason of the details of the development proposed and the unique land use characteristics of the proposed use of the Subject Property; and that but for the details of the development proposed and the unique land use characteristics of such proposed use, the master development plan planned unit development would not have been approved; and WHEREAS, as a condition of approval of the master development plan planned unit development, the City has required the execution and filing of this Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (hereinafter the "Declaration "); and WHEREAS, to secure the benefits and advantages of approval of such planned unit development, Declarant desires to subject the Subject Property to the terms hereof. NOW, THEREFORE, the Declarant declares that the Subject Property is, and shall be, held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions, hereinafter set forth. 1. The use and development of the Subject Property shall conform to the following documents, plans and drawings: a. City Resolution No. 2013-, Attachment Two b. Development Plan/Overall Preliminary Plat (Revised 06/06/2013), Attachment Three C. Preliminary Plat (Sheets 4 and 5 of 38; Revised 06/06/2013), Attachments Four and Five d. Preliminary Grading Plans, (Sheets 6 through 14 of 38; Revised 06/06/2013), Attachments Six through Fourteen e. Preliminary Utility Plans (Sheets 15 and 16 of 36; Revised 06/06/2013), Attachments Fifteen and Sixteen £ Preliminary Landscape Plans (Sheets 17 through 20 of 36; Revised 06/06/2011), Attachments Seventeen through Twenty g. Temporary Access for Phase 3 and 4 Plans, Attachments Twenty One through Twenty Four 2 h. Bella Vista Revised Wetland Mitigation dated June 26, 2013, Attachments Twenty Five through Thirty Two i. Buffer Averaging Analysis, Attachment Thirty Three j. Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision, Attachments Thirty Four through Thirty Seven. all of which attachments are copies of original documents on file with the City and are made a part hereof. 2. Development and maintenance of structures and uses on the Subject Property shall conform to the following standards and requirements: a. Maintenance of the stormwater basin, infiltration basin and associated stormwater infrastructure necessary for the long term operation and function will be performed by the City. All other maintenance including but not limited to garbage collection, or landscape replacement or the like shall be the responsibility of the of the private property owners. All maintenance of the stormwater basin and infiltration basin shall be the responsibility of the City after the basins have been established. b. Maintenance and replacement of trees and landscaping other than that associated with the stormwater basin and infiltration basin described in standard a. shall be the responsibility of the adjoining homeowners' association. C. The home design front elevation shall include a minimum of three and a half (3.5) feet of brick or stone wainscoting, excluding doors, windows or the wall behind the front porch; a front porch with railing that extends at least 30% of the width of the front elevation, including the garage; a side entry garage; or no more than 70% lap siding, excluding doors and windows. 3 e. Fences are not allowed in wetland buffers. f. All areas within the wetland buffers that do not have natural vegetation shall be seeded and established with a wetland buffer seed mix. 3. The Subject Property may only be developed and used in accordance with Paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Declaration unless the owner first secures approval by the City Council of an amendment to the planned unit development plan or a rezoning to a zoning classification that permits such other development and use. 4. In connection with the approval of development of the Subject Property, the following deviations from City Zoning or Subdivision Code provisions were approved: a. Section 11 -4 -5 F. 1. R -1 Minimum Lot Area: The minimum lot area shall be 9,250 square feet. b. Section 11 -4 -5 F. 2. R -1 Minimum Lot Width: The minimum lot width shall be 75 feet. C. Section 11 -4 -5 F. 4. R -1 Minimum Front Yard Setback: The minimum front yard setback shall be 20 feet for Lots 3 through 5, Block 2; Lot 1, Block 3; Lots 1 through 5, Block 4; and Lots 1 through 4, Block 11 with wetland buffers. d. Section 11 -4 -5 F. 4. R -1 Minimum Front Yard Setback: The minimum front yard setback shall be 25 feet for all lots other than those specifically listed above in subsection c. e. Section 11 -4 -5 F. 5. R -1 Minimum Side Yard Setback: The minimum side yard setback shall be 7.5 feet. f. Section 11 -7 -2 C. Building Setback from OHWL: The building setback from the OHWL of Mare Pond and Horseshoe Lake shall be a minimum of 75 feet. 11 g. Section 12 -3 -1 K. Cul -de -Sac Length and Units: Street EE may be constructed with a cul -de -sac length up to 1,050 feet and direct access of up to 20 single family lots. h. Comprehensive Wetland Management Plan Section IX. B. Structural Setback from Wetland Buffers: The structural setback for lots containing wetland buffers shall be a minimum of 20 feet. In all other respects the use and development of the Subject Property shall conform to the requirements of the Paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Declaration and the City Code of Ordinances. 5. This Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions provides only the Subject Property only master development plan planned unit development approval. Prior to the improvement or development of the Subject Property, beyond the rough grading, a final development plan planned unit development approval pursuant to Zoning Code Section 11 -10 -6 C. 5. of the Subject Property is required and an addendum filed with County Recorder to this Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. 6. The obligations and restrictions of this Declaration run with the land of the Subject Property and shall be enforceable against the Declarant, its successors and assigns, by the City of Rosemount acting through its City Council. This Declaration may be amended from time to time by a written amendment executed by the City and the owner or owners of the lot or lots to be affected by said amendment. 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned as duly authorized agents, officers or representatives of Declarant have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. DECLARANT U.S. HOME CORPORATION 3 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF ) Its The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2013, by , the , for and on behalf of a by and on behalf of said THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 2875 145TH STREET WEST ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068 651- 423 -4411 on Notary Public Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit (LGU) Address City of Rosemount 2875 145th St W Rosemount, MN 55068 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Application Lennar - Joe Jablonski Bella Vista (AKA Marshes of Application Number Bloomfield) 5/9/2013 1916 -930 ® Attach site locator map. Type of Decision: ❑ Wetland Boundary or Type ❑ No -Loss ❑ Exemption ❑ Sequencing ® Replacement Plan ❑ Banking Plan I echmcal Evaluation Fanel t mdmas and Kecommendation (it ❑ Approve ® Approve with conditions ❑ Deny Summary (or attach): A TEP meeting was held on June 29, 2011 with the previous application. The TEP Findings of Fact and summary notes were included in the May 9, 2013 permit application. The TEP met again on May 29, 2013. The meeting notes are attached. During the application review process, the wetland mitigation plans changed two include two mitigation areas adjacent to Wetland M in the southeast corner of the site. This information was provided to the TEP for review. In an email dated June 27, 2013 and July 1, 2013, the SWCD and BWSR respectively indicated they did not have any comments on the revised mitigation plan. 2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT DECISION Date of Decision: Anticipated July 16, 2013 ❑ Approved ® Approved with conditions (include below) ❑ Denied LGU Findings and Conclusions (attach additional sheets as necessary): BWSR Forms 7 -1 -10 Pagel of 3 Lennar is proposing the construction of the Bella Vista Planned Unit Development in Rosemount, MN, on 142 acres within the NE 1/4 of Section 21 and SE 1/4 of Section 16, Range 19 West, Township 115 North. The construction of the development is proposed to impact 0.42 acres of wetland consisting of both Type 2 and Type 3 wetlands. The project will be required to replace the wetlands at a 2:1 ratio (0.84 acres). Mitigation for the Bella Vista wetland impact is proposed via concurrent on -site project - specific replacement. Mitigation is proposed in two areas around Wetland M and its associated buffer. Mitigation M1 will extend Wetland M to the north and create 0.31 acres of new wetland (0.23 acres eligible for replacement). Mitigation M2 will extend Wetland M to the southwest and create 0.63 acres of new wetland (0.47 acres eligible for replacement). Wetland buffer around the Wetland M /mitigation complex will provide 0.57 acres of buffer - 50% is eligible for credit providing 0.28 acres of eligible credit. The applicant is seeking 0.16 acres of credit. Summary of Wetland Replacement Credits • Wetland Creation — - Mitigation Ml: 0.31 acre at 75% = 0.23 acre - Mitigation M2: 0.63 acre at 75% = 0.47acre - Buffer: 0.57 acres at 50% = 0.28 acres - TOTAL CREDIT: 0.98 The total required mitigation for Bella Vista 0.84 acres. The Bella Vista Replacement Plan provides 0.98 acres of replacement credits; therefore there is an surplus of 0.14 acres of credit. While the applicant has only requested 0.86 acres of credit, the project is eligible for 0.98 acres of credit per the WCA. The applicant is not applying to deposit surplus credits in the State Wetland Bank. Buffers are being incorporated into the design of the project to meet the City of Rosemount Wetland Management Plan and the WCA. The WCA requires upland buffer around mitigation sites to be at least 25 feet. The proposed buffer around the mitigation sites meets or exceeds this requirement in most areas, but is below 25 feet in a a few small areas. Based on discussions with the TEP, this requirement can be waived since overall more buffer is being implemented than required. Only WCA credit has been proposed around the mitigation area where buffers exceed 25 feet. The Bella Vista application dated May 9, 2013 and revised June 26, 2013 is approved on the following conditions: 1. The WCA Deed Forms are recorded for the mitigation areas and the mitigation area buffer prior to construction starting. These forms must be provided to the City. 2. The monitoring, maintenance, and performance standards provided in the application are adhered to for the duration of the monitoring period as defined by MN Rule 8420 and within the application, as amended. 3. The vegetation performance standards dated May 30, 2013 are incorporated into this approval and are revised so that in Year 5 of the monitoring, there will be 80% cover of native, non - invasive vegetation rather than the 60% indicated in the May 30, 2013 submittal. 4. The applicant submits a letter of credit or cash escrow, as per MN Rule 8420.0522 Supb. 9, in the amount of $65,000 to be held until certification of successful replacement and the completion of monitoring, as per MN Rule 8420.0820, to ensure successful replacement. For Replacement Plans using credits from the State Wetland Bank: Bank Account # Bank Service Area County Credits Approved for Withdrawal (sq. ft. or nearest .01 acre) BWSR Forms 7 -1 -10 Page 2 of 3 Replacement Plan Approval Conditions. In addition to any conditions specified by the LGU, the approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan is conditional upon the following: ® Financial Assurance: For project - specific replacement that is not in- advance, a financial assurance specified by the LGU must be submitted to the LGU in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 (List amount and type in LGU Findings). ® Deed Recording: For project - specific replacement, evidence must be provided to the LGU that the BWSR "Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants" and "Consent to Replacement Wetland" forms have been filed with the county recorder's office in which the replacement wetland is located. ❑ Credit Withdrawal: For replacement .consisting of wetland bank credits, confirmation that BWSR has withdrawn the credits from the state wetland bank as specified in the approved replacement plan. Wetlands may not be impacted until all applicable conditions have been met! LGU Authorized Signature: Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 5 provides notice that a decision was made by the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. If additional details on the decision exist, they have been provided to the landowner and are available from the LGU upon request. Name Title Signature Date Phone Number and E -mail July 16, 2013 THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT. Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. Applicants proceed at their own risk if work authorized by this decision is started before the time period for appeal (30 days) has expired. If this decision is reversed or revised under appeal, the applicant may be responsible for restoring or replacing all wetland impacts. This decision is valid for three years from the date of decision unless a longer period is advised by the TEP and specified in this notice of decision. 3. APPEAL OF THIS DECISION Pursuant to MN Rule 8420.0905, any appeal of this decision can only be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal, including applicable fee, within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice to the following as indicated: Check one: ❑ Appeal of an LGU staff decision. Send ® Appeal of LGU governing body decision. Send petition and $ fee (if applicable) to: petition and $500 filing fee to: Executive Director Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, NIN 55155 4. LIST OF ADDRESSEES ® SWCD TEP member: Dave Holmen ® BWSR TEP member: Dennis Rodacker BWSR Forms 7 -1 -10 Page 3 of 3 Z LGU TEP member (if different than LGU Contact): Eric Zweber ® DNR TEP member: Melissa Doperalski ® DNR Regional Office (if different than DNR TEP member) ® WD or WMO (if applicable): Mark Zabel, Vermillion River Watershed JPO ® Applicant and Landowner (if different) ❑ Members of the public who requested notice: ® Corps of Engineers Project Manager ❑ BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator (wetland bank plan decisions only) 5. MAILING INFORMATION ➢For a list of BWSR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/workareas/WCA areas.pdf ➢For a list of DNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us /wetlands /wca/DNR TEP contacts.pdf ➢Department of Natural Resources Reaional Offices: NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. 1201 E. Hwy. 2 1200 Warner Road 261 Hwy. 15 South NE Grand Rapids, MN 55744 St. Paul, MN 55106 New Ulm, MN 56073 Bemidji, MN 56601 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr re ig ons.pdf ➢For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www.mvp.usace.army.mil /re ug latory /default.asp ?paaeid =687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District, ATTN: OP -R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 55101 -1678 ➢For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 6. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the site locator map, list any other attachments: ® June 5, 2013 REVISED TEP Meeting Memo (WSB) ® May 30, 2013 Wetland Performance Standards (Westwood) ® June 25, 2013 Revised Mitigation Memo (Westwood) ® Temporary Road plan sheet BWSR Forms 7 -1 -10 Page 4 of 3 a E s _ ,r rj A, M .f a k 3 t f,� a 9 9 9 one C,t °y S A r � • � Y - 777 ,. y�• v} y � ' J« f � a f _ w _ i y - LP w _ ice j T ' ieen Be t m •- �` '— - R SE 3'k v a a ROSEMOUNT i _ y r ata Sources ): USA Topo Maps, MnDOT BaseM ap Roads for Dakota County (2010, Westwood (2013). Marshes of Bloomfield Rosemount, Minnesota wakwood RoU.ubnat StrAm Inc. 7699 A -9— 0— Ed.. P --, M %5 PHO f 952- 937.5150 N , , Site Location & USGS Topography FAX 952.9375922 Feet Tp1FREE 1898937.5150 VVestwymd Y WesbvoAPICWI 0 3,000 EXHIBIT 1 �a 9s IData Source (s): MnG EO WMS (2012), Westwood (2013). uwuwooe rro e; tesswM( seMa (M, 7899 Anagram 0- tr .Prairie, NN 53344 Westwood PHONE 952-937 -5150 ' FAX 952- 937 -5872 Feet MLLFWE 7888- 937.SirA ,,,w,,,, �„.d>n.,— 0 400 ��v e �a 9s IData Source (s): MnG EO WMS (2012), Westwood (2013). uwuwooe rro e; tesswM( seMa (M, 7899 Anagram 0- tr .Prairie, NN 53344 Westwood PHONE 952-937 -5150 ' FAX 952- 937 -5872 Feet MLLFWE 7888- 937.SirA ,,,w,,,, �„.d>n.,— 0 400 0 Marshes of Bloomfield Rosemount, Minnesota Wetland Boundaries EXHIBIT 2 i UM"D mm ol Ed F-I ME7LAAO X 75X (NO WRC( WED FM9UfFFA) L7� ME7LAAO X 75X (NO WRC( WED FM9UfFFA) F- L a Leg-d '0 l5) I 3 , A � �! a rn.eo rnwmwr 'I !Q , ED 0 . Q Q � Q w �b�Q1 Alma � F L tt\ . \ it C ° Naaw,. w�mr rnsm,c cx.� (rml 8 � w11GIlIOV �MFi �__._ 93(1 a ; i v i �. "' "" i i i i i i i i i 00 0' ZO' 40' w ooaaeene]Cen M1le rt 0 15" W K5 V ,V Aix., I A EX. 18" FES ? i w, IE=955.68 WETLAND M EX. 12" FES 7 17 17 1 A4-2 IE=954.69 V '7 p NKL = 957.0 ....... ...... ............ 177 ... .. --FX' 15" FFI,- ------------------ Legmd _o B_ L EU El 970 % - - TRAIL aE'VA PM rswc MRW ]ION AREA gm ... ..... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - --- ------------------ Legmd _o B_ L EU El 970 % - - TRAIL aE'VA PM rswc MRW ]ION AREA gm M r ,$..;{, engineering • planning • environmental • construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 - 541 -4800 Fax: 763 - 541 -1700 Memorandum To: Dave Holmen, Dakota SWCD* Kelly Kunst, Westwood* Eric Zweber, City of Rosemount* Mark Zabel, VRWMO* Dennis Rodacker, BWSR Jeff Berg, DNR Waters Melissa Doperalski, DNR From: Andi Moffatt, WSB & Associates* Date: June 5, 2013 Re: REVISED Marshes of Bloomfield TEP Meeting Minutes WSB Project No. 1916 -93 A portion of the Rosemount TEP met on May 29, 2013 to discuss the Marshes of Bloomfield wetland application. Those in attendance include those with * by their name above. The following constitutes WSB's understanding of the meeting. If you have edits or additions, please let me know by June 7, 2013: The need for a DNR permit was discussed. In 2011, the DNR indicated that they would waive jurisdiction for this project. It is unclear how official that waiver was and there is now new staff in this position at DNR. Mitigation Site B will include grading below the OHW (952.2) of DNR wetland 19 -12W. Andi will contact the DNR to resolve this issue (message left with DNR). • As part of the municipal road construction with this project, it is anticipated that some storm sewer pipe outfalls may be below the OHW of some DNR wetlands (19- 320W). Westwood will need to provide the plans and design, the City will obtain the DNR permits for these outfalls. This will occur separately from the current Marshes of Bloomfield permit application since these plans have not yet been developed. BWSR indicated in emailed comments that performance standards for the mitigation will need to be provided. Kelly has provided this information dated May 30, 2013. These standards are attached to these meeting minutes for TEP review. These standards generally appear to be in conformance with a Moderate quality wetland per the COE performance standards. However, the LGU will require in Year St. Cloud • Minneapolis • St. Paul Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\01916- 930Wdmin\PermitsV-AEMO - TEP meeting mmut,, - 060513_... I.d. June 5, 2013 Page 2 5 that there be 80% cover of native, non - invasive vegetation rather than the 60% indicated in the submitted performance standards to bring the performance standards into alignment with the Manage 2 wetlands that are being impacted. The future grading of the mitigation sites was discussed. Generally, the contractor grades the whole site and a separate seeding contractor would conduct the seeding. The City will need to review and approve the contractor and plans for the mitigation construction. The City will discuss internally the need for an inspector during mitigation site grading. • BWSR emailed questions about the storm sewer pipes within the proposed mitigation areas. The explanation about the storm sewer system is as follows: M -1 Mitigation (Southwest): The storm sewer system in the M -1 mitigation area is existing outlet control structure from the Bonaire Path water quality treatment pond. The manhole is being used to provided skimming of floatables prior to discharge to the Mare Pond DNR 19 -12W (Wetland B). The pipe diameter change allows for the overflow into the structure prior to using the overland overflow. (See Attached figure) M -2 Mitigation (Southeast): The pipe that is shown on the plans is the existing storm sewer system. This system will be modified to move the outlet control structure south of the mitigation area. The new location of the outlet control structure and storm sewer system is shown in the attached figure. The City had received a letter from the US Corps of Engineers dated April 14, 2011 indicating that they did not have jurisdiction over the wetlands within the development. The group discussed that some areas of the buffer around the mitigation areas did not meet the WCA 25 foot requirements. However, other areas of the buffer are greater than 25 feet. The 25 foot standard can be waived by the LGU with input from the TEP. The group and the City agreed that the buffers as shown on the plans are reasonable and the 25 foot requirement did not have to be met on the south side of the mitigation areas. • The application is anticipated to be reviewed by the City Council at the June 18 meeting. The deadline for the Council packet is June 10. This constitutes WSB's understanding the meeting. If you have comments or changes, please let me know by June 7, 2013. K:b 1916- 930Wdmin\PermitsNEMO - TEP meeting minutes - 060513 re, Ld- LJ .1.21. �_•••J MEMORANDUM Date: May 30, 2013 Re: Marshes Replacement Wetland Performance Standards Westwood File 0000586.00 To: Andi Moffat, City of Rosemount c/o WSB Engineering Eric Zweber, City of Rosemount Dennis Rodacker, Minnesota BWSR Brian Watson and Mark Zabel, Dakota County SWCD Melissa Doperalski, Minnesota DNR Cc: Joe Jablonski, Lennar Fran Hagen, Westwood Professional Services From: Kelly Kunst, Westwood Professional Services 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952- 937 -5150 FAX 952- 937 -5822 TOLL FREE 888 - 937 -5150 www.westwoodps.com This letter is in response to comments from the Minnesota BWSR on the Wetland Replacement Plan Application for the Marshes of Bloomfield Project dated May 9, 2013 concerning the lack of performance standards associated with the Wetland Replacement Plan. The performance standards noted below are supplemental to the more general performance standards noted in Appendix C of the May 9, 2013 Marshes application. The following performance standards provide specific benchmarks through the five year monitoring period to measure the progress of the mitigation areas in attaining the overall mitigation goal of creating wetland areas that are functioning Type 2/3 wet/sedge meadow, shallow marsh wetlands dominated by native, non - invasive vegetation. Specific site preparation, seeding, and annual maintenance activities are detailed in Appendix C of the Marshes application dated May 9, 2013. Performance Standards Year 1 Cover crop species (if used) should cover exposed portions of the mitigation wetlands at greater than 75% aerial cover. Seedlings of at least two species of the designated seed mix should be present. Land and Energy DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS INNONOMMENINEEN May 30, 2013 Page 2 Year 2 Regularly exposed portions of the mitigation wetlands should have 50% cover of native, non - invasive vegetation. There should be no more than 20% cover of non- native, invasive species. Years 3 to 5 Regularly exposed portions of the mitigation wetlands should have 60% cover of native, non - invasive vegetation. The wetland plant communities should contain at least 25% of all species contained in the specified seed mixes or include a minimum of five native species, whichever is greater. There should be no more than 20% cover of non - native, invasive species. In general, if noxious weeds and invasive non - native species are identified within the wetland replacement areas during the five -year monitoring period, reasonable efforts will be made to control these species using appropriately timed herbicide applications or other methods. While reasonable steps are proposed, it should be recognized that reed canary grass control remains experimental and that effective reed canary grass control cannot be guaranteed. RI � a C �t MH EX. TUB 7.39 MH RE= 978.10 IE (8 ")E= 937.86 IE (15 ")N= 937.39 WETLAND E / / - MH WETLAND D �� / / / TR.+HWL =981.99 \ - ZE�-975.Cr - - - IE= 938.09 — — — — — — — — — — — -L / I I WWEfLA1ND a / 100 YR. "gH"�9 WL-- 99si9 / SNOWMELT HWL-=2 yl �gTM�D ✓ \\ V \ 100 YR. HWL-954. is I - - -- — rr-------- - - - - -- — GAS GAS GAS I 16 D P W.M. MH RE= 969.23 IE SW,NE= 955.87 STUB --� ]E=956.38 MH RE= 967.30 IE= 956.26 GAS — T I GAS POND 6 OUTLET -957.0 100 YR. HWL -958.7 J / I\ 10 �I RE= 969.83 IE SW,N =9550 13 plop V n MH NWL =957.0 j RE= 970.44 10 YR. HWL =95&1 / 100 YR. HWL =95&9 IE SW,NE= 955.54 ` l 16 / / 6 C ECT TO • POND 6 OUTLET -957.0 100 YR. HWL -958.7 J / I\ GAS T GAS o GAS II i I _ I I _ I II II - II III II II� I I III I I III I I II� I I II� � T 13 w1L x/1560 V WETLAND M NWL =957.0 j 19 10 YR. HWL =95&1 / 100 YR. HWL =95&9 / SNOWMELT HWL =959.0 / 14 / / 6 C ECT TO • 15 IEX. 1 " DIP EX. -15" FES W. M. / IE =95T8 _ \ EX. CITY No 4 �GQ OUTLET -956. 100 YR. HWL -9 MOVE EXISTING sneH PI & STRUCTURES E =96. r -� — — I PR. 18" IE =95 7 IE= 955.82 PRO SED OCS W /REMOVABLE WEIR LL, TOP WEIR =958.9 EX. 18" IE =955.5 W _ - _ - - _ - _ — _— 4• t)IP W.M. (RAWI J— _ —__ I _ 16" DIP W.M. GAS T GAS o GAS II i I _ I I _ I II II - II III II II� I I III I I III I I II� I I II� � T 1 P1 ��•• MEMORANDUM Date: June 26, 2013 Re: Bella Vista (aka Marshes) Revised Wetland Mitigation File 0000586.00 To: Eric Zweiber, City of Rosemount Phil Olson, City of Rosemount Andi Moffat, City of Rosemount c/o WSB & Associates Dennis Rodacker, Minnesota BWSR Brian Watson & Mark Zabel, Dakota County SWCD Melissa Doperalski and Jeff Berg, Minnesota DNR Cc: Joe Jablonski, Lennar Fran Hagen, Westwood Professional Services From: Kelly Kunst, Westwood Professional Services 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952- 937 -5150 FAX 952- 937 -5822 TOLL FREE 888 - 937 -5150 www.westwoodps.com This memo and the attached plan sheets constitute the revision to the Wetland Replacement Plan (WRP) dated May 9, 2013 for the Marshes development (now known as Bella Vista) in the City of Rosemount. Due to issues related to the construction of wetland mitigation area M -1 adjacent MnDNR Public Water Wetland 19 -12W, M -1 was moved to a location north of Wetland M. As a result, the revised WRP consists of two wetland creation areas (M -1 and M -2) located north and south of Wetland M, respectively. The revised WRP also includes the addition of 0.65 acres of upland buffer adjacent to the new wetlands to be utilized for wetland replacement credit. Proposed elevations for M -1 and M -2 range from 954.0 to 956.0, with a predicted normal water level of 956.0. Hydrology will be supplied by surface runoff and a shared hydrologic connection to Wetland M. The subwatershed of the M -1/M -2 /Wetland M complex totals 18.9 acres which is comprised of 4.2 acres on site, 12.9 acres contributed from off -site to the east, and 1.8 acres of contribution from the adjacent roadway to the south. The high water level for a 2 -year event is 956.25 and 956.60 for a 10 -year event. Upland buffer areas that are utilized for replacement credit have a maximum slope of 8:1 and have a minimum width of 25 feet. M -1, M -2, and the buffer areas will be constructed, seeded, managed, and monitored in accordance with the plan submitted with the Marshes WRP dated May 9, 2013. Land and Energy DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS HNNEENNENEENN June 26, 2013 Page 2 Attached Exhibits 3A through 3D depict the revised Wetland Impact and Mitigation Plan and details of mitigation areas M -1 and M -2. Exhibits 4A and 4B (Wetland Buffer Plan) were also revised to reflect these changes. The following table summarizes the revised wetland replacement credit provided for the Bella Vista Project. Table 2. Wetland Replacement Summary Replacement Size sf (acre) Replacement Wetland Type Area ID Credit Generated sf (acre) M -1 0.31 0.23 Sedge /wet meadow - shallow marsh M -2 0.63 0.47 Sedge /wet meadow - shallow marsh WCA Buffer 0.65 0.16 Buffer Total 1.59 0.86 ---------- - - - - -- A total of 0.86 acres of replacement credit will be generated which exceeds the minimum replacement requirement for the Project by 0.02 acres. Please provide written concurrence that this revised WRP for the Bella Vista Project meets the requirements of the Minnesota WCA and the City of Rosemount Comprehensive Wetland Management Plan (WMP). L Fm- IS L I Mwkv M qVIAILLVAILLVAAILVAILkVA',4&i,T4 Ale R7�: MARIA AW-: 101 IV, B Bf am Mm offiffumm MEN a ==M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lennar Corporation NO M& A— N-& &d. dM Mplmtk m...De. 364" Bella Vista III O 20' 40' w, 7 Wetland Mitigation c F- Lennar Corporation WM Mffi A- N.* &d. 6W Ow4m v7m my� M�� mw W L 4 05/10/13 4 Bella Vista Wetland Mitigation C F- L --97LAW I OW 0-2 a-46AW Ilk I EXG BUFFV? a7l aC SUFFIR 1.16 OMAND 9 �Mmmm own Elm ON= OEM Emma AE�v win orA AmR _7 F7LL-0.O6 AC G 3w I rf �Mmmm own Elm ON= OEM Emma AE�v win orA AmR _7 F7LL-0.O6 AC G 3w r EXCERPT OF DRAFT MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MAY 28, 2013 5.b. Request by Lennar Corporation for the Approval of the Bella Vista Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan with Rezoning (13- 21 -PP, 13- 22 -PUD). Senior Planner Zweber stated that Lennar Corporation has requested a preliminary plat, planned unit development (PUD) master development plan and rezoning to R -1 PUD: Low Density Residential Planned Development Plan to develop 158 single family homes on 142.6 acres. The submittal from Westwood Engineering had the name "Marshes" on the plan sheets. Lennar has since requested the name of the subdivision to be referred to as "Bella Vista ". Any document that is labeled Marshes is the Bella Vista application. Mr. Zweber gave the Commission a brief history of the property. Commissioner Husain asked how far the development is from the railroad tracks and if noise will be an issue. Mr. Zweber replied that the tracks are a little over a quarter mile from the development with the Meadows of Bloomfield development in between which will buffer the noise. He further stated the noise should be at a minimum due to the quiet zones. Commissioner Husain asked who would be responsibility for roads, sewage and electricity installments and whether or not there is a provision for continuous water quality analysis. Mr. Zweber stated that improvements will be paid by the developer. He stated the feasibility study will determine the developer's share of the collector roads and the cost of the lift station will be shared. The park dedication fees and sanitary sewer trunk fees are paid by the developer. With respect to the water quality analysis, Mr. Zweber stated that the developer's stormwater system plan meets the City's requirement for stormwater quality. Commissioner Husain asked what the environmental impact would be to the residents from the refinery. Mr. Zweber responded that Flint Hills Resources is monitored by other agencies who actively monitor environmental issues around the area including the MPCA who has issued an air emissions permit to Flint Hills and they are currently meeting those requirements. Commissioner Weber asked if the applicant had taken into account the high water table for the lots and roads considering the amount of water bodies and wetlands. Mr. Zweber responded that elevations are reviewed in the preliminary plat stage to insure they are three feet above any neighboring water body and emergency drainage fields for overflow are verified in the final plat stage. Mr. Zweber stated that staff is comfortable with the conditions in the recommendations that the applicant will be in compliance at the final plat stage. Chairperson Powell asked if there was potential for a public beach on Horseshoe Lake. Mr. Zweber showed the grading and the neighborhood park area on the map and stated that a public beach is probably not feasible in this development but that when the property to the northwest of the lake develops and the shore on the northwest corner of the lake becomes available, that area may be more appropriate for a beach area. Chairperson Powell asked the reason for the serpentine path of Autumn Path and the impact on property owners to the east. Mr. Zweber responded that Autumn Path needs to go around wetlands and a stormwater pond, plus a windrow of trees is along the property line. He further stated the property owners would have to share in the cost of the road. Chairperson Powell asked staff for a clarification of the purpose of a lift station. City Engineer Brotzler explained the needs for a lift station with respect to the stormwater runoff from Horseshoe Lake. Chairperson Powell asked for justification of the planned unit development and whether or not there was a traffic impact study completed. Mr. Zweber stated that the area in the southwest where the regional trail goes through will contain a larger park than what would normally be included and he further gave an explanation of easement conditions as result. Also, Mr. Zweber stated that this area was included in the traffic element of the comprehensive plan and staff determined that a separate study was not warranted. Mr. Brotzler added that this property was included in the AUAR as a precursor to the comprehensive plan and traffic in the area was part of that AUAR. Chairperson Powell asked what would happen if it was determined that the initial well site was not a good site. Mr. Zweber stated that one of the conditions required is for the developer to locate a second possible well site in the northwest area of the development. Chairperson Powell asked for a clarification of Phase 1 requirements with respect to the trunk sanitary sewer extension of Bacardi Avenue and the improvement of that roadway to the entrance. Mr. Brotzler responded that a feasibility study of Bacardi Avenue needs to be initiated and the developer will be depositing funds to pay for that study. A completion of that study will be a condition of Phase 1. Chairperson Powell asked about the possible cost assessments to neighboring property owners. Mr. Zweber stated that the proposal of the shared cost of improvements will be a part of that study. Chairperson Powell asked if the applicant has submitted a wetland replacement plan considering the number of wetlands on the property. Mr. Zweber stated that the wetland application was submitted and reviewed by staff and the proposal meets and exceeds the City's wetland conservation plan. The public hearing was opened at 8:14p.m. Arthur McMenomy, 1283 Bonaire Path, landowner alongside the proposed development stated that his family does not want the road (Autumn Path) built on their side of the land and then assessed for the costs. He feels the City is taking advantage of them and they will fight having to pay for another assessment. MOTION by Powell to close the public hearing. Second by Husain. Ayes: 4. Nays: None. Motion approved. Public hearing was closed at 8:16p.m. Chairperson Powell asked how much flexibility the developer and the City have with respect to Autumn Path. Mr. Zweber stated that Conditions 5, 6, and 7 stated that Phase 3 of the development cannot be constructed if the road cannot be constructed in that alignment. Commissioner Kurle asked for clarification of the process involved with constructing the road. Mr. Zweber responded that usually in the case of a new road like Autumn Path, it is the responsibility of the developer to gain possession of the right of ways from property owners needed to build the road. MOTION by Weber to recommend that the City Council Approve the Bella. Vista Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan and Rezoning to R -1 PUD: Low Density Residential Planned Unit Development, subject to the following conditions: 1. Deviations from the R -1 zoning district are granted to allow a 75 foot minimum lot width, 25 foot front yard setbacks for most lots, 20 foot front yard setbacks for lots with wedand buffers; 7.5 foot side yard setbacks, and 9,250 square foot minimum lot size. 2. The home design front elevation shall include a minimum of three and a half (3.5) feet of brick or stone wainscoting, excluding doors, windows or the wall behind the front porch; a front porch with railing that extends at least 30% of the width of the front elevation, including the garage; a side entry garage; or no more than 70% lap siding, excluding doors and windows. 3. Lennar will provide the northwest corners of Lots 23 and 24, Block 10 as an Oudot for a well site within the Preliminary Plat. The well site will need to be a minimum of 0.25 acres with a minimum dimension of 105 feet by 105 feet and have permanent access onto a local public street. 4. Phase 1 and 2 can be developed with access from Street H and Bacardi Avenue. 5. Phase 3 cannot be developed until either Autumn Path is constructed to the intersection of Street E or Street B is connected to Bonaire Path through the exception parcel(s). 6. Phase 4S cannot be developed until the roadway connection for Phase 3 is constructed and the temporary sanitary sewer lift station should be installed concurrently. 7. Phase 4N cannot be developed until the entirety of Autumn Path is constructed and the temporary sanitary sewer lift station is installed. 8. Street S road and sidewalk design shall be revised to include the Street "S" Cul -de -sac & Sidewalk Grading Revisions exhibit dated May 22, 2013. 9. Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 are unbuildable until Street G is constructed to the west and the temporary cul -de -sac is removed. 10. Lot 10, Block 5 is unbuildable until Autumn Path to the east is constructed. 11. Lots 14 and 15, Block 6 are unbuildable until Street B is constructed to the west and the temporary cul -de -sac is removed. 12. Lot 1, Block 3 and Lot 1, Block 10 are unbuildable until Street E is constructed to the north and the sanitary sewer is provided from the north. 13. PUD deviation for Street EE for a cul -de -sac length up to 1,050 feet and direct access of up to 20 single family lots. 14. No trees shall be installed in the street right -of -way. All trees installed on private lots shall be installed between the house and the street right -of -way. 15. Trees installed on individual lots shall be planted in a location that does not interfere with curb stops or individual sewer or water connections. 16. Drainage and utility easements with storm sewer infrastructure may contain fences but shall be required to include gates to provide truck access; shall prohibit sheds or other accessory structures; and shall prohibit landscaping that would impede drainage. 17. Relocate any landscaping within the 25 foot sight triangles at intersections at Street E and Autumn Path; Street G and Autumn Path; and Street H and Bacardi Avenue. 18. Re -grade the southeast corner of Pond 8 to save the 33 inch bur oak ( #10783) heritage tree behind Lot 12, Block 2; save the 28 inch white oak ( #12316) heritage tree on the property line of Lots 25 and 26, Block 10 by installing a retaining wall; and save the 32 inch bur oak ( #5053) heritage tree in the rear yard of Lot 28, Block 10 by installing a retaining wall. 19. Wetland buffer averaging is allowed for the roadway and lot buffer averaging analysis. All areas within the wetland buffers that do not have natural vegetation shall be seeded and established with a wetland buffer seed mix. 20. Conservation easements shall be recorded over all wooded areas, wetlands, wetland buffers, stormwater ponds, and stormwater buffer strips. Fences are not allowed in conservation easements. 21. Structural setbacks for lots with wetland buffers located on them are reduced to twenty (20) feet from the wetland buffer. 22. Minimum building setbacks from the OHWL mark of Horseshoe Lake and Mare Pond shall be 75 feet. 23. An eight (8) inch sanitary sewer stub shall be extended from the manhole over the existing manhole in Bacardi Avenue into the outlot in a location south of the future City well. 24. Create and record a restrictive covenant on the retaining wall located on private property that ensures that it is the homeowners cost and responsibility to maintain the retaining walls. 25. The retaining wall southwest of Lot 1, Block 8 shall be relocated onto Lot 1, Block 8. 26. A trail shall be installed by the developer on the north side of Bonaire Path between the eastern exception property and Autumn Path. 27. A trail shall be constructed from the regional trail to the north shore of Mare Pond at the property line with the western exception property. 28. The regional trail shall be extended to the west to the intersection of Bacardi Avenue and Bonaire Path. 29. Payment of $8,715 for the prorated portion of the 42 -52 AUAR costs. 30. It is understood that this preliminary plat includes multiple phases that may occur over a number of years. Upon recording of one final plat within the first year of preliminary plat approval the preliminary plat will be valid for all subsequent plat phases; so long as each subsequent final plat phase must be consistent with this preliminary plat. 31. Approval of the Shoreland Ordinance Planned Unit Development by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 32. Compliance with the conditions and standards within the City Engineer's Memorandum dated May 22, 2013. 33. Compliance with the conditions and standards within the Park and Recreation Director's Memorandum dated May 22, 2013. 34. Compliance with the conditions and standards within the Fire Marshall's Memorandum dated May 20, 2013. Chairperson Powell stated he wanted to explore in the future the possibility of a public beach for this development and the possibility of revising the stormwater and valve system of the infiltration system to ensure a more sustainable approach to stormwater in the area. Second by Kurle. Ayes: 4. Nays: None. Motion approved. • ia LENNAR: BELLA VISTA .4, �N- 400 0 ;37rc ST VFW, I^.- I. 41T-VSVF Disclaimer. Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not Map Scale a legal document and should not be substituted For a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning I inch = 1601 feet verification. Dakota County assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. 5/24/2013 ftpidw ` ®v�'1Y I �" -� -- I -- I L I « Lennar Corporation C �` 16905 96X1- Aran— Nash — w YAst —d ��.�ma. w"M X`. w 96971 Plymwth, Nlnnann SSH6 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL T- City — 661-454 -0001 Nn, — E,„ I-- -.1 -1166 —^** DATA E.laf.1 ImNq Ac E.NfN9 Cu/de Plan LPR: LPM Om4fY RrafOwrfXA RapeaN ImNq R -I (PUDJ told 91. Arw County Roan JB R.0.. eedaoflm: 111.61 A— 0.33 Acres Aulume Pefn R.0. N.: 230 A= CR /Camf Lmda (Wflon E ! r) 6 JO A— Ref ReaxNn(id Arts 76.36 A- Rrl Pr ROw [ CRa/t'omlY lmd, Rapoavd SM9 /r lOm6Y Lofa' 136 Lofa OmalrT- 206 un /« IM cTXNnXRT9C $In le pe�y Lof MbW (O lronf Ywd SeloocX) 75' NN. 1.1 D, . 115• NN. (IJO'1 owrogs) NNimum Lof Area: 9,199 rl. Awroge Lof A— 11,,693 al. F 1 Yare Sa16 «x •13' Ilp (10• MN.) Std, Ywe Cunw Lofa 23' 9er Yard 416 «x I.3n3' : IS' Iold R. Ysd Se lb— JO• Sefeaux fo A.— PaW (lut toll «IwJ Js• mN. Sef6ad fo CaunfY Rood JB 10' of ana- Sfrvcfwr S,Ih «X ro —flood 1,d 3' mN. M'ofr Lon — NM • (Bl «X45 1,J, 1.e l0) now raduc,e Wool aero «x m 10' due m rear lNrd -0-d —.11 Nn. FINAL PLAT PHASING FUN PHASE r - LOTS PH 11 ASE 2 - LOTS PHASE J - 40 LOTS PHASE 1 - 46 LOTS .r. - 1. LOTS FHASINr NOTM I. GRADING COIKIRVCPON Wn O< EACH PHASE OF IIXE PLAT NAY EXCEED UWIS AA 'wt, — N p90ER IO BALANCE 9.. 2. AL PRCMro WE ii IXWACM AND NIPCAPW AREAS MLL BE CWSIRUCIED MlNR PHASE I —RftJCPON. 3 CWSMUCMRI � NE ii RTRAPLW 6ASRl MLL W CCXWLCICO IN J PHASES, BEOWRRC MN PHASE I —MOC77- ANO CLWPLEfINC N PHASE J CLWSPtUCPLW. EACH W NE MSt t PHASES W PIE R MAROII BASIN COVSMUCPW WILL BE 0.` AOEWA IE 9IE AS N PRONOE PIE REWIRED R fl m — AREA G COLA TLL U9NC NE NEW DEKLW—r AREA LY' EACH Ci` PHASES I R 2 3'yFIu1 73' $Insl• FL,n9Y jat JO' REAR TARO SEIa- .J l r0.0' R -r Eoaemml SIOE YARD SETBACK 9 LOt NUMBER '� 3•— Side Eaa- J ji 100' r— E.,emmf 15• lrml Yard Sef6erx 0' 200' x00' 6DO' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �p01 ws 04/30/13 9t.•e 3 or 38 v Bella vista Development Plan k Overall Preliminary Plat -0 Waat.eo611.1 ... 1 -1 S—... Inc. I wol<: 1..f, mawee •;In . (m«x, ZA". ra) n... nw..a nmr nrm.w ro zo• NERANO T GOPHER STALE ONE CALL ' ww6R6r a. to •ww Hra ,.f1me cm,lrainla. n• w[n.wo Eu>P 118(1 Iun-Td >T �p 85600 -]5166 RS fwwpWY 0,,_ 0,,,* CamIY Coaen•Ir SHfwn 11&J AO (1986 •eN,Im..0 n - - - -- - -- I ai REET G dRLOT B 1 Vafkal Dalum; 196&/Aro H Vs r . 1 r . I j I� 2 Il_ <• IIOw � +11Mv 1 an Ils.sd.11v rug �� ` :J 1 ~ it Legend ' •^ 11i 1 NETLAND BUFFER COMPENSATED �\ ^ \\ F TD AREAS DUE LOT AREAS --TOTAL � 29}90a 9f-- — - - - - -- i ..'.. ✓� '1'` e ` J f II 11 WERANDS i OI \ \\` NERAN0 BUFFER COMPENSATED '� �'__- - \,• "•'�,., ,'%•��.• ^: •:.'. "� r �p I? ___ L r, AREAS DUE TO ROAD R. 0.1Y.� <' n�•p r 5"-� -'1 1\ TOTAL « 16,297 r/ \ (.wsw.wal •,•� uvo eu"a ._.JJ 1 \ 1\ \�� .. -.,.. ^1 �n /' mwa n,•. ..�� 1. L 1�1\ 6 NETLAND BUFFER COMPENSATORY \n ; • 11` - -uJ/ oaow.nr.ar :.� •° - n I� � /u , 1 \\ AREAS FOR LOTS I TOTAL « 68.J7J s/ W r...�.• 1 + 11 11 1 KETUNO BUFFER CDIIPENSATORY , .rMANq R ^ \\ // 7 E 111 11 __ HORSESHOE LAKE r ^1p1•`Y'� 11 11 :,. AREAS FOR ROADS I / v DNR PW St9 -320 vim-` J b� ---11 TOTAL J9.J96 s/ _ ____ i 669 >B > J L--- -l` - -\\ - --------- ------ l\I III 1 ( i � �� • `. � T10/iSEl/OE DIKE " NETLAND S `! J, --OUTLOT C / '''r•:,� I II _ — _ -t, I it I � :\ /.•.�. � I __ II II 1 I �_- ______'"• 1 �. � i � N+ : �'wN1u I' I _ _ ," - !II II IL WLRAND S ,en.w ewrtx I n Y "" -�I I III Q `/� OUTLOT F 21 \ .7 IIN one / T L I / /� �•' (``- '� III II 1 '-- - - -- ` 540 \� \ / `('1 ! T �;� 1� � Ala �/ ��,� •• -- �+• /' ':l p I III III w i - (�� ' MJ! •• Esa[ _1`\\\� � � < � r II1 III 6`°�1 n I I III + I ii ii) ` �� I 6 �•Y' . %'° \� .4., �, � I it ii �/ �_• •\` s+ L7 r1 .,d J�� / %`ri < `� �` 'v L` 9� ��." t lia iiI �')i�� +-_ C 1 CF• s F.,�/r- 1�r- .. I.�,. .F-IyF •� r:, -na.4i' r I J ,Y L ...J_ \:- �\ �.e�l �., l a,fl n�l -�! �1 M pll � �i «''/ y °vE•° � �'�� \I, \� -' - /i `/i� x", ' r ` R X A •..1 . -- - � I i-5��j- 'I ..... \ 2H \ f w', - -x'-11 I rt1�. ^`�� L _�•1 �IL - / 5.i.. 'C1 rte.+ rn WMAND / %::• a y J / a000smwrar.<•v L_ 04/30/13 m.. 4 38 w Bella Vista Lennar Corporation Preliminary Plat 16065 J6e6 Awmue Non6 9uila 600 Westwood 6 M/00/Lt 21IRt IMymOUN. MLlnuot, 556A6 Raseswnt Mhmeon o 2otJ Wrat.000 Prolraaimal $pACra, Inc. J \ xy D �./ "'- 11 xl p ( ' , / F ♦ RANK ♦ �� '1 < W� /�.. IB.,., �rl,�. J✓ �. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TT b Cnr 65 N 11 N -0002 it ,... 1 2B 1 r "'p- -j'-,1 I ` x\0 ` J _.,� �` /�C': i'r�'�:t✓:.5'.... •'�� /f- 5 1I rw r... t- xsz -use mI'�'t "., - \L "n�I \ �, M , '� iq.'= : /�"• \Jr�22 JI m- ' 'J WETLAND I ' Y ID "1/I �F%Ayr ourLOve /' --' °�, )•� I aI - ___ I < ':. •� > t '�' "" "'✓• "•', a..oa.mr 25 ,'',' r ♦ \"N. 1J '` J 26i WEnANO c .. i 2 i 4;�; �� -�i ,,,Y�, /, /'• •�' 'fie: ran ''� /,'',,' ♦ v \� 4 �, r` ''� �` r zB �\ i_ __ �iw,�.JJ /:, Cyr' "� / ,' !•" ' i '//� ^. l _J I M£nAND N �', / /'!' /' uu a.m. :. /•.". +��, 6 \/ \ lU `� _ J ' '•'" - `� .-�� rou ,( "r/� , UNNAMED BASIN L l� 1 PWW 119-321 11£nAN % r '11 / _ 82 % / / /Y 1. "1 � � r✓N""�.,'.w -vw' L i �'�- ._- f ___ _ _ �l.`9 J 6~1-,i - �� / a I •N£ILAND • •, ;,;' Fr� / �� / / r: d t B .ttcuANO :I \ . /, X• F' y/� 'EXCEPTION /,� • w. m WETLANDE�.l' ' �"./ :•: `c. i� II / / u / EXCEPTION al AND ' f „ `ax x 4 rx: ou .. i' ` rrn.wP oar WETLAND B \ �\ I J — x,' ' n as /:. ! AND M J� II J1 1 , 1 ;; 1 \ '•.,'� 't ! ._- �_L -- - - -= ,♦C /.'T III Q i � n• raoiar ., nu, \ i °"t" STORM POND yyf /r 4 MARE POND \ �♦ a7o / h 'ifiw.`e•r95o. R PW f19 -12W _ • %��' I C '' 3• odt'"� I �rctLva ,r,.nan 'z '1t; \ I I I I 100 200' 300' — �w — .",. t.,, .,.....� .,a�.. Ax... ,., ...,.�... ,�, ..a.. ,. >o .» ,. •..,�, ..ra..�,..a,. \ I I I I I I / / I 01/30/13 a.., S 0a 36 Bella Vista Lennar Corporation Preliminary Plat 1610.5 5Nh w • NwN SWI. 60D V11eft d �6 a /JON w \ Ply —Ith. Mlnam SSW Rwemarnt, Mhurma. 7 .xou wml.RR6 hR se.a tc� .� _ YY ..., _ ��/ /% - -`)I Wo�c. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL _ / / J 1 I .-.. / /l / � TIN, CA, Ar.w 651 -154 -0002 t I /� ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISHED SURFACE/GUTTER GRADES UNLESS Nn. TdI Fm I- fWD -xsx n66 % ,' /� GMERrnsE NO ¢D. REiLA TO ME FINAL PLAT FOR CURRENT HORIZONTAL STE DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. \ IIII l %l� i j \ / �"-".� \\ \ I l I II i� I I �.• i ME CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ME LOCATI AND ELEVATION OF ENISBNG URUTIES AND I / / %l% I/ %r \ ♦,r % % \ \ \'U / I - 1 •• 1 "•• �' TOPOGgAPHICAL FEATURES MM ME OWNERS AND FIELD- VERIFY PRIM TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ME ENGNEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES qi VARIARONS •TIE CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT GOPHER STATE 'WE CALL' FOR UTIUIY LOCATIONS AT 65I- 454 -0002. ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE M -PLACE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATM /CONSTRUCTION AM SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF OR EHWM COMER k \ •\ \ I Z�\ : / �"� / • I l HAS BEEN ESTABUSHEO. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON SHALL BE MAW iAWFD AND M REMOVED AM SULL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO ME GRADING CONTRACT IT IS OF ENMEME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS MIN RESPECT TO EROSON CONM0. TEMPORARY \ PENDING, DIKES, HAYBALES, ETC. REWIRED BY AGENCIES /OWNER SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO ME GRADING. I>r11 / \ , y j ( . \ ' - TH GRADING CONTRACTOR MUST BE AWARE OF ALL EKISTWG AND PROPOSE. UTILITIES / SEE S T B`il , SEES T ALL CONSMUCTION BULL CONFORM TO LOCAL AND STATE RULES INCLUDING THE NATONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPMS) PERMIT REWIREMENIS. I I ��\ \ I •I /` \ ! '� I) r ! - J ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT ME END M EACH I % KCEGFRACNWC OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC THE SIIREEIS,MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO DETAILS TO M t REDUCE POSTME DRAINAGE FROM ME STE MUST BE PROMOEO AT ALL TIMES. ALL EXPOSE p SOTS MUST BE STABILIZED MMIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS E ROUGH MADE i \`' X•.111' I h C PETM UNLESS OTHERMSE DIRECTED BY ME ENGINEER. ALL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE ADEWATE SEDMCNT MAPPING SYSTEMS INSTALLED AROUND MEN. TEMPORARY SEEOWC FERTILIZING, AM MULCHINL MTIST BE APPLIED MTbN 14 GAYS OF ROUGH GUOING UNLESS WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED MTHN 60 DAYS E MANN. CWPLETON. ME SITE MUST BE KEPT IN A KU.-DRAINED CWOTIOH AT ALL TIMES. mE CENMACTOt SHALL BE RE OASBLE FOR TEMPORARY DITCHES. RPING OR OTHER MEANS REEMAC i0 SE c / - I 1 INSURE PROPER DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRICTION LOW FONTS IN ROADWAYS M BUILDING / \ PADS MUST BE PROVIDED MM A POSRW OUTFLOW H FREE OF SOL AND DEBRIS. STREET SWEEPING HALVING HOURS MUST BE CONFIRMED MIN ME CITY PRIOR TO BEGNNMG WORK. •PUBLIC SMELTS USED FOR HAULING SHALL BE RCPT I S ALL BE CONCURRENT MM EARMWMN ON 41E n l'ii�4�i ` t . � `"`�• . . , „ � � .. (k k:. — ._ ' .`orn -:P:' �/ "may .. '`� . �. all � 6►��.�L I �%/ ° %s % Him i. mss+ �( �,�� MORl��'✓'r fi\ : �• wv.�! ^III�,I°gF,I t��SL- ��i`�Il.Efsl1! \gIS��IC,,. /tea uL Ni/ � �```��i �� :��1 '�� III ��2tI' <hL,tt�� I °I �; .� �SanIES ..a -'�• ��'�� d I •�'Cl��l �""" "" x � 'I I�II)II�1 I�, �J1�o.�nl �� Fiji ill i _ NZIr, <�1 j 1�-2 -= +l'<£d51 V __ �'' --' E�3 : 6��- r�lll�i9'✓•�W091�rt1 '®1iY VV..t -..d �. D6rosnS T1/16 UH NuINssuaTw+IOW WIO �B• `�ROOa� a� I DCW�. ZZ u�G =Af IWNW ELLMMM PAO —{ - - RP ZINC I: Ro.o ap s;NN IWW 1 Norz � IaHam aslw LoT II I P.ucx MI nr ITLr olROrPFR TYPICAL LDT 90 = I P rp FR . Lennar Corporation P I6 Wh Avenue NRnh SIdI 600 PIT Lh. MRU AYU. SSU6 I.HGO DENOTES SOL BORING DENOTES SILT FENCE OENOTES HEAW OUTY SILT FENCE —Oy DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS .�PBO -� DENOTES PROPOSED CONTWRS DENOTES EXISTING STMM SEWER DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING FREE LIE DENOTES APPROXIMATE TREE /"M"YWr REMOVAL UNITS neS DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATOR DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATI ON pm DENOTES BIO-RWL EROSION MECKS DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW Eo.F. ELEVATION - - - - -- DENOTES THEE PROnCTM LINTS X 0' x00' 400' 600' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION TRH. 04/ /13 ss.l: 6 a 38 Bella Vista Overall Grading Plan Memount. MWIeeoU 6ATE ONE CALL GOPHER TATE S Cly A— 651 15. -0002 1 I` M.N w `Aw NC y -iii / 1 nw sroRw cA4m BAVrvs T\._ .. ra r... I- eoo- 252 -nss •., `\ \ L ((ro. >� ' i wttUOE INLET�PNO'E N ^ / I/ / �D I /� 'd -- Street G 9�b -- F',1 IF �- - '�:/� _ \ /'.....,,.. -, �' "....�1 I �_ ! 1 . 15 :: I I WO ,813.1 �I. J wo �..: wo 95/ 5I I �.s c I w0 D �' c I I w0 ....cam �/ y \•• i `o j� \ / �I ' '. \ \ i a 1 b b 1 1�r ,,,, �.., / `- i ` c \ .. a 9n� ' ✓ y IL- n.z— I I a.]:a— I I— a2 I I g� LJ - s(J�' 1 \ \ \�f' �� I� �I �\ I / I '\ra44'4%�*S.rM"' \\ / j / � ` � ' ' \\ s \` • \ \111 �6 a J I / ) ' _.� -v�. •'• \ / r 9L1 \ \ �� / £ \ .,. , 11 gig' __'mot — _- �- -�.�-9/0 I_ i � ��,\ � •. .. 4 \\ y TI .°T IT b 2f SLIT rtNCE I—) —E n[uovAL LIMITS (TrP.I �, •. ,, � ,.!; ,- �� \ c, ., Pa II � � 'oo - 1'' 1 � \ / � �✓- 9J6� /. ". ' \., _� /' � 91r- -�\ a '4�''.. \:1 / i I II O 1 - I II p 1\ \\ \�I '7. DENS -S— %�\ TREE LINE (Tro.) DENOTES MEMAND LINE (Tro.) 1 \ O K% No `NR Pw AI9 -0SO NNR ON 9]5.1 :: p9],0 I I ( II `.ro \ \\ Il \ \. 9S \I \� [NOTES ;M, NNNL°9Sfi.1 LINE (Tro,) -�- IW lA NML(NO INnLT , UPSTREAM) -9)69 DENOTES METLAND \ L950 1 ° 111 SNOVMELi Nvt -9J9 0 FUNGET FF BUER LINE NCLU (—s DE HORSEHIDE LAKE R DENOTES DRAINAGE tom" \ ' 1 ( U11UTT EASEMENL (TM.) \ \, \;1,y` ,\ �1 \S j �.5 I 1' I — , y�' I • I ��r L 1 \ I— / L 1 j ---f ------ - -- � \ I VI I I � - �aa9 a6 �T.. 01/90/13 9s-a 7 Dr 31 u IM6u 0 Nom.. I Pam ,,� 16JOS 600 Bella Vista Preliminary Lennar Corporation Grading Plan ]h A—M, N. S- W twod =6 ' I wN!S —_ IMYuIm101, MLMluot 55116 Roesalnt. MWwo11 _ _ _ GOPHER STAM ONE CALL �LT FENCE 34-0002 —AND S -934 D DENOTES WETLAW LINE ITYT`) FUW E MAIL BY U-TY EASEMENT (T-) TRIE L' MET REMOVAL UMITS wc tj A INF. AREA 22 Bella Vista PreliMinary Lennar Corporation Grading Plan _ .406 w.,o-..d r...... o.q S—,.,, mr. .yti` a ef�'s �� I wn E12�'• \''? >V 0O\ — II// \ _ / D COPHER STATE ONE' :CALL MERAND \ a TN Clly N.. 651 - 151 -0004 ` '�/ - 1 «♦ / �9' '/ �_�" �1 iVp M'MVA �B] i S' 1 I �✓�o � ,.. '\ INF. AREA 44 I I I Tql fr.. 1- 90D_454 -1166 3 //�. /> / //. /'`9i �� B�'�: .� \ 9]0'/ 100 �M.1HH'9�Ht �9 ♦9.'L'/ \ _ -_ °I � I a 1 / / =i � � RE 9._95 .; B \ _ /\ ' ♦" � G' 1 � _ - � "!_ n ' i ``\ �� M /q, f.. / ®•'." ___ -'—� E WTe ).a /�' / __. \'� % B+"i " � ,^, I I / SB_i'd � \I '6 P'S'. / q. ' / / / .. " .4L,$rORY cAr e.9NS ro T- . '1 MCLOOE INIEi ROIECTON I ` \ � 9 / WREM19a).J <' ✓ - D m «wt. -9aa.3 /' i- dam, � �/ I r / .11 � /( / I I \ / / / / ./> / /// > � � .oY ( /! � � � q\ I\ a -�✓ 50' 100' t50' � I , J \` ` \ OUTLOT t t , c" '�` \ �.,,.,... '_ >�i ��"-� / -_ .. -1, A � ` \\ � -$�~' �� . \ \, \J� / Ap y5 3 J / ,.,•� g� / � -� \ � �g50- w I / I,�1 \ II � QR1-6 `f \h/ 6p / NNRE ORTRONCE x \ =A E NN N - >� \ a' - - \ / , %i'�" / ,•� \ � � �! /'\ L. J i C � \ \9JJ> c •`` ~` v � ° � Bela I I - I ,`� \ 4. 10 TR91HMt.B19 ♦ I 11 '. / / l I l i l � _ I, Ox � \ \I `\ `�\ \ ii I M1.0 � ? \ �/� �/ / .`\,' /� ./ ; e io..�� , �,I Y9 •• � %/ L /e 3° �./ �/ i �'- aB I > wErL // f � I -`_.�_ I � I oENDTES AND / /— / . /y-�y -r. _— I 1� /ll/ ♦ __ / ,� / °��11a / - -- - - _� ( I I9ab 1 /1 it T FENRi(fW.) - - - -, - - -- - -� \ n K/ / ' • � i . '....., \�• \ /I _..` I _' 1' , _ -_- J _ • � o°n U � ° ; 1 TREE RWOVAL e ' / �', F/ �''' '�. -' - -' c, /•. % -- -- a I 1 m I�` I uWrif°°'I') i 17`- L \ r I }, DENOTES EfOSTINC 966/0 \ - 959. \ i I / "'. -\ -. ♦ _� / -/-- DENOIFi OR N OE t / ., O u n / i ••- - I\ H _ n I _ '' lei/ 'r �. ♦ >0 -. _+ ) 11Y ,CASE ME NT (T!P / — a "- I \•�♦ '`\ °.:1 11 I/ wn E14 11\ SQ 13 ' .-;, /' _._ I I/ L _ wEnANbL 9�0 1 O ^ / - - - / ]).) 1111 1 / ♦/♦ )\ ♦ I r YR. HMt.955 16,/ / / i' n/ '`� I ♦ r _ I a �,< s[IOw Rr «wt -esa. j 1 o -fir. /1 I 1 1 d 1 / N 04/30 sr9 9 or 38 0 ^.�. ♦w Bella Vista ®® Lennar Corporation Preliminary P Grading Plan °i' 16aD9 J6N1 Armu. Na6e Sult. 600 Yll twOOd I nod. n�iWly� 0.�— .rr�.B�w kl+r PlyvwuN, MIMmI. SSM6 Aaemarrl4 MI^^°^f• F Mg I! I:! — LL ; - qu 'A GOPHER STATE ONE - CI Y A 651-4,54 2 TO I- -j,,, 1j ..ETLE2.26 L KNOTS ORMNACE «N' , 7 —T; EASENENT 57' SNOWELT N It RE-962.D It SILT FENCE MEE REMOVAL L.In C A I I IW 1R. _T I TOi TLE v, A. STORM CATCH I?A9Nl 1. Ott /rCLUDE INLET —TECTIDN ----- --- --- ;o M .--1%.7 ....... MS 97A DO --UT I I I / A; oENOiE HAND CY PETER ELF I N s W/REMOV WE I KIR- 9 Yv IEII F LINE ,0 909. 96 7 - - - - - - — - - - - - MAND —N MITICAPON AREA RE�966.24 ------------- 161 No. 38 ____-4435th Street West) — — — — M - — ",-- — — — — — — oat T F 6N RE_97 .51 04/30/13 BY.e 10 OR 38 Bella Vista Preliminary Lennar Corporation Grading Plan 1&A — A11— N-h SId" Wed d Ply—h. Ml-- S _ _ GOPHER STATE ONE CALL T.IW CI Wn 11369 H2 V RETAINING WALL (T11.) DENOTES EXIS-C BEHOMS WATER LINE v RUNNING WALL INCWD INLET PROTECTION ALL STORM CATCH BASINS TO BENOTES MANAGE SILT FENCE (TYP,) IBO YR. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION P.P" f- Bella Vista Preliminary Lennar Corporation Grading Plan 02011 w..—d PI.l... m0 .A. U/ LdT G, I , it /, %' 30 9 I1', / 100 1R. H9A•9501 �„ / I \ / 16 j. ' 11 i / /!' TIFF REMOVAL LIMITS (LM c 18. DENOTES WE LIFTER LINE ( RAND (( m II •'sJ�9 TIP. �L I r , -L � -' `'• m ` ,, I II '. I �' � y \ \ 62. .\\ I ' �I ` � %/ Y :J'r - - -' i/, /'- = Cl. _ bil. \ "; I�I I I it WnEg h�., �M. \ _ � •'� '/,i / '/ j- �% ;In �h 6� ^'Fe �" � SH52.1 100 WL•0 tR. HWt 952.5. --' -1 � I l,� jlll �' I I � hl i� �: %j �� ;; r� /i�r/ - _ �_ \ •� i- '< tl G • 982 x.966- -.i IcD 1 6 967 � I > 68 3 ` 1 •. 1 � /. � wii C6 � � � .-- � _li �. L _ _ i i1 ' T , � - � �' I ; / 100 RP NSA 61 , I �'•. '�q, cc ➢ �! b 9t2 \ \. - I _ _ \ ELT N •96 .1 ` 11 � / _ if 'U )0 986\ / ,�, IC tl I / \I "...,�• „ !/ I 1 / %".�, \� Q•. - N 1 , � ( //! / ' ' 1111 fa i/� � � y6 � .X9) ]✓�`� � mil' � 111 S II I / /NE1lAN a ., ��I \`\ ' I b � , ( l i''� s. � 9eo / L— =9a.T. , ,I 18 �\ � o '1 qbb i y�°. • °" i \ \ \\ \ / jl 1 lr,., 9). q ^b � 2J 0 Y _/ / 'L � •/968. �` � i � \ � I'I r � �1 P P ��' � � � rye, 13'"j�'\. • . "� . , I ®`� =7'=.. ( �� Pepud P9c Lennar Corporation u .M..• 4 �'•• 16005 ONh A..UO. Nmh Soh. 600 YVa�v.�d 06/06N 17216 �O�'� Plyma0V1. MLU1eR1. SSM6 CAA 46 H.I. hap. 0991,,9: \ ) GOPHER STATE ONE CALL I? J. T.M TCNY M.o 6800- 51 -ISA -000 353 2 - 1 /'•, �' 0� Mn. d1 Er« 1 --1166 11 ALL STORM CATCH BASINS TO INCLUDE INLET PROIECHON I RETAI %NC WALL yl , •i '� 11 SILT PENCE II I. UTIUTDENOTES DRAINAGE unutt k EAS6uENr OEHOTES WATER L/ �r DENOTES U 'AND NE I—) ) \i DENOTES THEE I \ ) \w9 PIR\opTECnoN uu1Ts \•• \\ 0' S0' IOU 150' \ •){ ._>6`- 1 9550:N I 951.6 I.' VIO 95 • ! �- ' JI /L.. ,958.) c , I a.6 I IAA I I � 1 / J L �/ monesW9T.•. 04130N aR 12 a� 38 Bella Vista Preliminary Grading Plan Rd..al940L. MWwoh — _ treel UP NG JU K—H go XT 04/30/13 13 w 38 Bella Vista Preliminary Lennar Corporation Grading Plan - 2013 .—d PI-111-1-1 S"'--, GOPMER STATE 2.M2 T CI 65-5 T.� -M- U-IIIIII ONE CALL --- - --------- S9 -972 'N '96- 'oo. \X . . .... . ..... 'IN A 'W" v 'A s. WOU w 7:— N: 'k e Y 11533 —AND B oENOrES KILAND DDZRR PUIT"L LINE ("P.) A TLET 10 �. .-52.3 1. 1IL —95- SNO�ELT H-9512 —GALON —A ., I I I .I / / / / /I airy / / f °�, 4`g /�� / s B \� \\` I `,� I� ._ , DENOTES WA� V� LINE (—) NENOTES NEMANO / % / / /// O / I \ \ ' DUFI- LINE %ET 9! :p o� /' I / J/ I I l li / /toD m HIL DENOTES EXISPNG A ME LINE 1E 950. -- — ----------- 0 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - c j i V 7 EX ia -NOT FOR C IN. 04/30/13 B6a 14 a 31 Bella Vista Preliminary Lennar Corporation Grading Plan 1630e ]61h —h S.11. w-t—d N, =6 01013 Wael«oa8 Pl PlaaelM�el SWMCae, Inc. IwcHl •• i GOPHER STATE ONE CALL rwN..nl Utll;N ill WL e21,o F)ncTN . PROPO�F11 / [ T.In PO Mae 1100 -2[ -0002 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL Ea15TING CONOITIOUS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION Mn. Td1 free t -800 -252 -1188 SANITARY SEWER -- ^ - -- SANITARY $EWER —1— �•. I AND NOTIFY THE OWNER O ANT DIFFERENCES. WATER WATER —I— 1 OU71.O7 B UNLESS OTHER ISE NOTED. ALL MATERIALS. CONST. TECHHIOUES AND TESTING SHALL HYD. w/VALVF T I I CONFORM TO THE 1999 ED. OF THE 'STANDARD UTILITIES SPEOnCAPONS FOR WATER STORM SEWER -- +� -- STORM SEVER 1_..A,� y Ij II MAIN AND SEfl LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER �+ q ( ) 1 [ I w,rt I.— v INSTALLATION BY THE CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION O Ill AND TO THE RI`"L wP.iv 4• S. 6 % 6 9 1 e`RKMO• STANDARD SPECIFICATION FM HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION' MINN. DEPT. O TRANS., I p 9uA[T AUGUST 31. 2005 INCLUDIND ME CURRENT ADDENDUM. ME CONTNACTOI SHALL BE l M 1 1 Z e K wcxa' REWIRED TO FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURES AS OUTLINED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY. • THE CONTRACTOR MALL RECEIVE THE NECESSARY PERMITS FOR ALL WORK OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY LIMITS. - -- " - -- • VERIFY EXISTING INVERT LOC. A: ELEV, PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, • THE WATER SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED WIM A MIN. O 7.5 FT. OF COVER. THE_ — _ — _ — — _ J ' �� / ^• 1 CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE CITY AS -BUILT CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO CHECK V _ \ •�`\ , -e4 LOCATION AND MATERIAL TYPE. _ -_- \ V`•�,/ ' \I\ • ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 5 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. (' • ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE B" PVC SDR 35 k ALL WATER MAIN SHALL 5 \` \\ BE B' D.I.P. CLASS 52 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. \ • SHALL CONTACT STATE T ORE CALL' FOR % 1 \ 1 it FOR UNITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO UTILITY INSTALLATION. I 1 f \\ e R 6 HE CONTRACT OR I� Rnnox 00J I / � ii .sE elT.m 1 11 I ` - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - -- I INORSE410EUUe �'G c Mr, I � . Q \ / �. \ v w �}°8e°r -LL rs I I - $ II ° Z• % 2• 1 RJfRL07 F % ;;:� �- I / II s uaee Ao-ea >. >e I l / / � \ � J ./ -ix.. I 4• 4' I� I / ,CC .... � �/" i 8 i`cs i I i r \ ,Z_ 5• 4 2 II r III I / 29 _ LP / =:� Ro oni` 'Y', / /'� 2 iz Iii III i — a - - -R wL ''�/ r 13 R 2 [ N WeWLLwOOd - +...a.m- o_ O6 /06/Ll u.� x. M6 Y_ M22 esw — 4 w `Y tw. °aRi id A «e I TI I _ /M` 26 1 \•J 9i 11 aAKL w '�' A l� /� Vim./ is / ,, es. e 17 A . I2 /• ' ��/ 1y'C:=•:1'r 22 • j, i '� � cRA«ETI sIrn _ o' IDD zoo' M, / w `. « / NOT FOR CONS U cq �' 1 I 27 l 04/30/13 6e a is w Bella Vista ®® M W •, wmM k _�"_."y� rtpud Ta Lennar Corporation a ;i ly PI,'„ Y M RMe_ I— 36Rh A a N..M R.U. 600 1'1 th MWI t[ SSA[6 Rasesount, MWIee9tW WeWLLwOOd - +...a.m- o_ O6 /06/Ll u.� x. M6 Y_ ° x013 W., —d Prol...bna S--, Inc. d . ' Cal H ATE ONE 1l / w � �,,.�/ ' � ^" «•� \ GOPHER STATE ONE CALL '/\ T.N CITY N.e 651 -15. -0002 II1 (TV,> 16 12 t7 ' ' ',_/ tm 1, si.�w•c°y '�� S ' — w. raI r... 1- eoo- x52 -u6e 8 r �/ ' � ''� ',... � . ��.....� � c .. �. l ..an PROPOern IIb. IT /• , / ' ' / • - �}_ -_L' ,.> ..1... A I ARY SEWER -- SANITARY SEVER —. — �[ / . _ 'i,CCC coKt* Wiwi 5T I W 1ER -T 1— / J / �. N W/rALSE 'm nro. W/VAE W. 6E 11 S W SEWER -- .✓: — S— SEWER — ea;::.a... amore 25 wuc i Im.l 5 _•r u ,/ /i .S \ — . ' 4 i„sv°W n 26 5 ? 1 _ / , . \ •'` \ \ 5 j I 1 8 6 , / \ r I a.W.. aeE, J- -I — -- a I I -- -- ~� --i 11111 , 16 � I I ti [lis M'9 . 1. — — — 100' 200' ]00' — _�� — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — \ I II I I T FOR dQNSIR TI 0 4/30/13 6rc 16 w 38 Bella Vista „,..,,- Lennar Corporation Preliminary ; I _ 16f0.6 06eh —.. Noah S.. 600 V�I.xtA+IOad Me. 06/06/IJ� =6 rir°IR°la Mlnnnwl. SSN6 RuemwM. MlxsuvvW °>ou w.a.o.o v l a s.ae p. � w � � ..\ � � % ._ •. \ \ 1 \ / / I' LE-41, - `=--ter `\•♦ � -i—.`� = _ ♦-� V '` \ _ , 1 , - \\ ' t� - •t. ' 689 - J / - t - / - -- l ' -� / »,..: ^� ; HORSEHOE LAKE Q OMOT F _ NMOTO Ili/ l L. '� /, , /Ir _'•. 1 � ♦' /r' /^l ,— Ij� I �` :. J �..�' \ < �T _ /(�'� /l ! \,. r rqy� '\`� qee' .:3 t I *l ii 1. �/ � .i t: � /�; 24 ,`;J_ I � ,. / ..i`, =�. el 1" �� -?` \' \`e♦.' ,.'.w'4... _ e 9�� // � i ir� 9fi1\ � � / '�'' 9 /986... ,_ .�— \ E.. / ,. \ 9 tP \� >!�'' 950 951 .. 990 i /, 9� 9.0'.r `• .�� . ' \ "I 5' 2 � � 4,wc ,i- \I '�P " / H: _ 1 • T • 1 / 9B4^ �;\ f °3g 1jrYn ?6 ': ,ysB q,Cl� � 1 `� � . \ \� � / •, �P\ _ - 9 ~ �_✓ (��' 9"° l�V /`w� fi1�. 9 fil • \� 1 _ 1 ij 1 I / .' i 97 s> 2T ..19 : • fi \ ,/ �/ / l 16 1. ! . l ..- %ZJ.. /; /r j. I r i \ - .'9j6.� J�, ri .� �.♦. ! (� .^. i 1'c`. /} 1 n• �;- ��yl "s.\ � ' 95 ', I 9>B�T /'�_. a' ! •t_,; � t ✓/1 N g' �I / S, 9 6;r k91B '{ \ \ • \ 1 JI i ., 7 f- 9 >e P / ♦♦ .o 'ti 0 AshI - tz �A \I` �/ ��r' /0'/ �� 9 899 �` 1 95�. ('�.w� II l ' 0 C~ S �: I y VOL -- Lennar Corporation � L 16lD! ONh A.enue Nwth SWIS 600 vvestv9ood D1�/B9N abm nrttw�m. MNnmuh ss116 1 I \\ % Cal 1e N9oa hwlaes a 211 1GOPHER STATE ONE CALL T.F Cll> — 651 -151 -0002 252-1166 9 Nn ToN fr« 1- 000- \ I \ 1 \ 950 , kA A 1 A 1 1 � ' II i l } •0' I \ \100' - -_ ]00' ]00' _ _ FOR N c 9oa9b.ww..., o... 06/30/13 a.. 17 a 38 Bella Vista Preliminary Rosemount, Mhmewfa Landampe Plan — o xou w.a.00a P.ol.,, o.o s..d•., N, -_ _. :�.. /i / �- - . + ^\ ... - �%}/ Y``, t '-'� - •. -P J' .."'� J $ '� �l. OPHER STATE BONE CALL / 4 1 j P �/ / I I i, c'S'J°•le /I /. ^ / \ \,'�,,/ C / ..� /�/9". \ t -Y ._ V ,,.I -'% 9S� ! i } -\ `� TrN CII 000 Mw 691-195 -2 Yfn, 1- 800 -392-1186 / I � QI °\ \� ->;]e ] e'•I / I \ .: � �tin��``�i'' / �.T fi ,„..._ 4 �a� � .y r �,� \ :I I I �� \ I I i;, (' a� f, m� 29 tl a:; t a`` \. <• / G ...9• -_ 9e �/ 'i o / + A i \ t . A '� I j,F l a• �/_ �.:� ,\ \ \ \,\ ' -_ r l � I - ti`s --'. � eN' w- �"" �� i ,. /�/ i/ . � � 4 `�,. / �� •' 1 I \\ \ ' OU/LOT E v -✓I !' I; — � ., : a �_`_,—I-�;�' �• . %9� `� • / t � .. • ;!9��? \: \ �_ _ � �� /� �,1 r �jp'� '�2� 9�,� at: �f ;�,as, r 9� ,r i \• �,', I I � ' 1 t •- / I/� � // / .� \ // \ / / V'.^ °. ._s,]e�. .. 3;� '' ` 450 _ f/ I '' t - I i 9]0 '� f 9•' � \q^ 28! 968 �_ � } 11�-• 1�: T ; 4 _"' i 9Bp�,gB4 'e �ge zee �✓ v i�/� /i r_ -� :,,� ��-.. I' � � �/ �' \ 1 � �' �'� \ '� '•'z ff \ , \ ' �1 . �'•, -= . ^ lo,., :f'..9�a:. 1 ; /y / -. , it r• •i f / r� '�'y o f - -- I \• \ ,. ,I ', ... \ ,;, , , � , 4_,. �. '•PF. Ifi/ 4 F. ! ,,F': r %// !�r \ ;.r/' ! �♦ ''t_ _ \ I/ /� z VI y,ry/ n'.i I 'LLa I � /�.9• / /�/ I r l I`: { � /A r� // / / , .1 `C 6 , ��, -� -, •,. • ;: ,E %IS111tiC WJACEwT (ceHOP�r br+ Esc. ? _ e' ,F ,o/ a. ',.✓ .� / ` ( �A: 1 i'1 /9 I .:! 9 / 9 $. ' •o I ?N6>t ATT it '�. , C." ._s >t, it r.. .,6 ,;, / /' , /. J: __ - - -_.. !` �/ 96�t..• I' �\•• ••�\ y �I I :, � \.• ... 90 ' .. \�'' ��.+'\ A� ' / i r' 1 � �' / .. /_ � � /: �, �1 / �'._ ;�' h( ! ( r a = - ( sfisi J _ I �- / It• \l V r r y \ - _.,.._:��8 .�r(� I�.\ �.> ✓'��;...\a'6 /P T /�x'- i�!'{J /�!i- iii %Ilt�r /� \',`� "T�i I � I .- .. tt, - III � t? s` 11 ' ,'.• •,J �' ; \ % /.�" / -'� \ �. vV; ' -n / y\ -./r \ t�• /\ v /- / `, f ,ti -, I mop - - -- — \ I •, \\�./ J� p ] ' ; e .3 ' \ � \ � ,- .,.�'. / 11! / `\ '•° , \ \ r - A -a— "?- 1 - _ , J/ �� \ 1f }r.l I `� ��' / i I � ' -,.X ,....0 1 �C I 1 , t' E-i ,ate ; i/t \ '� \\ t�\ • r- ,." 1:.� { 1 -/y - �'� / -` /I / 9io '.•; i. .:i/?/ ,,I (/ i, f'A I l- r :)� S � `\ \♦ + I I! 4r -.w � _ � rl f/ --- ="l9se �li ii� ( J /- l� '. l /• , :N r \ \ ! ''\ ,CKMY+CC liiL49 « / -' I •t- ' i I I. .q.I : ' � ! �/ � \ •.>" � r..r^ --1 e. r / e •� r \ _ _ _ _ . —. y 6 - 96-�` yx,9 6 yl 19 2 � r I1I I 0 r � 100' � 200' 300' -- - -- - -- -- _ _ I — R6 w ltl i . • a \ F P�IPFe'r ' // I ^� I �� `\ ` �� I n „�i �� •�iI �V / / I � r �� %�� , {Y /.i'' ,.. A•' ' I / ,�'" IC'7 � nr U4 /DO/73 s..e 1e 38 ar Bella Vista Preliminary �® ro M� ,,• y` �` °G I �' _ I I Lennar Corporation o Undacape Plate I -- I _ �� 16105 06eh ju M Nollh Sidle 600 N'P ti od W /]I1N 064/I PlrmOUlh. Mh�nee91• 99116 leo,em0un Mlnnooh L S 6 Ji f tl .11 S '� 4 i"1911 5 F✓ •, ..�— — ' i gyp_ - . .'; vs � :b � I CA III RE A � O r lI tw l EA��ENTJ -� � 0 TES R OA • l a i v.. rdl n.1 I- sasrxsx -u�s t O I • �GASL�JE 1. � V •, � '• 1 �g `` I tce r.r c n •ry RT rrccn _ cni TTU CFP'T'T(1Tf v�,.•. K I ,.�.,•.�n v. � .•7.o.�.r..a�`i9 � ®�` �� d \7d: d1i.. '7r. -% �B �r7i. t,D�s S.n sT7%...,��.�iWn•��7a.��,So: �'. �': �. ®.� i�•� �•$p ®•� R`� ta: -'a ,v$ � ' a!^ ��'w�) ■ 4o v � '� .. e � a eda,*" �,1�!�Ti�•ESr3: *► ® IRi 4® flea I® � . � � �y r1•: r! n�.��'�'!f�'�l'•`�,',r'•9 a ®. ` /y *.�.�:� �;.rp �� -._ - 1 e.:rwc��•_•* e.� v�,.•. K I ,.�.,•.�n Lennar Corporation W_tb w liwslxHmouA Mb,nNN- SSS . MAIN ENTRY - BICARDI AVE I 0' So' 100' 150' -OR CONSTRUCTION W,, •., .> , 01/30/13 — 19 - 38 Bella Vista so Scale Landscape Detail _ _ _ .2DI3 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL ,5/7 jj� �j j, --- -- ---------- :,4 -------------------------- --------------------- ------- ---- --------------- --- ----------- --------- k 1 N ii 11 It M. mu DENOTES REMOVED TREE V DENOTES OFFSITE TREE DENOTES GRADING LIMITS/ SILT FENCING NOT FOR CO DENOTES TREE PROTECTION FENCING 04/30/13 25 38 Bella Vista Preliminary Tree Lennar Corporation Preservation - e x013 We,lw°°C Pr°leaelmA 5er•I�e.. Inc. KEY p x059 DENOTES SAVED TREE eac DENOTES REMOVED TREE DENOTES OFFSITE TREE ` -� DENOTES GRADING LIMITS/ \ SILT FENCING \ DENOTES TREE PROTECTION FENCING X 0 0 50' 100' 150' ^* _R ly0 951'- I r %la 4.1 1 ,I .. : ' 1.-' 'n" ca .e Nwn ed >. 61ggFq: /GOPHER STATE ONE CALL- Cl T.F ly Ne9 881-1!.2 -116 4 •1, ' . ' ' -------- --'--'- w.. Tat Free T- eoo- xsx -naa 9 . � _....:w .r r �^ yy I I '" � ' :a..'� -� � .,',;f �t%q. ♦, j1� ♦ I 1 '•- � I I t � Z. t-�L I `' >,�, \ ♦, " -�9f -1 .lk Y',' ' %'r11t ♦: r� 1' _III 1 1 ■ _< 1' .,r. I I II ■ _ /.. /,1 ,'.p ��• I �ii; i I II \`y .♦ -._ i:11 _ �/; ',.T• ': � i�i: r.e. r•1• 1� - LI._�; SxAr1.l a 1 /.�I ,_. ,/ �,,• `,� " "�: ``.`.r -.';; � %' :''� ,: 'nom.,♦ I ♦R: ;' I�M^,.�:,..:'.1..� ■ ��f('.yF /,., / °9p 1t •,•.`�' -::: -� ^•, /' /.� � ",', I 1 011 �' /�... ,. -- - -`, \ / • 1 : '•;_ ..fly , e• ,, I III■ \ ,I �; 1 \ r,Ae, ,�lt�r -41� .�I% _ l �' /ai «i, •I 1 ". �: iJ e.. I I ; 1 I 9 ,r / I i j .,i 9 I I I p■ I e I - iY 9814 - , 7' I I 1 \ ... l., ■ q1x 9•B ' i I i F � 9•� �`� :811 1 ! 1,! , r .9•A' r - - Bx,� -- - \ g r (' alb" •+ l ■,, � _.- //rr : ; • ; ARE - - 'f -� - — v. -- _ ; r ..= 9•� ate, - _ ! , r , , 1 01_.. ... -- � - } •II Ia :5.5695 '__` `` •' - -- � _ - � - r I i . , i �.,: :�51 -1.• ;. . / ; -'9fix'- B2 +1,' qhB .•� • �, '/g50- �� V { `� /I( / , i '\ -- ___' -ms`s • ° I / ' � •� \ c ; , i,, \ '11 \ 9a M a - w� �F � ♦ /.« .j •may i a959'1T Sa i 1 - / ♦' f , •6•., ... 958 _ ?_ .' - "�f .. _. - :.$° .'•9he '. /i \r � sB I � / r� \'____'_ "958 --------- - _- - ..: � ,.2 ;:;:: �' �i _ -- `n'r1v fi � n. 95fi � :` � R`_ �V ••\ y\ /� ' r Y ' 9� 95P6 .•� - i 9609, y / 9h 9•p ''°j / \ , I 'I r .., r iii i __`� • N h2' -„ t /� / \ \ I REE •- / 4 !�� % .92' '- � 950: ,%r __ J a,4 gam_ '�_••� \: /�^ �P � '\ �i E 1. 9. .y r i 9 e ,� � ! �� ^•*�" X�� sj�a � � � i ;1, \\ f II� + ' ! i I `„ �II�1 -� °� �1� NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION% _ / i j : 9 B '�g5%.rrr := ::.... 9 �'ti � �iw._!', t. �i \ •I. � �' !'r � /Mn i'• ( I a ! ! , / / , i ( 0•Ie OU30/13 ah..e 26 a 38 � ® u. n.n.r,4. y„r �`":`ry� e•„` Prepelad l� Bella Vista Preliminary Tree Lennar Corporation Preservation W�MrWd _nu i w I l,.Tr 6 —� 16MS JNh A.enue North SWIa 600 Pan 06/B6N� u 18911 ' ( I�Enla.birr rm nyalel,th M4ulmte 85116 Aoeenrount, Mlvroata _ _ _ GOPHER STATE ONE CALL S. tp o TREE DENOTES 4) FSITE DENOTE GRADING LIMI LQ tu op if G4/30/13 27 38 Bella Vista Preliminary Tree Lennar Corporation Preservation _ e2010 w.1— P191.1ama S A— Inc - -J ; I-_.__ .—• '��i°�- �T`-__ ��/ 1'I / 6'. M� \1 - T.In curawe5l- 25 2-112 L , ,1'I 4w r a F... 1 -800 -252 -1166 0 MT ,'i F4 II II . 3 I J '"`� } .% / I/ __\ - 1 / � — I '` •* I � /� /'� \ . i..� _-1 fir. 1 \/ / c 7 a •' .:,,: S e J IP: I' -- m - - --- — 96, ' ;j 1. / II r i - - f.,it • V "''5,�' ► L/ : / __ I °s I' - - -- J I I / _ / \, __ - "d V'= � •%' � i�l' ' I I "iT � B „_ / 1•- .,,_ imam' � , / .i .:. .�__ r91'� h.L�— _ —1" __ _._.__ - -_ ,1 , -__•_ iai, �. 1 , .a I bBt' \\ e I o / � }k� �i _._. B \ I / � r �v �\ .... „fit , -r� \ . \'. ... y11_Bt _ \ qaa ___ }.. I II � I -- '�- L '�• ^\ I j} : a , D� „r 9� r 41/ / _ \ !, - r 1 n ”' - , 7 �'0 F`•,� \'•. i'F P!' -~°O' I 9 ^' '� I {-il , - --------- I LIB\ KEY. '� ^. rI °,: .e \ -�;'r✓YS J/ f O; 2158 .DENOTES _4AVE0.._TREE_- {{ \ ENOTtS REMOVED TREE i. /; 7 ,��``1'b a /� 1 �� I 1;:..•1 I / l i \ I -- .• tG NCI \O .� ♦ / /' ,� - -' B' \ I - r 11E O*S OFFSITE i1tEE / 910-" I•,,. r/ DENOTES GRADINC'LIMITS!/ • j/� i/ /' !' B I i y !, { Y... \ L,^,Y •..._... u \ 1 - ,q11 * .Sltk FENCING - -_" - - - 2222 :\ DENOTES TREE PROTECTION{'! Y / �'', I I y •••_ ..� - ,./ li -_ ,-.. l 9T• I 9 /FENEING A. �I-•-a 1 .,F'f'� � i / � I I I �! / I 5, e : T95 �J 111 l � _ 1 i •'` .\ ' "o.1ar.... \ : "•.! -_. ._ _ _� I Ii -qa• 91s. ,'a! = /, Ii11 \ /1, I •,I' I 1 i w 1R,K, I. Mylpfcp 9 _ __ - __ __ _ _ - _ - _ 96B _- a96 -098' �96r2„/" �♦ =--- __ _ -...Z i ____ Y ` _ax tiIfY4W1L6'- lAAl4(31A} ___ _ _ ___6�OC_ «..... �.95tl 94 9fi — — Lam.. �� ^ 70 —' -r--_ '., % , I y 7 \�9 _. �to I — —�j2 — ,.'...._ _ -�`^ N T F R hl "1 -KU� �i� �°..ww.. u e 1 04/30/13 ® 2s -s 31 .� ,R =1 P1.P...eran Bella Vista Preliminary Tree �� " °" I ="` I u I Lennar Corporation Preservation - M. a �.. 1aw5 ym l . Nnaa swl. eoB Plan WtlIwOOd 06/06/11 ?6971 PlYmoutR M-ewt. 55H6 Rorm°un[, Mlnnm°t. e ]011 wxt.oan Cd1 •6 Nuux lafwa nlggE': GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 7- City A— 651 -454-0002 Nn. Tdl Frx 1-600-352 -1166 ell fee e, \ I w I I : - I w t •_, / . / _/ ,� 'ate \ \ _ r I l � I I I 912 - -- s___ _ __ __ __ __ a__ -__ = \ \ - -- \ \� VE tj i v I ` / i .... 'I. - -" 1 '. ` :, \, �, r` \ \ :� }a:..' - -_ 956 �'�. `� ��'u 66••r ./ KEY: BIUCM Cnerrr DENOTES SAVED TREE I \ / I % �'' / DENOTES REMOVED TREE / J I:' / :••'i //7 .. , * • ) DENOTES OFFSITE TREE \i I, /��! ��\ I // 1',i /, /,, // ��\w¢i �\ \ •ia' / "1I ° a- l �!ij ` "A (v DENOTES GRADING LIMITS/ \ I •. I I` i /'•fit „.” �... -\ E t / '! Ali X / / / ^ SILT FENCING A / % jai✓ 1 '\ d' "' �_�� _Ja ti T l 5. 1 i '' ;''. a -'� DENOTES TREE PROIEC. FENCING g _ it I n ly - 976.,` .�i' .'ln' q (i;I!'�,. � � �" �• �'. �f" �r.� l;� _ AEI a,�, /� I M1aj(�/ �,,, � \�� A xa4�''IY�I,,� hlr� ' � — /-� NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION a9o9 6.w 9 95a�_ _ e nn.� _ `"�. _ ..�•... , a . - \ wr 04/30/13 Src 29 a 38x r w y _ � fe _ Bella Vista Preliminary Tree "°`" I �• Lennar Corporation Preservation 1610 as w[4b_ I 5 06N A-- Nunn Su11. 600 Plan �,- �� rlyvl M Mlnnewr SSH6 Itoxmawf, ML.naMa f— o=3 -.1— 11.1... ono s «N / ;tA 3 / / 11 �, I�/ % \1\ ( / �r "��yJ�, `\ `•/ I / 1' I C 1 F / • RR A / I � '\ iS. 1 '(o,p g �� M Ai" ,ISR. / . /I 2 \, � I •ia -9 �� ,/ . , r \e•,�, '•e, � /` ea s Ewa r`°" '+"y h.. __ __ Hof Ij .b t • \ .. - I I ,�I� lr l; \ �� yl a1 Vq'�.„ �- dN;, yy ! (, t`j /j ,9y}, -i 11 / I rn« r ` � �°.t161 / �,: I I 95f"..rr;I q. .(iY'✓ � I q6 �_. .n \ X \ /"-_, ' 7 -'96 .� to '�* ..r, � —`. �y1 ( \�- �• 66 y _ .o ��I I or 1`••. ' ?�„ �A 9T R- 1 966. ! .. � r I °, .wen `. 'r 11 r _ } / e I , I /a"`ol / I �,,..., �'s^ ) - �.s„ ✓) .gk, /: °•9 0.__'+,~d �f. A. a • /� .1 ,96 -! �• _ / ' I''. I` I �" � ♦ g....: i 6 - v^''°- !". R-i A T. l ,� I \ \.. l 1 ; ! I "i 'fa° / jA'r.�s =` PTT( ^,/ 1 7� ♦ ° "�'rvcrury Y S01 96x.1 \ \e -JI II �. is 4 9y�� -�y �'� (� I/ / I \'�., "°u ✓Pi F,... i' "sue ;. 7 16'� •„ Lennar Corporation u.p 16103 9Mh Amur Nonh Suhr 660 q��d 06 / %AS ]69n Plrvlwth Mlnnelotr 3+f66 1 1 �• C•II rfi Hrun lrla. elpgMq� GOPHER STATE ONE CALL CITY — 651 -65. -0002 Mn. T91 Fnr 1 -8W- 252 -1166 KEY: ) ! I 1 Olim�xficn «.i DENOTES SAVED TREE ' I I N '105" DENOTES REMOVED TREE III u c J ', ' ' ��^ '•05 DENOTES OFFSITE TREE + y DENOTES GRADING LIMITS/ { I ` SILT FENCING DENOTES TREE PROTECTION FENCING a � � 9� - 956 95fi / R11 �p , •__ .4 _ -_ -- __ FO -COI�7 TdC`T70N',' / 9e�5.rMO«..:a Bella Vista Preliminary Tree Preservation Plan _ - _ GOPHER STATE ONE CALL ol pi NN NN 0 11— DENOTES SAVED TREEj! DENOTES REMOVED TRkEj N DENOTES 6ADINd' ITS/ NN. LT FENO.G DENOTES TREE PROT*TI.& FENCING 04/30/13 31 W 38 14 r Bella Vista Preliminary Tree Lennar Corporation Preservation - _ _ _ FT E'�CALL 091205' C'l'y DENOTES SAVED TREE DENOTES REMOVED TREE DENOTES GRADING LIMITS/ SILT FEN ING DENOTES TREE PROTECTION FENCING bj ON Pl. 04/30/13 32 38 Bella Vista Preliminary Tree Lennar Corporation Preservation Plan � - I — —11 d 4 W,. Tree P—ervation Caloulations $..d i—I IZ OKR ;7 IwR N;", ..Wil" —d -iM 7— �7—k s—d —d —d 'e. 14 ... U11, 11 11 —d 1— 11- 6 .1 P :.vL!� 13 14 e04 14 9 n< n I d, scree 10: 1:.111 I _—d 12, ZD :0 1 . ....... —Id., 111k rIII. oxa 1. .14 1- —k 21 C" I 1— 6 0 ... ::" 01: OKR 4d DIk 15 OK R,d O.k 16 "MM" .CURe — 12 -OX d 7— 1—d C k, a K.d —d 16 �—OA Ox —1— 1s IlSei 1] mien —d —d -P J 2s ME lmi —11. OKR Ud 10 MU Cnem 6 7 .— — 12 A '"" 61 1.111 t, u .11 -171L -v , M-I, d ;.wed , d .2 —d wx 24 Tree Replacement Calculations bw 41W —d —k 0 0 nx -7 Wu I.A .1— Wu —k WI- - I — —11 d 4 W,. d OKR U11, 11 11 —d BOX -0d., 11 :.vL!� 13 14 e04 14 10 n scree 10: 1:.111 I :0 1 . ....... —Id., 111k rIII. oxa 1. .14 1- —k 21 C" I 1— 6 0 ... ::" 01: OKR 4d DIk 15 OK R,d O.k 16 d 7— a K.d —d d IlSei 1] mien —d �.d _12— ii5q Il Rea Oak —d n'. 7 .— — 12 A '"" d ;.wed , d —d W T-EE Lennar Corporation 16301 -h —.. —h SW. Plymouth, MI-- 55a4 Maus Veo '.7_ b, R.d 4 —d BrelBlkalM ,I• —12 Summary of Plan Changes Al::= ow 04/30/13 Bella Vista PreUminary Tree � Inventory Plan F- e 2011 WntxooE Prelasa antl SerHCee, nc. 0 . �( 1 11 -- / Call 40 — b.— EggMq' 1 J _ �I�., yg 1 5/R a 11ETLANiYJ�) – GOPHER STATE ONE CALL yf erc a168001I51�6fi h nw, 1 J - 1 i� r-1� r♦a��" //� < ,rSo..�'� K �/, (� /�i/� /'�' \(i`I `� � , ». ml 1 „hq� I r �, x �// t\ ��J / '� '{� � //✓ I6ERAN0 / j� � A L�' J I. _ { - -J _ J I � ) nC "�'� /0 �� I».w. •.��j / / � Harr, V..- � 1 � —T I \ - i Jt L_ ` 1 - I .»YL� \ ,all, \ts A6a, .\\ �/, A'^Oe� �~' °a °a.�'^ •�.' / �Y' l ,fl, ll ✓ `` J In ��no', i 'A`/ r� -ir__ WE RAND G ar. 1 " 1 lip% / •• / / \ YJ�^ 7s � �L m ,�+ I W nn, I - � � '��1' i /<!`_S' / �C•,e, / //, .cnum axrtx °q nV / /� // - � L` -�L� � 1 W TLAND N UNNAMED BASIN WW #19-3 ° WERAND •K l u,!•1� \ � I `» V". 11j+ j L' - 1 a I p ° ...° Vim,_,,,, ." . -° �' / • , / , / _ i �� a.iS., »• � I • I , m �.. ,'� •: .' , 't._ , :.% : :` .:'.: .F, ` � rs � Y� EXCEPTION EXCEPTION i WRAND E ------ I > a,_ / Iz MAID DY/ ,4t, ,aaw, / t I � \ • ` unMC \ _I.' � - f � J TEaNO'W`° ,e� (ar anaysl lk / ...:t \ .,� � „:/ / � • '� i"� I II �WL 956.0 I Ll I ,/ •::.�" v v . � I I � . �' III I /�r /' :: :. rs'vxsu,c \ •_- i- —_ - �y III Q ,u Ik ;; , :: • • • rn.un ewrza ...uu. ` \ \ _. r- .. / y � � � ,.. STORM POND / , ..... i° MARE POND 06J DNR PW 419 -12W r i �_NWL 95 II .[Hum 6nprP ' • :::. °e�' ° � \ \ 1 / i � 2 u° ��.°.�a �a"E�t I I I I J nre1: Y c ""rl L 1 Ill --° -- -- - - -_ —� _ —_ _ —_ -- - - --- -- T .--- - - - -r® -- -- \---- r- - -i��— �\ -- T-- I-- I — =1 - -j oa/sona 6 s m. ae Bella Vista Lennar Corporation Preliminary Plat 16305 MTh Avenue North S— 600 WISt —d .».�wnw»y.a »-slw I or /�N� u... x. 1 14,E Plymovlll. M1mnoM1 55446 Raemount. Mirv,nota I F | | | 75.10 75.10 85.95 TRAIL 4141- V 17 21,394 sf "TREET WEST' � F- Li - was MEMORANDUM Date: June 26, 2013 Re: Bella Vista (aka Marshes) Revised Wetland Mitigation File 0000586.00 To: Eric Zweiber, City of Rosemount Phil Olson, City of Rosemount Andi Moffat, City of Rosemount c/o WSB & Associates Dennis Rodacker, Minnesota BWSR Brian Watson & Mark Zabel, Dakota County SWCD Melissa Doperalski and Jeff Berg, Minnesota DNR Cc: Joe Jablonski, Lennar Fran Hagen, Westwood Professional Services From: Kelly Kunst, Westwood Professional Services 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952- 937 -5150 FAX 952- 937 -5822 TOLL FREE 888- 937 -5150 www.westwoodps.com This memo and the attached plan sheets constitute the revision to the Wetland Replacement Plan (WRP) dated May 9, 2013 for the Marshes development (now known as Bella Vista) in the City of Rosemount. Due to issues related to the construction of wetland mitigation area M -1 adjacent MnDNR Public Water Wetland 19 -12W, M -1 was moved to a location north of Wetland M. As a result, the revised WRP consists of two wetland creation areas (M -1 and M -2) located north and south of Wetland M, respectively. The revised WRP also includes the addition of 0.65 acres of upland buffer adjacent to the new wetlands to be utilized for wetland replacement credit. Proposed elevations for M -1 and M -2 range from 954.0 to 956.0, with a predicted normal water level of 956.0. Hydrology will be supplied by surface runoff and a shared hydrologic connection to Wetland M. The subwatershed of the M -1/M -2 /Wetland M complex totals 18.9 acres which is comprised of 4.2 acres on site, 12.9 acres contributed from off -site to the east, and 1.8 acres of contribution from the adjacent roadway to the south. The high water level for a 2 -year event is 956.25 and 956.60 for a 10 -year event. Upland buffer areas that are utilized for replacement credit have a maximum slope of 8:1 and have a minimum width of 25 feet. M -1, M -2, and the buffer areas will be constructed, seeded, managed, and monitored in accordance with the plan submitted with the Marshes WRP dated May 9, 2013. Land and Energy DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS " ®®®®■ ■ ®■ ■ ■ ■ ■ June 26, 2013 Page 2 Attached Exhibits 3A through 3D depict the revised Wetland Impact and Mitigation Plan and details of mitigation areas M -1 and M -2. Exhibits 4A and 4B (Wetland Buffer Plan) were also revised to reflect these changes. The following table summarizes the revised wetland replacement credit provided for the Bella Vista Project. Table 2. Wetland Replacement mary Replacement Size sf (acre) Replacement Wetland Type Area ID Credit Generated sf (acre) M -1 0.31 0.23 Sedge /wet meadow - shallow marsh M -2 0.63 0.47 Sedge /wet meadow - shallow marsh WCA Buffer 0.65 0.16 Buffer Total 1.59 0.86 ---------- - - - - -- A total of 0.86 acres of replacement credit will be generated which exceeds the minimum replacement requirement for the Project by 0.02 acres. Please provide written concurrence that this revised WRP for the Bella Vista Project meets the requirements of the Minnesota WCA and the City of Rosemount Comprehensive Wetland Management Plan (WMP). F- �� > > V L + WMGRa F[lF/JiC BOW°Am `j + \� -• -I . — � ' /' 4B — .. — PROGOSD FE11MIa BUFFER \ 9 -�. .. oe.Brts )cnAAV aurFw R{� ��11 "^mil ) _ --•1/ �%� � — y'�-• -- �\ F . WCA BUFFER W. ACREAGE %Frt.Un cRAwAK % RB; . . _... °y "• pO�.� 'O.° Y� ° ::�:.��ii• \ � \ %eM.m o., o.e> /— NEILAND s '•." V.• v .'b.:.`. l aecrrAD£/D ac a 9rEx ✓n aO4 1.5f i /1 as 9•° .°� - xcmAaa BUFFER aH °e t BUFFER II RS• EXG Nrlur�vs _ l o.zs °° RE' xsna+D s s�ca RErwADC� u� 0.22 oc REGRADE BUFFER Exc BUFFER j j /l'l j �i { � U i °t' / ( � i. �, //p �.\ •� 'T"'1� , i �, .'X:t.. q aria ° � �:d � 1 ) (((„ ae � \ r17-� I (1( i � h' (_ \ � � / a'o. / y�.-- .11''' •ti 'l ry ��J,' I � 1'�s\, ` C_. � ae ` a � 'T � -� ,tp .d8' 'B \ y\ �� »B 1 �� / � � / � �- —� • / �� _ 959 / ao - 'c� , // � �q10�_ I�'.•� � �� \nl ` � � ate' �'-� _ - / 1L` �1 r `a v 1 1 I� n� � fir► ��I • 11l, I�I�II oa \�� Gil 1, Ii LIU f M 41 a7f N�EXG awm? fXC OUFFER 1.16 REMAND 9 I-r -- --------- ---- ------- ------- A - I F- � t. I CnAND I WE KILAND H j EXX 8 0.02 41 a7f N�EXG awm? fXC OUFFER 1.16 REMAND 9 I-r -- --------- ---- ------- ------- A - I F- � t. I ?U-aOS Ar- V71-4 � iii AIN] _ m ?U-aOS Ar- V71-4 Fm- D BURFA 0 -QOI '74 jig 7� W%r W, WE7LAND M VART EX. 18" FES 17 71 IE=955.6 ■ By 70 -- ---- ---- -- UN N HE T Lennar Corporation WM a66 A— N-& � M Ow4m vm — I I pir� WveR✓A 5%4 964 II X 77n=mv1= 2D' oaoeeearoacM We 3 et t; Bella Vista d Nfifigation c C F 4111,11111 £WAILVAILVAILVAILVAWLT4MLVAMV,I', MOM,glA A std ` '%� `.� ... MI 77GA 77ON '74 jig 7� W%r W, WE7LAND M VART EX. 18" FES 17 71 IE=955.6 ■ By 70 -- ---- ---- -- UN N HE T Lennar Corporation WM a66 A— N-& � M Ow4m vm — I I pir� WveR✓A 5%4 964 II X 77n=mv1= 2D' oaoeeearoacM We 3 et t; Bella Vista d Nfifigation c C I- - ------------ -HE c� -------- LP top �Iffmffl 9 19 Emmum RMEMN Lennar Corporation - I "' Fir-.b, � 21" RCP ----------- / i P iA 9 20 05/10/13 4 Befla. Vista Wetland Mitigation R- in- c e1013 weatwaoa Prolaaa onol snHCaa. Inc j/ "' / \ I ' - / V I T I Call eB R ATE ONE CALL ECRr ADE/SEED `. ,' ! l GOPHER STATE ONE ' .. —_r� .� • ` \ M£7LANQ" / R _ \ F it r Ugend i \ '• - -__ \ �- 1uo. ruR v.n 1-800 - 252-1166 ONKHi[D —10 ea ARY .'' ., % , _ 1 �.1 \\ _ g� •\ a�, `gta PRDPp3[D KMxO BORER , I �V'E ;'.. RAGING ANA D acoRwi6wcn.RD BIrrER 1 T � ♦ y y .. �. ... --q. _6.J L �I L .� � \ g,B � \lam � Q� l q .. a o RcrtsxD ORnrxe¢ \ I \ \ . -.__ .� -' I` I _. _ ., . n._� \ ®/ '�V: ". \,1 \/`\ • • 4 rrov/Rtvl.etFKxr ` J . Y ' •�•' � �, aCMwO wnu AND BUFFER COMPENSATED, /- \ - - - :. El lw.un,e o..ran, x.. wnme a.eru ��_- REMADE /SEED EXG BUFFER ISDUE'iOROAD R 151 ac L r 16,291_sF BUFFO 0.04 c ;� .•••••• Rrrn.Dro wwraxorD UPUw BDa*rx ti.•` \\, ��, t ..;.,1 ;// / RfGRADE� i v �)�\ 1\ /EAYY \ /' 0.44 BUFFER 11 7 "'�"•" ♦. T ___ EXC nanm'c uxnxD wrru LL 68. 7J sl \ I 1 BUFFER E 4 IND BUFFER C06FPENSA'*Y\ , MERAN4 R \\ l; arJ '. �•' i l '\ \ \ 1 gall _ IS FOR, ROAD BUFFER � -� $, \ 1 / FKJRSEI+'OE LAKE BUFFER . EXG OTS D �%� NERAND 5 OT. C �.. 111111 — _ao £XG BUFFER • '� 1" �) „ r _ RfCRAD � D, _ III\\ '�• a l BERAND s REGRAOE/SEED 1 15 a I I I I • 4 / /�� .� \� l� /' v • ( �/I I. l 02�c I n 0.! P "I! I / BUFFEREISM 4j/�" r/ ' :" •1 rp/ I ^, / ,. \m j I I: \ a- i 0.4J DD i. vc+��+° jr //� .! ' I;I i.�• ,�...' 17 ;� � a \•.. I I I� ��..y /'�Tfl � / S't� % 1 qj-\ y ,� s luFXrGER 1.74 cc I y r EXG B s 1.r gl� \ � UFFER ,�V/• `_ ✓ � /�' ' _/,.� 1 TT I �. �I�I' II `1�, J' — � d r``\ 1tlx `••i� r�s� • \�•� \/ �. it lit .' I r 1 ': -1 / C' ! _ j -I:: / _ ' _ 4 � REGRADE ED i r ! \ 1 ,1,_ / , ' . •/ ^ s I I rl 1 �'•.0 • �. ":�F: . " _ 1. J 1 rb ISac it / e " ,� _. � ', r � f l � r BuFfER ' \ I� r 1 � � \ 8 \ - �w �! . '° �' �/ �✓� 9 � 1�? J � \ i' 1�� I''I �� i' 1,, � DE%SE /`... , ., \ 959 '. g !9 � 9 ♦ 956 .J :.%' /!/ !;% 4 !1 - g�g•14 pJ I /• %' 'j � I .. � � ./ 9 ° °.5 0 1 +�'.i� '� '� \ _ --�R, _ qg0 a •956' 1. � 1 f � %a/ y c '/ Y72•T6 \ Sae � j0.. (. -I' \`..1 /. � y3e-"`yj q°° �./ � ` 9B � -.` 1B. \ v /1G. \ ,ao`� / \ „ �' ♦I •.� rFB�'.. �. / � ° �' �, li'�G'L J: I, � � _, pAr .' _ - 195a__D "•t,.'�. 3 93E ! '' p 1 / , r, '/ l; , I I '� " ;' ' '.� � 1 °D ' al'° f2 _,- 9 . A ay� 9 ...,nA a ^` \ •E r I II `q i � oo ° N£MNO � \ _ � tiBi� L' d _ � I ^. I •. .•\ I s Off° ( Ty ? / I ° °O fiB A /(IA 961 /N.. B•W� i' / / \' - \\ i .. wmola \ ooama. �4 / - J �f �ADEA/SEED 5 .R wr 04/30A3 s.e 37 or 38 a ` I BFegB9ed °e .,° 1l, ` :� % /1 / I l D ON ./_�� - ®. Bella Vista Wetland Impact Lennar Corporation Mitigation Plan I Hors r.rwrarr n 1a.6., � D� � Ia�r. I FvlAebl I t0. Plymouth Minn aF. S.H 66 � T4esTrrood I m O6 /06N 11F16 ' ( aol Rosemount MLmooh _ - _ DRAI IrrD o. XG BUFFER WETLAND 8 STMIPDND TH NOT OR 0 STR Bella Vista P�P.� f-b Wetland Impact Lennar Corporation Mitigation Plan _ BUFFER AVERAGING ANALYSIS: T�Z-d m-aw wr ton . .......... Kaar Mr- --/ . ......... ... . . . . . . . . . . IX -I. Wetland Management and Protection Requirements Management Management Wetland Buffer Storm Water Management Minimum Mitigation Class Strategy Standards Standard Preserve Maintain wetland and existing 75 feet Sediment and nutrient 3:1 replacement ratio with a functions, values and wildlife pretreatment required; minimum 2 acres of Wetland habitat. 30' minimum if buffer consider diversion if Replacement Credit and averaging is encouraged possible maximum 1 acre of Upland Apply strict avoidance Buffer Credit for every acre standards. Monuments required impacted. Manage 1 Maintain wetland without 50 feet Sediment and nutrient 2:1 replacement ratio with a degrading existing functions, pretreatment required minimum of 1 acre of Wetland values and wildlife habitat. 30' minimum if buffer Replacement Credit and a averaging is encouraged maximum of 1 acre of Upland Sequencing is required Buffer Credit for every acre impacted. Additional mitigation Monuments required may be required by the WCA in MR 8420. Manage 2 Maintain wetland functionality 30 feet Sediment pretreatment 2:1 replacement ratio with a required minimum of 1 acre of Wetland Allow limited sequencing 15' minimum if buffer Replacement Credit and maximum of 1 acre of Upland flexibility averaging is encouraged Buffer Credit for every acre Monuments required impacted. Additional mitigation may be required by the WCA in MR 8420. Manage 3 Allow maximum sequencing 15 feet for non - agricultural Pretreatment to NPDES standards (per Minnesota 2:1 replacement ratio with a minimum of 1 acre of Wetland flexibility areas only Pollution Control Agency Replacement Credit and Monuments not required rules) is required if these maximum of 1 acre of Upland standards apply to the Buffer Credit for every acre project impacted. Additional mitigation may be required by the WCA in MR 8420. Page 24 February 2013 ,YROSEMOUNT MINNESOTA 3 Y a•� vALLtT City of Rosemount, Minnesota Transportation Plan _ Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local Road .'11 Prepared by. 0 101 %mY A�enw SauiR SWIe 7a0 e� �D Mnro�q, MN 551st sail Legend -- - - - - -- Principal Arterial (future roadway) -- - - - - -- Major Collector (future roadway) -------- Minor Collector (future roadway) & Number of Lanes 2030 Roadway Functional Classification Figure 5.3 PARK DEDICATION SKETCH 4ROSEMOUNT PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: July 11, 2013 TO: Eric Zweber, Senior Planner CC: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director Andrew Brotzler, Director of Public Works /City Engineer Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director Chris Watson, Public Works Coordinator Kathie Hanson, Planning & Personnel Secretary FROM: Phil Olson, Assistant City Engineer RE: Bella Vista Preliminary Plat: Developer Plan Review SUBMITTAL: Prepared by Westwood Engineering, the Bella Vista Preliminary PUD Submittal is dated April 30, 2013 and revised June 6, 2013. Engineering review comments were generated from the following documents included in the submittal: Preliminary PUD Submittal (38 pages) dated April 30, 2013 and Revised June 6, 2013, comprised of the following: • Existing Conditions • Development Plan /Preliminary Plat • Preliminary Grading Plan, Preliminary Utility Plan, and Preliminary Landscape Plan • Preliminary Profiles • Preliminary Tree Preservation Plan • Preliminary Tree Inventory Plan • Wetland Impact — Mitigation Plan • Wetland Mitigation Plan Exhibit 5, dated June 21, 2013. • Existing and Proposed Drainage Area Map, (4 pages) revised April 25, 2013. • Stormwater Management Report, (343 pages) revised April 25, 2013. • Temporary Access for Phase 3 & Phase 4 (4 pages) revised July 8, 2013. DEVELOPMENT FEES: The developer will be responsible for the cost of the improvements within the development and a share of the future cost to construct Autumn Path with the cooperation of the adjacent property. A feasibility report detailing the developer's costs and financial responsibilities will be required prior to approval of a final plat. It will also detail the schedule for when improvements will be required. Below is a listing of some of the items the developer will be responsible for funding. • Autumn Path (Street L) • Ponding • Utility extensions • Utility relocation • Right -of -way • Roadway and utility improvements • Temporary sanitary sewer lift station • Construction of the temporary access across Lot 15, Block 6 from the cul -de -sac at the south end of Street B to Bonaire Path • Removal of temporary infrastructure • Cul -de -sacs • Sanitary sewer lift station • Temporary access across Lot 15, Block 6 from the cul -de -sac at the south end of Street B to Bonaire Path. • Stormwater management, lift station, and forcemain 2. The developer will be responsible for a share of the cost to upgrade Bacardi Avenue to an urban roadway for the segment adjacent to the development. A feasibility report is currently being completed. The report will include roadway and utility improvements and will identify the funding responsibility for the Bella Vista development. The developer is responsible for the entire cost of the feasibility report if Bella Vista is not developed. 3. The developer will be responsible for the cost of all sidewalks and trails internal to the development. The developer will be responsible for grading the regional trail. 4. Additional development fees are required with final plats based on the current Schedule of Rates and Fees. GENERAL COMMENTS: 5. A feasibility report is required for this development prior to design and construction of this project. The feasibility report will determine the following items: • Stormwater management • Sanitary sewer to exception parcels • Details with a temporary sanitary sewer lift station • Details with the temporary cul -de -sacs • Well locations • Utility layout, sizes and phasing 6. The city is currently working on feasibility report for Bacardi Avenue. This report is required prior to finalization of a subdivision agreement. 7. Individual lots, post home construction, are not allowed to be constructed with a slope greater than 1:4. The final lot survey is requirement to verify that this requirement is met. In the past, walkout models have not used the entire building pad which increases the grade from the front to the back of the house. 8. Northern Natural Gas, Koch Pipeline, and Magellan Pipeline all have gas pipelines within the proposed development. Crossing permits and grading permits are likely required from the gas companies for the proposed improvements. The developer is required to work with the gas companies to execute any required permits. 9. Pothole elevations are required for each utility crossing and roadway crossing the pipelines to verify that the improvements can be constructed as proposed. Any design changes required by gas companies shall not result in any nonconforming lots. Due to the restrictions with this site, the pothole elevations should be provided prior to approval of the grading plan. 10. Conservation easements are required over all stormwater ponds, infiltration basins, wetlands, and buffers. Signage for conservation easements shall be provided by the developer and an extended 5 year maintenance warranty shall be required to ensure establishment of the naturally vegetated areas. Costs associated with the establishment of the naturally vegetated areas and the 5 year maintenance period shall be a cost of the development. 11. All areas proposed to be naturally vegetated are required to be established by the developer and maintained with a 5 year maintenance period. Costs associated with the establishment of the naturally vegetated areas and the 5 year maintenance period shall be a cost of the development. 12. Storm sewer is proposed along the side and back lot lines of certain properties to convey rear yard drainage. Drainage and utility easements along these lines shall prohibit the installation of sheds to ensure that access can be provided for storm sewer maintenance. Fences are allowed but shall not restrict drainage and are required to include gates for truck access over the drainage and utility easement. Also, landscaping that will block access should be prohibited. These restrictions should be added as a restriction on the property deed. This will impact the following properties: • Block 2: Lot 6, 7, 12, 13, 18, 19 • Block 1: Lot 2 and 3 • Block 5: Lot 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 22, and 23 • Block 7: Lot 1, 12, 13, 5, and 6 • Block 6: Lot 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 • Block 4: Lot 1 • Block 10: Lot 1, 2, 8, 9, and 23 • Block 8: Lot 2, 3, 10, and 11 13. Trees should not be located over storm sewer pipes or within emergency overflow routes or overland flow routes. Additionally, trees located on individual properties should not be planted near the sanitary sewer and water service lines. These trees should be positioned a minimum of 15 feet from the service lines. 14. The width of drainage and utility easements over all public utilities shall be verified during final design. 15. The grading for the regional trail is required to meet ADA trail standards and be in conformance with the Mn /DOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual. 16. Fences are required for all retaining walls adjacent roadways, sidewalks, trails, or other public uses. Fences located along the rear yards of private properties will be reviewed on a case — by -case basis with the final plat. 17. Retaining walls and fences are required to be installed by the developer with the mass grading of the site. Retaining walls and fences are required to be owned and maintained by the developer or individual property owner. 18. Temporary construction easements will be required for all grading shown outside of the property limits. 19. Lot 1, Block 11 and Lot 1, Block 3 will not be constructed until development occurs to the north and the roadway is extended. 20. Lot 14 and Lot 15, Block 6 and Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 2 will not be able to be constructed until the adjacent properties develop. 21. Lot 7, Block 1 may not be able to be constructed until after the temporary lift station is removed. 22. The EOF elevations to the east from Street L are required to be shown on the plan. 23. Contour annotations should be added to the plan at all ponds and the infiltration basin (1:4, 1:10,13). 24. A permit from the DNR is required to grade below the OHW. This is proposed adjacent to Wetland B (Mare Pond). STORMWATER MANAGEMENT/WETLAND MITIGATION COMMENTS: 25. A storm sewer lift station from Basin 1424 is required as part of a regional improvement to manage future runoff from the White Lake watershed and a local improvement to direct runoff from the development from Basin 1424 to the infiltration basin. The developer is required to include the proposed forcemain alignment with the site plans. The system design should include the forcemain alignment for discharging to the infiltration area and discharging downstream to Mare Pond. Valves should be included to direct the flow in the forcemain. The forcemain should be located within the project right -of -way or drainage and utility easement. In addition to payment of stormwater trunk fees, the developer will be responsible for paying the additional cost associated with the construction of the diversion system (force main, valves, monitoring system and controls) to carry this water to the 26. A permanent operation plan for the lift station, diversion system, and infiltration basin is required to be provided by the developer that demonstrates that adequate freeboard is present for structures for a 100 -year storm event and to meet the city requirements for infiltration. 27. An operational plan to provide flood protection for the site and surrounding structures prior to installation of the permanent lift station is required to be provided by the developer. The plan is required to provide rates, frequency, and allowable depths of water. This plan is required to be submitted with the final plat of the Phase 1. 28. Additional discussions are required with the developer to find the best option to meet the stormwater requirements on a phased basis. One option may be to pump a predetermined amount of water from Basin 1424 to allow for the additional drainage from the development. This could be done on an annual basis until the storm sewer lift station is construction in Phase 2. It is the developer's responsibility to manage the stormwater protection for the site and property adjacent to the site until the lift station and diversion system is fully operational. The entire cost to operate any temporary system to keep the site in conformance with the City flood protection standards will be at the developer's expense. 29. Additional infiltration testing data is required to verify that the rate control design is in conformance with City requirements. The infiltration testing should be completed during site grading and at the proposed grading plan elevations. It should be noted that a clay layer is shown in the boring logs at 942, which is at the bottom of the infiltration area. If the tested site infiltration rates are not deemed adequate by the City, the developer will be required to bring the site into conformance with City standards. 30. Piezometer readings are required across the site to verify the separation between the low floor and groundwater elevations is in compliance with city standards. Piezometer readings are required to be submitted to the city prior to approval of the grading plan. 31. The storm sewer system design calculations and drainage area calculations will be reviewed with the final plat. Storm sewer that exceeds 10 feet in depth will require additional drainage and utility easement. 32. All stormwater ponds are required to contain a clay liner to the NWL. 33. Riprap or other erosion control method is required at all pond and wetland EOF locations. 34. The NURP treatment volumes for Pond 4A should be provided to demonstrate that the pond is in conformance with the City standards. 35. The low floor building openings within the property north of Basin 1424 are required to verify that the development will not cause flooding. 36. A DNR outlet permit for Basin 1424 is required to establish the management elevation at 934.0. Permit approval is required prior to approval of the grading plan. 37. The Basin 1424 outlet elevation of 934.0 will need to be approved by the DNR for the development to be in conformance with the city's water quantity requirements. 38. Drainage from the rear yards of Block 1 is not currently addressed with this plan. The stormwater management plan is required to include this area. If onsite ponding is not feasible, offsite ponding and infiltration may be an option with the ponding constructed for Street L. If offsite ponding is available, the developer will be required to pay an offsite ponding fee. 39. Ponding for Street L is not included with the stormwater management plan. Ponding for Street L will be addressed with the feasibility report. 40. The stormwater modeling proposes as 12 -inch pipe between Basin 1560 and Pond 6. The utility plan and grading plan do not include the proposed connection. This connection should be shown on the plans. 41. The water quality treatment volume in Pond 6 is required to be updated in the stormwater management plan. These changes have been submitted but are still being reviewed. PLAN COMMENTS: SHEET 4 & 5: 42. The pipeline easement document numbers should be added to the preliminary plat. SHEET 8: 43. The grading northwest of the intersection of Street E and Street EE should be reviewed. It appears that the 954 and 956 contours are not shown correctly and need to be revised. 44. The trail cross slope between Pond 5 and the pipeline easement is proposed at a 4:1 slope. This is required should be revised to meet the trail standards. Sheet 9: 45. The storm sewer outlet from Basin 1518 should be installed in a way that restricts seepage along the pipe. 46. Storm sewer from the back property corner between Lot 5 and Lot 6, Block 7 should be directed to a stormwater pond prior to discharge to the wetland. SHEET 12: 47. The easements in the rear years of Lot 7 through Lot 10, Block 11 should be increased to encompass the EOF to elevation 959.5. It appears that the building pad of Lot 8, Block 11 may need to be raised with an EOF of 958.50. 48. The EOF between Lot 6 and Lot 7, Block 11 should be shown on the plan. The easement across lots 6 -7, Block 11 should encompass the emergency overflow route to elevation 960.0. 49. The easements on Lot 26 through Lot 29, Block 11 should be revised to encompass the rear yard overland flow routes. SHEET 14: 50. The regional trail is shown to cross Wetland B. Crossing options are currently being considered. Mass grading is not allowed in the wetland and silt fence should be installed to protect this area during grading operations. SHEET 18: 51. Sight triangles should be shown on Street H at the intersection with Bacardi Avenue. Should you have any questions or comments regarding the items listed above, please contact me at 651- 322 -2015. !i ROSEMOUNT PARKS AND RECREATION To: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director Eric Zweber, Senior Planner Jason Lindahl, Planner Andy Brotzler, Public Works Director /City Engineer Phil Olson, Assistant City Engineer From: Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director Date: June 13, 2013 Subject: Bella Vista — Preliminary Plat On May 29, 2013 the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the Bella Vista preliminary plat and recommended the City Council approve the plat with the following conditions: • The neighborhood park identified to be located on the south side of Horseshoe Lake should be developed with an emphasis on natural resource based recreation and conservation, which is consistent with the City's 2008 Parks Master Plan. • The parks dedication requirement for 158 units is 6.32 acres of land. The Parks and Recreation Commission recommended that the developer be given credit for .65 acres of land and that the remainder of the parks dedication be provided as cash in -lieu of land. • The City should accept the fee title for the property that Dakota County is purchasing conservation easements for within the development. • Include a public trail along Bonaire Path. The trail would be in the R.O.W. where possible but would need to be located north of Mare Pond and south of Wetland M. The trail should also be shown in the ghost plats for the two exception parcels. A trail is also requited between the cul -de -sac on Street K and the exception parcel, between Wetland B and Wetland H. • The regional trail should connect with Bonaire Path in the northeast corner of Bacardi Avenue. This will provide a connection with the existing trail south of Bonaire Path. Please let me know if you have any questions about this memo. 4ROSEMOUNT FIRE DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M To: Eric Zweber, Planner From: Dale Chard, Fire Marshal Date: May 20, 2013 Subject: Marshes /Bella Vista Upon review of the Marshes Preliminary PUD Submittal dated 4/30/13 provided for review by Westwood Professional Services Inc. on behalf of Pulte Group the Fire Marshal offers the following comments: o Provide a temporary turn around for east end of Street E (Phase 2). The turnaround must meet section D103 of the 2007 MNSFC. (Fire Apparatus Access Roads). ® Add hydrant near the temporary turnaround on the West end of Street G (Phase 4N). ® Facilities, building or portions of buildings hereafter constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of an approved access road with and asphalt, concrete or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the unposed load of at least 75,000 pounds. Thank you, Dale Chard