Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.b. CDBG Amendment for Assessment Abatement ProgramAGENDA ITEM: CDBG Amendment for Assessment Abatement Program AGENDA SECTION: Update PREPARED BY: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director AGENDA NO. •13. ATTACHMENTS: None APPROVED BY: 0 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff is proposing to proceed with a Major Amendment to the FY06 CDBG allocation to permit funding of the assessment abatement program for 2009. 4 ROSEMOUNT CITY COUNCIL City Council Work Session Meeting: February 11, 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ISSUE Each year the City of Rosemount receives a CDBG allocation from Dakota County. The amount of money is based upon the appropriation from Congress and allocated to Dakota County communities based upon an adopted formula. Typically, the City has received around $65,000 annually. Each year the City must choose what the money will be used for based upon identified program priorities. In FY06, the City designated funds for the Downtown Revitalization program which allows businesses to match the funds for building improvements. The CDBG funds would be used to bring properties into compliance with existing building code requirements and the owners match would be used for facade improvements. While this program has been available for several years, and has been widely publicized with the building owners, there have been no participants. Last year, the City used its CDBG allocation to assist in paying for street assessments to qualifying households. In total, 30 households applied with 20 receiving financial aid. The program was successful and $25,700 was expended. Staff intended to roll over the retuning funds to provide assessment relief to financially qualifying households for the 2009 pavement management project. There are two pieces of information that could make this year's assistance more problematic than last years. First, the assessment amount is significantly higher than last year. This year all the assessments are slated at $5600 when last year they were $1,990 for single family homes and $1,050 for townhome units. The second issue, that staff was unaware of last year, is under the program, all households at or below 50% of the median income are entitled to have their entire assessment paid as part of the program. Households in the 50 -80% would be able to receive some financial assistance, if funding was available, but the program does not require full payment by the City. To try and estimate the number of households out of the 72 within the 2009 pavement management project area, the CDA sent out a scoping income survey. Thirty -four surveys were received and seven, approximately 20% of those received, indicated they were at or below the low income range. An additional 55% of the respondents appeared to fall into the 50 -80% median income levels. Extrapolating from the surveys received, fifteen households could qualify for the full assessment payment which would require $84,000 in expenditures through the CDBG fund. Any remaining funds would be equally split by the 50 -80% median income qualifiers. At the present time there is $37,400 remaining from the 2008 CDBG allocation. Staff is also recommending that funds allocated to the Downtown Revitalization program be used for the assessment abatement program, bringing the total amount available to $101,800. An amendment to the FY06 CDBG application would need to be processed to permit this change and the CDA staff has begun that procedure so that amendment processing does not negatively affect the street project and assessment payment schedule. While staff understands that the Downtown Revitalization program is an important tool to have for Downtown building owners, there are certain requirements in the CDBG funds relating to spending of funds within certain timeframes. The CDA staff would like the City to expend existing funds to assist in county -wide compliance, with the thought that a future allocation could replenish funds for the Revitalization program, if desired. SUMMARY Staff would like to move forward with the assessment abatement program as outlined above. The funds would come from the 08 allocation and redesignated funds from FY06. It is hoped that these funds would provide enough revenue to pay assessments for all households under 50% of the median income. Any remaining funds would be distributed evenly among households falling between 50 -80% of median income, upon income verification. Staff wanted to update the City Council regarding the assessment abatement program and inform them that funds from the Downtown Revitalization program would be used for the program as needed. 2