HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.r. GlenRose of Rosemount (Dean Johnson) Final Plat 05-43-FPAGENDA ITEM: Case 05 -43 -FP GlenRose of Rosemount
(Dean Johnson) Final Plat and
Subdivision Development Agreement
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent
PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson, City Planner
Andy Brotzler, City Engineer
gGEN
i p Eht
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution, Location map, Final
Plat and Proposed Roadway Easement
Exhibit reductions, 09/27/2005 PC
Minutes, Resolution 2005 -40
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the final plat for
GlenRose subject to conditions, and
Motion to authorize the execution of the subdivision development agreement.
4 ROSEMOUNT
CITY COUNCIL
City Council Regular Meeting December 20, 2005
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ISSUE
The Developer of GlenRose has requested final plat approval for the 76 unit townhouses east of Highway
3 between the St Joseph's Cemetery and Rosemount Woods manufactured housing park. The final plat is
the official survey document that will be recorded at Dakota County that legally defines the street right -of-
way for the 140 Circle cul -de -sac, the individual building pads and various drainage, ponding and utility
easements. Also included are the easements related to the potential trail underpass for Highway 3 required
as part of the PUD approval.
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW
No concerns were identified by the Planning Commission, it was recommended fot approval by consent.
BACKGROUND
Applicant Dean Johnson of Dean Johnson Homes
Property Owner: Church of St Joseph
Current Zoning- R -2, Moderate Density Residential
Comp Plan Desig Urban Residential
Preliminary Plat Approved: July 19, 2005, Resolution 2005 -40 (83)
Number of Units• 76
Land Area 10.75 gross, 9 55 net (less Right -of -way and wetland)
Density: 7.07 du ac (gross); 7 96 du /ac. (net)
Planning Commission Action: Recommendation of approval (5 -0)
The final plat represents the last stage of the planning process for this development. Conformance with
the approved prehminary plat assures the developer approval of the final plat Therefore, the focus of the
review is the comparison between the prehminary and final plats A public hearmg is not required. If
there were something m the final plat that was different from what was approved m the preliminary, then
the developer would need approval of an amendment to the Planned Umt Development which would
revise the preliminary plat.
This final plat is somewhat different from many final plats that the City reviews because there are no
individual lots created for single family use Lots are defined on the basis of townhouse building
footprints and the right-of -way for 140 Circle as dedicated on the plat. The site also has a pre existing
easement for a storm water utility pipe that traverses the property. All other easements are expected to be
dedicated with the common area, which is Lot 14, Block 1
The City Council also required easements m support of a possible trail underpass at Highway 3 as part of
the preliminary plat approval If the underpass is built, it would be linked with sidewalks m the
development to the pondmg /wetland perimeter, and ultimately, to the trail connecting 140 Circle with
the park on the east side of the plat. Easements for those potential improvements are included with the
final plat information.
The plat is adjacent to State Highway 3 and is therefore subject to review by MnDOT. MnDOT has
denied access to Highway 3 because the ahgnment of 140 Circle is off -set from the opposite entrance; the
Community Center driveway across Highway 3 A gap between the access points would cause a conflict
between left -turn movements into either property given the center turn -lane design. A solution to the
problem is to shift the Community Center driveway further south. Sufficient right -of -way is available for
this purpose. Approval is conditioned on the Developer obtauung the necessary MnDOT access permits
and fundmg the reconstruction of the Community Center driveway A condition of approval relating to
this issue has been added to the recommended approval.
RECOMMENDATION
The preliminary plat has been compared to the final plat The lot areas ahgn with the building footprints
and is consistent with the prehmmary plat as approved. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the final
plat with condition. Typically a condition of final plat approval is execution of the subdivision agreement.
In this case, the subdivision agreement has already been signed to allow awarding of the pubhc utility
contracts.
2
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2005
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT
FOR GLENROSE OF ROSEMOUNT
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an
application from GlenRose Investments, LLC (Dean Johnson Homes) on September 13, 2005
requesting a Final Plat for GlenRose of Rosemount, legally described as
That part of Lot One (1) and Lot Six (6) of Auditor's Subdivision No. 1 to the Village of Rosemount, according
to the recorded plat tfi ereof now on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Deeds withm and for the
County of Dakota anQ State ofMnmesota, said part of Lot One (1) being located in the Northeast Quarter (NE
Y) and said part of Lot Six (6) being located m the Northwest Quarter (N /W 'A) of Section Twenty -nme (29),
Township One Hundred Fifteen (115) North Range Nineteen (19) West. and being described as follows:
Beginning at a judicial land mark on the East line ofthe Northwest Quarter (NW of said Section Twenty
nine (29), a distance of 1997.40 feet North of the Southeast corner thereof, said East line assumed to be North
00 degrees East; thence South 88 degrees 13 minutes 27 seconds East 495 00 feet to a Judicial land mark at the
southeast comer of said Lot One (1); thence North 16 degrees 46 mmutes 28 seconds East along the Easterly
line of said Lot One (1). a distance of 668 00 feet to aJudicial land mark on the North line of said Northeast
Quarter (NE '''A), thence South 88 degrees 00 mmutes 00 seconds West along the North line of said Northeast
Quarter (NE'/) and Lot One (1), a distance of 688.00 feet to a Judicial land mark at the Northwest cornerof
said Northeast Quarter (NE'/) of Lot One (1), thence South 89 degrees 44 minutes 42 seconds West along the
North line of said Northwest Quarter (NW and said Lot Six (6), a distance of 80.68 feet to ajudicial land
mark on the Easterly right of way line of State Trunk Highway No 3 as now established; thence South 17
degrees 29 minutes 51 seconds West along said right of way line 618.44 feet to a judicial land mark, thence
South 87 degrees 51 minutes East a distance of 266.81 feet to the East line of Lot Six (6) and of said Northwest
Quarter (NW /a) being the point of beginning, the land herein described.
WHEREAS, on September 27, 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount
reviewed the Final Plat for GlenRose of Rosemount located east of Highway 3 between the S.
Joseph's Cemetery and Rosemount Woods; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend that the City Council
approve the Final Plat for GlenRose of Rosemount, subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on December 20, 2005, the City Council of the City of Rosemount approved the
Final Plat for GlenRose of Rosemount after reviewing the Planning Commission's
recommendation and the Final Plat; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the Final Plat for GlenRose of Rosemount, subject to:
1. Execution and recording of the GlenRose PUD agreement.
2. Payment of all development and subdivision related fees in accordance with the current
fee schedule
3. Recording of easements for roadway, temporary construction and trail purposes related to
a potential future grade separated pedestrian crossing of South Robert Trail.
4. Park dedication in the amount specified by the Parks and Recreation Director based upon
the current fee schedule (anticipated to be $3.000 per unit) and dedication of an easement
for the trail connecting 140` Circle to Central Park.
5. Acquisition of a State Highway 3 access permit from the Minnesota Department of
Transportation.
6. The Developer shall provide for all costs associated with conditions of MnDOT access
permit requirements.
William H Droste, Mayor
ADOPTED this 20th day of December, 2005 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
ATTEST:
Linda Jentmk, City Clerk
RESOLUTION 2005
Motion by: Second by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Member absent:
2
0
0
Excerpt of Minutes from the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of September
27, 2005
Consent Agenda:
4A. Approval of the August 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Minutes.
4B. Approval of 05 -43 -FP GlenRose of Rosemount (Dean Johnson) Final
Plat.
Commissioner Schultz requested a correction on page 8 of the August 23, 2005
minutes striking "Schultz" m the second sentence and replacing it with "Zorn
MOTION by Powell to approve the Consent Agenda with the change to the
minutes. Second by Schultz Ayes: All Nayes None. Motion carried.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2005 -40
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIINARY PLAT AND PUD FINAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR GLENROSE OF ROSEMOUNT
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an
application from Dean Johnson Homes requesting Preliminary Plat and PUD Final Development
Plan approval concerning property legally described as:
That part of Lot One (1) and Lot Six (6) of Auditor's Subdivision No. 1 to the Village of Rosemount,
according to the recorded plat thereof now on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Deeds
within and for the County of Dakota and State of Minnesota, said part of Lot One (1) being located in the
Northeast Quarter (NE Y) and said part of Lot Six (6) being located in the Northwest Quarter (N /W of
Section Twenty-nme (29), Township One Hundred Fifteen (115) North, Range Nineteen (19) West, and
being described as follows: Beginning at a judicial land mark on the East line of the Northwest Quarter
(NW Y,) of said Section Twenty -nine (29), a distance of 1997 40 feet North of the Southeast corner thereof,
said East line assumed to be North 00 degrees East, thence South 88 degrees 13 minutes 27 seconds East
495 00 feet to a judicial land mark at the southeast comer of said Lot One (1), thence North 16 degrees 46
minutes 28 seconds East along the Easterly line of said Lot One (1), a distance of 668 00 feet to a judicial
land mark on the North line of said Northeast Quarter (NE thence South 88 degrees 00 mmute;,00
seconds West along the North line of said Northeast Quarter (NE'/) and Lot One (1), a distance of 688.00
feet to a judicial land mark at the Northwest comer of said Northeast Quarter (NE of Lot One (1), thence
South 89 degrees 44 minutes 42 seconds West along the North lme of said Northwest Quarter (NW and
said Lot Six (6), a distance of 80 68 feet to a judicial land mark on the Easterly right of way line of State
Trunk Highway No 3 as now established, thence South 17 degrees 29 minutes 51 sends West along said
right of way line 618 44 feet to ajudicial land mark; thence South 87 degrees 51 minutes East a distance of
266.81 feet to the East line of Lot Six (6) and of said Northwest Quarter (NW Y) being the point of
beginning, the land herein described.
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed
the Preliminary Plat, Final Development Plan, rezoning from PI to PUD R -2, and Final Site and
Building Plan; and
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2005, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, PUD Final Development Plan, subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on July 19, 2005, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning
Commissions recommendations; and.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the Preliminary Plat and PUD Master Development Plan for the GlenRose of
Rosemount development, subject to:
1. The developer shall provide documentation from MnDOT that the plan has been
reviewed and approved by MnDOT. This documentation will need to be received by
the City prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
2. For the proposed grading on the adjacent property to the north, the developer shall
provide documentation of an easement or right -of -entry to complete this work prior to
the issuance of a grading permit
2
RESOLUTION 2005 -40
3. The EOF spot elevation between Lots 8 9 and Lots 12 13 require 1' of freeboard
to the low floor opening elevation. Also, all EOF locations shall be labeled on the
plans.
4. The street section shall reflect the City of Rosemount's typical section for residential
street construction of 2" bituminous wear course, 2" bituminous non -wear course, 6"
Class V, 24" select granular and B618 curb and gutter.
5. The developer shall complete the Wetland Conservation Act permit for the proposed
impact. The following items shall be addressed relative to the wetland and storm
water pond.
6. A 30' buffer shall be shown on the plan from the delineated wetland edge and
proposed mitigation edge. Buffer averaging will be required to meet the wetland
buffer requirements.
Buffer monumentation shall be shown on the plan.
A conservation easement will be required for the wetland, mitigation site,
storm water pond and a buffer area.
Restoration of the wetland, mitigation site and storm water pond shall be with
MnDOT Seed Mixture 310.
7. All final plans meet the detail and specifications of the engineering department
relating to drainage, easements, grading, storm water management, street alignments
and utilities.
8. Park dedication shall be in the form of cash dedication in lieu of land dedication with
the payment to be made at the rate of the current fee schedule at the time of final plat.
9. The trail connection at the mid -block of 140 Circle needs to be identified on the plan
as a future connection to the north, intended for access to Connemara Trail
10. Grading is allowed in the park as per the plan, with only the seven identified trees to
be removed from the northwest corner of the park.
11. The developer will pay for all trail costs including those on City property.
12. Increase the buffer at the northeast edge of the park with additional plantings to create
a buffer from the ballfield lights, etc.
13. All public trails and sidewalks shall be designed and built to current standards
Sidewalks shall be made of concrete and a minimum of 5 feet wide. Trails shall be
made of asphalt and are 8 feet wide.
RESOLUTION 2005 -40
14. Execution of a PUD agreement based upon the revised plans received on July 12,
2005, and recording the PUD agreement with Dakota County. The plan revision
satisfactorily resolved previously identified setback, landscaping, architectural and
site plan deficiencies referred to in the Planning Commission recommendation.
15. Conformance with the requirements for final plat including execution of a subdivision
development agreement to secure public and private infrastructure to serve the
development
16. Conformance with the attached housing garage standards for minimum size and
storage space.
17. Conformance with all of the conditions of Resolution 2005 -11.
18. Homeowners association covenants and documents shall be approved by the City
Attomey and recorded at Dakota County at the time of final plat.
19. Driveways for building 8 shall be combined to increase the driveway spacing from the
intersection between buildings 7 and 8.
20. The intersections between buildings 9, 10, 11 and 12 shall be redesigned by consolidating
the east -west street and connecting the north -south streets with perpendicular alignments.
21. The applicant dedicate a public trail and access easement over 100' between the Hwy 3
and the southern private street for an underpass and a 10' easement for a sidewalk system
along the southern side of the private drive to Link with the sidewalk shown on the plans
date stamped July 12, 2005 adjacent to the overlook. The applicant is required to install
the 5' sidewalk in back of the curb of the private drive around the pond, terminating at the
private driveway or some reasonable location acceptable to staff The applicant shall
dedicate a 400' temporary easement between Hwy 3 and the western private drive that
shall be in effect until such time as the City constructs an underpass or the City vacates
the easement. To facilitate the future construction of the underpass the southern private
dnve shall have a 945.1 elevation at the western edge.
22 The applicant revise the front facade of building 1 to provide additional architectural
detailing and to ensure that the front steps and railings are proportionate to the structure
and of appropriate mass.
3
ADOPTED this 19 day of July, 2005 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount
ATTEST:
Linda Jentink, City Clerk
Motion by: Shoe Corrigan
Voted in favor. Sterner, DeBettignies, Shoe Corrigan, Droste, Baxter
Voted against: None
Member absent: None
William H. Droste, Mayor
Second by: Sterner
4
RESOLUTION 2005 -40