Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.a. Request by City of Rosemount for a Two Lot Preliminary and Final Plat of Rosemount Senior Living 4ROSEMOUNTEXECUTIVE SUMMARY PLANNING COMMISSION Planning Commission Meeting Date: March 25, 2014 Tentative City Council Meeting Date: April 15, 2014 AGENDA ITEM: Case 14-14-PP; 14-15-FP: Request by the City of Rosemount for a Two Lot Preliminary AGENDA SECTION: and Final Plat of Rosemount Senior Living Public Hearing for the Construction of a 90 unit Senior Housing with Services Building and an Activity Center PREPARED BY: Eric Zweber, Senior Planner AGENDA NO. 6, of ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Rosemount Senior Living Preliminary Plat; Rosemount Senior Living APPROVED BY: Final Plat; Rosemount Senior Living Site Plan; City Engineer's Memorandum dated IZA/` March 21; Park and Recreation Director's Memorandum dated March 11. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Motion to Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat for Rosemount Senior Living, subject to the following conditions: 1. City Council approval of a Maintenance Agreement to the joint use and maintenance of the Parking Lot, Access and Connection Corridor. 2. Payment of$204,000 of Fee-in-Lieu of Park Dedication for the 60 units of Assisted/Independent Living units. No Park dedication will be required for the Memory Care units due to the independent activity limitations of those residents. 3. Compliance with the conditions and standards within the City Engineer's Memorandum dated March 21, 2013. 4. Compliance with the conditions and standards within the Park and Recreation Director's Memorandum dated March 11, 2014. SUMMARY Applicant: City of Rosemount and the Rosemount Port Authority Comp. Guide Plan Designation: DT: Downtown Current Zoning: DT-PUD: Downtown Planned Unit Development The applicant, the City of Rosemount,requests approval of a preliminary and final plat for Rosemount Senior Living, to allow the creation of two (2) lots. Lot 1 will be sold to the Rosemount Senior Living Associates I to construct a 90 unit senior housing with services building. Lot 2 will be retained by the City of Rosemount and houses the Steeple Center (former St.Joseph's Church) and future public activity center. On February 25, the Planning Commission reviewed the site plan, survey and building elevations for the senior building and activity center and recommended approval of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Master Development Plan with rezoning and the PUD Site and Building Plans. On March 18, the City Council approved the PUD Master Development Plan and Site and Building Plans. Staff finds the preliminary plat and final plat applications are consistent with the senior housing and activity center development approved within the PUDs. ISSUE ANALYSIS Legal Authority. This application is a Quasi Judicial action. The preliminary plat and final plat application is Quasi Judicial because the City has a set of standards and requirements for reviewing this type of application that is described in detail below. Generally,if the final plat meets the ordinance requirements it must be approved. Preliminary Plat. The preliminary plat shows the proposed lot lines and easements over the existing conditions survey. The plat will generate two lots,Lot 1 being 1.95 acres in size and Lot 2 the remaining 1.15 acres. The line dividing the two lots runs east from Cameo Avenue along the center of the parking lot access and turns directly north when the parking lot turns north. The line cuts across the parking lot and then finally runs east to South Robert Trail between the senior housing and the activity center. As discussed with the PUD review, the public and private uses will share a single vehicular access from Cameo Avenue and share all the parking stalls. The City Council and Port Authority have a development contract with Rosemount Senior Living Associates I to address the joint use of the access and parking lot and are required to enter into a maintenance agreement that will cover the long term use,maintenance and replacement of the joint spaces. The preliminary plat generally proposes 10 foot wide drainage and utility easements on the street frontages of Cameo Avenue, 143`d Street and South Robert Trail and a 5 foot wide drainage and utility easement along the south property line, adjoining the Robert Trail Library. Ten foot easements along streets and 5 foot easements along interior property lines are typical because all zoning district other than the DT: Downtown zoning district has building and structural setbacks greater than the typical easements. In the DT: Downtown zoning district, there are no setback requirements and therefore the easements need to be reduced when appropriate to accommodate the site design. The proposed drainage and utility easements are reduced in two areas. First, the drainage and utility easement is reduced to 4 feet in width adjacent to the south property line when it is next to the parking lot sidewalk. Second, there is a 10 foot long reduction to an 8 foot wide easement along South Robert Trail to accommodate the north east corner of the building which is closer than 10 feet to the property line. Additionally, there is a large 42 foot wide drainage and utility easement running across Lot 1 (the senior housing lot) from Cameo Avenue to the edge of Lot 2 (the City retained lot). This easement covers the existing sanitary sewer,water and private utilities that serve the Steeple Center and the future activity center. There is no need for this easement to be extended onto Lot 2 because no other properties are served by these utilities. Final Plat. The final plat has the identical lots lines and easements as noted above in the discussion of the preliminary plat. Staff finds the final plat consistent with the preliminary plat and recommends approval with the same condition of preliminary plat approval. 2 Parks and Open Space. The Parks and Recreation Director is recommending that the City collect fee-in- lieu of park dedication for the 60 units that are assisted living or independent living. The Director does not recommend collecting fees on the 30 memory care and care suite units because these residents are under intense care and monitoring that will not allow these residents to use the City's park system. In addition, the development will provide an additional$20,000 for exercise equipment to be located in the City's park system. This payment is memorialized in the development contract recently approved by the City's Port Authority and City Council. Engineering Comments. The Assistant City Engineer has reviewed the proposed Rosemount Senior Living plat and has a few minor concerns. The comments generally state that trunk utility fees will not be collected because the site was previously developed and that the existing easements need to be vacated with the plat approval. Staff is preparing the easement vacation documents for the April 15 City Council meeting and will contact the natural gas company to vacate their obsolete easements. The comments are detailed in the attached memo dated March 21, 2014. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat for Rosemount Senior Living creating two (2) lots. This recommendation is based on the information submitted by the applicant, findings made in this report and the conditions detailed in the attached memorandums. 3 Rosemount Senior Living , t.,..... ..,.', .,.,‘ "••• k , '''' '',„0,/ CRGUNDY ■ IF . , . ,,. ‘! r ., .■ 0 n „ , N'''' ... .„ , . ". ... --, 147 .. 4. of, EirtICK:3011,-- I .-..,., ,,,.. ., , PARK ..: .4, , 1 ' . ... r .,. ' k _.2, / t • , - i...,...„... . .. , 1 1 , , .., . . . . . ..,, 1 1, * Libisi */ .4., , inn ,,:,!'" Seniu , s * ' . . - 1 t 1 , -r -t ,---. --, , to t k ; , I I '—' ..„. , 4 4 i //, . , ,..,, p. „. _7 , - - ' - V 1 ti I < ' " iqpil , -.-.4."- "1. --i ' 1 -.4, i Nt ' > -,"--"*", •n i •s-* ? - *.i I ' ----- ii- - i--- - 1. lirb -*---- — , cc, -------4, , , , * ' - ' - . - 1 .-.. .,1 I 111 r----*— . . i - ,,, i - „ :t,.,1 iT - TI-1 _ -1.,.., - , .. , 1 - ., : ' I.' - 1''' ' ' IN ,, .. _ Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but,lccura,y is not guaranteed. This is not a Map Scalelegal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning 1 in 3/21/2014400 feet i verification. Dakota County assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. 3 X13 1 g� Es g ha Uo 1 = E 1 1 lot i g g ,, ", & o §affi Fob YE. a1 ;1111 !s Y E>: $ N a r 1 E yT Igli 1111 1111'1 a i . 0 aViAi s " s s "*Chi AIM s III I ;$!1 1= Ea 2t g E- s• 84 ye rsa99 48 p . p C zM lie — V / Z ----- L R--a°`9;° a ! 0 / O� so. ,E „,,.,- "A 4 •i I i " D Z . !AO NIGoI, 5'°+ra' a � I 6 �• g 0 Y. A 4 "W,o� ' I i F °-` ` s 161 RI n e C V 6 11 1' _ _ OtF 4'S_ , __ 711��_ \\. P,—,i1 i ilk / aY ,i I AA dr .ill M �.I Aw ''^^\\r i,1". /..7� p ,„ Rto I '•• :x9 °W Y1 _ j v,l 4�N ;III X / g USE$I O •,•I' Co� `\it id 1 !Will QI.I Y I e°• Y I n kf I;§k" I i e ': 1113\ 3�e} �\ iy ' I 1/�/ •,°1' F 1 nIliI 4 . ',§ I rk6d w ' '�'Lis _ i `f al w 'if a J 6 ! f—._ .r-,�a 616 --1146 rr --I.e o * -t,--- - - tf $ i aY ''6�- 'ta� = ,reakMr nor =� 2; 411'01 LI' �i _ /• 21.4 l 3l1N3A - 03Wt/. - 5"- 'X Fgg€g. �1 w ► ri ; 11.1 12 81 se €• S € es n " 2 E I g g fig gill 1 ¢ � ¢ [ B TR �$ ;_ °A 3 ° a !,1-w -F is gt S a < a I . # g o f p o f fq. g i s g $ .!1' I l = g g 4i X51• 2 _ E m g a 4 € zs ,. ti g. 3 3 : a S a �3 $ N 8 n $ $� m v q I II 2° ° , ¢n CUES z a 17 m 3 at ; 3 81 5 If I e x53 E d� s" = e „5 a : 8 n x xn ;s 8 = g; ° ° 6 1° a keg �° _$ 8 g F a o il a° 3 ti is i 3 1s11 4 E € o g pg€s g € �x ¢g a €ss€q a g LL Stl X $9 6 n 8 I al Yi g ,, i .6 EO ,} n ,o i �, ° 3 L' 9E 0 2' . . ., < -I EN%° - i c - Y 1 S I °1 95 i I 256 m C§ 5 2 m a§ s" :a o gi ia € _ ° II � - i i / / a / / / --- 1,31,50 - / / 8g1 . 1 D.'% g 1 8 p l r g 3 n 6 V N 1 O l F ( a$ S o 3 t0 Y Z . . Z Bt Q 3 .. ' 1 I--1 ~ ° i i i . • ., ^ G �a w $ 1 y ce , 0 MF s a O W -- - I a I n 0 '• y ^;"a • 3 S • a s F a w I v2, e g -A v. W w I' ° I$ m A y 5 8 g g k y, I� rill �� 'S 19'SLT 31 — —1.65.ON 3 3 1 >3 & O It 8§ as t E J 9 a w v r - e 4 S . 0 It e p E O le 1 ¢ Y f 2 9`.5 5 5= ? s i �z� = £14 1611M lb ¢ _ ,..egg fz--... 91SS NV SI1OdV3NNW L-fttt g DI 0,` a O 3 ins'aAl9 a0ISl3OX3 LOPS !1131/ a wl�k IN i oll'dnaOopeleV au E '3 € m Pi 04 531 •r NW1NIlOV S0i1 $€ L1x1 i 6 y 1 0 fi 6,4 E� a 68 tlh p ieew DNIAIl tIOIN3S 1NfON3SO .iga a U U�o �3row age° a � a'k� n ". @~ aaA @ F r @ o n �/� wla" gp iM ; : $t6 m :Ig eLLIX8 w9`s B : € g € 11 s Y a E i ‹) 418!31! I IP €" $;3 la 16X a@s� i .' @1;1 1 g $ a e ! ' ! 1 @4 1 bb / 2 YY - �e y g� � � ��i@ � 3e"s� � e� g a# 1 "e� e 4 >~ @ � er 44 Nx °0 el 9e ! m < a a 14°[ �- $ 5 8 � 3 � e � � R e � �W iw � ; 31 4g,1z1 i4 P E4` 10 ,d6 gx4g,.3 R. i€aa - ge 61 i !g n < . : w 1 4"4EYgi4§3 I' R$ °'! g� t�`a -/ $€ ig s 1 g 2 '' o ag e4 g ! VII e x 3 oo g8 b aEs k m 3i mg a l g j gyp .e€ < a y q gW g g e 0 e4 7a a , w m g; u c Pg � e g aw a a° e � � e s DI 4<3aRA � I g80%11.29,1 `g- it 4e gvE '.4 4 g 4,'° gm ; ; go *$ g s E rc F i°x e'a§ 44 4'g p" z„i �s!e i game .a R �4 ,N § ea $ s $ 'eggs o belle a!`�' g4 g �4f gi4 $ g!elisg E. s ag ! 4 i4 m vg 9 wg -' — 1 I ( a � g $ � gma � 4a g � ge fig Y �' g � a � 8 ' °4a $ jai ig a§ igff an 1 eg a °M i <r € z ® . '0 4e $ [ s< c � e s j 1 11 \ id W $ 11$gi!! :$ ors, iei lgi ;§1 :1111111 1 g:Ii3 ; ! $i m 1 11 s !: I 1 1 — p 1 it = o / g o 11 „ - 1 I . u E I g _:[---""5 n R , �� /- -1 — 'y1\.. 111 I t . 1 s �” _ r I /�"�' I I 1 e 6 I Z Lg % , — ti� I k ,,, i r /r i II 1 I 1 i ill g R h C 3d \, O ;!i a J £ C� s I ' j J$ ti\s-.0) L2 i his TT9.. eil� i ' 1 ali- , 3 ciii ),_ ________-- A70 , 11 =I , 1 , qq i J $11 � e `•- I o .. - - Imo- �1 z I I i I oi4 �I r ., _ i 1 I , 'I o e� ° 1 o L m L ° o_f j • s l E 4 ROSEMOUNT PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 21, 2014 TO: Eric Zweber, Senior Planner CC: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director Andrew Brotzler, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director Christine Watson, Public Works Coordinator Kathie Hanson, Planning Department Secretary FROM: Phil Olson, Assistant City Engineer RE: Rosemount Senior Housing Plat Engineering Review SUBMITTAL: Plats prepared by Rehder&Associates are dated March 19, 2014. Engineering review comments were generated from the following documents included in the submittal: • Rosemount Senior Living Preliminary Plat • Rosemount Activity Center Final Plat DEVELOPMENT FEES: 1. No trunk utility area charges are proposed with this development. 2. Sewer and water connection charges are required at the time of development. 3. The developer will be responsible for consultant fees not covered by the grant for the underground stormwater system. EASEMENTS: 4. A drainage and utility easement is required for the city sanitary sewer,water main, and private utilities that extend from Cameo Avenue into the site. The easement should include an area 10 feet on either side of the sanitary sewer and water main. A 10 foot wide easement is also needed for the existing private utilities. This easement area will be included on a future plat by the City. 5. The city is working with the attorney to vacate an easement owned by Peoples Natural Gas. This is needed prior to a future plat by the City. 6. The existing drainage and utility easement for the sanitary sewer serving the old school is not needed and should be vacated with a future plat by the City. Should you have any questions or comments regarding the items listed above,please contact me at 651-322-2015. 4 ROSEMOUNT PARKS AND RECREATION M E M O R A N D U M To: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director Eric Zweber, Senior Planner Jason Lindahl, Planner Andy Brotzler, Public Works Director/City Engineer Phil Olson, Assistant City Engineer From: Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director Date: March 11, 2014 Subject: Rosemount Senior Living at the Steeple Center Site The Parks and Recreation Commission recently reviewed the plans for the Rosemount Senior Living Project at the Steeple Center site and they made the following recommendation: • The Parks and Recreation Commission approved a motion to recommend that the City of Rosemount collect parks dedication for all 90 units and that the fees should be based on the approved City Fee Schedule at the time the fees are paid. Motion passed 5 - 0 Staff also recently reviewed the plans for the Rosemount Senior Living project on the Steeple Center site and has the following comments: • Staff is recommending the City of Rosemount collect parks dedication fees for 60 units of assisted living and independent living units but not for the 30 memory care/care suite units and that the fees should be based on the approved City Fee Schedule at the time of payment. The current rate for residential dedication is $3,400 per unit. Staff recognizes there is an additional$20,000 being paid by the applicant for other park purposes. Please let me know if you have any questions about this memo.