HomeMy WebLinkAbout9.a. Town Centre (Core Block East) Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Planned Unit Development Master Development with Rezoning, and Planned Unit Development Final Development Plan - Case 08-55-PP; 0806-FDP; 08-07-PUD; 08-08-FP 4 ROSE\4OLINT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CITY COUNCIL
City Council Regular Meeting: March 18, 2008
AGENDA ITEM: Case 08- 05 -PP; 08- 06 -FDP; 08- 07 -PUD;
08 -08 -FP Town Centre (Core Block East)
Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Planned Unit AGENDA SECTION:
Development Master Development with New Business
Rezoning, and Planned Unit
Development Final Development Plan.
PREPARED BY: Eric Zweber; Senior Planner AGENDA NO. 9,
ATTACHMENTS: Resolutions, Ordinance, Planned Unit
Development Agreement, Excerpt from
the February 26 Planning Commission APPROVED BY:
Minutes, Final Plat, Site Map, Site Plan,
Preliminary Plat, Utility Plan, Storm
Storage Detail, Existing Conditions,
Grading Plan, Erosion Control Plan,
Landscape Plan, Architectural Site Plan,
Garage Floor Plan, Exterior Elevations,
Site Lighting Layout and Photometric
Analysis, Reference First Floor Plan,
Exhibit C Draft Downtown Design
Guidelines, City Engineer's Memorandum
dated March 12, 2008, Color Site Plan,
Color Robert Street Elevation, Color 146
Street Elevation, Color Northwest
Perspective, Development Framework for
Downtown Rosemount Core Block
East, Lighting Fixture Photos, Downtown
Photos from other Communities
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat
and Final Plat for Town Centre.
Motion to adopt a Resolution approving the Planned Unit Development Master
Development Plan with Rezoning and Planned Unit Development Final Development Plan
for Town Centre.
Motion to adopt an Ordinance B ca, an Ordinance amending Ordinance B City of
Rosemount Zoning Ordinance for Town Centre.
ISSUE
Stonebridge Development Acquisition, LLC (Stonebridge) has proposed a three story building on three
quarters of Core Block East that will contain 106 residential rental units and approximately 13,000 square
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2008
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLAT
FOR TOWN CENTRE
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount received a request for Preliminary Plat and Final Plat
approval from 146th Street Partners, LLC concerning property legally described as:
Lots 4 -14, Block 3, ROSEMOUNT, and the north 33 feet of Maple Street adjoining said
Lot 14; Lots 4 7, Block 4, ROSEMOUNT, and the west half of Vacated Hayes Avenue
adjoining said Lots.
WHEREAS, on February 26, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount held a
public hearing and reviewed the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat for Town Centre; and
WHEREAS, on February 26, 2008, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
Preliminary Plat and Final Plat; and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2008, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the
Planning Commission's recomrnendations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat for Town Centre, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum dated February 19, 2008.
2. A sidewalk easement shall be recorded over the pedestrian sidewalk along 146th Street
West extending one (1) foot south of the sidewalk.
3. Legal description needs to be revised to include all of Lot 7, Block 4 of Rosemount.
4. Payment of the MCES sewer connection fee. The 2008 fee is $1,825/ SAC unit.
ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 2008, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
William H. Droste, Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
RESOLUTION 2008
Motion by: Second by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Member absent:
2
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2008
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MASTER
DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH REZONING AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TOWN CENTRE
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received
an application from 146 Street Partners, LLC requesting a planned unit development master
development plan with rezoning and planned unit development final development plan
concerning property legally described as:
Lots 4 -14, Block 3, ROSEMOUNT, and the north 33 feet of Maple Street adjoining
said Lot 14; Lots 4 7, Block 4, ROSEMOUNT, and the west half of Vacated Hayes
Avenue adjoining said Lots.
WHEREAS, on February 26, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount held
a public hearing and reviewed the requested application; and
WHEREAS, on February 26, 2008, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
requested applications, subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2008, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the
Planning Commission's recommendations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the planned unit development master development plan and planned unit
development final development plan of Town Centre and the rezoning of the property from
C2 Downtown Commercial and C3 Highway Commercial to C2 PUD Downtown
Commercial Planned Unit Development, subject to:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum dated February 19, 2008.
2. Revise the design of the third story brick on the four columns on the Burma Facade to
include the capital and corbel course of the brick on the other parts of the building.
3. The height of the existing sanitary sewer manhole shall be adjusted to correspond with
the proposed grading plan.
4. The landscaping plan shall be revised to replace the four (4) white birch trees on the
east side of Burma Avenue with a more appropriate boulevard tree species and to mix
the shrubs and perennials together to add more diversity.
5. The property owner is responsible for maintaining the landscaping installed within the
boulevard and right -of -way. Particular attention will need to be given to the trees
within the sidewalks and close proximity of the buildings, which normally have shorter
life spans than trees that roots systems can expand the full width of their crowns. It is
expected that trees may need to be replaced every 15 to 20 years and all the trees on a
common street frontage should be replaced at one time.
RESOLUTION 2008
6. The developer will submit a detailed landscaping plan of the rain gardens for staff
review and approval.
7. The fencing around the residents' courtyard will be decorative in nature and similar to
the railings on the balconies. Privacy fencing or other opaque fencing will not be
permitted.
8. Revisions to the landscape plan, including the possibility of additional landscaping, is
anticipated to screen ground mounted mechanical equipment, such as the electrical
transformer.
9. "Pedestrian Crossing" signage shall be installed at the mid -block crossing and the
crosswalk will be constructed of concert with a decorative pattern and color.
10. The developer will pay a park dedication fee of $120,000.
11. Signage is not approved as a part of this application. The applicant will need to submit
for sign permits before signs are installed and will be approved administratively using
the Zoning Ordinance and Downtown Design Guidelines. The all signage for the
entire building will need to be identical in style and will need to be determined before
the first sign permit is approved.
12. The exterior lighting fixtures in the Burma Avenue parking lots shall be identical in
style to the decorative acorn -style street lights that are installed by Xcel Energy along
South Robert Trail and 145 Street West. The pole mounted lights within the 146
Street West and Lower 147` Street West parking may be the decorative style that the
developer has proposed.
13. The developer shall enter into a development agreement that will include, among other
things, a determination of a period payment from the property owner maintenance of
the area that is beyond normal City responsibilities. An example would be the trucking
of snow from the site because there are not street boulevards for snow storage. The
development agreement will also lay out the procedure for the developer to conduct
public improvements and the process for payment of the improvements. This
agreement must be approved by the City Council and Developer prior to any work
commencing on the public improvements of the project.
ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 2008 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
William H. Droste, Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
2
RESOLUTION 2008
Motion by: Second by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Member absent:
3
City of Rosemount
Ordinance No. B -xxx
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE B
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT ZONING ORDINANCE
Town Centre
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Ordinance B, adopted September 19, 1989, entitled "City of Rosemount Zoning
Ordinance," is hereby amended to rezone property from C2 Downtown Commercial and C3
Highway Commercial to C2 PUD Downtown Commercial Planned Unit Development that is
located east of South Robert Trail, south of 146` Street West, and north of Lower 147 Street West
within the City of Rosemount legally described as follows:
Lots 4 -14, Block 3, ROSEMOUNT, and the north 33 feet of Maple Street adjoining said
Lot 14; Lots 4 7, Block 4, ROSEMOUNT, and the west half of Vacated Hayes Avenue
adjoining said Lots.
Section 2. The Zoning Map of the City of Rosemount, referred to and described in said
Ordinance No. B as that certain map entitled "Zoning Map of the City of Rosemount," shall not be
republished to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the said zoning
map on file in the Clerk's office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for
in this Ordinance and all of the notation references and other information shown thereon are hereby
incorporated by reference and made part of this Ordinance.
Section 7. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication
according to law.
ENACTED AND ORDAINED into an Ordinance this 18th day of March, 2008.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
William H. Droste, Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
Published in the Rosemount Town Pages this day of 2008.
r
i
1 Enhance the streetscape. Additional public streetscape improvements should build on
previous investments and avoid duplication of expense. Future improvements will
0 add green space and materials and seek to improve pedestrian spaces.
P
Coordinate access and parking. Shared parking creates an opportunity to provide an
e adequate overall supply while preventing duplication. Reducing unneeded parking helps
to maximize the development potential of Downtown.
Enhance the pedestrian crossings of Highway 3 at 146th Street and 147th Street. These
crossings form strong connections between the eastern and western redevelopment
projects along Highway 3.
Enhance pedestrian connections with the library.The objective is to establish a safe and
inviting link between the library and Downtown businesses. These pedestrian links are
one means of helping businesses capture users, and therefore potential shoppers, at-
tracted to Downtown by the library.
P
Provide buffer between commercial development and the adjacent residential neighborhood.
i Implementation
Initiating redevelopment in the Core Block West area makes a desirable "first step" project for
J implementation. Redevelopment in Core Block West strengthens the heart of Downtown. It
allows additional streetscape improvements to be made in the Highway 3 corridor. It prodaims
that redevelopment will occur in Downtown Rosemount.
1
P The redevelopment concept for Core BlockWest requires a series of actions over the next one
0 to five years. The timing of redevelopment is influenced by the use of tax increment financing.
t This area is included in the Brockway Downtown TIF district. Under current state law, com-
mitments to use tax increment revenues from this district must be made within five years.
-rte\\ °w Steps needed to implement this concept include: T
R NE; i q) Engaging cu rrent property owners in discussions about property acquisition options
5m 4 m Q P P ty b P P tY q P
O. ma OW gzu and interest in relocating within Downtown.
Il 1 Rill= e H..-„,,, Soliciting proposals for redevelopment. The ability to evaluate the financial feasibility
lil r.
P "'IllU of redevelopment in this area will be enhanced when working directly with a developer
0 Lei'M
Piing familiar with redevelopment issues.
Irsim 0,61:1 l o Core Block East
■+1 1 AU 192 Site Overview
i+l C9 t
u uir�
11 t S f -j The Core Block East focus area lies east of Highway 3 between 146th Street and 147th Street.
1 +1 Lou, I S
-d �i 0 It consists of the parcels known as the "Ratzlaff Block" and property adjacent to the rail line.
0, D This area offers a desirable location to initiate redevelopment in Downtown.
Like the Core BlockWest, this area lies in a critical location, in the heart of Downtown.
i Core Block East Area
Redevelopment Framework Development Framework
P Page 24 Downtown Rosemount
V
x
Redevelopment of this area plays an important role to define the future development
pattern and character of Downtown.
The City has already assembled part of the property. The Port Authority owns the
back half of the block.
The intensity of existing development is less than at other locations in Downtown.
3f
S�en ce motion 1
`f
��Y s
Saw" T k a Housing
4
is P i ce
1
w 5 �n ii tAntiek rl Port Authority F uegel Stora
Figure 10
Site Overview Core Block East
Development Concept
The preferred concept for this area includes a combination of mixed use and residential devel-
opment. The Concept anticipates two or three floors of housing over street -level retail. The
nature of the redevelopment project will be shaped by economics, market forces, and the need
to provide adequate parking.
Core Block East provides an excellent opportunity to introduce a new mixed use form of
development to Downtown. A multi -story building along Highway 3 complements the planned
mixed use development in Core Block West. The resulting patterns "stagger" these multi-story
buildings along Highway 3 to avoid a potential canyon -like effect and to create parking that is
clearly visible from the street.
The housing component of a mixed use project should be supported by other housing to be
built in Core Block East. Extending the development to the rail line creates a larger neighbor-
hood in Downtown. The residential element of the mixed use development is less isolated. For
Development Framework Redevelopment Framework
Downtown Rosemount Page 25
p
0 Promote mixed use re-
development that
establishes new pattern for
downtown and increases
feasibility of redevelopment
1 Str fir I f y g r Vacate and reroute Burma gr
li Ave. to enhance redev-
tra i� elopment potential
E`er Provide dear and convenient
J a a� nry 4 access to parking from Hwy. 3,
and strong pedestrian links
between parking and
businesses
Potenti al trail along rail
li $1! corridor
p p Enhance streetscape along
Highway 3
Seek area -wide storm water
i X F s f managementsolutions; use
�E F storm water systems as site
c� °rp
3 3 i k
1 amenities It
p Enhance streetscape (Intl.
on- street parki) on 146th,
Figure 11 147th, and Burm a
Development Concept Core Block East
Define and enhance key
pedestrian crossings of Hwy.
3 at 146th and 147th
Streets
the remainder of the area, the Concept shows a combination of medium- and high- density
housing. The intent of this illustration is to establish that either residential use is possible at
1 this site. The housing style will be evaluated and set through negotiations with a developer.
The Concept also illustrates the desired approach to storm water management for Downtown.
The Concept illustration shows a rain garden as part of this site. Rather than a fixed element of
this Concept, it highlights the need to provide facilities for managing storm water in the area.
Looking for shared, area -wide solutions will minimize constraints to revitalization. Storm wa-
ter management systems can also be designed to provide a green amenity to Downtown.
1
This concept reroutes Burma Avenue. Without the removal of Burma, the eastern parcels
pose a difficult development challenge. The size of the site and the proximity to the rail line
limit the redevelopment potential of these parcels. The new Burma Avenue alignment helps
to establish a buffer between the housing and the rail line.
Key Elements
Any redevelopment of Core Block East should include the following elements:
Redevelopment Framework Development Framework
Page 26 Downtown Rosemount
Promote uses, building character, and site design to enhance the core of Downtown.
Strengthen pedestrian connections with Central Park and the remainder of Down-
town.
Enhance the streetscape. Additional public streetscape improvements should build on
previous investments and avoid duplication of expense. Future improvements will add
green space and materials and seek to improve pedestrian spaces.
Coordinate access and parking. Shared parking provides an adequate overall supply
while preventing duplication. Reducing unneeded parking helps to maximize develop-
ment potential of Downtown.
Enhance the pedestrian crossings of Highway 3 at 146th Street and 147th Street. These
crossings form strong connections between redevelopment projects on both sides of
Highway 3.
Extend streetscape improvements and provide parking on 146th Street and 147th Street.
Implementation
Given the characteristics of this area, the Core Block East becomes a strong candidate for an
initial redevelopment project. As with the Core BlockWest, redevelopment of this site strengthens
the heart of Downtown. It allows additional streetscape improvements to be made in the High-
y
wa 3 corridor. It establishes that redevelopment will occur in Downtown Rosemount.
Steps needed to implement this concept include:
Engage current property owners in discussions about property acquisition options and
interest in relocating within Downtown.
Solicit proposals for development. The ability to evaluate the financial feasibility of
redevelopment in this area will be enhanced when working directly with a developer rr
familiar with redevelopment issues. I kl 113 14
!"JIB i Y
Crossroads North d
YL FY:7.
Site Overview 4 Mi! U H --,,r,
The name for this area refers to the nature of the adjacent streets. Highway 3 and 145th Street n on n ut g.
form the "crossroads" of Downtown. These streets are the primary routes carrying people into 0 1i1
and through Downtown. The traffic signal at this intersection is the only traffic control device `s
on Highway 3 in Downtown. Q F b
uny
The redevelopment focus for this area lies with the parcels adjacent to 145th Street. The key El R FJ L f
action underlying this concept is the relocation and re P i
ymg P q redevelop ment of Polfus Im lement. Ac u- 1 h 4 gr
,y o
sition of a portion of the Polfus site is needed to enhance the entrance to Central Park. The site
is already crowded, and the business may not be viable with a smaller site.
.fiii
Crossroads North Area
Development Framework Redevelopment Framework
Downtown Rosemount Page 27
11:; 8:z g1Ight11:7, L Tr) vv s.
e 'k 1 7 y r- vv -,..g.t; F.,,
.3
3' w
•1 I I 7 7.T 1 1 1 3; 11 11---"i i91, l )1 II FT=
1
II 1 I I r if n 1 ri- 1
1 1 .4
il 1
I fl I 1 7 r i I I I- g
L
I F 1 IL j‘ sall I 11
ii
L i
i II I ll ktr ,T11 _1 1 1 1
r 1 .1 10.1.14, 5' w 1 i 1 1
li III 1 r l i
1 it 11 P I •II lit .3 •II
1 to 1 1
-1- r. -1 1tL j n 1r r 1 t 1 ll ts s I
1 :4 I.: ,C) cs
se I. I I. 1■1 F WI 6 Eill -1 -1--11 vino e
iii Li c E I 1 ik.
4 r r- ov-
:E-- tf,
1,.. i
--i ii—
1 --3T.6, 1
1„.__.. _u,"-
t- dhi u V- i 1 1 01F-- ID ,ii
■Nr...,,z:xbsc
!II OiisirmlowitirmiN.--nicam,,,, 'i 4'1 1 A. k
1r 141 1: ...%1■211•1179...
1 i i tsi f .i i uslioci [waft I
1 I I
'1_
I 1 i 1 i i
J f.im,i TR
0, 0 0
ti
1
Min I I I s o I
T
1 i
,1311M vv
-1
g
t‘ Illb.iam. um law.■Irm;i■ "mpg. imanormormimmi Nom.
Ad
ST .1 i ST
■3:1P.i 11-
•5.
I 5 r•I i
lift J _Allitii■
ec 0. .:,irow..-swisii/Irjair 'MP-4qt f
S
)r.7-' 7 F______ 6,-= mor:Ofg 'T.,17,1 If F
N I I l
1 .11.
E y s
(4 W U i;1
i f;4
I
N :iS. .4 0 11111Mf il I
-.7:: I a
li
I I
P
41111 I 1
t
1
1 A
LL__ pp,•• i.L..:... 1
::'!":t..-,.. 1 a 9
4.• -.'.:.i. N,.`'s
-5 1111.1111MithrolliW
,4e
I I jil t3
L J
5
N
1 1 1 1 I •1 14 1 i
gx i I 7 Vs .9 iii 1p k w
4 I it g 1 1
r ;i: i T 3 i ili WI 11 a
i IN t (1 0 '*I
1 IO
0
1 Z13 4 1 "I -f- 1 4 5; 2 Milaiaiii 2 9 61; I a3
v
Hil ig WOhlmli g 11
t; 49
1 9
1
4 1 4
,n_ 4 I ,...,a.
to I 4 4 k
:4
e 1 Iti
1:axi 4"
a!
.=7 T---------
nnISIONS
WN
i
1573 1 F RARTNERS, LLC
III oliage va
g et V
a ra )11 55424 9,
CENIRKAIM
1 heraby 4404 eat Ihis pm, 47:111corn or mart
HEDLUND
14th STEET P)STNERS.
PLWAIWG 0006000 SL/17■EYNG
2005 Pe 0.714 Drive
Eagan, 414 55122
Ptsane (631) 405-6600
Date
fax (651) 405-6806 Randall C. Helena le* Ernymer uneler
MN UC. NO. 19571 rums au re
r re.. our. r
a... peaw-4,..... 2.,
R
1 1 L._ i
I
4 4
5 0
c 77:r...•... ._.L.2L7-.777r. iiminioitm!mw!iswilimmommplar. .4011L\ Sr
tr IF
I Fr
I il li I,'il III I j ,J 1 1 M••: 1
f I
6, 1 j... _Li LI_
,...L i I': 11 s.... 1 sEi _",„saisommir„)':..1 i. s .4'6 limicemi 11002171."..,.i, e, s 1
—I 1 i II H
I r i f 1 I r 1 I I r I I lir 1 I 1
I 2 II Id I 1 1 I 1 7 I I L
I 4 Il 7 LII p 1 1
I r 1 I --I
...y i -I: L I t
L .1, .1
11 II g4t. 7 I 7 .f. l 1 1 1
1 El,' .fj.!:
I 1.
_1 1,.
1 11 ..1 1 ...'111=111.7.1 ,i+ I
4 -7...
...:_.1,— ....„...L. 1 1
I 1
:1....-', 1- i 1 1 1
--t-
I. '61" 1 r' 'ffi ..i...:. 1-1- MI i
1, s
4 I
'6
1.9 111:i
1 i ,q. IN
i
1
H .ff- A its.
q leit
l
1 4
1 2 1
liffl 1 I r
1
o I.
I I i I I 1
i I I I
1
r in
l'--------,-1--.-- i o
1 i o
1
i
1 T
I T g i 1
1
1
-1 ihrwil i
00 AilIPIM■11MPMINN IMMO IiR77111.1minom map= I. L
i
WillinWEEMEMPASIIMIS r.:.'.tx"1,-.7MAIMMININEE9tialy411) i
Ili:
imilizn 1 1615rWil!'
MI MI
ST
11111111 Alm
SS
1.,._111.1111111t
'N MI 55 4 NU *A
1-... W Mirikik -Allift
i
Te cri
erinasoi.rmilenpwalifratemszsmustsomaiato=...MtNei 4-
c I I I
rF e 1 ,I t i funtilk
1
1
I i
I
1 I
si.. 1 1 1
NI
I 5-1 .r.
1 I I I
I t I A*4 1 1 I
I
I
1
I
.E 1 IL.
.-..,:-1 4 i
1
.1 Ar.,,_
A
i
1
4;4 iiAA A;;4 Aig A R;;MliA f4 g
.;a; ;"i F i
41: P R g Allri 91 R 1?
IY fg.p 10!
1 tV i Wille !!!:::!4:11;aiihN II 1 11. Q 2
.4 ftrqmi14-19.TA/T P t i2g41 2 24 1 P 5 1 °A 44t
Aa."0.
13 P CI .ft ZI:
M 1 f e• pi: lAIiP A P. a
16- RW
A§Pi.milx1 .11 irmil il 1,h ii 5 t
it 1 il igliOgi' Ill!
17 7 1 1
0 4a li paT§ialg x -1 p.,, .1m5 a ox 005 L cb till
6g5 x a a A'
2 0•■•• 1 4M 110 gie PIO 9 ig;INAI Al ;4 li :0
1------- A Ag tigglaqii g A t li 2- 11 ?-l '9 li t ::1
t
n cn 1
i R P
w I R 111 POP i P
gl Ag
In Lim
a
.h F11
a. 0
!8-17). xi Iggil a Eg 1 i glye A
p 20v 0 f; 0 81 !Al 11.1
l•
St CERIVICATOft R(...
TOWN CENTRE 0 L pus
R
i
,13 IF
II 146th STREET PARTNERS, LLC
15734 F.. A..
APO. WI,. 6512e
Pnane: (952) 451 i I.. 0 1 P.. 10.... or mpg.
HEDLUND Er n 4 Seift eaTit
POINAaNG EVGACTRIVG SUR,VINC
2005 Pin Oak Or.
U., WI 55122
FTenr (661) WS-6600
Fax: (6,51) 405-6606 Ras C. Hedlund 1454. LIG. NO 19576 NO.NPS P
EROSION CONT
Cr.....al al"11. ea
A...* ...-ca, M. WI/.
3
°.?,z1 t\2007-0.!.\-1"\-\------!.\--.
I I
X-Rof Owl 07102300 .0 I 1
;:::274g■glit:: d I 1
F-..i
I 1 1 1
I i 1 i
F 1
.*::•1
j, I 1 7.- 77 7. ts. 7 7 77 7 .7
r I r r, t 1
i, .1
1 I 'T 1, 7 1 ii.1 I I
,1 5 r 1 i .1 1 'sa i
1 i- J' 1' if 1 f.,:.. 1 7 -1" t„,,,.
1 1 ;i
R.I... 1•41 •1••1 I
i I L 7 4 I f`imfts..-;
[i 5
l' I
I s I 4 I l i ;I r i'7 1 11, 1j -1--'''' 7- I I I J. I i 'f,: *L__: r. _1, f
r 1 ...1, ii •.1 _T r„, -J,--L-....,-:.." 77 7" 7 7 7 t r I 1! I I:
1 I 41 1 1 -i.r.i.. 1 t y 1 1 k
r f 1 ii. 1 I: 1 I I
.1._)_. .1 1 1 1
I gli j i''
;-,-1 ..J1;1._. 1 1 C.' 11: P 1 I 1 1 li T li
i ii 1 11 -•-1
r 7 1 1 .'f I 7- 1
-1. I'
A•::../ 101 --I.- 11_.i L L. _L :L•'•'... I
-1 1
1 H.
1
1 1 ill I
11 1 I VI i i I k I 11
Il
1 1
I 1
1 I! li
1 i I 1 W411 1 I I, 1 1
I I i 11 f 1
1 I 1 1 1 g i
I 1:1 I! ::1
i 11 1 1 1 1
1 1 r..:
I
J I ,!i i I
1.....: I v i- i
I
lr I._ .z.. 7 :i.s• 4. 7 1. .77_ IT ;!!,7 1 -7-,, 1 4.3 11:
i 1
2.....--4. m 0.; ce .-2*, ---1 44"-- 4
1 I. i
1-12 J! 1 f
1 1 fj
r t -11 I
1 1 t-: I 1 f.1,.. Sq. 91.. r 1
'NI 1 1 L 4_ il I
I 4 11 r i i I 11 i.
P 1 II l•
r
I
N 1 1 1
I
1 1 ipf _11 III 1 i I
'it:•,:r...
17 II
.....1 i• id.
..A.
-223
0
C
M 11/1111 1 t. ,4 ibl: t
I? Pt; 2fIA11 °171'',•10efa*•00-: 6 mei 2 CI a
8 1 LI 111 1
iz 1 11 1 1 1 4
I Si' XI Eg.,.....
0 COM Ffs R rzi 222)suumus 2 1 E" 'e n v.
c==--z-t=-- o-o, illgiolammal 4. --4g1 .3
II en 4 4 4
11111';111 g;gg 11
a 4
1 N
3 0> 2
am ff I iliMi
i z-<
s.• t; g..
0 w VW IOILL
TOWN CENTRE
a REMOVAL PLAN
1 WIWOOM flit
ClOYWICATSM WNW.
HEDLUND
s =0 11.2 1.kard Wood Um., WOW We low Ot Iho
146th STREET PARTNERS, LLC PLAANIVG OV4VITRING SOftt
g 1
)5736 NO,* Avehoo 2005 loin OW Drive
Ili II Owl. WNW, ION 551
Wane: (952) 93)-3909 Eagan. MN 35172
Phone: (659 .3-6600
fox (651) 905-6606 Jaffrey 0 Lindy. Dote
MN. I.C. NO 11376
L
F
uf
177'-sse s.
1.1 yo., MA V
4 V i
77:77 0
7 .L :1 7 [2:::,....i 7
I I H77.77-7.77,761., ST
fr'r 1
1
7 y
I II HI I 1 I In I II r i Ft r 1 ,1 t lii I I I
II I: I F I ..1 I I. I t: I' L_
?.I1
1 k--
.....-,..4..'.i 1 1 '1 i 1 T. 1 0 1 I
i_ -•:•.r: i_ i r I.. r I I' I I
1 k1'.:t. :.4 4. ..e I 1 jt L_t _1 .1 il I I
1 .•'1,,,„_4_:Lss..: -0 I •ii• 7., f ii
i
1
-I l'• 1
1 t-1 i i. I
1 kr!' 7 1 9 '1 1''.."...:•':; .1 1 'A I 1 1
I l''. i :•y, l L
4783— -I.: T i -I 1 1 I
11:17- i x
c
111-1 1
1 1 ..I I 's 1
1. 11
4 II 14 1 I
I I k Il
1 1
1 I 4 -0- it gi- —L-- 1
1F.
1 1
ill 1 1 L
1 Pk --4 I
I I
1
I
l'. I ;if: ti\
It ti 1 III 1 ■T 1 1 1 1 1 i s' 1
H 1
li ri --4
jI
'a. :I
-.T-
sx
•TT tr.
't
ss 'Js■ e ss
Mi ST ll 11•4 z
M-4,..;'
1
1
il 11 I
N 1 I 1 1 1-- 1 11 I I 11
N 'f..,..i I I
NI 1.. ;1 k L _i_ i 1 l
4
H
I I
I X: I 1 il
s i s
9 -1 2A I r-- f
li
z. :4, L
4 1
i
jti A 1 E ;:i 1 p.t 1
ss
-4,.. MO0 1 10632 ---T. 4
....i
i
,e.. L J
I
1
ti 164
lb
k ai:
11;:t E 2 0 4 11{1/ •iom..•0 Geo
5.,ce b cc
I. g
0'1111,1 k
CI
'cl' iigiiii"'"i1 k tZt
ro x rms•
0
a..1.: z
/=:=----z
P 1 1 4 4 Il i
c• 5 I3( n Z
0 g 5 6 P i 5 In 14 Rig
e- g g> 11 iliq It t
S
musses se: CaAnCA1101. 11D1710a6
ff ErTfic CONDITIONS
2: 1 th STREIT PARTNERS. LLC
i HEDLUND
148
e
PLANNING DIGNEEPING SIAPPENNt
2005 Pin Oak Orly.
Phon. W' (651M 2 5-6600
Fa. (651) OOS-6606 I booby earlify 4.41 WM sonoy. gen. royal. ar aaserlallan
aes p.a. by m4 or oar my alreal sopa* and Pot
lo
Mho, D. Undgran
MN. LIG MO. 14376 PINAMICS Put In
aby aroma .../.4/04 to i
PM* yastro, Pownd 0. 2 I
...es-. ls..
a a pA l 5 vou 1 ar yer 5
i
Pom6 n."\m.a.•.w.- n'",.wr:nla..
N 00•]6'51' E 220.10
--7 63 F -r I T 2 1 0 K r
-'1 I I i I I I 1 5
1 I I i
30.5 ---I I I 1 1 9 1
1
M00 E 19763 S
I O 5 H—.
iri p= �I
r
I I I„ I
fi -�L�� I I I I I y
fi g =;I 1 1 I 1 1 I
J 65 1 1 1112.10 1 I 1 x
S00']{'M 41 7.{0
S
1 H00'3{'� I I -1 �1 1
1 ND I 1
724 I.y —j-2
300'S9'16'W 103..7
e$m� n Z
g. s8S s¢ ;e n O F: i.: i. E: Y ;7 1g 'i l..1_, E
o I�,D s
n D-r�
a
A Tom vi r,
1Z� I�- ..g r ID 1. R_ s
9r2, nIV• 1,10.4860 m
R BLIN
PLAY HEDL UND a, um ..n ".,..u` r a .N 6.
vfP.l[6 ,Ok SI NN al NAN inmsNo Lm S rw1v bark. bark. IM b. a V,• SINN uw A•w •N M .9 i
146th STREET PARTNERS, LLC a NAING ovav salvo SURICMc e.. 43 1 1 0
13751 Faioq• •.aw• 2003 Pin Oak Drive PMnc 7) 31 3 P.enr MI) 105 -6600 Dote: M
Fos (651) 103 -8606 JON, O. 4n69r•n a0. Dot 14376
/---fl_ L i
_...1,
ix fa 3 W.,1.1
f\--- WM
—1 1 r:.:5;. r--
I
55
1 —T. 1 -19111■11m■mus• ■IM/ .i
I i 1-
1-- ffik!' I I 1 FT
i ii
,1 I 1
1 ii Lii 1-1 ri d'.• 1 F-
4 .1 d 1 I.: 1 1 i •l
1 L
HI
l ik.-171: 1- -.I l
I t 1 1 I L _I T
1.
1 :6 i .1
1
I li'' ill i.11 1.-- 1- 1 ---i I L 7 I lis' 41
A ti
E.--.. -J. is -.-L-0
_J ILI sl J... r 7"7 -9:7- 1 1 WA& .1 1
r.#7 l,
1 I
4. 1 I 1 11 ::-'..i.: 11 1
I
ri I I. :7. I
7J! 0 1 .21._ _.1
-4 1 Jr7:
1
igg gil
I ‘‘I.' I •NI i 4 h 1 1 1
1
I
:.k...02211;i:_. .51 v,.. 4.--1-- 2 1
y eA V
111
11 il I 1 .1 1 i :;;...1 ''Irs!:415,:
1 l ipriii P 15
11 V V i_.
N, BUM9111 1 ry
1 .7- !•;',7 1 I r v v moms mpleat IF 1 A.
1. 1
$.$11
Egs' 1....,
i i .....2 1
I II !I:. 1.- I
i• ,n Wil,1
4 P
)14 7 I m ea linrwwwwww =Pro isimmilmiwilmmi ime■ NI --4 1
I
v i II nommo ti v....,,,,.,.. i
...W11111111
54
u.vii suss WEST I SS mu,
i Prifik i v"
7 Cc
1 1- c• r 3 052011acre:i0E 1
1
r r 1E 1-7,1n3 Irl 1 1 I-..
I
1..:11.' t.g.. 1 1 1
..3■., 1 i ,z-.g iii
I
N 1 i
NI 1 CI) g
N
1 1
.1
t F=
1 1
qg i
ii 1
1
1
1.___
It II N Ir.
i s 1 n, kr=1}1
1 1 i
I i
I q ql
i l i II i i i i
4 II
1
9,
1
I
1 nu 1 1
I o
11,1 i c,.3
41
1
..--z h
I I i i i In fr g i 1 1 I III
i 1 411 i i ..1'
,s i 1 i i i i Itilliififfilitilitlii ill 0 41 Pk
lirreed v III c 'll 1 11 At
1,1
7 p 4 I i i: a 1 cl
gi4. 1 4 f r nEl I' i tif 9, g g I; g g 0 lc
g 1111 EE I V
if• 1 rs g• s. i s. .4 4, n■ g 1 11111
A I
ii
g g
E E
A
11
g
t:1
V
Vs1 a Ili
i 25
POPMCD Mt 1.411.6
Tr i u n Ti rrf irr CB p NT LAN R.E
H
146th STREET PARTNERS, LLC
1
1
Illi 15734 Fano,. Avenue
Apple Vass MP 55124
Phone (952) 431-3700 2005 Pln Ook Orhe.
Eagan. LW 55122
Phone (651) 405-6650
fox: (551) 4 03-5506 Pondoll C. Hedlund WC Dolc
UC. Pa 19576
s I n NO. ROBERT TRA:
3t Hwy No. 3 0 �T o Z (230.00 to a)
4 y o f 1 IT T N00'2051 E 220 Mean
Po Ik po k Pam o I i I c I o I
L
R R I I 8>
A°
ill e i i I N00 157.83 L__
rs s PS 1 1 s I I C 8
g. I g'< a fI a V T I O N ',i*
V I r-
°v: g e if _I 625 •4 \-1 I L
I gg a 8'R 417.93
1
f L e 3; ii i "Fad Ina Bloc, 3, 80�110UNr 4 BURMA ti'i i j BUR M4 loam AVENUE i AVENUE
l Se N 00'3Y4CE 21e T
i L^. I
Ijgee?� 1 �j .1 M I –1
N C MG C' N50.3Y48'E mast' B O
8 BURNLEY AVE.
s 8) T L iti '•i
\ESE ,O..,
S
c
P.-
y
I0 I°
a Ex F i s G l3 i i .2> g. gi
g?i �'aLai? ,t ly $s m gs ce w $o� a i1 st E I E a z� 9
a v°:azp I zo a° i I i= as I g .!i 2 g aoa a If i?i g
g a-r -1 az 2_ g 4 so m°g 1.° :a1 g3 $3 g lei �Y �3g
WUP
4 I, s 7 1 4 7 i 7. G /3 Am 'c1. 3• cg E A i
g *3 m n m me ni a 0 s 1e i g a i 3 gig 4S
g
II ee 5 U m 9 o it .a—, as 8 8 i i I i v y°
1, 1 3 e Im F. me i
I i: c c I I q N 3 Is g 3 e ri ei
11 g l y w i :S ...1 I A a -1 i 5{ i !i I 3g I A j g g 2 iii 1-
lli a =F S g
I S 3 8:g° I Y i a ii
r m g a
9.9
R zfil
Fl I o aBa
I u 3 i
ill; 3
a
e A r€ 1 1 1 g E
1 ii i e S !sr?, 9 S
Y 9 8 6 a
w
c :3$
s I g I _I.
;26 SI s a 111 a
O 583 la 1 g s' a
;1 6Re2:22 :n
,..e„ I
L J
i=
II
i1 L;I II T r I-- j
I ;r f m 1
KT
I
1 I
L 1 -1 .'c
i
J
r III .I 1 1 ism
o m,n 53 _.I °i 1.„ :
1 L 'e i J I_
O o m a
it I z
L, 1/---1 p 14I �'I i _I110
1
-0 i
_GE —0E_ 61� 9�1, 9,
N. N. a m I it
\I i :i oo IP
E:: :E.:7;,:: vE:
O
ta
11 •iaaa i nn nnnnn 1 O 8 4
u2 002 ~aL2�� 7C,, G E3 a w O
07 y Ng
2 o M r a i kl i4 y y i :�z. 0 0 r t Iii
151 z R Ij ti
a y
z
be
MKPABCO MI BY
mimeo toff:
SITE P HEDLUND e me Ne. 4.-6<- w W
M DAM
y` x wx Ma a me n Ot N1 Meal Anamana ur able,
Nelmn I, wens. Nslx,len- 6n
146th STREET PARTNERS, LLC Nn x. e--.,. xNNe M.
v 005 e�xa ze6r c srev2 e.M1Me
\u v Y. 55
Eagan. 00 55122 aw
Ili Fl:a:r. (532) 431 -3160 F**, (6511) S 4*5 -6606 Randall C. HNUnel 646 C. 140. 19575
a tv ;irtHrEt;
1 trt i I'r11'r_ =•R 1 sv 1 :...6ithtt „ti::Iti_ 4 i i t (I e d Iil i l i j i'ji liisl l'"liitiri PhliiT'1"l.£.;: 554
t
l 1( NI 1§ I,l? rt .l l` tl ti i{KII
i 11 1 1 ]rrf ill! tirl itlt,I!, 1 i 11 2 r i
1 i t 1 Oh rl t
1.' 1 �1
1 LIE 'lt1 -11 .Ft3 1 il k 1 t1 ter t1 r i p
t 1 1 :r 1 4 1v Pr-Ali!' 1 t 1' I;.t I f i y T C
1 iI�1 EI■ 1 0 r ti iF =1 :il 1 1 1t I t l t I`lll 6 1 i 1 i
i 1 i 6 e 7i t 11 t. f t .t +z I
F1 I q ii r Ir: lt l
lt 1 t 1 1I a
fig t `t :f I� i t IL F fllt FFr
rFr ii} 1 tIIi! 111 t Ef,
1 I
P e
lii i 1 X p! L r L LL L r L
1 i 1 1 111111M 011111 101 L t y I l g
p qq pc, t i lie ill l Ili 11 i 111 p1161:ifief E Ile O S Iilll it 5 fl t s 0 11211
l
ill t 1 •til rll 111 1A 9' 1 pal ilid 1 I pf i S l 4 4
i 1 1 1 j i �,l d 1 c B 1 4 i10. ild. 4 5 ,1 ilia} i t all `R t
1 1i1 F 1 1 1 .l !I 1 1 gi. :1 11.1 1 F 3 `r 1.
6i:d1 1Ali1s{sI•z ilil11 x oli a t
i
3
i 4 s l i alt I 111 s I Flo i II
i 1I h 1t !ill! E 4 t
i1 F i1 {1 I {1 IrlU1 w".
1. 9 A t 1 i 11 A :ii 4 :k"�,
F
i'ir
i t j 1 N
l a
i 's ue i a
ri
off z
0� 1 t
m
�r
p
rn
zZ
c>
z� it i l( I 'r i,1 y R I III MI
Ii 'pow, E 6p i{ �t
it 1 #11 r
h
1 ill 1 �b�
r {11 i
iit
f K str t l 1 t 1 iiii p 1;
IA .iR
0
Zill r
1 }I
ii
f t 1
x:1411•
iI
r e e6 t 11: r11 {1 tr t r+ r` Ir 1 }l $t
midi l t r 1 r 1 i i t t l f }t 1 t F 1
11 1 1 itl t1 t ti 1 tl 1 1 +9 11 r r6 o r r r I Rrl I r rr 1 I ii.1 �1 l r 1 i 1 Ill li 1 ,1 1 I� i t
1 itlrii II i I i ill 11111111 lil i 1 I I I t $1. WI. I. t E J tl•0I I 1111 Olt 11 I t ii1$ I
rt c r iii Iii t6 1 1 1 1 1 1 t, II 1( [I irr` 1 tt 1 1l t
i 11 It 1 ,1 li i{ t r ti i1 t 1 =I III ii i1 1 r ,1 1
i I t$ j t ltl� °i l 1i 1tI 1
1 1 1
10 1r 1� i I 1 1 r!•1 III1 1 1 `r 1 I trl 1 I I i •j t 1{• 1i 11
t �t i It111 r Wilt 1 i 111 1 fI 1 1 1 1r 1' i�tii' i .111l11e. Il t 1 It 6 tlI }}tI
i i i ill t I 1 11 t i 1 1 11 i i t r t t r 1{ 1 1 it G� l� I i i i 1 jj� it NI i t 1�i,11 II I i ii of 1 l 1 l 1i If 1 10 111 ii 1 1 1l• i 1' 1 D illl 1 r i 11 1' i t
pr i I I 11 1 1r 1 Itl I i i I I1 {1 ni 11 i it !I r 1 1 i i i i hilt it t j 1 l t l r F 1 i 1 1 q i
r t if t{ i r 1 1 1
id ii ;ii J t i 9 r 4 r 1' t r l i t tl lr i t,I r I r t t
1 1 1 t 1 I 11 1 Ihil Hint il i' ti III 11 IFI 11 I l f 1i I li 1 I i (t i �iI I fl l r 11 i1 11 t r l r 1 1 ;(r i IE 1 t, 1111 1 ,1111 1 11 1 ti 1111 r i
1111,1 t .l 11111 i jj 1 r I I f i 1 t. lEl 1 {1 l I 1 l 1 It li 1 1 {i I r{ Iit tt r1 t r i r{ 1 r 1 t t i1. t 1 i 11 it ti t 1 li i t i ti fi I {i. 11 tit I l (11 1 1 1 11 l t i1 I i' 11 111 11 {t 1 1, i 6{ r 111 1 1 {i 1 1 1 I t J t 1! lei I r 11
I 1 1 I r i 1 1 I F i I! t i I 1 i iI1 1 11 1
6 1 i 1+ ti Ii„ Lilo' r t 1 I i r 1 l} i t i 1 11 tr r1i i II
l 111 1 I II I III 1 1 lit t1 11.411 11 it i; 1 t' fl „Ito i$ 1 t 11 1 1 i I 1 tl. 1 i 11
}r i 1 l rl.s 1F 1Il 1) I is l r 11', I I
11 1F 1 11 11 1 1 t i t I i i ;I ev F 1 1 i1 i II 11 01 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 I 1 I RP i II) 1 1 1 t
1 t} 1 i. 1 It I 1 113 1 il ll r' 1 i t t r I tl {ll It t t 1 9 1 I I I II 1 ,1 r t 1
1 i 1 1 1 1`111 1 1 i F 1 (le r III i 1
COML.. r1.110d1 —01 91zT TOWN CENTRE
MOM. 1Y EROSION CONTROL PLAN NEDL UND e+' ur a.l or r.
PurN:m rn+: w. .:.Y r..l .:6 r
•ro.r.l.e.
N•1 1 a. 6MY L4m,W ha1�W.M Uprr .n.•r h 01 1
i. rt 146th STREET PARTNERS, LLC
.6lrwt c NavEFR6ve Sw9CNw;
15734 Fano M0001 ]005 FH b9 DrM u 1
Coq, 104 �.",l.
Pirmr SS'2�.0 Moran (6DI) -6600 51 51 IL b b' blc
Frc (651) 405 6606 Rm6M C. Hedlund M. tK NQ 19576
di' CB SOUTH ROBERT TRML 1. di: 28 2:
•1110.:511■1FAI air ►.UM1 LNI■airIM■ JMk.INf
1 I oaaeoeoo .:.5r. b6o etioeanoo ...tak° esre'a ar1II II
ee �!•U ■11■ ■A!■ ■■t■■■- ■■rri'i
1 1. ■ii ■ii■ Or� *uI d I a,
0.
e o
R 4 :21.5 ne.,a 111111 n o
o �U1WIM'.�.N111i11 �4iri>ii�i�
r
o;• AS 1 1i 1 1 a� ::r 7, 1 1:: 4
r Fr717 :3 C: :3 0 17 s ,ot
P, l•oeoe o�0 1llkari1. s it E: i
I e ..u... d al 111 o I I 9
i'�
O O r 0'O np e g00' i n
1 111
6,. o 9 2 1 9 9 9oe0a►.. -•t nw°,i o 3° Lul it
o iiii iia7i■ 12ff �i °s •n..+w tie."
6 0 2 ,',I i A .l ..Il y ii
•I a a if aauk, ani
r�i gN� arisT,•i7 if...- o I 4y
l li 111IIRI! NUMMI 1 1111••1111/ Nii■M1 I \ii uii 11111•1•1111 UMW/ /i1�R1\ •ii u,1. 1!!
9 w °w w.' 'IMP' NW' NI� nom, '1n' �!1!► o,�
�1w�►
URMA AVENUE E
ra.ra,`1 ■r'
6:2111j1 I i �r p;;l
Imo--- "III
:o... ....nom:. i &eeS 'set 0
4 X11.
1 410 1
:11
'Ili 1 16L
It 0000000]
11 O.�OODOOJ
r I
1
1...,
I
i
1E3�p'. z ::::071:::::: 7 r.nn!!!' E:EN 9 :'E°: E
j iif iila iij il i if Ili ii i 1 i 1i Hi h' !iiii0 �1' 11'ilil of I Hipimmi :rpm L E Q 1
s.11 ;s1i :i ai P 11 1 li is Ali hill 1 d: 41a hill Z 'I l ii l u Ill,' 7 i r C ?i F a a 411 1 1 11 1 d iii i 1 i i d 1' ai 1 k l id 1 1 1. i f i 1 i i g 1 ii g 1 1 1 11 1 1 i i1 1i i i u m iii.';i" g 11 A i 4t t i'i i id l i 11 1 i 1 1 1 1ii 1 1 if1 i�: i i 1 �1 i1 li i, 1'!1 I k 11, a
s s a $4 1 e i e1 i iii li 1 i Ilia •i lil it 11 d 1 i� d� 1° 1 i pl i i y g @1 111 1 1 O f i �y d 1 �,1 1 11 Ja 1 i a 11 !i i 1 ii4ii E =11 pp 1 iii 1 I� L Ai i :t 1 11 d 1 is i a 1 i i= 1 di 1 1 t i 14 1i, iE t 1 1s 1 d 1E 1 �t 1 i d 1 1 i 1 ,1 i 1ii�1• a t i 1 a i s ry t iii P°
1 1 i 1 ..11 i 11 i e i 1 11 1 1 I i 1 11 °'l ii i I 11 i 1 Hi 6 1i ill= I i i 0 ;H i 11 i g d
11. i it 111 1 4 i1° 1 1 fp 11 Hi ill iI 2 i 1111, 0 t 1 i t 1 1 d!! i1 a1 i 1 F1 d °i °(t 1I1 �,f11 VV d e
111 ii S Q 1 a i1 li ii •f i d 1 i :iii 1 �ii 1 1 i si a li i i I l J °1 HI, 1 i1 1 1. 1 i i 1 i iii i 1. i' 1i 1 i 1 f 0 i d �Ii� f� 1
i 1a1 i iii ;11 1 iia 11 1 1'1 1 is ;I' IIIIII HIII Oil ql
i IIIIIIIIIIIII i iiiiiii /III iii i O i i 1
I g:15 991! litiii n 0 qii,"fill fig :c
F AA i ir 2 b i t p i p 9 a ga$ x c
T. HWY NO 3 (S0 RORERT TRAIII
I
z O 0 O
1 !Nl ■■�11�111M11■■■■■■ipi11■1■ ■111111
1 t o
Fl I
1 0 1 0
i II t. VIM 1
1 1 enuua -0 e
IH■ ne p �r'
Arsit■I�IIf-ruI'
1 1 1 sINVO :1111111U•I"4UJ•
a 1 1 F C l °e
I 1111 Y i IOW I_ L H ll I r e 9 d e i a:an■ 2
IsiP
1 8 i 617
Plikalillillteg 0
1 c;
I
O e 1 J 1
1 cII l i
o
II 1 Ia
w w rat
C ■�fl ■N ■O3iG^ rllnli iiftiiiiiilli`i m yeaiFaiii •il�
11■■•MIIII■ ■•■■M■■■■■■■ ■■■■■1■■■■ ■1 ■1 ■1■ ■WICII■ ■r1l W,
0 O I O e -r-.
BURMA AVE
it •�I..iiuM� Y \ii\•cr
N
0 '��?G o
IMO 'u
1 r_ e o
I
I r°
I c=
I C k
iii t 1 Z
7, .7 Do r i
r
al 11 1 1Ii 1 Ap i n 1 1 0 pill
Ill
l
I i ae 11 4
R S a w n n "e 5" 1 Z
g
5 0000®00$ ii a
I WW1
cl i" I
A s!
t g I J I 1 gill if h c E I'M o`
C) 1111 3 aYg W fia
-.c.< Z Z 1
ref ltd ow 1.0, Vd 1rs' sr 1rd
c p. 11 0 1 1 1. 1 1 •1 xs
s D') 0 4 N ft4 m b-i s g ^rm r q E d 4
O It
4 I/ Ord 4
0
k —I 11 Its
111 2040
4
i,- f
i k' Yd 4
c
d L srd and
it 4 1
r
,.Yd 4
i
i
me, tr.. se, ,rd 0.-2. 0.-2. d 20-0 20-0 1Yd 41.2.-2. 41.2.-2. 11
t r r-
iiiiii /�io�o iiiiii L Y �iiA AL .iii //a
i M. Y
X4 •:=1,-, jr44,144
rd
4 �4 •d r 4 4
^Tf J e
4 u u' 1 4 fri
/iii' ✓ii /ia 1"." ../74r L •Loiii�iiAzi.
1 .rd 1 'd 1 ,.d 1,.. e 1 »'d 4 ,rd 1,rd 1 rd 1 f
h E
I llri
11 Ill i /i ii El' gz .P.10 Ili 4. 1
f 0 i o 0° G' 1 W w
0 0 111111U i �w a 3
s g r 7 Z I Q p 0
00000000000000 v1 a li p II p i I fi i l k
Iiiii§5tlagil =pd f o o o d 0
I f� 6 I R 1 1. 4 1 R 11
F 1
1,1 I
i ,.1',,:, 11
rJ
r� ����i'I 1 JJ 11
=II 01 e e 1 111E1111 e
Ig 71 71 �1 -11 -11
3 I I I mi I :i 11 I' NI
-1I ill l 0
I 1 =1 1 ■I
11/11111111/1 1 I _II Nimsommi
''r =1 =M1 MI II b I I
,z_ .I 1m• m
I1 VIII I,'
IR ■ail �I� ill I
!MEM.
177■
f I I 1711M11 I 1_I 11
■I 71 i 1;* o j e e
;I; i 1 mil I '1 i
I II ■I _III (1) 7 g
1 p, ■M1 al �I
I I ii O mI
I I I min. IN maim 0
1
I1
II
II
11111 11
<i. ■,I ■II ■II IIe. 1
l of i_�ll'1 „,,,�I �'�i ■ie■
IN■li fl
LF 1.■
i 3ir3m loin'
e r} Y
1 M1 11
.I. ti all ■I ■1 I ■ii ■ii■
EMI MI Mill III i _Ell ■III ■I II I Imo'
II II
1111.111r
II
II
II I =I II l M N
1=■ e 9 6 11
-Li- A I I
4 II
I AI.
I
�1� rill
11--
I'
l i re ire re I; ■1I III I ■I I .i a
■1 71 �I ...I al .1 I
I I
FI V i S E M _l
1 ∎11 I�II,I��111� �I���II�111I INN •=gom■
II 611112 1 -1 -I■ II 1.1
11 r
I ..II I ti 4
I I I I_ 1 me
r ME1 IIIIII IIIII 1 1 g
IT nil '�1 Ili 'n f d� `a
f
D UqIi 1 y C LF w PP l O
r 0 O o II
(J O 1 1 9 C
P F3 P PI gg
ai 0 0 0 e O f a a ,d q li f (1P 1 1
t 1. `i .:III _Ilgl :11111
1�. ∎1
i mmil. mu i 2 II ....1_,..11__,..111 ''3
aiiu
1■■ p l =I ■t.Et..
1� I I o ••I♦•CI
I ■IEM .I o p i1mi 1.I
[Mil I e I II I e
=III mill
I I�, III I I'7 I f I I 1 ri.
I J� I o
O 1 1 1 1 1 1 11111
I I� ilk I 1 r. °11111. ,11. 11 m ■tt■ I• EIt■I
I I' :II, X11
ii
I: :IIi1 I
I� EN IIIIli i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111'III
IIIC e
".m ill I= ii 1 1 I I.I.I.I 4'1' I 1 l 1 I 1 1I .i
II
�i =itltl o f 0 e o
11
4 t
.1 .1 K
1
1 �.I -.II ..III -t' e
�.I =i111 nil
4
0 0 1' M���1
1`
1— ■_ti_■
1.1.1.1.1.' l.___g, P P P
n
ii 1 9
iP P� P
o o e
II
II
J mil
n .I
.1 1 •ICI
O O .1 .1 I I
11
rL l =Mid X111
!�It 1 =_111 :;1111 0
1
d r 1 I. 1 �m
Iemu I -mil .I.1 i 1' .mmo ..�mmI
rF- !n1 'col
12, 17,1, ir.mm.doil
II 1E111
11111': INEMIENI
'r 1
No
Imo:.
is I I�::
EM 0 1 1 IIIth
1
5171111 K !MU 11.4:1111111:: ICI I I II 1 {I
11 :1111
1 I l 'Gi11 0 1 ;taro II_?=1::1■
M .1
URR•l o 0
-I IRR�r
1 1
1
on IIIMIIIIIII 1>
VI
��11 `x
1 11 11111 00000000000000
�'!I1 ,IEII,II t
I t t llll 1
I �'g
O 0 4
8
ii16 i !fili fifi Illi
3
O 6 III 3 1.1 c
N 1 1 111 1110 z o a 2 0 I.,,
1 R I z g 36.Mg1
1 1 :4 z al f i Ii
(1) r*- 11..11 I _I' 111 0 0 Q O
rill _iI i II 0 1 r,----- ii
1.1. EL 11111M1111•11
H I Ir c 1:!
l ':1111
1111 e I 1= °1 11111:1111111:: 1 -1-1—I
iI 0 ril 111 I e I; I Imo: ■::i u
A IM 121 I I 11 I I�1 I 0
ii 01 -_1 21 II Ill c
1 I 1 1 1 0 i l 1 C o
c.
I Irl 1
11 [ill
Illy 1
P I
NMI MI Ii I; -II 1 �I
I
I; MEI 1'I I; o ME V' 1m1 I
11
1:1 0
III/ Eli ■1 i, ��f i1
O I l
II
O 4 I I I 1 I IM
1111= I
1
r_ 11 i l
Ilia _I
�1 ;1= o !l -1J l•• I
II -I■
I
:e ms
Tr
I I MI lisk low)
11
ti
I I MIL I
I O O 0 00 011
1i
11
cii 4> 4',.,,
00000000000000
411191 16115
1 i s t 6
g
III. 11111 l 3 zO dJI
;el SI C 0 ANN ������0 3 73 11 e q Alf
a5 I
z 1
z s 3 °A
1111::
is
it
tr;
I
.1111 _..RaR,�,- ��y. 1. 19 1 1:1 4 1111
bA Rr��� RaA' 'iRr ��Rti�. ,�i
yr c aRt��r�!��
III
111
1 I w .r =II
X11
111111M1111/'
I pi fil i II 111
I EFINIIIIIN MI *lanai
r V7 g r 1 rrr
i
11 r ill
L
Mt
4
A
1 i g 0
I i 1
ii i 1 1 m h 0,
1 1 1 p 1
1
i
Et
ji
-g5'. Hi ll
91111 o y
O
in i O a gZ :1111:110 4 d g° g g m
ilE v
floc)
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXHIBIT C
DRAFT DOWNTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
(Revised September 2004)
The Downtown Design Guidelines outline objectives, required zoning regulations
and recommended design guidelines for both renovation and redevelopment in
Downtown Rosemount. The intent of the Design Guidelines is to implement the
City's Development Framework and guide both land owners and the City as they
prepare development projects in the downtown.
The Design Guidelines contain 16 elements. Each element is broken down into
three subcategories: Objectives, Standards, and Guidelines. Objectives
represent the aim or goal of the specific element. Standards are required zoning
regulations that apply to a given element based on the existing zoning ordinance.
Standards apply to any development within the downtown. By comparison,
Guidelines represent an alternative performance standard than the base zoning
regulations that the developer must meet to receive financial assistance for a
given development.
The Downtown Design Guidelines have three main goals:
1. Implement the City Downtown Development Framework.
2. Create and enhance the small -town, unique character of Rosemount's
traditional downtown.
3. Enhance the pedestrian orientation of downtown Rosemount and
encourage streetscape design that is inviting and on a human scale.
1. AWNINGS
Objective: To enhance the historic feel of Downtown while providing sun
protection for display windows and shelter for pedestrians.
Standard: Awnings shall be constructed of durable, protective, and water
repellant material, however, materials susceptible to damage from
temperature extremes, ultraviolet light or fading are not allowed. Awnings
must project a minimum of 36" from the building and may not come within 24"
of the adjacent curb on a public street. All awnings shall be supported by the
building. A minimum eight feet of clear space shall be provided from the
sidewalk elevation to the lowest point of a canopy. The maximum height of an
awning shall be thirty percent (30 of the height of the floor of the building
on which it is placed.
,Y•
infiNgniq,714AAi;6556! X I 4
it
4p.., pa d
@PP4
!fl? i Y-I )Yd 1
it aaaaaaraaaaaaaaaaaaa a d r 1 I_�I*�
,--P I E d 11116
34433443114« %4 q 4 x
aaaaayaaaaaaaaaraaaaaa A
t It allir 1_,,,
wil k d
d x
d
M
iird
se s,•e Y-r' Yd 2,-... 7/7' PAN 1I it 1 yamy�,,, i n a. 28-'
d 1 1-. d
x i x
6w.4 6 41 4.._4 6.
Y'y' ry' Y.Y Y7' YC N'4 Yd if-0' Yd Yd f
]iT-r 1
i N o ���iii I ii o 7C
NN3
Z
es
a 111111 3 a
Guideline: Canopies, awnings, and specific architectural accents will be
encouraged on a case -by -case basis. The style and characteristics should be
consistent on all tenant spaces within a multi- tenant project. Awnings which
cover individual tenant spaces and do not cross multiple storefronts and /or
multiple buildings are encouraged. Backlighting or illuminating awnings are
discouraged.
2. SIGNS
Objective: Signs should be architecturally compatible with the style,
composition, materials, colors and details of the building which it identifies
while differing from signs on surrounding sites and providing a unique identity.
Standard:Painted window signs shall not consume more than one -third of the
glazed area of the window. Neon signs are permitted in display windows
only, if not covering more than one -third of the window surface area. The
combination of neon signage and permanently painted signage should not
exceed a total of one thirds (1/3) of the window surface area. Window and
neon signage may only consist of tenant identification and logo.
Projecting signs may not exceed 12 square feet in size or three feet in width.
No portion of a projecting sign may extend beyond the second floor of the
building. No Tess than 10 feet of clearance shall be provided between the
sidewalk elevation and the lowest point of the projecting sign. Maximum
distance between sign and building face is one foot. Signs cannot block or
obliterate design details, windows or cornices of the building upon which they
are placed.
Wall signs may not exceeding fifteen percent (15 of the total area of the
wall on which the signs are affixed. Wall signs on a storefront type building
shall generally be placed within the sign band immediately above the
storefront.
Freestanding shall not exceed 40 square feet and 20 feet in height or the
second story of the building whichever is less. All freestanding signs shall
have a masonry base to match the building and reflect the architectural
character of the project. Exceptions may be considered if the sign is
constructed of higher quality materials that compliment the building.
Sidewalk signs are allowed without a permit only in the Community
Commercial (C2) District subject to standards.
Signs not allowed include:
2
Rooftop signage
Signs painted on building
Electronic reader boards
Flashing or motion signs
Guideline: Symbolic and historic projecting signs are encouraged while
pylon /ground signs are discouraged. Ground signs should not exceed 30
square feet or 10 feet in height and should have a base equal to the width of
the sign face. Signage should have the capability of being lit in the evening
but internal illumination is discouraged and the source of light must not be
visible to motorists or pedestrians. If an internally illuminated sign is
proposed, only the text and /or logo of the message may be illuminated.
Permanently painted window signage is encouraged if compatible with the
architecture of the building.
The City may consider project- specific sign convents to allow flexibility in
design to create a distinctive identity for the project consistent with historic or
traditional downtowns.
3. HEIGHT
Objective: Building heights should mimic the distinct yet complementary
rhythm of traditional "Main Street" or "Downtown" buildings.
Standard:
Principal Structure: 75 feet (C -2 District)
Accessory Structure: 18 feet
Guideline: Varying heights of buildings is encouraged. A flat roof building is
not permitted unless a parapet or other architectural feature is added to
increase height and visual interest. Two -story buildings are preferred over
one -story buildings.
In multi -story buildings, the ground floor shall be distinguished from the floors
above by the use of at least two of the following elements:
A difference in building materials or detailing.
An offset in the facade.
Awnings, loggia, or arcade.
Special window lintels.
Brick or stone corbels.
4. SETBACKS
3
Objective: Buildings in the C -2 District should be set close to the street to
create a pedestrian- orient environment associated with traditional "Main
Street" or "Downtown" areas.
Standard: No minimum setback is required in the C -2 District. New
construction and infill developments shall align building facades with the
sidewalk edge or property line. If a parking area abuts the street, the
sidewalk edge should be delineated with a combination of landscaping,
pillars, and /or fencing (no less than three (3) feet and no more than four (4)
feet in height) consistent with the City's standards.
Buffer Yard: Where a C -2 Downtown Commercial District abuts a residential
district, a ten foot wide buffer yard shall be required. This buffer shall contain
no structures, shall not be used for parking, off street loading or storage, and
shall be landscaped. Landscaping shall include sod or seeded grass and
planting of trees and shrubbery. A screen wall or fence not less than fifty
percent (50 opaque, nor Tess than three (3) feet in height is recommended.
The buffer must provide sufficient screening of the commercial parking.
Berming and /or landscaping may substitute for the fence.
Guideline: Buildings should be positioned along the edge of the sidewalk or
property line to create a pedestrian oriented environment found in traditional
"Main Street" or "Downtown" areas. Exceptions may be granted for
pedestrian oriented amenities that contribute to the quality and character of
the streetscape such as landscape enhancements and outdoor seating and /or
gathering areas.
5. UTILITY AREAS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING
Objective: Utility areas and mechanical equipment should be designed so
that they are functional but do not detract from the aesthetic appeal of the
downtown.
Standard: All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened by a raised
parapet wall or with comparable and compatible exterior building materials.
The city administrator or a designee may deem it unnecessary to screen
minor, incidental rooftop equipment, which equipment shall be of a color to
match the roof. Metal cabinets used to enclose and protect rooftop
equipment shall not substitute as screening.
Exposed roof materials shall be similar to, or architecturally equivalent to, a
three hundred (300) pound or better asphalt or fiberglass shingle, wooden
shingle, standing seam metal roof or better.
4
Guideline: Utility areas and mechanical equipment shall be designed to be
screened by architectural elements that are consistent with and blend into the
building or site design.
6. WIDTH
Objective: To break up the monotonous appearance of long facades.
Standard: Building exteriors are required to include architectural
enhancements to create visual contrast and interest, such as lintels, cornices,
inset doorways, beveled corners, parapet walls, etc.
Guideline: A building more than 45 feet in width should be divided into
increments of no more than 45 feet through the articulation of the facade.
This can be achieved though combinations of the following techniques:
Divisions or breaks in the materials
Window bays
Separate entrances and entry treatments
Variations in roof lines
Building setbacks
7. FENESTRATIONS (WINDOW DOORS)
Objective: To encourage large, open views into the commercial space
enhancing the pedestrian experience by providing a visual connection to the use
inside the building. On upper levels, windows should provide privacy while
aesthetically and functionally serving the building.
Standard: A minimum of 50% of the ground level facade and sides of buildings
adjacent to public rights -of -way shall be transparent (windows and doors). A
minimum of 20% of the building's rear facade facing a public right -of -way, parking
area or open space shall be transparent. Reflective or glass tinted more than
40% is not allowed.
Guideline: Window and door play a significant role in shaping the built
environment of the downtown. Large and open views are encouraged along the
first floor to create visible connection between pedestrians and the products or
consumers within the building. Upper floor window should be vertically oriented
and include architectural features including arched tops, column framing and
decorative lintels.
8. MATERIALS DETAILING
5
Objective: Projects shall be constructed with long lasting materials and include
detailing that creates or compliments the distinct character and harmony of a
traditional downtown.
Standard: The exterior wall surfaces of all buildings within the C -2 Central
Business Commercial District shall be constructed of one hundred percent
(100 brick or an equivalent, excluding all doors and windows. Non earth tone
brick shall be limited to architectural accents. Brick or stone exteriors shall not
be painted during the life of the exterior materials.
The following materials are not allowed on the facades or sides of buildings
adjacent to public rights -of -way:
Aluminum, vinyl or fiberglass siding or roofing materials
Concrete masonry units
Materials that attempt to mimic traditional materials such as fiberglass
panels that are molded to look like brick
While variation in materials and colors that support the general theme may be
allowed, the overall building shall have "360 Degree" architecture. In the event
that the rear or base of a building utilize integrated rock face block, the color shall
match the predominant brick color.
Guideline: Traditional materials such as brick and stone should be used as the
primary building materials. Tile, stone, glass block, copper flashing, metal and
wood should be considered for accent materials. A minimum of 75 percent of the
all facades (excluding the transparency requirement) should be brick or stone. A
high level of design and architectural detailing is preferred. Primary materials
should be used to emphasize rear entrances.
9. COLOR
Objective: To encourage a varied yet complimentary use of color.
Standard: Buildings shall use primarily earth tones with light and bright colors
used only for minor accenting. Accent colors should complement the primary
color and may not exceed five (5) percent of any building elevation or wall.
Monochromatic walls or facades are discouraged.
Guideline: Varying shades of earth tones are encouraged. Exception may be
considered if the applicant can demonstrate that the alternative color scheme is
more consistent with traditional "Main Street" or "Downtown" environments.
10. FRANCHISE ARCHITECTURE
6
Objective: To create and maintain the unique character of Downtown
Rosemount, buildings should not be branded using the architectural style of a
company.
Standard: Neither the C -2, Downtown Commercial District nor the Traditional
Downtown Overlay District contain standards related to franchise architecture.
Staff offers the following amendment to the Zoning Ordinance:
Applicants shall create a unique architectural design and style that is consistent
with the Development Framework for Downtown Rosemount and City of
Rosemount Downtown Architectural Guidelines.
Guideline: Franchise architecture (building design that is trademarked or
identified with a particular chain or corporation and is generic in nature) is not
allowed. Franchises or national chains shall follow Rosemount's Design
Guidelines to create a unique building that is compatible with downtown
Rosemount.
11. STREETSCAPE
Objective: Streetscape elements should create an attractive and welcoming
environment for pedestrians while providing unified theme throughout Downtown
Rosemount.
Guideline: Benches, trash receptacles, and ashtrays should be consistent with
the downtown streetscape standards. Brick inlay, exposed aggregate, colored
concrete, or similarly enhanced pavement treatment is encouraged. Streetscape
elements should be placed in both public and private areas throughout the
downtown to encourage pedestrian activity.
12. LIGHTING
Objective: Lighting in Downtown Rosemount should serve to illuminate facades,
entrances and signage while providing an adequate level of personal safety and
enhancing the aesthetic appeal of the buildings.
Standard: Lighting shall be consistent in character throughout the entire
property site, in both design and bulb type.
Any light fixture must be placed in such a manner that no light emitting surface is
visible from any residential area or public/private roadway, walkway, trail or other
public way when viewed at ground level.
Light directed upward is prohibited. Externally lit signs, displays, buildings and
aesthetic lighting must be lit from the top and shine downward. Lighting must be
shielded to prevent direct glare.
7
The level of lighting shall not exceed 0.5 lumens at any residential property line
or 1.0 lumen at any non residential property line.
The maximum height for exterior lighting is thirty (30) feet.
All non essential lighting will be required to be turned off after business hours,
leaving only the necessary lighting for site security.
Lighting styles and building fixtures shall be of a design and size compatible with
the building and adjacent areas.
Ornamental pedestrian light fixtures shall be of a color and design compatible
with the established city streetscape and adopted Tight standards including the
green "acorn" style.
Guideline: Both private property and public street lighting should be consistent
with the City's streetscape standards. Light poles in parking areas should not
exceed 25 feet.
Exterior wall lighting shall be encouraged to enhance the building design and the
adjoining landscape. Building and signage lighting must be indirect, with the light
source(s) hidden from direct pedestrian and motorist view. For exterior sign
illumination, shaded gooseneck lamps are encouraged.
13. PARKING
Objective: Parking in the downtown should adequately serve the public and
residents without detracting from the compact design that makes a successful
and pedestrian friendly commercial center.
Standard: Uses existing in the C -2 Community Commercial District before
January 1, 2004 shall be exempt from Section 8.1 (Off Street Parking
Requirements) except that all such parking provided shall comply with the
Parking Design Standards in subsection L. The City may require new or
expanding uses to comply with Section 8.1 should the Council find off street
parking is necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the community.
When determined appropriate, such features as benches and bicycle parking
facilities that do not interfere with pedestrian movement shall be included as site
design features in new construction or redevelopment. These elements shall be
consistent with the City's streetscape standards.
Guideline: Off street parking must be located in the rear of buildings whenever
possible. An exception may be when parking must be located in a side yard
8
adjacent to a building and fronting on a street. In this case, landscaping, pillars,
and fencing shall screen the parking as outlined under Setback Guidelines.
Side -by -side parking lots created by two separate buildings or properties and
corner parking Tots are prohibited.
Surface parking lots should be kept small and close to the businesses served
when possible. Larger surface parking lots should have visual breaks of four
season landscaping treatments. Parking structures adjacent to any public right
of -way or walkway shall have ground floor elevation designed and detailed like
other commercial or office buildings.
Shared parking between sites is encouraged. The parking needs of individual
tenants will be reviewed to determine the amount of shared parking needed.
14. LANDSCAPING
Objective: Landscaping treatments should be used to enhance the pedestrian
experience, complement architectural features and screen utility areas.
Standard: Developments within all commercial districts are required to provide 8
trees or 1/3,000 square feet of building, whichever is greater. Commercial
developments shall also provide one foundation planting per ten (10) linear feet
of building perimeter.
Landscape buffers are required between commercial uses and residential
districts. Landscape buffers are required in the event a building is setback from
sidewalks or right -of -way to separate parking areas from sidewalks.
Landscaping shall include boulevard and ornamental trees, shrubs and mulch or
turf. Landscaped "islands" will be encouraged as a means of reducing large
expanses of asphalt.
When a required off street parking lot for six (6) or more cars is located adjacent
to an "R" District, landscaping and berming to meet ninety percent (90) opacity
year round must be provided along the "R" District property line. In certain
situations, the City may consider, but not necessarily approve, installation of a
fence or screening wall not more than six (6) feet in height but not within the
required front yard.
Guideline: The use of flower boxes, planters and hanging flower baskets is
encouraged. All landscaped areas shall be irrigated.
15. REAR ENTRANCES
Objective: To provide a rear entrance to the buildings that is welcoming to
pedestrians.
9
Standard: Neither the C -2, Downtown Commercial District nor the Traditional
Downtown Overlay District contains standards related to the design of rear
entrances. Staff does not recommend adding a standard requiring rear
entrances. Rather, we recommend the guideline below.
Guideline: The rear entrance should be clean and well maintained. A small sign,
awnings, display windows and planter boxes can improve the appearance.
Primary building materials should be used to emphasize rear entrances.
16. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
Objective: To encourage pedestrian movement both to and within the downtown
through sidewalks, trials, streetscape elements and site amenities while
acknowledging the need for vehicles to bring good and customers to the
downtown.
Standard: Concrete sidewalks, five (5) feet in width, shall be provided on all
commercial property along any collector or arterial street.
Clear and well lighted walkways shall connect building entrances to adjacent
public sidewalks and to any parking facilities located on the site.
Guideline: Trails and sidewalks shall have a textural and architectural style
consistent with the City of Rosemount streetscape standards. The minimum size
of trails and sidewalks in the Downtown should be ten (10) feet or the maximum
area available between the building and the adjacent curb.
10
4 ROSEMOUNT
PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 12, 2008
TO: Eric Zweber, Senior City Planner
CC: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director
Andrew Brotzler, City Engineer
Kathie Hanson, Planning Department Secretary
FROM: Morgan Dawley, Project Engineer
RE: Stonebridge /Core Block East Town Centre Development Plan Review
Revised Submittal
Upon review of the Stonebridge /Core Block East Town Centre Development Site Plan dated
March 11, 2008 and received on March 11, 2008, the Engineering Department offers the following
comments:
General Comments:
1. As a condition of plat approval, the applicant shall execute a subdivision or development
agreement with the City to secure the public and private improvements associated with the
proposed development. This agreement shall address items such as, but not limited to:
conditions of plat approval, time of performance, identification of developer improvements
and public improvements, security for improvements, ownership of improvements, and
responsibility of costs.
2. Public improvements associated with the development will be built by the applicant's private
contractor, which is a deviation from the standard practice of constructing public
improvements separately by public contract. Plans and specifications for these
improvements will be designed by the City's consultant engineer to be included in the
developer's construction bid package. In addition, construction services for the public
improvements including construction staking and inspection will be provided by the City.
3. All construction work within the right -of -way by the developer's contractor, including
removals, shall commence no later than August 1, 2008 to ensure completion of all work and
site stabilization prior to the end of the 2008 construction season. If, due to scheduling of
developer's site work or other unforeseen circumstances, work cannot begin by August 1,
2008, work within the right -of -way shall be delayed to begin as soon as possible in the 2009
construction season.
4. Drainage and utility easements shall be incorporated into the final plat as deemed necessary
G: \2008 \Planning Cases \08 -05 -PP Core Block East Preliminary Plat\ EngineerComments _CoreBlockEast
upon review of the final plan at the discretion of the City Engineer.
5. All rain garden areas and underground storage systems are to be privately owned and
maintained and inspected with privately conducted inspections with reports submitted to
City staff at regular intervals. The parameters of this arrangement will be stated in the
developer's agreement, approved in conjunction at the time of final plat approval.
Appropriate plantings within rain gardens shall be identified on the landscape plans. Letter
of credit or other appropriate form of security for rain garden landscaping will be necessary
throughout the maintenance period.
6. A design for proposed site rain gardens shall be submitted for review, including vegetation,
soil correction, etc.
7. All work within Mn /DOT right -of -way or roadway easement is subject to permit by
Mn /DOT. The developer shall submit all necessary plans to Mn /DOT for review. If
needed, documentation of permit acquisition shall be forwarded to the City prior to issuance
of a grading /building permit.
8. NPDES permit is the responsibility of the developer /contractor. Documentation of permit
acquisition shall be forwarded to the City prior to issuance of a grading /building permit.
9. Estimated development fees for the site are as follows:
o Sewer Connection (SAC, Units calculated by MCES)
MCES Fee $1825/SAC Unit
Storm Water General Comments:
1. A complete review of the provided stormwater calculations is currently being conducted and
has not yet been completed. Approval of the submitted plans shall be conditional upon this
review. Following the completed detail review, staff will continue to work with the
applicant's engineer to identify and revise specific design issues prior to final plat approval.
2. The north rain garden shall have a piped outlet, standpipe or otherwise as appropriate, to the
storm sewer in 146 Street rather than an overland overflow outlet.
Construction Plan Review Detailed Comments:
Preliminary Plat Sheet C -2
1. Although not shown on the preliminary plat, final plat approval shall be conditional upon
dedication of a sidewalk easement on 146 Street from the proposed platted property line to
1 foot behind the back of sidewalk.
2. Drainage and utility easement shall be revised to encompassing the existing sanitary sewer
manhole on Lot 1 Block 1, 10 feet on all sides to the building foundation limits.
G: \2008 \Planning Cases 08-05-PP Core Block East Preliminary Plat\ EngineerComments_CoreBlockEast 03122008.doc
3. A 10 -foot perimeter drainage and utility easement shall be shown in all areas where there is
no building foundation, including areas north and south of the proposed building along the
west side of Burma Avenue.
Utility Plan Sheet C -3
1. Sewer flow information used to specify 10" sanitary sewer service to Burma Avenue shall be
provided to ensure adequate capacity exists in the downstream trunk system. If identified as
necessary as a result of the proposed development, any downstream trunk improvements
shall be funded by the developer.
2. Existing watermain gate valve locations in 146 Street and 147 Street are not shown on the
plans. As built data should be checked against existing utility information shown in the
plans.
3. The sanitary sewer manhole in the southwest corner of the site appears to require
adjustment to match final grade. Adjustment of the manhole to final grade shall be included
in the applicant's plans.
Removal Plan Sheet C-4
1. Areas of bituminous pavement on Lot 1 Block 2 are not shown for removal. Plans shill be
revised to show removal of pavement to back of curb.
2. Add notes requiring the contractor to locate, remove, all existing water and utility services to
the property line. Services shall be capped to the approval of the City at the property line,
and locations shall be surveyed and included on the as built plans to be submitted to the City
following project completion.
Standard Detail Plates Sheet C -5
1. Add necessary sanitary sewer standard plates as necessary for manhole adjustment on site.
Existing Conditions Sheet C -6
1. The existing low building elevations should be shown on the plan sheet.
Grading Plan Sheet CG -1
1. The area west of the patio and south of the proposed building appears to require slopes
greater than 4:1 or retaining wall to tie in with existing grade elevations at the property line
with adjacent properties. Slopes in these areas shall be flattened to the maximum allowable
4:1 slope or retaining walls installed as necessary.
2. All overland overflow routes and elevations should be shown on the plan.
3. The bottom and top elevations for all retaining walls should be shown on the plan. The
retaining wall shown adjacent to the properties to the west appears to be greater than 4 feet
in height. Construction plans signed by a registered engineer shall be submitted to the City
G: \2008 \Planning Cases 08-05-PP Core Block East Preliminary Plat EngineerComments _CoreBlockEast_03122008.doc
for all proposed retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height and a safety fence will be
required on top of the wall.
4. The sideslopes for the infiltration basins and rain gardens should be shown on the plans.
5. The grading plan on the south side of the parking lot east of Burma appears to direct
drainage towards the existing buildings. The runoff from this area should not impact the
adjacent properties unless the provided stormwater calculations currently being reviewed
demonstrate that the runoff rate and volume does not exceed existing pre development
conditions.
6. The grading plan on the south side of the building appears to direct drainage toward the
retaining wall and toward adjacent properties to the southwest (existing building corner
elevation 961.0). The runoff from this area should not impact the adjacent properties unless
the provided stormwater calculations currently being reviewed demonstrate that the runoff
rate and volume does not exceed existing pre development conditions.
7. The low building elevation for the building south of Lot 1, Block 2 should be shown on the
plan.
8. The bottom, highwater elevations for the rain garden areas should be shown on the plans.
9. The proposed driveway grades should be shown on the plans.
Erosion Control Plan Sheet CE -1
1. Silt fence should be shown around the entire site.
2. Rock construction entrances should be shown at the entrance to the east parking lot area off
Burma Avenue. If the north entrance off 146 Street is to be used, a rock entrance should
be shown in this location as well.
3. Show inlet protection at appropriate locations throughout the site. A separate erosion
control plan is being prepared for the work within the right -of -way which will address inlet
protection for catch basins in the right -of -way.
Landscaping Plan Sheet L100
1. The landscape plan should not have trees located within drainage swales, emergency
overflow routes of over storm sewers or other public utilities and should be revised to
correspond with the utility and grading plans. Additionally, the tree locations along shall be
coordinated with decorative street lighting locations once the lighting plan has been
developed by Xcel Energy.
2. Landscaping plans comprised of appropriate vegetation and native plantings within rain
garden areas shall be developed.
3. Additional tree removals or relocations may be determined and necessary for intersection or
sign sight distance prior to final plat approval.
G: \2008 \Planning Cases \08 -05-PP Core Block East Preliminary Plat \EngineerComments_CoreBlockEast 03122008.doc
Should you have any questions or comments regarding the item listed above, please contact me at
651 322 -2022.
G: \2008 \Planning Cases \08 -05 -PP Core Block East Preliminary Plat \EngineerComments_CoreBlockEast 03122008.doc
a-
D
SZ O
0
0
O
O
N
A
O
O
a
t c 3 F� o
''':--,?,,;;;113='..fi,41:1'.';''?".-;':.''''!;`1"—:"------7:--- L''-- ,:i. ,,1;:, ri ci)
__.„:„.,;,,...:,,,,,„,....,1,....,,t7g0,-,,,,,,,..,..,i:41,3;,,,,t,..ttiv,„
n
AaC Y 11
V,
O
„fie
f
o
_7' C:( I iti 4 r
C.
i 0) 0)
2 a)
0
a�
O a)
E
W
c/I
O O
7
R ..z
i s1. i t'
1
F
i
2
a
D
SZ O
W 0
8
pp N
r E 1 z
I
4
B
a)
3 E
iii
A
a)
N c
to
O
W
^1
W
t
O
CI) .0 f 131
ff
I
i" iF p
;t_ 9 m3
S o
w
CC)
c s,
,,',',4f,t.it;', s.`;'...'ir'lf....,0*.;8,•.,,,,,,-.
6
'''''4'''' .,.-tr.g.'-','Is.,''',.!•17.f.,1...,.,.;.',
''',-.4-i''',46tt'2i,-.,-", -a. r ...'iti
0
H E
z
2.',,)4-41,•.ri,::`,,g4ir'..4,''''-' 1''11
04::4
„,..',','•=5:ft!.44
*t.":,4';*.A;##;:i,..5,- ,„...,71
t3=„464,4f. O.s..,*7„: 4t
.r.„....,,,
'A$7-4"1,,,,, -,:',""•:-:::-";,-.,1'40'-' 1 r
4'2'
'ir-itt..M.':•;::::i4*-.,:-;".".'"' -At 1
k
1ttaLl',..."et:-:‘,, t—r:tiii.T14'.;71.7-3 'i 7.771
AZ'gt=4:::;if%.',.,;";tilil,':•.`'‘ -,':157.- ...s"..',Li-i t ;i:-.-.,"..F:i
a)
.4.,,,,,,,,::.f,,,,,,,,,,,4,,,,,,,,,,,,v.,,,,,.,.,,,.,-,,
4,,,,,,,,‘,.,..„„,,,,„,..,....„.„..t,„4.1.,,,,,,,,„...,........ti,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,.,,,.
ftt,..-.:,:i.,,,,,,,,...„-.!,,,,,,..„tot
E
0
ca
''"*.v.,.!....1
fr,I,IgiZe'::.:','■:it.i:''':■.:: 'Z't.'1.,'-' ;27 2';.1 .I.
a) tii.i.t„, ,,:..:-..-„,,p
a) ,„,„..t.t,:,,..,,,:„.„,„,„,„1„:.0.,.,„.„ I
0
,31
a)
1
:1 i••1722•••
Ci) 0
D
n.:,,..':
.11■0
fiff.:=1,-, (ZS
1.411
y f,
MI
L
a) a)
r ',,r r ',:rrZiiiii .._,1 i'....'',:•::.::,..
X
'1'. L':';':;:::':',:k4,11 'I''' r.■ 'i 11
•k II I I
.4 I
I 1 1
':::'''',a,A
C CD
■1
r :■':::::::',;f41,,,a,,,F' --.:11„.,-;,2.4.--r I-
a)
-I—I
(I) (C4
0 r
•I'L 0
Ct
...w
lit t P
1 ,11':W Z1
F.,4Riri;ki.
L
ktii
i ST/
,4;-*, ',4",,,•,,,-,5,v,:::g1•;.' 11
14:44.,71;tA,Ilig'3'z'S.;[
.44: "•Ji-,4%.,ttitil0-.4:',''''::',.:,-..,::-:''''
,,,..-Ii-e..,„',,,,,,,,,.„..,
.'44 ti:44%.:,,,-
4t1A"-r.4,- r
affordable to households making less than 50% of the median area income. This will result in 22 of the
residential units being affordable to households making less than 50% of the median area income.
Surrounding Land Uses: North: Commercial and Multiple Family Residential (including a three story
condominium building and a six story apartment building)
East: Railroad Tracks
South: Fluegel's (Farm, seed, and garden supplies)
West: Commercial
Existing Zoning District: C -2: Downtown Commercial (all properties except former Ratzlaff)
C -3: Highway Commercial (former Ratzlaff gas station)
Traditional Downtown Overlay District
Proposed Zoning District: C -2 PUD: Downtown Commercial Planned Unit Development
Traditional Downtown Overlay District
Required Setbacks: N/A
(Traditional Downtown Overlay District allows a zero foot
setback)
Proposed Setbacks: Front: 10 Feet (structure)
Side (North): 22 Feet (structure) 13 Feet (parking)
Side (South): 41 Feet (structure) 2 Feet (parking)
Rear: 0 Feet (structure)
Maximum Height: 50 Feet (Traditional Downtown Overlay District)
Proposed Height: 37 Feet at South Robert Trail and 146 Street West
45 Feet at Burma Avenue and Lower 147 Street West
SUMMARY
Site Layout
The site encompasses three quarters of the block (except the three businesses in the southwest corner)
bounded by South Robert Trail, 146t Street West, Burma Avenue, and Lower 147 Street West and half of
the block (except for the Fluegel's feed mill) bounded by Burma Avenue, 146 Street West, and the
railroad tracks. The block west of Burma Avenue is dominated by the three story Y- shaped building, a
parking lot south of 146` Street West, and a parking lot north of Lower 147` Street West. The block east
of Burma Avenue will contain a parking lot for the tenants of the building.
The site slopes to the southeast from an elevation of 968.9 feet at the corner of South Robert Trail and
Burma Avenue to an elevation of 959.3 feet at the corner of Burma Avenue and Lower 147 Street West.
The first floor of the building is proposed to have an elevation of 969 feet which will result in eight feet of
the underground parking garage being exposed at the corner of Burma Avenue and Lower 147` Street
West.
The building is Y- shaped, providing frontage onto South Robert Trail and Burma Avenue and courtyards
along 146` Street West and Lower 147 Street West. The frontage along South Robert Trail runs along
the north half of the block and is occupied by commercial space on the first floor and residential units
above. The frontage along Burma Avenue has three stories of residential units with the underground
garage becoming exposed as the building moves south. The underground parking garage will be accessed
from Lower 147` Street West about 40 feet west of the intersection with Burma Avenue.
The 146` Street courtyard has a circular parking lot that provides access to both the commercial space and
the residential units. The parking stalls are ideally sited for the commercial customers.
3
The Lower 147`" Street West courtyard has a 12 -stall parking lot and a patio for the residential tenants of
the building. The 12 -stall parking lot is designed to serve the three businesses in the southwest corner of
the block when redeveloped, and was a condition of the purchase agreement for the former Ratzlaff gas
station. The patio is comprised of two areas, a flat paved area next to the building with a trellis suitable as
a gathering area, and a paved walk leading south to lawn and circular area seating with a flower garden.
The patio will be enclosed with a fence that has a gate to access the southern parking lot.
The parking lot east of Burma Avenue will have a single access from Burma Avenue. The parking is
provided mainly for the building residents and their guests. Additional parking is provided along 146
Street and Burma Avenue. However, on -street parking will be subject to City ordinance regulations
pertaining to overnight parking during the winter months.
Building Design and Materials
The South Robert Street frontage is predominately brick with cast stone accents. The corner frontage is
predominately cast stone with a sheet metal awning over the first floor. The first floor commercial space
is predominately glass windows with five separate entrances. The five entrances will allow the commercial
space to be divided into multiple tenant space. In the center of the second and third stories will be
balconies for the residential units.
The 146` Street West and courtyard facade is predominately brick with cement fiber panels on the second
and third floors accounting for less than 50% of the facade. The commercial facade is predominately
windows and contains two entrances on the northern facade and one entrance onto the eastern facade.
The northern courtyard facade has the main residential unit entrance in the center of the facade and a
single commercial entrance to the west of the residential entrance. Balconies are provided for all second
and third story units and some of the first story residential units.
The Burma Avenue facade has brick on all three floors at the corners and on four columns of the building,
while remaining portions of the facade have brick only on the first floor and cement fiber panels on
second and third stories. Staff requests a revision to the third floor brick on the four columns to include a
capital and corbel course similar to the other brick portions of the building. The exposed portions of the
underground garage are a rough faced block. There are two entrances on the Burma Avenue facade for
use by residents who park on Burma Avenue or the parking lot east of Burma. There are balconies for
units on all three floors of this facade.
The Lower 147 Street facade is predominately brick with some cement fiber panels near the balconies on
the second and third floor. Approximately eight feet of the underground garage is exposed and treated
with rough face block. There is no pedestrian entrance on this facade, but the garage door leads to the
underground garage for vehicle access.
The southern courtyard facades are primarily cement fiber board with brick on all three floors of the
corners and on approximately the western 100 feet and the southern 50 feet of the first floor. The
exposed portion of the underground garage is rough faced block. There is only one entrance on this
facade that leads to the patio area. There are balconies for all the second and third story units and the
southern four units of the first floor. This facade will be less visible to the public as it is currently screened
by the existing commercial establishments.
The Traditional Downtown zoning district requires 100% brick (except for windows and doors) on the
facades. While this proposed building provides nearly all brick along the South Robert Street, the 146
Street West, and Lower 147 Street West facades, less brick is used progressively through the 146 Street
4
courtyard, along Burma Avenue, and the southern courtyard facades. The more recent Downtown Design
Guidelines (Guidelines) state that the building shall have "360 degree" architecture and that 75% of the
building shall be brick or stone (excluding the windows and doors), which is a more relaxed requirement
than the Overlay District. The Guidelines also note that concrete masonry units could be used on any
facades not along public right -of -way. The materials section of the Guidelines also indicates that lesser
desired materials can be used on the base of buildings or non -public facades. It is staff's belief that these
guidelines are meant to encourage the best materials be placed on public fac
The proposed building generally meets these intentions, with staff suggesting the sole change to the fac
of adding the capital and corbel course on the third story brick of the four brick columns of the Burma
Avenue fac It is recognized that modifications were previously made as directed by the Planning
Commission which are reflected in the current plans.
Landscaping
The zoning ordinance requires that one (1) overstory tree is planted per 3,000 square feet of land area and
one (1) foundation planting per ten (10) linear feet of building foundation. The proposed development
would require 41 trees (122,610 square feet /3,000 square feet) and 145 foundation plantings (1,450 linear
feet /10 feet). The proposed landscape plan provides 68 overstory trees and 674 foundation plantings.
While the proposed landscaping exceeds the requirement, staff is concerned about some of the design
elements.
Staff is concerned about the selection of four (4) white birch trees in the boulevard and the parking lot east
of Burma Avenue. Birch trees are typically short lived and have narrow crowns, making them undesirable
for boulevard trees. Staff recommends these the white birch trees be replaced with a hardier species with a
full crown that are more suitable as boulevard trees.
The proposed foundation plantings have a variety of evergreen and deciduous shrubs, perennials, and
ornamental grasses in total, but their placement is in mono cultural plots around that building. Staff
recommends revising the location of the foundation plantings so that each plot or fac has a mixture of
evergreen and deciduous shrubs, perennials, and ornamental grasses.
The courtyard to the south of the building has a patio that is comprised of two areas, a flat paved area next
to the building with a trellis suitable as a gathering space, and a paved walk leading south to lawn and
circular area seating with a flower garden. This area is intended for the recreation and leisure of the
building residents and is proposed to be enclosed by a fence with a gate leading to the southern parking
lot. A detail for the fence has not been provided. Staff recommends that the fence be decorative in
nature, similar to the railings along the balconies. Privacy or opaque fences would not be permitted for the
fencing around the patio.
There is a maintenance concern about the long term survival of the trees, particularly those located within
the boulevards or near the building. Trees grow best and live the longest when their root zone (which is
typically the same dimension as their crown) can grow unimpeded through the ground. Trees planted near
the building, and particularly the trees within the sidewalk tree grates, have stunted root growth and less of
an area from which to draw moisture and nutrients, which can shorten the life of the trees and make them
more susceptible to diseases. The alternative of having no trees or increasing the setbacks or right -of -way
to allow more space is not acceptable because of the urban nature of Downtown.
For these reasons, staff recommends that the property owner be responsible for the long term
maintenance of the landscaping within the boulevards and rights -of -way. It is anticipated that the trees
5
near the building or within the sidewalks will need to be replaced every 15 to 20 years. To maintain
symmetry to the landscaping design, the property owner may be required to replace all the trees along a
colnrnon fac at one tune.
Access and Parking
Parking will be provided by on street parking on 146 Street West and Burma Avenue, three surface
parking lots, and an underground parking garage. The parking lot off of 146 Street West will have two
accesses in the middle of the block. The parking lot east of Burma Avenue will have one access
approximately 120 feet south of 146 Street West. The parking lot off of Lower 147 Street West will
have an access in the middle of the block. The access to the underground parking garage is located off of
Lower 147 Street West approximately 40 feet west of the intersection with Burma Avenue.
Parking Requirements
Use or Zoning District Parking Ratio Parking Spaces Required
Multiple Family Housing 2 spaces per unit 212 spaces
Office or Multiple Retail 1 space per 200 sq. feet 65 spaces
Traditional Downtown District Commercial none 159 spaces underground
Multi- Family 1.5 spaces
underground
Parking Provided
146t Street (on street) 15 spaces
146t Street Lot 28 spaces
Burma Avenue (on street) 21 spaces
Burma Avenue Lot 69 spaces
Lower 147 Street Lot 12 spaces*
Underground 125 spaces
Total Provided 270 spaces*
The 12 spaces in the Lower 147th Street West parking lot are reserved for the potential redevelopment of the three businesses on South Robert Trail per the
purchase agreement with the property owner of those three businesses.
The proposed development provides 270 parking spaces, with 12 of the spaces reserved for the future
redevelopment of the three businesses on South Robert Trail per the purchase agreement with the
property owner of those three buildings. This results in 258 parking spaces available for the Stonebridge
project. Additionally, the on -street parking will be regulated like other City streets, which does not allow
overnight parking during the winter months. Most of the on- street parking is geared toward short term
trips, with longer stays accommodated onsite or underground. The Traditional Downtown zoning district
does not require any parking for commercial space and requires 1.5 spaces per multiple family residence,
resulting in a requirement of 159 parking spaces.
The proposed development is designed so that the parking along 146t Street and in the 146t Street
parking lot is anticipated for the commercial space and the parking on Burma Avenue, the Burma Avenue
lot, and the underground parking is anticipated for the residential units. The underground parking garage
has a maximum design of 125 spaces, 34 spaces short of the 1.5 spaces per unit requirement. It is not
practical to build a multiple level underground parking garage due to project economics and parcel size.
Staff recommends a waiver of the underground parking standard as a part of the PUD, recognizing that
the project provides greater than the 1.5 parking ratio required although not all underground.
6
Pedestrian Circulation
Sidewalks will be installed on all street frontages controlled by the developer, with eight (8) foot wide
sidewalks on South Robert Trail and 146` Street West; an eleven (11) foot wide sidewalk with tree grates
along the west side of Burma Avenue, and five (5) foot wide sidewalks along the east side of Burma
Avenue and north side of Lower 147` Street West. These sidewalks provide pedestrian access around the
entire site and connect to the larger Downtown sidewalk system.
Additional pedestrian measures are proposed to provide connections interior to the site. There is a
separate six (6) foot wide sidewalk in front of the commercial space along South Robert Trail. This
separate sidewalk is needed because the South Robert Trail curb slopes to the south, creating about a two
and a half (2.5) foot difference between the commercial space and the sidewalk abutting the street. The
sidewalk along the commercial space stays level to provide handicapped access. A staircase will be
constructed on the south end of the building to connect the two sidewalks.
Sidewalks are constructed to connect the commercial space and the 146` Street courtyard with the
sidewalk along 146 Street West. The sidewalk within the courtyard surrounds the perimeter of the
parking lot and connects to the four entrances (two commercial entrances and two residential entrances)
adjacent to the courtyard.
Along Burma Avenue, bump outs in the curb line are created at the intersection of 146 Street West and at
the access to the parking lot to provide areas for pedestrians to cross Burma Avenue. The mid -block
pedestrian crossing at the parking lot access is recommended to provide a safe access for the residents
parking in the lot to reach the two residential entrances within the Burma Avenue facade. "Pedestrian
Crossing" signage is expected to be installed at the mid -block crossing and the crosswalk will be
constructed of concrete with a decorative pattern and color to increase the safety at this crossing.
The City received funds from the Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Act grant to install benches,
bike racks, and other pedestrians and bicycling features. The City, with consultation with the developer,
will determine the location and types of these features during the design of the street reconstruction.
Mechanical Equipment and Trash Enclosure
The majority of the mechanical equipment will be roof mounded or placed interior to the building. The
roof mounted equipment will be screened by the height of the building and the parapet walls around the
edge of the roof. There may be some mechanical equipment, such as electrical transformers, that are
installed at ground level. It will be required of the developer to revise the landscape plan, possibly
including additional landscaping; to ensure that any ground mounted mechanical equipment is screened
from public view.
The trash containers will be stored within the underground parking garage and rolled out to the garbage
truck.
Signs
No signs have been proposed with this application. Signs will be reviewed and approved administratively
per the zoning ordinance and Guidelines. All signage will need to be similar in style throughout the building
and that style will need to be approved administratively before the first sign permit is approved.
Lighting
The proposal provides lighting through a decorative style cut off lights on 12 foot tall poles in the parking
lots, bollard lights on the patio and the commercial space on 146 Street West, and wall pack lights are
7
used over the doors. The photometric plan indicates that the light intensity will not exceed 1.0 lumens,
with the exception of the 12 -stall parking lot at the property line of the existing commercial businesses.
The light intensity and lighting style meets the ordinance requirement, except at the 12 -stall parking lot.
Since the intent of the 12 -stall parking lot is to serve the adjoining properties and was a part of the
purchase agreement with the business property owner, staff recommends granting a waiver to the lighting
intensity standard for this area as is allowed by the planned unit development standards.
The zoning ordinance and Guidelines require that light sources are not visible from residential areas or
right -of -ways which often prompts the use of shoe box lights. Staff would not support use of these types
of lights as they are inconsistent with the intent of the Guidelines for a greater level of architectural interest
in Downtown lighting. The street lighting in Downtown is decorative acorn -style lights (which make the
light source visible) rather than the typical cobra -style street lighting through the rest of the community.
Staff had recommended a waiver from the lighting standards be granted to allow a visible light source,
such as the acorn style lights. The developer is reluctant to having a visible light source adjacent to the
residential units and has proposed a decorative style light fixture that is a cut off design but closer in design
to the Guidelines intent than typical shoebox light fixtures. Staff is supportive of the use of the
developer's decorative light fixture in the 146 Street and Lower 147` Street parking lots, but requests that
the acorn style lights be installed in the Burma Avenue parking lot. The Burma Avenue lot is not adjacent
to the residential units and is visible from the larger Downtown area, so staff feels that it is important that
the lighting in that parking lot match the acorn style street lighting.
Park Dedication
The subdivision ordinance requires a park dedication of 1/25 acre per residential unit and 10% of any
commercial land area for any new development. For the Town Centre development, this would generate a
dedication of 4.24 acres of parkland for the 106 residential units and 0.04 acres of land for the 13,462
square feet of commercial space, generating a total of 4.28 acres of park dedication. The fee -in -lieu of
park dedication for the 4.26 acres would be $364,000. Staff would propose to take fee -in -lieu of park
dedication.
The City Council has the authority to vary from the Park Dedication requirement under the Subdivision
Ordinance. Staff is proposing a fee -in -lieu of park dedication in the amount of $120,000. This figure is in
recognition that the City is a partner in the redevelopment process with Stonebridge and that a significant
public investment has been made into the project. The Parks and Recreation Commission is aware of the
proposed $120,000 fee -in -lieu payment, but did not make a formal recommendation to the City Council.
Utilities
Trunk sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water lines lie beneath Burma Avenue, which will serve both the
proposed building and also other Downtown properties and neighborhoods to the southwest. This is
both good and bad. The good news is that the utilities are sized large enough to handle the needs of this
development. The bad news is that these utilities cannot be relocated, meaning that the Framework proposal
to vacate the current Burma Avenue and relocate it to the west side of the railroad tracks is not practical.
Sanitary sewer and water systems are generally in place to serve the building, but there are two areas of
concern when anticipating future redevelopment in the Downtown. A 6 -inch waterline within 146 Street
is inadequate to serve the surrounding properties, so a new 8 -inch waterline will be installed within the
street as a part of the development. There is an existing sanitary sewer line running through the middle of
the block, as opposed to public right -of -way, to Lower 147 Street West. This sewer line served the
former Rosemount Saw and Tool business and currently serves the three existing businesses that will
8
remain on the block. The existing sewer line will not interfere with the construction of this building, but
the manhole at the end of the line will be located on this property. An easement ten (10) feet on each side
of the manhole will need to be dedicated, and the height of the manhole may need to be adjusted due to
the proposed grades of this development.
South Robert Trail will not be altered and the only change to Lower 147 Street will be the installation of
new curb cuts and relocating stormwater catch basins. Burma Avenue's curb line will change due to the
bump outs at the pedestrian crossings and the curb cut to access the parking lot. The northern road, 146
Street West, will be completely reconstructed.
Reconstruction of 146 Street will need to occur to install new water and storm sewer lines, as well as to
create the new diagonal parking stalls on the south side of the street and the parking lot access. The
diagonal parking stalls will be partly outside the current 146` Street right -of -way and 5.5 feet of additional
right -of -way will dedicated to ensure that the parking stalls are within the street right -of -way.
The developer has requested that they be allowed to construct all the infrastructure improvements, both
public and private on the site. The City Engineer has been working with the developer to discuss an
appropriate procedure and how to determine costs and payments. To facilitate the project and expedite the
process, staff is willing to allow the developers contractor to construct the public improvements. It is the
intention that the City will design the public improvements and will conduct a separate inspection process
as part of the agreement. A separate development agreement with outlines the procedure, costs and
expected payment will be before the City Council shortly for review and approval.
Easements on this property will need to be treated differently from most developments (in addition to the
previously mentioned sanitary sewer manhole easement). Normally, a ten (10) foot wide drainage and
utility easement is required to locate private utilities such as telephone, cable, gas, and electricity. Due to
the zero setbacks allowed Downtown, this not possible. Instead, a ten (10) foot wide drainage and utility
easement will be dedicated in all areas where there is no building foundation. Additionally, a sidewalk
easement will need to be recorded on the sidewalk south of 146 Street West, which is located on the
developer's private property.
The final design for the storm water system of this development has not yet been determined. Due to the
urban nature of Downtown, the City's storm water standards cannot be met wholly on the site, but can be
met in combination with improvements on -site and to the regional storm water system within Central
Park. The existing trunk storm water line within Burma Avenue will connect this site with the regional
system to the north. Initially, the developer was directed to handle as much of the storm water on site and
the proposed plan includes rooftop water detention, underground storage, and three rain gardens. Upon
review of the regional improvements that could occur within Central Park, it may be that less storm water
treatment on site is needed. The current plan reflects less on -site stormwater controls. Staff continues to
work with the developer to address storm water issues. Staff is confident that the proposal, most likely
through changes in the regional system downstream, will adequately address the City's storm water
requirements. Further, the proposal will improve upon the existing condition in terms of water quality
since previous development occurred prior to quality standards being adopted.
The proposed on site stormwater improvements are proposed to be rate control in the building roof
drains and two rain gardens. The roof drains will slow the rate of the roof water from entering the sewer
line within Burma Avenue, allowing water from other parts of the City to use this sewer line first. The two
rain gardens, one located on both sides of the underground garage entry and one located on the north side
of the Burma Avenue parking lot, will handle the run off from the southern patio, the Lower 147 Street
9
parking lot, and the Burma Avenue parking lot. A detailed landscape plan for the rain gardens will need to
be submitted and approved administratively by staff.
Due to the additional maintenance costs that the City anticipates to support Downtown development that
is not required in other parts of the City (such as trucking snow outside of Downtown), staff expects that
the extra cost will be picked up by the developer. As a condition of approval, the property owner shall be
responsible for the additional costs of this upgraded maintenance. The cost of this maintenance will be
addressed within the development agreement.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat,
the Resolution approving the Planned Unit Development, and the Ordinance rezoning the property to C2
PUD Downtown Commercial Planned Unit Development.
10
EXCERPT FROM MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 26, 2008
5.b. Core Block East Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Planned Unit Development Master
Development with Rezoning, and Planned Unit Development Final Development Plan
(08- 05 -PP, 08- 06 -FDP; 08- 07 -PUD; 08- 08 -FP). Senior Planner Zweber presented this item.
Stonebridge Development Acquisition, LLC Stonebridge) has proposed a three story building
on three quarters of Core Block East that will contain 106 residential rental units and
approximately 13,000 square feet of commercial space. To construct this building, Stonebridge
has requested preliminary plat, final plat, planned unit development master development plan with
rezoning, and planned unit development final development plan approvals.
Mr. Zweber showed an aerial view of the downtown subject area and reviewed the provisions in
the Downtown Framework pertaining to development of Core Block East. Mr. Zweber further
showed the site plan and elevations of the proposed project. Mr. Zweber reviewed requested
changes to the fac with respect to the amount of brick coverage. Other topics reviewed were:
landscaping, parking and related ordinance, pedestrian access, mechanical equipment location,
trash enclosure location, signage, lighting proposal, and utilities including rain garden locations.
Commissioner Howell asked whether or not there is handicap accessibility to the private sidewalk
from the public sidewalk. Mr. Zweber replied that there is really no need for a ramp for handicap
access because the grade is the same at the one end of the sidewalk.
Commissioner Schwartz suggested installing more than one handicapped parking space on the
146 Street side since that is where handicapped people will be able to access the sidewalks. Mr.
Zweber replied that the end two stalls will actually be removed or moved down due to street
access issues, but that staff will be evaluating the location of all handicapped stalls.
Commissioner Schwartz asked what needs to be done to accommodate the additional weight of
rain water storage on the roof. Mr. Zweber explained that the applicant has used this design in
other locations with success. The roof will store about 4 inches of water and release it slowly to
the holding pond. Commission Schwartz then asked whether or not Erickson Pond has enough
storage for rainwater to accommodate additional development in the downtown area. Project
Engineer Dawley stated that with a few improvements, Erickson Pond will be an adequate
stormwater runoff area for a good portion of the downtown.
Commissioner Schwartz asked about the underground storage for rainwater. Mr. Dawley shared
that the Aldi site has a similar underground storage tank that provides underground volume to
hold the rainwater runoff and then leads the waters to the holding pond.
Commissioner Schwartz then asked about the smaller parking lot on the east side and whether or
not there will be handicapped parking spaces there. Mr. Zweber stated there will be one stall in
that parking lot which well exceeds the requirement of one handicapped stall per 25 stalls.
Commissioner Schwartz asked if additional materials can be put on the north elevation on 146t
Street. Mr. Zweber explained that location is the main residential entrance which will be
constructed of cast stone so it will stand out from the rest of the building. Mr. Zweber further
reviewed the elevations on Burma Street where staff requested additional brick. Commissioner
Schwartz suggested a more distinctive exterior in the area behind the three businesses that are
more private because we not only need to decorate for passersby, but for the residents also.
Chairperson Messner asked how many entrances there are along the Burma Street side and Mr.
Zweber replied that there are two entrances which he pointed out on the elevation drawing.
Commissioner Palda asked about a different method that could possibly alleviate the roof weight
due to stormwater retention on the roof. Mr Zweber replied that he would leave that question to
the applicant to answer.
Commissioner Howell asked if the signs and awnings will be addressed at a later date. Mr. Zweber
replied that those issues will be addressed before the first commercial business comes in so the
general design of all businesses are similar.
Applicant, Wally Johnson, President, Stonebridge Companies, developer and contractor for this
development approached the Commission. Mr. Johnson stated that Stonebridge has constructed
five buildings similar to this design with a flat roof with stormwater retention and has had no
problem. He further described the process and stated the building is structurally designed to
handle that amount of water and release the water slowly. Mr. Johnson stated he does not have
any disagreement with the staff report requests and recommendations. Mr. Johnson further
reviewed the type of residential units, general design and approximate monthly rent for each.
Commissioner Schwartz asked Mr. Johnson how many fully handicapped accessible units will be
out of the 106 units. Mr. Johnson replied that all of the units will be handicapped adaptable, three
will be accessible with lower countertops and wider doors.
Mr. Zweber added more on the roof storage that it is not necessarily storage of stormwater, but
more of rate control of stormwater in that it controls the rate of disbursement of the water into
the City's stormwater system.
The public hearing was opened at 7:19p.m.
There were no public comments.
MOTION by Howell to close the public hearing. Second by Palda.
Ayes: 4. Nays: None. Motion approved. Public hearing was closed at 7:20p.m.
There was no discussion or questions among the Commission.
MOTION by Schwartz to approve the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat for Town Centre (Core
Block East), subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum dated February 19, 2008.
2. Additional right -of -way on 146 Street West shall be dedicated to a line perpendicular
w ith and running through the southern curb line of the new parking stalls.
3. Ten (10) foot wide perimeter drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated around the
entire site except where the building foundation is located.
4. A sidewalk easement shall be recorded over the pedestrian sidewalk along 146 Street
West.
5. A utility easement shall be dedicated ten (10) feet on each side of the existing sanitary
sewer manhole on the south side of Lot 4 Block 3.
6. The applicant must waive any appeal or protest to be included into a special taxing
district to recover the cost of an additional maintenance required of the City as a result
of this and other downtown redevelopment.
Second by Howell.
Ayes: 4. Nays: None. Motion approved.
Motion by Messner to recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Master
Development Plan, Final Development Plan and Rezoning to C2 -PUD: Downtown Commercial
Traditional Downtown Overlay Planned Unit Development for Town Centre (Core Block East),
subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum dated February 19, 2008.
2. Remove the infiltration basin from the south courtyard and grade and vegetate the area
for recreational space for the tenants.
3. Re -grade or relocate the retaining wall from the southern courtyard to prevent
construction equipment or workers from needed access to the three existing businesses'
properties.
4. Add brick to the second and third stories of the center two columns of the Burma
Avenue fac to break up the mass of the building.
5. Add brick to the first floor of the southern portion of the Upper 147t Street West
courtyard fac between the first balcony and the corner unit.
6. The height of the existing sanitary sewer manhole shall be adjusted to correspond with
the proposed grading plan.
7. The landscaping plan shall be revised to replace the white birch and to mix the shrub
and grasses together to add more diversity.
8. The property owner is responsible for maintaining the landscaping installed within the
boulevard and right -of -way. Particular attention will need to be given to the trees within
the sidewalks and close proximity of the buildings, which normally have shorter life
spans than trees that roots systems can expand the full width of their crowns. It is
expected that trees may need to be replaced every 15 to 20 years and all the trees on a
common street frontage should be replaced at one time.
9. Detail landscaping plans of the rain gardens will be provided and approved
administratively.
10. The western two diagonal parking stalls on 146t Street West shall be removed to prevent
turning conflicts at the intersection of South Robert Trail and 146 Street West.
11. The underground parking shall include at least 1 parking stall per residential unit.
12. Pedestrian zebra -style street striping shall be installed at the three curb line bump outs
along Burma Avenue and "Pedestrian Crossing" signs shall be installed at the mid -block
crossing.
13. Signage is not approved as a part of this application. The applicant will need to submit
for sign permits before signs are installed and will be approved administratively using the
Zoning Ordinance and Downtown Design Guidelines. The all signage for the entire
building will need to be identical in style and will need to be determined before the first
sign permit is approved.
14. The exterior lighting fixtures shall be identical in style to the decorative acorn-style street
lights that are installed by Xcel Energy along South Robert Trail and 145 Street West.
Second by Palda.
Ayes: 4. Nays: None. Motion approved.
As follow -up, Mr. Zwebet stated staff will work with the applicant to make the changes noted
within the conditions before the item will go to the City Council at the March 18 meeting.
1
I
II 111
i4 ::;,;4
t z ;re x i s „a
r
i k s 4 �t tt k 1.,' ri
r- 3 f r, a' n Y 3* s
New Building in Downtown Elk River
14 ii--- t
j
i
s
I it 4
p
r Ohl 1 I
d 2 `,.:�,u. m' .c' A ,a m f5.+ 's ,r y
y max
F,: y kk Y
e 4�
u
New Building in Downtown Elk River
INVF EXECUTIVE
:OUNCIL
rch 18, 2008
ncil Goals 2008 2009 AGENI
New B
le, City Administrator AGENI
APPRI
)n to Adopt the City Council Goals f
;sion at the end of January 2008. The gc
it at the February 19 work session.
ed out at this evening's City Council Mei
Torking document for staff and Council
Is as presented or modified through Cou
Cle41 7 Ale
4 ROSEMOUNT
arch ib
ADMINISTRATION
M E M O R A N D U M
To: Mayor and Council Members
From: Jamie Verbrugge, City Administrator
Date: March 18, 2008
Subject: Council Agenda Updates
1. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: CONSENT AGENDA
Item 6.h. Appointment of Election Judges for April 22, 2008 Special Election. The
revised staff report and draft resolution are attached for consideration. Staff has recruited 41
elections judges to serve on April 22.
2. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: NEW BUSINESS
Item 9.a. Town Centre (Core Block East) Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Planned Unit
Development Master Development with Rezoning, and Planned Unit Development
Final Development Plan Case 08- 05 -PP; 08- 06 -FDP; 08- 07 -PUD; 08- 08 -FP. A
revised Resolution Approving the Planned Unit Development Master Development Plan
with Rezoning and Planned Unit Development Final Development Plan for Town Centre is
attached. The revision includes condition 14.
3. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: NEW BUSINESS
Item 9.b. Adopt City Council Goals 2008 -2009. Staff recommends adoption of the City
Council Goals for 2008 -2009.
4. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: NEW BUSINESS
Item 9.d. Appointment of the Acting City Administrator. A draft resolution appointing
the Interim City Administrator is attached. Also provided is the resignation letter of City
Administrator Verbrugge.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2008
RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES
FOR THE APRIL 22, 2008 SPECIAL ELECTION
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount has called for a Special Election on April 22, 2008;
WHEREAS, the Election Judge appointments consists of individuals recommended by the City Clerk
with the approval of the majority of the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the general public listed below to serve as
election judges reside in Dakota County as required by Minnesota Election Laws and will be trained
according to Minnesota State Statutes:
Melinda M. Andreasen Pat Anthony Muriel D. Barnes Grayme Bartuli
Julie Cartier Arlene M. Casey Bruno E. DiNella Jeanne A. Eibner
John Eibner Michael P. Faber Christine L. Ford Delores L. Friend
Dawn C. Groen Gerrit D. Groen Caroline P. Harris Barbara Henkemeyer
Lawrence A. Jacobson Gail P. Johnson Sharon A. Johnson Teresa A. Johnson
Peter Jonas Geneva A. Karsten Lowell Larson James Mann
Susanne V. McKinley Marcia Nelson Ted Northwick Shirley E. Pepin
Roger Peterson Keith Reed Marcia Roush Patrick Schreier
Norma Sell Jennifer A. Sinderman Sharon G. Staats D. Douglas Stevenson
Laxman S. Sundae Judith A. Swanson Lavonne M. Swenson Robert E. Yates
Terrance L. Yourchuck
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the hourly compensation for election judges will be $8.25 and
co- captain judges will receive $9.00.
ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 2008 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
William H. Droste, Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
Motion by: Second by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Member absent:
q.c1.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2008
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MASTER
DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH REZONING AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TOWN CENTRE
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received
an application from 146 Street Partners, LLC requesting a planned unit development master
development plan with rezoning and planned unit development final development plan
concerning property legally described as:
Lots 4 -14, Block 3, ROSEMOUNT, and the north 33 feet of Maple Street adjoining
said Lot 14; Lots 4 7, Block 4, ROSEMOUNT, and the west half of Vacated Hayes
Avenue adjoining said Lots.
WHEREAS, on February 26, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount held
a public hearing and reviewed the requested application; and
WHEREAS, on February 26, 2008, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
requested applications, subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2008, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the
Planning Commission's recommendations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the planned unit development master development plan and planned unit
development final development plan of Town Centre and the rezoning of the property from
C2 Downtown Commercial and C3 Highway Commercial to C2 PUD Downtown
Commercial Planned Unit Development, subject to:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum dated February 19, 2008.
2. Revise the design of the third story brick on the four columns on the Burma Facade to
include the capital and corbel course of the brick on the other parts of the building.
3. The height of the existing sanitary sewer manhole shall be adjusted to correspond with
the proposed grading plan.
4. The landscaping plan shall be revised to replace the four (4) white birch trees on the
east side of Burma Avenue with a more appropriate boulevard tree species and to mix
the shrubs and perennials together to add more diversity.
5. The property owner is responsible for maintaining the landscaping installed within the
boulevard and right -of -way. Particular attention will need to be given to the trees
within the sidewalks and close proximity of the buildings, which normally have shorter
life spans than trees that roots systems can expand the full width of their crowns. It is
expected that trees may need to be replaced every 15 to 20 years and all the trees on a
common street frontage should be replaced at one time.
RESOLUTION 2008
6. The developer will submit a detailed landscaping plan of the rain gardens for staff
review and approval.
7. The fencing around the residents' courtyard will be decorative in nature and similar to
the railings on the balconies. Privacy fencing or other opaque fencing will not be
permitted.
8. Revisions to the landscape plan, including the possibility of additional landscaping, is
anticipated to screen ground mounted mechanical equipment, such as the electrical
transformer.
9. "Pedestrian Crossing" signage shall be installed at the mid -block crossing and the
crosswalk will be constructed of concert with a decorative pattern and color.
10. The developer will pay a park dedication fee of $120,000.
11. Signage is not approved as a part of this application. The applicant will need to submit
for sign permits before signs are installed and will be approved administratively using
the Zoning Ordinance and Downtown Design Guidelines. The all signage for the
entire building will need to be identical in style and will need to be determined before
the first sign permit is approved.
12. The exterior lighting fixtures in the Burma. Avenue parking lots shall be identical in
style to the decorative acorn -style street lights that are installed by Xcel Energy along
South Robert Trail and 145t Street West. The pole mounted lights within the 146
Street West and Lower 147 Street West parking may be the decorative style that the
developer has proposed.
13. The developer shall enter into a development agreement that will include, among other
things, a determination of a period payment from the property owner maintenance of
the area that is beyond normal City responsibilities. An example would be the trucking
of snow from the site because there are not street boulevards for snow storage. The
development agreement will also lay out the procedure for the developer to conduct
public improvements and the process for payment of the improvements. This
agreement must be approved by the City Council and Developer prior to any work
commencing on the public improvements of the project.
14. The developer shall enter into a planned unit development agreement with the
City.
ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 2008 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
William H. Droste, Mayor
ATTEST:
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
2
RESOLUTION 2008
Motion by: Second by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against
Member absent:
3