The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6.l. Resolution of Support for Livable Communities GrantAGENDA ITEM: Resolution of Support for Livable Communities Grant AGENDA SECTION: Consent Agenda PREPARED BY: Kim Lindquist, Deputy Director AGE 6 L ATTACHMENTS: Resolution, Grant Application (attached to the Port Authority packet materials) APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the Resolution 4 ROSEMOUNT CITY COUNCIL City Council Regular Meeting July 19, 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DISCUSSION Staff recently submitted a Livable Communities Grant application to the Metropolitan Council for the 2005 -06 funding cycle. We subnutted the same project that we did last year, the expansion of Central Park. Some of the narrative and graphics have been revised from the previous year. The application was attached to the Port Authority packet. As part of the application process, the City is required to approve a resolution supporting the project A similar resolution is before the Port Authorty at their July 19, 2005 meeting RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached resolution. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2005- RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING THE NEED FOR LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT FUNDING AND AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS WHEREAS the City of Rosemount is a participant in the Livable Communities Act's Housing Incentives Program for 2005 as determined by the Metropolitan Council. and is therefore eligible to apply for Livable Communities Demonstration Account funds; and WHEREAS the City has identified a proposed project within the City that meets the Demonstration Account's purposes and criteria and is consistent with and promotes the purposes of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act and the policies of the Metropolitan Council's adopted metropolitan development guide; and WHEREAS the City has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration; and WHEREAS the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the grant agreement, and WHEREAS the City agrees to act as legal sponsor for the project contained in the grant application submitted on June 30, 2005; and WHEREAS the City acknowledges Livable Communities Demonstration Account grants are intended to fund projects or project components that can serve as models, examples or prototypes for development or redevelopment projects elsewhere in the region, and therefore represents that the proposed project or key components of the proposed project can be replicated in other metropolitan-area communities; and WHEREAS only a limited amount of grant funding is available through the Metropolitan Council's Livable Communities Demonstration Account during each funding cycle and the Metropolitan Council has determined it is appropriate to allocate those scarce grant funds only to eligible projects that would not occur "but for" the availability of Demonstration Account grant funding. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that, after appropriate examination and due consideration, the governing body of the City: 1. Finds that it is in the best interests of the City's development goals and priorities for the proposed project to occur at this particular time. 2. Finds that the project component(s) for which Livable Communities Demonstration Account funding is sought: (b) 3. Authorizes its Community Development Department to submit on behalf of the City an application for Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant funds for the project component(s) identified in the application, and to execute such agreements as may be necessary to implement the project on behalf of the City. ADOPTED this 19th day of July, 2005. ATTEST: (a) will not occur solely through private or other public investment within the reasonably foreseeable future; and will not occur within two years after a grant award unless Livable Communities Demonstration Account funding is made available for this project at this time. Linda Jentink, City Clerk William H. Droste, Mayor Motion by: Second by: Voted in favor: Voted against: Member absent: 0 City of Rosemount Downtown Gateway /Central Park 2000 Air Photo 6/1/04 AA! Metmpo AA Downtown Gateway/ Central Park Enckson Fields Park Core Bicck East Redevelopment Phase I n Council 1,000 D net 2000 Aerial Photo Project Name: Rosemount Downtown Gateway /Central Park Applicant (city or county): City of Rosemount Project Location (city): Rosemount Address (street boundanes or Major intersection): Northeast corner, State Highway 3 and 145 Street W. Primary Project Contact: Name' Title. Kim Lindquist Community Development Director Address: 2875 145 Street, Rosemount, MN 55068 -4997 Phone. 651- 322 -2020 Fax: 651- 423 -4424 E mail kim .lindquist@ci.rosemount.mn.us Authorized city or county Name: official for contract Title: execution Jamie Verbrugge City Administrator LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT APPLICATION FORM 2005 Instructions: Submit form and attachments by 4:30 p.m. on June 30, 2005. Use font size 11. Use of bulleted lists is encouraged. Do not attach a coversheet or use any graphic images on top of the application Limit application to 17 pages plus attachments, for a total of no more than 25 pages. Strictly follow the format or the application will be returned for revision. Project Information: Project Summary Summarize goals and components for the project or current phase. If the project has more than one phase, address project goals for the current phase in this section, as well as more broadly, if desired. Include details on other phase(s) on page 3, in B.2. (Limit 20 lines) The City of Rosemount is committed to redevelopment of its historic 36.7 -acre Downtown detailed in the Development Framework adopted by the City Council and Port Authority. The Framework combines the essence of the existing Downtown with a vision of what the community can become. Improvements will begin on Core Block East with the private developer chosen this spring and refinement of the concept plan underway. The next phase will be Core Block West, with the Port Authority to consider other blocks as the opportunities arise. Projections through 2010 for Downtown Rosemount based on market research indicate demand for the creation of up to 535 new housing units, including critical options for senior living and for single person or small family units with an affordable component. Demand is anticipated for up to 86,000 square feet of commercial space The Core Block East project is anticipated to introduce up to 150 residential units into Downtown and 23,000 square feet of commercial service space. The Downtown Gateway /Central Park project, a key component of Downtown Revitalization, will create a common theme that weaves together all of Downtown's purposes and aspirations. It will offer a gathering place for new and current residents and visitors drawn to work, shop, and play. It will supplement the construction of new housing alternatives desired by the community. It will improve pedestrian access to the existing 10.7 -acre Central Park, which is currently isolated from the community's crossroads and from the Core Block East project. It will serve as a terminus for the interpretive trail corridor connecting Downtown Rosemount to the Mississippi River, which today is largely inaccessible from and underutilized by the rest of the community, and to the system of Dakota County parks. It will meet the demand for civic celebrations and public events essential to unite a growing community. Office Use Project Name Rosemount Downtown Gateway /Central Park Applicant (city or county). City of Rosemount Project Location (city): Rosemount Address (street boundaries or Major intersection). Northeast corner, State Highway 3 and 145 Street W. Primary Project Contact. Name. Title Kim Lindquist Community Development Director Address 2875 145 Street, Rosemount, MN 55068 -4997 Phone 651 322 2020 Fax 651- 423 -4424 E -mail: J dm.lindquist @ci.rosemount.mn.us Authorized city or county Name: official for contract Title. execution Jamie Verbrugge City Administrator LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT APPLICATION FORM 2005 Instructions: Submit form and attachments by 4:30 p.m. on June 30, 2005. Use font size 11. Use of bulleted lists is encouraged. Do not attach a coversheet or use any graphic images on top of the application. Limit application to 17 pages plus attachments, for a total of no more than 25 pages. Strictly follow the format or the application will be returned for revision. Project Information: tic `s Ric Project Summary Summarize goals and components for the project or current phase. If the project has more than one phase, address project goals for the current phase in this section, as well as more broadly, if desired. Include details on other phase(s) on page 3, in B.2 (Limit 20 lines) The City of Rosemount is committed to redevelopment of its historic 36.7 -acre Downtown detailed in the Development Framework adopted by the City Council and Port Authority The Framework combines the essence of the existing Downtown with a vision of what the community can become. Improvements will begin on Core Block East with the private developer chosen this spring and refinement of the concept plan underway. The next phase will be Core Block West, with the Port Authority to consider other blocks as the opportunities arise. Projections through 2010 for Downtown Rosemount based on market research indicate demand for the creation of up to 535 new housing units, including critical options for senior living and for single person or small family units with an affordable component. Demand is anticipated for up to 86,000 square feet of commercial space. The Core Block East project is anticipated to introduce up to 150 residential units into Downtown and 23,000 square feet of commercial service space. The Downtown Gateway /Central Park project, a key component of Downtown Revitalization, will create a common theme that weaves together all of Downtown's purposes and aspirations. It will offer a gathering place for new and current residents and visitors drawn to work, shop, and play. It will supplement the construction of new housing alternatives desired by the community. It will improve pedestrian access to the existing 10.7 acre Central Park, which is currently isolated from the community's crossroads and from the Core Block East project. It will serve as a terminus for the interpretive trail corridor connecting Downtown Rosemount to the Mississippi River, which today is largely inaccessible from and underutilized by the rest of the community, and to the system of Dakota County parks. It will meet the demand for civic celebrations and public events essential to unite a growing community. Office Use to Ter Ct tiA 1 9u /t, 1 t gluu pad 170/9 90/9 #EQ IJUIS' £0/8 i; 1,000 paplemy'sy 00 rested components in priority order. Under Task/Eligible Cosi, provide as much detail as you can abot r l f the Tark/Elrgrhle Cost is Underground Parking, the details might include information about location of per stall. If the Task/Eligible Cost is Acquisition, the details might include number, type and location of buil Task Eligible Cost Itemize detail, for each item. •per i��i' =iy5 z;f� Land acquisition. One 1,827 square -foot gas station and associated parking on one lot equaling 16,384 square feet (cost including relocation). f i f otal dollars requested and the start and completion date for the entire project or phase: e project components be phased to move forward with a smaller grant award? If so, please list elemen Could purchase the 8,320 square foot retail building and conduct expansion of the park. If funding is not obtained for acquisition of the gas station, project may be revised to remove commercial building and expand park to the south. Building Demolition ronents of the proposed project previously funded with an LCDA grant, if applicable, indicating the ai fated coin 'tenon date of that corn onent. Previously Funded LCDA Components Frevious funding received as an Opportunity Grant for Planning for Downtown Redevelopment Process e phases of the project, if applicable, or write "none," and estimated start and completion dates. Future Phases' _i .:onstructton work on Core Block East will occur in the Spring of 2006. It is anticipated that the second phase. Core Block West, will occur in late 2007 or early 2008 redevelopment of Downtown Rosemount will occur in several phases over a 5 -10 year time )eriod. 9 1 1TI �h G'N>i 4. 1111111) 1st to Ter Ct tiA B. Additional Project Information (rinut one page) 1. In this section, provide additional project details you did not have space to include in the "Project Summary" on page 1, and any pertinent information on the history of the site. (Limit 20 ]roes) The City of Rosemount has attempted to revitalize its Downtown several times over three decades There were attempts in the 70's and 80's that resulted in two revitalized Downtown corners with four new commercial uses, two high density residential uses, and a small urban plaza. Prior to the currently adopted Development Framework, the City embarked on a planning process in 2002, which ended with a 3 -2 vote not to approve the 2002 Plan. Downtown has experienced significant business turnover, vacancies, and loss of a long established family owned business It is apparent that the aesthetics and architecture of the previous redevelopment attempts are dated, if not obsolescent, and certainly not sustaining. With the commercial challenges from surrounding, faster growing suburbs, Rosemount's Downtown has had difficultly competing The Downtown Gateway /Central Park project proposed here would come on line with the implementation of the Core Block East, a new private redevelopment project one block south of the Park. The Gateway project will publicly convey the City's commitment to the process and overall goal and will be a catalyst to draw private dollars into the community. With public investment into Downtown, the private sector will understand and appreciate the commitment that the City and the community have to improving the Downtown marketplace and providing additional residential, office, and commercial opportunities in the historic Downtown area Development in Core Block East and elsewhere will be in the more compact, neo- traditional design genre. To support the livability of the project, amenities within the greater neighborhood must be provided Central Park's proximity to Core Block East and its strategic location in Downtown make it a natural choice for residents who can access the Park from the existing pedestrian system. The Park's location adjoining the local government operations and athletic fields also makes it a grander space, providing respite to the entire community. 2. Describe phasing for the project, if applicable, and include details of phases. (Limit20 lines) The grant request is for land acquisition. This would be the first and most important phase of the project because it provides the opportunity for Park expansion and construction of an ancillary commercial use. The City has contacted both of the current business owners and is looking at potential relocation alternatives within the community After acquisition the City will demolish existing structures and remove other site improvements such as surface parking, gas dispensers, and driveways Site grading, utility relocation, and shifting of a road segment to improve traffic safety would all occur during this phase. Construction of the Park, based on the approved master plan, would then take place. The existing Central Park would be expanded to the west, opening the public space to the street and inviting residents into what can become the Downtown jewel. A public plaza that can serve as a gathering place, with amenities such as a fountain, benches, landscape island, and architecturally enhanced pathways will draw people to the Park and the greater Downtown area Central Park's link to Erickson Fields, an active recreational park, will allow new Downtown residents to use the newly created space for their passive and recreational needs. The greater public will be able to use the Park for larger civic events and also for intimate gatherings. 3 3. Benefits of LCDA funding. Address all that apply of the following: How will LCDA funding overcome obstacles, provide a catalyst, or increase the value of the project to the community? (Limit 20 lines) Funding of this project will overcome financial obstacles to the community in revitalization of Downtown. The City is committed to improving public spaces within Downtown. Expansion of Central Park will provide the catalyst for future improvements in Downtown and will convey to the private sector that the City is committed to revitalization of Downtown. The Downtown Committee recommended that Central Park be expanded for the enjoyment of the entire community Because Rosemount is a fast growing community, financial resources for public improvement are limited. Current development is predominately residential, meaning that the local tax rate is higher and there is more of a burden on individual homeowners. The typical financial approach to obtaining redevelopment, use of tax increment financing (TIF), is unavailable for this project because there are restrictions on its use for public purposes and the structures did not meet the TIF blight test. The City will be looking at TIF to assist in infrastructure improvements associated with the project such as the road realignment and infrastructure improvements. Other funding sources are the City's Park Dedication Fund and private donations for park improvements. While the Park Dedication Fund is a reasonable source for funding park improvements, there are numerous park projects needed within the community to provide services and amenities for the growing population. Enhancement of the Central Park's visibility, access, and circulation will amplify the amenity as useable open space to promote and support higher densities of redevelopment available to the private sector. Central Park is a unique park within the community, providing the serene pleasure of communing with nature Unfortunately, the location and development pattern around it makes it difficult to access, and there is less public use than desired. By opening the Park to the street, it will become the cornerstone of the City's redevelopment efforts and will also enhance the usability of the Park for the community 4. "But -For" Test Assessment. Describe the unfilled gap needs that can only be filled by an LCDA grant awarded in 2005. Describe why this project or funded components could not occur within two years of the grant award. (Lima 20 lines) The City has limited financial capacity due to the high rate of growth and the legislative barriers. Much of the general fund is allocated toward daily operations and services. It is not possible to divert funds to a public amenity project at this time. The City intends to use park dedication funds for improvements at Central Park, but land acquisition is cost prohibitive. At the present time, the Park Dedication Fund is providing recreational amenities for new subdivisions in town. Diversion of funds from this pool of money would compromise the integrity of the Fund and would negatively impact previously approved residential projects To accomplish the land acquisition of the two businesses in the future, park dedication fees would have to be significantly increased, forcing the community to have higher fees than other adjoining communities. This fee alteration would increase the cost of development in the community, negatively affecting the ability to provide life -cycle housing. 4 Will be Needed Underway Completed X Comprehensive plan amendment. If needed, please describe: A portion of the land will be used for a private commercial venture, and therefore is consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan's land use designation. The City would need to modify the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the larger public use occurring with the expansion of Central Park N/A Environmental Reviews EAW, EIS, AUAR. If needed, please describe: An EAW will be conducted for the Core Block East project The Gateway Central Park project does not require an EAW. X Zoning changes and variances. If needed, please list and include change to /from: Similar to the Comprehensive Plan, the City's current zoning C -2 allows for the commercial use contemplated. The City would rezone the portion of the site to be used for Park expansion. The rezoning would be from C -2, Downtown Commercial to PI, Public Institutional. 5. Regulatory Status: Mark (X) whether the following will be needed, is underway or is completed, or if not applicable, place `NA' in the box. Briefly provide additional information as noted. 5 Developed Communities or Locations X Will buildings be rehabilitated or adapted for reuse? If yes, briefly describe: X Will buildings be demolished? If yes, indicate the number of and type of buildings: One 8,320 square -foot retail building and one 1,827 square -foot gas station building and associated gas canopy X Will new buildings be constructed? If yes, list the percent mix of commercial, residential, public or other uses: X Commercial X Public Residential Other Uses list: The new land uses will be approximately 40% commercial and 60% public park X Will new streets or other infrastructure be added? Yes, mostly utility relocation and shifting of a public road. X Will any park land be converted? Briefly describe: Some existing commercial land will be converted to park land. All existing park land will remain in its current condition. Developed Communities or Locations Developing Communities or Locations Achieves this objective in ways such as Makes cost effective use of infrastructure and increases density Converts or reuses declining or underutilized lands to accommodate growth forecasts, ensure efficient utilization of existing infrastructure investments and meet community needs Achieves this objective in ways such as Converts or reuses declining or underutilized lands to accommodate growth forecasts, ensure efficient utilization of infrastructure investments, and meet community needs. Includes land use patterns that will facilitate groundwater recharge to protect the region's water supply C. Evaluation Criteria (Begm new page) Proposals will be evaluated on the extent to which they will be replicable demonstrations of the criteria in C.1 through C.5. 1. Uses Land Efficiently a. Describe how the project uses land efficiently, in the ways listed above, or in other ways. Limit 10 lines It is expected that Downtown, through redevelopment, will create a more dense development pattern. The City expects to attract up to 500 new housing units into the 36 7 acre Downtown Area. The first phase is expected to add up to 150 residential units. Commercial space will also increase dramatically, possibly doubling from the current level and providing a variety of land use opportunities not readily available today. The Core Block East project is estimated to provide 23,000 square feet of retail and service space. New residents and customers will need an attractive place to gather. Park expansion provides the recreational amenity typically sought on a case -by -case basis for individual residential projects Because of the limited space in Downtown it is reasonable to expand the current park rather than create smaller, less effective pocket parks The change in land use from developed commercial, with buildings and hard surface, to parks and open space will increase water quality from the site and permit groundwater recharge through a reduction in impervious surfaces b. Proposed land use changes: Mark (X) appropriate box Yes No 6 Developed Communities or Locations Developing Communities or Locations Achieves this objective in ways such as Achieves this objective in ways such as Includes land use patterns that support transit service and Supports the transportation needs of the planned build -out development of the community Includes local transportation, transit, pedestrian and bicycle Improves transportation connections and investments to improve connections between workplaces, residences, retail, services and /or entertainment activities addresses /incorporates commuting issues such as park and rides, express bus service. Includes land use patterns to support transit development and service expansion 2 Develops land uses linked to the local and regional transportation system. a. Describe how the project will connect land use to the local or regional transportation system, in the ways listed above, or in other ways. Limit 10 lines The redevelopment of Rosemount's Downtown will dramatically increase the amount of residential development within the area. Residential densities will increase to provide a more transit oriented development pattern than the current condition. This will create a mass critical for economical and efficient mass transit service to Downtown. The area is presently served by a single "flex service" MVTA route. As Rosemount's population increases, the City is looking forward to additional mass transit opportunities. From a regional road system perspective, the ability to locate additional residents within Downtown utilizes regional infrastructure. State Highway 3 is the primary arterial road used by residents traveling to the north and south. Highway 52, with its new improvements, provides a seamless commute to St. Paul, and County Road 42 serves as the Principal Arterial in the area, providing controlled access to the west. b. Describe any new sidewalks, trails, or bike paths, or improvements to existing pedestrian infrastructure planned to link to transit. Limit 8 Imes The Central Park expansion will extend the pedestrian infrastructure within Downtown. The existing sidewalk system will be enhanced to provide better pedestrian accessibility Phase I of the Downtown Redevelopment project, Core Block East, is readily accessible to the Park through the current pedestrian system. A series of trails within the Park will connect the passive and active amenities within the area. The Park's location will also allow for a signalized access to one of the three sites for a newly proposed Dakota County library branch, located west of the Park From a regional perspective, Central Park is designated as the trailhead for the interpretive trail linking to the Mississippi River. Ultimately, this trail will link the various regional parks in Dakota County with the river. 7 Developed Communities or Locations Dev eloping Communities or Locations Achieves this objective in ways such as Provides infill development. redevelopment, and adaptive reuse of structures to connect housing and jobs, and integrates new development into existing neighborhoods. Achieves this objective in ways such as Builds connections between workplaces, residences, retail, services and /or entertainment activities 3. Connects housing and centers of employment, education, retail and recreation uses. a. Connections: Describe how the project will connect housing and centers of employment, education, retail and recreation uses, in the ways listed above or in other ways. Limit 8 lines The expansion of Central Park increases the visibility of the civic complex in Downtown. The newly expanded park will become the gathering place for the residents located within Downtown and for the larger Rosemount community. The Park currently serves as the site for community events such as Leprechaun Days, Music in the Park, and the Halloween Trail and active recreational activities. Central Park will serve as the open space feature for new Downtown residents and embodies the public investment in and commitment to revitalization of the area. Downtown and its environs serve as the place of commerce for the community Its close location to the City's business park means Downtown offers employment and provides services to the employment elsewhere in the community. The Gateway project will elevate Downtown to compete fairly with other commercial areas in the City. b. c. Yes X X No Mark (X) appropriate box Will new pedestrian infrastructure be added? If yes, check type: X Sidewalks X Bike paths X Trails Will existing pedestrian infrastructure be improved? If yes, check type: X Sidewalks Bike paths X Trails How will the additions or improvements provide or improve connections within the site or with adjacent neighborhoods? The improvements to the sidewalk system and internal trails will allow greater access to and flow through Central Park. The Park currently is expansive but is hidden from the public with only a small entranceway. Additional pedestrian access is an important component of the redesign to increase Park visibility and use. These pedestrian improvements will also provide linkages into the new Downtown, particularly for the planned residential projects, to provide easy access to new residents. Mature residential neighborhoods exist to the west of the site, an area linked to Downtown and Central Park by the in -place sidewalk system New residential development in the northwest also includes connections to Central Park. Yes No X Mark (X) appropriate box Will new streets be constructed? If yes how will they enable connections within the site or to adjacent neighborhoods? No new streets will be constructed, but Burma Avenue will be shifted to the east, so that it aligns with the entrance to City Hall and Central Park. 8 Type of Use Number of Existing Uses Square Footage or Acreage Number of Planned Uses Square Footage or Acreage Mark (X) if planned uses are new construction, rehab /renovation or adaptive reuse 3,000 -5,000 X District 196 Schools, Dakota County Technical College, Greif Brothers, City of Rosemount 1,000 -3,000 New Rehab! Renovation Adaptive Reuse Commercial 2 Total 10,147 sq ft Retail 1 3,000 sq ft X Restaurant Office L Govenunent/Civic Arts /Cultural Entertainment Open Space /Public Space 1 31,525 sq ft (expansion) X X Other (list) Number of Jobs Mark (X) appropriate number range Major employers within 2 miles More than 5,000 15 Commercial service 3,000 -5,000 X District 196 Schools, Dakota County Technical College, Greif Brothers, City of Rosemount 1,000 -3,000 500 -1,000 Less than 500 X Will this project create any new jobs? If yes, how many and what type? Number Job Type 15 Commercial service d. Mix and Type of Uses: List the number and types of existing or planned uses for the project site. e. Employment proximity: Estimate the number of jobs within 2 miles of the project site and list major employers. f. Creation of new jobs: Yes No Mark (X) appropnate box 9 Developed Communities or Locations Total of Units ft Units Owner Units Rental Distinguishing Features: of stories, architectural design) Existing Housing: N/A N/A Single family Townhouse Apartments or Condominiums Duplexes Other (list): Planned Housing: N/A Single- family Townhouse Apartments or Condominiums Duplexes Other (list). Developed Communities or Locations Developing Communities or Locations Achieves this objective in ways such as. integrates new housing into existing neighborhoods Achieves this objective in ways such as Includes housing planned to take into account population forecasts, existing housing stock, current and future community needs 4. Develop a range of housing densities, types and costs. a. Describe how the project provides a range of housing densities, types and costs, in the ways listed above, or in other ways Limit 10 lines The Central Park project will fulfill the open space requirement for new residential development to be located in Downtown. While the project does not directly provide housing, its creation allows for higher density attached housing alternatives that could not otherwise be contemplated. The City will consider the Park opportunity when granting final approval for the Core Block East project, which has several housing products. Core Block East will provide opportunities in an "urban" setting, options that are not currently available in Rosemount The City is exploring the provision of affordable housing which would rely on public spaces to provide project amenities. b. Type and Tenure of Housing: List the number of housing units by type and tenure (owner /renter) currently in the project site area (corresponding to the site plan, Attachment #3) and planned. c. Housing Density: 10 Current Overall Density (net units per acre) Planned overall density (net units per acre) N/A N/A 4. Develop a range of housing densities, types and costs. a. Describe how the project provides a range of housing densities, types and costs, in the ways listed above, or in other ways Limit 10 lines The Central Park project will fulfill the open space requirement for new residential development to be located in Downtown. While the project does not directly provide housing, its creation allows for higher density attached housing alternatives that could not otherwise be contemplated. The City will consider the Park opportunity when granting final approval for the Core Block East project, which has several housing products. Core Block East will provide opportunities in an "urban" setting, options that are not currently available in Rosemount The City is exploring the provision of affordable housing which would rely on public spaces to provide project amenities. b. Type and Tenure of Housing: List the number of housing units by type and tenure (owner /renter) currently in the project site area (corresponding to the site plan, Attachment #3) and planned. c. Housing Density: 10 d. Housing Affordability: List estimated affordability levels for existing and planned housing in the following format. (Area median income $76,700) 11 Number of Units up to 50% of Area Median Income Number of Units at 50 -80% of Area Median Income Number of Units at Market Rate Current/Proposed Price Ranges of Market Rate Units Existing housing Planned housing Yes No Mark (X) appropriate box i Are there mechanisms to ensure long term affordability? If yes, what type? Mark (X) any that ap ly Land trust Resale price indexing Other (describe): d. Housing Affordability: List estimated affordability levels for existing and planned housing in the following format. (Area median income $76,700) 11 X Developing Communities or Locations Does the project consider the site's relationship to nearby park and open space amenities? Achieves this objective in ways such as Abates, prevents or removes point and nonpoint source pollution. reduces soil erosion, protects or Improves water quality, maximizes groundwater recharge through surface water infiltration. as feasible and appropriate If yes, please describe. The project is immediately adjacent to the present Central Park The project expands the Park, enhancing the natural experience and providing a more clearly delineated public plaza for civic events. Trails and pathways will weave between the old and new park, allowing several different circulation alternatives for users. Phase I of the City's redevelopment efforts will be sited to maximize the visual and pedestrian connection to the expanded Central Park envisioned in this application. Developed Communities or Locations Developing Communities or Locations Achieves this objective in ways such as Protects and restores natural resources where feasible and appropriate Controls and treats stormwater, as feasible and appropriate. Achieves this objective in ways such as Abates, prevents or removes point and nonpoint source pollution. reduces soil erosion, protects or Improves water quality, maximizes groundwater recharge through surface water infiltration. as feasible and appropriate 5) Abates, prevents or removes point and non -point source pollution, and maximizes groundwater recharge through surface water infiltration. a. Describe how the project will reduce volume and pollutant content of point and non -point source runoff from the site when compared with existing site uses, or maximize groundwater recharge through surface water infiltration, in the ways listed above or in other ways. Limit 10 fines The current land uses on the project site are developed as commercial and include a gas station/service center and small commercial implement dealer. At the time of their development, water quality issues were not addressed, with the result that most of the property is developed and impervious. There is no water quality infrastructure or stormwater ponding to filter existing site runoff As part of the Central Park project, 65% of the site will be redeveloped into green and open space, significantly reducing the amount of hard surfacing from the current state, promoting groundwater recharge, and improving water quality. The change in and use will reduce the amount of pollutants exiting the site. The landscaping plan for the site includes development of a rainwater garden to control and treat stormwater in an ecologically acceptable manner not presently available on the site. b. Yes No Mark (X) appropriate box 12 X Connects to the existing storm sewer system without any water quality improvements. If yes, please describe: Presently, the site directly connects to the City's system without the benefit of pre treatment After redevelopment, the site will use an ecological filtration system, such as rain gardens, to provide needed treatment of runoff, X Provides conventional project specific runoff treatment facilities, e.g retention basins, detention basins, infiltration basins. If yes, please describe: X Incorporates project- specific Low Impact Development (LID) runoff reduction measures. e.g. porous pavers, rain gardens, green roofs. If yes, please describe As part of the Central Park expansion, the project will include the use of paver blocks and rainwater gardens as amenities to the site that will also provide stormwater water quality benefits. X Provides constructed or restored natural methods of runoff treatment: e.g. restoration of buried creeks, wetlands, bio- infiltration areas If yes, please describe: X Provides green spaces for increased infiltration, recreation and scenic value. If yes, please describe: The present site is 100% commercial with the vast majority of the land hard surfaced Redevelopment will dramatically increase the amount of open space on the site for infiltration as well as aesthetic reasons. The additional gardens and open space, in addition to the plaza and trails, will enhance the scenic and recreational use of the project site and the existing Central Park. Other (describe): c. Describe specific runoff water quality improvement techniques, extent of use, and any community amenity benefits for marked items. Yes No Mark (X) appropriate box 13 Name of Partner(s) Type of Partnership or Role of Partner Contractor Property Developers Company (working with several builders and leasing companies) Project Management, leasing, and sales of commercial and residential space in Core Block East Dakota CDA Affordable housing provider within Downtown. Dakota County/Dakota County Library Board Work with two Boards in developing plans for new library sited within City's Downtown x Design standards Will be Needed Underway City has Adopted Mark (X) appropriate box X Zoning codes /regulatory changes x Design standards X Development standards 6. Tools and Processes to Ensure Successful Outcomes (Begin new page) All Communities Appropriate and effective regulatory tools, such as zoning codes, design standards, development standards Partnerships among government, private for -profit and nonprofit sectors a. City review /regulatory process: Describe city review or regulatory processes or procedures used or developed for this project, such as zoning codes, design standards, or development standards. (limit 6 lines) A citizen's committee drafted the adopted Development Framework for Downtown Redevelopment in 2004 Since then the Port Authority has received proposals, interviewed development firms, and chosen a development partner for the first redevelopment phase The developer, Contractor Property Developers Co (CPDC), has entered into a preliminary development agreement with the City and has initiated planning activities and land acquisition Design guidelines have been developed for Downtown. The zoning ordinance was previously modified to facilitate redevelopment. b. Indicate the status of zoning, regulatory changes or design standards: c. Indicate the status of market and feasibility studies: Will be Needed Underway City has Completed X X Mark (X) appropriate box Market studies Feasibility studies If completed, briefly state the conclusions of the studies: (limit 4 lines) The Market Study found that the "total demand potential for Downtown Rosemount" is 515 -535 total housing units and 53.000 to 86,000 square feet of commercial space (2003 -10). The Redevelopment Eligibility Assessment found that Downtown qualifies as a Tax Increment Finance Redevelopment District by meeting the Blight Test based on land coverage and condition of buildings. d. Planning and Implementation Partnerships: List and briefly describe the type and nature of partnerships in the project among government, private, for -profit and non -profit sectors. 14 7. Community Support (Begin new page) All Communities Community participation, local 'vision and leadership a. Community's role: Describe any public participation processes involving residents, businesspersons and others used to develop the proposal. Describe plans for future community involvement in project Implementation. Limit 10 lines Appointment of the 13- member Downtown Redevelopment Committee began the public participation process The Committee held three public open houses prior to approval of Framework. The City hired an ombudsman to work with Downtown businesses during the planning process, and there was a Downtown business meeting and two mailers updating them on Framework progress. The City initiated an online Blog for specific Downtown updates and keeps the City website updated with plans and information. Business owner meetings have continued which revolve around topics such as relocation benefits, eminent domain, and an introduction to the developer and its concept plan. These meetings will continue as new information becomes available and the news media, website, blog, and mailings will be utilized to disseminate updates. b. City's role: How have elected officials, city council initiatives or actions supported the project? Linn 10 lines The Port Authority and City Council are on record supporting redevelopment of Downtown Rosemount; both bodies adopted the Development Framework document. The Port Authority has been acquiring land on a willing seller basis for more than a decade in anticipation of redevelopment and has recently authorized acquisition of four homes. The Authority set up a TIF District to assist in redevelopment activities and the Council authorized interfund loans to allow activities to continue until an increment is generated. The Port Authority has entered into a Preliminary Redevelopment Agreement with CPDC to revitalize Core Block East and has expended funds to assess existing infrastructure and investigate necessary upgrades to accommodate redevelopment. Redevelopment of Downtown continues to be one of the community goals adopted by the City Council in 2005. 15 Name of Developer(s) Type of contract or commitment The City is the primary developer. Private developer of commercial building Have had preliminary discussions with CPDC about commercial building. X Is the developer acquiring the development site from the city? If yes, is the site being sold at fair market value? The City will be selling the commercial site adjoining Central Park. It is expected that the City would sell the parcel at fair market value. X Are market studies or appraisals available for all some or all components of the project? If yes, which components (e.g. retail, office, ownership housing, rental housing)? A market study for the entire Downtown was completed and shows a need for additional commercial uses. e. D. Selection Criteria (Begin new page) 1. Developability and Readiness a. Developer's role: Mark (X) appropriate box X Is a developer(s) committed to the project? Yes No b. Ifves- Yes X No Mark (X) appropriate box Is the development site as represented currently within a designated development district, or an approved development (i e. PUD) c. Mark (X) status of applicant control of the site, or sites represented in the proposal. X Under option Own Condemnation Within a TIF District Other (list): d. If the site is not under the applicant's control, state the steps that will be needed to get control. Limit 5 lines The City had preliminary discussions with the two property affected property owners about site acquisition. The City will need to obtain appraisals and begin the negotiation process for land purchase. Yes No Mark (X) appropriate box f. Yes No Mark (X) appropriate box 16 X Bidding X Contracting estimates X Developer estimates X City estimates If yes, state source(s): Other (list): X No Does the applicant intend to apply for LCDA funds for this project in future years for additional phases or components? X If yes, briefly describe future phase(s) or components We will be looking for funding to assist in specific redevelopment proposals on several blocks within Downtown. Yes No Mark (X) appropriate box X Has the applicant applied this year for the same funds, as detailed in this request, from another source(s) If yes, state source(s): g Yes No X Has an architect/engineer been selected for the project? h. Mark (X) appropriate box Yes No X Mark (X) appropriate box Is site plan final? If not final, describe status (limit 4 lines) The plan is a draft that has been reviewed by the City Council, Port Authority, and Parks and Recreation Commission. A final plan will be created by the City for the Park portion of the project, and by a private developer for the commercial building. i. How have costs been determined? Mark (X) as many as appropriate. (If more than 1 box checked, explain which oroiect element or elements j. If commercial is proposed, provide as much specificity as possible regarding the type of tenants and projected rents. Type of Tenant Specialty Retail Projected Rents $14 /square foot lc Yes No Mark (X) appropriate box 1. 17 Uses Amount Portion from LCDA Source Other Public Sources Other Private Sources Hard Costs: Pending Park Dedication Fund $380,000 Land acquisition and relocation $420,000 $420,000 $200,000 Preliminary Discussion; need final approval from Port Authority Land acquisition and relocation $472,500 $472,500 Building demolition and tank removal $80,000 $80,000 TOTAL: Installation of Park amenities including trees, signage, fountain, decorative concrete, benches, sod, trail, landscaping, and irrigation $380,000 None $380,000 City Park Dedication Fund; May receive some private donations of some park amenities. Relocation of utilities and shifting of road and driveway $200,000 None $200,000 TIF Fund Total Hard Costs: $1,552,500 $972,500 $580,000 Soft Costs: Park Master Plan $20,000 None $20,000 City Park Dedication Fund Rezoning and re- guiding of property $5840 None $5840 City Waive Fees Project administration including receiving appropriate approvals $30,000 None $20,000 City staff and consulting engineering administration, relocation consultant Total Soft Costs: $45,840 $45,840 OVERALL TOTAL $1,593,340 Sources Amount Status' Approval Anticipated by: LCA Development Grant $972,500 Pending Park Dedication Fund $380,000 Preliminary Discussion; need final approval from Parks Commission Fall 2005 TIF Funding $200,000 Preliminary Discussion; need final approval from Port Authority Fall 2005 TOTAL: $1,552,500 2. SOURCES AND USES Fill out completely, ensuring that numbers total. Incomplete sources and uses may indicate lack of funding readiness. The Livable Communities Advisory Committee cannot evaluate the financial readiness of a project without complete information. 18 0 City of Rosemount Downtown Gateway /Central Park 2000 Air Photo X00 Downtown Gateway/ Central Park 1 Erickson Fields Park 6/1/04 III Metropolitan Council Core Block East Redevelopment Phase I 2,000 1 eet 2000 Aerial Photo City of Rosemount Downtown Gateway /Central Park Regional Infrastructure and 2020 Planned Land Use 1,000 2, 1 Feel Sewers, Transit Sewer Interceptor Lift Stations Gravity Sewer Force Main Sewer Bus Routes Bus Stops P Park and Ride Lots 6/1/04 III Metropolitan Council I I I Roads, Railroads, Trails Railroads Regional Trails Principal Arterial A Minor Augmentor A Minor Reliever A Minor Expander A Minor Connector B Minor Major Collector Minor Collector Planned Land Use Agricultural Rural Residential Single Family Residential Multi Family Residential Commercial Industrial Mixed Use Single Units Multiple Uses Several Units Institutional Park and Recreation Open Space Restncted Use Open Water Airports in the Regional System Regional Parks n rnase �111d!� 1 '.pIPn l" a: PL 111/11 gr lc i i w issEL o I�L� ��`s nil. Vii !n�� Inqf Ie,� twir sell W h 1.! In ill-C. ill I 5 3 IF�!� I. i_ at J I ti j .IA4: ,f ie ;4; 1� IIIJ Trail Connections I t at civic Complex Downtown Gateway Central Park Core Block East Phase I V CORE BLOCK EAST CONCEPT 62 rri I'1.r'+J DOWNTOWN ROSEMOUNT aM1 0 I00 200 300 SCALE I'•100 DTJ DESIGN E 4 .j fir a/ 7, Y *IC n h in gr -a: 4 ROSEMOUNT SPIRIT OF PRIDE AND PROGRESS prim !Mkt grA rit Downtown Gateway /Central Park 1/4- and 1 /2 -mile radii with Downtown intain za with 7 ches MMU NTER POSE RY it Existing Bandshell Existing Memorial Shelter Exist. Play Structu Exis Pave Rink 0 Rock Garden Gravel tails Bri Fo PI S 0 c P LI DOW OWN BASE OFOmSATICM PREPARED m: DAKOTA COADY 1 S Site Plan Downtown Gateway Central Park Paved Tra..a 3000 Sq. Ft. Etiaanisi ni City of Rosemount TO EASTSIDE MN RIVER TRAIL Existing Parking Lot New lot entry 3 t L- Sidewalks f Transit Stoo PR 1 1510 Como Avenue iMxl Itrampois Mime, SA¢ p 612/311 2500 14/ '010 .ww n jelan 0M0mepaun f H z 0 w t ;Oar II V 104"- FZ 1; esec'stitlie i;\ 1 ;nfg.b,. la I.: 1 7±-3 t iiiirta:Lalit:: 4,, 1 s it: --a> , 4 ,cte, ••••■•■•1111 cv i vanIIIL 'I I i CAW!: I 1 ,ifri IR I 1 l 'f i titi o L 1/2 at ieii ii e ar.----I ii, op in t 0 1 Il liniigthill eh 9;111 s er' ;,:5.) 3i C :r7i 111A,3411P 'S r a t a rra: 1.- -2- 1 1: .21 sr= I: 2 t 1= i i ,Attl 1;144 littom t tai fit:glifif Pi• ibi.A --ethiiit iniza 1 .c; mi.,. coL. Ti, 1 I gri A ::19 1 •111111111• vs r ift E gli i At datheutteutwitis 1 litifililt-' ot ..;,„,,„,,ontainere -I rgE S I 4 in-Ino 0....... TA 1 I i ,a *oh' rator SINISEW; -.-.1 y::::,,.,;; ata L ,-it2,:ciat i ittIttlititir _s *Ai fatal tr-.- 311.- V 1 Tr uniti i A111111■6 nvr 0 1 111111 5110;11 1 II 41 Ali 11.111011i i t 1 1 rs li "7 75 1 1b111 0 0