Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.c. Central Park Expansion Planning StudyAGENDA ITEM: Central Park Expansion Planning Study AGENDA SECTION: Discussion PREPARED BY: Eric Zweber, Senior Planner AGENDA NO. 2.C• ATTACHMENTS: Central Park Expansion Alternatives APPROVED BY: G RECOMMENDED ACTION: Discussion Only 4 ROSEMOUNT CITY COUNCIL City Council Worksession Date: February 11, 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND The City has been considering improving and /or expanding Central Park for a number of years. The expansion of the Central Park frontage and access is identified within the Development Framework for Downtown Rosemount (Framework), which was adopted in July 2004. The Framework identifies the northeast corner of 145 Street West and South Robert Trail as Crossroads North. The Framework identifies the importance of expanding the frontage and public access to Central Park, including the possible acquisition of Polfus Implement and the BP gas station. The City has applied for funding to expand the park numerous times, including 2004, 2005, and 2008 Livable Communities Demonstration Account grants. Last year, the City received a $20,000 planning grant from the Dakota County Community Development Agency (CDA). The grant is a one to one match, meaning the City contributes $10,000 and the CDA contributes $10,000. The grant was requested to develop planning alternatives for Central Park including what can be done with only the land that City currently owns, what can be done if the City acquired the Polfus property but not the BP property, and what can be done if the City acquired both the Polfus and BP properties. DISCUSSION Since receiving the grant, staff has met with the property and business owners of the Polfus and BP properties, surveyed Central Park and the adjacent properties, developed a number of different design alternatives, and had the Parks and Recreation Commission review the altematives. Staff has selected five alternatives that show the potential improvements and /or expansion that can occur at Central Park including one that uses the property that the City all ready owns (Alternative F), one that requires the acquisition of only the Polfus property (Alternative D), and three that require the acquisition of both the Polfus and BP properties (Alternatives A -2, G, and H). Staff would like to review these alternatives with the City Council and gather their input before scheduling an open house to gather public comment regarding the alternatives. Alternative F shows the improvement of Central Park using the property that the City currently owns. This alternative is dominated by the extension of the bike trail to the pedestrian crossing at Burma Avenue and 145 Street. This would serve as the beginning to the Interpretive Trail Corridor which is planned to extend from Downtown Rosemount to the Mississippi River. It is anticipated that a number of the trees to the east of Polfus would be removed to install the trail and to expand the visibility of the park from 145 Street. It appears that a small easement would need to be acquired from the Polfus property to allow the alignment of the trail due to the lift station located on the north side of the intersection Burma Avenue and 145` Street. The four remaining alternatives all have a number of common features. All four have the bike trail extended to the pedestrian crossing at Burma Avenue and 145 Street and all four have the entrance of the parking lot for City Hall and Central Park reconstructed to align with the intersection of Burma Avenue and 145 Street. Staff has realigned this entrance for two reasons, first to provide a visual corridor along Burma Avenue that connects Central Park with the Waterford Commons project and second to improve the safety on 145 Street at the intersections of Burma Avenue and City Hall due to the intersection offsets. Currently, there are conflicting left turns when a car is turning left onto Burma or into City Hall. This safety issue is expected to get worse after the Waterford Commons project is open. Reconstruction of the entrance to City Hall to the intersection of Burma Avenue and 145 Street would require relocation of the lift station on the north side of the intersection. This lift station serves all of Downtown Rosemount and the residential neighborhood east of Chippendale Avenue via a sanitary sewer running under Burma Avenue. It is estimated that relocation of the lift station will cost almost $500,000. Staff recognizes that there is a substantial cost associated with improving the intersection offsets and the Council may want to defer this improvement until there is a higher need for the modification. Alternative D demonstrates what is possible if only the Polfus property is acquired. This alternative shows a fountain in the center of the former Polfus site with sidewalks connecting to 145th Street and the existing Central Park. The area between the fountain and City Hall parking lot is intended for a more active use, while the area to the west of the fountain is more passive with gardens and walking paths. Alternative G demonstrates what is possible both BP and Polfus are acquired and turned completely into park. This alternative shows a fountain and gazebo in the center of the acquired land with sidewalks connecting to South Robert Trail, 145 Street, and the existing Central Park. The areas to the west, south, and east are intended for a more active use. The area north of the fountain and adjacent to the neighboring businesses shows an extension of the gardens and walking paths for a more passive use. Alternatives A -2 and H demonstrate what is possible if both BP and Polfus are acquired and both a park and commercial building is constructed. Alternative A -2 shows a fountain along South Robert Trail with a 3,000 square foot commercial building along 145 Street and parking behind. This alternative splits the new fountain area from the existing Central Park but provides a space for a business that may build off of the Interpretative Trail, such as a bike shop. Alternative H shows a 3,000 square foot building along South Robert Trail and a fountain directly at the corner of South Robert Trail and 145 Street. Visually, there is more of a connection between the fountain area and the existing Central Park, but shared parking lot and access to the commercial building splits the park area in two. When reviewing these alternatives, they should be viewed more as phased developments of the park than incompatible alternatives. The City can start with Alternative F today, then expand to Alternative D if there is an opportunity to acquire Polfus, and then determine which of the three remaining alternatives is desire when the BP site is acquired. Staff is not looking for the City Council to choose a preferred alternative to pursue solely, but instead seeking guidance on ways to improve any of the individual alternatives or if any single alternative should be thrown out. Based on the comments received, staff will revise the alternative as need and plan for an open house in the near future to gather public comments on the alternatives. 2 The tentative schedule for the remaining actions to complete the planning grant is as follows: Open House for Public Comment Early March Port Authority Review Late March Parks and Recreation Commission Review Late March City Council Review and Approval April RECOMMENDATION Provide comments or changes to the five Central Park design alternatives and authorize staff to conduct an open house for the design alternatives. 3 BURMA AV 7- i. 3 li.,' .t 0, 0 v o j, i k N. ,,,2, s,__.._ A A b z A/c uteri WO UNt 1 I ,A -1.. \1/ \-11ET *ALL I 41. S-7\ I I, T-1 ,B N.\.\ ,'o 3 z z m 0 D 0 m z y r m m x --I v. 0 0) z c v BURMA AV 1 c z v z zm I 7J r1 m Zm 4 <n 0 m m 0 z BURNLEY AVE TRUNK HIGHWAY 3 >m c� (n z 0 z r >0 m m u L ma a z 0 c El el NET WALL N N 0 bl s y 0 m r- -I 'V M 73 73 Z X m 1 X M —0 Z cn 0 c 0 co c c)- 0D m 00 m cn z c BURMA 0 z v v M 70 Z M v -I M r A3 0 I A) m i r" 0 z rri 0 111 'II —I !I! I L 1 4.7:, --1 H N 2 '4 BURNLEY 'AVE v A v TRUNK HIGHWAY 3 -0 L I A k' q 0 I 0 11 L- L \N IN uurr I ive waif /KT MALI. 1 1) F. x 1 2 t 1 c ...e.'' \t.....c. t i 1. L 2N 1-5 j o i i• c 1 I cd ,0 i q 1 L (i --4.___ 4 -4 1 c