Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
9.a. Receive Feasibility Report/Order Plans & Specifications - 2010 Street Improvements Project, City Project #428
AGENDA ITEM: Receive Feasibility Report/Order Plans and Specifications 2010 Street Improvements Project, City Project #428 AGENDA SECTION: New Business PREPARED BY: Andrew J. Brotzler, PE, Director of Public Works City Engineer AGENDA NO. (1,a, ATTACHMENTS: Feasibility Report; Resolution; Maps APPROVED BY: OW RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1) Motion to Adopt a Resolution Receiving the Feasibility Report and Authorizing the Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the 2010 Street Improvements Project, City Project #428. and 2) Motion to authorize the design of trail and sidewalk pedestrian improvements as proposed in City Project 428, or with one or more modifications as follows: a) boulevard width of 5 feet with reduced trail width of 5 feet with on Shannon Parkway. b) reduced boulevard width of 3 feet (paved) with sidewalk width of 5 feet on Delta Avenue. c) remove Shannon Parkway and /or Delta Avenue pedestrian facilities from City Project #428. and 3) Motion to authorize Staff to proceed with one of the following: a) continue discussions with Independent School District 196 to obtain a position for or against the construction of a proposed roundabout on Shannon Parkway at the Shannon Park Elementary entrance as part of City Project #428. b) remove the roundabout from further consideration as part of City Project #428. 4 ROSEMOUNT BACKGROUND: CITY COUNCIL City Council Meeting: December 15, 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At the September 15, 2009 regular Council meeting, the Council authorized the preparation of the Feasibility Report for the 2010 Street Improvements. This project has been designated as City Project 428. A map illustrating the project area and proposed improvements is attached. Prior to preparation of the plans and specifications for the project, discussion is needed regarding some elements proposed within the Feasibility Report as part of the 2010 Street Improvement Project. At this time, the specific items requiring additional discussion to provide direction for design of the project are: 1) trail and sidewalk pedestrian improvements, and 2) Shannon Parkway roundabout. Detailed information is included in the attached Feasibility Report, and Staff will provide an overview relating to the discussion items and related issues at the meeting. Additionally, information and options for roadway striping reconfiguration on Shannon Parkway will also be presented, although direction from Council is not necessary at this time. A full presentation of the Feasibility Report and all of the proposed improvements contained within will G: \ENGPROJ \428\ 121509 CC Receive FR-Ord P1nSpecs.doc be made at the Public Improvement Hearing for the project, anticipated to be held in the fast quarter of 2010. ISSUES: 1. PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS During the preparation of the Feasibility Report, Public Informational meetings were held to provide residents living in the project area with information regarding the proposed improvements, preliminary costs and funding, and to provide the opportunity for comment and discussion. At, and following the informational meetings, numerous comment cards, mails, and phone calls were received from residents pertaining to the proposed pedestrian improvements in the project area. Copies of all communication received on the project and a summary are included in appendix of the attached Feasibility Report. The majority of public comments received were from residents living along those segments identified for new pedestrian facilities where none currently exists: the west side of Shannon Parkway from Connemara Trail to Dellwood Way, and the east side of Delta Avenue from Dearborn Path to Connemara Trail. Impacts associated with the installation of pedestrian facilities in these areas are generally related to grading and construction activities in front yard areas. More detail regarding these impacts will be included in the presentation and can be found in the report. By standard, pedestrian facilities in Rosemount are typically designed and installed within the public right of -way approximately 1 -2 feet outside the property line and available boulevard space is used for snow storage, sign placement, and as a safety buffer between vehicles and pedestrians. Some of the front yard impacts associated with the installation of new trail or sidewalk mentioned above can be mitigated by reducing the width of either the trail or sidewalk itself, or reducing the boulevard width and can be considered. Staff is seeking Council discussion and direction regarding these items prior to proceeding with final design on the project. 2. SHANNON PARKWAY ROUNDABOUT A modern roundabout has been considered in the Feasibility Report as an intersection treatment on Shannon Parkway and the Shannon Park Elementary School, based on identified concerns relating to vehicle speeds, pedestrian safety, and delay and congestion during peak traffic periods such as the beginning and end of the school day. The additional cost of the roundabout is estimated to be $563,700. More detail is included in the Feasibility Report and will be presented to Council during the meeting. To be able to construct the roundabout, the full support of Independent School District 196 is needed. Staff has met with and provided the information included in the report to representatives from the school and the district, and at this time, ISD 196 has not yet communicated a formal position on the proposed roundabout. It is known that members of the Shannon Park Elementary School Site Council are opposed to the roundabout. Should Council support the continued consideration for a roundabout as part of the 2010 Street Improvement Project, staff would continue discussions with ISD 196 to obtain their position either for, or against, the proposed roundabout. In order to keep the project on schedule, this will need to be received from the school district in Jan»ary 2010 for the roundabout to be included. 3. SHANNON PARKWAY STRIPING CONFIGURATION The pavement mill and overlay and rehabilitation of Shannon Parkway from Connemara Trail to McAndrews Road as a part of the proposed 2010 Street Improvements Project provides an opportunity to restripe the 48 -foot wide roadway from its existing configuration to improve the lane configuration and potentially implement a more "complete street" using the existing road width. Several striping options 2 were developed for each of three segments of Shannon Parkway that include center left turn lanes, on- street bike lanes, and on -street parking within the existing roadway width, although not all elements are feasible at the same time and some options use narrower lanes than currently exist on Shannon Parkway. Staff will outline the options during the presentation for Council discussion. SUMMARY: Staff recommends Council adoption of the attached resolution receiving the feasibility report and authorizing the preparation of the plans and specifications for the 2010 Street Improvement Project, City Project 428. In addition, Staff requests Council direction regarding pedestrian improvements options and the consideration of a roundabout on Shannon Parkway as part of the proposed improvements in the 2010 Street Improvement Project. 3 WHEREAS, the City Council deemed it necessary and expedient that the City of Rosemount, Minnesota, consider constructing certain improvements, to -wit: City Project #428, 2010 Street Improvements Project, in the City as described in and in accordance with the feasibility report prepared by the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, the City Council has been advised by the City Engineer that said utility and street improvements, City Project #428 is feasible, and should best be made as proposed, and the City Engineer's report to this effect has heretofore been received by Council, and filed with the City Clerk on November 17, 2009; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount accepts the feasibility report for City Project #428 and places it on file. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rosemount orders the preparation of plans and specifications for said improvements of City Project #428. ADOPTED this 15th day of December, 2009. ATTEST: A RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE FEASIBILITY REPORT AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 2010 STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT CITY PROJECT #428 Amy Domeier, City Clerk CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2009 William H. Droste, Mayor Motion by: Seconded by: Voted in favor: Voted against: ill iLd Ali 1 I I I IIIIIiips 4 41mial i ampwawaridrunprzw mrsivimweoup,p0,/ swoh. vat o n, /FA ple I a 127 H C W P AN i i i ii. ,3,5 ST ��yir�� ow. 1� M1l1���m� r, a OA y1► fil •40�' y S IU D DY O ARy ���rr S-• si, \q� �j• MOW 7114%;: oeme ti p k o id Li 1 13 0 441# I. ellhateRom roam au 41, �N ►R 1111 111111 .1�,' I I� 1 w Men PION ��NN C ra rM Iliiil� J �ip I I►� miE flu *I �I IiiI Ats111150A 1�� Pit A P AVM AI Or imo u, 3 0I� *I� 10 dip 0 WO wIff°4 MI ill 1 1, 0 6 %if filo siw RI ell" IA NNEAIARA j ,1' OA /1i��0 00 o n �,��W* �it 54111 X13 �i #411111 r4ti a 1 mama l rismill OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENTS SIDEWALK /TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS WSB ANIMEIM Associates, Inc. �.I 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 www.wsbeng.com 753-541-4800 Fax 763 -541 -1700 INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING CONSTRUCTION 2010 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS VROSEMOUNT WSB Project No.01668 -93 October 16,2009 Figure Number K: \0 93 \Cad \Exhibits \FIG_01 Public Presentation.dwg, Layoutl MINNESOTA OP ON) ONNEMARA DERRWOOR C� 0 400 OPTION 2 :1311VENPOR 143RD ST W EV ERMO Z 133Rd AVI 7A1PF_ is IN 11 rJ Sti`ST FT rl N 5 143RD ST W cmee ER HI1I Y CROCL FTT LEGEND NEW 8' CONCRETE WALK NEW 8' BITUMINOUS TRAIL NEW 5' CONCRETE WALK g REMOVE EXISTING TRAIL AND INSTALL NEW 5' CONCRETE WALK REMOVE EXISTING TRAIL -114 T e WSB immik Associates, fnc. -1 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 www.wsbeng.com 763 541 -1800 Fax 763. 541.1700 NFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING CONSTRUCTICN 2010 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS ROSEMOUNT MINNESOTA WSB Project No.01668 -93 December 15,2009 Figure Number 9 K 01668 .931Cad' -Exhibits \FTG_9.dwg, layoutl Decemba. 15, 2009 S ROSEMOUNT MINNESOTA WSB Associates, Inc. Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 FEASIBILITY REPORT 2010 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY PROJECT NO. 428 FOR THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA December 15, 2009 Prepared By: WSB Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 763 541 -4800 763 541 -1700 (Fax) I WSB Associates, Inc. December 15, 2009 Engineering 1 Planning 1 Environmental 1 Construction Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Rosemount 2875 145 Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 Re: Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668 -93 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: Transmitted herewith for your review is a feasibility report which addresses improvements associated with the 2010 Street Improvement Project. 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We are available at your convenience to discuss this report. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 651- 322 -2724 if you have any questions regarding this report. Sincerely, WSB Associates, Inc. Mor Assis Enclosure Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 Project Manager Minneapolis 1 St. Cloud Equal Opportunity Employer I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date: December 15, 2009 Date: December 15, 2009 Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668 -93 Date: December 15, 2009 Quality Control Review Completed By: Lic. No. 44178 Lic. No. 25496 Phil Olson, EIT Page 2 TITLE SHEET LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CERTIFICATION SHEET TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 2. STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT 6 2.1 Introduction 6 2.1.1 Authorization 6 2.1.2 Scope 6 2.1.3 Data Available 6 2.2 General Background 7 2.2.1 Project Location 7 2.2.2 Project Zoning 8 2.2.3 Project History 8 2.3 Existing Conditions 9 2.3.1 Surface 9 2.3.2 Municipal Utilities 11 2.3.3 Pedestrian Facilities 11 2.4 Proposed Improvements 13 2.4.1 Surface 13 2.4.2 Municipal Utilities 14 2.4.3 Shannon Parkway Lane Configuration Alternatives 14 2.4.4 Pedestrian Facilities 17 2.4.5 Permits/Approvals 20 2.4.6 Construction Traffic and Activities 20 2.4.7 Pavement Management Program Maintenance Project 20 2.4.8 Public Involvement 21 3. FINANCING 22 3.1 Opinion of Cost 22 3.2 Funding 24 4. PROJECT SCHEDULE 27 5. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION 28 Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 3 Appendix A Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) 1 Proposed Improvements 2 Shannon Parkway Lane Configuration Segment 1 3 Shannon Parkway Lane Configuration Segment 2 4 Shannon Parkway Roundabout Improvements 5 Shannon Parkway Roundabout Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Improvements 6 Shannon Parkway Roundabout Storm Sewer Improvements 7 Shannon Parkway Roundabout Easement 8 Shannon Parkway Lane Configuration Segment 3 9 Pedestrian Improvements Appendix B 2010 Street Improvement Project: Opinion of Probable Cost Appendix C Funding Calculations: Shannon Parkway Turn Lane Funding Calculations: Shannon Parkway Roundabout Assessment Calculations City Fund Calculations Shannon Parkway Mill and Overlay Credit Preliminary Assessment Roll Appendix D Soil Boring Logs Bituminous Coring Spreadsheet Rosemount Roads, Dated February 10, 2009 Figure 10 Leak Detection Survey Map: Hydrant Locations Appendix E 2009 OCI Map Pedestrian Facilities Map: Updated November, 2008 Appendix F Public Comment Summary Public Comments Appendix G Figure 11— 2010 Crack Seal and Seal Coat Map 2010 Seal Coat Street Index Appendix H 2010 Pavement Management Program Maintenance Project: Opinion of Probable Cost Appendix I 2010 2014 Street Improvement Program Project Funding (CIP Fund) Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project Na 428 WSB Project Na 1668 -93 Page 4 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2010 Street Improvement Project, City Project No. 428, includes pavement mill and overlay, roadway rehabilitation, pedestrian facility improvements, and proposed modern roundabout (referred to as the 2010 Street Improvement Project (SIP)). Additional improvements include crack filling and seal coating (referred to as the Pavement Management Program Maintenance (PMP) Project). A pavement mill and overlay is proposed on roadways within the Country Hills 1 8 Additions, roadways within the Le Foret addition, and the urban section of Shannon Parkway between Connemara Trail and 1,200 feet north of Evermoor Parkway. Roadway rehabilitation is proposed for the rural section of Shannon Parkway north to McAndrews Road (CR 38). Proposed pedestrian improvements in the project area include the following: the replacement of existing trail with concrete walk on Dearborn Path, 137 Street West, and Danube Lane; new concrete walk on Delta Avenue; and new concrete walk and trail on Shannon Parkway. Additionally, a dead -end segment of existing trail with no connection is proposed to be removed as a part of the project. The total project cost for the 2010 Street Improvement Project is estimated at $3,653,400 and is proposed to be funded as follows: Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 Street CIP Fund 819,490 Special Assessments 502,440 Municipal State Aid Fund 1,702,270 Trail/Sidewalk Improvements Fund 460,100 Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund 9,100 Water Utility Fund 101,300 Storm Utility Fund 58,700 3,653,400 The PMP Maintenance Project includes crack filling and seal coating roadway segments that currently have an Overall Condition Index (OCI) rating between 61 and 90 and either have not received a seal coat prior to the year 2000, or were newly constructed or reconstructed 3 years ago. The total estimated project cost for the PMP Maintenance Project is $131,800, with Street CIP and Street Maintenance General Fund dollars proposed as the funding source. The total 2010 funding requirement of the Street CIP Fund is $819,490 for the proposed 2010 Street Improvement Project, including the PMP Maintenance Project. This funding level was evaluated with the 5 -year CIP (2010 2014) attached in Appendix I. It is proposed that construction begin in May 2010 and be completed, including all restoration items, by the fall of 2010. This project is feasible, necessary, and cost effective from an engineering standpoint, and should be constructed as proposed herein. Page 5 2. STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT 2.1 Introduction 2.1.1 Authorization On September 15, 2009, the Rosemount City Council authorized the preparation of an engineering feasibility report for the 2010 Street Improvement Project. This project has been designated as City Project No. 428. 2.1.2 Scope The 2010 Street Improvement Project was initiated in an effort to prioritize Pavement Management funding towards projects focused on the long -term preservation of the roadway network. The Country Hills 1 8 Additions, the Le Foret addition, and Shannon Parkway have all been identified as areas showing pavement distresses which indicate that the roadways are nearing a critical point in their lifecycle. Improvements within this report have been proposed to address these pavement distresses and extend the life of the roadway. This funding priority shift from reconstruction to preservation has resulted in some proposed improvements originally detailed within the 2007 2010 Street Improvement Program Feasibility Report (City Project 410) to be rescheduled beyond 2010. Residents living within these future project areas have been notified by mail of this change. 2.1.3 Data Available Information and materials used in the preparation of this report include the following: City of Rosemount Utility Plans City of Rosemount Record Plans City of Rosemount Topography Maps Field Observations of the Area Field Survey Field Review Private Utility Maps Soil Boring Logs and Bituminous Coring Logs City of Rosemount Assessment/Improvement Policy Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 Page 6 2.2 General Background 2.2.1 Project Location The project is located in the northwestern portion of the City and is bounded by Shannon Parkway to the east, Diamond Path to the west, the Evermoor Additions to the north, and the Hawkins Pond Addition to the south, as shown on below. The streets proposed for improvement as shown below include: 133 Court Daisy Court 137 Court Dallas Avenue 137 Street Dallas Court 138 Court Dalton Lane 141 Court Danbury Court Copper Court Danbury Path Currant Circle Dander Court Daffodil Path Dane Avenue Dahlia Court Danube Lane Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668 -93 Location Map Danville Court Daphne Lane Darnell Court Dartmouth Path Darwin Way Davenport Court Davenport Path Davy Court Daytona Way m mpg moll IN 1111001 vim= 4441 la... 1.111. le k or 1•11A ■Tommildelillikii FillirpVig& ffiiiill 101A, i �J�. i ett- 11111 n It s Omp14► oC moms thilm►r0 rI y�n .,►�eEece�r7 l',,,° x 1y� a1 i ta'1: a 11! pas 4 TA *4 1 41 6 �qf, E t y 1: 1 ➢to 4 :7 ;Aii i i l c i l t i l r it i a l k 4 n�cf t t t 3 1 Q% i 5 io "ts�In ar �C -D► �T �'a "l��li i +�ei ��jY1Qi>f 1 i J ♦��'�\IIIt III r VII LLF t I j ArQ 'a�1V 4 4:4 4 4 I r ar i a 1..lier Lit 4* 4101/0 P; jentititt SIVIP 41 164W/eV 4/2 pit 4 11 tl A ll y♦il►t, vit 1 111 i V ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS \I1 ,t S11H jinn■ I&►�' ►1FIii3:�Gi1�tiAH1111. SIDEWALKITRNI IMPROVEMENTS o 2 9. UI1111uI!II 11 Dearborn Path Dekalb Avenue Dellwood Court Dellwood Way Delta Avenue Delta Court Delta Place Shannon Parkway Page 7 2.2.2 Project Zoning The project zoning is as follows: Shannon Parkway R Low Density Residential PI Public /Institutional POS Parks and Open Space TR Transitional Residential RR Rural Residential 2.2.3 Project History Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 Country Hills 1 8th Additions: R —1 Low Density Residential Le Foret Additions: TR Transitional Residential This project was initiated through the continued development and implementation of the City of Rosemount Pavement Management Program (PMP). The PMP was created to help City officials evaluate and monitor the condition of existing street surfaces to schedule timely maintenance and improvement activities in an efficient and cost effective manner. The PMP consists of the field review of City streets and establishment of an Overall Condition Index (OCI) based on the type and number of distresses in each roadway segment. Proposed improvements correlate to OCI ranges which categorize all street segments. Approximately one -third of the City's total street mileage is reviewed every year, such that all paved roadway segments within the City are reviewed once every three years. A copy of the 2009 OCI Map containing up to date OCI values for the entire Rosemount street network is included in Appendix E. The graph below illustrates the typical lifecycle of a pavement utilizing PMP best practices to maintain the OCI rating and extend pavement life by optimizing the timing of maintenance. 100 90 80 60 0 externem number of emanations allowed bne interval between oveneY 40 35 20 Pavement Lifecycle h- Routine Mmmmnence only 1 0 Start of Plan 20 40 Age (Years) 60 Page 8 2.3 Existing Conditions 2.3.1 Surface The various component areas of the project are as follows: Country Hills 1st 8th Additions o 32 -foot wide urban streets o Surmountable concrete curb and gutter o 60 -foot right -of -way o 2h/ to 4 h/ inches bituminous pavement o Constructed between 1988 and 1992 Le Foret Addition o 30 -foot wide rural roadways o Existing culverts and ditches o 60 -foot right -of -way o 2% inches of bituminous pavement o Constructed in 1984 Shannon Parkway 1200' N of Evermoor Parkway to McAndrews Road (CR 38) o 40 -foot wide rural roadway o Existing culverts and ditches o 80 -foot right -of -way o 3 to 41/2 inches of bituminous pavement o Constructed in 1988 Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668 -93 Shannon Parkway Connemara Trail to 1200' N of Evermoor Parkway o 48 -foot wide urban street o Surmountable concrete curb and gutter: Connemara Trail to 200' N of 137 Street o B618 concrete curb and gutter: 200' N of 137 Street to 1200' N of Evennoor Parkway o 80 -foot right -of -way o 41/2 to 7' inches of bituminous pavement o Constructed in 1988 Shannon Parkway at Evermoor Parkway Connemara Trail o 52 -foot wide urban street o B618 and surmountable concrete curb and gutter o 80 -foot right -of -way o Constructed in 1988 Southbound Page 9 The roadways listed on the previous page are aging and exhibiting various severities of alligator cracking, block cracking, edge cracking, longitudinal cracking, and transverse cracking. The curb and gutter is in fair condition; however, some cracking and settlements have resulted in isolated drainage issues and additional pavement distress. Roadways within the Country Hills 1 8th Additions are experiencing rapid deterioration due to pavement stripping and /or raveling at the interface between the pavement surface and the chip seal. To date, this deterioration has only occurred in the upper portion of the pavement. Further explanation of these pavement distresses is detailed in a memo titled Rosemount Roads from Mike Rief dated February 10, 2009. A copy of this memo has been attached in Appendix D of this report. Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 Daffodil Path at Danube Lane (Eastbound Bituminous pavement core samples taken within the Country Hills 1st 8th Additions and the Le Foret Addition revealed that the existing pavement thickness ranges between 2% to 41/4 inches. Substandard pavement thicknesses (approximately less than 4 inches) have been identified within the Le Foret Addition and on 133`' Court. Thin pavement sections can contribute to accelerated pavement deterioration. Soil borings completed along the rural section of Shannon Parkway revealed a pavement thickness of 3 to 41 inches and a roadway subgrade containing fine grained sand with silt. The soil boring logs and bituminous coring spreadsheets are both attached in Appendix D of this report. Test holes completed in the shoulder and the middle of the traveled lane revealed that the shoulders are made up of approximately 1 inch of pavement and that the pavement thickness in the traveled lane is similar to the soil borings. The test holes also revealed existing cobbles at a depth of 15 to 18 inches below the pavement. The rural section of Shannon Parkway contains excessive pavement deterioration including large amounts of block cracking and alligator cracking. These distresses have likely been caused by age and traffic loadings but have been accelerated due to a pavement section insufficient for the current traffic volumes. The deterioration indicates the pavement is nearing the end of its useful life and is severe enough to require replacement of the roadway. Both the rural and urban sections of Shannon Parkway in the project area are designated Municipal State Aid (MSA) route segments, and all improvements which meet State Aid standards are eligible to be funded using Municipal State Aid funds. Page 10 Crack sealing and seal coating was completed on the following roadways as listed below: 1984: Le Foret Addition 1993 and 2001: Shannon Parkway from Connemara Trail to 137 Street 1994 and 2002: Country Hills 1 Addition, Country Hills 2 Addition south of Connemara Trail and the cul -de -sacs north of Connemara Trail, and Country Hills 3' Addition south of Connemara Trail 1994 and 2002: Shannon Parkway from 137 Street to McAndrews Road 1995 and 2005: Country Hills 4 Addition, Country Hills 5 Addition, Country Hills 6 Addition, and Country Hills 7 Addition 1996 and 2003: Country Hills r Addition north of Connemara Trail, and Country Hills 3' Addition north of Connemara Trail with the exception of Shannon Parkway 2.3.2 Municipal Utilities Storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and watermain located within the project area have been determined to be in fair condition. No issues have been reported or identified with these facilities; however, a wide variety of storm sewer and sanitary sewer manhole castings are located throughout the site. Many of these castings do not meet the current City standards and contain pick holes that are difficult to open or allow inflow during rain events. On October 12, 2009, a leak detection survey was conducted on the watermain within Country Hills 1St 8th Additions and on Shannon Parkway. No watermain leaks were identified during the survey. Hydrants tested as a part of the leak detection survey are shown on Figure 10 in Appendix D. Properties within the rural section of Shannon Parkway and Le Foret Addition utilize individual wells for water service, septic systems for sanitary sewer service, and ditches and culverts for drainage. Some minor erosion and drainage issues (ponding) are evident along the shoulders and ditches of the rural section of Shannon Parkway. 2.3.3 Pedestrian Facilities Pedestrian facilities within the project limits are listed below: Bituminous Trail 8 feet wide: North side of Dearborn Path between Shannon Parkway and Delta Avenue North side of 137 Street between Shannon Parkway and Danube Lane East side of Danube Lane between 137 Street and Daffodil Path East side of Shannon Parkway between 150 feet north of Dellwood Way and McAndrews Road West side of Shannon Parkway between Daffodil Path and 133' Court Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668 -93 Page 11 Danube Lane North of 137 Street (Northbound) Concrete Sidewalk 5 feet wide: North side of Daffodil Path between Shannon Parkway and Danube Lane East side of Danube Lane between Daffodil Path and Evermoor Parkway Concrete Sidewalk 8 feet wide: East side of Shannon Parkway between Connemara Trail and 150 feet north of Dellwood Way Shannon Parkway North of Currant Circle (Northbound) The bituminous trail along Dearborn Path, 137 Street, and Danube Lane is aging and showing distresses, which indicate that the pavement is nearing the end of its useful life. Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 Page 12 2.4 Proposed Improvements 2.4.1 Surface Roadways within the Country Hills 1 St 8th Additions are proposed for a 11/2-inch pavement mill and overlay with spot curb and gutter replacement. This improvement addresses the existing pavement distresses caused by the stripping and/or raveling by removing the deteriorated pavement and subsequently paving over the lower portion of the bituminous pavement that is still in good condition. Full width milling and paving of all roadways is recommended to retain the desired cross slopes and maintain pavement rideability. However, on 133 Court an only an edge mill and overlay is proposed due to the thin existing bituminous thickness of 2'/ inches, and to retain as much of the existing pavement structure as possible prior to overlay paving. The urban section of Shannon Parkway is proposed to receive a 11/2-inch pavement mill and overlay with spot curb and gutter replacement. Leveling course paving prior to the overlay is proposed to smooth two settlement areas in the segment north of Connemara Trail. These proposed improvements will extend roadway life and improve the overall ride of Shannon Parkway, which functions as a north -south collector. The section of Connemara Trail east of Shannon Parkway (approximately 600 feet) that did not receive a mill and overlay in 2005 is also proposed to for a mill and overlay with the 2010 Street Improvement Project. Adjacent to the proposed Shannon Parkway improvements, the overlay of this segment of Connemara Trail will provide consistency in the timing of maintenance activities along the Connemara Trail corridor. Roadways within the Le Foret addition are proposed for an overlay of 11/2 inches of pavement with no milling of existing pavement. This method is proposed due to the thin existing bituminous roadway section. Consequently, the existing pavement will structurally support the overlay and contribute to a more stable and sustainable roadway. Since the rural, northern segment of Shannon Parkway is nearing the end of its useful life, the roadway is proposed to undergo rehabilitation rather than a mill and overlay. Rehabilitation involves the replacement to the existing deteriorated pavement and recycle existing subgrade materials into the new roadway. A larger aggregate base section and bituminous pavement section is proposed through the rural segment to increase the strength of the roadway and more easily accommodate the higher traffic volumes on Shannon Parkway, functioning as a collector street. Reclamation, as a roadway rehabilitation method, reuses the existing granular subgrade by pulverizing the existing bituminous and mixing it with the existing aggregate base to create a new roadway subgrade. Minor grade changes may then be made to the roadway profile to improve the geometry and drainage prior to paving. Figure 1 in Appendix A shows the project area for the above roadway improvements. Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 Page 13 2.4.2 Municipal Utilities It is proposed that all storm sewer and sanitary sewer castings not meeting the current City standard be removed and replaced. Additionally, manholes with rings in poor condition are proposed to be replaced through a casting adjustment. All storm sewer and sanitary sewer castings meeting City standards are proposed to remain in- place. Watermain valve box adjustments are proposed as needed to match pavement grades. Damaged valve boxes are also proposed to be removed and replaced with a new top section. 2.4.3 Shannon Parkway Lane Configuration Alternatives As part of the mill and overlay project and rehabilitation project, the City has the opportunity to improve the lane configuration through the corridor and implement a "Complete Street" concept. This improvement would include provisions for parking, bike lanes, turn lanes and/or shoulders. The general assumptions in developing the alternatives were to maintain the existing pavement width through the corridor and in accordance with State Aid Standards. In some cases, not all of the components of a complete street concept are possible while maintaining the existing pavement width on Shannon Parkway. There are 3 distinct segments of Shannon Parkway, and each has slightly different alternatives. Each segment is discussed below. Segment 1 Connemara Trail to Dellwood Wav (Urban Single Family) This segment is currently an urban section, 48 feet in width with two 14 foot lanes and two 10 foot shoulders. Parking is allowed on the shoulders and residential driveways have access directly to Shannon Parkway. Four options have been developed and are shown in the attached Figure 2 in Appendix A. They include: Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 Option A A continuous center left turn lane with two through lanes and parking on both sides. No exclusive bike lanes are provided. This option contains a standard 12 foot turn lane with narrow 10 foot through lanes. The parking lanes would be the standard 8 foot width. Option B A continuous center left turn lane with two through lanes and a bike lane on both sides. No parking lanes are provided. This option contains standard 12 foot turn lanes and through lanes. The bike lane is 6 feet (5 foot is the standard). Option C A continuous center left turn lane with two through lanes and a bike lane on one side and parking on the other side. This option contains standard 12 foot turn and though lanes however they would be offset from the center. The parking lane is a standard 8 feet with a narrow 4 foot bike lane. Page 14 Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668 -93 Option D Two through lanes with parking and bike lanes on both sides. No center left turn lane is provided. This option contains narrow 11 foot through lanes with standard 8 foot parking and 5 foot bike lanes. With a center left turn lane, Options A C would provide for the safest vehicle operations to and from the driveways and streets along Shannon Parkway. However, there is no history of accidents or other data that shows an existing safety deficiency in this segment that might be mitigated by the addition of a center left turn lane. Segment 2 Dellwood Wav to 1200 feet North of Evermoor Parkway (Urban Non Single Family) Similar to Segment 1, this segment is also currently an urban section, 48 feet in width with two 14 foot lanes and two 10 foot shoulders. Parking is allowed on the shoulders and turn lanes are provided at the Shannon Park Elementary School Entrance 133`' Court and at Evermoor Parkway. The existing turn lane configuration at the school entrance is deficient in geometry, as northbound and southbound lane edge lines do not match. Where turn lanes are provided, parking is allowed on one side of the roadway. The same four options as Segment 1 have been developed and are shown in the attached Figure 3 in Appendix A. They include: Option A A continuous center left turn lane with two through lanes and parking on both sides. No exclusive bike lanes are provided. This option contains a standard 12 foot turn lane with narrow 10 through lanes. The parking lanes would be the standard 8 foot. Option B A continuous center left turn lane with two through lanes and a bike lane on both sides. No parking lanes are provided. This option contains standard 12 foot turn lanes and through lanes. The bike lane is 6 feet (5 foot is the standard). Option C A continuous center left turn lane with two through lanes and a bike lane on one side and parking on the other side. This option contains standard 12 foot turn and though lanes however they would be offset from the center. The parking lane is a standard 8 feet with a narrow 4 foot bike lane. Option D Two through lanes with parking and bike lanes on both sides. No center left turn lane is provided. This option contains narrow 11 foot through lanes with standard 8 foot parking and 5 foot bike lanes. Similar to Segment 1, Options A C would provide for the safest vehicle operations to and from the driveways and streets along Shannon Parkway, including a center left turn lane. Again, as with Segment 1, there is no history of accidents or other data in this segment that show an existing safety deficiency in this segment that a center left turn lane might address. Page 15 If left turn lanes are added to Option D (Option D -1 on Figure 3), an additional 10 to 12 feet of roadway width is be required. The additional roadway width can be achieved within the existing right -of -way by eliminating the boulevard and paving the trail adjacent to the back of the curb. As an alternative additional intersection treatment at the Shannon Park Elementary School entrance 133 Court intersection with Shannon Parkway, a modern roundabout is proposed. The preliminary roundabout concept is illustrated in Figures 4 7, included in Appendix A. Primary benefits of modern roundabouts include: The roundabout alternative requires approximately one -half acre of additional permanent roadway right -of -way to be dedicated by the school district. Including the roundabout will also reduce the cost of the Shannon Parkway overlay portion of the project by approximately $58,700, as the limits of the proposed roundabout improvements extend north and south of the intersection on Shannon Parkway, precluding the need for a pavement mill and overlay in this area. It is anticipated that the total project cost for the street, storm sewer, and surface improvements associated with the roundabout would be eligible to receive State Aid funding through the Municipal State Aid program, excluding the cost for sanitary sewer and watermain relocations. More detail on the estimated costs and proposed funding for the Shannon Parkway roundabout are included in Section 3 of this report. Initial meetings with representatives from Shannon Park Elementary and Independent School District 196 staff resulted in their identification of an issue regarding the potential for vehicle stacking (i.e. queued or `backed up' vehicles) from the school parking lot back to the school entrance intersection. An alternative for improving this concern without affecting the through traffic on Shannon Parkway would be the addition of a right turn lane from Shannon Parkway to the school entrance. This would require either the elimination of parking or bike lanes or a 10 to 12 foot widening of the roadway. The widening can be accomplished within the existing right -of -way by narrowing the boulevards. This widening can be included with the roundabout option, although it Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 Safety for all pedestrians crossing all movements of the intersection. Pedestrians only have to watch for traffic in one direction, approximately 16 feet to cross at a time. Lower vehicle speeds. The design of the modern roundabout physically forces vehicles to reduce their speed to 15 to 20 mph prior to and through the intersection. Reduces delay and stacking during peak traffic periods. The function of a modern roundabout provides for a continuous flow of traffic. With the lower speeds, vehicles can yield and enter the traffic flow with smaller gaps than a typical intersection controlled with a stop sign. Improved aesthetics. The center circle provides opportunities for landscaping or other aesthetic treatments that might serve as a gateway to Shannon Park Elementary School. Page 16 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A 1 1 1 1 1 would require slightly more right -of -way. The additional cost for the right turn lane has been included in this feasibility; however, no additional costs have been included for additional right -of -way. Segment 3 1200 feet North of Evermoor Parkway to McAndrews Road (Rural) This segment is currently a rural section (ditches on both sides), 40 feet in width with two 12 foot lanes and two 8 foot shoulders. Parking is allowed on the shoulders. This segment also has residential driveway access directly to Shannon Parkway on both sides. Three options have been developed and are shown in the attached Figure 8 in Appendix A, which include: Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 Option E A continuous center left turn lane with two through lanes. No exclusive bike lanes or parking lanes are provided. This option contains a standard 12 foot turn lane and through lanes with a 2 foot shoulder on each side of the roadway. Option F A continuous center left turn lane with two through lanes and a bike lane on both sides. No parking lanes are provided. This option contains a standard 12 foot turn lane and narrow 10 foot through lanes. The bike lane is a narrow 4 foot. Option G A continuous center left turn lane with two through lanes and parking on one side. This option contains a narrow 10 foot turn and though lanes however they would be offset from the center. The parking lane is a standard 8 feet wide with a narrow 2 foot shoulder on the other side. Parking through this segment is currently not prohibited, however, the need for or use of on- street parking in the area is not apparent. All options provide for safe vehicle operations into driveways and adjacent roadways along Shannon Parkway. Additional bike lanes or parking could be provided if the roadway is widened 6 to 16 feet and with the acquisition of additional right -of -way. As previously discussed in the options for Segments 1 and 2 and also relevant to Segment 3, there is no history of accidents or other supporting evidence in this segment that demonstrate any existing safety deficiencies that a center left turn lane might directly address. 2.4.4 Pedestrian Facilities The Rosemount Pedestrian Facilities Plan is a document that was adopted by City Council to illustrate the existing and proposed pedestrian improvements throughout the developed area of the City. This plan was created to link the existing pedestrian facilities and create a safe and comprehensive network to serve the community. In past roadway projects, proposed pedestrian facilities within the project area have been included in the project as a way for the City to obtain favorable bids and to group construction activities together. Page 17 In addition to new pedestrian facilities, it is proposed to replace the aging bituminous trails within the project area with a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk. The neighborhoods where these facilities are located are more appropriately suited for concrete sidewalk since driveways cross the existing trail. Additionally, maintenance is more efficient and effective with concrete sidewalks on local streets where driveways are present. The pedestrian improvements proposed for this project include the following: The 8 -foot wide bituminous trail along the north side of Dearborn Path is proposed to be removed and replaced with a 5 -foot concrete sidewalk. A new 5 -foot concrete sidewalk is proposed to be installed along the east side of Delta Avenue. Tree and driveway impacts, discussed later, can be mitigated by reducing the boulevard width along this segment, and/or the installation of retaining walls. A new 8 -foot concrete sidewalk is proposed to be installed along the west side of Shannon Parkway between Connemara Trail and Dellwood Court. Tree and driveway impacts, discussed later, can be mitigated by reducing the boulevard width along this segment, reducing the sidewalk width, and/or the installation of retaining walls. A new 8 -foot bituminous trail is proposed to be installed along the west side of Shannon Parkway between Dellwood Court and Evermoor Parkway. Tree impacts, discussed later, can be mitigated by reducing the boulevard width along this segment, reducing the trail width, and/or the installation of retaining walls. The 8 -foot wide bituminous trail along the north side of 137 Street between Shannon Parkway and Danube Lane, and the 8 -foot wide bituminous trail on the east side of Danube Lane between 137 Street and Daffodil Path is proposed to be removed and replaced with a 5 -foot concrete sidewalk. The 8 -foot bituminous dead end trail segment along the west side of Dane Avenue between Dearborn Path and Dartmouth Path is proposed to be removed, as it lacks connectivity to the rest of the system. 137 Street West of 137` Court (Westbound) Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668 -93 Page 18 Impacts On Shannon Parkway and Delta Avenue, new pedestrian facilities are proposed in locations where none currently exist. With this type of installation, construction limit impacts are anticipated to be significantly greater than those with existing trails or sidewalks. Examples of impacts typically associated with the installation of new sidewalk or trail includes: tree removal, grading within the front lawn, removal and replacement of driveways, and modifications to existing driveway grades. Work associated with these impacts will primarily occur within the public right -of -way, but driveway removal and grading within the yard may extend to the house or garage. Tree Impacts Installation of sidewalk is estimated to require the removal of approximately 75 trees along the west side of Shannon Parkway, several of which are located in side -yard areas within the public right -of -way or permanent easements. Similarly, approximately 4 trees along Delta Avenue will need to be removed to install sidewalk. In some instances, retaining walls of 1 foot -2 foot in height may allow for sidewalk installation around trees such that they do not need to be removed. The costs associated with these walls have been included in the feasibility estimates in this report. Additionally, the cost for 2.5" trunk diameter deciduous or 8 foot high coniferous replacement trees have been included in cost estimates to mitigate tree removal throughout the project area. Replacement trees would be located outside the public right -of -way and permanent easement so as not to interfere with future trail, sidewalk, or utility maintenance activities. Finally, reducing the boulevard width or the width of the proposed sidewalk or trail during final design is another adjustment anticipated to reduce the number of trees to be removed along the project. Driveway Impacts Currently, 3 of 13 existing driveways on Shannon Parkway are greater than the maximum City standard slope of 10 percent. Although more detailed analysis will be necessary during detail design of the improvements, the installation of sidewalk along the urban segment of Shannon Parkway with driveways may result in the replacement of driveways at grades exceeding 10 percent in these areas. A preliminary review along Delta Avenue showed that sidewalk installation is feasible with driveway grades of 10 percent or less, provided the 5 foot concrete walk is installed with a 3 foot concrete boulevard adjacent to the back of curb. Pedestrian Safety One of the primary safety issues related to pedestrians in the project area is the safe crossing of Shannon Parkway, which experiences higher traffic volumes, higher vehicular speeds, and functions as a collector roadway. Currently, there are four marked crosswalks along this segment of roadway; one at Connemara Trail, one at Daffodil Path and two at Evermoor Parkway. The Connemara Trail crossing is controlled with an all way stop at the intersection. The other three crossings are at uncontrolled intersections. Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668 -93 Page 19 The modern roundabout alternative discussed in section 2.4.3 above would provide a safe alternative for pedestrians crossing Shannon Parkway. This alternative, in conjunction with the new pathway segments, would eliminate the existing crossing at Daffodil Path and potentially the two crossings at Evermoor Parkway. An additional alternative that could be considered in the future would be a pedestrian crossing signal. This would be a mid -block signal system that is pedestrian activated. The primary issue with this type of system is they have a high up -front cost, typically ranging from $100,000 to $120,000, for the benefit received. They do provide a safe crossing as long as the vehicles on Shannon Parkway obey the signal. It has been documented that persons driving a route consistently tend to, over time, not pay attention to traffic control devices (i.e. the signal is green the majority of the time). In addition, the signal would not have an impact on vehicle speeds in the corridor, as opposed to the roundabout which requires motorists to travel at much lower speeds to safely navigate through the circle. The pedestrian activated crossing signal alternative is currently not included as part of this feasibility study. Proposed pedestrian facility improvements are shown on Figure 9 in Appendix A. A copy of the current Pedestrian Facilities Map has also been attached in Appendix E of this report. 2.4.5 Permits/Approvals For the sidewalk improvements and the rehabilitation improvements, only the National Pollution Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) General Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) will be required. It is anticipated that in addition to the NPDES permit, the construction of the modern roundabout would require a watermain permit from the Minnesota Department of Health. 2.4.6 Construction Traffic and Activities During construction, access will be maintained with the exception of short-term restrictions for driveway access as necessary for concrete driveway and apron installation. This project will require the removal of millings and excavated materials from the existing roadway and pedestrian areas as well as installation of significant volumes of aggregate base and bituminous pavement materials. This effort will require the temporary traffic control measures to be taken on the roadways under construction. 2.4.7 Pavement Management Program Maintenance Project The Pavement Management Program (PMP) maintenance project includes road segments requiring crack seal and seal coat improvements as indicated by the current OCI rating or initial scheduling. Streets identified to receive a seal coat either have an OCI rating between 61 and 90 and have not received a seal coat prior to the year 2000 or were newly constructed or reconstructed three years ago. Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 Page 20 Crack seal and seal coat work is completed in Rosemount as part of a Joint Powers Agreement with 12 to 13 neighboring communities. Segments proposed for these improvements are listed on the 2010 Seal Coat Street Index in Appendix G and are shown on Figure 11 in Appendix G of this report. 2.4.8 Public Involvement Two public informational meetings for the proposed project were conducted October 27 and 28, 2009, and provided preliminary information regarding the proposed improvements, cost, funding, schedule, and impacts associated with the project. Comment cards were distributed to attendees at both meetings. Several comments were received, both at, and following, the public informational meetings, along with telephone and email communications from residents living in the project area. Copies of all correspondence received and a summary is included in Appendix F. Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 Page 21 3. FINANCING 3.1 Opinion of Cost Detailed opinions of cost for the various portions of the project can be found in the appendices as described below: 2010 Street Improvement Project Appendix B includes both Roadway and Pedestrian Improvements) 2010 Pavement Management Maintenance Project —Appendix H For the 2010 Street Improvement Project, the opinions of cost incorporate estimated 2010 construction costs and includes either a 5% or 10% contingency and either an additional 20% or 25% for all related indirect costs (legal, administrative, engineering, and financing items). The PMP Maintenance Project includes a 5% contingency and 5% for all related indirect costs (legal, administrative, engineering, and financing items). Table 1, Table 1A and Table 2 below provide summaries of the estimated total project costs for the roadway improvements and pedestrian improvements within the 2010 Street Improvements Project. Table 3 provides a total summary of costs for both options that includes the proposed 2010 Pavement Maintenance Project costs. Because the full support of Shannon Park Elementary and Independent School District 196 is needed for the roundabout to be constructed, two alternate costs have been developed as follows: Table 1 represents the total project costs including the roundabout alternative; Table 1A represents turn lane construction at the school entrance in lieu of the roundabout alternative: Table 1A 2010 Street Improvement Project Summary of Cost: Roadway Improvements (Turn Lane) 7 Schedule A Coun Hills Surface Im s rovements Schedule B Le Foret Surface Im s rovements Schedule C Shannon Parkwa Surface Improvements Schedule D Shannon Parkwa School Surface Im rovements Schedule E Connemara Trail Surface Improvements Schedule F Shannon Parkwa Rehabilitation Improvements Schedule K Shannon Parkwa Turn Lane Total Total $941,000 $55,900 $327,100 $57,400 $49,000 $495,100 $196,600 $2,122,100 Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 Page 22 Table 1- 2010 Street Improvement Project Summary of Cost: Roadway Improvements (Roundabout) Total Schedule A Country Hills Surface Improvements $941,000 Schedule B Le Foret Surface Improvements $55,900 Schedule C Shannon Parkway Surface Improvements $327,100 Schedule D Shannon Parkway School Surface Improvements $57,400 Schedule E Connemara Trail Surface Improvements $49,000 Schedule F Shannon Parkway Rehabilitation Improvements $495,100 Schedule G Shannon Parkway Roundabout Surface Improvements $650,000 Schedule H Shannon Parkway Roundabout Sanitary Sewer Improvements $9,100 Schedule I Shannon Parkway Roundabout Watermain Improvements $101,300 Schedule J Shannon Parkway Roundabout Storm Sewer Improvements $58,700 Shannon Parkway Mill and Overlay Credit ($58,800) Total' $2,685,800 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Table 2 2010 Street Improvement Project Summary of Cost: Pedestrian Improvements .tion 1 137th Street tion 2 Danube Lane tion 3 Shannon Parkwa Connemara Trail to Daffodil Path .tion 4 Shannon Parkwa 133rd Court to Evermoor P tion 5 Dearborn Path .tion 6 Delta Avenue tion 7 Dane Avenue Total Total $109,600 $57,400 $329,800 $45,900 $178,100 $110,400 $4 600 $835,800 Table 3 Grand Total Summa of Cost Shannon Parkwa Turn Lane 2010 Street Improvement Pro'ect 2010 Pavement Mana .ement Pro ki am Total Shannon Parkwa Roundabout 2010 Street Im provement Pro'ect 2010 Pavement Mana ement Pro ti am Total Total $2,957,900 $131 800 $3,089,700 Total $3,521,600 $131 800 $3,653,400 Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668 -93 Page 23 Table 4 Assessment Calculations* Overlay Assessment Calculations Assessment Rate I 35% Total Assessable Cost $1,015,100 Total Assessment $357,060 Assessable Units I 541 Unit Assessment 1 $660 Le Forst Overlay Assessment Calculations Assessment Rate 35% Total Overlay Cost 1 $55,900 Total Assessment $19,630 Assessable Units I 13 Unit Assessment 1 $1,510 Shannon Parkway Overlay School Assessment Calculations Assessment Rate 35% Total Overlay Cost $57,400 Assessable Percentage of Roadway 50% Total Assessment $10,050 Assessable Units I 1 Unit Assessment $10,050 Shannon Parkway Rehabilitaton Assessment Calculations Unit Assessment 35% Total Assessable Rehabilitation Cost $330,700 Total Assessment $115,700 Assessable Units 13 Unit Assessment 1 $8,900 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3.2 Funding Special Assessments are determined as set forth by the City's assessment policy and current fee resolutions. According to the City of Rosemount's proposed 2010 Fee Resolution, street assessments for both overlay projects and rehabilitation project is 35% of the total improvement cost. The total funds proposed to be recovered through special assessments are estimated at $502,440. A summary of the proposed assessment calculations are shown below on Table 4 and detailed assessment calculations are located in Appendix C. The Street CIP Fund will finance the remaining cost of the project surface improvements. Per City of Rosemount proposed 2010 Schedule of Rates and Fees Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 Page 24 Table 5 Proposed Funding: Shannon Parkway Roundabout 2010 Street Improvement Project 2010 Pavement Management Program Total Street Capital Improvement Fund $687,690 $131,800 $819,490 Special Assessments* $502,440 $502,440 Municipal State Aid Fund $1,702,270 $1,702,270 Trail/Sidewalk Improvements Fund $460,100 $460,100 Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund $9,100 $9,100 Water Utility Fund $101,300 $101,300 Storm Utility Fund $58,700 $58,700 Total $3,521,600 1 $131,800 1 $3,653,400 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Financing for the 2010 Street Improvement Project and the 2010 PMP will come from the funding sources listed below in Table 5 and Table 5A, which summarize the funding scenarios for roadway and pedestrian improvements for the proposed project. As similarly presented in the Opinion of Cost section previously, Table 5 represents funding scenario for roadway and pedestrian improvements including the Shannon Parkway roundabout alternative, and Table 5A summarizes funding for roadway and pedestrian improvements but includes Shannon Parkway turn lanes in lieu of the roundabout alternative. Improvements associated with the PMP Maintenance Project are proposed to be funded solely by the Street CIP Fund and Street Maintenance General Fund. Table 5A Proposed Funding: Shannon Parkway Turn Lane te a Street Ca. ital Im rovement Fund S ecial Assessments* Municipal State Aid Fund Trail/Sidewalk Im rovements Fund Total 2010 Street Improvement Project $687,690 $502,440 $1,307,670 $460,100 $2,957,900 2010 Pavement Management Program $131,800 $131,800 Total $819,490 $502,440 $1,307,670 $460,100 $3,089,700 Funding Calculations for both the Shannon Parkway Roundabout and Shannon Parkway Turn Lane options are located in Appendix C. City Fund calculations and the Shannon Parkway Mill and Overlay Credit are also located in Appendix C. The preliminary assessment roll can be found in Appendix C of this report and the 2010 2014 Street Improvement Project Funding (Capital Improvement Program Funding) can be found in Appendix I of this report. Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668 -93 Page 25 Municipal State Aid funds applicable to eligible roadway and pedestrian improvements on Shannon Parkway, including roundabout and turn lane construction. Funding for utility relocations associated with Shannon Parkway roundabout improvements. Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 Page 26 4. PROJECT SCHEDULE The proposed project schedule for the 2010 Street Improvements Project is as follows: Public Informational Meeting (South of Connemara) October 27, 2009 Public Informational Meeting (North of Connemara) October 28, 2009 City Council Receives Feasibility Report/Order Plans and Specifications December 15, 2009 Approve Plans and Specifications Authorize Ad for Bid February 16, 2010 Open Bids, Compute Assessments March 5, 2010 Set Public Improvement Hearing Declare Costs Set Assessment Hearing March 16, 2010 2010 Street Improvements Project and Assessment Hearing April 6, 2010 Receive Bids Award Contract May 18, 2010 Preconstruction Meeting May 25, 2010 Preconstruction Neighborhood Meeting May 27, 2010 Begin Construction May 31, 2010 Certify Assessments with County July 2010 Substantial Completion August 2010 Final Completion of Construction September 2010 Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 Page 27 5. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION Improvements and options within the 2010 Street Improvement Project are proposed to address several different issues in the project area. 1. Pavement mill and overlay within the Country Hills 1 8th Additions, Le Foret Addition, the urban section of Shannon Parkway north of Connemara Trail, and Connemara Trail east of Shannon Parkway. 2. Roadway rehabilitation of the rural section of Shannon Parkway. 3. Pedestrian Improvements including the following: a. New sidewalk and trail along the west side of Shannon Parkway and the east side of Delta Avenue. b. Trail removal and sidewalk installation along 137 Street, Danube Lane, and Dearborn Path. c. Removal of existing trail on Dane Avenue. 4. Modern roundabout construction on Shannon Parkway as an intersection treatment at 133' Court Shannon Park Elementary entrance. 5. Restriping of Shannon Parkway to accommodate a combination of turn and through lanes, on- street bike lanes, and on- street parking. 6. Crack seal and seal coat streets associated with the 2010 PMP Maintenance Project. In the event that a position of support for the proposed roundabout cannot be obtained from Independent School District 196, the installation of turn lanes on Shannon Parkway will improve the existing lane configuration and at the school entrance and should be considered an alternative. The total estimated cost for the 2010 Street Improvement Project including roadway improvements, pedestrian improvements, the 2010 PMP Maintenance Project, and the roundabout alternative is $3,653,400. Proposed funding for the project is provided through a combination of Special Assessments, Street CIP Funds, Municipal State Aid funds, and utility funds. The PMP Maintenance Project is proposed to be funded solely by Street CIP Funds. The total funding responsibility of the Street CIP is estimated to be $819,490 for both projects. The funding level anticipated through the levy of special assessments to benefitting property owners is $502,440. This project is feasible, necessary, and cost effective from an engineering standpoint. It is our recommendation that the improvements be implemented as outlined in this report. Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 Page 28 Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 APPENDIX A Figure 1— Proposed Improvements Figure 2 Shannon Parkway Lane Configuration Segment 1 Figure 3 Shannon Parkway Lane Configuration Segment 2 Figure 4 Shannon Parkway Roundabout Improvements Figure 5 Shannon Parkway Roundabout Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Improvements Figure 6 Shannon Parkway Roundabout Storm Sewer Improvements Figure 7 Shannon Parkway Roundabout Easement Figure 8 Shannon Parkway Lane Configuration Segment 3 Figure 9 Pedestrian Improvements 1111,111Wirentroloi hozo ONNEMARA A WSB Associates, 1ni� L__ ano-, �gNgpq�� 11 1 MOP III 1111111 till Mir MOP Jo 0 stain 1 02 Q tottlfir 4, Arar .0 X111 X1EI mum il. 1 3R 2010 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 'ROSEMOUNT MINNESOTA WSB Project No.01668 -93 December 15,2009 Figure Number 1 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 www.wabeng.com 16 41.4 00 Fax7e3541.1700 �NFRASTRUCfURE ENGINEERING PLANNING CONSTRUCTION LEGEND OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENTS r SIDEWALK/TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS 550 1100 K: \01668 -93 \Cad \Exhibits \FIG 1.dwa. Lavoutl. 12/9/2009 10:25:20 AM NM MI NM IMMEMI N IM IM MI I Cid 0 I 0 cl �CD �CD a. o 5 S g z c n C 8 A W 3rn °o 3 z z m 0 O H N MI=MIIN IM N IM INIIM draik 0 I 0 of 5 co CD c CD m N y g c g ,W MN w- I M ■r 1■11 MI I MN E E ■I I w M I MI IMMEMIMMIMMMIMIMMIEMENIMIMMIIMUM=1 MMIMMMMEMMOMMME WSB 2010 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SHANNON PARKWAY ROUNDABOUT EASEMENT "ROSEMOUNT MINNESOTA WSB Project No.01668 -93 December 15,2009 Figure Number 7 PARCEL 1 MI11I I1111 701 >.enia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 www.wsbeng.com �i Ix•mm 7635414800 Fax 763541 1700 INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINE: ltING PLANNING CONSTRUCTION Proposed Permanent Roodwoy Easement Area 19,886 sq ft 0.46 oc K:101668 -93 Cad \Exhibits'. =IG 7.dwa. 7. 12/9/2009 10:97:31 AM MIMIMMEIIMMMMINIMEM 011111 IAN a z 0 A WSB Associates, Inc INFRASTRUCTURE 1 ENG 1 s• NI 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 www.wsbeng.aom 7835414800 -Fax 783541.1700 PLANNING CONSTRUCTION LEGEND NEW 8' CONCRETE WALK NEW 8' BITUMINOUS TRAIL NEW 5' CONCRETE WALK REMOVE EXISTING TRAIL AND INSTALL NEW 5' CONCRETE WALK REMOVE EXISTING TRAIL 2010 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS **ROSEMOUNT MINNESOTA WSB Project No.01668 -93 December 15,2009 Figure Number 9 R: \01668 Cad \Exhibits \FD; 9.dwa. Lavoutl. 12/9/2009 11:00:04 AM Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668 -93 APPENDIX B 2010 Street Improvement Project: Opinion of Probable Cost Opinion of Probable Cost Design By PO Schedules G J By: AP Checked By: JPK Date: 12/15/2009 WSB Project: 2010 Street Improvement Project Project Location: City of Rosemount City Project No.: 428 WSB Project No: 1668 Item No. MN/DOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost A. COUNTRY HILLS SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 2 2104.501 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 4000 $2.00 $8,000.00 3 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 900 $3.50 $3,150.00 4 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS SIDEWALK SQ YD 70 $3.00 $210.00 5 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 470 $3.00 $1,410.00 6 2104.509 REMOVE CASTING EACH 74 $50.00 $3,700.00 7 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 1500 $3.50 $5,250.00 8 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 1000 $8.00 $8,000.00 9 2232.501 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1.5") (P) SQ YD 87035 $0.50 $43,517.50 10 2232.604 EDGE MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (0" 1.5") (P) SQ YD 1150 $0.75 $862.50 11 2350.503 TYPE LV WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS SQ YD 470 $20.00 $9,400.00 12 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 9750 $3.00 $29,250.00 13 2360.503 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) 1.5" THICK TON 8270 $55.00 $454,850.00 14 2504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX EACH 15 $50.00 $750.00 15 2505.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX (NEW TOP SECTION) EACH 5 $300.00 $1,500.00 16 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME RING CASTING EACH 40 $300.00 $12,000.00 17 2506.602 CASTING ASSEMBLY (SANITARY) EACH 41 $650.00 $26,650.00 18 2506.602 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM) EACH 33 $650.00 $21,450.00 19 2521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 1600 $4.00 $6,400.00 20 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN SPECIAL LIN FT 4000 $15.00 $60,000.00 21 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 180 $34.00 $6,120.00 22 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 23 2575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN (INCL. TOPSOIL FERT.) SQ YD 1650 $4.50 $7,425.00 Subtotal Schedule A Schedule A Total Surface Improvements $746,895.00 5% Contingencies $37,340.00 Subtotal $784,200.00 20% Indirect Cost $156,800.00 Surface Improvements $941,000.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Opinion of Probable Cost WSB Project: 2010 Street Improvement Project Design By PO Project Location: City of Rosemount Schedules G J By: AP City Project No.: 428 Checked By: JPK WSB Project No: 1668-93 Date: 12/15/2009 Item No. MN/DOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost B. LE FORET SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS 24 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 25 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 850 $3.00 $2,550.00 26 2360.503 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) 1.5" THICK TON 720 $55.00 $39,600.00 26 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $100.00 $100.00 Subtotal Schedule Schedule B Total B Surface Improvements $44,350.00 5% Contingencies $2,220.00 Subtotal $46,600.00 20% Indirect Cost $9,300.00 Surface Improvements $55,900.00 C. SHANNON PARKWAY SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS 27 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 $12,300.00 $12,300.00 28 2104.501 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 800 $2.00 $1,600.00 29 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 1800 $3.50 $6,300.00 30 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS SIDEWALK SQ YD 30 $3.00 $90.00 31 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 30 $3.00 $90.00 32 2104.509 REMOVE CASTING EACH 10 $50.00 $500.00 33 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 80 $3.50 $280.00 34 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 500 $8.00 $4,000.00 35 2232.501 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1.5") (P) SQ YD 24190 $0.50 $12,095.00 36 2350.501 BITUMINOUS PATCH MATERIAL TON 95 $300.00 $28,500.00 37 2350.503 TYPE LV WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS SQ YD 30 $20.00 $600.00 38 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 2635 $3.00 $7,905.00 39 2360.503 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) 1.5" THICK TON 2235 $55.00 $122,925.00 40 2504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX EACH 10 $50.00 $500.00 41 2505.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX (NEW TOP SECTION) EACH 2 $300.00 $600.00 42 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME RING CASTING EACH 10 $300.00 $3,000.00 43 2506.602 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM) EACH 10 $650.00 $6,500.00 44 2521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 1900 $4.00 $7,600.00 45 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN SPECIAL LIN FT 800 $15.00 $12,000.00 46 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 305 $34.00 $10,370.00 47 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 48 2563.601 12" STOP LINE WHITE PAINT LIN FT 30 $10.00 $300.00 49 2564.604 ZEBRA CROSSWALK WHITE PAINT SQ FT 575 $2.50 $1,437.50 50 2575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN (INCL. TOPSOIL FERT.) SQ YD 200 $4.50 $900.00 51 2582.501 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (RIGHT ARROW) EPDXY EACH 1 $45.00 $45.00 52 2582.501 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LEFT ARROW) EPDXY EACH 4 $45.00 $180.00 53 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE WHITE EPDXY LIN FT 11000 $1.00 $11,000.00 54 2582.502 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW EPDXY LIN FT 6000 $1.00 $6,000.00 Subtotal Schedule C Schedule C Total Surface Improvements $259,617.50 5% Contingencies $12,980.00 Subtotal $272,600.00 20% Indirect Cost $54,500.00 Surface Improvements $327,100.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Opinion of Probable Cost WSB Project: 2010 Street Improvement Project Design By: PO Project Location: City of Rosemount Schedules G JBy: AP City Project No.: 428 Checked By: JPK WSB Project No: 1668 -93 Date: 12/15/2009 Item No. MN /DOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost D. SHANNON PARKWAY SCHOOL SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS 55 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 56 2104.501 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 100 $2.00 $200.00 57 2104.509 REMOVE CASTING EACH 6 $50.00 $300.00 58 2232.501 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1.5 (P) SQ YD 4510 $0.50 $2,255.00 59 2350.501 BITUMINOUS PATCH MATERIAL TON 15 $300.00 $4,500.00 60 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 500 $3.00 $1,500.00 61 2360.503 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) 1.5" THICK TON 420 $55.00 $23,100.00 62 2504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX EACH 2 $50.00 $100.00 63 2505.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX (NEW TOP SECTION) EACH 2 $300.00 $600.00 64 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME RING CASTING EACH 5 $300.00 $1,500.00 65 2506.602 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM) EACH 6 $650.00 $3,900.00 66 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN SPECIAL LIN FT 100 $15.00 $1,500.00 67 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $250.00 $250.00 68 2564.604 ZEBRA CROSSWALK WHITE PAINT SQ FT 145 $2.50 $362.50 69 2575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN (INCL. TOPSOIL FERT.) SQ YD 20 $4.50 $90.00 70 2582.501 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (RIGHT ARROW) EPDXY EACH 2 $45.00 $90.00 71 2582.501 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LEFT ARROW) EPDXY EACH 2 $45.00 $90.00 72 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE WHITE EPDXY LIN FT 2210 $1.00 $2,210.00 73 2582.502 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW EPDXY LIN FT 850 $1.00 $850.00 Subtotal Schedule Schedule D Total D Surface Improvements $45,497.50 5% Contingencies $2,270.00 Subtotal $47,800.00 20% Indirect Cost $9,600.00 Surface Improvements $57,400.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Opinion of Probable Cost WSB Project: 2010 Street Improvement Project Design By PO Project Location: City of Rosemount Schedules G J By: AP City Project No.: 428 Checked By: JPK WSB Project No: 1668 -93 Date: 12/15/2009 Item No. MN /DOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost E. CONNEMARA TRAIL SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS 74 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 75 2104.501 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 80 $2.00 $160.00 76 2104.509 REMOVE CASTING EACH 2 $50.00 $100.00 77 2232.501 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1.5 (P) SQ YD 3860 $0.50 $1,930.00 78 2350.501 BITUMINOUS PATCH MATERIAL TON 25 $300.00 $7,500.00 79 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 390 $3.00 $1,170.00 80 2360.503 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) 1.5" THICK TON 330 $55.00 $18,150.00 81 2504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX EACH 2 $50.00 $100.00 82 2505.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX (NEW TOP SECTION) EACH 1 $300.00 $300.00 83 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME RING CASTING EACH 4 $300.00 $1,200.00 84 2506.602 CASTING ASSEMBLY (SANITARY) EACH 1 $650.00 $650.00 85 2506.602 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM) EACH 1 $650.00 $650.00 86 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN SPECIAL LIN FT 80 $15.00 $1,200.00 87 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 88 2564.603 12" STOP LINE WHITE EPDXY LIN FT 66 $2.00 $132.00 89 2564.604 ZEBRA CROSSWALK WHITE -EPDXY SQ FT 290 $2.50 $725.00 90 2575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN (INCL. TOPSOIL FERT.) SQ YD 50 $4.50 $225.00 91 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE WHITE EPDXY LIN FT 1300 $1.00 $1,300.00 92 2582.502 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW EPDXY LIN FT 600 $1.00 $600.00 Subtotal Schedule E Connemara Trail Schedule E Total Connemara Trail Surface Improvements $38,892.00 5% Contingencies $1,940.00 Subtotal $40,800.00 20% Indirect Cost $8,200.00 Surface Improvements $49,000.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Opinion of Probable Cost WSB Project 2010 Street Improvement Project Design By PO Project Location: City of Rosemount Schedules G JBy. AP City Project No.: 428 Checked By: JPK WSB Project No: 1668 -93 Date: 12/15/2009 Item No. MN /DOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost F. SHANNON PARKWAY REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENTS 93 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 $18,500.00 $18,500.00 94 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 450 $3.00 $1,350.00 95 2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 50 $5.00 $250.00 96 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 200 $3.50 $700.00 97 2104.513 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 20 $4.00 $80.00 98 2104.602 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL MAILBOX EACH 13 $50.00 $650.00 99 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 1000 $8.00 $8,000.00 100 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CU YD 1000 $8.00 $8,000.00 101 2105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CU YD 600 $18.00 $10,800.00 102 2112.501 SUBGRADE PREPARATION ROAD STA 28 $150.00 $4,200.00 103 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 20 $120.00 $2,400.00 104 2130.501 WATER MGAL 40 $40.00 $1,600.00 105 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 1800 $12.00 $21,600.00 106 2221.501 AGGREGATE SHOULDERING TON 900 $12.00 $10,800.00 107 2331.604 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT RECLAMATION (P) SQ YD 12500 $1.25 $15,625.00 108 2350.501 2360 TYPE SP WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON 2310 $55.00 $127,050.00 109 2350.502 2350 TYPE LV NON WEARING COURSE TON 1540 $54.00 $83,160.00 110 2350.503 TYPE LV WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS SQ YD 450 $20.00 $9,000.00 111 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 1360 $3.00 $4,080.00 112 2501.515 15" RC PIPE APRON WITH TRASH GUARD EACH 1 $800.00 $800.00 113 2503.541 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V LIN FT 50 $26.00 $1,300.00 114 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48 -4020 LIN FT 6 $225.00 $1,350.00 115 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 1 $550.00 $550.00 116 2531.507 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 50 545.00 $2,250.00 117 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 57,500.00 $7,500.00 118 2564.602 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN EACH 6 $100.00 $600.00 119 2573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE MACHINE SLICED LIN FT 8000 $2.00 $16,000.00 120 2573.602 INLET PROTECTION EACH 2 $100.00 $200.00 121 2573.602 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH 2 $600.00 $1,200.00 122 2575.501 SEEDING (INCL TOPSOIL FERT) ACRE 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 123 2575.523 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 SQ YD 7000 $3.00 $21,000.00 124 2575.608 SEED MIXTURE 240 POUND 140 $5.00 $700.00 125 2582.501 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (RIGHT ARROW) EPDXY EACH 1 $45.00 $45.00 126 2582.501 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LEFT ARROW) EPDXY EACH 1 $45.00 $45.00 127 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE WHITE EPDXY LIN FT 5800 $1.00 55,800.00 128 2582.502 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW EPDXY LIN FT 2800 $1.00 $2,800.00 Subtotal Schedule F Shannon Parkway Rehabilitation Schedule F Total Shannon Parkway Rehabilitation Improvements $392,985.00 5% Contingencies $19,650.00 Subtotal $412,600.00 20% Indirect Cost $82,500.00 Improvements $495,100.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Opinion of Probable Cost WSB Project: 2010 Street Improvement Project Design By: PO Project Location: City of Rosemount Schedules G JBy: AP City Project No.: 428 Checked By: JPK WSB Project No: 1668 93 Date: 12/15/2009 Item No. MN/DOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost G. SHANNON PARKWAY ROUNDABOUT SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS 129 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (2.5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 130 2101.501 CLEARING ACRE 0.25 $3,500.00 $875.00 131 2101.502 CLEARING TREE 10 $200.00 $2,000.00 132 2101.506 GRUBBING ACRE 0.25 $3,500.00 $875.00 133 2101.507 GRUBBING TREE 10 $200.00 $2,000.00 134 2104.501 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 2665 $2.50 $6,662.50 135 2104.503 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALK SQ FT 7100 $2.50 $17,750.00 136 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 6200 $2.00 $12,400.00 137 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN PANEL TYPE C EACH 10 $40.00 $400.00 138 2104.513 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 150 $2.50 $375.00 139 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 1200 $4.00 $4,800.00 140 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CU YD 4000 $6.00 $24,000.00 141 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) (P) CU YD 4000 $8.00 $32,000.00 142 2105.523 COMMON BORROW (CV) (P) CU YD 450 $6.00 $2,700.00 143 2105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW (CV) (P) CU YD 600 $4.00 $2,400.00 144 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 40 $130.00 $5,200.00 145 2130.501 WATER MGAL 100 $20.00 $2,000.00 146 2211.503 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 (P) CU YD 1,500 $18.00 $27,000.00 147 2301.503 CONCRETE PAVEMENT IRREGULAR WIDTH 7.0" SQ YD 230 $34.00 $7,820.00 148 2301.511 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE CU YD 45 $125.00 $5,625.00 149 2301.529 REINFORCEMENT BARS (EPDXY COATED) POUND 260 $4.00 $1,040.00 150 2301.602 1.25" DOWEL BAR EACH 270 $8.00 $2,160.00 151 2350.501 TYPE LV 3 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (B) TON 300 $50.00 $15,000.00 152 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 800 $2.00 $1,600.00 153 2360.501 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) TON 1,800 $52.00 $93,600.00 154 2360.502 TYIaE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (2,B) TON 1,350 $48.00 $64,800.00 155 2521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 3800 $3.00 $11,400.00 156 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB GUTTER DESIGN B612 LIN FT 190 $11.00 $2,090.00 157 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB GUTTER DESIGN B624 LIN FT 3310 $14.00 $46,340.00 158 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB GUTTER DESIGN S524 LIN FT 265 $18.00 $4,770.00 159 2531.602 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP EACH 14 $500.00 $7,000.00 160 2531.602 GONG ENTRANCE NOSE DES 7113 EACH 8 $500.00 $4,000.00 161 2545.511 LIGHTING UNIT EACH 4 $2,850.00 $11,400.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Opinion of Probable Cost WSB Project: 2010 Street Improvement Project Design By: PO Project Location: City of Rosemount Schedules G J By: AP City Project No.: 428 Checked By: JPK WSB Project No: 1668 -93 Date: 12/15/2009 Item No. MN/DOT Specification No Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost 162 2545.515 LIGHT BASE DESIGN SPECIAL EACH 4 $900.00 $3,600.00 163 2545.523 2" NON METALLIC CONDUIT LIN FT 600 $5.15 $3,090.00 164 2545.531 UNDERGROUND WIRE 1 COND NO 6 LIN FT 1200 $1.20 $1,440.00 165 2545.602 HANDHOLE EACH 4 $750.00 $3,000.00 166 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 167 2564.531 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SQ FT 250.0 $30.00 $7,500.00 168 2564.531 SIGN PANELS TYPE D SQ FT 25.00 $50.00 $1,250.00 169 2573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE MACHINE SLICED LIN FT 1000 $2.00 $2,000.00 170 2573.530 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 20 $250.00 $5,000.00 171 2575.502 SEED MIXTURE 240 POUND 50 $4.00 $200.00 172 2575.502 SEED MIXTURE 330 POUND 20 $4.00 $80.00 173 2575.502 SEED MIXTURE 340 POUND 10 $5.00 $50.00 174 2575.505 SODDING TYPE SALT RESISTANT SQ YD 2660 $2.75 $7,315.00 175 2575.511 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 3 TON 2.0 $200.00 $400.00 176 2575.523 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 1 SQ YD 2000 $1.50 $3,000.00 177 2575.532 FERTILIZER TYPE 1 POUND 80 $1.00 $80.00 178 2575.604 SEEDING SQ YD 4000 $0.50 $2,000.00 179 2582.501 PAVT MSSG (YIELD) EPDXY EACH 4 $200.00 $800.00 180 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE WHITE -EPDXY LIN FT 800 $0.50 $400.00 181 2582.502 24" DOTTED LINE WHITE -EPDXY (SPECIAL) LIN FT 120 $6.75 $810.00 182 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE YELLOW -EPDXY LIN FT 120 $0.50 $60.00 183 2582.502 24" SOLID LINE YELLOW -EPDXY LIN FT 300 $6.00 $1,800.00 184 2582.502 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW -EPDXY LIN FT 1,600 $0.75 $1,200.00 185 2582.503 CROSSWALK MARKING -EPDXY SQ FT 300 $4.25 $1,275.00 Subtotal Schedule G Shannon Parkway Roundabout Schedule G Total Shannon Parkway Roundabout Surface Improvements $492,432.50 10% Contingencies $49,240.00 Subtotal $541,670.00 20% Indirect Cost $108,330.00 Surface Improvements $650,000.00 H. SHANNON PARKWAY ROUNDABOUT SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 186 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (2.5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 $160.00 $160.00 186 2503.603 RECONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLES LIN FT 12 $500.00 $6,000.00 187 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME RING CASTING EACH 3 $250.00 $750.00 Subtotal Schedule H Shannon Parkway Roundabout Sanitary Schedule H Total Shannon Parkway Roundabout Sanitary Sewer Improvements $6,910.00 10% Contingencies $690.00 Subtotal $7,600.00 20% Indirect Cost $1,520.00 Sewer Improvements $9,100.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Opinion of Probable Cost WSB Project: 2010 Street Improvement Project Design By: PO Project Location: City of Rosemount Schedules G JBy. AP City Project No.: 428 Checked By: JPK WSB Project No: 1668 -93 Date: 12/15/2009 Item No. MN /DOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost I. SHANNON PARKWAY ROUNDABOUT WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS 188 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (2.5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 189 2104.501 REMOVE WATER MAIN LIN FT 500 $9.00 $4,500.00 190 2104.509 REMOVE HYDRANT AND VALVE EACH 1 $650.00 $650.00 191 2104.509 REMOVE GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 2 $300.00 $600.00 192 2451.602 PIPE BEDDING MATERIAL TON 100 $10.00 $1,000.00 193 2504.601 TEMPORARY WATER SYSTEM LUMP SUM 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 194 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN EACH 4 $1,250.00 $5,000.00 195 2504.602 HYDRANT ASSEMBLY EACH 1 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 196 2504.602 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 1 $900.00 $900.00 197 2504.602 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 2 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 198 2504.602 16" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 1 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 199 2504.603 6" WATER MAIN -DUCT IRON CL 52 LIN FT 20 $27.00 $540.00 200 2504.603 8" WATER MAIN -DUCT IRON CL 52 LIN FT 100 $32.00 $3,200.00 201 2504.603 16" WATER MAIN -DUCT IRON CL 52 LIN FT 400 $70.00 $28,000.00 202 2504.604 4' POLYSTYRENE INSULATION SQ YD 10 $25.00 $250.00 203 2504.608 CUCTILE IRON FITTINGS POUND 5,000 $2.50 $12,500.00 Subtotal Schedule I Shannon Parkway Roundabout Schedule I Total Shannon Parkway Roundabout Watermain Watermain Improvements 10% Contingencies $76,740.00 $7,670.00 Subtotal 20% Indirect Cost $84,410.00 $16,880.00 Improvements $101,300.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Opinion of Probable Cost WSB Project: 2010 Street Improvement Project Design By: PO Project Location: City of Rosemount Schedules G J By: AP City Project No.: 428 Checked By: JPK WSB Project No: 1668-93 Date: 12/15/2009 Item No. MN/DOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost J. SHANNON PARKWAY ROUNDABOUT STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 204 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (2.5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 205 2104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) LIN FT 120 $10.00 $1,200.00 206 2104.509 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 10 $350.00 $3,500.00 207 2503.541 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V LIN FT 320 $29.00 $9,280.00 208 2503.541 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 LIN FT 60 $32.00 $1,920.00 209 2506.501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 LIN FT 80.00 $220.00 $17,600.00 210 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 20 $500.00 $10,000.00 Subtotal Schedule J Shannon Parkway Roundabout Storm Schedule J Total Shannon Parkway Roundabout Storm Sewer Improvements 10% Contingencies $44,500.00 $4,450.00 Subtotal 20% Indirect Cost $48,950.00 $9,790.00 Sewer Improvements $58,700.00 Grand Total 2010 Street Improvement Project $2,744,600.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Opinion of Probable Cost WSB Project: 2010 Street Improvement Project Design By: PO Project Location: City of Rosemount Schedules G JBy: AP City Project No.: 428 Checked By: JPK WSB Project No: 1668 -93 Date: 12/15/2009 Item No. MN/DOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost SCHEDULE K SHANNON PARKWAY TURN LANE 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 2 2104.501 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 1200 $2.00 $2,400.00 3 2104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) LIN FT 560 $8.00 $4,480.00 4 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS SIDEWALK SQ YD 650 $1.00 $650.00 5 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 200 $2.00 $400.00 6 2104.509 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 10 $350.00 $3,500.00 7 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 1,200 $3.50 $4,200.00 8 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 1100 $4.00 $4,400.00 9 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CU YD 100 $6.00 $600.00 10 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CU YD 800 $8.00 $6,400.00 11 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 5 $120.00 $600.00 12 2130,501 WATER MGAL 10 $40.00 $400.00 13 2211,501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 400 $12.00 $4,800.00 14 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 110 $3.00 $330.00 15 2360.501 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) TON 140 $55.00 $7,700.00 16 2360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (2,B) TON 210 $110.00 $23,100.00 17 2503.541 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V LIN FT 275 $26.00 $7,150.00 18 2503.541 1'3" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 35 $32.00 $1,120.00 19 2503.541 21" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 285 $37.00 $10,545.00 20 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 21 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48 -4020 LIN FT 60 $200.00 $12,000.00 22 2506.602 CASTING ASSEMBLY (CATCH BASIN) EACH 10 $550.00 $5,500.00 23 2521.604 2 BITUMINOUS PATH SQ YD 650 $20.00 $13,000.00 24 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB GUTTER DESIGN SPECIAL LIN FT 1200 $15.00 $18,000.00 25 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 26 2564.602 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN EACH 2 $75.00 $150.00 27 2573.530 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 2 $75.00 $150.00 28 2575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN (INCL. TOPSOIL FERT.) SQ YD 1400 $4.50 $6,300.00 29 2582.502 24" SOLID LINE YELLOW -EPDXY LIN FT 70 $6.00 $420.00 30 2582.502 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW -EPDXY LIN FT 600 $1.00 $600.00 Subtotal Schedule K- Shannon Total Schedule K Shannon Parkway Turn Lane $148,895.00 10% Contingencies $14,890.00 Subtotal $163,790.00 20% Indirect Cost $32,760.00 Parkway Turn Lane $196,600.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Opinion of Probable Cost WSB Project: 2010 Street Improvement Project Design By: PO Project Location: City of Rosemount Checked By: JPK City Project No.: 428 WSB Project No: 1668 -93 Date: 12/15/2009 Item No. MN/DOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost OPTION 1 137TH STREET SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 $3,900.00 $3,900.00 2 2101.511 CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHRUB EACH 2 $50.00 $100.00 3 2104.501 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 40 $2.00 $80.00 4 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 120 $3.50 $420.00 5 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 710 $3.00 $2,130.00 6 2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 40 $5.00 $200.00 7 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS SIDEWALK SQ YD 1150 $3.00 $3,450.00 8 2104.511 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 20 $4.00 $80.00 9 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 280 $3.50 $980.00 10 2104.601 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES LUMP SUM 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 11 2104.602 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL MAILBOX EACH 14 $100.00 $1,400.00 12 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 350 $8.00 $2,800.00 13 2350.503 TYPE LV WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS SQ YD 400 $20.00 $8,000.00 14 2504.602 CURB BOX REPAIR EACH 14 $150.00 $2,100.00 15 2504.602 ADJUST CURB BOX EACH 14 $50.00 $700.00 16 2521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 6770 $4.00 $27,080.00 17 2521.501 6" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 1450 $4.50 $6,525.00 18 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB GUTTER DESIGN SPECIAL LIN FT 40 $15.00 $600.00 19 2531.507 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 290 $40.00 $11,600.00 20 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 16 $34.00 $544.00 21 2571.504 SHRUBS EACH 2 $100.00 $200.00 22 2571.602 TREE PROTECTION EACH 5 $25.00 $125.00 23 2575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN (INCL. TOPSOIL FERT.) SQ YD 1900 $4.50 $8,550.00 Subtotal Option 1 I 37th Street Total Option 1 137th Street Sidewalk Sidewalk Improvements $83,564.00 5% Contingencies $4,1 80.00 Subtotal $87,700.00 25% Indirect Cost $21,900.00 Improvements $109,600.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Opinion of Probable Cost WSB Project: 2010 Street Improvement Project Design By: PO Project Location: City of Rosemount Checked By: JPK City Project No.: 428 WSB Project No: 1668 -93 Date: 12/15/2009 Item No. MN /DOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost OPTION 2 DANUBE LANE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS 24 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 25 2104.501 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 40 $2.00 $80.00 26 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 325 $3.00 $975.00 27 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS SIDEWALK SQ YD 650 $3.00 $1,950.00 28 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 150 $3.50 $525.00 29 2104.601 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES LUMP SUM 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 30 2104.602 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL MAILBOX EACH 6 $100.00 $600.00 31 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 250 $8.00 $2,000.00 32 2350.503 TYPE LV WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS SQ YD 160 $20.00 $3,200.00 33 2504.602 CURB BOX REPAIR EACH 6 $150.00 $900.00 34 2504.602 ADJUST CURB BOX EACH 6 $50.00 $300.00 35 2521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 3710 $4.00 $14,840.00 36 2521.501 6" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 650 $4.50 $2,925.00 37 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB GUTTER DESIGN SPECIAL LIN FT 40 $15.00 $600.00 38 2531.507 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 120 $40.00 $4,800.00 39 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 16 $34.00 $544.00 40 2571.602 TREE PROTECTION EACH 5 $25.00 $125.00 41 2575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN (INCL. TOPSOIL FERT.) SQ YD 1300 $4.50 $5,850.00 Subtotal Option 2 Danube Lane Total Option 2 Danube Lane Sidewalk Sidewalk Improvements $43,714.00 5% Contingencies $2,190.00 Subtotal $45,900.00 25% Indirect Cost $11,500.00 Improvements $57,400.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Opinion of Probable Cost WSB Project: 2010 Street Improvement Project Design By: PO Project Location: City of Rosemount Checked By: JPK City Project No.: 428 WSB Project No: 1668 -93 Date: 12/15/2009 Item No. MN/DOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost OPTION 3 SHANNON PARKWAY PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS 42 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 $11,300.00 $11,300.00 43 2101.502 CLEARING TREE 70 $150.00 $10,500.00 44 2101.507 GRUBBING TREE 70 $100.00 $7,000.00 45 2101.511 CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHRUB EACH 20 $50.00 $1,000.00 46 2101.603 ROOT CUTTING LIN FT 100 $4.00 $400.00 47 2104.501 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 200 $2.00 $400.00 48 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 100 $3.50 $350.00 49 2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 120 $5.00 $600.00 50 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 1620 $3.00 $4,860.00 51 2104.511 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 20 $4.00 $80.00 52 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 260 $3.50 $910.00 53 2104.601 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES LUMP SUM 1 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 54 2104.601 TREE TRIMMING LUMP SUM 1 $500.00 $500.00 55 2104.602 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL MAILBOX EACH 13 $100.00 $1,300.00 56 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 1500 $8.00 $12,000.00 57 2350.503 TYPE LV WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS SQ YD 1160 $20.00 $23,200.00 58 2411.604 RETAINING WALL SQ FT 600 $20.00 $12,000.00 59 2504.602 CURB BOX REPAIR EACH 13 $150.00 $1,950.00 60 2504.602 ADJUST CURB BOX EACH 13 $50.00 $650.00 61 2521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 10540 $4.00 $42,160.00 62 2521.501 6" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 2500 $4.50 $11,250.00 63 2521.604 2" BITUMINOUS PATH SQ YD 1200 $20.00 $24,000.00 64 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB GUTTER DESIGN SPECIAL LIN FT 200 $15.00 $3,000.00 65 2531.507 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 120 $40.00 $4,800.00 66 2531.507 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 310 $40.00 $12,400.00 67 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 160 $34.00 $5,440.00 68 2557.603 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL FENCE LIN FT 300 $15.00 $4,500.00 69 2564.602 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN EACH 4 $50.00 $200.00 70 2571.501 CONIFEROUS TREE 8' HT B &B TREE 35 $250.00 $8,750.00 71 2571.502 DECIDUOUS TREE 2.5" CAL B &B TREE 35 $250.00 $8,750.00 72 2571.504 SHRUBS EACH 20 $75.00 $1,500.00 73 2571.602 TREE PROTECTION EACH 25 $100.00 $2,500.00 74 2575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN (INCL. TOPSOIL FERT.) SQ YD 6000 $4.50 $27,000.00 Subtotal Option 3 Shannon Parkway Pedestrian Total Option 3 Shannon Parkway Pedestrian Improvements $251,250.00 5% Contingencies $12,560.00 Subtotal $263,800.00 25% Indirect Cost $66,000.00 Improvements $329,800.00 1 r 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Opinion of Probable Cost WSB Project: 2010 Street Improvement Project Project Location: City of Rosemount City Project No.: 428 WSB Project No: 1668 -93 Design By: PO Checked By: JPK Date: 12/15/2009 Item No. MN /DOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost OPTION 4 SHANNON PARKWAY TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS 75 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 76 2101.502 CLEARING TREE 3 $150.00 $450.00 77 2101.507 GRUBBING TREE 3 $100.00 $300.00 78 2104.501 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 20 $2.00 $40.00 79 2104.601 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES LUMP SUM 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 80 2104.601 TREE TRIMMING LUMP SUM 1 $500.00 $500.00 81 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 300 $8.00 $2,400.00 82 2105.523 COMMON BORROW (CV) (P) CU YD 50 $6.00 $300.00 83 2411.604 RETAINING WALL SQ FT 300 $20.00 $6,000.00 84 2521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 150 $4.00 $600.00 85 2521.604 2" BITUMINOUS PATH SQ YD 550 $20.00 $11,000.00 86 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB GUTTER DESIGN SPECIAL LIN FT 20 $15.00 $300.00 87 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 16 $34.00 $544.00 88 2564.602 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN EACH 3 $50.00 $150.00 89 2571.501 CONIFEROUS TREE 8' HT B &B TREE 2 $250.00 $500.00 90 2571.502 DECIDUOUS TREE 2.5" CAL B &B TREE 1 $250.00 $250.00 91 2571.602 TREE PROTECTION EACH 1 $100.00 $100.00 92 2575.502 SEED MIXTURE 240 POUND 50 $4.00 $200.00 93 2575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN (INCL. TOPSOIL FERT.) SQ YD 1400 $4.50 $6,300.00 94 2575.511 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 3 TON 1.2 $200.00 $240.00 $50.00 $1,500.00 95 2575.532 FERTILIZER TYPE 1 POUND 50 $1.00 96 2575.604 SEEDING SQ YD 3000 $0.50 Subtotal Option 4 Shannon Parkway Total Option 4 Shannon Parkway Trail Improvements $34,924.00 5% Contingencies $1,750.00 Subtotal $36,700.00 25% Indirect Cost $9,200.00 Trail Improvements $45,900.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Opinion of Probable Cost WSB Project: Project Location: City Project No.: WSB Project No: 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount 428 1668 -93 Design By: PO Checked By: JPK Date: 12/15/2009 Item No. MN/DOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost OPTION 6 DELTA AVENUE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS 117 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 118 2101.502 CLEARING TREE 4 $150.00 $600.00 119 2101.507 GRUBBING TREE 4 $100.00 $400.00 120 2101.511 CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHRUB EACH 10 $50.00 $500.00 121 2101.603 ROOT CUTTING LIN FT 100 $4.00 $400.00 122 2104.501 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 80 $2.00 $160.00 123 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 660 $3.00 $1,980.00 124 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 180 $3.50 $630.00 125 2104.601 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES LUMP SUM 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 126 2104.601 TREE TRIMMING LUMP SUM 1 $500.00 $500.00 127 2104.602 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL MAILBOX EACH 9 $100.00 $900.00 128 2411.604 RETAINING WALL SQ FT 200 $20.00 $4,000.00 129 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 500 $8.00 $4,000.00 130 2350.503 TYPE LV WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS SQ YD 400 $20.00 $8,000.00 131 2504.602 CURB BOX REPAIR EACH 9 $150.00 $1,350.00 132 2504.602 ADJUST CURB BOX EACH 9 $50.00 $450.00 133 2521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 5425 $4.00 $21,700.00 134 2521.501 6" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 1475 $4.50 $6,637.50 135 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB GUTTER DESIGN SPECIAL LIN FT 80 $15.00 $1,200.00 136 2531.507 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 170 $40.00 $6,800.00 137 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 64 $34.00 $2,176.00 138 2557.603 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL FENCE LIN FT 80 $15.00 $1,200.00 139 2571.501 CONIFEROUS TREE 8' HT B &B TREE 2 $250.00 $500.00 140 2571.502 DECIDUOUS TREE 2.5" CAL B &B TREE 2 $250.00 $500.00 141 2571.504 SHRUBS EACH 10 $75.00 $750.00 142 2571.602 TREE PROTECTION EACH 5 $100.00 $500.00 143 2575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN (INCL. TOPSOIL FERT.) SQ YD 2500 $4.50 $11,250.00 Subtotal Option 6 Delta Avenue Total Option 6 Delta Avenue Sidewalk Sidewalk Improvements $84,083.50 5% Contingencies $4,200.00 Subtotal $88,300.00 25% Indirect Cost $22,100.00 Improvements $110,400.00 1 1 1 M 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Opinion of Probable Cost WSB Project: 2010 Street Improvement Project Design By: PO Project Location: City of Rosemount Checked By: JPK City Project No.: 428 WSB Project No: 1668 -93 Date: 12/15/2009 Item No. MN/DOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost OPTION 7 DANE AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS 144 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $160.00 $160.00 145 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS SIDEWALK SQ YD 290 $3.00 $870.00 146 2575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN (INCL. TOPSOIL FERT.) SQ YD 550 $4.50 $2,475.00 Subtotal Option 7 Dane Total Option 7 Dane Avenue Improvements $3,505.00 5% Contingencies $180.00 Subtotal $3,700.00 25% Indirect Cost $900.00 Avenue Improvements $4,600.00 Grand Total 2010 Street Improvement Project Pedestrian Improvements $835,800.00 1 1 1 F r 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 APPENDIX C Funding Calculations: Shannon Parkway Turn Lane Funding Calculations: Shannon Parkway Roundabout Assessment Calculations City Fund Calculations Shannon Parkway Mill and Overlay Credit Preliminary Assessment Roll Schedule A Country Hills Surface Improvements Schedule A Country Hills 1st 8th Addition Assessments Schedule B Le Foret Surface Improvements Schedule B Le Foret Assessments Schedule E Connemara Trail Surface Improvements 2010 Pavement Management Program Overlay Assessments Le Foret Overlay Assessments Shannon Parkway School Overlay Assessment Shannon Pakrway Rehabilitaiton Assessment Shannon Parkway Mill and Overlay Credit Option 1 137th Street Option 2 Danube Lane Option 5 Dearborn Path Option 6 Delta Avenue Option 7 Dane Avenue Funding Calculations: Shannon Parkway Roundabout r et Captt l improvement Ft xn ecial Asses opa >State` Schedule C Shannon Parkway Surface Improvements Schedule C Shannon Parkway Surface Improvements Assessments Schedule D Shannon Parkway School Surface Improvements Schedule D Shannon Parkway School Surface Improvements Assessments Schedule F Shannon Parkway Rehabilitation Improvements Schedule F Shannon Parkway Rehabilitation Improvements Assessments Schedule G Shannon Parkway Roundabout Surface Improvements Option 3 Shannon Parkway (Connemara Trail to Daffodil Path) Option 4 Shannon Parkway (133rd Court to Evermoor Parkway) all Side valk Improvements Fun ant tary Sever Utility Fun Schedule H Shannon Parkway Roundabout Sanitary Sewer Improvements atermain Utility Fun Schedule I Shannon Parkway Roundabout Watermain Improvements Stori i Sewer Utility Fund Total Funding Total Funding $502,440 Total Funding Total Funding Total Funding Total Funding Schedule J Shannnon Parkway Roundabout Storm Sewer Improvements Total Funding Total Project Funding Add $941,000 $55,900 $49,000 $131,800 $357,060 $19,630 $10,050 $115,700 $327,100 $57,400 $495,100 $650,000 $329,800 $45,900 $1,702,270 $109,600 $57,400 $178,100 $110,400 $819 490 $4,600 $460,100 $9,100 $9,100 $101,300 $101,300 $58,700 $58,700 $3,653,400 Subtract $338,580 $19,630 $18,480 $10,050 $115,700 $58,800 Schedule A Country Hills Surface Improvements Schedule A Country Hills 1st 8th Addition Assessments Schedule B Le Foret Surface Improvements Schedule B Le Foret Assessments Schedule E Connemara Trail Surface Improvements 2010 Pavement Management Program Overlay Assessments Le Foret Overlay Assessments Shannon Parkway School Overlay Assessment Shannon Pakkway Rehabilitaiton Assessment Schedule C Shannon Parkway Surface Improvements Schedule C Shannon Parkway Surface Improvements Assessments Schedule D Shannon Parkway School Surface Improvements Schedule D Shannon Parkway School Surface Improvements Assessments Schedule F Shannon Parkway Rehabilitation Improvements Schedule F Shannon Parkway Rehabilitation Improvements Assessments Schedule K Shannon Parkway Turn Lane Option 3 Shannon Parkway (Connemara Trail to Daffodil Path) Option 4 Shannon Parkway (133rd Court to Evermoor Parkway) Option 1 1371.h Street Option 2 Danube Lane Option 5 Dearborn Path Option 6 Delta Avenue Option 7 Dane Avenue Funding Calculations: Shannon Parkway Turn Lane ra reed Capital lmpt oveen U pe cpxal at Artdu ro' r Int Total Funding Total Funding $502 440 Total Funding ernents Fun Total Funding Total Project Funding Add Subtract $941,000 $338,580 $55,900 $19,630 $49,000 $131,800 $819,490 $357,060 $19,630 $10,050 $115,700 $327,100 $18,480 $57,400 $10,050 $495,100 $115,700 $196,600 $329,800 $45,9007 $1,307,670 $109,600 $57,400 $178,100 $110,400 $4,600 $460 100 $3,089,700 Assessment Calculations tcul on uerlay`AssessmentG Schedule A Country Hills Surface Improvements Schedule C Shannon Parkway Surface Improvements Shannon Parkway Improvements City Funded Assessable Project Cost Assessment Rate Total Assessment (Exact) Total Assessment (Rounded) Country Hills South of Connemara Country Hills North of Connemara Shannon Parkway Single Family Unit Assessment (Exact) sessr n Unit Assessment (Rounded) Iculafiansfp Assessable Project Cost Assessment Rate Total Assessment (Exact) Total Assessment (Rounded) Unit Assessment (Exact) Schedule D Shannon Parkway School Surface Improvements Assessable Roadway Percentage Assessment Rate Total Assessment (Exact) Total Assessment (Rounded) Schedule F Shannon Parkway Rehabilitation Improvements Shannon Parkway Rehabilitation Improvements City Funded Assessable Project Cost Assessement Rate Total Assessment (Exact) Total Assessment (Rounded) $941,000 $327,100 $253,000 $1,015,100 35% $355,285 $357,060 243 270 28 Total Lots 541 $657 $660 Schedule B Le Foret Surface Improvements $55,900 $55,900 35% $19,565 $19,630 Total Lots 13 $1,505 Unit Assessment (Rounded)1 $1,510 kw 'a no' saes cuIa $57,400 50% Assessable Project Cost $28,700 35% $10,045 $10,050 no #0404.' A e ulatiorx $495,100 $164,400 $330,700 35% $115,745 $115,700 Total Lots 13 Unit Assessment Exact $8,903 Unit Assessment (Rounded) $8,900 City Funding Calculations WSB Project: 2010 Street Improvement Project Design By: PO Project Location: City of Rosemount Checked By: JPK City Project No.: 428 WSB Project No: 1668 -93 Date: 12/15/2009 Item No. MN /DOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimate Qty or Cost City Funding Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost SHANNON PARKWAY REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENTS CITY 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 20% 0.2 $18,500.00 $3,700.00 2 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 1000 20% 200 $8.00 $1,600.00 3 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CU YD 1000 20% 200 $8.00 $1,600.00 4 2105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CU YD 600 43% 258 $18.00 $4,644.00 5 2112.501 SUBGRADE PREPARATION ROAD STA 28 20% 5.6 $150.00 $840.00 6 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 20 20% 4 $120.00 $480.00 7 2130.501 WATER MGAL 40 20% 8 $40.00 $320.00 8 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (ROADWAY ONLY) TON 1800 100% 1,800 $12.00 $21,600.00 9 2331.604 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT RECLAMATION (P) SQ YD 12500 20% 2,500 $1.25 $3,125.00 10 2350.501 2360 TYPE SP WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (1 TON 770 100% 770 $55.00 $42,350.00 11 2350.501 2360 TYPE SP WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2 TON 1540 20% 308 $55.00 $16,940.00 12 2350.502 2350 TYPE LV NON WEARING COURSE TON 1540 20% 308 $54.00 $16,632.00 13 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT (1 LIFT) GALLON 680 100% 680 $3.00 $2,040.00 14 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT (1 LIFT) GALLON 680 20% 136 $3.00 $408.00 15 2501.515 15" RC PIPE APRON WITH TRASH GUARD EACH 1 100% 1 $800.00 $800.00 16 2503.541 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V LIN FT 50 100% 50 $26.00 $1,300.00 17 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48 -4020 LIN FT 6 100% 6 $225.00 $1,350.00 18 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 1 100% 1 $550.00 $550.00 19 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 20% 0.2 $7,500.00 $I,500.00 20 2582.501 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (RIGHT ARROW) EPDXY EACH 1 100% 1 $45.00 $45.00 21 2582.501 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LEFT ARROW) EPDXY EACH 1 100% 1 $45.00 $45.00 22 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE WHITE EPDXY LIN FT 5800 100% 5,800 $1.00 $5,800.00 23 2582.502 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW EPDXY LIN FT 2800 100% 2,800 $1.00 $2,800.00 Subtotal Shannon Parkway Rehabilitation Total Shannon Parkway Rehabilitation Improvements $130,469.00 5% Contingencies $6,500.00 Subtotal $137,000.00 20% Indirect Cost $27,400.00 Improvements $164,400.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 City Funding Calculations WSB Project: 2010 Street Improvement Project Design By: PO Project Location: City of Rosemount Checked By: JPK City Project No.: 428 WSB Project No: 1668 93 Date: 12/15/2009 Item No. MN/DOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost SHANNON PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS CITY 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% MAXIMUM) LUMP SUM 1 $9,500.00 $9,500.00 2 2104.501 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 300 $2.00 $600.00 3 2104.509 REMOVE CASTING EACH 6 $50.00 $300.00 4 2232.501 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1.5 (P) SQ YD 23120 $0.50 $11,560.00 5 2350.501 1.5 -INCH TYPE LV 3 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) TON 2135 $55.00 $117,425.00 6 2350.501 BITUMINOUS PATCH MATERIAL TON 80 $300.00 $24,000.00 7 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 2525 $3.00 $7,575.00 8 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME RING CASTING EACH 7 $300.00 $2,100.00 9 2506.602 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM) EACH 6 $650.00 $3,900.00 10 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN SPECIAL LIN FT 300 $15.00 $4,500.00 11 2564.604 ZEBRA CROSSWALK WHITE PAINT SQ FT 575 $2.50 $1,437.50 12 2575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN (INCL. TOPSOIL FERT.) SQ YD 150 $4.50 $675.00 13 2582.501 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (RIGHT ARROW) EPDXY EACH 1 $45.00 $45.00 14 2582.501 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LEFT ARROW) EPDXY EACH 4 $45.00 $180.00 15 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE WHITE EPDXY LIN FT 11000 $1.00 $11,000.00 16 2582.502 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW EPDXY LIN FT 6000 $1.00 $6,000.00 Subtotal Shannon Parkway Total Shannon Parkway Surface Improvements $200,797.50 5% Contingencies $10,040.00 Subtotal $210,800.00 20% Indirect Cost $42,200.00 Surface Improvements $253,000.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Shannon Parkway Mill and Overlay Credit &„f`e- ::':3b" ..S N 4k3, /^P.AV.V, t‘ 'ea wa'N: n. 'E ":Z' -f $4 •ft..,.. a 4 I tY m�...r, u.A %i 5 -x': Schedule C Shannon Parkway Surface Improvements $327,100 Schedule D Shannon Parkway School Surface Improvements $57,400 Total Shannon Parkway Overlay Cost $384,500 Shannon Parkway Overlay Length (feet) 5425 Cost Per Lineal Foot $70.88 Length of Shannon Parkway Roundabout (feet) 830 Shannon Parkway Mill and Overlay Credit (rounded) $58,800 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N I M 1 MI r— w w MS NM r MN N M MI I 01 cn 0 rn 03 01 ON ON 0 0 cn 0 rn 0 W 01 0 01 O a\ ON 0 W 01 O 4' ON ON 0 Ozl ti tri W 01 O 4, O` ON 0 j 01 0 0 69 ON ON 01 0 0 49 ON ON 01 01 0 0) 0 j 01 O 69 ON ON 0 cn 0 0 rn 0 01 0 0 4' ON O\ 0 cn cn 0 rn 0 01 0 69 O\ ON 01 O 69 ON 0 0 0 0 m 0 69 ON 0 cn 0 0 cn CO 01 0 0 69 0) rn 0 cn cn 0 0 W 01 0 69 ON ON 01 0 69 rn 0 0 0 0 rn CO 01 0 69 ON 0 cn cn 0 rn 0 w 01 0 0 68 ON ON W 01 O 69 ON ON 0 01 0 0 69 ON 0 0 rn 0 01 O ON ON 01 0 0 0 W 01 0 0 69 ON 0 cn 0 0 0 W 01 0 a O ON 0 w 0 rn 0 01 0 En O\ ON 0 cn 0 rn 0 j W O 69 ON ON 0 1 LA 0 0 49 ON 0 U1 01 0 rn 03 01 0 4' ON ON 0 01 O 69 ON O\ 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 rn 0 01 0 69 O\ ON C/1 cn 0 rn 03 (J.) 01 O ON ON 0 01 0 0 rn 0 01 0 0 01 0 69 0' ON 9 EA 00 O N O b9 VI O b4 ON O O MN NMI MN INN IIIIIII IMO MI NM MI MO Mill 1.1111 INN IMO 1 NMI 1111111 w A Co w 000000000000000000000 ..1 n w A Co w x.7 O CT w A CO w 0' C U w A Co CO w A 00 CJ CA w A 03 w r w A Co 0) U. w A Co w w A 0 w 0 w A CO w rn w A Co w w A 00 w (r a.> A w w (n w A OD 0) (n w A CO w CO w A 00 03 fd w A 00 0) (d w A 0 w 03 w A 03 w (J w A Co w (il w A Co w O w A CO w (4 w A CO w O w A Co w w a 00 03 0 C CO 03 CO 03 w A CO w 'A w A OD w w C C C w A 0, w w A Co w 1 I 348180001001 w A Co 0000000 0000.000 A OD A 00 A Co w A CO o 0 0 w A Co 03 0 A w A CO 0 0 0 GREGORY J MARY A SICORA i 1 DAVID B BIRKHOLZ r JEFFREY T KAREN M PETERSON I JACOB E SARAH P HINES DONALD J BILLIE JO SANDOZ I NGHIEM TAN NGUYEN i I I MICHAEL C GREGERSON RICHARD L ROBERTS I MARK P JUDY K SCHOSTAG I THOMAS H SHERRIE D BUSSE I GEOFFREY W BONNIE EBELING JOHN R JR ANGELA L DEBETTIGNIES I JOHN A JULIA A HOLTZE I JOSEPH G DEBORAH M GUBBELS WILLIAM E JANICE E MATULKA I SCOT P KRISTINE A CHARBONEAU DAVID A JACQUELINE SPEICH I MARC W KARI L GALE JEFFREY A HEIDI L KRECH I STEVEN G LYNDA E ANGELOS JONATHAN E BURT I 1 I I I FRANK J LEE ANNE HORVATH BRIAN G TRACIE A VANKEULEN 1 BRIAN E PATRICIA M CHASE 1 DANIEL D JOELL M OLSON I i 1 1 MATTHEW M JENNIFER NELSON NORMAN W STRATTON JEFFREY PAUL KLEINBOEHL DAVID M LYNETTE M STAUFFER RAYMOND THERESA REINARTZ MARK A JULIE M BODURTHA c I I I I RICHARD PATRICIA MOHRLAND I r i i EDWARD H CATHERINE HINZ I WARREN A MARLYS A COE 1 Fee Owner 13456 DAFFODIL PATH I 13462 DAFFODIL PATH 13468 DAFFODIL PATH I 13476 DAFFODIL PATH I 13482 DAFFODIL PATH I 13437 DAFFODIL PATH I 1849 BOHLAND AVE I 13451 DAFFODIL PATH 13457 DAFFODIL PATH I 13465 DAFFODIL PATH I 13471 DAFFODI PATH 13479 DAFFODIL PATH I 13485 DAFFODIL PATH I 13491 DAFFODIL PATH I 13407 DAFFODIL PATH I 13415 DAFFODIL PATH I 13423 DAFFODIL PATH I 13431 DAFFODIL PATH I 13410 DAFFODIL PATH 13402 DAFFODIL PATH I 13394 DAFFODIL PATH I 13386 DAFFODIL PATH 13378 DAFFODIL PATH 13370 DAFFODIL PATH 1 13347 DAFFODIL PATH 1 13357 DAFFODIL PATH 1 13365 DAFFODIL PATH 13373 DAFFODIL PATH 13381 DAFFODIL PATH I 13389 DAFFODIL PATH 13397 DAFFODIL PATH 4030 133RD CT W 4012 133RD CT W 4048 133RD CT W 4051 133RD CT W 4033 133RD CT W 4017 133RD CT W 3898 133RD CT W I 3918 133RD CT W I ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN SAINT PAUL MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN I City/State 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55116 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 I 55068 I 55068 I 55068 1 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 1 55068 Zip Code I 13462 DAFFODIL PATH I 13468 DAFFODIL PATH 13476 DAFFODIL PATH I 13482 DAFFODIL PATH I 13437 DAFFODIL PATH I 13445 DAFFODIL PATH I 13451 DAFFODIL PATH I 13457 DAFFODIL PATH I 13465 DAFFODIL PATH I 13471 DAFFODI PATH I 13479 DAFFODIL PATH 13485 DAFFODIL PATH I 13491 DAFFODIL PATH I 13407 DAFFODIL PATH I 13415 DAFFODIL PATH I 13423 DAFFODIL PATH 13431 DAFFODIL PATH I 13410 DAFFODIL PATH I 13402 DAFFODIL PATH I 13394 DAFFODIL PATH I 13386 DAFFODIL PATH I 13378 DAFFODIL PATH 13370 DAFFODIL PATH 13347 DAFFODIL PATH 13357 DAFFODIL PATH 13365 DAFFODIL PATH 13373 DAFFODIL PATH 13381 DAFFODIL PATH I 13389 DAFFODIL PATH I 13397 DAFFODIL PATH 1 4030 133RD CT W 4012 133RD CT W 4048 133RD CT W 4051 133RD CT W 4033 133RD CT W 4017 133RD CT W 3898 133RD CT W 3918 133RD CT W Property Address 1 1 i ...1 -1 -i Assessable Unit 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% I 35% 1 35% I 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% I 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% Assessable Rate 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 1 $660 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 $660 $660 I $660 I $660 I Proposed Assessment I- MI NM MO M NM M I= ION MI M r MI Mill IMO NM NM NMI No ma ma M MIN MIN Mil NM NM MN 341830418002 341830417002 341830416002 1 341830415002 341830414002 341830413002 341830412002 341830408002 341830407002 341830406002 341830405002 341830404002 341830403002 341830402002 341830401002 1 341830411002 341830410002 341830409002 341830309003 Co CO 1 341830307003 341830306003 341830305003 341830304003 CA) CO 0 341830302003 341830301003 1 341830307002 1 341830503003 C I 341830502003 1 341830501003 1 341830502006 I 0) CO 0 0 0 0 0) JAMES P CHRISTINE MARX JODI SIMMONS JEFFREY E CANDACE WILLIAMSON MATTHEW J BARBARA CONLIN MICHAEL CONSTANCE SMITH JAMIE JONES HOYOUNG KANG RANDOLPH ROBIN HAUGE ALAN M DEBRA L WIELOCH MARK A LARSON JERRY L BIBLE KEITH MARY E GILBERT MICHAEL THERESA HUEMOELLER NANCY S KEMPE 1 PETER J HELEN K HAUSMANN I SCOTT MARY OW ENS MARK R JANICE M TYSON DAVID A HEIDI A WEILER I RUSSELL D MAYLAND 1 TIMOTHY J SUSAN A BISHOP KIEN T SIUFUN L QUAN BRIAN R KLEINKE DAVID S CRISTINA G STURM RYAN J COLLEEN A MCLEAN MARK D MYRIAM T SHERVEY ADAM B SARA V GURNO CARL G JOAN M PETERSON KENNETH J ROSE M BUECKSLER CHARLES J MARY J DOBBS WILLIAM B ELAINE M TRAISER BRUCE A LINDA S SWORD ROBERT KERRI LEUTH DAVID M RAQUEL J PECK I RICHARD S LINDA J MARHULA I GREGORY R CALLY E PICKER I i NICHOLAS CHRISTINE HOLLENBECK I i I MICHAEL J RENAE S OMALLEY 1 Fee Owner I 13462 DELLWOOD WAY I 13568 DAHLIA CT 13558 DAHLIA CT 13546 DAHLIA CT I 13536 DAHLIA CT 13524 DAHLIA CT I 13512 DAHLIA CT I 13502 DAHLIA CT 1 13495 DAHLIA CT 13507 DAHLIA CT 13517 DAHLIA CT 3648 DORENA PL 1 13541 DAHLIA CT 13551 DAHLIA CT 13563 DAHLIA CT 13573 DAHLIA CT 13490 DAHLIA CT 13480 DAHLIA CT 13485 DAHLIA CT 13492 DALTON LN 13484 DALTON LN 13478 DALTON LN I 13470 DALTON LN 13464 DALTON LN 13456 DALTON LN 13450 DALTON LN 13442 DALTON LN 13436 DALTON LN 13485 DALTON LN 13477 DALTON LN 13469 DALTON LN 13461 DALTON LN 13453 DALTON LN 3810 SCENIC VALLEY DR 13494 DAFFODIL PATH 13488 DAFFODIL PATH I 13448 DAFFODIL PATH I 13442 DAFFODIL PATH ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN WEST SACRAMENTO CA ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN KINGWOOD TX ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN 1 City /State 1 55068 1 55068 55068 1 55068 1 55068 1 55068 1 55068 1 55068 1 55068 1 55068 1 95691 1 55068 55068 1 55068 1 55068 I 55068 1 55068 1 55068 I 55068 1 55068 1 55068 1 55068 1 55068 r 55068 1 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 77345 1 55068 55068 55068 55068 1 Zip Code I 13462 DELLWOOD WAY 13568 DAHLIA CT 13558 DAHLIA CT 13546 DAHLIA CT 13536 DAHLIA CT 13524 DAHLIA CT 13512 DAHLIA CT 13502 DAHLIA CT 13495 DAHLIA CT 13507 DAHLIA CT 13517 DAHLIA CT 13529 DAHLIA CT 13541 DAHLIA CT 13551 DAHLIA CT 13563 DAHLIA CT I 13573 DAHLIA CT 13490 DAHLIA CT 13480 DAHLIA CT 13485 DAHLIA CT 13492 DALTON LN 13484 DALTON LN 13478 DALTON LN I 13470 DALTON LN 13464 DALTON LN 13456 DALTON LN 13450 DALTON LN 13442 DALTON LN 13436 DALTON LN 13485 DALTON LN 13477 DALTON LN 13469 DALTON LN 13461 DALTON LN 13453 DALTON LN 13502 DAFFODIL PATH 13494 DAFFODIL PATH 13488 DAFFODIL PATH 13448 DAFFODIL PATH 13442 DAFFODIL PATH Property Address Assessable Unit 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% I 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% Assessable Rate $660 I $660 I $660 I I $660 I $660 I $660 I I $660 I I $660 I I $660 I $660 I $660 $660 I I $660 I I $660 I $660 I $660 i $660 I I $660 I I $660 I $660 I $660 I I $660 I I $660 I I $660 I I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 $660 I lllll $660 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 Proposed Assessment MI Mill IMO NM NM NMI No ma ma M MIN MIN Mil NM NM MN poi um um I MN NM M MI w I NMI IBM NM CO Co WWwWwWwwwWwWWWwww( p CO 03 p 03 Co p CO CO 0 CO Co 0 CO 0oco 0 Ca 0 03 0 CO 0 Ca co 0 CO 0 CA 03 co 0 rn 03 0 rn 03 co 0 rn 03 0 rn 03 0 rn Co 0 rn Co Co C 01 CO Ca 0 C11 Co Co 0 CJ1 03 03 0 CJ1 Co Co wwW 0 UT O Co O O CJ) 03 Co 0 U) O --I O O C)) 03 Co 0 01 O 0) O O O) Fee Owner CURTIS A MCALONEY MICHAEL R ANITA L PEKARIK JEFF A KELLY L GORMAN STEVEN M DIANNE M HAYLE RICHARD SR SUZANNE SAINTEY ADAM L KATHRYN F WESTMAN DENNIS J LORI J ODONNELL MARC E JULIE L BETINSKY STEVEN J KATHLEEN HENJUM PRESTON KELLY ZACHARIAS ARCHIE A SUSAN M MRKVICKA MARY E DIERBERGER KRIS A SUSAN L MESTAD BRIAN K JILL D KOPPERUD JOHNP &MARYEROUP WILLIAM P SCHROEDER I RICHARD G BONNIE L KIEHL ROBERT I PATRICIA BLANC i STEPHEN R KELLI A GRUND GERALD L JANIS M ABRAHAM r BRUCE P KATE P HENNINGSGAARD I p CHRISTOPHER T NIXON I I r DOUGLAS G CYNTHIA NELSON I i I JASON KATHERINE NEMITZ 13580 DELLWOOD WAY 13572 DELLWOOD WAY 13533 DELLWOOD WAY 13523 DELLWOOD WAY 13511 DELLWOOD WAY 13501 DELLWOOD WAY 13491 DELLWOOD WAY 13479 DELLWOOD WAY 13469 DELLWOOD WAY 13566 DELLWOOD WAY 13558 DELLWOOD WAY 13550 DELLWOOD WAY 13544 DELLWOOD WAY 13536 DELLWOOD WAY 13528 DELLWOOD WAY 13522 DELLWOOD WAY 13514 DELLWOOD WAY 13506 DELLWOOD WAY 13498 DELLWOOD WAY 13492 DELLWOOD WAY 13484 DELLWOOD WAY 13478 DELLWOOD WAY 13470 DELLWOOD WAY 13457 DELLWOOD WAY Fee Owner Address ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN City/State 55068 55068 55068 55068 F 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 1 55068 55068 55068 55068 Zip Code 13580 DELLWOOD WAY 13572 DELLWOOD WAY 13533 DELLWOOD WAY 13523 DELLWOOD WAY 13511 DELLWOOD WAY 13501 DELLWOOD WAY 13491 DELLWOOD WAY 13479 DELLWOOD WAY 13469 DELLWOOD WAY 13566 DELLWOOD WAY 13558 DELLWOOD WAY 13550 DELLWOOD WAY 13544 DELLWOOD WAY 13536 DELLWOOD WAY 13528 DELLWOOD WAY 13522 DELLWOOD WAY 13514 DELLWOOD WAY 13506 DELLWOOD WAY 13498 DELLWOOD WAY 13492 DELLWOOD WAY 13484 DELLWOOD WAY 13478 DELLWOOD WAY 13470 DELLWOOD WAY 13457 DELLWOOD WAY Property Address Assessable Unit a 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% Assessable Rate $660 $660 $660 $660 $660 $660 $660 $660 $660 $660 $660 $660 $660 $660 $660 $660 $660 $660 $660 $660 $660 $660 $660 $660 Proposed Assessment poi um um I MN NM M MI w I NMI IBM NM I 341830509003 I 341830508003 I 341830507003 I 341830506003 I 341830505003 I 341830504003 341830508002 I 341830507002 I 341830506002 I 341830505002 I 341830504002 I 341830503002 1 341830502002 I 341830501002 I 341830205007 I 341830204007 I 341830203007 I 341830202007 I 341830201007 I 341830203006 I 341830202006 I 341830201006 I 341830503004 1 341830502004 1 341830501004 I 341830504001 1 1 341830503001 I 1 341830502001 I 1 341830501001 1 1DANUBE LANE 1 341830613001 1 341830612001 1 341830611001 1 341830610001 I 341830609001 1 341830608001 1 341830607001 1 341830606001 1 341830605001 1 1 341830604001 1 341830603001 1 DAISY COURT 1 PID I Fee Owner 1 JON T SANDRA R KNOTT 1 STEVEN D JOHNSON 1 BRADLEY R BACK 1 MARK J CATHERINE DOLAN 1 RANDELL B TERRI L LIA DENNIS SUSAN BAYROCK GARRY L SANDRA L SPANGLER DAVID W DEBORAH K KANGAS GARY G LINDA J IVERSON JEFFREY S LYDIA K LANGFIELD DAVID M LAURIE A EVENOCHECK JAMES C SABINE E RAPP 1 BRADLEY D CLAUDIA BRAMMER I MICHAEL J LAMB 1 DOUGLAS W SPRINTHALL 1 JOEL WILLIAM JACKSON 1 ROBERT J MARGARET HIBBARD I ROBERT JR DEBRA S EHRLICH PAUL R TERESA M GROTHE KELLY E KIMBALL SANDRA R MIDDENDORF I SHARLA J RIETMANN -WAGY HOWARD A KURTEN MICHAEL P BARBARA NEWMAN I TROY A NANCY A CROWELL TROY A SARAH J SALLEY STEPHEN K MARY B KUSSKE BRIAN E CATHY A SZYMANSKI THOMAS E LYNETTE R BRAY SCOTT W ROBERTA M W IIG ELIZABETH W KEARNS CHRISTOPHER G HARDER 1 RICHARD ELIZABETH CARLSON 1 GREGORY J DAWN M MICHELSEN JAY D JUDY L NEUDECKER 1 BRIAN N TSTE GUARNEROS MICHAEL STEPHANIE JACKSON I THOMAS R VALERIE E SCHULTZ I KAHATAPITI K S PERERA I ROBERT E DEBRA J HILMOE 1 Fee Owner Address 13486 DAISY CT 13494 DAISY CT 13502 DAISY CT 13510 DAISY CT 13518 DAISY CT 13526 DAISY CT 13534 DAISY CT 13531 DAISY CT 13523 DAISY CT 13515 DAISY CT 13507 DAISY CT 13636 DANUBE LN 13614 DANUBE LN 13594 DANUBE LN 13572 DANUBE LN 13552 DANUBE LN 13530 DANUBE LN 13627 DANUBE LN 13611 DANUBE LN 13593 DANUBE LN 13577 DANUBE LN 13559 DANUBE LN 13541 DANUBE LN 13525 DANUBE LN 13507 DANUBE LN 13645 DANUBE LN 13701 DANUBE LN 13703 DANUBE LANE 13705 DANUBE LN 13709 DANUBE LANE 13702 DANUBE LN 13706 DANUBE LN 13710 DANUBE LN 13488 DANUBE LN 13466 DANUBE LN 13444 DANUBE LN 13491 DANUBE LN 13473 DANUBE LN 13457 DANUBE LN 13439 DANUBE LN City /State 1 ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN Zip Code 1 55068 1 55068 55068 r 55068 55068 55068 r- 55068 1 55068 55068 1 55068 55068 55068 r 55068 55068 55068 r 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 1 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 Property Address 1 13486 DAISY CT 1 13494 DAISY CT i 13502 DAISY CT 13510 DAISY CT 13518 DAISY CT 13526 DAISY CT 13534 DAISY CT 1 13531 DAISY CT 1 13523 DAISY CT 13515 DAISY CT 13507 DAISY CT 13636 DANUBE LN 13614 DANUBE LN 13594 DANUBE LN 13572 DANUBE LN 13552 DANUBE LN 13530 DANUBE LN 13627 DANUBE LN 13611 DANUBE LN 13593 DANUBE LN 13577 DANUBE LN 13559 DANUBE LN 13541 DANUBE LN 13525 DANUBE LN 1 13507 DANUBE LN 1 13645 DANUBE LN 1 13701 DANUBE LN 13703 DANUBE LANE 13705 DANUBE LN 13709 DANUBE LANE 13702 DANUBE LN 13706 DANUBE LN 13710 DANUBE LN 1 13488 DANUBE LN 13466 DANUBE LN 13444 DANUBE LN 13491 DANUBE LN 13473 DANUBE LN 13457 DANUBE LN 13439 DANUBE LN Assessable Unit Assessable Rate 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35 I 35% I 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% I 35% I 35% 35% i 35% 35% 35% 35 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% Proposed Assessment I 1 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I 1 $660 I $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I $660 I 1 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I MIN BE MI MN MN II MN MN =I =I NM INS INN 11111 =I NM NM NIS OM 1 341830144001 1 341830143001 1 341830142001 1 341830141001 1 341830134001 1 341830133001 1 341830132001 1 341830147001 1 341830146001 !DANBURY PATH 1 341830212006 1 341830211006 1 341830210006 1 341830209006 1137TH COURT 1 1 341830214008 1 341830213008 1 341830212008 1 341830204005 1 341830203005 1 341830202005 1 341830201005 1 341830211008 1 341830210008 1 341830209008 1 341830208008 1 341830207008 1 341830206008 1 341830205008 1 341830204008 1 341830203008 1 341830202008 1 341830201008 1 341830215006 1 341830214006 1 1 341830213006 1 1 341830208006 1 1 341830207006 1 1 341830206006 1 1 341830205006 1 1 341830204006 137TH STREET 1 PID Fee Owner JOHN P TAMARA K KINSELLA 1 MARCHETTA P MCINTOSH HEIDI M OLSON 1 KEITH D LOUISE M JUHNKE TONYA N MOUW 1 DAVID J SANDRA P KNIGHT 1 HUGH J WENDY MACGILLIVRAY 1 SCOTT JUDITH ANN SCHOAF 1 MARK W WEBER 1 TIMOTHY L PATTERSON 1 TOM SUKI FAIRCHILD 1 GREGORY C SCHULTZ 1 JOHN C MELANIE A BEASLEY 1 LARRY J MARGARET M MILLS OTHMAR S LORILEA J KLIMEK KEVIN LYNN HUBBARD BRIAN L JANET HUBBARD JAMES M BARBARA J STERN 1 DONALD SCOTT KANE 1 KEVIN JAGOE 1 ANDRE T MEISNER 1 DENNIS A CATHERINE SUNDLIE 1 TIMOTHY J ANN M EVERETT 1 DALE M DIANE L VINCENT 1 KURT P CARLA M GRAUSNICK 1 CHARLES R LADONNA MANKOWSKI 1 STEPHEN P LISA MCLAUGHLIN MARK R HAILER BERNARD M KAREN J MCGARRIGLE RICHARD KATHERINE HOLTZ THOMAS C DORETTA J ERTMANN MICHELLE SIFFERLE DANIEL S NANCY L THUNSELLE KEVIN W BRENDA J JIROVEC VINCENT L LINDA R STRAUB KATHY MARIE HAUGEN D DOUGLAS LORI J STEVENSON JOHN E SHARON E PETERSON DOUGLAS A COLLEEN PELLOCK Fee Owner Address 3951 137TH ST W 3975 W 137TH ST 3995 137TH ST W 3930 137TH ST W 3940 137TH ST W 3960 137TH ST W 3980 137TH ST W 4015 137TH ST W 4031 137TH ST W 4051 137TH ST W 4065 137TH ST W 4085 137TH ST W 4105137TH ST W 4125 137TH ST W 4145137TH ST W 4165137TH ST W 4181 137TH ST W 4201 137TH ST W 4016 137TH ST W 4030 137TH ST W 4056 137TH ST W 4086 137TH ST W 4110 137TH ST W 4130 137TH ST W 1 4150 137TH ST W 4170 137TH ST W 1 13745 DANBURY PATH 13757 DANBURY PATH 13767 DANBURY PATH 13781 DANBURY PATH 13825 DANBURY PATH 13833 DANBURY PATH 13841 DANBURY PATH 13721 DANBURY PATH 13729 DANBURY PATH 4062 137TH CT W 4068137TH CT W 4074 137TH CT W 4080137TH CT W City/State I ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN r ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN Zip Code 55068 55068 55068 55068 I 55068 55068 55068 I 55068 r 55068 1 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 1 55068 1 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 r 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 Property Address 13745 DANBURY PATH 13757 DANBURY PATH 13767 DANBURY PATH 13781 DANBURY PATH 13825 DANBURY PATH 13833 DANBURY PATH 13841 DANBURY PATH 13721 DANBURY PATH 13729 DANBURY PATH 3951 137TH ST W i 3975 W 137TH ST 3995 137TH ST W 3930 137TH ST W 3940137TH ST W 3960 137TH ST W 3980 137TH ST W 4015 137TH ST W I 4031 137TH ST W 4051 137TH ST W 4065 137TH ST W 4085 137TH ST W 4105 137TH ST W 4125137TH ST W 4145 137TH ST W 4165 137TH ST W 4181 137TH ST W 4201 137TH ST W 4016 137TH ST W 4030 137TH ST W 4056 137TH ST W 4086 137TH ST W 4110 137TH ST W 1 4130137TH ST W 1 I I 4150 137TH ST W 1 4170 137TH ST W 4062 137TH CT W 4068 137TH CT W 4074 137TH CT W 4080 137TH CT W Assessable Unit Assessable Rate 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% Proposed Assessment $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I $660 $660 I 1 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I 1 $660 I I $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I 1 $660 I $660 1 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I 1 ME MI I•11 MIll MN I= 1 NM I i NM CO 1 0) O W 1 0 0 W 1 0 0 1 341830102003 CO 1 CO O 0) 1 CO Co 0) 1 CO 0 1 341830140001 CO 0 Ca 0 0) 1 CO 0 0 CO 1 CO 0 0 0) 1 CO 0) 0 1 1 1 341830113003 CO 1 03 CA 0 W 1 CO 0) 0 W 1 CO Co 0 0) i CO CJ) 0 0) 1 CO 0) 0 CO 1 CO 0) 0 0) 1 00 0) 0 C.) 1 CO 0) 0 CO Oa Co CO 1 CO 0) 0 1 A C) Y 0 N 0) 1 CO CO 0 Al Y 01 0 0 1 TERRY J ZURN BRUCE A PATRICIA M LEWANDOWSKI MICHAEL MARQUERITE HUSSEY 1 MARLYN KAELBERER NHU D SUE A TRAN 1 PAUL M LEIDIG CHARLES D JODY A BORRELL RICHARD A CHERYL A LEMKE DIANE P DON W LEHN TIMOTHY M WINTERS CRAIG L LISA M HARVEY JEFFERY D KATHLEEN WEISENSEL TIMOTHY L BETH P WYNNE DAVID J BONNIE J GANFIELD J MICHELE R ELIN CHARLES D JR OFFICER LORI ANNETTE PROOPS JANICE G BELBECK JOHN E REBECCA M FLOERSCH JOHN J DEBORAH J KAYE JOHN CINDY M BANCHY JOSEPH P ALICE K WOOG BRIAN P LYNN L GRAY CURTIS H CYNTHIA A THURMES JAMES L LAURA QUINN I I i WILLIAM H CAROL F DROSTE I I I ROBERT M NAOMI L LEWISKI Fee Owner 13883 DAPHNE LN 13889 DAPHNE LN 13901 DAPHNE LN 13886 DARWIN WAY 13900 DARWIN WAY 13899 DARWIN WAY 13885 DARWIN WAY 13801 DANBURY CT 13805 DANBURY CT 13809 DANBURY CT 13811 DANBURY CT 13815 DANBURY CT 13819 DANBURY CT 13728 DANBURY PATH 13736 DANBURY PATH 13744 DANBURY PATH 13752 DANBURY PATH 13720 DANBURY PATH 13760 DANBURY PATH 13768_DANBURY PATH 13776 DANBURY PATH 13784 DANBURY PATH 13792 DANBURY PATH 13800 DANBURY PATH 13808 DANBURY PATH 13832 DANBURY PATH 13737 DANBURY PATH I ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN l ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN I City/State 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 1 55068 55068 1 55068 55068 55068 55068 Zip Code 13883 DAPHNE LN 13889 DAPHNE LN r 13901 DAPHNE LN 13886 DARWIN WAY 13900 DARWIN WAY 13899 DARWIN WAY 13885 DARWIN WAY I 13801 DANBURY CT 13805 DANBURY CT I 13809 DANBURY CT 13811 DANBURY CT 13815 DANBURY CT 13819 DANBURY CT 13728 DANBURY PATH 13736 DANBURY PATH 13744 DANBURY PATH 13752 DANBURY PATH 13720 DANBURY PATH 13760 DANBURY PATH 13768 DANBURY PATH 13776 DANBURY PATH 13784 DANBURY PATH 13792 DANBURY PATH 13800 DANBURY PATH 13808 DANBURY PATH 13832 DANBURY PATH I I 13737 DANBURY PATH Property Address 1 Assessable Unit 35% I 35% I 35% 35% 35% 35% I 35% 35% I 35% I 35% 35% 35% I 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% Assessable Rate $660 I I $660 I I $660 I $660 I $660 I I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I I $660 I I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I Proposed Assessment I•11 MIll MN I= 1 NM I i NM 1 341830007001 1 341830006001 1 341830003003 1 341830002003 1 341830007002 1 341830006002 1 341830005002 1 341830004002 1 341830003002 1 341830002002 1 341830001002 1 341830005001 1 341830004001 1 341830003001 1 341830002001 1 341830001001 1 341830107001 1 341830106001 1 341830105001 1 341830104001 1 341830103001 1 341830102001 1 341830101001 1 341830115001 1 341830114001 1 341830113001 r 341830112001 r 341830111001 1 341830110001 1 341830109001 1 341830108001 1 1 341830122001 1 1 341830121001 1 1 341830120001 1 1 341830119001 1 341830118001 1 341830117001 1 PID 1 PAUL NATHAN NESS 1 MARC DANIEL JOHNSON 1 EDWARD F NELSON 1 RONALD TAMIE JENSEN 1 CHRISTIAN B UNSER 1 MANIJ SHRESTHA 1 ROGER H ANNETTE M FREY 1 SCOTT P CAROL J MAKI 1 STEVEN R MURTELL 1 MICHAEL D BEVERLY CASS MICHAEL PO THARP 1 JASON E WOLTERMAN 1 TROY F RHONDA RAE GROSS 1 VASANA BRIAN MCCORKELL 1 GARY L BETH C WILKIN 1 TIMOTHY S ALISSA M RUKA 1 NOEL TSTE EDSON JAMES B SARAH A BERG 1 MARK S MARTHA M GLENDE 1 WAEL MUSTAFA SUSAN ABDEL -GRANT 1 RON E KINTZI 1 GREGORY LISA LUEDKE 1 KEVIN J NANCY L CARLSON 1 JON R JEAN M PAVOLA 1 STEVEN J CYNTHIA A WAGNER 1 STEVEN H REBECCA A NESS TRACY L SUSAN W JUELS MARCUS R NICOLE S CARRIGAN TIMOTHY M JULIE A LONGMAN THOMAS G BETH E KARLSON JEFFREY K KATHLEEN KAMM 1 THOMAS M PAULA J HALL I WILLIAM M SONG H SCHULER 1 HERMAN JR ROBINSON 1 I I GREGORY L BONNIE H BORRELL 1 THOMAS M JANIS M POWERS 1 BRUCE M KATHY L WESTBROOK I Fee Owner PO BOX 3 14073 DELTA CT I 14120 DELTA AVE 14102 DELTA AVE 14078 DELTA AVE 14066 DELTA AVE 14052 DELTA AVE 14042 DELTA AVE 1 14030 DELTA AVE 14016 DELTA AVE 14004 DELTA AVE 1 14059 DELTA AVE 1 14047 DELTA AVE 14035 DELTA AVE 1 14023 DELTA AVE 1 14011 DELTA AVE 13963 DELTA PLACE 1 13967 DELTA PL 1 13971 DELTA PLACE 13975 DELTA PL I 13979 DELTA PL I 13983 DELTA PL 13987 DELTA PL 13931 DAVY CT 13935 DAVY CT 13939 DAVY CT 13943 DAVY CT 13947 DAVY CT 13951 DAVY CT 13955 DAVY CT 13959 DAVY CT 13903 DALLAS CT 13907 DALLAS CT 13911 DALLAS CT 13915 DALLAS CT 1 13919 DALLAS CT 13923 DALLAS CT Fee Owner Address ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN r ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN r ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN City /State 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 1 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 1 55068 1 55068 1 55068 1 55068 55068 1 55068 I 55068 1 55068 r 55068 1 55068 I 55068 55068 1 55068 1 55068 1 55068 1 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55066 55068 55068 55068 Zip Code 14083 DELTA CT I 14073 DELTA CT 1 r 14120 DELTA AVE 14102 DELTA AVE 1 r 14078 DELTA AVE 14066 DELTA AVE 14052 DELTA AVE 14042 DELTA AVE 14030 DELTA AVE 14016 DELTA AVE 14004 DELTA AVE 14059 DELTA AVE L 14047 DELTA AVE 14035 DELTA AVE I 14023 DELTA AVE 1 14011 DELTA AVE 1 13963 DELTA PLACE 13967 DELTA PL 13971 DELTA PLACE 13975 DELTA PL I 13979 DELTA PL 13983 DELTA PL I 13987 DELTA PL 13931 DAVY CT 13935 DAVY CT 13939 DAVY CT 13943 DAVY CT 1 13947 DAVY CT 13951 DAVY CT 13955 DAVY CT I 13959 DAVY CT 13903 DALLAS CT 13907 DALLAS CT 13911 DALLAS CT 13915 DALLAS CT 13919 DALLAS CT 13923 DALLAS CT Property Address 1 Assessable Unit 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35 35% 35% 1 35% 1 35% 35% 1 35% 35% I 35% 35% 1 35% 1 35% 35% 1 35% 1 35% 35% 1 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% Assessable Rate $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 1 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 $660 1 $660 I $660 I $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 1 $660 I 1 $660 I $660 I $660 I 1 $660 1 $660 1 I $660 I 1 $660 I $660 1 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I Proposed Assessment 1 341830116006 1 341830115006 1 341830114006 1 341830113006 1 341830112006 1 341830111006 1 341830110006 1 341830109006 1 341830107005 1 341830106005 1 1DARTMOUTH PATH 1 1 341830104005 1 341830103005 1 341830102005 1 341830101005 1 341830106004 1 341830105004 1 341830104004 1 341830103004 1 341830102004 1 341830105005 1 341830113004 1 341830112004 1 341830111004 1 341830110004 1 341830109004 1 341830108004 1 341830107004 1 1 DAYTONA WAY 1 1 341830104007 1 341830103007 1 341830102007 1 341830101007 1 341830105007 1 !DALLAS AVENUE 1 1 341830013001 1 341830012001 1 341830011001 1 341830010001 1 341830009001 1 341830008001 1 ELTA D C 1 PID II Fee Owner 1 MATTHEW P JACOLYN PAVLOVEC 1 TODD J STACY J MASICOTTE MARK BUCKHOLDT JOHN D SHERRY A KROMSCHROEDER 1 CHARLES JR LOTTIE RIKE 1 RANDALL G ISIS N MATEO 1 RICHARD L MARY E BAQUERO THOMAS V MARY J AADLAND 1 RICHARD J NANCY L KRASKA 1 MARK WIEDERHOLD 1 WILLIS KAY DEKRUIF 1 MARK W RENEE T FLINK TONY L XIAAJ SCOTT A JEANNE M HELGESON ANDREW CAROLYNNE MOFFAT I BARBARA E MARK A RATZEL I FORREST R ELEANOR CARBARY GARY E CAROLYN M DRAKE BA VAN CHIEM TAMMY SORENSON ROBERT SHERYL OCONNELL JACK 0 VIRGINIA M PEARL MARK J LINDA K EVENSON MARCUS R NICOLE S CARRIGAN JANET M JACOBSON ROBERT MARGARET M KAUFMAN PAUL J MINDY L HILO 1 RONALD BRENDA GREEN 1 BISHOP D SVENDAHL JASON M KOENIG I ERIN E FULSAAS JEFFREY A JANE M RUDY MICHELLE A MADICH GARY A REBECCA BIRD BOBBY B II PARHAM THOMAS M KATHLEEN FARICY GARY LEE PATRICIA DAHL 1 CHARLES E JANE I KOSTECKA 1 Fee Owner Address 14129 DELTA CT 14121 DELTA CT 14113 DELTA CT 14105 DELTA CT 14099 DELTA CT 14091 DELTA CT 13992 DALLAS AVE 13986 DALLAS AVE 13972 DALLAS AVE 13962 DALLAS AVE 14000 DALLAS AVE I_ 13990 DAYTONA WAY 13998 DAYTONA WAY I 14008 DAYTONA WAY 14016 DAYTONA WAY 14037 DAYTONA WAY 14045 DAYTONA WAY 14053 DAYTONA WAY 14061 DAYTONA WAY 14069 DAYTONA WAY 13980 DAYTONA WAY 13981 DAYTONA WAY 13989 DAYTONA WAY 13947 DAVY CT 14005 DAYTONA WAY 14013 DAYTONA WAY 14021 DAYTONA WAY 14029 DAYTONA WAY 14034 DARTMOUTH PATH 16140 INVERNESS WAY 14042 DARTMOUTH PATH 14046 DARTMOUTH PATH r 14048 DARTMOUTH PATH 14050 DARTMOUTH PATH 14052 DARTMOUTH PATH 14054 DARTMOUTH PATH 14053 DARTMOUTH PATH 14049 DARTMOUTH PATH City /State ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN LAKEVILLE MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN Zip Code 55068 55068 55068 55068 r 55068 55068 r 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55044 55068 55068 55068 1 55068 1 55068 1 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 Property Address 14129 DELTA CT 14121 DELTA CT 14113 DELTA CT 14105 DELTA CT 14099 DELTA CT I 14091 DELTA CT 14034 DARTMOUTH PATH 14038 DARTMOUTH PATH 14042 DARTMOUTH PATH 14046 DARTMOUTH PATH 14048 DARTMOUTH PATH 14050 DARTMOUTH PATH 14052 DARTMOUTH PATH 1 14054 DARTMOUTH PATH 14053 DARTMOUTH PATH 14049 DARTMOUTH PATH 13992 DALLAS AVE 13986 DALLAS AVE 13972 DALLAS AVE 13962 DALLAS AVE 14000 DALLAS AVE 13990 DAYTONA WAY 13998 DAYTONA WAY 14008 DAYTONA WAY 14016 DAYTONA WAY 14037 DAYTONA WAY 14045 DAYTONA WAY 14053 DAYTONA WAY 14061 DAYTONA WAY 14069 DAYTONA WAY 13980 DAYTONA WAY 13981 DAYTONA WAY 13989 DAYTONA WAY 13997 DAYTONA WAY 14005 DAYTONA WAY 14013 DAYTONA WAY 14021 DAYTONA WAY 14029 DAYTONA WAY Assessable Unit Assessable Rate 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 1 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% Proposed I Assessment $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I 1 $660 I $660 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 1 $660 1 1 $660 I $660 I $660 1 $660 $660 I $660 I $660 1 $660 I $660 I MI NM Mil MN EMI NMI EMI MN MN I= NM NMI ME IIIIII i r cawwcawwwwwwc CO Ca) 0 0000000000000000 CO w 0 CO w 0 CO w 0 CO CO 0 CO w 0 CO w 0 CO w 0 CO w 0 CO w o CO c C ac CO c C 341830120006 341830119006 w CO w o 0 341830108006 341830107006 co a D 0000 44. OD c C co a J C) OD co O 1 341830102006 1 341830101006 co C co 01 341830110005 0000 D 341830008002 1 1 341830108007 341830109007 341830110007 I 341830107007 1 co Co w o' o CID o o 341830117006 1 HOWARD W VICTORIA GOPLIN GREGORY SCHMIDT PHYLLIS MARIE JAHR JAMES JR MORAN DOUGLAS P SARAH J MCCOMB DOUGLAS P LYNETTE ECKERMAN KENNETH P BLOCH VIRGINIA KAY NICOLAY TIMOTHY L SABRINA LARSON DAVID D KAREN M GRUENKE PETER HANA VILIM JAMES M DEBRA K GONZALEZ MARIE B LEWIS WILLIAM R CINDY M THOMAS THEODORE BEATRICE TREMBATH BRUCE W DEBRA A BERKEBILE DEBORAH J PAVEL RYAN COSGROVE DANIEL J JUETTEN 1 MICHAEL I LORI J FRAFJORD 1 ROSE M PELIKAN 1 JOHN C BUECHE 1 DAVID J JENNIFER L CULLEN 1 MICHAEL S MARIA WEBER I DEBORAH A ALLEN BENJAMIN J THURNAU THEODORE N DEBRA A RICHARDVILLE GARY A KRISTI A JOHNSON THOMAS J REMMEL GREGORY S CYNTHIA DENUNZIO ROBERT B KATHLEEN OVERBY MELISSA A MCDERMOTT KRISTEN GARRICK GARY C LYNN M SWANSON THOMAS J ANGELA E SZANAJDA THOMAS S DORIS A MCCARTY ROBERT G MARIA C SMITH PAUL TERESA NEUMAN EDWARD F CAROL S MAYER I CAROL C PETERSON Fee Owner I 14106 DEARBORN PATH 14108 DEARBORN PATH I 14110 DEARBORN PATH 14114 DEARBORN PATH 14116 DEARBORN PATH I 14118 DEARBORN PATH I 14122 DEARBORN PATH 14130 DEARBORN PATH 14150 DEARBORN PATH I 14154 DEARBORN PATH 14105 DEARBORN PATH I 14109 DEARBORN PATH 14113 DEARBORN PATH I 14141 DEARBORN PATH 18820 E SUPERSTITION DR 14131 DEARBORN PATH 14125 DEARBORN PATH 14121 DEARBORN PATH 14117 DEARBORN PATH 14056 DARTMOUTH PATH 14058 DARTMOUTH PATH 14060 DARTMOUTH PATH 14062 DARTMOUTH PATH I 14064 DARTMOUTH PATH 14066 DARTMOUTH PATH I 14068 DARTMOUTH PATH 14070 DARTMOUTH PATH 14065 DARTMOUTH PATH 14061 DARTMOUTH PATH 14059 DARTMOUTH PATH 14055 DARTMOUTH PATH 14073 DARTMOUTH PATH 14072 DARTMOUTH PATH 14075 DARTMOUTH PATH 14041 DARTMOUTH PATH 14037 DARTMOUTH PATH 14035 DARTMOUTH PATH 14043 DARTMOUTH PATH I 14047 DARTMOUTH PATH I 14030 DARTMOUTH PATH ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN F ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN QUEEN CREEK AZ ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN City /State 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 85242 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 I 55068 I 55068 1 55068 55068 r 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 1 55068 Zip Code 14106 DEARBORN PATH 14108 DEARBORN PATH 14110 DEARBORN PATH 14114 DEARBORN PATH 14116 DEARBORN PATH 14118 DEARBORN PATH 14122 DEARBORN PATH 14130 DEARBORN PATH 14150 DEARBORN PATH 14154 DEARBORN PATH 14105 DEARBORN PATH 14109 DEARBORN PATH 14113 DEARBORN PATH 14141 DEARBORN PATH 14135 DEARBORN PATH 14131 DEARBORN PATH 14125 DEARBORN PATH 14121 DEARBORN PATH 14117 DEARBORN PATH 14056 DARTMOUTH PATH 14058 DARTMOUTH PATH 14060 DARTMOUTH PATH 14062 DARTMOUTH PATH 14064 DARTMOUTH PATH 14066 DARTMOUTH PATH I 14068 DARTMOUTH PATH 14070 DARTMOUTH PATH 14065 DARTMOUTH PATH 14061 DARTMOUTH PATH 14059 DARTMOUTH PATH 14055 DARTMOUTH PATH 14073 DARTMOUTH PATH 14072 DARTMOUTH PATH 14075 DARTMOUTH PATH 14041 DARTMOUTH PATH 14037 DARTMOUTH PATH 14035 DARTMOUTH PATH 14043 DARTMOUTH PATH 14047 DARTMOUTH PATH 14030 DARTMOUTH PATH Property Address Assessable Unit f 35% 35% I 35% I 35% I 35% I 35% I 35% I 35% 35% I 35% I 35% 35% I 35% I 35% 35% 35% 35% I 35% I 35% 35% J 35% 35% 35% I 35% I 35% I 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% Assessable Rate $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I I $660 I I $660 I $660 I $660 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I I $660 I I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I I $660 I $660 I $660 I I $660 I $660 I $660 I I $660 I $660 I I $660 I I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 $660 $660 $660 I $660 I $660 I Proposed Assessment NM =I M N i- i■ M NM MI MN MN MI MN NM W 1 CO W 000000001 000000001 00000000 00000000 W A 1. CO W f 03 l 03 CO W A 00 W W A 00 CO W A• 00 W 1 1 1 1 341830029001 CO 00000 00000 rJ ..i JO co W A 1 CO W 0 0 W A 1 CO W 0 0 W A 1 CO co 0 0 I I I 1 1 1 341830022001 1 1 1 1 i 1 341830021001 W A 1 CO W 00001 0000 0000 W A 1 00 W CO f W A 1 CO W W A• Co W 1 1 1 341830016001 A 1 03 W 0 O 000000000001 000000000001 C A 1 00 W 0 O W A 1 CO W 0 N W A 1 Co W 0 N W A 1 00 W 0 N I Co I 1 N N N P )0 0J V N W A 1 CO W 0 N N W A• 1 Co W 0 N N 1 1 1 1 I I 341830206001 341830207001 341830208001 Co 00000 0 0 CO 0 0 Co 0 0 A A 1 00 WC.) N O 0 0 1 w P 1 co N O 0 0 1 JEFFREY R LORIE M BUNKE 1 ALFRED SANDRA SEVERSON JULIE A MARQUARDT KIMBERLY A NIEDERLUECKE KYLES LOCH PETER R VONDELINDE I CRAIG S MICHELLE L ZEHNDER I JAMES A BARTHOLOW JAMES M SUSAN L GEE DOUGLAS J BORN JAMES M ELLEN D MCNEARY MICHAEL J CATHY J LARSEN BRYAN P FRANDRUP JEFF DALEY GAIL A KAYFES I DOUGLAS E ROSE M JOHNSON LANCE J LISA M QUEEN 1 I j I I CRAIG K ELIZABETH EUL I ROBERT A LORAINE M TIERI DAVID J GABRIELE K FRENZEL JON J PENHEITER RICHARD S DEBORAH DECKER I SCOTT JEANNE JOHNSON 1 VIRGINIA M DANGELO 1 JEFFREY A LISA M ROBINSON I DANIEL G SUSAN E POOLE I MATTHEW G STALSBERG JOHN A NOONAN 1 BRIAN N DEMUTH ANNE M NOLET AMY JYTYLA VASSEL DEBORAH J MCBRIDE JOHN R CYNTHIA L GAMLIN ROBERT G JOAN K VISNOVEC DEBRA A WINDSOR I DAVID A JULIE K FORCIER MARK ELIZABETH KLINKNER I I RALPH D CATHERINE SCHUMACHER I MARK ELIZABETH ZIRBES I Fee Owner I 14185 DEARBORN PATH I 14191 DEARBORN PATH I 14195 DEARBORN PATH I 14199 DEARBORN PATH I 14205 DEARBORN PATH I 14206 DEARBORN PATH I 14210 DEARBORN PATH I 14214 DEARBORN PATH I 14218 DEARBORN PATH I 14228 DEARBORN PATH I 14234 DEARBORN PATH I 14242 DEARBORN PATH I 14246 DEARBORN PATH I 14250 DEARBORN PATH I 121 S 8TH ST STE 1460 I 14245 DEARBORN PATH I 14241 DEARBORN PATH I 14235 DEARBORN PATH I 14231 DEARBORN PATH I 14227 DEARBORN PATH 14223 DEARBORNE PATH I 14219 DEARBORN PATH 1 14213 DEARBORN PATH 1 14209 DEARBORN PATH I 14101 DEARBORN PATH 14097 DEARBORN PATH I 14095 DEARBORN PATH I 14093 DEARBORN PATH I 14091 DEARBORN PATH I 14089 DEARBORN PATH 14087 DEARBORN PATH 14085 DEARBORN PATH 14083 DEARBORN PATH 14086 DEARBORN PATH 14084 DEARBORN PATH 14082 DEARBORN PATH 14088 DEARBORN PATH 14090 DEARBORN PATH 14092 DEARBORN PATH 14094 DEARBORN PATH 14096 DEARBORN PATH ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN MINNEAPOLIS MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN J ROSEMOUNT MN J ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN City /State 55068 I 55068 I 55068 I 55068 I 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55402 55068 I 55068 55068 55068 55068 I 55068 I 55068 1 55068 I 55068 I 55068 I 55068 I 55068 I 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 Zip Code I 14185 DEARBORN PATH I 14191 DEARBORN PATH 14195 DEARBORN PATH 14199 DEARBORN PATH I 14205 DEARBORN PATH 14206 DEARBORN PATH I 14210 DEARBORN PATH 14214 DEARBORN PATH 14218 DEARBORN PATH 14228 DEARBORN PATH 14234 DEARBORN PATH 14242 DEARBORN PATH 14246 DEARBORN PATH 14250 DEARBORN PATH 14249 DEARBORN PATH 14245 DEARBORN PATH I 14241 DEARBORN PATH I 14235 DEARBORN PATH I 14231 DEARBORN PATH 14227 DEARBORN PATH 14223 DEARBORNE PATH I 14219 DEARBORN PATH I 14213 DEARBORN PATH I 14209 DEARBORN PATH 14101 DEARBORN PATH 14097 DEARBORN PATH I 14095 DEARBORN PATH I 14093 DEARBORN PATH I 14091 DEARBORN PATH 14089 DEARBORN PATH 14087 DEARBORN PATH 14085 DEARBORN PATH 14083 DEARBORN PATH 14086 DEARBORN PATH 14084 DEARBORN PATH 14082 DEARBORN PATH 14088 DEARBORN PATH 14090 DEARBORN PATH 14092 DEARBORN PATH 14094 DEARBORN PATH I 14096 DEARBORN PATH Property Address Assessable Unit 35% I 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% I 35% I 35% 35% 35% I 35% I 35% I 35% I 35% I 35% I 35% I 35% I 35% I 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% Assessable Rate $660 I 1 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I I $660 I I $660 I I $660 I $660 I I $660 I $660 I I $660 I I $660 I I $660 I $660 I $660 I I $660 I I $660 I I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 $660 $660 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I Proposed Assessment MIMIMI w NM I= NMI MEM= INII W CO W O o W S CO W O o W J) S CO 0) O n I 1 341830037001 W CO co O W A .A CO W O W -A O co O W CO W co i I 341830103009 W CO W O W •P -P CO W O W 0 W O W CO co O CO CO W O W CO W O 03 co 03 ca 03 .P ca W CO co O O O co 01 W 4 CO O O co O O W W CO co O O co O O W Fee Owner 1 THOMAS M BRENDA L KROETEN 1 MARK MARTHA JARVINEN BRUCE R CINDY MENSING BRIAN J AMBER WESSELS DENNIS W JAYNE L BAKER TIMOTHY J FIRNSTAHL BRIAN T JODI L TYLER BROOK A THERESA A VICKERY JEROME L SHARON M LEMKE GLEN G ROSANNE V RERICK KEVIN 0 DANA J LARSON I 1 I I I GUY JAMES DAWSON 1 I KEVIN C LINDA L PLAN I 1 1 SCOTT E EMILY C WINKELS 1 ALBERT KAY ANN ZAVALA TITILOLA OLOGUNDE DANIEL A AMY M MALDONADO DANIEL WILLIAM RADMACHER COURTNEY A JENNE IVAN W FELTON CRYSTAL L CARTER 1 14162 DEARBORN PATH 1 14166 DEARBORN PATH 1 14170 DEARBORN PATH 1 14169 DEARBORN PATH 1 14165 DEARBORN PATH 14159 DEARBORN PATH 14153 DEARBORN PATH 14147 DEARBORN PATH 14186 DEARBORN PATH 14182 DEARBORN PATH 14176 DEARBORN PATH 14175 DEARBORN PATH 1 14181 DEAR BORN PATH 1 14229 DEKALB AVE 14215 DEKALB AVE 14205 DEKALB AVE 14195 DEKALB AVE 14187 DEKALB AVE 14182 DEKALB AVE PO BOX 101559 14245 DEKALB AVE City/State ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ANCHORAGE AK ROSEMOUNT MN Zip Code 1 55068 1 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 1 55068 1 1 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 99510 55068 Property Address 1 14162 DEARBORN PATH 1 14166 DEARBORN PATH 1 14170 DEARBORN PATH 1 14169 DEARBORN PATH 14165 DEARBORN PATH 14159 DEARBORN PATH 14153 DEARBORN PATH 14147 DEARBORN PATH 14186 DEARBORN PATH 14182 DEARBORN PATH 14176 DEARBORN PATH 14175 DEARBORN PATH 14181 DEAR BORN PATH 14229 DEKALB AVE 14215 DEKALB AVE 14205 DEKALB AVE 14195 DEKALB AVE 14187 DEKALB AVE 14182 DEKALB AVE 14168 DEKALB AVE 14245 DEKALB AVE Assessable Unit Assessable Rate 1 35% 1 35% 1 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 1 35% 35% 35% 1 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% Proposed Assessment 1 $660 I 1 $660 I 1 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I 1 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I 1111 III I 341830224002 1 341830223002 1 341830222002 1 341830221002 INIICOIII' 1 341830220002 C411031111 341830104008 341830217002 341830218002 341830111007 341830101008 341830102008 341830103008 1 341830009005 1 341830006004 1 341830005004 1 1 341830004004 1 341830003004 1 341830106010 341830001004 341830002004 C41(1 0111 341830115009 341830101010 341830102010 341830103010 341830104010 GERALD BEVERLY MAHLKE DARREYL S LAURIE A SEDBROOK ZACHARY ANDERSON 1 KIM D LYNN M ERICKSEN DARIN KARLA LUTTERMAN JACOB F SR PAMELA DELPINO 1 MEGAN M MCCULLOUGH 1 KEVIN MICHELLE L BELLRICHARD 1 ELIZABETH THIELEN JOHNSTON 1 DOUGLAS ROY THIBODO JEFFREY J FISCHBACH ANDREW J SUSAN L HAVERKAMP JOHN C CATHERINE B CUSACK MICHAEL W RUTH A KASTEN PATRICIA LEITCH JERRY N STRUDLE ROBERT G NAGEL DANIEL M RENEE M GULLICKSON BERNARD L BARBARA BRINK ROBERT S KERI L GEHLING RENEE D TRIER STEPHEN R DEBORAH LEE KEITH KATHLEEN MAGNUSON JAMES FRECHETTE MICHAEL J YVONNE J BIBRO ANTHONY E SUNDGAARD I BENEDICT G BRENDA FISCHER 1 Fee Owner 1 14062 DANE AVE 14059 DANE AVE 14065 DANE AVE 14071 DANE AVE 1 14077 DANE AVE 14083 DANE AVE 14089 DANE AVE 14095 DANE AVE 14110 DANE AVE 14106 DANE AVE 14102 DANE AVE I 14100 DANE AVE 14099 DANE AVE 14241 DAVENPORT PATH 14220 DAVENPORT PATH 14226 DAVENPORT PATH 2400 126TH ST W 14236 DAVENPORT PATH 14180 DAVENPORT PATH 14248 DAVENPORT PATH 14242 DAVENPORT PATH 14186 DAVENPORT PATH 14190 DAVENPORT PATH 14196 DAVENPORT PATH 14200 DAVENPORT PATH I 14204 DAVENPORT PATH 14207 DAVENPORT PATH I Fee Owner Address ROSEMOUNT MN J ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN I ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN 1 ROSEMOUNT MN 1 City /State I 55068 I 55068 I 55068 I 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 1 55068 I 55068 1 55068 55068 1 55068 1 55068 1 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 55068 Zip Code 1 14062 DANE AVE 1 14059 DANE AVE 1 14065 DANE AVE I I 14071 DANE AVE 14077 DANE AVE I 14083 DANE AVE I 14089 DANE AVE I 14095 DANE AVE 14110 DANE AVE I 14106 DANE AVE I 14102 DANE AVE 14100 DANE AVE 14099 DANE AVE I 14241 DAVENPORT PATH 14220 DAVENPORT PATH 14226 DAVENPORT PATH 14230 DAVENPORT PATH 14236 DAVENPORT PATH 14180 DAVENPORT PATH 14248 DAVENPORT PATH 14242 DAVENPORT PATH 1 14186 DAVENPORT PATH 14190 DAVENPORT PATH 14196 DAVENPORT PATH 14200 DAVENPORT PATH I 14204 DAVENPORT PATH 14207 DAVENPORT PATH Property Address Assessable Unit 35% 35% 35% I 35% 35% I 35% I 35% I 35% 35% 35% I 35% 35% I 35% 35% I 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% I 35% Assessable Rate $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 I I $660 $660 I I $660 I $660 I $660 I I $660 I $660 I $660 I I $660 I $660 I $660 I I $660 I $660 $660 J $660 $660 $660 $660 I $660 I $660 I $660 $660 I $660 I Proposed Assessment 4, 0 O v O) 0 Z r m 0 4 al 01 O rn co w V 0 0 D Z 1- r m 0 w cn O rn 00 vs O O cn 01 O rn 0 v Cn w co 0 01 cn O o) co 4- 4- 01 O rn co 4, cn 01 0 0) 0 cn 0 rn co cn cn 0 rn 0 N co v w 2 0 01 cn O c» Qo ON w 01 0 rn CO ON ON O cn cn 0 CD 0 ON ON O cn cn 0 rn CO ON O 01 0 rn 0 cn cn 0 rn 0 cn cn 0 rn CO 0 -t V1 GO m z z 0 go D m XI 0 0 m 0' cn 0 rn CO 01 01 0 rn CO cn cn 0 rn CO 0' 0 rn CO 01 0 co 0o cn 01 0 rn OD cn cn 0 rn co 01 0 rn w 0) 01 0 rn 03 0 01 0 rn 00 cn 01 0 rn 03 01 0 co 03 cn y h b o Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 APPENDIX D Soil Boring Logs Bituminous Coring Spreadsheet Rosemount Roads, Dated February 10, 2009 Figure 10 Leak Detection Survey Map: Hydrant Locations Legend: mu= 2010 Street Improvement Project SOIL BORING BITUMINOUS CORE WSB ASIBIESIESSOL 2010 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BORING AND CORE LOCATIONS ROSE/MO-U:1\11 MINNESOTA WS9 ProJeet NOM 669 -43 October 14.2009 Figure Number 1 amnia 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 www.wsbenrg.cam Asscciates, li,c. 7ci114,00• Far767•::1.1700 INFRASTRUCTURE ENGNEEP,ING PLANNING CONSTRUCTION Kt'101668 -93'1 Cad\Exhlbits\8orino and Core Lccatbn 1.1ap.dwa, Layout) LOG OF TEST BORING PROJECT: Rosemount SIP 2010 CLIENT/MBI N0140/N9430 LOCATION: Rosemount, Minnesota BORING NUMBER: FA -1 DEPTH (FEET) DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL SURFACE ELEVATION: USCS GEOLOGIC ORIGIN N or SAMPLE LABORATORY TESTS No. TYPE MC DD LL PL Qu/RQD 0 1 "L1111! i 2 �I 3 ylmv 1 l'•tl ?•i:':l :1111 r.3y1;�1 ,a3Yl 141 1191' J:nli m1Yrl.1 i!!3,:q 1:11 L1a•1 t ilrlsr fill:':' 1 :t1Y1•ll. fiilil.4[ 1:I1.L1.1'I 1:11. t r:il'flfl Eiti 1 ..ilia 1:1111141 rE1 1 8 1 ii=t1 all 3 Bituminous Asphalt FILL Roadway Pavement Sand with Silt, Fine Grained, Brown =ll 1 Y 11. =q, m n m SP -SM Coarse Alluvium 4 I Silty Sand, Fine Grained, Dark Brown SM 5 6 7 8- 9 10- 11- 12- 13 14— END OF BORING WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS START: 10/14/09 END 10/14/09 DATE TIME SAMPLED DEPTH CASING DEPTH CAVE -IN DEPTH WATER DEPTH BAILED DEPTHS METHOD CREW CHIEF 10/14/09 1:15 PM 5' 0' None 6" Flight Auger 0' 5' R. Smith 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LOG OF TEST BORING PROJECT: Rosemount SIP 2010 CLIENT/MBI N0140/N9430 LOCATION: Rosemount, Minnesota BORING NUMBER: FA-2 DEPTH (FEET) DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL SURFACE ELEVATION: USCS GEOLOGIC ORIGIN N or CR SAMPLE LABORATORY TESTS No. TYPE MC DD LL PL Qu/RQD 0 1 2— 3 4 5 -"x.. 4.5" Bituminous Asphalt Fill Roadway Pavement Fill, Sand with Gravel and Silt, Fine Grained, Brown Roadway Base Sand with a Little Gravel, Fine Grained, Brown 1 SP Coarse Alluvium 6 7 8 9 Silt, Brown, Wet, Very Loose ML Fine Alluvium 10 11 12 13 14 END OF BORING WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS START: 10/14/09 END: 10/14/09 DATE TIME SAMPLED DEPTH CASING DEPTH CAVE-IN DEPTH WATER DEPTH BAILED DEPTHS METHOD CREW CHIEF 10/14/09 1:30 PM 10' 0' None 6" Flight Auger 0 10' R. Smith 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LOG OF TEST BORING PROJECT: Rosemount SIP 2010 CLIENT/MBI N0140/N9430 LOCATION: Rosemount Minnesota BORING NUMBER: FA-3 DEPTH DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL (FEET) SURFACE ELEVATION: USCS GEOLOGIC ORIGIN N or CR SAMPLE LABORATORY TESTS No. TYPE MC DD LL PL Qu/RQD 0 V.v. :40:4 4" Bituminous Asphalt Fill Roadway Pavement Fill Sand with Gravel and Silt, Fine Grained, Brown n Roadway Base 2 3 4 i Silty Sand, Fine Grained, Brown I SM Coarse Alluvium 5 6 7 8 9 I 0 11 12 13 14 END OF BORING WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS START: 10/14/09 END: 10/14/09 DATE TIME SAMPLED DEPTH CASING DEPTH CAVE-IN DEPTH WATER DEPTH BAILED DEPTHS METHOD CREW CHIEF 10/14/09 1:45 PM 5' 0' None 6" Flight Auger 0 5' R. Smith 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LOG OF TEST BORING PRO.TECT: Rosemount SIP 2010 CLIENT/MBI NO140/N9430 LOCATION: Rosemount, Minnesota BORING NUMBER: FA-4 DEPTH (FEET) DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL SURFACE ELEVATION: USCS GEOLOGIC ORIGIN N or CR lAk I SAMPLE LABORATORY TESTS No. TYPE MC DD LL PL Qu/RQD 0 2 4 5 —1 *00.4.. 1*: :;:iti: 4.5" Bituminous Asphalt Fill Roadway Paven Fill Silty Sand with a Little Gravel, Fine Grained, Dark Brown Roadway Bas i. Sand, Fine Grained, Light Brown SP Coarse Alluvium 6 -431vito: 7 -If '4111g 8 --no...4 -.a 9 -41.111.Nt h t.11..i. ...lauf Ilf 11M la: !filigi: .1111TA II% li•Eit. citpac ii!b el. tirry niisfoir atvr.m: tit ixiNt 'it;i11.1 Sand with Silt, Fine Grained, Light Brown SP-SM 10 11 12 13 14 END OF BORING WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS START: 10/14/09 END. 10/14/09 DATE TIME SAMPLED DEPTH CASING DEPTH CAVE-IN DEPTH WATER DEPTH BAILED DEPTHS METHOD CREW CHIEF 10/14/09 2:00 PM 10' 0' None 6" Flight Auger 0' 10' R. Smith 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LOG OF TEST BORING PROJECT: Rosemount SIP 2010 CLIENT/MBI NO 140/N9430 LOCATION: Rosemount, Minnesota BORING NUMBER: FA -5 DEPTH (FEET) DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL SURFACE ELEVATION: USCS GEOLOGIC ORIGIN N or CR SAMPLE LABORATORY TESTS No. TYPE MC DD LL PL Qu/RQD 0 I 2 3 p O •.v+•• .o .o 3.75" Bituminous Asphalt Fill Roadway Pavement Fill, Silt Sand with a Little Gravel, Dark Brown Fill Fill, Sandy Silts and Silty Sands, Brown ❖O 5 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11 12- 13 14— END OF BORING WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS START: 10/14/09 END 10/14/09 DATE TIME SAMPLED DEPTH CASING DEPTH CAVE -IN DEPTH WATER DEPTH BAILED DEPTHS METHOD CREW CHIEF 10/14/09 2:15 PM 5' 0' None 6" Flight Auger 0' 5' R. Smith 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0) 0) O 0) 0 0 0 0 E 0 1) 0 0 c E C) o o L) 0 o o U 00 C) O> 00 L) o 0 0 0 0 O o o O L 0 C c 0 Z (7 a 0 c 0 Y 0 o Z Z 0 0 (9 C7 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a) 0 01 N 2 5 e io °f co m (1) (1) if v E o 1 Y 00 j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z o Z Z Z Z Z o Z Z Z p Z Z Z o Z j Z Z Z CO p o. CL 0 u. u LL 10 N C fs 0) d m m O. ao J U la a) 0 W 0 0 0 O O 0) 00000 y Z 0) Z Z Z N 7• A T R I T O N N N a) e 3 m co m co co y c r ca 0 o d R a iao 0 0 a c J O d v a ac 0. >r c c c c c 0 c a m °o U z Q a`) a c o a 0 1 L S 6.0 o .g v 9 0 a) CO L L. 0) m N A I N 0) N 0) N d a1 N 0) W c0 Cn CO CO CO N y r l] D D 0 0 0 at O N M '7 10 10 c0 0) O N CO Y 10 CO l'.. 03 0) 0 N N N CO 0 N 0) 0) a) a) CO m v v '0 a v CO n v-0 v v 0) 0) d C) 0) E E E E E 0 0 .NC 0 0 v v 0 v v c c 0 0 c CO COCOCOCORI 0) 0) CD 0) 0) 0 N 0) 0) 0 0) a a .o .o a .o a N CO V) U) N N N RI i 7 T 7 T 7 T a 'O '0 80 'O 'O 9 'O 13 71 i7 '0 'O 'O 'N 13 'O b! N V 'O 'O 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 CO CO CO 0 0 0 CO 0 0 CO CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 N W 0 0 0 0 0) 0 0 0) C) O 0 0 0 0 0 x 000 L n e E 0 0 0 y 0 0 10 Zn 0 0 0 T T co co co J CO J J Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f` 10 Y N N N j E 7 N o r 0 7 y O s E i W N 7 w W n Z 1 Z Z C O W 1) Z 3 Z 3 3 I c° n in Ea 4 io io 4 to io i0 CD 0 CD 0 4) CD 0 0 V 'O '0 '0 'O 17 1:3 1:113 _O a E E o E E E E N o E 0) 0 a) m c0 CO 07 01 07 CO CO CO U CO m m CO CO CD 01 CD 0 CO 0 m RI 01 CO CO a 0 c N 0 0) i 0 0) 0) 0) CA 0) 0) 0) 'P N N a kr V d' 0) to 17 CD 01 .0 0 E Z a) c a) CO E co a) d E 0) Z CO CO CO CO M N N CO Co CO V Y M CO a) a) o CD C d a L LI 17 17 o E .0 a a E 8 E E E a N E 0 N 0 O] Y m co CO 0 0 CO 0) CD 0 Et CO m is 4) c m d 0) WSB Associates, Inc. Infrastructure Engineering Planning Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 -541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 Memorandum To: Mr. Andy Brotzler, PE City Engineer, City of Rosemount From: Mike Rief, PE WSB Associates, Inc. Date: February 10, 2009 Re: Rosemount Roads City of Rosemount Project No. 426 WSB Project No. 1668 -77 During the fall of 2007 and spring of 2008 it was observed by Rosemount Public Works and Engineering Staff that certain roads were undergoing a rapid deterioration due to stripping and/or raveling of the pavement at the interface between the pavement surface and chip seal. A field review and investigation was conducted on March 26, 2008 followed up by discussions with adjacent communities, suppliers, and contractors. Roadway history was also gathered in an attempt to identify the properties and characteristics of the inplace pavement, base and subgrade. Based on these efforts a general theory was developed as to the cause and mechanisms which may have contributed to the deterioration. A summary of this is below: Prior to the introduction of Quality Management (QM) of bituminous mixes in Minnesota, the specification for hot mix asphalt did not address nor measure many of the important volumetric properties on the mix such as asphalt film thickness and voids in mineral aggregates. The importance of these mix parameters was not known at the time and therefore, the specifications developed did not properly address these necessary properties. So production of hot mix asphalt under these specifications could lead to bituminous mixes which were subject to stripping and deterioration. This issue was also magnified by the energy crisis in the 1970's and 80's and bituminous mixtures were design with lower asphalt contents and poorer quality materials as a means of staying competitive during a time when resources were scarce and expensive. During this time, several areas within the City of Rosemount were paved with bituminous mixes design with this early specification. It is estimated that bituminous roadways placed in the City prior to 2000 may fall into this category. ACEC 2008 Firm of the Year Minneapolis St. Cloud Equal Opportunity Employer K:t01668- 77WdmintDon1/4040 -a braxla- 020909.da Mr. Andy Brotzler, PE February 10, 2009 Page 2 The roadways in Rosemount are not all failing as a result of this, but may be more susceptible to deterioration. In the case of road in the Country Hill Development, the addition of a second chip seal allowed moisture to remain present at the interface between the pavement surface and chip seal. As a result of this extended exposure to moisture, the susceptible hot mix asphalt began to deteriorate and strip. As deterioration progressed, more areas were available to contain moisture thereby accelerating the process until the chip seal began to debond and the surface of the pavement was exposed and deterioration progressed. Full depth samples of the pavement were removed and supported this theory as the deterioration was contained in the upper portion of the roadway and the structure remained solid in the lower portion of the asphalt pavement. Conclusions and Recommendations Rosemount has several roadways of the generation and design which could be susceptible to accelerated damage. To date, this only seems to be a potential problem with roads where more than one surface treatment is being placed. It appears that an initial surface treatment still allowed the pavement to "breathe" and the concerns are slight or nonexistent. The second surface treatment on these types of roads may be creating a less permeable surface which is beneficial until that protection is compromised. Going forward the following is recommended. The City should modify its preventive maintenance program and discontinue the practice of placing a second surface treatment on roadways which were constructed prior to the year 2000. Additional investigation should be undertaken to define the scope of roads which may be subject to this effect. Once this is known, the city can revise the approach and continue the practice of multiple surface treatments for extended pavement life. Modify the cities pavement management data collection to incorporate additional design variables on roadways so information can be accessed to assist the City in understanding why good roads perform well and identify trends with roads which fail to meet performance standards or expectations. Continue to monitor the roads with multiple surface treatments to gain an understanding of the extent of the issue and develop a strategy to address the distress at a time when repair options are inexpensive and roadway performance is not compromised. Continue the implementation of the cities Preventive Maintenance Program to extend pavement life and performance by protecting the pavement structure from damaging environmental elements. tsf K.\OI668- 77.Adniin'Axs.MEMO-+ brotzla -020909.dx 0 4N r'J AO C UPPER 13 13 TF{i orpho VAN air pj y'Y S T W Pm I P" lia dillitt Al 1110 Aar 1 P ili ond NNEMARA AY -o O R J‘A An Oa Tn. 0 1 f i tt, i "L\ FE c 4 0 F 10 p 04116 I 1 Afatrik Air saw 3 3 1 ao sa w 1 0 inj� y OW S sw Q ss, r mr MI adank__", AVAtintit w NO imply jot qv— t;10 ffs,P1 big We 4111 J le kVA*" I Mt vissai„, h. iv ivt. taq sue.. NN1 visa fr Tr GE 0 0 cr M FR 10 p *4# 11,Aiol■ 1!1 1 gr Irke NUMMI 1 lea sf -la nil MOP $2, t i4t att4 WSB Associates, Inc. #4* Oil IL-11 j iii gazimiN N� X11 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 www.wsbeng.com 1, 4.•■•■ 783541-4800- F1x783541 -0700 INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING CONSTRUCTION 0 400 800 S LEGEND: 2010 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT HYDRANT 2010 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LEAK DETECTION SURVEY MAP: HYDRANT LOCATIONS **ROSEMOUNT MINNESOTA WSB Project No.01668 -93 December 15,2009 Figure Number 10 K: \01668 -93 \Cad \Exhibits \FIG 10.dwa. Lavoutl. 1219/2009 11:01:27 AM Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 APPENDIX E 2009 OCI Map Pedestrian Facilities Map: Updated November, 2008 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 w y4 1 J c ap r o `U GANDREWS RD CSAhi 38 u i3ONAIRE PATH W o 9 0 LP 1a `API 0 o J Z U TI S CT OO�D O Q s e N 4 _•A i1 O G uMcjfE ,..LIF us Co USdCi R f eill 1 r CHARLSIC NYVA, a a V -A W el Q M Op R a RO z. Perk 111 �8r �I I/ �;�A VV ,a t+y M 0 r rd 1 I� "TnsTOy�iz nqH rI Q YO OD V'1, o lib O� irN t C ft CONNEM= CON 14STH ST nuwws eh Pond O w l 0. 1 W 19tT S'N `�A �rpFkN l'Jrrt C.ROCU3W F 6. P 0 CTN 0 LmONT r s I Q P Dug Canoes 1 W e E Ps .p m ew wood. Z a ark En kW Y 9 R E j E L Q m a JRI) STW r 4 O LiFIF o- 4 ,tir �r z .w Rte: f LLU_ll 145THT 4M R Y D 6 r/ s� I s,W B F ��;Aa�RR :a +yam 45TH ST PRY 9 b OR R• I!S o ODAL ID NUM II IL- _.'Hl 8 3T w 'T BIS AN 1 rr, ,,V r 1 t t 6 1 L W �n I 'K TTTR r t T 1 i 1 1 I MR(Iil f5T�p'� T BR i�R ti:l�.`f ll� falrlbl R ST el rrCN IME Z LLJ Y tbna 17 L ,,��e�S.w I Pal sa sa SI v 160TH ST (CSAH ,,.ycTw DP nA D k c ee 1, k t H 46 160TH ST W (CSAH 46) N Pedestrian Facilities Improvement Plan EXISTING BITUMINOUS PATH ROSEMOLINT Pedestrian Facilities Map EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK 4 City of Rosemount EXISTING TUNNEL PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PATH SPIRIT OF PRIDE AND PROGRESS November 2008 PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 M• r NM E MN M- MI I M MI I MN DIAMOND PATH (CR 33 Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 APPENDIX F Public Comment Summary Public Comments M MN I N NM M I 111111 MIll MO MN NM a D m D m O w o 0 m c m o a3 m 0 7• (D 0 CD Si 0 a aN (D 0 O (/i N 2 a 7 c y 7 0 a 2, 0 acn3 y 0) O 0 (D DJ 0 7 O O 7 O fi O 7 O O a 0) c 7 a 0 a a a) 7 0 7 O 7 CD 7 0 0 CD m m I 50.c ra to 0)= a CD O-a 3 a*c o 0 0 3 0 0 N 0 7 (p N 0 cp 0 0 0 co O O C0 0) 0) 0 7 7 v 0 7 7 13 "13 CD 03 0 c ao n v0 1D S 7 N Q co 4 (0 (D N C 5- m 0 7 o a O CD 0 0 a o 8 a 0) a 0 O 7 a 0 OD O a o m 7 d W 0 to o 0 0 3 0 O. (D 0 CL •3 O o fD o •2" C) co 8 w 7 s7 CD 13 'O 0 d V) S 0 CD H (0 W O 0- o 0. q o z o o o, 0 0 O 7 Q 0 D, O 7 0 a 01 X CD O ?r'O O O. (1) a) St 3 0 3 =o w o p A •P N O CO v 7• 0 SD 7 y O 0) 3 3 y 9. O O 0) a° a 3 0 0 ao 0 0 7 `2' y 8 0 O Q C_) 0 3 N 0 v 5 .1 a 0 O 0 0 0 c o 0 j c co C co 3 0 So m a a a 3 n O Q 7 8 a w°) (n CD o o o co a 0 o z la o 3 co fD o_ 0) co 0 8 3 0 0 0 8 •J 1.) 0) 0. IDa (D 0 c 0) O �'3 O 8 v so O O P 8. N 3 0) 0 •o v ID 0) ID co v d 0 a y N O (O v g3 0 CD co o O 11) 7 O 7 a co 7 w 0) (D (fl 7 N N O D g. to co 2. a W 0 a CD g a 7• 7. O alt O 5 a CD jot N if y u) co 0 0 (q N a 8 n 0) 0) 0 O. 0i 0) O o a s d 0 91 8 -O2 0 0 0 N Co 0 (D a a n xi 5 7 8 CD 0) O 7 N o 0) a 0) 0) co O 0)) 0 co Ps N oy O. 0 o0 ag 0) c a(DA- 1' O d a 7o) O CD 7 N O y C c c a fD 3 N 0 -8c.2 n a n 2 7 O 0 O (D c a ao 5 (7 5 o N a: '5 a p. 8 v 3 3 0 0 .0 0. CI 0 CD 0 7 a3 o cn a 8 n a c 3 ci m y 0. co 0 0 3 3 CD 7 73 w 0 0I ID (D 8 (D 0 a 0 0 3 3 XI a 0 ID N CD 7 7 C (D w J O co CJ CD 0 D 7 7 c CD a �3 a_ 3 3 C 0) O O) g s? 0 0 o S 8 0 *m c co 3 O 3 O O 3a3 c 3 g 12° ca a o 9 0.0g v a 0.a Q y a g a 7 ca 5 0 0 0 0 3 CD 0: a) O y o 0) N R. 2 7 c O CD O N 8 'O 0) (D 0 7 N 5 O N co N MO NM M NM MI I IM OM MI MN I I NM n a 0 0 CA N 3 4 O O— T1 3 N 0 m o y a 9,- 0 3 m 3 0 5 m m 0 0- m v o 5 S R._ *o am 0 o m a.-Z 0 D O 3 w 0 m( 3 0° fD S a o 3 0 0 CD Cp 'O 0 0 o 3 A CCCC 0 c o 0) 3 N oo(°4aCD3a) ID 0 8 CD a E. o 5 CD 0) 0 0.9 o a m v o 5 m c° lHHih 3 0 c 0 0 to o O y= N iTl 0) 3 ;I.: t co 0 j i$ g 0 (0 S a 13)) C' 0 p< p p 0 su 0 3 0 0 =up m a ID m o 0 3 a w n• N a_ N a° O 8 51 a 7 Q p C) CD c E. c17 N N 4 N N CD p p C 7 3 0= d 0 3 CD a o 0) 3 v CD a D N CD D C 3°005 0 0 to O g Cn W 8 CD 3 0) m 6) 0 c c_ a 5. v_, 0 v v -i 5v+v -o r.:,- vi T. X 5 5. 5 3 o c 8 d a m N O co N O a co 0 y. N c 0 CO, CD C] S _i g G p 0 R. o 0 'O i s g p 2 61 V i p O 7 0 Q0 Fn 0 0 N a c a a o� �3 y co v 8 W 3 CD m O a o y o o 'O G c N C a 0 o g o (IT O OO m co 3 3 3 3 N ry y' p d m 3= 0 fcc 3 3 �v o o N. a m go o a d 0) 0) a Cp N C a U 09 7' CD C a m p j m O) a 5 0 0) .w. a m 5 w o 3 0 c 3 goy o o'<.< o ,0 0 co a s 3 o� 8 a,° c3 o 3 5n 0 0 g CD ay a 7 aa) °c EL 0n 0 3 u c m o V 0` 0 0 3 0 y o rn N �c O c a° 3 ti) v o m a m N T� C 0 N 3 0 �Lel d CD 8O 0 X 3 CC y 0) o N C C 0 E CO 7c 7 :op O) N N y ti 0) 0 C) o:_ p 5 a CD O ET 0 y 3 w O a 4j 0 O N O' a 0 7 to co 0 0 o 0 3 4 N 3 0 G O 0 a m- U) ?CT o 5 (0 c a 13 x 3 f to 3• a0 m -v m? a 5 0) o CU 0 cA o la I O PP 5: No�aa aam>�'� CD o =X 8. o 0. oo o a �'�01 Fri 3 O f0 0 a 'r F o, o 5 t o 0) 5 0 C m 47 cno. P m D O) N a- 0) C -1 N N o N .O. C 8 C N O 0a0 o m 3(0 0 O C O 'O ,g co 3 a CO c 0 0 N 0. 3 N 0ni° m m 0 0 1 o v m CD C C7 �r o m O O a o y a m yy C a a s 0 a y co m CD, m o c c o CD CI.) N w y O w N o O 0 CD y 9. 0 1 0 D O 0 0- co 2 m� m ai> 0 ID 4=. 0 g N a aE p a a 0 0- g -Pi 50 0 (1) 0. 0 N c CD 3 o 3 0) 3 X0 3 0. s 0. 0 p a 2. 3, a O O m c n a n 3 rn a A. w V 3 3 3 3 a m c •O 0 3 3 5 `D o o 0 I M I NM E M E M NM I M r M r NM CO N 0 CD 0) 0) CD ,37 y a o 3 d a m 7.O CO o 2 27 a i m a0 5 a) m O 1 N b m Q (0 m 5 g, a a O 0 0 m o 5 co o m 0 y 7 CD 3 CD a m m m C. m 3 v m o 0 11 1 6 5' m m m o a o -0 m s O a a m N W v `g O 0 0 m g 3 m 0 N m O N ,y- a a.. 01 `Z N O 0 N F g O E; 07 f 0 g 0 m 3 7,9". Nye a) 0 y M `G 0 0 1 D( cc a p o o x5 m y v m CZ a0'< o o gg m 3 y cD C N a 0 5' 5 ill 7 2; m 0 y 5 o a) 0 W g f D c3 fD 1; 50 °2 8 c u 3 m 6.13 c m uc co o g� o 3 m 3 0 3 5 m 0. co m a 0 O -^3 cu P. 5 0 y C y O 0. y O O g 0 o ca m 0 54 m O ag 5 m 7 01 3 x000 0 3 O m 3 CD 0 7 0 C m 0 m m F., 3 cr m o o O O !0 O g O g 6 3 g=� a a. 0 CO O O 0 020: a o 0 0 CI a 0. 'iC N 'O n o C O o 0 m m 9. to o o 0 as v°y d i m a. o am. a n 3. m o 0 3 s a ff. m 3 m 0 t 0 m 0 N m m 0 O m o 5 a m y 7 o m 3 5 -0 C a m y CD 0 N C oa CD -00., 'O 0 N 0 7 N N =v0 O-m -1. o m 6 co i a 0 s v; 3 0 agmv a) m 0;* a 9 0 0 m m �.m —m m° i o m 0) 7 C FI3 CD 4) C 'O m O, e m 0. m v 2 CL 0 0 0 0 8 0 3 a o a m o�04 -o Fir 0 0 0 m 0 CD y m 3 N 0 c0 O C C V N -0 2- g. <2 0 0 aoT ic�ram° v <.3�; o P3 v m° N m Z a n a3 y cD �p m 3 o m i m 13- S12. a mc `D CD 5 'cgo a 3 0- 0 8,00 3(D 7 3'y 0 0 y 7 O T C. 0) O' g 0 C N N N Z 3 7 y 0 3- c0, 0 co c0 m 2 O 0 0 S g. a c N m 0. mom 2 7 0 a a o a 0 g 4 -8 o Q m gd 8� 3 3 =0E00.00-- m 03, 3 ao a g Q. g y 2 3 3 6 P m y 2 0; 0 3 m y c a� s g, o 0 m 8. o g c a N O g N N y N g y 0. 0) 7 0 C m 7, 0 0. 0) m°_;a0m2 c° 000 9 8 ate ma 0g,3 v 3oa.< 0. 6 2 3' o 5. ao go c 5 i 2 CD I M M M M M M EM MI MO I MIEN1111=1 MI MN NM y c 0 a: u CO.0) 0) m o a a 0 8 (o a. a o Q (D y 0 o N a a 07 8- a m g o. �r O a 7 m a 0 o- a C m (D f7 3 "0 07 a (3 m 7 CD 0. V0 m a -1 a CD 0°1 Cl. 0. Ca p' CD CO O w a y 7 m 0) 0) 0. 0 3 W C) 0 3 3 CD 7 0 0 0 CD o co 3 0 0 7 c CD a 0 c rn cn W O (0 cv 0) .0 O 0-c 7' 07 n CD 5 t 8 3 y m O m C P, O 4 O a y d �w S 0) 0) O S co y y 7 a a y (D (0 7 7 CO O 0 y m, 3 s•S 7 03 0) Q (O (0 g• 0) y (p O o 7 O O 0 m y 7 to 0 3. mo5 t ,v O. m (n f� 1 '1 y Q O. 0 07 N O m (O S y V D (0 o .O g 7 m m _0 a a m O v-)- y v g 7 0 0 (55- m O 3 7 3.. 5 5: m 13 8 0 m oo 7 p N C 7 m 7 O (/l a 0 0 m c y y V7 y O Po _3 m F 0) v m 5' o. m m m �c a. (0 00 0 0 m C g- 0 m v 0 0a m S m (D 7 R. 0 7 y 0 3a� D O� .o CP y 3 g 0 (5 m 0) a m 7 c o E. o m N co g C D. N rd a C o yg -r mm m 0) S CO c5 a m v cu 17 m o R 7 3 �c R 3 7. Q C N C 7( O m 3" ET o ==oo m. a a m n y 0 0 m c 3 a acv c 0 "8= CD N n m •p 7 m .y. 7 0 O O 7 0 y:D g C 0) 0) y o g O 3 m g 0) n 17 5 O. cr o g 0) 0 a o �mcvia90 m y ?c -5 Cr O 01 C.{ 0 m m g C (Sp ((0 (O m 0 0 3 m O 0 5 8 7 0 0) o m m 7 g m 0 a° 0. a S O y 3 m m m Q 3• m m m 0 m CL m 0 (0 0) (0 0) 0. o 0 g y 0 0 0 0 7 (D o 7 3 5 0 0 8 3 y y, o m a Q 3 a 3 i 3 7 am o o 0 ia (o o 0 7 c y O 7 p y O N 0 0) m o o ((0 0 7 3 ((DD 7 y m m O m a 0) O O co 00 Q 0 0 y g 3 CD m U) m m m m a. (o 2. d 7( o 7 0 0 0 n C) m O m y m C. 07 7 3 0 0 m a y -a7 0 O N 9 m 2: 7. 7 7 G`G 0 (O 0 a C m 3.3a a 12- m 7 0) m (D m 7• g< fig C i 3 3 mm as y O m.g C� 03 0 0) O o 7 c (O M 57.0 m 7 m 0) a(0 -w CD m m 7 �7 c-5 y 28.0)8.33 8 7 y 3 a 8 3 g m fO c m c0 m m y •'m O c 7 a, O. O 0 0) a.., O. 3 3 a9 y m r 0 m N. o y m S L 's. O 74 a ED, `G g'0 m 0 P m O m 97 y a D A m g g a m; O m 0 0 c N 5" oh 73 a a 2. 3°: om m m _0. CD CD 3 a 9 C° N 5' 3 z 0 0 a< m O y m m C 'a 8 7 8 m S z�(0 0 7 0. 07 m g d m a m 0 3 O 0 (0 7 7 m o. c m o a O 30 0] O O. rt a 0 m 0 a 0 3 Z d 3 0 0 0 0 a m 7 a a 3 a a CO d 0 8 0 0 3 3 m 3 0 0 0 m MI I NM MI OM NM M 0 Co O O O N g 0 N N 0) O N 0 O C 0 o 6- 7 c b a) 0) 7 0) 0 7 (0 'a 3 O v 0 0 CD O 7 0 0 co y a Q0 d v7 c 0—)O. D 0 n 2 O 0 y. C 0 O s 0) (0 0) 7 W 7 D -I 07 A c gy 0 O O zX c 2 3 5' 8: 0. 0 S�aQ (0 0 O 0 N 0) N O co co m 3 y 7 o N N y K D x+ 7 a m 0 o 7. a) C N CD 0 S O (0 N ((n CD (0 2 0 a N o CD 0 D (15 y a D O. 3 a 0 0 O a 0) 0 S N C N a (D 0 AA 1 71 3 y 01 (D O N 7 7 a; "0 0 y cr O. N O 0 CO N N 0 CO 8 m m a J p 0) C 0) 0) 0 a 5: co 0 3 co 7 8 cn 63 N co 0. m ti a co 0. 0 0: c 0 m a ((0 o ci 0 c. 7sZ m 0) 30. 0 O 0) 0) m 0 y O y a Q) 0 a CD y 0 N N a 0 0 0) (1) 0) N 0) co 0o 0 y 3 do y N M 0 J O 3 CD 0 CD 6 0 CD O CO O m a 0 O O a m 3 y 0 0) O 0 M. 0) 0) b n y 0) 0 00 n0 m 0 0 0 y O O a o (0 0 a m 2 0 (D o *v o m 3 O a" -O N 0) C Cr CD W O N 0) N O CO a8D D N 5 O 9. co 0) N 0 o 0) D a 3 -0 X 0)0 a v co iu N c 0 a 0 3 0 E o co y a A CO m ,2 O CO 0 g O C o a 0 '0 CD a a y 0 7 0) N v 0 0) 0 -i 0) 0 N 0) O O CO 2 CD c 3 0 C 0) 0) a 0) 0 C 8 O 3 0 D r 0) 0) N m 6 N 2 m 5 a. 0 N 0) b 0 a 71717 5 0) 'g a o 3 S 0 S. N a o 8 y 7 'p 2 n (n N Q. m c. 5 7 5 D N C O (D y 0 p) 0. co o i•. 3 0 m o d2 0 D o a co s N 7 0 (D y 3 D 0 OD N co (0 y 0 y 5:aa y 0) fa 0 m N y N Fir C EL Ftr o m 0;d vi (D 3 C y d 0: w 5 8 ;1 5 (D 7 5 3 W 5 3 g a a a 3. 0 O CD (0 (D 0 co c C o 8 7 v, 0 0) fD 0 DJ 3 (D 0 a vi 7 Q o v 5` m 0 01 0 N O O CO 7 y 7 N co a 0 0. 8- W3 g. o.) 3 u' N o. N j m fD 7._0 7 0) N 0 LD A C 0 5: 5 0 0 0) N 0 8 a5`< 3� N 7) y Q) CD 7 S. 5. 3 N CO N K 3 <5 3 0) N 0) a c tD f m 0, co c 3 Dy 0 0 3,3 (0 00 8 N 0) j C 0) C D O1 0) D (n C N. a o 0 7 5• V m m( O CC �m C N S 0 m N a xi g t0 0) 5 CO 5° N (o 0. co 0 a a 0 v D 3. 0 CO 0 a CD 0 a 0. 5 (0 3 0) 0 0) 0 s 0) 0 N N 0 (0 0) 50 at C9D 3 a 0) o 7 n 0) Cg 4 O g 80 6 N O (0 3 a 0 3 W y N a� g y 8 a, y o 5. m (D 0 0 y (D y 3 o 0 7 a N 0) C) 0. fD y 2 a (D 4' 1.) 0 W 0) 0) (D 3 N 8 50 W a 0 a a to 0 10 O 0. (D 7 9 y co 0. 0 a y ID 8 3 3 5 76' a o N 0) 0) co 7 c- a a 0) 7 g 3 0D "E o 9. 5: 7 7 O m (0 s m o m a 3 ID 0) y. 7 v m a 01 N 7 C) 3 (D 7 y Q. a= a O. (D 0. (0 a 3 eft m Z 0) 3 CD 0 y a 0 7 r b. a 3 0 a m 3 d 7 0 5. n 0 3 CD 7 CD 0 7 ID (0 P N O 8 C a co( 0 v 0 m c Q, a 0 0 8 Q CD 3 7 7 n Q Q. S0 O o 0 (o cc a3 N o C)) CD 8 —a o o y 0• m a 0'y a v 0 CD y 3 f0 ry o 0 3 -0 ?y o co 0 a o 0 a D) o a N a 4 (S3 O a Sawa N D) a cu oo a CD c m n a N 7c 0 0 w o x• CD CD 17 C 'O 7 (0 7 CD C 7 as di co 7 o o CD 7 'D N C D) 0 a 8 ma rn c m 0• a 9: 9 0 n CD 7 O N C O co 2 O p c N o 0 O C O m N o 3 o CD 0 D C n o O mu 0. 0 2 cn N co o 7 3 -0 7 0 c O CD Cr w CD 5. (n (D p) 0 �a X70 (D• za Q. 7 c y cn CD •O 0 m CD C 0 7 0 N 0 7 o 0 E 7 a O N m 3 CD a1 Q a 8 m C CD N 0 co a o w 3 C O 3 w M CD m m N a (0 W g (D y v 7 N 3 O (0 3o° O CD O N O S G C� 07 CD N C A D CD N Q. c CD i C 7 (A a .O 7 CD o (0 0 o o) v 8 80- 0 CD 7 Fir O a m s CD aa. m 7 0 Cr N a CD 7 Cr M 5i 0 0. c '2 •o CA fD N y J 0) 0 0 0) cn 3 0 m a Cn C y CP 0 M. S 0 d Q N (D (D N D) 0 0 CO O 0 7 3 O N C C o o m 7 o (D O CD O R: X N CD 7 N 3 3 N CD N a 0 00 Cr c� 7. 0 W CD S 3'5°: o d (o a, 8 a v -0 O. c 3 o c iB ty a y 0 CD 8 CD 0 O fA 1 0 o O O (0 7• C 3 N C N 7 7 V1 CC C N Q 7 (D a 7 0 0 a a om a 8 0 a 3 m a o ca_ C3 a a N Vl rj 13 g O 7 g N C N N (C0� 0 >c a C 3 (D p. O. 0 a .V)= .R- 5- 8 Q 0 3 O- (,j. v K a) LP 2 3 O O p3 8 'p •o o N d 8 0 0 0 (at) n 0 a 3;(e 0 (4 0 0 .9 O 9. W j co co S N (D N 4) Q SS 7 X 0 0 O 5. 5 .9 o -O (n 8 cn N. (D 7 (o T c- 7 n 0 (c o� (D i S 5O n S. (1) a m 3 o 0. 0 CC a CO f N 3 7 8 O S N c 8- 7 CD w a 0 O a 7 v y. 7C• y 2 CD 7 0 O '0 a 7 (D m z 9 8 0) („0 7 N C Q (D C (0 7 7 (D a 0 CD 2 aa< O D O CD O C C N a N O C 0 0 O (D (D 0) 5 S 7 0. 0 ,(0 N 8 a 0 a. 8 (1) g 3 m M 0 R 2 8 g O 7c 0 7 0 5 (A 0 o x30 a C ce p 0 CD 0 o 5 co W O O c O 0 cfl 0 3 5 C m a co P O fCDD a) N •O 0 5 CD a 7 r.. 3 *2 o (D m y o (D .70 G. O a E m o 0 0 1 B CD a a 3,.o *(n3 vm a Q•" (c CO A ga 3 0. 0 N O (0 CO a- y c8 pmp t 0) 0. co 5 M 0 CO tG 0 5 a (1, p 8 7 0 0 (G y C 0) CD m m m 0. 2 o •O co c Q o O c3 w Q. 7 7.3 y 3 0 5 Q. c O Cr m CD 4D r c) O 3 3 vs w 0 ((0 m MIN MO N NM I MN I 11110 M CI: a o w A- '03 3 2 m 0) O C tp W N a 0 0 3 3 7 a 0 CD (O m c c 7 N o 3 N 7 7 Wo rm m 3 a s 0 5 a. o g o a o a O y 0. C• 7 7 co CD 0) o v o aam N (0 CD 0) g 3 c 0) n. 0 CD CD co (0 51 (3 3 0) W O c 7 N 7 W W 7C 3 O W 2.c •O N CD 3 O 3 7 W O W N 7 W 0 C N O 0) W a W v o W g m 3 v s vo a 0 cFg� CD C O 0) 0 m 0) a a O W e fl. 7 51 7 m( 7 Q O N W N N 3 3 a n 0 7 C W Q a W a p a co O g• O 00 0) m 0 7 0 0) 0. o 2 p S W m 9 o O< a c 7 (D v N m 7 o T 3 Q• 0 a< o m m CD (p F,• o o S W 50 3 CD O 3 6 a v W O m N W 0 ct z 77 0 W C 6 (0 O m° 0 0) 0) �0) 7 O 3m 2.000 03,v0 m (p S 9. m 6 K C a p C O -0 to m 3 0 a, 0. W Co m q p O O n• N co c oa 8g2 o v W =„v 3 3 g M W s O C 0 7 o C W 3 co o O. 0) a m c n 0 0 3 O. 7 2 7 c. 0) m j o o) CD 0 -0 m C a 7c0 0a 30 (0 8 C) o Cp P.. CO co O o. (D a N O. 0) 0 5 5 6'° a s< 3 0 N a 'O (a 0 N m c y o y 00 2ao mmn: °W 7 m oof .W G 0 13. 03 3 o. N W D a) 7 'J 0 y. m c co 7-, W 0) c W c G a= 0 t D Ui -0 W 0 0 0 W 7 a vi c 2 `5 p s m' n 0) 8 S c 7c O 7' p m (a m p 'a (p p) O o W W Cp c S 5 W e ms 01 m< N N W* 3 C) m to N C 4U it., W mW3- 2° i s cu 0CA 3r a. (-3.,y,-8 3, 4, U O X 7 W< 7 ai t j N 7 R- 5° W g (m 3 (3 y a' o o m m@ o ca 6 0 2 ?iii o m 5=3 5-'5- (0 m 4) aim o <o 5a <o m 5v mm w •Q. g 0 3. ,v o f 0a A f° 7 °'0mvs m m So 3.y o c cm o ui vofa m a3 p`0 m o m 0 51• v W W W O r p W W 0 0 0) 7* 3 Q (a a m m m c c 3 y f o W O m W 'c O N t 0 W O W 0 a 0� N 7 W ,•2 c m 3 3 m m O R'=' W 7c ui a .co C o o•( 7 'o W d 0 .0, m W A...= o s `c v 02. fo 5 C 0 m n3 o5-8 7 CD to 70 ..70,0. =e.(o 0) o a °c 0 o 9 m p W 7 c o W- C W c m A (q 7C l�l o m 3. 0) q o 7 y 0. O W a 5 C O 51 0., 0 7 co y C W C c L W m 0.W c 0) (0 0 m N O y o 0 o o p m W W C W O 7 3 p 7. c W i W y 3 o o W c 99. c 0 W W m e m N 0 O CD *0 0. v. CD g v m 0 m 3 o 8 3 a �v 3 o a. n o 0. (0 0 7 cc 3 7 U) v w 0- 7_ CD a 8 3 51 o 3 O 1 co W, m o a m o n W O 7 0 co 7 7' 0 0 o (D n 0) m 0 N N O O CO 3 0> 03 0:., 3 5a23 o c o co n -I a O c Fe N 7 W* W W c co" W 0 a N 7 O g .-1. m N hI c o 0. O) m f 0 0) a g `..D., a N 3 W (D 5 CO e 3 D 51 0. 0 07 CD =o 9i W Q 7 WO. m O N I O D CD C to W 0) a Q. O 5 o 7 °i N N 7 W m b 7. u) 0 a a a) 0 m<< v_g o o U i pg) 2 o g W 7 O W co 4 c c O O W W 1 5 a 7 co 0 7 W 7 51 a 0. 3 (0 0 0 sZ c (n, d -TI O 0 7• --180-1- N. 0.7 (0 0) g 3- N 0 a a 0 y N O O O a. j a) N •O 9 3 O (�pp 7 �p 0 0 0 3 0 O 5 N a 3 7 O@ 01 co_, t W D y O Er a (�_o �m 5vo 0 05: 0 00 0; a) g� (o ,a P .-A 3 m 8 o9mo ono. o. CD o W 7cm y °s• w0 II) hs z 0 3 c W o 7 I O a o 3 0 0 0 a co o m co 3° m O W 4 cn 3 o W -I Cu W c g 0 g o v o P D 3 o o a v o. 0 m v 7 N •W 0 (D 01 7 N 7 m 4)2 a W ID 3 Q 3 m N m m W o S y 0) a m (if 0) W 0 m to Era m 7� av 3 .�r3= I •70) 0. 0) 0. o a 3 0. CD 2 m m o p O S 0 W O 7 m 7 W W m Joe Koscielak From: Andy Brotzler Rosemount Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 8:44 AM To: Tharp, Michael S SMSgt MIL USAF USMEPCOM Cc: Morgan Rosemount; Schultz, Dan Subject: RE: 2010 Street Improvement Project Mr. Tharp Your comments will be forwarded to the City Council with the feasibility report for the project. Regards, Andrew J. Brotzler, P.E. 1 Director of Public Works City Engineer City of Rosemount 2875 145th Street West 1 Rosemount, MN 55068 Direct: 651.322.2025 1 Fax: 651.322.2694 From: Tharp, Michael S SMSgt MIL USAF USMEPCOM mailto: michael .s.tharp @mepcom.army.mil] Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 11:42 AM To: Brotzler, Andy Subject: RE: 2010 Street Improvement Project Importance: High Sir, After reviewing your comments, observing the paint marks in my yard, and measuring out the width of the sidewalk that is proposed....I would like to go on record stating my vote to not approve of this sidewalk installation. If installed, the new sidewalk will decrease my front yard by nearly half and allow strangers extremely close to my front door /front windows. This intrusion into my private property is unacceptable. Request the city further review and reconsider sidewalk installation on the opposite side of my property /Delta Ave (14004 Delta Ave). V/R SMSgt Michael S. Tharp (United States Air Force) Station Supt, Senior Enlisted Advisor Minneapolis MEPS 612 725 -1769 (Office) 612- 298 -1458 (Blackberry) 612 725 -1749 (Fax) michael.s.tharp @mepcom.army.mil From: Brotzler, Andy [mailto:andy.brotzler @ci.rosemount.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 10:49 AM To: Tharp, Michael S SMSgt MIL USAF USMEPCOM Cc: Dawley, Morgan; Schultz, Dan Subject: RE: 2010 Street Improvement Project Mr. Tharp 1. At this time, there is not a plan to put biking/walking lanes on the streets in -place of sidewalks. On local residential neighborhoods where parking is allowed on both sides, the street width is a concern in addition to the annual costs associated with striping on a city wide basis. 2. The sidewalks proposed to be constructed are proposed to be located within the street public rights -of- way. I would not anticipate this to be any more of a potential issue than what exists today from pedestrians walking on the street. 3. At this time we are not planning to add street lights. Should the sidewalks be constructed as proposed, 11/20/2009 Page 1 of 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 Page 2 of 4 our goal is to improve the safety for pedestrians by providing separate facilities from the street and vehicular traffic. 4. If it is necessary for a property owner to dig in front of their property within the public right -of -way, it would be the responsibility of the property owner to rernove /replace the sidewalk. 5. The question of liability is difficult for the city to provide advice for as this is an individual property owner matter on a case -by -case basis. 6. The city's maintenance of the sidewalk is limited to removal /replacement as necessary based on evaluations. With a new sidewalk, our expectation will be that there will not any maintenance required for a period of time. We do inspect sidewalks on an annual basis and prioritize sidewalks that create trip hazards for removal and replacement. 7. The right -of -way typically extends 30' from the center of the street or 13 -14' from the back of the curb to the property line. Our standard for new construction is to locate the 5 -foot sidewalk 1 -foot inside the right of -way from the property line. This would be the maximum distance from the back of curb. This provides an adequate boulevard width for street signs and snow storage in the winter. During final design, the existing topography, driveway grades, trees and landscaping will be evaluated and taken into consideration to determine the final sidewalk location. 8. All comments received in writing at and after the public informational meetings will be included in the feasibility report to be presented to the City Council. This will include e-mails received along with responses. A copy of the power point presentation for the public informational meetings will be posted on the city's web page at http: /ci.rosemount.mn.us. The presentation will be the "2010 Street Improvement Project" under "Construction Project Updates" within the Public Works /Engineering Department page. Regards, Andrew J. Brotzler, P.E. 1 Director of Public Works City Engineer J City of Rosemount 2875 145th Street West 1 Rosemount, MN 55068 Direct: 651.322.2025 I Fax: 651.322.2694 From: Tharp, Michael S SMSgt MIL USAF USMEPCOM [mailto:michael.s.tharp @mepcom.army.mil] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 7:46 AM To: Brotzler, Andy Subject: RE: 2010 Street Improvement Project Importance: High Sir, A neighbor had a few questions she would like answered please answer at your convenience...thanks: 1) Is there a plan to put a bike /walk lane on the streets rather than putting in the sidewalks? 2) How can we ensure our privacy and security from potential trespassers? 3) Will the city be putting in the additional street lights? 4) If for some reason, homeowners have to dig on the yard, who would be responsible to put the sidewalk back? 5) Due to liability issues, should the homeowners consider increasing their insurance coverage? 6) How often will the city maintain the sidewalk? 7) How close or far does the city plan to put the sidewalk into our yard? 8) Do we have a say in whether the sidewalk goes in or not? 1 the questions from me 11/20/2009 Sorry to interrupt your busy schedule, it appears 1 have been chosen as the neighborhood spokesman....Iast of V/R SMSgt Michael S. Tharp (United States Air Force) Station Supt, Senior Enlisted Advisor Minneapolis MEPS 612 -725 -1769 (Office) 612 298 -1458 (Blackberry) 612 725 -1749 (Fax) michael.s.tharp mepcom.army.mil From: Brotzler, Andy [mailto:andy.brotzler @ci.rosemount.mn.us] 1 Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 2 :40 PM To: Tharp, Michael S SMSgt MIL USAF USMEPCOM Cc: Dawley, Morgan; Schultz, Dan Subject: 2010 Street Improvement Project Mr. Tharp 1 In response to your comments /questions below I would offer the follow enumerated responses. Page 3 of 4 1. Estimated costs associated with the proposed replacement and addition of trails and sidewalks would be funded with city general operating funds. The city budget annually includes funding for repairs and additions to the city trail and sidewalk system. 2. Costs associated with the removal and replacement of sprinkler systems are included in the project costs and are funded as noted above. During the design process and construction, our goal is to work with property owners to identify the existence and location of these facilities to minimize the cost and impact of the project. 3. Same as 2. 4. The removal of snow from sidewalks is the responsibility of the adjacent property owner per city code. The city does perform snow removal on trails and sidewalks located along collector streets and school routes. 5. Regarding the grade of driveways, we do evaluate the grade of driveways during final design. With regards to the proposed addition of a sidewalk along the east side of Delta Avenue, in 2005 the City Council adopted a trail and sidewalk plan to promote the expansion of the city's trail and sidewalk system. The plan also includes the connection of existing systems to eliminate gaps in the system and provide network connectivity of the system. The sidewalk along Delta Avenue was identified as a network connector for the neighborhood between the trail on Connemara Trail and Dearborn Path. Hopefully this addresses your questions /comments. Should you have additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. From: Tharp, Michael S SMSgt MIL USAF USMEPCOM mail to: michael .s.tharp ©mepcom.army.milJ Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 12 :24 PM To: Dorniden, Cindy Subject: Informational Open House Importance: High will attend tonight's meeting but do not want to cause an issue with my concerns. In regards of the proposed sidewalk installation on Delta Ave, my issues/concerns are: 1) Who will pay for the sidewalk installation 2) Who will pay for the removal/replacing of my lawn sprinkler system 3) Who will pay for the removal /replacing of my underground invisible pet fence 4) Who will be required to remove snow on the sidewalk 5) How will this affect my current driveway. Currently when I enter /exit my driveway to the street, my vehicle scrapes the pavement due to the severe slope of my driveway and the road. In the winter, have to "gun" the gas to get up my driveway. With the installation of a level sidewalk, this will severely alter my enter /exiting during summer conditions and will almost if not definitely keep me from getting up my driveway. This driveway is a serious issue to survey in regards to the other questions i raise. Almost every home on the east side of Delta ave have underground sprinkler systems and they ARE NOT happy with the thought of a sidewalk being installed. V/R SMSgt Michael S. Tharp (United States Air Force) Station Supt, Senior Enlisted Advisor Minneapolis MEPS 612- 725 -1769 (Office) 612- 298 -1458 (Blackberry) 612- 725 -1749 (Fax) 1 11/20/2009 Andrew J.Brotcar,P.E. Director of PubIic Works City Engineer 1 2Q75145th Street West Rosemount, yWN 55068 Direct: 651.322.2025 1 Fax: 651.322.2694 1 11/20/2009 City of Rosemount Page 4 of 4 Joe Koscielak Regards, Andy- From: Andy Brotzler Rosemount Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 11:27 AM To: Wiinamaki, John M. Cc: Morgan Rosemount Subject: RE: 2010 Street Improvement Project A copy of the power point presentation will be available on the city's web page at http: /ci.rosemount.mn.us by the end of the week. The presentation will be located under the "2010 Street Improvement Project" within "Construction Project Updates" under the Public Works /Engineer page. Andrew J. Brotzler, P.E. 1 Director of Public Works City Engineer I City of Rosemount 2875 145th Street West 1 Rosemount, MN 55068 Direct: 651.322.2025 I Fax: 651.322.2694 I From: Wiinamaki, John M. [mailto:john.wiinamaki @centerpointenergy.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 4:45 PM To: Brotzler, Andy Subject: Re: 2010 Street Improvement Project Again, thank you for the information. I cannot attend the meeting, please forward the slides. From: Brotzler, Andy <andy.brotzler©ci.rosemount.mn.us> To: Wiinamaki, John M. Cc: Dawley, Morgan morgan .dawley @ci.rosemount.mn.us Schultz, Dan <dan.schultz @ci.rosemount.mn.us> Sent: Tue Oct 27 16:36:30 2009 Subject: RE: 2010 Street Improvement Project Mr. Wiinamaki There was a public informational meeting in January 2004 for the citywide proposed trail improvements. The proposed overlaying of the streets is part of the city's pavement management strategy. In addition to addressing the surface deterioration of the roads, our goal is to improve the structural integrity of the streets. By performing structural improvements at the appropriate time in the pavement life cycle, the goal of the pavement management system is to extend the life of the street from between 25 -30 years out to 40 -50 years. Essentially striving to spend smaller amounts of monies at appropriate times rather than a large amount to reconstruct the street prematurely. If you are able to attend the public informational meeting, our presentation will include several slides on the city's pavement management program. If you are not able to attend and would like a copy of the presentation, please let me know and I will have a copy forwarded to you. Thanks, Andrew J. Brotzler, P.E. 1 Director of Public Works, City Engineer 1 City of Rosemount 2875 145th Street West I Rosemount, MN 55068 Direct: 651.322.2025 I Fax: 651.322.2694 1 1 11/20/2009 Page 1 of 3 From: Wiinamaki, John M. [mailto:john.wiinamaki @centerpointenergy.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:14 PM To: Brotzler, Andy Cc: Dawley, Morgan; Schultz, Dan Subject: Re: 2010 Street Improvement Project Andy Thank you for the prompt response. I understand the decision process but disagree with the fact that I didn't have an opportunity to voice an opnion (probably missed an announcement). I'II make sure to discuss with the mayor who lives nearby. Why are you overlaying a twenty year old road? From: Brotzler, Andy andy .brotzler @ci.rosemount.mn.us> To: Wiinamaki, John M. Cc: Dawley, Morgan morgan .dawley @ci.rosemount.mn.us Schultz, Dan <dan.schultz @ci.rosemount.mn.us> Sent: Tue Oct 27 14:48:16 2009 Subject: 2010 Street Improvement Mr. Wiinamaki I am e- mailing in response to your comments /questions below. For street overlay projects as proposed, 35% of the project cost is assessed to adjacent property owners. At this time, the estimated per unit assessment rate for single family properties is between $700 $1000. The balance of the project cost is funded with city general tax levy funds. Assessments to residential properties are typically levied over a 10 -year period. With regard to the proposed trail on the east side of Shannon Parkway, in 2005 the City Council adopted a trail and sidewalk improvement plan. This plan includes the proposed construction of a trail along the east of Shannon Parkway. Shannon Parkway is classified as a collector street in the city street network system based on higher volume and speed of traffic than local streets. As a collector street, the city's goal is to provide pedestrian facilities on each side of collector streets for pedestrian mobility and safety. Should you have additional questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. From: Wiinamaki, John M. [mailto john. wiinamakina centerpointenergy.comJ Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 200912 :20 PM To: Dorniden, Cindy Subject: Proposed Overlay and Sidewalk Project Dear Public Works/Engineering Department: Thanks! 11/20/2009 Page 2 of 3 I recently received a letter regarding a proposal to overlay Shannon Parkway and Currant Circle and to add a sidewalk on Shannon Parkway. I have a question regarding how the projects will be funded full city responsibility or assessments? Currant Circle will only have a street overlay. A final question, who instigated the need for additional sidewalks on Shannon Parkway? This is, in my opinion, unnecessary and an expensive waste of taxpayer's money as there is already an under utilized sidewalk on Shannon Parkway. Andrew J. Brotzler, P.E. 1 Director of Public Works City Engineer! City of Rosemount 2875 145th Street West 1 Rosemount, MN 55068 Direct: 651.322.2025 1 Fax: 651.322.2694 1 11/20/2009 Page 3 of 3 FW: Sidewalks Page 1 of 2 Joe Koscielak Pat From: Andy Brotzler Rosemount Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 2:40 PM To: kavy @frontiernet.net Cc: Morgan Rosemount; Schultz, Dan Subject: FW: Sidewalks Importance: High Thank you for your time on the phone. As discussed, your comments will be included with the feasibility report brought forward to the City Council for their information when considering the proposed trail project on Shannon Parkway. Should you have additional comments or concerns, please do not hesitate to phone or e-mail me. Regards, Andrew 3. Brotzler, P.E. 1 Director of Public Works City Engineer 1 City of Rosemount 2875 145th Street West 'Rosemount, MN 55068 Direct: 651.322.2025 Fax: 651.322.2694 1 Original Message From: Cox, Alan On Behalf Of Comment Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 1:24 PM To: Brotzler, Andy Cc: Johnson, Dwight Subject: FW: Sidewalks Importance: High Original Message From: kavy @frontiemet.net [mailto:kavy@frontiernet.netj Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 12:09 PM To: Comment Subject: Sidewalks Importance: High To: Andy Broxler From: Patrick Kavanagh 13835 Shannon Parkway Rosemount, MN 55068 Andy, I was very surprised to fmd out about the sidewalk that is being installed on our street. It is obvious that there was never a plan to put in a sidewalk just by looking at the evelations of the yards and where the trees are relative to the street. Did the city put in the trees...no, but if there had been any need or want, these trees would not be where they are. As it is, the people that run or taker their dogs for walks often use the street anyway so why are we giving them another sidewalk to not use? People are out of work, struggling, trying to pay bills, and the City of Rosemount puts in ridiculous things such as this that not only make sense, but will make that side of the street look ridiculous without massive restructuring of lawns, yards, and driveways. These reasons plus the city seems to have a tough enough time keeping up with the snow the way it is along Shannon Parkway. Does this mean you will have to hire more people and take more taxes to keep this up or will it come out of the engineering budget? 11/20/2009 FW: Sidewalks Page 2 of 2 If you want to do something useful you can clean up the wetlands in the back of the houses so we don't have birds dive bombing on our heads in the back yards. We can't touch that and I would applaud this to make the back yard safe to mow again. If you are trying to spend money, at least do something constructive. I cannot be at the meeting tonight because I was out of work and now have to work in Florida to keep my house on Shannon Parkway. Maybe you can spend that money to save money in the future. Be creative. This makes no sense. We will have a lawyer at the meeting tonight and I will talk to him tomorrow to see what our next step is. Thank you for your time. Patrick Kavanagh kavy @frontiemet.net Cell 651- 307 -9040 11/20/2009 RE: Fwd: Project #428 Informational Open House Joe Koscielak From: rogerandkathyhansen @charter.net Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 3:37 PM To: Andy Brotzler Rosemount Cc: Schultz, Dan; Morgan Rosemount Subject: RE: Fwd: Project #428 Informational Open House Mr. Brotzler Thank you for your response. I must say I see this project as totally unnecessary and a complete waste of public funds. I am not sure who would put their name on a study that would indicate the need is based on public safety. Nonsense! I suggest that the funds required for the initial construction and future monies for maintenance of this sidewalk be directed to our Rosemount Police Department for keeping Shannon Parkway safe. I would like to go on record of being strongly opposed to this project and would like to see a public hearing held to review today the merits of a project that was put in front of the city council in 2005. I suggest the ideas represented in 2005 would not be supported in 2009 most certainly by the neighborhood residence and also today's council members. Regards, Roger W. Hansen 13809 Shannon Pkwy. 11/20/2009 Page 1 of 2 Mr. Hanson We will be posting a copy of the power point presentation on the city's web page at http: /ci.rosemount.mn.us by the end of the week. The presentation can be found in "2010 Street Improvement Project" under "Construction Project Updates" within the Public Works/Engineer Department page. With regard to the proposal to construct a trail/sidewalk along the west side of Shannon Parkway, this was identified by the city and City Council. In 2005 the City Council adopted a trail and sidewalk improvement plan to promote the expansion of the city's trail and sidewalk network along with connecting gaps in the system. The goal is to provide safety and mobility opportunities for pedestrians within the community. In addition, because Shannon Parkway is a collector street with higher volumes and speed of traffic, it is the city's goal to provide pedestrian facilities on each side of collector streets to reduce the need for pedestrian crossings of collector streets. Should you have addition comments or questions, do not hesitate to phone or e-mail me. Regards, Andrew J. Brotzler, P.E. I Director of Public Works City Engineer 1 City of Rosemount 2875 145th Street West I Rosemount, MN 55068 Direct: 651.322.2025 1 Fax: 651.322.26941 Original Message From: rogerandkathyhansen @charter.net niailto_ rogerandkathyhansen 4charter.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 11:46 AM To: Brotzler, Andy Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Project #428 Informational Open House Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:33:54 -0700 From: rogerandkathyhansen @charter.net> RE: Fwd: Project #428 Informational Open House Page 2 of 2 To: comment@ci.rosemount.mn.us Subject: Fwd: Project #428 Informational Open House Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:08:26 -0700 From: <rogerandkathyhansen @charter.net> To: andrew .brotzler @ci.rosemount.mn.us Subject: Project #428 Informational Open House Mr. Brotzler, I unfortunately will be unable to attend the open house on October 28th and I am requesting copies of presentation materials and minutes of the meeting to capture other citizen input and city responses. As a resident located on the west side of Shannon Parkway, I am extremely curious as to the rationale on the need for another sidewalk to mirror the existing sidewalk already in place on the east side. It would seem to me that the funds being proposed for this project could be better used on something of a much higher priority and with a more pressing need. I look forward to receiving the information requested. Regards, Roger Hansen 13809 Shannon Parkway 11/20/2009 Joe Koscielak From: Dorniden, Cindy cndy .dorniden @ci.rosemount.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 12:22 PM To: Andy Brotzler Rosemount; Morgan Rosemount Subject: FW: Proposed Overlay and Sidewalk Project Would one of you please respond to this e-mail. Thanks. From: Wiinamaki, John M. [mailto:john.wiinamaki @centerpointenergy.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 12:20 PM To: Domiden, Cindy Subject: Proposed Overlay and Sidewalk Project Dear Public Works /Engineering Department: Thanks! 11/20/2009 Page 1 of 1 I recently received a letter regarding a proposal to overlay Shannon Parkway and Currant Circle and to add a sidewalk on Shannon Parkway. I have a question regarding how the projects will be funded full city responsibility or assessments? Currant Circle will only have a street overlay. A final question, who instigated the need for additional sidewalks on Shannon Parkway? This is, in my opinion, unnecessary and an expensive waste of taxpayer's money as there is already an under utilized sidewalk on Shannon Parkway. 1 Joe Koscielak 1 1 FW: Project #428 Infoumiational Open House Page 1 of 1 Original Message--- From: rogerandkathyhansen @charter.net [mailto: rogerandkathyhansen @charter.net] Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 1:34 PM To: Comment Subject: Fwd: Project #428 Informational Open House Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:08:26 -0700 From: rogerandkathyhansen@charter.net> To: andrew.brotzler @ci.rosemount.mn.us Subject: Project #428 Informational Open House Mr. Brotzler, I unfortunately will be unable to attend the open house on October 28th and I am requesting copies of presentation materials and minutes of the meeting to capture other citizen input and city responses. As a resident located on the west side of Shannon Parkway, I am extremely curious as to the rationale on the need for another sidewalk to mirror the existing sidewalk already in place on the east side. It would seem to me that the funds being proposed for this project could be better used on something of a much higher priority and with a more pressing need. I look forward to receiving the information requested. Regards, Roger Hansen 13809 Shannon Parkway 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11/20/2009 From: Cox, Alan [alan.cox @ci.rosemount.mn.us] on behalf of Comment [Comment @ci.rosemount.mn.us] Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 1:41 PM To: Andy Brotzler Rosemount Subject: FW: Project #428 Informational Open House FW: Sidewalks Page 1 of 1 Joe Koscielak 11/20/2009 From: Cox, Alan [alan.cox @ci.rosemount.mn.us] on behalf of Comment [Comment @ci.rosemount.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 1:24 PM To: Andy Brotzler Rosemount Cc: Johnson, Dwight Subject: FW: Sidewalks Importance: High Original Message From: kavy @frontiernet.net [mailto:ka a frontiernet.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 12:09 PM To: Comment Subject: Sidewalks Importance: High To: Andy Broxler From: Patrick Kavanagh 13835 Shannon Parkway Rosemount, MN 55068 Andy, I was very surprised to find out about the sidewalk that is being installed on our street. It is obvious that there was never a plan to put in a sidewalk just by looking at the evelations of the yards and where the trees are relative to the street. Did the city put in the trees...no, but if there had been any need or want, these trees would not be where they are. As it is, the people that run or taker their dogs for walks often use the street anyway so why are we giving them another sidewalk to not use? People are out of work, struggling, trying to pay bills, and the City of Rosemount puts in ridiculous things such as this that not only make sense, but will make that side of the street look ridiculous without massive restructuring of lawns, yards, and driveways. These reasons plus the city seems to have a tough enough time keeping up with the snow the way it is along Shannon Parkway. Does this mean you will have to hire more people and take more taxes to keep this up or will it come out of the engineering budget? If you want to do something useful you can clean up the wetlands in the back of the houses so we don't have birds dive bombing on our heads in the back yards. We can't touch that and I would applaud this to make the back yard safe to mow again. If you are trying to spend money, at least do something constructive. I cannot be at the meeting tonight because I was out of work and now have to work in Florida to keep my house on Shannon Parkway. Maybe you can spend that money to save money in the future. Be creative. This makes no sense. We will have a lawyer at the meeting tonight and I will talk to him tomorrow to see what our next step is. Thank you for your time. Patrick Kavanagh kavy @frontiernet.net Cell 651-307-9040 Joe Koscielak From: Andy Brotzler Rosemount Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:57 PM To: Bill Droste Cc: Morgan Rosemount; Johnson, Dwight; Schultz, Dan Subject: FW: 2010 Street Improvement Project From: Wiinamaki, John M. [mailto:john.wiinamaki @centerpointenergy.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:14 PM To: Brotzler, Andy Cc: Dawley, Morgan; Schultz, Dan Subject: Re: 2010 Street Improvement Project Why are you overlaying a twenty year old road? Should you have additional questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. 11/20/2009 Page 1 of 2 Mayor Fyi on a resident response for the 2010 project. We did host a public informational meeting in January 2004 which all property owners along proposed trail /sidewalk routes were invited to. Andrew J. Brotzler, P.E.1 Director of Public Works City Engineer 1 City of Rosemount 2875 145th Street West 1 Rosemount, MN 55068 Direct: 651.322.2025 1 Fax: 651.322.26941 Andy Thank you for the prompt response. I understand the decision process but disagree with the fact that I didn't have an opportunity to voice an opnion (probably missed an announcement). I'll make sure to discuss with the mayor who lives nearby. From: Brotzler, Andy <andy.brotzler @ci.rosemount.mn.us> To: Wiinamaki, John M. Cc: Dawley, Morgan morgan .dawley @ci.rosemount.mn.us Schultz, Dan <dan.schultz @ci.rosemount.mn.us> Sent: Tue Oct 27 14:48:16 2009 Subject: 2010 Street Improvement Project Mr. Wiinamaki I am e- mailing in response to your comments /questions below. For street overlay projects as proposed, 35% of the project cost is assessed to adjacent property owners. At this time, the estimated per unit assessment rate for single family properties is between $700 41000. The balance of the project cost is funded with city general tax levy funds. Assessments to residential properties are typically levied over a 10 -year period. With regard to the proposed trail on the east side of Shannon Parkway, in 2005 the City Council adopted a trail and sidewalk improvement plan. This plan includes the proposed construction of a trail along the east of Shannon Parkway. Shannon Parkway is classified as a collector street in the city street network system based on higher volume and speed of traffic than local streets. As a collector street, the city's goal is to provide pedestrian facilities on each side of collector streets for pedestrian mobility and safety. From: Wiinamaki, John M. fmailto. john. wiinamaki @centerpointenergy. comj Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 200912 :20 PM To: Dorniden, Cindy Subject: Proposed Overlay and Sidewalk Project Dear Public Works/Engineering Department: Page 2 of 2 I recently received a letter regarding a proposal to overlay Shannon Parkway and Currant Circle and to add a sidewalk on Shannon Parkway. I have a question regarding how the projects will be funded —full city responsibility or assessments? Currant Circle will only have a street overlay. A final question, who instigated the need for additional sidewalks on Shannon Parkway? This is, in my opinion, unnecessary and an expensive waste of taxpayer's money as there is already an under utilized sidewalk on Shannon Parkway. Thanks! Andrew J. Brotzler, P.E. 1 Director of Public Works City Engineer' City of Rosemount 2875 145th Street West' Rosemount, MN 55068 Direct: 651.322.20251 Fax: 651.322.2694 1 11/20/2009 November 4, 2009 Public Works Engineering Department RECEIVED NOV 6 2009 CRY OF A069 We have many concerns regarding the proposed sidewalk addition on Delta Avenue. Some of these concerns are short term, but it's the long term concerns that are the most bothersome to us as homeowners. Parking is one of the concerns that we have. For over twenty years we have had full use of the driveway on our lots. If the proposed sidewalk is installed we the homeowners lose that use, which is a huge Toss for the homeowners, especially those of us that have multiple drivers and vehicles and those who have frequent out of town visitors. Even though the city does not have an ordinance prohibiting parking on the sidewalks, we all know that the proper thing is to not park on the sidewalk. We built this home in 1987 and were one of first homes built in this development. We could have chosen any lot available at the time and specifically chose one that would not have a sidewalk. We did not want the maintenance and liability that went along with a sidewalk then and we want it even less now. The Country Hills development was designed over twenty years ago, the sidewalks that best fit in the development were laid out and approved at that time. Nothing has changed in the last twenty years that requires a sidewalk on Delta Avenue. The neighborhood has grown to become part of the Rosemount community with well maintained homes along with trees that were planted by the developer and homeowners all based on the requirements of the city. These trees have grown to provide a mature and beautiful neighborhood and now some of these trees may be lost to a sidewalk. Losing these trees would be detrimental to the value of our properties. In the last twenty two years we have watched most of our neighbors move up and move out of the neighborhood. We decided many years ago that we would stay in our starter home with a goal of being able to enjoy life, travel a bit, and eventually maybe even get out of Minnesota to head south for the winter. We both worked multiple jobs to get to this goal. When we eventually needed to do some remodeling to our home, we kept our goals in mind, and used low or no maintenance products whenever possible so that we would have less maintenance in the future. This proposed sidewalk that is at 'no cost to the homeowner' is actually going to cost those of us affected by it plenty over the long run. I know that we will have to increase our homeowner liability insurance to protect ourselves if someone slips and falls on the sidewalk in front of our home. Those of us who do not have a snow blower will probably need to purchase one in order to move the deep snow that is left by the snow plow. Those of us that have a smaller snow blower will need to upgrade to a more heavy duty one in order to move the snow. The city requires that the sidewalks be cleared of snow within a twenty four hour period. For over twenty years we have been able to live our lives and enjoy the activities that we have become accustom to without having to worry if we are out of town and may not be able to clear the sidewalk in the twenty four hour required timeline. If this sidewalk is installed we have the burden of having to hire out and pay for removal every time we are away and it snows. Over the long term this could be extremely costly for active families that do go away often in the winter We were informed at the meeting on October 27 that there was a letter sent out in 2005 to the affected homeowners concerning this sidewalk addition. We never received that letter and I know of at least one other homeowner on this street that lived here at that time and did not receive that letter. If we had known in 2005 that there was a possibility of a sidewalk going in on this street we would not have invested the time or money into this home that we did. We invested in this home on the premise that we would stay here forever. We would have put our house up for sale at that time and moved on towards our long term goals. If this project does move forward we feel that we will have to move to a home that will fit our future lifestyle. Unfortunately we will be in limbo for some time waiting to see if this project will move forward. We cannot put our house on the market without having to explain that the front yard may look very different and may be missing the mature shade tree that was planted in the front yard by the builder. We also wonder how many other people would feel the same way about the liability and maintenance involved with a sidewalk as we do. We wonder what this sidewalk will do to the value of our property. At the October 27 meeting it was stated that sidewalks are needed to promote exercise. Sidewalks do not promote people to exercise. There are a number of neighborhoods in Rosemount that do not have sidewalks at all and you see people walking all the time. For over twenty years people have walked on the streets in the Country Hills neighborhood. As far as we know there have not been any issues due to a lack of a sidewalk on Delta Avenue. It is one thing to have chosen to build or buy a house that already has a sidewalk on the property. To have this project imposed on us after we have been established in a neighborhood simply seems unfair and isn't the best situation for all homeowners. The bottom line is that for the benefit of the few people that will walk on the sidewalk the burden to those of us on Delta Avenue is quite large and long term. For our family it will mean a move to another neighborhood and the Toss of my customer based business income as I will not go through the process with the city and state again in order to open another salon in my home. I understand that the city has some funds available to use for projects like this. I can only hope that you will consider all of the families that will carry the long term burden of this project before the final decision is made. Please think about how this project will affect our families and their futures for the benefit of walking on a sidewalk instead of a street like they have been accustom to for many years now. If this proposed sidewalk addition is approved, the homeowners on Delta Avenue will lose a portion of our established driveway parking, possibly our mature front yard tree, and most importantly, our freedom to live the lives that we have built without worrying about clearing a sidewalk. The only things that we stand to gain is the liability and maintenance required by us to keep the sidewalk cleared of snow and the price it will cost to hire it out to be done for us if we are not home when it snows. Basically we lose what don't want to lose and gain what we don't want to gain. Our last child will be graduation this spring and we are also concerned that our front yard and front or side streets may be a mess for his graduation party. We do not have a date picked out yet but it will be sometime early to mid June shortly after the proposed start date of this project. Thank you for taking the time to hear our concerns. Ron and Tamie Jensen 14102 Delta Avenue 651 423 -5242 rtbbj @charter.net 1 1 4ROSEMOLINT Telephone Meeting I Talked to: Subject: 1 Comments: 1 1 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Project Phone 4 307— 70`ib 6. 1 Company: Date: 110/42P/D "hr-v 6 dit#41.x.rx.. 4140 TELEPHONE MEETING LOG Signed: 1 1 4 ROSEMOUNT 1 I Telephone Meeting 1 1 1 1 cc: 1 Talked to: 'PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TELEPHONE MEETING LOG Project Phone 78 340 705 614) K /ST I(ER Company: Date: 171 /L Subject: 1 Comments: f Signed: I 4ROSEMOUNT 1 1 1 1 1 1 Company: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Telephone Meeting Talked to: Ie4e. Ta 414+L Subject: 010/1 d III Comments: 3 VP I2 1 CC: TELEPHONE /.MEETING LOG Project Phone ‘57 757 Date: ///9/49 1 1 1 1 Signed: �Y 1 4...-.*.vic*.r. The original plot design of our home at 14042 Delta Ave did not anticipate the future addition of sidewalks. The placement of the house on the lot is not sufficient to accommodate a sidewalk. Had the builder anticipated the addition of a sidewalk the house would have been built 25 feet, further back as the back yard is approximately 75 feet long, the setback would n of have been an issue at the time of construction. EASE COMMENT ON ANY ISSUES THE CITY SHOUIJD DESIGNING OR CONSTRUCTING THIS PRO.tEC` The new sidewalk as it is being show in the study will be a security risk to my home as people will be walking right through the middle of the front yard. Additionally, the need to keep the proposed sidewalk clear for pedestrian traffic would severely limit my ability to utilize my driveway. I emphatically protest the addition of a sidewalk on Delta Ave in Rosemount, MN Scott and Carol Maki 14042 Delta Ave Rosemount, MN 55068 651 -423 -2293 r= TT r ITT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (If 'l y /c& 1 WO I d like_ -ris Co �tI�'1�'uc v I t J h d Pi" t'.o Arco -42 SO 4 cat e( -rte 1 "at av► L a U t 5 Your Name Gre j Sc.L 11 2 Address k Phone 6 sl 3/3- 3 s4/ PLEASE COMMENT ON ANY ISSUES THE CITY SHOULD CONSIDER WHEN DESIGNING OR CONSTRUCTING THIS PROJECT? 9 ROSEMOUNT PLEASE COMMENT ON ANY ISSUES THE CITY SHOULD CONSIDER WHEN DESIGNING OR CONSTRUCTING THIS PROJECT? L) e a t, c. rr.. -cqvor- eDf R.., CAI CZIL pC14 }C)04k o& kor4t OvIal ,cenA o DOA /1;1 C. The Mail\ r' eel S CP\ 4 Z CrOid 13 04k MI 0100 L C" a 1 HY\- ■Sd00) k 1 0 5 /1114.0 er1 C,I) O se 7 1 6 IA a I k -1 At_ f kred j r QS-5 or- Cro.S.5 riti A tiv -0er e b (.4 i s k 1: 1;1 4 A c. &iv 1 4 7 1 Qr /4 j:s- V er don cp-o &C o& n-qtar a snow "Me mes O N the- rqoa are CorA Your Name J: edt 1 r Address 135 bcth 1 Ci Phone 4,3' I/3" 032. pleA call r'r o ne p C.,4 ei cfb fe. aka/ r ;V r2 CI,17 s Ct 4 4& op or ca. Ain -fr 474e Q 64 131 f I Curve I 4 ROSEMOUNT PLEASE COMMENT ON ANY ISSUES THE CITY SHOULD CONSIDER WHEN DESIGNING OR CONSTRUCTING THIS PROJECT? -roc in frrrn vt- us 014 --1-11,e_ (r)-1 hY -i beli■ rid -the p4 ire yr -t- /s 'r e ewal k v jc4 try irri iv rVa44WxyS OA Sill G vw4 i S (vh�b{ --fit YI tv eqttrti sii- w4 l h ,w r I u n r ,s I,(.YI.VIeLess4V he Avvis 1U1/Mt S 4-111 pdvorvitl- je-b+ IA tiI 41(er, rs G,r vwdi t5-f; 54& a s, j iS ho need otmn Ar.e. _ikkik- ace I 0111 Yo r i' ax n Address Phone I,vi G, One r -F�trn -e/ -fit v S. a +1 -ro hew e tI- c; s otur� ret v�eS -1-Dr -F1lwt (I (-e 'r r`� gose e 4 ROSEMOUNT MINNESOTA 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 PLEASE COMMENT ON ANY ISSUES THE CITY SHOULD CONSIDER WHEN DESIGNING OR CONSTRUCTING THIS PROJECT? „h 1L /�E Jkv�'1? L.� tazdsuu j.SletlYlen t fr€' g G/4 t1i 4.5`1- C110 is s I /11 (9/1171 11 z1 (4 (J 4 "v4 �i 7 Y'j 11 s (1 L f} w4 t14i d7 Z/II1.e Pm, /2 /(.ALL eiA RUC iIIa/z��� Yite A,410 &ck wig Itipti-561€<-1 dze-cla4 y /%144_ eat 11)(440 .1 Aea.ze.4-a.44 6 i 4 .c e26j =(r42_1 moy Your Name 1 1 tie e'I/ 4d L)» tics ,4 'ja, ~f'i&1tef E 'Address /3770 S Allmon Plef Phone GS' t!G ROSEMOUNT MINNESOTA 1 PLEASE COMMENT ON ANY ISSUES THE CITY SHOULD CONSIDER WHEN DESIGNING OR CONSTRUCTING THIS PROJECT? 1 A >f 2 4 v /Le- dd a A r t c re."4 e-7,9r)- atevt.9.s.5 icte.r q c /(j 4. Vid-rs-e. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Your Name Address 1 1 5 1n,4 1 -n Phone ‘,1-- LIC) a 37 x uosEMouNr MINNESOTA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PLEASE COMMENT ON ANY ISSUES THE CITY SHOULD CONSIDER WHEN DESIGNING OR CONSTRUCTING THIS PROJECT? (-*As M-t t irzmiti w t2/ ,egyin. Aut tea° e �I` ap7e- tz 4 Wit: %-#6.6-141 c ./u N tel4,e,ce.re./j 4t i ■`J`t lrtd .A lubuvi t) a-va �Pa Your Name e j t bt..v A 4 ddress l '4o 7e 17 e..l LA:=v�t ROSE\4O Phone to 12- cl¢, 9 122 MINNESOTA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ctwl c` u -e cc p teCt Sr' kJ-) 1/4 'v-o oP b -See( PLEASE COMMENT ON ANY ISSUES THE CITY SHOULD CONSIDER WHEN DESIGNING OR CONSTRUCTING THIS PROJECT? 1 "co v exv s tt) S i'Ve-c -t-- u IA d ,c; e. uc w► f vt 2 ,514 k a. .e e r/"v 1p o3 .a co 5 tS e c wt re pion a j aiAAA fit ctie6/7,-- �a� cM S •w k v""t v(61.0EC.4 t kit .14 (A &lry OW CC,- C` 0 CU L. d.P c� 'E wQ. tl Your Name J 4- IC7 V vl Address /0 s.s �ear� Phone 6.5 4 2 3 7 3 7 4 ROSEMOUNT MINNESOTA 2875 145th Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 Phone 651.322.2022 Fax 651.322.2694 CU() Rrzspi-- s INA 4 v,,,.,3-42. k por Project Description Project No. Designed By Date Task Description Checked By Date Page of Qa L P te.-. Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668 -93 APPENDIX G Figure 11— 2010 Crack Seal and Seal Coat Map 2010 Seal Coat Street Index MIMI ISM OM 1•1111 i11111 INN MI IMO Me NMI NS NM IIIIN INN z z m 0 CA rri 0 co a, z 0 v 8 CC ORADO AVE CIMAR,RON AVE ,w, CJM.ARRON AVE w RVSLER:. A: /C AMFI E LD CIR CHIPPE AVEct 1PPER' {49TH T Y ...Hip ':AVE CHILI AVE 0 o �dHEVELLE CT a 4 HARLESTON CHIANTI A 4 4 BOISE CIR 1,4A- AVE,* BURNLEY AVE BROUGHSHANE AVE' BOBTON CIR BRIANBORU AVE E f BREMEN AVE n BLANCA AVE F BISCAYNE AVE 81$C j 95CAYNE AVE__. 2 r CAMEO AVE SHANNON PKY F COBBLER AVE xCHllk AEf S p O y u 4 y 2 CANTATA. AVE W CAOSSGLENN RA 7' a: C CROSSCROFT AVEi fi F� /pp- Sr: re 6, °t3 eR r RWS BURGUNDY AVE y BUNDORAN AVE '.A BISCAYNE AVE SHANNON PKY <CRO SSSMOOR AVE m 41ALLL ■HAD LANE IR N A o x DERBY CT m �N SHANNON PKY in c F CRESTONE AVE 1 Q° o V/ m o D D0 m r DAMASK AVE W DAHOMEY AVE W LA IANNON PARKWAY SHANNON PKY DALLAR,', AVE W COVINGTON AVE r m G) m z v CRI. STVIEW:: AVE CRANI.i ALL AVE E O f- DAMASK AVE W F DALLARA AVE W4 0 8 Oy F SHANNON PKY m DA NDER rA0B9ftN R te: AKRON AVE'. DARWIN WAY DANBURY CT 0 0 0 DANNER PATH Seal Coat Street Index WSB Project: 2010 Street Improvement Project Design By: PO Project Location: City of Rosemount Checked By: JPK City Project No.: 428 WSB Project No: 1668 -93 Date: 12/15/2009 Street From 1 To I Length (Ft) I Area (Sq Ft) 2007 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Biscayne Way 145th Street Biscayne Avenue 1440 33128 Cambrian Avenue Lower 147th Street Cambrian Avenue 1289 42551 Camero Avenue Cambrian Avenue Cambrian Avenue 974 35064 Subtotal' 3,704 1 110,743 BONAIRE PATH Bonaire Path 'Akron I 10,511 I 132nd Court IBon a e Path 'Bonaire Path 823 20,303 Subtotal) 11,334 1 421,596 GLENDALOUGH 6TH ADDITION Carrach Avenue 200' E of Couchtown Court 200' E of Coachford Avenue 1088 27526 Coachford Avenue Carrach Avenue 300' N of Carrach Avenue 290 7926 Carrach Way Carrach Avenue Carrach Avenue 515 26077 Coachford Avenue Connemara Trail Carrach Avenue 705 17837 Coachford Way Coachford Avenue Coachford Avenue 1040 26312 Subtotal/ 3,638 1 105,678 CROSSCROFT 3RD ADDITION Claredowns Way Connemara Trail Crosscroft Place 165 4536 Crosscroft Place Cul -de -sac west 125' E of Crossmoor Avenue 875 25608 Crossmoor Avenue Crosscroft Place Crosscliffe Path 480 13228 Crosscliff Path Cul -de -sac west 170' E of Crossmoor Avenue 865 25612 Crossmoor Court Crossglenn Path Crossglenn Path 380 10066 Subtotal' 2,765 1 79,050 BACARDI TOWER DRIVEWAY Bacardi Tower Driveway 1Fire Station Driveway (Well 14 1 435 1 11,350 Subtotal) 435 1 11,350 Grand Totals 21,876 1 728,417 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Pavement Management Program Maintenance Project: Opinion of Probable Cost Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 APPENDIX H Opinion of Probable Cost WSB Project: 2010 Street Improvement Project Design By: PO Project Location: City of Rosemount Checked By: JPK City Project No.: 428 WSB Project No: 1668 -93 Date: 12/15/2009 Item No. MN/DOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost Pavement Management Program Maintenance Project 1 2356.604 BITUMINOUS SEAL COATING SQ FT 728,420 $0.14 $101,978.80 2 2358.505 CRACK FILLING STA 219 $80.00 $17,520.00 Subtotal Pavement Management Program Schedule Pavement Management Program Maintenance Maintenance Projects $119,498.80 5% Contingencies $6,000.00 Subtotal $125,500.00 5% Indirect Cost $6,300.00 Projects $131,800.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX I 2010 2014 Street Improvement Program Project Funding (CIP Fund) Feasibility Report 2010 Street Improvement Project City of Rosemount Project No. 428 WSB Project No. 1668-93 0 0 s 0 U 00 0 Lel O 0 6 8 O ON 0\ 00 69 69 O 0 0 00 65, co O 0 0 0 N 00 0 69 0 00 O s 69 0 69 8 O 0 0 N S 00 ON 69 O 00 0 69 0 0 0 O LYi 69 69 0 O 0 N N 0 N O O O N 0 On O 1 69 O 0 N kel 69 O O s O N 0 0 0 O '0 N 'A b 69 69 69 0 O O; N N 69 O O 0 00 00 69 O O 0\ trl M 'n O O 00 O N 00 69 0 0 M 0 'n N 69 0 0 0 0.4 O_ 69 0 O 0 NO 0 0 0; O, 06' O 69 0 v 00 '0 69 69 69 6 0 N G0 rr .■y O O O O O .N N.N N O O O O O 00 0 69 O O 0 0 O ON s 69 O O 0 O N N 69 0 kn O M 0 O O C 0 O 00 69 O 0 O O 00 69 O O 0 O 0 N Vl 69 O 0 O 0.4 0 69 0 O 'n U O 0 00 N d4