HomeMy WebLinkAbout9.a. Fairview Health Services Major Amendment to their PUD for an Expansion at their Clinic at 15075 Cimarron Ave�A,C)SEMOUN 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CITY COUNCIL
City Council Meeting Date: August 5, 2013
AGENDA ITEM: Case 13- 29 -AMD; Fairview Health Services
Major Amendment to their Planned Unit
AGENDA SECTION:
Development for an Expansion at their Clinic at
New Business
15075 Cimarron Avenue.
PREPARED BY: Eric Zweber, Senior Planner
AGENDA NO.
q .a•
ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Resolution; Major Amendment
APPROVED BY:
to the Fairview Health Services Planned Unit
Development Final Development Plan
Agreement; Fairview Health Services Planned
Unit Development Final Development Plan
Agreement; Title Sheet; Landscape Plan;
Existing Conditions; Site Plan; Grading Plan;
Utility Plan; Floor Plan; Exterior Elevations;
Excerpt of the Draft July 23 Planning
Commission Meeting Minutes; City Engineer's
Memorandum dated July 17, 2013; Park and
Recreation Director's Memorandum dated July
18, 2013.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a Resolution approving a Major Amendment
to the Fairview Health Services Planned Unit Development (PUD) Final Development Plan
Agreement for an Addition to the Western Side of the Existing Clinic.
Motion to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Major Amendment to the
Fairview Health Services Planned Unit Development (PUD) Final Development Plan
Agreement.
ISSUE
Fairview Health Services is requesting a Major Amendment to their Planned Unit Development to construct
an approximate 4,500 square foot expansion to their clinic at 15075 Cimarron Avenue. The expansion will
be for additional clinic space as well as a pharmacy with drive through.
JULY 23 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
During their July 23 meeting, the Planning Commission conducted a Public hearing for the Fairview
addition. No residents were present during the meeting. Planning Commissioner Husain asked what EIFS
is constructed of Staff explained that EIFS is accentually rigid foam insulation covered with stucco.
Commissioner Kurle asked if there were enough egress doorways with the addition. Staff explained that the
Building Official has reviewed the proposal and that all the existing doorways would remain and an
additional doorway will be installed at the new main entrance. Chair Powell asked how long it would be
until the next addition and if it is common for the City to approve a conditional use within a PUD. Staff
responded that Fairview has not committed to a timeline for the next expansion but that it took only 5 years
for this addition to the project. Staff also responded that it is not unique to address specific uses within the
context of the PUD and that the City included limits to auto - orientated uses within the Prestwick Place
PUD.
The Planning Commission unanimously (4 -0 with Commissioner Weber absent) recommended approval of
the Major PUD Amendment with the five staff recommended conditions.
SUMMARY
Fairview Health Services constructed a 10,000 square foot clinic at 15075 Cimarron Avenue in 2008.
Fairview has stated that the clinic has been more successful than expected and therefore they are proposing
an expansion of 4,547 square feet including both additional clinic space and a pharmacy. The expansion will
be added on the west side of the clinic. The 1,452 square foot pharmacy will be located on the north side of
the addition with a drive through window facing north (towards Wendy's) and will be accessed through the
Fairview parking lot. The remaining 3,095 square feet is designated as clinic space including eight additional
exam rooms.
Surrounding Land Uses: North: Commercial
East: Commercial and Wetland
South: Multiple Family Townhomes
West: Commercial
Existing Zoning District: C -4 PUD: General Commercial Planned Unit Development
Required Setbacks:
Frontage
Structure
Parkin /Drivewa
151St Street West
30 Feet
20 Feet
Cimarron Avenue
30 Feet
15 Feet
Interior
15 Feet
0 Feet
Proposed Setbacks:
Frontage
Structure
Parld /Drivewa
151" Street West
30 Feet
N/A
Cimarron Avenue
45 Feet
15 Feet
Interior
15 Feet
0 Feet
Site Layout
Currently the 10,000 square foot building is located on the southeast corner of the site, nearest the corner of
Cimarron Ave and 1515[ Street and a 49 stall parking lot directly north of the building. The parking lot is
accessed off of a private drive to the north, and is shared with Applebee's and Wendy's. The proposed
4,500 square foot expansion will be attached to the west side of the existing building. With the expansion,
the parking lot will be expanded to the west as well.
The southwest corner of the site will remain vacant and could accommodate another expansion of
approximately 5,000 square feet.
Building Design and Materials
The expansion will match the colors and design of existing building. The north side, south side and corners
of the building will be constructed of the same brick as the existing building. The west side of the expansion
is proposed to be EIFS in the same colors as the rest of the building. Fairview is requesting the EIFS in
K
anticipation of the next expansion because EIFS is less expensive than masonry construction. Provision of a
lesser grade material in anticipation of a building expansion is not without precedent. The east facade of
Rosemount Market Square (The Pond) facing Dairy Queen and Taco John's is EIFS because Rosemount
Market Square was approved for a 15,000 square foot future expansion. Staff is supportive of the request
for EIFS on the west side of the expansion.
The entrance to the building will be relocated to the west side of the existing building resulting in a main
entrance centered in the building with expansion. This relocated entrance will also be centered on the newly
expanded parking lot.
The addition will contain a pharmacy with drive- through window on the north side of the expansion facing
the private drive, Applebee's and Wendy's. The drive- through lane will be one -way from east to west to
allow the driver to access the drive- through window. The addition itself will shield any headlights from the
townhouses to the south. The headlights of a car leaving the drive- through would shine toward the strip
retail building containing Great Clips to the west. Any stacking for the drive- through would queue in the
Fairview parking lot, with additional cars flowing into the private drive. No public road should be impacted
by stacking for the drive- through window. Staff is supportive of the drive- through layout and recommends
a condition of approval is the layout through the PUD instead of requiring a separate stand -alone
conditional use permit (CUP).
Access and Parking
As generally described earlier, the parking lot for the clinic and the access to the drive- through is through the
existing site access, off of the adjoining shared private drive. The current 49 stall parking lot is being
expanded to the west resulting in a total 84 stalls. The ordinance parking requirement with for the
expansion is 75 stalls (5 stalls for each of the 10 doctors and 1 stall for each of the 25 employees). This
design leaves an excess of 9 stalls for future expansion on the site.
Staff would note that the 9 -stall excess parking, as compared to ordinance standards, could mean that future
clinic expansion would be limited by the amount of parking that can be provided on site. However, the
advantage of having the clinic expand in phases is that the City can monitor actual parking demand at the
site. Often the City recognizes that the ordinance parking formula is a general formula and may or may not
address a specific project need. On several occasions the City has approved parking that the applicant has
indicated is needed based upon their experience and often a parking study. This could differ from the
ordinance criteria. Staff is recommending that Fairview submit a parking study demonstrating actual parking
demand with any future expansion. The study will allow the City to evaluate the appropriateness of the
requested future expansion. The current expansion meets ordinance criteria and therefore a parking study is
not being requested at this time and submission is not a condition of approval. However, the applicant is put
on notice that additional information will be needed in the future.
Landscaping
The landscaping installed for the addition follows the same pattern as the original clinic. Foundation
plantings are installed on the north and south side of the addition and within the island created by the drive -
through lane. Boulevard trees are proposed along 1515` Street, the private drive, and within the new parking
lot island. The landscaping proposed meets the City requirements.
Engineering and Park Director's Memorandums
Engineering has a couple of comments within their memorandum, which is attached to this executive
summary. The most significant suggestion is to regrade the parking lot expansion, which is essentially a
bowl with a catch basin in the middle of the parking lot. The downside of this design is that if the catch
basin were to become clogged, then the parking lot would slowly fill up with water until it overflowed to the
3
southwest. If the parking lot were regraded to create a constant slope from a high point at the parking lot
entrance in the northeast to a low point in the southwest, then only the curbing at the southwest would fill
up with water before overflowing. The current design meets City regulations, so staff is not requiring the
change. And as any negative impact is within private property, it is up to the applicant whether they would
like to modify their grading plan.
In 2008, when the 10,000 square foot Fairview Clinic was constructed, Fairview had anticipated splitting the
lot and considered selling the western one acre of property. With this proposed addition, Fairview will no
longer be splitting the property. Because of that possible split, the park dedication funds were only collected
for the eastern half of the property. With the proposed expansion, the western half of the property will be
required to pay its park dedication which is $9,000 for fee -in -lieu of dedication for one acre of commercial
land.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Major Amendment to the Planned Unit Development for the expansion
of the Fairview Clinic.
L1
4
• 4
Fairview
r t Id
wyr+K 0.%P"
1
Lr'
I a
\ 1
R
r -m
• b • • , 31�-
IAA
Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a Map Scale
legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning 1 inch = 400 feet
verification. Dakota County assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. 7/19/2013
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2013 -
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE FAIRVIEW HEALTH
SERVICES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AN
ADDITION TO THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE EXISTING CLINIC
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received a
request from Fairview Health Services to amend the Fairview Health Services Building Planned Unit
Development (PUD) Final Development Plan Agreement to construct an approximately 4,500
square foot addition including a pharmacy and drive through window to the western side of the
existing clinic, and
WHEREAS, staff has prepared and recommends a Major PUD Amendment to allow the building
addition, and
WHEREAS, on July 23, 2013 the Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing regarding the
Major PUD Amendment, and
WHEREAS, on July 23, 2013 the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the
Major PUD Amendment, and
WHEREAS, on August 5, 2013, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the
application and the recommendation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the addition to the Fairview Health Services Clinic, subject to the following conditions:
1. Allow EIFS on the west side of the expansion until the next addition is approved.
2. Approval of the drive- through window and access lane.
3. Payment of $9,000 fee -in -lieu of dedication for the equivalent of 1.0 acres park land.
4. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum dated July 17, 2013.
5. Compliance with the Parks and Recreation Memorandum dated July 18, 2013.
ADOPTED this 5" day of August, 2013, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
William H. Droste, Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT (PUD) FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGREEMENT
THIS DECLARATION made this 5th day of August, 2013, by and between Fairview
Health Services, a Minnesota non - profit corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Declarant "),
and the CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as
the "City ");
WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of the real property described on Attachment One,
attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property ");
and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is subject to a Planned Unit Development Agreement,
"Fairview Health Services Planned Unit Development Final Development Plan Agreement ",
dated August 4, 2008 and recorded with the Dakota County Recorder as document number
2618707 on October 20, 2008, (hereinafter referred to as the "Planned Unit Development
Agreement "); and
WHEREAS, Declarant wishes to amend the Planned Unit Development Agreement to
remove the Lot Split and replace the Site Plan to all work an western addition to the existing
health clinic building, which amendment has been approved and consented to by the City of
Rosemount, acting through its City Council, as evidenced by the duly authorized signatures of its
officers affixed hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Declarant declares that the Subject Property is, and shall be,
held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the covenants, conditions, and
restrictions, hereinafter set forth.
1. The use and development of the Subject Property and Prestwick Place 8th Addition shall
conform to the documents, plan and drawings listed in Paragraph 1 of the Planned Unit
Development Agreement and, in addition, to the following:
h. City Resolution No. 2013 -_; Attachment Two
i. Site Plan; Attachments Three
j. Grading Plan, Attachment Four
1
k. Utility Plan, Attachment Five
1. Landscape Plan, Attachment Six
m. Floor Plan, Attachment Seven
n. Exterior Elevation, Attachment Eight
All of which attachments are copies of original documents on file with the City and are made
part hereof.
2. The use and development of the Subject Property shall conform to the Planned Unit
Development Agreement except as modified herein.
a. Lot 4, Block 1 Rosemount Village Center Lot Split, Attachment Two: The lot
split shall be removed from the attachments of the original agreement.
b. Minimum Lot Size: The deviation for the 0.984 acres minimum lot size is revoked.
c. 11 -4 -14 D. C -4 General Commercial Conditional Uses: The drive through
window and access lane is approved as an accessory use to the health clinic principal
use.
d. 11 -4 -14 G.3. C -4 General Commercial Permitted Building Materials: The
western wall of this addition shall be able to remain as EIFS until the next clinic
addition is constructed.
3. Except as modified by paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Amendment, the Planned Unit
Development Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
4. The obligations and restrictions of this Amendment run with the land of the Subject
Property and shall be enforceable against the Declarant, its successors and assigns, by the
City of Rosemount acting through its City Council. This Amendment may be amended
from time to time by a written amendment executed by the City and the owner or owners
of the lot or lots to be affected by said amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned as duly authorized agents, officers or
representatives of Declarant have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first
above written.
DECLARANT
FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES
By
Its
By
Its
K
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of ,
20135 by and , the and
, for and on behalf of Fairview Health Services,
a , by and on behalf of said
Notary Public
91
This Amendment is approved and consented to by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
William H. Droste, Mayor
And by:
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2013,
by William H. Droste and Amy Domeier, the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, for and on behalf
of the City of Rosemount, a Minnesota corporation, by and on behalf of said corporation.
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
City of Rosemount
2875 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
651- 423 -4411
El
Notary Public
2618707
Receipt#: 20837
ABSTRACT FEE $46.00
Recorded onBy: TMB 0 � 7 06PM
De
Realm to:
KENNEDY & GRAVEN rder
BA
470 U S NK PLAZA Joel T. Beckman -
Recd
200 SOUTH SIXTH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 Dakota COunty, MN
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS
AND RESTRICTIONS
FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGREEMENT
THIS DECLARATION made this � day of August, 2008, by the Fairview Health
�• Services, Minnesota a non - profit corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Declarant ");
WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of the real property as described as Lot 4, Block 1 of
Rosemount Village Center, Dakota County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject
Property "); and
WHEREAS, on October 1, 1996 the City of Rosemount, Minnesota ( "City ") approved a
planned unit development for the Chippendale /42 Partnership that included the Subject Property and
its use is consistent with the uses allowed within the C4 General Commercial zoning district; and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is subject to certain zoning and land use restrictions
imposed by the City of Rosemount, Minnesota ( "City ") in connection with the approval of an
application for a planned unit development for a 10,000 square foot medical clinic on the Subject
Property; and
WHEREAS, the City has approved such development on the basis of the determination by
the City Council of the City that such development is acceptable only by reason of the details of the
development proposed and the unique land use characteristics of the proposed use of the Subject
Property; and that but for the details of the development proposed and the unique land use
characteristics of such proposed use, the planned unit development would not have been approved;
and
WHEREAS, as a condition of approval of the planned unit development, the City has
required the execution and filing of this Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions
(hereinafter the "Declaration "); and
WHEREAS, to secure the benefits and advantages of approval of such planned unit
development, the Declarant desires to subject the Subject Property to the terms hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Declarant declares that the Subject Property is, and shall be, held,
transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions,
hereinafter set forth.
1. The use and development of the Subject Property shall conform to the following
documents, plans and drawings:
a. City Resolution No. 2008 -, Attachment One
b. Lot 4, Block 1 Rosemount Village Center Lot Split, Attachment Two
C. Site Plan, Attachment Three
d. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan, Attachment Four
e. Utility Plan, Attachment Five
f. Landscape Plan, Attachment Six
g. Exterior Elevations, Attachment Seven
all of which attachments are copies of original documents on file with the City and are made a part
hereof.
2
0 2. The Subject Property may only be developed and used in accordance with Paragraph
1 of this Declaration unless the owner first secures approval by the City Council of an amendment
to the planned unit development plan or a rezoning to a zoning classification that permits such other
development and use.
3. In connection with the approval of development of the Subject Property, the
following deviations from Chippendale /42 Partnership planned unit development agreement
provisions were approved:
a. Minimum Lot Size: The Chippendale /42 Partnership agreement requires a
minimum lot size of one (1) acre. The lot size of Lot 2 of the Lot Split is 0.984 acres. Upon
review of the concept site plan and layout of Lott it is determined that the lot can
development similar and consistent with the other lots within the original development
0 while being 0.984 acres.
In all other respects the use and development of the Subject Property shall conform to the
requirements of the Paragraph 1 of this Declaration and the City Code of Ordinances.
4. The obligations and restrictions of this Declaration shall run with the land of the
Subject Property and shall be enforceable against the Declarant, its successors and assigns, by the
City of Rosemount acting through its City Council. This Declaration may be amended from time to
time by a written amendment executed by the City and the owner or owners of the lot or Iots to be
affected by said amendment.
L
3
• IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned as duly authorized agents, officers or representatives of
Declarant have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written.
DECLARANT
Fairview Health Services
By
R mond E. Piirainen
Director of Real Estate
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF )
The for o' g ' trument was acknowled ed be e a �-y of 008,
by ll e for and on behalf of
Fairvie Health Services, Minnesota non - profit corporation, by and on behalf of said corporation.
N ublic
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
2875 145 STREET WEST
ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068
651- 423 -4411
0
4
JILL MELLUM
NOTARY PUBLIC
MINNESOTA
E.y wmmi�wn EcpwsNl�M.
is
AbaA wi- MQ/
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2008- 60
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FAIRVIEW CLINIC
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received
an application from McRoberts Development, LLC, requesting a planned unit development
final development plan concerning property legally described as:
Lot 4, Block 1, Rosemount Village Center, Dakota County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, on October 1, 1996, the City Council of the City of Rosemount approved a
planned unit development for the Chippendale /42 Partnership including Rosemount Village
Center; and
WHEREAS, on July 22, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount held a
public hearing and reviewed the requested application; and
WHEREAS, on July 22, 2008, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
requested applications, subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on August 4, 2008, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the
Planning Commission's recommendations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the planned unit development final development plan of Fairview Clinic, subject to:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum dated July 17, 2008.
2. Compliance with the Park and Recreation Director's Memorandum dated July 17,
2008.
3. Execution of a planned unit development agreement.
4. The trash enclosure shall be faced with bricks that are identical to those used in the
exterior of the medical clinic.
5. All wall signage shall be channel letters.
6. Removal of the wall sign on the south facade facing the residents south of 151" Street
West.
7. Lights within the parking lot shall be cut -off style fixtures.
8. A landscape security in the amount of $11,000 that will be effective through a one year
warranty period after the landscaping has been installed.
ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 2008 by the City Cc
ncil of the City of
H. Droste,
RESOLUTION 2008 - 6 0
J
ATTEST:
A ��d Wv _c&.—
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
Motion by: DeBettignies Second by: Shoe - Corrigan
Votedinfavor: Baxter, DeBettignies, Shoe - Corrigan, Droste, Sterner
Voted against: None
Member absent: None
0
0
- llldS 101 (]3SOdO'dd " $
Y V102NNIW '1NnOMSOb
? w 2131N3� 3J�fnIA INnOW3SON
oR crass aaPi�3E`a�
tall
r o �e��P ;5$1111 3$:R���8�€
tit ZK R ,a , gfg
Jill{ y 9¢e �'�$ 8 8
i B 1 s��a g� 14,
oe
�6 i '6s$a�s>esa a� ass$
�
31 all
s�W jai
z
\ H y
! I
.Y3078 \ m
I
/
\ /
— J--- - - - - --
a
a CIMMARON
9M 3.1
g n
'. U
CI
i
yE• g \
-r b5,
uj
1 \
1 � `
U
CL
MAT
127+9 ; -.; , ,� .•.
—17
r
Iml-wo"
551 5 5 p
, . a .,
N
Nl c,D
3
5
d
1 N
JOH 31
aX
� q
$ 0
A
a�
•
e
O
4
4
4
(S `
{p
N 1
Ig
I
t
t
L_
1� `
d 1
CIMAMON AVENUE
r7
all a Ci
N
c�
W �a
o C
r
s 43 - - A:
x _ T _ �
\ � Y \.. R __ P °_ -' _ - -__ 'axe" j --� � i• >e �
t 9pR t
-
1 1
�.5 t
OL
§ , l
~ r f •• � � � i�� # p x e � -' YT flu � m � �,t
F m e� �
a r I
It
AM I
A 11
\ -
n
0 /wa L9I
0 I �:cM ti t� 95a3. Z wa ! [[ I
3nN3AYWOVVWWIJ __
— L - - -. —i h
malgitt
z F-,d a 2 1!
t r
Z Z \\ Z o m
to S FF n r
i � ����i � �� _ • • ���� ¢ }$� gym' � �� � � � � �1'iif : Ci
m
PIiICF a Q SL Yud cL m
ak,mw
W L
C
All
r
w
_-
p J
o
_
�FA
1
`
,
�
t N
� a
,
'1• I
It
I
it
3�
i
>P
\
\
m
e
za ,
S BUR 6
°na _.. --
' %six
� G
51 iT
A
0G
m
O Q
a� g
/ \ 8
Q—"' -m/ / - \ a
Zm \
s \ \-Hr— \
j�
z a `,
Z S
In !^
.$gl
0
. G
I 4
, f
\
\ I% p
! \' p
1
i ICI{ ix 111 1
IN In, :H
L C;L d r
C 1
A 1
O
� 1
_i
�p1 m
,
a
0
i
n0
51.0
t
,
,�• a
I
1
1
t Q1J sm
1 •�
1
t
b 1
I
1 I Q LLB
N
!S3 Z
n I FS Z
I
1
1
I
L �
3n NJAtV b OMVWWIJ
_X-ImepiFi$m ZZIP, s p
3 g�agk�82 � amp
e:��p `yppE a
\ u eu
l'am
Pr, Qo PP°, ?Po PFPP= FPP° �P� RPM en em PyPPp�� qqFp Pp; c
i�A a9 mA 3e�ag MY
,Z,.$Yp88 M$ 8$u _ 3S -p @M pV$,`'.� A
SuK 8 s u, N88 r4 �" a
1A Eh E1115 D ° iC .jil ? C7
A#Achv�
RVv
All
_-
_
,
@,gym 4
t
�
t N
� a
,
'1• I
'i
it
3�
i
>P
0
i
n0
51.0
t
,
,�• a
I
1
1
t Q1J sm
1 •�
1
t
b 1
I
1 I Q LLB
N
!S3 Z
n I FS Z
I
1
1
I
L �
3n NJAtV b OMVWWIJ
_X-ImepiFi$m ZZIP, s p
3 g�agk�82 � amp
e:��p `yppE a
\ u eu
l'am
Pr, Qo PP°, ?Po PFPP= FPP° �P� RPM en em PyPPp�� qqFp Pp; c
i�A a9 mA 3e�ag MY
,Z,.$Yp88 M$ 8$u _ 3S -p @M pV$,`'.� A
SuK 8 s u, N88 r4 �" a
1A Eh E1115 D ° iC .jil ? C7
A#Achv�
RVv
p y f �8 TO
ui
r�
1
ri {{pp rr
!l��o
l 1 { LEN Ii 8 0-1 l a
� ® 8 i1� ll:� �l, to cl
11 , i! �I� `
Iii Pil il� 0
-
4
a � y !!� ii p j 1
rr rt
8S
�l
All �1 ' - Fla °• a�
I _ ! IN aI "
Fit
n �s loll",
P
(d
CN �lllil`�I
, i C
,9INO
R
a
I I:
{{iIE!
I1R�a4
I�
TN
�•'�
A e
„ I � i
6 � u
r
r
r
i,��"(v�i-i
g
CID
� �� y� ➢r
,9INO
R
a
I I:
{{iIE!
I1R�a4
i
TN
€
TN
i�
r
} �
s
t�
� t
�d�i
4 A t `
,9INO
R
a
I I:
{{iIE!
I1R�a4
i
� F
€
TN
� a
r
E cc
s
rt
rt t
si s
� gill
d"
6
!d t
t •a. 4
4 A t `
`SiM 1
e €
� F
€
TN
� a
IIJ
[ i E 6i
7i,4
III i mill;
Q
Fit
o
E
�1$R^_6 AAA ! lZ � "C C j III aR Is p! �a,
Rik 0 I !jy z
a @ ■ !i �� i �� E� � �1 DMA 1 !6 a7 Z
k $ !! �!�€ �� n
�IE €� Oxel 1 -
lei
oz ICA
� J•s
e
till
y fit's
fill
o
CD
p 1rJ'll
O
j i�a•�lR iR � \
z
rn
RR 0 1-811 8 \ '
Z \
����j'ds
F � � � o
m
Y I 1 11 1 1 1 16
O
k N z {
a_
" i& +a n So Cy Q� W s+
z
fill 'I'll I IM
1. a s
° z
2 loll z
lilies
all
9 � 6 • gg
tp�
Q I $ �-,
(IIII Idr y _a @alb �..
F�m
L-
�_��
v _
ram
o o.. `
Awn-of Six
QWwn
�°
N�'✓
•
aa'fo<
��
III
a
�°
�,
;; .�.�
,
II
�..•..:
11111111/
v
A
`1�0�
t"
��� \\�
II
ii�G ��i
Awn-of Six
0
l
i
i�
i
I
O
r
�A
EA
R�
R
1° s
k,
21t
{
00
R
M (\
mA
Fc D
O
§C� m
xxxx.
;s:s
�ggd
exec
tl
N
A{%uthrnad"
men
z
O
IN
O
rW
0
O
0
20
j
1
g
HIUN
i J21,
zC 64 _4
vv YE! ayl 9"M 9
o.
nn
2Y, i
fi-M fi. g
Rw
iin!
YN
V� Na lgl qin
vN
IV H N
2Z
NY 1-V;
PU
:fig;:
Yip
K 3 mu Isang
v
AIR
AV'
a
to
zo
;rnlul�
ani
zC 64 _4
vv YE! ayl 9"M 9
o.
nn
2Y, i
fi-M fi. g
Rw
iin!
YN
V� Na lgl qin
vN
IV H N
2Z
NY 1-V;
PU
:fig;:
Yip
K 3 mu Isang
v
AIR
AV'
a
to
;rnlul�
ani
47
Now
ON I
z
0
z
0
u
0
0
z
pp,
RN g! -H
/
�
z <
§)|
=
2,
o g
---- -- ------
\
\
;
_ -:
'00
Z3
]
\
\ / \
�|
�
\]
:(
z
0
z
0
u
0
0
z
pp,
RN g! -H
HOR
iH.
---- -- ------
6 �z
sma
'000
MR lam;
MOIR
ON, Nq
APH 00 AVE
Q
T-
a.
7g�s a3F, pjb ajz RN 1 t� 41 am RR
Eby° au °gs, "c 9�at ='a
2 a� e ¢ in! $ ,� 1 °l �' Rio W �g s
o a' a s:. "vat €s•Mx ,a= , "r r; has. e a
ij j�.- fag a gee W6` Y -i'l " Yg "i e: E: ?il
1 y rs a s. a g x 6s03� R, i s 6usr
Ie %ig 4 hex ao F gegab?3p g °p7 4,n5
�a��g a Sig ` s�dt ' E 3a S= - �'a i; as
yES2a< ss ai6 sageEa:s ° 0 =3!5
z u Iz O a ag pgja @ gys III OflH
x$k a ag = icflb d: HUS B'a � $x£;x �:� �,S=Ya: RH z-- JUNIa
poN AVE
G
IMAR
o p .atl 5
gbPk�a'eaa';a
SE§ "N °sEbgaga =c gx ai
X44°
%k Y°
g�?
z 'a aga� =„ H
4a� 3s
e"
efl3E a ° -y3e 195 s gf
s
b�F
s�a
nm�
a.
7g�s a3F, pjb ajz RN 1 t� 41 am RR
Eby° au °gs, "c 9�at ='a
2 a� e ¢ in! $ ,� 1 °l �' Rio W �g s
o a' a s:. "vat €s•Mx ,a= , "r r; has. e a
ij j�.- fag a gee W6` Y -i'l " Yg "i e: E: ?il
1 y rs a s. a g x 6s03� R, i s 6usr
Ie %ig 4 hex ao F gegab?3p g °p7 4,n5
�a��g a Sig ` s�dt ' E 3a S= - �'a i; as
yES2a< ss ai6 sageEa:s ° 0 =3!5
z u Iz O a ag pgja @ gys III OflH
x$k a ag = icflb d: HUS B'a � $x£;x �:� �,S=Ya: RH z-- JUNIa
poN AVE
G
IMAR
o p .atl 5
gbPk�a'eaa';a
SE§ "N °sEbgaga =c gx ai
X44°
%k Y°
g�?
z 'a aga� =„ H
4a� 3s
e"
efl3E a ° -y3e 195 s gf
�3
S8�
P °v}
yb5 g
s m
mu
g
51h PG gay ga a§ xis.= : - abn E Mi h
z a "ja�pX, 9,21H €e, " o gg as : ; � . ag, $i j yy}
p dk'� 7°y�8 SH € Roe '' MN ? 3� b : x � b F � «k. 4` !sa"
§ �g w ; ass 'glob iffy's 1 @e a ° o y3 a s a3x�$kffa
e=eegi "k «t" ua $
� : =g�caRa#a« R "A « $; x caad$dx?ns
3yxx $ Yn eq sax °uy $ I e n < I 01-- mil na
¢°= fiU4
a °5a3 N `ys
g:a'Hin s3 A Nw 414ag �:-as g3 a w ' S g "a 3a -owl
o I I I II ��_ gig € =gso �.3p °g "xis °�a;i' xx «
;xag jn., 'n, �smg S ass € iii c� <xsd
«° : s <ca =:can$a° i$ «` °fin x axs
O bng�a= gs.x; arks: xa Ka° xb°�re ° °m Kgg� �"
z I ....x�gsgEarG; g4 aa aa�sR ��3d J3 ` �2€ AdB ayaa3,zpi
CIMAR 90N AVE
_
3
h-
-IM
icy
6 iieMINH b "a
�ne
R
< x
`
I 1935Ffr
m
1�
z �
141
t2
m
1�
z �
141
i! |
eer {.
}j; �(
\ \ \.
/ ^� ii yi,
( �� ( |
m
§ \ oil I
CD:
CA
AS
M
A
\\
\)
WON
VANE
BE
10.
i! |
eer {.
}j; �(
\ \ \.
/ ^� ii yi,
( �� ( |
m
§ \ oil I
i! |
eer {.
}j; �(
\ \ \.
/ ^� ii yi,
EXCERPT OF DRAFT MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING
JULY 23, 2013
5.a. Request by Fairview Health Services for a Major Amendment to their Planned Unit Development
for an Expansion at their Clinic at 15075 Cimarron Avenue (Case 13- 29 -AMD). Fairview Health
Services is requesting a Major Amendment to their Planned Unit Development to construct an
approximate 4,500 square foot expansion to their clinic at 15075 Cimarron Avenue. The expansion
will be for additional clinic space as well as a pharmacy with drive through.
Commissioner Husain asked for an explanation of EIFS and why it is recommended. Mr. Zweber
stated that EIFS stands for "exterior installation finishing system" and it is actually a foam
installation on the wall covered by stucco. It is a system commonly used in commercial construction
and costs less than brick so if Fairview would possibly expand further in the future, it would cost
less to tear down a wall with EIFS than with brick.
Commissioner Kurle asked if staff identified any issues with the number of exits to the building.
Mr. Zweber pointed out the entrances and exits of the building and stated staff did not find any
issues but that the Building Official will make the final approval in the building permit process.
The applicant was present but did not have any comments.
The public hearing was opened at 6:46p.m.
There were no public comments.
MOTION by Miller to close the public hearing.
Second by Kurle.
Ayes: 4. Nays: None. Motion approved. Public hearing was closed at 6:46p.m.
With respect to condition #1, Chairperson Powell asked when the next addition would be approved.
Mr. Zweber stated that Fairview has been more successful than they originally thought they would
be, due to moving doctors from neighboring clinics and the patients moving with them. If they
continue to grow at the same rate, the next addition could come as early as five years from now.
Chairperson Powell asked if drive -thru approvals are always done through a PUD agreement and
not part of a conditional use permit. Mr. Zweber responded that while it isn't common, items have
been approved that way before and gave an example of such an approval in Prestwick Place.
MOTION by Kurle to recommend approval of the Major Amendment to the Planned Unit
Development, subject to the following conditions:
1. Allow EIFS on the west side of the expansion until the next addition is approved.
2. Approval of the drive- through window and access lane.
3. Payment of $9,000 fee -in -lieu of dedication for the equivalent of 1.0 acres park land.
4. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum dated July 17, 2013.
5. Compliance with the Parks and Recreation Memorandum dated July 18, 2013.
Second by Husain.
Ayes: 4. Nays: None. Motion approved.
KROSEMO[.IN "I'
PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 17, 2013
TO: Eric Zweber, Senior Planner
CC: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director
Andrew Brotzler, Director of Public Works /City Engineer
Kathie Hanson, Planning Department Secretary
FROM: Phil Olson, Assistant City Engineer
RE: Fairview Rosemount Clinic Expansion Plan Review
Submittal:
Fairview Rosemount Clinic Expansion Plan prepared by BDH + Young and Westwood
Professional Services, dated June 25, 2013. The following review comments were generated from a
plan set containing the following sheets:
• Landscape Plan
• Site Plan
• Grading Plan
• Utility Plan
• Details
• Floor Plan & Exterior Elevations
DEVELOPMENT FEES:
The development fees below are due with the building permit. The fees are based on the total
property area of 2.11 acres minus 1.1 acres that was previously paid for with the first phase. Fees
are based on the 2013 Fee Resolution.
Fnirviaw Clinir Fctimated nevelnnment Fees (due at huildine nermit)
No.
Item
Cost
Calculation 2013 Fee Rates
I
Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge
$ 1085.75
$1075 /acre * 1.01 acres
2
Watermain Trunk Charge
$ 6565.00
$6500 /acre * 1.01 acres
3
Storm Sewer Trunk Charge
$ 6933.65
$6865 /net developable acre * 1.01 acres
Sewer Connection Fees (SAC)
SAC Units are calculated by MCES
4
MCES Fee
$ 2435 /SAC Unit
5
City Fee
$ 1200 /SAC Unit
6
Storm Connection Fee (STAC)
$ 2292.70
$2270 /acre * 1.01 acres
Total
$ 16,877.10
Does not include SAC TBD by MCES
General Comments:
1. The grading plan is required to show an emergency overflow route that is 1.5 feet below the
low building opening elevation of the building. The overflow route and elevations are
required to be shown on the grading plan with the final build out conditions.
2. It is recommended that the low point of the parking lot be built in the southwest corner of
the lot to direct the overflow away from the front of the building. This will also reduce the
storm sewer length on site and ensure that the EOF from the parking lot is below the low
building openings.
3. Inlet protection should be added to the catch basin on the north side of 151" Street to
protect the city's storm sewer in the event that the silt fence fails.
4. The storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water main proposed with this development will be
owned and maintained by the property owner.
The NPDES permit is the responsibility of the owner/ contractor. Documentation of
permit acquisition shall be forwarded to the City prior to issuance of a building permit.
Record drawings (paper and electronic formats) of the site that meet the standards set forth
in the Engineering Guidelines shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy.
Should you have any questions or comments regarding the items listed above, please contact me at
651- 322 -2015.
4ROSEMOUNT
PARKS AND RECREATION
M E M O R A N D U M
To: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director
Eric Zweber, Senior Planner
Jason Lindahl, Planner
Andy Brotzler, Public Works Director /City Engineer
Phil Olson, Assistant City Engineer
From: Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director
Date: July 18, 2013
Subject: Fairview Clinic Expansion
The Parks and Recreation Department has reviewed the submittal for the Fairview Clinic Expansion
and is providing the following comment:
• In the past, staff recommended that the City collect cash dedication for the two
commercial lots that were to be created. It was recommend that we collect $9,900 for
the 1.1 acre lot that the Fairview Clinic was to be built on and that the cash
dedication for the remaining 1 acre lot was to be paid prior to receiving a building
permit based on the fees in place at the time of the payment.
• Staff is recommending that the City now collect the cash dedication for the 1 acre of
land that we have not yet received the cash dedication for. The cash dedication for 1
care of commercial property is $9,000 per acre.
Please call me at 651 - 322 -6012 if you have any questions about this memo.
W20130anning Cases \13- 29 -AMD Fairview Health Services Major Amendment to PUD \ParkMemo_ Fairview _07182013.docx