HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.i. An Application for U.S. Homes Corporation (Lennar) for a Minor PUD Amendmen Adding Two New Home Products to the Evermoor Glendalough Neighborhood, Case 09-13-AMDAGENDA ITEM: Case 09- 13 -AMD An application from
U.S. Homes Corporation (Lennar) for a Minor
PUD Amendment Adding Two New Home
Products to the Evermoor Glendalough
Neighborhood
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent
PREPARED BY: Jason Lindahl, A.I.C.P.
Planner
AGENDA NO.
6 l
ATTACHMENTS: Ramsey and Pillsbury Home Elevations,
Letter from Lennar, Letter to Applicant, Original
Evermoor Glendalough PUD Standards, Minor
Amendment to the Planned Unit Development
Agreement for Evermoor Glendalough With
Elevations, Site Map, Resolution, Impervious
Surface Analysis
APPROVED BY:
t]al
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Motion to adopt a resolution approving a Minor Amendment to the Evermoor
Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement to add two (the Ramsey and Pillsbury)
new homes to the list of approved homes in the Evermoor Glendalough
neighborhood.
2. Motion to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an amendment to the PUD
agreement for Evermoor Glendalough.
4 ROSEMOUNT
in Date: June 16, 2009
SUMMARY
Applicant Property Owner(s):
Location:
U.S. Homes Corporation Lennar)
North of Connemara Trail, west of Highway 3 (South Robert Trail)
and east of Evermoor Parkway.
Approximately 126 Acres
TR Transitional Residential
R -1, Low Density Residential Evermoor Planned Unit
Development (PUD)
The applicant, U.S. Homes Corporation Lennar), requests approval of a Minor Planned Unit Development
(PUD) amendment to add new housing products to the existing Glendalough PUD. According to the
applicant, the amendment is necessary to update the list of approved homes for Glendalough in response to
changing market conditions and the desires of their customers. Staff recommends approval of two (the
Ramsey and Pillbury) of the five homes submitted as part of the 2009 Landmark Series. The remaining
Area in Acres:
Comp. Guide Plan Desig:
Current Zoning.
CITY COUNCIL
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Amendment History for Evermoor Glendalough
Action
Date
Application
Request
June 2009
Minor
Amendment
Add 2009 Landmark Series with 3
Stall Garages (Ramsey Pillsbury Approved.
Fitzgerald, Sinclair, St. Croix Denied)
Staff Recommends
Approval of 2 Homes in
the 2009 Landmark Series
Dec. 2008
Minor
Amendment
Add 2009 Landmark Series (Ramsey Prairie
Model) with 3 Stall Garage
Approved by CC
May 2008
Minor
Amendment
Add 2 New Centex Homes
Supported by Staff but
Withdrawn by Applicants
Dec. 2007
Minor
Amendment
Add 3 new homes (Ramsey, Sibley, and
Longfellow) with 2 Stall Garages and Remove 3
Existing Homes (Colonist,Bungalow, and
Farmhouse).
Approved by CC
June 2007
Minor
Amendment
Add American Heartland Series (Lancaster,
Pennington, Springfield, Worthington)
Approved by CC
three homes (Fitzgerald, Sinclair, and St. Croix) were denied administratively by staff (see attached letter)
based on the finding that they were not consistent with the standards of the Glendalough Planned Unit
Development.
By Ordinance City staff can approve minor amendments; however, because the PUD agreement is a
contract between the developer and the City, Council approval is required. Therefore this item has been
reviewed by staff and recommended for approval but has not been reviewed by the Planning Commission,
consistent with the process outlined in the ordinance. Should the applicant wish to pursue approval of the
other elevations proposed in this application, they would need to apply for a Major PUD amendment which
would require a public hearing at the Planning Commission prior to City Council review. The other option,
should the applicant believe the proposed buildings comply with the PUD standards, is to appeal the
decision of the Zoning Administrator to the Planning Commission, sitting as the Board of Appeals.
BACKGROUND
The table below summarizes the amendment history for the Evermoor Glendalough neighborhood. It
shows that Lennar has requested five PUD amendments over the last two years (June 2007 to July 2009).
Generally, Lennar has sought to amend the PUD once every six months. Each amendment has requested a
change to the list of homes approved for construction in Glendalough. In each case, the City ultimately
granted some portion of the requested amendment.
Staff met with the applicant several times throughout each application. Many of these meetings included
Councilmember Shoe Corrigan. During these meetings and in the subsequent staff reports, the City
emphasized it's commitment to preserving the original spirit and intent of the Glendalough PUD agreement.
To that end, it was stressed that any new home products approved by the City Council will be subject to all
the performance standards (including but not limited to architecture, garage placement, setbacks and lot
coverage) for the other homes within the Glendalough neighborhood. Specifically, that includes the
following five standards:
1. Early 20 Century architecture.
2. Porches oriented to the street and intimate (reduced) setbacks.
3. De- emphasized garages with side or rear yard placement and doors oriented perpendicular to the street
2
whenever possible.
4. Garages will be recessed a minimum of four (4) feet from the front elevation of the principal structure or
set perpendicular to the street.
5. Housing styles shall be consistent with the drawings labeled "Traditional Homes of Evermoor (see
attached).
During the last PUD, the applicant requested the City provide further detail regarding these standards. In
response, the City offered the following three statements:
1. Roof lines that emphasize the living area portion of the house and de- emphasize the garage portion.
2. Front porches shall have ornamental accents including, but not limited to, columns with a base of brick
or stone.
3. Front doors shall be accented by transoms or sidelights.
ISSUE ANALYSIS
The requested amendment is considered minor because the Ramsey and Pillsbury homes are found to be
consistent with the original intent of the Evermoor Glendalough PUD (see standards above). The Ramsey
with a two stall garage was approved by the Council as part of the December 2007 PUD amendment. In
addition, the Council approved the Prairie style Ramsey with a three stall garage as part of the last PUD
amendment in December 2008 (see table above). The four elevations of the Pillsbury home represent a new
home plan that has not been built in Glendalough before.
The applicant has submitted a narrative detailing changes made to the 2009 Landmark Series. Interior
changes include expanding the kitchen and redesigning the first floors to bring the family, eating and kitchen
areas into one large flowing space. The applicant's narrative also cites changes to the exterior of the homes
which attempts to de- emphasize the garage portion of the homes while adding interest to the living space.
After reviewing each proposed home against the criteria listed above, staff finds the Ramsey and Pillsbury
homes consistent with the original intent of the Evermoor Glendalough PUD.
The homes approved under this PUD are also subject to the other performance standards applicable to the
rest of the R -1 district and the Glendalough neighborhood including, but not limited to, lot coverage and
setbacks. The applicant has submitted an impervious surface coverage analysis (see attached) indicating that
the homes recommended for approval will meet the hard surface coverage requirement.
CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of a Minor Amendment to the Evermoor Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Agreement to add two new homes (the Ramsey and Pillsbury) to the list of approved homes in the
Evermoor Glendalough neighborhood. This recommendation is limited to the Ramsey and Pillsbury homes
and is based on the information submitted by the applicant and the findings made in this report. In
addition, it should be noted that, if approved by the City Council, the new Ramsey and Pillsbury homes will
be subject to all the performance standards (including but not limited to architecture, garage placement,
setbacks and lot coverage) for the other homes within the Glendalough neighborhood.
3
d
Elevation B To de- emphasize the garage we flattened the roofline over the garage by
removing large gables that drew attention to the area. The single garage stall has been
pushed back by one foot and the double stall has been pushed back by an additional two
feet. An offset between the garages is maintained to create additional interest to the
elevation. The pronounced gable and arched patio are reminiscent of historic
architectural features that will be showcased by a siding shake in contrasting color to the
home. To emphasize the main entrance we also added sidelite windows to the door and
pulled the porch out an additional two feet. The end result is a house dominated
elevation that has the garage recessed six feet from a large covered porch.
Elevation C To de- emphasize the garage we flattened the roofline over the garage by
removing large gables that drew attention to the area. The single garage stall has been
pushed back by one foot and the double stall has been pushed back by an additional two
feet. An offset between the garages is maintained to create additional interest to the
elevation. A set of windows were added to the livable space above the garage to further
incorporate the garage into the home. To emphasize the main entrance we also added
sidelite windows to the door and pulled the porch out an additional two feet. The end
result is a house dominated elevation that has the garage recessed six feet from a large
covered porch.
St. Croix
Craftsmen From the street, the elevation is heavily weighted to draw attention to the
livable space. The front porch was expanded by a 54 sq ft area that includes an
interesting gable. To de- emphasize the garage we flattened the roofline over the garage
by removing large gables that drew attention to the area. The single garage stall has been
pushed back by one foot and the double stall has been pushed back by an additional two
feet. An offset between the garages is maintained to create additional interest to the
elevation. The end result is a house dominated elevation that has the garage recessed six
feet from a large covered porch.
Elevation B From the street, the elevation is heavily weighted to draw attention to the
livable space. This is done with the incorporation of shutters and a variety of siding
types. The front porch was expanded by a 54 sq ft area that includes an interesting gable.
Pronounced gables over the garage have been eliminated and dormers were added to
break up the extended roof line. The single garage stall has been pushed back by one foot
and the double stall has been pushed back by an additional two feet. An offset between
the garages is maintained to create additional interest to the elevation. The end result is a
house dominated elevation that has the garage recessed six feet from a large covered
porch.
Elevation C From the street, the elevation is heavily weighted to draw attention to the
livable space. This is done with the incorporation of band boards, enlarged columns and
a variety of siding types. The front porch was expanded by a 54 sq ft area that includes
an interesting gable. The pronounced gable over the garage has been visually reduced by
minimizing pitch and size. The single garage stall has been pushed back by one foot and
935 Wayzata Blvd E, Wayzata, MN 55391 Phone: 952 -473 -1231 Fax: 952 473 -7401
LEN NAR.COM
June 9, 2009
Jason Lindahl
City of Rosemount
2875 145 Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Re: Minor PUD Amendment Application, Glendalough
Dear Mr. Lindahl;
At your request I am providing additional information regarding improvements we have made to
further de- emphasize garages on the Landmark series. The Landmark collection consists of
four updated floor plans with four elevations of each plan. The 2009 Landmark series has
evolved from feedback which we received on the current Landmark plans that have two (plus)
garage stalls. On the interior, kitchens were expanded and traditional rooms such as a formal
dining area have been incorporated into a living pattern that brings the family room, eating area,
and kitchen into one large flowing space. The adjustments to the floor plans are necessary to
accommodate the needs and want of the today's market. In doing so, the two car (plus tandom)
garages were expanded to a more traditional three car garage. In March 2009 you agreed to meet
with us to informally discuss our new Landmark collection. Based on feedback we revised
several elevations with the intent to have them approved for construction in Glendalough. In
general, all of the elevations incorporate a single stall garage nearest to the main entrance and a
double stall garage on the outside. We chose this method of incorporating a third garage stall to
avoid the appearance of the third stall looking like an afterthought to the home elevation. The
technique gives an upscale impression to the elevation and blends the garage into the home.
Several plans that are currently built in the Glendalough Community have garages that protrude
from the main entrance as much, if not more then the plans proposed with this application. We
feel the below adjustments to the base plans demonstrate our sincere interest in cooperating with
the intent of the PUD.
Sinclair
Prairie A Prairie style elevation was created to fit with the theme of the Ramsey plan
approved by City council in December 2008. The home style offers a flatter roof line and
less dominating gables. To de- emphasize the garage we flattened the roofline and added
a set of `bumped out' gabled windows that draw the visual attention to the house. The
single garage stall has been pushed back by one foot and the double stall has been pushed
back by an additional two feet. An offset between the garages is maintained to create
additional interest to the elevation. To emphasize the main entrance we added sidelite
windows to the door and pulled the porch out an additional two feet. The end result is a
house dominated elevation that has the garage recessed six feet from a large covered
porch.
935 Wayzata Blvd E, Wayzata, MN 55391 Phone: 952 -473 -1231 Fax: 952 -473 -7401
LENNAR.COM
Pillsbury
Regards,
the double stall has been pushed back by an additional two feet. An offset between the
garages is maintained to create additional interest to the elevation. The end result is a
house dominated elevation that has the garage recessed six feet from a large covered
porch.
No changes were made to the Pillsbury plans.
Fitzgerald
Elevation A The single garage stall has been pushed back by one foot and the double
stall has been pushed back by an additional two feet. An offset between the garages is
maintained to create additional interest to the elevation. From the street, the elevation is
heavily weighted to draw attention to the livable space. To emphasize the main entrance
we added sidelite windows to the door and pulled the porch out an additional two feet. A
gable was also added to the large front porch that will help create interest in the home
rather then the garage. The end result is a house dominated elevation that has the garage
recessed six feet from a large covered porch.
Elevation B The single garage stall has been pushed back by one foot and the double
stall has been pushed back by an additional two feet. An offset between the garages is
maintained to create additional interest to the elevation. From the street, the elevation is
heavily weighted to draw attention to the livable space. To emphasize the main entrance
we added sidelite windows to the door and pulled the porch out an additional two feet.
An interesting set of rooflines were incorporated over the entrance and varying siding
sizes are proposed to draw attention to the home rather then the garage. The end result is
a house dominated elevation that has the garage recessed six feet from a large covered
porch.
Ramsey
In December 2008 a prototype for the Ramsey plan was approved by City Council. The
new elevation adds variety to a floor plan that has been well received by consumers.
Pronounced gables over the garage have been eliminated except above a section of
windows that was added to increase the visual appeal of the home. The end result is
house dominated elevation that has the garage recessed nine feet from the porch.
I hope you will find this information helpful as you complete your review. The intent of these
adjustments is to de- emphasize the garage in a way that does not compromise the floor plan
within the home. If you have questions or comments, feel free to contact me.
ablonsk
US Home Corporation,
d/b /a Lennar
935 Wayzata Blvd E, Wayzata, MN 55391 Phone: 952 -473 -1231 Fax: 952 -473 -7401
LEN NAR.COM
June 10, 2009
Mr. Joe Jablonski
Lennar US Home Corporation
935 East Wayzata Blvd.
Wayzata, MN 55391
Re: Minor Amendment to Planned Unit Development Agreement (09- 13 -AMD)
Dear Mr. Jablonski:
Please accept this letter as notice of action by the City of Rosemount's Community
Development Department staff on the above referenced project. That action include:
1. Administrative approval of the Ramsey and Pillsbury home plans as part of the approved
plans for the Evermoor Glendalough neighborhood based on the findings that these
elevations are consistent with the standards of the associated PUD.
2. Administrative denial of the Fitzgerald, Sinclair, and St. Croix home plans as part of the
approved plans for the Evermoor Glendalough neighborhood based on the findings that
these elevations are not consistent with the standards of the associated PUD.
By Ordinance, City staff has the authority to act on minor amendment applications. However,
because the PUD agreement is a contract between the applicant and the City, Council approval is
required.
The minor amendment incorporating the Ramsey and Pillsbury plans into the Glendalough PUD
is scheduled to go before the City Council on June 16, 2009. City staff will notify you in writing
once the Council has acted on the amendment.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact at jason.lindahl@ci.rosemount.mn.us or
651- 322 -2090.
Sincerely,
Jason Lindahl, AICP
Planner
Sidewalks and Trails
This neighborhood is relatively self contained and, as such, the trails shall remain private.
Sidewalks along Connemara Trail and Street A will be constructed in the right -of -way and
become city sidewalks
'Glendalough (Traditional Neighborhood)
This neighborhood is intended to recapture early 20th century housing and neighborhood
character. Houses will be custom built with porches oriented to the streets and an intiniate
setback in the 'front yard. Garages will be de- emphasized with rear or side yard placement and
doors oriented at a perpendicular to the street wherever possible. Housing styles shall be
consistent with drawings labeled "Traditional Homes of Evermoor" attached hereto as Exhibits
41, 42, 43 and 44 and made a part hereof. Garages will be recessed a minimum of four feet from
the front elevation of the principal structure, or set at a perpendicular to the street.
Total Lots Front, Side Rear Yard Setbacks Lot Width. Death Area (avg.)
257 15', 25'* 5' (10' total) 10' 75' 120' -168' 12,000 sq. ft.
Measured from back of curb on private street
Parks Open Space
All of the open space associated with Glendalough shall be privately owned and maintained by
the homeowner association because it functions primarily as buffer for the neighborhood.
Outlots JJ, KK, LL and NN are "vest pocket parks" which serve as the collective front yards for
the neighborhoods. These shall also be private.
While there are no protected wetlands in this neighborhood, easements for the storm water
ponding areas shall be deeded to the City.
Sidewalks and Trails
The trail which traverses Outlot 00 and ultimately connects Street A to Dodd Blvd shall be
located in a 12' ft. wide trail easement.
Roundstone (Coach Townhomes)
This townhouse neighborhood will have the highest density of the development excluding the
future senior housing. Thirteen buildings will be row style, and five buildings will be double
loaded. Housing styles shall be consistent with drawings labeled• "Coach Townhomes of
Evermoor" attached hereto as Exhibit 48 and made a part hereof. All parking shall be restricted
to driveways or common parking spaces.
Total Units Front Yard Setbacks Average Lot/Unit Area
118 18' (21' from curb) 3,340 sq. ft.
Parks Open.Space
All of the open space associated with this neighborhood will be treated like a typical townhouse
Evermoor PUD Agreement
Page 8
1
11111111111
OD
111
83
w
EE
i
I .d I 1 4
1 0
0
0
0
Ff
Ea
E8
■EI..
ISINEDIE
11111111111111
■m®S®
12111
MIMEO
J
Iww
1
T.4
a 3.
fo
s
3
t n
Ed
F i
3
H
O
0
III IooIIIIII
minium
1
y .�l•
[d
3
4
„Iluh'''
1}IIIU1111
.1I11I1111111III
nl
11176[11
r\71
ll
r
ti
6
et 1
NOLLY/Gla 2:1Y321
a.
0
0
I
___j
1( Ii
/I I;
1
gi I
l3
77
7
nII—
-r" l te_ 4
l
U
o
Ill
r21
t), 'S n
t /1 lit
I
I 3
i is
o.
It
w :-I.
T.4
a 3.
fo
s
3
t n
Ed
F i
3
H
O
0
III IooIIIIII
minium
1
y .�l•
[d
3
4
„Iluh'''
1}IIIU1111
.1I11I1111111III
nl
11176[11
r\71
ll
r
ti
6
et 1
NOLLY/Gla 2:1Y321
I II I 4 1'1' V I I I I I 1� I I i I I
II I I I II I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIM111110l IiuI;I III II!'l 1 Uih;►;� i; .1!�;f I 1 ►1111, liil
i 1 I; li I. I;I� .;I;
cici
I NE '0111111
1
I
I IIIIb II1 I.
1!1!1111 II 11 ���III 111 ;IIl�I!I ►�II`III�1..1 !I�!I I I'N�. I II II�'
I 1111 111, l i l II I II I I 1 I 1 1 1'
A MINOR AMENDMENT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
ADDING THE RAMSEY AND PILLSBURY PRODUCTS TO THE LIST OF
APPROVED HOMES IN THE EVERMOOR GLENDALOUGH NEIGHBORHOOD
THIS DECLARATION made this 16 day of June, 2009, by and between U.S.
HOMES CORPORATION,
(hereinafter referred to as the "Declarant and the CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, a Minnesota
municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "City
WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of the real property described on Attachment One,
attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Properties and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is subject to a Planned Unit Development Agreement,
"Planned Unit Agreement Evermoor dated June 20, 2000, (hereinafter referred to as the
"Planned Unit Development Agreement and
WHEREAS, Declarant wishes to amend the Planned Unit Development Agreement as
hereinafter provided, which amendment has been approved and consented to by the City of
Rosemount, acting through its City Council, as evidenced by the duly authorized signatures of its
officers affixed hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Declarant declares that the Subject Property is, and shall be,
held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the covenants, conditions, and
restrictions, hereinafter set forth.
1. The use and development of the Subject Property shall conform to the Planned Unit
Development Agreement except as modified herein.
A. The list of permitted housing plans for the Planned Unit Development Agreement
is amended to add the following home product:
1. The Ramsey Craftsman, Attachment 2.
2. The Pillsbury Elevations A, B, C, Dd Attachment 3.
1
1. Except as modified by paragraph 1 of this Amendment, the Planned Unit Development
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
2. The obligations and restrictions of this Amendment run with the land of the Subject
Property and shall be enforceable against the Declarant, its successors and assigns, by the
City of Rosemount acting through its City Council. This Amendment may be amended
from time to time by a written amendment executed by the City and the owner or owners
of the lot or lots to be affected by said amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned as duly authorized agents, officers or
representatives of Declarant have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first
above written.
2
DECLARANT
US HOMES CORPORATION
By
Its
By
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF DAKOTA
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
2009, by and the and
for and on behalf of U.S. Homes Corporation, a
by and on behalf of said
3
Notary Public
This Amendment is approved and consented to by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
By:
Wiliam H. Droste, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF DAKOTA
And by:
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2009,
by William H. Droste and Amy Domeier, the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, for and on behalf
of the City of Rosemount, a Minnesota corporation, by and on behalf of said corporation.
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
City of Rosemount
2875 145 Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068 1
651- 423 -4411
4
Notary Public
Lot 1, Block 5;
Lot 2, Block 5;
Lot 18, Block 4;
Lot 19, Block 4, all in Evermoor Glenda lough 1 Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota.
Lots 7, 9, 10, 14, 16, and 17, Block 2, Evermoor Glenda lough 5tli Addition, Dakota
County, Minnesota.
Lot 3, Block 1;
Lots 1 through 10, Block 2;
Lot 2, Block 3;
Lot 13, Block 3;
Lots 1 through 8, Block 4;
Lots 2 through 7, Block 5, all in Evermoor Glenda lough 6 Addition, Dakota County,
Minnesota.
Lots 1 through 7, Block 1;
Lots 1 through 10, Block 2;
Lots 2 through 8, Block 3;
Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, all in Evermoor Glendalough 7 Addition, Dakota County,
Minnesota.
Outlot D, Evermoor, Dakota County, Minnesota.
ATTACHMENT ONE
s
ATTACHMENT 3
r
935 Eat \'Va;.-zo c Bk'd. V \/av -_atc, MN 5539' 954 -249 -3000
Pills
DU
ry
;fir Dinette
t.
10' -1" x 15'1"
•s:f i
t i
Kitchen
8' -1" x 15' -1"
Family Room
13'4" x. 14'5"
n e i Foyer
Study
11'4" x 9
Mud
,IRoo
ad.
-I
uJ Porch ;A
J
Main Level
2 Stories 14 Bedrooms 13 Baths 1 3 Bay Garage
Garage
2,190 Sq. Ft. Total
m
Bedroom
10' -10" x 10'4"
Bedroom
1l' -0" x 10' -10"
Ba
Upper Level
ain
La dry
Owner's Suite
n er's 14'4" x 13' -1"
at
Bedroom
11'4" x 10'10"
Ust.
Plans and devotions arc artist's renderings and may contain options, which ore not standard on all models. Lennor reserves the right to make changes to these floor pluns,
specifications, dimensions and elevotions without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage arc approximate and should not be used as representation of the
home's precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, regarding "under air' or "finished area" or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of
rporal on. Lennor and h
f e Le logo e manner
regi tered which
sery ce marks of Le Corpo ation and /orlitsusubsi be 2/09 to indicate ceriointy. Copyright C' 2009 Lennor
Co
Copyright 2007, Dakota County Map Date: May 31, 2007
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2009
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR AMENDMENT TO PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ADDING THE RAMSEY AND PILLSBURY
PRODUCTS TO THE LIST OF APPROVED HOMES IN THE EVERMOOR
GLENDALOUGH NEIGHBORHOOD FOR U.S. HOME CORPORATION (LENNAR)
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an
application from U.S. Home Corporation (Lennox) requesting PUD Minor Amendment approval
concerning the Subject Property, legally described on Attachment One; and
WHEREAS, the amendment would add the Ramsey and Pillsbury products to the list of approved
homes in the Evermoor Glenda lough Neighborhood; and
WHEREAS, on June 16, 2009 the City Council approved a minor amendment to the Evermoor Planned
Unit Development (PUD) agreement allowing the Ramsey and Pillsbury products based on the finding
that they were acceptable under the original terms and characteristics for homes in the Glendalough
neighborhood as detailed in the Glendalough section of the Evermoor Planned Unit Development
agreement; and
WHEREAS, since the Ramsey and Pillsbury products were found acceptable under the original terms
and characteristics for homes in the Glendalough neighborhood, this application may be processed as a
minor amendment to the planned unit development (PUD) agreement; and
WHEREAS, minor amendments to a planned unit development (PUD) agreement may be
reviewed and approved by the City Council without a public hearing before the Planning
Commission; and
WHEREAS, on June 16, 2009, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the application
and agreed with staff's recommendation for approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves a Minor Amendment to the Planned Unit Development agreement for Evermoor
Glendalough, subject to:
1. Execution of the Minor Amendment to the Planned Unit Development agreement for
Evermoor Glendalough.
RESOLUTION 2008-
ADOPTED this 16th Day of June, 2009, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
ATTEST:
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
William H. Droste, Mayor
Motion by: Second by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against
Member absent
2
Lot 1, Block 5;
Lot 2, Block 5;
Lot 18, Block 4;
Lot 19, Block 4, all in Evermoor Glendalough 1 Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota.
Lots 7, 9, 10, 14, 16, and 17, Block 2, Evermoor Glendalough 5th Addition, Dakota
County, Minnesota.
Lot 3, Block 1;
Lots 1 through 10, Block 2;
Lot 2, Block 3;
Lot 13, Block 3;
Lots 1 through 8, Block 4;
Lots 2 through 7, Block 5, all in Evermoor Glendalough 6 Addition, Dakota County,
Minnesota.
Lots 1 through 7, Block 1;
Lots 1 through 10, Block 2;
Lots 2 through 8, Block 3;
Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, all in Evermoor Glendalough 7 Addition, Dakota County,
Minnesota.
Outlot D, Evermoor, Dakota County, Minnesota.
ATTACHMENT ONE
3
1
6
11,180
23%
22%
25%
22%
22%
1
2
6
12,422
21%
20%
22%
20%
20%
3
2
6
13,463
20%
18%
20%
18%
18%
4
2
6
15,402
17%
16%
18%
16%
16%
5
2
6
14,932
18%
17%
18%
16%
17%
6
2
6
14,762
18%
17%
19%
17%
17%
7
2
6
10,938
24%
23%
25%
22%
23%
8
2
6
12,880
20%
19%
21%
19%
19%
9
2
6
14,752
18%
17%
19%
17%
17%
10
2
6
13,988
19%
18%
20%
18%
18%
1
4
6
10,458
25%
24%
26%
23%
24%
2
4
6
9,750
27%
26%
28%
25%
25%
3
4
6
9,750
27%
26%
28%
25%
25%
4
4
6
10,707
25%
23%
26%
23%
23%
5
4
6
10,707
25%
23%
26%
23%
23%
6
4
6
9,750
27%
26%
28%
25%
25%
7
4
6
9,750
27%
26%
28%
25%
25%
8
4
6
11,050
24%
23%
25%
22%
22%
7
5
6
12,540
21%
20%
22%
20%
20%
1
1
7
16,445
16%
15%
17%
15%
15%
5
1
7
10,875
24%
23%
25%
23%
23%
6
1
7
11,745
22%
21%
23%
21%
21%
7
1
7
13,775
19%
18%
20%
18%
18%
2
2
7
11,250
23%
22%
24%
22%
22%
3
2
7
11,250
23%
22%
24%
22%
22%
5
2
7
12,415
21%
20%
22%
20%
20%
6
2
7
14,864
18%
17%
19%
17%
17%
7
2
7
15,077
17%
17%
18%
16%
16%
8
2
7
16,072
16%
15%
17%
15%
15%
9
2
7
13,949
19%
18%
20%
18%
18%
10
2
7
16,302
16%
15%
17%
15%
15%
2
3
7
10,592
25%
24%
26%
23%
23%
3
3
7
11,095
24%
22%
25%
22%
22%
4
3
7
14,685
18%
17%
19%
17%
17%
5
3
7
19,538
13%
13%
14%
13%
13%
6
3
7
18,863
14%
13%
15%
13%
13%
7
3
7
11,503
23%
22%
24%
21%
21%
8
3
7
12,618
21%
20%
22%
19%
20%
2
4
7
11,744
22%
21%
23%
21%
21%
3
4
7
12,684
21%
20%
22%
19%
19%
Glendalough Impervious Surface Analysis
O
J
12,913 1 20%
N 1~ tp
N N N N N
19%
2
V
21%
19%
19%
main flr 1138 1096 1347 1080 988
garage 721 695 673 640 684
porch 172 104 140 142 199
drive in lot 170 170 170 170 170
drive house to curb 425 425 425 425 425
Total area 2626 2490 2755 2457 2466