HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.k. Request by McDonald's USA, LLC for a Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit for the Drive-Through to Rebuild the Existing McDoanld's Restaurant, Case 11-10-SP & 11-11-CUPAGENDA ITEM: Case 11 -10 -SP 11 -11 -CUP: Request by
McDonald's USA, LLC for a Site Plan
Review and Conditional Use Permit for the
Drive Through to Rebuild the Existing
McDonald's Restaurant
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent
PREPARED BY: Eric Zweber, Senior Planner
AGENDA NO.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution; Site Map; Color Rendering;
p, 9,
Survey; Site and Paving Plan;
Architectural Cover Sheet; Exterior
Elevations; Floor Plan; Landscape Plan;
Site Photometrics; Utility Plan; Public
Works Memorandum dated April 11;
Excerpt from the April 26 Planning
Commission Minutes.
APPR VED BY:
Mel
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a resolution approving the Conditional
Use Permit for the Drive Through Facilities for McDonald's USA, LLC.
4 ROSEMOUNT
CITY COUNCIL
City Council Meeting Date: May 17, 2011
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ISSUE
The McDonald's at 15035 Canada Avenue was constructed in 1981 and is being proposed to be
demolished and reconstructed with a new McDonald's on the same site. To accomplish this
reconstruction, McDonald's is requesting a Site Plan Review approval for site and building and a
Conditional Use Permit for the dual drive through lanes.
APRIL 26 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
At their April 26 meeting, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for the McDonalds
proposal. No residents spoke during the public hearing. Brent Nasset, McDonald's design
consultant from Kimley -Horn, addressed the Commission on behalf of the applicant.
Commissioner Irving asked if the existing sign would be changed with this reconstruction. Senior
Planner Zweber stated that McDonald's is not currently proposing to change the sign but staff has
discussed the current sign standards with the franchise and that a sign can be approved
administratively separate from this application, if found compliant with the ordinance standards.
Commissioner Miller asked about sustainability issues, inquiring if McDonald's used the "green"
design and if there would be a bike rack installed. Mr. Nasset explained the McDonald's design and
stated that a bike rack is not proposed to be installed. Commissioner Powell asked for an
explanation on how customers parking in the western stalls would walk through the drive- through
lane and asked if the water service would be increased during reconstruction. Mr. Nasset explained
the parking lot design and stated that the water service would be increased for better fire
suppression.
The Commissioner questioned the staff proposed standard that the speakers would be inaudible
from the property line. Mr. Nasset asked that the standard be as is written in the Ordinance that the
public address system be inaudible at the nearest non commercial property line (which would be on
the north side of CSAH 42) instead of at the property line. Staff explained the rational for the
property line standard is because of the 12 foot wide trail running between McDonald's and CSAH
42 which would contain residents that are not going to McDonald's. Some Commissioners
observed that the traffic on CSAH 42 would be louder than the speakers and that no other drive
through facility in town has this more stringent standard. The Planning Commission changed the
condition in their recommendation to the speaker being inaudible at the nearest non commercial
property.
The Planning Commission approved the Site Plan for McDonald's with the following conditions:
1. Install a swoosh atrium on the north side of building (facing CSAH 42) similar to the
swoosh atrium on the south side of the building (facing private drive), or comparable
embellishment for staff review and approval.
2. Increase the parking lot setback to CSAH 42 to a minimum of 30 feet.
3. Install ground cover and landscaping along the north and east property lines to screen the
parking area to a height of four feet.
4. Selection and placement of the rooftop mechanical equipment so that the parapet wall
shields the equipment from public view.
5. Lighting fixture cut sheets shall be provided to ensure that are a cut -off style of lighting.
6. Non essential lighting shall be turned off after business hours.
Since the Planning Commission meeting, McDonald's has revised their plans (attached) to address a
number of these conditions. The parking setback has been increased to 31.7 feet. A berm and
landscaping is proposed on the north side of the parking lot and landscaping is proposed on the east
side of the parking lot to provide the screening required. A cut sheet has been added to the
photometric plan to show the shoebox /cut -off style of lighting they will be installing.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the drive
through facilities at McDonald's.
BACKGROUND
The current McDonald's at 15035 Canada Avenue (southwest corner of Canada Avenue and CSAH
42) was constructed in 1981 with the building sitting on the western half of the site, a playland facing
the private drive, a single drive through lane between the building and the Pizza Hut to the west,
and a double laned parking lot on the eastern half of the site. To improve and modernize the
function of the McDonald's, the corporation is proposing to demolish the building and parking lot
and reconstruct the building central to the site with the parking lot on the east, north, and west sides
of the building. The new McDonald's will still have an interior playland to the south, but will be
within the building architecture instead of the glass addition on the existing McDonald's. The new
McDonald's will have double drive- through lanes and menu boards while being served by a single
lane pick -up windows.
To facilitate reconstruction, the Planning Commission has approved the Site Plan Review (with
conditions) and has made a recommendation to the City Council for the approval of the Conditional
Use Permit (CUP) for the drive- through facility. The City Council is only required to approve the
Resolution approving the CUP.
2
Frontage
Required Setback
Provided Setback
Building
Parking
Building
Parking
North (CSAH 42)
50 feet
30 feet
89 feet
31.7 feet
East (Canada Ave)
30 feet
20 Feet
72 feet
20 feet
South (Private Dr)
10 feet
10 feet
41 feet
15 feet
West (Pizza Hut)
10 feet
10 feet
79.8 feet
11.8 feet
SITE PLAN REVIEW
Setbacks
1 CSAH 42 is a principal arterial requiring an additional 20 foot building setback and 10 foot parking setback.
All setbacks meet ordinance requirements.
Parking
Required: 1 per 3 seats: 110 seats /3 37 parking stalls
Provided: 52 parking stalls
Landscaping:
Trees Required:
Trees Provided:
1 tree per 3,000 square feet of land area: 62.7K sq. ft. /3K sq. ft.= 21 trees
6 existing trees to remain 15 new trees installed 21 trees
Foundation Plantings Required:
1 per 10 feet of building perimeter: 326 foot perimeter /10 feet 33 plants
Foundation Plantings Provided: 118 scrubs
11 -4 -14 G. C -4: General Commercial Site And Building Standards: To prevent urban blight and
ensure quality long lasting construction compatible with both adjacent properties and those
throughout the district, all sites and buildings shall comply with the following standards, as well as
applicable sections of this title:
1. Architectural Appearance: While variation in materials and colors that support the general
theme may be allowed, the overall building shall have "360 degree" architecture. Nonearth
tone materials shall be limited to architectural accents. The color of the nonbrick or stone
portion of the building shall match the predominant brick or stone color portion.
The treatment of the building is similar on the east, south, and west
facade, but the north facade is essentially only a brick wall. Staff
recommends that a swoosh atrium similar to the one on the south
facade, or comparable embellishment, be added to the north facade
(facing CSAH 42).
2. Building Massing: Facades shall be articulated to reduce their mass and scale and provide
visual interest consistent with Rosemount's identity, character, and scale. Large uninterrupted
building walls or elevations are prohibited. Corner architectural elements are encouraged to
define the edges of a building. A building more than one hundred feet (100') in width shall
be divided into increments of no more than thirty feet (30') through the articulation of the
facade. This shall be achieved through combinations of the following techniques:
a. Divisions or breaks in the materials.
The east, south, and west facades are broken up by the metal
awnings and the swoosh architectural features. Staff recommends
3
that a similar swoosh architectural feature is added to the north
facade.
b. Arcades, entry features, window bays, or the like.
Entry features are included in the design.
c. Variations in rooflines or slope plane.
The rooflines are varied by the metal awnings and swoosh
architectural features. Staff recommends adding a swoosh feature to
the north facade.
d. Variation in building plane or setback.
The building planes are broken up by the entry features and swoosh details.
e. Equivalent techniques approved by the city.
Staff recommends adding a swoosh feature to the north facade.
3. Permitted Materials: The exterior wall surfaces of all buildings shall be constructed of at least
fifty percent (50 brick or natural stone. The remaining fifty percent (50 of the wall
surface may be specialty integral colored concrete block (including textured, burnished, and
rock faced block), tile (masonry, stone or clay), architectural textured concrete panels cast in
place, or better. EIFS or masonry stucco may be used for the sign band areas and /or
architectural accents totaling no more than ten percent (10 of the nonglass, brick or stone
portion of the building. Unadorned concrete is prohibited.
The building facades are predominately face brick and windows
with architectural accents of metal awning, swoosh details and
horizontal fascia bands.
4. Pedestrian Circulation: Appropriate provisions shall be made to protect pedestrian areas
from encroachments by parked or moving vehicles. Clear and well lighted walkways shall
extend throughout the site and parking area(s) connecting building entrances to adjacent
public sidewalks and any parking facilities located on the site.
a. Walkway(s) shall be made of high quality, long lasting, and decorative materials and
incorporate architectural themes present in the surrounding building. Bituminous or
asphalt materials are prohibited.
Walkways are installed along two and half sides of the building to all
customer entrances and a walkway is added to the east across the
parking lot to the sidewalk along Canada Avenue.
b. A walkway at least six feet (6') wide shall extend along any facade featuring a
customer entrance and any facade abutting a parking or maneuvering area.
4
A six foot wide sidewalk is installed on two and a half sides of the
building to all customer entrances.
c. A continuous and permanent concrete curb not less than six inches (6 above grade
shall separate internal sidewalks from parking, loading, stacking and maneuvering
areas.
There is a curb installed along the six foot wide sidewalk.
d. Concrete sidewalks, five feet (5') in width, shall be provided on all commercial
property abutting any collector or arterial street.
There is a bituminous trail along CSAH 42 and a sidewalk along
Canada Avenue. A walkway is installed between the sidewalk on
Canada Avenue to the building.
5. Lighting: Lighting shall be consistent in character throughout the entire property site, in both
design and bulb type.
a. Any light fixture must be placed in such a manner that no light emitting surface is
visible from any residential area or public /private roadway, walkway, trail or other
public way when viewed at ground level.
Cut sheet information provided for the lighting fixtures shows a
shoebox /cut -off type of fixture.
b. Light shall be directed toward the ground. Externally lit signs, display, building and
aesthetic lighting must be lit from the top and shine downward. Lighting must be
shielded to prevent direct glare.
The cut -off type of fixture will meet this standard.
c. The level of lighting shall not exceed 0.5 lumens at any residential property line or
1.0 lumen at any nonresidential property line.
Anticipated lighting levels do not exceed 1.0 lumen at the property
line. There are no residential property lines.
d. The maximum height for exterior lighting is thirty feet (30'). The maximum height
for exterior lighting within one hundred feet (100') of a residential use or district shall
be twenty feet (20').
The exterior lighting mounting height is designed for 24 feet in
height. There are no residential uses or districts within 100 feet.
e. All nonessential lighting will be required to be turned off after business hours,
leaving only the necessary lighting for site security.
Staff has proposed a condition to require nonessential lighting to be
turned off after business hours.
5
6. Parking Lots: To reduce the impact of large expanses of paved surfaces, provide a more
pedestrian friendly environment and provide adequate room for snow storage, all parking
areas (including driveways and drive aisles) shall be screened and landscaped. Trees, shrubs,
flowers and ground cover needed in these areas shall be in addition to the minimum number
of trees and foundation plantings required by this title.
a. Screening: Landscaping and berming shall be a primary source for screening parking
areas. Should landscaping and berming be found ineffective by the city, the city may
approve screening walls and /or decorative fencing as an alternative. Screening walls
shall be constructed of the same materials as the principal building and shall not
extend more than twenty five feet (25') without a change in architecture to reduce
their mass and appearance. The screening source (landscaping and berming or walls
and /or decorative fencing) shall provide a minimum fifty percent (50 opacity
screen to a height of at least four feet (4').
A berm and line of alpine current shrubs are proposed to the north
(CSAH 42) and a line of alpine current shrubs are proposed to the
east (Canada Avenue) property lines. Staff finds this is adequate to
meet the intention of the Ordinance.
b. Landscaping: A minimum of ten percent (10 of the parking area shall be
landscaped. This landscaping shall be located on islands, peninsulas or the like within
the perimeter of the parking area.
The parking lot perimeter encompasses about 36,000 square feet.
With the four landscaped comers of the parking lot, the island
between the two entrances, the peninsula at the southeast corner of
the building, the sidewalk peninsula on the east side and the two
drive- through islands, there is about 5,800 square feet of
landscaping.
1) The islands or peninsulas shall be a minimum eight and one -half feet (8.5)
wide and extend the length of the adjacent parking stall(s). These
dimensions may be altered to provide sufficient area for the proposed
landscaping to mature.
Islands and peninsulas are at least 8.5 feet wide and the
length of a parking stall.
2) To ensure this landscaping is properly dispersed, a minimum of one island,
peninsulas or the like shall be located within each six thousand (6,000)
square feet of vehicular use area.
Nine islands, peninsulas, or the like are installed within the
36,000 square feet of parking area.
3) A minimum of one tree shall be required for each two hundred fifty (250)
square feet or fraction thereof, of required landscape area. Deciduous trees
shall have a clear trunk of at least five feet (5) above the ground and a
caliper of at least two and one -half inches (2.5 Coniferous trees shall be
6
at least four feet (4') in height. The remaining area shall be landscaped with
shrubs or ground cover (not to include rocks or gravel except as a mulch
around shrubs and ground cover) not to exceed two feet (2') in height.
There is at least one tree in eight of the nine islands,
peninsulas, or the like. There is no tree within the
peninsula for the sidewalk connection but the sidewalk
connection runs through two existing trees that will be
saved and maintained.
7. Landscaping: All areas of land other than those occupied by building or hardcover shall be
landscaped with a combination of sod and plantings. Rock or mulch may only be used as an
accent material around sod or plantings. Trees, shrubs, flowers and ground cover needed in
these areas shall be in addition to the minimum number of trees and foundation plantings
required by this title. All landscaped areas shall be irrigated. Portions of the site may be
exempt from these requirements where future development or expansion is planned. These
areas shall either be graded and seeded with prairie grass in accordance with the city of
Rosemount grading requirements or remain as undisturbed natural areas containing existing
viable natural vegetation that can be maintained free of foreign and noxious plant material
and will not produce soil erosion due to potential increases in storm water runoff.
There is landscaping or other suitable ground cover in all areas not
covered by the building or parking areas.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Drive through facilities for restaurants, banks, and other similar uses.
1. The site and building(s) shall be designed to limit the effects of the drive- through on
adjacent properties and public rights of way. No use with a drive through window shall be
located abutting any residential use or district.
The drive- through lanes turn the cars towards the west (Pizza Hut)
when ordering and pick -up windows face the west (Pizza Hut) and are
not visible from any public right -of -way.
2. Drive- through facilities shall have a minimum six (6) stacking spaces per drive- through
window. Fast food uses operating more than one window per individual drive aisle shall
meet the stacking requirements for a single drive- through facility. Each space shall be a
minimum of nine feet (9') wide by eighteen feet (18') long.
The drive through windows have space for the stacking of at least six
cars. The double menu board lanes maximize the amount of stacking
while minimizing the length needed for stacking.
3. The principal building shall be the primary source for screening the drive- through facility
and stacking and exiting areas from adjacent properties and /or rights of way. Landscaping
and berming shall be a secondary source for screening drive- through, stacking or exiting
areas. Should landscaping and berming be found ineffective by the city, the city may approve
screening walls and /or decorative fencing as an alternative. Screening walls shall be
constructed of the same materials as the principal building and shall not extend more than
twenty five feet (25') without a change in architecture to reduce their mass and appearance.
7
Stacking areas shall have a minimum ninety percent (90 opacity screen to a height of six
feet (6') while exiting areas shall have a minimum fifty percent (50 opacity screen to a
height of at least four feet (4').
The building screens the drive through windows from the public right
of -ways. The staff recommended ground cover and landscaping to four
feet of height will serve to screen the menu boards.
4. Stacking lanes, order board intercom, and service window shall be designed and located to
minimize noises, emissions, and headlight glare upon adjacent properties and public rights of
way.
The stacking lanes, menu boards, and service windows are configured
to limit any headlight glare upon public right -of -ways and adjacent
residential properties.
5. Stacking lanes shall not interfere with circulation through any required parking, loading,
maneuvering or pedestrian area.
Stacking lanes do not interfere with circulation or any required parking,
loading, maneuvering or pedestrian area.
6. No public address system shall be audible from a noncommercial or nonindustrial use or
district.
The Planning Commission recommended condition requires the drive
through speakers being inaudible from the nearest non commercial
property line.
7. In addition to the freestanding sign allowed by the sign ordinance, fast food uses may display
menu signs related to drive- through facilities, provided that:
a. Not more than one menu sign per defined drive through aisle is allowed.
b. Individual menu signs shall be single sided with an area not to exceed thirty two (32)
square feet including both menu information and sign cabinet.
c. The height of the menu sign(s) shall not exceed eight feet (8') including its base or
pole measured from grade to the top of the structure.
d. The menu sign(s) shall not encroach into any parking setback and shall be located
directly adjacent to the drive through aisle and oriented in such a manner that the
sign provides information to the drive- through patrons only and does not provide
supplemental advertising to pass by traffic and does not impair visibility or obstruct
circulation.
The actual design of the menu boards has not been provided. Staff has
prepared a condition that requires conformance with the above menu
board standards.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the resolution for the Drive Through Facilities at
McDonald's.
8
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an
application from McDonald's USA, LLC requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to operate a
drive -thru facility at their restaurant located at 15035 Canada Avenue, Rosemount.
WHEREAS, on April 26, 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed and
conducted a public hearing for the conditional use permit application of McDonald's USA, LLC;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend that the City Council
approve the conditional use permit application for McDonald's USA, LLC; and
WHEREAS, on May 17, 2011, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Planning
Commission recommendations for the conditional use permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the conditional use permit for the operation of a drive -thru facility at the McDonald's
restaurant located at 15035 Canada Avenue, Rosemount, subject to the following conditions:
ADOPTED this 17 day of May, 2011 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
ATTEST:
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2011
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP)
FOR THE DRIVE- THROUGH FACILITIES FOR MCDONALD'S USA, LLC
1. Public address systems and ordering speakers shall not be audible at the nearest non-
commercial property lines.
2. The text on the menu board shall not be so large as to be visible from the public right
of -way or as to serve as off -site advertising.
3. Size and design of menu boards shall conform with condition seven (7) of the drive
through facility conditional use permit standards.
William H. Droste, Mayor
McDonald's
Disclaim: =r: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not
guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,
appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.
Map Scale
1 inch 400 feet
s kL i•Nls
normo GrOgi
.07117.9 Ad0.15
mtNYLI41,153. 1 5.G7s.40 .2
.41
0
1
731
los!T:.1=1,:lroai
3111'salepossv pue L mr".es
wottitepuN =L,
21 s!
1 1
1
I 1 g=
ii-ti 1 ti i 1 11' 0
I! 11
1.- ilgtgli 1 Eg i' g
iitillilgilliglIglil 11111111 ti HMI
1 Vage88r.sts1.30?151XEMSti&41§g. igilig
CD
.1 0 7
AAA2MS
3AV VOVNVO SCOS/ r
011 'vsnspieuocow
uJ
Tr.0•••42
1.“ .dzrz tioz lat ANN z \os"1 ca,,\
8
SN041n3i1
ro I�
tse sre -on ;v
oul salepossy pue k
wok- ,(aw!N
NV1d
ONIAVd CNN 31IS
i o
tl
I
3AV VOVNVO S£OSL "r f r
O-11 VSII s,pleuoOow
tl
ay
a a
vwgrvg
.I
Iocoou lua 4 /0 wdoG' I'.oZ 0'i .11 E G.7 »!G 1 \132 133 +5 \G133NS ribldsGos, \vlv Inl.IV350i \G01bI.00_n \�3T Jv.1
X
0
2 a
Z
jj
�u��IMM���M
����MM����MM��
0
0
_I
CO
I—
0-
k
2
Li
I A
II gb^,
•t
2 e
7)
hJ a
2
Ph
UM
7
//k
e W
.nnnaco 11.nw .020. Is. 12400 v.0.. w.. 4* w 40337
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER:
0 0.4 nun. 440
N MVNO SIHI I
w
133HS a e
d S
1N afG2 a m#NOa
p #n om u m.
moisaa
asuciazilb
050111 oz/no/'c
Nos•mor •ei sree
V:052.1n
.41 .44 ■•pon 1,3111.0
r:tge= ./74
SNOLLVA313 8012131X3
NH '11010043508 153M 311113AV VO'ONVD MSS
59t0 .110 •PIS
wawa t3/ed/Li/165t 3d0101071d 1S3M0111
INVelf1V1S38 S,G1VNOC1
311 fl smeuoani W
•1••••o* mot 0
NUMAINKEMI
ii
411)
0
1
0
L;
El
a g
MDISU
1
asudarmi;
Nos... 'II 141.7
eq. le .11 ...pun
A.P I 1.1
IZI
SNOUNA313 801e131X3
NW '01(10,1350d 1S3/A 311,13AV VOVNVO SCOGL
St LO—ZZ •Po3 •IS *PM
ON1011(18 10/dd/Li/1651 36.1010Nd LS3MOIVI
INVdrIVIS38 S,131VNOC1
311 Vsn s,pieuocpw
191,...! aanwries
El CIO
a Iglir
1
114.
aird
11
111 13 g; 2
i 11;
ON Os 0 El 0 O 0000
pit;
1 II
ig 16 EL
sId opis EITDA
VI NOISHG
1:0; ski
1,..„.„
ti d figh
C50.1. 00Z/20/0
NOSNHOt Nvi.
VICUNNIR
0311M3tl■
NVld 001J
'1,1f10H3508 '153M 311N3AV VOVNIO SUSI
lO-Zi •ItS •1.1s
orcaline .w/dd/L3/L6s. 3d),10108,1 SSJMOCVI
INVallVIS3d S,01VN00
311'v9n spiEuoaNCW
z
5
o
oul'salepossV pue L rm.
woH -Aalw8
NVId 3dVDSONV1
3AV VOVNV3 Ssosl f r f
011 VSf s,pleu000vu
y
co
2
z
z
J
a
1SZ1I -g//V34 frarNlr0 7 t
e
8
0
grai
kv
w 1
0
O
O
-ED Q Q
§x
x§
z
0
uJ
w
w
oc
ssnu w.te, lloY 'CI n NY
u
JY i1 I uu u_aVU.I i l \lf� lf_r. .a__fH. lry \U•lY \nvf l
LIMESTONE WALL SECTION
SCHEDULE AND NOTES
PLANTING PLAN
i
ill
30 .22
ewares
0000
'A
PLANT SCHEDULE
Navy
COMMON NAME I BOTANICAL NAME I ME
EAL TREES
COMMON NAME 'BOTANICAL NNAME I SEX
Oao
w
Od L
-tivn2
-wx
3E6
-0122
BOTANICAL NAME
TRIELIMIR 20,226 .201
020162 612. v0AWN 1wCOM'
32IBN TIMNVIOB
anNe2 531310
.3200 ON. V0NN IN reN Snow
3100523NON 0.160
00 30 TN. 5mv0u0n0c
316N riawvlOB
KOONS vSOe
0322/13 1101 1 0301x, rlb3n
t
201111213 31611V
006000 DION, 0
allzvO MN 30 11131.5.
0010
*TIN 101203
S3
320N Noll
5500 NxNO 0Ol S.x3Nlvx
iB
oas
IVINN:
ISM
zrl
..A.
alola F
s n
oul'salepossV pue L rm.
woH -Aalw8
NVId 3dVDSONV1
3AV VOVNV3 Ssosl f r f
011 VSf s,pleu000vu
y
co
2
z
z
J
a
1SZ1I -g//V34 frarNlr0 7 t
e
8
0
grai
kv
w 1
0
O
O
-ED Q Q
§x
x§
z
0
uJ
w
w
oc
ssnu w.te, lloY 'CI n NY
u
JY i1 I uu u_aVU.I i l \lf� lf_r. .a__fH. lry \U•lY \nvf l
LIMESTONE WALL SECTION
SCHEDULE AND NOTES
PLANTING PLAN
nlc, 2011 2 4E," by brcnI noo,c1
0
2 A?
g g
CANADA Ai/ivue. wesr
a
a
m
0\ McDonald's USA, LLC
J J 15035 CANADA AVE
CI, Or 1.0,1,0L,na 1.111,f1PCn
SITE
PHOTOMETRIC
PLAN
0E9Cuf0 Jr.
$4 t-
L 0:lag
Kimley-Hom
and Associates, Inc.
rxr. zza f514""
"4„ rett
REvISIONS
CATE Br
3,11
5�'Oi5N3tl
ur-wa I�cf�l ox w
ou 'samaossy pue
woH -RaIwq
B 43
to AO NOVNO
Yr 03
NVId ,llllllfl
0 1N10'A3SOtl ]O al!J
3AV VOVNV3 SEOSL
311'VSll s,peueaouv
N
0
o
0
0
w
J
5
3051 :13ifi#1
/1111.11
e9 40 ue1i5 01 1100 '60 mr 6.9 wW 3O Hn 1 vo \135 133e5 \S133u5 N01o\ 0000\ Nr 3MOVO50a\SOlrrO00n\■30r]wl\ 0 6u +op
DATE: April 11, 2011
TO: Eric Zweber, Senior Planner
FROM: Phil Olson, Assistant City Engineer
RE: McDonald's Plan Review
MEMORANDUM
Erosion Control Plan: C2.2:
1. Maximum slopes of 4:1 are allowed.
Revise Note 16 to read "Construct slopes no steeper than 4:1."
4 ROSEMOUNT
CC: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director
Andrew Brotzler, Director of Public Works /City Engineer
Kathie Hanson, Planning Department Secretary
PUBLIC WORKS
Submittal:
McDonald's Plan prepared by Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc., dated March 29, 2011. The
following review comments were generated from the following documents included in the submittal:
1. Existing and Proposed Drainage Conditions, McDonald's, Rosemount, MN:
Dated March 29, 2011
2. Construction Plans for Rosemount Rebuild "McDonalds Restaurant 13 Sheets, Dated
March 29, 2011 and Received March 29, 2011
3. McDonald's Restaurant (Architectural Plans) prepared by Reprise Design Incorporated, 4
Sheets, Dated July 8, 2010 and Received May 29, 2011
General Comments:
Grading and Drainage Plan C4.1:
2. Maximum slopes of 4:1 and minimum slopes of 2% are allowed. The grading plan appears
consistent with this standard. Revise Note 8 to read "All proposed slopes shall be a
maximum of 4:1 and a minimum of 2 Any slopes steeper than 4:1 require erosion and
sediment control blanket per Mn /DOT 3885.1 as depicted on the plan."
Utility Plan: C5.1
3. Traffic control shall be required in accordance with the MUTCD standards. Construction of
the water service within the existing private driveway will require a lane closure or a detour
and closure of the driveway.
Should you have any questions or comments regarding the items listed above, please contact me at
651- 322 -2015.
EXCERPT OF DRAFT MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 26, 2011
f. Request by McDonald's USA, LLC for a Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit to Rebuild
the Existing McDonald's Restaurant (11 -10 -SP and 11 -11 -CUP). McDonald's USA, LLC has
submitted applications for site plan review and conditional use permit to allow for the complete
rebuilding of the existing McDonald's restaurant. Senior Planner Zweber reviewed the details of the
new design and the requirements of the conditional use permit.
Commissioner Irving asked about a new sign with the golden arches and whether or not it meets the
new sign ordinance. Mr. Zweber replied that the applicant had not submitted a sign plan yet which
would be approved administratively. However, the existing sign meets the height standards but not
the material standards of the sign ordinance, so if the applicant plans on changing the sign, it would
have to meet the existing standards.
The applicant, Brent Nasset, of Kimley —Horn Associates, Inc., on behalf of McDonalds,
approached the Commission and explained that they are pushing the building more to the center of
the site to allow for more landscaping and decrease the amount of impervious surface coverage Mr.
Nasset also stated they are updating the existing stormwater catch basins to allow for better drainage
on the site and increasing the greenspace. Commissioner Miller asked if there will be bike parking at
the site and Mr. Nasset replied no.
Commissioner Powell asked if there was any way to change how pedestrians have to walk across a
drive -thru lane and whether or not the water service was being upsized. Mr. Nasset replied that
pushing the building was further to the west would not allow an exit lane and there would be more
pedestrian problems on the east side. Mr. Nasset stated that the water service is being improved to
meet the fire code.
Mr. Nasset requested Condition #1 of the conditional use permit be modified to extend the noise
boundary from the property line to the nearest non commercial property line. He stated that the
applicant will try to minimize the noise but they do not want to be limited by the requirement to be
inaudible at the property line. Mr. Zweber clarified the reason for the property line requirement was
due to the trail on the north side of the property used by people not necessarily visiting McDonalds
and they should not have hear the drive -thru speakers. A discussion took place among the
Commissioners as to whether not they felt it would be an issue to hear the speakers from the trail.
Commissioners Ege and Irving felt it may be an unrealistic expectation. Commissioner Powell
stated his understanding that staff is trying to provide an experience for pedestrians along the trail.
Commissioner Miller asked if there was a noise pollution provision within the applicant's
sustainability vision and possibly a way to gather residential concerns and comments about the noise.
Mr. Nasset replied that he doesn't know if McDonalds has a process to gather residential comments
but that the sound system in the new speakers will be a better quality than what is there now.
Commissioner Powell stated his opinion that Condition #1 of the conditional use permit should
remain as is to encourage McDonald's to achieve that standard.
The public hearing was opened at 8:39p.m.
There were no public comments.
MOTION by Ege to close the public hearing. Second by Irving.
Ayes: 7. Nays: None. Motion approved. The public hearing was closed at 8:40p.m.
Commissioner Irving asked staff if the City has ever received complaints from other public address
systems or drive -thru speakers from other businesses or if this is a special situation in this case. Mr.
Zweber responded the ordinance states that the public systems cannot be audible from any non-
commercial district but the difference in this case is due to the residents on the trail at the property
line. Commissioner Ege stated her concern that if this restriction is not placed on other businesses
with drive -thrus close to residential areas, then the City would be singling out McDonald's. Mr.
Zweber stated the Commission could decide to change the condition to what the ordinance requires.
MOTION by Powell to approve the Site Plan for McDonald's subject to the following
conditions:
1. Install a swoosh atrium on the north side of building (facing CSAH 42) similar to the
swoosh atrium on the south side of the building (facing private drive), or comparable
embellishment for staff review and approval.
2. Increase the parking lot setback to CSAH 42 to a minimum of 30 feet.
3. Install ground cover and landscaping along the north and east property lines to
screen the parking area to a height of four feet.
4. Selection and placement of the rooftop mechanical equipment so that the parapet
wall shields the equipment from public view.
5. Lighting fixture cut sheets shall be provided to ensure that are a cut -off style of
lighting.
6. Non essential lighting shall be turned off after business hours.
Second by Ege.
Ayes: 7. Nays: None. Motion carried.
MOTION by Demuth to recommend that the City Council approve the Conditional Use
Permit for the Drive Through Facility for McDonald's subject to the following conditions:
1. Public address systems and ordering speakers shall not be audible at the nearest non-
commercial property lines.
2. The text on the menu board shall not be so large as to be visible from the public
right -of -way or as to serve as off -site advertising.
3. Size and design of menu boards shall conform with condition seven (7) of the drive
through facility conditional use permit standards.
Second by Powell.
Ayes: 7. Nays: None. Motion carried.
Mr. Zweber stated this item will go before the City Council at the May 17, 2011 meeting provided
staff receives plan modifications on the landscaping and setbacks prior to the meeting.