HomeMy WebLinkAbout13440 BRILLIANT GEM AVE GRAD/NG PLAN DATE/REV/S/0N DATE 7/14/06 Address: l3440 BRILLI.ANT GEM AVENUE
SANITARY SERVICE INVERT ELEVATION �
PER CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT = 962.55 Lot 6� BIOCk 3, HARMONY 2ND �
1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: �
� ��3� �`� ��'��- ���`��� ADDITION. Dakota County. Minnesoto. N
w �
� � u�
` �/Q � n-�- ,� ,� We herebq certify that this is a true and correct survey of the above � ��
�o �_v � i i described property and that it was performed by me or under my � �
��, / direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Surveyor under the ' � � '`
��,� laws of the State of Minnesota. That this survey does not purport to � � �
9 � show all improvements, easements or encroachments, to the property � �
except as shown thereon. � � �
r��JS `1 Signed this 23rd day of J� , 2014. James R Hill, I�Cq � a
. � � �g �
I /1T —7 �� g'.L �'� \ � nT � 7 � � � n. t� �
L_v I 1 '�, 96s ,�o ♦ �� L_v I i ` BY
G 9�2A ;����*��o�-,,"4 `t �j Marcus F. Hampton, so a L.S. No. 47481
��`�� �O ��� �'/ F-��'-��� ��'
+ J o� 9 ti� �,�� s �� � � Notes•
��o ����''���+9���5��,91 F�F,�c�\ J �''' / •
ti `��,� � +9���� `9699, 2>,p��`q�� �" 1. Building dimensions shown are for
�0°' J 9�'►• �,J�0,',1 y� / e� F�P�'�'�'j � / horizontal & vertical lacement af structure
�\ �1 +`� " �.`9 4•oyl/�i.�'1��0,�-,`9�0�, '0���`�,, \ 2 only. See architectural plans for building m o�
�j � & foundation dimensions. � z m
�s�,� '�� 99��� � +�e�°1, � �''9 �'� ,o� ��� 2. Na specific soils investigation has been � ��
'L\ 6 `q-a � < � �O �,, completed on this lot by James R. Hill, Inc. a
� �9. o-_� m� � •�
s �/ �9 tio• � �,�� ,�� � \ O � n-r � � The suitability of soils to support the specific F1 ��
o ��F r��� y. � 'o �� 0�6� •so � O,1 � �(p �•_ �_v I i � house proposed is not the responsibility of p � � _�
�\ � �9� '� �� s °'�9�' �� � f� f ,� � � James R. Hill, Inc. or the surveyor. o � �;
� `�'� '�" �• o�� �ti� 9�' �g�'� �r- �' � � 3. No speci f ic ti t le searc h for exis tence or non- � 'c! ,�o
� � �� ��o ����� •�`'o'��``�f �o �s i°�� �,��� � s /�`°: existence of recorded or un-recorded easements � ,� �o
C `� \�'.�-1�� �6��'=G��yc�� �✓ �9 / �`9���� � J �� of thisesur endu anl� easementsrV er�the reco ded U � �Z
` �� 9/0 � ,'
� Q � � .yo o, ���,���, �,�p `9 y�/ 9��o � plat are shown. y P p J o
9 \�J �� R. ' ,�,5• ��.y��,��� 6,� ,. 9��-�G) � H 4. Pro pased grades shown were taken from � Q
/J, �� �o � . ' �,�� •J o 9�$/� �Fj. ,O�'' the grading &/or development plan prepared by
�� �� � " �� �'�a <,�93� /9 6� �9�4 a� �02� WESTWOOD Professiono! Services lnc. DR PVYfV BY
�' �g / 9 ' ��r0
/� �� \ �� �s � � p N w 91e•8 DATE
v, � � � m �^�\ T � \ � Denotes set spike 7 23 14
--� " � � ^ o Denotes set iron monument REVISIONS
�\ �� �j � �_v � .,.� • Denotes found iron monument 9 8 14 Grodes
x[900.0] Denotes as-built elevation er ctt comments
� 5 22 15 As—built
� (930.0) Denotes proposed elevation final rade
"}7 —► Denotes proposed drainage s � 15 Add n
� �o tc Denotes top of curb as-bui�t shots
� � �-�.<,�- as 1built�shots n
Z ��• =� Bench Mark: 972.50 _ TNH—Lots 3 & 4. Block 3
LOT 6 = 10,830 S�. FT. G `
F�E31d��W8d SS ti0'IA�d:Q SCALE IN FEET Pro osed Gara e Floor � Front= 979.8
HSE/GAR = 1,571 SQ. FT. � p 30 60 gp Proposed Garoge Top of Block= 980.2
PORCH = 157 SQ. FT. ��rnjt; Pro osed House To of Block= 980.2 CAD FlLE
DRIVEWAY = 796 SQ. FT. ❑ P P
Total Impervious = 2,524 SQ. FT. Proposed Lowest Floor= 971.5 hse2014\340315
F3y:�� 1 inch = 30 feet Proposed Top of Block PROJECT NO.
OR 23.3% OF LOT AREA D&tg:— l0�19- 2� S- at Lookout Window= 974•7 340315
Bearings are on assumed datum
� SHEE7 1 OF 1