HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.a. Request to Adopt the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as Approved by the Metropolitan Council 9 ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CITY COUNCIL
City Council Meeting Date: November 17, 2009
AGENDA ITEM: Request to Adopt the 2030 Comprehensive AGE DA SECTION:
Plan as Approved by the Metropolitan I �U> I MSC
Council I 1 f1,
PREPARED BY: Eric Zweber, Senior Planner AGENDA NO.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution; Figure 7.5: 2030 APPROVED BY:
Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map;
Metropolitan Council Incomplete for
Review Letter dated June 17, 2009;
Rosemount Re- submittal Letter dated
August 4, 2009; Metropolitan Council
Approval Letter dated October 29, 2009
Provided on CD: 2030 Comprehensive
Plan. DDJ
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a Resolution adopting the Rosemount
2030 Comprehensive Plan.
SUMMARY
On May 19, 2009, the City Council approved the Rosemount 2030 Comprehensive Plan and
authorized its submission to the Metropolitan Council for their approval. On June 17, the
Metropolitan Council's staff provided an incomplete letter to the City which included a number of
recommended revisions. On August 4, City staff re- submitted the Comprehensive Plan to the
Metropolitan Council addressing the recommended revisions. As a result of this re- submittal, the
Metropolitan Council approved Rosemount's 2030 Comprehensive Plan on October 28, 2009.
BACKGROUND
On May 19, the City Council approved the 2030 Comprehensive (Comp) Plan and authorized its
submittal to the Metropolitan (Met) Council. On June 17, the Met Council responded to our
submittal with a letter stating that the Comp Plan was incomplete and recommended a number of
changes. The majority of the comments were minor in nature and all of the comments were
addressed by correcting inconsistencies between different sections or adding language to clarify
either the data provided or the intent of the City. The revised Comp Plan was resubmitted to the
Met Council on August 4. The Met Council's incomplete letter and the staff's response letter with
the re- submittal are provided as attachments to this Executive Summary.
On October 13, the Met Council's Environment Committee reviewed (particularly the water and
sewer components) the Comp Plan and recommended its approval with no additional changes or
comments. On October 19, the Met Council's Community Development Committee reviewed and
recommended approval of the Comp Plan. The Community Development Committee's comments
were procedural in nature; they clarified the final steps needed before the Comp Plan can be
implemented. On October 28, the Met Council approved the Rosemount 2030 Comprehensive
Plan. The Met Council's approval letter and staff reports are provided as an attachment to this
Executive Summary. Please note that the final adoption letter from the Met Council does not require
revisions to the Plan but rather recognizes the Plan will be put into effect with the information
contained in the approved Plan and any new amendments must also go before the Met Council for
approval.
Following the Met Council's approval, the City Council must adopt the Comp Plan as approved by
the Met Council. In addition, the City must also review its "official controls" and revise them as
needed to ensure that they allow the goals and policies within the Comp Plan to be fulfilled. Official
controls include the City's Ordinances, Zoning Map, and Capital Improvement Plan. To begin this
process, the Planning Commission will begin reviewing the C2: Downtown Commercial and
Traditional Downtown Overlay zoning districts later in November.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Rosemount 2030 Comprehensive Plan as
approved by the Metropolitan Council.
2
C(evVJ
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 111111/001 �'G(
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2009
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ROSEMOUNT 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute Section 473.864 requires the City of Rosemount to adopt a
Comprehensive Plan describing the City's growth through the year 2030; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, with assistance from the Parks and Recreation
Commission, Port Authority and the Utility Commission, constructed the Comprehensive Plan
through a series of public meetings held during 2007, 2008, and 2009; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount gathered additional public input from six public open
houses, numerous newsletter articles and mailings, the City website, and written public
comments; and
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2008 and May 27, 2008, the Planning Commission conducted
community hearings on the proposed Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, on August 19, 2008, the City Council authorized the release of the Comprehensive
Plan for a six month review and comment period and distribution of the Comprehensive Plan to
the neighboring jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, the six month review period ended February 19, 2009 and the City received
comments from the neighboring communities, State agencies, and residents; and
WHEREAS, on March 24, 2009, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount held a
public hearing and reviewed the comments received regarding the 2030 Comprehensive Plan;
and
WHEREAS, on May 19, 2009, the City Council of the City of Rosemount approved the 2030
Comprehensive Plan and authorized its submittal to the Metropolitan Council; and
WHEREAS, on June 17, 2009, the Metropolitan Council provided a review letter regarding the
2030 Comprehensive Plan including a number of recommended changes; and
WHEREAS, Rosemount staff meet with the Metropolitan Council staff re their
requested changes and on August 4, 2009, the Rosemount staff resubmitted the 2030
Comprehensive Plan with the recommended changes; and
WHEREAS, on October 13, 2009, the Metropolitan Council's Environment Committee and on
October 19, 2009, the Metropolitan Council's CommunityDevelopment Committee reviewed
and recommended approval of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, on October 28, 2009, the Metropolitan Council approved the 2030
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2009, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the
Metropolitan Council's approved 2030 Comprehensive Plan.
RESOLUTION 2009
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
adopts the Rosemount 2030 Comprehensive Plan.
ADOPTED this 17th day of November, 2009, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
William H. Droste, Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
Motion by Second by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Member absent:
7
a
NI a
ti o
f
0 1.1 flY i 3 I
1
Y
1 a 4 I 1--/ LC) A +-t-----' -s n L� V V I
//s AI f
M f kV 11.. r a
1 ilipli k Nr
rg 1 .1 ,V;Ty,..„ k 4
t r
r
p-T irAnallt
L
b
1 'r j
I I 1 4
of 1 1
r
I 4 L ill
OM
TI.gg ii ,1
d
II1
03 o �f 1
U) 2 2 2 :13' .P mme 4
I 1 thtl "i:: en
CD
L. e
c
era I; a
p
CL 16. 41 LT, 1 .g 01 061, q414
Vii' 0 thrt
cc 9 F-5 2 i Oh' In 3 j q-
iti•,.... .....L. kto qg u
u d
E
(n U E r
r 1 'r„: 1 7 raj og
s- 1 I :1 P. E C 1 ,Alf,„k i (Vil. ,-1 AA m o m E c I Y J a -3i m to ff__i re lA
z 2 1' 3 -Lett-,:,„" d i t rat w L.,... ...se iv-mg. Lo
U M
'14 Metropolitan Council
i
June 17, 2009
Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director
City of Rosemount
2875 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068 -4941
RE: City of Rosemount 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update— Incomplete for Review
Metropolitan Council Review File No. 20584 -1
Metropolitan Council District 16, Wendy Wulff
Dear Ms. Lindquist:
Thank you for the submission of the City of Rosemount's Comprehensive Plan Update (Update)
on May 29, 2009. Council staff found the Update is incomplete for aviation, forecasts, land use,
transportation and wastewater. In addition, Council staff has identified issues that could result in
a system departure and require a plan modification. Review of the Update will be suspended
until the additional information is submitted and found complete for review. The following
items were found incomplete:
REQUIRED INFORMATION
Aviation (Chauncey Case, 651 602 -1724)
The Update is incomplete for aviation. Page 10 of the Transportation section needs to
add information concerning notification to Minnesota Department of Transportation and
the Federal Aviation Administration as described in the Local Planning Handbook.
Forecasts (Todd Graham, 651- 602 -1322)
The Update is incomplete for forecasts because sanitary sewered household forecasts are
missing.
The forecasts in Table 1 below are consistently presented in Community Background
Table 2.1, Land Use Table 7.4, and Transportation Plan Appendix Table C.1 (forecasts
allocated to Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs). However, forecast information is
incomplete in Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan Table 4.1 and Water System Plan
Table 6. In these two sections, population forecasts are presented, but households
expectations are missing. The City needs to edit the incomplete tables to include the
sanitary sewered household forecasts.
The Update includes a City requested revision of households and population forecasts in
2030. The City's request is premised on a realistic and evenly spread staging of future
land development. In April 2009 discussions, Council staff agreed to include these
forecast revisions in Council staff's report and proposed action on the City Update.
www.metrocouncll.org
390 Robert Street North St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 (651) 602 -1000 Fax (651) 602 -1550 TTY (651) 291 -0904
An Equal Opporluntly Employer
Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director
June 17, 2009
Page 2
Table 1.
Rosemount Forecasts Pending Approval
2010 2020 2030
Population Metro System 21,900 31,500 40,700
Population Unsewered 1,850 1,550 1,300
Population TOTAL 23,750 33,050 42,000
Household Metro System 7,400 11,250 15,000
Household Unsewered 650 550 500
Household TOTAL 8,050 11,800 15,500
Employment Metro System 8,400 10,100 12,220
Employment Unsewered 0 0 0
Employment TOTAL 8,400 10,100 12,220
Metropolitan Council 's forecast will be officially revised, as above, upon Council approval of the Update.
Advisory Comments:
Land use and forecasts used in the Update do not yet reflect the potential development of
UMore Park. The City expects that the population, households, and employment forecasts
will need to be revised based on this development. Council staff acknowledges that the
Update may be amended in the future, and forecasts revisions will be considered
accordingly as a comprehensive plan amendment.
Land Use (Freya Thamman, 651- 602 -1750)
The Update is incomplete for land use. The Downtown land use category allows
residential as shown in Table 7.8 and discussed on Page 68. Please include the estimated
percent residential in the text description on Page 68 and allowed minimum and
maximum densities.
Table 7.7 shows the City's density calculation, which uses the lowest allowed density and
exceeds 3 units per acre. Based on the City's plat monitoring history and preliminary
calculations, Council staff does not see policy issues in regards to the City's sewered
residential areas meeting at least 3 residential units per acre. However, additional
information is needed to describe how the acreages in the table were.derived. In addition,
please include whether the acres shown as net or gross.
The Update included a cover letter and responses to the Council's informal review
comments. However, the Update also needs to include the comprehensive plan update
transmittal form, which is located at htto:// www. metrocouncil. org/ planning /assistance/CPUFormJan06.doc.
Advisory Comments:
It is advised that the future land use map include the Agricultural Preserves as shown in
Figure 7.7.
Table 7.3 as well as Table 7.8 through 7.11 that stage development in five -year
increments include the City's best estimate on the unit/acre density. It is suggested that
Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director
June 17, 2009
Page 3
the City include a footnote or text in the Update that states the units per acre in these
tables is based the City's best estimate.
Transportation (Elaine Koutsoukos, 651- 602 -1717)
The Update is incomplete for transportation and not in conformance and may be, more
likely than not, a substantial impact or departure from the Transportation Policy Plan's
Facility Site Location Plan for future park- and -rides (P &R). The Update shows- a
projected demand of 1,200 spaces by 2010, 1,800 spaces by 2020, and 2,750 spaces by
2030 in Table 3 -2 of the Transit Plan. To be determined complete, Table 3 -2 needs to be
revised to reflect the numbers projected park- and -ride users as shown by traffic analysis
zone (TAZ) and totaled in Table 2.
Table 2.
,;fatal Projected P &R Users
TAZ 2010 2020 2030
221 116 126 157
222 46 59 93
223 48 106 153
224 1 31 62
225 0 2 0
226 0 1 2
227 0 0 0
Total 211 325 467
Source: TPP Park -and -Ride Facility Site Location Plan.
The Update is not in conformance with the Transportation Policy Plan (TPP) because it
identifies future park -and -ride sites that are not in the TPP. Demand for future park -and-
ride spaces was identified in the TPP's Park and -Ride Facility Site Location Plan in the
area of Highway 52 and County Road 42
www. metrocouncil. org/ parkridefacilitysitelocation /PRDModelTablesFinal.pdf and
www. metrocouncil. org /parkridefacilitysite]ocation/ Figs- 3_ SouthMetroA reaPotentialSiteLocationAreasFinal .pd0
The Park and -Ride Facility Site Location Plan shows a projected demand of 200 spaces
in 2020. There are no other future park- and -ride locations identified.
The Update needs to be revised to reflect only the potential park -and -ride site locations
that are in the Park- and -Ride Facility Site Location Plan.
Advisory Comments:
TAZ Allocation: The TAZ allocation table (C -1) sum to the "Pending" set of numbers
approved by Research. These will be used for travel demand forecasting.
Functional Classification: The Update contains both map and text of its classified
roadways that accurately reflects the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB)- adopted
system. The Update does contain a number of "Collector" roadways that are currently
not on the TAB maps. To be included in the TAB functional classification map, the City
Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director
June 17, 2009
Page 4
will need to formally request inclusion through the Transportation Advisory Committee
Planning Committee.
Transit: Some park- and -ride users will utilize a park -and -ride in Rosemount, but others
will travel to park- and -rides in nearby cities for various reasons. The following list
shows the park- and -rides that residents of Rosemount are currently using:
2008 Park Ride Users from Rosemount
Apple Valley Transit Station 97
Blackhawk, Eagan 25
Palomino, Apple Valley 47,
Eagan Transit Station 13
157th P &R 6
Burnsville Transit Station 14
Total 202
On page 6 -9, text states that "by 2030, a very short segment of Cedar Avenue is
depressed at County Road 42, a "lid" is added..." The Cedar Avenue Transitway plans
do not include this element.
Access Management Guidelines: On pages 9 and 15, The Update refers to the guidelines
being in section 5.2.3. This needs to be section 5.2.4.
Wastewater (Kyle Colvin, 651- 602 -1151)
The Update is incomplete for wastewater services. The wastewater element of the Update
includes population projections through 2030. The Update also needs to include sewered
household projections in the 10 -year incremental time periods consistent with the flow
projections provided in the document.
Advisory Comments:
The Update indicates that the City requires property owners to connect to the sanitary
sewer system within 10 years after it becomes available or at the time of a documented
on -site treatment system failure. The Council's current Rules and Regulations require the
connection within twenty -four months after sanitary sewer service becomes available.
The Council is currently in the process of revising its Waste Discharge Rules to define
the term "availability" in the Regulation. A comment in the final staff review write -up on
the Update will indicate that the City will need to adopt and implement the new Rules
and Regulations when they are approved by the Council.
The wastewater flow projections in the Update are significantly higher than the Council's
projections as provided in the Systems Statement. Although the projections in the Update
may be used for the design of local trunk sewers, the Council will program improvements
to the Metropolitan Disposal System based on its projections and the continued
monitoring of system flow in Rosemount.
Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director
June 17, 2009
Page 5
To expedite the Council staffs' review of supplemental materials submitted in response to
incomplete items, please provide a cover memo that outlines where and how the incomplete
items are addressed in the new material. Also, as with the original submittal, please send one
hard copy and one electronic copy in PDF format on to Cheryl Olsen, Reviews Coordinator.
After all of the required elements of the Update are submitted and found complete, Council staff
will begin the official review process. Please contact Freya Thamman, Planning Analyst at 651-
602 -1750, Patrick Boylan, Sector Representative, 651- 602 -1438 or the listed technical review
staff with any questions or for additional assistance.
Sincerely,
111/ r pf
Phylli on, Manager
Local arming Assistance
cc: Wendy Wulff, District 16
Patrick Boylan, Sector Representative
Freya Thamman, Principal Reviewer
Cheryl Olsen, Referrals Coordinator
N.• ICommDevlLPAlCommunitieslRosemounilLetterslRosemount 2009 CPUlncomplete.doc
4 ROSEMOUNT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
August 4, 2009
Metropolitan Council
Attn. Cheryl Olsen, Referrals Coordinator
390 Robert St North
St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805
RE: City of Rosemount 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update Re submittal
Metropolitan Council Review File No. 20584 -1
Dear Phyllis Hanson:
Thank you for the comments provided within the incomplete letter dated June 17, 2009.
Rosemount staff has provided the additional information or performed the required corrects to
complete the City of Rosemount 2030 Comprehensive Plan. In addition to the Plan, attached is the
transmittal form and below are the responses to the comments that the Council staff has provided.
You should now find the Plan to be complete and the City looks forward to the review of the Plan
by the Metropolitan Council.
Aviation (Chauncey Case, 651 -602 -1724)
The Update is incomplete for aviation. Page 10 of the Transportation section needs to add
information concerning notification to Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Federal
Aviation Administration as described in the Local Planning Handbook.
The requested notification information had been included in the previous draft, submitted to the Metropolitan Council
on May 29, 2009. A telephone conversation with Chauncey Case of the Metropolitan Council stcfon Jun 25,
2009 conformed that the language is acceptable for aviation. No revision is required.
Forecasts (Todd Graham, 651- 602 -1322)
The Update is incomplete for forecasts because sanitary sewered household forecasts are
missing.
The forecasts in Table 1 below are consistently presented in Community Background Table 2.1,
Land Use Table 7.4, and Transportation Plan Appendix Table C.1 (forecasts allocated to Traffic
Analysis Zones (TAZs). However, forecast information is incomplete in Comprehensive
Sanitary Sewer Plan Table 4.1 and Water System Plan Table 6. In these two sections, population
forecasts are presented, but households expectations are missing. The City needs to edit the
incomplete tables to include the sanitary sewered household forecasts.
The household forecasts have been added to Table 4.1 and Table 6.
Land Use (Freya Thamman, 651 -602 -1750)
The Update is incomplete for land use. The Downtown land use category allows residential as
shown in Table 7.8 and discussed on Page 68. Please include the estimated percent residential in
the text description on Page 68 and allowed minimum and maximum densities.
SPIRIT OF PRIDE AND PROGRESS
Rosemount City Hall 2875 145th Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 -4997
651- 423 -4411 TDD /TTY 651 -423 -6219 Fax 651 -423 -5203
www.ci.rosemount.mn.us
Phyllis Hanson, Manager, Local Planning Assistance
August 4, 2009
Page 2
The residential density range of the Downtown land use category bas been added to page 68.
Table 7.7 shows the City's density calculation, which uses the lowest allowed density and
exceeds 3 units per acre. Based on the City's plat monitoring history and preliminary
calculations, Council staff does not see policy issues in regards to the City's sewered residential
areas meeting at least 3 residential units per acre. However, additional information is needed to
describe how the acreages in the table were derived. In addition, please include whether the
acres shown as net or gross.
A footnote bas been added to Table 7.7 to indicate that the acres arr gross acreages following the Plat Monitoring
program guidelines.
The Update included a cover letter and responses to the Council's informal review comments.
However, the Update also needs to include the comprehensive plan update transmittal form,
which is located at ht www, metrocouncil. org/ vianning /assistange/CPUFonnlan06,doc.
The transmittal form bas been provided with the re submittal
Advisory Comments:
It is advised that the future land use map include the Agricultural Preserves as shown in Figure
7.7.
Figure 7.7 does show the future land use designations and tbe land enrolled in the Agricultural Preserves progtivn.
Table 7.3 as well as Table 7.8 through 7.11 that stage development in five -year increments
include the City's best estimate on the unit/acre density. It is suggested that the City include a
footnote or text in the Update that states the units per acre in these tables is based the City's best
estimate.
A. footnote has been added to Tables 7.3 and 7.8 to 7.11 to clarify that tbe densities used are based on historical
averages derived from the plat monitoring data.
Transportation (Elaine Koutsoukos, 651 602 -1717)
The Update is incomplete for transportation and not in conformance and may be, more likely
than not, a substantial impact or departure from the Transportation Policy Plan's Facility Site
Location Plan for future park and -rides (P &R). The Update shows a projected demand of 1,200
spaces by 2010, 1,800 spaces by 2020, and 2,750 spaces by 2030 in Table 3 -2 of the Transit
Plan. To be determined complete, Table 3 -2 needs to be revised to reflect the numbers projected
park and -ride users as shown by traffic analysis zone (TAZ) and totaled in Table 2.
Representatives of the City communicated with Elaine Koutsoukos matting the projection ofparking demand at
potential future park- and -ride sites as summarized in Table 3 -2. Once Mr. Koutsoukos was provided with
clanication regarding the methods used and the presentation of information in Table 3 -2, she indicated that tbe table
Phyllis Hanson, Manager, Local Planning Assistance
August 4, 2009
P age 3
would not need to be revised, under the conditions that clarifcations be made in the text introducing the table. These
clarifications have been added to the paragraph preceding Table 3 -2.
Table 2.
Total Projected P &R Users
TAX 2010 2020 2030
221 116 126 157
222 46 59 93
223 48 106 153
224 1 31 62
225 0 2 0
226 0 1 2
227 0 0 0
Total 211 325 467
Source; TPP Park and -Ride Facility Site Location Plan.
The Update is not in conformance with the Transportation Policy Plan (TPP) because it identifies
future park -and -ride sites that are not in the TPP. Demand for future park -and -ride spaces was
identified in the TPP's Park and -Ride Facility Site Location Plan in the area of Highway 52 and
County Road 42 www. metrocouncil. org/ pw{ ctidefacilitysitelocation /PRDModelTablesFinal.adf and
www, metrocouncil. ora/ mkridefacilitvsite locationWFig5- ,$outhMetroAreaPotentiaiSitef ocetionAreasFinal.pdf)
The Park- and-Ride Facility Site Location Plan shows a projected demand of 200 spaces in 2020.
There are no other future park and -ride locations identified.
The Update needs to be revised to reflect only the potential park and -ride site locations that are
in the Park and -Ride Facility Site Location Plan.
Representatives of the City communicated with Elaine Koutsoukos and Connie Kozlak regarding the potential future
Park-and-Rides. Language bas been added to Page 13 of the Transit Plan to clarify that the future Park and -Rides
are not in the 7PP and are shown for long range planning as potential location where Park and -Rides may become
fea.rbk due to the growth depicted in the 2030 Comp Plan or may help to facilitate the growth expected in the 2030
Comp Plan. The language recognizes that the City will need to work with the transit providers and the Metropolitan
Council to add these Park- and -Rides to the TPP as demand warrants
Advisory Comments:
Functional Classification: The Update contains both map and text of its classified roadways that
accurately reflects the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) adopted system. The Update does
contain a number of "Collector" roadways that are currently not on the TAB maps. To be
included in the TAB functional classification map, the City will need to formally request
inclusion through the Transportation Advisory Committee Planning Committee,
The City of Rosemount understands that it will need to formal# request revisions to the Metropolitan Council's
regional functional classification map outside of the comprehensive plan update process. No revision is required
Phyllis Hanson, Manager, Local Planning Assistance
August 4, 2009
Page 4
Transit: Some park- and -ride users will utilize a park and -ride in Rosemount, but others will
travel to park- and -rides in nearby cities for various reasons. The following list shows the park
and -rides that residents of Rosemount are currently using:
2008 Park Ride Users from Rosemount
Apple Valley Transit Station 97
Blackhawk, Eagan 25
Palomino, Apple Valley 47
Eagan Transit Station 13
157th P &R 6
Burnsville Transit Station 14
Total 202
On page 6 9, text states that "by 2030, a very short segment of Cedar Avenue is depressed at
County Road 42, a "lid" is added..." The Cedar Avenue Transitway plans do not include this
element.
This appears to be a comment on another Comprehensive Plan, penhaps.Appk Valley. This comment does not apply
to the Transportation Plan as part of the Rosemount Comprehensive Plan Update. There is no `Page 6 -9" in the
Rosemount Transportation Plan or its appendices No revision is required.
Access Management Guidelines: On pages 9 and 15, The Update refers to the guidelines being
in section 5.2.3. This needs to be section 5.2.4.
The comment is accurate and the proposed corrections bane been made in the attached revised Transportation Plan.
Wastewater (Kyle Colvin, 651 602 1151)
The Update is incomplete for wastewater services. The wastewater element of the Update
includes population projections through 2030. The Update also needs to include sewered
household projections in the 10 -year incremental time periods consistent with the flow
projections provided in the document.
Household forecasts have been added to Table 6 of the Wastewater Plan.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the re- submittal of Rosemount's 2030
Comprehensive Plan, please feel free to contact me at (651) 322 -2052 or
eric.zweber@ci.rosemount.mn.us.
Sincerely,
Eric Zweb enior
cc: Kira. Lindquist, Community Development Director
AA Metropolitan Council
AA
October 29, 2009
-OR n \V 11
NOV 3 2009 II
Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director
City of Rosemount By
2875 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
RE: City of Rosemount 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update— Post Council Action
Metropolitan Council Review File No. 20584 -1
Metropolitan Council District 16, Wendy Wulff
Dear Mr. Lindquist:
The Metropolitan Council completed its review of the City of Rosemount's Comprehensive Plan Update
(Update) at its meeting on October 28, 2009. The Council based its review on the staff's report and
analysis (see attached).
The Council found that the City's Update meets all Metropolitan Land Planning Act requirements,
conforms to the regional system plans including transportation, aviation, water resources management and
parks, is consistent with the 2030 Regional Development Framework, and is compatible with the plans of
adjacent jurisdictions.
In addition to the Advisory Comments and Review Record, the Council adopted the following
recommendations:
1. Authorize the City of Rosemount to put its 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update into effect;
2. Adopt the revised forecasts and affordable housing needs number, as detailed in Table 1
and the Housing section of the attached Review Record;
3. Advise the City it is required to submit comprehensive plan amendments to the Council
as discussed in the Land Use section of the attached Review Record;
4. Forward the Council's Critical Area plan review, findings and recommendations to the
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and National Park Service for their records;
5. To implement the advisory comments in the transportation and forecast sections of the
Review Record; and
6. Approve the City of Rosemount's Tier II Comprehensive Sewer Plan.
Please consult the attached staff report for important information about the City's next steps. Of particular
importance are the Council's actions, listed on page 1, general Advisory Comments listed on page 3, and
the specific comments for technical review areas, which are found in the body of the report. The final
copy of the Update needs to include all supplemental information/changes made during the completeness
review.
www.metrocouncil.org
390 Robert Street North St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 (651) 602 -1000 Fax (651) 602 -1550 TTY (651) 291 -0904
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Committee Report
Community Development Committee Item: 2009 -374
Environment Committee
For the Metropolitan Council meeting of October 28, 2009
ADVISORY INFORMATION
Subject: City of Rosemount 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update
Tier II Comprehensive Sewer Plan
Review File No. 20584 -1
Proposed Action:
That the Metropolitan Council adopt the attached Advisory Comments and Review Record,
and the following:
1. Authorize the City of Rosemount to put its 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update into effect;
2. Adopt the revised forecasts and affordable housing needs number, as detailed in Table
1 and the Housing section of the attached Review Record;
3. Advise the City it is required to submit comprehensive plan amendments to the Council
as discussed in the Land Use section of the attached Review Record;
4. Forward the Council's Critical Area plan review, findings and recommendations to the
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and National Park Service for their records;
5. Implement the advisory comments in the transportation and forecast sections of the
Review Record; and
6. Approve the City of Rosemount's Tier II Comprehensive Sewer Plan.
Summary of Committee Discussion Questions:
Community Development Committee
Local Planning Assistance staff member Freya Thamman presented a summary of the report
and proposed actions to the Committee. Ms. Thamman informed the Committee that Eric
Zweber, Senior City Planner for Rosemount, was also available to answer questions from the
community's perspective.
Chair Steffen asked if the City currently has any aggregate mining. Ms. Thamman responded
that the City has aggregate areas. Mr. Zweber stated that the City has about four active
mines that are probably all under the size of forty acres and that the University of Minnesota
is planning to extract the aggregate from the UMORE area before it would develop.
Motion to approve the City of Rosemount's Comprehensive Plan Update was made, seconded
and passed unanimously.
Environment Committee
There was no discussion. Motion to approve the City of Rosemount's Tier II Comprehensive
Sewer Plan was made, seconded and passed unanimously.
1
N.• ICommDevILPAICommunitieslRosemountlReportslRosemount 2009 CPU 20584 -1 Joint Committe Report.doc
Business Item
C Community Development Committee Item: 2009 -374
Meeting date: October 19, 2009
E Environment Committee
Meeting date: October 13, 2009
ADVISORY INFORMATION
Subject: City of Rosemount 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update
Tier II Comprehensive Sewer Plan
Review File No. 20584 -1
District(s), Member(s): District 16, Council Member Wendy Wulff
Policy /Legal Reference: Minnesota Statutes Section 473.175
Staff Prepared /Presented: Freya Thamman, Principal Reviewer (651- 602 -1750)
Phyllis Hanson, Manager Local Planning Assistance
(651- 602 -1566)
Kyle Colvin, Asst. Manager Engineering Services
(651- 602 -1151)
Division /Department: Community Development Planning and Growth Mgmt
Environmental Services Engineering Services
Proposed Action
That the Metropolitan Council adopts the attached Advisory Comments and Review Record,
and the following:
Recommendation of the Community Development Committee:
1. Authorize the City of Rosemount to put its 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update into
effect;
2. Adopt the revised forecasts and affordable housing needs number, as detailed in Table
1 and the Housing section of the attached Review Record;
3. Advise the City it is required to submit comprehensive plan amendments to the
Council as discussed in the Land Use section of the attached Review Record;
4. Forward the Council's Critical Area plan review, findings and recommendations to the
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and National Park Service for their
records; and
5. To implement the advisory comments in the transportation and forecast sections of
the Review Record.
Recommendation of the Environment Committee:
Approve the City of Rosemount's Tier II Comprehensive Sewer Plan.
2
N.• ICommDevILPAICommun itieslRosemountlReportslRosemount 2009 CPU 20584 -1 Joint Committe Report.doc
ADVISORY COMMENTS
City of Rosemount's 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update and
Tier II Comprehensive Sewer Plan
Review File No. 20584 -1, Council Business Item No. 2009 -374
The following Advisory Comments are part of the Council action authorizing the City to
implement its 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update "Update and approving the City's Tier II
Comprehensive Sewer Plan:
Community Development Committee
1. The Council- adopted Local Planning Handbook states that the City must take the
following steps:
(a) Adopt the Update in final form after considering the Council's review
recommendations; and
(b) Submit one electronic copy and one hard copy of the Update to the Council.
The electronic copy must be organized as one unified document.
A copy of the City Council resolution evidencing final approval of the Update should be
submitted to the Council.
2. The Council's Handbook also states that local governments must formally adopt their
comprehensive plans within nine months after the Council's final action. If the Council
has recommended changes, local governments should incorporate those
recommended changes into the plan or respond to the Council before "final approval"
of the comprehensive plan by the governing body of the local governmental unit
(Minn. Stat. 473.858, subd. 3).
3. Local governmental units must adopt official controls as described in their adopted
comprehensive plans and must submit copies of the official controls to the Council
within 30 days after official controls are adopted (Minn. Stat. 473.865, subd. 1).
4. Local governmental units cannot adopt any official controls or fiscal devices that
conflict with their comprehensive plans or which permit activities in conflict with the
Council's metropolitan system plans. (Minn. Stat. 473.864, subd. 2; 473.865,
subd. 2). If official controls conflict with comprehensive plans, the official controls
must be amended within nine months following amendments to comprehensive plans
(Minn. Stat. 473.865, subd. 3).
Environment Committee
1. The Council- approved Tier II Comprehensive Sewer Plan becomes effective only after
the Update also receives final approval by the City's governing body. After the Update
receives final approval by the City and the Tier II Sewer Plan becomes effective, the
City may implement its Update to alter, expand or improve its sewage disposal
system consistent with the Council- approved Tier II Sewer Plan.
2. A copy of the City Council Resolution adopting its Update, including the Tier II Sewer
Plan, must be submitted to the Council.
3
N :1CommDevILPAICommunities \Rosemount \Reports1Rosemount 2009 CPU 20584 -1 Joint Committe Report.doc
Background
Rosemount is located in Dakota County, surrounded by the Cities of Apple Valley, Coates,
Cottage Grove, Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, and the Townships of Nininger, Vermillion, and
Empire (see Figure 1).
The 2030 Regional Development Framework (RDF), as amended in December 2006,
identifies Rosemount as located partially within the "developing community" geographic
planning area and partially within the "agricultural" geographic planning area (see Figure 2).
The City submitted its 2030 Comprehensive Plan (Update) to the Council for review to meet
the Metropolitan Land Planning Act requirements (Minn. Stat. 473.175) and the Council's
2005 Systems Statement requirements.
Rationale Standard of Review Findings
a) Does the proposed Update conform to Regional Systems Plans?
b) Is the Update consistent with Metropolitan Council policies?
c) Is the Update compatible with plans of adjacent governmental units and plans of
affected special districts and school districts?
Conformance with Regional Systems Plans:
1. Regional Parks Yes
2. Transportation including Aviation Yes
3. Water Resources Management Yes
(Wastewater Services and Surface Water Management)
Consistent with Council Policy Requirements:
1. Forecasts Yes
2. Housing Yes
3. 2030 Regional Development Framework and Land Use Yes
4 Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS) Program Yes
5. Water Supply Yes
Compatible with Plans of Adjacent Governmental Units and Plans of Affected
Special Districts and School Districts
1. Compatible with other plans Yes
Funding
The City did not receive a Council grant or loan for the preparation of its Update.
Known Support Opposition
There is no known opposition.
4
N.•I CommDevILPAICommunitieslRosemountlReports1Rosemount 2009 CPU 20584 -1 Joint Committe Report.doc
REVIEW RECORD
City of Rosemount 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The Metropolitan Land Planning Act (MLPA) requires local units of government to submit
comprehensive plans and plan amendments to the Council for review and comment
(Minn. Stat. 473.864, Subd. 2). The Council reviews plans to determine:
Conformance with metropolitan system plans,
Consistency with other adopted Plans of the Council, and
Compatibility with the Plans of other local jurisdictions in the Metropolitan Area.
The Council may require a local governmental unit to modify any plan or part thereof if,
upon the adoption of findings and a resolution, the Council concludes that the Plan is
more likely than not to have a substantial impact on or contain a substantial departure
from metropolitan system plans (Minn. Stat. 473.175, Subd. 1).
Each local government unit shall adopt a policy plan for the collection, treatment and
disposal of sewage for which the local government unit is responsible, coordinated with
the Metropolitan Council's plan, and may revise the same as often as it deems necessary.
Each such plan shall be submitted to the Council for review and shall be subject to the
approval of the Council as to those features affecting the Council's responsibilities as
determined by the Council. Any such features disapproved by the Council shall be
modified in accordance with the Council's recommendations (Minn. Stat. 473.513).
CONFORMANCE WITH REGIONAL SYSTEMS
REGIONAL PARKS
Parks and Trails
Reviewer: Jan Youngquist, CD Regional Parks System Planning (651- 602 -1029)
The Update is in conformance with the Regional Parks Policy Plan. It acknowledges the
regional parks system facilities, which include Spring Lake Park Reserve, the planned
Mississippi River Regional Trail and the Vermillion Highlands Greenway Regional Trail
Search Corridor.
TRANSPORTATION
Roads and Transit
Reviewer: Elaine Koutsoukos MTS Systems Planning (651- 602 -1717)
The Update is in conformance with the Transportation Policy Plan adopted in 2004 and
addresses all the applicable transportation and transit requirements.
There are three principal arterials within Rosemount: Trunk Highway (TH) 52, TH 55, and
County State Aid Highway 42. There are no expansion plans for the metropolitan
highways located within Rosemount. The transportation chapter includes analysis of
existing and future transportation deficiencies and recommends improvements to the
minor arterial, major and minor collectors, and local roadway networks.
5
N.• ICommDevILPAICommunitieslRosemountlReports \Rosemount 2009 CPU 20584 -1 Joint Commute Report.doc
Rosemount lies within the Metropolitan Transit Taxing District. The western portion of
Rosemount is within Market Area III; the eastern portion in Market Area IV. Service
options for Market Area III include peak -only express, small vehicle circulators, midday
circulators, special needs paratransit (ADA, seniors), and ridesharing. Service options for
Market Area IV include dial -a -ride, volunteer driver programs, and ridesharing. Regular
route express and local transit service is provided by Minnesota Valley Transit Authority
(MVTA). Dial -a -ride service is provided by Dakota Areas Resources and Transportation
for Seniors (DARTS).
Advisory Comments
Transit Table 3.1 of the Update's Transportation section shows the average MVTA
subsidy to be $3.98. While this is correct, as a caution in comparing this subsidy to the
subsidy of the new service shown in the table, Rosemount should be aware that the cost
of overhead is included in the average subsidy calculation. The average also combines
local and express routes. In 2007 the average subsidy for the MVTA express routes
(using only operating expenses and fare revenues) was $2.07, which is similar to the
$2.12 subsidy of the new route.
Functional Classification The Update contains both a map and text of its classified
roadways that accurately reflects the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB)- adopted
system. The Update contains a number of "collector" roadways that are currently not on
the TAB maps. To be included in the TAB functional classification map, the City will need
to formally request their inclusion through the Transportation Advisory Committee
Planning Committee.
Aviation
Reviewer: Chauncey Case, MTS Systems Planning (651- 602 -1724)
The Update is in conformance with the Transportation Policy Plan and is consistent with
Council aviation policy.
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
Wastewater Service
Reviewer: Kyle Colvin, ES Engineering Services (651 -602 -1151)
The Update is in conformance with the Water Resources Management Policy Plan
(WRMPP). The Update summarizes the City's vision for the next 20 years or to year 2030.
It includes growth forecasts that are consistent with the Council's recommended forecasts
for population, households, and employment.
The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services currently provides wastewater treatment
services to the City. Wastewater generated within the City is conveyed to and treated at
the Metropolitan Council's Empire Wastewater Treatment Plant in Empire Township. The
City is provided wastewater conveyance service through interceptors 7112 and 9208. The
Update projects that the City will have 15,000 sanitary sewered households and 12,200
sewered employees by 2030. The Metropolitan Disposal System with its planned
scheduled improvements has or will have adequate capacity to serve the City's growth
needs.
The Update provides sanitary flow projections in 5 -year increments. The rationale for the
projections is given in the Update and determined appropriate for planning for local
services.
6
N: ICommDevILPAICommunities \RosemountlReportslRosemount 2009 CPU 20584 -1 Joint Committe Report.doc
Rosemount is not currently identified by the Council as a community impacted by wet
weather occurrences. The Update, however, does include a description of an Inflow and
Infiltration (I /I) reduction plan which includes televised inspection and regular
maintenance of the sanitary sewer system. The City prohibits the connection of sump
pumps, rain leaders, and passive drain tiles to the sanitary sewer system.
Tier 11 Comments
Council staff reviewed the Update's Tier II Sewer Element against the Council's
requirements for Tier II Comprehensive Sewer Plans for developing communities having
both urban reserve and agricultural areas, and found it complete and consistent with
Council polices. The Council's approval of the Tier II Plan becomes effective upon the
City's adoption of the Update. At that time, the City may alter, expand or improve its
sewage disposal system consistent with the approved Tier II Sewer Plan. A copy of the
City Council Resolution adopting the final Update needs to be submitted to the
Metropolitan Council for its records.
Surface Water Management
Reviewer: Judy Sventek, ES Water Resources Assessment (651- 602 -1156)
The Update is in conformance with the WRMPP for local surface water management.
Rosemount lies entirely within the Vermillion River watershed. The Vermillion River Joint
Powers Board's watershed management plan was approved by the Board of Water and
Soil Resources in 2005. Rosemount prepared a comprehensive storm water management
plan (CSWMP) in 2007 that was reviewed under separate cover. The CSWMP was found
to be consistent with Council policy and the Council's WRMPP. The Council also found the
plan to provide an excellent framework for managing storm water in the city.
CONSISTENCY WITH COUNCIL POLICY
FORECASTS
Reviewer: Todd Graham, CD Research (651- 602 -1322)
The Update is consistent with Council expectations and regional policy for forecast related
content. The Update includes a City- requested revision of households and population
forecasts. The City's request is premised on a realistic and evenly- spread staging of
future land development. In April 2009, Council staff agreed to include these forecast
revisions in the Council proposed action on the Update. The forecasts shown below in
Table 1 are consistently presented in Update's Community Background Table 2.1, Land
Use Table 7.4, Transportation Plan Appendix Table C.1, and Sewer Plan Table 4.1.
T able 1. City of Rosemount Preferred Forecasts
2010 2020 2030
Unsewered 1,850 1 550 1,300
Population Sewered 21,900 31,500 40,700
Total 23,750 33,050 42,000
Unsewered 650 550 i 500
Households Sewered 7,400 11,250 15,000
Total 8,050 11,800 15,50 0
Employment Unsewered 500 500 0
Sewered 7,900 9,600 12,200
Total 8,400 10,100 12,200
7
N :•I CommDevILPAICommunitieslRosemountlReports1Rosemount 2009 CPU 20584 -1 Joint Committe Report.doc
The Metropolitan Council's forecast will be officially revised, as shown above, effective upon
Council approval of the Update. The revised forecasts in Table 1 replace the Council's most
current forecasts shown in Table 2 below.
;Table 2. City of Rosemount
'A ril 2006 Revised S stem Statement Forecasts
2010 2020 2030
Population Total 29,600 38,400 38,400
Households Total 10,200 13,700 13,700
Employment Total 8,400 10,100 12,200
Note: The City's System Statement land use and forecasts were revised by Council action on April 12, 2006 on the City
of Rosemount's County Road 42 and US 52, Land Use Area MUSA Expansion Comprehensive Plan Amendment approval.
Advisory Comment
Land use and forecasts used in the Update do not reflect the potential development of
University of Minnesota Outreach, Research and Education (UMore) Park. The City expects
the population, households, and employment forecasts will need to be increased due to
the magnitude of potential development. The Update may be amended in the future and
forecasts revisions will be considered accordingly as a comprehensive plan amendment.
2030 REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK AND LAND USE
Reviewer: Freya Thamman, CD Local Planning Assistance (651- 602 -1750)
The Council's 2030 Regional Development Framework (RDF) shows Rosemount in two
geographic planning areas: Developing and Agricultural (see Figure 2). The Update plans
for the two geographic planning areas. Developing communities are expected to
accommodate sanitary sewered residential growth at a net density of 3 to 5 units per
acre. Agricultural areas are directed to have a density of no more than 1 unit per 40
acres. Sanitary sewered development is anticipated within the portions of the RDF
agricultural area generally north of CR 42 and generally southeast of the intersection of
US 52 and CR 42. The City requested the Council's RDF map be updated to reflect the
change.
The existing development in Rosemount is predominately located in the western third of
the City (see Figure 3, Existing Land Use Figure /Table). The land use in this area is
primarily urban, including a range of various residential densities, retail commercial and
businesses and public institutional. The eastern part of the City includes the Flint Hills
Refinery and industrial uses along Highway 55. Rosemount's remaining areas are largely
undeveloped /agricultural (65
The City's future land uses are shown on Figure 4 and in Table 3. The City
accommodates the forecasted growth through the year 2030 and has a 5 -year staging
plan (Figure 5). In this Update, the City's guides 605 acres of additional residential and
approximately 665 acres are primarily designated for commercial and industrial uses.
The City's future land uses are shown below in Table 3.
8
N.• 1CommDevILPAICommunities \RosemountlReports \Rosemount 2009 CPU 20584 -1 Joint Committe Report.doc
Table 3. City of Rosemount's Future Land Use
Land Use
Developed Undeveloped
Total Land
Land L -se Designation Land Area Land Area=
Abbreviation (Acres) (Acres) Area (Acres)
Agriculture AG 3,790 0 3,790
Agricultural Research AGR 3,200 0 3,200
Rural Residential RR 1,540 290 1,830
Transitional Residential TR 740 170 910
Low Density Residential LDR 2,105 1,485 3,590
Medium Density Residential MDR 210 305 715
High Density Residential HDR 55 70 125
Downtown DT 65 0 65
Neighborhood Commercial NC 5 10 15
Community Commercial CC 125 473 600
Regional Commercial RC 0 370 370
Business Park BP 120 1,485 1,605
Light Industrial LI 35 580 615
General Industrial GI 1,675 1,085 2,760
Waste Management WM 240 0 240
Public /Insdmtional PI 470 0 470
Parks and Open Space PO 675 0 673
Floodplain (and Mississippi FP 975 0 975
Ricer)
Total Land Uses 16,025 6,525 22.530
s As of 12/31/07. Table 7.6 of City of Rosemount 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update
Approximately 31% of the City will remain agricultural through 2030, guided at 1 unit per
40 acres. Of the land guided "agriculture approximately 880 acres are enrolled in the
Agricultural Preserve Program. The City's planned land use map includes current
agriculture preserve land anticipated to withdraw from the program before 2030. The
planned land use map shows the agriculture preserve land as well as the future guiding
after the land is removed from the Agricultural Preserve Program.
The City has indicated areas on the land use map that are expected to develop with other
land uses after 2025. Initiating withdrawal from the Agriculture Preserve Program must
be done eight years in advance; therefore, the City has not initiated withdrawal at this
time. If parcels in the Agricultural Preserve Program expire and /or are no longer guided
at 1 unit per 40 acres, then a comprehensive plan amendment (CPA) will be required to
revise the Update's Agricultural Preserve figure.
The 3,200 -acre UMore Park property is guided "Agricultural Research" at 1 unit per 40
acres. The Update states that once the University chooses to proceed with development
of this property, the City will submit a CPA.
The residential land uses within the City include: Rural Residential, Transitional
Residential, Low, Medium, and High Density Residential. In addition, redevelopment
within the Downtown area could include residential.
The City's Rural Residential area is in the northwestern part of the City is outside the
Municipal Urban Service Area (MUSA) and has a density of 1 unit per 5 acres. The City's
Transitional Residential land use is also in the northwest and has densities of 1 unit per 5
acres in areas without sewer.
The Update indicates two areas of undeveloped/ underdeveloped Transitional Residential
within the 2020 MUSA. The Update states that Transitional Residential within the MUSA
is required to have densities of 1 to 3 units per acre. This area within the MUSA is
included in the City's density calculation (Table 3). The Update states that Transitional
residential outside the MUSA is not anticipated to be developed by 2030 provided septic
systems continue function. The Update states that the City has a plan for providing
municipal sanitary sewer services to Transition Residential land outside the MUSA if failing
9
N. ICommDevILPAIConununities \Rosemount \Reports1Rosemount 2009 CPU 20584 -1 Joint Co,mnitte Report.doc
septic systems arise. The Update states that underdeveloped properties would develop
to urban densities if sanitary sewer were provided. If sewer is provided to
Transitional Residential areas outside the MUSA, a CPA would be required to ensure
the City is meeting the density requirements of 3 units per net residential acre.
Low density residential is the predominate land use within the MUSA, followed by
medium and then high density residential (Table 3). The Downtown (65 acres) area
has redevelopment plans that could include 25% residential with up to 40 units per
acre.
The City has participated in the plat monitoring program since the year 2000. For the
years 2000 through 2007, the City has averaged 4.1 residential units per acre. As shown
in Table 4 below, the City's projected residential density using the Council's MUSA
guidelines exceeds 3 units /acre.
Table 4. Residential Density
Density
Range Gross
Category Min Max Acres Min Units Max Units
Transitional Residential 1 3 155 155 465
Low Density Residential 1 5 270 270 1350
Medium Density Residential 5 10 150 750 1500
High Density Residential 10 24 30 300 720
TOTALS 605 1475 4035
Density for Newly Planned Areas* 2.4 6.7
Council's Plat Monitoring Program (PMP)
2000 -2007 Data 780 3188
Total Planned and PMP 1385 4663 4.1
MUSA Guideline Density
Y
*Notes:
a) Table 4 is based on the City's Update
b) The density calculation follows the Council's MUSA Guidelines. (Metropolitan Council,
September 12, 2007, Business Item 2007 -14). Table shows sanitary sewered residential
not in the 2020 Comprehensive Plan.
HOUSING
Reviewer: Linda Milashius, CD Livable Communities (651- 602 -1541)
The Update is consistent with the Council's polices on housing. The housing element
fulfills the affordable housing planning requirements of the MLPA. The Update
acknowledges the City's share of the region's affordable housing need for 2011 -2020
which was revised from 853 to 1,000 units based on the City proposed forecasts (see
Table 1 of the forecast section). To provide opportunities to meet this need, the Update
has designated enough medium density residential development at 5 -10 units per acre
and enough high density residential development at 10 -24 units per acre (See Figure 5
Staging Table). In addition, the Update includes a Downtown land use category intended
to provide for a variety of land uses that will include a mixed use zoning district with
medium and high density residential with a density range of up to 40 units per acre.
The Update provides the implementation tools and programs the City will use to promote
opportunities to address its share of the region's housing need. The Update indicates the
City will continue to work with the Dakota County Community Development Agency (CDA)
10
N: I CommDevILPAIConununities1RosemountlReports \Rosemount 2009 CPU 20584 -1 Joint Committe Report.doc
and other state and federal agencies to provide workforce and affordable housing
opportunities. The CDA partners with local communities to offer a number of services to
assist in the creation and preservation of affordable housing. Rosemount is an active
participant in the Local Housing Incentives program of the Livable Communities Act
(LCA), and has applied for and received over $1.8 million in grants through the LCA
program.
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS (ISTS) PROGRAM
Reviewer: Jim Larsen, CD Local Planning Assistance (651 602 -1159)
The Update is consistent with the WRMPP for ISTS. It indicates that as of January 2009,
there were 510 ISTS in operation in the City. Current City Code Title 9, Chapter 6,
available on the City's website addresses ISTS installation, operation, and maintenance
management. The City's program and ordinance are consistent with Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency (MPCA) Rules and Council policy requirements.
The Update indicates that property owners served by ISTS are required to connect to the
City collection system within ten years of City service becoming available or when the City
has determined the ISTS has failed, whichever is earlier. This is inconsistent with current
Metropolitan Council's Waste Discharge Rules and Regulations. However, these Rules are
currently being revised. The City will be expected to adopt these Rules and Regulations
once they have been revised and adopted by the Council.
WATER SUPPLY
Reviewer: Sara Smith, ES Water Supply Planning (651- 602 -1035)
The Update is consistent with the WRMPP for water supply. The Council recommends the
City continue to implement conservation programs targeted at reducing residential water
use.
RESOURCE PROTECTION
Historic Preservation
Reviewer: Freya Thamman, CD Local Planning Assistance (651- 602 -1750)
The Update contains a section on Historic Preservation as required by the MLPA.
Solar Access Protection
Reviewer: Freya Thamman, CD Local Planning Assistance (651- 602 -1750)
The Update contains a section on Solar Access Protection as required by the MLPA.
Aggregate Resources Protection
Reviewer: Jim Larsen, CD Local Planning Assistance (651- 602 -1159)
The Update contains a section on aggregate resources protection as required by the
MLPA. It indicates, consistent with Minnesota Geological Survey Information Circular 46
data, the presence of viable aggregate resources within the city. Extraction standards are
presented in City Code Title 11, Chapter 10 -4, accessible on the City's website. The City
encourages mining (considered to be incompatible with residential neighborhood
development) to occur prior to urbanization, utilizing an interim use permit process for
lands outside the 2020 Municipal Urban Service Area (MUSA). A reclamation plan is
11
N.• IConnDevILPAICommunitieslRosemountlReportslRosemount 2009 CPU 20584 -1 Joint Committe Report.doc
required of all applicable interim uses to ensure that orderly development can occur after
the interim use has ceased to operate.
Mississippi River Critical Area Plan
Reviewer: Tori Dupre, CD Local Planning Assistance (651- 602 -1621)
The Update includes a "Mississippi River Critical Corridor Area Plan," a component
addressing the approximately 3,000 acres within the river corridor. The City
proposes no land use or policy changes to the critical area plan, which the
Metropolitan Council reviewed on January 26, 2000 (Business Item 2000 -39).
The City is located within the Critical Area's "Urban Diversified and Rural Open Space"
districts. The City's current critical area plan addresses both state Critical Area Act
requirements, and federal "Mississippi National River and Recreation Area" standards.
The Council will forward the final action and review record to the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources and National Park Service for their records.
PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
Reviewer: Freya Thamman, CD Local Planning Assistance (651- 602 -1750)
The Update includes a description of:
Capital Improvement Program Yes
Zoning Code Yes
Subdivision Code Yes
ISTS Codes Yes
Housing Implementation Program Yes
COMPATIBILITY WITH PLANS OF ADJACENT GOVERNMENTAL UNITS AND
PLANS OF AFFECTED SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS
The City submitted the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update to adjacent local units of
government, school districts, counties and special districts for comment on August 29,
2008. Comments were received from Minnesota Department of Transportation, Lakeville,
Inver Grove Heights, Eagan, Cottage Grove, and Dakota County. The City provided a
summary of all comments and the City's responses to commenting communities and
jurisdictions. No substantial compatibility issues with plans of adjacent governmental
units and plans of affected special districts and school districts were indicated.
DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW:
City of Rosemount 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update and Cover letter, May 28, 2009
Adjacent Community Review Comments /City Responses, May 28, 2009
Revised City of Rosemount 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update, Re- submittal Letter,
CPU Transmittal Form, August 6, 2009
Revised Table 7.6, August 26, 2009
12
N.• ICommDevILPAIConununities1RosemountlReports1Rosemount 2009 CPU 20584 -1 Joint Committe Report.doc
ATTACHMENTS
Figure 1: Location Map Showing Regional Systems
Figure 2: 2030 Regional Development Framework Planning Areas
Figure 3A: City of Rosemount Existing Land Use Table Associated with Figure 3
Figure 3: City of Rosemount Existing Land Use
Figure 4: City of Rosemount Future Land Use
Figure 5: Land Use in 5 -Year Increments Table
13
N. ICommDevILPAIComnumitieslRosemountlReports1Rosemount 2009 CPU 20584 -1 Joint Conunitte Report.doc
Figuie 1. Location 1vlap S howing Regional Systems
Rosemount
L P aul P alk
r Grey l _loud Isla nd:1
E l yi' InvelGlove Heights
ottage Grove
t A sit lid
y
x ...e.. ..fry
55'.
Apple Valley Roseronnut
Nil eng a T•re).
L I
1
r /Imes J�
—Lakeville
r
J Eupile Twp. Vermin on Twp.
y
f 1 1/eltilllNU11
A 0 0 .5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 Miles
l WA NI cIN Regional Systems Lr
1. RAh1SElf 41�tstew:ter Services Regional and Stare Tr ils
In a�a� Regional basting
w1,---V,..12 A ER Treatment Plants Regional Planned
L.-if i Regional Proposed
.i T TranspoltaYlou 1 Recreation Open Space
-a
DAKOT f �o Merstates
4 SC f TTY US Hghways Park Resell*
l r State Highways Regional Park
3 7'' Special Recreation Feature
County Roads
illralli
TLG Street CeMert res, 2007
14
N: IConlmDevILPAIConununities \RosemountlReports \Rosemount 2009 CPU 20584 -1 Joint Committe Report.doc
Figuie 2. 20 30 Regional [levelopment Framework Planning Areas
R osemount
�,St. Pat
d Park
J
Grey Cloud �Islaiirl Tv ii. I
Eagaii 'liver Grove Heights .7 r
ttage Grove
l
J
Apple Valley r Roseiu4 stet_
r,
I t
Hininger .Twl,.
a �.L_
1
____—..,............________4 Copes
i ----1 r _J
Lakeville 1
Env ir e Twp. 1 Vermillion Toil).
-r1 I _1 1 Vennillinii I
�j F- l 1
0 as 1 1.5 2 25 3 as
Miles
—1 --4 p W
f4S 1 V CrW
_1HENN
^X ERIN T r1SEY H Agricultural Area
a
of 1 f' Developed Area
CA Developing Area
'1 Diversified Rural
K
UAKOT 1 Non-Council Area
SCtJTII 1 Rural Center
rti >a- Rural Residential
N 1 TLG Street Centerlines, 2007
15
N. IComniDevlLPAIConiniunities1RoseniountlReports1Rosenioimt 2009 CPU 20584 -1 Joint Committe Report.doc
Figure 3 A. Existing Land Use Table Associated with Figure 3, Existing Land Use
City of Rosemount
Land Use Area Percentage
Single FarnilT, Resider,. 6a: 2,555 1 13
lIulti-Fanailr Residential 320
Famisteads 160
Commewial 140
Ifixed Use 35 O2
Industrial 1,700 73%
Extractive 150 0.S%
Institutional 375 1.7%
Pa.exs, Recreation. and Preserres 910 4.0%.
Vellicular Right of War 335 1.5%
Railways 50 02%
Airports 0 0.D%
Open Water 1,155 5.1%
Agriculture 9,270 41.1c/c
Undeveloped 5,365 2 3.3%
Total 2 100.0%
1.
etoolic
16
N:1CommDevILPAICommunitiestRosemountlReports1Rosenzotint 2009 CPU 20584-1 Joint Committe Report.doc
Figure 3. Existing Land Use -City of Rosemount
Figure 72 Metropolitan Council Land Use 2005 14)SLP1Ol1
e4 41Lili■
4400 Maliv
,fir
0...
j
i 1 1
J L wV i
L u
.,.-3 I. 4 L -i v`
j t -1 yy�
z.-vid Y til
1 7 f ►ii 'J T I !1,
1
i t;
r
om i
40 —1
Generalized Land Use, 2005 MEI 441w..- .701.10.04. us ...4. o....
3,111 Pena, a.�m+- sss.a.... em.n..- uv...- a..we «.11x1.... e.
Source: M etropofbn Counol MetrOGIS 3;' MSP.,.y n...ey- 3221x,. IIII aw.f.r- 3211... pm„n...m3Awes
me Pads. e.a.aen.gh.ay. 9074 Ia.. YN...e3M-1.V7Ao..
1553 4,. .ao MKUaw33*3W.• 334 3.49 0 026 06 1 1.5 2
March 2009 MIla4
men.napaa..*6 iCNa. P+ e. Pem.,4.n.,.,.,pwmupwwn<.,..w... ■e
17
N: Comm DevILPAICommunitieslRosemountlReportslRosemount 2009 CPU 20584 -1 Joint Conunitte Report.doc
Figure 4. 2030 Future Land Use, Including Agriculture Preserves
City of Rosemount
AGA9rbAve NI AGRAgrcuitural Research as NOR Hp n Oenaty RealEentlal GI General Indus.
•OTOaveb,m RR Rural ResdenIial =PIPUb4 n•tauap,ul MN NY.Iwaale N enagemenl
NG N.0bah d Commerical LEI ft Low Oen sly flesken11M i PO Eaellrg ParkWpen Spurs 3110 MUSA Lee
SORG Reg bna1Canmerda 1RTanaaonal Residents! BPBU11maa Pails 2030 MUSA Lee
MO CC Canmu arty Commercial .`.iMORNearum Denary R.s*.m.l U LetIMUslral I2 t *A .Pmaeny
a
4
-e.-... ii ��p ecc Lai 4 t y1' 1 1
men l it°° si 4
r rr
r
1. AO Preserve Expiration 9 /2 912 01 0
2. No Experatlon Dale. The City will monitor this lend to ensure 1 Is available for development post 2026.
0 025 0,5 1 1.5 2
Miles NORTH May 2009
18
N:• 1CommDevILPAICommunities1Rose inount \Reports \Rosemount 2009 CPU 20584-1 Joint Committe Report.doc
Figure 5. 5 -Year Staging
City of Rosemount
xxvii. Table 7.8: 2007 2010 Residential Development
Land Use Designation Acres Developed Units per Acre Number of Units
Transitional Residential 0 2' 0
Low Density Residential 145 2.35' 341
Medium Density Residential 24 7' 168
Downtown" 4 20' 108c
Total Residential 176 3.50 617
Based on historical City of Rosemount development densities per the Plat Monitoring data.
The Downtown dyad rest atesiguation allows NO Deady Rnielodiat desellneent.
•Watelwd Cannon war *pond ou 03/18/2018 for 108 farktalt:mitt.
xtviii. Table 7.9: 2011 2015 Residential Development
Land Use Designation Acres Developed Units per Acre Number of Units
Transitional Residential 70 28 140
Low Density Residential 290" 2.35' 680
Medium Density Residential 120' 7' 840
High Density Residendal 15 20' 300
Total Residential 495 3.96 1,960
'Based on bistorical City of Rosewood development densities per the Plat Monitoring data.
e In inks 100 aim of triad awxnry emoutd in the Agriaxlt:r Pierre pogrom &hub is nt to coin an August 29, 2010.
Iml da 60 axs eland aaxntt eroolkl in the atoing iax Prams "own wAidb u set to expire ale Aagwt 29, 2010.
Iurkaks a 5% saranry rats aganrmk 1,850 bouxho/dr.
xtix. Table 7.10: 2016 2020 Residential Development
Land Use Designation Acres Developed Units per Acre Number of Units
Transitional Residential 70 2' 140
Low Density Residential 290 2.35' 680
Medium Density Residential 120 7' 840
High Density Residential 15 20' 300
Total Residential 495 3.96 1,960"
Based on historical City of Rosemount development densities per the Plat Monitoring data.
e Ionian a 5% saraury Mt to generate 1,850 bowebolds.
xxx. Table 7.11: 2021— 2025 Residential Development
Land Use Designation Acres Developed Units per Acre Number of Units
Transitional Residential 0 2' 0
Low Density Residential 340 2.35' 800
Medium Density Residential 120 7' 840
High Density Residential 15 20' 300
Total Residential 475 4.08 1,940"
'Based on historical Ciy of Rosemount development densities per the Plat Monitoring data.
e Mx ak, a 5% saraury rate kgentrate 1,850 bowebolds.
xxxi. Table 7.12: 2026 2030 Residential Development
Land Use Designation Acres Developed Units per Acre Number of Units
Transitional Residendal 0 2' 0
Low Density Residential 340" 2.35' 800
Mediutn Density Residential 120c 7' 840
High Densiry Residential 15 20' 300
Total Residential 475 4.08 1,940a
Based on historical City of Rosemount development densities per the Plat Monitoring data.
Inches 160 any e toad that is nom* amid in the Assiadllme Pnrenr programs.
balloter 40 armselaud that ise imtlytnrollddhetbe4iaetho Pxsrrm prograaa.
&in s a 5% radaury sate a p e ak 1,850 bowehotb.
Note: The City's 5 -year staging assume that approximately 85+% of the available acres
of undeveloped land in each land use category (see Table 3 of Review Record) will be
developed by 2030.
19
N.: IColnmDevILPAIContmunitieslRosentountlReportsRRosemount 2009 CPU 20584 -1 Joint Committe Report.doc