HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.a. Trails, Sidewalks, and Shannon Parkway Striping - 2010 Street Improvements Project - City Project #428ROSEMOUNT
CITY COUNCIL
City Council Work Session: January 13, 2010
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AGENDA ITEM: Trails, Sidewalks, and Shannon Parkway
Striping — 2010 Street Improvements AGENDA SECTION:
Project — City Project #428 TOM S "
PREPARED BY: Andrew J. Brotzler, P.E., Director of AGENDA NO. 2A,
Public Works /City Engineer
ATTACHMENTS: Maps, Exhibits, Public Comments, APPROVED BY:
Accident Reports n n j
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council discussion.
BACKGROUND:
At the December 15, 2009 regular City Council meeting, the City Council received the feasibility report,
heard public comments, and authorized the preparation of plans and specifications for the 2010 Street
Improvements Project. This project has been designated as City Project #428. A map illustrating the
project area and proposed improvements is attached.
As previously presented to Council, additional discussion is needed regarding some elements proposed
within the feasibility report as part of the 2010 Street Improvement Project. These items are: 1) proposed
trail and sidewalk pedestrian improvements on Delta Avenue and Shannon Parkway, and 2) Shannon
Parkway striping configuration. Staff is requesting Council review of the information below.
13-41111111 *3
1. PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS
Trail and sidewalk improvements are proposed on the west side of Shannon Parkway from Connemara
Trail to Dellwood Way, and the east side of Delta Avenue from Dearborn Path to Connemara Trail.
These proposed improvements are consistent with the adopted 2005 Pedestrian Facilities Improvement
Plan.
At the December 15, 2009 regular City Council meeting, it was noted that there is concern about the
existing and proposed driveway grades associated with the proposed sidewalk on the east side of Delta
Avenue from Dearborn Path to Connemara Trail. Attached to this report, using topographical survey
data, staff has prepared additional driveway cross section figures depicting driveway grades and front yard
dimensions, along Delta Avenue. These sections show that installation of the proposed sidewalk can be
accomplished and the steepest portions of driveway can be flattened through re- grading and replacement
back to the garage.
Additional project and grading activities within the front yard areas to match grades would include impacts
G: \ENGPROJ \428 \01132010 CWS Trails - Sidewalks- Striping.doc
to adjacent items such as:
o Sod
• Sprinkler systems
• Invisible fences
• Landscaping items such as edging and retaining walls
• Trees and shrubs
Replacement or repair of these items as close as possible to pre - existing conditions and to the satisfaction
of the affected homeowner as a part of construction restoration has been past standard practice for
reconstruction or sidewalk /trail projects. This work has been successfully completed on projects such as
the 2006 Pedestrian Improvements Project, the 2008 Pavement Management Project, and the 2009 Street
Improvements Project. In addition, trees that require removal are typically replaced at a 1:1 ratio, with
replacement trees planted in an appropriate location outside the public right -of -way.
2. SHANNON PARKWAY STRIPING CONFIGURATION
The pavement mill and overlay and rehabilitation of Shannon Parkway from Connemara Trail to
McAndrews Road as a part of the proposed 2010 Street Improvements Project will include the restriping
of Shannon Parkway. Within the feasibility report and briefly discussed at the December 15, 2009 regular
City Council meeting, there are several options for the restriping of Shannon Parkway. Figures illustrating
the available configuration options for the two segments of Shannon Parkway are attached. The options
were developed based on the following minimum standards and guidelines:
• Urban and Rural
• 10 feet - minimum thru & turn lane width
• 8 feet - minimum parking lane width
• 4 feet - minimum bike lane width
For the urban section of Shannon Parkway between Connemara Trail and Evermoor Parkway, Options
A,B,C and D as attached depict the various lane striping configurations that meet minimum standards and
guidelines. Not shown but also an option is to restripe the urban section of Shannon Parkway to the
current configuration.
For the rural section of Shannon Parkway between Evermoor Parkway and McAndrews Road, Options E,
F and G as attached depict the various lane striping configurations that meet minimum standards and
guidelines. Again, not shown but also an option is to restripe the rural section of Shannon Parkway to the
current configuration.
Additional information for Council consideration related to the striping configuration of Shannon Parkway
is attached and consists of the following:
• Accident reports on Shannon Parkway from September 15, 2006 to present.
• Comments from Mr. Tom Gurney, 13800 Shannon Parkway
• Comment Card from Robert & Laura Rosario, 3956 133`d Court West
SUMMARY:
At this time, staff is requesting Council review for the proposed striping of Shannon Parkway. The
proposed options are as follows:
2
Urban Section — Connemara Trail to Evermoor Parkway
• Option A
• Option B
• Option C
• Option D
• Restripe to existing configuration
Rural Section — Evermoor Parkway to McAndrews Road
• Option E
• Option F
• Option G
• Restripe to existing configuration
For the proposed pedestrian facility improvements based on Council discussion and direction, it is
anticipated that an item will be presented at the January 19, 2010 regular City Council meeting. Options to
be considered may include the following:
Shannon Parkway
• Do nothing
• Develop 5' walk with 3' concrete boulevard — ($375,000)
• Develop 5' walk with 5' boulevard — ($375,000)
Delta Avenue
• Do nothing
• Develop 5' walk with 3' concrete boulevard — ($120,000)
3
KA01668-93 \Cad\Exhlblts \FIG l.dm. tavout1. 12/23 /2009 11:22:52 AM
a
a
0
z
0
0
ry
wk.1t.q I
ROBINSON H
N � will
N i
1
4,P
LEGEND
NEW 5' CONCRETE WALK
NEW W BITUMINOUS TRAIL
NEW 5' CONCRETE WALK
REMOVE EXISTING TRAIL AND
INSTALL NEW 5' CONCRETE WALK
REMOVE EXISTING TRAIL
c
- 2010 STREET IMPROVEMENT WSB Project No.01668 -93 December 15,2009
701 Xenia Avenue south, suite 300 PROJECT
Minneapolis, MN 55416
www.wsbeng.com PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS Figure Number
& Associates, Inc.
VROSEMOUNT g
��. 763- 541 4600 - Fn 763-MI -1700
11111STRUCTURE tNGINEERING PLANNING: CONSTRUCTION MINNESOTA
KA01668 -93 \Cad \Exhi1bits\FlG 9.dwq, lavoutl
i
I
W
1
1
D
\
I
W
1
Q
I
Q
1
Q
1
1
J
>K
N
11
W
W
0
1
I O
1
x
ao
1 C)
1
1 �
�
1
0,
I
\
Q
>
1
3
96' 6'Y3
11
o
WL56' 13
b
\
a�
I
04
a
��
WF °
-
—
o 5
CL 0
o z
3nN3nd
,41134
I
W I
D
Z
Q I
\\ <
\ J
W I
� � I
C) I
° Q
\ 3:
O
�2
ZO
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
R I
I
I
W
Z
w
Q
Q
J
w
r)
O
O
O
O
N
M
0
°I° (D LO 0
0 rn rn oa,
W
D
Z
O
et
O
N
E
0) 0) (3)
O CD O
IT O (7)
W
O
Q
Q
3DM
5
>K
N
W
x�
x
ao
-
0,
i7 x
O
>
0
u CO
04
��
WF °
-
—
o 5
CL 0
o z
O
a+o
a L
w
LK
IT Q)
0)
0)
E
Z
m
i-
U
W
O F
- z7
W O F
W
0'
O
uj
x W
~ fsI
O
0
an •�
0
ALI,
'o
-;7
E
Z 04
LL
LU
LU
U)
0
0
'o
z
oz-
z
LU
� LL Q.):
LLI Z
gg > 0
0
CL
z
F- <
LL,
ui
U)
O
�e
rl
C� <
z
0
z
z
hN;
0
0 0
'Aim
I
LL
Pig
Kr
III oz III o
WON
E
Z
LL
w
0
z
0
0
LLI
w
U)
I Ill
zz
rl
E
Z 00
lT
LL
Jdm"
ZZ'
I V
co
Ii l
ZL)
III Lo
10 0
L)
Z
0
Fz25
Z
z
o I
0
0
w �_l 'Z-
pr
';E
� a !�
j-.f H
77M
A_
C-) z
w 2
0 F-
F__j 1
z (D
w
2 LL
C
w Z
> 0
0
W
Q
_j
CD <
z
0
z
z
';E
� a !�
j-.f H
77M
A_
Brotzler, Andy
From: Tharp, Michael S SMSgt MIL USAF USMEPCOM [ michael .s.tharp @mepcom.army.mil]
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 8:44 AM
To: Brotzler, Andy
Cc: Tharp, Michael S SMSgt MIL USAF USMEPCOM
Subject: 2010 Street Improvement Project
Importance: High
Mr. Brotzler,
I request the city provide to me in writing everything that will be accomplished to my property if a public sidewalk/trail is
installed. Listed below are some items we have discussed:
1. Underground water sprinklers will be replaced and reinstalled to the homeowners specifications (paid by city of
Rosemount)
2. Underground invisible pet fence will be replaced and reinstalled to the homeowners specifications (paid by city of
Rosemount)
3. All grass and landscaping that was removed or damaged will be replaced (paid by city of Rosemount)
4. Entire driveway will be removed and replaced with new driveway from garage entrance to street with new slope
specifications (paid by city of Rosemount)
5. Any other areas not addressed or discussed that will need to be addressed (paid by city of Rosemount)
6. No assessments, expenses, fees will be required by homeowner
Thank you for taking time to visit yesterday — after additional research, it appears my current driveway (14.5% slope) is
seriously out of driveway slope code by many city /state laws (no more than 12 %). Having a new driveway with a slope of
9.37% and a new sidewalk is a win -win for all of us.
V/R
Michael S. Tharp
14004 Delta Ave
Rosemount, MN 55068
612 - 725 -1769 (Office)
612 - 298 -1458 (Blackberry)
612- 725 -1749 (Fax)
michael.s.tharpea mepcom.armv.mil
YgfCWV M //5/,-20/a
Food for thought as City Council members contemplate traffic control improvements on
Shannon Parkway.
• Shannon Parkway between Connemara and Evermore Parkway meets state
guidelines as a residential road. Similar roads in nearby communities are
classified as "residential collector ". I believe Rosemount also adheres to this
classification.
• 1 suggest that current striping on Shannon Parkway is appropriate for a
"residential collector" road and is not in need of improvement or change.
• Changes to traffic control at the elementary school intersection sound reasonable
and prudent.
• Bike lanes are a fine progressive idea where they connect heavily used biking
arteries or routes. Shannon Parkway does not meet those criteria.
• IF IT AIN'T BROKE, DON'T FIX IT - "Any attempt to improve on a
system that already works is pointless and may even be detrimental.
Small improvements to working systems are most often the best
course of action.
-What I found when googling the term "IF IT AIN'T BROKE, DON'T FIX IT"
- As an engineer for over 30 years, I've learned this is a truism
Parking
• During spring and summer evenings, dozens of cars park on both sides of
Shannon Parkway in front of Shannon Park Elementary for baseball and soccer
games. This is overflow traffic from the school parking lot. This is also true for
school events. This parking situation has served the community well for 20 years.
• On the residential section of Shannon Parkway, street parking has served the
community well for 20 years. There is nowhere for our visitors to park for several
hundred yards in either direction.
• If this was a rural section of road I could see the argument for eliminating street
parking. Whether any of us likes it or not, it is indeed residential.
• Where bike paths exist on Shannon Parkway it is not possible to park two cars
one in front of the other in our driveways. When the walking trail is installed on
the west side of the street this situation will be present for all residents on
Shannon Parkway. Hence street parking is needed for the residents here.
• If parking lanes are reduced to one side of the street, residents will be forced to
cross the street when using street parking. One reason for installing the west
bike or walking path is to eliminate the need for crossing the street. One side of
the street parking would be contrary to this reasoning.
ON
• There are no striped bike lanes on city streets in Apple Valley or Eagan. I verified
with both city engineering staffs.
• According to Dakota County Planner Kurt Chatfield, current County policy for
bikers is to build 8 -foot bike paths separated from the street. It is true that they
are considering bike lanes as a new policy where it makes sense.
• As an 18 year resident on Shannon Parkway, I have observed an extremely low
frequency of bikers using the street. My observation has been that most bikers
use the bike path. Street bikers are far less frequent than street parkers.
Observations of similar residential collector streets in the area:
• 145th street between Chili Ave and Highway 3
o 30 MPH, no left hand turn lanes, and legal residential parking
• Diamond Path between Pilot Knob and McAndrews is very similar to Shannon
Parkway.
o 30 MPH, no left hand turn lanes, and legal residential parking
• Pennock Ave in Apple Valley South of McAndrews
o MPH, no left hand turn lanes, and legal residential parking
• Garden View Parkway in Apple Valley south of Highway 42 and north of Highway
42 where curves in the road are present.
o 30 MPH, no left hand turn lanes, and legal residential parking
• 157 1h Ave in Apple Valley between Galaxie and Garden View Parkway is another
very similar street.
o 30 MPH, no left hand turn lanes, and legal residential parking
• It would be easy to identify dozens more of these examples
Left Hand Turn Lanes
• Great idea between 145th street and Connemara
• From a speed control perspective, left hand turn lanes create a "through traffic
situation" not create a traffic calming situation in a residential area or school
zone. I suggest we should be looking for ways to slow traffic in this area.
• Not a needed improvement to this section of Shannon Parkway.
IN
Speed control on Shannon Parkway
• One could argue that speed control on this residential and school zone section of
road would be priority number one and the sole improvement needed here.
• Not having left hand turn lanes northbound on Shannon Parkway can be argued
to be a speed control method leading up to the school zone at Shannon Park
Elementary. Traffic slows down for those making left hand turns northbound
which is a positive situation as drivers approach the school zone.
o Note that the intersections in play here are also used by students riding
their bikes and walking to school which is common in the early fall and
spring.
• According to Dakota County Planner Kurt Chatfield, street parking is documented
to be a speed calming situation on residential — collector streets.
• Apple Valley and Eagan seem to have consistent policy of 30 MPH zones on
most "residential — collector" streets. Whether they are major or minor collector
streets.
• Council and staff might find speed control signage on Diamond Path between
Pilot Knob and McAndrews interesting. Note the frequency of the signs. Also
note the speed control painting on the street where Diamond Path meets Pilot
Knob and McAndrews. This type of speed control might fit our residential / school
zone situation on Shannon Parkway.
• A consistent 30 MPH speed zone between Connemara and Evermore Parkway
would be easier for drivers to adhere to.
• A side note - Highway 3 in Rosemount is a 30 MPH zone. Are pedestrian safety
requirements on this stretch of road more important than the residential section
of Shannon Parkway?
In conclusion:
• Please don't take away our street parking. We use it often.
• Bike and left turn lanes are a great idea - I just don't think they fit this section of
Shannon Parkway.
• Perhaps experimenting with bike lanes on Connemara would be a better first
step.
• A consistent 30 MPH speed zone between Connemara and Evermore Parkway
would be easier for drivers to adhere to.
Thank you,
Tom Gurney
13800 Shannon Parkway
Rosemount, MN
651 322 4517 — home
651 247 9593 - cell
0
PLEASE COMMENT ON ANY ISSUES THE CITY SHOULD CONSIDER WHEN
DESIGNING OR CONSTRUCTING THIS. PROJECT?
A5pecT
A:A\4
- - QC
S (1003
ft C0V nd6L b0U (.
gcr-de1ti5 i o
rec (fvt i
S'ee✓i one
\-J nG r+T /33 60.11T
We-stT
1
��► �oc�;ever, -� fyoc, ,q % tL.
-to s i- de w ru< -on cocas
S
e Sttrtn
io n P"-WY, "Po C
S Rl eff feASO(V W .fi
It i i 5
,
i5 Pr V1 l+t; -1e NfFt lye foAd 1Ct1TrA4Ce +o -(le
S. s ,de c siqonof)
pp-w y
Your Name P"p N ` [p,0VA 0 wi )
Address 5 u n t Wee j
Phone bS ciQ- 3 Q
!CROSEMOUNT
MINNESOTA
Brotzler, Andy
From:
Craig Cool [coolvmc @yahoo.com]
Sent:
Thursday, January 07, 2010 11:58 AM
To:
Droste, William; Bills, Kurt; DeBettignies,Mark; Shoe - Corrigan, Kim; Weisensel, Jeff D.
Cc:
Brotzler, Andy; Dawley, Morgan
Subject:
Shannon Parkway striping
Council members:
I would like to voice my concerns over the proposed restriping of Shannon Parkway between Conemara and
Evermoor Parkway.
am NOT in favor of any restriping of this section of roadway. If bike paths or turn lanes or other restriping
includes the elimination of parking on Shannon Parkway it is NOT a good idea.
We have lived on Shannon Parkway for 18 years. In that time the bike riders I have observed are minimum in
numbers at best. Usually the riders are very young and ride on the sidewalk or they are "Pro" riders who ride
in packs down the traffic lanes in the street.
Eliminating parking would negatively impact the use of my property and be a great inconvenience to my family
and guests. I can only image my parents who are in their 70's having to park at least a block away or more and
navigate icy and snowing sidewalks because they couldn't park in front of our home.
The way the road is striped now does allow for a buffer if bikers want to ride in the street so there is not a
need to restripe.
Restriping this section of road for bikers is not useful even to bikers as this section does not go anywhere. It
does not connect to businesses or service providers. If you want to try out bike lanes I would suggest it be
tried on 140th street between Chili and the downtown area. If it works there then maybe it can be expanded.
As someone who actually lives on this section of roadway please consider what the residents of this area want
and need.
Craig Cool
13770 Shannon Parkway
Email: coolvmc @yahoo.com
Craig Cool
coolvmc @,-yahoo.com
Brotzler, Andy
From: Steve Huderle [steve.huderle @apachegroup.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 11:59 AM
To: Droste, William; Bills, Kurt; DeBettignies,Mark; Weisensel, Jeff D.; Shoe - Corrigan, Kim;
Brotzler, Andy; Dawley, Morgan
Subject: Street Parking on Shannon Parkway
All
I am writing to voice my extreme displeasure is hearing that the city council is considering eliminating parking on Shannon
Parkway in favor of bike lanes. I have lived on Shannon Parkway for 14 years and parking the way it stands now, has
always been an issue. We already are having our neighborhood disrupted with the new sidewalk going in, now you guys
want to get rid of parking on Shannon Parkway ?? Do any of you guys live facing Shannon Parkway ? ?? Because if you
did you would not be in favor of this. Someone tell me were people are suppose to park when I have guests over,
graduations, BBQ's, anything. I would appreciate if someone would call me on this to discuss. My address is 13895
Shannon Parkway..
Thanks,
Steve Huderle
Territory Manager
Apache Group
651 - 633 -5555 ext. 617
651- 633 -1118 (fax)
steve. huderle(a-)apachegroup.com
Brotzler, Andy
From: Hansen, Roger [Roger. Hansen @CHART- IND.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 12:52 PM
To: Rosemount City Council
Cc: Brotzler, Andy; pkavanagh @roncomachine.com; t.benz @farmshows.com
Subject: City Project 428
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members,
My name is Roger Hansen and I reside @ 13809 Shannon Parkway
I was unable to attend the council meeting on December 15th but since that time I have had the
opportunity to view the Webcast provided by the city. In preparation for the January 12th informational
meeting I am sending this e-mail to share my comments on two specific issues from the December
15th council meeting.
1. Proposed sidewalk on the west side of Shannon Parkway between Connemara Trail and
Dellwood Way.
2. Shannon Parkway Striping Improvements
Proposed Sidewalk West Side of Shannon Parkway /Connemara Trail to Dellwood Way (Urban
designation)
• My first comment is I do not support the use of the current funds available tin the sidewalk
and trail budget for this specific project.
• My objection to the proposal is based on what I see as not the best prioritizing of the trail
projects as detailed in the 2008 Pedestrian Facility Map
• 1 have been a resident at 13809 Shannon Parkway since August of 1990 (Original
owner /second home to be built on Shannon Pkwy). During my 20 years we have raised 4 children
from elementary through college and have watched this area develop and the population grow
substantially. I believe that the current sidewalk on the east side of Shannon Parkway is more then
adequate to accommodate pedestrian and bicycle traffic today and into the future. Two improvements
that could be made is better marking of the crosswalk at 137th Street and Shannon Parkway and
continued monitoring of excessive speeds on Shannon Parkway. Speed on Shannon Parkway has
been an issue since the road was extended to McAndrews in the early 1990's. The residents in fact
joined together to ask the city to consider changing the speed limit from 40MPH to 35MPH which the
city did in the mid 90's.
• Rather then just disagree to this proposal I would like to offer another proposal which I feel
will put the funds to work on a project that I would rate as a higher priority to my subject opposition.
Resident Proposal to Utilize Funds for More Urgent Project
�onnemara I suggest that our area would consider completing the sidewalk system on the north side of
Trail from Shannon Parkway to Diamond Path to have a higher priority then the proposed
Shannon Parkway project.
Advantages
o Completing this sidewalk system would complete the city's plan for the corridor from
Diamond Path on the West to Hwy 3 (So. Robert Trail) on the East.
o The above mentioned corridor a more heavily used pedestrian and bicycle path in this area.
o My unofficial calculations indicate that this proposed sidewalk distance would be .5 miles
vs. .3 miles for the Shannon Pkwy system so not a substantial change in distance.
0 1 walked this stretch of Connemara Trail and found that there were no trees, landscaping,
driveways or other significant objects to contend with for installation of a sidewalk.
o This particular stretch of Connemara Trail borders Connemara Park and today for residents
of the Country Hills Addition - Briarwood community access to park requires crossing 4 lanes of traffic
with no crosswalk. In addition my observation, again as a long time resident, is that excessive speed
is a major concern especially by the park entrances. Having a sidewalk on the north side of
Connemara would make it possible to establish controlled crosswalks to the park.
o In addition to establish a controlled crossing to Connemara Park we would also be able to
complete a controlled crosswalk system at the intersection of Shannon Parkway and Connemara
Trail.
o Finally, using this proposal would finish off the pedestrian crossing system at Connemara
Trail and Diamond Path and culminate with the complete connection to the Apple Valley sidewalk
system west of Diamond Path.
Shannon Parkway Striping Improvements
• 1 find Option A of proposed striping improvement to be the most palatable simply because it
will allow for necessary on street parking and improved traffic flow.
• Residents on Shannon Parkway require on street parking as no provisions were made in
the original development of this urban section of roadway for off street parking other then standard
residential driveways.
• The ability to park (with some city restrictions) has been heavily used by numerous
residents on both sides of Shannon Parkway and I have witness the frequent need over the past 20
years.
• Option D would be another possible alternative however less favored simply due to the
concern regarding vehicle speeds on Shannon Parkway and the safety of bicycle riders.
Conclusion
I have sent a number of a -mails to Mr. Brotzler expressing my opposition to the sidewalk on the west
side of Shannon Parkway and he has been very accommodating with information. I believe that
effective government requires citizens to not only communicate opposition to city plans but also to
help with solutions. I hope you will consider this proposal and my comments for city project #428.
I have copies Mr. Patrick Kavanagh and Mr. Todd Benz on this e-mail. Both gentlemen reside on this
section of Shannon Parkway and support the comments and recommendations.
If you would like to contact me you can reach me at this e-mail address or
rogerandkathyhansen(a)_charter.net or feel free to call me at home 651- 423 -7467 or my cell 612 -386-
9550
Sincerely,
Roger W. Hansen
Office 952 - 758 -8231
Cell 612 - 386 -9550
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This email is confidential, may be legally privileged, and is for the intended recipient only. Access,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited and may be a criminal offence.
Please delete if obtained in error and email confirmation to the sender.
Brotzler, Andy
From:
Jonilynn Heikes Uoni.heikes @gmail.com]
Sent:
Thursday, January 07, 2010 2:04 PM
To:
Droste, William; Bills, Kurt; DeBettignies,Mark; Shoe - Corrigan, Kim; Weisensel, Jeff D.;
Brotzler, Andy; Dawley, Morgan
Cc:
Steve Shogren
Subject:
Bike lane on Shannon Parkway
Dear Council Members and City Engineers,
It was recently brought to our attention that you are considering adding bike lanes on Shannon Parkway. While
at first blush a bike lane would be a nicety for those of us who bike in our area, we also learned that these lanes
would eliminate street parking on Shannon Parkway. We are strongly against any action that would eliminate
street parking on Shannon Parkway.
Although we are a family of bikers, we own a home on Shannon Parkway. As is the same for many of our
neighbors, our driveway is not only small, but is at quite an angle. Many icy winters we have had trouble
getting up our drive way and have needed to park in the street in front of our home. Additionally, we
commonly park in the street when we have company visiting, or are working in our garage.
Again, we strongly encourage you to disregard any action that would eliminate street parking on Shannon
Parkway. Given the size and angle of our driveway, it would be extremely inconvenient for our family to not
have available street parking.
We can be reached for question or comment at (651) 344 -8434 or via mail at 13668 Shannon Parkway.
Thank you,
Joni and Steve Shogren
„w7.u- .xar.,Y- .r�rx. ar.-:!x �:. �Y? ^•J';2?'s, ^il —
IOUI CASE NO..... ..... .. - - AMENDED
09002619 N
>� �Of1 .'JA �� �%�J I ,���i L/i'`ij
"R_ _ . # OFF
Ill •�,,3.',>'i 7i� t: �T'A•A 1
.� ' `'A�Q��� _,...
i f MILITARY TBME
DAthu
.'0
o
0I
"n,AND -RUN PUe PROP VEHICLES KILLED
INJURED S MINF ” 1YFY -42.3. xd.TT MONTH DATE TEAR
C
m
N N 62 60
y 1751
O1 Y �„ tl 12 24 2009
.•. 4•I
•AT
a
ROUTE SYSTEM ROUTE NUMBER OR STREET NAME
ROADWAY DIRECTION MI N E OF
N E INTERSECTION OR 7 /Y (1. /l �� S S N
L_�
z
{
10 SHANNON PARKWAY s W WITH -zu YYYaaa///
oN
IM _EM REFERENCE POINT ROUTE SYS ROUTE t STREET, OORP UMfr OR FEATURE
Lou rs
COUNTY NO
19 �TWP 3285
+ 10 DELLWOOD WAY
v .ROADWAYS.WERE.SLIPPERY.DUE TO. HEAVY.SNOWFALL,
•
Y�iS�wr • T- �� � :'� .
FACTOR I
;i'�f'tJ1)B"F;.§ –'4
STATE CLASS OLSTATUS POSITION DRNERLICENSENUMBER•I STATE CUSS OL STATUS
\ 9yy ,I,-UNIT #.1- SLID -AS -IT WAS - GOING - •AROUND -- SLIGHT �CUNIT
POSITION
MN D 01
A;
114CTOR1
16 J01
°y kfi ON SHANNON PARKWAY AND HIT THE LEFT -REAR OF UNIT
N `
TE OF BIRTH I NAME (FIRST, MIDDLE. LAST) GATE OF BIRTH
FACTOR 2
FACTOR 3 INAME FIRST. MIDDLE. US
'� OR VIOLTN RESTRICT
MNUVER
NAODRESS MNWER
DR VIOL RESTRK: ADDRESS
O1
N, Ol
LM9 AWL
, CITY, STATE ZIP
PHYSCL
PHVSCL CfTY, STATE, DP
05
WPq��;
O1
�VEH�ICLE�� TOWED - -AS - WELL. - -BUT- _WOULD .MAKE - ARRANGEMENTS'_
W FATHER 2
8E% SAPE EOPT SAFE
EOPT AN2BAG EJECT INJ SEV -S SEXEEOPTEEOPT ARBAG EJECT IW BEY
USE
RCOAWD
RCOMNO MDRE
94 I�
ISO
COpREC�T
04 98 05 N
01 M .
DELLW 000 WAYk{ ON HIS OWN. ........ _..... ......
........... .. ... ... ..... ..
TYPE DRUG TYPE TRANSPORT MIBULANCE SERVICE RUN NUMBER I ALCHL TYPE DRUG TYPE TO NOSP TRANSPORT AMBULANCE SERVICE RUN NUMBER
ROBSON
ALCHL ITOZiP
TFw$J ❑ AM
Q 9ST
TEST TEST ❑ AMB
113
' ..
'� PASSENGER (OWNER) IN UNIT #1 SAID SHE HIT HER
9 9 8 N'7 ❑ OTHER
�J v
OTHER
' `FIRE FIRE
OCCUP
OCOUP
N
00
05
N
vEH TYV
TOWED TOWED
Y
vttv
O1 1
..... _
Y;
O1
VEH USE
VEH USE
PULLING OBRECT
PULLING DIRECT 98
""� 7 O
98
0 5
DIAGRM
O 1
lr�
�$
OMG LOC
DMG LOC
0 2
0 6
wY'_
... , ... .... .. .. .. AGENCT PATROL BTATgN � STATE PATRCL � LOCAL
.
TREFETHREN 3524 Rosemount PD � SHERIFF ❑OTHER
OFFICER RANK.
PATROL
Y EOF EVE pTS m HOST IEV T ST REG Amo a y,y,,,, Vo0INPM EVENT
04SEV
04
02 MN 101 O1 02 01
04
O1 02
CE
S NUMBER
POLICY NUMBER UNR
f
WANED• HAZIMT
CARGO SOY
CARGO 80 HA2 MAT INSPECTIONA
INSP BAOGEE
IF ACCIDENT INVOLVED A COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE, SCHOOL BUS, OR HEAD START BUS F'LAC
rYPE
IWA7
TYPE Puc
REMEMBER TO NOTIFY THE STATE PATROL (required under MS 169.783 and 169.4511).
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE NUMBER:- MOTOR CARRIER NAME
DOT NUMBER COMMERCIAL VEHICLE NUMBER ] -MOTOR CARRIER NAME DOT NUMBER
UNrr
POSTN DATE OF BIRTH SEA I
TYPE I
USE I
AIRBAG I
EJECT I
NJ SEV I
TO HOSP
TRANSPORT
PASSENGERS I WITNESSES
❑ ANB M/B SERVICE
01
03
04
04
06
05
C
N;
❑OTHER
7NUMBER
RUN
❑M9 AMB SERVICE
01
1 F
04
04
06
05
N
N''
C3 OTHER
RUN NUMBER
�AW AMB SERVICE
0111
M
02
02
06
05
N
N
❑OTHER
PROPERTY ANDroHY 1— IA-N�Meel.tol
ACC TYV .3;;`:
NARRATIVE:
I AR
02
_..._ .......... ........ ht
+ UNIT #1 TRAVELING SOUTH ON SHANNON PARKWAY,.
SCHL BUS:
03
WORK JG
Lou rs
1
v .ROADWAYS.WERE.SLIPPERY.DUE TO. HEAVY.SNOWFALL,
9 8
02
ON BRIDGE
'
:
O
\ 9yy ,I,-UNIT #.1- SLID -AS -IT WAS - GOING - •AROUND -- SLIGHT �CUNIT
INTR EL
A;
°y kfi ON SHANNON PARKWAY AND HIT THE LEFT -REAR OF UNIT
N `
N< \ A 4:
\ 99 �3' #2, WHICH WAS LEAGALLY PARKED:" -
4•�
TYPE OFwz
y�1'.... _..,
..LIMIT
98
UNIT #1 WAS TOWED BY DICKS TOWING.
}'• �]�:. WEATHER
... .. .... ... ...... .. .... ..'•t,'
I.
LM9 AWL
fr ._ ...
' OWNER OF UNIT #2 SAID HE WOULD HAVE TO HAVE HIS
05
WPq��;
?
�VEH�ICLE�� TOWED - -AS - WELL. - -BUT- _WOULD .MAKE - ARRANGEMENTS'_
W FATHER 2
\ I
.x,
DELLW 000 WAYk{ ON HIS OWN. ........ _..... ......
........... .. ... ... ..... ..
04
ROBSON
c
' ..
'� PASSENGER (OWNER) IN UNIT #1 SAID SHE HIT HER
LIGHT
08
— — —`< ......
— — KNEE ON DASH BUT DID NOT WANT MEDICS TO RESPOND:
RD SURF
... _. ..
03
.�
..... _
moos
-
DIAGRM
RD CHM
lr�
�$
J
0 2
}.• _. ..
NAME AND BADGE M
OFFICER
... , ... .... .. .. .. AGENCT PATROL BTATgN � STATE PATRCL � LOCAL
.
TREFETHREN 3524 Rosemount PD � SHERIFF ❑OTHER
OFFICER RANK.
PATROL
AMENDED
LOCAL c ,��(,y7 .. p-�(�C 7i l • U" f ..Sy+ jT� 7.Mii�y'ir.•y,�. .y.1 _ T
MR-IWD -RUN PUB PROP VEHICLES KILLED INJURED f MIN Tir)-ja ,J,•X1 amity. ?i V
MONTH DATE YEAR ` • pAy� at MILITARY-nME En En
N N b 2 0 0 `0 0 1' k< •M`AE�IRMFJ� - 12 2 2 2 0 0 7 J 1815 N
ROUTE SYSTEM ROUTE NUMBER OR STREET NAME m
ROADWAY DIRECTION
10 SHANNON PARKWAY N E a AMERSEGT*N OR (, /, (T ( MI N o E Z
ON COUNTY NO B 8 W WITH �Y �.1L�: }LV_ FT 3 ❑ W DF I •`
19 �CITY INT ELEM REFERENCE POINT ROUTE SYS ROUTE N, STREET, CORP LIMIT. OR FEATURE W
TYw ROSEMOUNT + _ • 10 137TH STREET W.
FA TORT ION D IVER LI S MBER -1 STATE CLASS OL STATUS POSITION DIVER LICENSE NUMBER •3
l O 1
CLASS MN D O 1 O 1 STATE
MN D O 1 6f
FACTOR 1 NAME F BIRTH NAME (FIRST, MIDDLE, LASn FACTOR 7
MNUVER A }
_ O 1 DR V
N'• 01 f AD O LTNI RESTRICT MNU Eq
02 05
PHVSCL CITY, STATE, ZIP N .;
O1 CrrLS1ATF ZIP
PMYSCL
t 01
RCO1 ADDRESS SEX SAFE EOP7 SAFE EOPT AIRBAG EJECT INJ SEV -� �OOR EST SEX SA OPT use E 4 uR0 EJECT 0 5 I�T•T V 0 i O
O 1 ` °E`T M TY� 4 °SE 04 0 6 0 5 N lip lJ Li Lv
ALCHL TYPE DRUG TYPE TO HOSP TRANSPORT AMBULANCE SERVICE RUN NUMBER ALCHL TYPE DRUG TYPE TO HOSP TRANSPORT AMBULANCE SERVICE RUN NUMBER
ST
98 98 N. o�„BER T 1 98 l 98 N 13
: x. ,..n:f. -..s: .:� OOTHER
O f. FIRE I
N F RE OCCUp
RE
VEH TYP
03 �
? O1
T_ °
N TOWED O1
TYP
VEH
PULLING DIRECT TAT B+
U PULU D OCT —USE O Z T'" O Z U�NlL �Z
01
OMG LOG M YEAR COLOR
O 1 :} DEL DMGLOC
OMG SEV N R REG s� y DF ETM�M3 MOST NNIM EVEM i N 03
02
PRE OF EMEf_:TS ,wm MOSTIW,MEVE DMG $EV
MN 8 O1 01 MN 08 Ol 01 03
POLICY NUMBER
P ICY NUMBER
CARGO BOY HAZ MAT WAIVED INSPECTION a INSP BADGE M
TvpE vue IF ACCIDENT INVOLVED A COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE, SCHOOL BUS, OR HEAD START BUS «AweO PAAZZ�n'AT CARG,O�BVOY
REMEMBER TO NOTIFY THE STATE PATROL (required under MS 169.783 and 169.4511). P LV 9 7 PE
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE NUMBER I• MOTOR CARRIER NAME OOTNUMBER
COMMERCUL VEHICLE NUMBER 2 -MOTOR CARRIER NAME GOT NUMBER
PASSENGERSIWITNESSES UNIT POST N CATS OF BIRTH SEX TYPE USE AIRBAG EJECT INJ SEV TO HOSP TRANSPORT
01 0 M 04 04 0 6 05 N N, o""" 'SIB SERVICE RUN NUMBER
O OTHER
O AMe AMS SERVICE RUN NUMBER
.00THER
OMIB AM SERVICE RUN NUMBER
OOTHER
OWNER OF OTHFA DAMAGED PROPERTYANO DESCRIPTION OF DAMAGED PROPERTY AND/OR YELLOW TAG NUMBER(S)
DAMAGED PROPERTY I YELLOW TAG NUMBER
ACCTYP
e } NARRATIVE:
01
s,� DEVICE
SCHL BUS F.,r, "4:
98
03 — DRIVER OF VEH. 2 WAS TURNING N/B TURNING E/B INTO''
...
;r HER DRIVEWAY WHEN VEH. 1 ALSO TRAVELING N%B SLID
LocATTI - 137TH ST. W. ,
01 INTO.THE PASS.. SIDE OF HER VEH- DAMAGIN,G..,THE__ WORKING
ON BRIDGE t b PASS. SIDE DOOR. DRIVER 1 STATED THAT DRIVER 2
N I GY DIDN!T HAVE HER LIGHTS-OR TURN SIGNAL-ON. DRVIE I';�- INTREL
N 2 STATED THAT SHE DID. THE ROADWAY WAS EXTREMELY
TYPE OF N2 ICY: NO CITATIONS' - ISSUED. 01
98 (/L�jT T'� SL�•L DRIVEWAY OF WY T SPEED
I SHANNON PKWY
LOC OF CRASHhVZ
98
u nR
35
WOESEERS
p:. f'j .. .. WEATHER 1
9 0
I SHANNON PKWY t1 wEATHERZ
ROESGN'. ,.
08
• /
RD SURF LIGHT �"�. - - _
C
05 ,,.' n 0 4
TT-
DIAGRAM
0 5
OFFICER RANK DG
NAME AND BAE N
AGENCY PATROL STATION I STATE PATROL LOCAL
OFFICER Daniel Gleason 3534 Rosemount PD
SHERIFF 0 OTHE0.