HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.a. Minutes of the April 12, 2006 Regular City Council ProceedingsROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDINGS
REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 4, 2006
CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the Rosemount City Council
was duly held on Tuesday, April 4, 2006, at 7:30 p.m. m the Council Chambers at City Hall,
2875 145 Street West.
Mayor Droste called the meeting to order with Council Members Sterner, Baxter,
DeBettignies, and Shoe Corrigan attendmg Staff members present were City Administrator
Verbrugge, Assistant City Admuustrator Weitzel, City Attorney LeFevere, City Engineer
Brotzler, Community Development Director Lindquist, Parks and Recreation Director
Schultz, Finance Director May, Communications Coordinator Cox, Chief of Pohce
Kalstabakken, Fire Chief Aker, and Recording Secretary Burr. The Pledge of Allegiance was
said.
ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE AGENDA
City Adrmmstrator Verbrugge additional information has been handed out related to Item
6.p., regarding the PUD for D.R. Horton. There is also an add -on, Item 9.a, for New
Business He noted there is also a request to have a closed executive session at the end of
tonight's meeting.
City Attorney LeFevere requested a closed meeting be held under attorney -client privilege to
discuss a proposed setdement of the mercury contamination claim He stated there is a need
to discuss a settlement proposal during a confidential discussion among Council Members;
there will be no other matters discussed
Motion by Droste. Second by Baxter.
Motion to adopt the Agenda with the addition of 9.a. and the executive session at
the conclusion of the meeting.
Ayes: 5.
Nays: 0. Motion carried.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Carol Hickman, 29370 Randolph Boulevard, Randolph, requested to distribute a handout to
the Council Members. She stated that during the Council work session on March 22, an
important issue was left on the table, which is the security of Vic's Crane. The summary that
Kim Lindquist prepared gave the business one opuon for security, and that was to guide the
property or a portion of it back to general industrial
Ms Hickman continued that she understands the Council wants to see commercial m this
area. She indicated the southern portion of her property is well hidden and would provide
space for the existing operation, and those 15 to 18 acres could remain general industrial.
Ms Hickman continued that at a meeting with the Met Council last month, she was told it is
not unusual for cities to secure a longstandmg businesses using spot zoning or by writing
their particular land use into zoning rules. That would mean an additional change to the
business park ordmances. She requested assistance to protect her business and remain in
business as it has for the last 55 years.
Ted Northrup, 3645 148 Street, asked a question about Project 396. He inquired if citizens
will be assessed for the street, curb and gutter, and storm sewer. He was informed money
was set aside for the storm sewer. His property already has a storm sewer on the north side,
and therefore he and Ins neighbors have already paid once for the storm sewer
Mr. Brotzler responded property owners will not be assessed for the storm sewer. The
$4,400 assessment for this is set by the City's fee resolution, which is adopted by the Council
annually That assessment rate is for street and curb reconstruction project; the storm sewer
will be paid out of the storm sewer find.
RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENT
None.
DEPARTMENT HEADS REPORTS /BUSINESS
5.a. Receive Donation from Office of Traffic Safety
Pohce Chief Kalstabakken introduced two representatives from the Office of Traffic Safety,
Bob O'Bnen and Jean Ryan. He reported Rosemount has participated in the Safe and Sober
program for many years, and it has been a successful program for the City. Sgt Jim O'Leary
will be accepting the award tonight; he has been coordinating the program for the
department over the last couple years.
Jean Ryan, Office of Traffic Safety, stated each year the leadmg cause of death ages 1 to 33 is
traffic injuries. The purpose of the program is to reduce that devastation The office cannot
do it without great parmershrps, and one of those great partnerships is with the Rosemount
Pohce Department.
Bob O'Brien thanked the Police Department for their efforts and thanked the Council for
supporting them. He explained Rosemount was one of 400 cities that participated in the
program but only 1 of 9 that received the laser device.
Mayor Droste thanked the Ms. Ryan and Mr. O'Brien as well as the Pohce Department and
their efforts on behalf of the City.
CONSENT AGENDA
Motion by DeBetngmes. Second by Sterner.
Motion to approve the Consent Agenda, Items a. through o., with the removal of
Items g, k, and p
a. Minutes of the March 21, 2006 Regular City Council Proceedings and the March
22, 2006 City Council Work Session.
b. Bills Listing
c. Receive Donations Parks Recreation Dept.
d Expenditure Approval from the Donation Account Parks Recreation Dept.
e. Receive Donation DARE Fund
f Budget Amendments
h. AFSCME Contract
1. Hiring of a Part-time Utility Billing /Deputy Registrar Clerk
j. Medical Leave for a Firefighter
k. Recent Plans Specificau ns /Auth nzc Ad fir Bid 2006 Pcdestnan Facility
Improvei..cnts, City Pt j„ct 100
1. Receive Plans Specificauons /Authorize Ad for Bid 2006 Pavement
Management Improvements, City Project 396
m. Danner, Inc. Mineral Extraction Permit Renewal 06 -01 -ME
n. Flint Hills Resources L.P. Comprehensive Plan Agreement Case 05 -62 -CP
o. JJT Business Park First Addition Preliminary Plat and Final Plat 06 -03 -PP and
06 -04 FP
p. Cr sscr f t 3. Addiu n D P e I I rt n) Preliminary Plat and Final Plat and
Ce,,.,scr. ft 3` Addition (D R. I Itdton) PUD Major Amendment 06 07 PP and
06 09 FP and 06 OS AIM
Council Member Shoe Corrigan requested to pull Item 6 k. from the Consent Agenda.
Council Member Baxter requested to pull Item 6.g. from the Consent Agenda.
Mayor Droste requested to pull Item 6.p. from the Consent Agenda.
Ayes: 5.
Nays: 0. Motion carried.
Council Member Baxter stated he pulled 6.g. because the Council recently went through the
process of appointing new members to the Parks and Recreation, Port Authority and
Planning Commissions. In this case, there were more applications than there were vacancies
or openings. At the time, the Council encouraged the other applicants to become involved
m other ways m the City.
Council Member Baxter continued that he wanted to take this chance to say how proud he is
of the City and its volunteers and encouraged anyone who is interested to get involved in
Leprechaun Days.
Motion by Baxter. Second by Shoe Corrigan.
Motion to approve the 2006 Service Agreement with the Rosemount Leprechaun
Days Committee.
Ayes: 5.
Nays: 0. Motion carried.
Council Member Shoe Corrigan asked about the replacement of the bituminous trail with a
concrete sidewalk m City Project 400. She asked if it is a policy change to have a segment
trail along a trail that is already bituminous
City Engineer Brotzler responded the reason for the replacement is the fact that there are
properties with driveways accessing Shannon Parkway In 2003 and 2004, the City overlaid
trails along Shannon Parkway but was not able to maintain that section because of the
driveways The concrete is longer-lasting, more durable and will require less maintenance.
He stated the challenge is the driveways and the way the grades work.
Mr Brotzler continued when the City overlays a trail, it raises the profile of the trail 2 inches.
It creates a lot of work to get the driveways to match. He clanfied this is not something to
be promoted as a standard; this is an isolated situation.
Council Member Sterner asked about the completion date for the segments of the trail on
the west side of Shannon.
Mr. Brotzler responded both segments along the trail are further down on the priority list.
As funds become available m the future, they may become repriontized. But at this point in
time, there is no completion date for the segments on the west side of that trail
Council Member Shoe Corrigan asked if there will be bituminous on both sides of Shannon
Parkway because there are no driveways along there. Mr Brotzler responded that is correct.
He added that for long -term maintenance, he would recommend moving to a two -trail
system except where there are sidewalks.
Mr. Brotzler explained the City's pohcy of mamtauung sidewalks when they back up to
private property.
Council Member Sterner asked if, around these three trail segments, surrounding
homeowners will be required to maintain the trail.
Mr Brotzler that his expectation is the City would maintain those areas being on a collector
street.
Motion by Shoe Corrigan. Second by Baxter.
Motion to adopt a resolution receiving plans and specifications and authorizing
advertisement of bids for the 2006 pedestrian facility improvements, City Project
#400.
Ayes: 5.
Nays: 0. Motion carried.
Mayor Droste asked Ms. Lindquist to address item 6.p.
Community Development Director Lindquist stated this item was pulled from the Consent
Agenda because of the change to the PUD. The change clarifies the building elevations that
were omitted in the previous packet that went to the Council.
Motion by Shoe Corrigan. Second by Council Member DeBettigmes.
Motion to adopt a resolution approving the Prehmmary Plat and Final Plat, subject
to conditions; to adopt a resolution approving the PUD Major Amendment, subject
to conditions, to authorize execution of the Subdivision Agreement; and to authorize
execution of the PUD Amendment Agreement.
Ayes: 5.
Nays: 0. Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING
7.a. Public Drainage and Utility Easement Vacation Rosemount Business
Park 2 Addition
Community Development Director Lindquist stated this follows up on a project the city has
been working on for a long time With the inclusion of Oudot A into the JJT Business Park
First Addition plat, the existing 10 -foot drainage and utthty easement needs to be vacated. It
is Important not to have those old easements m place after the properties are combined. She
stated this is a very straightforward vacation of the easement.
Mayor Droste opened the hearing at 8:00 p.m.
Motion by Droste. Second by Shoe Corrigan
Motion to close the public heanng.
Ayes: 5.
Nays: 0. Motion carried.
The pubhc heanng was closed at 8.04 p.m.
Motion by DeBettigmes. Second by Shoe- Corrigan.
Motion to adopt the resolution vacating a public drainage and utthty easement on
Oudot A, ROSEMOUNT BUSINESS PARK SECOND ADDITION, Dakota
County, Minnesota
Ayes: 5.
Nays: 0. Motion carried.
OLD BUSINESS
None.
NEW BUSINESS
9.a. Industrial Districts Zoning Text Amendment for the BP Business Park
and LI Light Industrial Districts Case 05 -48 -TA
Community Development Director Lindquist stated the Planning Commission has reviewed
this draft ordinance four or five times, and the Council discussed it at a work session. The
main issue is to clarify the issue of outside storage. Based upon Council direction, this draft
allows no outside storage m the business park district.
Ms. Lindquist noted there is an outside storage provision m light industrial. Under the
existing Comprehensive Plan, the language for business park does allow for some light
industrial if it meets the goals of the Comp Plan as determined by the Council. In the future,
this Council will recognize there may be some light industrial areas inside of Business Park
should Council Members feel it meets the objectives of the Comp Plan.
Ms. Lindquist stated staff does disagree with the Planning Commission recommendation in
one area. The Planning Commission suggested that warehousing, wholesaling, and
distribution uses be a conditional use. Theca primary concern was for traffic; they felt traffic
impact should be reviewed.
Ms Lindquist continued that staff received feedback throughout this process about the
concern of having that use along with the 60- to 90 -day review period for a conditional use,
noting that that use is very similar to other types of uses In fact, almost all kinds of
manufacturing or showroom have some kind of warehousing function. The feedback was in
favor of having that as a permitted use
Ms. Lindquist continued as a result of that feedback, as well as the Council's discussion at
the previous work session, it is staff's understanding that the Council is comfortable with
higher traffic generating businesses as permitted uses. The draft before the Council allows
warehousing, wholesaling and distribution as a permitted use, which is contrary to the
Planning Commission's recommendation.
Ms. Lindquist asked that Motion 1 be modified to read Section 11 -4-15 -1 and Motion 2
should read Section 11- 4-15 -2 Staff is trying to compartmentalize the industrial districts
into one location in the zoning ordinance Because of the way this is structured, this
numbering sequence works better.
Ms. Lindquist noted the add -on item under New Business. Staff is asking Council to pass
two resolutions authorizing publication of the ordinance that allows publication to give a
brief overview of the amendment rather than publishmg the entire ordinance. This is a cost
related issue
Council Member Baxter stated there are businesses with outdoor storage that can be handled
well. His recollection was part of business park could be rezoned light Industrial which
would allow for outdoor storage. Ms Lindquist responded that is correct.
Council Member Baxter asked if that rezoning would require a simple majority of the
Council Ms. Lindquist responded that is correct.
Council Member Sterner asked about Vic's Crane and whether it would be allowed to have
outdoor storage under the new ordinance.
Ms. Lindquist responded Vic's Crane property is zoned general industrial, which does not
fall under either of the zoning amendments She clarified Ms. Hickman will be asking to be
reguided general industrial and ask to remain both zoned and guided general industrial rather
than the business park designation.
Council Member DeBettigmes stated the City used to have a Business Park 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Now those designations have been ehmmated, and business park and light industrial will be
in its place. Ms. Lindquist responded that is correct
Mayor Droste stated the map will show business park, but the Comprehensive Plan says
light industrial is allowed.
Motion by DeBettigmes Second by Shoe Corrigan.
Motion to adopt an Ordinance amending Section 11- 4 -15 -1 of the City Code
regarding the BP Business Park Zorung District.
Ayes: 5.
Nays: 0. Motion carried.
Motion by DeBettigmes. Second by Shoe Corrigan.
Motion to adopt an Ordinance amending Section 11- 4 -15 -2 of the Rosemount City
Code creating the New LI Light Industrial Distract.
Ayes: 5.
Nays: 0. Motion carried.
Motion by DeBemgmes. Second by Shoe Corrigan.
Motion to adopt an Ordinance amending Section 11 -1 -4 of the Rosemount City
Code Creating New Definitions for the Terms Office Showroom, Office Warehouse,
Light Manufacturing, and Medium Manufacturing
Ayes: 5.
Nays: 0. Motion carried.
Motion by DeBettigmes. Second by Shoe- Corngan.
Motion to approve a Resolution Authorizing Publication of Ordinance No B -168
an Ordinance Amending the Rosemount City Code by Striking Section 11 -4 -15
Regarding the BP Business Park Zoning District and Replacing it with Section 11 -4-
15-1 the New BP- Business Park District and a Resolution Authorizing Publication of
Ordinance No. B -169 an Ordinance Amending Section 11 -4 -15 of the Rosemount
City Code by Adding Section 11- 4 -15 -2 Creating the New Light Industrial Distract.
Ayes: 5.
Nays: 0. Motion carried.
9.b. Business Park Classifications Rezoning Class 06 22 ZA
Community Development Director Lindquist stated this rezoning item is to consolidate the
actual properties that are zoned BP -1, 2, 3, and 4 so they are all zoned BP and subject to the
ordinance just approved.
Motion by Baxter. Second by Shoe Corrigan.
Motion to adopt the attached Ordinance rezoning all BP Business Park 1, 2, 3, and
4 District to BP Business Park.
Ayes: 5.
Nays: 0. Motion carried.
9.c. Transportation Plan
City Engineer Brotzler stated before the Council is the final draft transportation plan. This
was reviewed with the Council at a work session in December. At that time there were
several comments and questions raised by the Council.
Mr. Brotzler stated one comment at the time was snowmobiling use in the City. A section at
2.2 in the report was added addressing snowmobiling
Mr. Brotzler indicated another question raised was the intersection 42 and Shannon
Parkway. One question was the cross- section of 42.
Mr. Brotzler continued the other was a sight distance issue when making left turns from
Shannon Parkway onto 42 which is created by the geometries of the intersection. The
resolution of that would require additional review as far as significant intersection
improvement and signal system modifications.
Mr. Brotzler stated at this time there is no Council direction to do anything to move forward
with that. The other issue raised was reconfiguring the lanes along the entire length of
Shannon Parkway. He recommends the City look at that intersection when reconfiguring
the lanes along Shannon Parkway.
Mr. Brotzler noted the plan has Diamond Path as a collector street. Finally, there was
discussion about the High School Street driveway access at Highway 3 The challenges of
that intersection were discussed. The final draft plan that is presented tomght does call for
future unprovements. Because that is a State highway and a school district street, it will take
the State and school district to work out that matter.
Mr. Brotzler stated pending Council approval of the plan; the draft stamp will remain on the
plan It will then be submitted to the Met Council as a Comp Plan amendment. Following
their approval of the amendment, the draft stamp would be removed and it would be bound
and available for Council members and others. He added Chuck Rickart and Peter
Langworthy are present tomght to discuss the details of the plan.
Chuck Rickart stated this plan has been a long process. The purpose of the plan is to
document the existing transportation system and plan for the future The public process was
participated in early on in the planning and now the plan is ready to be presented to the Met
Council.
Peter Langworthy outlined the structure of the document. It includes the introduction,
existing transportation conditions and issues, trends and planning considerations, future
Rosemount transportation needs, and a transportation plan.
Mr. Langworthy highlighted the existing transportation conditions and issues. He provided
background on the process. He defined the roadway functional classifications and outlined
the roadway junsdictional classification. Then the existing traffic levels were documented.
Mr. Langworthy continued outlining a number of the existing transportation conditions. He
discussed Shannon Parkway and challenge of lane continuity. There are three locations that
may potentially need traffic signals. He discussed the increased usage of Chili and noted
there may need to be a redesign at some point. He noted the congestion on T.H. 3 may
warrant a redesign at some point.
Mr. Langworthy provided an overview of the trends and planning considerations. He
provided an outline of the documents referenced in preparing this section
Mr Langworthy outlined the analysis of transportation needs. He stated future development
was considered heavily in this section. From an access and capacity perspective, they looked
at future land use. The 2000 Rosemount Comp Plan was looked at and was updated with
the Land Use and Transportation Plan which came out of the 42/52 study He stated that
land use information was used to define access needs and forecast traffic levels on primary
roadways within the City Using a computer traffic modeling program, they created 2025
traffic forecast levels.
Mr. Langworthy displayed the land use plan used for the 2025 traffic forecast levels.
Regarding the forecast plan, it was broken into five -year increments. He read through the
projects for the first five years, from 2006 through 2010. He stated the transportation plan
is used to generate a plan for using forward.
Mr. Langworthy stated access management is a critical component of transportation
planning He recommended City standards for access management, and they are based on
the State's standards. He noted the County does have different standards.
Mr. Langworthy stated another key component of the transportation plan is the 2025
functional classification network. He displayed the 2025 functional classification network on
the overhead. He discussed right -of -way standards for the different classifications for major
and minor connectors and local streets. He noted the County has its own standards for the
County roadways.
Mr. Langworthy stated the plan addressed non motorized transportation issues, including
transit and trails. For trails, the plan recommends the existing practice of, at a minimum, a
trail on one side and sidewalk on the other side of connector -level roadways. The plan also
includes analysis of the new City trail from downtown to the nver.
Council Member Sterner thanked Mr. Langworthy for the level of detail of the plan. He
inquired about Dodd Boulevard and if it is classified as a collector m its entirety.
Langworthy responded it is identified as a collector west of the Chippendale.
Council Member Baxter stated a lot of transportation issues depend on cooperation by Mn-
DOT and Dakota County. He asked if there is a way to become more involved with the
decisions those entities are making.
Mr. Brotzler responded staff has regular contact and interaction with Dakota County. There
are regular meetings as they develop their annual CIP On an annual basis the Council
approves a letter requesting projects in the CIP and ultimately a resolution is passed that
gives support for the projects on the CIP He added there are some minor projects the City
has requested m the past that have not yet made the CIP.
Mr. Brotzler continued a big issue is the 42/52 interchange project and the scope of that and
the long -range planning involved. He stated with Mn -DOT, discussions tend to be more
sporadic He recommended perseverance in constantly putting the City's issues on the front
page for Mn -DOT staff to help move things along. Staff is considering a Mn -DOT tour of
the City sometime this summer to help them see the issues facing the City first -hand.
Mayor Droste stated this plan implies increased congestion. Regarding transit, it is a way to
reheve congesuon If the City does not put it in its plan, at 2020 or 2025, the City will face
congestion because it was not planned for
Mr Rickart stated transit in a lot of these transportation plans does not get as much
attention as it should. He expressed agreement that that portion of the plan could be
beefed up He stated Dakota County and Mn -DOT receive a copy of this plan, and the
County provides its plan as well.
Council Member Baxter stated he appreciates the work gone into this plan. His concern is
the City has to continue to be active on this transportation issue. The Council and staff have
to be involved.
Council Member DeBettignies stated he talked about entering partnerships with the DCTC
and the University of Minnesota Trying to coordinate student transportation back and
forth from residential areas is also an issue There is a lot of growth opportunity, and he is
glad the plan looks forward.
Mr. Rickart stated early on stakeholder meetings were held; the University and DCTC were
involved m that process. Through some of the projects being worked on, the City will be
working with them much more.
Council Member DeBetugmes asked about a left -hand turn lane for Shannon Parkway. Mr.
Brotzler responded that is an issue that can be evaluated. He noted all modifications come
with a cost. Regarding signals on 42 and a protective left -turn lane on Shannon Parkway,
that is more of a County issue and how they set that system up.
Council Member DeBettgmes stated with the high number of accidents at these
intersections, he assumes the Council would allow turn signals. Mr Rickart responded when
the City was working on this m 2003, the County said no to the signals. At this point staff
can go back to the County and see what can be done.
Council Member Shoe Corrigan asked if the document addressed a turn lane on County
Road 38. She noted people are pulling onto the shoulders to make turns.
Mr. Brotzler stated one of the items that has been included in the annual letter to the County
is a bypass lane on 38 and a right -turn lane at Shannon Parkway. The County's response has
been there is no record of there being any issues there, there are not significant numbers of
accidents at that intersection. People are making lanes on the shoulder, but at the same time
it results in a solution so that the County does not feel it needs to respond with
improvements
Council Member Shoe Corrigan asked what other measurements the County utilizes, other
than the shoulder.
Mayor Droste asked if a traffic counter can be put on a shoulder. Mx. Brotzler stated there
are the same issues on Highway 3 There have been a few occasions where the police have
gone out and actively enforced that. It does create a safety issue, but it is not a very
enforceable matter. It is a challenging situation but something staff is aware of. He
suggested with this year's request to Dakota County, a renewed effort be made to urge them
to make improvements at that intersection.
Council Member Sterner asked if all neighboring communities were contacted with this plan,
including Farmington and Empire Township Mr Brotzler responded the plan was sent out
to all communities required by the Met Council. Farmington is not contiguous so it was
hkely not sent to them; Empire Township did receive it but did not send back comments.
Council Member Sterner asked about the recommendations on page 15. Mr Langworthy
stated those are the recommendations from the inter regional corridor study One of the
projects, the 117 Street Interchange on STH 52 m Inver Grove Heights, has been
completed.
Mr. Brotzler noted that closmg the Pine Bend Trail access was part of a plan that was done
with the inter regional corridor as well as the 52/42 interchange study.
Council Member Sterner questioned some of the classifications of the roads as collectors.
He thought a number of roads should be identified as collectors and currently are not.
Mr. Brotzler explained how roads are determined to be collectors.
Council Member Sterner asked if this transportation plan has to be approved tonight. Mr.
Brotzler responded the timing is up to the Council. The public hearings have been held, and
now it is appropriate for Council to consider it.
Mayor Droste noted there are some minor typos that will be cleaned up by staff prior to
Council approval.
Council Member Sterner stated there are a couple of areas he would like to work with staff
on clarifying items. Council Member Shoe Corrigan stated she would like the item back
under Old Business at the next Council meeting to review modifications.
Mayor Droste stated the transit component needs to be figured out.
Community Development Director Lindquist stated transit and other issues will be revisited
in the future as well.
Motion by Sterner Second by Shoe Corngan.
Motion to table the Final Draft Transportation Plan until the next most practical
future Council meeting.
Ayes: 5.
Nays: 0. Motion carried.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
City Adnumstrator Verbrugge provided a legislative update. There has been quite a bit of
news regarding disclosure of negotiations between the University of Minnesota and a
number of parties that has led to new legislation that would involve sale and transfer of land
of the University's research property that is partially in Rosemount and partially in Empire
Township. While the media has reported that the 3,000 acres is in Rosemount, the land is all
within Empire Township, at least those that are still subject to negotiations.
Mr. Brotzler noted the Utility Commission meeting scheduled for April 10 has been
cancelled and is in the process of being rescheduled for April 17, though that is still
unconfirmed.
Mayor Droste reviewed regularly scheduled meetings on the City calendar as well as an egg
hunt scheduled for April S.
Mr. Verbrugge noted the Council work session m May is scheduled for the 10 However,
he and Mr Brotzler will be at respective state association meetings and would like to
reschedule. The Council decided to reschedule it for the 24th.
City Attorney stated the Council may want to reconvene after the executive session to take
action on the settlement agreement if the Council wishes to approve it.
Mayor Droste moved to recess into executive session to discuss the mercury contamination
issue He noted the Council will be reconvening following the executive session. Second
by Sterner. Ayes 5. Nays: 0.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Droste moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:40 p.m. Second by Sterner. Ayes: 5.
Nays 0. The meeting was adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
Allison Burr,
Recording Secretary