HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.a. Presentation of Bond Credit Rating Upgrade PlaqueAGENDA ITEM: Presentation of Bond Credit Rating
Upgrade Plaque
AGENDA SECTION:
Department Head Report
PREPARED BY: Jeff May, Finance Director
AGENDA NO. 34„
ATTACHMENTS: Moody's Rating Notification Letter
APPROVED BY:
P0 1
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
4 ROSEMOUNT
CITY COUNCIL
City Council Regular Meeting: October 7, 2008
EXECUTIVE iSUMMARY
Ms. Terri Heaton, from Springsted, will be here this evening to present a plaque acknowledging the City of
Rosemount's bond credit rating upgrade. This credit rating upgrade actually occurred last October when
the City was in the process of issuing debt and was going through the normal bond rating process. The
City's rating went from Al to Aa3. As detailed in the notification letter there were many factors involved
in the City's upgrade and we had actually been advocating for an upgrade for a couple of years. The City's
last upgrade occurred in July of 2002 when we went to the Al rating.
Moody's Investors Service
New Issue: Rosemount (City of) MN
Global Credit Research
New Issue
1 OCT 2007
MOODY'S UPGRADES TO Aa3 FROM Al THE RATING ON THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT'S (MN) OUTSTANDING
GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT
ASSIGNS Aa3 RATING TO $1.2 MILLION GO WATER REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2007A, AND
$450,000 GO EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES OF INDEBTEDNESS, SERIES 2007B
Municipality
MN
Moody's Rating
ISSUE RATING
General Obligation Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A Aa3
Sale Amount $1,210,000
Expected Sale Date 10/02/07
Rating Description General Obligation Unlimited Tax
General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2007B Aa3
Sale Amount $450,000
Expected Sale Date 10/02/07
Rating Description General Obligation Unlimited Tax
Opinion
NEW YORK, Oct 1, 2007 Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Aa3 rating to the City of Rosemount's
(MN) $1.2 million General Obligation Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, and $450,000 General
Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series2007B. Concurrently, Moody's has upgraded to
Aa3 from Al the rating on the city's outstanding general obligation debt. Rosemount has $28.0 million of
outstanding general obligation debt, including the current offerings. The Series 2007A bonds and the Series
2007B certificates are secured by the city's general obligation unlimited tax pledge. Debt service on the
Series 2007A bonds is to be paid with net revenues of the city's water utility, and bond proceeds will finance
improvements to the water system, including the construction of a new well. Debt service on the Series
2007B certificates is to be paid with property taxes, and certificate proceeds will finance the acquisition of
various items of capital equipment for the city's public safety and public works departments. The Aa3 rating
assignment and upgrade reflect the city's rapidly growing and slightly concentrated tax base that is favorably
located in the Twin Cities metropolitan area; well- managed financial operations with healthy reserves; and
debt levels that are expected to remain affordable.
RAPIDLY GROWING AND SLIGHTLY CONCENTRATED TAX BASE FAVORABLY LOCATED IN TWIN
CITIES METROPOLITAN AREA
Located in northern Dakota County (general obligation rated Aaa) in the southern suburbs of the Twin Cities
metropolitan area, the City of Rosemount has experienced rapid growth over the past several decades, both
in population and full value. The city's population has increased from 1,337 in 1970 to 20,468 in 2006. Full
value growth has also been rapid: the 2006 full value of $2.5 million follows a 17% average annual increase
since 2001 (compared to a median average annual growth rate of 12% for Minnesota cities and 8% for cities
nationwide). Moody's expects tax base growth to continue, driven in part by mixed -use redevelopment efforts
in a tax increment district that was created in 2004 in the city's downtown area. New residential development
also continues to drive tax base growth, as the city is favorably located within commuting distance to
employment centers throughout the metropolitan region. Young families in particular are attracted to the city,
as evidenced by the above average percentage of children in the city's population. The per capita income
level of 100% of the state (which is relatively low for the Twin Cities region) reflects the younger population,
but the median family income level of 121% of the state and the median home value of 125% of the state are
both sound.
Rosemount's tax base is somewhat concentrated, with an oil refinery owned by Flint Hills Resources (issue
rated Al /stable outlook) representing 9% of the city's assessed valuation. Moody's notes the elevated credit
risk associated with this degree of dependence on a single taxpayer, as well as the potential negative impact
of the refinery on future development in the surrounding areas of the city. However, Rosemount has been
home to the refinery since 1955, and its oil producing capacity has since grown tenfold. Due to sustained
demand for gasoline and diesel fuel, another expansion for the refinery is scheduled for the fall of 2007.
Continued expansions of the plant, which employs 790 people and is Minnesota's biggest source of gasoline,
evidence Flint Hills' commitment to remaining in Rosemount.
WELL- MANAGED FINANCIAL OPERATIONS WITH HEALTHY RESERVES
Moody's expects the city's healthy finances to continue, supported by well- managed operations and ample
reserves. Following several consecutive years of operating surpluses, the city's General Fund balance grew
from $4.7 million in fiscal 2003 to $5.8 million in fiscal 2006.The fiscal 2006 fund balance equaled 68% of
General Fund revenues, which is well above the median of 49% for Minnesota cities. City policy calls for the
maintenance of General Fund reserves equal to 55% of the subsequent year's budgeted General Fund
revenues. Amounts in excess are typically transferred to the city's Capital Projects Fund, which carried a
balance of $5.6 million at the close of fiscal 2006. Due to a slowdown in the housing market, General Fund
building permit revenues have declined somewhat in recent years, so the city did not transfer monies from
the General Fund to the Capital Projects Fund in 2006 and does not plan to do so in 2007. However, officials
report that General Fund reserves should remain level in 2007 and 2008. Favorably, the city is primarily
dependent on locally- generated revenues for general operations, with property taxes representing 67% of
General Fund revenues. Intergovernmental aid comprises just 3% of General Fund revenues, which
insulates the city from the impact of fluctuations in state aid that have occurred in recent years. The city's
Port Authority Tax Increment Fund posted a deficit fund balance of $2.8 million in fiscal 2006, but officials
report that this deficit balance will be addressed with proceeds from tax increment bonds that will be issued in
2008. Revenues that should be generated from redevelopment projects in the downtown tax increment
district are expected to be used to repay the bonds.
DEBT LEVELS EXPECTED TO REMAIN AFFORDABLE
Moody's believes the city's low debt levels will remain affordable due to expectations of continued tax base
growth and limited future borrowing needs. At 0.8% and 1.7 the city's direct debt position and overall debt
burden are both below state and national medians. The debt levels are particularly low for a city with such a
rapid pace of growth. Payout is aggressive, with 91 of all- debt retired in ten years (compared to a median
rate of 71% for cities nationwide and 74% for cities in Minnesota). Minnesota cities benefit from the state's
statutory requirement to levy 105% of the annual debt service levy for tax- backed general obligation debt,
providing excess revenues to offset property tax delinquencies. Future debt plans include issuing $3.5 million
to $5 million of tax increment bonds in 2008 to fund downtown redevelopment projects and issuing
approximately $1 million in bonds in late 2008 or early 2009 to fund water system improvements. Pending
voter approval, the city may also issue between $5 million and $10 million of bonds to construct an athletic
facility on 57 acres of land donated to the city by-Flint Hills Resources.
KEY STATISTICS
2000 census population: 14,619 (a 67% increase from 1990)
2006 estimated population: 20,468 (a 40% increase from 2000)
2006 full value: $2.5 billion
2006 full value per capita: $120,667
1999 per capita income: $23,116 (100% of state)
1999 median family income: $68,929 (121% of state)
Dakota County unemployment rate: 4.1% (June 2007)
Fiscal 2006 General Fund balance: $5.8 million (68% of General Fund revenues)
Direct debt position: 0.8%
Overall debt burden: 1.7%
Principal amortization (10 years): 91%
Post -sale general obligation debt outstanding: $28.0 million
Analysts
Rachel Cortez
Analyst
Public Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service
Elizabeth Weber
Backup Analyst
Public Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service
Contacts
Journalists: (212) 553 -0376
Research Clients: (212) 553 -1653
Copyright 2007, Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and /or its licensors including Moody's Assurance Company, Inc.
(together, "MOODY'S All rights reserved.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT LAW AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE
COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED,
REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY
FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All
information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the
possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such Information is provided "as is" without warranty
of any kind and MOODY'S, in particular, makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, timeliness,
completeness, merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any such information. Under no circumstances shall
MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or
relating to, any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or
any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis,
interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential,
compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in
advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The credit ratings
and financial reporting analysis observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be
construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any
securities. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR
FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY
MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Each rating dr other opinion must be weighed solely as one factor in any
investment decision made by or on behalf of any user of the information contained herein, and each such user must accordingly
make its own study and evaluation of each security and of each issuer and guarantor of, and each provider of credit support for,
each security that it may consider purchasing, holding or selling.
MOODY'S hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and
commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MOODY'S have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MOODY'S for
appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,400,000. Moody's Corporation (MCO)
and its wholly -owned credit rating agency subsidiary, Moody's Investors Service (MIS), also maintain policies and procedures to
address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist
between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to
the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5 is posted annually on Moody's website at www.moodys.com under the
heading "Shareholder Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."