HomeMy WebLinkAbout13468 BRILLIANT GEM AVE GRAD/NC PLA/V DATE/REVIS/ON DATE 7/14/06 Address: 13468 BRILLIANT GEM AVENUE
SANITARY SERVICE INVERT ELEVATION � �
PER CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT = 958.40 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 4. BIOCk 3, HARMONY 2ND � �„ _
�
ADDITION, Dakota County. Minnesota. � � � �
� � � ^
We hereby certify that this is a true and correct surv�y of the above .Z � � �
described property and that it was performed by me or under my N � �
direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Surveyor under the �r � � ``
\ Z. laws of the State of Minnesota. That this survey does not purport to � s o
� � nT '� � show all improvements, easements or encroachments, to the property y tz., � a
� �_v � � t except as shown thereon. � � � m
� ^T � o r,, Signed this 26th da y of June ^ � 0�4. James R. HIII, I�C., � � � ;
L_\./ I ...f � z �
�N � � � �
` / R13w�: �' gY � a � a
/
/S�`G ,$o,LO'41'�E. 2 —� /9�2� Harold C. Peterson, Minnesota L.S. No. 12294
Ex� . / N 5 g7�. � e A��►ed as r�o�ed*�
� 30 � � NOVS� `9�6.21 3.���[9�.9� C � �
�0 � .� �9, _ -�.�� ,� � � �,���: � Notes:
r, v ✓ 973.9� x `°
.i
� ~" '�� '' n 1, Buildin dimensions shown are for
� 1 N N �i/� 973.6 r�4.� 'i ^ J N� i,' ..� � 11'T �) � - 9
� � o�- 5 % � � �� t O� � �_v � i �� �I: ['� � horizontal & vertical placement of structure � o ,
� T.v. "` O g74' �4•N7 ,� -�'� � �m N �p p�• /( Ca�Z%,,,�+-�, only. See architectural plans for building y o
� � 0 �g���5 0 2�'��, �� o o `' O -o s� � � ,� & foundation dimensions. � � °z ;
i � � o� •o�y 'o �Z � �^ % �f , � O � 2. No specific soils investigation has been � ��., r�
'� _ ` �, �� 2.0�� ��.g7 � x � � p� , � compfeted on this lot by James R. Hill, Inc. y o T I
�� , � �� ,.� c� N ; w w -� � The suitability of soils to support the specific w o ��
1 �o �v, � �----
Z � Z r;,\ �N g�q, w,�o\`�� � �� ° � h o u s e p r o p o s e d i s n o t t he r e s ponsi bi li ty o f Q � � = o
.� � �m �°, �' 67�- xx rn � �' " ` i� f^ James R. Nilf, Inc. or the surve r o " �
o �. 3 -- -^n O cn 'o w 8� 473.3� �--�'� � • � � ri o
�- 0--
F� O 3 0 _ 5 0 -o e e-� �9�2� �, g73.5) 3. No specific title search for existence or non- � "d Y o
�? °' � u,25� �� �N .r.�,,c`�*+'� � 2� / 4 / existence of recorded or un-recorded easements �; � o 0
� ,,,, O m�r, ��s�x r' N �9 7%• 9 2, �, m o
� � � J � . � o\\ _/ �2 � h a s b e e n c o n d u c t e d b y i h e s u r v e y o r o s a p a r t V r„�
• `N �,, w 33.0 � �(�, ,�•'� t ' of this survey. Only easements per the recorded �cf �o
� ,� C J ''9 a. �� 4'9�g.5 �— o���j j /�°"��' p l a t a r e s h o w n. � J o
, � �p ��g 7� 0 9 �8 ,�4,�5�E � W w N�� H ��; 4. Proposed grodes shown were taken from � Q
c. o
� v� �g��3� �ao�� o,o �'r�'d ;, the grading &�or development plan prepared by
N � nT � ,�� ' 1 WESTWOOD Professiona/ Services, lnc. DRAWN BY
�'�' � `— C�Q•O� � L_V I � ( ;,; �' ,� PLM
/ �� m � ✓� '�'� '`,,U�
` � u� °� �`� � t ''t' g DATE
� � � '� �� 6 26 14
Z � � i �T � � H � � Denotes set spike
G �o N �_v I � � ' � Denotes set iron monument REVISIONS
� � • Denotes found iron monument 7 9 14 Fr. orch
� x[900.0] Denotes as-built elevation » 3 14 As-built
� (930.0) Denotes proposed elevation
finol rade
, Denotes proposed drainage
tc Denotes top of curb
Bench Mark: 972•50 _ TNH–Lots 3 & 4, Block 3
LOT 4 = 9,636 SQ. FT.
HSE/GAR = 1,571 SQ. FT. SCALE IN FEET Proposed Garage Floor � Front= 974.6
FRONT PORCH = 110 SQ. FT. 0 30 60 90 Proposed Garage Top of Block= 975.0
' DRIVEWAY = 791 SQ. �"T. Proposed House Top of Block= 975.0 CAD FlLE
SCREEN PORCH = 235 SQ. FT. Proposed Lowest Floor= 966.3 hse2d14\340277
I Totol Impervious = 2,707 SQ. FT. 1 inch = 30 feet Proposed Top of Block PROJECT NO.
OR 28.1� OF LOT AREA Bearings are on assumed datum at Egress Window= 969•5 340277
SHEET 1 OF 1
,