HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.i. Mineral Extraction Permit Phasing Plan Update for Shafer Contracting Co 04-73-MECITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
City Council Meeting Date, Februa 15, 2005
AGENDA ITEM: Mineral Extraction Permit Phasing Plan Update
AGENDA SECTION:
for Shafer Contracting Co 05 -73 —ME
Consent
PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson, City Planner
AGEND NO
ATTACHMENTS: Draft 2005 Mineral Extraction Conditions of
APPROVE BY:
Operation, Location map, revised phasing plan,
p revious phasing Ian
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to approve the updated phasing plan for Shafer Contracting Co Inc and the
revisions to the 2005 operating conditions
ACTION:
ISSUE
Scott Spisak representing Shafer Contracting Co Inc requests that the City approve the
updated phasing plan for Shafer Contracting The attached permit conditions of operation will
be revised to reflect the advancement into the phase 4 area This item is essentially an
update with a minor modification to the permit conditions (Paragraph B) It does not
materially change the reclamation plan, and therefore does not require a public hearing and
Planning Commission recommendation.
BACKGROUND
Applicant Property Owner(s)
Location
Area in Acres.
Comp Guide Plan Desig
Current Zoning
Nature of request
Status of permit.
Shafer Contracting Co, Inc
Approximately 12500 Rich Valley Blvd mile west of
County Road 71, and 1 mile north of County Road 38
(135` Street West)
93 total acres, 15 acres in current phase, now in Phase 4,
with processing of stockpiles occurring on the west half of
the phase 3 area.
Agriculture
Agriculture
Annual renewal
Renewed for 2005 on November 16, 2004
SUMMARY
In 2000, Shafer Contracting Co Inc purchased the 90 -acre property from the previous
owner, Lance Johnson, and assumed the responsibility for operations Originally, the mineral
extraction permit only covered the easterly 35 acres permitted in the 1970's and was divided
into three phases In 1999, a new grading reclamation plan was prepared with a phasing
plan for the entire 90 acres. At that time, the City Council was reluctant to expand the permit
area considering that mineral extraction was no longer a permitted use in the applicable area
of the Agriculture District Legal action ensued with applicable case law providing support for
the expansion of mineral extraction consistent with City standards into the balance of the
entire property
The balance of the 90 acres was approved for future phases 4 -7 The progress of the
excavation of the pit area is now about 25% into Phase 4 and the processing occurs in the
west half of Phase 3 The eastern half of phase 3 and earlier phases has been graded to the
new reclamation plan grades
The 2005 conditions of operation contain a specific reference to the phasing plan that needs
to be updated Therefore, the attached previously approved conditions for 2005 have been
edited reflecting the progress of the phasing plan in Paragraph B Staff is comfortable with
the phasing plan update and the minor revision to the conditions
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of the updated phasing plan for Shafer Contracting Co Inc and the revisions to the
2005 operating conditions
2
Mineral Extraction Permit
2005 Conditions For Mineral Extraction Permit Renewal
SHAFER CONTRACTING COMPANY INCORPORATED
A. Shafer Contracting Co., Inc (hereinafter "the Property Owner signs a written
consent to these conditions binding itself and its successors, heirs or assigns to the
conditions of said permit
B. This permit is granted for the area designated as the western half of Phase 3 (6 5
acres) and Phase 4 (1= acres), on Exhibit A (drawing 5 of 7 dated April 6, 1999),
which is attached hereto as one of the exhibits
C The term of the permit shall extend from January 1, 2005 until December 31, 2005
unless revoked prior to that for failure to comply with the permit requirements A
mining permit fee of $315 00 shall be paid to the City of Rosemount.
D. All required permits from the State of Minnesota, County of Dakota and City of
Rosemount (hereinafter "City or any of their agencies be obtained and submitted
to the City prior to the issuance of the permit That failure by the Property Owner to
comply with the terms and conditions of any of the permits required under this
paragraph shall be grounds for the City to terminate said mining permit.
E The final grading for the permit area shall be completed in accordance with the
grading plan labeled Exhibit B (drawing 7 of 7 dated April 6, 1999), which is
attached hereto, or as approved by the City Engineer, and any other conditions as
may be imposed by the City from time to time
F All gravel trucks and other mining related traffic shall enter and exit the mining area
from Rich Valley Boulevard It shall be the Property Owner's responsibility to
obtain any access permits or easements necessary for ingress and egress. The
location of the accesses and/or easements for ingress and egress shall be subject to
approval by the City, as well as the County Highway Department or the Minnesota
Department of Transportation if applicable or if any changes occur relative to the
mining process The current location of the access driveway is indicated on the
Phasing Plan, Exhibit A A stop sign shall be installed at the driveway entrance to
County Road 71. in accordance with standards on file with the City or County
Highway Department Warning signs including "Trucks Hauling" shall be installed
at the Property Owner's expense as needed in accordance with Dakota County
requirements
G A plan for dust control shall be submitted to and subject to approval by the City
The Property Owner shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from
extraction or hauling operations related to the Mineral Extraction Permit After the
2005 Mining Permit
Shafer Contracting
2of5
Property Owner has received 24 -hour verbal notice, the City will complete or
contract to complete the clean -up at the Property Owner's expense In the event of
a traffic hazard as determined by the City Administrator (or his designee) or
Rosemount Police Department, the City may proceed immediately to complete or
contract cleanup at Property Owner's expense without prior notification
H The surface water drainage of the mining area shall not be altered so as to interfere,
contaminate, or otherwise affect the natural drainage of adjacent property
No topsoil shall be removed from the site and that the Property Owner shall take
necessary measures to prevent erosion of the stockpiled topsoil The location of the
stockpiled topsoil shall be indicated on Exhibit A, the Phasing Plan
Any costs incurred now or in the future in changing the location of existing public or
private utilities including but not limited to pipelines, transmission structures and
sewer infrastructure located within the permit area shall be the sole obligation and
expense of the Property Owner.
K. All costs of processing the permit, including but not limited to planning fees,
engineering fees and legal fees, shall be paid by the Property Owner prior to the
issuance of the permit That the Property Owner reimburse the City for the cost of
periodic inspections by the City Administrator or any other City employee for the
purpose of insuring that conditions of the permit are being satisfied That the
Property Owner agrees to reimburse the City for any other costs incurred as a result
of the granting or enforcing of the permit.
L. The daily hours of operation for the mining area shall be limited to 7 00 a m to 7
p m subject, however, to being changed by the City Council
M The Property Owner deposit with the Planning Department a surety bond or cash
escrow in the amount of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars per acre
($7,500 00 /acre) for any active phase in favor of the City for the cost of restoration,
regrading and /or revegetatmg land disturbed by mining activities and to ensure
performance of all requirements of this agreement and City ordinances by Property
Owner. The required surety bonds must be
(1) With good and sufficient surety by a surety company authorized to do
business in the State of Minnesota with the right of the surety company to
cancel the same upon thirty (30) days written notice to the permit holder and
the City
(2) Satisfactory to the City Attorney in form and substance
2005 Mining Permit
Shafer Contracting
3 of 5
(3) Conditioned that the Property Owner will faithfully comply with all the
terms. conditions and requirements of the permit, all rules, regulations and
requirements pursuant to the permit and as required by the City and all
reasonable requirements of the City Administrator (or his designee) or any
other City officials
(4) Conditioned that the Property Owner will secure the City and its officers
harmless against any and all claims, or for which the City, the Council or any
City officer may be made liable by reason of any accident or injury to
persons or property through the fault of the Property Owner
(5) The surety bond or cash escrow shall remain in effect from January 1, 2005
until July 31, 2006
Upon thirty (30) days notice to the permit holder and surety company, the City may
reduce or increase the amount of the bond or cash escrow during the term of this
permit in order to insure that the City is adequately protected
N. The Property Owner furnishes a certificate of comprehensive general liability
insurance issued by insurers duly licensed within the State of Minnesota in an
amount of at least Five Hundred Thousand and no /100 ($500,000 00) Dollars for
injury or death of any one person in any one occurrence. bodily injury liability in an
amount of at least One Million and no /100 ($1,000,000 00) Dollars and damage
liability in an amount of at least Two Hundred Fifty Thousand and no /100
($250.000 00) Dollars arising out of anyone occurrence The policy of insurance
shall name the City as an additional insured and shall remain in effect from February
15, 2005 until July 31, 2006
O. No processing or mixing of materials shall occur on the site, except as approved by
the Dakota County Environmental Health Department as incidental to a sand and
gravel mining operation at which time such activities will be enclosed with snow, or
cyclone fencing or as approved by City staff, Construction of any pondmg areas,
wash plants or other processing or equipment brought to the site shall require
additional City Council approval and notification of adjacent property owners.
P The Property Owner shall hold the City harmless from all claims or causes of action
that ma} result from the granting of the permit That the Property Owner shall
indemnify the City for all costs, damages or expenses, including but not limited to
attorney's fees which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims
Q The Property Owner shall comply with such other requirements of the City Council
as it shall from time to time deem proper and necessary for the protection of the
citizens and general welfare of the community
2005 Mining Permit
Shafer Contractmg
4of5
R. Complete mining and reclamation is required in all phases before any additional
mining is authorized Modifications or expansion of the mining areas must be
approved in writing to the City Property Owner shall submit to the City semi-
annually a written report indicating the amount of material extracted from the site
for the prior six -month period
S The Property Owner shall incorporate best management practices for controlling
erosion and storm water runoff as specified by the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency and the United States Environmental Protection Agency
T. The Property Owner must have a copy of the Dakota County Soil and Water
Conservation District mining application completed and on file with the City of
Rosemount Planning Department prior to the approval of the Mineral Extraction
Permit
U Reclamation requires the replacement of the entire stockpile of topsoil to the mined
area, reseeding and mulching necessary to re- establish vegetative cover for
permanent slope stabilization and erosion control, provided also that the minimum
depth of topsoil shall not be less than two inches after reclamation Topsoil for
reclamation shall conform to specifications on file with the City No restored slopes
may exceed a gradient of 25% or four to 1 (4 1)
V. The Property Owner must show how materials stockpiled for recycling will be
processed and inform the City of all stockpiled materials
W. All recycling must be completed with the completion of the current phase No
recycling processes shall be allowed to continue into subsequent phases.
X The Property Owner may not assign this permit without written approval of the City
The Property Owner will be responsible for all requirements of this permit and all
City ordinances on the licensed premises for the permit period unless the Property
Owner gives sixty (60) days prior written notice to the City of termination and
surienders permit to the City The Property Owner shall identify all Operators prior
to their commencement of mineral extraction- related activities in the pit area The
City shall have the authority to cause all mineral extraction activities to cease at any
time there is an apparent breach of the terms of this Permit
Y The Property Owner shall install and maintain a "stock" gate (or equivalent) at the
entrance to the property where the mining operation is located. The gate must be
secured at 7.00 p in and at any time the pit is not in use.
Z. There shall be no "haul- back" of materials from any other property or job site that
would be imported to the property for fill or other purposes other than incidental
concrete recycling as referred to in paragraphs O, V and W, and topsoil imported for
the purpose of re- establishing turf as accepted by the City
2005 Mining Permit
Shafer Contracting
5of5
AA Truck operators within the pit area shall not engage in practices involving slamming
tailgates, vibrating boxes. using of "Jake" or engine brakes (except in emergency
situations) or other such activities which result in excessive noise
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Shafer Contracting Company, Inc the
Property Owner, hereby consents and agrees to the foregoing conditions of said mmmg
permit this day of 2005
Shafer Contracting Co., Inc.
By:
George Mattson, Its President
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss
COUNTY OF DAKOTA
The foregomg instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
2005, by George Mattson, President of Shafer Contracting Company,
inc, the Property Owner, on behalf of the Corporation
Notary Public
SITE MAP
PROPERTY 10 NUMBER 34 -01400.013 -09 2002 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUES IPA(ABLE 2aW 1 20M BUILDING INFORMATION (PAYABLE 20031
FEE OWNER SHAFER CONTRACTING CO INC LAND i LOT SIZE (EXCLUDES NO DATA AVAILABLE
COMMON NAME SHAFER CONTRACTING GRAVEL PIT BUILDING ROAD EASEMENTS)
PO BOx 128 TOTAL
SHAFER NN 55074 -0128 536 093 SO FT
PAYABLE 2002 TAXES SCHOOL DISTRICT 196 12 31 ACRES
LOCATION SW114 NE1,4 SECTION 14- 115 -19
NET TAX >wsR
SPEC A- ASSESSMENTS 1jiii PAYABLE 2003 HOMESTEAD STATUS NON HOMESTEAD
TOTAL TAX 3 SA
WATERSHED O.STRICT VERMILLION RIVER
PAYABLE 2003 ASMNT USAGE RESIDENTIAL
INDUSTRIAL LAST QUALIFIED SALE
DATE AMOUNT
INVE2 C--aiiF}G1�j 9
m p
I
;I
Ik
vE
t
I IT y
ACGESS
4d+"Ctl EhSEr(ElSC
CL
t
1 f
i
I
I
i I
PLAT NAME SECTI0N 14 TWN I IS RANGE 15
TAX DESCRIPTION PT OF S 12 OF NE VA LYING
W OF RR EX CON NE CDR OF SW
VA OF NE V4 'N 17274 FT
rl
NOTE Dimensions rounded to nearest feat
TO BEG S SO 36M 36S W 66 74
FT N 85D !7M 2:S W 80 90 FT
opynght 2002 Oakaa County
S SO 36M 36S W 382 62 FT N
/1
890 5'M 2ES W 933 14 FT N
l�
-ms drawing n neither s legally rfootball map nor a survey ends nal rntendeo to be used as one
CO IEM SOS E 451 50 FT TO N
-his drawing is a compliacon of records intarmabon and data located n varmus Mh doubly and
LINE E 1080 FT TO 6EG EX
ta,e oKCes and other sources aNectmg the area snown and is to be used for reference purposes
CCN INT S LINE d'N WW RR N
)rly Dakota County Is not responstbie for any inaczuradres herein cortamed If dlscrepanaes are
080 36M MS E ON R 870 FT
o..rd please mntaa Cakata County Survey and Lana Infarmaudn DeparinenL
W PARR S LINE 707 FT S TO 5
LINE E TC BEG
Aap Data Novemoer6 2CC2 Parcels Updated 1024=02 Aenal Photography 1990
1411519
99D
AREA AT REC1- AMA7ION GitADEs
5112l05 DEPSGIION OF PHASE 3 4 OPERAIINO PLAN ARE 1,11`I`1
9m 9uuaso f
94D 930 9 90
9 950 950 r y A1 V 1
60950�� J,� •5p� OHHNSN
09
9m cxrlLC�
�PSOwsTQ
Ill ���f I p����1 1a A roY �iil�u� of
r.
r ss y t�ld •1 r �jiA$$ a
4PPR C
r 4. ,1 M a
x}r� �1l{r �i� �n �lil 1 f d.'�t���1' 1 •3 {-i 4 °r a'[
�p{ A �Al r r� l r f( `�..r 1`�i'�rr o��. n`^6' A�fhi i gA YP�R i[AGDMW¢KiY PASEb_�ni
;y 'r•F `a �Pi,; r
P
SID
9iD sab 6eo
gpO 990 930940 93092U
cobs F�E3 OPERk�CIOA'�
30'h11NVS6 wo �9N3 95tl 950
980 Ij��, r9k0 910 9Y0 97 OPERATIONS ��y PLPLAN CwaYm
Sao AD
99tl 960 ARS'A DPD TO FFLASE SING m„emu�+P' mew utand
POSED 11vG OP PROP 0SWA&8AP0g'I'gi'ls t� 'l,[RANxPIANT ON 9m 'A�dma yc<a Q
PR®S OL7 lYJ,ll yy, J �J MANYOPt AREAg
pYOPOY ®EOLYL Nu AAHA �L�'° a �AN�p jG Oiuu D y w ,b96
S% Ma PERMYPYEO
ED
umm siaob� 19Rb
YNA$EH 1.2, ANUS 4AOPOYID39TO8M WAPE& L.01O u g mmwoaw &+mpw«T^r
H{ANAO V C mvn,sws �9m. w9s.wwss9s ssna.l
AYYEP. cawr�'s. M °yrtad'
P &W44 �5•gAC �m�. bum °IVmwwPV �pi1O °�.wmL
P ISACREg
MAIII 1, 11
pNABBP 1l ACREY
5.Dm w- *0".mmd?l �C\ 0
p 600 U
HheBrlCOm9vafm8CamP%OY. b°' g 0 190' 300' A
gye (,'OEISOOC35LB ComPx°Y, 9o8 eta ssat
P o
55094 651-11l -wl Pc 651 199.8819
M9nIDg Qperarion -1n -5019 ea. 655 u9a
p elation and Proposed nkNN
M 1I1121g op ela tion
1ohE6on 4YOPanY ROB
Pleasing Plan
1999
Cl\
L
9� PHASING P
AN
SING OPERATION AND
PROPOSE" ,,R,,
.4AtIDQN� '1 �X[� CONIVilu
C] moo
�p1 A }8 A ASTW�1� f��
wig p ation and
Phasing plan
rpnnecim6 Co�pB°eT8tl0ll