HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.k. Request by CalAtlantic for 22 Lot Final Plat Approval of Greystone 5th Addition
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Council Regular Meeting: November 14, 2016
AGENDA ITEM: Request by CalAtlantic for 22 Lot Final
Plat Approval of Greystone 5th Addition
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent
PREPARED BY: Kim Lindquist, Community Development
Director AGENDA NO. 6.k.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution, Location Map; Final Plat;
Greystone III Preliminary Plat; Excerpt of
the September 27 Planning Commission
Minutes; Engineering Memorandum
dated September 21, 2016; Park & Rec
Memorandum dated September 22, 2016
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a Resolution approving the Final Plat for
Greystone 5th Addition
and
Motion to approve the Subdivision Development Agreement for Greystone 5th Addition and
authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into this agreement.
SUMMARY
CalAtlantic is requesting final plat approval for Greystone 5th Addition, which is the first final plat coming
from the new Greystone neighborhood. The plat will create 23 buildable lots and several outlots that will
be further subdivided in the future. Access to the new lots will be through the existing neighborhood from
138th or 139th Street. As part of the PUD approval the next phase of the development must include the
new road extension from Bonaire into the neighborhood.
Preliminary Plat Information:
Applicant: CalAtlantic Homes
Location: East of Akron Avenue about ½ mile north of CSAH 42 and south
of the Union Pacific Rail Line, immediately east of the current
Greystone neighborhood
Acres: 93.9 Acres
Proposed Lots: 169 Lots
Gross Density: 2.21 Units/Acre (excluding Lot 1, Block 1)
Wetlands: .82
Net Density: 4.06 Units/Acre (excluding Lot 1, Block 1 & ROW)
Existing Comp Plan Designation: LDR – Low Density Residential
Existing Zoning: AGP – Agricultural Preserve
Proposed Zoning R1 PUD – Low Density Residential Planned Unit Development
BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission reviewed the Greystone III request on September 27, 2016 which included
requests for preliminary plat approval, rezoning to PUD and Master Development Plan, and final plat
approval. The issues raised by residents dealt with the large Homeowners Association, who would pay for
Bonaire Path upgrades, and continued utility discussions with the owner of the exception parcel. The
2
Commission recommended approval of the above items which were detailed in the Council memo on the
October 18, 2016 meeting. At that meeting the Council took action on all items with the exception of the
final plat.
ISSUE ANALYSIS
Legal Authority. The final plat application is Quasi-Judicial because the City has a set of standards and
requirements for reviewing this type of application that is described in detail below. Generally, if the final
plat meets the ordinance requirements it must be approved.
Final Plat. Standards for reviewing subdivision requests are detailed in Title 12 of the Rosemount City
Code. This section of the Code outlines the two-step Preliminary and Final Plat process for land
subdivision. In this case, the preliminary plat was approved in October 18, 2016, creating 168 lots for
future development. The final plat contains 23 lots for single family construction, five outlots, and lot 1,
Block 1 which will remain as is, a single family home and farmstead.
Because of the time of year, the applicant requested that the fees and financial sureties not be paid until
they are ready to close on the property, since no work will occur on the site this fall. Staff is
recommending as a condition of approval that the fees outlined in the subdivision agreement and the
signed agreement be submitted to the City prior to release of the final plat for recording. The applicant is
agreeable with that condition, which allows delay of the payment until they are ready to take action on the
site.
Streets & Access. The access to this development is provided through the eastern extension of 138th or
139th Street through the existing Greystone neighborhood. The applicant is required as part of the PUD
agreement to construct the road entrance from Bonaire Path in the next phase of development. They
anticipate that road construction in mid-2017, with completion by the end of 2017. It is also anticipated that
much of the heavy equipment traffic, for grading and utility work, will not go through the existing
neighborhood and will gain site access from the north.
Parks and Open Space. The Greystone 5th Addtion creates 23 buildable lots and one additional
residential lot with the remaining land platted as outlots. The Parks Commission did not request additional
land dedication as part of the preliminary plat and therefore cash payment in lieu of dedication is required.
Based upon the current fee schedule the applicant is required to pay $78,200 (23 units x $3,400 per unit).
The Commission also recognized that Lot 1, Block 1 will be further developed in the future, although
perhaps not platted. Therefore staff has required that the property owner of lot 1, Block 1 enter into an
agreement that recognizes park dedication fees will be required when future development occurs. That
agreement must be signed prior to release of the final plat.
Engineering Comments. The Project Engineer has reviewed the proposed Greystone 3rd Addition with
comments found in the attached memorandum. Most of the comments are related to the preliminary plat
and grading plans, but staff wanted to reinforce the comments by including them here.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Final Plat for Greystone 5th Addition
creating 23 single family buildable lots, 5 outlots and another parcel, Lot 1, Block 1 for future development.
This recommendation is based on the information submitted by the applicant, findings made in this report
and the conditions detailed in the attached memorandums.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2016 -
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT
FOR GREYSTONE 5TH ADDITION
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount received a request for Final Plat approval from CalAtlantic
Group, Inc. concerning property legally described as:
The Southeast Quarter of Section 22, Township 115, Range 19, Dakota County, Minnesota,
EXCEPT the railroad right away, AND EXCEPT that part of the West Half of the Southeast
Quarter of Section 22, Township 115, Range 19, lying southerly of the southerly of Union
Pacific Railroad Right of way; AND EXCEPT the North 525 feet of the West 230 feet of the
East 447 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section 22, Dakota County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, on September 27, 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed
the Final Plat for Greystone 5th Addition and recommended approval subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on November 15, 2016, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the
Planning Commission’s recommendations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the Final Plat for Greystone 5th Addition, subject to the following conditions:
1. Approval and execution of a subdivision agreement.
2. Trees installed on individual lots shall be planted in a location that does not interfere
with curb stops or individual sewer or water connections.
3. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer as detailed in the attached
memorandum dated September 21, 2016
4. Conformance with all requirements of the Parks and Recreation Director as detailed
in the attached memorandum dated September 22, 2016
5. The property owner enter into an assessment agreement for Lot 1, Block 1 relating
to payment for roadway upgrades and park dedication fees prior to release of the
final plat.
6. The applicant pay all required fees and provide sureties as outlined in the subdivision
agreement and enter into the agreement prior to release of the final plat for
recording.
ADOPTED this 15th day of November, 2016, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
__________________________________________
William H. Droste, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Clarissa Hadler, City Clerk
Greystone III 5th Addition
Property Information
Se pte mber 12, 2016
0 875 1,750437.5 ft
0 270 540135 m
1:9,600
Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.
%+8+.'0)+0''45 .#0&2.#00'45 .#0&5748';145 .#0&5%#2'#4%*+6'%65
%+8+.'0)+0''45 .#0&2.#00'45 .#0&5748';145 .#0&5%#2'#4%*+6'%65
%+8+.'0)+0''45 .#0&2.#00'45 .#0&5748';145 .#0&5%#2'#4%*+6'%65
%+8+.'0)+0''45 .#0&2.#00'45 .#0&5748';145 .#0&5%#2'#4%*+6'%65
24'.+/+0#4;2.#6E1()4';5610'+++415'/1706/+00'516#%#.#6.#06+%*1/'5ÄÄ2,%$0/$0/,&/0COG4GI0Q&CVG4GXKUKQPU&CVG&GUKIPGF&TCYP2KQPGGT'PIKPGGTKPI2#/GPFQVC*GKIJVU/0'PVGTRTKUG&TKXG
Ä(CZÄYYYRKQPGGTGPIEQO.#0&5%#2'#4%*+6'%65.#0&5748';145.#0&2.#00'45%+8+.'0)+0''45ÄÄ+JGTGD[EGTVKH[VJCVVJKURNCPYCURTGRCTGFD[OGQTWPFGTO[FKTGEVUWRGTXKUKQPCPFVJCV+COCFWN[.KEGPUGF2TQHGUUKQPCN5WTXG[QTWPFGTVJGNCYUQHVJG5VCVGQH/KPPGUQVC2GVGT,*CYMKPUQP#0#)4#/&4+8''&'024#+4+'/+00'516#ÄÄ#FF.QV$NM
24'.+/+0#4;2.#6
E
1()4';5610'+++
415'/1706/+00'516#
%#.#6.#06+%*1/'5ÄÄ
2,%$0/
$0/,&/
0COG
4GI0Q&CVG
4GXKUKQPU &CVG
&GUKIPGF
&TCYP
2KQPGGT'PIKPGGTKPI2#
/GPFQVC*GKIJVU/0
'PVGTRTKUG&TKXG
Ä
(CZÄYYYRKQPGGTGPIEQO
.#0&5%#2'#4%*+6'%65.#0&5748';145.#0&2.#00'45%+8+.'0)+0''45
ÄÄ
+JGTGD[EGTVKH[VJCVVJKURNCPYCURTGRCTGFD[
OGQTWPFGTO[FKTGEVUWRGTXKUKQPCPFVJCV+
COCFWN[.KEGPUGF2TQHGUUKQPCN5WTXG[QT
WPFGTVJGNCYUQHVJG5VCVGQH/KPPGUQVC
2GVGT,*CYMKPUQP #0#)4#/&4+8''&'024#+4+'/+00'516#
ÄÄ#FF.QV$NM
EXCERPT OF DRAFT MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 27, 2016
5.c. Request by CalAtlantic Group, Inc. for a Preliminary Plat, Planned Unit Development Master
Development Plan with Rezoning and Final Plat to Develop a 170 Lot Subdivision named Greystone III (16-42-
PUD, 16-40-PP, and 16-41-FP)
Community Development Director Lindquist gave a brief summary of the staff report.
Chair Kenninger inquired about the access for the northern property. Lindquist stated it will be off of Bonaire Path. She
also asked if construction of the northern access point could be pushed up to accommodate the construction traffic.
Lindquist deferred to the applicant.
Commissioner VanderWiel inquired about the six deviations from City Code, if they are the same as previous approvals.
Lindquist said yes, these deviations are consistent with the previous phases of Greystone; early on they made
commitment for smaller lots and more affordable single family homes. This allowed a boost in density while still
allowing single family homes.
Commissioner Forster inquired about what is happening on the triangular property. Lindquist stated currently both
pieces are only one parcel, which is the reason it is included in the application. The owner is not interested in developing
that piece at this time and the conditions do not apply to that piece. He also inquired about the access off of Bonaire and
if there is required length from the railroad. Hatcher stated he is not aware of a requirement for distance but access is
pushed as far east as possible without going to other private property
Commissioner Henrie noted that currently Bonaire is dirt road, what is the plan to pave. Lindquist said nothing is
planned right now but it is on the City’s radar.
The public hearing was opened at 7:56 pm.
Public comments:
Mavis Gerber,14089 Addison Court, inquired when the homeowner’s association will be turned over to the residents, it
keeps getting pushed out with each addition. Residents should have a say in the Association and when it will be turned
over to the residents. Lindquist stated the city is aware of the HOA but does not regulate the documents. The structure
is setup by developer not the city. Gerber is also concerned about one entry into the development.
Mark Sonstegard with CalAtlantic Homes stated the second access point will be done in fall of 2017 so construction
traffic can come in through north entrance. They want to keep sales office where it is at and continue the process of
building homes, don’t want to stop for 4-5 months to build road. There would be one homeowner association for all of
Greystone, he stated they are planning on starting a homeowner association committee to address issues maybe add
residents to architectural review committee. The turnover of the association would be around until 2020 at this time.
Commissioner Clements inquired about any other plans to develop to the east. Mr. Sonstegard stated that Flint Hills
owns land to the east and the south is zoned differently. Clements also asked what is the home prices start at, Sonstegard
noted they start at about $275,000-345,000 for base prices.
Commissioner Forster inquired how many homes were in the phases 1 and 2. Sonstegard stated there are about 120
homes the in previous phases. He also inquired if staff foresees any issues with only two access points all those homes.
Lindquist stated that Dakota County limits spacing on Akron and the railroad limits adding another access point.
Commissioner Clements inquired if there are any new plans for the northern exception lot. Staff stated they would have
to ask the landowner.
Darin Johnson, 1450 Bonaire Path E, stated he is the owner of the exception lot and has had no problems working with
CalAtlantic. All of his concerns have been addressed.
Brian McMenomy 1283 Bonaire Path W, inquired who will get assessed if Bonaire is paved. Lindquist stated the City
hasn’t determined the project is at this point and would speculate that from Akron to the entrance of the northern
entrance would be paved. Flint Hills and City own most of the property not included in this proposal. Mr. McMenomy
also inquired where utilities would come from; Lindquist stated they will come from the south off of Akron Avenue.
MOTION by Henrie to close the public hearing.
Second by Clements.
Ayes: 6. Nays: 0. Motion Passes.
The public hearing was closed at 8:19 pm.
Additional Comments:
Commissioner Henrie inquired about the plan for the park. Lindquist not sure what the plan is but the Park Commission
has approved it, and this is a neighborhood park and isn’t anticipated the need for parking.
Chair Kenninger struggles with only two access points and would like to have the second access done sooner. She also
inquired if there is a requirement for access depth, Lindquist there are standards for cul-de-sacs. Staff doesn’t want to
limit access into neighborhoods but there are requirements set forth by the County and railroad. Kenninger then
inquired if 141st Street could be extended to the east for an additional access for construction traffic to bypass the
existing residencies. Lindquist stated that is not an option. Kenninger also inquired if the Planning Commission could
add a condition to require Bonaire Path to be paved. Lindquist stated that City Council would need to approve the
project since it would require the City to spend money on the road improvement. Kenninger stated that she would
strongly encourage the paving of Bonaire to the eastern entrance of Greystone.
Commissioner VanderWiel stated she doesn’t feel comfortable waiting until 2017 to deal with construction traffic.
Lindquist explained that not all 23 homes will be built next summer, the infrastructure for those 23 homes will be built
then once that is complete they will start on northern access point. Engineer Hatcher further explained that the
construction of the roads wouldn’t be started until June of 2017, so residents wouldn’t be dealing with the road
construction from now until next fall of construction.
Commissioner Forster inquired if there is a plan for pedestrian traffic to access the Flint Hills Complex to the north.
Lindquist stated that will be addressed in the future but no plans have been created at this time.
1. Motion by Clements to recommend the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat for Greystone III, subject
to conditions:
a. Approval of a Major Planned Unit Development rezoning the subject property and designating
minimum lot requirements and setbacks.
b. Payment of $110/ft for the parcel frontage along Bonaire Path Conformance with all requirements of
the City Engineer as detailed in the attached memorandum dated September 21, 2016
c. Conformance with all requirements of the Parks and Recreation Director as detailed in the attached
memorandum dated September 22, 2016
d. Outlots C, E &F should be incorporated into the plat. Outlots A and D should be dedicated to the
City with Outlot B owned and maintained by the Homeowners Association.
e. Drainage and utility easements should be dedicated over all ponding and wetland areas with a
conservation easement provided over the designated wetlands.
f. The property owner enter into an agreement for Lot 1, Block 1 Greystone III which waives an appeal
of future assessments for upgrades to Bonaire Path up to $110/front foot and recognizes future
payment of park dedication fees upon site development.
Second by VanderWiel.
Ayes: 6. Nays: 0. Motion Passes.
2. Motion by Clements to recommend the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development Master
Development Plan with the Rezoning of the Property from AGP – Agricultural Preserve to R1 PUD – Low
Density Residential Planned Unit Development, subject to conditions:
a. The front elevation design shall include one of the following elements:
i. Three and a half (3.5) feet of brick or stone wainscoting, excluding doors, windows or the
wall behind the front porch;
ii. A front porch with railing that extends at least 30% of the width of the front elevation,
including the garage;
iii. A side entry garage;
iv. Or, no more than 70% lap siding, excluding doors and windows.
b. A deviation from City Code Section 11-2-15 F. so that the home designs do not need to include an
option for a three garage stall.
c. A deviation from City Code Section 11-4-5 F.1. to reduce the interior lot minimum area of 10,000 to
8,600 square feet and corner lot minimum area from 12, 000 to 10,400 square feet.
d. A deviation from City Code Section 11-4-5 F.2. to reduce the minimum lot width to sixty (60) feet for
interior and seventy five (75) feet for corner lots.
e. A deviation from City Code Section 11-4-5 F.4. to reduce the front yard setback to twenty five (25)
feet.
f. A deviation from City Code Section 11-4-5 F.5. to reduce the side yard setback to seven and one half
(7.5) feet except in areas where existence of larger drainage and utility easements require additional
setbacks.
g. A deviation from City Code Section 11-4-5 F.9. to reduce the maximum lot coverage to forty percent
(40%) for lots less than 9,750 square feet in size and thirty five percent (35%) for lots between 9,750
square feet and 11,250 square feet.
h. Each corner lot will have two overstory trees, one fronting on each road and all interior lots will have
one boulevard planting. The seed mix in the ponding areas should be modified to include more
wildflowers in the mix. The applicant shall modify the landscape plan to address the noted concerns
and include a maintenance plan for the open space areas of the site.
i. The developer will include the Bonaire Path intersection and road extension in the second phase of
development to provide an alternative access for residents and construction traffic.
j. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer as detailed in the attached memorandum
dated September 21, 2016
k. Conformance with all requirements of the Parks and Recreation Director as detailed in the attached
memorandum dated September 22, 2016.
l. The property owner enter into an agreement for Lot 1, Block 1 Greystone III which waives an appeal
of future assessments for upgrades to Bonaire Path up to $110/front foot and recognizes future
payment of park dedication fees upon site development.
Second by VanderWiel.
Ayes: 6. Nays: 0. Motion Passes.
3. Motion by Clements to recommend the City Council approve the Final Plat for Greystone 3rd Addition,
subject to conditions:
a. Approval and execution of a subdivision agreement.
b. Trees installed on individual lots shall be planted in a location that does not interfere with curb stops
or individual sewer or water connections.
c. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer as detailed in the attached memorandum
dated September 21, 2016
d. Conformance with all requirements of the Parks and Recreation Director as detailed in the attached
memorandum dated September 22, 2016
e. The final plan reflect the modifications to the preliminary plat relating to outlot reconfigurations.
Second by VanderWiel.
Ayes: 6. Nays: 0. Motion Passes.
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 21, 2016
TO: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director
CC: Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner
John Morast, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Amy Roudebush, Planning & Personnel Secretary
FROM: Mitch Hatcher, Project Engineer
RE: Greystone III - Preliminary Plat Review
SUBMITTAL:
Prepared by Pioneer Engineering, the Greystone III Preliminary Plat, dated June 28, 2016, revised
August 19, 2016. The following review comments were generated from the following documents
included in the submittal:
Preliminary Plan comprised of the following:
▫ Existing Conditions
▫ Preliminary Plat
▫ Utility Plan
▫ Grading Plan
▫ Erosion Control
▫ Details
▫ Street Profiles
▫ Phasing Plan
▫ Landscape and Seeding Plan
Greystone 5th Addition Final Plat
Stormwater Management Plan and Calculations
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. The development fees below are estimated based on the current Schedule of Rates and Fees.
These fees are due with the final plat and subdivision agreement.
GIS Fees: $60/unit
Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge: $1075/acre
Watermain Trunk Charge: $6500/acre
Storm Sewer Trunk Charge: $6865/acre
1. The developer shall be responsible for costs associated with upgrading Bonaire Path. The
improvement cost is $110/ ft. Based on the 217’ of front footage, the total cost for
Greystone III is $23,870.
2. A street lighting plan should be submitted for review and approval.
3. Provide gas pipeline warning and owner contact information on plan.
4. Conservation easements are required over all stormwater ponds, infiltration basins, wetlands,
and buffers. Signage for conservation easements shall be provided by the developer and an
extended 5 year maintenance warranty shall be required to ensure establishment of the
naturally vegetated areas. Costs associated with the establishment of the naturally vegetated
areas and the 5 year maintenance period shall be a cost of the development.
5. Drainage and utility easements are required on all property lines and over proposed storm
sewer and drainage and emergency overflow routes. The width of drainage and utility
easements over all public utilities shall be verified during final design.
6. Outlots C, E, and F of the preliminary plat should be eliminated. The surrounding property
lines should extend to encompass the wetlands, stormwater ponds, and gas pipeline and the
appropriate easements applied.
7. All work occurring within the Great River Energy easement or Xcel Energy easement shall
be by agreement or permit with the easement owner.
8. An Enterprise Pipeline runs through the development. A permit shall be required between
the developer and Enterprise Pipeline for all crossings, grading, and construction.
9. The developer is required to obtain a NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit and provide
a copy of the approved SWPPP to the City prior to the start of any construction activity.
STORMWATER COMMENTS:
10. A 10:1 safety bench is required for NURP Ponding Basins 10P, 30P, and 70P. Details are on
sheet 16, but it is not clear if the grading plan and stormwater calculations are included the
bench.
11. Basin 70P should be labeled with the surface water managements plan pond number WRV-
1739.
12. Add EOFs at low points on Street B, near STA 9+00 and 14+00.
13. Add EOF at low point on 138th Street, near STA 38+00.
14. Offsite storm sewer locations and information should be shown on the utility plan. Storm
sewer draining into Outlot A and Wetland B from previous phases of Greystone are missing.
15. OCS-10 rim need to increase if the invert will be 940.5. Build height needs to reflect invert
and rim elevations.
16. OCS-3 rim needs to increase if the invert will be 923.0. Build height needs to reflect invert
and rim elevations.
17. Outlet elevations for OCS (sluice gate inverts) should be set at the infiltration/NWL to allow
basins to drain down to the NWL with the gate open.
18. HWLs on the plan set should be called out for both the 100-yr, 24-hr rainfall event and the
10-day snowmelt event.
19. Lining of NURP ponding areas is not required by the City; however, the developer may want
to consider this as ponding areas will likely not maintain vegetation below the NWL.
20. Hydraulic Report and HydroCAD Model comments:
Notes and warnings should be displayed on HydroCAD report.
All wet ponds in HydroCAD must have the starting elevation set at the ponds NWL.
Ponds that need starting elevations: 3P, 6P, 8P, and 9P.
7P, the 15” outlet is 0.8’ below the lowest storage elevation
Outlet diameters need to reflect the plan
▫ 30P – increase device #1 from 12” to 15”
▫ 501 – model outlet as an overland weir
▫ 60W – increase device #1 from 12” to 15”
21. For basins without an outlet (201 and 501), the developer should provide calculations to
show the 24-hr drawdown time can be achieved per Minnesota Stormwater Manual design
criteria or add an OCS with sluice gate similar to other basin designs.
22. Average depth calculations are not consistent with information contained within the
HydroCAD report. Basin 30P needs a deeper average depth.
23. Provide a soil borings map with legible soil boring locations to verify infiltration basins have
soils conductive for infiltration.
Based on section 4.9 of the Geotechnical Report, “the topsoil and directly underlying
weathered soils and/or bedrock do not provide for good infiltration”. To obtain the
desired infiltration rates, the topsoil and directly underlying weathered soils and/or
bedrock would need to be excavated and replaced with clean granular sand or gravel.
A post-construction percolation test must be performed on each infiltration basin to
demonstrate that the constructed infiltration rate meets or exceeds the design
infiltration rate prior to project acceptance by the City.
24. Add hatching pattern over all wetlands and wetland buffer areas
25. A protective buffer strip of natural vegetation shall surround all wetlands. Buffer width shall
be in accordance with the VRWJPO rules shown below:
PRELIMINARY GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN
26. Add additional proposed contour labels for ease of reading plan.
27. Site grading and storm sewer is proposed on the property to the east of the development.
The necessary approvals are required to be provided to the City.
28. Inlet control, outlet erosion control, and rock construction entrance locations are not
identified.
29. Add stabilization to emergency overflows between lots 4/5 Block 2, 107/108, and 198/199.
30. Add erosion control blanket in back yard drainage behind all homes off of Street D.
PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN:
31. The City requires RCP for all storm sewer owned and maintained by the City. All HDPE in
the plan should be changed to RCP.
32. The City, Developer, and property owner of the exception parcel have had discussions
regarding the service and hookup of sewer and water to the existing home on the property.
Future discussions are necessary to develop a plan for servicing the property.
33. As currently proposed, the storm sewer catch basins in the intersection of 138th Street &
Street A drain east on 138th Street to Street C, South on Street C to 139th Street, West on
139th Street to the CB in the southeast corner of Lot 12, Block 2 (7407 to 7011), then to
Basin 70P. This proposed storm sewer with Phase 1 is not feasible. A revised storm sewer
layout is suggested to account for the drainage in the intersection of 138th Street and Street
A.
34. Construction of Basin 70P is required with Phase 1.
35. Pothole elevations shall be provided during final design at each gas pipeline crossing to
verify that the utility crossings can be constructed as proposed. Additional information
regarding the gas line easements shall be provided (number of lines and sizes).
36. Storm sewer is proposed along the side and back lot lines of many properties to convey rear
yard drainage. Drainage and utility easements along these lines shall prohibit the installation
of sheds to ensure that access can be provided for storm sewer maintenance. Fences are
allowed but shall not restrict drainage and are required to include gates for truck access over
the drainage and utility easement. Also, landscaping that will block access should be
prohibited. These restrictions should be added as a restriction on the property deed.
37. Trees are not allowed to be planted within drainage and utility easements, over the proposed
storm sewer, or within a pond access location. Trees located on individual properties shall
not be planted near the sanitary sewer and water service lines.
Should you have any questions or comments regarding the items listed above, please contact me at
651-322-2015.
M E M O R A N D U M
To: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director
Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner
Anthony Nemcek, Planner
John Morast, Interim City Engineer
Mitch Hatcher, Project Engineer
From: Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director
Date: September 22, 2016
Subject: Greystone 3rd Addition Preliminary, Final Plat and PUD Master Development
Plan
The Parks and Recreation Department recently reviewed the preliminary and final plat for the
Greystone 3rd Addition Preliminary, Final Plat and PUD Master Development Plan. After reviewing
the plans, the Parks and Recreation Department staff has the following comments:
PARKS DEDICATION
The parks dedication requirement for the 169 units in the Greystone 3rd addition is either 6.76 acres
of land or cash in lieu of land. Because the existing Greystone Development area has already
dedicated land that is being developed as a public park, staff is recommending that the developer pay
cash in lieu of land to fulfill their parks dedication requirement. The cash in lieu of land dedication
for 169 units is $574,600 (169 units x $3,400 per unit).
Staff is recommending that the park dedication for Lot 1 Block 1 be collected in the future when the
property develops.
TRAILS and SIDEWALKS
The trail and sidewalk amenities appear to be designed in a manner that works toward the City’s goal
of having a well-connected community. Staff is not recommending any changes to the plan.
Please let me know if you have any questions about this memo.
M E M O R A N D U M
To: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director
Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner
Anthony Nemcek, Planner
John Morast, Interim City Engineer
Mitch Hatcher, Project Engineer
From: Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation Director
Date: September 22, 2016
Subject: Greystone 3rd Addition Preliminary, Final Plat and PUD Master Development
Plan
The Parks and Recreation Department recently reviewed the preliminary and final plat for the
Greystone 3rd Addition Preliminary, Final Plat and PUD Master Development Plan. After reviewing
the plans, the Parks and Recreation Department staff has the following comments:
PARKS DEDICATION
The parks dedication requirement for the 169 units in the Greystone 3rd addition is either 6.76 acres
of land or cash in lieu of land. Because the existing Greystone Development area has already
dedicated land that is being developed as a public park, staff is recommending that the developer pay
cash in lieu of land to fulfill their parks dedication requirement. The cash in lieu of land dedication
for 169 units is $574,600 (169 units x $3,400 per unit).
Staff is recommending that the park dedication for Lot 1 Block 1 be collected in the future when the
property develops.
TRAILS and SIDEWALKS
The trail and sidewalk amenities appear to be designed in a manner that works toward the City’s goal
of having a well-connected community. Staff is not recommending any changes to the plan.
Please let me know if you have any questions about this memo.