HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.g. 11/15/2005 Receive Feasibility Report/Set Public Hearing - 2006 Pavement Management Project, City Project #396AGENDA ITEM: Receive Feasibility Report /Set Public
Hearing -2006 Pavement Management
Project, City Project #396
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent
PREPARED BY: Andrew J. Brotzler, P.E., City Engmee
A G ar, t
APPROVED BY: yr
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution; Feasibility Report
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt a Resolution Receiving the Feasi lity Report
and Setting a Public Hearing for the 2006 Pavement Management Project, City Project
#396.
x ROSEMOUN r
CITY COUNCIL
City Council Meeting: December 20, 2005
BACKGROUND:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On July 5, 2005 the Rosemount City Council authorized the preparation of a Feasibility Report for the
2006 Pavement Management Project. This project has been designated as City Project No. 396
Attached please find a copy of the Feasibility Report for the 2006 Pavement Management Project This
report addresses the reconstruction and bituminous pavement rehabihtauon of streets within the City of
Rosemount that have been identified by the Pavement Management Program to receive scheduled
maintenance. A beef review of the proposed improvements and funding is as follows:
1. LOCATION
The project is located in the southwest poruon of the City of Rosemount. Streets included in this project
are located south of Dodd Boulevard, west of Chippendale Avenue, north of 150 Street West (CSAH 42),
and east of Colorado Avenue (property line 1300 feet west of Chippendale Avenue).
2. PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Each street within the 2006 Pavement Management Project has reached a significant level of deterioration
in its quality and performance As part of the City of Rosemount's Pavement Management Program, each
street or area of streets is to receive the appropriate improvement to enhance the design strength of the
roadway and extend the useful life of each roadway. Two separate improvements are proposed for the
streets designated in the 2006 Pavement Management Project.
The area of streets within the Broback 10 Addition, including Chrome Avenue, Chrysler Avenue,
Cimarron Avenue, 146' Street West, and 147` Street West, is proposed to have full depth pavement
rehabilitation. Since the existmg public utility infrastructure (samtary sewer, water main, and storm sewer)
are all in place and m good working condition, and the existing concrete curb and gutter has not
experienced significant cracking or setdement, it is proposed that these streets receive pavement
rehabilitation m the form of pavement reclamation
The area of streets within the Edwin Rahn's 1" 2 and 3r Additions, including Cimarron Avenue, Chorley
Avenue, 148 Street West, Upper 148 Street West, 149` Street West, and Upper 149 Street West, will
receive a full reconstruction to include the removal of the existing bituminous surface and all existing curb
G ENGPROJA396 \RLCeuveFR- SetPHCC12 -20.05 doc
and gutter.
3. STORM SEWER
Currently there is storm sewer in the Broback 10` Addition only. Streets within the Edwin Rahn's 1 2"
and 3`d Adchtions do not have an interconnected storm sewer system. The existing catch basins collect
street surface runoff that infiltrates directly into the subgrade of the roadway. The proposed storm sewer
improvements include the installation of a subsurface collection and conveyance system throughout the
Edwin Rahn's 1 2 and 3` Additions. This will transport runoff into two existing infiltration basins
located within the project area One of the infiltration basins is located on the west side of Cimarron
Avenue between 148` Street West and Upper 148 Street West This basin has an existing storm sewer
outlet. The second drainage basin is located on the south side of Upper 149t Street West between
Cimarron Avenue and Charley Avenue This basin does not have a storm sewer outlet A proposed
outlet is to be installed to the south, extending toward 150` Street (CSAH 42), where a connecnon would
be made with the existing storm sewer system within the County right -of -way.
4. SANITARY SEWER
The existing sanitary sewer system within the project is found to be m good condition. Some sanitary
sewer manholes within the project area have been installed with excessive casting adjustment rings. It is
recoimmended that pre -cast manhole sections be installed on these manholes to reduce the number of
adjustment rings and make manhole access safer for pubhc works personnel.
5. WATERMAIN
The water main over the entire project area is still well within its useful hfe. There are, however, portions
of cast iron pipe (CIP) m the Edwin Rahn's if, 2 and 3rd Additions. It is recommended that a leakage
test is performed on the water main m these areas prior to construction to determine if these are any pre-
existing leaks or weak joints in the water main Potential problems would be fixed as part of construction,
All the fire hydrants within the Edwin Rahn's 1 2 1 d and 3'd Additions do not conform to the current City
of Rosemount design standards. These fire hydrants will be replaced with new fire hydrants that meet city
standards
6. PARK IMPROVEMENTS
The sidewalk within Chippendale Park is proposed to be replaced as part of this project. A concrete pad
will also be mstalled for placement of portable toilet facilittes. Pedestrian ramps adjacent to the park will
be replaced to comply with current American Disability Act (ADA) standards
7. FUNDING
The estimated construction cost for the 2006 Pavement Management Project is $1,426,600 as shown on
the following table:
Proposed Project Funding
1Special Assessments
(Street CIP
Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund
(Water Utility Fund
Storm Sewer Utility Fund
Park Department
Total
$595,310
II$ 32,800
Cost
$571,190
x$30,500
$187,500
$9,500
$1,426,600
°A of project
42%
40%
2%
2%
13%
1%
100%
2
A breakdown of the funding for the project is as follows:
The proposed 2006 Pavement Management Project has been divided into two separate improvement
categories for assessment purposes: rehabilitation and reconstruction According to the proposed 2006
City of Rosemount's Fee Resolution, 35% of the total cost for street rehabilitation projects can be assessed
to benefiting properties For reconstruction projects in areas zoned Urban Residential, a proposed per-
unit assessment rate of $4,400 can be assessed to benefiting propernes.
For the pavement rehabilitation within the Broback 10` Addition, benefiting properties will be assessed on
a per-mint basis, at an estimated $2,010 per lot The total funds proposed to be recovered through
assessments m this area are estimated at $102,510.
Similarly, the per -umt assessments for street reconstruction occurring within Edwin Rahn's 1 2n and 3`
Additions give a total assessment value for street reconstruction estimated at $492,800.
The City Street CIP Fund, Storm Sewer Utility Fund, Sanitary Sewer /Water Main Utility Fund, and Park
Department will fund the remauung portion of the project.
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends Council adoption of a resolution receiving the feasibility report and setting the public
hearing for the 2006 Pavement Management Project, City Pioject No 396
3
r
WHEREAS, the City Council deemed it necessary and expedient that the City of Rosemount, Minnesota,
construct certain improvements, to -wit: City Project #396, 2006 Pavement Management Project, in the City as
described in and in accordance with the feasibility report prepared by the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has been advised by the City Engineer that said utility and street improvements,
City Project #396 is feasible, and should best be made as proposed, and the City Engmeer's report to this effect
has heretofore been received by Council, and filed with the City Clerk on December 20, 2005, and
WHEREAS, the statute provided that no such improvements shall be made until the Council has held a pubhc
hearing on such improvements following mailed notice and two publications thereof in the official newspaper
stating time and place of the hearing, the general nature of the Improvement, the estimated costs thereof, and
the area proposed to be assessed, in accordance with the law.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount accepts the feasibility
report for City Project #396 and places n on file.
NOW THEREFORE IT BE FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount that
the public hearing be scheduled to consider City Project #396, 2006 Pavement Management Project, to be held
on Tuesday, January 17, 2006 at 7:30 o'clock p.m or as soon thereafter as possible, in the Council Chambers of
the City Hall.
ADOPTED this 20th day of December, 2005
ATTEST:
Linda Jentmk, City Clerk
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2005-
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE FEASIBILITY REPORT AND
SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE
2006 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT
CITY PROJECT #396
William H Droste, Mayor
Motion by Seconded by.
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
2006 Pavement
Management Project
City Project No. 396
December 20, 2005
Prepared for:
4 ROSEMOUNT
MINNESOTA
Prepared by:
s
WSB
Associates, Inc
1
I
Repor
WSB Project No. 1556 -45
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416 763 -541 -4800
Feasibility Report
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Project No 396
City of Rosemount, MN
WSB Project No. 1556-45
FEASIBILITY REPORT
2006 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT
CITY PROJECT NO. 396
FOR THE
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA
December 20, 2005
Prepared By:
WSB Associates, Inc.
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
(763) 541-4800
(763) 541 -1700 (Fax)
WSB
Infrastructure 1 Engineering 1 Planning 1 Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South
Associates, Inc
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
December 20, 2005 Ter 763- 541 -4800
Fax 763 -541 -1700
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Rosemount
2875 145 Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Re: Feasibility Report
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Project No. 396
City of Rosemount, MN
WSB Project No. 1556 -45
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members:
Transmitted herewith for your review is a feasibility report which addresses the street and utility
improvements of the following streets:
146 Street West Cimarron Avenue
147 Street West Chrome Avenue
148 Street West Chrysler Avenue
Upper 148 Street West Chorley Avenue
149 Street West Upper 149 Street West
We are available at your convenience to discuss this report. Please don't hesitate to contact me
at 763 -541 -4800 if you have any questions regarding this report.
Sincerely,
WSB Associates, Inc.
L5
Kevin B. Kawlewski, P E
Senior Project Manager
Attachment
srb
Minneapolis 1 St Cloud
Equal Opportunity Employer
Date: December 20, 2005
Feasibility Report
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Project No. 396
City of Rosemount, MN
WSB Project No. 1556 -45
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
6.„ Lit_
Kevin B. Kawlewski, P.E.
Date: December 20, 2005
Prepared By:
Lic. No. 25496
TITLE SHEET
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
CERTIFICATION SHEET
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
2. INTRODUCTION 2
2.1 Authorization 2
2.2 Scope 2
2.3 Data Available 2
3. GENERAL BACKGROUND 3
3.1 Project Location 3
3.2 Project Zoning 3
3.3 Project History 3
3.4 Existing Conditions 4
3.4.1 Streets 4
3.4.2 Sanitary Sewer 5
3.4.3 Water Main 5
3.4.4 Storm Sewer 5
4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 6
4.1 Streets 6
4.2 Sanitary Sewer 7
4.3 Water Main 7
4.4 S torm Sewer 7
4.5 Right-of-Way/Easements 8
4.6 Permits/Approvals 8
4.7 Construction Traffic 8
5. FINANCING 9
5.1 Opinion of Cost 9
5.2 Funding 9
6. PROJECT SCHEDULE 11
7. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION 12
Appendix A
Figures
Appendix B
Opinion of Probable Cost
Appendix C
Cost Distribution Calculations
Preliminary Assessment Roll
Appendix D
Soil Boring Logs
Feasibility Report
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Project No. 396
City of Rosemount, MN
WSB Project No. 155645
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Project No. 396 provides for the street reconstruction of streets within the Broback 10
Addition, Edwin Rahn l Addition, Edwin Rahn r Addition, and Edwin Rahn 3 Addition, all
located between Dodd Boulevard, Chippendale Avenue, Cimarron Avenue, and 150 Street
West (CSAH 42). The streets within the Broback 10 Addition are proposed for pavement
rehabilitation. These streets include Cimarron Avenue, Chrome Avenue, 146 Street West, and
147 Street West. The streets within the Edwin Rahn 2 and 3td Additions are proposed to be
reconstructed, and include Cimarron Avenue, Chrysler Avenue, Chorley Avenue, 148 Street
West, Upper 148 Street West, 149 Street West, and Upper 149 Street West.
Pavement rehabilitation includes in -place bituminous reclamation of approximately 3,200 feet
(0 60 miles) of 30- foot -wide urban section streets, located in the area west of Chippendale
Avenue, between Dodd Boulevard and 147 Street West. Bituminous reclamation involves the
gnndmg up and in -place compaction of the existing bituminous pavement, followed by the
placement of a new bituminous surface. Where it is deemed necessary, existing storm sewer and
sanitary sewer castings, as well as cracked or spalled concrete curb and gutter, will be replaced.
The reconstruction portion of the project will include the total reconstruction of approximately
5,600 feet (1.10 riles) of 28 -foot urban section streets, located west of Chippendale Avenue
between 148 Street West and Upper 149 Street West, complete with bituminous paving and
new B -618 concrete curb and gutter. Also included in this portion of the project is the upgrade
of existing hydrants, installation of storm sewer, and the upgrade of two existing drainage basins.
The total estimated project cost is $1,426,600, which includes a 5% contingency and 30%
indirect costs. Funding for the project will consist of special assessments, 2006 Street Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP) funds, and utility funds as necessary. The final assessment hearing will
be held in the fall of 2006, following completion of the construction of the project.
It is proposed that construction occur in 2006 and is anticipated to be completed, including all
restoration items, by the fall of 2006.
This project is feasible, necessary, and cost effective from an engineering standpoint and should
be constructed as proposed herein.
Feastinlay Report
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Project No. 396
City of Rosemount, MN
WSB Protect Na 1556 -45
Page 1
2. INTRODUCTION
2.1 Authorization
On July 5, 2005, the Rosemount City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report
for the 2006 Pavement Management Project. This project has been designated as City Project
No. 396.
2.2 Scope
This project provides for street reconstruction and pavement rehabilitation for streets within the
Broback 10 Addition, Edwin Rahn 2 Addition, and Edwin Rahn 3` Addition. The proposed
project area is shown in Figure I of Appendix A.
Proposed Broback 10 Addition improvements include the reclamation of in -place bituminous
pavement for reuse as aggregate base, new bituminous pavement, and replacement of outdated or
broken manhole castings and cracked or spalled concrete curb and gutter. Streets affected by
these improvements include Cimarron Avenue, Chrome Avenue, l46 Street West, and 147
Street West.
Proposed Edwin Rahn 15` tat and 3 Additions improvements include total street
reconstruction, with new concrete curb and gutter, and storm sewer improvements. Fire hydrants
that do not meet current City standards are also proposed to be replaced. Streets affected by
these improvements include Cimarron Avenue, Chrysler Avenue, Chorley Avenue, 148 Street
West, Upper 148` Street West, 149 Street West, and Upper 149 Street West.
2.3 Data Available
Information and materials used in the preparation of this report include the following:
City of Rosemount Record Plans
City of Rosemount Topography Maps
City of Rosemount Pavement Management Program Field Rating Data
Sanitary Sewer Televising
Field Observations of the Area
Rosemount Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan
Field Survey
Soil Borings (Appendix D)
Feasibility Report
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Project No. 396
City of Rosemount MN
WSB Project No. 1556 -45
Page 2
3. GENERAL BACKGROUND
3.1 Project Location
The project is located in the southwestern portion of the City, and is bounded by Dodd
Boulevard to the north, Chippendale Avenue to the east, 150 Street West (County Road 42) to
the south, and Cimarron Avenue to the west. The streets proposed for improvement include
146 Street West
147 Street West
148` Street West
Upper 148 Street West
149`" Street West
Cimarron Avenue
Chrome Avenue
Chrysler Avenue
Chorley Avenue
Upper 149 Street West
The proposed project area is identified on Figure I in Appendix A of this report.
3.2 Project Zoning
The project area is zoned Urban Residential. The existing properties consist mainly of single
family residential homes, with some four -unit apartment buildings and duplexes.
3.3 Project History
This project was initiated through the development and implementation of the City of
Rosemount Pavement Management Program. The Pavement Management Program was created
to enable City officials to evaluate and monitor the condition of existing street surfaces. This
allows for timely maintenance and improvement activities to maximize the life of existing
pavements. The Pavement Management Program consists of a field evaluation of City streets in
order to establish a Pavement Condition Index (PCI). The PCI is used to rank the surface
condition of each street segment. One -third of the City's total street mileage is reviewed every
year, such that each segment is reviewed once every three years.
In order to interpret the PCI ranking of a street segment, the following values are used as a
guideline to determine the maintenance and improvement strategies:
Feasibility Report
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Project No. 396
City of Rosemount, MN
WSB Project No 155645
PCI Recommended Improvement
91 -100 Do Nothing
61 -90 Routine Maintenance /Seal Coat/Crack Seal
40 -60 Patch/Repair /Overlay
0 -39 Total Reconstruct/Reclamation
Page 3
A breakdown of individual street ratings and the year each was constructed is as follows:
Year 2004 Projected 2006
Street Constructed PCI Rating PCI Rating
146 Street West 1975 28 18
147 Street West 1975 55 47
148 Street West 1973 61 53
Upper 148 Street West 1973 40 31
149 Street West 1973 18 7
Upper 149 Street West 1973 40 30
Cimarron Ave. (Dodd Blvd. to 147 St.) 1975 32 22
Cimarron Ave. (148 St. to U. 149 St.) 1973 36 26
Chrome Avenue 1975 30 20
Chrysler Avenue 1973 18 7
Chorley Avenue 1973 20 9
Based on the individual PCI ratings and field observations of existing curb and gutter conditions,
it is proposed that 146 Street West, 147 Street West, Cimarron Avenue (from Dodd Boulevard
to 147 Street West), and Chrome Avenue receive pavement reclamation and resurfacing. It is
proposed that Cimarron Avenue (148th Street West to Uper 149 Street West), Chrysler
Avenue, Chorley Avenue, 148 Street West, Upper 148` Street West, 149 Street West, and
Upper 149 Street West be reconstructed. While the PCI ratings in this area indicate that
bituminous reclamation and resurfacing may be a possible alternative to reconstruction, the poor
condition of the curb and the lack of storm sewer indicate that complete street reconstruction is
warranted.
3.4 Existing Conditions
3.4.1 Streets
The streets within the Broback 10 Addition are 30 feet wide with surmountable concrete
curb and gutter. The partial cul -de -sac at the intersection of Cimarron Avenue and 148
Street West is 90 feet in diameter, and also includes surmountable concrete curb and
gutter.
The streets within the Edwin Rahn ls 2 and 3 Additions are 28 feet wide with
surmountable concrete curb and gutter. The partial and full cul -de -sacs at the
intersections of Cimarron Avenue and Upper 149 Street West, Cimarron Avenue and
148 Street West, Chorley Avenue and Upper 149 Street West, and Chorley Avenue
and 148 Street West are all 90 feet in diameter, and include concrete curb and gutter.
Borings taken throughout the proposed project area indicate approximately 2 to 3 inches
of bituminous pavement over mostly fine to medium grained sandy gravel, ranging in
depth from 2 feet to 9 feet beneath the surface. Bonngs taken in the Edwin Rahn 1 2"
and 3` Additions indicated areas of silty sand and clay 'nixed with granular matenal
beneath the gravel base, extending to a depth of 9 feet. Boring depths were set at 9 feet
due to the proposed depth of the storm sewer installation.
Feasibthty Report
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Protect No. 396
City of Rosemount, MN
WSB Project No. 155645
Page 4
3.4.2 Sanitary Sewer
There are two types of sanitary sewer within the project area. Sanitary sewer constructed
as part of the Broback 10` Addition consists of 8 -inch and 10 -inch vitnfied clay pipe
(VCP). Televising reports completed as part of this study indicate that the sanitary sewer
is in good condition. There were no indications of ground water infiltration or root
intrusion identified by televising throughout the Broback 10 Addition.
The existing sanitary sewer within the Edwin Rahn l 2 and 3 Additions consists of
8 -inch PVC pipe. Televising reports indicate that this pipe is also in good condition, with
no cracking or settlement found throughout the project. There was no ground water
infiltration or root intrusion identified throughout the Edwin Rahn 2
3.4.3 Water Main
and 3` Additions.
Some sanitary sewer manholes within the project area have been installed with excessive
casting adjustment nngs. Too many adjustment nngs creates a maintenance hazard that
prevents public works personnel from being able to safely reach the steps within each
manhole structure.
The existing watermam network within the project area consists of 8 -inch and 6 -inch cast
iron pipe (CIF) and ductile iron pipe (DIP) within the Edwin Rahn 1 2 and 3`
Additions, and 6 -inch DIP within the Broback 10 Addition. The water main is between
30 and 45 years old, and is in generally good condition.
3.4.4 Storm Sewer
The proposed project area is located in the Wachter Lake Drainage District (WA). The
Broback 10 Addition contains interconnected storm sewer that takes street and
residential runoff and flows south to Wachter Lake.
The Edwin Rahn 1 2 and 3rd Additions do not contain any storm sewer. Runoff is
directed into catch basins that infiltrate directly into the soils below the roadway, or is
directed via overland flow to two drainage and infiltration basins within the project area.
Localized street flooding has occurred in some areas of the Edwin Rahn l 2 and 3
Additions dunng larger rain events and spring snowmelt periods. One drainage basin is
located on the west side of Cimarron Avenue between 148 Street West and Upper 148
Street West. The second drainage basin is located on the south side of Upper 149 Street
West between Cimarron Avenue and Chorley Avenue. The Cimarron Avenue drainage
basin contains an outlet pipe that directs runoff to Wachter Lake, and functions pnmanly
as an infiltration basin. The Upper 149` Street drainage basin does not have an outlet
pipe, and functions strictly as an infiltration basin.
Feasibility Report
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Project No. 396
City of Rosemount MN
WSB Project No. 1556 -45
Page 5
4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
4.1 Streets
Each street within the 2006 Pavement Management Project has reached a significant level of
deterioration in its quality and performance. As part of the City of Rosemount Pavement
Management Program, each street or area of streets is to receive the appropriate improvement
based on its PCI to enhance the design strength of the roadway and extend the useful life of each
roadway Two improvement techniques are proposed for the streets within the 2006 Pavement
Management Project.
Streets within the Broback 10 Addition have an average weighted PCI rating of 29, with
individual PCI values ranging from 18 to 47. With the exception of 147 Street, which has a
PCI rating above 40, all other streets within the Broback 10` Addition have PCI ratings within
the Reconstruct/Rehabilitate" improvement category. The existing public utility infrastructure
(sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer) are all in -place and in good working condition.
The existing concrete curb and gutter has not experienced significant cracking or settlement.
Based on the overall condition, it is proposed that pavement rehabilitation in the form of
pavement reclamation and bituminous surfacing occur in this area The existing bituminous
pavement will be ground up and mixed with the existing Class 5 aggregate base and re-
compacted in -place to form a new aggregate base for the roadway. Prior to resurfacing, gate
valve boxes and storm sewer and sanitary sewer manhole castings will be replaced Spot repairs
will be made to the concrete curb and gutter, followed by the installation of 4 inches of new
bituminous pavement.
Streets within the Edwin Rahn 1 t and 3 Additions have an average weighted PCI rating of
31, with PCI ratings ranging from 7 to 53. With the exception of 148 Street, which has a PCI
rating above 40, all other streets within the Edwin Rahn 1 2nd and 3 Additions have PCI
ratings within the "Reconstruct/Rehabilitate" improvement category. The lack of a storm sewer
system has resulted in widespread cracking and deterioration of the streets and curb and gutter.
The soil borings also indicate the need for some subgrade correction. Therefore, it is proposed
that the streets within the Edwin Rahn 1 2 and 3 Additions be completely reconstructed.
The reconstruction would include the removal of all existing bituminous pavement and removal
of the existing curb and gutter. New B -618 concrete curb and gutter, 4 inches of bituminous
pavement, 6 inches of Class 5 aggregate base, and select granular material as needed for
subgrade correction, are proposed as part of the improvement. In addition, all existing sanitary
sewer castings and gate valve boxes are proposed to be replaced.
The proposed roadway improvements and typical street sections are shown on Figures 2 and 3 in
Appendix A.
Feastbdity Report
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Project No. 396
Cay of Rosemount, MN
WSB Project No. 1556 -05
Page 6
4.2 Sanitary Sewer
The existing sanitary sewer system within the project has been televised and found to be in good
condition. A portion of the sanitary sewer along Chrome Avenue in the Broback 10 Addition
exhibited some minor cracking at joints The pipe does not display any signs of settlement,
visible root intrusion, or groundwater infiltration. Therefore, there are no improvements or
repairs recommended for the sanitary sewer pipe as part of the project.
Some sanitary sewer manholes within the project area have been installed with excessive casting
adjustment nngs. For these manholes, it is recommended that a pre -cast manhole section be
installed to reduce the number of adjustment nngs. These additional manhole sections would
include an additional step for safer manhole access by public works personnel.
4.3 Water Main
The existing water main within the Broback 10 Addition and the Edwin Rahn 1st Addition
(148 Street West) is 6 -inch ductile iron pipe (DIP). The water main within the Edwin Rahn tad
and 3 Additions is 6 inches in diameter, and is assumed to be cast iron pipe (CIP). All water
main in the area was installed between 1962 and 1975, and has no history of breaks or unusual
maintenance requirements. The pipe ranges from 30 to 43 years old, but is still within its useful
life of 70 to 100 years.
All fire hydrants within the Edwin Rahn lst, 2 and 3` Additions do not conform to the current
City of Rosemount design standards. These hydrants will be replaced with new fire hydrants that
meet City standards.
Due to the presence of CIP within the project area, it is recommended that a leakage test be
performed on the existing water main within the project pnor to construction to determine if
there are any pre existing leaks or weak joints in the water main. Any potential problem areas
would be repaired as part of construction. This is recommended as CIP tends to become more
bnttle with age. Pnor to the placement of the bituminous wear course, a second leakage test
would be performed on the water main within the project to make certain that no water main was
damaged as result of construction. If leaks or damaged portions are found, these sections of
water main would be replaced.
The proposed hydrant replacement locations are shown on Figure 3 in Appendix A.
4.4 Storm Sewer
Currently, there is storm sewer in the Broback 10 Addition only. The Edwin Rahn l r and
3 Additions do not have an interconnected storm sewer system. Existing catch basins collect
street surface runoff that infiltrates directly into the subgrade of the roadway. This infiltration
has resulted in the saturation of the street subgrade in certain areas. There are no subsurface
pipes to transport the water to stormwater ponds or infiltration areas. While effective in smaller
rain events, larger ram events and springtime snowmelt have caused minor street flooding and
erosion in adjacent drainage basin swales.
Feasibility Report
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Project No 396
City of Rosemount, MN
WSB Project No. 1556 -45
Page 7
The proposed storm sewer improvements include the installation of a subsurface collection and
conveyance system throughout the Edwin Rahn 1 2 and 3rd Additions. This storm sewer
would collect and transport runoff to existing drainage basins located within the project area.
One drainage basin is located on the west side of Cimarron Avenue between 148 Street West
and Upper 148 Street West. This basin has an existing storm sewer outlet, and would require
little or no grading modifications. The second drainage basin is located on the south side of
Upper 149 Street West between Cimarron Avenue and Chorley Avenue. This basin does not
have an existing storm sewer outlet, and currently acts as an infiltration basin. An outlet is
proposed to be installed to the south, extending toward 150 Street (County Road 42), where it
would connect into the existing storm sewer system within the County right -of -way.
The proposed storm sewer improvements are shown on Figure 3 in Appendix A.
4.5 Right of Way/Easements
The acquisition of temporary construction easements or nghts -of -entry may be required for grade
modifications proposed within the Edwin Rahn 1 2 and 3rd Additions. The majority of the
easements would be for driveway repairs that may be necessary if the roadway grades are
lowered. City staff will work with the affected property owners to acquire the necessary
temporary construction easements.
4.6 Permits/Approvals
The following permits will be necessary as part of this project.
MN Department of Health (MDH) Water Main
MN Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer
Dakota County Highway Department Work Within Right -of -Way
MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES II) General Storm -water
Permit for Construction Activity
(MN R110000)
4.7 Construction Traffic
This project will include excavation and disposal of materials from the existing street areas.
Significant volumes of granular base, aggregate base, and bituminous pavement materials will
need to be hauled into the project area. This will increase truck traffic on the streets adjacent to
the construction area. All residents will have access to their properties during construction,
however, some inconvenience is anticipated, primanly during the curb and driveway apron
construction phase of the work.
Feasibility Report
2.006 Pavement Management Project
City Protect No 396
City of Rosemount, MN
WSB Project No. 1556 -45
Page 8
SCHEDULE/DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
A. Broback 10` Addition Rehabilitation
$310,100
B. Edwin Rahn 15` 2nd and 3 Additions Reconstruction
$856,400
C. Sanitary Sewer Improvements
$32,800
D. Water Main Improvements
$30,300
E. Storm Sewer Improvements (Edwin Rahn 15t, 2 °6, and 3
$187,500
F. Chippendale Park Improvements
$9,500
TOTAL
1,426,600
5. FINANCING
5.1 Opinion of Cost
Detailed opinions of cost can be found in Appendix B of this report. The opinions incorporate
estimated 2006 construction costs and include a 5% contingency factor and all related indirect
costs, which are estimated at 30 The indirect costs include legal, engineering, and financing,
as well as other administrative items. The cost does not include any easement acquisition costs.
A summary of the project costs is as follows:
2006 Pavement Management Project
Summary of Costs
5.2 Funding
Funding for the project will consist of a combination of Special Assessments, Street CIP funds,
Storm Sewer funds, and Water Core funds.
The proposed 2006 Pavement Management Project has been divided into two separate
improvement categories: rehabilitation and reconstruction. According to the City of
Rosemount's Fee Resolution, the costs of street rehabilitation occurring in areas zoned Urban
Residential can be assessed at a rate of 35% of the total cost. In the case of the Broback 10
Addition, benefiting properties will be assessed on a per -unit basis, at $2,010 per lot. The total
funds proposed to be recovered through assessments in this area are estimated at $102,510.
Similarly, according to the City of Rosemount's Fee Resolution, the costs of street reconstruction
occurring in areas zoned Urban Residential are proposed to be assessed at a rate of $4,400 per
residential unit. In the case of the Edwin Rahn 1 2 and 3 Additions, the total assessments
for street reconstruction are estimated at $492,800.
Feasrbtlity Report
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Project No. 396
City of Rosemount, MN
WSB Project No. 155645
Page 9
PROPOSED PROJECT FUNDING
COST
OF PROJECT
Special Assessments'
595,310
42%
Street CIP
571,190
40%
Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund
32,800
2%
Water Utility Fund
30,500
2%
Storm Sewer Utility Fund
$187,500
13%
Park Department
$9,500
1%
TOTAL
1,426,600
100%
In order to fairly distribute the pavement rehabilitation costs within the Broback 10 Addition, a
residential equivalent for Kidder Park was determined. This equivalent was found by taking the
average front footage per lot within the Broback 10 Addition and applying that average to
Kidder Park. This equated to three residential equivalent units. The assessable cost of these
improvements adjacent to Kidder Park is proposed to be supplemented through the City's Street
CIP fund.
Additional street improvement costs in the amount of $571,190 are proposed to be funded
through the City's Street CIP fund The cost for sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer
improvements are proposed to be funded entirely through the City's Sanitary Sewer, Water and
Storm Sewer utility funds, respectively.
A summary of the proposed funding for this pro ect is in the following table:
1 Based on the City of Rosemount's proposed 2006 rate schedule.
A Preliminary Assessment Roll and Cost Distribution Calculations can be found in Appendix C
of this report.
Feast ility Report
2006 Pavement Management Project
Cay Project Na. 396
City of Rosemount, MN
WSB Protect No. 1556 -45
Page 10
6. PROJECT SCHEDULE
The proposed project schedule for these improvements is as follows:
Authorized Preparation of Feasibility Report July 5, 2005
Public Information Meeting December 7, 2005
Receive Feasibility Report and Order Public Heanng December 20, 2005
Public Heanng/Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specs January 17, 2006
Receive Plans and Specs /Authonze Ad for Bid March 21, 2006
Receive Bids/Award Contract April 18, 2006
Begin Construction May 15, 2006
Substantial Completion Fall 2006
Assessment Hearing Fall 2006
Feasibility Report
2006 Pavement 6fanagement Project
City Project No. 396
City of Rosemount, MN
WSB Project No. 1556 -45
Page 11
7. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION
Due to deteriorating street conditions identified as part of the City of Rosemount's Pavement
Management Program, the following improvements are recommended:
Pavement rehabilitation through bituminous reclamation of streets within the Broback
10 Addition, including 146 Street West, 147 Street West, Cimarron Avenue, and
Chrome Avenue.
Street reconstruction and storm sewer improvements within the Edwin Rahn l t and
3 Additions, including 148 Street West, Upper 148 Street West, 149` Street West,
Upper 149 Street West, Cimarron Avenue, Chrysler Avenue, and Chorley Avenue.
Sanitary sewer manhole section replacement on manholes within the project area that
have excessive adjustment nngs.
Fire hydrant replacement and spot water main replacement within the Edwin Rahn l
2nd and 3 Additions
The total estimated cost of these street and utility improvements is $1,426,600. Funding for
these improvements will be provided through a combination of Special Assessments, City Street
Capital Improvement funds, and City Utility funds.
This project is feasible, necessary, and cost effective from an engineering standpoint. It is our
recommendation that the street rehabilitation of streets within the Broback 10 Addition,
including 146 Street West, 147 Street West, Cimarron Avenue, and Chrome Avenue; the street
reconstruction of streets within the Edwin Rahn 1 st 2nd and 3 Additions, including 148 Street
West, Upper 148 Street West, 149 Street West, Upper 149 Street West, Cimarron Avenue,
Chrysler Avenue, and Chorley Avenue; the installation of pre-cast manhole sections on
manholes with excessive adjustment nngs within the Broback 10 Addition and Edwin Rahn 1
r and 3 Additions; and the installation of storm sewer and new fire hydrants within the
Edwin Rahn 1 st 2nd and 3 Additions, be implemented as outlined in this report.
It is the recommendation of WSB Associates, Inc. that the City Council accepts this feasibility
report and schedules the public hearing as proposed herein.
Feasibility Report
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Project No. 396
City of Rosemount, MN
WSB Project No. 1556 -45
Page 12
Feasibility Report
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Project No. 396
City of Rosemount, MN
WSB Project No. 1556 -45
APPENDIX A
Project Location Maps
w
0
z
al
0
I
!4H l[
(:11;11
41
Es
a
0 4
E_ so 1
RESTWE
Y� rc
n 1,1u,
11114
,I
n_
t 4TH
4S4N 5
j
4
ors
150TH 5T W
■I
V
5 N 1 r
al
7
46TH ST
nST
ST
0
so
SG
s
t1 _Prim
D S
1u
811H
WI R' NN 2NR A
FRAhN
UpPEI4 i4�T 14.
■VIII■. 11 I
11111 :11111,
IV
11111
1•
1441
n[TIT T1!1T
S1
uPPEr
I ST
111
1
T
ST
1
0 R
1
11 ER
5
7
;e o
11 u
P
V
T
50711 ST
L
U
■'s
a1
L
150 51
�Ur
15
5T
1
1
I7
1
0
w
5T
1
15157
0
X
400
800
-at
701 Xena Avenue South, Suite 300
W58 Minneapolis, MN 55416
JQ wwm wsberg com
Associates, Inc
7635414810.FU l835J1.170)
INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING CONSTRUCTION
2006 STREET IMPROVEMENTS
IROSEMOUNT
MINNESOTA
WSB Protect No 0155645
January 17,2006
Figure Number
1
J
K 101556- 451Cad1Exh,bds 1556 .45_FIG_01 dwg, 12/13/2005 1 30 05 PM
0
co
�,.�I
\i,
0
I
0
D F
1
I
7
N
-N� GIMARRON AVE
4 5 1 1
`1. c
�r H
co
CI-IRY�LER I AVE
I
A
1
C
Icn 931
COILORADO AVE
I
1
C11ORLEY AVE
CLIIPPENDA�VE
L
Feasibility Report
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Project No. 396
City of Rosemount, MN
WSB Project No. 1556 -45
APPENDIX B
Opinion of Cost
Opinion of Probable Cost
WSB Project 2006 Street Reconstruction Design Bit JDH
Project Location City of Rosemount Checked By BDC
Gay Project No. 396
WSB Project No 1556 -45 Date 12'5/2005
Item
No
MN /DOT
Specification
No
Descnption
Unit
Estimated
Total
Quantity
Estimated
Unit Pnce
Estimated
Total Cost
A. Surface Improvements Broback 10 Addition
1 2021 501
MOBILIZATION
LUMP SUM
1
$4,500 00
$4,500 00
2
2104 501
REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER
LIN FT
1800
SS 00
$9,000 00
3
2104.505
REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
SQ YD
50
$2.50
$125 00
4
2104 505
REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
SQ YD
20
$3 50
$70 00
5
2104 509
REMOVE SIG(.
EACH
7
$50 00
$350 00
6
2104 509
REMOVE CASTING
EACH
10
$75 00
$750 00
7
2104 509
REMOVE VALVE BOX
EACH
6
$75 00
$450 00
8
2104 513
SAWING BITUM]NOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)
LIN FT
150
$300
$450 00
9
2104 513
SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)
LIN FT
20
S5 00
$100 00
10
2105 507
SUBGRADE EXCAVATION
CU YD
100
$S 00
$800 00
11
2105522
SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)
CU YD
100
$650
$65000
12
2112 501
SUBGRADE PREPARATION
ROAD STA
33 0
$225 00
$7,425 00
13
2211 501
AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED)
TON
1,000
$t0 00
$10,000.00
14
2331 604
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT RECLAMATION
SQ YD
9,500
$4 50
$42,750 00
15
2331 607
HAUL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT RECLAMATION (LV)
CU YD
1,550
$8 50
$13,17500
16
2350.501
TYPE LV 3 WEARING COURSE (C
TON
1,150
$42 00
$48,300 00
17
2350 502
TYPE LV 3 NON WEARING COURSE (C
TON
1,150
$40 00
$46,000 00
18
2357 502
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT
GALLON
520
$3 00
$1,56000
19
2503 602
CHIMNEY SEALS
EACH
14
$300 00
54,200 00
20
2504602
ADJUST GATE VALVE AND BOX
EACH
6
$20000
$1,20000
21
2504 602
F &1 VALVE BOX
EACH
6
$650 00
$3,900 00
22
2506 516
CASTING ASSEMBLY
EACH
10
S450.00
S4,500 00
23
2531 501
CONCRETE CURB GUTTER, DESIGN SPECIAL
LIN FT
1,800
$1100
$19,800
24
2563 601
TRAFFIC CONTROL
LUMP SUM
1
$1,500.00
$1,500 00
25
2564.531
F &I SIGN PANELS TYPE C
SQ FT
12 0
$25 00
$300 00
26
2564 602
F &I SIGN PANELS TYPE 0
EACH
6
525000
51,500 00
27
2573 502
SILT FENCE, TYPE HEAVY DUTY
LIN FT
100
$2.50
$250 00
28
2573 602
INLET PROTECTION
EACH
6
$150 00
$900 00
29
2575 505
SODDING TYPE LAWN (INC.. TOPSOIL PERT
SQ YD
850
$3 00
52,550 00
SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE A Surface Improvements
TOTAL Schedule A Surface Improvements
Broback 10 m Addition $227, 100 00
5% Contingencies $1 1,360.00
Subtotal 5238,500.00
30% Indirect Cost $71,550 00
Broback 10 16 Addition $310,100.00
Opinion of Probable Cost
2006 Pavement Management Project
Cav Project No, 392
WS8 Project No. 1563 -00
1 Of 5 K 10155845WammiFeas,b.tylOpman of Probable Costsf xis
Opinion of Probable Cost
WSB Project 2006 Street Reconstruction Design By IDH
Project Location City of Rosemount Checked By BDC
Cuy Project No. 396
WSB Project No. 1556 -45 Date 12/5/2005
Item
No.
MN/DOT
Spec
Descnption
Unit
Estimated
Quanti
Estimated
Unit Pnce
Estimated
Total Cost
B. Surface Improvements Edwin Rahn 1 st 2nd and 3 Additions
30
2021 501 MOBILIZATION
LUKIP SLM
1
$12,00000
$12,00000
31
2104 501
REMOVE CURB AND GUII ER
LIN FT
11,100
5500
$55,500 00
32
2104 503
REMOVE CONCRE I E WALK
SQ FT
100
3200
$200 00
33
2104 503
REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
SQ YD
1200
$3 50
$4,200 00
34
2104505
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
SO YD
18,100
$250
$45,25000
35
2104 505
REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
SQ YD
400
$3 50
$1,40000
36
2104 505
REMOVEBITUMINOUS SIDEWALK
SQ YD
12
5500
$60 00
37
2104 509
REMOVE VALVE BOX
EACH
11
S75 00
$825 00
36
2104509
REMOVE CASTING
EACH
2
55000
$10000
37
2104 509
REMOVE SIGN
EACH
4
55000
$200 00
38
2104 513
SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)
LIN FT
300
5300
590000
39
2104 513
SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)
LIN FT
720
5500
$3,60000
40
2105 507
SUBGRADE EXCAVATION
CU YD
2,000
$8 00
$16,000 00
41
2105 522
SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)
CU YD
2.000
S6 50
513,000 00
42
2112,501
SUBGRADE PREPARATION
ROAD STA
57
520000
$11,42000
43
2211 501
AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED)
TON
7,800
SI000
$78,000 00
44
2350 501
TYPE LV 3 WEARING COURSE (C
TON
2.000
$42 00
$84,000.00
45
2350 502
TON
2,000
540 00
$80,000 00
TYPE LV 3 NON WEARING COURSE (C
46
2357 502
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT
GALLON
900
53 CO
$2,700
47
2502 541
4" PERF PVC PIPE DRAIN
LIN FT
230
57 50
$1,725 00
48
2503 602
CHIMNEY SEALS
EACH
23
530000
$6,900 00
49
2504602
F &I VALVE BOX
EACH
t1
S65000
$7,150
50
2506 516
CASTING ASSEMBLY
EACH
2
545000
5900
51
2521501
4 "CONCRETEWALK
SQ FP
100
5300
5300
52
2521 604
2' BITUMINOUS PATH
SQ YD
12
S20 00
$240 00
53
2531 501
CONCRETE CURB GUTTER- DESIGN B618
LIN FT
11 100
S8 50
$94,350 00
54
2531 507
7" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
SQ YD
1,200
$45 00
$54,000 00
55
2531 618
TRUNCATED DOMES
SQ FT
12
55000
$600.00
56
2540 602
RELOCATE MAIL BOX
EACH
135
$100 00
$8,500
57
2540 602
F &I MAIL BOX AND SUPPORT
EACH
111
$150 00
$16,650 00
58
2563 601
TRAFFIC CONTROL
LUMP SUM
I
SI 50000
51,500 00
59
2564 602
F &I SIGN PANELS TYPE D
EACH
4
525000
51,000
60
2573 502
SILT FENCE, TYPE HEAVY DUTY
LM FT
100
$2 50 I
$250 00
61
2573 602
INLET PROTECTION
EACH
30
56000
$1,800
62
2575 505
SODDING TYPE LAWN (INCL TOPSOIL PERT) SQ YD
7,400 53 00
$22,200 00
SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE B Surface Improvements Edwin
TOTAL Schedule B Edwin
Rahn 1
`r 2 and 3 Additions $627,400 00
5"!o Contingencies $31,370 00
Subtotal $658,800.00
30% Indirect Cost $197,640.00
Rahn 1 2 and 3 Additions $856,400.00
Opinion of Probable Cost
2006 Pavement iWanagenrent Project
City Project No. 392
WSB Project No. 1563 -00
20f5
K 10155 8- 4 51Admm(FeasibdRNOpmon of Probable Costs( xis
Opinion of Probable Cost
WSB Project 2006 Street Reconstruction Design Br, ]DH
Project Locator)! City of Rosemount Checked By: BDC
City Project No 396
WSB Protect No 155645 Date. 12/5/2005
Item
No
MN;DOT
Specification
No
Descnptton
Unit
Estimated
Total
Quantity
Estimated
Una Pnce
Estimated
Total Cost
C Sanitary Sewer Improvements
63
2104 501
REMOVE MANHOLE
EACH
20
$150 00
S3,000 00
64
2104 509
REMOVE CASTING
EACH
36
S50 00
$1,800 00
65
2506 516
CASTING ASSEMBLY
EACH
36
$450 00
$16,200 00
66
2506 603
CONST48" DIA SAN SEWER MANHOLE
LIN Fr
20
575000
$3,000 00
SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE C Sanitary
TOTAL Schedule C Sanitary
Sewer Improvements $24,000 00
5% Contingencies $1,200 00
Subtotal $25,200.00
30% Indirect Cost $7,560 00
Sewer Improvements $32,800.00
D. Water Main Improvements
67
2104 501
REMOVE WATER MAIN
LIN FT
120
$15 00
$1,80000
68
2(04 509
REMOVE HYDRANT
EACH
9
$250 00
$2,250 00
69
2504 601
WATER MAIN LEAK SURVEY
LUMP SUM
2
$2,000 00
$4,000 00
70
2504 602
CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN
EACH
2
$1,000 00
$2,000 00
71
2504 602
ADJUST HYDRANT
EACH
4
$500 00
$2,00000
72
2504.603
6" DIP CL 52 WATERMA[N
LIN FT
120
$45 00
$5,400 00
73
2504 602
CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE
EACH
4
$300 00
SI _00 00
74
2504 602
t" CORPORTION STOP
EACH
4
$60 00
$240 00
75
2504 602
CURB STOP AND BOX
EACH
4
5150 00
$600 00
76
2504 603
r TYPE K COPPER
LIN FT
120
$20 00
32,400 00
77
2504 602
DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS
POUND
175
32 00
3350 00
SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE D Water
54
TOTAL Schedule D Water
Main improvements $22,200 00
5% Contingencies $1,1 10 00
Subtotal 523,300.00
30% Indirect Cost $6,990.00
Main Improvements 530,300.00
Opinion of Probable Cost
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Project No. 392
WSB Project No. 1563 -00 3 Of 5 K 01556 -45W erntheeasAdoylOpmron of Probable Costs', xis
Opinion of Probable Cost
WS8 Project. 2006 Street Reconstruction Desagn By 1DH
Project Location City of Rosemount Checked By. BDC
Crty Project No 396
WSB Protect No 1556 -45 Date. 12/5/2005
Item
No
MN /DOT
Specification
No,
Descnptton
Unit
Estimated
Taal
Quantity
Estimated
Unit Pnce
Estimated
Total Cost
E. Stoup Sewer Improvements
78
2104 501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)
UN FT
28
310.00
$280 00
79
2104 509 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
EACH
5
315000
$750 00
80
2104 505
REMOVE CONCRETE FLUME
SQ YD
80
$1200
$960 00
81
2104509
REMOVE CASTING
EACH
5
$5000
325000
82
2451 602
GRANULAR FOUNDATION MATERIAL
TON
50
3300
515000
83
25015/5
18" RC PIPE APRON
EACH
I
345000
$45000
S4
2501 515
24" RC PIPE APRON
EACH
2
350000
51,00000
85
2501 602
TRASH GUARD FOR 18" PIPE APRON
EACH
1
340000
540000
86
2501 602
TRASH GUARD FOR 24" PIPE APRON
EACH
2
350000
$1,00000
87
2503 541
15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CL V
UN FT
1,170
S21 50
$26,325 00
88
2503 541
18" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CL 01
LIN ET
1,070
S24 50
526,215 00
89
2503 541
21" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CL 111
LIN FT
235
S27 75
16,521 25
90
2503 541
24" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CL III
UN FT
120
33100
33,72000
91
2506 501
CONSTRUCT' DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48 -4020
LIN FT
100
327500
327 500 00
92
2506 501
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 60 -4020
LIN FT
10
330000
33,00000
93
2506 501
CONSTRLCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES SPECIAL 1 (2 CB)
EACH
14
31,250 00
317,50000
94
2506501
CONSTRUC T DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES SPECIAL 2
EACH
1
35,00000
35,00000
95
2506 516
CASTING ASSEMBLY
EACH
23
350000
311,50000
96
2506 602
CONNECT INTO EXISTING STORM SEWER
EACH
1
3I 000.00
52,00000
97
2511 501
RANDOM RIPRAP CL 1V
CU YD
22
370 00
51,540 00
98
2511 515
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE IV
SQ YD
33
5300
S9900
99
2575 501
SEEDING(NCL TOPSOIL FERT, MULCH, DISC ANCHOR)
ACRE
025
5400000
31,00000
100
2575 523
EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3
SQ YD
80
3200
316000
SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE E Storm
TOTAL Schedule E Storm
Sewer Improvements $137,300 00
5% Contingencies 56,870 00
Subtotal $144,200.00
30% Indirect Cost $43,260.00
Sewer Improvements 5187,500.00
Opinion of Probable Cost
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Project No 392
19513 Project No. 1563 -00
4 of 5 1( 101555.4SAOmn\FeambHRylOpmron of Probable Costs, xfs
Opinion of Probable Cost
WSB Project 2006 Street Reconstruction Design By IDIT
Project Location Cvty of Rosemount Checked By BDC
City Project No. 396
WSB Pi oiect No 155645 Date 12/5/2005
Item
No.
MINiDOT
Specification
Descnption
Unit
Estimated
Q u�na` ty
Estimated
Unit Pnce
Estimated
Total Cost
F. Chippendale Park Improvements
101
2104 503
REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK
SQ FT
900
$I 00
590000
102
2104 603
SAWING CONCRETE WALK
LIN FT
15
$5 00
$75 00
103 2105.501
COMMON EXCAVATION
CU YD
10
$5 00
55000
104 2105 522
SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)
CU YD
10
$6 50
365 00
105 1 2521 501
4" CONCRETE WALK
SQ FT
1,290
$4 50
35,805 00
SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE F Chippendale
TOTAL Schedule F Chippendale
Park Improvements $6,900 00
5% Contingencies $350 00
Subtotal 57,300.00
+30 Indirect Cost $2,190 00
Park Improvements 59,500.00
GRAND TOTAL 2006 Pavement Management Project 51,426,600.00
Opinion of Probable Cost
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Project Yo. 392
WSB Project No. 1563 -00
5 at 5 N 101556- 151MmmlFeas,MitylOpinton of Probable Costs! xis
Feas+btlity Report
2006 Pavement Management Project
Cay Project No. 396
City of Rosemount, MN
WSR Project No. 1556 -45
APPENDIX C
Cost Distribution Calculations
Preliminary Assessment Roll
Cost Distribution Calculations
WSB Project: 2006 Street Reconstruction
Project Location City of Rosemount
Cuy Project No 396
WSB Protect No 1556 45
Design By BDC
Checked By KBK
Date- 12/5/2005
Special Assessments
5439 ft
51
107 ft
352 ft
3
$310,100
$108,535
54
=II
$856,400
112
54.400
Residential Equivalent Calculation (for Kidder Park Assessment)
Total Residential Front Footage
Total Residential Properties
Average Residential Front Footage 5439 ft 51
Kidder Park Front Footage
Residential Equivalent for Kidder Park 352 ft 107 ft
Surface Improvements Broback 10 Addition (Schedule A)
35% Assessable to Benefiting Properties
Total Residential Properties Residential Equivalents
Cost Per Property $110,705 54 Properties
Surface Improvements -Edwin Rahn 1 2 and 3 Addition (Schedule B)
Total Residential Properties
$4,400 Assessable to Each Benefiting Property
Special Assessment TOTAL
$595,31A
Street Capital improvement Program (CIP) Fund
$310,100
S856,400
$1,166,500
($595,310)
Surface Improvements Broback 10th Addition (Schedule A)
Surface Improvements -Edwin Rahn 1st, 2nd and 3rd Addition (Schedule B)
SUBTOTAL
Subtract Special Assessments
N Street Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Fund
5571,1901
Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund
$12.800
Sanitary Sewer Improvements (Schedule C)
Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund TOTAL
$32,8001
Water Main Utility Fund
sin Inn
Water Main Improvements (Schedule D)
Water Main Utility Fund TOTAL
$30,30
Cost Distribution
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Project No. 392
WSB Project No. 1563 -00
1 of 2
Cost Distribution Calculations
WSB Project 2006 Street Reconstruction
Project Location. City of Rosemount
City Project No. 396
WSB Protect No 1556 -45
Design By
Checked By
Date
BDC
KBK
12/ 5/2005
Storm Sewer Utility Fund
$187.500
Storm Sewer Improvements (Schedule E)
Storm Sewer Utility Fund TOTAL
5187,500,
Park Department
59.500
Chippendale Park Improvements (Schedule F)
S torm S ewer C ore F T
$9,500
Cost Distribution
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Project No. 392
WSB Project No. 1563 -00
2 oft
1 Preliminen y Assessment Roll 1
IndUIVaasV
pasndiud
Is 2OW O
I s 2,010 00 y
I 2,0(000 I
S 2,010001
1000E0'Z sj
IS 2,01000
LS 2,010001
1 cal NWT. s1
1 00010.E s
2,01000
s 2,01000
1000IOY
11 00 010`Z s I
1 s 2,010 00 1
too OI0'Z S 1
1 00 010 5
Assessable
Residential
Equsvalent
Units
1 1
1 1
r-
L—» 1
a
L-
Properly Address
3np4
HAV dNNOHHJ OOP II
114629 CHROME AVE 1
114618 CHROME AVE
1 HAV d141011H3 L 19911
14(70 CHROME AVE
14574 CHROME AVE
114585 CHROME AVE
114566 CHROME AVE 1
368 W
13600 146111 ST W
1 M 1S 11L96I 58921
1 M LS 111961 8099
13584 146111 ST W
13652 1461H ST W
13566 146 LH ST W
3634 146TH S I W
3 SI W
1 M LSII19010E9E1
1 3536 146TH ST W
3516 146T11 ST W
VENUE IV. of 147th ST. W.)
1 M3AVNOURVWIJ 559@1
114671 CIMARRON AVE W II
M 3AV NORRVIN1J L896I
114709 CIMARRON AVE W 1
174725 CIMARRON AVE W
137201471H ST W
13619 147TH ST W
370 147TH ST W
City /State Zip Code
1 89055
1 89055
1 89055
1 89055
1 89055
1 89055 1
1 59055
1 a155
89055
55068
1 89055
1 59055
1 89055
1 S9055
1 89055 J
1 89055 I
1 89055
1 66055 J
1 89055
89055
89055
89055
89055
L 89055
S9055
L 89055
1 89055
59055
L 89055 j
1 Brohack 10 Addition
1 Rosemount, MN 1
Rosemount, MN 1
Rosemount, MN 1
Rosemount, MN 1
Rosemount, MN
1 NH 'ue2e3
Rosemount MN 1
1 Rosemount, MN 1
Rosemouut,
Rosemount, MN 1
1 NV4 5 1010 a 40 11 1
1 NW `mnosuasuw
1 Rosemount, MN
Rosemount, MN
1 Rosemount, MN
1 Pity 'a0 1na%fl I
Rosemount, MN 1
1 NW yunomasoy 1
ftosemoun1, MN 1
Rosemount, MN 1
L Rosemount, MN
1 Rosemount, MN
L Rosemous, MN
1 Rosemount, MN
1 Rosemount, MN
pap ion ouasog I
1 Rosemount, MN 1
Fee Owner Address
L4630 CHROME AV L 1
k4629 CHROME AVE
114618 CHROME AVE 1
114617(IIROME AVE 1
114600 CHROME AVE 1
114603 CHROME AVE
114574 CHROME AVE
11228 TOWN CENTRE DR 1
114566 CHROME AVE 1
1 M ISHL9bI@89E1
136001461H ST W 1
1 M IS H1961 58911
13668146THS1' W 1
13584 146T11 ST W 1
13652 146111 ST W
135661461H ST W, 1
13634 I46TH ST W
120655 JUTLAND PL 1
1 M IS1119PI OZ9q
13536 1460H ST W 1
13516 146TH ST W 1
L4655 CIMARRON AVE W
114673 CIMARRON AVE W 1
14687 CIMARRON AVE W
114709 CIMARRON AVE W. 1
13720 147 EH ST W
13619 147TH ST W 1
137061471H ST W 1
Fee Owner
!KEVIN JENNIFER PAULY 1
1JOHN C CUNNINGHAM 1
CHERYL WITSO 1
1JAMES R KATHIE1 HANSON
1 ZVd W VSI1
1 37IHJSLI1N V HVNOH3U 7 8 M HVH1.01
1 DAKO I A COHN l Y CDA 1
HYRON ZEFVELD 1
1LINDA 1 MUELLER 1
1KATHLEEN D REINEKE 1
1MARK 1 GINA D PETERSON 1
1PAUL AND JENNUFRL ZERUA 1
'BENJAMIN JOHN PIAZZA 1
1KELLY STEVEN GOVE MELISSA LOUISE GOVE j
1DANIEL L SANDRA M LINKE 1
1LAWRENCF L PRIOR 1
1URIAN H DOYLE 1
1ORVILLE JR RHONDA TROXEL 1
[STEVEN ENE00 1
1 t131 V Id V Nt4A 11
TTOPDI ONHa1
1 Sa3Aaw d NIAVJ11
1EMILYJ &KRISN REKSTAD 1
1 SVW VS 131111 V33"'
RONALDE OLSON 1
1 NOS/1113d 3NIR3HLV.3 TAR3f
1 33OD a NRA31S 'w A3TUIHM T VIJD I V d
1DAVIDC &JINAL WEIS 1
ai d
CHROME AVI
1 34- 15209 010 -041
U4_15209
1 10 bf
1 34 -15209 -040 -04 1
1 34- 15209- 050 -04j
1 34- 15209 -010 -02 1
1 34 -15209- 010 -03 1
34_15209 -020-02 1
1 34-15209 -030-03
1 Z0
1 34- 15209 -040 -03 1
1-E0-050- 60Z -srt
1 34 -15209 060-03 1
1CIMARRON A
1 10 1
1 34- 15209- 020 -01 1
Flo-ow-60u -bE
L34-15209-0S0-0I 1
1 34-15209 -060-01 1
1 Z0 090 W
1 34- 15209 070 -0I 1
a
Preliminary Assessment Roll 1
loam ssassv
pabulum
01010'3
If 2.010aou
1$ 2,010O1I
100010.z
15
2,010 00 11
1 o 010'2 $1
R 000102 S)
EIEFET8
O
N
O
r$_ 2,01000 1
Assessable
Residential
Equivalent
!bits
1-- -1
1— 1
L 1
1- l 1
1 1 1
1__'
1_
Property Address
3633 147TH S1 W 1
3515147TH SP W 1
M IS HULPI 06931
3651 147TH ST W 1
13 53 5 14711! ST W 1
13666 147111 ST W
13667 147Th ST W 1
1 M ISHILPI IC
1 M LS HILPI 0591
3691 147TH ST W 1
1— M IS111601595CI
3632 147TH ST W
13705 147TH ST W 1
1 M 1S 311LPJ C89
136181471H ST W
13599 I 4711 ST W 1
13598147THS W
I MIS Hl H Z85C
13564147TH ST W 1
[3550 147TH ST W 1
I M- LS II11P1 1
[3514 I47TH ST W -1
I
I
1 Broback 10 Addilmn Assessment Totn!
apo0 dpy
89055
1 89055 1
u
89055 I
89055 1
1 89055 j
1 89055
1 89055 _I
1_8905 1
IL 89055 I
1 89055 I
1 89055 1
89055__I
1 89055 I
89055 1
1 89055
1 89055
1 89055
1 89055 J
1 89055 I
1 89055 1
89055 1
I
1 89055
Broback 10 Addition 1
ainsabbo
1 Rosemount, MN 1
1 Rosemount, MN 1
1 Rosemount, MN 1
1 NW 'lunomaso)
1 Rosemount, MN 1
1 NW'Rlnowasog I
L NW lunotuaso) I
1 Rosemount, MN
1_ NW `Imsomasoll I
1 Rosemount, MN
1 mg ltmomasoN I
1 NW }unomasaN I
1 NW 'lunuwase)/ I
1 Rosemount, MN 1
1 Nyy'sunonusoN -1
1 pay'lunomasou I
Rosemount, MN 1
1 Rosemount, MN 1
r Rosemount, MN 1
1 NW 'lunouiasn) 1
1 Rosemount, MN 1
1
Fee Owner Address
13633 147111 ST W 1
13515147TH ST W
13690 147TH ST W 1
13651 147TH ST, W 1
1 M ISHILPI SCSC
1 MIS 11I01999C
13667 147111 ST W 1
13551 147111 ST W 1
[3650 1471H ST W 1
13691 147TH ST W 1
13565 147TH S C W l
M IS Hilt I ZC91
13705 147111 ST W 1
3583 147 ST. W. 1
M IB HILPI 8
13599 147111 ST W 1
135981471H ST W 1
1 M IS 1110128511
[3564 147TH ST W 1
1 M ISHILPI OSSC
r
I
1JERAMY &CYNTHIAM LADZUN 13534 147TH S1 W 1
[JOSEPH L LAHONNE 13514 147TH ST W
Fee Owner
1 WWDI d.L13 IOHJIN re' WINN W UTAVa1
1 Sit ILLS AONIO a8 1 71NHDnd1
1MICHAILJ KIMBERLY GORMAN 1
[DAVID L DIANE MULLIGAN 1
1 7Iuv1D f IWV1 Z? S
O)11n1 MAH10W111
'KAREN R &JASON LOVOLD 1
1HRUCE A SMDERMAN 1
1HENRY F DARI LNE S WIENTJES 1
1THOMAS C SHERRI I BIRKHOLM 1
[FREDERICK E MARIA CONE 1
1 NOSHHOI 1LLwuni aB 3U1VN]I
1 NVIIOJ 1 VNVU 7 8 1 JIJINIVd
!DANIEL L DONNA M GAINOR 1
111 I FREY S KARL 1
!CHARLES E PA 1 FY SCHEID
1JEFFREYA &JOANE PLAN 1
VWAI VIJTIVIN 1191'IVM
1JEAN CAROL(WHIIE) JOHNSON 1
11EFFREY IFAN LAWRENCE 1
i
i
Old
o oco-6BZ51 rc'
1 34- 15209- 080 -014
20 080 60LS11
34- 15209 -090 -0d
1 34_15209 -090 -03 1
1 C0 602S111
F4- 15209 -110 -021
rio-0Z 1-60Z51-PC
Net 1 5209 140 -01
34- 15209 170 -01
34-15209- 180 -01
1 Prefmtiamy Assessment Roll 1
11'58 Project. 2006 Pavement Management Project Date: December 5, 2005
Project Location: Rosemount, MN
WSB Project No: 1556450 Edwin Rahn 1", 2" and 3 Additions
Proposed Per -Unit Assessment: $4,400
Proposed
Assessment
4,40000
11
4,400 00
4,400 00
4,40000
4,100 00
00 001'1
AA .L'.
„Goon
l oo omit I
5 4,400 00
4,400 00 I
4,400 00
5 4,400 00
I-, 4,400 00 1
4,400 00
4,400 00
5 4,400 00
!CHRYSLER AVENUE
4,400 00
4,400 00
4,400 00
1 55 11.L661 1
4,40000
4,400 00
4A0000
I s 4,40000
4,40000
4,400 0
4,40000
4,40000
I
1
1CHORLEYAVENUE W.
0
1 00 0066
t I
Assessable
Residential
Equivalent
_hats
1
I
1 1 J
1 1
I
114875 CHRYSI ER AVE W
14885 CHRYSLER AVE W
14895 CHRYSLER AVE W
I4850CIIORLEYAVE W
M BAV A3111OIIJ 8981
55068 3725 tJ1'PLR 148711 SF W 1
1 55068 13705 UPPER 148111 ST W 1
1 UPPER 148111 ST W 1
1 55068 13665 UPPER 148 rH ST W 1
1 55068 13645 UPPER 148TH Si W 1
1 55068 13625 UPPER 148T11 ST W 1
55068 13605 UPPER 148111 ST W 1
r UPPER 148111 ST W 1
I_ M IS 111801 )13ddf 595[1 89055 J
55068 3545 UPPER 148TH S I W 1
[3546149TH ST W 1
1 M IS H1601 9951
13586 149TH ST W 1
13606 149TH ST, W 1
1 M IS H16PI9Z9EI
36467491H SI W 1
i
1
11666149TH SF W 1
I
1 M 1S 01611 9891.1
Property Address
114835 CIMARRON AVE W 1
114896 CIMARRON AVE W 1
114895 CIMARRON AVEW 1
114906 CIMARRON AVE W I
114905 CIMARRON AVL W 1
14916 CIMARRON AVE W
114915 CIMARRON AVE W 1
89055
89055 l
Zip Code
1 89055 1
1 H9055 1
1 89055
S9055
89055
1 89055 1
1 89055 1
1 89055 j
89055 J
1 55068 1
1 100175 1
1 89055 1
1 89055 1
1 89%5 1
I_89055 j
1 8E906
1 89055 1
1 89055 1
Rosemount, MN 1
1 N51 'Ianowasog 1
Aosemount, MN 1
1 Rosemount, MN 1
1 Rosemount, MN 1
1 tort 7unomasog 1
1 NH 'wnowasn8 1
1 NN 'Innotuaso)I I
1 Rosemount, MN
Rosett MN
Rosem ?yarn
1 NPI ytmowaso
1 Rosemount, MN 1
1 IM 6UatuY
1 Rosemount, MN 1
1 Rosemount, MN 1
I N!AJ 7nnowaso)1
1 Rosemount, MN 1
1 VJ 'Ppen}sJ e'l
E Rosemount, MN 1
1 Rosemount, MN 1- 1
1 Rosemount, MN 1
1 Rosenwu t,5
Fee Owner Address City /State
114835 CIMARRON AVE W. 1 Rosemount, MN
114896 CIMARRON AVEW 1 Rosemount, MN
114895 CIMARRON AVEW F Rosemount, MN 1
14906 CIMARRON AVE W 1 Rosemount, MN 1
114905 CIMARRON AVE W Rasenount, MN 1
114916 CIMARRON AVE W 1 Rosemount, MN
114915 CIMARRON AVEW 1 Rosemount, MN 1
1215 CENTRAL
1 M 1S H160199
13586 149TH ST W 1
13606 149TH SI W 1
1 M 15 Mkt 1 991
1 N7 VH3IAINl 90 €51
1 M IS1116PI999E
13686 149TH ST W 1
1148511 CIIORLEY AVE W 1
114866CHORLEY AVE, W 1
13725 UPPER 148TII ST W 1
13705 UPPER 148 III ST W 1
13685 UPPER 148TH ST W. 1
13665 UPPER 148TH ST W 1
1 M J S H18171 IMMO 569fI
13625 UPPER 148111 ST W 1
13605 UPPER 1481H ST W. 1
13585 UPPER 148TH ST W 1
13565 UPPER 148TH Sf W 1
3545 OPPUR 148TH ST W 1
14875 CHRYSLER AVFW 1
1 M 3A 831SAUHD 5881
114895 CHRYSLER AVE W 1
1 34- 62801 -020 -04 1CIJRTIS 0 DARLA M STENE J
134- 62801- 03o- 041ROBERT& PA7RICIA PETERSON J
1 34- 62802- 230 -01 1MARCELI.YN F CARLSON 1
Fee Owner
1MICHAELJ GRO}I
r NOSD[8OW t NH011
1DAVIDH PA fRICIA RATZLAFF 1
1111OMASR &LINDAL ALTON
[NANCY J MOSTAD 1
KEVIN J LAURA M CORNELL
STANI EY CAROL SHIIBERT
[HELEN E NELSON 1
1K LNNETH ILA RUD 1
11AMES L DEBRA L CUNNINGHAM 1
1MONICA GUI HMILLER J
1DEBORAB J GROEHLER 1
1VENEVIFVE ALEXON 1
1 HOSDH>13D1 V IIVA3H5R
1ERIC LORI SNYDER
1 UNV7H3HNVHJ f VUN3)IB't8 f1H3H
1JAMES R REBECCA S SOILEAU 1
CHARI OE1E 1 BItEVOLD 1
!FRANCIS C BOl INERT PIIYLLIS C BOHNERT J
1 S3FINVH O 73IHnN'w8 1 OHVHJIH 1
I NBA3151 73HVBI NINltl
[HELEN J CUNNINGHAM
[MARKA &MYRLAL BAUMANN 1
1DONALD L STFLLA HEAD 1
DEBRA K B
1CORY K KELI.I STEVENS 1
1CURTJSR COBURN
F34-62802-150-01
34- 02802- 160 -01
1 34- 62802 170 -01 1
1 i0
1 I0
1 34- 62802 200 -01 1
1 34-62802-210±9L1
11 .2± ±,2 11. 2 .22
0 -01
1 34- 62801- 120 -03 1
1 34- 62801- 130 -03 1
ma
i 34- 62801- 050 -01
34- 62802 -010-01
34- 62802 010 -02
34- 62802 -020 -01
34- 62802 -020 -02
34- 62802 030 -01
34- 62802 -030-02
1 UPPER 148th c
34-62801-050-03 34- 62801 -020-03
34- 62801- 030 -03
34 -62801 -040 -03
34- 62801 -060 -03
34- 62801 070 -03
R0
1 34-62801 -090-03
1 (0
1 34- 62801 110 -03 1
1 Pre /Jtnittnry Assessment Roll 1
JYSB Project 2006 Pavement Management Project Date December 5, 2005
Project Location. Rosemount, MN
wSB Project No 1556 -450 Edwin Rahn 1", 2 and 3" Additions
Proposed Per -Unit Assessment: $4,400
Proposed
Assessment
4,40000
s 4400 00
00 006'P s 1
OOOOb'0 1
17,60000
17,60000
17,600 00
17,600 00
8,800 00
1 4,400001
17,600 00
4,400 00 1
s 4,400 00
S 4,40000 1
4,40000
8 00008'8
o000P'P $I
00 ma's
I n 4,40000
4,400 00
s 440000
4,40000
s 4,400 00
S 4,400 00
4,400 00
4,40000
4,40000
44(1000
4,400 00
11 00001/P "t
1 00 0006 TT
4,400 00 1
000OP'P T
1_L 1
L 1 1
1 I 1
1 1
I
1 1
s n
4ua1rnp363
Imtuaptsau
aplessassy
1 1 1
1 P I
1 1
1' 1
1 Z 1
13622 UPPER 149111 ST W 1
13606 TIPPER 149TH Sf W 1
13588 UPPER 149TH SL W f
3111 UI'IS W_
3796 UPPER LR 149111 149TH SST'.
3570 UPPER 149TH ST W
3695 UPPFR 149TH ST W
13 UPPFR 149TH ST W 1
13679 (UPPER 149111 ST W 1
13764 UPPER 149111 ST W
13663 UPPER 149 HI ST W 1
M IS I I I6P l lI3dd0 sac('
3647 ZIPPER 149TH Si W 1
1 M 1S 11.L6PI IMMIX] ZEbE
1 3631 IR'I'LR 149TH S1 W
3696 UPPER 149r11 ST W
3621UPPER 1491H ST W
1081 UPPER 149TH ST W 1
13605 UPPER 149111 ST W, 1
3664 UPPFR 149TH ST W
3587 UPPER 149TH ST W
3648 UPPER 149TH ST W
1 M 1S H1601 113ddf L95C1
Properly Address
114876 CHORI EY AVE W 1
14884 CHORLEY AVE W 1
14892 CHORLEY AVE W
14898 (HURLEY AVE. W
114998 (2I]ORLEY AVE W 1
114990 CHORLEY IORLEY AVE W 1
114986 C'I IORLEY AVE W 1
■4946CHORLFY AVE W 1
1HRLEY W
14925 4928 C CHOO AVE AVF W
Ire (-Laces'
1 bZ055 1
1 89055 1
1 89055 1
/89055 1
1 89055 i
1 5905e 1
1 89055 1
1 89055
1 55068 1
I_ 8905$
1 890SS 1
1 S90Se I
1 89055 1
1 89055 1
1 89055 1
1_ 89055 1
1 89055 1
L8965 1
89055
89055
/89055 1
1 89055 1
apa0 dtZ
1 89055 1
1 89055 1
1 55068 1
1 89055 1
1960Z
19PO2 8/£551
PPOSS 1
55044 -8804
55068
1 FRnI'amnia "°93 J
1 Farmington, MN 1
1 Rosemount, MN
1 NW 'Nnomasou
L Rosemount, MN 1
L NJnl yunowasog
1 Rosemount, MN
1 NW 'Rmomasog
1 Rosemount, MN
Rosemount, MN
Rosemount, MN
1 Rosemount, MN 1
1 NW '1unomasow I
1 Rosemount, MN 1
r Rosemount, MN 1
1 Rosemount, MN 1
1 Rosemount, MN 1
r Rosemount, MN
1 NW lunom> sou
r Rosemount, MN
F Rosemount, MN
Rosemount, MN
1 NW 'lunowasOj
1 Rosemount, MN 1
1 Rosemount, MN
1 Rosemount, MN
1 Rosemount, MN 1
1 MIN '00ua'el
1 NIM 'a9EArS
1 Jypsl'a8ene5 1
NW '211'031e1 1
1 NPI l 1
1 Rosemount, MET
19900 LINDEN DR 1
18231 FIKWOOD AVE 1
13588 UPPER 149TH ST 1
13711 UPPER 149TH ST W 1
r 11
3570 3796 UPPER PPER 149TH 149 LH ST ST W W
3695 ZIPPER 149TH ST W 1
F780 UPPER 149TH ST W 1
13679 UPPER 149111 ST W
13764 UPPER 149TH ST W 1
13663 UPPER 149TH ST W 1
13748 UPPER 149TH ST 1
3647 UPPER 149TH ST W 1
13732 UPPER 14911-1 ST W
13631 UPPER 149111 ST W 1
696 UPPER 149TH ST W 1
1 M IS H16P1 N3ddfl IZ9E1
680 UPPER 149TH S7 W 1
13605 UPPER 149TH ST W 1
13664 UPPER 149TH ST W
13587 UPPER 149TH SF W 1
13642 UPPER 149TH ST W 1
13567 UPPER 149TH ST W
Fee Owner Address
[14876 CHORLEY AVF W 1
14884 CfIORLEY AVE W_ 1
114892 CHORLEY AVE W 1
/4898 C 11ORLEY AVE W 1
116840 INTERLACHEN BLVD
113552 LYNN AVE 1
3AV NNA1 Z55CI
16685 KENTUCKY AVE
10341 204TH ST
15355 AKRON AVE
1EARL W STEIN
1_ )13N1 I3f ANOILLNVI
1AlINEM MCDONOUGH
1 930N4 1 VNI1 S SB3BOu
(LORI ANN BOUDREAU
DAVID L SALI Y L STAPF
!JOSEPH A_ FRANCES I MURPHY
r
11130NIS'IU VNI431 NVH1tlNOf
1 "IHV1S V A3VR1 OHd3SOt
LEE W EUNICF SCHULDT 1
'RONNIE ROGER HOCHHALIER
I 30BV1302I IN 9113INVO 38 u3HSI 1 f AO0J1
1FIUC E SANDRA D BROOKS 1
1 ATILNVJ Sal 1HlyNl8H13NN3N
GERALD D EDNA 1 WEISJAHN
JOHN E KIM M HANKS
1 1uVH W NVO11
1DAVID S VALARIEI CI EAR J
JAYNEC HAI PAUS
DARYL D HAMPTON NORMA I HAMPTON
111ARLAN G MCCLINTOCK 1
11OIINM &A C HAFIERSON 1
1ALL EN L SUZANNE GAETKE 1
Fee Owner
L UBTI30N 1 AJNYN 38 SHIROW1
1MICHAEL OLSON 1
1 a IOOd NA'13A3
1 PETER D KIRSTEN B OSTBY 1
1 dO G1 aNaEt3 ACHY A N DMOHS39 V u
1 WILLIAM &SHERIIII WEBER 1
1WILLLAMA WEBER _1
!SCOTT JENNIFER KURTZ 1
1A C BROBACK ID PTNSHP 1
LERRANCE Y11RIKO YOURCHUCK 1
L aid
1 34- 62891- 140.03 1
4:2801-150-03
2801- 160 -03
34- 62801- 170 -03
34- 62802 050 -03
34- o2802- 060 -03
3402802- 070 -03
34- 62802- 080 -03
1 E0 ZO8Z T
11 34- 62802 150 -01 1
JUPPER 149TH
34- 62802- 011 -03
34-62802 -020-03
34-62802 -030-03
1 34- 62802 -040 -01
34- 62802 040 -02 JI
13462802- 040-03
1 3452802 -050-01 1
34- 62802 050-02
34- 62802 060 -01
1 34- 62802- 060 -02 1
1 3462802- 070 -01 1
I zo-oto-cos
3
1134- 52802 080 -01
4- 62802- 080 -02
1 10-060- Z0810-P£ tl
1
U1 060 ZOSZH P£
3462802 -10001
34-62802-100-02
34- 62802 -I 10 -01
34- 62802 110 -02
34- 02801 -120 -01 1
p 0 0E1ZOBZRPE
ZO-OZIZOSZA-P£
E
V
as
O
a
7
0
a
0
s
O
c`.
ala
EzE
Feasibility Report
2006 Pavement Management Project
City Project No. 396
City of Rosemount, MN
WSB Project No. 1556.45
APPENDIX D
Soil Boring Logs
11 i♦ Nn
urn
,Qa
18,1
,eDD
10101
PANINt-
14144
1
1 14105 I l I a I I+
1
3 Y6
di 1 pPr
,Im
wsa gs�
s r ua en
z.a
lelbaranalera 1511 1
�IIh 9ii;iiN1e 1
11501111M11111 I
IEF W&!!ii!IiIfl 5 1: _l
c °n rl ia' a I
al i, l RD uRS
ial ii 4 i t* j i s p R J Rd RII t f R R
Cs4+t 4 z
euA•n f-s-ln
4 ROSEMOUNT 2006 Street Reconstruction
Utility Map
!OMIT Of AVID! AID MKfryt
r—� r
zoo leo
IO O
300 Man
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT 2006 Rosemount Reconstruction Project 396 CLIENT/MBE NO I 40/N5498
LOCATION Rosemount, Minnesota BORING NUMBER PB- 1
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
USCS
GEOLOGIC
N
or
SAMPLE
LABORATORY TESTS
(FEET)
SURFACE ELEVATION.
ORIGIN
CR
No
TYPE
MC
DD
LL
PL
Qu /RQD
0
Re
2 12" Bituminous Pavement
FILL
Fill
1
S
vino
Fdl, Mostly Sand with Gravel
1
HSA
-2
J
Sand with Grasel, Fme to Medium Grained, Light
SP
Coarse Alluvium
-3
Brown, Ntotst, Loose
9
2
SB
-4
-5
8
3
SB
-6
-7
-8
9
4
SB
-9
-10
Sand, Fme Grained, Brown, Moist, Medium Dense
12
5
SB
-11
-12
END OF BORING
-13
-14
1- 15
-16
-17
-18
-19
20
-21
-22
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
START. 9/16/05
END 9/16/05
DATE
TIME
SAMPLED
DEPTH
CASING
DEPTH
CAVE -IN
DEPTH
WATER
DEPTH
BAILED DEPTHS
METHOD
CREW CHIEF
9/16/05
11 45 AM
11 1/2'
9 1/2'
None
3 1/4" HSA 0' 9 1/2'
R. Smith
McGhie p Betts, Inc.
LOG OF TEST BOREtiG
PROJECT 2006 Rosemount Reconstruction Project 396 CLIENT/MBI NO 40/N5498
LOCATION Rosemount, Minnesota BORING NUMBER PB -2
DEPTH
(FEET)
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
SURFACE ELEVATION
USCS
GEOLOGIC
ORIGIN
N
or
CR
S AMPLE
LABORATORY TESTS
No
TYPE
MC
DD
LL
PL
Qu/RQD
0
3" Bituminous Pavement
Fill
Fill
Fill, Mostly Sand with Gravel
—1
I
HSA
—2
Sand with Gravel, Fine to Medium Grained, Light
SP
Coarse Alluvium
—3
Brown, Moist, Medium Dense
13
2
SB
4
5
16
3
SB
6
—7
Sand with Gravel, Medium to Fine Grained, Light
—8
Brown, Moist, Medium Dense
26
4
SB
9
—10
20
5
SB
—I I
—12
END OF BORING
—13
—l4
—15
—16
—17
—18
—19
—20
—21
—22
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
START 9/16/05
END 9/16/05
DATE
TIME
SAMPLED
DEPTH
CASING
DEPTH
CAVE -IN
DEPTH
WATER
DEPTH
BAILED DEPTHS
METHOD
CREW CHIEF
9/16/05
1215 PM
111/2'
91/2'
None
3 1/4" PISA 0' -91/2'
It Smith
McGhie cp Betts, Inc.
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT 2006 Rosemount Reconstruction Project 396 CLIENT/MBI N0140/N5498
LOCATION Rosemount, Mumesota BORING NUMBER PB -3
DEPTH
(FEET)
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
SURFACE ELEVATION
USCS
GEOLOGIC
ORIGIN
N
Of
CR
i
3
SAMPLE
LABORATORY TESTS
No
TYPE
MC
DD
LL
PL
Qu/RQD
0
nra
3" Bituminous Pavement
Fill
Fill
J
Fill, Mostly Sand with Gravel
I
1
HSA
—2
VS
Silty Sand, Brown, Moist, Loose
E
SM
Coarse Alluvium
6
—3
2
S8
—4
Sandy Lean Clay, Brown, Very Soft
CL
Till
—5
3
3
SB
—6
7
—8
Lean Clay, Dark Brown, Soft
Lean Clay with Sand, Brown, Soft
7
4
SB
—9
IO
Sand with Gravel, Medium to Fine Grained,
Brown, Loose
SP
Coarse Alluvium
10
5
SB
—11
12
END OF BORING
—13
14
—15
—16
—17
—18
19
—20
—21
—22
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
START 9/16/05
END 9/16/05
DATE
TIME
SAMPLED
DEPTH
CASING
DEPTH
CAVE -IN
DEPTH
WATER
DEPTH
BAILED DEPTHS
METHOD
CREW CHIEF
9/16/05
1030 AM
II 1/2'
9 1/2'
None
3 1/4" FBA 0' -91/2'
R SEmth
McGhie c Betts, Inc.
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT 2006 Rosemount Reconstruction Project 396 CLIENT/MBI N0140/N5498
LOCATION Rosemount, Minnesota BORING NUMBER PB -4
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
USCS
GEOLOGIC
N
SAMPLE
LABORATORY TESTS
(F hET)
SURFACE ELEVATION
ORIGIN
CR
No
TYPE
MC
DD
LL
PL
Qu/RQD
0
2 1/2" Bnummous Pavement
Fill
Fill
Fill, Mostly Sand with Gravel
I
1
HSA
—2
Sand with Gravel, Fine to Medium Grmned, Light
SP
Coarse Alluvium
—3
Brown, Moist, Medium Dense
Pushed Rock)
28'
2
SB
—4
Sand with a Little Gravel, Medium to Fine
Grained, Light Brown, Moist, Dense to Medium
—5
Dense
Pushed Rock)
42*
3
SB
—6
—7
—8
34
4
SB
—9
—10
28
5
SB
—11
END OF BORING
—12
—13
—14
—15
—16
—17
—18
—19
-20
—21
—22
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
START 9/16/05
END 9/16/05
DATE
TIME
SAMPLED
DEPTH
CASING
DEPTH
CAVE -IN
DEPTH
WATER
DEPTH
BAILED DEPTHS
METHOD
CREW CHIEF
9/16/05
11.00 AM
111/2'
912'
None
3 1/4" HSA 0' -91/2'
R Smith
McGhie Betts, Inc.
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT 2006 Rosemount Reconstruction Project 396 CLIENT/MBI N0140/N5498
LOCATION Rosemount_ Minnesota BORING NUMBER PB -5
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
GEOLOGIC
N
SAMPLE
SAPLE
LABORATORY TESTS
No
TYPE
MC
DO
LL
PL
Qu(RQD
(FEET)
SURFACE ELEVATION
ORIGIN
CR
3
0
act
2" Bituminous Pavement
Fill
Fill
iii Fill,
.M
Mostly Sand with Gravel
—1
VOW
1
HSA
2
:*,:a
Silty Sand with a Little Gravel, Brown, Medium
SM
Coarse Alluvium
Dense
—3
Pushed Rock)
27*
2
SB
—4
1
Sand with a Little Gravel, Medium to Fine
SP
5
Grained, Brown, Moist, Medium Dense
16
3
SB
—6
—7
-8
13
4
SB
—9
10
Sand, Fine Grained, Light Brown, Moist, Medium
Dense
22
5
SB
—11
—12
END OF BORING
—13
—14
—15
—16
—17
—18
—19
—20
—21
—22
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
START 9/16/05
END 9/16/05
DATE
TIME
SAMPLED
DEPTH
CASING
DEPTH
CAVE -IN
DEPTH
WATER
DEPTH
BAILED DEPTHS
METHOD
CREW CHIEF
9/16/05
9 35 AM
11 1/2'
9 1/2'
None
3 1/4" HSA 0' 9 1/2'
R Smith
McGhie cp Betts, Inc.
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT 2006 Rosemount Reconstruction Project 396 CLIENT/h,IBl N0140/N5498
LOCATION Rosemount, Minnesota BORING NUMBER PB -6
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
GEOLOGIC
t
SAMPLE
LABORATORY TESTS
No
TYPE
MC
DD
LL
PL
QU RQD
(I EET)
SURFACE ELEVATION_
USCS
ORIGIN
Or
CR
0
2 1/4" Bituminous Pavement
Fill
Fill
Fill, Mostly Sand wtih Gravel and a Little Silt
—1
1
HSA
—2
Lean Clay with a Little Sand, Brown
CL
Till
—3
Sand with Gravel, Fine to Coarse Grained, Brown,
SP
Coarse Alluvium
Moist, Medium Dense to Dense to Medium Dense
25
2
SB
—4
—5
pieces of limestone
38
3
S8
—6
-7
-a
19
4
SB
—10
19
5
SB
—11
—12
END OF BORING
—13
—14
—15
—16
—17
—18
—19
-20
—21
—22
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
START 9/16/05
END 9/16/05
DATE
TIME
SAMPLED
DEPTH
CASING
DEPTH
CAVE -IN
DEPTH
WATER
DEPTH
BAILED DEPTHS
METHOD
CREW CHIEF
9/16/05
10:00 AM
11 1/2'
91/2'
None
3 1/4" HSA 0' -91/2'
R. Smith
McGhie cp Betts, Inc.
I
Subsurface Profiles
The subsurface stratification lines on the graphic representation of the test bonngs shows an approximate
boundary between soil types or rock. The transition between materials is approximate and is usually far more
gradual than shown. Estimating excavation depths, soil volumes and other computations relying on the subsurface
strata may not be possible to any degree of accuracy.
Water Level
NOTICE TO REPORT USERS
BORING LOG INFORMATION
McGhie Betts took groundwater level readings in the exploratory borings, reviewed the data obtained, and
discussed its interpretation of the data in the text of this report. The groundwater level may fluctuate due to
seasonal variations caused by precipitation, snowmelt, rainfalls, constructon or remediation activities, and/or other
factors not evident at the time of measurement.
The actual determination of the subsurface water level is an interpretative process. Subsurface water level may not
be accurately depicted by the levels indicated on the bonng logs. Normally, a subsurface exploration obtains
general information regarding subsurface features for design purposes. An accurate determination of subsurface
water levels in not possible with a typical scope of work. The use of the subsurface water level information
provided for estimating purposes or other site review can present a moderate to high risk of error.
The following information is obtained in the field and noted under "Water Level Measurements" at the bottom of
the log.
Sampled Depth The lowest depth of soil sampling at the time a water level measurement is taken.
Casing Depth The depth to the bottom of the casing or hollow -stem auger at the time of water
level measurement.
Cave -In Depth The depth at which the measuring tape slopes in the bore hole.
Water Level The point in the bore hole at which free standing water is encountered by a
measunng tape dropped from the surface inside the casing.
Drilling Fluid Level Similar to the water level, except the liquid to the bore hole is a dnlling fluid.
Obstruction Depths
Obstructions and/or obstruction depths may be noted on the bonng logs. Obstruction indicates the sampling
equipment encountered resistance to penetration. It must be realized that continuation of dnlling, the use of other
drilling equipment, or further exploration may provide information other than that depicted on the logs The
correlation of obstruction depths on the log with construction features such as rock excavation, foundation depths,
or buried debns cannot normally be determined with any degree of accuracy For example, penetration of
weathered rock by soil sampling equipment may not correlate with removal by certain types of construction
equipment. Using this information for estimating purposes often results in a high degree of misinterpretation.
Accurately identifying the obstruction or estimating depths where hard rock is present over the site requires a scope
of service beyond the normal geotechnical exploration program. The nsk of using the information noted on the
bonng togs for estimating purposes must be understood
TERMINOLOGY
SYMBOLS
Sod layering and Moisture
Type Size Ranee
Dri Ilinq and Samplin g
Term Visual Observation
Laboratory Testing
Symbol
es cn non
Symbol
Descn onon
HSA
3- 1 /4 "LD Hollow stem auger
W
Water content, (ASTM** D2216)
FA
4", 6" or 10" diameter flight auger
D
Dry density, pcf
HA
2 4 or 6" hand auger
LL
Liquid limit (ASTM 04318)
DC
2 -1/2 4 5", or 6" steel drive casing
PL
Plastic limit (ASTM D4318)
Size A, B or N rotary casing
_RC
PD
Pipe drill or cleanout tube
Inserts in last column (Qu or RQD)-
CS
Continuous split barrel sampling
DM
Drilling mud
Qu
Unconfined compressive strength, psf (ASTM D21 66)
J W
Jetting water
Pq
Penetrometer reading, tsf (ASTM DI 558)
SB
2" 0 D split barrel sampling
Ts
Torvanc reading, tsf
L
2 -1(2" or 3 -1/2" 0 D SB liner sampler
G
Specific gravity (ASTM D854)
2" or 3" thin walled tube sample
SL
Shnnkage limits (ASTM D427)
_T
3TP
3" thin walled tube using pitcher sampler
OC
Organic content- combustion method (ASTM D2974)
TO
2" or 3" thin walled tube using Osterberg
SP
Swell pressure, tsf (ASTM D4546)
sampler
PS
Percent swell under pressure (ASTM D4546)
W
Wash sample
FS
Free swell, (ASTM D4546)
B
Bag sample
SS
Shrink swell, (ASTM D4546)
P
Test pit sample
pH
Hydrogen ion content -Meter Method (ASTM D4972)
_Q
BQ, NQ, or PQ wire line system
SC
Sulfate content, parts /million or mg/I
_X
AX, BX, or NX double tube barrel
CC
Chloride content, parts/million or mgt
N
Standard penetration test, blows per foot
C"
One dimensional consolidation (ASTM D2435)
CR
Core recovery, percent
Qc•
Tnaxial compression (ASSTM D2850 and D4767)
WL
Water level
D S'
Direct Shear (ASTM D3080)
Water level
K•
Coefficient of permeability, cm/sec (ASTM D2434)
NMR
No measurement recorded, primarily due
P"
Pinhole test (ASTM D4647)
to presence of drilling or coring fluid
DH•
Double hydrometer (ASTM 04221)
MA"
Particle size analysis (ASTM D422)
R
Laboratory electncal resistivity, ohm -cm (ASTM 057)
E•
Pressuremeter deformation modulus, tsf (ASTM 04719)
PM•
Pressuremeter test (ASTM D4719)
VS"
Field vane shear (ASTM 02573)
IR*
Infiltrometer test (ASTM D3385)
RQD
Rock quality designation, percent
•Results shown on attached data sheet or graph
"ASTM designates Amencan Society for Testing and Matenals
TERMINOLOGY
Particle Sizes
Sod layering and Moisture
Type Size Ranee
#200 sieve and 0 005mm
#200 sieve and 0.005mm
Term Visual Observation
of any combination of
or colors
sods in a soil mass
materials or colors
water
water
limit
Boulders 12"
Cobbles 3" 12"
Coarse gravel 3/4" 3"
Fine gravel #4 sieve 3/4"
Coarse sand #4 #10 sieve
Medium sand #10 -#40 steve
Fine sand #40 -#200 sieve
Silt 100% passing
Clay 100% passing
Lamination Up to 1/4" thick stratum
Varved Altenng laminations
clay, silt, fine sand,
Lenses Small pockets of different
Stratified Altering layers of varying
Layer 1/4" to 12" thick stratum
Dry Powdery, no noticeable
Moist Damp, below saturation
Waterbearing Pervious soil below
Wet Saturated, above liquid
Gravel Content
Standard Penetration Resistance
Coarse Grained Soils
Fine- Grained Soils
Cohesionless Soils
Cohesive Soils
Gravel Description
Gravel Description
pl -Value Relative Density
N -Value Consistency
2 -15 A little gravel
16 49 With gravel
5 Trace of gravel
5 15 A little gravel
16 -30 With gravel
31-49 Gravelly
0 -4 Very loose
5 10 Loose
11 30 Medium dense
31 -50 Dense
50 Very dense
0 -4 Very soft
5 8 Soft
9 Firm
16 -30 Hard
30 Very hard
SYMBOLS AND TERMINOLOGOY ON TEST BORING LOG
fir kIli ISZIat ma eraavd
11 lb
J•
u
f s
g
sails and srtaalmt te a°am of
vea,ad sda.
Swaim
ertarmi
U..255
Egason
UYeVarLa0a0
1.1.1510
ten e0-0
at PI.4
than P14073(LL-
at V-
PI-7
0(LL-6)
to
Qt
1
011
n1.
MH or
OH
G r
a in n i.lr
I
ML ;rOL
oo
11 lb
4 10 ao 40 60 t 4Q
u
f s
I
n3p'
1
.0075
we
1111 I t n 111111 1 111111 r 1
1111
Coarse- Gniaed Soils
More then 50% retained on No 200
Fine-Grained Sacs Silts and Clays
Liquid bust Is than 50
50% or more passes the No 200
wM
Hngh1Y organic sods
Filing Peat 6rA Fibers
CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES
ASTM Designation: D2487
(Based on Unified Soil Classification System)
Silts and Clays
Liquid limit 50 or more
1
"Based oo the mend passing the 3 -m (75 -nm) stem
If Sad sot gsle contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add
`with nobles or boulders, or both' to group nem
Gnwls with 5 to 12% firms requue dud symbols
GWGM well -gashed gravel with sit
GWGC well -graded pawl with clay
GP-GM poorly graded gavel vnth salt
GP-GC ponty graded gavel with clay
Sands Ynth 5 to 12% goes require dual symbols
SW-SM well-graded sand with silt
SW-SC well -graded sand with day
SP -SM poorly graded sand with silt
SP -SC poorly graded sand with dry
100 50
Crams for Amman Group Symbols wad Group Naas Ususg Laboratory Tests"
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Gravels
More than 50% coarse
&aeon° moused on No 4
sine
Sands
50% or more of coarse
fraction passer No 4 slew
10 5
t 5 d
PARTICLE SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
Clean Gravels
than 5 fines`
Gravels with Fuses
than 12 %fines
Clean Sands
than 12%fnes
Sands with Fuses
More thin 12 %fines
morpnJG
organic
inot$11mc
Pnmanly °queue matter, dads in color, and organic
Home Peat 33 %67 Ffliers
CuwDo /Dui
0
Less Cud andl <Cc <3E
Mort
Cu 4 and/or] >Cc>3E
Fines classify es ML or MH
Fuses classify as CL or CH
Less Cu 6 and l<Cc53
Cu 6 and/or l Cc 3
Fines classify as ML or MH
Fuss classify as CL or CH
PI 7 and plots on or above "A" line
P[ 4 or plots below "A" [use
Liquid loot moo dried
Liquid bust not dned
PI plots on or °bose'A" line
PI plots below "A" base
Cc- (D L/
D10 Dm
'If sod comas 11 sand, add belch timer to group name
e lf fines classify as CL -M1, use dual symbol GC-GM or SC-SM
a lf fines art organic, add 'with organic fuses" to group name
t If soil contains d 15% gravel, Md'WUh gavel" to group name
1 If Atterberg bust plot in hatched area sod ts a CL -ML silty day
If seal contains 15 -29% plus No 200, add' with sand" or "ands
goad,' whichever a prdoonnant
Ifsoil contams 30% plus No 200, prdomnandy sand.
add "sandy" to group came
SOIL ENGINEERING
075
Liquid Lost- oven dt'wd 075
Liquid limit not deed
Group
Symbol
GW
GP
GM
GC
SW
SP
SM
SC
CL
ML
OL
Sad Clasnfic,non
Group Nave'
Well-graded pr°x7
Poorly graded AaveI
silty ga VSF G,N
Clayey grsvelr,0"
Well graded sand
Poorly graded sand'
Silty sand
coin Sand
Lem clay
Silt"
Glganc dey
Omen ujt tL1l°
CH Fa dry''
MH Elastic silt
OH Otpmc day
Organic silt"
PT Pea
Sapnc Peat 33 %Fibers
n lfsoil contains a 30 %plus No,
200, predonenmtJy gn.d,
add 'gravelly" to group name
PI? 4 and plots on or above
"A line
PI <4 or plots blow "A" line
'P1 plots an or above "A" ill=
PI plots below "A" hoe
60
50
E 40
30
a 20
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Liquid Ltrnd (LL)
PERCENT RETAINED
PERCENT PASSING