HomeMy WebLinkAbout9.a. Request by CF Industries for Planned Unit Development Concept Plan and 2030 Comprehensive Plan Designation Application, 08-44-CONAGENDA ITEM: Case 08-44 -CON Request by CF Industries
for a Planned Unit Development Concept
Plan and 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Designation Approval.
AGENDA SECTION:
New Business
PREPARED BY: Eric Zweber, Senior Planner
AGEN A NO.
a.
ATTACHMENTS: CF Industries Concept Plan; Planning
Commission Minutes dated December 23,
2008; Email from John Shardlow dated
December 22, 2008; City Engineer's
Memorandum dated December 17, 2008;
Draft 2030 Land Use Map and CF
Industries requested Change; Draft
Mississippi River Regional Trail Alignment
Map.
APPROVED BY:
tu
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a Resolution approving the Planned Unit
Development Concept Plan for CF Industries.
or
Motion to adopt a Resolution denying the Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for
CF Industries.
ROSEMOUNT
CITY COUNCIL
City Council Meeting Date: January 20, 2009
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ISSUE
CF Industries has submitted a Planned Unit Development Concept Plan (Concept Plan) describing
the future development of their facility. CF Industries has 370 acres of property along the
Mississippi River that contains their existing facilities, bluffs, native tree stands, and former farm and
pasture land. CF Industries' desire is for the Concept Plan to demonstrate how future development
of their site would expand onto the former farm and pasture land while protecting and improving
the bluff and native tree stands. CF Industries is requesting that 12 additional acres of former farm
and pasture land be added to the GI General Industrial land use designation of the 2030
Comprehensive Plan to allow for the future expansion shown in the Concept Plan. The request to
guide the 12 acres to GI General Industrial will be addressed by the Planning Commission and the
City Council during the review of the public comment received for the draft 2030 Comprehensive
Plan.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION
The City Council discussed CF Industries' desire to expand their facility along the Mississippi River
during their January 14 Worksession. It was discussed that the Concept Plan was prepared first to
support CF Industries desire to have an additional 12 acres of land designated General Industrial in
the 203 Comprehensive Plan and second to provided the City some measure of legal control to limit
the possibility of expanded industrial use to only that needed by CF Industries. Council members
expressed their concern about protecting the natural resources along the River, as well as providing a
suitable buffer between CF Industries and Spring Lake Regional Park Reserve. Additionally, it was
described how the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan General Industrial designation was determined
by the bluffline and bluff setback to the north and the Rural Open Space Mississippi River Corridor
Critical Area designation to the east.
Scott Dohmen, representing CF Industries, attended the work session and stated that there is no
timeline for future construction. Some Council members indicated that the request is premature
when there is no timeline for expansion. The concern is that circumstances may change by the time
construction would occur and the Council at that time may not want the expansion in the manner
proposed. From a regulatory perspective, the City is in the best position to control the land use and
development of the site if the property remains guided as Agriculture. Under the PUD, the City
continues to maintain some control but the property owners also benefit from some surety of future
expansion potential. How the Council approaches this decision is more a policy decision than a
planning decision typically based upon ordinance standards.
Due to this discussion, staff has prepared two resolutions for the City Council to consider. The first
is a resolution approving the Concept Plan with 16 conditions that the Planning Commission
recommended. The second is a resolution denying the Concept Plan with findings of fact that the
application is premature, expansion of their facility can occur without currently re- guiding
additional property to General Industrial, and the importance to preserve, protect, and buffer the
bluffs and Spring Lake Regional Park Reserve. The City Council may choose the appropriate
resolution based on their discussions and majority vote.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
John Shardlow, CF Industries' Planning Consultant, submitted an e-mail to the Planning
Commission containing six concerns with the recommended conditions of approval. Of his six
concerns, only the concern of truck traffic and staging on Pine Bend Trail was discussed at length by
the Planning Commission. The proposed conditions stated that CF Industries must quit staging
trucks on Pine Bend Trail today and must construct additional staging areas interior to the site when
any additional warehousing is constructed. CF Industries stated that due to regulations regarding
homeland security, their gates must remain locked until they open at 6 am. This sometimes results
in semi trucks staging along Pine Bend Trail before 6 am. The Police Department stated that they
have received only one complaint in the last ten years regarding semi trucks staging on Pine Bend
Trail. Since there does not appear to be a major concern with the current CF Industries operation,
the Planning Commission removed the requirement to quit staging trucks on Pine Bend Trail today,
but maintained the condition that additional internal staging areas be constructed with additional
warehouse space in the future.
During the public hearing, one resident spoke regarding the CF Industries proposal. Joseph
Simones, 13272 Pine Bend Trail, stated that the proposed expansion of CF Industries would occur
directly across the street from his residence and that would change his view from the currently open
field to large warehouses. Mr. Simones also stated that if CF Industries is allowed to expand his
industrial business, then his land should be planned for industrial as well. Staff reviewed the
planning for the area. The 42 -52 Plan has Mr. Simones' land guided for CC- Corporate Campus, but
the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan has his land designated remain in its current designation: AG-
Agricultural. The major reasons that Mr. Simones' land has not changed designation in the 2030
2
Comprehensive Plan is because sewer and water will not be available until after the land to the south
and west has been developed, which is not expected to occur before 2030.
BACKGROUND
Applicant and property owner: Scott Dohmen of CF Industries
Location: 5300 Pine Bend Trail
Area in acres: 370 Acres
Zoning district: HI Heavy Industrial (developed areas)
GI General Industrial (undeveloped areas)
FP Floodplain (within the 100 year floodplain)
Draft 2030 Comp Plan designation: GI General Industrial (developed area and south of the
bluff and farther than 1,320 feet from Spring Lake Park Reserve)
AG Agricultural (undevelopable areas)
Nature of request: Add approximately 12 acres of land to the GI designation
SUMMARY
CF Industries (CFI) has operated a fertilizer warehouse and transfer facility along the Mississippi River
at 5300 Pine Bend Trail for over 40 years. CFI owns approximately 370 acres of land that is bounded
by Flint Hills refinery property to the west, Dakota County's Spring Lake Regional Park Reserve to the
east, the Mississippi River to the north, and Pine Bend Trail to the south. The facility currently has
two operations, a liquid fertilizer operation on the west side of the facility that stores and transfers
ammonia and urea fertilizer products, and a solid fertilizer operation on the east side of the facility that
stores and transfers nitrogen and phosphorus based dry fertilizers. The liquid and solid operations
each have their own barge terminal, railroad spur, and access onto Pine Bend Trail. The facility has
fertilizer arriving via barge and train car and ships out fertilizers via train cars and semi trailers. The
busiest times of the year for the facility are in the spring and lesser so in the fall, but activities occur
year round.
CFI has been involved in the creation of the 2030 Comprehensive (Comp) Plan since the beginning
of the process and has submitted written requests for the entirety of their property to be designated
GI General Industrial. The request would allow for the rezoning of the property to HI Heavy
Industrial to permit expansion of their facilities in the future. Staff has been reluctant to do this for
two reasons. First, much of the land under CFI ownership is environmentally sensitive, with lands
being designated as floodplain, protected as part of the Mississippi River bluff, or native tree stands.
Many of these lands are protected by City Ordinance and all these lands are not suitable for
development. Second, the City does not desire the expansion of the number of industrial uses along
the river or the number of heavy industrial businesses. If the City were to simply re- designate the
CFI property without some legal commitment to the limits of the development the property, then
CFI could sell the property to another business and expand the number of businesses along the
river. CFI has submitted the proposed Concept Plan to attempt to address both of these concerns.
Natural Resources
The Concept Plan displays the floodplain and bluffs on Figure 6: Summary Analysis Map and the
native trees stands on Figure 7: Natural Resources Map. The floodplain is shown in blue on Figure
6 and is the area that would be inundated by the 100 year flood and is regulated by City Code
Section 11 -4 -19 FP Floodplain zoning district. The FP zoning district restricts development
within the floodplain to water orientated uses, such as barge terminals of boat slips, or uses that can
be intermittently inundated, such as parks or golf courses.
3
The bluff areas are shown in orange on Figure 6. The bluff areas are regulated by City Code Section
11 -7 -4 Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Overlay District and the Executive Order
that created the MRCCA in 1974. The MRCCA regulations have two general purposes, to protected
and prevent the degradation of the bluff and to preserve the scenic views from the Mississippi River.
The MRCCA has a number of different designations including two within Rosemount, the Urban
Diversified district (the more developed district) and the Rural Open Space district (the more rural
district). To protect the bluffs, the MRCCA requires a 40 foot setback from the bluff in the Urban
Diversified district and a 100 foot setback from the bluff in the Rural Open Space district. The
setbacks from the bluff are both meant to protect the bluffs from development and to reduce the
amount of development that is visible from the river itself.
In addition to the setbacks and the scenic views, the Executive Order and the City Code addresses
the uses in allowed within the MRCCA. The Executive Order allows commercial and industrial uses
in both the Urban Diversified and the Rural Open Space districts, while the City Code allows
commercial and industrial uses in the Urban Diversified district, but not in the Rural Open Space
district. The MRCCA Executive Order allows local governments to be more restrictive than the
Executive Order, so the City Code prohibition of commercial and industrial uses prevails. CFI is
requesting a waiver from this code requirement to allow industrial uses in the Rural Open Space
district as shown in Figure 9: Phasing Concept Map.
Figure 7 shows the tree stands within areas that would be affected by the proposed development.
The tree stands are described as three different areas, Area 1, Area 2, and Area 3. Area 1 is a stand
of native oak forest that is similar to oak forest existing on the bluff and the river bottom. Area 2 is
remnant tree stand remaining from when the area was farm and pasture land. It has some of the
same tree species as Area 1, but is less dense, has more invasive species, and has suffered damage
due to wind and past disturbances. Area 3 is vegetation that has established itself on a pile of former
dredge spoils when the liquid and solid barge terminals were created. The Area 3 vegetation is
dominated by pioneering species and species that prefer wet soils, such as cottonwood and aspen.
Dredge spoils continue to be deposited in Area 3 as the barge terminals are maintained.
The management of these tree stands is described in Appendix A of the Concept Plan. The
Concept Plan proposed to remove Area 2 for the future expansion of the CFI facility and protect,
enhance, and expand Area 1 and the other areas of oak forest to compensate for the removal of
Area 2. Area 3 will be impacted by the future deposits of dredge spoils, but will continue to
revegetate over the spoils with time.
Staff can support the proposed natural area management plan with a number of conditions:
1. A conservation easement is created over Area 1 and oak forest north and east of the red line
shown on Figure 7 and is a minimum of 500 feet wide from the property boundary with
Spring Lake Regional Park Reserve.
2. Commencement of the natural area management plan as described in Appendix A by
December 31, 2009.
3. Any tree removal shall meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance as
adopted at the time of the tree removal.
4. Any new dredge spoils that are deposited shall meet the bluff setback standards and shall be
vegetated immediately to prevent erosion or damage to the bluffs.
4
Conservation Easement
The City has a generic conservation easement that was created for the preservation of wetlands and
staff has forwarded this easement to CF industries as an example of the easement we are looking
for. CF Industries has review the easement document and has some concerns about language they
feel does not apply to the CF Industries. John Shardlow, representing CF Industries, has
communicated the concerns that they have that can be summarised into three issues:
1. Unlimited access to the site.
2. Prohibition of removing vegetation.
3. Prohibition of use as stormwater management.
Staff believes that the first two issues can be resolved amicably. Staff would support reasonable
limitation to access of the site for inspection, such as a minimum of 48 hour notice and having a
company escort while on the site. Staff can also support the allowance of limited vegetation
removal, such as buckthorn, honeysuckle, or invasives, as described and limited to those described
in Appendix A of the Concept Plan. Staff is less comfortable with the stormwater management
occurring within the conservation easement.
Staff's concern about stormwater management is because staff is unaware of an accepted stormwater
management method that would not damage the bluff or trees, both areas that are protected by the
conservation easement. The bluffs can be damaged by the stormwater management methods
because there is a risk of causing erosion either during construction of the method or when water
passes through. Trees are also a concern because staff is unaware of any stormwater management
method that would not require removal of trees during its construction or could cause damage to
the tree when inundated by stormwater. Staff is not supportive of changing the language of the
conservation easement in a way that allows stormwater management within the oak forest or. on the
bluffs or require bluff setback.
In talking with CF Industries, their concern is that placing an conservation easement over the entire
area north and east of the red line as shown on Figure 7 would encumber some land that does not
contain oak forest or bluffs. CF Industries has identified some areas below the bluff and east of the
road that accesses the barge terminal that is open and may be appropriate for stormwater
management. Staff is willing to work with CF Industries to prepare a description for the
conservation easement that does not include these areas but does preserve all the areas with oak
forest, bluffs, and bluff setbacks. Scott Dohmen stated that this will accomplish CF Industries
desires while not changing the language of the conservation easement.
Land Use
The proposed expansion of the CFI facility is illustrated on Figure 8: Proposed Concept Map,
Figure 9: Phased Concept Map, and Figure 10 of the Concept Plan. There are two elements to the
proposed expansion of the liquid operation, a future office building and an area for future storage
tanks. Both elements are depicted to be placed closer to Pine Bend Trail than the existing facilities.
The liquid facility is within the GI General Industrial land use designation and HI Heavy
Industrial zoning district which allows CFI to submit a site plan application for these elements
without the need of rezoning or a Comp Plan modification. Any liquid facility expansion would
need to meet all City Code requirements including, but not limited to, building materials, buffering
and screening, setbacks, and stormwater management.
5
The proposed expansions to the solid fertilizer operation are more extensive than the liquid
operation. The proposed expansion includes the expansion of the sea wall at the barge facility to
include a third off loading area, seven new warehouses in four phases, and conveyor systems and
railroad spurs to serve the warehouses. Staff had inquired if additional warehouses could be built in
the middle of or to the west of the existing warehouses. CFI stated that the area to the west of the
warehouses is used for truck staging (which can be significant during their busy season) and that the
area in the middle of their warehouses is the locomotive shop and maintenance facility for rail cars.
These areas are needed to ensure that CFI is not staging trucks and rail cars within the Pine Bend
Trail right -of -way, which the police department has verified has occurred in the past.
The proposed solid operation expansion would require changes to the Comp Plan designation and
rezoning in addition to site plan review. Currently, the draft 2030 Comp Plan has the existing
facility, Phase 1, Phase 2, and the western 2/3 of Phase 3 designated as GI General Industrial,
while the eastern 1/3 of Phase 3 and all of Phase 4 are designated AG Agricultural. The AG
Agricultural designation would prohibit the construction and development as proposed in the
Concept Plan.
The current zoning for the existing facility and the western half of Phase 1 is HI Heavy Industrial,
while the remaining portion of the facility is either FP Floodplain or GI General Industrial.
Staff intends to rezone the GI General Industrial zoned land to AG Agriculture after the
adoption of the Comp Plan to provide consistency with the Comp Plan. The phased expansion of
the CFI facility would require the approval of Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan
that further defines the development and the approval of the rezoning to HI PUD Heavy
Industrial Planned Unit Development. These approvals will only be considered in areas that have
the Comp Plan designation of GI General Industrial and that follows the phasing plan shown in
Figure 9. The decision of the Planning Commission and the City Council of CFI's request for the
12 additional acres of GI General Industrial land use designation will determine if it is possible for
CFI to develop the east 1/3 of Phase 3 and all of Phase 4.
The Planning Commission has recommended the approval of the Concept Plan with the 16
conditions provided in the resolution. These conditions include the expectation that the stormwater
system will likely be larger than that shown on the plan, that the new warehouses would need to
meet all the code standards (unlike the existing building that do not meet the building material
standards), and berming and landscaping would occur between the proposed warehouses and Pine
Bend Trail. These conditions may result in a reduction in the size or the number of warehouses that
could be constructed.
Pine Bend Trail and Recreational Trail Corridors
The CFI facility is located adjacent to Pine Bend Trail which is classified as a Minor Collector street.
Currently, parts of Pine Bend Trail are paved and portions are gravel, with approximately 66 feet of
right -of -way, and lacks turn lanes or shoulders. With future reconstruction, Pine Bend Trail will be
upgraded to Minor Collector standards including 100 feet of right -of -way with paved shoulder and
turn lanes at intersection and accesses to major facilities, such as CFI. CFI shall incorporate this
road design and right -of -way width into there plans to accommodate this future street
reconstruction.
6
Dakota County is currently planning the alignment of the Mississippi River Regional Trail corridor
through Rosemount, which will eventually connect Downtown St. Paul to Hastings. The preferred
alignment is on the north side of Pine Bend Trail to the rail spur crossing for the CFI liquid facility,
then running on the south side of Pine Bend Trail. An alternative alignment runs entirely on the
north side of Pine Bend Trail, adjacent to the CFI facility. Rosemount has plans for our Interpretive
Trail corridor to run from Downtown Rosemount to the Mississippi River Regional Trail, with the
connection of the two trails somewhere in the area of CFI. CFI has been working with Dakota
County and the City on these trail alignments and a condition within the proposed motion requires
CFI to continue to work on the alignments.
Next Steps
The Planning Commission and City Council with consider the addition of the 12
acres into the GI General Industrial zoning district during the review of the public
comments to the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan.
During the rezoning of the City following the adoption of the 2030 Comprehensive
Plan, all of the CF Industries owned land that is currently zoned GI- General Industrial will
be rezoned to AG- Agricultural. To construct the phased development shown in this
Concept Plan, CF Industries will need to apply for a rezoning to HI Heavy Industrial,
Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan, and Planned Unit Development
Final Site and Building Plan when construction is imminent. Any future rezoning would be
review and considered in light of the adopted Comprehensive Plan land use designation, the
conditions within this Concept Plan, and the approval and recording of a Planned Unit
Development Master Development Plan agreement.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Plan
with the 16 conditions.
7
VIORE
Location Map
Figure 1
K:125751257507001 \Graphics \Location.ai
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2009-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
CONCEPT PLAN FOR CF INDUSTRIES
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount has received an
application for Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Plan approval for CF Industries located
at 5300 Pine Bend Trail; and
WHEREAS, on December 23, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed
the PUD Concept Plan for CF Industries; and
WHEREAS, on December 23, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount
conducted a public hearing for review of the PUD Concept Plan as required by Ordinance B, the
Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend that the City Council
approve the PUD Concept Plan subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on January 20, 2009, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the
Planning Commission's recommendations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the PUD Concept Plan for CF Industries, subject to the following conditions:
1. A Planned Unit Development Plan Master Development Plan, Planned Unit Development
Final Site and Building Plan, and Rezoning will be required before any facility expansion to
the east is permitted.
2. The Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan and Rezoning will include a
deviation from Code Section 11 -7 -4 E.2.a. to allow industrial uses in the Rural Open Space
district limited to the area shown in Phase 3 and Phase 4 of Phasing Concept Map Figure 9.
3. Approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Plan does not permit any deviation to
the GI- General Industrial or Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Overlay Districts
beyond that described in Condition 2.
4. A Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan and Rezoning will only be
considered by the City when needed, as depicted on the Phasing Concept Map Figure 9. No
rezoning shall occur more than 9 months in advance of a construction project.
5. CF Industries will work with the City and Dakota County to site the Mississippi River
Regional Trail and the Interpretive Trail Corridor.
RESOLUTION 2009
6. A minimum of 500 feet wide buffer shall be provided between any building, structure,
parking or loading area and the eastern property boundary, adjacent to Spring Lake Regional
Park Reserve.
7. A conservation easement shall be placed over the bluff, bluff setback, and vegetated areas
located north and east of the proposed spur as shown on the Proposed Concept Map Figure
8 by December 31, 2009.
8. Any removal of trees to accommodate the development as shown on the Proposed Concept
Map Figure 8 shall include tree replacement as described in the adopted Tree Replacement
Ordinance at the time of tree removal.
9. The implementation of the natural area management plan as described in Appendix A shall
commence by December 31, 2009.
10. The stormwater infrastructure shown on the plan is inadequate to accommodate the
proposed expansions. No waiver from the stormwater management rules in place at the
time of expansion are granted as a part of this Concept Plan. The area of the proposed
expansion may need to decrease to accommodate the stormwater infrastructure that is
required to meet City standards.
11. Pine Bend Trail is designated as a Minor Collector road within the 2030 Comprehensive
Plan. Any development within CF Industries shall include the preservation of the 100 feet
right -of -way width to allow the reconstruction of Pine Bend Trail into a Minor Collector
road.
12. The development of the additional warehouse may need to include additional rail car and
semi trailer staging areas to prevent the parking or staging of rail cars or semis within the
Pine Bend Trail right -of -way.
13. The applicant shall add berming and landscaping to buffer the future buildings from the
Pine Bend Trail right -of -way.
14. The existing buildings at CF Industries do not meet the building material standards within
the HI Heavy Industrial zoning district. This Concept Plan approval does not waive
required building standards and the future buildings will need to meet the adopted zoning
and building standards at the time of construction.
15. The dredge spoils deposited in Area 3 shall not infringe into the bluff or bluff setback area
and must be vegetated after new spoils are deposited to prevent erosion and damage or
filling of bluff.
16. Compliance with the Engineering Memorandum dated December 17, 2008.
2
RESOLUTION 2009
ADOPTED this 20th day of January, 2009 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
ATTEST:
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
William H. Droste, Mayor
Motion by: Second by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Member absent
3
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2009-
A RESOLUTION DENYING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN
FOR CF INDUSTRIES
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount has received an
application for Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Plan approval for CF Industries located
at 5300 Pine Bend Trail; and
WHEREAS, on December 23, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed
the PUD Concept Plan for CF Industries; and
WHEREAS, on December 23, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount
conducted a public hearing for review of the PUD Concept Plan as required by Ordinance B, the
Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend that the City Council
approve the PUD Concept Plan subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on January 20, 2009, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the
Planning Commission's recommendations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
denies the PUD Concept Plan for CF Industries, based on the following Findings of Fact:
1. The application is premature because there is no projected timeline for construction of
the facility expansion. CF Industries has testified that they have no plans to expand the
facility at this time.
2. CF Industries can expand their facility without the approval of the Concept Plan. Phase
1 and Phase 2 of the Concept Plan are designated General Industrial within the draft
2030 Comprehensive Plan which would allow the construction of an additional 3
warehouse buildings.
3. The City values its natural resources and regulates their preservation through the
Floodplain, Mississippi River Critical Corridor Area, Tree Preservation, and other
applicable Ordinances. The vagueness of the Concept Plan and unknown timeline of
construction do not provide the detail necessary to ensure that the bluffs and Spring
Lake Regional Park Reserve will receive the proper buffering and preservation.
ADOPTED this 20th day of January, 2009 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
William H. Droste, Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
RESOLUTION 2009
Motion by: Second by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Member absent:
2
Planned Unit Development
Proposal
CF Industries
Rosemount, Minnesota
November 2008
NOV f)
jT Bonestroo
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION 1
City ofRosemount's Objectives 1
CF Industries Objectives 2
BACKGROUND 3
Description of CF Industries 3
Existing Conditions 3
Land Use Designations, Rosemount Comprehensive Plan 4
Zoning 4
Mississippi River Critical Area and Mississippi National River and Recreation Area
(MNRRA) Corridor 4
Summary of Natural Features and Conditions 5
Bluff Line Protection 6
Natural Resource Inventory Assessment 6
Areal 6
Area 2 7
Area 3 7
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN 7
Phasing of Expansion 8
Mississippi River Critical Area (CA) and MNRRA Compliance 8
Summary and Conclusion 9
APPENDIX A: NATURAL AREAS MANAGEMENT 10
General Comments 10
Summary of Proposed Restoration Activities 10
Oak Woodland Restoration 10
Mixed Woodland Restoration 11
Open (old field) Areas 12
CF Industries Natural Areas Restoration Management Summary 13
FIGURES
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
C.F. INDUSTRIES. ROSEMOUNT. MN
Location Map
Existing Operations Map
Proposed 2030 Land Use Map
Zoning Map
Critical Area Map
Summary of Analysis Map
Natural Resource Map
Proposed Concept Maps
Phasing Concept Map
Section A Section B
IN PRODUCTION
CF Industries (CFI) has closely monitored the City of Rosemount's comprehensive
planning process and has actively participated at every opportunity. CFI has appreciated
the open and candid sharing of information that has occurred throughout this process and
the willingness of community elected, appointed and staff leaders to visit CFI's campus
and to understand its concerns.
After numerous meetings and conversations, CFI and the City of Rosemount have
reached a mutual understanding of their respective interests and objectives. Both parties
have agreed that a Planned Unit Development (PUD) will provide the best opportunity to
memorialize this understanding and ensure that there is a clear and abiding record of the
opportunities and constraints associated with the future use of the CFI site.
It is also understood and must be remembered that this will not be a typical application of
PUD zoning. That is because CFI does not currently have any specific plans for the
expansion of its corporate campus. Therefore, it is unnecessary to invest significant
amounts of money and time necessary to prepare the detailed planning and engineering
documents and plans typically required as part of a PUD application. Such plans and
materials would almost certainly need to be completely redone in response to CFI's
specific future expansion plans.
The objective of this PUD process is to produce, refine and ultimately agree on
conceptual plans that can support the preparation of either an agreement, or a
memorandum of understanding that will memorialize the mutual understanding about the
type of future development allowed on the CFI site, including, its general location within
the site, as well as areas that are off limits to development. In exchange for Rosemount's
commitment to allow future development, as defined by the agreement, CFI will commit
to permanently conserve and actively restore specific open space areas and natural
resource systems. Ultimately, the purpose of this PUD process is to (a) allow CFI
flexibility in developing its site to expand its future operations, and (b) preserve the
desirable site characteristics and open space and to protect sensitive environmental
features such as the bluffs, tree stands, the flood plain and the Mississippi River.
City of Rosemount's Objectives
In addition to being a tool that is designed to provide flexibility, PUDs also present a
process that facilitates negotiation between property owners and local governments. One
of the first steps in any is to understand the interests and objectives of each
party. The following paragraphs contain a summary of the City of Rosemount's position
as it is currently understood by CFI. The PUD review and approval process may modify
this understanding.
Rosemount contains a number of very large, heavy industrial businesses in the Pine Bend
Industrial area. These include the Flint Hills Resources Refinery and the Pine Bend
Landfill among others. Rosemount accepts the existence of these major businesses and is
C.F. INDUSTRIES ROSEMOUNT, MN
1
committed to working to ensure positive working relationships with all of its businesses
that provide livable -wage jobs to local residents and that help build the overall wealth of
the community. The City does not, however, desire the addition of new heavy industrial
businesses in the area. Therefore, the City has been reluctant to simply amend the
comprehensive plan and rezone all of the CFI site HI Heavy Industrial.
The City does recognize CFI as a good corporate citizen and would like to support
reasonable future expansion, provided that it is consistent with the goals and policies
contained within the Comprehensive Plan, the Mississippi River Critical Area Plan (CA)
and the. Mississippi National River Recreation Area (MNRRA) plans. At a basic level,
this means that any expansion of CFI facilities into the Rural Open Space District must
be low intensity uses. Furthermore, the PUD process should facilitate permanent
buffering of the Spring Lake Regional Park and the conservation of natural resource
systems.
The City also needs to reconcile the current disparity between the 2030 Land Use Plan
and the Official Zoning Map. The successful completion of this PUD process will
accomplish that objective.
CF Industries Objectives
CFI has made an enormous investment in its Rosemount facilities. The demand for the
products that it distributes has never been greater. The continued pressure on agricultural
production for food and alternative energy promises to increase the importance of CFI's
role in the economy of the Upper Midwest and beyond.
CFI owns a large parcel of land that is strategically located, with excellent river, rail and
highway transport service. These features combine to afford CFI the capacity to expand
its operations in the future, although there are no specific plans at this time.
CFI also recognizes and respects the unique location of its site in the context of the
Mississippi River Corridor. Long before there were any rules requiring sensitivity to the
bluff line, or other natural resource systems, CFI set its facilities back from the bluff and
have no intention of disturbing either the bluff area, or the shoreline or floodplain
portions of the site. To the contrary, the only future expansion contemplated by CFI is for
low intensity storage uses, within the existing shelf, between the railroad tracks and the
bluff line. Along with gaining the rights to this future expansion, CFI is willing to
permanently conserve and restore the higher valued wooded areas adjacent to Spring
Lake Park, implement alternative stormwater treatment systems and work to eradicate
invasive species throughout the site.
C.F. INDUSTRIES ROSEMOUNT, MN 2
C.F. INDUSTRIES ROSEMOUNT, MN
BACKGROUND
The following sections contain a summary of relevant background information.
Additional information is available upon request.
Description of CF Industries
CFI owns the 367.69 acre site, located between Pine Bend Trail and the Mississippi River
Corridor (See Figure 1). This location places CF Industries at the northeastern edge of the
Pine Bend Industrial Area. To the north is the Mississippi River. To the east is the Spring
Lake Regional Park. To the south is some agricultural/resident property as well as
additional heavy industrial uses, including the Pine Bend Landfill. To the west is the
Flint Hills Resources refinery. CFI has owned and operated this site since 1965.
CFI is one of the largest distributors of fertilizer products in North America. From its
location in Rosemount, CFI, distributes products to agricultural customers throughout the
Midwest and as far away as Montana. The products handled include the following:
Anhydrous Ammonia
Urea
UAN (urea ammonia nitrate)
GTSP (granular triple super phosphate)
DAP (diammonium phosphate)
MAP (Mono- Ammonium Phosphate)
Potash
Ammonia Polyphosphate
The Pine Bend facility receives shipments of liquid and granular fertilizers by rail and by
barge and transships fertilizer to customers via rail and truck. Therefore, the activities on
the site consist of off loading facilities for barges and trains, the storage of product prior
to distribution and then the loading of products on to train cars and trucks for delivery to
customers.
Existing Conditions
Figure 2 is an aerial photograph of the CFI site and the immediate surroundings. As
Figure 2 clearly illustrates, the bulk of CFI's activities are focused around a central hub.
This is the point where the most intensive site activities occur. The majority of the
product that is shipped to the site is either conveyed from barges via a conveyor belt
system, or arrives on rail cars to be loaded into storage facilities here. Figure 2 also shows
each of the points at which rail cars and trucks are either unloaded or loaded.
To the west of the central hub are three large liquid storage facilities. The two white tanks
contain anhydrous ammonia. The darker tank contains Urea Ammonia Nitrate (UAN).
Figure 2 also shows that there is another rail and truck loading facility in this western
section of the site.
3
Also illustrated on Figure 2 is the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES)
easement for the Empire waste water treatment plant outfall. This is a significant regional
facility that effectively divides the CFI campus, separating the liquid storage area to the
west and the remainder of the dry storage, loading and unloading facilities and office
functions to the east.
Land Use Designations, Rosemount Comprehensive Plan
Figure 3 shows the proposed 2030 Land Use Comp Plan for the City of Rosemount. The
CFI site is delineated in black and labeled "Site Figure 3 illustrates that the CFI site
contains two different land use designations. The bulk of the currently developed portion
of the site is shown in grey, which corresponds to the GI- General Industrial designation.
Portions of the site along the Mississippi River and on the east side adjacent to the
regional park are shown in light green, which corresponds to AG- Agriculture
designation.
Zoning
Figure 4 is the Official Zoning Map for the City of Rosemount. The CFI site is again
delineated in black and labeled Site. Figure 4 illustrates that the CFI site currently
contains three different zoning designations (in addition to W- Water). They are HI-Heavy
Industrial, GI- General Industrial and FP -Flood Plain.
There is currently an inconsistency between the Land Use Comp Plan and the Official
Zoning Map for the eastern portion of the site. This area is designated AG- Agriculture on
the Land Use Comp Plan and is zoned GI- General Industrial on the Official Zoning Map.
One of the purposes of the PUD process is to reconcile the discrepancy between the Land
Use Comp Plan and the Official Zoning Map.
Mississippi River Critical Area and Mississippi National River and Recreation Area
(MNRRA) Corridor
In addition to the Rosemount Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan and standard zoning
districts affecting the future use of the CFI site, the site is also located in, a portion of the
Mississippi River Critical Area (CA) and Mississippi National River recreation Area
(MNRRA) Corridor that runs through Rosemount. Figure 5 illustrates the location of both
the CA and MNRRA corridor and the CFI site.
The CA program was established in 1976 by the State of Minnesota and is currently
administered by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The CA was
established by executive order, which established both an external boundary and internal
district boundaries (e.g. rural open space, urban diversified, etc.).
C.F. INDUSTRIES ROSEMOUNT, MN 4
The MNRRA is a federally designated unit of the National Park Service and was
established in 1988. MNRRA established the same external boundaries as the CA, but it
contains no internal districts.
When the CA was established, the Metropolitan Council provided maps, guidelines and
standards to each of the local governmental units that contained portions of the corridor.
Each of these cities was then required to incorporate this corridor and its objectives into
their comprehensive plans and prepare and adopt local ordinances and other official
controls to implement the program.
The internal district designations within the CA were largely selected in response to
existing conditions in 1976. It is notable that the Executive Order establishing the CA did
not contain any process or guidance for modifying either the external boundary, or the
internal district boundaries.
Figure 5 shows that the CFI site is primarily within the Urban Diversified District, but
approximately 52 acres of the eastern -most section of the site is within the Rural Open
Space District. While this represents only 14 percent of the CFI site, it is an important
issue. It will be essential to fully understand the purpose and intent of both the CA and
the MNRRA and to be able to demonstrate that this proposed Planned Unit Development
(PUD) can fully support these broad public objectives, while allowing CFI to continue to
make reasonable use of the site.
Summary of Natural Features and Conditions
There are many specific provisions of the Mississippi River Critical Act (CA) that may
need to be analyzed and discussed, but there are some overarching principles that must be
understood first. Executive Order 79-19 was issued by then- Governor Wendell Anderson.
It is important to acknowledge that the CA recognizes that the 80 mile stretch of the
Mississippi River through the Seven County Metropolitan Area is a working river. The
CA seeks to conserve and protect the natural resources and scenic character of the river
corridor, but it also supports the continuation of the commercial and cultural uses of the
river and its navigation for both recreational and commercial purposes.
Additionally, it is important to note that CFI predated the Critical Areas Act of 1973 and
Executive Order 79 -19. CFI has, therefore, been a river transport dependent business of
national significance, for over 40 years. If one analyzes the entire 80 mile CA one will
see that in the vast majority of instances both the external boundaries and the internal
district boundaries tend to follow property lines, section lines, or major roads. It is
unusual to split an individual property with either external boundaries, or internal district
boundaries. That was done intentionally to avoid situations in which individual land
owners would be faced with different standards on their property.
What is important to understand and focus on with this PUD is the need to facilitate an
effective transition between the Urban Diversified District and the Rural Open Space
C.F. INDUSTRIES ROSEMOUNT, MN 5
District. The PUD provides an excellent tool to ensure that transition is accomplished and
is permanently implemented.
Bluff Line Protection
One of the primary features that the CA sought to protect was the bluff line. Much of the
attention is focused on setbacks from the bluff to avoid the encroachment of development
and the disruption of the natural scenic character of the bluffs The public purpose in
protecting bluff lines from encroachment is to maintain a natural view from the water.
"Bluff Line" is defined as the line delineating the top of a slope connecting the points at
which the slope becomes less than eighteen percent (18
Figure 6 shows the location of the bluff line as it meanders through the CFI site. The key
on Figure 6 also identifies the 40 ft. setback from the bluff line in the Urban Diversified
District and the 100 ft, setback from the Rural Open Space District.
What is important to understand in reviewing Figure 6 is that the existing development of
the CFI site is setback from the bluff line and sits on a shelf. With the exception of the
two places where barges are unloaded and a dredge spoil disposal site, the view from the
river to the overwhelming majority of the CFI site is of natural wooded open space. In
summary, the existing development of the CFI site is consistent with the bluff line
protection and scenic character objectives of the CA.
Natural Resource Inventory Assessment
Environmental stewardship is one of the primary objectives of the CA. The PUD process
provides a means by which the City of Rosemount and CFI can ensure a higher level of
environmental stewardship than could be guaranteed through conventional zoning.
Figure 7 contains both a graphic summary of the general land coverr categories, as they
are depicted in the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS). It also shows
the findings of a more detailed field inventory and assessment conducted on the eastern
portion of the site. This includes the land that is within the Rural Open Space district.
Area 1
Area 1 is the wooded area that is adjacent to Spring Lake Regional Park. This is the
highest quality forest on the site, although it is only identified as a Moderate Condition
Natural Community (Qualitative Ranking C). It has been classified Oak Forest, but in
addition to Northern Pin Oak, it also contains Hackberry, Black Cherry, Green Ash,
Boxelder and American Elm.
The understory in this area contains Tatarian Honeysuckle and Buckthorn with some
Gooseberry. This wooded area is an excellent candidate for restoration, starting with the
removal of invasive species. Once the invasive species have been removed, the forest can
C.F. INDUSTRIES ROSEMOUNT. MN 6
be restored with the planting of native hardwood species, including Red Oak, Bur Oak,
Indian Grass, Satin Grass and Brown Eyed Susan.
Area 2
This area would be affected by the proposed future expansion. According to the natural
resource specialist who completed the inventory and assessment, Area 2 is classified as
an "Altered/Non- native Deciduous Forest" according to the guidelines of Minnesota
Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS). For a general description of this plant
assemblage type, please refer to the MLCCS Manual, V. 5.4, which can be accessed on
the MN DNR's website at: http:// www. dnr .state.mn.us/mlccs /index.html. Dominant trees
in this area include boxelder, green ash, elm, cottonwood, Siberian elm, and to a lesser
degree, other pioneering tree species. This assemblage of pioneering/opportunistic
species does fit with any of the native plant community types described by the MN DNR
in their Key to Native Plant Communities (which is part of MLCCS). There is evidence
of wind damage throughout the area and the shrub layer is dominated by nonnative,
invasive species, including Tatarian Honeysuckle and European buckthorn. The ground
layer in this area is dominated by the nonnatives motherwort (Leonurus cardiaca) and
stinging nettle (Urtica dioica). Native ground layer species are less common and include
the early successional/weedy native forbs honewort (Cryptotaenia canadensis), white
snakeroot (Eupatorium rugosum), and others.
Area 3
Area 3 contains many of the same characteristics as Area 2, except for tree species
associated with lower ground, like Cotton Wood and Trembling Aspen. This area is an
excellent candidate for restoration in close proximity to the river's edge.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN
The Proposed Concept Plan for the CFI site is shown on Figure 8. This concept calls for
the shelf located between the railroad tracks and the bluff line to be improved over time
with the addition of potential storage uses. These are the least intensive uses within the
CFI site. Moreover, this concept is desirable because it efficiently clusters the potential
improvements in a central location —thus preserving the maximum amount of open
space. Storage uses are also allowed uses within the Agricultural District, which
corresponds to the current Land Use Plan designation for this area.
It is important to note that these are not actual proposed buildings. They are shown to
illustrate the geographic area that could be developed in the future, as well as the
substantial portions of the site that will be conserved as open space.
The Natural Resource Inventory and Assessment revealed that this area adjacent to
Spring Lake Park Reserve is the highest valued Oak Forest on the upper portions of the
CFI site. The Concept Plan proposes a permanent buffer area that is approximately 550 it
C.F. INDUSTRIES ROSEMOUNT, MN
wide. In addition to committing to no development in this area, CFI is prepared to
commit to the staged restoration and management of this forest, including the removal of
invasive species and the replanting of native species to fill gaps in the forest and restore
ecological health. With the approval of this Concept Plan the City of Rosemount will
have successfully achieved the permanent conservation (and staged restoration) of at least
236 acres within the CFI site. This represents approximately 64% percent of the overall
site area.
The Concept Plan also proposes the installation of alternative stormwater treatment
systems, including rainwater gardens to facilitate infiltration and evapotranspiration and
improve the quality and reduce the quantity of stormwater leaving the site.
Phasing of Expansion
The only near term expansion to the existing CF Industries campus is the addition of a 24
ft. by 48 ft. office building on the liquid storage side of the campus. This proposed office
building is illustrated and labeled Future Office Building on Figure 9. With the exception
of this office building, there are no active plans for any of the potential additions shown
on Figure 9. There are neither any specific proposed expansion activities, nor any
particular improvements addressed in any long range plans for the facility. The purpose
of this process is to establish a mutual understanding between the City of Rosemount and
CF Industries about the long range potential for the CF campus.
Figure 9 shows that if and when CFI were to add dry storage facilities, this expansion
would proceed from the west to the east. The buildings shown are for illustrative
purposes only. Likewise, there are no plans to add wet storage tanks, but if they are
proposed in the future that storage will be contained within the general area shown on
'Figure 9. This is both due to topography, the MCES easement, logistics and proximity to
the other tanks and loading and unloading infrastructure. Any future tank installation
would also have to be surrounded by containment dikes.
Finally, if CFI were to expand its barge unloading capacity in the future, the expansion of
the current seawall would be in the location shown on Figure 9. Notably, this expansion
would not require a new conveyor corridor to be constructed, since the capacity of the
current system could be significantly increased by a larger conveyor within the existing
corridor. The potential improvements and expansion described in these paragraphs
include all of the potential long range changes CFI management can envision for this
campus.
Mississippi River Critical Area (CM and MNRRA Compliance
The proposed Concept Plan respects the bluff line setbacks throughout the site. Figure 10
illustrates a section drawing through the site and shows the substantial setbacks from the
river and bluff. It also shows the substantial buffer area between the future development
and Spring Lake Park Reserve.
C.F. INDUSTRIES ROSEMOUNT, MN
8
As proposed the CFI PUD Concept Plan would ensure that 73% of the portion of the site
contained within the Rural Open Space District will be permanent open space. In addition
to remaining undeveloped, it will actually be restored.
Finally, the proposed storage uses shown on the Concept Plan represent the least
intensive uses within the CFI site and both storage and rail service are permitted uses in
the Agricultural District.
Summary and Conclusion
The proposed PUD Concept Plan presents the opportunity to satisfy the objectives of
both the City of Rosemount and CF Industries. It will not only facilitate and support
reasonable expansion of accessory uses within the site, but it will also result in substantial
public benefits that could not be achieved through conventional zoning, or the passive
reliance on the Mississippi River Critical Areas Act, or the Mississippi National
Recreation River Area Plan.
With the inclusion of text describing the PUD Concept Plan, Rosemount will be able to
successfully meet the requirement of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, of consistency
between the comprehensive plan and zoning. Moreover, the Plan allows CFI flexibility in
developing its site to expand its future operations, and preserves the desirable site
characteristics and open space and protects sensitive environmental features such as the
bluffs, tree stands, the flood plain and the Mississippi River. The Plan will ensure the
continued viability of a long -term excellent corporate citizen of the City of Rosemount
that provides opportunities for livable -wage jobs to local residents and also buildings the
overall wealth of the community. The completion of this process and the documentation
of this Concept Plan will ensure that the mutual understanding between Rosemount and
CF Industries is memorialized.
c.F. INDUSTRIES ROSEMOUNT, MN
9
O
U
U
2
N
U e
s
c O t 7 N
2 E d m o o,
5 m
V C 3 N U N p o O -O
a> o a E N r �r m c
L L 3 d .a 0 5=.. -c .i' E @L O
a c a U 5 o r
o o o 5 N E c m o
O N O D N '5 C C N 0
1 ..3.1 U c o c E m@ N
m E o ai E o9 E E m o@
L l9 C W N U U N ti N
p N. E 5 o N c 5 N N
N W O C U L~ c Y O N N
coo o@ a N 0 L O c N N o
co c a c T a N
c 0 N a -0 Q 8 E L
,-,--a c Q o r=o -R 5 o
Z o). N O E C N d m O O N O 'O N
N X O U g 3
2 G O N 1 N m C N 1 O@ E E
N N@ 0 J N N c@ Q a c s
Q O a 0 O Z C d r N 43 3 m m m s o °oa E o E
d T, 3 U m 0 o 0 `m 0 Q m
0
E
o W
2
N
C U N
O N a
w o E zL
O m E Q 0
C C N O
m
-oo c
in c L m 'a. m
o o c -3 E
O o
LL z- m m o t
1] -z E m r O N
E g o a s@
co O E j y N Z p N
O N .L. C O) N L
2 m,. 3 E -8 c U 3
p a y a E o f
O N .9.2. U N O N
N O 3 .N N@ m c L- N
c 0 o T o o m
Y O c
Z U O r Q 2 C
T O O N C
C
a N L N L 0 N 0 O
O
Q m n m `m m `m 8-3 a
O
O 0
f9 H U7 O E N C v
i m L U O 2 2
<C3 3
cn
z
G
C
O
(L N
Proposed Warehouse
C.F. Industries
Rosemount, MN
June 3, 200B
4 ooneR oo
5D1 un dun 6ob]ya
Figure 10
730'
Spring Lake
Regional Park
Spring Lake
Regional Park
General comments
APPENDIX A: NATURAL AREAS MANAGEMENT
The brief management plan outlined below is based on the best current practicable
knowledge in the field of natural areas restoration and is premised on the idea of adaptive
management. That is to say that the management activities outlined for the first three to
five years can be carried out with relative certainty. Activities proposed for the time
period beyond five years are also outlined here, but these may be modified in a minor
fashion based on feedback from management
This approach is referred to as "adaptive management" and is premised on the fact that
nature is a complex system influenced by a myriad of biotic and abiotic factors. Retaining
the flexibility to modify activities based on feedback forms the basis for adaptive
management and will be important for achieving the best results for natural areas
restoration at the site. This approach also requires that a brief review /updating of
management approaches and activities be taken every few years. Although this periodic
evaluation does not need to be an extensive planning effort, it will be important for
ensuring the best outcome for the physical and financial resources dedicated to this
natural areas restoration and management effort.
The management activities outlined below are provided in order of priority for
management, with the remnant oak woodland adjacent to the Dakota County Parks
property. Additional management activities are recommended for the remainder of the
bluff line and old field areas, but are proposed to begin only after the initial push of
restoration is complete in the oak woodland site (approximately 2 -3 years, minimum).
The majority of natural areas restoration work is planned occur within the first 3 -5 years
following initiation for any particular area, while less intensive follow -up management
activities would occur as ongoing maintenance beyond year five.
Summary of Proposed Restoration Activities
Oak Woodland Restoration:
Management priority: High
This area includes an oak woodland brushland area called out (along with adjacent mixed
woodland area) for restoration on Figure 9 of the July 25, 2008 PUD Concept Plan
document. This oak woodland areas is of moderate quality in its current condition,
primarily as a result of a dense shrub layer of the normative, invasive shrubs European
buckthorn and Tatarian honeysuckle, as well as having relatively poor quality ground
layer vegetation. The top priority area is the oak woodland brushland immediately
adjacent to the Dakota County regional park. Management activities for this area include:
C.F. INDUSTRIES ROSEMOUNT, MN
10
Invasive, nonnative brush control
Winter 2008 -09
The top priority for this area will be to cut and treat invasive nonnative shrubs. These
should be cut within 6 inches of the ground and cut stumps treated with a seasonally
appropriate herbicide (e.g. 20 -25% solution of glyphosate or picloram). This work may
also include cutting of select invasive trees that have poor structural qualities, or
excessively large vines that are impacting or inhibiting existing quality native hardwood
trees, or similar. For instance, selective cutting of weedy softwood species such as
boxelder may occur where this activity could release more desirable native hardwoods
such as oak, hackberry, black cherry, ash, and similar
Supplemental native ground layer seeding
Late winter, early spring 2009
A diverse native woodland grass and flower mix should be planted (more than 20 species
total) to improve species diversity of the ground layer, improve wildlife habitat, and
provide competition to hinder resurgence of nonnative shrubs, as well as to add color and
improve the appearance along the highway and park sides of the property.
Follow -up control of invasive, nonnative brush
Fall 2009 spring 2010
The winter after initial invasive shrub and tree management it will be important to
perform follow -up management of invasive shrubs. This may include stems that
resprouted, were missed, or advanced in size from seedlings not cut/treated in the
previous effort. In most instances, this work is a small fraction of the original work
amount. However, in some instances it can require as much as one half to two thirds of
the original effort.
Mixed Woodland Restoration:
Management priority: Medium
This includes several mixedwoodland areas mostly dominated by early successional
trees and shrubs, resulting in these areas being of moderate to poor quality in their current
condition, primarily as a result of a dense shrub layer of the nonnative, invasive shrubs
European buckthorn and Tatarian honeysuckle, as well as having poor quality ground
layer vegetation. Although it would be beneficial to manage these mixed woodland areas
for improved quality, the oak woodland adjacent to the regional park is of higher priority.
Management activities for the mixed woodland areas include:
Invasive, nonnative brush control
Anticipated winter 2010 -2011
Initial restoration efforts in these areas will be to cut and treat invasive nonnative shrubs.
These should be cut within 6 inches of the ground and cut stumps treated with a
seasonally appropriate herbicide (e.g. 20 -25% solution of glyphosate or picloram). This
work will also include cutting of select invasive trees that have poor structural qualities,
and/or those that are impacting or inhibiting existing quality native hardwood trees, or
C.F. INDUSTRIES ROSEMOUNT, MN 11
similar (release cut for highest quality hardwoods in these areas). For instance, selective
cutting of weedy softwood species such as boxelder may occur where this activity could
release more desirable native hardwoods such as oak, hackberry, black cherry, ash, and
similar.
Supplemental native ground layer seeding
Anticipated spring 2011
A diverse native woodland grass and flower mix should be planted (more than 20 species
total) to improve species diversity of the ground layer, improve wildlife habitat, and
provide competition to hinder resurgence of nonnative shrubs, as well as to add color and
improve the appearance along the highway and park sides of the property.
Follow -up control of invasive, nonnative brush
Anticipated Fall 2011— spring 2012
The winter after initial invasive shrub and tree management it will be important to
perform follow -up management of invasive shrubs. This may include stems that
resprouted, were missed, or advanced in size from seedlings not cut/treated in the
previous effort. In most instances, this work is a small fraction of the original work
amount. However, in some instances it can require as much as one half to two thirds of
the original effort.
Prescribed burning (optional)
Prescribed burning is beneficial for prairie and oak dominated woodlands. Depending on
the rate of development of the native seed mix, the resurgence of invasive brush, and
potential for teaming with Dakota County Parks to conduct a prescribed bum across
property lines, this activitymay be employed.
Open (old field) Areas:
Management Priority: Medium -low
There is at least one open area currently dominated by nonnative pasture grasses, a few
species of weedy native forbs as well as pioneer /invasive trees and shrubs. This area is
well- suited for restoration to native vegetation types, including prairie /savanna
restoration or forestation. These are briefly described below:
Prairie/Savanna restoration in old field areas
This work would occur in the same areas as the tree (and shrub) plantings described
immediately above and would either complement or serve as an alternate to this activity.
These areas currently have perennial ground cover dominated by nonnative grass and
weedy trees and shrubs. We propose to prepare the site through control of the existing
nonnative vegetation and plant native prairie to increase the native species diversity and
wildlife habitat value of the area.
Site preparation measures would include a combination of herbicide application
(proposed glyphosate and broadleaf herbicide such as 2,4 -D). Seeding would occur
C.F. INDUSTRIES ROSEMOUNT, MN
12
approximately 1 -2 weeks following a spring herbicide application or the following spring
if herbicide application is conducted in late summer /fall.
Savanna restoration in this old field area would include the additional planting of
approximately 10 -35 oak trees per acre in this area in the one to three years following
initial planting of a diverse prairie seed mix.
Forestation: Native Tree (and Shrub) Plantings
There are several small openings on the edge of the mixed woodland (shown on Figure 9
of the July 25, 2008 PUD Concept Plan document) that could potentially be planted to
native trees and shrubs to provide in -fill for tree canopy gaps. We propose planting bare
root stock in these areas with a stocking rate of 400 trees /shrubs per acre. These would
primarily consist of native, hardwood tree species, especially oaks and native shrubs
characteristic for oak woodlands.
CF Industries Natural Areas Restoration Management Summary
C.F. INDUSTRIES ROSEMOUNT. MN
13
Item
Timing/ Date
Oak/Mixed Woodland
Cut invasive trees/brush
2008 -09
Oak Woodland Seeding
2008 -2010
Follow -up cut/treat invasive shrubs
2009 -10
Prescribed burning (optional)
TBD
Mixed Woodland
Cut invasive trees/brush
2010 -11
Woodland Seeding
2011
Follow -up cut/treat invasive shrubs
2011 -12
Prairie /Savanna restoration in old field
Site preparation Spray
TBD
(or forestation)
Prairie Seeding
TBD
Prairie Grow -in Maintenance
TBD
Forest Expansion Tree Shrub
Plantings
TBD
approximately 1 -2 weeks following a spring herbicide application or the following spring
if herbicide application is conducted in late summer /fall.
Savanna restoration in this old field area would include the additional planting of
approximately 10 -35 oak trees per acre in this area in the one to three years following
initial planting of a diverse prairie seed mix.
Forestation: Native Tree (and Shrub) Plantings
There are several small openings on the edge of the mixed woodland (shown on Figure 9
of the July 25, 2008 PUD Concept Plan document) that could potentially be planted to
native trees and shrubs to provide in -fill for tree canopy gaps. We propose planting bare
root stock in these areas with a stocking rate of 400 trees /shrubs per acre. These would
primarily consist of native, hardwood tree species, especially oaks and native shrubs
characteristic for oak woodlands.
CF Industries Natural Areas Restoration Management Summary
C.F. INDUSTRIES ROSEMOUNT. MN
13
EXCERPT FROM MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 23, 2008
5.a. CF Industries PUD Concept Plan Application (08-44 -CON). Senior Planner
Zweber reviewed the staff report. CF Industries has submitted a Planned Unit
Development Concept Plan (Concept Plan) describing the future development of their
facility. CF Industries has 370 acres of property along the Mississippi River that contains
their existing facilities, bluffs, native tree stands, and former farm and pasture land. CF
Industries' desire is for the Concept Plan to demonstrate how future development of their
site would expand onto the former farm and pasture land while protecting and improving
the bluff and native tree stands. CF Industries is requesting that 12 additional acres of
former farm and pasture land be added to the GI General Industrial land use designation
of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan to allow for the future expansion shown in the Concept
Plan. The request to guide the 12 acres to GI General Industrial will be addressed by the
Planning Commission and the City Council during the review of the public comment
received for the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Zweber also reviewed an email sent by
John Shardlow of Bonestroo, in response to the staff report.
John Shardlow, of Bonestroo, approached the Commission to comment on a few issues. He
stated that the purpose of this Planned Unit Development was to memorialize the
understanding between CF Industries and the City of Rosemount of what is expected to
happen in the future development of the site. Mr. Shardlow mentioned that the guidelines for
the Mississippi River Critical Area include preserving the land but also protecting the river for
industry and transport. He stated the concept plan shows conservation close to the regional
park but there also needs to be something on record that will show an area for possible
expansion in the future. With respect to storm water infrastructure requirements, Mr.
Shardlow stated that CF would hope to use natural treatment options for the management of
storm water but would agree to comply with the City requirements when the time comes for
approval. With respect to parking along Pine Bend Trail, Mr. Shardlow stated that this was
not an issue before Homeland Security because the gates were then left open and the trucks
could enter the site. Now, he stated, the gates are locked so if a truck comes early, they need
to wait on Pine Bend Trail. He further stated there has only been one complaint to date. Mr.
Shardlow stated that CF will work with staff between now and the Council meeting to come
up with language to work out this issue with the size of the facility as it is now and
arrangements if the facility grows.
Chairperson Messner stated one alternative to Condition No. 12 as it is currently worded
would be to strike the first sentence with the idea that CF and staff would work together on it
further. Mr. Shardlow agreed and stated the word "prohibited" is what CF does not like about
how the condition is currently worded.
Chairperson Messner commended the presentation.
The public hearing was opened at 7:13p.m.
Joe Simones, 13273 Pine Bend Trail, approached the Commission and expressed his concern
with the increase in noise and the reduction in his property value with more construction
taking place across Pine Bend Trail. Chairperson Messner pointed out that the parcel Mr.
Simones was referring to directly north of his property is guided General Industrial and
designated in the 42/52 land use study as Corporate Campus, and therefore the property will
not remain as vacate land.
There was no further public comment.
MOTION by Howell to close the public hearing. Second by Palda.
Ayes: 5. Nays: None. Motion approved. Public hearing was closed at 7:16p.m.
Chairperson Messner stated that he is in favor of moving forward taking into consideration
how the parcel is currently zoned and guided, as well as the understanding that this is just a
concept plan. He further stated he would recommend deleting the first sentence of
Condition No. 12 with the understanding that staff would work with the applicant if there is
ever an issue with parking.
MOTION by Messner to recommend the City Council approval of the Planned Unit
Development Concept Plan, subject to the following conditions:
1. A Planned Unit Development Plan Master Development Plan, Planned Unit
Development Final Site and Building Plan, and Rezoning will be required before any
facility expansion to the east is permitted.
2. The Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan and Rezoning will
include a deviation from Code Section 11 -7 -4 E.2.a. to allow industrial uses in the
Rural Open Space district limited to the area shown in Phase 3 and Phase 4 of
Phasing Concept Map Figure 9.
3. Approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Plan does not permit any
deviation to the GI- General Industrinl or Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area
Overlay Districts beyond that described in Condition 2.
4. A Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan and Rezoning will only be
considered by the City when needed, as depicted on the Phasing Concept Map
Figure 9. No rezoning shall occur more than 9 months in advance of a construction
project.
5. CF Industries will work with the City and Dakota County to site the Mississippi
River Regional Trail and the Interpretive Trail Corridor.
6. A minimum of 500 feet wide buffer shall be provided between any building,
structure, parking or loading area and the eastern property boundary, adjacent to
Spring Lake Regional Park Reserve.
7. A conservation easement shall be placed over the bluff, bluff setback, and vegetated
areas located north and east of the proposed spur as shown on the Proposed
Concept Map Figure 8 by December 31, 2009.
8. Any removal of trees to accommodate the development as shown on the Proposed
Concept Map Figure 8 shall include tree replacement as described in the adopted
Tree Replacement Ordinance at the time of tree removal.
9. The implementation of the natural area management plan as described in Appendix
A shall commence by December 31, 2009.
10. The stormwater infrastructure shown on the plan is inadequate to accommodate the
proposed expansions. No waiver from the stormwater management rules in place at
the time of expansion are granted as a part of this Concept Plan. The area of the
proposed expansion may need to decrease to accommodate the stormwater
infrastructure that is required to meet City standards.
11. Pine Bend Trail is designated as a Minor Collector road within the 2030
Comprehensive Plan. Any development within CF Industries shall include the
preservation of the 100 feet right -of -way width to allow the reconstruction of Pine
Bend Trail into a Minor Collector road.
12.
prohibitcd on Pinc Bend Trail. The development of the additional warehouse may
need to include additional rail car and semi trailer staging areas to prevent the
parking or staging of rail cars or semis within the Pine Bend Trail right -of -way.
13. The applicant shall add berming and landscaping to buffer the future buildings from
the Pine Bend Trail right -of -way.
14. The existing buildings at CF Industries do not meet the building material standards
within the HI Heavy Industrial zoning district. This Concept Plan approval does
not waive required building standards and the future buildings will need to meet the
adopted zoning and building standards at the time of construction.
15. The dredge spoils deposited in Area 3 shall not infringe into the bluff or bluff
setback area and must be vegetated after new spoils are deposited to prevent erosion
and damage or filling of bluff.
16. Compliance with the Engineering Memorandum dated December 17, 2008.
Second by Schultz.
Ayes: 5. Nays: 0. Motion approved.
As follow -up, Mr. Zweber stated this item will go before the Council in January either at the
regular meeting or possibly a work session. With respect to the Comprehensive Plan
schedule, Mr. Zweber reiterated that in March, the Planning Commission will see the public
comments submitted and the changes made as a result of those comments. He asked the
Commission if there was any additional information they would like to see regarding the CF
Industries request, and Chairperson Messner stated that the level of detail in the submitted
concept plan was more than most and he was comfortable with the level of information
provided. The other Commissioners agreed.
From: Shardlow, John W.
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 4:38 PM
Cc: 'Dohmen, Scott Pine Bend'; Phelps, Todd
Subject: Planning Report for CF Industries" PUD Concept Plan Staff Report
Eric: Scott passed along a copy of the staff report to Todd and me and we have had the opportunity to
review and discuss it together. We are please to receive the recommendation for approval by the staff and
we are fine with the vast majority of the suggested conditions of approval. After working together on this
matter for many months, it is good to finally be at this point.
We do not intend to make a full presentation, unless you recommend otherwise. We have been in dialogue
with the commissioners, many have toured the CF campus and we participated actively during the
comprehensive planning meetings. I will have large scale, board mounted versions of all of the key exhibits
with me. You are more than welcome to use them during your presentation, if that would be helpful. I will
plan to make some brief remarks focused primarily on the items I will address shortly. Scott Dohmen will be
there to answer any questions and Todd Phelps will be available as a resource.
SUMMARY OF COMMENTS:
1. It may seem implicit to you, but the staff report does not explicitly say that if a Planned Unit
Development Master Plan Development Plan, Planned Unit Development Final Site and Building
Plan and rezoning request are submitted and they are consistent with this PUD Concept Plan and
all other applicable codes and ordinances, they should be approved. I know that this is an atypical
application of PUD zoning (and we appreciate your flexibility) but we believe it would strengthen and
clarify the record to be explicit on these points.
2. Condition 5 states that CF Industries will work with the City and Dakota to site the Mississippi
River Regional Trail and the Interpretive Trail Corridor. We take no issue with that statement and we
have no objection to agreeing to it as a condition. Scott Dohmen has in fact been working with
Dakota County and will welcome the opportunity to continue to work cooperatively toward identifying
a mutually acceptable trail corridor. The point we need to make is simply that there are extremely
serious public safety concerns about all of the alternatives that have been suggested to date.
3. Condition #7 calls for a conservation easement to be placed over the bluff, bluff setback and specific
vegetated areas. We are completely in agreement with the intent of this condition, but if the PUD
commits to conserve these areas and the PUD Concept Plan commits to the bluff locations and the
setbacks and the land is subsequently zoned PUD, doesn't that affectively accomplish the same
result?
4. Condition #10 states that the stormwater infrastructure as shown is inadequate and any future
development will need to comply with City standards. We have no issue with that condition as
written, but we do intend to take full advantage of all available ways to naturally treat as much
stormwater as possible on the site. This is an important component of our overall site conservation
and restoration strategy. It frankly helps CF Industries justify the significant commitment they are
making to dedicating open space and natural resource restoration.
5. Condition 12 was the one condition that came out of the blue to us. None of us can ever
remember this issue being raised at any point over the last couple years of conversation and it was
not raised during your initial preliminary review. We understand the issue and we are willing to work
toward a solution, but there are significant practical and Homeland Security issues that are involved
with this condition. First of all, CF Industries prefers to stage trucks on its property. In the past, they
would simply leave the gate open and truck drivers would come into the site and wait for the
business to open at 6:00 am. Now they are required to keep the gate locked and there are times
when truck drivers arrive before the gate is open and wait out on the road. Scott Dohmen is willing
to post signs and communicate with the haulers and encourage them to park elsewhere if they
arrive early.
Scott has also indicated that there are a small number of peak periods annually when the volume of activity
is simply too great to accommodate all of the trucks on site. In the past he has worked directly with Police
Chief, Gary Kalstabakken to manage these short term situations. If some strategy cannot be worked out to
manage this issue, it has the potential to create a major hardship for CF Industries.
In closing, most of the conditions listed in your staff report were expected and they pose no concerns for us.
We are also hopeful that we can work together to find mutually acceptable solutions to those listed above.
Any opportunity to discuss them prior to the meeting tomorrow would be welcomed. I am in all day and can
be very flexible in accommodating a phone call, or conference call if necessary. Thanks and see you
tomorrow night
John Shardlow
Principal
Tel 651 967 -4560
Cell 612 720 -3674
iohn.shard lowabonestroo.com
2335 Highway 36 W
St. Paul, MN 55113
Tel 651 636 -4600
Fax 651 -636 -1311
www.bonestroo.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail communication and any attached
documentation may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure and is intended only
for the use of the designated recipient(s). It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any
unauthorized person. The use, distribution, transmittal or re- transmittal by an unintended recipient of this
communication is strictly prohibited without our express approval in writing or by e-mail. If you are not the
intended recipient of this e-mail, please delete it from your system without copying it and notify the above
sender so that our e-mail address may be corrected. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient is
not a waiver of any attorney client or work product privilege.
DATE: December 17, 2008
TO: Eric Zweber, Senior Planner
MEMORANDUM
CC: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director
Andy Brotzler, City Engineer
Kathie Hanson, Planning Department Secretary
4 ROSEMOUNT
FROM: Morgan Dawley, Project Engineer
RE: CF Industries Planned Unit Development Concept Review
PUBLIC WORKS
Upon review of the CF Industries Planned Unit Development Proposal, dated November 2008, and
received November 28, 2008, the Engineering Department offers the following comments:
1. It is recommended that the "Area 1 Oak Forest" (Figure 7), "Forest Restoration" area
(Figure 8) and "Native Tree Gap Restoration Zone" (Figure 8), as well as any other
appropriate natural preservation areas that may be identified on the site during development
of the final Planned Unit Development (PUD) be encompassed by permanent conservation
easements.
2. Management of site stormwater runoff shall be in accordance with the requirements of the
Comprehensive Surface Water Management Plan. Although shown in concept only, the
"Alternative Stormwater Treatment" areas as identified in Figure 8 do not appear to have
adequate capacity to store the 100 -year, 24 -hour rainfall event runoff for the approximately
25 acres of proposed impervious surface in the concept plan.
3. The site is in the general vicinity of a trunk stormwater overflow to the Mississippi River
identified in the Comprehensive Surface Water Management Plan. Integration of these
trunk improvements and any associated easements, if feasible, will be examined and
considered by Staff during development of the final PUD.
4. Consideration should be given to the fact that Pine Bend Trail's 2030 Roadway Functional
Classification is identified as Minor Collector in the draft Rosemount Transportation Plan,
and that the required right -of -way guidelines for a 2 -lane, rural minor collector is 100 feet of
right -of -way width. Additional right -of -way may be required at certain locations for
channelized turn lanes. Pine Bend Trail's existing road right -of -way exists by prescriptive
rights, and is approximately 66 feet in width.
Should you have any questions or comments regarding the item listed above, please contact me at
651- 322 -2022.
F Industries Proposed Comp Plan Change
G103:10►01110110
AG Agriculture
DT Downtown
NC Neighborhood Commercial
RC Regional Commercial
CC Community Commercial
AGRAgricultural Research
December 2008
Ell
RR Rural Residential
LDR Low Density Residential
TR Transitional Residential
MDR Medium Density Residential
HDR High Density Residential
PI Public/Institutional
PO Existing Parks /Open Space
BP Business Park
LI Light Industrial
GI General Industrial
WM Waste Management
Lakes and Rivers
parcela
Public ROW
I Private ROW
city_railroad
rump unnjiI 1
c�.
rr
k
iti7 2
/Ilmumu► 111.11.h
°1 ►�L
1
5�n.a %max Z .G
eo 11 11I_ uiu� i/I
/1111111 Ql 111�GI1111110,1* C 4,
1Ep
EO 111�up�: rl��
CO
1
C:)
01
1
0
0
0
0
3
3
c
0
0
3
3
0
1
73 Z
00
co
0
0
0
3
3
0
0)
z
co
0•
2,
0.
0
3
3
0
("3.
0
0
0
CD
co
1
0
0
0
c
E3
c
51* Es
CD
7 7)
C U
c
N
0
I 0
co)
o
0.0.
E
3 Ed
O
(0
0
cp
cr
ct9 c T,
E:
c
co
CD
0
0
3
3
0
I
0 7
/2 a
F, 2 a
0 0
a) 5
0
a) 0
co
3
(D
0
3:1
a),
0
0.
0
(E)
a)
co
CD
0
0
3
3
co
C o 2
co
CD
0
0.
cn
0
[.1 1
O 0
N.)
O 0
O 0
3
c 0,
F6
0
O 0
O 0
3 o
33
(O
a 3
5
cn
N
0
(12
0 W
o 0
co
o
o
r o
a o
c
Vl
CD N
N
co
c
0 a
p
Na
O
0)
0
c
o
cc
Q
Z
CD
cn
m
CD
Cn
N
a
O
N CD
O O
CO
Z
cp
C
C w
co
4 W 0 D 0 0 D
Q
2=OCn I0 g C C/) CD 0 m m_ m cD 0 P m cQ
E a a_ 0 v 0 F N CD c 0 c,
0 0 cn D v Cfl O
0 m c" cn c Q -a 1. N 0 a) a 0 CD o C v O
n CO cn G) 0 0 0 Q R -s C p fA z v n
c D O CD E. m
0 0 o) -0-'
7 co Q 0 o N c Q 0
CD (7• D c° n v m Z O m n u) cQ m =Q 0 m D m
0 3 CD
0_ �'0Q°�O°
a =5 in 0_ 0-CD o a O 0
o v w g cn n 0 v m x 0 n� 0 v
ca CD m c
c n n 0 5- m 0 cn 0 v o'
C7 Q C- 3 v� m m. v 2 0 o
m- n C D CD 3 CD 0 7 0 a
F, o n n co c. n 0 c
0 CO Q c m
�QVQ °s o a
(7)' o o N. Co o i
c D
3 S O �G
ED
n
7 0 0 rt (D
0 a
0 v 3
c o m v m n' c G 3
T 0 r'- o 0
Q 0 7' O
0 Z 3 o 0
0 0 r" 0
c 0 n a i o 0 c
m C
3 0
cr
0
E
0 Q D 5 E' m C7
c a o m cn O o C) c,. o a v v 0_
O. 0 N Q 0 c 7 :1 0 O a O cn
Q Co z Q (l `G `C
-ivc° g' z n m m ,c) at v 0 m
0 03° Q O r o
o m 0 Q c�D o
go c� n' o c w (4 E Q CQ
c
C d O c' N o n 7 N'
N (Q (D
n
v, -0 n o Q Q
o o m 0 0 a cD
o o
CD 0 G 0 w
o o cn v c Q v o
c n. co_ v c, m 71. v 6 CD
c 0 0 3 c 3 o 3 co
c
-0 m v 0 2 R� co 0 n 0 U)
v 7 O C 03 0_ O 00
0 c 3
C D
0 0 N 0 0
0 T C c?. (D O cn
o c n 0 a O
-S c 0 c Q o
Q O o O CD (D O 0 0
o
o c o cn
cn (n 0 0 n
0 0
0 o
0
O
410 z
0-,,„ —I 5 HID,. G) TI
0 -9
Q a 0 2 a) 0
0 0 co v 0 v
0 o n cn G)
0
Q v O
0 a 0 g
v a p -I 0
0 0 0 c cn g m D
a) n 0 0 g
0-
O n D v 1
3 2) 0 90
m =m g NJ
N
CD
Co a) cn Sp O Q
3 CO CD 0
CD cnn `G 0 (75' 0 3
cn co o v
N v CD
a C R CD CD
W 0 (n Q
Cr O 0-
7 3 ,C CD K
Q (D 0
I- v O T)' co
O N
(D
DO O r O
C 0 3
Q Q 0 CD
v co
Q
cn
0
c o
cr a
iv ET
o o
n 0.
CD
Iv
GJ
CD
CT)
0_
Z
O
CD
0
CD
0
Q
O
c
n
Cn
m
0 0 J CD 11
ti 9
o CD CD
0
00
o Z
Z
O
-o
O
CD
0
0
0
0
CD
co
N CO
CD
Cn
Alternat StormwatOi
Estatdl- RaidGatdensx+th
Pre Tree ent Areas to
Corlhol t or Intj,ltretton
Pine Bend Trail
Proposed Warehouse
C.F. Industries
Rosemount, MN
June 3, 2003
4 nonestroo
iC .V57552575070011Grsphlcs1,eciwn Muff ti.3 psd
Figure 10
Spi ig La
Reg ;nel Park
Railroad
Bluff
Mississippi
River
Section A
Spin[ Luke
Regional Pak
CF Industries Propo ed Comp Plan Change
BM SVO111 I01I
AG Agriculture
DT Downtown
NC Neighborhood Commercial
RC Regional Commercial
CC Community Commercial
AGR Agricultural Research
CHANGE
December 2008
RR Rural Residential
LDR Low Density Residential
TR Transitional Residential
MDR Medium Density Residential
HDR High Density Residential
PI Public /Institutional
717
PO Existing Parks /Open Space
BP Business Park
LI Light Industrial
GI General Industrial
WM Waste Management
Lakes and Rivers
parcela
Public ROW
Private ROW
city_railroad
4 1 4: 1 1
110-
o
r
11■11 I. 1 14
1110
.4 4,
I
04,
1