HomeMy WebLinkAbout2. Rosemount Crossing, Revised Resolution to Resolution 2004-124, Final Plat and Subdivision Development Agreement11
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
City Council Meeting Date: October 28, 2004.
AGENDA ITEM: Rosemount Crossing, Revised
Resolution to Resolution 2004 -124, Final
AGENDA SECTION:
Plat and Subdivision Development
Conserw
Agreement.
PREPARED BY: Kim Lindquist, Community Development
Aderhold, Project
AGENP W., #
Director, Anthony
t
Engineer
ATTACHMENTS: Revised resolution, Final Plat Resolution,
APPROVED BY:
Subdivision Agreement, Final Plat
RECOMMENDED' ACTION:
Motion to adopt a resolution rescinding Resolution 2004 -124 and adopting a revised
resolution approving the preliminary plat and planned unit development (PUD) final plan for
Rosemount Crossing
-.and -
Motion to adopt a resolution approving the final plat for Rosemount Crossing subject to
conditions.
- and -
Motion to authorize execution of the subdivision agreement for Rosemount Crossing.
-and -
Motion to authorize execution of the PUD agreement for Rosemount Crossing. (item to
be delivered at a later date)
ACTION:
ISSUE
The developer of Rosemount Crossing has requested that the Resolution approving the PUD
for Rosemount Crossing be revised to clarify language relating to the parking issues and
control over future tenants based upon parking demand for the Center. Conditions 23 & 25
have been modified from that initially approved to provide better clarity and to propose a
remedy, provision of a parking study, should the developer wish to introduce additional non -
retail uses to the site. The Council action being asked is to rescind the previously approved
resolution and adopt a totally new one, with the two conditions changed. From an
administrative standpoint, a new resolution is preferable to a separate corrective resolution
that would just modify the conditions of resolution 2004 -124.
Approval of the final plat is also before the council. Staff believes that the final plat is
consistent with the approved preliminary plat and therefore recommends approval. Final plat
review action was included with the various recommendations taken by the Planning
Commission at their September 14, 2004 meeting
The attached subdivision development agreement is structured to secure public and private
infrastructure.
The PUD agreement is still being negotiated. The agreement will reference the plans for the
development as the zoning instrument, and what changes would trigger an amendment.
The PUD agreement will also require cross- access and parking easements and will address
the maintenance of the stormwater system. Staff is hopeful that the PUD can be sent out
prior to the Council meeting on Thursday.
2
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2004 -
A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION 2004 -124 AND APPROVING A
REVISED RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PREMILINARY PLAT AND
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) FINAL PLAN FOR ROSEMOUNT
CROSSING
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount
received an application from Steiner Development, Incorporated, requesting a
Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Final Development for the
Rosemount Crossing, legally described as:
Marian Terrace excepting therefrom that part now platted as Marian Terrace Replat and
also excepting therefrom that part now platted as Marian.Terrace . Replat 2nd Addition,
according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles
in and for said County of Dakota and State of Minnesota.
Together that portion of public lands vacated in Document No. 11942 filed June 21,
1955, which accrue to subject premises.
WHEREAS, on June 21, 2004, the applicant submitted a revised site plan that responded
to some staff identified concerns, where upon the Planning Commission of the City of
Rosemount continued the public hearing for the Planned Unit Development Concept Plan
to July 14, 2004 to provide sufficient time to review the revised plans; and
WHEREAS, on July 2, 2004 the applicant submitted another revised PUD Concept Plan
for the project renamed Rosemount Crossing addressing additional concerns.
WHEREAS, on July 14, 2004, the Planning Commission reviewed the revised concept
PUD for Rosemount Crossing and received comments at the continued public hearing;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend that the City
Council approve the Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for Rosemount Crossing,
subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, August 2 n1 , 2004, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the
Planning Commission's recommendation, the Planned Unit Development Concept Plan
for Rosemount Crossing.
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Rosemount approved the Plan Unit Development
Concept Plan for Rosemount Crossings, subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on September 14, 2004, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to
recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit
Development Final Plan for Rosemount Crossing, subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on October 5, 2004, the Council of the City of Rosemount approved the
Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Final Plan for Rosemount Crossing in
Resolution 2004 -124, subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on October 28, 2005 the City Council rescinded Resolution 2004 -124 and
approved a revised resolution approving the Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit
Development Final Plan for Rosemount Crossing, subject to conditions
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount
hereby approves the Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Final Plan for
Rosemount Crossing, subject to:
I . Execution and recording of a PUD agreement to assure the property is developed
and used in accordance with the plan documents received on September 23, 2004
and this resolution. To the extent of any inconsistencies between this resolution
and the approved declaration of covenants and restrictions, the latter will control.
2. The development shall include a 6,500 sq. ft. restaurant with the first phase of
construction unless otherwise specified in the PUD agreement.
3. Incorporation of recommendations of the City Engineer regarding drainage,
erosion control, grading, street, storm water and utility design including the
following specifics:
a. A maintenance agreement shall be required for the underground storm water
storage system prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
b. The sanitary sewer shall be reconfigured to utilize the two stubs already
present on -site.
c. The plans shall conform to all City of Rosemount Engineering Standards and
guidelines and address comments specifically listed in the following report.
d. Dedication of right -of -way for the street connection between Camero Lane
and Cambrian Avenue and provision of funds necessary to construct the street
to City standards.
e. Obtain a MnDot access permit.
4. Reconstruction of Cambrian Avenue for exclusive access into the Rosemount
Crossing site and provision of landscaping for screening adjacent residential uses.
In consideration that site access is located within the public right -of -way, the City
may at its own discretion take over the driveway within Cambrian Avenue for
public access purposes.
5. Plan revisions to eliminate setback and sight- triangle encroachments of the
monument signs along Highway 3 at the corners with County Road 42 and
Cambrian Avenue, and setback encroachments along Highway 3 and County
Road 42 for ground signs.
6. Ground signs shall have monument bases consistent in width with the sign face,
and consistent with building architecture and materials. Three ground signs are
permitted within the entire PUD consistent with the approved site plan. All
2.
1
freestanding signs may not exceed the height width and sign tenant into and logo
than the plan dated 9/2/04 and received by the City on 9/23/04.
7. Implementation of the revised landscaping plan received on September 23, 2004,
and further refinements to the plan:
a. Provide additional plantings within the normal parking setback area along
Highway 3 to immediately and effectively screen the drive- through from
south -bound traffic year round achievin O to % no more than 25� (currently
b. Reduce the overall percentage of As trees
more than 50% of all boulevard trees).
c. To coordinate with grading revisions associated with the emergency storm
water overflow.
8. All landscape areas including parking lot islands shall be irrigated.
9. Pedestrian or service doors entering into the drive- through lane shall not be
permitted in the 4,200 sq. ft. restaurant, or delivery times will be restricted to
periods exclusive of drive- through service availability.
10. Provision of a sign plan for consistency of design of wall signs. The sign plan
should designate a sign band for sign placement on each building, the type of
signs acceptable on the site, and the sign area for each tenant space. This sign
plan or covenant serve as the sign regulations for the entire property and will
supersede City adopted ordinance regulations.
11. The grocery building shall no e entrances nd windows.. A PUD locat
mendment shall
E.LF.S. sign locations near th
be required if the building is proposed to be altered for multiple uses or tenants.
12. Construction of the sidewalk / trail connection to Camfield Park consistent with
specifications of the Parks and Recreation Director.
13. Approval of the Dakota County Plat Commission including provision of
additional right -of -way for County Road 42
14. Sidewalks intersecting with driveways shall emphasize the pedestrian crossings
with pavement detail including either textured concrete or brick pavers.
15. Incorporation of Recommendations from the Parks and Recreation Commission
for Park Dedication in the amount of $64,710 based upon current fee resolution.
16. The four light fixtures lining the outer edge of the retail building service area shall
be reduced to 20 maximum heights. Parking lot lighting and wall lighting must be
complementary to the light standards along Hwy 3. Light fixtures A -3, all D and
E fixtures shall be "Acorn" style fixtures as installed along highway 3.
17. The light fixture "E -26" shall be moved out of the pedestrian ramp / curb cut
adjacent to the 22,400 sq. ft. retail building.
18. Building awnings shall be consistent with all applicable standards recommended
in the Draft Downtown Design Guidelines (Revised September 2004).
19. The applicant shall obtain necessary permits for work within right -of -way from
MnDOT and Dakota County and necessary permits from the State such as the
NPDES permit.
stall masonry trash enclosures consistent with the materials
20. The applicant shall in
of the principal structures.
ee public plaza spaces shown on the final
21. The applicant shall provide the thr
development plan accessory to the freestanding restaurant, south of the coffee
3.
shop, and on the southern end of the multiple tenant retail space.
22. Payment of all required development fees including park dedication fees.
23. Should the property experience a parking shortage which creates negative off -site
impacts, as determined by the City, the City may require a parking study
predicting the impact of proposed future changes in use. The parking study will
use typical industry standards or if found acceptable, information generated
specifically for the end user. The parking study will be reviewed and approved by
the City prior to issuing a building permit or certificate of occupancy for the
proposed change in use.
24. The applicant must pay for no parking signs in adjoining residential
neighborhoods if they experience on- street parking associated with the project.
25. The tenant mix is restricted to that portrayed in the October 1, 2004 parking study
referencing the following use locations and building sizes submitted by the
applicant. The indicated square footages and distribution of the uses are
considered to be maximum square footages not to be exceeded for the entire
project. The property is approved for a 15,000 sq ft ALDI grocery store, a 1,800
sq ft coffee shop, a 1,200 sq ft bagel shop, a 6,500 sq ft full- service freestanding
restaurant, and a 3,000 sq. ft casual dining/high turnover sit -down restaurant.- The
Lot 2 building may have a 2,400 sq ft bagel restaurant if the 3,000 sq ft casual
dining/high turnover sit -down restaurant space is reduced to a maximum of 1,800
sq ft. The total square feet of the restaurant space in the project my not exceed
12,500 square feet without a major PUD amendment. The introduction of non-
retail uses aside from those listed above will not be allowed without a parking
study using typical industry standards, showing that the site has adequate parking
for the new and existing uses, subject to city review and approval.
ADOPTED this 28th day of October, 2004 by the City Council of the City of
Rosemount.
William H. Droste, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda Jentink, City Clerk
4.
1 h
7
Motion by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against: _
Member absent:
Second by:
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2004 -
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT FOR ROSEMOUNT
CROSSING
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount
received an application from Steiner Development, Incorporated, requesting a Final Plat
for the Rosemount Crossing, legally described as:
Marian Terrace excepting therefrom that part now platted as Marian Terrace Replat and
also excepting therefrom that part now platted as Marian Terrace Replat 2 nd Addition,
according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles
in and for said County of Dakota and State of Minnesota.
Together that portion of public lands vacated in Document No. 11942 filed June 21,
1955, which accrue to subject premises.
WHEREAS, on August 10, 2004, the applicant submitted a final plat application; and
WHEREAS, on September 14, 2004, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to
recommend that the City Council approve the Final Plat for Rosemount Crossing, subject
to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on October 5, 2004, the Council of the City of Rosemount approved the
Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Final Plan for Rosemount Crossing in
Resolution 2004 -124, subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, on October 28, 2005 the City Council rescinded Resolution 2004 -124 and
approved a revised resolution approving the Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit
Development Final Plan for Rosemount Crossing, subject to conditions, and
WHEREAS, on October 28, 2004 the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed
the Final Plat and found it to be consistent with the Preliminary Plat approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Rosemount
hereby approves the Final Plat for Rosemount Crossing, subject to:
1. Approval of the Dakota County Plat Commission and Minnesota
Department of Transportation as needed.
2. Recording of cross - access easements for all lots associated with the plat to
have ingress and egress to the Cambrian Avenue access.
3. Execution of a maintenance agreement to maintain and replace as needed
private parking lot, driveway and landscaping improvements.
4. Payment of all development fees specified in the current fee schedule
r
associated with the development and subdivision including GIS, SAC,
STAC, WAC and Park Dedication.
5. Provision of an easement for the park access trail connecting Cambrian
Avenue to Camfield Park.
6. Execution of a subdivision development agreement to secure public
infrastructure and private improvements to serve the plat including
landscaping.
7. The applicant provide all necessary easements for public utilities,
including the public drainage system which includes the EOF from the
north and south.
ADOPTED this Twenty- eighth day of October, 2004 by the City Council of the City of
Rosemount.
William H. Droste, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda Jentink, City Clerk
Motion by: Second by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Member absent:
,,,. ., •.e � - -. a ;... 1 . x, -_-, �, , s��,� .,�ya�.. _
-
40.OI
` -DR—GE 239.17
676.40 NOO'34'34'E
I l 796.22
�—
_ — — —
— —
U_,y u EPYMENT —_ - - -.
— �.�-- - - - - -- — 1
srr. ciw�[P a
PWn �P2 r
'
i
C
_
O
rn
CO
m
—
— -
-_
b . q
15
. O
-
_
........ ......
_ n m £
Qam z
�.
4N.66
X 5.60
N 00'3434' E
� Q
Sf•„
y
A?
co
''`•'fjJ L 31'6)B�
m° '� _
i'tr .
@ J� 1\I �Y.
A
Cl),.
r LIS w
�EMSON
tSr ADDmON
o
gym=
d O
o .
it
zo y
�.
29
4
m z
y y
x
' p`
v
Z
m Z
2
t
- 6
C
:
rv1A'
En
-
—
IF '771177-
4
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
Rosemount Crossing
AGREEMENT dated day of , 2004, by and between the CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, ( "City "), and ROSEMOUNT REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, LLC. a
Minnesota Limited Liability Company, (the "Developer ").
1. Request for Plat Approval The Developer has asked the City to approve the subdivision of land
and a plat of land to be known as Rosemount Crossing, which land is legally described on
Attachment One, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof (hereinafter referred to as the
"subject property").
2. Conditions of Plat Approval The City has approved the subdivision and the plat on the
following conditions:
a. Incorporation of recommendations of the City Engineer concerning design and installation of
public infrastructure and including .grading, erosion control, streets and utilities.
b. Execution of a Subdivision or Development Agreement to secure the public and private \
improvements.
c. Payment of all applicable fees including G.I.S., Park Dedication and other fees identified in the
current fee schedule.
d. Incorporation of any easements necessary to accommodate drainage, ponding, trails,
conservation areas, streets and utilities.
3. Phased Development The City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent additions of the
plat if the Developer has breached this Contract and the breach has not been remedied.
Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until Subdivision Agreements for such phases
are approved by the City.
4. Effect of Subdivision Approval For two (2) years from the date of this Agreement, no
amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the
current urban service area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density,
lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or
agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this
Agreement to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law the City may require
compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan, official controls,
platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Agreement.
5. Development Plans The subject property shall be developed in accordance with the following
plans, original copies of which are on file with the City Engineer. The plans may be prepared,
subject to City approval, after entering this Agreement, but before commencement of any work on
the Subject Property. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, the written terms
shall control. The plans are:
Plan A -- Final Plat of Rosemount Crossing as approved by the City.
l
Rosemount Crossing
10/21/04
A
Plan B - Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan prepared by Schoell & Madson, Inc.,
dated September 21, 2004.
Plan C -- Utility Plan prepared by Schoell &Madson, Inc., dated September 21, 2004.
Plan D -- Landscaping Plan and Landscape Details prepared by Schoell & Madson dated
September 21, 2004.
Plan E -- Lighting Plan prepared by Schoell & Madson dated August 10, 2004.
Plan F -- Tree Preservation Plan prepared by Schoell 7 Madson dated August 10, 2004.
Plan G -- Existing Conditions Plan prepared by Schoell & Madson, Inc., dated October 24, 2003
Plan H -- Preliminary Plat Plan prepared by Schoell & Madson Inc., dated September 22, 2004
Final plans which incorporate all conditions of approval shall be signed and submitted to the City
for approval.
6. Installation by Developer The Developer shall install or cause to be installed and pay for the
following:
A. Street Lights
B. Setting of Lot and Block Monuments
C. Surveying and Staking of work required to be performed by the Developer.
D. Gas, Electric, Telephone, and Cable Lines
E. Site Grading & Erosion Control
F. Utility Plan
G. Landscaping
(Hereinafter referred to as the "Developer Improvements ")
And other items as necessary to complete the development as stipulated herein or in other
agreements.
7. Time of Performance The Developer shall install all required improvements enumerated in
Paragraph 6 which will serve the subject property by September 30, 2005. The Developer may,
however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be
conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the
extended completion date.
8. Public Infrastructure Improvements. The Developer shall also install or cause to be installed and
pay for the following Improvements, which are hereinafter referred to as the "Public Infrastructure
Improvements ":
a. All sanitary sewer improvements to be installed within any public right -of -way or drainage
and utility easements.
b. All watermain improvements to be installed within any public right -of -way or drainage and
utility easements.
2
Rosemount Crossing
10/21/04
C. All storm sewer improvements to be installed within any public right -of -way or drainage and
utility easements.
d. All public street improvements to be constructed within any public right -of -way.
e. All sidewalks or pathways to be constructed within any public right -of -way or public
easements.
The Public Infrastructure Improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Plans. The
attached Exhibit C depicts the area within which the Public Infrastructure Improvements are to be
constructed.
Final plans for Public Infrastructure Improvements shall be prepared by the Developer in accordance
with the City of Rosemount Engineering Guidelines and shall be approved by the City Engineer prior
to the commencement of construction.
Developer shall obtain "any required permits from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency,
Department of Health or other governmental agencies and provide to the City before proceeding with
construction of the Public Infrastructure Improvements.
9. Deposit for Cost of Public Infrastructure Improvements (Section deleted in entirety)
10. Security for Developer Improvements To guarantee compliance with the terms of this
Agreement, payment of the costs of all Developer Improvements and construction of all Developer
Improvements (as noted in Paragraph 6), the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash escrow or
two (2) individual irrevocable letters of credit from a bank ( "security ") for:
a.) $ 82,500 Landscaping
b.) $180,950 All Other Improvements
which is 110 % of the estimated cost of the Developer Improvements. The amount of the security
was calculated as follows:
3 Rosemount Crossing
10/21/04
Cost
110%
Grading & Erosion Control
$25,500
$28,050
Pond Restoration and Erosion
Control Removal
$25,000
$27,500
Survey Monumentation
$2,000
$2,200
Retaining 'Walls
-0-
-0-
Street Lighting (3 lights)
$12,000
$13,200
Buffer Monumentation
-0-
-0-
Park Equipment/Improvements
-0-
-0-
Wetland Restoration/Mitigation
-0-
-0-
3 Rosemount Crossing
10/21/04
Wetland Monitoring
-0-
-0-
Public Infrastructure Improvements
$100,000
$110,000
Total
$164,500
$180,950
Refer to Exhibit A and Exhibit B for an explanation of each item.
The bank and form of the letter of credit or other security shall be subject to the approval of the City
Administrator. The letter of credit shall be automatically renewable until the City releases the
developer from responsibility. The letter of credit shall secure compliance with the terms of this
Agreement and all obligations of the Developer under it. The City may draw down on the letter of
credit without notice if the obligations of the Developer have not been completed as required by this
Agreement. In the event of a default under this Subdivision Agreement by the Developer, the City
shall furnish the Developer with written notice by certified mail of Developers default(s) under the
terms of this Subdivision Agreement. If the Developer does not remove said default(s) within two
(2) weeks of receiving notice; the City may draw on the letter of credit. With City approval the letter
of credit may be reduced from time to time as financial obligations are paid and developer installed
improvements completed to the City's requirements. Upon completion of the Developer
Improvements and Public Infrastructure Improvements, and acceptance of the Public Infrastructure
Improvements by the City, the balance of the security shall be released to the Developer.
11. Grading Plan /Site Grading Site grading shall be completed by the developer at its cost in
accordance with the Plans and approved by the City Engineer. The completion of grading activities
will need to be coordinated by the City in conjunction with the installation of utilities. Developer
shall furnish the City Engineer satisfactory proof of payment for the site grading work and shall
submit a certificate of survey of the development to the City as the site grading is completed by
phase, with street and lot grades. If the installation of utilities is occurring simultaneously with the
grading, the utility contractor shall have preference over the grading activities. No substantial
grading activities can be completed over installed utilities unless otherwise protected. All
improvements to the lots and the final grading shall comply with the grading plan as submitted and
shall be the responsibility of the Developer.
12. License The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a
license to enter the Subject Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the
City during the installation of Public Infrastructure Improvements.
13. Erosion Control Prior to site grading, and before any utility construction is commenced or building
permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected and approved
by the City. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded within
72 hours after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion
control plan, seed shall be rye grass or other fast - growing seed suitable to the existing soil to provide
a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be mulched and disc
4 Rosemount Crossing
10/21/04
Cost
110 %
Landsca in
$75,000
$82,500
Total
Refer to Exhibit A and Exhibit B for an explanation of each item.
The bank and form of the letter of credit or other security shall be subject to the approval of the City
Administrator. The letter of credit shall be automatically renewable until the City releases the
developer from responsibility. The letter of credit shall secure compliance with the terms of this
Agreement and all obligations of the Developer under it. The City may draw down on the letter of
credit without notice if the obligations of the Developer have not been completed as required by this
Agreement. In the event of a default under this Subdivision Agreement by the Developer, the City
shall furnish the Developer with written notice by certified mail of Developers default(s) under the
terms of this Subdivision Agreement. If the Developer does not remove said default(s) within two
(2) weeks of receiving notice; the City may draw on the letter of credit. With City approval the letter
of credit may be reduced from time to time as financial obligations are paid and developer installed
improvements completed to the City's requirements. Upon completion of the Developer
Improvements and Public Infrastructure Improvements, and acceptance of the Public Infrastructure
Improvements by the City, the balance of the security shall be released to the Developer.
11. Grading Plan /Site Grading Site grading shall be completed by the developer at its cost in
accordance with the Plans and approved by the City Engineer. The completion of grading activities
will need to be coordinated by the City in conjunction with the installation of utilities. Developer
shall furnish the City Engineer satisfactory proof of payment for the site grading work and shall
submit a certificate of survey of the development to the City as the site grading is completed by
phase, with street and lot grades. If the installation of utilities is occurring simultaneously with the
grading, the utility contractor shall have preference over the grading activities. No substantial
grading activities can be completed over installed utilities unless otherwise protected. All
improvements to the lots and the final grading shall comply with the grading plan as submitted and
shall be the responsibility of the Developer.
12. License The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a
license to enter the Subject Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the
City during the installation of Public Infrastructure Improvements.
13. Erosion Control Prior to site grading, and before any utility construction is commenced or building
permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected and approved
by the City. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded within
72 hours after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion
control plan, seed shall be rye grass or other fast - growing seed suitable to the existing soil to provide
a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be mulched and disc
4 Rosemount Crossing
10/21/04
anchored as necessary for seed retention.
All basement and/or foundation excavation spoil piles shall be kept completely off City right -of -way
and shall be completely surrounded with an approved erosion control silt fence. Approved erosion
control fencing shall be installed around the perimeter of each lot or at City approved locations at the
time of building permit issuance and remain in place until the lot is seeded or sodded. A 20 -foot
opening will be allowed on each lot for construction deliveries.
The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If development does not
comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the
City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. This right also applies
to the required erosion control for basement and/or foundation excavation spoil piles. The City will
endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so
will not affect the Developer's or City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not
reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within thirty (30) days, the City may
draw down the letter of credit to pay any costs. No development will be allowed and no building
permits will be issued unless the Subject Property is in full compliance with the erosion control
requirements.
14. Planting and Seeding Landscaping shall be in accordance with Landscape Plans approved by the
City Planner.
15. Clean up . The Developer shall clean streets of dirt and debris that has resulted from construction
work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. The City will inspect the site on a weekly basis and
determine whether it is necessary to take additional measures to clean dirt and debris from the
streets. After 24 hours verbal notice to the Developer, the City will complete or contract to complete
the clean up at the Developer's expense in accordance with the procedures specified in Paragraph 13.
The Developer shall inspect and if necessary clean all catch basins, sumps, and ponding areas of
erosion/siltation and restore to the original condition at the end of home construction within this
development. All silt fence and other erosion control should be removed following the
establishment of turf. These items are to be secured through the letter of credit as is noted in Exhibit
A.
16. Ownership of Improvements Upon completion and City acceptance of the work and
construction required by this Agreement, the Public Infrastructure Improvements lying within
public rights -of -way and easements shall become City property without further notice or action.
Upon completion of the Public Infrastructure Improvements, the City shall, upon request, deliver a
letter to Developer acknowledging acceptance of the Public Infrastructure Improvements by the
City.
17. Warranty The Developer warrants all work required to be performed by it against poor material
and faulty workmanship for a period of two (2) years after its completion and acceptance by the
City. All trees, grass and sod shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality and disease free for
twelve (12) months after planting.
5 Rosemount Crossing
10/21/04
18. Responsibility for Costs
A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the
City in conjunction with the development of the Subject Property including, but not limited
to, Soil and Water Conservation District charges, legal, planning, engineering and inspection
expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the subdivision and the
plat, the preparation of this Agreement and any amendments hereto, and all costs and
expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the Subject
Property.
B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made
by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat or
subdivision approval and development of the Subject Property. The Developer shall
indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages or expenses which
the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorney's fees.
C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the preparation and enforcement
of this Agreement, including engineering and attorney's fees. The estimated City fees of
$23,310 shall be deposited with the City at the time this Agreement is signed, and represent
the following estimates:
$15,000 Engineering Fees
$ 2,500 Attorney Fees
$ 5,000 5% City Fees
$ 360 Street Light Energy Cost
450 Seal Coating
$23,310
If the City fees exceed this estimate, the Developer shall pay the additional costs to the City
within 10 days of the request.
D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred
under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time,
the City may halt development work and construction including, but not limited to, the
issuance of building permits for lots which the Developer may or may not have sold, until the
bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of
nine percent (9 %) per year.
E. The Developer shall pay all energy costs for street lights installed within the Subject Property
for 24-months at a cost of $5 /month/light. After that, the City will assume the energy costs.
F. The Developer will pay the cost of sealcoating the streets within the development at a cost of
$0.60 /SY. The sealcoating will be completed within two (2) years following wear course
placement.
6 Rosemount Crossing
10/21/04
19. The following fees, charges and assessments shall be payable at the time of issuance of building
permits by the applicants for such permits for construction of buildings on the individual lots
designated in the plat:
A. Park Dedication fees in the amount of $64,701.
B. Geographic Information System (GIS) fees in the amount of $791.
C. Storm Sewer Trunk Area Charges in the amount of $27,357.
D. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Area Charges in the amount of $7,297.
E. Watermain Trunk Area Charges in the amount of $28,828.
Or such other amounts for such fees as in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
The above fees, charges and assessments totaling $128,974, shall be allocated and payable with
respect to each of the lots, as follows:
LOT 1: Park Dedication $19,112
GIS $ 234
Storm Sewer Trunk $ 8,332
Sanitary Sewer Trunk $ 2,155
Watermain Trunk $ 8,515
LOT 2: Park Dedication $ 6,764
GIS $ 83
Storm Sewer Trunk $ 2,055
Sanitary Sewer Trunk $ 763
Watermain Trunk $ 3,014
LOT 3: Park Dedication $12,047
GIS $ 147
Storm Sewer Trunk $ 4,741
Sanitary Sewer Trunk $ 1,359
Watermain Trunk $ 5,367
LOT 4: Park Dedication $26,780
GIS $ 327
Storm Sewer Trunk $12,230
Sanitary Sewer Trunk $ 3,020
Watermain Trunk $11,932
Refer to Exhibit B for additional explanation of each item.
20. Developer understands that builders will be required to pay for the Subject Property the fees, charges
and assessments in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. The rates for each of these
7 Rosemount Crossing
10/21/04
items will be set according to the current rate structure at the time the building permit is received.
The fees, charges, and assessments in effect as of this agreement are:
A. Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Availability Charges per SAC unit (current
rate is $1,350).
B. Storm Sewer Connection Charges per commercial rates (currently at $1,525 /acre).
C. Sanitary Sewer Availability Charges per SAC unit (currently at $1,125 /SAC unit).
D. Water Availability Charges per water meter size.
21. Building Permits No occupancy permits shall be issued until:
A. The site grading is completed and approved by the City.
B. All public utilities are tested, approved by the City Engineer, and in service.
C. All curbing for public streets and for any parking or driveway improvements on the
individual lot for which the occupancy permit is requested is installed and backfilled.
D. The first lift of bituminous for public streets and for any parking or driveway improvements
on the individual lot for which the occupancy permit is requested is in place and approved by
the City.
C. All building permit fees are paid in full.
F. No early building permits will be issued.
The Developer, in executing this Agreement, assumes all liability and costs for damage or delays,
incurred by the City, in the construction of public improvements, caused by the Developer, its
employees, contractors, subcontractors, materialmen or agents. No occupancy permits shall be
issued until the public streets and utilities referred to in paragraph 6 and 8 are in and approved by the
City, unless otherwise authorized in writing by the City Engineer.
22. Developer's Default In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be
performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall
promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first
given notice of the work in default, not less than 48 hours in advance. This Agreement is a license
for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a court order for permission to
enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition -to its other remedies,
levy the cost in whole or in part as a special assessment against the Subject Property, provided the
City shall first give Developer notice of the amount to be levied and the opportunity to pay such
amount within thirty (30) days of receipt of such notice. Developer waives its rights to notice of
hearing and hearing on such assessments and its right to appeal such assessments pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.081.
8 Rosemount Crossing
10/21/04
23. Miscellaneous
A. The Developer represents to the City that the development of the Subject Property, the
subdivision and the plat comply with all city, county, metropolitan, state and federal laws and
regulations including, but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances and
environmental regulations. If the City determines that the subdivision or the plat or the
development of the Subject Property does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to
allow construction or development work on the Subject Property until the Developer does
comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance.
B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement.
C. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of
building permits, including lots sold to third parties.
D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phase of this Agreement is
for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portion of this Agreement.
E. If building permits are issued prior to the completion and acceptance of public
improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in
of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer,
its contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, employees, agents or third parties.
F. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the
provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing,
signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's
failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or
release.
G. This Agreement shall run with the land and maybe recorded against the title to the property.
The Developer shall take such steps, including execution of amendments to this Agreement,
as are necessary to effect the recording hereof. After the Developer has completed the
Developer Improvements and,the Public Infrastructure Improvements, at the Developer's
request, the City will execute and deliver to the Developer a release.
H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to
every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to
the City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power
and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so exciting may be exercised from time to time as
often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of
the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right,'power or remedy.
9 Rosemount Crossing
10/21/04
L The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the written permission of the City
Council.
24. Notices Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to
the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the
following address:
Rosemount Real Estate Investors, LLC
Attn: David L Kordonowy
3610 County Road 101
Wayzata, MN 55391
Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or
mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: City
Administrator, Rosemount City Hall, 2875 145 Street West, Rosemount, Minnesota 55068.
10
Rosemount Crossing
10/21/04
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the day and year first above
written.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
BY:
William H. Droste, Mayor
BY
Linda Jentink, City Clerk
ROSEMOUNT REAL ESTATE INVESTORS LLC
BY:
Its
BY:
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA
) SS
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,
2004, by William H. Droste, Mayor, and Linda Jentink, City Clerk, of the City of Rosemount, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by
its City Council.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,
2004 by and , the
and of Rosemount Real Estate, Investors LLC, a limited
liability company, on behalf of the said limited liability company.
Drafted By:
City of Rosemount
2875145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Notary Public
11
Rosemount Crossing
10/21/04
EXHIBIT A
The following clarifies the various portions of the letter of credit for Developer Improvements that are
outlined in the Subdivision Agreement:
Grading & Erosion Control — A restoration and erosion control bond to ensure revegetation and erosion
control ($3,500 /acre). Note: The minimum bond amount is set at $25,000.
Pond Restoration/Erosion Removal — A security to allow for cleaning of sedimentation ponds prior to City
acceptance and removing any installed erosion control measures such as silt fence and woodfiber blanket
following development of 75 percent of adjoining lots (estimated Lump Sum).
Survey Monumentation — An amount equal to 110% of the cost to monument all lots within the
development.
Landscaping — An amount equal to 110% of the cost to complete the minimum required landscaping. If
additional landscaping is planned, a bond for that cost is not required.
Retaining Walls — An amount equal to 110% of the cost to complete the retaining wall construction.
Street Li ting - An amount equal to 110% of the cost to complete the minimum required lighting. If
additional lighting is planned, a bond for that cost is not required ($4,000 per light has been used to calculate
this cost).
Buffer Monumentation - An amount equal to 110% of the cost to manufacture and install the necessary
buffer monumentation signs around all ponds and wetlands ($50 per sign has been used to calculate this
cost).
Park Equipment — An amount equal to 110% of the cost of improvements agreed upon to be completed in
the park areas.
Wetland Monitoring - An amount equal to 110% of the cost to hire a wetland specialist to monitor the
mitigation areas for 5 years to ensure their proper creation. This wetland specialist will be hired by the City.
Wetland Restoration/Mitigation — An amount equal to 110% of the cost to develop new wetlands should the
mitigation not be effective ($20,000 per acre of mitigation).
12 Rosemount Crossing
10/21/04
ATTACHMENT ONE
(Legal Description)
Marian Terrace excepting therefrom that part now platted as Marian Terrace Replat and also
excepting therefrom that part now platted as MarianTerrace Replat 2 nd Addition, according to the
plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County of
Dakota and State of Minnesota.
Together that portion of public lands vacated in Document No. 11942 filed June 21, 1955, which
accrue to subject premises.
13 Rosemount Crossing
10/21/04
ROSEMOUNT CROSSING
W
y iL
hia'21AN TERRACE ;.;•; -;, REPLAf
p= 2ND I �L _t I Ajl)flj0N
EXC �pl EXCEPTION
$3A� E%CEPnIX+ eo BL.^CK a � sor la' pppp��
S 6 BLOCK 1 " " uoinu+ �333� W I Z
r�4 303.20 s. N89 . 29'34 "E �� 3 1218 � smu OLj N
� 12 .71 d8 _ate -- Il ng. �Y <•J6 f ��iso z C�
N, .. pi
* <� CAMERO
bO� S63 'S]'39'E' EXCEPTION
1 239.13
0-
.. 45.95 ° 23'35'38" W
a3.� _ � a` \ I I /// W E
� 1 I si rta � °r un � 4 Mµ`i�✓
I 4
48 I 4% soxe so 1w
$
q i
la:� '�Xs y 59 r t
54 I Cib' I 56 I I 57 I 58 I A
X EAST 154.19
tr i I
25
n
n
a
`�
ry , •4'
56. 3 a 1
1 66 I 55 E4 I 63 I 52 I 61 60 .t
3]S _L _ _569 '44'W '
�L 7 e.ome. V,o+'n n ape m p� vpl IMF M euael 4
�,- IUM 91FE eeM9 a arumM 6Mne e/ Nee•]e'N'L
s ibOT ST EET WEST " �' . - op t. m.m„„
3 s. uxc o N m•.c, la • n pu m m m. p1
: ma mmNa N 9.E} xe. le6H
3 S 89 W
� 5,.4,H MI.. 42
( 15� S; RE. T ME-ST) SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.
ENGINEERS * SURVEYORS * PLANNERS
SOIL TESTING * ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
SHEET 2 OF 2 ;WFFTS
e"
1 -i
°sa x
3�
V
rr
W
N
0
m
Z
0
m
0
v
N
I
a
° 8 � m �� c m 4E: 2 a, 9> A6i9g 4 $
�T 6R9g mss �$ "g 2 mg �98 F> o
gi n
U u
Ma _"
x$39 el �S s $" � g= $� ° o R $m
€ $ I $ ce 9 F Q9 MA.- ��� � �a�� � EN E 7 ��
4F
a 5 °
1 " ,
q rR`4VC � Q4 ��� e = �„
i po a
3 �
N .
�CAMEIL
LANE
m "
r:
� I
o I ,
a ,
s > P g R
�a 01 P :
s
s
i
M�
nF
n $ °
z $ ROSEMOUNT CROSSING INC "
I SCHOELL & MAOSON,
i ROSEMOUNT,MN °,a "E�tS • SINh4Y0R5 •'
Y ax m ° "' ���EL�ER
Z
Sow rES,wc• nYw,w+uwru.s
g GRADING, DRAINAGE & — ®— 105°° 80 "fl""n•'
Ste
.
9
lift,
PLAN "'° a
is �omx�r:rswmw
gm
gg1 1
9
se�_
W
Q�Q
q R 14
3
N .
�CAMEIL
LANE
m "
r:
� I
o I ,
a ,
s > P g R
�a 01 P :
s
s
i
M�
nF
n $ °
z $ ROSEMOUNT CROSSING INC "
I SCHOELL & MAOSON,
i ROSEMOUNT,MN °,a "E�tS • SINh4Y0R5 •'
Y ax m ° "' ���EL�ER
W
Sow rES,wc• nYw,w+uwru.s
g GRADING, DRAINAGE & — ®— 105°° 80 "fl""n•'
Ste
.
EROSION CONTROL
lop I
Deve ment, nc.
PLAN "'° a
is �omx�r:rswmw
CONSTRUCTION NO7ES
1. I puMROxA A W tK:;lws•ux w,xPxw .wo .Nwwc tArwT
u EW,n ,FRxr Au '
'
-
.:E°: RPM "ie o :TAG D "ae
CYxNECTexS
Ul YTAIiv went SHALL BE PESTMMp w A¢g9µ¢ wTN TW Ott
¢ RalFUOUxT SPECM4T01If Axp 9uROw0 RFANT RtwIAOWxrs.
a n � oAw�Aw�¢iroAV.n Aero ¢u /Ar... n vs 3
3
/Aiu,e a
a,v -im io tl
¢, T¢i NTAS Axp OnxR ,xRUSr PdxTf
alai et s rRO"" T ¢n w rnm coxcA LE RucTlGx BAFxwO cx WEeA we
Au wAmuwx sH x wsuLlE. wTx w wwnw IF r.s• mxEA ANO i
i
1. T
m9
o
5[RM CroIP,L7E0 NAM xv-iA. SMALLdWwFCW0 Ax0 m
I <q E
EAS[xpil
6< e' un s' vC -]] uxIES9 xOm i
i
Exr IF 1
yyr
AOWO FR.K FoR cd+cRCiE Waa aP sAxx
`� tt ronExw¢ un AFPAM
wE°AP°w1°s w n,s µo waeoNAre .wr`eECUism o,r
wYECTMS MF.EEe Fox Ott A¢VTµ¢. ,
,LV6 � '�+
FWAL uµx SNAIL BE TWw R. dAYE,FA`CK
un v M , Ap,NSxtAµXIXfS M AS,u 4 A
xA A
BENCHMARK
w 9
O-1-- 98093 ITN (G�, xl Re eve— .—)
1 BL:CK. 9
I
n
3
O AD 80 120
SCALE IN FEET
"x+.,,, LEGEND
�A41w. P, OENDTES BOUNDARY NNE
- _- __ -__ - -_ OENOlES ORAMAOf /UTWTY EASEMENT
y� < DENOTES EASING STORK SEWER
DENOTES PROP05E0 ST— SEWER
i)ENOTES EIGSTING - TERNA.
/ wv.95 ID I DENOTES PROPOSED AK
p ID � <--- pENOTES EA51wG SANITARY SEWER
I DENOTEs PROPOSE. —T—Y sE—
E,,,,, DENOTES EASING BIIILpNO
O DENOTES PROPOSED BLRLOwG
/ O W ...'Es EAIS,NG sTORW .—ou:/ EB
—0TES PROPOSED ST¢iN MANHOLE/ G
IT / DENOTES PRDPO M / FES W/WPRAP
% O pE MI fASiwI SANITARY NA--
�RAq.v]E.99
9 / • pfNOlES PROPOSEp SANITAPY NANH¢E
/ OEN01ETi PROPOSED HYDRANT
wI9 %ex H DENOTES PROPOSED GATE VALVF
/ pE—S EAISTNG HYDTANT
i
A
TEAV-
.A. vK
I
l
i
e»MS /
WARNING
THE CONIRACT¢1 SHAD TACT ALL PUBLIC
UTNTES Fw LOUnoxs of ALL w+DERFnouNO DARES.
cAMS. CO )$w PIPES. MANHOLES. VA ,,% OR
o"J, ..CD SMMIEE BETORE D-I.. HE SHALL
REPAIR OR REPLAa THE ABO\E — —DID) DURING
CONSTROCTON AT NO COST TO OWNER.
S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 60172 -080
Plan C
F
G!
xY — • R.ex C.,
�9W I
wv:i: w
U
I S~ •1
O
Di
yy �ig 3 � t I �
FE
RR ,�
U
= a g
O �
C7
V
z
qq J
CL
u7 :3
O � �
R 9- s,�o. KVxu15
DRAM BY
DATE T— a -IO -oR
C4
SHEET
1 .
A
TEAV-
.A. vK
I
l
i
e»MS /
WARNING
THE CONIRACT¢1 SHAD TACT ALL PUBLIC
UTNTES Fw LOUnoxs of ALL w+DERFnouNO DARES.
cAMS. CO )$w PIPES. MANHOLES. VA ,,% OR
o"J, ..CD SMMIEE BETORE D-I.. HE SHALL
REPAIR OR REPLAa THE ABO\E — —DID) DURING
CONSTROCTON AT NO COST TO OWNER.
S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 60172 -080
Plan C
F
G!
xY — • R.ex C.,
�9W I
wv:i: w
U
I S~ •1
O
Di
yy �ig 3 � t I �
FE
RR ,�
U
= a g
O �
C7
V
z
qq J
CL
u7 :3
O � �
R 9- s,�o. KVxu15
DRAM BY
DATE T— a -IO -oR
C4
SHEET
1 .
WARNING
THE CONIRACT¢1 SHAD TACT ALL PUBLIC
UTNTES Fw LOUnoxs of ALL w+DERFnouNO DARES.
cAMS. CO )$w PIPES. MANHOLES. VA ,,% OR
o"J, ..CD SMMIEE BETORE D-I.. HE SHALL
REPAIR OR REPLAa THE ABO\E — —DID) DURING
CONSTROCTON AT NO COST TO OWNER.
S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 60172 -080
Plan C
F
G!
xY — • R.ex C.,
�9W I
wv:i: w
U
I S~ •1
O
Di
yy �ig 3 � t I �
FE
RR ,�
U
= a g
O �
C7
V
z
qq J
CL
u7 :3
O � �
R 9- s,�o. KVxu15
DRAM BY
DATE T— a -IO -oR
C4
SHEET
1 .
:a
`3
o�
�S
Fa
I
CANEI
LANI
"
a�
C
d
m
dim
E
0
0
0
N
I
O
of
o�
�v
gs
go
FR
:2911:00:1111 HIM I
R
Q
7 g`a I
R
ogeF m$ H. afi s: `a; a 'mF >a m�a
�£ € s t� �^ ° 9 A F� - °da
o��
R
>?�
o ^'o
A5$ F s Y
u
g " a MA 9 °gig
a3s
sAa 5 5A : 5 a ? am Ss
'� ixuur cwnn OWNER /DEVELOPER
§° s ROSEMOLTW CROSSING SCNOELL & MAO50N, INC. "� "m w
ROSEMOi1NT, MN °�"'� • suw°AS_ •1M6 ° "` n "'E °""159'" Steiner
—L _ mY. resnne • owwoluwru sources ,�s�
PRELIMINARY 090 W"ZT" �""" T
Development, Inc.
LANDSCAPE PLAN
n tea,. "x.n.na,u.a
'a
I-
m
n �y
A
$ s �
�I�I 1
191 @
@IIG
R
Q
7 g`a I
R
ogeF m$ H. afi s: `a; a 'mF >a m�a
�£ € s t� �^ ° 9 A F� - °da
o��
R
>?�
o ^'o
A5$ F s Y
u
g " a MA 9 °gig
a3s
sAa 5 5A : 5 a ? am Ss
'� ixuur cwnn OWNER /DEVELOPER
§° s ROSEMOLTW CROSSING SCNOELL & MAO50N, INC. "� "m w
ROSEMOi1NT, MN °�"'� • suw°AS_ •1M6 ° "` n "'E °""159'" Steiner
—L _ mY. resnne • owwoluwru sources ,�s�
PRELIMINARY 090 W"ZT" �""" T
Development, Inc.
LANDSCAPE PLAN
n tea,. "x.n.na,u.a
'a
I-
m
n �y
A
$ s �
W GENERAL NOTES
1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS ON PROPERTY WITH THE
GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND BY CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (651- 454 -0002) PRIOR TO
STAKING PLANT LOCATIONS.
2. COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATIONS WITH OTHER
CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE.
3. WHERE EXISTING TREES AND /OR SIGNIFICANT SHRUB MASSINGS ARE FOUND ON SITE'.
WHETHER SHOWN ON THE DRAWING OR NOT, THEY SHALL BE PROTECTED AND SAVED
UNLESS NOTED TO BE REMOVED AND /OR ARE IN AN AREA TO BE GRADED, ANY OUESTION
REGAROING WHETHER PLANT MATERIAL SHOULD REMAIN OR NOT SHALL BE BRCUGHT TO
THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO REMOVAL.
4. ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN TO BE FERTILIZED AND PRUNED TO REMOVE DEAD WOOD
AND DAMAGED OR RUBBING BRANCHES.
S. BB TREES AND SHRUBS ARE BALLED AND BURLAPED.
6. NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED
OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ME
SUBMISSION OF A BID AND /OR QUOTATION.
T. ALL PLANT A
M TERIAL SHALL CCMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION THE AMERICAN
STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN.
6. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ON -GOING MAINTENANCE OF ALL NEWLY INSTALLED
WHCH I MAY O CCUR PRIOR TO OMER AC
ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE A RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE
INSPECTION.
10. WARRANTY FOR LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SHALL BEGIN ON THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AFTER THE COMPLETION OF PLANTING OF ALL LANDSCAPE
MATERIALS. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED.
It CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE NEW PUNT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR
FROM THE DATE OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE WITH ALL REPLACEMENTS TO BE PROVIDED AT NO
ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.
24' WOOD STAKE SET
M PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS
1. PLANTING BED PREPARATION: ALL MASS PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM
DEPTH OF 10 AMENDMENTS SHALL BE APPLIED AFTER CULTIVATION.
2. BACKFILL SOIL: USE SOIL EXCAVATED. FROM PLANTING HOLES AND PROVIDE AMENDMENTS.
REMOVE ALL DEBRIS INCLUDING ROCKS LARGER THAN 3" DIAMETER,
3. FERTILIZATION: ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH
DRIED BONE MEAL OR OMER SPECIFIED FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER
THE MANUFACTURER'S WSTRUCTIONS. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
4. MULCH MATERIAL: AS SPECIFIED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. MASS MULCH ALL PLANTING
BEDS TO 3' DEPTH OVER FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER. ALL PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS TO
RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH 'WITH NO FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER. ALL
EVERGREEN AND DECIDUOUS TREES TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH
WIN No MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. -
5. TREE STAKING: IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO STAKE AND /OR GUY
THE TREES ACCORDING TO THE DETAILS. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S PESPONSIBILITY TO TAKE
EVERY STEP NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN THE TREES AND SHRUBS IN AN UPRIGHT AND PLUMB
CONDITION AT ALL TIMES UNTIL THE END OF THE PLANT GUARANTEE PERIOD ESPECIALLY
WHERE VANDALISM, SOIL OR WIND CONDITIONS ARE A PROBLEM.
6. TREE WRAPPING: WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE QUALITY, HEAVY WATERPROOF CREPE
PAPER MANUFACTURED FOR THIS PURPOSE. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE
FALL PRIOR TO 12 -1 AND REMOVE ALL WRAPPING AFTER S -1.
7. RODENT PROTECTION: PROVIDE ON ALL TREES. EXCEPT SPRUCE UNLESS OTHERWISE
SPECIFIED.
S. PLANTING PLAN: ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE LOCATED CAREFULLY AS SHOWN ON THE
PLANS. PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES
EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. RESPECT STATED DIMENSIONS.
00 NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.
9. EDGING: EDGING SHALL BE 4" P.V.C. COMMERCIAL GRADE EDGING WITH THREE (3) METAL
ANCHOR STAKES PER 20 FOOT SECTION. ALL MASS PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE EDGING.
PLACED BETWEEN MULCH AREA AND ANY ADJACENT TURF AREA.
10. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE THOROUGHLY WATERED TWICE 'DURING THE FIRST 24 -HOUR
PERIOD AFTER INSTALLATION. ALL PLANTING SHALL BE THEN WATERED WEEKLY. OR MORE IF
NECESSARY. DURING THE FIRST GROWING SEASON.
11. ALL PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO RECEIVE A 3' LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH.
OVER FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
W CONIFEROUS TREE
NOTES:
CONIFER TO HAVE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
NO MULCH TO BE IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK.
SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PUNTING.
TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE ILLUSTRATED,
IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES: HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE
GUARANTEE PERIOD.
PLACE ROOT COLLAR AT OR JUST ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.
W PLANTING NOTES
I. NO PLANTING TO BE INSTALLED UNTIL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED
IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.
2. ALL PLANT MATERIAL LOCATIONS MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANY AND ALL DIGGING,
3. IF ME LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PERCEIVES ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT 'SELECTIONS.
SOIL CONDITIONS. OR ANY OTHER SITE CONDITION WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT
PLANT MATERIAL ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL, OR GUARANTEE, THEY SHALL BRING THESE
DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION,
4. AOJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD,
SHOULD AN ADJUSTMENT BE ADVISED. THE LANDSCAPE. ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED.
S. ALL PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER PLANTING DETAILS,
6. ONE SHRUB PER TYPE AND SIZE IN EACH PLANTING BED AND EVERY TREE SHALL BE CLEARLY
IDENTFIED COMMON OR LATIN NOMENCLATURE) WITH A PLASTIC TAG WHICH SHALL NOT BE
REMOVED P TOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE.
7. WHERE SOD /SEED ABUTS PAVED SURFACES. FINISHED GRADE OF SOD /SEED SHALL BE HELD
I' BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL. SLAB, CURB. ETC.
6. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS, ON
SLOPES STEEPER MAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, ME SOD SHALL BE STAKED TO THE
GROUND.
9. SEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING OTHER THAN THOSE AREAS NOTED TO
RECEIVE SOD.
10. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO THE
OWNER.
Ti.. ALL PIANRNO AREAS VALL RECEIVE B" OF t SpK Aw0 9HaLL BE FREE OF CMUMNANTS
p INVASIK SEEDS.
=IRRIGATION NOTES
1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A SHOP DRAWING
ILLUSTRATING AN IRRIGATION PLAN AND SPECIFICATION AS PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK
WHEN BIDDING. THESE SHALL BE RENEWED BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO ORDERING
2. VERIFY EXISTING/PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM LOCATION.
3. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ALL SOD AND PLANTING AREAS INDICATED ON PLAN SHALL
BE 100% IRRIGATED. THE IRRIGATION SHALL INCLUDE THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY BETWEEN
PROPERTY LINE AND BACK OF CURB WHERE NEW LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ARE
PROPOSED.
4. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT ALL
SOD AND PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSE AREA
DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION.
S. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A WATERING/LAWN
IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANT
MATERIAL GROWTH REOUREMENTS.
M SHRUB
16" POLYPROPYLENE OR
POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL,
1 -1/2' WIDE STRAP TYR)
B' -0" STEEL STAKE
RAGGING - ONE PER WIRE
ROOTS LL TO SIT ON
SUBGRAOE
MULCH - 4" DEEP
SHREDDED BARK (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE)
PLANTING SOIL - SEE SPEC.
2" X 24" WOOD STAKE
AT ANGLE
Fa
NOTE:
THE HOLE FOR PLANTING MUST BE AT LEAST
TWICE THE WIDTH OF THE ROOT BALL
ALL TREES TO BE PLANTED WITH THE ROOT COLLAR
LEVEL OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE GRADE.
NOTE:
HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF
CONTAINERIZED MATERIAL (TYP.)
SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF
HOLE PRIOR } T CL
O
ABOEEFINpSHEO GRAOET OR JUST
SHRUBS TO SR ON SUBGRAOE
MULCH - 3" DEEP SHREDDED BARK
(UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE)
IANOSCAP FABRIC - SEE SPEC,
PLANTING SOIL - SEE SPEC
4" P.V.C, EDGING
REFER TO PUN FOR GROUND
COVER
SUBGRADE
CENTERING OF SHRUB IN BED
TO TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER
DIMENSION FROM EDGE.
NOTE:
THE HOLE FOR PLANTING MUST BE AT LEAST
TWICE THE WIDTH OF THE ROOT BALL.
ALL SHRUBS TO BE PLANTED. WITH THE ROOT COLLAR WARNING
LEVEL OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE GRADE. WC CONTRACTOR SHALL GONTACT ALL PUBLIC URLRIES
MR LO TIONS OF ALL UNOERK -10 WIRES. CABLES,
CONOURS, PIPES, MANHOLES. VµVE4, OR OMER BURIED
SNAKNIAES BEFORE OICORIG. HE SHALL REPNR OR
REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN OAMAOEO OUMNO
CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO OWNER.
DECIDUOUS TREE
NOTE:
TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF
TREE STAKING ARE ILLUSTRATED
IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION
TO STAKE TREES: HOWEVER, THE
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB
POSITION THROUGHOUT THE
GUARANTEE PERIOD.
SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF
HOLE T I NG
QPRIOR
r
ABOVE FIN GRAOET OR JUST
DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE -
4STAKE
3' O 120' INTERVALS (TYP.)
16" POLYPROPYLENE OR
POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL, 1 -1/2"
WADE STRAP TIP.)
TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH
FLAGGING -ONE PER PARE
ROOTSALL TO SIT ON SUBGRADE
EDGE' BARN
lE NGNOaTFiO OE
VA TE
�
A`�
U_ 9
Z UCH !2
O
l S 3
i p qp
:3
0�3W
gg S
U TTpIIp99RRTT
Z�
N .�
O
J
O
N '9 a
77
( 1�
T2 J
Lu
W La
a
0 Z Q _
W 5�5 (n
LLI Z
Z
a_j
ADAS-
DRAWN SY
wTE IssuEp a -Ip -o.
L2
Wf£f
S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 60172 -080
NOTE:
THE HOLE FOR PLANTING MUST BE AT LEAST
TWICE THE MOTH OF THE ROOT BALL
ALL TREES TO BE PLANTED WITH THE ROOT COLLAR
LEVEL OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE GRADE.
I
7 1 - I L - i n
6� S.
WARNING
• CONTRACTOR TO SUB- SHOP DRAWWG OF ELECTT M /UGHTING
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL ft— mm
mm�
� ii .Ip
WALL PACK LIGHT FIXTURES
REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN 1-11 1FIND
COHE.UCDON AT NO COST TO OWNER.
d
N
• FIN ADJUSTMENTS OF L AND SUBMISSKN OF
a 1,
W 1e 1. p
• L fI
is 6
1,' TA t
Lpp'
�a�og�s
(SEE E SSP PECS.) RA
RAOIVS MIN
LEVEGDE CH 9S'
G
IT WRn 9LY BEND
(SEE SPECS)
"
D
WAR. OF RASE
\ I
a -4] HES EDUALLY
�a
/
4 i 6
8' -0' SPACED
0.1
IT
t tk
�
GROUND ROD (SEE SPECS.)
B
L
t
to p l •
❑ I L
]' FI%TVNE BASE (PARKING L01 FlMUREI
eu• / � L I
,
6 J ¢p rc�.a i
M 4 uuBa■
T:!
IM
CK.. � NO.
• ����� fl:��
':� Lit
• PROVIDE I' P 6 /10 AWG UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
WARNING
• CONTRACTOR TO SUB- SHOP DRAWWG OF ELECTT M /UGHTING
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL ft— mm
mm�
� ii .Ip
WALL PACK LIGHT FIXTURES
REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN 1-11 1FIND
COHE.UCDON AT NO COST TO OWNER.
d
N
• FIN ADJUSTMENTS OF L AND SUBMISSKN OF
MS�E�
Lpp'
�a�og�s
(SEE E SSP PECS.) RA
RAOIVS MIN
LEVEGDE CH 9S'
G
IT WRn 9LY BEND
(SEE SPECS)
"
D
WAR. OF RASE
a -4] HES EDUALLY
CK.. � NO.
.1`C
• CONTRACTOR TO PLACE UNDERGROUND CONOUCTONS IN PVC
• PROVIDE I' P 6 /10 AWG UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
WARNING
• CONTRACTOR TO SUB- SHOP DRAWWG OF ELECTT M /UGHTING
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL ft— mm
PLAN FOR APPROVAL
FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL UNCENGNOUNp WWES, CABLES
COHOLETS, PIPES, I'ANNOLES VALM. OR OTHER BURNED
STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. HE 5— REPAIR OR
WALL PACK LIGHT FIXTURES
REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN 1-11 1FIND
COHE.UCDON AT NO COST TO OWNER.
LIGHT' TYPES: F
�j
i
BG'
■ E ■IB /
�IQI �1 P
99 gg _! IGr7 .
QQ�Q
No
�� ■�
PARK
6. LOT FIXURES TO BE
i+)I)lar>sl
LIGHTING NOTES
• CONTRACTOR TO PLACE UNDERGROUND CONOUCTONS IN PVC
• PROVIDE I' P 6 /10 AWG UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
CONWR.
• CONTRACTOR TO SUB- SHOP DRAWWG OF ELECTT M /UGHTING
• ELECTRIC. CONTRACTOR TO 52E CONOUCTDRS AND PREPARE
CIRCUIT PLAN,
PLAN FOR APPROVAL
• ELECTR C. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE PHOTO CELL
• PAW E SEPARATE CONDUR MW CRCUR - NON.— SIGN.
FROM HOUSE PANEL FOR EACH RESPEORVE SEN.
CONTACNRS WMERS AND COMPLETE SYSTEM FOR OWNER TO
AuTOMI.TICALLY OR MANUALLY CONTRW LIGHT FUNCDO N$.
PROVIDE LIGHT POLE 80.5E PER DETAIL.
N
• FIN ADJUSTMENTS OF L AND SUBMISSKN OF
AS -SALTS SWILL BE THE RESPDNSBEUTY OF THE ELECTRICAL
CONTRACTOR.
Numeric Summa ALI
cl: M Pre acla ARCHRE -- LIGHTING DES IN'.NC.
Label Cek2 a ANTHONY LANE
3920
Av Mln Me. Mm Sr. ANTHONY, MN SS4T6
fllumlrmnce R 0.61 1 F. 0.00 0.00 611- 252 -4100 613- 251 -4141 1..
GISCLAIMER CONTACT: SCOTT HARNES
,
rot c
LIGHT X LIGHT FIXTURE iM1eQ
T . 0- akmaliene Ara eubaLRUle IN IMepeMenl n .—Hnq ewyeN ALD �,(:.
LIGHT TYPES: A,AA,B.0 by pr t•e 9RIw1 engineer.
1'o •a 1.11l or axner prevel n AAL WJIMmJOk•e:NSJNC
enlea .H Or m NOT n.mree - d1 - ILO enO.n or mlyw Dien a•iaq am '. n -u0
S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 60172 -080
Plan E
V
�-I
. g
� Q� q
U
$•
p �y3
F 3
ai �
U
za
J Iq B.;
W Q ��
O d 4
x
L u l l - ,
z 2
F
Q
U
0� z
W W z
A
° r4 CL CL
RD SKKE
DRAWN .
wri Issu60
L3
HEED
1 r
UG
SEE POLE SPECS
BY
-24"
CONOUR ENO' MUST PROJECT
ER HIG THAN BASE OF POLE
/
COCRAOE
CCUAA`
—UNO NUrs PR- E SPA (SEE SPECS.)
48OLT
(SEE E SSP PECS.) RA
RAOIVS MIN
LEVEGDE CH 9S'
IT WRn 9LY BEND
(SEE SPECS)
"
D
WAR. OF RASE
a -4] HES EDUALLY
8' -0' SPACED
REINFORCING STEEL
/6' x 10' -0' COPPER —
GROUND ROD (SEE SPECS.)
B
]'
GROUND ROD
]' FI%TVNE BASE (PARKING L01 FlMUREI
PUN
NOT To sC
SEE POLE SPECS.
LEVELe1G No"
GENERAL NOTES
I. DESIGN BASED ON:
CONDUT ENDS MUST PROJECT
(A) FIXTURE WDGWNG iqo CBs.
24
HIGNEq LIMN BASE OF POLE
EFFECTNE PROJECTED
6Pa0E
MEA O.0 50. R.
(6) GROUND LNE MOMENT OF:
9.S* RADIUS N.
9500 FT. LDS -29' POLE
]'ABOVE
ANCHOR BOLT'
12500 R USE -35 POLE
GRADE
24 MN. ]6' LENGTH
18000 FT LES. -40' POLE
,
CORD. wITN WI' BEND
(C) ASSUMED SOIL 6M
ENG
OF 2500 PEF.
(SEE SPECS)
2. REINFORCED STEEL
DECORATNE LIGHT FIXTURE
'
b -/] THEE EWKLY
SPACED
DEFORMED TYPE AST. 'ATOS'
NEW MILLET STOCK AST. 'A,"
LIGHT TYPES: D,E
6
TER EDMTE GRADE
A.C.C. BWIS
(SEE SPECS.)
J TOP b' OR ] -b' OF FOODNO SHALL
BE FORMED WIM SWNA TUBE
J•
4 -/6 REINFORC STEEL
SEE SPEC FICiTpNS
W Ik Ni
Pm act a6 Pro
1
4. CONCRET E
c NO Label
MOUNT N IWT
s /6' X 10'D (SIDE CO P P ER—
• . • GROUND ROD (SDE EE SPECS.) )
S-- BE N ]T4]
(MN/DOT SPECIEICAIKIH 2451)
2 A
29'
2a
J
S. FILL PULED AROUND --
EN.L BE COMPACTED IN
{ M
M
ze
UYEBE 6' THIGH OR LESS.
s
M
ze
28
RUSH FIX
R
TURE E RXNRET
NG
9 M
3a
SCIXUiIYE
G
MOUNTED ON ] FOOT XIGH
CONCRETE BASE.
10 M
II M
20
28
12 M
I4 B
2
3J
e
x0 Max
LIGHT PO
is c
io MA
FOUN DATION
I G
zD Max
Lwnlnein ScHetluN
16 D
19
n
II
Pea'em:
s m6R
Pll Pro
01
ems
LObm
wren emen!
Camera
'LLi
OeeeN IIPn - Or
mvetl E 1
Flleneme
23
i I
11
9
]
M
a
BACK- K
NOTE
20000
20W0
0.650
0650
WitleEt. M]M- 25WM -SH
"A". AL]Y- 250MN -4H -NS
aIm255M1. I
mm254M1e.
24
11
II
J
A
s
200
0.650
tleMle AL]M- MH- H
eM153M1. 1
S E
S
D
E
IS
SNCL
S
9500
0 TW
0 O
Wmec S— pemw D - IOOMH -SG] C AM6OV
Lumec Smetl Oemu• 005- IOOUH -SG2 OBC AMbOV
s0 08042JU
s020 0411u
16
2)
11
1{
sIHN
20000
Wrtice 1 I- -2SOMX
uli25u.iN
28
la
2
C
SWGIE
20000
0690
WbMRe AL1M 2 N -JX -NS
ED]I115N .lee
3B
14
Numeric Summa ALI
cl: M Pre acla ARCHRE -- LIGHTING DES IN'.NC.
Label Cek2 a ANTHONY LANE
3920
Av Mln Me. Mm Sr. ANTHONY, MN SS4T6
fllumlrmnce R 0.61 1 F. 0.00 0.00 611- 252 -4100 613- 251 -4141 1..
GISCLAIMER CONTACT: SCOTT HARNES
,
rot c
LIGHT X LIGHT FIXTURE iM1eQ
T . 0- akmaliene Ara eubaLRUle IN IMepeMenl n .—Hnq ewyeN ALD �,(:.
LIGHT TYPES: A,AA,B.0 by pr t•e 9RIw1 engineer.
1'o •a 1.11l or axner prevel n AAL WJIMmJOk•e:NSJNC
enlea .H Or m NOT n.mree - d1 - ILO enO.n or mlyw Dien a•iaq am '. n -u0
S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 60172 -080
Plan E
V
�-I
. g
� Q� q
U
$•
p �y3
F 3
ai �
U
za
J Iq B.;
W Q ��
O d 4
x
L u l l - ,
z 2
F
Q
U
0� z
W W z
A
° r4 CL CL
RD SKKE
DRAWN .
wri Issu60
L3
HEED
1 r
o�
0
3F
F;
3�
CAMEI I
LtNI
_b
ryFS
.
ryO
soxsaousasss��ym�rsa a °—aa—r;N�asa
aox &EgBa� as 5 ;i
'Ir '17 5
3g °98 :
[[s °xRxx
E5�
v i 3 i:E 5343 }ass !$ 3 °o�$o� S$ O3i Si ° $3i3 E i�4ii z°
� �c� � $' 3• i p
M
D
M
O
rn
O
J
N
O
wN All
116 X,
D �
4 4
sa
��mzaP�B$O{,C6 By��ACZA��°,4iRF1 ?*�m�E9E'
° .: E C C L• 8 8 G ::: C C: ,'-. G C C :. ° C' G C 6 C C°
ROSEMOUNT CROSSING �«
OWNER DEVELOPER
�! I SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. W° oW.
— 1 m ROSEMOUNT,MN �NEMS ; " MOPS ' "^* a s Steiner
m TREE PRESERWnON
—�- imeo Wrrt r� ewiuv�wo. sunE i
i s PLAN I IZ>_ Development, Inc.
111E4y°Y W.Pfa4La,f W�
,rePC1.61iv.5.M+4b
a�
W
F
n �
S
g
E M S
9
Rpm
wN All
116 X,
D �
4 4
sa
��mzaP�B$O{,C6 By��ACZA��°,4iRF1 ?*�m�E9E'
° .: E C C L• 8 8 G ::: C C: ,'-. G C C :. ° C' G C 6 C C°
ROSEMOUNT CROSSING �«
OWNER DEVELOPER
�! I SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. W° oW.
— 1 m ROSEMOUNT,MN �NEMS ; " MOPS ' "^* a s Steiner
m TREE PRESERWnON
—�- imeo Wrrt r� ewiuv�wo. sunE i
i s PLAN I IZ>_ Development, Inc.
111E4y°Y W.Pfa4La,f W�
,rePC1.61iv.5.M+4b
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
2875 145TH STREET WEST
ROSEMOUNT. MN 55068 -4997
(651)- 523 -4411
DAKOTA COUNTY
1560 -1590 HWY. 55
HASTINGS, MN 55033
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
MEARS PARK CENTER
230 5TH STREET EAST
ST. PAUL, MN 55101
Mn /00T
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
395 JOHN IRELAND BOULEVARD
ST. PAUL, MN 55155.
VERMILLION RIVER WATERSHED
1560 -1590 HWY. 55
HASTINGS, MN 55033
(952)- 891 -7011
EXCEPTION
li BLOCK 1
W '' 0 LDI 'I
30 .
4 .
_ I
_ pD,xD i
D wa.a w
I AanJ
I jl
°aS au m r� aaa T QW��'s2
I
I Et cvonw� T
a' aS3,i End,x,p �.s.,I a
I _ 9wp x • .
,7
I Au.
.
BD%CHMARN
TW nut -F hydnnl aen9 Camnrim An, m Ulawn.
EI•mtlan � 988.93 bet (aly el Rmempunt OaWm)
/
f y /
/
/
/
i
/
i
/
WARNING
THE COMWM. SHALE CONTACT ALL Pueuc UlIIJ11E5
NR LOCAipNS DE ALL UNDERGRWND WIRES, .6LE5.
CONDUITS. PIPES, NANiq . v.VES, m OMER 9URN:D
STRUCTURES OEM E NO.-. NE $HA11 W., w
REFUGE ME AOl WHEN D AGED DMM '.
CoWR..M AT ND asr W —o.
S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 60172 - 080
wm.bx TION
m I
Plan G
W
Lrr u I Z
r
EXCEPTION 0
3,'W /
n
a
e lo BD ¢o
sa IN rEEr
LEGEND
o - o.ml.a wn Nemm.nt s<t
- o.nae. non Npmm.a EppM
learn - wnpb. cemm
t� - D.ml.. enpmFpp. apnea.
m - mml.a Cpn<rae sw «.
m smner s.w..
�eSLeF - o. el.. storm s.w.r
- "9 - Dsnalee Wol•rmeM
ba U Gnund El— U... , -- -- - D Dmp unax c.emla T.Iegmn< unm
- Deneta
`i - wlmin worn vme<
� - D.nam corn Am cml<.
b - D.nolm P1r. N
I - Denphe Deb voce
� tt - oenetm uqN PpN
O - De,wtes Senner srv.r xax,ae
® - ne„ptee stern se <.r elmu,a<
� - Berotm Catch Beets
° - pme4a Plarea EM Sectbn
anp<e. N Wty �eer
B _ Danpl <. $e9 iwt xacpli•n
— PRRL —_ Denesm Perinnq s.wea. EFe
— —_ Derletm MAnq s.tl,ea.Lw
- Denelea Poal
- Dmpba Wkly Ppb
r 0 7A 7
/ " - Darole Fi1a1F9 Gemllpd Cenleur Llm
/ mra - Demb• E—g Sppl GemUen
nNy9ae. <,
ZpNNG
The cNy el Resemwnl M1m Indkpted Thal Ma au9pct ty b --by
Y�
ed C -A, (D<ndrd CmnnMCa) ulMer Me appllca8le, ianF9 requbtbna.
:7a
=-:g nW4•mmle ntl raalr'slbm <eear_g to Flprmeli°n O,"ded by IM1a
DeDartmmi el a CUy et Reeamaunl
t
�SCRVTIpN
N o Tema- EXCEPn INE 1Nml part nm potted m M T"
mb
m EE
1
R and AL90 E %CEP NG MFAV. Nat Dart now gqplod m No b temps
Replpt and Addlllm, xcaMFq 1p ue plot thvyeel an DIe and el retard F the
Nn�lqS e; qe RegbUm el TUm F ad br aeW Cwnty a Dahpb ad Sbb el
T 935� ° w °r ille� a 1 IO°*.11 ie mooed F Daeuiriml Ne. 11942 Ma June 21,
3
I
C) R
a�
(u
Q) i �
�
�
d t
�G
Ci
Id
0
M
f
z
m Z
O 0
E
U
0 Z
V u`T. L, ZQ
n
C4
w 0-
REV1sIOxs
DMWN By
DATE ISSUED
C1
SIWFT
VICINITY MAP 95
CRY OF ROSEMOUM ` 1 4 a '+ " "`.''
BLOCK I
K
2875 145TH STREET WEST � R; ; •f;! i .. "i2 >!"
ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068 -4997 ND % 1`71 L:, IN LOI I^
r
(651)- 523 -4471 scAtc +r s_.. CQ . A .j�, Z - ,
aa Ro
DAKOTA COUNTY BENCHMARK I •°�• 303.20
Td nxl of 9ydrvnt . DRmbr� Av ® T'B
1560 - 1590 HWY 55 O.wnen . DD93 s m
• t (C.,
HASTINGS, MN 55033
r d•uneenl Oeaml b
D b W =p
BRAINPGE
...A L unlnr
EASEKNr
-
amw 11 8m.
99R9'34'E
THE CDNRU 1 SHILL CONTACT ALL PUBUC -DIES
FOR LOCATIDHS OF ALL UNOERDROUIID MACS, CABLES.
1560 -1590 HWY. 55 .Om r dry) a.mt e
i 33.33
LOr I9
t:
'l
—
5
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
swE IN rEET
'
•w,
I
j
�•/
- EXCEPTION
5 23' }S' }8 W
S 23'
MEARS PARK CENTER
UTILITY OPERATOR CONTACTS
`• vw.a
wr
T
230 5TH STREET EAST
�
4:T 0•ndbe eenirenw •.. ^"`�� D•ndtn Irw Bm.
� • I:<
.�
0
Av
ST. PAUL, MN 55101
Mn /DOT
A ::All Gremgd:
B
W
.y
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
395 JOHN IRELAND BOULEVARD
BE Demtr Be. tlaer
Bu D•nan Be.n OBEB.3
C
#Ar+
ST. PAUL, MN 55155
��
0.1 An UWav EA•a — ar.
•noun Ue•: CH Denet•• C1,._
VERMILLION RIVER WATERSHED
TREE LEOEW
Nana•r mnern9 abbom A a ormm.a amnmrr
Iqn
' 800 (>
m mn.., u.. r.r dbo.. 9raune x.a.n..• e a
°"
`NG
5 00 W
amw 11 8m.
99R9'34'E
THE CDNRU 1 SHILL CONTACT ALL PUBUC -DIES
FOR LOCATIDHS OF ALL UNOERDROUIID MACS, CABLES.
1560 -1590 HWY. 55 .Om r dry) a.mt e
i 33.33
LOr I9
t:
'l
—
5
pONS/RUCRON AT ND COST 10 OWNER.
HASTINGS, MN 550 }} Na b.r tell'e.m n.w. e•n°l.• n, ddm.l.r In r•x
'
•w,
73r orxEp} �
j
�•/
- EXCEPTION
5 23' }S' }8 W
S 23'
/
(952)- 891 -7011 De,ulo a �wem tra. [] D.noas .nNe. -�
%1'
�
4:T 0•ndbe eenirenw •.. ^"`�� D•ndtn Irw Bm.
� • I:<
.�
Av
A ::All Gremgd:
It 1I•'
BE Demtr Be. tlaer
Bu D•nan Be.n OBEB.3
#Ar+
��
0.1 An UWav EA•a — ar.
•noun Ue•: CH Denet•• C1,._
.Ly .
1__ 0. D•netn t" plit
10--I
m o et:: spL A
D
1%..
J
L_L_o0
PROPOSED ZONING:
m.
6
ND SCNE C3- GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
BNnq 10 reel M wMUr eM otlj..
rpnl -dr -way Bru• unto• aiN' . LOT 1 2.002 AC .
intliwlW, mtl b•N9 rrl ',11
dna dejd N., mt pn•., o. 0 an N• pmt. LOT 2 0.575 AC.
LOT 3 1.163 AC.
+•.
LOT 4 2.800 AC.
'�'•
-
DEDICATED PUBLIC R/W 0.848 AC.
DESCRIPTION
. a a:r u. .w �mw . .nr
A l- .r ww9'P:: a . "a w
nd
eim� wm
30.1
n rA.l •e.« rr ae. w .r« a d « «r . I,..: R« .. R. W.A
i
IS KERAL NOTES
tl
23
.. u. r.ro... n w d... I . mm m..r xrs.0 nw.cn, n« ., d..«w •..H. .I s uw «
/j
N a •...m ueH«.• u.r u...weL:.w1w ti� • • I drv° e.,.neaa 1 u..dn u. rorrN• a.dm•
•n.•w�wr. w rur,rarw wn.rr.,, . va.^M pro.�u•M r
...r ,
m
.hen xn +a,
LOT 1
2
r; (rWn...ea..ra aw.aO
R..•
•
.
.•.- b r.n 1•spr .•m «ae mm.+l
DRAINAGE
U TK
I
I
snn.a
wi
AT
EASEx[xT
C
t.
n
(..nw we•.a.r abx0
•.: m in Irpa• .wanrw anexq
u.
LDi e
4^.T 06
I 4
w >�r «r
�M
sl.
W •
.� . e m w a. weed. dro>r,. «I. a. «........•. curl w_ «r.
. 9
w ( rw n°°n. a •I. n r e Iw a•..H�, u• ao r.':, : uwx aw, . e a.d.« u a
w..
m
A, W °rw`o-'w�
PUBLIC
N!
b
0. 37
R
r�ww� .Mew � M.. T •r MewWI MI,•e�Ma t .�. cp r � wxnau« n S
'Idl
•..•e. ..mlrr N - e > .«mw .. .... a.Rx., wl r.ma m. .....wrom«t .r w �
• . A. w. ...«. .r «., •rr.... x•. sm4
1
i
35B 38
5 F
M
154.19
�WIN 1,
2�
S
a. n. n.. a •...n. «r w a.a «n u.l u. xro.v A�... « r.x ..r m.. a a Rr m,. c
C.S.A.H. NO. 42
«.wM I. R..a r•...•.. ..a x u..wNlr n «x w. =mus ams L «xu.s •r w pwa rm«s•m u. y.,q. I S
.n.•w aA,- - ___ - -_ --
° A.... . A. (enx «.rl
r rra
SENCHMARN 1 160TH STREET WEST
T.P nut At hydrant d1r C.Ab A— e
EI.ra1Ml . 980.93 tut (City df R .t Datum) see......�a..�
PRELIMINARY PLAT OFE
e _V 2 ' EXCEPTION ROSEMOUNT CROSSING
_ tar rs U
R•raa
5 00 W
amw 11 8m.
99R9'34'E
THE CDNRU 1 SHILL CONTACT ALL PUBUC -DIES
FOR LOCATIDHS OF ALL UNOERDROUIID MACS, CABLES.
��
i 33.33
LOr I9
t:
'l
—
5
pONS/RUCRON AT ND COST 10 OWNER.
✓1
73r orxEp} �
j
�•/
- EXCEPTION
5 23' }S' }8 W
S 23'
/
Av
D�
/
/
WARNING
}_______.________.W
THE CDNRU 1 SHILL CONTACT ALL PUBUC -DIES
FOR LOCATIDHS OF ALL UNOERDROUIID MACS, CABLES.
LONOUIiS, PPE.. I ANHDIES. VALVES, DR OIHER BLrtIEp
SIRUCi1MF} BEFURE ..-. NE — REPAIR OR
REFUGE THE ABOVE WHEN OANACEO WMNO
pONS/RUCRON AT ND COST 10 OWNER.
S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 60172 -080
�-I
IN
O
Sy �
y�dE
SSS$
zig
y.Y
S
W W �
O
� V
� I
in i
0 J
CJ a
F � }
a
Z
W _J Q
a 0-
REwslaxs
4 Na �R f e�w
DRAmW By
.5m 9 -r3-a
C 2
5110