HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.i Concurrence for Revocation-CSAH 48N
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 2005
AGENDA ITEM: Concurrence for Revocation -CSAH 48
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent
PREPARED BY: Andrew J. Brotzler, P.E., City Engineer
A
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution, Letter, Map
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION IN
CONCURRENCE WITH DAKOTA COUNTY FOR REVOCATION OF DESIGNATION
OF COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 48 WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT.
ACTION:
BACKGROUND:
With the recent realignment of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 46 at the southern
border of Rosemount and Coates at TH 52, there is a short segment of CSAH 48,
shown on the attached map that Dakota County is planning to revoke as a county state
aid highway. As noted in the attached letter from Dakota County staff, the construction
of CSAH 46 has resulted in a decrease in traffic volumes on CSAH 48, such that the
revocation and redesignation of the CSAH mileage to another county road will be more
beneficial. The majority of CSAH 48 is within Coates, however there is a short segment
that /z of the road is within Rosemount. Therefore, for the County to revoke the
designation of CSAH 48, approval from the City is required.
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution concurring with the
revocation designation of County State Aid Highway 48.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2005
A RESOLUTION IN CONCURRENCE WITH DAKOTA COUNTY
FOR REVOCATION OF DESIGNATION OF COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 48
WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
WHEREAS, the County Board of the County of Dakota will adopt a resolution on January 25,
2005, revocating designation of County State Aid Highway No. 48 within the corporate limits of
the City of Rosemount, as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of said County State Aid Highway No. 48 with
the easterly right of way boundary of State Trunk Highway No. 52; thence easterly along said
centerline as it transgresses through the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter, the
southeast quarter of the southeast quarter, the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter and
the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 31, Township 115 North, Range 18
West and the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter, the northeast quarter of the
northwest quarter, the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter, and the northeast quarter of
the northeast quarter of Section 6, Township 114 North, Range 18 West to its intersection with
the northerly right of way boundary of new County State Aid Highway No. 46 and said line
there terminating. Be, and hereby is revoked as a County State Aid Highway of said County
subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the County engineer and Transportation Staff recommend that the road, as
described as follows, should be designated as County Road 48; and
WHEREAS, the County Board of the Commissioners has determined that the road as
described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of said County State Aid Highway No. 48 with
the easterly right of way boundary of State Trunk Highway No. 52; thence easterly along said
centerline as it transgresses through the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter, the
southeast quarter of the southeast quarter, the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter and
the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 31, Township 115 North, Range 18
West and the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter, the northeast quarter of the
northwest quarter, the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter, and the northeast quarter of
the northeast quarter of Section 6, Township 114 North, Range 18 West to its intersection with
the northerly right of way boundary of new County State Aid Highway No. 46 and said line
there terminating. Be, and hereby is revoked as a County State Aid Highway of said County
subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota; and
Be, and hereby is established, located, and designated a County Road.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount that said
revision is in all things approved.
ADOPTED this 18 day of January, 2005.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and
adopted by the City Council of Rosemount at a duly authorized meeting thereof, held on the
18th day of January, 2005, as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession.
(SEAL)
Linda J. Jentink, Rosemount City Clerk
William H. Droste, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda Jentink, City Clerk
Motion by:
Voted in favor:
Second
Voted against:
C 4e
C O U N T r
Transportation Department
December 21, 2004
Mark J. Krebsbach. P.E.
T an,p :ao ^e,nr;
Mr. Andy Brotzler
(-.m Engineer
Rosemount City Engineer
Dakota county
2875 -145 Street West
Western Service Center
Rosemount, MN 55068 -4997
14955 Galaxie .Avenue
3rd Fl=
Apple Salle.. MN 55124 -8579
RE: Resolution of Concurrence for Revocation of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 48 and
Designation of County Road (CR) 48 in the City of Rosemount
952.891 7100
Fax 952 891 112 7
w co.dakotamn.us
Dear Andy:
Dakota County receives State Aid highway funds based on the following formula: 10%
equalization distribution, 10% motor vehicle registration, 30% CSAH lane miles, and 50%
CSAH money needs. CSAH money needs ("needs') are the estimated cost to improve the
County's designated CSAH system from the existing condition to appropriate State Aid
standards.
Currently, CSAH 48 (160` Street) in the cities of Coates and Rosemount is drawing "needs"
for the Dakota County Highway system. The 50% CSAH "Needs" are based on projected
future 2025 traffic volumes and the corresponding roadway design for that volume of traffic.
With the new CSAH 46 roadway and overpass at TH 52 completed, traffic volumes on CSAH
48 have decreased. The Dakota County Transportation Department would like to revoke
CSAH status on this road and designate it as a County Road (CR). It is beneficial to Dakota
County to designate another roadway (with a higher traffic volume) as a CSAH and be able
to draw greater "needs This roadway will continue to be maintained by Dakota County at
the existing level of service. In the future, if this County Road is to be turned back to the
cities, it will still require an executed agreement between each city and the County Board
according to Policy M.10 of the Dakota County 2025 Transportation Plan.
At this time, I am requesting that the City of Rosemount consider passing a resolution of
concurrence for the revocation of CSAH 48 and designation of CR 48 from Trunk Highway 52
to CSAH 46 within the City of Rosemount. I have enclosed a sample resolution for your
convenience.
If you have any questions or concerns, please call me at 952.891.7090 and I will be glad to
discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
i i(i
Holly A derson
Principal Engineering Specialist
Encl. Sample Resolution of Concurrence Location Map
Ca
n ca
Attachment A
evocation of CSAH 48
)csignution of C'R 48
ROSEMOUNT
46)
VERWLLION
Revocation of CSAH 48
Designation of CR 48
;6 OAT E S