Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.c. Approval of ownership change for Charter cable EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Council Regular Meeting: November 17, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of ownership change for Charter cable AGENDA SECTION: PREPARED BY: Alan Cox, Communications Coordinator & Emmy Foster, Assistant City Administrator AGENDA NO. 6.c. ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Resolution APPROVED BY: ddj RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve the attached resolution approving a change in ownership of Charter Communications. Charter Communications, which holds a franchise to provide cable television service in Rosemount, plans a change in its ownership structure. The change requires the City Council’s consent. BACKGROUND The Council last year agreed to a change in control of Charter in anticipation of an agreement between the company and Comcast that would have restructured ownership of the companies’ systems in Minnesota. Early this year, Charter and Comcast abandoned the agreement after regulators raised anti-competitiveness concerns. Charter then entered into agreements to merge its cable systems with those owned by Time Warner Cable and Bright House Networks. The owners of those systems will hold a minority ownership in the new Charter. State law requires approval by the franchising authority to any “fundamental corporate change.” The Apple Valley, Farmington & Rosemount Cable Commission instructed its attorney to review the transaction. In consultation with the company, the attorney drafted the resolution proposed for action tonight. FEE DISPUTE As part of the discussions between the attorney and counsel for Charter, the company has agreed to partially resolve a disagreement with the Commission over a fee imposed for cable boxes needed at city facilities. The cities’ franchises with the company require it to provide free cable service to city facilities. When Charter converted to all-digital transmission last year, the signal provided to the cities became unusable without cable boxes available solely from the company. Charter began to bill the cities for the boxes; the City of Rosemount refused to pay. Charter agreed last year to waive the fee through the end of 2014, on the assumption that the company and the Commission would reach an agreement on the fee issue. That issue is now part of negotiations for the renewal of the Charter franchises in the three cities. The franchises originally expired in 2014. After delays last year in the company’s willingness to enter negotiations for a new franchise, the Rosemount City Council agreed to extend Charter’s franchise through December 31, 2015. The Commission’s attorney has advised the Commission that negotiations on the franchises have begun, but it is uncertain when they will be complete. Negotiations so far suggest that 2 the company will propose a reduced rental rate to the cities for the boxes. As part of the discussions over the change in control, Charter has agreed to waive cable box fees to the City of Rosemount through calendar year 2015 following passage of the resolution under consideration tonight. RECOMMENDATION The Cable Commission voted unanimously on November 5 to recommend that the three City Councils approve the proposed resolution for a change of control of Charter’s systems. 1 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - 91 RESOLUTION GIVING CONSENT TO CHANGE OF CONTROL OVER CABLE FRANCHISEE WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount (City”) is a member of the Apple Valley, Farmington, Rosemount Cable Commission (“Commission”), a municipal joint powers entity; WHEREAS, the Commission advises the member cities regarding cable television regulatory matters and provides community programming services to the cities; WHEREAS, the City and Commission’s other member cities enacted identical cable franchise ordinances (together, “Franchise”) with Charter Cable Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Franchisee”), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Charter Communications, Inc. (“Charter Communications”); WHEREAS, the Franchise authorizes operation and maintenance of a cable communications system and the provision of cable service in the City under specified terms and conditions and applicable law; WHEREAS, Charter Communications is currently the seventh-largest multichannel video programming distributor in the United States serving approximately 4.2 million residential video customers, including customers in 158 Minnesota communities; WHEREAS, the Franchise provides that the City “may delegate any and all regulatory authority to the Commission. A Grantee must fully cooperate with the Commission in the exercise of regulatory authority delegated by the City”; WHEREAS, under the joint powers agreement, the member cities delegated Franchise enforcement authority to the Commission; WHEREAS, the Franchise, as extended, expires on December 31, 2015; WHEREAS, Franchisee requested renewal of the Franchise and the Commission and Franchisee are currently engaged in processing that request; WHEREAS, in August, 2014, Charter Communications filed an FCC Form 394 seeking approval to restructure the company (“2014 Form 394”); WHEREAS, the City conditionally approved the 2014 Form 394 but Charter Communications subsequently did not complete the restructuring contemplated by the 2014 Form 394; WHEREAS, on May 23, 2015, Charter Communications with its subsidiary CCH I, LLC (“New Charter”), entered into agreements with Advance/Newhouse Partnership (“A/N”), the ultimate parent company of Bright House Networks, LLC (“BHN”), Time Warner Cable, Inc. (“TWC”), and Liberty Broadband Corporation (“Liberty”) (collectively “The Agreements”), the purpose of which are to effectuate the acquisition of BHN and merger with TWC (“Transaction”), and WHEREAS, Charter Communications will merge with a subsidiary of New Charter, and all shares of Charter Communications will be converted into shares of New Charter, and New Charter will assume the name Charter Communications, Inc. (“Charter”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreements, A/N, TWC shareholders, and Liberty will acquire minority ownership interests in Charter; and 2 WHEREAS, on July 1, 2015, Charter Communications filed a FCC Form 394 seeking approval for the Transaction; and WHEREAS, under the terms of the Franchise, and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 238.083, subds. 1 and 2, the Transaction constitutes a “fundamental corporate change” which, by law, “requires the written approval of the franchising authority.” WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 238.083, subd.4, provides: “[t]he franchising authority shall approve or deny in writing the [request],” and “approval must not be unreasonably withheld.” NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY AS FOLLOWS: 1. The foregoing recitals are incorporated by reference. The City conditionally consents to the Transaction as provided herein. 2. New Charter shall notify the City in writing within ten (10) days of completion of the Transaction. Such notice shall include the certification provided in the 2015 Form 394, Section V, Part II(c), stating that New Charter: Will use its best efforts to comply with the terms of the franchise and applicable state laws or local ordinances and related regulations, and to effect changes, as promptly as practicable, in the operation of the system, if any changes are necessary to cure any violations thereof or defaults thereunder presently in effect or ongoing. Such certification shall be provided by, and executed on behalf of, New Charter. 3. Franchisee or New Charter shall reimburse the Commission and City’s legal fees and other costs incurred in review of the 2015 Form 394 within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice detailing such fees and costs. 4. Except as specifically stated herein, the City makes no findings or representations regarding the continuing validity and enforceability of the Franchise, nor any Franchise compliance matters. The City expressly reserves and does not waive authority to enforce the Franchise with respect to any Franchise violations or compliance matters whether arising before or after the date of this Resolution, and whether known or unknown as of the date hereof. 5. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. Violation of this Resolution shall render the City’s consent to the Transaction null and void. The City shall endeavor to provide written notice of any violation of this Resolution. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Rosemount, Minnesota this 17th day of November, 2015. By: Name: William H. Droste Title: Mayor ATTEST: Clarissa Hadler, City Clerk