Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.c. ORC Discussion 4 ROSEMOLIN1T SUMMARY
CITY COUNCIL
City Council Work Session: February 13, 2008
AGENDA SECTION:
AGENDA ITEM: ORC Discussion Discussion
PREPARED BY: Dan Schultz, Parks and Recreation AGENDA NO. A Director
ATTACHMENTS: Commission meeting minutes, Former
St. Joseph's Analysis report, ORC Cost APPROVED BY:
Estimates, Estimated Tax Impacts and
Updated ORC Site plans
RECOMMENDED ACTION: None, discussion only.
ISSUE
Parks and Recreation Commission Discussion On January 28, at the Parks and Recreation Commission's
regular meeting, they discussed the topic of holding a special referendum to ask voters to approve a spring
2008 referendum to construct recreational amenities for the community. The Commission discussed in
detail the possibilities of including the outdoor recreation complex, improvements to the former St.
Joseph's Church and possibly new tennis courts in the referendum.
Their recommendation was to include the outdoor recreation complex (ORC) and the improvements to
former St. Joseph's Church as part of the referendum. They felt the tennis court project had other
possible partners and because of the smaller dollar amount, it could be developed through the CIP budget
in future years. The Commission recommended asking voters for $8.5 million dollars for the ORC and St.
Joseph's Church improvements. Their hope is to include all of the field lights and also two concession
buildings with the initial ORC project. The Commission voiced a concern that if amenities aren't included
now there wouldn't be future funding available to finish the projects. The Commission felt there weren't
many options with the former St. Joseph's church because most of the improvements are required by
code.
Project costs The current project cost estimates are:
ORC $6,584,840 (see attached highlighted ORC cost estimate)
Church Improvements $1,196,626 (see attached Former Church Needs Analysis Study)
The Parks and Recreation Commission passed the following motion "recommend that the City Council
approve a resolution calling for a special referendum to be held ofi Tuesday, April 22, 2008 to ask voters to
approve spending $8.5 million on parks and recreation improvements that would include but not be limited to
the outdoor recreation complex and improvements to the historic St. Joseph's Church."
Tax Impact The latest estimated tax impacts to residents based on two different referendum amounts is
attached to the executive summary for your review.
Draft Resolution to Call for a Special Referendum and Ballot Question For the City to hold a special
referendum on April 22, 2008, the resolution must be passed at the regular City Council meeting on
February 19, 2008. At the work session meeting on Wednesday, staff will be providing the City Council a
with draft copy of a resolution calling for the special referendum. Should the City Council provide
direction to move forward with the resolution, it would be placed on the City Council's February 19
regular meeting agenda.
Timing of ORC Construction Documents (Plans and Specs) The Parks and Recreation Commission
discussed the idea of developing the construction documents before the referendum took place and had
some concerns about spending the money on the plans should the referendum fail. When the City Council
talked about this issue at a past work session, they felt that it was best to move forward with the
documents so that the project could be started as soon as possible.
Holding off on the construction documents would mean not being able to get much construction work
completed this fall, not being able to get all necessary permits in a timely fashion and having to rush
through the process and not spend as much time reviewing and sharing information with the Commission
and Council. If the expectation is that a majority of the construction of the project will get done in 2008,
staff feels that the construction documents need to be prepared prior to the referendum.
ORC Site Plan Since the decision was made to include two access drives to the ORC project, our
architect has updated the design with two options that will both work. The two plans are attached, and in
both cases, we would lose one soccer field. The architect is continuing to try and work with plan C so that
we can get a smaller u9 or u10 field on the east side of the park. At this time the change in the design is
expected to increase by the cost of the project by $60,000 to $120,000 dollars due to additional roads,
utilities and retaining walls.
SUMMARY
Staff asks that the City Council discuss the items listed above and provide direction to staff.
2
PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
Regular Meeting Minutes
January 28, 2008
DRAFT
Members Present: Jason Eisold, Mike Eliason, Sandy Knight, Kevin Strayton
Members Absent: Maureen Bartz
Staff Present: Dan Schultz, Director of Parks and Recreation and Sonja Honl, Recording Secretary
Student Volunteer: Jonathan Nutzmann
Others Present: None
1. CALL TO ORDER: F.liason called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.
2. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA: None.
3. APPROVAL OF THE NOVEMBER 26, 2007 MEETING MINUTES: MOTION by Knight to approve
the minutes of the November 26, 2007 meeting. SECOND by Strayton. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Motion passed.
APPROVAL OF THE DECEMBER 10, 2007 SPECIAL JOINT WORK SESSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Eisold to approve the minutes of the December 10, 2007 special joint work session. SECOND
by Knight. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Motion passed.
APPROVAL OF THE DECEMBER 10, 2007 SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES: MOTION by
Knight to approve the minutes of the December 10, 2007 special meeting. SECOND by Strayton. Ayes: 4
Nays: 0 Motion passed.
4. AUDIENCE INPUT: None.
5. DISCUSSION (Response to Audience Input): None.
6. OLD BUSINESS:
a. Parks and Recreation Improvements Schultz provided the Commission with an update on what
had been discussed at the City Council's special work session on January 2. The City Council favored a
spring referendum asking for between $8.25 million and $8.5 million, that would include the outdoor
recreation complex, improvements to the historic St. Joseph's Church, and the addition of tennis courts with
lights to Erickson Park. He explained that it is required that the City Council pass a resolution at least 53
days prior to holding a referendum, and informed the Commission that the City Council is expected to
decide in February whether to move forward with this referendum. The City Council also discussed
approving spending $523,000 from parks dedication funds for plans and specs for the outdoor recreation
complex. The parks dedication funds would be reimbursed after the referendum passes. The City Council
indicated they would like to see the City move forward with the development of the specs and plans as this
would allow construction to begin earlier in the summer.
Schultz handed out an updated site plan for the recreation complex. Based on discussions with Dakota
County, access from Bonaire Path has been included in the plan, one soccer field has been removed to allow
for ponding, and a small parking area has been added.
The Commission expressed concern with the long driveway that continues through the newly added parking
lot from the access point on Bonaire Path, and with the elimination of a soccer field. Schultz explained that
getting access approved by the county is a very detailed process and even though we had provided them
with information last October, it has to go through several channels before a decision is made. The new
plan is the result of the county telling us that they would prefer that the city provide access from a city street
(Bonaire Path) instead of a county road (Akron Ave.). Knight pointed out that the traffic will be going to
Akron Ave. even if the access is from Bonaire Path. There was further discussion on various options for the
new plan. The Commission was very disappointed about the loss of the green space in this plan. Schultz
-1-
PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
Regular Meeting Minutes
January 28, 2008
stated that the plan does not have to be voted on at tonight's meeting and the details can be worked out in
the future; tonight he was only asking for a recommendation on the amount of the referendum.
There was discussion regarding converting the green space at Erickson Park that currently is used for soccer
into eight tennis courts. Schultz explained that most of the City Council members were agreeable to not
including this item in the referendum, due to the cost, timing issues, and the loss of the soccer fields that
would result from placing tennis courts in this location.
Schultz reviewed exterior and interior drawings of proposed improvements to the historic St. Joseph's
Church. The improvements to the exterior include the expansion of the front steps and the addition of an
entrance ramp, rebuilding the steps at the back of the building, and the addition of restrooms and a
mechanical area to the rear of the building. The restrooms and mechanical area will be the major changes to
the exterior. As far as the interior, the improvements include increasing the stage area (former alter) and
adding stairs with hand rails for access to the stage. Per Schultz, the school portion of the site will be
evaluated at some time in the future. The focus now is to make the necessary improvements to the church
so that it is useable space that meets current codes.
Discussion turned back to the issue of tennis courts. Schultz informed the Commission that he has
contacted the school district by letter regarding the opportunity to partner on projects and improvements
such as the addition of tennis courts.
Discussion continued regarding the changes to the outdoor recreation complex site plan due to the addition
of the new access point on Bonaire Path. The Commission again stated how unhappy they were with the
loss of the field in the new plan. They also expressed concern about the safety of the new entrance
driveway. They felt that people would be speeding along the driveway and through the parking area, as well
as parking along the driveway so they would have easy access to nearby fields. It was suggested that the
driveway through the complex and parking areas could be made a one -way, with the entrance access from
Akron Ave. and the exit access onto Bonaire Path.
There was discussion regarding lighting at the complex. Eisold thought that if lights were not included
initially, they would never be added. The Commission agreed that it was very important to light both of the
concession stands and as many fields as possible. The Commission felt strongly that lights should be
included from the start of the project and that there would not be funds to add them later.
The Commission talked about the possibility of including tennis courts at other parks instead of at Erickson
Park. Eisold suggested adding two courts with lights to a neighborhood park instead of eight courts at
Erickson Park. He didn't think that Erickson Park was the best location for courts and was concerned
about the loss of green space and lack of supervision there. Knight agreed with Eisold that Erickson Park
was not the best location for tennis courts. She was not in favor of putting them on green space and also
had concerns about them being unsupervised. The Commission thought that having eight tennis courts in
this location would not be the best use of the space. It was suggested that the addition of tennis courts be
addressed when the parks master plan is updated. Possibly adding two lighted courts at Charlie's Park or
two at Bloomfield Park was suggested.
There was also discussion regarding the use identified for the green space fields at the outdoor recreation
complex. They are identified as multi- purpose, which could mean soccer, lacrosse, or football. Eliason
stressed that soccer is already short fields and they have more participants than other sports. He was
concerned that other sports would be scheduled to use the fields instead, even though they do not have
nearly the number of participants and field needs. Per Schultz the city could work with RAAA and set up
guidelines for scheduling of the fields that would address this. It was also mentioned that unless fencing was
added, there could be issues with lacrosse balls being hit out of the fields and possibly into the parking area
and across the road.
-2-
PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
Regular Meeting Minutes
January 28, 2008
Strayton thought that the cost estimates were high for the complex considering the current building market.
Schultz explained that the project will be put out for bid and he hoped to see bids that reflected the current
market. Strayton also questioned whether the Commission should approve spending $523,000 for plans
and specs before the referendum passes. After further discussion, it was the consensus of the Commission
that spending $523,000 for plans and specs without knowing for sure that the referendum would pass was
not fiscally responsible. They were not comfortable making a recommendation in favor of this.
Knight expressed frustration with the county for making a decision about access two months after seeing
plan, she didn't like losing the field or lights at the complex. She also thought that two concession buildings
with bathrooms were necessary.
MOTION by Strayton to recommend that the City Council approve a resolution calling for a special
referendum to be held on Tuesday, April 22, 2008 to ask voters to approve spending $8.5 million on parks
and recreation improvements that would include the outdoor recreation complex and improvements to the
historic St. Joseph's Church. SECOND by Knight.
FRIENDLY AMENDMENT by Eisold to add "but not be limited to" after "include" in the original
motion. Strayton accepted the amendment.
The amended motion should read as follows: Motion to recommend that the City Council approve a
resolution calling for a special referendum to be held on Tuesday, April 22, 2008 to ask voters to approve
spending $8.5 million on parks and recreation improvements that would include but not be limited to the
outdoor recreation complex and improvements to the historic St. Joseph's Church.
Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Motion passed.
b. DCTC Facility Partnership Update The City Council recently approved a letter of understanding
between the City and Minnesota State Colleges and Universities for funding of the design and construction
of three soccer fields at Dakota County Technical College. The letter includes the City's intent to contribute
$450,000 for construction of the project. The letter also identifies that there are other agreements that have
to be worked out before the City releases the funds. A copy of the letter was included in the Commission
packets.
7. NEW BUSINESS:
a. Director's Report The park improvement fund balance as of December 31, 2007 was $2,116,427.55.
No parks dedication fees, grants or donations were received this month. Interest for December was
$11,539.14. There were expenditures of $22,500.75 outdoor recreation complex planning and Brazil Avenue
trail planning.
Update on 2008 City Council Goal Setting Schultz attended the goal setting workshop last weekend. He
provided the City Council with an update on the Outdoor Recreation Complex and additional information
about the project.
Outdoor Ice Season The outdoor ice season has been a good one so far this winter. The weather has
cooperated and we have had a number of skaters at the rinks. Generally the outdoor ice season ends near
the end of February, but we will try to keep the rinks open longer if the weather permits.
MRPA Award Tom Schuster, Parks Supervisor, was recognized by the Minnesota Recreation and Parks
Association. He was awarded the Meritorious Service Award for coordinating the 2007 Parks and Natural
Resources Workshop that was held at the Rosemount Community Center last October.
3
PARKS RECREATION COMMISSION
Regular Meeting Minutes
January 28, 2008
Teen Night The Parks and Recreation Teen Night program is having another successful year.
Approximately 275 middle school students attended the January 11 Teen Night. A middle school band,
"Big Bang Theory" performed for their first crowd this month at Teen Night.
8. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION by Eisold to adjourn the meeting. SECOND by Strayton. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Motion passed. The
meeting was adjourned at 8:49 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by
Sonja Honl,
Recording Secretary
-4-
f
s
FEBRUARY 8, 2008
FORMER ST. JOSEPH'S CHURCH FACILITY
ROSEMOUNT, MN QUINN HUTSON, AIA
17 II(1
NEEDS ANALYSIS STUDY:
ACCESSIBILITY
CODE
MAINTENANCE
MECHANICAL
ELECTRICAL A,
CN N
7300 WEST 147TH STREET, SUITE #504 APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124-7580
"II( LS PH: (952) 431 -4433
The Former St. Joseph's Church Facility project renovates the former St. Joseph's Church
building with the primary goal to upgrade it to meet current building code requirements for a gen-
o
eral multi purpose assembly space. This upgrade is required prior to an Occupancy Permit when z
any building is reclassified from one occupancy use to a new use. The scope of the remodeling
represented in the schematic design documents is limited to these required code upgrades, basic 0
usability needs and minor maintenance issues. Additional upgrades may be undertaken in the o
future to fine tune the facility as specific arts programs develop and the specific facility needs are
Et
known for these programs. In the meantime, the facility will be fit for a wide variety of
community functions including performing arts, visual arts, meetings of all types, or rental for z
private events.
After several meetings with city staff, schematic level drawings and outline narrative
specifications were developed to determine the actual designs for each of these building upgrades.
Next based on the approved schematic design documents, a detailed cost estimate was developed
to get a very close budget for this addition and renovation work.
The upgrades address accessibility, building codes, basic comfort, and modernize the
mechanical and electrical services as further outlined in the following schematic design overview.
The schematic design drawings and narrative specifications are attached in Appendix A.
Former St. Joseph's
Church Facility will
r
accomodate a vide
variety of community
functions including i 0
Y
performing arts, visual
arts meeting space
facility rental and 'a
1�
private events. a_
Ya
1 p 1 z
W
M
C Njy
1 ARCHITECTS
Accessibility:
The existing building has many ADA compliance issues including doorway clearances, non-
accessible areas, and unsuitable door hardware. To rectify these issues some adjustments need to
be made to become compliant. For non accessible areas such as the main entrance and stage areas,
handicap accessible ramps need to be added to allow access. The north apse in the Assembly Hall
has platform risers that are non accessible and would need to be removed to be compliant. u]
u]
Most of the interior doors do not have the clearance to be ADA compliant and would need to
be modified. For example the doors in the north and south apse of the Assembly Hall do not have Q
z
enough clearance to allow a wheelchair to pass. The doors need to be removed from the frames to Q
have enough clearance to be ADA compliant. At the north door of the Lobby offset hinges need
to be added to the door to provide enough clearance to be ADA compliant. Also, electric handicap
push buttons will be added to the main entrance and Assembly Hall doors to allow access.
Code:
Since the existing building was built many years ago, the existing conditions do not meet
current code requirements. To make the building a useable space, some adjustments need to be
made regarding exiting, plumbing and handrail/guardrail code requirements.
For exiting purposes, the main entrance
doors do not have the correct exiting hardware and
I II
would p
Id need new panic hardware to meet code. The
door on the north side aisle of the Assembly Hall
swings in the wrong direction from the exiting
requirements and will need to be switched to swing a ,i
out from the space.
II 0
4 rf lkol
t
1 I l'
1
C NN
2 t wit
j
x
Overall exterior image of existing
tit: 1,1' facility w ith additions.
I
u -ewr p
The existing exterior door and stair exiting from the Meeting Room does not currently
meet code and will need to be replaced with a new door and stair to be compliant.
The existing plumbing conditions do not meet the requirements for the new intended as-
sembly use of the building. To meet these requirements an addition will need to be added in the
rear of the church to allow for the correct amount of fixtures to be accessible to the main Assem-
bly Hall.
Many of the handrail and guardrail conditions do not meet code and will need to be
raised to 34" and 42" respectively to be code compliant.
Maintenance:
The overall interior of the building is in very good condition considering the age of the
building. A few minor issues that need to be addressed are water damage on exterior surfaces
and some soiled carpeting in the Assembly Hall. To repair the water damaged areas, the exterior
wall leaks need to be fixed and the plaster patched and painted.
The carpeting in the Assembly Hall would need to be replaced where the stage is
extended and where the risers in the north apse would be removed. An alternate is included to
recarpet the entire Assembly Hall due to the stains and wear throughout the space.
Mechanical:
The mechanical systems in the building have been upgraded over the years and range
in different degrees of conditions. The hot fin -tube radiators are in good condition while the
boilers have reached the expected service life but are still in good condition. It is recommended
that the boiler that serves the existing building be replaced at this time to service the new use of
C NN
twi wi 4/us
i._
the building. New boilers should be installed in a Mechanical Room addition off the rear of the
church since the existing building does not have space to handle the new boilers.
There currently is not a cooling and ventilation system in the building which would need
to be added to make the building functional. The building control systems should consist of a
direct digital control which would allow for remote control access of the mechanical systems
which is appropriate since there will likely not be a custodial staff on duty at all time solely at
this building.
Also, to meet current building codes a fire protection sprinkler system and associate fire
alarm system will need to be added throughout the building.
Electrical:
The existing building contains electrical systems in good working condition; however
most are dated and could be replaced for better efficiencies. New switch gear needs to be added
to handle the new function of the building and could be placed in the new Mechanical Room
addition. All fluorescent bulbs could be replaced with more energy efficient bulbs and would not
affect the original aesthetics of the main Assembly Hall.
For life safety, a fire alarm system needs to be installed for the building to be used, as
noted above.
Four electrical alternates were included to
make the building more usable or secure. First, the
current sound system in the Assembly Hall is dated
and not sufficient enough for the new use of the
building. A new sound system alternate is included
to meet the general needs of the space. Likewise,
data and cable lines chould be added throughout the
existing building to provide flexibility in each space
for different functions. An alternate for cable televi-
sion runs was included to provide the connections to
ljl televisions, projectors and the option for broadband
4 `i ii internet connections. Finally since the times vary in
which the building is in use, an alternate to include a
security system was included to protect the building
when it is not in use.
r
a
St. Joseph's interior image
cN
4 Cffi•Eels
Revised Schematic Design Budget Estimate for Former St. Joseph's Church Facility
CSI Division Description CSI Division Subtotal
02000 Sitework and Demolition $66,164.25
03000 Concrete $29,580.50 F
Q
04000 Masonry $70,768.00
05000 Metals $8,660.00
06000 Wood Plastics $9,136.00 w
07000 Thermal $24,772.20
08000 Doors, Windows Glass $21,330.00
09000 Finishes $41,292.25 U
10000 Specialties $9,620.00
11000 Equipment $0.00
12000 Furnishings $0.00
13000 Special Construction $0.00
14000 Conveying Systems $0.00
15000 Mechanical $465,197.00
16000 Electrical $85,886.77
Subtotal Direct Cost $832,406.97
General Conditions 10% $83,240.70
Overhead Profit 6% $54,938.86
Total w/o Contingency $970,586.53
Design Contingency 10% $97,058.65
A &E Fee 6.75% $72,000.00
Construction Contingency 5% $48,529.33
Total Project Cost $1,188,174.51
Alternates: Total:
Alt. 1 Recarpet Assembly Hall $17,907.89
Alt. 2 Security System $16,826.55
Alt. 3 Public Address/Intercom $15,238.40
Alt. 4 Telephone and Data System $28,231.19
Alt. 5 Cable Television System $4,402.64
The above cost estimate is the result of a detailed material and labor take -off done by our
cost consultant, Professional Project Management (PPM). The cost estimate includes a design
contingency of 10% in order to cover the additional information and possible fine tuning that will
occur between these schematic design level drawings and the final construction plans and
specifications. The estimate is based on a construction start of July, 2008, and construction
duration of approximately 8 months. The actual start date selected for the project may impact the
inflation rate calculation, up or down, and therefore the final construction cost.
I recommend providing for a construction contingency of 5% after the final bids are re-
ceived as included above to cover unknown conditions that might be encountered in remodeling
of a building of this age. VI 5 t °ts
The remodeling and addition
shown in this schematic design study will
upgrade this great facility to a point that
will allow an occupancy permit to for the
use of the building for assembly functions.
While there may be further
remodeling desired as the future uses of
the Former St. Joseph's Church Facility
develop, this step will make the building
LO
very usable by a wide variety of functions
taking it well into the future.
This remodeled building will
provide the City of Rosemount a
wonderful community resource both
architecturally and through expanded
programs and events.
ik1
1.
CN H
6 �CHI TEers
0 j;_c lo le 4 i Pt- bot-s t. ei xi
Rosemount Outdoor Recreation Complex
MASTER PLAN COST ESTIMATE Feb. 7, 2007
Schedule #11 Base Facility Development On Site Costs
Description Est. Cost
Grading earthwork erosion control (assumes no soil corrections are necessary) 550,000.00
Stormwater utilities 264,711.50
Sanitary Water utilities (for maintenance facility) 76,325.00
nitary Water utilities (for concession buildings /restrooms) 97,000.00
Retaining walls with chainlink fendng 95,500.00
Entrance drive parking areas, induding: concrete curb and gutter, 3" asphalt pavement, over 6" 481,500.00
aggregate base, h.c. parking and misc. traffic signs, parking lot striping
Asphalt pavement for trail system (3" asphalt pavement over 6" aggregate base) 248,000.00
One 400' baseball field, includes:
fencing backstops with concrete maint strip,
f dugouts and bleachers with shade canopies, 225000.00
agg -lime,
concrete pads for bleachers,
hill nen etr,
Four 40 multi purpose ballfields, includes:
fendng backstops with concrete maint strip,
0 dugouts and bleachers with shade canopies, 620 000.00
agg -lime,
concrete pads for bleachers,
hull nen 5. etc.
Two 155 youth baseball field, includes:
fendng backstops with concrete maint strip,
10 dugouts and bleachers with shade canopies, 335,000.00
agg -lime,
concrete pads for bleachers,
WI nenc, etr.
LP Electrical service and parking lot lighting 75,000.00
.ry Lighting for two 315' baseball fields 200,000.00
p Int Lighting for one 400' baseball field 125,000.00
i C Lighting for three 240' X 360' soccer fields 220,000.00
L♦ Electrical conduit for future lighting of four 240' ballfields 30,000.00
E$ Concrete steps with handrailing 27,500.00
Le Irrigation system for sport fields 365,500.00
Li; Concession restroom building #1 (center wheel of 240' ballfields) 345,000.00
Maintenance facility with related sitework, pavement, access drive, etc. (budget) 375,000.00
Miscellaneous Site Amenities: budget cost for freestanding benches, tables, bike racks, trash 35 000.00
recept, etc.
C1! 3 Drinking Fountains 18,000.00
`a",, 2 Park Identification Monuments (budget cost) Note: this is 1/2 of estimated cost assumed 12,000.00
to be iointly funded with Flint Hills
ft Naturalized seed 98,000.00
g Turf seed 124,000.00
C*y Fiber blanket for seeding in swales and steep slopes (budget cost) 60,000.00
e-'• Landscape Improvements: minimal planting of trees and shrubs at key locations 75,000.00
r Construction Surveying Staking (budget) 145,000.00
Subtotal: 5,323,036.50
Contingency 10% 532,303.65
Subtotal Base Facility Development On Site Costs' 5,855,340.15
Est. Design Fees Prelim. Testing (indudes Base Facility and Base Altemate Add-On Items] 523,100.00
Total Estimated Cost Base Facility Development On Site Costs' $6,378,440.15
Brauer Associates, Ltd. H:IDOCS12007107 -20 Rosemount Rec Complex\07 -20 ORC final masterplan estimate.xls Page 1
Schedule #2: Base Facility Bid Alternate Add -On Items On Site Costs
Item Active Area Development Zone Est. Cost
1 Lighting for four 240' ballfields 320,000.00
2 2 batting cages for 400' baseball field 40,500.00
3 Two Play Containers, including: play equipment, concrete curbing, wood chip surfacing, drain -tile 160,500.00
underdrainacie, etc.
4 Imported topsoil for 7 ballfields (may be req. if soil tests indicate poor existing soils) 75,000.00
5 Imported topsoil for 4 soccer fields (may be req. if soil tests indicate poor existing soils) 80,000.00
6 Bleacher with shade canopy for 1 multi- purpose green 18,500.00
7 Safety netting at key locations 285,000.00
8 9 Chain -link Bif Enclosures on concrete slabs at various locations 45,000.00
9 Scoreboards for 7 ballfields 77,000.00
10 Scoreboards for 4 multi- purpose greens 44,000.00
11 Soccer goals and comer markers 20,500.00
Subtotal: 1,166,000.00
Contingency 10 116,600.00
Subtotal Base Alternate Add -On Items On Site Costs' 1,282,600.00
*Note: Est. Design Fees Prelim. Testing are included in Base Facility table above
Schedule #8s Base Facility Development Off Site Costs
Item Active Area Development Zone Est. Cost
Akron Ave. Roadway Surface Improvements (50 219,492.50
Akron Ave. trunk sanitary sewer improvements 90,000.00
3) Akron Ave. trunk water main improvements 116,400.00
4 Bonaire Path Roadway Surface Improvements (50 143,512.50
Subtotal: 569,405.00
Contingency 10% 56,940.50
Subtotal Base Facility Development Off Site Costs 626,345.50
Fees: design prelim. testing 15% 93,951.83
Total Estimated Cost Base Facility Development Off Site Costs) 720,297.33
half of roadway cost represents frontage
based on half the cost of 8 sewer extension (CP 418 feasibility study,
based on half the cost of 8" watermain extension (CP 418 feasibility study
Summary
Schedule #1: Base Fadlity On Site Costs 6,378,440.15
Schedule #3: Base Facility Off Site Costs 720,297.33
Total Development Project Cost $7,098,737.48
Brauer Associates, Ltd. H:IDOCSV007107 -20 Rosemount Rec Complext07 -20 ORC final masterplan estimate.xls Page 2
Schedule #4: Potential Add -On Items On Site Costs
Item Active Area Development Zone Est. Cost
1 Concession /restroom building #2 (adjacent to baseball field) 375,000.00
2 Omamental safety railing between play containers parking area 31,500.00
3 Landscape Improvements additional tree and shrub plantings throughout park 150,000.00
4 Chainlink fencing around perimeter of the 4 225' x 360' multi- purpose greens 82,000.00
5 Under drainage system for 4 225' x 360' multi purpose greens: 375,000.00
6 1 pre-fab picnic shelter: conc. slab, custom columns, standing seam metal roof, etc. 49,500.00
7 Drill a well for irrigation system 115,000.00
8 Irrigation for select areas adjacent to sport fields 75,000.00
Subtotal: 1,253,000.00
Contingency 10% 125,300.00
Subtotal Potential Add -On Items On Site Costs 1,378,300.00
Design Fees prelim. testing 15°fo 206,745.00
Total Estimated Cost Potential Add-On Items On Site Costs $1,585,045.00
Schedule #5: Potential Alt. Storm Water Mgt Items On Site Costs
Item Active Area Development Zone Est Cost
1 Storm water filter strips parking lot 60,000.00
2 Storm water subsurface storage parking lot north 150,000.00
3 Storm water subsurface storage parking lot south 255,000.00
4 Upgrade from standard bituminous to porous pavement for stormwater treatment 983,675.00
Subtotal: 1,448,675.00
Contingency 10% 144,867.50
Subtotal Potential Alt. Storm Water Items On Site Costs 1,593,542.50
Design Fees prelim. testing 15% 239,031.38
Total Estimated Cost Potential Alt. Storm Water Items On Site Costs' $1,832,573.88
Brauer Associates, Ltd. H ADOCS\2007\07 -20 Rosemount Rec Comp1ex\07 -20 ORC final masterplan estimate.xls Page 3
$7,915,000
City of Rosemount, Minnesota
General Obligation Park Bonds
Series 2008 GO Park Bonds Issue Summary
Bank Qualified Rates
Total Issue Sources And Uses
Dated 02/01/2008 I Delivered 08/01/2008
Athletic St. Joseph Issue
Complex Church Summary
Sources Of Funds
Par Amount of Bonds $6,695,000.00 $1,220,000.00 $7,915,000.00
Total Sources $6,695,000.00 $1,220,000.00 $7,915,000.00
Uses Of Funds
Deposit to Project Construction Fund 6,585,000.00 1,197,000.00 7,782,000.00
Total Underwriter's Discount (1.100 73,645.00 13,420.00 87,065.00
Costs of Issuance 35,737.68 6,512.32 42,250.00
Rounding Amount 617.32 3,067.68 3,685.00
Total Uses $6,695,000.00 $1,220,000.00 $7,915,000.00
Series 2008GOFe tBonds IssueSum+nery 2/8/2008 10.19AM
Springsted
City of Rosemount, Minnesota
Estimated Tax Impact Based on Referendum Market Value
20 -year Issues
BQ Non -BQ
Athletic St. Joseph Athletic St. Joseph
$7,915,000 $7,915,000
Yrs. 2008.2027 Yrs. 2008.2027
Max. Annual Levy $620,860 $636,788
Less Existing Levy $0 $0
Estimated Increase $620,860 $636,788
Market Pay 2008 RMV $2,318,778,500 $2,318,778,500
Value (a) Tax Rate Increase (b): 0.027% 0.027%
$100,000 27 27
150,000 40 41
200,000 54 55
250,000 67 69
300,000 80 82
350,000 94 96
400,000 107 110
500,000 134 137
600,000 161 165
700,000 187 192
800,000 214 220
900,000 241 247
1,000,000 268 275
1,500,000 402 412
2,000,000 536 549
2,500,000 669 687
3,000,000 803 824
3,500,000 937 961
4,000,000 1,071 1,098
4,500,000 1,205 1,236
5,000,000 1,339 1,373
(a) Estimated market value is the basis from which the net tax capacity is calculated.
This value is not necessarily the price the property would bring if sold.
(b) The fax rate increase is derived by dividing the average debt service by the referendum
market value. The dollar increase in taxes payable is derived by multiplying the market value
by the tax rate increase.
Note: Changes in interest rates, Timing or size of the bond issue may cause significant
alterations of this information.
$8,250,000
City of Rosemount, Minnesota
General Obligation Park Bonds
Series 2008 GO Park Bonds Athletic St. Jos Issue Summary
Bank Qualified Rates
Total Issue Sources And Uses
Dated 08/01/2008 1 Delivered 08/01/2008
Athletic St. Joseph Issue
Complex Church Summary
Sources Of Funds
Par Amount of Bonds $7,040,000.00 $1,210,000.00 $8,250,000.00
Total Sources $7,040,000.00 $1,210,000.00 $8,250,000.00
Uses Of Funds
Deposit to Project Construction Fund 6,925,000.00 1,190,000.00 8,115,000.00
Total Underwriter's Discount (1.100 77,440.00 13,310.00 90,750.00
Costs of Issuance 33,920.00 5,830.00 39,750.00
Rounding Amount 3,640.00 860.00 4,500.00
Total Uses $7,040,000.00 $1,210,000.00 $8,250,000.00
`Additional funds available between project cost estimates and desired bond size were added to the St. Joseph Church project.
Series 2008 GOHrkBonds Issue Summary 2/ 6/2008 11:06 AM
Springsted
City of Rosemount, Minnesota
Estimated Tax Impact Based on Referendum Market Value
20 -year Issues
BQ Non -BQ
Athletic St. Joseph Athletic St. Joseph
$8,250,000 $8,250,000
Yrs. 2008.2027 Yrs. 2008 2027
Max. Annual Levy $645,755 $662,353
Less Existing Levy $0 $0
Estimated Increase $645,755 $662,353
Market Pay 2008 RMV $2,318,778,500 $2,318,778,500
Value (a) Tax Rate increase (b): 0.028% 0.029%
$100,000 28 29
150,000 42 43
200,000 56 57
250,000 70 71
300,000 84 86
350,000 97 100
400,000 111 114
500,000 139 143
600,000 167 171
700,000 195 200
800,000 223 229
900,000 251 257
1,000,000 278 286
1,500,000 418 428
2,000,000 557 571
2,500,000 696 714
3,000,000 835 857
3,500,000 975 1,000
4,000,000 1,114 1,143
4,500,000 1,253 1,285
5,000,000 1,392 1,428
(a) Estimated market value is the basis from which the net tax capacity is calculated.
This value is not necessarily the price the property would bring if sold.
(b) The tax rate increase is derived by dividing the average debt service by the referendum
market value. The dollar increase in taxes payable is derived by multiplying the market value
by the tax rate increase.
Note: Changes in interest rates, timing or size of the bond issue may cause significant
alterations of this information.
L Alternate A Master Plan (1 -8 -08) j
1041] Excelsior MA., Suite #1, Hopkins, MN 55313
Tel. (952) 238-0831 Fax 19521238.0933
Outdoor Recreat Complex Brauer Associates, Ltd.
City of Rosemount, MN 1 Land Use Planning and Design
I
I
1
ti a�V1TlileESFR�c+1►�s.,,
1
Le 11 r �R T
/W GRANTED O s y `r r y8 y d\ a II h
3 -_-Db OTA I C' JI et 0 11 d� i 4 6 Jo
gg5, R' ,40� b if' JN89:,.48 I• e 1
s pki.'Q ks.I 2 Cr r y '722426 FE I
i i ,pp tt1E' W1'f2-' 74 0 12.
i lie ,41 :40, c i 4 :‘,.,_,..._,'■1 1I l L
t
SAFETY '�04Mt _wr: 1 2_
"ic ;';.3' 1 a o �y w 0 1 a o c 'j`_ "::::71'' •s''
a .... 244 y `L i,� a t 1
1 MUL7i -P•. 4 o p; 0i TI;P 1 E ;‘,1,,, %1
LIG 1
-_1 li t LIGHTS) I 0 C 1 (w� t 0� j 1
X 1 1 1
EARTHW(1 b'• 1
BALANCE ~C1" .1:\;: 1
&SC' D2 1'' ',�?y' POND 1,
PARKING ziASEBALL FIELD 40�'ADULT l lf lW; N iii r�"
513+/- y
VEffi I '1 1
1 OW! LIGHTS) f 11 4. I 4�
d i 1::::::„.._--:::/",,/,,: y r=
�i= -'moo
r•
i t Ye t 1-:-7.:;,.:.;, ,�r 1_
FA I l l c° 1 z
,7,7 _Z III q
o`" o: fl 1141, /:,l y 8
I W o •',i: :rti':. r r= PO I r
0 'I �i 1 I1 I 1 t� MAINTENAffil 0 r I t 1 1 1 1 i p� s 1 ,1 i 'i 1 1 t1_,.. 1
T I 11{ 11 0' 210'x360'
t W Pt 1 1 F Yf A:iik ',1 tr�i TITtt IPOSTs 1 11 MULTI- PURWSE r
P 9 CIF 4 1 '4 4 .M'X c r----,... GREF� I i
j a rta 1 FORTH•I•tG .1._ 1 irruit am 1
$4$1;-, r Y� ..,:.,..,.,.4.,...,,,., 1 -�C, r .y :41,L, a '9' --'::11
t t Cgtl noi 1 t 4: `fi -J- AS�TtZA71EL r 1
i i %ij1 t' s �➢k atA 7 '1 ,5 F RE bF W,1 /2 1 .r
rso- p i l l �I NSIE ,ate \I-vs R. ie czzt 1 !1 1 1/11,111 t,
eo, lo- ir. rrP r s�,r rr r r 4 ff i ca .15_ r .cw' sas
J Ys�,, gip. �r�cs�n
i —T .1° 6 w�i' d s J ai `�i rP� LL ,,s ,J �:.1J ey�rzw+��d rr�, 1Ca++ lv, +e R �lT n��fC� r�1'.k'
1 BENCHMARK FI B'
II I I
Al 1 1
i
Alternate "C" Master Plan (2 -6 -08) I 10417 Excelsior Blvd., Suite 91, Hopkins, MN 55343
Tel. (957) 238 -0831 Fax. (9521238-0833
9
Outdoor Recreation Complex Brauer Associates, Ltd.
City of Rosemount, MN land Use Planning and Design
I I
'TI
li I
z_, €ONCJ SSJON BUILDING I
--J gym y
1 R/W GRANTED t) -=z--:::::::-....7.1-----;-.:-;;;•. ,T r tr qa t
S D*DTA"C 4 e 1 9 D lr 6, 1
_N0. 4 .O b 27 T 5 h
RDED,dJ /�i _�_"B t i`
S'DHZPI,DNE'OF-TM£ i' '722 F ‘E.T i' !.'4,1,:iii'_—:"..1.1,..
444 D.: 15 ,1" A� E `•1b1 7k..0 32 :ESL f :%:I 1 P ION+ l R`: �`3�115\ uvrq -f\, a s t ir_ BAs01 mtg
i• it T' ?4;, IT i`, 1 GIFT% .t
o t :t.O.A'k°-' I j 'MI 1 g II ii ,5: LI? i t 2 l 7 K 1 1 *4 1 2 r 0 O f --IiF t I, it ?.itii, l' I 1 j >,,\t::::::;;;;;:: L a::: ;:ti --It' .6,:'
SAFETY 'r o Pr-, w y�.vj��� Igo p 9'- S ::%•,'":1
NETTING t F r. L
p 1 Is u� b.... p_ x ,---:f:::::::::-:
c' iI .4 a 5 .24 E y p r /0
MULTI y 61 Q 1T ry PURP i.
a
f LIGHTS) i r Q 0 1 (W�IT C•=T `ti i
EARTHWO' 74'. e a ,11
BALANCE I i y��µ 9i /T 1 0 r BUIW' i i M T 0 p,; 1 111 LIGHTS) l
PARKI F ii 1 :1 a ‘•\.'S.....,"---___ i"f
APPO y i 52 li r y ow
i HI rl S wl i1': i a ,,.I DTTIONAL
J i W.:,-.•":„ a► 4 :_....-1-
4 AIMING
EAC v r; 44. 439 9 t a Y a ::,0,
LS
C 1 ii i f i; r I 9
DITIONAL
ry 11i I I j_ CFSSIEXIT
w 6 ,a� VE' ATs; 1 1 �HII DRLN'S= AD TO
J PLAY- -AREA �i'----" 1 NAIRE
tnU DRI N H Ii 11 "ii,1411 i
I AR[AA i4'*1,,,i ,',#;i r
E
r, iftk4*rt`•f "'T r'-t t r--><i r i _..-t- JJ i ULDB 7ED AAD
F i a ,r fir, 1\V' F t 1 r fi o RLA.
V ,1: Q 1`. IV q I I I PON AOSLA.ZGE
I. ^p 0� 1 `l 1 1 i 1 I' TOURNAMENT
.9, 0' a% V 11111 1 l 0 1 ti •�A 1 240'x360 EVENTS
l
1 1 i i 0 Ili; •I J I E 1 I LI9" URPoSE 1 M(j,J- PURPosI; 1
s a `-t. 1 ./4•.-;;. r Get •J 'r-•. GREEN I 1 J
i6 I�f9F 1 y ,,r� tyr�.. 1 �r 1 a,
u1 P :j P'1�. n Ill, 'litiA> I (t'ITTH t IGI 1 1 1 f
/F7 /i 1 Tf Q� T A1 X1\,1,•. 6 `!l 5 \Z �,..,:,M T iQ5 R 19
"41Y! r r r se a• ,r r a r r u tlw
7' :'''Z i A :.�r' �s fv ,r'''''' v J J cvasa
BENCHMARK
11 i I 1
!1i
�i 1
fi' 1 i