HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.o. Minnesota Army National Facilities 05-34-SPCase 05 -SP MN Army National
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent
AGENDA ITEM: -34
Guard Facilities Site Plan Review
PREPARED BY: Jason Lindahl, A.I C.P
Assistant City Planner
AGENDA Nr
s 4
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution, Draft 08/23/05 PC
Minutes, Draft Zoning Text Amendment
Relating to Fences in the PI
Public /Institutional District, Location Map,
Site Plan, Grading, Drainage, Erosion
Control Utility Plan, Storm Water
Prevention Pollution Plan, Building
Addition Floor Plan, Building Addition
Elevations /Building Section/Wall Section,
Cold Storage Building Plan, Cold Storage
Building Elevations /Sections, Photometric
Plan.
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to approve the site plan for the Minnesota Army National Guard allowing
construction of a 4,233 square foot maintenance training bay and storage addition to the
existing building and a 6,789 square foot accessory storage building with a six foot (6') two
inch (2 galvanized steel mesh fence with three strands of barbed wire extending one foot,
subject to conditions.
1. Approval of a zoning text amendment allowing fences granter than six feet with
barbed wire in the PI Public /Institutional District.
2. Submission of a revised landscape plan illustrating eight (8) boulevard trees and 13
evergreen screen trees as replacements for the required foundation plantings. Five
of these trees should be planted in a double row 15 feet on center east of the
accessory building drive /maneuvering area to provide screening from Biscayne
Avenue and the adjacent residential uses The remaining eight screening trees
should be planted in gaps in the existing landscaping in front of the principal building
to increase screening of the training bay and vehicles.
3. All lighting must be directed down toward the ground and shall not exceed 0.5
lumens adjacent to any residential use or 1.0 lumen adjacent to any non residential
use
4 ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CITY COUNCIL
City Council Meeting' September 6, 2005
Engineering Conditions:
1. The storm water rate control requirements for the site do not meet the discharge rate
limit based on the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (CSMP)
requirements. The storm water modeling results should include the existing pond
located to the south to determine if the rate control requirements for the site are
being provided.
2. Proposed ponds 1 and 2 are not providing the water quality treatment for the site.
The existing pond located downstream to the south appears to contain water quality
treatment volume. The water quality treatment volume of the downstream pond
should be provided if this basin is being used to treat the storm water from the site.
3. The storm water modeling of the 10 -Day runoff event is not accurately simulated in
the calculations The SCS curve number should be set to 100 to simulate frozen
ground conditions. The results should be updated in the summary table on Sheet
C3.
4. The 15 -inch outlet pipe located in Pond 1 does not correspond to the construction
plan pipe sizes from CB 3 to CB 2 The storm water model input should correspond
to the construction plan storm sewer system.
5. The storm water model should include the existing pond located south of the site
The existing pond appears to be used for rate control and water quality. The off-site
drainage area to the existing pond should also be included in the analysis The
storm water routing of the entire site should be simulated to the existing pond for the
proposed conditions. Also, the pond outlet should be simulated to determine if the
proposed conditions model is meeting the discharge rate requirements for the
system.
6. The drainage area map on sheet C3 for the existing conditions includes a drainage
area #4 which is not in the analysis. The drainage areas on the map should
correspond to the storm water model drainage areas.
7. The storm sewer system capacity should be designed for the proposed conditions of
a 10 -year event discharge rate. The proposed pipe may not have adequate capacity
for fully developed conditions of the site for the area to the north. The full flow
capacity calculations for the developed conditions should be forwarded for review. It
is recommended that pipe alignment be considered for extension to the north for
future development on the site that will not interfere with future buildings.
8. An agreement shall be executed with the City prior to release of a grading permit
and /or building permit that when a future expansion occurs on the National Guard
Site the proposed access is eliminated and a new access is constructed that aligns
with Birch Street.
2
SUMMARY
Applicant Property Owner(s):
Location:
Area in Acres:
Comp Guide Plan Desig:
Current Zoning:
Blumentals Architecture Inc. representing the
Minnesota Army National Guard
West Side of Biscayne Avenue North of the Railroad
Tracks
49 38 Acres
PI Public /Institutional
PI Pubhc /Institutional
The applicant, Blumentals Architecture Inc representing the Minnesota Army National Guard,
requests site plan approval to allow the construcuon of a 4,233 square foot maintenance training bay
and storage addition to the existing principal building and a 6,789 square foot accessory storage
building. The property is located on the west side of Biscayne Avenue and north of the railroad
tracks.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
The plannmg commission held a public hearing for this item on August 23, 2005. After hearing no
public comment, the commission approved the site plan subject to the conditions listed below.
1. Submission of a revised site plan illustrating the three (3) off -street parking stalls required for
the accessory building in proposed drive /maneuvering area prior to City Council acuon on
this item.
2. Submission of a revised landscape plan illustrating eight (8) boulevard trees and 13 evergreen
screen trees as replacements for the required foundation plantings. Five of these trees
should be planted m a double row 15 feet on center east of the accessory building
drive /maneuvering area to provide screening from Biscayne Avenue and the adjacent
residential uses. The remaining eight screening trees should be planted in gaps in the
existing landscaping m front of the principal building to increase screening of the training
bay and vehicles.
3. All lighting must be directed down toward the ground and shall not exceed 0.5 lumens
adjacent to any residential use or 1.0 lumen adjacent to any non residential use.
4. Should the City approve a zoning text amendment to allow barbed wire in the PI District,
the applicant will be required to receive approval of the fence with barbed wire through a
separate building permit.
5. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer.
A key piece to this plan is surrounding the accessory building with a six foot (6') high two inch (2
galvanized steel mesh fence with three strands of barbed wire extending one foot above the fence.
This design is similar to the fence surrounding the existing principal building Currently, fences with
barbed wire are not permitted within the PI Pubhc /Institutional District. The Planning
Commission approved the site plan and recommended the applicant seek a zoning text amendment to
allow fences with barbed wire as a conditional use within the PI Pubhc Insututional District.
This text amendment is scheduled to go before the Planning Commission on September 27t and the
3
Building Performance Standards for the PI Public /Institutional District
Standard
Required
Proposed
Status
Existing Bldg.
Accessory Bldg.
Front Yard
30 ft.
218 ft.
123 ft.
Conforming
Side Yard
30 ft.
114/1,246 ft.
718/881 ft.
Conforming
Rear Yard
30 ft
725 ft.
889 ft.
Conforming
Building Height
40 ft
30 ft.
21 ft.
Conforming
City Council on October 18 In the interim, staff recommends the City Council grant approval of
the site plan and the fence with barbed wire contingent on approval of the text amendment.
While granting contingent approval is not a typical process, both the Community Development staff
and the City Attorney feel it is warranted in this case based on the findings that the Planning
Commission held a pubhc hearing on this item on August 23, 2005 and the proposed fence with
barbed wire conforms with the standards for granting a conditional use permit outlined in Section 12.7
(see findings hsted in the Fence section below) as well as those in the proposed text amendment.
Should the City Council approve this process, it would allow staff to issue a conditional use permit for
the fence with barbed wire after Council approval of the text amendment but without sendmg the
apphcant back through the review process.
Site Plan
Land Use Zoning. The subject property is both guided in on the 2020 Land Use Map and
zoned PI Pubhc /Institutional As a result, the proposed maintenance training bay and storage
addition to the existing principal building as well as the accessory storage building are consistent
with the current land use and zoning designations.
The following table compares the required building performance standards with those proposed by
this development. It shows that both the proposed addition and accessory building meet the
minimum setback and height performance standards for properties in the PI Pubhc /Institutional
District.
Access and Parking. As designed, the subject property meets the access and off street parking
requirements for the office and warehouse uses m the PI District Section 8.1.H outlines the off
street parking standards and requires one stall for every two hundred (1/200) square feet of office
area and one stall for every two thousand (1 /2,000) square feet of warehouse area. Given these
standards, the principal building with the addition requires 46 stalls and the accessory building
requires 3 stalls The site plan show 33 total stalls with enough surfaced area to accommodate the
additional 16 stalls. The Commission conditioned their approval on the applicant providing 3 stalls
adjacent to the proposed accessory building. The applicant has revised their plans to meet this
condition.
Loading. The site plan illustrates sufficient loading and maneuvering area for both the principal
and accessory buildings.
Exterior Building Materials Both the proposed addition and accessory building meet the
exterior building matenals standards for properties m the PI District Both buildings will have a five
4
foot wainscot base made of integrated color decorative block and walls made of another color of
integrated color decorauve block The colors will match the earth tones of the existing principal
building.
Trash Enclosure. The site plan fails to show a trash enclosure for the accessory building. The
applicant has provided a letter indicating that all trash from the accessory building will be removed
or bought to the trash enclosure for the principal.
Landscaping and Berming. The revised landscape plan dated August 31, 2005 meets the
minimum landscape and plantings requirements for the PI Public /Institutional District Section
8.3 requires a minimum eight (8) trees and one foundation planting for each ten linear feet (1/10) of
accessory or principal buildmg. Give these standards, the expansion and new accessory building
must provide eight trees and 52 foundation plantings (expansion 185 linear feet /10 =19 and
accessory buildmg 332 linear feet /10 33 19 +33 =52). Given the use of the site, staff suggests
converting foundation plantings to evergreen screening trees at a rate of four shrubs equals one
evergreen screening tree, or 13 trees Five of these trees should be planted in a double row fifteen
feet on center east of the accessory building drive /maneuvering area to provide screening from
Biscayne Avenue and the adjacent residential uses. The remammg eight screening trees should be
planted in gaps m the existing landscaping m front of the principal buildmg to increase screening of
the training bay and vehicles.
Signage. The proposed expansion and accessory buildmg include no signage plans
Exterior Lighting. The exterior fighting plan appears to meet the lighting performance standards
for the PI District. Both the addition and accessory building will have wall lighting (see attached
photometric plan and light cut sheets). All lighting must be directed down toward the ground and
shall not exceed 0.5 lumens adjacent to any residential use or 1.0 lumen adjacent to any non-
residential use.
Fencing. The applicant proposes to surround the accessory building with a six foot (6') two inch
(2 galvanized steel mesh fence with three strands of barbed wire extending one additional foot.
Currently, barbed wire is only permitted in the AG Agriculture, AGP Agnculture Preserve, RR
Rural Residential, IG General Industrial, and WM Waste Management Distncts
The Planning Commission recommended the applicant seek a text amendment to allow fences with
barbed wire as a conditional use. Staff is m the process of drafting such language which is scheduled
to go before the Planning Commission on September 27t and the City Council on October 18,
2005. In the interim, staff recommends granting approval of the fence contingent on the City
approving the zoning text amendment.
While granting contingent approval is not a typical process, staff feels it is warranted m this case
based on the findings listed below which match the existing conditional use permit standards
outlined in Section 12.7 as well as those m the proposed zoning text amendment.
1. The Planning Commission held a pubhc hearing on this site plan which mcluded discussion
of the proposed six foot (6') two inch (2 galvanized steel mesh fence with tree strands of
barbed wire.
5
2. The proposed fence with barbed wire is necessary for the amplified secunty needs unique to
this military use.
3. The proposed fence with barbed wire will not be detrimental to or endanger the public
health, safety, or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city.
4. The proposed fence with barbed wire will be consistent with objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan and city code provisions with approval of the text amendment.
5. The proposed fence with barbed wire will be designed, constructed, operated and
maintained so as to be compatible and similar m appearance with the existing fence and shall
not substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood.
6. The proposed fence with barbed wire will have no detrimental effect on essential public
facilities and services including streets, police and fire protection, drainage, structures, refuse
disposal, water and sewer systems and schools.
7. The proposed fence with barbed wire will not involve uses, activities, processes, material
equipment and conditions of operation that will be hazardous or detnmental to any persons,
property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke,
fumes, glare or odors.
Park Dedication. Park dedication fees are typically paid as part of the final plat approvals.
Therefore, no park dedication is due as part of this application.
Engineering. The Engineering Department offers the following comments:
Storm Water Rate Control
1. The storm water rate control requirements for the site do not meet the discharge rate limit
based on the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (CSMP) requirements The
storm water modeling results should include the existing pond located to the south to
determine if the rate control requirements for the site are being provided.
Storm Water Quality
1. Proposed ponds 1 and 2 are not providing the water quality treatment for the site. The
existing pond located downstream to the south appears to contain water quality treatment
volume The water quality treatment volume of the downstream pond should be provided
if this basin is being used to treat the storm water from the site
Storm Water Modeling
1. The storm water modeling of the 10 -Day runoff event is not accurately simulated in the
calculations. The SCS curve number should be set to 100 to simulate frozen ground
conditions. The results should be updated m the summary table on Sheet C3.
2. The 15 -inch outlet pipe located in Pond 1 does not correspond to the construction plan pipe
sizes from CB 3 to CB 2. The storm water model input should correspond to the
construction plan storm sewer system.
3. The storm water model should include the existing pond located south of the site. The
existing pond appears to be used for rate control and water quahty The off -site drainage
area to the existing pond should also be included in the analysis The storm water routing of
the entire site should be simulated to the existing pond for the proposed conditions. Also,
the pond outlet should be simulated to determine if the proposed conditions model is
meeting the discharge rate requirements for the system.
4. The drainage area map on sheet C3 for the existing conditions includes a drainage area #4
which is not in the analysis. The drainage areas on the map should correspond to the storm
water model drainage areas.
Storm Sewer System
1. The storm sewer system capacity should be designed for the proposed conditions of a 10-
year event discharge rate. The proposed pipe may not have adequate capacity for fully
developed conditions of the site for the area to the north. The full flow capacity calculations
for the developed conditions should be forwarded for review. It is recommended that pipe
alignment be considered for extension to the north for future development on the site that
will not interfere with future buildings.
General Comments
1. An agreement shall be executed with the City prior to release of a grading permit and /or
building permit that when a future expansion occurs on the National Guard Site the
proposed access is eliminated and a new access is constructed that aligns with Birch Street.
CONCLUSION
Staff recommends site plan approval for the Minnesota Army National Guard to allow construction
of a 4,233 square foot maintenance training bay and storage addition to the existing principal
budding as well as a 6,789 square foot accessory storage building with a six foot (6') two inch (2
galvanized steel mesh fence with three strands of barbed wire extending one foot. While granting
contingent approval is not a typical process, both the Community Development staff and the City
Attorney feel it is warranted m this case based on the findings that the Planning Commission held a
pubhc hearing on this item on August 23, 2005 and the proposed fence with barbed wire conforms
with the standards for granting a conditional use permit outlined in Section 12.7 as well as those in
the proposed text amendment. Should the City Council approve this process, it would allow staff to
issue a conditional use permit for the fence with barbed wire after Counral approval of the text
amendment but without sending the apphcant back through the review process. This
recommendation is based on the plans submitted by the applicant, the findings made in this report
and the conditions outlined m the recommended actions section above.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the attached resolution.
7
Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. One.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2005-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MN ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
FACITILITES SITE PLAN REVIEW
WHEREAS, on July 26, 2005, the Community Development Department of the City of
Rosemount received an application from Blumentals /Architecture, Inc. representing the MN
Army National Guard requesting Site Plan Review for a 4,233 square feet addition to the existing
maintenance facility and a new 6,789 square feet accessory storage building located at 14221
Biscayne Avenue, legally described as:
WHEREAS, on August 23, 2005, the Planning Commission of the Rosemount reviewed the Site
Plan for the MN Army National Guard Facilities and held a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend that the City Council
approve the Site Plan Review, subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on September 6, 2005, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the
Planning Commission's recommendation and the Site Plan Review requested by the MN Army
National Guard Facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Site Plan Review for the MN Army National Guard
Facilities, subject to conditions, and based upon the following findings of fact:
1. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this site plan which included
discussion of the proposed six foot (6') two inch (2 galvanized steel mesh fence with
three strands of barbed wire.
2. The proposed fence with barbed wire is necessary for the amplified security needs unique
to this military use.
3. The proposed fence with barbed wire will not be detrimental to or endanger the public
health, safety, or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city.
4. The proposed fence with barbed wire will be consistent with objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan and city code provisions with approval of the text amendment.
5. The proposed fence with barbed wire will be designed, constructed, operated and
maintained so as to be compatible and similar in appearance with the existing fence and
shall not substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood.
6. The proposed fence with barbed wire will have no detrimental effect on essential public
facilities and services including streets, police and fire protection, drainage, structures,
refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools.
RESOLUTION 2005-
7. The proposed fence with barbed wire will not involve uses, activities, processes, material
equipment and conditions of operation that will be hazardous or detrimental to any
persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise,
smoke, fumes, glare or odors.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council hereby approves the Site Plan for
the Minnesota Army National Guard allowing construction of a 4,233 square foot maintenance
training bay and storage addition to the existing building and a 6,789 square foot accessory
storage building with a six foot (6') two inch (2 galvanized steel mesh fence with three strands
of barbed wire extending one foot, subject to:
1. Approval of a zoning text amendment allowing fences granter than six feet with barbed
wire in the PI Pubhc /Institutional District.
2. Submission of a revised landscape plan illustrating eight (8) boulevard trees and 13
evergreen screen trees as replacements for the required foundation plantings. Five of
these trees should be planted in a double row 15 feet on center east of the accessory
building drive /maneuvering area to provide screening from Biscayne Avenue and the
adjacent residential uses. The remaining eight screening trees should be planted in gaps
in the existing landscaping in front of the principal building to increase screening of the
training bay and vehicles.
3. All lighting must be directed down toward the ground and shall not exceed 0.5 lumens
adjacent to any residential use or 1.0 lumen adjacent to any non residential use.
Engineering Conditions:
1. The storm water rate control requirements for the site do not meet the discharge rate limit
based on the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (CSMP) requirements. The
storm water modeling results should include the existing pond located to the south to
determine if the rate control requirements for the site are being provided.
2. Proposed ponds 1 and 2 are not providing the water quality treatment for the site. The
existing pond located downstream to the south appears to contain water quality treatment
volume. The water quality treatment volume of the downstream pond should be
provided if this basin is being used to treat the storm water from the site.
3. The storm water modeling of the 10 Day runoff event is not accurately simulated in the
calculations. The SCS curve number should be set to 100 to simulate frozen ground
conditions. The results should be updated in the summary table on Sheet C3.
4. The 15 -inch outlet pipe located in Pond 1 does not correspond to the construction plan
pipe sizes from CB 3 to CB 2. The storm water model input should correspond to the
construction plan storm sewer system.
5. The storm water model should include the existing pond located south of the site. The
existing pond appears to be used for rate control and water quality The off -site drainage
area to the existing pond should also be included in the analysis. The storm water routing
of the entire site should be simulated to the existing pond for the proposed conditions.
2
Also, the pond outlet should be simulated to determine if the proposed conditions model
is meeting the discharge rate requirements for the system.
6. The drainage area map on sheet C3 for the existing conditions includes a drainage area #4
which is not in the analysis. The drainage areas on the map should correspond to the
storm water model drainage areas.
7. The storm sewer system capacity should be designed for the proposed conditions of a 10-
year event discharge rate. The proposed pipe may not have adequate capacity for fully
developed conditions of the site for the area to the north. The full flow capacity
calculations for the developed conditions should be forwarded for review. It is
recommended that pipe alignment be considered for extension to the north for future
development on the site that will not interfere with future buildings.
8. An agreement shall be executed with the City prior to release of a grading permit and/or
building permit that when a future expansion occurs on the National Guard Site the
proposed access is eliminated and a new access is constructed that aligns with Birch
Street.
ADOPTED this 6th day of September, 2005 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
ATTEST:
Linda Jentink, City Clerk
William H Droste, Mayor
RESOLUTION 2005-
Motion by: Second by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Member absent.
1
Excerpt of Minutes from the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of August 23,
2005.
Public Hearing:
5B. Case 05 -34 -SP MN Army National Guard Facilities Site Plan Review.
Mr. Lindahl reviewed the staff report. Blumentals Architecture Inc. representing the
Minnesota Army National Guard requested site plan approval to allow the construction of a
4,233 square foot maintenance training bay and storage addition to the existing principal
buildmg and a 6,789 square foot accessory storage building. The property is located on the
west side of Biscayne Avenue and north of the railroad tracks.
Chairperson Messner asked the Commission if they had any questions for Mr. Lmdahl.
Comnssioner Powell asked where the proposed ponds one and two would be located. Mr.
Lmdahl indicated where the ponds would be located. Mr. Powell had no further questions
regarding the ponds.
Commissioner Schultz asked staff if there is an alternative to using barbed wire and if other
apphcants have been interested m using barbed wire fencing and if that is the reason for the
text amendment. Mr. Lmdahl stated that the Army National Guard is the primary applicant
related to adding barbed wire uses and staff felt the text amendment limits and focuses on
the amount of barbed wire related to military uses
Comtissioner Messner asked if the apphcant would like to come forward.
Janis Blumental, Blumentals Architecture Inc., stated the fencing proposed is an Army
standard fence. He further indicated hardly anyone is on site during the off season storage.
Master Sergeant Tim McDonald, Facility Supervisor, representing the owner, explained it is
standard policy for the military to have a double barrier and that tents and annual training
items will be kept m the storage building. The fence is a deterrent to keep people out of the
building.
Chairperson Messner asked the applicants to explain the alternative to the hammerhead. Mr.
Blumental stated the paved area is large enough to provide for parking for up to six cars.
Commissioner Messner opened the Public Hearing There was no public comment.
MOTION by Zum to close the Public Hearing. Second by Schultz. Ayes: All.
Nayes: None. Motion approved.
Commissioner Zurn questioned if the landscaping proposed will block the fencing from the
neighbors across the street. Mr Lmdahl stated the boulevard trees will be deciduous and
will screen the fence as they grow. In addition, the double rows of evergreens will also
provide a substantial screen.
Chairperson Messner wanted Staff to provide clarification on where the fence would be
located. Mr Pearson stated it will be located immediately surrounding the building.
Commissioner Powell suggested that Condition 1 be modified to strike out the hammerhead
portion of the condition
MOTION by Powell to recommend approval of the site plan for the Minnesota
Army National Guard to construct a 4,233 square foot maintenance training bay and
storage addition to the existing building and a 6,789 square foot accessory storage
building, subject to conditions.
1. Submission of a revised site plan illustrating the three (3) off -street parking stalls
required for the accessory building pnor to City Council action on this item.
2. Submission of a revised landscape plan illustrating eight (8) boulevard trees and
13 evergreen screen trees as replacements for the required foundation plantings.
Five of these trees should be planted in a double row 15 feet on center east of
the accessory building dive /maneuvering area to provide screening from
Biscayne Avenue and the adjacent residential uses. The remaining eight
screening trees should be planted in gaps in the existing landscaping in front of
the principal building to increase screening of the training bay and vehicles.
3. All hghtmg must be directed down toward the ground and shall not exceed 0.5
lumens adjacent to any residential use or 1.0 lumen adjacent to any non-
residential use.
4. Should the City approve a zoning text amendment to allow barbed wire m the PI
District, the apphcant will be required to receive approval of the fence with
barbed wire through a separate building permit.
5. Conformance with all requirements of the City Engineer.
Second by Schutlz. Ayes: All. Nayes: None. Motion carried.
Mr. Lindahl stated this item will go before the City Council for approval on September 20,
2005.
h.
ATTEST:
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE B-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING REGULATIONS
PERTAINING TO SUPPLEMENTARY REGULATIONS
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 7.2.C.1.h of the Rosemount Zoning Ordinance is amended as follows:
Districts. Barbed wirc, not exceeding three (3) strap.
fcncc, pr viding thc arms d not project over the public right of way or any adjacent
fcncc is requested, an application shall be made to thc Building Official. A Certificate of
approval of the City Attorney as to form and in an amount as set forth in Minnesota
Statutes Section 566.04. (Ord. B 21, 6- 16-92)
Security fences not exceeding eight feet (8') in height are permitted in the IG General
Industrial and WM Waste Management Districts and are a conditional use subject to the
standards in Section 12.7 (Conditional Uses) in the PI Public /Institutional. Barbed
wire may be permitted on top of a security fence where the applicant demonstrates the
barbed wire is necessary for greater security and will not be harmful to the health, safety,
or welfare of the community. The barbed wire portion of the fence may not have more
than three strands, the lowest of which shall be at least six feet (6') from finished grade
No portion of the barbed wire shall project over the public right -of -way or any adjacent
public or private property. No security fence (with or without barbed wire) shall be
constructed without issuance of the applicable City permit.
Section 2: Ordinance shall be effective the day following its publication
Adopted this day of 2005.
Linda Jentink, City Clerk
William Droste, Mayor
Published this day of 2005 in the Rosemount Town Pages.
City Hall
__1452x eT W
1 1 1
Army .4ational Guard Site Loca....m Map
1 I 1
Copynght 2005, Dakota County Map Date August 11, 2005
t
°t9
4
4.0.411
MOM
9
a
y a y
94�
i
CV
r
ON FLOOR PLANS
rt
HOC
J
m�
CD
7
v
0
G
0
C