Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.j. Harmony 2nd Addition, CPDC Final Plat and Subdivision Development Agr.05-17-FPAGENDA ITEM: Case 05 -17 -FP Harmony 2 Addition (CPDC) Final Plat and Subdivision Development Agreement AGENDA SECTION: Consent PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson, City Planner Anthony Aderhold, Project Engineer p 1 1 j ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution, Draft Subdivision Development Agreement, Final Plat Reductions, Resolution 2004 -85 Preliminary Plat Approval, Draft PC Minutes 04/26/2005 APPROVED BY:� RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a resolution approving the final plat for Harmony 2 Addition subject to conditions. And Motion to authorize execution of the subdivision development agreement. ACTION: City Council Meeting Date. May 17, 2005 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION ISSUE The final plat encompasses the northeast quarter of the Brockway development now called Harmony. The plat provides for single family detached lots and building pads for row -house style townhouses between County Road 38 and the centrally located "round about" intersection. The request for final plat approval is the last step in the planning process for developments prior to construction. Approval and recording at Dakota County results in individual lots for sale. No public hearing is necessary for final plat approval. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW The Planning Commission reviewed the Harmony 2 Addition final plat on April 26, 2005 as a consent item. No issues were identified and the item was recommended for Council approval with conditions. BACKGROUND Applicant Property Owner(s): Dave Hempel and Mike Waldo of Contractor Property Developers Company (C.P.D.C.) Location: Area in Acres: Number of Lots /Units Density: Comp Guide Plan Desig: Current Zoning Planning Commission Action: Northeast quarter of the former Brockway site, 1/8 mile east of STH 3 and south of 132 St. (Bonaire Path)/ County Road 38. 20.41 47 single family lots, 34 row -house units 4 du. acre Urban Residential R -1 Low Density Residential PUD for the single family and R -2 Moderate Density Residential PUD for the row houses Recommendation of Approval (5 -0) SUMMARY This is the second phase for construction in the Harmony neighborhood. The plat encompasses the northeast quadrant of the Brockway area, east of the primary north -south street, south of 132 St. (County Road 38). The conditions of approval are fairly typical of the final plat process. Staff requested that the City Engineer approve a final grading permit prior to the final plat going before the Council. Review and approval of the final grading plan will allow engineering to determine all necessary easements for drainage and utility purposes prior to approving the final plat Specific conditions that relate to street width and parking restrictions are being reiterated in the final plat approval because the lot and block references have changed from preliminary to final plat. For example, the preliminary plat included 22 blocks. As each portion is platted, the blocks are numbered based upon the individual area being platted at one time. The plat also requires approval of the Dakota County Plat Commission because portions of it are next to County Road 38 (132 Street and Bonaire Path) The final plat has been checked with the preliminary plat, the PUD agreement and the conditions of the approval resolution and has been found to be consistent with all of those items. Staff finds that the final plat is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat and therefore recommends approval of the request RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval of the final plat for Harmony 2 Addition, subject to conditions, and authorize the execution of the Subdivision Development Agreement. 2 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2005 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT FOR HARMONY 2 n1) ADDITION WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an application from Contractor Property Developers Company (CPDC) on March 22, 2005 requesting a Final Plat for the Harmony 2 Addition, legally described as: Outlots G, H, and I, OUTLOTS OF BROCKWAY, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, on April 26, 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Final Plat for Harmony 2 Addition located on the northeast quarter of the former Brockway site, 1/8 mile east of STH 3 and south of 132 St. (Bonaire Path) /County Road 38; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend that the City Council approve the Final Plat for Harmony 2 Addition, subject to conditions, and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2005, the City Council of the City of Rosemount approved the Final Plat for Harmony 2 Addition after reviewing the Planning Commission's recommendation and the Final Plat, and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the Final Plat for Harmony 2 Addition, subject to: 1. Execution of a subdivision development agreement. 2. Review and approval of the final grading plan by the City Engineer prior to City Council approval of the final plat. 3. Conformance with the conditions of Resolution 2004 -85 including: Private streets on Outlots D and F (H and J from the preliminary plat) shall be a minimum of 28 feet wide face to face, or as approved by City Staff. Parking shall be on one side only. Parking on Brass Parkway, 133` Street and Brilliant Gem Ave. (streets 2 3 of the preliminary plat) shall be on the inside edge. Lot 2, Block 3 shall include a driveway turn- around to provide an alternative to backing onto 135 Street (Lot 2, Block 5 of the preliminary plat). As no on- street parking is recommended for 135 Street, the turn- around shall also provide guest parking. Lots 1 3, Block 3 shall be designed with lot fronts and driveways oriented to Brass Parkway and Brilliant Gem Ave. respectively. 4. Approval of the Dakota County Plat Commission as required by the Dakota County Continuous Plat Ordinance for that portion of the plat along County Road 38. 5. Payment of all development associated fees as specified in the current fee schedule including (but not limited to): SAC, WAC, STAC, GIS and Park Dedication. ADOPTED this seventeenth day of May, 2005 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. ATTEST: Linda Jentink, City Clerk William H. Droste, Mayor Motion by: Second by: RESOLUTION 2005 Voted in favor: Voted against: Member absent: 2 N 0 0 0234' W 44]31 oaf.. A! clun.art emorielr 4 1 D V SC N? I 3' o j gZZ2o 'z v so.10°CI N gl'9B_ b 6G 912...7 o� 1.. >na Pat a S40 1 44?0 -J 1Po00 c 475.9 B•NOO °40'20N 's 110 21 10449 1 /I I al 41 11 P I .v 3 Jr-L Z.. --1."-:" 4 1 /ei e A% 66 o` Ill r 2 D 77 0 r Ili/ 11 I 1L Yj Is Ia n ain J b n ss-+. In .I N it L_� Mr .ti- .J H S a 3 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2004- 85 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PUD FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE BROCKWAY DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an application from Contractor Property Developers Co requesting Preliminary Plat approval to redevelop the Brockway property to a PUD -mixed residential use and future neighborhood commercial site. The property is legally described as: That part of the South West of the North East 1, Section 20, Township 115 North, Range 19 West, Dakota County, Mmnesota, lying East of the center line ofS T.H No 3 (formerly S.T.H No 218); All of Government Lot 2, said Section 20, that part of the North'/: of the South East 1 of Said Section 20 lying East of the centerline of said S T.H No 3, lying West of the Westerly right of way line of Chicago, Milwaukee, St Paul and Pacific Railroad, and lying North and West of the following described line Commencing at the intersection of the South line of said North South East 1/4 and said Westerly right of way line of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad, thence South 89 degrees 43 minutes 18 seconds West, assumed bearing along said South line, 270 47 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described, thence North 12 degrees 05 minutes 15 seconds West, 357 87 feet, thence North 89 degrees 43 minutes 18 seconds East, 500 28 feet to said Westerly right of way line and there to rm mat.ng WHEREAS, on March 23, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Preliminary Plat to redevelop the Brockway property to a PUD -mixed residential use and future neighborhood commercial site; and WHEREAS, on April 27, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed revisions and updates guided by staff for the Preliminary Plat to redevelop the Brockway property to a PUD -mixed residential use and future neighborhood commercial site; and WHEREAS, on April 27, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount conducted a public hearing for the purpose of reviewing the preliminary plat for compliance with the Shoreland Overlay Regulations as a Planned Unit Development; and, WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed further revisions and updates guided by staff for the Preliminary Plat to redevelop the Brockway property to a PUD -mixed residential use and future neighborhood commercial site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount found the Preliminary Plat consistent with city standards for approval of a PUD and consistent with zoning regulations and guidelines including the Shoreland Overlay Regulations with recommended conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat for the Brockway development subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, on July 6, 2004, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendation and the Preliminary Plat for the Brockway development; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the Preliminary Plat for the Brockway development, subject to 1. Execution of a PUD Agreement. 2. Approval of other applicable agencies including, but not limited to, Dakota County Plat Commission and the Minnesota Department of Transportation. 3 The Developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with street and utility improvements serving the development, including the construction of a right turn lane on eastbound County Road 38 into the development. These costs shall include all costs associated with the construction of a storm sewer outlet from the project to Basin #1589 located on the south side of Connemara Trail. 4 A cash payment of $100 00 per front -foot along County Road 38 shall be deposited with the City for costs associated with County Road 38 improvements. 5. The first final plat completed for the development shall include the dedication of all right -of -way for Street I, Street 5, Street 6 and County Road 38. 6. All through private streets, outlots F, P and S, shall be a minimum of 28 feet wide face to face Connecting portions of Outlots H and J shall be a minimum of 28 feet wide face to face, or as approved by City Staff. Parking shall be allowed on one side only. 7. No parking will be allowed on Streets 1, 4, 5 and 6. For all other public streets, parking shalt be allowed on one side only. On Street 2 3, parking shall be on the inside edge. 8. Lot 2, Block 5 shall include a driveway turn- around to provide an alternative to backing into the street 5 As no on- street parking is recommended, the turn around shall also provide guest parking. Lots 1 3 Block 5 shall be designed with lot fronts and driveways oriented either to Street 2 or Street 3. 9. The existing driveway access to State Highway 3 shall be closed with the first phase of grading. Construction access shall be restricted primarily to Connemara Trail and secondarily to County Road 38 2 RESOLUTION 2004 8 5 10. Seven additional common parking spaces are required for Blocks 21 and 22. RESOLUTION 2004 85 11. The Developer will make reasonable attempts to accommodate plan revisions for garages in Gables II and Villa II housing to be incompliance with minimum size requirements. In the event such revisions are impractical, or would result in further inconsistencies with PUD or zoning standards, the Developer will be permitted to construct garages of less than 440 sq. ft. provided Developer meets all of the following requirements: i. No garages shall be smaller than 380 square feet; ii. The total number of units with garages less than 440 square feet cannot exceed 52 units, and iii. Developer shall construct 60 units (not including the apartments or senior housing units) whose base price meets the Metropolitan Council, affordable housing criteria. 12. Repair and maintenance of all private trails and sidewalks are the responsibility of the homeowners association(s). Snow removal from all public and private trails and sidewalks shall be the responsibility of the homeowners association(s) or the adjacent private property owners The trail exhibit outlines public and private responsibilities. 13. Outlots A and B shall be owned and maintained by the homeowners association or the outlots shall be eliminated by extending the lot lines from Blocks 2 and 3 to the outer edge of the plat and dedicating drainage and utility easements for storm water and infiltration ponding. 14. Single family housing in Blocks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 7 shall have minimum garage setbacks of 30 feet and principal structure front yard setbacks of 25 feet. The architectural conditions of Resolution 2004 -6 may be waived on interior lots as long as a majority of the lots including all corner lots shall have traditional housing styles, Those interior lots with building fronts behind or even with garages shall be subject to the 30 -foot garage setback. 15. Extensive landscaping is required for screening along State Highway 3. Optimum landscape screening includes earthen berms in combination with varieties of trees and shrubs to simulate a natural environment. In cases where berms are not feasible, screening shall be accomplished with landscaping equivalent to a double row of staggered eight foot high coniferous Spruce (or equal), or over -story deciduous boulevard trees augmented by shrub planting beds to facilitate full- spectrum screening subject to Staff approval. All landscaping along Highway 3 berms will be installed by the developer in conjunction with building construction. 16. All landscaping with public rights -of -way, outlots and the round -about shall be 3 maintained and replaced as necessary by resident homeowners association(s). Landscaping is subject to sight triangle criteria for preservation of visibility at intersections, subject to City Engineer approval. RESOLUTION 2004 85 17. Entry monuments shall be subject to sign permits and normal zoning standards. Appropnate sight distances must be maintained The north entrance monument shall be located in Outlot B dedicated to the City. If Outlot B is absorbed by adjacent single family lots, an easement shall be dedicated to the homeowners association for monument maintenance 18. PUD Amendments are required for the 120 apartments and 60 senior units in Blocks 14 and 15. Site Plan, architectural elevations, landscaping and all associated site amenities shall be reviewed in conformance with the approved concept plan and Resolution 2004 -6. 19. The neighborhood commercial on Outlot R, Block 20 is subject to Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning, and separate PUD approval. 20. The revised clubhouse shall require Planning Commission and City Council site plan approval for conformance with the PUD and applicable standards. 21. No privacy, chain -link, or generally opaque fences will be permitted along any public street right -of -way except as noted below Split rail or equn alent may be permissible, subject to city approval. Any fencing installed on Lots 7 -20 Block 1, of the Preliminary Plat. must be located interior to the project, allowing all screening and landscaping to be fully visible from Highway 3. Fencing is not permitted along Highway 3 adjacent to any multi family buildings. 22. Incorporation of other agency comments resulting from the Environmental Assessment Worksheet process including implementation of the Dakota County and MPCA approval of a response action plan (RAP) and a construction contingency plan (CCP) prior to City issuance of a grading or demolition permit for the property. 23. Incorporation of recommendations of the Parks and Recreation Commission regarding Park Dedication and facility design construction, Parks dedication credit should not be given for any pipeline easements, unnecessary pondmg in the park, or other items that negatively impact the park site or are deemed unusable. The playground area needs to be enlarged to at least 60' x 95'. The infiltration basin in Outlot M has not been removed. The park plan needs to have approval from the owners of the pipeline easement. The need for parking has not been adequately addressed for the disc golf course. 26 4 RESOLUTION 2004 8 5 parking spaces in the park located in Outlot M and on -street parking will not be enough parking for the public park areas. As outlined in the City's Subdivision Ordinance, all park dedication in the form of land and monetary compensation will occur with the first final plat approval prior to recording Staff would recommend that we continue with this practice unless other arrangements can be made to have the park installed in a timeframe that satisfies the Parks and Recreation Commission The lot line for the senior apartment area should be adjusted for the trail to remain in the park The park plan also needs to include other on -site amenities such as an irrigation structure, dnnking fountains, etc. 24. Incorporation of recommendations of the City Engineer relative to drainage, grading, street design, easements and utilities 25. The cul -de -sac Street 8 shall have all mailboxes clustered in one location as approved by the Postmaster. In addition, driveways may be shared with cross access easements and relief from side -yard parking and driveway setbacks. Only three driveways will be allowed w ithin the cul -de -sac bubble Mailbox stations within the project will be design to complement the proposed development. 26. The following outlots shall be dedicated to the City at the time of final plat T M for Park Dedication, Outlots D, E, I shall be dedicated to the Homeowner's Association with a public trail easement. 27. Plan revisions are required for the round -about on outlot K and related open spaces in Outlots G, I, and 0 fot the purpose of articulating open space amenities and cohesion with the sidewalks and trail system. In the event that conflicts between the round -about vehicular function and the pedestrian system cannot be resolved, then an altemative design for a pedestrian system is required as an important feature of the development and it's linkages to the city -wide system, and in light of the consideration that a trail along State Highway 3 has been shown to be impractical. ADOPTED this 6 day of July, 2004 by the City Council of the City o William H. Droste, Mayor 5 osemount. ATTEST: /11-;1 /2&(/L Linda Jentink, .Clerk Motion by: DeBettignies Second by: Droste Voted in favor Shoe- Corrigan, Droste, Strayton, DeBettictnies Voted against. None Member absent: Riley 6 RESOLUTION 2004 85 Excerpt from the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of April 26, 2005 Consent Agenda: 4A. Approval of the February 8, 2005 Work Session Minutes. 413. Approval of the February 22, 2005 Minutes. 4C. Approval of the March 8, 2005 Work Session Minutes. 4D. Approval of the March 29, 2005 Work Session Minutes. 4E. Approval of the April 12, 2005 Work Session Minutes. 4F. Continuation of Case 05 -15 -ZA GlenRose of Rosemount (Dean Johnson) Rezoning and Case 05 -16 -PP GlenRose of Rosemount (Dean Johnson) Preliminary Plat and PUD Master Development Plan. 4G. 05 -17 -FP Harmony 2 Addition (CPDC) Final Plat. 411. 05 -18 -FP Highlands of Hawkins (Kathy Trimble) Final Plat. MOTION by Humphrey to approve the Consent Agenda Items. Second by Zurn. Ayes Schultz, Zurn. Messner, Humphrey and Powell. Nayes: None. Motion carried.