HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.a. Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, 10-03-PLNROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CITY COUNCIL
City Council Special Meeting: August 10, 2011
AGENDA ITEM: 10- 03 -PLN: Pedestrian and Bicycle
AGENDA SECTION:
Master Plan.
!�
PREPARED BY: Jason Lindahl, AICP
AGENDA NO.
Planner
ATTACHMENTS: Framework Map, Walk -Bike Routes and
Treatments Table, Resolution 2010 -79
APPROVED BY:
Accepting the Pedestrian and Bicycle
Master Plan Dated October 28, 2010.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Direct Staff Regarding Formalizing and Posting Signs for the
City's Bicycle Routes.
SUMMARY
Staff requests the City Council formally recognize designation of bicycle routes throughout the city.
Potential bicycle routes and treatments are identified in the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan.
Designation and signing these bicycle routes is important because it can help cyclist of all levels navigate
within and between a variety of destinations throughout the community. Staff anticipates signing bicycle
routes with excess SHIP (State Health Improvement Program) grant funds upon concurrence of staff's
recommendation.
BACKGROUND
On November 1, 2010, the City Council formally accepted the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan.
At the time the Council accepted the plan, a primary area of discussion related to financing of individual
plan components. As a result, staff has worked to implement the plan when either development or grant
opportunities arise.
In late 2010, staff sought and received two SHIP grants to begin implementing the Pedestrian and Bicycle
Master Plan. The first was a $10,500 grant for a bicycle rack grant program. After advertising this
program to local businesses and non - profits, the City received bicycle rack grant requests from 5 local
organizations and the City's selected vendor will begin installing these racks later this month. The second
grant was for $25,000 for wayfinding signs to guide pedestrians to destination in and around downtown.
Favorable bids for the pedestrian wayfinding signs resulted in extra funds from this grant. The County has
approved the use of these extra funds to purchase signs to designate the major bicycle routes illustrated in
the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan.
ISSUE ANALYSIS
The Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan includes a Framework Map illustrating potential Access, Local and
Main bicycle routes throughout the community (see attached). Components for each type of route are
detailed in Figure 3.1: Walk -Bike Routes and Treatments (see attached). According to this table, bike route
treatments can be paved multi-use paths, on- street bike lanes, bicycle boulevards or bicycle routes. Adding
bicycle route signage to those routes that currently include either a multi-use path or striped shoulder
would require minimal expense to officially designate these routes.
Standards for the BIKE ROUTE signs and there placement are detailed in the the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). An example of this sign is provided below. These signs are intended
to be seen by both motorist and cyclist and will be located in the boulevard along the side of the road
similar to the BIKE LANE signs currently in place along Shannon Parkway between 145`' Street and
McAndrews Road (County Road 38).
CONCLUSION
Based on available grant funds, full implementation of the bicycle routes illustrated in the Framework Map
from the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan is not practical at this time. Given the City's existing bike
lane on Shannon Parkway, the Dakota County bicycle routes along County Roads 42 and 46 and the State
of Minnesota route along Highway 3, an alternative strategy would be to designate and sign a limited
number of Local and Main Routes to create the spin of a bicycle route network on which the City could
build. The recommended routes are detailed in the table below. Should the City Council endorse this
strategy, staff will bring this item back to the next available Council meeting for formal action.
Initial Bicycle Routes and Number of Associated Signs
Street
Segment
Shannon Parkay
145`'' to Co. Road 46
145`' Street
Diamond Path to Co. Road 42
Connemara Trail
Diamond Path to Bloomfield Path
Bloomfield Path
145`'' to Connemara Trail
Auburn Path
Connemara Tail to County Road 42
Chippendale Avenue
145` Street to County Road 46
Evermoor Parkway
Diamond Path to Connemara Trail
C)
v,
0
N
Cal
O
0
cn �
CD
,n
Sh nnon P
0
0
j
m
;
Biscayne Ave c
N
0
N
C
Akron Ave
T ? T n O
� � A
m " N
S
Cn
Cn
Blaine Ave E (CSAH71)
�I
onley Ave
a
0
A S
T
a v+ •
a � �
•
N •
J B
m
• y 0 r-
CD 0
Z
2
\�Opu C
n
I
I
I
Si
I�
IS
{m O
1 CO
1 '
1 �
I �
I
I
•
(Q y'
� y N •
� a 3
R
CD
tQ
O
N
N
�
>;
-CI,
.a-._
z
O
N
m cn v
o �
3 CD
,
C CD
o
X
a
O . CL
°�-
m W
� Is
Z
�.
♦ 40
o
C
» 7
CL
O N
N
CD
v
:
)
o
0
CD
N
n
0
3
3
v
�
c
z
v
e
H'
■
I •
N
_O
3
D D o
m m v �
:
(n
m v A m
o m
z - 0
ID
3
m (D
° el T
c
(D SU
(a 3
v
O
s m
°O OC
°. m
p
C_
Bacardi Path
Cn
C1
I
i
(D
w
v
w
I
I
I
I
Si
I�
IS
{m O
1 CO
1 '
1 �
I �
I
I
•
(Q y'
� y N •
� a 3
R
CD
tQ
O
N
N
�
>;
-CI,
CD
0
w
O
N
m cn v
o �
3 CD
,
C CD
N (D
m
� 3
� (n
c O
i� CD
o
3
O . CL
°�-
m W
n
D
a
_
m
Vl
3
C
3
O
o
C
» 7
CL
O N
N
1 D
�
3
D
CL
m
-
n
0
0
CD
N
n
0
3
3
c
e
H'
■
I •
D D o
m m v �
:
D =
m m
CL
m v A m
o m
z - 0
ID
3
m (D
° el T
c
(D SU
(a 3
v
O
s m
°O OC
°. m
p
C_
0 fD
D
O
1
N 7C
=
Cn
C1
(D
w
v
w
N
000
T
O
m
O
m co
x 0
..
0
0
T
C
c
m
T
C
c
D 3
In y
C
C
CL
CD
C
n
m
v
N
(D
C
n
m
N
m
N
N
ut
r
.70
fl1
7
(D
Z
(D
CD
FRAMEWORK
PLAN
__ THE PLAN SECTION 3 ��
PURPOSE:
Provide connections between citywide or regional trail system and regional destinations
Trail -heads with vehicle parking, rest areas with benches and water, visible bike racks at destinations
145th Street West, Chippendale Avenue -Chili Way, Bloomfield Path
USERS:
Walkers, all cyclists - novice to experienced
H
Focus:
Shared transportation and recreation function, safety, experience, improved travel time, route
N continuity
BIKE TREATMENTS:
Off -road: paved multi -use trail (side -path or trail corridor), On -road: bike lane, bicycle boulevard, bike
:3
BIKE TREATMENTS:
Off -road: bike lane, bike route, On -road: paved multi -use trail (side -path or trail corridor)
0
WALK TREATMENTS:
Sidewalks and paved multi -use trail (side -path ortrail corridor)
I=
WALK TREATMENTS:
Paved multi -use trail (side -path or trail corridor)
Z
WAYFINDING SIGNAGE:
Informational kiosks directional, route sign and bike button (see pg .50 )
Q
PREFERRED STREET CROSSINGS:
Controlled intersections, underpasses, high visibility crosswalk treatments at uncontrolled at -grade
J
crossings
crossings
Q
SUPPORT FACILITIES:
Trail -heads with vehicle parking, rest areas with benches and water, visible bike parking at destinations
F WAYFINDING
EXAMPLES:
Shannon Parkway, Connemara Trail, Rosemount Interpretive Trail
__ THE PLAN SECTION 3 ��
PURPOSE:
To provide safe routes to significant city destinations such as Downtown, schools and community center
Trail -heads with vehicle parking, rest areas with benches and water, visible bike racks at destinations
145th Street West, Chippendale Avenue -Chili Way, Bloomfield Path
USERS:
Walkers, all cyclists - novice to experienced
N
Focus:
Transportation for shorter local trips, recreation loops, safety, user experience, route continuity
W
F
BIKE TREATMENTS:
Off -road: paved multi -use trail (side -path or trail corridor), On -road: bike lane, bicycle boulevard, bike
O
route
Door -to -door connections between residential areas and destinations, route continuity, user experience,
WALK TREATMENTS:
Sidewalks and paved multi -use trail (side -path ortrail corridor)
J
Q
WAYFINDING SIGNAGE:
Informational kiosks, directional, route sign, bike button (see pg. 50)
O PREFERRED
STREET CROSSINGS:
Controlled intersections, underpasses, high visibility crosswalk treatments at uncontrolled at -grade
>_
J
crossings
__ THE PLAN SECTION 3 ��
SUPPORT FACILITIES:
EXAMPLES:
Trail -heads with vehicle parking, rest areas with benches and water, visible bike racks at destinations
145th Street West, Chippendale Avenue -Chili Way, Bloomfield Path
PURPOSE:
Provide designated quiet routes to connect to city -wide and greater community network
USERS:
Walkers; all cyclists - novice to experienced
Focus:
Door -to -door connections between residential areas and destinations, route continuity, user experience,
LLI
U
safety
U
Q
BIKE TREATMENTS:
Off -road: paved multi -use trail (side -path or short trail link), On -road: bike lane, bicycle boulevard, bike
>_
route
N
Q
WALK TREATMENTS:
Sidewalks Paved multi -use trails within the road right -of -way or short multi - purpose trail links
F WAYFINDING
SIGNAGE
Directional, route sign, bike button (see pg. 50)
d
PREFERRED STREET CROSSINGS:
Safe crossings of collector roads or higher at least every 1/2 mile
0
SUPPORT FACILITIES:
Benches, visible bike racks at destinations
H EXAMPLES:
155th Street West, trails in the Rosemount High - Middle - Elementary School Complex, Bonaire Path
iY
Q
PURPOSE
Provide fine grain connections to residential areas
U SERS:
Walkers, novice cyclists
Q
O
N
0
Focus:
Door -to -door connections to residential areas, user experience
=
—�
BIKE TREATMENTS:
Biking on sidewalks for novice cyclists, particularly young children
0 �
WALK TREATMENTS:
Off road: sidewalks, short multi -use trail links
m
= Q
WAYFINDING SIGNAGE:
None
W N
PREFERRED STREET CROSSINGS:
High visibility crosswalk treatments where needed on school routes
z
SUPPORT FACILITIES:
None
EXAMPLES:
153rd Street West, Brockway Ave, 144th Street West
__ THE PLAN SECTION 3 ��
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2010 -79
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE
PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN
DATED OCTOBER 28, 2010
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount applied for and received a grant in December, 2009, in the
amount of $25,000 from the Minnesota State Health Improvement Program (SHIP) through the
Dakota County Active Living Partnership and the Dakota County Public Health Department to
develop a pedestrian and bicycle master plan to support the community's active living vision; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount entered into a contract with Hoisington Koegler Group,
Inc. (HKGi) on February 23, 2010, for preparation of a pedestrian and bicycle master plan; and
WHEREAS, on March 31, 2010, the City of Rosemount held a stakeholders meeting to gather
information on the walking and bicycling challenges within and around the City of Rosemount;
and
WHEREAS, on April 7, 2010, the City of Rosemount held a public open house to gather public
comments on existing sidewalk and trail system, facilities and destinations; and
WHEREAS, on June 2, 2010, the City of Rosemount held a second public open house to
present the draft plan for review and comment; and
mtrastructure to create a community where choosing to wails or oixe is a
enjoyable recreation and transportation option for all users; and
WHEREAS, on August 11, 2010, the City of Rosemount City Council reviewed the draft plan at
a work session; and
WHEREAS, on August 24, 2010, the City of Rosemount Planning Commission reviewed the
draft plan and agreed with the comments made by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on April 26, 2010 and May 24, 2010, June 28, 2010, and September 27, 2010 the
City of Rosemount Parks Commission reviewed a draft plan as prepared by HKGi
recommending adoption of the Plan at their September meeting; and
RESOLUTION 2010-
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Plan will serve as a framework
for further development of bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure within the community which
will be implemented as deemed appropriate recognizing fiscal constraints.
ADOPTED this 1st day of November, 2010, by the City Council of the C' of osemount.
William H. Droste, Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
1
2