The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About9.a. Brockway Site Redevelopment - CPDCCITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2004- A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2020 ROSEMOUNT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND APPROVING A CONCEPT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE BROCKWAY SITE WHEREAS, The Planning Department received an application for concept approval of a residential planned unit development to redevelop the Brockway Site on September 24, 2003 for said property legally described as: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 20, Township 115 North, Range 19 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying East of the center line of STH No. 3 (formerly STH No. 218); All of Government Lot 2, said Section 20; That part of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 20 lying East of the center line of said STH No. 3 lying West of the Westerly right -of -way of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad, and lying North and West of the following described line: Commencing at the intersection of the South line of said North Half, Southeast Quarter and said Westerly right -of -way line of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad; thence South 89 degrees 43 minutes 18 seconds West, assumed bearing along said South line 270.47 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 12 degrees 05 minutes 15 seconds West, 357.87 feet; thence North 89 degrees 43 minutes 18 seconds East, 500.28 feet to said Westerly right -of -way line and there terminating. WHEREAS, The Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount conducted a public hearing as required by ordinance for the purpose of receiving public comment regarding the proposed residential planned unit development on October 28, 2003 and again on November 25, 2003; and, WHEREAS, The Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend approval of the concept planned unit development on November 25,, 2003 with conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, The Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the concept Planned Unit Development for the Brockway Site subject to the following conditions: 1. Amending the 2020 Rosemount Comprehensive Plan to reflect the requested land use RESOLUTION 2004- areas as defined by the concept and authorizing staff to prepare the amendment and forward it to the Metropolitan Council. 2. The concept plan shall be revised as follows: a) Aligning driveways and street intersections to eliminate off -set intersections with intervals of less than 250 feet. b) Provision of unrestricted turn- arounds with a minimum turning radius of 45 feet for all dead end common driveways or streets exceeding 150 feet, or as approved by the Rosemount Fire Marshal. c) The Parkway and public streets shall be constructed in accordance with City standards and a minimum of eight feet of boulevard width shall be provided for boulevard trees to eliminate conflicts with curb & gutter, sidewalks and trails. The round -about shall be consistent with applicable standards for minimum turning radius and lane width and shall include ornamental tree plantings and a water fountain in the center to be maintained by a homeowners association. d) In all cases where private streets are 22 ft. wide (or otherwise less than City standards), no parking will be allowed on either side. Common parking areas must be provided in these areas, consistent with the ordinance parking requirements. e) The applicant must utilize a portion of the excess lot depth along the outer edge of the single - family component to create a greenway for trails / sidewalks and buffering the effects of the traffic and dissimilar land uses. f) Single- family lots with setback and lot width reductions shall have front porches or entires as prominent design features and garages shall be setback a minimum of five feet from the front elevation of the house. Most of the houses shall be two - story designs with complementary colors, materials and architectural elements. Minimum materials expectations include low maintenance siding with aluminum trim and brick / stone accents. g) All townhouse units shall have two -car garages consistent with applicable zoning standards. h) Transitions between housing types shall include landscaping to buffer dissimilar housing styles and neighborhoods. The outer edge of the development, particularly along STH 3, Connemara Trail, County Road 38, and the railroad right -of -way shall have increased setbacks consistent with City standards as a minimum for screening the effects of higher traffic volumes and the railroad. Additional landscaping is required in these areas. i) Trails or sidewaolks will be included along collector or arterial streets / highways. Sidewalks or trails are required on both sides of the north -south parkway connecting County Road 38 with Connemara Trail, and on at least one side of all other streets except single - family cul -de -sacs, or private shared dead -end driveways serving less than three buildings. J) The apartment and senior condos shall be limited to three stories in height and have a minimum of 40% brick, or cultured stone and monolithic vertical building RESOLUTION 2004- planes shall be avoided with articulation of dwelling units, windows and balconies. Architectural details such as dormer windows, or similar features shall be used to provide relief of long roof eves. Primary building entrances shall have a variety of design features including separate gables, verandas or canopies creating significant relief (off -sets in excess of six feet). k) Concept approval does not guarantee the number of dwelling units. 1) Incorporation of recommendations by the Parks and Recreation Commission including land dedication of a neighborhood park including active public recreational facilities. Public parking for park uses shall also be provided as recommended by the Parks and Recreation Commission. m) The neighborhood park shall include footpaths, a picinic area, overlook view area and golf course facilities shall be restored to appropriate native conditions applicable to prairie and oak savanna. Private open space including recreational amenities serving the development shall include a ball field backstop, games courts including half - basketball and a pool at the community center. n) The neighborhood commercial site shall have architectural treatment that conform to standards that include: i. Two story buildings that may have mixed uses including accessory apartments or offices. ii. Gabled roofs with a minimum pitch of 4:12. iii. Rooflines shall consist of multiple gables, or be given variation through architectural devices such as cupolas, dormer windows or off -sets in the facades. iv. Variation of building fagade to reinforce an individual character for each separate use / tenant. v. The building shall be pedestrian oriented with no vehicular access or parking between the building and Connemara Trail or the north -south parkway. vi. Inclusion of gasoline fuel pumps shall be consistent with the standards specified in Section 6.14.B.2; and shall be thoroughly screened from residential uses with a bufferyard conforming to the standards of Section 6.14.E.9 as a minimum. o) Incorporation of recommendations of the City Engineer including, but not limited to the following: i. Storm Water Management in accordance with the City Storm Water Management Plan. ii. Implementation of the recommendations from the Traffic Impact Study as prepared by WSB & Associates, Inc. dated November 12, 2003. iii. Drainage, easements, grading and utilities. p) The Developer shall participate in the cost for upgrades to 132 Street and signalization along STH 3, as needed at the 132 Street and Connemara Trail intersections. q) Development phasing maybe required to follow sewer capacity limitations. RESOLUTION 2004 - r) Preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet and incorporating resulting recommendations into the Preliminary Plat design. s) Conformance with PUD Final Development Plan / Preliminary Plat and Final Plat requirements including execution of PUD and Subdivision Development Agreements. ADOPTED this 6 th day of January, 2004 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. William H. Droste, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Jentink, City Clerk Motion by: Seconded by:_ Voted in favor: Voted against: Member absent: CITY OF ROSEMOU NT TO: Honorable Mayor, Council Members City of Rosemount Planning Commission FROM: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director Rick Pearson, City Planner Andy Brotzler, City Engineer DATE: December 31, 2003 RE: Brockway Site Redevelopment CITY HALL 2875 — 145th Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 -4997 Phone: 651 - 423 -4411 Hearing Impaired 651- 423 -6219 Fax: 651- 423 -5203 Applicant: Homer Tompkins of Contractor Property Developers Company Location: Brockway Site East of STH 3 between Connemara Trail & County Road 38 Property Owner(s): George Wintz Area in Acres: Approximately 120 Number of units: 612 Comp. Guide Plan Desig: Business Park & Existing Parks / Open Space Current Zoning :. BP -2, Business Park and PI Public / Institutional SUMMARY During the Council workshop there were four major issues raised for further evaluation. They deal with the loss of designated Business Park land due to the reguiding request; loss of existing parks and open space property; more clarity on the traffic ramifications of the project and what actions the City can take to mitigate escalating traffic problems on Hwy 3, regardless of whether the project is approved; and what is the status of sanitary sewer capacity for the City and what is the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services doing to address a future capacity problem. The following information is what staff has been able to compile to address those questions. • Business Park Land At the December 10th Committee of the Whole meeting, several Council members discussed_ the change in land use on the Brockway property from Business Park and Open Space to various Residential land uses, with a small neighborhood commercial component. The concern was raised as to whether the guide plan should be changed given -that one of the city goals is to increase the overall tax base by adding more commercial and industrial development. Staff has inventoried land currently available for business park and industrial to help the Council assess the available land for those types of development. The figures are Brockway Site Redevelopment January 6, 2004 City Council Meeting Page 2 of 6 based solely on the current Zoning Map and do not include other lands in the east, being discussed for future industrial use but currently zoned for agriculture. The amount of undeveloped land for the industrial use (GI) may vary depending upon what the Council perceives as developed. Land controlled by Flint Hills, but generally open space, even if it contained a road or small structure, was considered undeveloped for purposes of this exercise. The figure for the business parkland does not include the Brockway parcel. Business Park General Industrial Total 442.33acres Total 2933.24acres Built 146.52acres Built 1875.47acres Undev. 294.0 l acres Undev. 1057.77acres *There is 1.2 acres of Industrial Park, which is developed. This is a zoning district no longer used by the City but maintained due to an existing business use. Recently, staff met with a developer to discuss the Business Park property within the community. Staff asked what his thoughts were about business park development in Rosemount and what type of absorption rate we could expect. In his opinion, Rosemount would be more attractive to smaller owner /users. This is primarily due to access and visibility within the Park. While the area has reasonably good access to Hwy 52, there remain other vacant properties within the metro area that are in closer proximity to the principal arterial system. Additionally, if access to Hwy 52 were very desirable, a developer would most likely look at other land in the east within Rosemount. Due to his belief that owner /users would be the primary target market, he felt you could expect perhaps, one to two users a year. The size of any particular project would be in the 5 -10 acres range Based upon that absorption, available land within the Business Park would meet the City needs for the next 7 -10 years. Staff also expects by that time that additional land in the east, affected by it's proximity to Flint Hills, will be available for more industrial development. In conclusion, staff believes there is available land within the community to achieve the Council goal of diversification of tax base by introduction of additional businesses into the community even with the development of the Brockway parcel as residential. • Parks and Open Space Property At the Workshop meeting the Council also noted that the development also reduces the amount of parks and open space in the area. The golf course functions more as an open space amenity since it is a private course although open to the general public. In discussions with the Parks Commission, the developer has indicated that they will be dedicating at least 12. 9 acres or approximately 10.7% of the gross acreage of the property. The Parks Commission has also Brockway Site Redevelopment January 6, 2004 City Council Meeting Page 3 of 6 recommended that the activity area interior of the ring road also be dedicated to the City, increasing the total acreage dedicated. It is unclear what the final total land dedication will be; it will be determined with the preliminary plat review. Because of the size of the project, and because the Parks Master Plan did not envision a park needed in this area, due to the current land use designation, Parks is recommending that a neighborhood park be provided within the project. The land dedication recommended would allow for creation of a neighborhood park to serve this development. It is also expected that the developer may be paying some portion of the park fee to satisfy the ordinance requirement. The developer has indicated they would like to contribute to the park amenities to offset the park dedication fee requirement. It is difficult to say at this point what the park improvements will be. Additional review of the area needs, and a better understanding of the site plan, particularly the grading plan will be necessary. Regardless, at this time the Parks Director is anticipating that the development itself will satisfy the park dedication requirements through a combination of land dedication, paying for neighborhood park amenities, and paying a portion in cash. Relating to the discussion above, the amount of business park and industrial land currently available, based upon the adopted zoning map is 1351 acres. These lands, using the 2004 fee rates, would generate $6,048,000 in park fees to permit future acquisition and improvements. In lieu of fees, the ordinance requires a 10% land dedication. Overall, staff believes the change in land use from parks and open space to residential continues to allow the opportunity for public open space opportunities. The change in use results in a more public solution than the current condition because the development will contain a city -owned park, rather than a private golf course. Other opportunities continue to exist within the community to provide additional open space amenities that may be obtained through park dedication or cash payment in lieu of dedication. • Traffic Issues At the December 10 Committee of the Whole meeting, traffic on Trunk Highway (TH) 3 and the traffic impacts of the proposed Brockway development were discussed. As previously noted, a Traffic Impact Study has been completed to review the impacts of the proposed development on the existing street and highway system and specifically the intersections of TH 3 and Connemara Trail and TH 3 and 132 Street (CR 38). Based on the results of the Traffic Impact Study, the following improvements are recommended for completion in conjunction with the development: 1. Install left and right turn lanes on TH 3 at 132 Street (CR 38). 2. Improve 132 nd Street (CR 38) to a 44 -foot three -lane section from the Brockway Site Redevelopment January 6, 2004 City Council Meeting Page 4 of 6 proposed site access to TH 3 to accommodate left turn lanes at the site access and TH 3. 3. Monitor the operation of the TH 3 and 132 ° d Street (CR 38) intersection to determine need for signal system in the future. Funds should be collected from the developer for future City costs associated with the construction of a signal system at this location. 4. Install signal system on TH 3 at Connemara Trail. 5. Construct site accesses on Connemara & 132 Street to three -lane cross sections with one entering lane and two exiting lanes. The City has submitted to Mn /DOT a request for Municipal Cooperative Agreement funding for the construction of a si nal system on TH 3 at Connemara Trail, turn lane improvements on TH 3 at 132" Street (CR 38), and intersection improvements and installation of a signal system on TH 3 at McAndrews Road (CSAH 38). One premise of the submittal is the closure of the existing Brockway facility driveway that currently gains access to TH 3 located between Connemara Trail and 132 Street (CR 38). The closure of this access is accommodated with the proposed development of the Brockway site as shown on the concept plan. The submittal to Mn /DOT was also made to address existing traffic safety issues on TH 3. With the recent opening of Connemara Trail to the east of TH 3, the intersection of Connemara Trail and TH 3 will meet warrants for a signal system with or without the development of the Brockway site. As such, staff is proceeding with the preparation of a Signal Justification Report (SJR) for this intersection in preparation for the installation of signal system at this intersection once funding is available. Funding for the project would either occur with participation from Mn/DOT or 100 percent funding by the City with Mn/DOT payback in the future, estimated to be in 2007 or 2008. For the TH 3 and McAndrews Road (CSAH 38) intersection, the submittal to Mn/DOT included a request for funding participation to improve this intersection through the construction of turn lanes and installation of a signal system. Another item discussed was access to existing residential driveways along TH 3 between 132 Street (CR 38) and McAndrews Road (CSAH 38). A possible solution to this issue is the widening of this segment of TH 3 to accommodate the installation of a continuous center left turn lane or the installation of a continuous center median, limiting the accesses to right -in /right -out. As the MnDOT Municipal Cooperative Agreement funding program is limited to $500,000 per year, alternatives to address this issue can be discussed with MnDOT in a future funding cycle. It should be reiterated that the cooperative agreement was not prompted by the Brockway project, and that staff would continue to pursue the funding regardless of the Council's decision on this specific project. However, given that traffic on Hwy 3 is an issue raised in the context of the Brockway review, staff has provided the cooperative agreement information. Most recently, the City received a letter 'Brockway Site Redevelopment January 6, 2004 City Council Meeting Page 5 of 6 from MnDOT relating to the cooperative agreement application. The letter is attached for the Council's information along with the City's response. From the letter, it appears that MnDOT staff is very supportive of the city's application; however, an independent group makes the final determination as to whether the city will receive funding. We expect to hear about the final status of the city's application by the end of January 2004. • Sanitary Sewer Capacity Over the past several months, staff has been working with Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) to review the current and future sewer capacity for the City of Rosemount. The majority of Rosemount is served by the Rosemount Wastewater Treatment Plant located along 140t Street, east of TH 52. The Empire Wastewater Treatment Plant serves a small area of Rosemount. MCES has previously prepared a Rosemount /Empire Master Facility Plan that indicated the elimination of the Rosemount.WWTP and construction of an interceptor to the Metropolitan Plant. In recent conversations with MCES, based on their analysis, it has been determined that interim alternatives to the construction of an interceptor to the Metropolitan Plant will need to be reviewed. An alternative that MCES is reviewing is the construction of an interceptor to the Empire WWTP and continuing to operate the Rosemount WWTP to provide additional sewer capacity for development in Rosemount. MCES staff has verbally indicated their intent to meet with City staff in February 2004 to review these alternatives and to work towards the completion of a project in 2005 to provide additional capacity to the City of Rosemount. In regard to the proposed Brockway development and based on flow and capacity information provided by MCES, it appears that the Rosemount WWTP will have sufficient capacity to accommodate the development of the Brockway site. This determination will be verified by MCES as part of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) review and the required Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment. The revised resolution contains an expanded set of recommended conditions of approval resulting from the Council discussion at the Dec. 10, Committee of the Whole meeting. The conditions are intended to identify project specifics and City expectations of developer performance in recognition of the City granting variances or giving concessions to typical ordinance standards. While concept review normally focuses on the broader land use implications of a project, the Brockway Site Concept Review booklet provides enough detail that specific site design issues can be addressed. The concept presents a dramatic change for the Brockway area. The concept presents comparatively high density over a large area and the proposed amenities must provide for Brockway Site Redevelopment January 6, 2004 City Council Meeting Page 6 of 6 the recreational and open space needs for the future residents. The concept also takes varies from current city development standards, and therefore must conform to conditions meant to protect the public health, welfare and safety. December 18, 2003 3 a Mr. Bryan Dodds, P.E. Cooperative Agreements Project Engineer Metro District Office of State Aid 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 Re: TH 3 from Connemara Trail to CSAH 38 (C.S. 1921) FY 2005 Municipal Agreement Program Project Submittal City of Rosemount WSB Project No. 1558 -00 Dear Mr. Dodds: On behalf of the City of Rosemount, the following is a written response to continents outlined in your December 10, 2003 letter. Each functional group comment is discussed below: 1. Cooperative Agreements ■ A revised one -page summary of the project has been prepared and is attached to this letter. In addition, a revised layout showing the proposed improvements has also been attached. ■ The cost breakdown has been revised based on the outlined comments. This proposed breakdown is shown on the attached project summary. ■ The cost estimate assumes the Mn/DOT cost is only for work within Mn/DOT right -of -way. The access improvement cost ($75,000) is for the relocation of the _. access from TH 3 to CR 38. 2. Permits This comment is noted. No revisions are required 3. Metro Traffic Si The cost participation has been revised to reflect a two- thirds Mn/DOT participation in the CSAH 38 signal. 4. Metro Traffic Signal Operations Proposed traffic signal interconnect has been included as part of the project. The cost participation for the interconnect is based on the total number of legs of intersections impacted by the interconnect (6/11 for Mn/DOT and 5111 for City /County). 5. Metro Traffic Program Support South Area Traffic Signal Justification Reports (SJR) will be prepared for both intersections. The CSAH 38 intersection will have two lanes of approach to TH 3 as outlined in the proposed improvements. FAVY WIN\1558 -00 \121603 bd.doc Minneapolis St. Cloud • Equal Opportunity Employer Mr. Bryan Dodds, P.E. December 18, 2003 Page 2 of 3 6. State Aid Work on Connemara Trail and CSAH 38 will follow State Aid standards. An SJR will be prepared for both intersections. 7. Transportation Planning No work on Biscayne Avenue is proposed as part of this project. The private accesses along TH 3 will be reviewed with each property owner to determine what possible consolidation or elimination can be included with the project. 8. Rail and Water This project will not impact the Soo Line Railroad tracks east of TH 3 on CR 38. 9. South Area — Program Delivery Engineer These comments are noted. No revisions are required. 10. Water Resources These comments are noted. Drainage will be reviewed during the detail design of the project. Based on these comments, the proposed submittal has been revised, and a one -page summary, including the estimated cost breakdown, has been attached, as requested. In addition, the layout showing the proposed improvements has also been revised and 20 copies are attached. If you have any questions, or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 763- 287 -7183 or Mr. Andy Brotzler with the City of Rosemount at 651- 322 -2025. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. 0 Charles T. Rickart, P.E., P.T.O.E. Associate/Project Engineer cc: Andy Brotzler, City of Rosemount F: \WPWIN\1558 -00 \121603 bd.doc FY 2005 MUNICIPAL AGREEMENT PROPOSAL TH 3 IMPROVEMENTS— CONNEMARA TRAIL TO CSAH 38 (125 STREET) ROSEMOUNT, MN The proposed TH 3 Improvements would include: 1. TH 3 at Connemara Trail ■ Construct a potential new traffic signal system at the intersection 2. TH 3 at CR 38 (132n Street) ■ Widen TH 3 with the addition of left -turn and right -turn lanes for northbound and southbound approaches. • Widen CR 38 (132 Street) westbound to include a two -lane approach with a through left -turn lane and a through/right -turn lane. 3. TH 3 at CSAH 38 (125 Street) • Widen TH 3 with the addition of a northbound left -turn lane and southbound right -turn lane. ■ Widen CSAH 38 (125 Street) eastbound to include a two -lane approach with a left -turn lane a right -turn lane. ■ Construct a potential new traffic control signal system. 4. Interconnect the System ■ Construct an interconnect system between Connemara Trail and CSAH 38 (125' Street). 5. Access Improvements ■ Close the access on TH 3 to the Triangle Warehouse and Brockway Golf Course and relocate the access to CR 38 (132 Street). ■ Work with the property owners on the west side of TH 3 to combine his two driveway access points or relocate both access to Dodd. Based on the above improvements, the following cost breakdown is anticipated: 1. TH 3 at Connemara Trail fiotal Cost $150 Mn%DOT host $75 x City /County Cost $75,000 2. TH 3 at CR 38 (132 "d Street) $100,000 $75,000 $25,000 3. TH 3 at CSAH 38 (125"' Street) $225,000 $175,000 $50,000 4. Interconnect System $60,000 $32,725 $27,275 5. Access Improvements $75,000 $75,000 $0 Total Construction Cost $610,000 $432,725 $177,275 Indirect Costs (35 %) $213,500 (1) $34,625 $178,875 Total Project Cost $823,500 $467,350 $356,150 (1) Mn/DOT will pay 8% of construction engineering. F: \WPWIN\1558 -00 \121603 bd.doc 3 �- �� .� �. .�� r. �P }.1 � I � 1 1 � �� 4 t ... �� N �`�1 0 �� s' �� # ,,�Nts o , - � - `1�( Minnesota Departrr,.., of Transportation 9' Metro District 3 � Office Tel: 651 - 582 -1353 �T of F. Office of State Aid Office Fax: 651 - 582 -1368 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 -3174 December 10, 20 Andrew J. Brotzler Rosemount City Engineer 2875 - 145` Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 -4997 RE: T.H. 3 from Connemara Trail to CSAH 38 in the City of Rosemount C.S. 1921 Project Submittal Review for FY 2005 Municipal Agreement Program Dear Mr. Brotzler: The Metro District has completed the review of the project submittal, dated October 14, 2003, for the above referenced project. The review comments are as follows: Cooperative Agreements — Bryan Dodds, Waters Edge Office, 651 -582 -1404 1. Please provide a revised one page summary of the project. We will mail this out to the selection committee in advance of the actual meeting. This will allow the committee members to become .familiar with your project prior to the actual meeting date. 2. In reference the cost breakdown on page 2 of 3 of your cover letter: a. . The cost sharing shown for items 1, 2, and 3 look to adhere to the Cost Participation Policy. Keep in mind that Mn /DOT can only pay for improvements that directly benefit the Trunk Highway. b. For the $75,000 access improvements, Mn/DOT could only pay for what it would cost for access control in that area. c. Mn /DOT would pay 8% of its construction cost or 8% of $375,000 total construction costs is $30,000. 3. Refer to the Cost Participation Policy located at: http: //www. dot. state .mn.us /stateaid /ftp /forms /ds11 1 pdf for information concerning what costs Mn /DOT can contribute toward a local let roadway project, specifically: a. See Section I D3a iv for information about access improvement. The bottom line is that, the maximum Mn /DOT can pay to close an access is what it would cost for access control. This cost can be the Cost to Cure or the cost to provide reasonable access by constructing a frontage road or new driveway. If the business at CR 38 and TH 3 already has reasonable access even though the access to TH 3 was closed, then Mn/DOT couldn't participate. Permits - Keith Van Wagner, Waters Edge Office, 651 -582 -1443 In 2002 permits were issued for the reconstruction of the intersection of TH 3 and Connemara. Metro Traffic Signals - Michael Gerbensky, Waters Edge Office, 651- 634 -2394 If the north junction of Co. Rd. 38 is a "T" intersection then we could pay 2/3 of the signal cost (2 out of 3 legs). Metro Traffic Signal Operations — Kevin Schwartz, Waters Edge Office, 651 -582 -1278 An equal opportunity employer Mr. Brotzler Page 2 December 10, 2003 Needs interconnect from 125` to Connemara to 145` Metro Traffic Program Support South Area - Lars Impola, Waters Edge Office, 651- 634 -2379 Very good project. Signals can be justified at both locations shown. We will program the signals in FY 07 or FY 08 but they are needed now. North junction of CSAH 38 must have 2 lanes of approach to TH 3. SJR's required for both signals; approach counts and turning movement counts required for SJR. Right turns should be subtracted from the approach counts in the warrant analysis. State Aid - Bernie Larson, Waters Edge Office, 651 -582 -1371 Connemara Trail is MSA route 104 to the east of TH 3 in Rosemount. Work on this roadway must meet State Aid Standards. SJR's needed for both signals. Transportation Planning — Brigid Gombold, Waters Edge Office, 651 -582 -1378 TH 3 in this area is a 5B Minor Arterial in an Urban/Urbanizing area. Spacing should be' /4 mile for full access or signalized intersections. The existing connection, Biscayne Ave, should be closed if a new connection is made. The proposed signal spacing would meet the guidelines. Private access at 1/8 mile or sight distance spacing. The area has too many driveways. Consolidating these will help to meet the 1/8 mile spacing. Rail and Water— Josh , Central Office, MS 470, 651- 296 -2472 No problem as long as CSAH 38 east of TH 3 is not widened over Soo Line tracks. South Area Program Delivery Engineer - Nancy Daubenberger, Waters Edge Office, 651 -582 -1379 TH 3 has a need for signalization at the Connemara Trail and CSAH 38 intersection which is already set up geometrically for a signal. The CSAH 38 intersection is in need of the proposed improvements in order for efficient signalization. The CR 38 intersection will be a safer place for full access with the proposed improvements (protected left turn lanes). This looks to be a very good project — definitely worth the $410,000 of State Funds requested. The proposed signals meet access spacing guidelines. Water Resources — Scott Carlstrom, Waters Edge Office, 651- 634 -2416 Existing drainage patterns must be perpetuated. WHAT IS NEEDED NEXT: Please review these comments and recommendations and prepare a written response. Return this response letter as well as a revised one page summary to my office by December 19. 2003. After receiving this additional information I will route the reply to the appropriate functional area. Please contact me if you have any questions or additional comments concerning the selection process at 651 -582 -1404 or by e -mail at bryan.dodds2dot.state.mn.us Sincerely, � .�- Bryak� Dodds Cooperative Agreement Project Engineer Metro District Mr. Brotzler Page 3 December 10, 2003 Enclosures: cc: Bob Brown, Mn /DOT -Metro State Aid Michael Kowski, Mn/DOT -Metro State Aid Nancy Daubenberger, Mn /DOT -Metro Program Delivery Project File * Electronic Copy Only CITY OF ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 10, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: BROCKWAY DEVELOPMENT AGENDA SECTION: b SGtkSS t OY PREPARED BY: KIM LINDQUIST, COMMUNITY AGENDA NO: DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR . . ATTACHMENTS: PLANNING STAFF REPORT, TRAFFIC APPROVED BY: STUDY, REDEVELOPMENT TIMETABLE, UNAPPROVED EXCERPT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOV. 25, 2003 As the Council is aware Contractor Property Developers Company (CPDC) is proposing to redevelop the Brockway property as a mixed residential development. According to the concept plan, the 120 acre site will yield 612 residential units. The site will include passive and active public open space, an association community center, and a site set aside for neighborhood commercial. The following issues appear to be the primary outstanding issues from the staff perspective. Because the concept plan stage does not provide the same level of detail a preliminary plat would, there may be additional issues raised as the specifics of the project become known. 1. Traffic. Residents at the public hearing, the Planning Commissioners in their discussion, and the City Council at previous meetings, have all expressed concerns about the growing traffic on Highway 3 and it's negative impact on safety. A traffic study has been completed to review the impacts of the proposed development on the transportation system. The traffic study looked at the intersections of Connemara Trail and TH 3, and County Road 38 (132nd Street) and TH 3 along with the proposed site accesses to Connemara Trail and County Road 38. Based on the results of the traffic study, improvements to the intersections of Connemara Trail / TH 3 and County Road 38 (132nd Street) / TH 3 are recommended to be completed to improve the safety of these two intersections. Staff would note that these improvements will need to be considered regardless of the development of the Brockway site. The needed improvements were anticipated and are part of the cooperative agreement proposal currently before MnDOT for review. The cooperative agreement proposes signal lights at Connemara Trail and Highway 3, signal lights at north CR38 (McAndrews) and turn lane improvements at CR 38, both the north and south legs. A signal light at southern CR 38 (132nd Street) is not part of the cooperative agreement. The study indicates that the improvements envisioned by the Cooperative Agreement must be implemented regardless of whether MnDOT participates in the funding or not. The amount of funding from CDPC for roadway improvements will need to be addressed during the preliminary plat stage. The city should also know the status of the cooperative agreement by January 2004. 2. Building Architecture and Design. The applicant has shown some of the buildings and designs proposed within .the project. It is unclear if the end result will be exactly as shown or whether the submittal is more indicative of the type of construction. Certainly in the single family portion of the project additional layouts would be available, however, staff will be looking forward to specific design criteria so that the buildings have continuity in design and style. Most likely much of the multi - family products will look similar to that presented in the submittal materials. The apartment and senior housing buildings have not been designed at this time. The submittal illustrates a design that would be consistent with what the applicant intends for the site. While the building design may vary, staff is expecting high quality architecture and exterior materials. 3. Stormwater. The site currently drains to the north, west and east. In reviewing the proposed concept plan, it appears that some of the ponding and infiltration requirements for the site can be accommodated off -site through the use of Keegan Lake and existing ponding and infiltration areas that are a part of the City's stormwater system. The scheduled completion of the Keegan Lake Outlet project will allow for stormwater from this property to be directed to Keegan Lake. The outlet project will address rate control issues and will regulate lake levels so that flooding would not occur. It is expected that drainage from the eastern portion of the site may be accommodated in an existing regional pond constructed with the Connemara Trail Phase 2 project. To the west, run -off would flow under Highway 3 through an existing culvert and pond in a low area south and west of the site. This area is identified in the City's Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan as a stormwater basin. The utilization of this area will require the acquisition of easements and coordination of the construction of an outlet through the Evermoor Development. Since the developer is the same in both projects, easements to facilitate drainage for the Brockway project needed in the Evermoor area should be easy to obtain. Because the project is at the concept plan stage, actual drainage calculations have not been submitted. That level of detail is necessary to fully understand the stormwater impacts of property development and the best management solution. Consistent with the City's stormwater plan, the site will need to have on -site ponding for water quality purposes and the applicant will need to pay for off -site ponding. 4. Timing. Development of the site requires an EAW. Because of the change in land use, the developer has moved forward with the concept plan, comprehensive plan amendment, and rezoning request to assess the level of interest by the City. Preliminary plat approval cannot be granted until the EAW is approved. Staff is also planning to hold back on the rezonings until the preliminary plat so the individual districts can accurately reflect the approved plat. 5. Site Design. The project reflects a dramatic change in land use from industrial and open space to residential. It appears that the site is large enough to create it's own distinct neighborhood and therefore staff can support the change in land use. Throughout the discussion at the Planning Commission there has been little reaction to the overall density of the project. The density 5.1 units /acre is consistent with a mixed use residential development and is reflective of the higher density rental and senior housing components. Staff supports the overall site design and allocation to differing housing types, however, we would expect additional refinements to the plan through the next phase of design development. Building location and orientation, open space, common parking areas, and creation of dead -end driveways are all items that the developer should be addressing in the next review. 6. EAW. Additional items beyond the scope of the information currently provided to the city may arise during the EAW process. One such issue is the sanitary sewer capacity for the City. The Council will be made aware of these items and potential mitigative measures through that process. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Discussion Only AUTHORITY ACTION: November 24, 2003 Parks Commission Minutes -- Brockway Brockway Concept Plan -Staff reviewed a map of the Brockway concept plan. Last month the Commission discussed the concept and talked about some of the ideas for the property. The most recently submitted plan calls for 612 units, which would require 24.48 acres of parks dedication. At this point 12.9 acres are being proposed, which would leave approximately 11.5 acres for parks dedication. Based on the concept plan of 612 units, the Parks Master Plan would require a neighborhood park to be built in the development. Our typical neighborhood park service standards are 300 to 650 households. The acreage area being proposed for the park is located in the southwest conger of the development, and includes a number of trees and a small wetland. The area would most likely be set aside for passive recreation. The developer is also proposing to build a private park, community center and other recreational amenities across the street from the public park area. Schultz he has urged the City Council and City staff to make sure that we provide enough active recreation areas in new developments so as not to over - burden current facilities that are already in high demand. Schultz would recommend that we incorporate the private area designated for a ball field into a public use area. Schultz recommended that the Parks and Recreation Commission approve the concept plan, but take another look at the separation between some of the private and public park amenities and follow the Parks Master Plan with regard to meeting the criteria for a neighborhood park and the type of land that is acceptable for credit toward parks dedication. Mr. Tompkins addressed the Commission and answered questions regarding the concept plan. He asked for clarification of parks dedication requirements. Schultz stated that parks dedication is 1 /25 of an acre per unit. This is based on the units built, not on a percentage based on the type of housing unit. In order to meet the City's requirement for 24.48 acres of parks dedication, Mr. Tompkins stated that in lieu of paying cash parks dedication, they would prefer to build the amenities in the public park, with direction from the Commission as to the amenities to be included. Mr. Tompkins asked how the Commission would feel about taking the private park area and converting it to a public park, (with the exception of a defined area for the clubhouse and swimming pool) and having that area be dedicated to the City as a public park. He asked the Commission for direction as far as the park amenities they feel would be advantageous for the size of this community so as not to create a burden on other park facilities in the City. He also asked the Commission to keep in mind that they are designing the community to be intergenerational housing and asked if there are other amenities the Commission feels seniors would use that could be added to the plan. Mr. Tompkins asked for a recommendation from the Commission for approval of the concept plan provided that they provide either cash, or public improvements satisfactory to the Commission in lieu of cash, within the Brockway development. If they are considering having to pay parks dedication he would be willing to include park amenities /facilities in the public park in lieu of some of the cash parks dedication requirement. With input from the Commission, Mr. Tompkins would like to come up with a plan to build these facilities. He was looking for specific direction from the Commission as to the facilities they would like. There was discussion regarding the proposed tunnel under the road that bisects the park, and the possibility of removing this road from the plan. This removal would have to be approved by the Planning Commission. If the road is retained, Mr. Tompkins had several suggestions for slowing traffic, such as narrowing the road at both ends, adding pavers, etc. There was discussion about including a parking lot, which Mr. Tompkins supported whether the road was there or not. Mr. Tompkins also suggested that it would be nice to have a trail connection to Central Park. Adding amenities such as tennis courts, mini -golf, a putting range, bocce ball, etc. was also suggested. Mr. Tompkins thought all of these were good ideas. He seemed very willing to work with the Commission on developing the parkland and adding amenities in this area. Mr. Tompkins is looking for a recommendation from the Commission that the concept plan is fine and it would be o.k. for them to build recreational facilities to help them meet their park dedication requirement, those facilities to be determined at a later date when they come back with a more defined plan. He was also looking for direction from the Commission regarding what to put on the plan. Schultz stated that the details need to be worked on down the road, the key is that the developer is moving in the right direction. If the Commission is o.k. with the proposed concept plan, Schultz suggested that the they recommend that the City Council approve the concept plan, and we can then work out the details for the park and also decide what would be credited toward parks dedication for both land and amenities built. MOTION by Johnson to approve the concept plan as designed including that the public park area designated in the southwest corner as well as the designated private park currently displayed as a baseball field, as being all part of the public land toward the parks dedication for the City, pending guidance from the Parks and Recreation Commission on the amenities to be included in that park. (We would need to give that to the developer next month.) Re- reading of motion: Approval of the concept plan, taking as park dedication land both the public park designated in the southwest corner as well as the private park area currently displayed as a baseball field, pending guidance from the Commission on what actual amenities will be included within that park. SECOND by Eliason. Schultz asked that the Commission include Mr. Tompkins' request for parks dedication credit for amenities built as they did for the Evermore development, i.e. playground, shelters, trails, parking lot, irrigation which were all put toward their parks dedication. FRIENDLY AMENDMENT by Eliason that the Parks and Recreation Commission would not accept park dedication for any pipeline easements, ponding, or other easements. Johnson accepted this amendment. Sterner felt that because we are looking at so many changes, he couldn't approve this concept plan. Johnson agreed with Sterner, but felt we should move forward and give the developer direction as to what the Commission would like done. Johnson agreed with giving the developer credit for paying for park amenities as long as they are built to the satisfaction and standards of the Commission. Jacobs asked for a friendly amendment to consider allowing the developer to pay for and install amenities in lieu of cash dedication fees with approval of the Parks Commission. Re- statement of motion by Johnson: Recommend approval of the concept plan as shown including the public park area on the southwest corner of the property as well as including the designated private park area that is reflected as a baseball field today, pending guidance from the Commission on what the requested amenities will actually be on that property. FRIENDLY AMENDMENT by Eliason that the dedication not include any easements for pipeline, ponding or right of ways. FRIENDLY AMENDMENT by Eliason to consider allowing the developer to pay for and install amenities in lieu of parks dedication with the approval of the Parks Commission. Ayes: 4 Nays: 1 (Sterner) Planning Commission Minutes November 25, 2003 - -- Brockway Continued from 10 -28 -03 Public Hearing: Brock Site Redevelopment — Cont'd from 10 -28 -03 This public hearing was continued from October 28, 2003 to allow time for the applicant to submit a refined concept plan for the Brockway site. The revised plan includes single family homes, town homes, apartments and senior condos, a 12 acres park on the southwestern corner and a commercial area on the south- east corner of the property. City Planner Pearson indicated Met Council would review the comprehensive plan amendment to determine the impact to regional services such as sanitary sewer treatment and transportation. With the approval of this development Mr. Pearson stated that the housing mix would move closer to the comprehensive plan goal. Single family housing is currently at 81 % and would move to 76.5% with this subdivision. The comp plan goal is 65 %. Multi- family housing is currently at 18% and with this development would move to 23.4 %, with a comp plan goal of 35 %. Mr. Chuck Rickert, representing WSB, presented an overview of the traffic impact study completed for this area. The study looked primarily at the intersections of CR38 /Hwy 3, Connemara Tr /Hwy 3 and site accesses. The study showed that with the development of the Brockway site an additional 3000 cars a day would be generated from the area. Biscayne Point, the Minea site, and St. Josephs Church would also have an impact in traffic generation. The current projections for general traffic growth on Hwy 3 is 3% and do not include this development. When Connemara Tr and CR38 are completed an additional growth factor of 6.5% is projected. The traffic generated by the Brockway site would have to be added into these percentages. The traffic study completed in June of 2003 indicates the ratings for these intersections are currently rated as very satisfactory. With traffic projections into 2008 and the site being fully developed, traffic would be rated at an E -level of service which would be an unsatisfactory rating. With the proposed improvements to this area, the level of service would be brought back to a satisfactory rating. Mr. Rickert indicated that an application has been submitted to MNDOT for cooperative agreement funding to improve Hwy 3. If approved, notification would be in January 2004 with the funding available in 2005. Improvements would include a signal at the Connemara Trail intersection of Hwy 3, left and right turn lanes on Hwy 3 at CR38 - no median but stripped lanes, closing the access into the golf course, and providing a signal and a stripped left turn lane at CR38. •palaaeo uolloW -auoN :sAeN - aaddeN pue `uanZ `aaussaW `lasuaslaM :seAV aaddeN Aq puooaS •panoidde Alleuolllpuoo se ueld aalsew ldeouoo aql pue ueld anisuagaadwoo papuawe aul ullnn lualslsuoo aq of seaae asn -puel lelojewwoo pue bulsnoq a4l euozei 1louno:D A11:D aul legl puawwooei of uanZ Aq NOIlOW •palaJeo uolloW •auoN :sAeN •uanZ pue `aaussaW `lasuaslaM `jaddeN sE)AV •uanZ Aq puooaS •I!ouno0 uelllodoilaW a4l of luawpuawe eqj pienuol pue veld anlsuegaadwo0 lunowaso�j OZOZ aul of luawpuawe ue aiedaid of llels azlaoglne 1pouno0 Allo aql leul puawwooei of aaussaW Aq NOIlOW 'palaJeo UO4OW auoN :sAeN •aaussaW pue `lasuaslaM `jaddeN `ujnZ :say V •aaussaW Aq puooaS - 6ulJeaH ol1gnd aul asolo of wnZ Aq NOIlOW •alaldwoo aae gE �JO Ol sluaLuanoadwi pun heal ejewauuo0 woal alls aul a of aneq p1nonn Selolgan uoljonalsuoo pue jonal •uado of Apeaa sl loefo.id aul lllun gE�jo oluo 6ulwoo o!lleal l!w!I of mill pinonn `gE�jo `uosaapuy kjer •01 ul sde6 aleaao pinonn ly6ll Ieu61s a pue SAennaniap aul ul!M sanssl aql ssaappe pinoo Aenng6lq aql 10 buluapinn a pue C AmH 10 6uldduls auel uinl •g£�jo nnau pue gg b0 plo ueannlaq SAennanlap aul ssaappe lou pip Apnls eqj pauleldxa pa�oi�l - aW spaepuels 40 4l!M eouepi000e ul sells a1agl woal silo una pue loiluoo alea ulelulew lsnw sluawdolanaa •sassaa6oad alls a4l to luawdolanap aul se awll aalel a le passaappe AIlewaol aq of peloedxa aae sanssl aalenn waols polels `aaaulbu3 Ally `aalzloa8 •JVl - seaje 6ulpuno.aans aul u1 spuod uo loalla sll pue ells Aemn ooa8 aul aol ueld 96euleap aul ul!nn passaadxa Senn uJapuoo leuo!l!ppe pue 6uluana aql u1 uanas pue inol to sinoq eqj uaannlaq ge�jo woal suing pueq llal anew of Alllige aul ul!M uaaouoo passaadxa `lsaM laaalS P „ ZE � g �qZ `auo�j wellllM •Aenng6lq uollenaasaad e se £ AMH 1 uoileublsap lOdNW aql pue `SAennanlap bullslxa alaul UJO4 pue of ssaooe aul `E AMH uo ollleal to awnlon aul ul!nn uaaouoo passaadxa `heal :p9go�1 ulnoS 00 � C � `eoq@N uea *sluawwoo oilgnd aol buueaH ol1gnd aql pauado lasuaslaM uosaadaieg0 *suollsenb Aue aannsue of luasa.id seen pue alls pasodoid aql to uollewiol eqj paddeoei Allauq `saluedwo0 punillo�l `luaplsaad 901A anllnoax3 `uallluM wll •sleu6ls pasodoid eqj aol bulpunl pue `E AMH aol sluawanoidwi to buiwil aql `sawn dead bulanp E AMH of ssaooe `suoiloesialul algejedwoo `ollleal JOl s6ullea lanai aolnaas a4l ueemlaq eouajalllp a4l 6u1pae6ei pansua uolssnosiQ •palaaeo uoi}oW 'IasuaslaM pue `aaddeN `uanZ `aaussen :s@AV •aaussaW Aq puooeS '£OOZ `Z l, aagwanoN pa}ep ApnjS joedwl oij4eal ayj apnlaui of 6£ uorllpuoo puawe of IasuaslaM Aq NOIlOW •uogoe papuawwooaa aqI jo ped se ApnjS ogeal ayj apnloui of apew aaann suollsa66nS •joedwi ue aney op Inq joefoid slyj jo adoos puoAaq aie sanssl oij.eil ayj pa}ejs lasuaslaM uosiadaleya •IasuaslaM Aq popuooes uol}oW 'sjy6ll ol}}ea} ayj y }Inn op 01 bulob sl Apo }eynn pue `uoljeolidde juaweeibe ayj `oi}}eaj y }Inn suaaouoo passaadxa uanZ aauolssiwwoa 'sjuawaalnbaa jell leulj pue Jeld tieUlw!laad /ueld juawdolanaa leu!j and yilnn eouew.aojuoa f u6lsap jeld �Jeuiwilaad ayj op suol}epuawwooaa buginsw 6ulleaodjooui pue 1aaysWAA Iuawssassy leIuawuoalnu3 ue jo uol }eaedaad i •juawaa.ibe and jo uollnoax3 y 'saljlgn pue oi `juawa6euew aalenn waois `6ulpea6 `sjuawasea `abeuieap `uollelnoalo `ssaooe 01 anl1e19.a aaaul6uE] Ajla ayj jo suol}epuawwooaa ;o uoi}eaodaooul •6 - fuessaoau se sJuawasea yjlM eaae �aed alenud ay} ul saljllloej leuoijeaaow oilgnd anlJoe pue saaoe ual of inoj jo uoileolpep puel bulpnloui uolssiwwoo uoi}eaaoa�l pue s�jed ayj Aq suollepuewwooaa 10 uolleiodaooul j -s}lun 6ulilannp jo aagwnu ayj aajueaen6 jou saop lenoidde Idaouoo •a - (lee; xis jo ssaoxa ul s }as- }40) ;ailaa jueo1pubis bul}eaao saldoueo ao sepueaan `salge6 ajeaedas bulpnloui sainjeaj u6lsap }o A}auen a aney lleys seouealua 6uipllnq fiJewiad •sana Joa 6uol Jo Jallaa apino.id of pesn aq Ileys snnopulnn aawaop se yons slle}ap leanjoa}lyoay •seiuooleq olylllouow pue pajnjlno ao painjoejnuew `le.injeu — auols ao 000njs `� oiaq %5Z jo wnwiuiw a aney Iieys ape6el 6ulpllnq yoea `slle1ap yons jo eouesge ayj ul •aa}oeieyo V slepajew 6ulpllnq `sa pewe A}lsuap -y6iy jo uoijelnolpe aagpn_ p •sesn puel aeilu.wlsslp pue ul,-4ea} ayj jo s}oaga ayj 6ul.aa}4nq pue s�lennapls /slleaj .ao} Aennuea.a6 a aleaao of seaie esn puel AIlwej elbuls ayj jo a6pa jalno ayj 6uole yjdep }ol ssaoxa ayi jo uoliezinn 'o •Ieysae(nl aii j junowaso�j ayj Aq panoidde se ao `Iaaj 05l, bulpaeoxe s199JIS ao SAennanup uowwoo pua peap Ile JOJ JaaJ 5t, jo snlpea buluan} wnwlulw a yjlM spunoie -uanl pajouIsaaun jo uolslnad 'q laaj 05Z ueyl ssal 10 slenuajul yllM suoljoasialul Ias --.o 9Ieulwlla o} suol}oasaaJul Jaaa }s pue SAennaniap 6 u1u 6 11`d 'e :oj joefgns ails Aemn poje ayj aoj ueld jaisew 1daouoo ay} anoidde Ilounoa Ajla ay} jeyj puawwooai o} aaddeN Aq NOHOW •pauaeo uoi}oW •auoN :sAeN 'aaussalN pue `IasuaslaM `aaddeN `ujnZ :s9AV 'IasuaslaM Aq puooeS 'sluawaiinbaa jeld leUl-A pue geld AJeulwlIaad /ueld luawdolanaa Ieuu and ql!m eouewiojuoa f u6lsap jeld Aieulwilaid eqj olui suoilepuawwooaa bul}lnsai 6uljeaodaooui pue IaagsIaoM }uawssassy IeIuawuoalnu3 ue jo uolleiedaad l •juaweeibe and jo uoilno9x3 •q 'EOOZ `Z� aagwanoN jo ApnjS joedwl obeli eqj jo suollepuawwooaa pue salllll }n pue oigeal `juawa6euew aa}enn waoIs `6ulpejb `s}uawGseG `a5euleap `uollelnoalo `sseooe 01 anl}elaa aaaul6u3 40 agl10 suoilepuawwooaa 10 uolleaodaooul •6 •tiessaoau se sluawasee gllnn eeje �aed ajenpd eqj ul sal}Ilpel leuolleaaoaa oilgnd anlJoe pue saaoe ual o} inol jo uol}eoipap puel bulpnloul uoissiwwoa uoileaaoay pue gJed aq} Aq suollepuawwooaa 10 uol}eaodaooul 'shun 6ulllamp jo aagwnu aql ea}ueaenb }ou saop Ienoidde Ideouoa 'a - (lea; xis jo ssaoxe ui slas -}}o) jallaa lueoljlubls bul}eaao saldoueo ao sepueaan `selge6 ajeaedes bulpnloui sainjeal u51sap Jo AjGUen a aneq llegs seouealua 6ulpllnq tiewlid - sans Jooa buol 10 JallaJ apinoad of pasn aq llegs snnopuim aawaop se gons sllelap Ieanjoajlgoay - saluooleq olglllouow pue `paan}Ino ao painjoelnuew `leinjeu — auols ao 000njs `�olaq %OZ jo wnwluiw a aneq (legs ape6el 6ulpllnq goea `spelap gons ;o aouesge eqj ul •aajoeaego 'R slepa}ew 6ulpllnq `saipawe Al!suep -g6lq jo uollelnol:pe aagpn_� •p •sasn puel aellwlsslp pue ol}}eal aqj jo s}oaj4a aqj 6ulaa_}nq pue sllennapls /sllejl aol Aennuaai6 a Glean of seaae asn puel Alywej 916uls eqj jo 96pa aalno aq} 6uole gjdap }ol ssaoxe eq} j uoliezlllia 'o - Iegsaew aal_� }unowaso�I aqj Aq panoidde se ao `Iaaj 05[ 6ulpa9oxa s}aaa }s a o SAennaniap uowwoo pua peap Ile'JOI 19915t, jo snlpea 6uluanl wnwlulw a u }Inn spunoie -uan} palolalsaaun jo uolslnOJd 'q 'Jaaj 09Z uegj ssal 1 sleAJaIul gllnn suol}oasaatul Jas - }}o ajeulwile 01 suol}oasaaIul JaaaJs pue SAennanlap 6uiu511y 'e :01 joefgns ails Aemn oojq eqj aol ueld jalsew Ideouoo aqj anoidde Ipounoa Ally eqj jegj puawwooaa of aaddeN Aq NOIIOW :sm011ol se uoiIow ulew uo 810n Planning Commission Minutes October 28, 2003 - -- Brockway Public Hearing: Brockway Site Redevelopment The redevelopment for the 120 -acre Brockway site will consist of a mix of residential uses and a small commercial area. The developer is anticipating around 600 housing units primarily being a variety of townhomes. The single family homes are on 55 and 70 foot lots. The standard is 80 foot lots. Based on the various reviews and approvals for this project and the impact to the Comprehensive Plan, Staff is recommending the public hearing be continued until November 25, 2003. Project Engineer Aderhold said that a traffic study is being prepared and will be ready for the November 25, 2003 meeting. The access points at STH 3 and Connemara Trail and at STH 3 and CR 38 will be sufficient for the amount of traffic generated by the 600 units. The proposed access to CR 38 may need to be shifted further east to accommodate intersection improvements at STH 3. The stormwater quality, infiltration and rate control requirements are not being met. There is the ability to use off -site ponding west of STH 3, Keegan Lake and the newly built storm pond next to the development. Further information regarding the utilization of off -site ponding will also be prepared for the November 25, 2003 meeting. Homer Tompkins, Contractor Property Developers Company, said they are concerned with the environmental issues. The site is pretty clean but there is some asbestos. They are going to preserve the trees on the southwest corner of the site. The land uses surrounding the site that do affect its value system. Examples would be the trailer park on the south, the railroads tracks on the east and the highway on the west. The price has been difficult as Land prices in Rosemount have skyrocketed. They have to buy the land and then incur the cost of demolishing the existing building. The emphasis on this development is stronger neighborhood involvement, stronger public ground spaces. They want this to be self- contained to provide an added value to help attract the values they need to. Tim Witton, Rotlund Company, stated the accesses are to the north and south of the site. They have put the higher density in the middle of the site so that it is more internal. They have put in a round -about and when people become familiar with them they function very well. They have done a round -about with similar density and it has been very successful. They want to enhance the open green space and make it a focal point. He gave an overview of the various amenities they are proposing and they look forward to working out the details with Staff. They have approximately 32.4 acres of open green space, ponding, etc. There are several opportunities to explore with the open space. This is an intergeneration development that touches all facets of the market. Chairperson Weisensel opened the public hearing. William Rohr, 2813 132 Street West, is concerned with the impact to the Comprehensive Plan, stormwater runoff, and the increased traffic. It is already hard getting onto Hwy 3. The Minea property was approved at a higher density which will add to the current traffic problems. He inquired what the utility plans were for CR38 and if those residents will be assessed for the improvements necessary for the Brockway redevelopment. Project Engineer Aderhold outlined the stormwater ponding options available as well as the traffic study that will be prepared for November 25, 2003. There was some discussion on the utilities in that area. City Planner Pearson discussed the comprehensive plan in relation to this redevelopment. The Business Park 4 district does allow multi- density housing so that would have been allowed if proposed. This site is no longer a consideration for the library site. Dan Kehoe, 13100 South Robert Trail, has lived in Rosemount for 43 years with the last 18 years being at this address. He has seen the traffic get worse and worse and it is tough to get onto Hwy 3. He also has kids in school and it is hard to get on Hwy 3 from both the High School and Middle School. The City is getting more building but nothing is being done to improve the highway. He is concerned that any turn lane improvements will start at or near his driveway and he is wondering what that impact will have on his property. He thinks the stop lights will just back -up the traffic. Tom Weis, Superintendent of Brockway Golf Course, is concerned with losing his position and is wondering if this project was going to happen. He has learned this will be an on -going process. He inquired if the developer would keep the course open as long as possible. Homer Tompkins of CPDC stated that they need to close on this transaction by March of 2004. The time - frame is very tight and they feel it will be hard to get any time extensions from the current owner. If everything went as planned, the golf course would not be open next year. Jerry Anderson, 2295 Bonaire Path, asked about the sanitary sewer service to this project and where exactly it will run. There area lot of problems with sewer around Keegan Lake right now and he is wondering if they will run that sewer around the lake to those homes. There was further discussion on the stormwater run -off and improvements that can be made to ensure the lake does not flood. This development will be self - contained and will be responsible for taking care of the stormwater run -off - paiaaeo uoiIoW •0 :sAeN uosaapuy `uanZ `aaussaw `lasuesia/N `aaddeN :saAy 'aaussaW Aq puooeS �OOZ `qZ aagwanoN plun 6uueaq oilgnd aql anuiluoo o} lasuasiaM Aq NOLLOW panjosaa ueaq aouis aneq sanssi esogj pa}els eqS . -una aalennwaols 6uipae6aa aoowaanE] ui 0ddo glinn peq aneq Aaqj senssi 6uipae6aa as }dal a pa:4iwgns peq `aue� egnuea t,6M `�aaewzoe>{ qaa •aoeds uaaa6 eqj jo uoilezign eqj pue sad Al 6uisnoq aql uo uoissnosip aaow osle seen aaagl - slueua} algissod pue eaae leioaawwoo eqj uo uoissnosip awos seen aaagl •juawdo19nap eqj Aq pa}eaao CITY OF ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION Planning Commission Meeting Date: November 25, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Brockway Site Redevelopment AGENDA SECTION: • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Public Hearing con't. • Rezoning • Concept Planned Unit Development PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson, City Planner AGENDA NO.1 ATTACHMENTS: Location map, Refined Concept reductions, APPROVED BY: Housing details, Staff Memos Applicant: Consultant: Property Owner: Area & Location: Comp. Plan desig.: Current zoning: Proposed Housing: Homer Tompkins of Contractor Property Developers Company (CPDC). Ed Hasik of Westwood Professional Services George Wintz Approximately 120 acres east of South Robert Trail, north of Connemara Trail, South of County Road 38 (132 St. W.). Business Park (Buildings & Parking); Parks / Open Space (Golf Course). BP -2, Business Park PI, Public / Institutional Proposed Zoning 86 Single Family — detached units R -1, Low Density Residential 346 Townhouse — attached units R -2 and R -3, Moderate and Medium Dens. Res. 180 Multiple Family — Apartments and Condos R-4, High Density Residential SUMMARY Homer Tompkins of CPDC has refined his concept proposal for redevelopment of the Brockway site for mixed residential uses and a small commercial site. A total of 612 housing units consisting of townhouses (56:5 %), apartments /condos (29.4 %) and single family on small lots (14 %) are proposed. A small neighborhood commercial site is also proposed for the southeast corner of the property on land unsuitable for residential use. The Concept clearly indicates the building types, orientation and relationship to surrounding land uses. Detail provided indicates public and private streets / driveways garages and parking. The attached Staff Review memo has been revised to respond to the provided detail and includes a series of recommended conditions. As previously suggested, this redevelopment scenario causes the City to re- examine previously held assumptions about the site starting with land use. Therefore, starting from the very basics, this first phase of review includes: Comprehensive Plan Amendment to a combination of Urban and High Density Residential; and Commercial. 2. Rezoning to the applicable residential and commercial districts. 3. Concept Planned Unit Development describing the land use areas, intensities, acreages, numbers and types of units, traffic circulation, parking, open space, recreation areas, pedestrian walkways, development staging, utility provisions and overall design objectives. Future phases of review anticipated at the end of this year or early 2004 will include: 1. Environmental Review (Environmental Assessment Worksheet EAW required). 2. Preliminary Plat / PUD Final Development Plana 3. The final plats for each phase (multiple years assumed). November 25, 2003 Planning Commission Reviews — Brockway Executive Summary Page 2. There is also an amendment process for plan revisions as needed. As previously mentioned, the attached memo provides further details of the development and staff recommendations. Approval of the Concept requires three separate motions: RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1 Motion to recommend that the City Council authorize staff to prepare an amendment to the 2020 Rosemount Comprehensive Plan and forward the amendment to the Metropolitan Council. 2. Motion to recommend that the City Council rezone the housing and commercial land -use areas to be consistent with the amended comprehensive plan and the concept master plan as conditionally approved. (Council action to adopt the rezoning may not occur until final plat approval). 3. Motion to recommend that the City Council approve the concept master plan for the Brockway site subject to: a) Aligning driveways and street intersections to eliminate off -set intersections with intervals of less than 250 feet. b) Provision of unrestricted turn- arounds with a minimum turning radius of 45 feet for all dead- end common driveways or streets exceeding 150 feet, or as approved by the Rosemount Fire Marshal. c) Utilization of the excess lot depth along the outer edge of the single family land use areas to create a greenway for trails / sidewalks and buffering the effects of the traffic and dissimilar land uses. d) Further articulation of high- density amenities, building materials & character. In the absence of such details, each building fagade shall have a minimum of 25% brick, and monolithic vertical building planes shall be avoided with articulation of dwelling units, windows and balconies. Architectural details such as dormer windows shall be used to provide relief of long roof eves. Primary building entrances shall have a variety of design features including separate gables, verandas or canopies creating significant relief (off -sets in excess of six feet). e) Concept approval does not guarantee the number of dwelling units. f) Incorporation of recommendations by the Parks and Recreation Commission including land dedication of four to ten acres and active public recreational facilities in the private park area with easements as necessary. g) Incorporation of recommendations of the City Engineer relative to access, circulation, drainage, easements, grading, storm water management, traffic and utilities. h) Execution of a PUD agreement. i) Preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet and incorporating resulting recommendations into the preliminary plat design. j) Conformance with PUD Final Development Plan / Preliminary Plat and Final Plat requirements. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: C1. M., CITY OF ROSEMOU NT MEMORANDUM Planning Commission FROM: Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director Rick Pearson, City Planner Andy Brotzler, City Engineer Dan Schultz, Parks & Recreation Director DATE: November 25, 2003 RE: Brockway Site Redevelopment: • Comprehensive Plan Amendment • Rezonings . • Concept Planned Unit Development SUMMARY CITY HALL 2875 - 145th Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 -4997 Phone: 651- 423 -4411 Hearing Impaired: 651.423 -6219 Fax: 651- 423 -5203 Homer Tompkins of Contractor Property Developers Company proposes to redevelop the Brockway property for mixed residential use that includes a neighborhood commercial site. The residential uses include: single family (small lots), townhouses, apartments and senior condominiums for a total of 612 units. Amenities for the residential uses would include a community center with a pool and extensive public & private park development. The Brockway redevelopment site currently consists of approximately 120 acres including offices, warehouse, the glass foundry and the golf course. The Applicant had indicated from the beginning that the project is not feasible without the golf course land. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment and related rezonings are policy decisions that will change the land use from Industrial (Business Park) and Golf Course (Public & Private Open Space) to a combination of residential and commercial uses and a park. The Concept Planned Unit Development will define the development with specific housing types, site density and site design. The Concept review is critical, because it is the time that the City will have the greatest level of influence on the design. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT The current 2020 Rosemount Comprehensive Plan has two land use designations for the Brockway site. The building complex and parking area is designated Business Park, assuming that the warehouse and other buildings would redevelop. The golf course is designated as parks or open space. The Comprehensive Plan amendment will need to change the land use designation to a combination of urban and high density residential reflecting the housing types in the concept, as well as the small commercial site. The comprehensive plan amendment process triggers Metropolitan Council review to examine the projected Brockway Site demand on regional services for sanitary sewer treatment, highway, transportation and housing. The other regional systems of airports and parks will not be measurably affected. The park component of the development is strictly a local park, and not part of the Dakota County, or State Park systems. Rosemount's Comprehensive Plan also has goals for housing mix or ratio of dwelling types that will be impacted by the redevelopment. The implications of the Comp Plan Amendment to the City are twofold: 03 -001 Brockway November 25, 2003 Page 2 of 9 • The Brockway area sanitary sewer demand may compete with limited sewer capacity available for other properties that are in the current Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) phase. Potentially, the additional capacity issue could force a waste -water treatment plant upgrade in the Rosemount plant, or diversion of effluent to other regional treatment plants (Empire or Metro). • The City has a housing mix goal of 65% Single Family / 35% Multiple or attached housing. Approval of the concept based upon the proposed 612 units would influence the current ratio as follows: Single Family (detached) — Current 81.4 % (6439 total units) Proposed 76.5% (6525 total units) Multiple Family (attached) — Current 18.6 % (1471 total units) Proposed 23.4% (1997 total units) All of the above unit counts are based upon a combination of current units and anticipated units, which would be those already approved but not yet built. REZONINGS Adoption of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment will enable the rezonings to be adopted reflecting the housing types. It is anticipated that the appropriate choices will be a combination of: • R -1, Low Density Residential for the single family lots (86 units) usually up to three units per acre; • R -2, Moderate Density Residential for the Garden and Urban Row Townhomes (160 units) usually up to six units per acre; • R -3, Medium Density Residential for the Villa and Gable Townhomes (186 units) usually ten to twelve units per acre. • R -4, High Density Residential for the Apartments and Senior Housing (180 units) above 12 units per acre. • Appropriate Commercial zoning for the neighborhood commercial site. C -1, Convenience Commercial is recommended based upon the concept sketch. CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT The Concept has a self- contained quality with its outer edges consisting of collector or minor arterial streets. Only a portion of the eastern boundary is shared with property that could redevelop. Connemara and 132 n Street are collector streets, which will be appropriate for moving traffic into and out of the development. The existing driveway along STH 3 will be closed. Access to the development occurs along a north -south parkway extending through the site. A significant design feature in the center of the site is an intersection round -about that connects with the east -west street. This central "node" combines with a loop road that gives the character of a tiered site. The street pattern also contributes towards forming neighborhoods by separating the housing types, roughly into quadrants on the site. The north -south parkway is an important feature of the concept, combining function with 03 -001 Brockway November 25, 2003 Page 3 of 9 aesthetics. It features significant tree plantings on tighter than usual spacing, and medians with more trees to channel the flow of traffic and add character. Private streets are proposed throughout the development. 22 ft. widths for the private streets are requested (28 ft. width is the standard (face to face). A traffic study has been prepared by the City's consulting engineering firm, W.S.B. The entire text is included in the Commissions packet. The study indicates that the proposed access locations into the project are reasonable and will accommodate projected traffic flows. A second street connection will be recommended to Bonaire Path (County Road 38). It originates at the round -about and extends to the east property -line of the adjacent 7.5 acre parcel. From the neighboring parcel, it is suggested that the road will swing north to connect with Bonaire Path with a reasonable separation from the railroad tracks to the east. From a traffic standpoint, the site will generate approximately 3,000 new trips per day. This compares to adjacent new development that is projected to generate 4,300 new trips per day. The study notes that without any improvement to Hwy 3 and CR 38 the intersection will operate at a Level of Service E during the peak hours and Hwy 3 and Connemara Trail will operate at a Level of Service E during the PM peak hour period. With the improvements proposed in the Municipal Cooperative Agreement Application the City has made to MnDOT, the Connemara intersection and all other intersections, except for Hwy 3/CR38 intersection will function at a Level of Service C or better. A signal light at CR 38 is required to improve the projected level of service from LOS E to LOS B. A signal light at CR38 /Hwy 3 is not part of the Cooperative Agreement Application. All projections are forecast to the year 2008, which is when the applicant anticipates full build -out of the Brockway project. Given the need for signalization at CR 38 and Connemara Trail in the near future, the developer should be put on notice that they will be contributing some portion of the financing for the signal installations. OPEN SPACE, PARK & AMENITIES Approximately 29 % of the site is designated for public / private open space including ponds. The southwest corner of the site will become a 12.9 -acre park that provides the highest amenity value with rolling topography and significant trees. The park will include footpaths, a picnic area, overlook view area and open space restored to native prairie. Staff would suggest that this is a transition area including Oak Savanna / clearing vegetation, given the mature hardwood trees. More specifically, the golf course facilities would be removed, and the land restored to a more natural state including prairie and Oak Savanna plants. A pond would separate the park from the townhouses to the east. The southwestern corner park is linked to a private green space, which separates the apartments and senior housing. This space forms an axis that connects through the higher density housing with a community center and the street intersection round - about. The open space includes active recreational facilities including a ball field, games courts and a pool at the community center. A 03 -001 Brockway November 25, 2003 Page 4 of 9 pipeline corridor of about 5.63 acres overlaps portions of the park and the private open space. The pipeline corridor traverses the site from west to east and provides a greenway with a trail and part of the ball field. The round -about includes ornamental trees and a fountain / water feature in the center. The open space continues northeast, through the Row Townhouse area, ultimately forming a site line to Keegan Lake. This northeastern open space is lined with ornamental and shade trees, includes walking paths, sidewalks and a gazebo. The Planning Commission had previously suggested a pedestrian underpass similar to Evermoor between the passive park area and the ball field. The pipeline corridor may preclude this suggestion, unless it occurs north of the small pond (which is in the pipeline easement). It does not appear the project will generate significant traffic along the internal ring road warranting the need for an underpass, especially as compared to Connemara Trail, where a trail underpass was constructed as part of the Evermoor project. The community center is now shown to have a driveway and parking. The driveways should be consolidated to reduce conflict points on the north -south parkway. Other facilities include a tot - lot, half games court and a pool. The building uses and character should be defined. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Based on the concept plan, this area meets the city's criteria for service by a neighborhood park. Neighborhood parks typically serve 300 to 650 households. The park would need to be four to ten acres in size, depending on the proposed amenities and location of the park. The proposed concept plan does appear to have adequate space set aside for public recreation. The proposed public park area is dominated by trees, rolling topography and small ponds. The site could provide for some very creative passive recreational opportunities. The private park area appears to include active recreation facilities. Due to the location and lack of access to active public recreational facilities, the Parks Director is recommending that a portion of the private park be included as a public recreational facility. Because the residents of this development will take part in public recreation programs, it is necessary for the neighborhood park to handle some of the facility demands of the development and not further burden facilities that are in high demand. With the dedication of the ball field to the City, it is expected that maintenance of the facility would be public and that some programming may occur at the site, consistent with what occurs at other neighborhood parks in the community. Staff urges Council to keep in mind that if recreational facilities are not built to adequately meet the residents' needs it will have a negative impact on our other facilities, causing more stress to our current facilities. The Parks and Recreation Commission will be reviewing the concept plan at their November 24, 2003 meeting. Staff is recommending we follow the Parks Master Plan with regard to meeting the criteria for a neighborhood park and for what type of land is acceptable for credit toward parks dedication. With the addition of more active public recreation space dedicated to the City, the Parks Director will be recommending that the Parks and Recreation Commission recommend 4 03 -001 Brockway November 25, 2003 Page 5 of 9 approval of the concept plan. A verbal update of the Parks Commission discussion will be available at the Planning Commission meeting. STORMWATER PONDING AND GRADING Because this is application is at the concept stage there has not been a final review of stormwater ponding requirements. However, staff believes that a good portion of the ponding from the site will be directed to off -site ponding areas. The site drains in three directions; north to Keegan Lake, west across Hwy 3, and east to an existing regional pond. All three of these areas are designated for regional ponding areas in the city's stormwater management plan. An easement over the low area in the west will be needed to permit ponding in that location. During the October planning commission meeting there was some concern expressed about potential ponding in Keegan Lake and the impact on existing residences. The City has begun the process for installation of an outlet from Keegan Lake reducing the risk of flooding. It is expected that this outlet project will begin in late spring 2004. There will continue to be on -site ponding required for rate control and water quality reasons. The developer should anticipate payment to the City in lieu of on -site ponding for the entire project drainage needs. Grading information has not been provided at this time given that the application is for concept plan approval only. However, the developer and Commission need to be aware that site topography may cause modifications to the concept plan from that which is currently up for review. In some cases, topography can affect the plan such that units are deleted from the plan to address all city requirements. Further information will be made available at the preliminary plat stage of the project. HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS & ISSUES • 70 and 50 ft. wide single - family lots suggest opportunities for traditional housing styles. The concept legend features housing examples expected in the Evermoor Glendalough neighborhood, Liberty on the Lakes (Stillwater) and Cobblestone Lake in Apple Valley. Front porches / entries and de- emphasized garages are emphasized. Other features include mostly two story units with complementary colors, materials and architectural elements including low maintenance siding with aluminum trim and brick / stone accents. This portion of the development is a form of "cluster housing" with smaller lots fronting on a public street. In this case, particularly as they back up to 132 Street, the lots have extraordinary depth, which provides opportunities for screening. Staff is suggesting that the greenway starting further south, on the pipeline corridor, be extended to the outer edge of the development in this area. It does not appear that any buildable area would be taken away from those lots. The additional greenway would allow for screening to County Road 38. Requested setbacks include 20 ft. front yards, five feet (both) sides (55 ft. lots) and garages would be 25 feet setback. 70 ft. lots would have 7.5 ft. side yard setbacks for both sides. • The Garden Homes are single -level quads similar to the Wensmann development north of Dodd Blvd. next to the Shannon Parkway Fire Station. These townhouses are usually a "low" low- density type product. The building design means that every unit is a corner unit. The downside is that garages and driveways tend to dominate the units, on opposite 03 -001 Brockway November 25, 2003 Page 6 of 9 sides of the structures. Maintenance free siding with aluminum trim and brick accents will be featured. 20 ft. front yard setbacks are requested, • Gable & Villa Townhomes provide the highest density type of product, besides the apartments and condominiums. It appears that much of the developed site is allocated to this type of housing. The buildings are large with 8 and even 12 unit double - loaded buildings. Gables have two stories of living space and decks above the two car garages. Villas have two stories of living space — along side and above the garages. These typically offer the most affordable owner- occupied housing besides condominiums. Each unit has its own pedestrian entrance to the street, and separate garage space. However, because the units back -up to each other, the only exterior wall is where the front door & garage is, unless it is a corner unit. Materials include a combination of shake and maintenance -free lap siding. Staff recommends that the site concept design should modify the distribution of Gable & Villa Townhouse buildings to relieve the dense, monolithic garage & asphalt corridors that can result due to the style of these structures. One method would be to have underground parking (2 driveways instead of 12). Another suggestion would be to "sandwich" Gable & Villa units between the single loaded urban row - houses • Urban Row Townhomes are the traditional single- loaded townhouses with pedestrian entrances on one side and the garages on the opposite side. The front door on the side opposite the garages often provide an attractive streetscape or orientation towards open space. The concept shows 2.5 -story walk -up units in front and three story units, including a tuck -under garage in the rear. Brick or stone accents will occur on the ground level, and lap and shake siding above. • There is minimal information available concerning the apartments or the senior housing. 120 apartment units are proposed with 120 underground parking spaces and 40 above ground. 60 senior units are proposed. The buildings are anticipated to be three stories with underground parking. Style, massing, height, materials and the specific amenities must be provided. Approval of the high- density housing should be conditioned on some expectations of proposed standards and amenities as part of a PUD or zoning strategy. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL The southeast corner of the development is proposed for a 4.1 acre commercial site. Access is shown from the north -south parkway around the north side of the building with parking behind. The building is oriented towards the sidewalk with a small plaza in front and exhibits traditional pedestrian character. The concept architecture suggests a 15,000 sq. ft. two -story building with variations of fagade suggesting four or five separate uses/ tenants. The concept does not suggest a gas station as one of the uses. However, staff would entertain a gas station at the site, so long as access and traffic were adequately addressed and the architecture and design of the station and canopy were consistent with the remaining retail and complementary to the proposed residential uses. This site is the re- mediated Brockway dump -site. The site was not cleaned up to a level appropriate for residential re -use, but commercial would be acceptable. Given its location along Connemara Trail and the railroad tracks, it would not be optimum for residential use anyway. 6 03 -001 Brockway November 25, 2003 Page 7 of 9 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION The concept presents a dramatic change for the Brockway area. Implications of the land use change need to be further explored, particularly with regard to the impact of the project on the overall housing mix in the community. It is anticipated that the concept introduces a significant number of single family, attached and multiple housing units in an area not previously considered for housing. Redevelopment of the Brockway site is the primary incentive for the City to ultimately approve the Concept, Comp Plan Amendment, and Rezonings. Introduction of this plan prompts a shift in thinking about the long -term use of the property. While not initially contemplated, residential development on the site is consistent with surrounding land uses in the area. Additionally, the site is somewhat isolated due to the presence of major streets and railroad, which means the developer needs to create a cohesive neighborhood through design and amenities. It appears that the applicant is moving in that direction as depicted in the present concept plan. If the Planning Commission is in support of the concept, then there are a number of issues or concept refinements that will be resolved as the process continues: • Preparation of Comp Plan Amendment documentation including sewer flow data and trip generation. • Zoning strategies with applicable standards. • Modify plans based upon the Planning Commission discussion and public comment. • Preparation of EAW and appropriate findings. RECOMMENDED MOTION 1. Motion to recommend that the City Council authorize staff to prepare an amendment to the 2020 Rosemount Comprehensive Plan and forward the amendment to the Metropolitan Council. 2. Motion to recommend that the City Council rezone the housing and commercial land- use areas to be consistent with the comprehensive plan and the concept master plan as conditionally approved. 3. Motion to recommend that the City Council approve the concept master plan for the Brockway site subject to: a) Aligning driveways and street intersections to eliminate off -set intersections with intervals of less than 250 feet. b) Provision of unrestricted turn - arounds with a minimum turning radius of 45 feet for all dead -end common driveways or streets exceeding 150 feet, or as approved by the Rosemount Fire Marshal. C) The Parkway and public streets shall be constructed in accordance with City Standards and a minimum of eight feet of right -of -way width shall be - provided for boulevard trees to eliminate conflicts with curb & gutter, sidewalks and trails. The round about shall be consistent with applicable standards for minimum turning radius, lane width and shall include 7 03 -001 Brockway November 25, 2003 Page 8 of 9 ornamental tree plantings and a water fountain in the center. d) In all cases where private streets are 22 ft. wide (or otherwise less than City standards, no parking will be allowed on either side, and common parking requirements for the development shall not be waived. e) Utilization of the excess lot depth along the outer edge of the single- family land use areas to create a greenway for trails / sidewalks and buffering the effects of the traffic and dissimilar land uses. 0 Single- family lots with setback and lot width reductions shall have front porches or entries as prominent design features and garages shall be setback a minimum of five feet from the front elevation of the house. Most of the houses shall be tow story designs with complementary colors, materials and architectural elements. Minimum materials expectations include low maintenance siding with aluminum trim and brick / stone accents. g) All townhouse units shall have two -car garages consistent with applicable zoning standards. Transitions between housing types shall include landscaping to buffer the dissimilar housing styles and neighborhoods. h) The outer edge of the development particularly along STH 3, Connemara Trail, County Road 38, and the railroad right -of -way shall have increased setbacks consistent with city standards for screening the effects of higher traffic volumes and the railroad. i) The apartment and senior condos shall be limited to three stories in height and have a minimum of one underground parking space per unit. Apartments shall be consistent with all applicable standards. D Further articulation of high- density amenities, building materials & character. In the absence of such details, each building fagade shall have a minimum of 25% brick, and monolithic vertical building planes shall be avoided with articulation of dwelling units, windows and balconies. Architectural details such as dormer windows shall be used to provide relief of long roof eves. Primary building entrances shall have a variety of design features including separate gables, verandas or canopies creating significant relief (off -sets in excess of six feet). k) Concept approval does not guarantee the number of dwelling units. 1) Incorporation of recommendations by the Parks and Recreation Commission including land dedication of four to ten acres and active public recreational facilities in the private park area with easements as necessary. m) The neighborhood park shall include footpaths, a picnic area, overlook view area and golf course facilities shall be restored to appropriate native conditions applicable to prairie and oak savanna. Private open space including recreational amenities serving the development shall include a ball field backstop, games courts including half - basketball and a pool at the community center: n) Incorporation of recommendations by the City Engineer relative to access, 8 03 -001 Brockway r November 25, 2003 Page 9 of 9 circulation, drainage, easements, grading, storm water management, traffic and utilities. o) Execution of a PUD Agreement. P) Preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet and incorporating resulting recommendations into the preliminary plat design. q) Conformance with PUD Final Development Plan / Preliminary Plat and Final Plat requirements. 9 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY BROCKWAY DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTOR PROPERTY DEVELOPERS COMPANY FOR: CITY OF ROSEMOUNT 2875145 TH STREET WEST ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068 November 12, 2003 Prepared by: WSB & Associates, Inc. 4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55422 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY BROCKWAY SITE ROSEMOUNT, MN WSB PROJECT NO, 1565 -00 GA2003 \Planning Cases \03- 001CON Brockway \TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 11- 03.doc CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Charles T. Rickart, P.E., P.T.O.E. Date: November 12, 2003 Lic. No. 26082 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY BROCKWAY SITE ROSEMOUNT, MN WSB PROJECT NO. 1565 -00 G:\2003 \Planning Cases \03- 001CON BrockwaffRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 11- 03.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS LINTRODUCTION ................................................................................ ..............................1 II. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS .............................................. ..............................3 III. SITE TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS ............................................ ..............................4 IV. PROPOSED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ................................. ..............................6 V. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ....................................................... ..............................5 VI. SITE ACCESS......... ............................................................................ .............................12 VII. CONCLUSIONS /RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................... .............................13 APPENDICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY BROCKWAY SITE ROSEMOUNT,MN WSB PROJECT NO. 1565 -00 G:\2003 \Planning Cases \03 -001 CON Brockway \TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 11- 03.doc INTRODUCTION Contractor Property Developers Company plans to construct a residential development in the City of Rosemount, MN. The site of the proposed development is bounded by Trunk Highway (TH) 3 on the west, County Road (CR) 38 on the north, Connemara Trail on the south and the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, and Pacific Railroad on the east. Access to this site will be provided via one full access driveway to CR 38 and one full access driveway to Connemara Trail, with a site circulation roadway within the site. Figure 1 in the Appendix shows the proposed site plan. The City of Rosemount requested that a Traffic Impact Study be prepared to determine what impact the proposed development might have on traffic operations and what site access improvements may be necessary to safely and efficiently accommodate both site and non -site traffic. In order to thoroughly evaluate this impact, the following tasks were undertaken: 1. Meet with the City of Rosemount and the developer to discuss the perimeters of the development. 2. Where traffic data was lacking or out of date, conduct traffic counts at key intersections. 3. Using existing traffic volume data and appropriate factors, future background (non -site) traffic volumes were projected for the Design Year 2008 (estimated year of full development) for the A.M. peak hour (7:00 to 8:00 a.m.) and P.M. peak hour (5:00 to 6:00 p.m.). 4. Estimate site generated traffic volumes. This estimate will be based on published rates in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Traffic Generation Manual. 5. Based on current traffic patterns, develop a directional distribution for site generated traffic. 6. Based on the derived directional distribution, assign traffic volumes to the area roadway system. 7. Combine site generated traffic volumes as assigned to the roadway system with Design Year background traffic volumes. 8. Perform a Capacity Analysis on traffic volumes derived in Item 7 for key intersections within the site area. Based on these analyses, define site access requirements and recommend any necessary improvements. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY BROCKWAY SITE ROSEMOUNT,MN WSB PROJECT NO. 1565 -00 Page 1 G:\2003 \Planning Cases \03 -001 CON Brockway \TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 11- 03.doc 9. Review of site circulation and access plan. The results of these analyses is a roadway and site access system capable of accommodating expected future traffic volumes. The key findings of these analyses are given in the following sections of this report. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY BROCKWAY SITE ROSEMOUNT, MN WSB PROJECT NO. 1565 -00 Page 2 GA2003 \Planning Cases \03- 001CON Brockway \TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 11- 03.doc II. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS As stated previously, the site is located east of Trunk Highway (TH) 3 between CR 38 and Connemara Trail. The site location is illustrated in Figure 2 found in the Appendix. The primary roadways expected to be served by the site are discussed below. Trunk Highway (TH) 3 is a north/south B minor arterial roadway which extends from St. Paul southerly through Rosemount into Southern Minnesota. In the vicinity of the site, TH 3 provides a two -lane cross section with one lame in each direction. At the intersection of CR 38, a northbound and southbound right -turn lane is provided. At the intersection of Connemara Trail, a left- and right -turn lane is provided both northbound and southbound. The posted speed limit on TH 3 transitions from 45 MPH to 55 MPH between Connemara Trail and CR 38. The existing average daily traffic on TH 3 in this area is approximately 12,000 vehicles per day. County Road (CR) 38 is an east /west roadway which runs from Blaine Avenue (CSAH 71) on the east to TH 3 where it jogs northerly before proceeding to the west as CSAH 38. In the vicinity of the site, CR 38 is a two -lane rural cross section with one lane in each direction. Approaching the intersection of TH 3 is a single -lane with no turn lanes. A 45 MPH speed limit is posted on this roadway. The existing average daily traffic on CR 38 is approximately 360 vehicles per day. Connemara Trail is an east /west arterial City street which extends from the Apple Valley border on the west and currently ends at Biscayne Avenue. Connemara Trail is currently under construction to cross the existing railroad tracks and ultimately connect to Blaine Avenue (CSAH 71) on the east. Currently, Connemara Trail is striped to accommodate a two -lane cross section west of TH 3 to match the two -lane cross section east of TH 3. However, the width of Connemara Trail has been constructed to accommodate a four -lane section. Ultimately, Connemara Trail will be a four -lane facility with right- and left -turn lanes at major intersections. Currently, at the intersection of TH 3, a left- and right -turn lane are provided for both eastbound and westbound. A 35 MPH speed limit is posted on Connemara Trail in the vicinity of the site. The current average daily traffic on Connemara Trail is approximately 520 vehicles per day. Existing Traffic Volumes Peak hour turning movement counts were previously conducted by WSB & Associates, Inc. on June 9 and 10, 2003. These counts were conducted from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Twenty -four hour directional counts were also conducted on June 9 and 10 on CR 38 and Comnemara Trail. The existing A.M. peak hour and P.M. peak hour turning movement counts (Figure 3) and the average daily traffic counts (Figure 4) are included in the Appendix. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY BROCKWAY SITE ROSEMOUNT,MN WSB PROJECT NO. 1565 -00 Page 3 GA2003 \Planning Cases \03- OOICON Brockway \TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 11- 03.doc III. SITE TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Site Generated Traffic Volumes The proposed Brockway Site Development that will generate additional traffic consists of 91 single - family residences, 362 town homes, 60 senior condominiums, and 120 apartment units. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual was used to calculate the A.M. and P.M. peak hour entry /exit volumes and the average daily traffic volume for the proposed development. In addition to the proposed site, additional adjacent development was assumed in the analysis. This additional development included the development of the Minea Site, Biscayne Point, and St. Joseph's Church and School. The anticipated A.M., P.M., and average daily traffic trip generation is shown in Table 1 on the following page. Site Traffic Distribution Site traffic distribution was assumed to be consistent with the existing traffic patterns. The existing A.M., P.M., and average daily traffic counts were used to determine this distribution. Figure 5 in the Appendix illustrates the overall traffic distribution for the proposed Brockway site. Projected Traffic The estimated first year of full development for the proposed site is 2008; therefore, the Traffic Impacts Analysis was conducted for that future year. The 2008 background street traffic volumes were estimate by increasing the existing peak -hour counts and average daily traffic volume by a growth factor of 2.7% per year on TH 3 and 6.5% per year on CR 38 and Connemara Trail The higher growth rate is the result of anticipated diverted traffic from 145 Street and other adjacent developments (Bloomfield) not directly included in the traffic generation. The 2008 total traffic volume was then developed by adding the proposed site traffic together with the adjacent development traffic to the background traffic. The Existing and Projected Average Daily Traffic (Figure 4) and projected 2008 A.M. and P.M. peak hour traffic volumes for background (Figure 6) and volume total with site traffic (Figure 7) is included in the Appendix. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY BROCKWAY SITE ROSEMOUNT, MN WSB PROJECT NO. 1565 -00 Page 4 G:\2003 \Planning Cases \03 -001 CON Brockway \TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 11- 03:doc Table 1 Traffic Generation Brockway Site City of Rosemount Land Use Size Unit Average Daily Traffic Rate Trips AM Peak Hour Rate Total Trips In Out PM Peak Hour Rate Total Trips In Out Brockway Site --- -- -- - - -- - Single Single F amity - - - - 91 - Unit - — _ 9.57 871 - - 0.75 -- -- 68 - 17 — 51 - - 1.01 - -- 92 59 - 33 Townhomes 362 Unit _ 5.86 2,12 0.44 159 -- - - - - 27 -- -- - - - --- 132 - - - .....- 0.54 - -- 1 95 - - -- - 131 - 65 Senio Cond 60 Unit 3 .48 209 0.07 4 3 2 0. 6 4 2 Apartments 120 Unit 6.63 - - 79 6 0.51 61 10 51 0.62 7_4 50 25 Total Brockway Trips - -- _ 2,992 22 44 - 183 - - 2 87 -_ 190 98 Adjacent Development Minea Site - Sing Family 160 _______23_2 Unit 9.57 - - 1,531 - 0.75 - 120 30 90 1 .01 162 103 58 Minea Site - Townhomes 232 Unit _ 5.86 1,360 -- 0.44 - - 102 -- --- 17 - -- 85 - - 0.54 . -._. --- --.... 125 84 -- 41 Biscayne Point - Single Famil 104 Unit 9.57 995 0.75 78 20 59 1. 01 67 38 S t. Joe Church 19 100'0 SF 9.11 173 0.72 14 7 6 0 .66 _105 13 7 6 St. Jo School — _ 230 Students 1 .02 235 0.29 67 3 27 0.26 60 28 32 Total Adjacent Trips 4,294 380 114 2 67 3.48 464 289 175 Total Study Area Trips 7,286 6 08 158 450 75 2 479 273 IV. PROPOSED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The City of Rosemount has submitted an application for Fiscal Year (F.Y.) 2005 Municipal Cooperative Agreement Funding for proposed improvements on TH 3 between Connemara Trail and CSAH 38 (125 Street). Figure 8 in the Appendix illustrates the proposed funding request. The proposed TH 3 improvements would include: 1. TH 3 at Connemara Trail ■ Construct a potential new traffic control signal system at the intersection. 2. TH 3 at CR 38 (132 Street) ■ Widen TH 3 with the addition of left -turn and right -turn lanes for northbound and southbound approaches. ■ Widening CR 38 westbound to include two lanes of approach with a through left -turn lane to include a two -lane approach with a left -turn lane and a through right -turn lane. ■ Construct a new access on CR 38 for the Triangle Warehouse /Brockway Golf course property on the east side of TH 3. 3. TH 3 at CSAH 38 (125 Street) ■ Widen TH 3 with the addition of a northbound left -turn lane and southbound right -turn lane. ■ Widen CSAH 38 eastbound to include a two -lane approach with a left -turn lane and right -turn lane. ■ Construct a potential new traffic control signal system at the intersection 4. Access Improvements ■ Close the access on TH 3 to the Triangle Warehouse and Brockway Golf Course and relocate the access to CR 38. ■ Work with property owners on the west side of TH 3 to combine the two access points or relocate both accesses to Dodd Boulevard. The proposed project will benefit the Trunk Highway System by eliminating and/or combining access to the corridor and providing left- and right -turn lane channelization and delineation for TH 3 traffic, thereby improving traffic safety. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY BROCKWAY SITE ROSEMOUNT,MN WSB PROJECT NO. 7565 -00 Page 6 G:\2003 \Planning Cases \03.001 CON Brockway \TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 11- 03.doc For the purposes of this traffic study, future roadway improvements should include, at a minimum, the proposed improvements as outlined in the Municipal Cooperative Agreement Application. Should Mn/DOT not participate in funding these improvements, the developer, City, and County would need to work together to determine a cost sharing alternative for funding the improvements. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY BROCKWAY SITE ROSEMOUNT, MN WSB PROJECT NO. 1565 -00 Page 7 `G:\2003 \P1anning Cases \03 -001 CON Brockway \TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 11- 03.doc V. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Using the traffic volume derived in previous sections, capacity analyses were formed for key intersections within the study area. The analyses of signalized and unsignalized intersections were perfonned using the Synchro Computer Model which simulates capacity analysis techniques as described in the Transportation Research Board (TRB) Highway Capacity Manual. The ability of a highway system to accommodate expected traffic volumes is expressed in terns of Level of Service (LOS). The LOS of an intersection is based on approach delay and the amount of time the driver must wait at an intersection before proceeding. The intersections are graded A through F with A representing the least delay and F representing the greatest delay. In urbanized areas such as Rosemount, an LOS D is typically acceptable during the P.M. peak hour, although LOS C is desirable. A brief description of LOS is provided in Table 2. The LOS measures are standards set forth by the Transportation Research Board (TRB) in the Highway Capacity Manual. The results of the Capacity Analysis are shown in Table 3. The following is a brief discussion of the analysis results for each analysis year. Existing 2003 Analysis The existing capacity and LOS Analysis indicates that all intersections are currently operating at satisfactory levels of service with the current lane configurations. All movements can be accommodated with the existing geometries and traffic controls. Year 2008 Analysis Without Brockway Development /Existing Geometrics — The year 2008 Capacity and Level of Service Analysis indicates that with no roadway improvements (existing geometries) and the projected 2008 traffic volumes including the adjacent development traffic (see Table 1), the intersection of TH 3 at CR 38 would operate at LOS E during both the A.M. and P.M. peak hour. The intersection of TH 3 at Connemara Trail would be operating at LOS D in the A.M. and LOS E in the P.M. peak hour. 2. Without Brockway Development Traffic /Proposed Geometrics The year 2008 Capacity Level of Service Analysis indicates that with the proposed geometries as part of the Municipal Cooperative Agreement funding project previously_ mentioned, the intersection of TH 3 at CR 38 would improve to an LOS B in the A.M. and LOS C in the P.M. peak hours as an unsignalized intersection. The intersection of TH 3 at Connemara Trail, assuming no geometric changes but TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY BROCKWAY SITE ROSEMOUNT, MN WSB PROJECT NO. 1565 -00 Page 8 G:\2003 \Planning Cases \03 -001 CON Brockway \TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 11- 03.doc improved with a traffic signal system, would improve to an LOS B in the A.M. and an LOS C in the P.M. peak hour. 3. With Brockway Site Development — Assuming the addition of the Brockway Development to the other development in the study area, and assuming the improvements outlined in the Municipal Cooperative Agreement Application, the intersection of TH 3 at CR 38 would be at an LOS D in the A.M. and LOS E in the P.M. peak hour as an unsignalized intersection. However, if this intersection would be signalized assuming the same lane geometrics, the level of service would improve to an LOS B in the A.M. peak hour and P.M. peak hour. The intersection of TH 3 at Connemara Trail would continue to operate at LOS C in the A.M. and P.M. peak hour as a signalized intersection as proposed in the Municipal Cooperative Agreement Application. The intersections of Connemara Trail at the site access and CR 38 at the site access would both be operating at LOS A as an unsignalized intersection stopping the traffic exiting the site. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY BROCKWAY SITE ROSEMOUNT, MN WSB PROJECT NO. 1565 -00 Page 9 G\2003 \Planning Cases \03 -001 CON BrockwaffRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 11- 03.doc Table 2 Level of Service Descriptions Brockway Site City of Rosemount LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTION A FREE FLOW: speed controlled by driver's desires, speed limits, or physical roadway conditions. B STABLE FLOW: operating speeds beginning to be restricted, little or no restriction on maneuverability from other vehicles. C STABLE FLOW: speeds and maneuverability more restricted. D APPROACHING UNSTABLE FLOW: tolerable speeds can be maintained but temporary restrictions to flow cause substantial drops in speed, little freedom to maneuver, comfort and convenience are low. E UNSTABLE FLOW: volumes near capacity, speed typically in neighborhood of 30 MPH, stoppages of momentary duration, ability to maneuver severely limited. F FORCED FLOW: low- operating speeds, volume below capacity, queues formed. Table 3 Traffic Analysis Brockway Site City of Rosemount Intersection Existing 2003 2008 without Site 2008 with Site Existing Geometrics Proposed Geometrics AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM TH 3 at CR 38 Unsignalized Signalized A A E E B C D E B B TH 3 at Connemara Tr Unsignalized Signalized A B D E B C C C Connemara Tr at Site Access Unsignalized NA NA NA NA NA NA A A CR 38 at Site Access Unsignalized NA NA NA NA NA NA A A VI. SITE ACCESS The Brockway development site access is proposed to be from two full movement accesses. One access from CR 38 and one access from Connemara Trail. Both access locations will be two -way stop sign controlled stopping the exiting movement from the proposed Brockway site. The access on CR 38 is located approximately 700 feet east of TH 3. This access point is located at a location more than an 1/8 mile east of TH 3 which provides sufficient stacking for traffic approaching TH 3 or traffic that may be turning left to go north at intersections on CR 38 across from the proposed Brockway site access. The access should be constructed to a three -lane cross section with one entering lane and two exiting lanes. The access on Connemara Trail is located approximately 1,500 feet east of TH 3. This location is more than adequate for vehicle stacking to TH 3. However, some consideration should be given to lining up the driveway with the access to the mobile home park. on the south side of Connemara Trail. This access is located approximately 500 feet west of the existing railroad crossing. Although this railroad crossing is not an extremely active crossing, it should be noted that if excess delays are encountered by vehicles waiting for a train, potential backup of traffic may occur through the site access. The access should be constructed to a three -lane cross section with one entering lane and two exiting lanes. The internal site circulation is laid out well to collect and distribute traffic through the site. The proposed traffic circle in the center of the site will need to have adequate signing to familiarize drivers with its operation. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY BROCKWAY SITE ROSEMOUNT,MN WSB PROJECT NO. 1565 -00 Page 12 G:\2003 \Planning Cases \03 -001 CON Brockway \TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 11- 03.doc VII. CONCLUSIONS /RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of the traffic analysis, the following conclusions can be made: ■ Intersection of TH 3 at CR 38 and TH 3 at Connemara Trail are currently operating at satisfactory levels of service (LOS C or better). ■ The proposed site is anticipated to generate 3,000 trips per day. The P.M. peak hour and A.M. peak hour trips are anticipated to be 287 and 228, respectively. ■ The adjacent development is anticipated to generate approximately 4,300 new trips per day with 380 A.M. peak hour trips and 464 P.M. peak hour trips. ■ By 2008, without any geometric improvements, the intersection of TH 3 at CR 38 would be operating at LOS E during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours and the intersection of TH 3 at Connemara Trail would be operating at LOS E during the P.M. peak hour period. ■ With the addition of the improved geometrics as outlined in the Municipal Cooperative Agreement Application including left- and right -turn lanes on TH 3 at CR 38 and a signalized intersection at TH 3 and Connemara Trail, the overall LOS of both intersections would be at satisfactory levels (LOS C or better) without the proposed Brockway Development traffic. ■ In 2008 with the proposed Brockway Development traffic, assuming the improvements as outlined in the Municipal Cooperative Agreement Application are made, the intersection of TH 3 at CR 38 would be operating at LOS E during the P.M. peak hour as an unsignalized intersection. With the installation of a traffic signal at that intersection, the overall LOS would improve to LOS B. All other intersections including the site access, intersection would be operating at LOS C or better. ■ The location of the site accesses to CR 38 and Connemara Trail are adequate for the proposed development. ■ The improvements, as outlined in the Municipal Cooperative Agreement Application, will be required by 2008 to accommodate the proposed site and adjacent development traffic. Even if state funding is not available, TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY BROCKWAY SITE ROSEMOUNT,MN WSB PROJECT NO. 1565 -00 Page 13 G92003 \Planning Cases \03- 001CON Brockway \TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 11- 03.doc the improvements will still be needed to accommodate the Brockway Development. Based on the analysis found in the study and the conclusions discussions above, the following recommendations are made: 1. Work with Mn/DOT on securing Municipal Cooperative Agreement funding for geometric improvements on TH 3 including addition of turn lanes on TH 3 at CR 38 and the signalized intersection at Connemara Trail. Should state funding not be available, the City, County, and developer will need to work together on a cost- share agreement. 2. Monitor the traffic conditions on TH 3 at CR 38 to determine when a traffic signal system would be warranted and justified. Work with Mn/DOT and the County on funding when this occurs. Escrow money from the developer for the City's portion (25 %) of the signal costs. 3. Improve CR 38 from the site access to TH 3 to a 44 -foot three -lane roadway providing left -turn lanes at the site access and TH 3. 4. Construct the site accesses to three -lane cross sections with one entering lane and two exiting lanes. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY BROCKWAY SITE ROSEMOUNT, MN WSB PROJECT NO. 1565 -00 Page 14 GA2003 \Planning Cases \03 -001 CON Brockway \TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 11- 03.doc t: \01005 -77 \cod \fig ure2.dgn �/ .. Cr T115N R19W U a 17 16 > 12 Co B 20 21 ST. ti W 104 C0NNEMARA TR Trailer �W Court 142nd ST. W. N Q 2 w m w a a ST. a W. a a rd ST. W. > 'a �u 103 �a -a J - - - O a a a 146th a ST. a W, m U ST. ❑ a �I J UPPER 147th ST. o w o � > a 148th ST. z a a � a 5. 6. 149th ST . j U PP ER 1149th S T LOWER Q� U / 150th ST. u 150th ST. W. 00LI-l4e-E9G Xb'j ':�u /'raivrvorsy� OO9T,vs ZZb49 NW'sgodeauuiVq 00£ allpS Rerey6lH Puow91N uosI0 O4t7 :.uauadoIanaQ AeAAMooa8 (cooz) 6u1:tSIXE E ain6l V cd — X X W b' — X X �0") W N N) Ln LO -.I - A � �--- 0 0 �, 6Z S2 rnoLn b 9 � I d ill V JVN3NNOO �1r 0 l L '1 = Cn w N) 0 2 - L --► cn OC Ll ", mow ry m w CO -N co o rn -- V cd — X X W b' — X X u6p'Fa'n6q \po3\LL- S00LO \:l �0") N) Ln LO -.I CD - r-,, A � �--- 0 0 0 0� �1r 0 l L '1 = Cn w N) 0 cn W - • Co w ry m u6p'Fa'n6q \po3\LL- S00LO \:l t% \01005 -7 7 \cod\ llg -4.dgn L 0 I ST. -'[ ZR' 105 pFtD o 300 pPGK O v rr) R• O O .— 1350 7: C , \ \, 104 If CONNEMARA 12,000 Trailer Court 7 142nd ST. W. w w a a ST. a W. 3 a rd ST. z w a w r U 103 ?I O Q a a 146th a ST. a W . m U � LOWER 147th ST, m I d �I J UPPER 147th 5T, o w a cc > a 148th ST. z a a � z 5. 6. 149th 1 49th S R `LOWER a� <// 150th ST. v 150th ST a 42 I 3 � w O� N 17. g �0 m I BI TT CIR. �s 15. XX - EXISTING ADT W' " XX - PROJECTED 2025 ADT WL�- �bs -E9L � �n,.=a;o „oss �uauadolanaa �CeA&Moo -j8 ooerIva -£9L ■� uoi:tnq!a:ta si aij}ea1 ZZK9 NW'sllodeauuiyy 5S aJ n 6 C 008 6tH IIeMy6lH leyowaw. uosl00Slb NOlineials[a Dijjdal - xx n � � M '1S y+OST n '15 U +OSI,1 S L n �K N3MO3 Ul6bti m �m D ro °1S U +6bI b3 dd 9 °S n z n � n m o 1S 4 +8bi 2 < 'ls U +Lbi a3ddn co ' is n U +Lbi a3MO I � �� r r m D M m 1S � 0�mo� rk4 + 9bi < -- - m - m < n M n 15 r C n D 1S Pa M n 1S n m N C M '1S Pu2bl JaJip-�1 - nom ONOV %S � Y unSax pu, uk0�i •M °ls •a � %z o o oao 15 Pu2 1 M '1S 1SISi Ol GM n z n \P- O \LL-900IO \ :1 Y \01005 -77 \cod \figure6. dgn O Co XX - AM X X - PM OD �- v •- N 2 Ln U-)M X163 106 O F- M t9 � t,, �— 35 22 00 ° , r v r- k. 2 6 21 87 ° ° k- 0 0 A1 kA 4— 1 1 TRAIL 'A �-- 291 215 1 13 17 19 .— 40 39 ♦ `5 I 365 120 36 ,r 0 0 4 3 CO. RD. 38 41 20 `5 I o Q �T 0 0 9 7 00 34 18 NrnN 00 Ln M ISM N O O Co Ln U-)M X163 106 M t9 � t,, �— 35 22 00 1 r 93 87 ° ° k- 0 0 CONNEMARA TRAIL 'A �-- 291 215 0 0 19 47 ♦ `5 I 365 120 36 16 --► 40 33 o Q rn O 0 M Ln u \poi \LL -900IO \ :l , 0 � O w O 00w OJ co LO Lnm c.n 0 k— 22 Ob N) (D 4— 2 Z b 9 OZ l S92 k – l Z 06 A� 1 ' L b 6 l Al 'Sk OZ Lb 8� 'aJ loo S l Z l6Z --► �' � I V2Jl V?MUNNO3 6S 0b --► SE b LL 2 L LLL 62L cn w L 2 Z 9 —► `51�' S9 20 - N °° LO 90L 29L –1 4 wc cn –� O -� (.0 cn v Wd - XX LO N N �N Co O u \poi \LL -900IO \ :l , O OJ LO Lnm NOLON `° m k – l Z 06 Al kA Al 'Sk OZ Lb 8� 'aJ loo 0L Z -.0 6S 0b --► LL 2 L S9 20 - N w CD –� O v Wd - XX �N Wd - XX u \poi \LL -900IO \ :l , Figure 8 Trunk Highway 3 Improvements F. Y. 2005 Cooperative Agreement Application City of Rosemount, Minnesota October 96, 2003 4150 Olson Memorial Highway ,� Suite 300 / Q \Y S Q Minneapolis, MN 55422 �/� 763- 541-4800 &Asso�iater. lnc. FAX 763 -541 -1700 0 250 500 Brockway Redevelopment Timetable November December January February March 1. Concept Approval---- - - - -12 / 16 CC (soonest) 2. Combination-------------------------------- - - -1/6 or 1 /20 CC 3. Comp Plan Amendment - -12 / 16 CC (soonest)- - - - - -- - - - - -- 4. Rezonings -------------------------------- 5. EAW-------------------------------- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -3/16 CC --3/16 CC 6. Preliminary Plat----------------------------- - - - - -1 / 27 PC PH (soonest) - - - - -3 /16* CC 7. Final Plat and Building Permits - -- Prelim. Plat must be approved * Preliminary Plat cannot be approved until EAW is completed and 1, 3 & 4 approved. Note: All dates are dependant on timely submission of complete applications CC = City Council MC = Metropolitan Council PC = Planning Commission PH = Public Hearing 1. Concept application is currently being processed. The Planning Commission reviewed it on October 14 and again on November 25. The Concept Plan defines new land use and describes the project in terms of overall character, housing types and densities. Issues are identified and the city has the highest level of influence on the proposal. It provides enough detail to consider' amendments to the Comprehensive Plan without engineering the project. 2. Combination application has not yet been received. It assembles multiple parcels. In the case of Brockway, the large building actually straddles a boundary -line. The combination is an interim step necessary for the setting up the Tax Increment Financing district prior to platting the properties. 3. Comp Plan Amendment concurrently with Concept review is the change of land use by the City. Approval by the Metropolitan Council is required. 4. Rezoning applications are also concurrent with Concept and Comp Plan Amendment. Staff will be holding off on the final rezonings until preliminary plat approval. The public hearing for the rezonings was held on November 25 as required. 5. Environmental Assessment Worksheet must be requested by applicant. City's consultant will prepare document, distribute for comments and publish in the EQB Monitor. 6. Preliminary Plat detailed engineering and architectural design of the development. MC PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 34- 02010- 010 -12 FEE OWNER: CUE PROPERTIES LLC COMMON NAME: BROCKWAY PO BOX 581698 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55458 -1698 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 13500 ROBERT TR S ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 PAYABLE 2003 TAXES NET TAX: SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: TOTAL TAX & SA: PAYABLE 2004 ASMNT USAGE:OPEN SPACE INDUSTRIAL -PREF ERRED COMMERCIAL �tOMMERCIAL I 1 /I b. b b �b, I I CO , O N F " UP NOTE: Dimensions rounded to nearest foot Copyright 2003, Dakota County - SITE MAP 2003. ESTIMATED MARKET VALUES (PAYABLE 2004) 2003 BUILDING INFORMATION (PAYABLE 2004): LAND: 1111111111M LOT SIZE T CLUBHOUSE WHSE,DIST BUILDING: YEAR BUILT 1969 1940 TOTAL: 2,429,823 TOTAL SO FT ARCH /STYLE 55.78 TOTAL ACRES FOUNDATION SO FfNOT APPL NOT APPL SCHOOL DISTRICT: 196 182,524 ROAD R/W SO FT FINISHED SO FT 1602 369976 BEDROOMS 0 0 LOCATION: SE1 /4 NE1 /4 SECTION 20- 115 -19 BATHS 2 4 FRAME D -WOOD S -STEEL PAYABLE 2004 HOMESTEAD STATUS: NON HOMESTEAD GARAGE SO FT 0 0 OTHER GARAGE WATERSHED DISTRICT: VERMILLION RIVER MISC BLDG LAST QUALIFIED SALE: DATE: 811990 AMOUNT: 323,750 i I — - �1rn��CLr�terl�- --o 4h 2-02-0 _ cx emou Y rl C�r� PI <<�� i This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This drawing is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, and state offices and other sources, affecting the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. Dakota County is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. If discrepancies are found, please contact Dakota County Survey and Land Information Department. PLAT NAME: SECTION 20 TWN 115 RANGE 19 N TAX DESCRIPTION: PT OF SW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 LYING E OF STH #218 & LOT 2 SUB TO HGWY 003430 2011519 I Map Date: October 6, 2003 Parcels,Updated: 9/18/2003 Aerial Photography: 1990 p - a�" r ml u •� v ' ri y- y�y .s.. __i4._ -s� -:� ®. WWI;) ^� �' 0 The single family homes on 55' wide lots are designed for young professionals and families looking for their first move up home to begin and/or continue the growth of their family. A unique aspect of these homes is the emphasis on the front entry and/or front porch instead of the garage of flee home. There is a common thread of materials and architectural elements and variety of preselected colors used so that homes will complement one another. Prices will range from $240,000 to $300,000. rraditions (young family market) • Two story with full basement and lookout and walkout opportunities. • Square footages range from 1600 to 2600 square feet with three and four bedroom plans. • Two and three car garages. • Low maintenance exterior including vinyl siding with aluminum trim and brick and stone accents. 55' Lot Data • Number of Lots: 39 • Site Area: 14.4 acres • Density(Units /Acre): 2.7 • Lot Width: generally 55' at front setback, 65' on corners. • Lot Depth: generally 135'. Setbacks: 20' front yard to living area 25' front yard to front of garage 5'15' side yard. ROMUND B"C KWAY SITE HOMES, INC. uncn'X4nrTNT'r r,rrNTNTFCnrA The single family homes on 70' wide lots are designed for families that are looking for their first or second move up to larger homes for their growing families. All plans will have the option for three car garages and many with opportunities for front porches. These homes cost anywhere from $380,000 to $450,000. 70' Lot Data • Number of Lots: 47 • Site Area: 19.0 acres • Density.(Units /Acre): 2.5 • Lot Width: generally 70' at front setback, 80' on corners. • Lot Depth: generally 135'. • Setbacks: 20' front yard to living area 25' front yard to front of garage 7.5' side yard. ROTTLUN BROCKWAY SITE HOMES, INC. ••••`•• ". ,_ n n C G 114 n T T TAT T' 114 T TAT XT C C! T The Garden Homes (four unit cluster townhomes) are all corner units with square footages of approximately 1320 square feet. Empty nesters and retirees are the targeted markets for these styles of units. The Garden Homes range in price from $200,000- $220,000. An advantageous characteristic of these units is the one level approach to living, which provides handicap adaptability for ease of accessibility for its owners. Garden Homes come standard with two car garages. The materials used for the Garden homes are maintenance free and include vinyl siding with aluminum trite and brick accents. A Homeowner Association will be responsible for the maintenance of all building exteriors, private drives and landscaping. ...s s&' Garden Homes • Number of Units: 52 • Site Area: 12.5 acres • Density (Units /Acre): 4.2. • Private Street Width: 22' Typ. • Driveway Length: 22' Typ. • Setbacks: 20' front yard 20' between building min. ROTTLUND HOMES, INC. BROCKWAY SITE _ A n C R 1IR n TT NT 'T' — T — — I n — T . The Villas are attached townhomes consisting of eight unit two story building clusters, with square footages ranging between 1632 and 1646 square feet. These townhomes produce densities of approximately 10 units per acre, while at the same time offering a private garage with direct access to the unit, a private front entrance and no unit stacked above another. Each unit has an entry and patio at grade, as well as a two car garage. The entrances for the corner townhomes are on the side of the unit therefore, on the ends of the building the front door is separated from the garage. This offers the unique opportunity to create a colonial rowhouse look with front doors connecting directly with sidewalks. The Villa Townhomes range in price from $170,0004200,000. The materials used for the Villas are maintenance free and consist of vinyl siding with aluminum trim and brick accents. A Homeowner Association will be responsible for the maintenance of all building exteriors, private drives and landscaping. Villa Townhomes • Number of Units: 96 • Site Area: 10.4 acres • Density (Units /Acre): 9.2 • Private Street Width: 22' Typ. • Driveway Length: 22' Typ. • Setbacks: 20' front yard 20' between building min. ROTTLUND HOMES, INC. B RO C -WAY SITE GABLES The target markets for these units are the single professionals and couples typically without children that might enjoy outdoor decks. The unique quality of these townhomes is the ability to produce densities of approximately 16 to 18 units per acre, while at the same time offering a private garage with direct access to the unit, a private front entrance and no unit stacked above another. All units have three levels, which allow for living space to be on its own level and not to be shared with the garage. This enables more windows to be incorporated into the design. All living space will be located on the second level, with bedrooms occupying the third level and storage and utilities on the garage level. The Gables range in square footage from 1470 to 1520. All units will have two car garages. The Gables range in price from $160,000- $180,000. The materials used for the Gables are maintenance free and consist of stone accents at the main level, vinyl lap and shake siding and asphalt roofing. A Homeowner Association will be responsible for the maintenance of all building exteriors, private drives, and landscaping. Gables • Number of Units: 90 • Site Area: 8.9 acres • Density (Units /Acre): 10.1 • Private Street Width: 22' Typ. • Driveway Length: 22' Typ. • Setbacks: 20' front yard 20' between building min. ®' ROTES,INC "CKWAY SITE B HOMES, INC. .. URBAN ROW TOWNHOMES The target market for Urban Row Townhomes are the single professionals and couples typically without children. The unique quality of these townhomes is the ability to offer a private two car garage with direct access to the unit, a private front entrance, and no unit stacked above another. All units are two story, Row type townhomes, which allow windows to be on two or three sides of the home. Living space will be located on the main level, with bedrooms occupying the upper level. All units will have two car garages. The materials used for the units will be maintenance free and consist of stone or brick accents at the main level, vinyl lap and shake siding, and asphalt roofing. A Homeowner Association will be responsible for the maintenance of all building exteriors, private drives, and landscaping. t a s h V-4 r- ..r,� � v Urban Row Townhomes • Number of Units: 108 • Site Area: 13.1 acres • Density (Units /Acre): 8.2 • Private Street Width: 22' Typ: • Driveway Length: 22' Typ. Setbacks: 20' front yard 20' between building min. ROTTLUND B"C KWAY SITE - ----- HOMES, INC. R n C F M Tl T T M T M T NAT N F Q n T d APARTMENTS - An important part of the community's range of housing opportunities are the apartments. This component of the development is anticipated to be two 3 -story buildings providing approximately 120 rental units. Parking will be provided both underground and at grade. The proximity to the community center facilities and open spaces provides recreational opportunities for residents. Apartment Unit Data:. • Number of Units: 120 • Site Area (Senior Housing included): 14.4 acres • Density (Units /Acre): 12.5 • Setbacks: 25' from R.O.W. • Parking: Underground: 120 stalls Above ground: 40 stalls • Dwelling Size (sq. ft.): 950 sf +/ _® ®' R °TTLUND HOMES, INC. BROCKWAY SITE Senior Housing is proposed to be a three story, architecturally distinctive building which can accomodate the social and service functions so important to senior living. The senior housing campus will be directly adjacent to the community center facilities and the large private park. Some internal facilities are likely to be provided as well. The target age group served will be 55- 60 +, and prices are expected to be in the $200 - 220,000 range. Senior Housing Data: • Number of Units: 60 • Site Area (Apartments included): 14.4 acres Density (Units /Acre): 12.5 =I ROTTLUND BR NCKWAY SITE - HOMES, INC. R n C F M 0 11 N T M r N NT F C n T A cw01 G" �ltiss (sAfvF Iva IV 0"- slo6�ov� r swa wl INe�p,K -T urmw r+r -rrF: fnug m,vr" KwIK „ T2w ry,.z l,.nws 7F•Ea' S :I rIRH u ul Tr"'a -s 4� =sl ro atA” N1w *- �— Fsv.ro ea.vw,! vJ eeaG. Mh It , P. al, TD °rc t su" e e > tA1aa5 The neighborhood commercial component of the project is anticipated to consist of approximately 1.5,000 square feet of business retail located adjacent to Connemara Trail. The retail center will be architecturally distinctive and is planned to offer a variety of services and goods for the neighborhood residents as well as the surrounding community. Commercial Unit Data: • Building Size (sq.ft.): 15,000 + /- • Parking Provided: 85 stalls + /- • Front Setback: 20' • Side Setback: 30' to Connemara Trail -_ ANY - ROTTLUND B" C KWAY SITE HOMES, INC. — -- ROS EMO UNT. MINNESOTA Level of Service Descriptions s Brockway Site City of Rosemount LEVEL OF Stop Sign SERVICE DESCRIPTION Delay Signal Delay A FREE FLOW: speed controlled by driver's desires, speed limits, 10 Sec 10 Sec or physical roadway conditions. B STABLE FLOW: operating speeds beginning to be restricted, 10 - 15 Sec 10 - 20 Sec little or no restriction on maneuverability from other vehicles. C STABLE FLOW: speeds and maneuverability more restricted. 15 - 25 Sec 20 - 35 Sec D APPROACHING UNSTABLE FLOW: tolerable speeds can be 25 - 35 Sec 35 - 55 Sec maintained but temporary restrictions to flow cause substantial drops in speed, little freedom to maneuver, comfort and convenience are low. E UNSTABLE FLOW: volumes near capacity, speed typically in 35 - 50 Sec 55 - 80 Sec neighborhood of 30 MPH, stoppages of momentary duration, ability to maneuver severely limited. F FORCED FLOW: low- operating speeds, volume below capacity, + 50 Sec + 80 Sec queues formed. Crash Summary TH 3 High School Entrance to CSAH 38 City of Rosemount Intersection 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Total Crashes PI PD PI PD PI PD PI PD PI PD 142nd Street/ High School Entr 1 1 3 3 1 9 Between 142nd and Dodd Rd 1 1 2 Dodd Road 2 1 3 Connemara Trail 1 1 2 4 Between Connemara Tr and CR 38 1 4 2 1 8 County Road 38 1 2 3 3 3 12 Between CR 38 and CSAH 38 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 10 CSAH 38 1 2 2 2 1 1 9 Total Crashes by Type 2 5 8 10 5 6 6 6 2 7 57 Total Crashes by Year 7 18 11 12 9 57 PI = Personnel Injury PD = Property Damage Traffic Analysis Brockway Site City of Rosemount Intersection Existing 2003 AM PM TH3atCR38 Unsignalized Signalized Proposed Geometrics AM A A PM AM TH 3 at Connemara Tr Unsignalized Signalized TH3atCR38 Unsignalized Signalized A B Connemara Tr at Site Access Unsignalized E E NA NA CR 38 at Site Access Unsignalized E NA NA Intersection 2008 without Site 2008 with Site Existing Geometrics Proposed Geometrics AM PM AM PM AM PM TH3atCR38 Unsignalized Signalized E E B C D E B B TH 3 at Connemara Tr Unsignalized Signalized D E B C C C Connemara Tr at Site Access Unsignalized NA NA NA NA A I A LCFR 38 at Site Access Unsignalized I NA NA NA NA A I A W Recommended Improvements Work with Mn/DOT on securing Municipal Cooperative Agreement funding for geometric improvements as outlined below: 1. TH 3 at Connemara Trail ■ Construct a potential new traffic control signal system at the intersection. 2. TH 3 at CR 38 (132 Street) ■ Widen TH 3 with the addition of left -turn and right -turn lanes for northbound and southbound approaches. ■ Widening CR 38 westbound to include two lanes of approach with a through left -turn lane to include a two -lane approach with a left - turn lane and a through right -turn lane. Construct a new access on CR 38 for the Triangle Warehouse /Brockway Golf course property on the east side of TH 3. 3. TH 3 at CSAH 38 (125 Street) ■ Widen TH 3 with the addition of a northbound left -turn lane and southbound right -turn lane. ■ Widen CSAH 38 eastbound to include a two -lane approach with a left -turn lane and right -turn lane. Construct a potential new traffic control signal system at the intersection. 4. Access Improvements ■ Close the access on TH 3 to the Triangle Warehouse and Brockway Golf Course and relocate the access to CR 38. Work with property owners on the west side of TH 3 to combine the two access points or relocate both accesses to Dodd Boulevard. Monitor the traffic conditions on TH 3 at CR 38 to determine when a traffic signal system would be warranted and justified. Work with Mn/DOT and the County on funding when this occurs. Escrow money from the developer for the City's portion (25 %) of the signal costs. Improve CR 38 from the site access to TH 3 to a 44 -foot three -lane roadway providing left -turn lanes at the site access and TH 3. Construct the site accesses to three -lane cross sections with one entering lane and two exiting lanes. 14 t: \01005-77 \cad \tigur e4.dgn 1 ti CT• Kegan 132nd ST. Lake o Ra o, X300 38 j F ' o i R Aq RACK O O rr O 6 R O �-- O X020 105 135th • O ;, N � � — PROJECT SITE ' I 4 1350 w 104 CONNEMARA T `— —, 520 104 w 15.000 ' 12,000 � I 0 � I �aL�f BELMO 1 +�' Trailer w CT. ' �/ Pa aS COUrt BIRCH BELMp� o � n 142nd ST. W. gEIFpS \ ti I CT m co I 5 � w o SC gFIELD a BELFP N 6�0 PATH w a ST. L W. a z a y6 T < < 9 1q a 3 CS. <Fq rd ST. > BEECH m , rn "4 ST. > a ST. W. y @ERRY (� a a J BED i� v rR _ 145 th U 103 L J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a PL. a 92 a a a 146th Q ST. g W. < m O a w �� p LOWER 147th ST, m a l BISCP ST. W. d N 17. 0 �C �I J [ UPPER 07 1 i 147th ST. o w o w a BI T T 148th ST. a V Q 5 ° 6 • 149th ST. ° 15. ` U PP E 1 149th S T. LOWER aU XX — E X I S T I N G ADT 115otn ST. lsotn ST. w. XX — PROJECTED 2025 ADT Figure 4 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Brockway Development 5 AL 4150 Olson Memorial Highway WSB Suite Minneapolis, MN 55422 422 763- 541.1600 &.Issociates, Ik. FAX 763- 541 -1700 5 o :Iueuudolanaa Aem3inoj13 DOLL L4S XV� "�I 'salmaossF' �g � CBL uopngjj4si❑ oijjeJ1 ZZK9 NW 'sgod —uryy 9 am B i j 00£ epS - AMON Puowayy u0sl0 OSLO NOI1n91 oIjjv8l - XX m °M 15 U +OSi n 1S U +OSI.1 S n d3M0l U+6bil W �m a3 dd nl °Si o '1S U +6bt . 9 °S D ° D s 'a10 z > D '1S y+8bt 1 1IH < m ° '1S U +Lbi a3ddn Im r I D M '15 in p�0 L i D 15 4 +Lbt CD ^� *y0SI9 m a3M0� - r O W M m 1S D U +9bi KRI U +Sbt �1 y �39 m D A25 '8 381 .y M is < m M D 1S C H 1b d m Y m H0339 ^ 1S P `� D � m Nl bd p0 y � 139 I < 01313W 1 1 5 I °� N \ 1Sd3138 04-01 M °15 PuZbi v � \ W139 HO8I91< 0 � I n I = I \ 0 O O \ I p I � I m b0/ 1 VaGW3NN00 b0/ ' `—' O /OS I � \ 0 co ` I ' I � ~ 31IS 103rodd I / , I 3 - - - - U+S21 % y pdV 1b Ip �VIbNO %Z S e 84 �l 10 15 PUM S uv8ax "I PUZ4 I 'M '1S +SI£[ I ukOPi I m 'M 'is 40, AGM spy V1 C) a D D CD p 1S SX yXpFi D I Z OZ n _ 2 m 91 L1 D '1S <_ U+9ZI a = W < D Z M61d NSI11 = 'M'10 U+LZI n .a k9Zt � pp0 m uWgam6y \Poo\LL -SOOIO V I Ted Tschida 2360 108th St. E. Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 Dear Rosemount City Council, I_am writing this letter about the Brockway development. I disagree with the plan, and if there is a development I think that stoplights should be put in. I am a student at Rosemount High School and drive Highway 3 everyday. The last three years, Highway 3 has been getting busier and busier. By adding this development would add even more traffic. Without traffic lights I am concerned that there might be an increase of accidents. So please vote not to have this development or if there is a development please vote to have traffic lights installed. Res tfully, "4 Ted Tschida l 51 q57- 1 /" Z O q MINNESOTA Trunk Highway 3 Improvemen City of Rosemount, Minnesota October 2, 2003 {p A 4150 Obon Memorial Highway S N 5 300 Mlnneapolls, MN 55422 - ]63fi01 <a00 � �,V,� f FP%]B3511 -t]00 4. 1 0 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2004- A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2020 ROSEMOUNT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND APPROVING A CONCEPT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE BROCKWAY SITE WHEREAS, The Planning Department received an application for concept approval of a residential planned unit development to redevelop the Brockway Site on September 24, 2003 for said property legally described as: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 20, Township 115 North, Range 19 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying East of the center line of STH No. 3 (formerly STH No. 218); All of Government Lot 2, said Section 20; That part of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 20 lying East of the center line of said STH No. 3 lying West of the Westerly right -of -way of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad, and lying North and West of the following described line: Commencing at the intersection of the South line of said North Half, Southeast Quarter and said Westerly right -of -way line of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad; thence South 89 degrees 43 minutes 18 seconds West, assumed bearing along said South line 270.47 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 12 degrees 05 minutes 15 seconds West, 357.87 feet; thence North 89 degrees 43 minutes 18 seconds East, 500.28 feet to said Westerly right -of -way line and there terminating. WHEREAS, The Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount conducted a public hearing as required by ordinance for the purpose of receiving public comment regarding the proposed residential planned unit development on October 28, 2003 and again on November 25, 2003; and, WHEREAS, The Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend approval of the concept planned unit development on November 25, 2003 with conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, The Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the concept Planned Unit Development for the Brockway Site subject to the following conditions: 1. Amending the 2020 Rosemount Comprehensive Plan to reflect the requested land use RESOLUTION 2004- areas as defined by the concept and authorizing staff to prepare the amendment and forward it to the Metropolitan Council. 2. The concept plan shall be revised as follows: a) Aligning driveways and street intersections to eliminate off -set intersections with intervals of less than 250 feet. b) Provision of unrestricted turn- arounds with a minimum turning radius of 45 feet for all dead end common driveways or streets exceeding 150 feet, or as approved by the Rosemount Fire Marshal. c) The Parkway and public streets shall be constructed in accordance with City standards and a minimum of eight feet of boulevard width shall be provided for boulevard trees to eliminate conflicts with curb & gutter, sidewalks and trails. The round -about shall be consistent with applicable standards for minimum turning radius and lane width and shall include ornamental tree plantings and a water fountain in the center to be maintained by a homeowners association. d) In all cases where private streets are 22 ft. wide (or otherwise less than City standards), no parking will be allowed on either side. Common parking areas must be provided in these areas, consistent with the ordinance parking requirements. e) The applicant must utilize a portion of the excess lot depth along the outer edge of the single - family component to create a greenway for trails / sidewalks and buffering the effects of the traffic and dissimilar land uses. f) Single - family lots with setback and lot width reductions shall have front porches or entires as prominent design features and garages shall be setback a minimum of five feet from the front elevation of the house. Most of the houses shall be two - story designs with complementary colors, materials and architectural elements. Minimum materials expectations include low maintenance siding with aluminum trim and brick / stone accents. g) All townhouse units shall have two -car garages consistent with applicable zoning standards. h) Transitions between housing types shall include landscaping to buffer dissimilar housing styles and neighborhoods. The outer edge of the development, particularly along STH 3, Connemara Trail, County Road 38, and the railroad right -of -way shall have increased setbacks consistent with City standards as a minimum for screening the effects of higher traffic volumes and the railroad. Additional landscaping is required in these areas. i) Trails or sidewaolks will be included along collector or arterial streets / highways. Sidewalks or trails are required on both sides of the north -south parkway connecting County Road 38 with Connemara Trail, and on at least one side of all other streets except single - family cul -de -sacs, or private shared dead -end driveways serving less than three buildings. J) The apartment and senior condos shall be limited to three stories in height and have a minimum of 40% brick, or cultured stone and monolithic vertical building RESOLUTION 2004- planes shall be avoided with articulation of dwelling units, windows and balconies. Architectural details such as dormer windows, or similar features shall be used to provide relief of long roof eves. Primary building entrances shall have a variety of design features including separate gables, verandas or canopies creating significant relief (off -sets in excess of six feet). k) Concept approval does not guarantee the number of dwelling units. 1) Incorporation of recommendations by the Parks and Recreation Commission relating to park land dedication fees include dedication of a neighborhood park including active public recreational facilities, payment of park dedication fees, and installation of public park amenities within the project. Public parking for park uses shall also be provided as recommended by the Parks and Recreation Commission. m) Amenities located within the neighborhood park may include bocce ball, tennis, basketball and softball/baseball. A picnic shelter, large playground, and trails and walkways are also anticipated. The final improvements for the public opens space will be based upon discussion and recommendation by the Parks Commission to be determined through the preliminary plat review process. n) Private amenities include the neighborhood community center and associated recreational features. o) The neighborhood commercial site shall have architectural treatment that conform to standards that include: i. Two story buildings that may have mixed uses including accessory apartments or offices. ii. Gabled roofs with a minimum pitch of 4:12. iii. Rooflines shall consist of multiple gables, or be given variation through architectural devices such as cupolas, dormer windows or off -sets in the facades. iv. Variation of building fagade to reinforce an individual character for each separate use / tenant. v. The building shall be pedestrian oriented with no vehicular access or parking between the building and Connemara Trail or the north -south parkway. vi. Inclusion of gasoline fuel pumps shall be consistent with the standards specified in Section 6.14.B.2; and shall be thoroughly screened from residential uses with a bufferyard conforming to the standards of Section 6.14.E.9 as a minimum. p) Incorporation of recommendations of the City Engineer including, but not limited to the following: i. Storm Water Management in accordance with the City Storm Water Management Plan. ii. Implementation of the recommendations from the Traffic Impact Study as prepared by WSB & Associates, Inca dated November 12, 2003. RESOLUTION 2004- iii. Drainage, easements, grading and utilities. q) The Developer shall participate in the cost for upgrades to 132 Street and signalization along STH 3, as needed at the 132 Street and Connemara Trail intersections. r) Development phasing may be required to follow sewer capacity limitations. s) Preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet and incorporating resulting recommendations into the Preliminary Plat design. t) Conformance with PUD Final Development Plan / Preliminary Plat and Final Plat requirements including execution of PUD and Subdivision Development Agreements. ADOPTED this 6th day of January, 2004 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. William H. Droste, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Jentink, City Clerk Motion by: Voted in favor: Voted against:_ Member absent: Seconded by: MEMORANDUM 6. -t TO: Members of the City Council FROM: Jason Lindahl, A.I.C.P., Assistant City Planner DATE: January 5, 2004 RE: Item 6.1- Uitenbogerd Addition Final Plat Subdivision Agreement Staff was unable to provide a signed copy of the Subdivision Agreement for the Uitenbogerd Addition Final Plat prior to distribution of the City Council packet last week. Attached please find a copy of the Subdivision Agreement signed by the developer Ed McMenomy. Please review it and make an additional motion to approve execution of this document. Recommended Action: Motion to authorize execution of the Subdivision Development Agreement for the Uitenbogerd Addition. CADocuments and Settings \jr1\My Documents \Memo outhne.doc SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT Uitdenbogerd Addition AGREEMENT dated day of , 2004, by and between the CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, a Minnesota municipal corporation, ( "City "), and BASIC BUILDERS, INC., a Minnesota Corporation, (the "Developer "). I. Request for Plat Approval The Developer has asked the City to approve the subdivision of land and a plat of land to be known as Uitdenbogerd Addition, which land is legally described on Attachment One, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof (hereinafter referred to as the "subject property "). 2. Conditions of Plat Approval The City has approved the subdivision and the plat on the following conditions: a. Incorporation of recommendations of the City Engineer concerning design and installation of public infrastructure and including grading, erosion control, and utilities. b. Execution of a Subdivision or Development Agreement to secure the public and private improvements. c. Payment of all applicable fees including G.I. S . , Park Dedication and other fees identified in the current fee schedule. d. Incorporation of any easements necessary to accommodate drainage, ponding, trails, conservation areas and utilities. 3. Phased Development The City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent additions of the plat if the Developer has breached this Contract and the breach has not been remedied. Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until Subdivision Agreements for such phases are approved by the City. 4. Effect of Subdivision Approval For two (2) years from the date of this Agreement, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service area, or official controls shall apply to. or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Agreement. 5. Development Plans The subject property shall be developed in accordance with the following plans, original copies of which are on file with the City Public Works Director. The plans may be prepared, subject to City approval, after entering this Agreement, but before commencement of any work on the Subject Property. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan .A -- Plat Plan B -- Soil Erosion Control Plan and Schedule Uitdenbogerd Addition 12/30/03 Plan C -- Drainage and Storm Water Runoff Plan Plan D -- Plans and Specifications for Public Improvements Plan E -- Grading Plan and House Pad Elevations Plan F -- Landscape Improvements 6. Installation by Developer The Developer shall install or cause to be installed and pay for the following: A. Setting of Lot and Block Monuments B. Surveying and Staking of work required to be performed by the Developer. C. Gas, Electric, Telephone, and Cable Lines D. Site Grading E. Landscaping (Hereinafter referred to as the "Developer Improvements ") And other items as necessary to complete the development as stipulated herein or in other agreements. 7. Time of Performance The Developer shall install all required improvements enumerated in Paragraph 6 which will serve the subject property by September 30, 2004. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 8. Public Infrastructure. The following improvements, known as City.Project 373, shall be designed, ins pe�ctect surveyedand administered by the City and installed in the Subject Property at Developer expense by a Contractor selected by the City through the public bidding process: A. Sanitary Sewer Services B. Watermain Services C. Curb & Gutter D. Sidewalks /Pathways . (Hereinafter referred to gas "Public Infrastructure Improvements ") The attached figure shows the area within which the Public Infrastructure Improvements will be constructed pursuant to this Paragraph. Contracts shall provide for construction in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by the City or its consultants The City will not enter into such contracts until all conditions of plat and subdivision approval have been met, the plat is recorded and the City has received the bonds and security required by this agreement. The City will obtain any necessary permits from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Department of Health and all other agencies before proceeding with construction. 2 Uitdenbogerd Addition 12/30/03 i 9. Deposit for Cost of Public Infrastructure Improvements For the purpose of financing the construction, installation and maintenance of the Public Infrastructure Improvements, Developer shall promptly make payments to the City of sums deemed necessary by the City to make timely payments to its contractor as follows: a. Prior to the receipt by the City of bids for the Public Infrastructure Improvements, Developer will pay to the City a cash deposit in the amount of Fifty -five thousand Dollars ($55,000) to cover one or more periodic payments to the City's contractor. Such deposit and later payments to the deposit as provided in this paragraph will be held by the City and used to pay the City's contractor for Public Infrastructure Improvements and no other purpose. b. From time to time as the City's construction of the Public Infrastructure Improvements proceeds and the amount held in the Developer's deposit is diminished by payments to the City's contractor, the City will give written notice specifying an amount due from the Developer to replenish the deposit, as determined by the City to be necessary to cover one or more periodic payments to the City's contractor. Payments shall be due no later than five (5) working days after receipt of notice by the Developer. No interest will be paid or credited to Developer on funds held by the City in the deposit. Following final payment for Public Infrastructure Improvements the City will return any unused funds in the deposit to Developer. d. In the event City does not recover its costs for completing the Public Infrastructure Improvements under the provisions of this paragraph, as an additional remedy, City may, at its option, assess the Subject Property in the manner provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and Developer hereby consents to the levy of such special assessments without notice or hearing and waives its rights to appeal such assessments pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.081, provided the amount levied, together with the funds deposited with the City under this paragraph, does not exceed the expenses actually incurred by the City in the completion of the Public Infrastructure Improvements. 10. Security for Developer Improvements To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, payment of the costs of all Developer Improvements and construction of all Developer Improvements (as noted in Paragraph 6), the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash escrow or two (2) individual irrevocable letter of credits from a bank ( "security ") for: a.) $11,000 Landscaping b.) $14,520 All Other Improvements which is 110% of the estimated cost of the Developer Improvements. The amount of the security was calculated as follows: 3 Uitdenbogerd Addition 12/30/03 Refer to Exhibit A for an explanation of each item. The bank and form of the letter of credit or other security shall be subject to the approval of the City Administrator. The letter of credit -shall be automatically renewable until the City releases the developer from responsibility. The letter of credit shall secure compliance with the terms of this Agreement and all obligations of the Developer under it. The City may draw down on the letter of credit without notice if the obligations of the Developer have not been completed as required by this Agreement. In the event of a default under, this Subdivision Agreement by the Developer, the City shall furnish the Developer with written notice by certified mail of Developers default(s) under the terms of this Subdivision Agreement. If the Developer does not remove said default(s) within two (2) weeks of receiving notice; the City may draw on the letter of credit. With City approval the letter of credit may be reduced from time to time as financial obligations are paid and developer installed improvements completed to the City's requirements. 11. Grading Plan /Site Grading Site grading shall be completed by the developer-at its cost and approved by the City Public Works Director. The completion of grading activities will need to be coordinated by the City in conjunction with the installation of utilities. Developer shall fi rnish the City Public Works Director satisfactory proof of payment for the site grading work and shall submit a certificate of survey of the development to the City as the site grading is completed by phase, with street and lot grades. If the installation of utilities is occurring simultaneously with the grading, the utility contractor shall have preference over the grading activities. No substantial grading activities can be completed over installed utilities unless otherwise protected. All improvements to the lots and the final grading shall comply with the grading plan as submitted and shall be the responsibility of the Developer. 12. License The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the 4 Uitdenbogerd Addition 12/30/03 Cost 110% Grading & Erosion Control - $5,600 $6,160 Pond Restoration and Erosion Control Removal $5,600 $6,160 Survey Monumentation $2,000 $2,200 Street Lighting Buffer Monumentation Park Equipment/Improvements rovements Retaining Walls Wetland Restoration/Mitigation Wetland Monitoring Total $14,520 Refer to Exhibit A for an explanation of each item. The bank and form of the letter of credit or other security shall be subject to the approval of the City Administrator. The letter of credit -shall be automatically renewable until the City releases the developer from responsibility. The letter of credit shall secure compliance with the terms of this Agreement and all obligations of the Developer under it. The City may draw down on the letter of credit without notice if the obligations of the Developer have not been completed as required by this Agreement. In the event of a default under, this Subdivision Agreement by the Developer, the City shall furnish the Developer with written notice by certified mail of Developers default(s) under the terms of this Subdivision Agreement. If the Developer does not remove said default(s) within two (2) weeks of receiving notice; the City may draw on the letter of credit. With City approval the letter of credit may be reduced from time to time as financial obligations are paid and developer installed improvements completed to the City's requirements. 11. Grading Plan /Site Grading Site grading shall be completed by the developer-at its cost and approved by the City Public Works Director. The completion of grading activities will need to be coordinated by the City in conjunction with the installation of utilities. Developer shall fi rnish the City Public Works Director satisfactory proof of payment for the site grading work and shall submit a certificate of survey of the development to the City as the site grading is completed by phase, with street and lot grades. If the installation of utilities is occurring simultaneously with the grading, the utility contractor shall have preference over the grading activities. No substantial grading activities can be completed over installed utilities unless otherwise protected. All improvements to the lots and the final grading shall comply with the grading plan as submitted and shall be the responsibility of the Developer. 12. License The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the 4 Uitdenbogerd Addition 12/30/03 Cost 110% Landscaping $16,000 $11,000 Total 1 $11,000 Refer to Exhibit A for an explanation of each item. The bank and form of the letter of credit or other security shall be subject to the approval of the City Administrator. The letter of credit -shall be automatically renewable until the City releases the developer from responsibility. The letter of credit shall secure compliance with the terms of this Agreement and all obligations of the Developer under it. The City may draw down on the letter of credit without notice if the obligations of the Developer have not been completed as required by this Agreement. In the event of a default under, this Subdivision Agreement by the Developer, the City shall furnish the Developer with written notice by certified mail of Developers default(s) under the terms of this Subdivision Agreement. If the Developer does not remove said default(s) within two (2) weeks of receiving notice; the City may draw on the letter of credit. With City approval the letter of credit may be reduced from time to time as financial obligations are paid and developer installed improvements completed to the City's requirements. 11. Grading Plan /Site Grading Site grading shall be completed by the developer-at its cost and approved by the City Public Works Director. The completion of grading activities will need to be coordinated by the City in conjunction with the installation of utilities. Developer shall fi rnish the City Public Works Director satisfactory proof of payment for the site grading work and shall submit a certificate of survey of the development to the City as the site grading is completed by phase, with street and lot grades. If the installation of utilities is occurring simultaneously with the grading, the utility contractor shall have preference over the grading activities. No substantial grading activities can be completed over installed utilities unless otherwise protected. All improvements to the lots and the final grading shall comply with the grading plan as submitted and shall be the responsibility of the Developer. 12. License The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the 4 Uitdenbogerd Addition 12/30/03 City during the installation of Public Infrastructure Improvements. 13. Erosion Control Prior to site grading, and before any utility construction is commenced or building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected and approved by the City. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded within 72 hours after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be rye grass or other fast - growing seed suitable to the existing soil to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be mulched and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. All basement and/or foundation excavation spoil piles shall be kept completely off City right -of -way and shall be completely surrounded with an approved erosion control silt fence. Approved erosion control fencing shall be installed around the perimeter of each lot or at City approved locations at the time of building permit issuance and remain in place until the lot is seeded or sodded. A 20 -foot opening will be allowed on each lot for construction deliveries. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If development does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. This right also applies to the required erosion control for basement and/or foundation excavation spoil piles. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's or City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within thirty (3 0) days, the City may draw down the letter of credit to pay any costs. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the Subject Property is in full compliance with the erosion control requirements. 14. Plantina and Seeding Landscaping shall be in accordance with. Landscape Plans approved by the City Planner. 15. Clean up . The Developer shall clean streets of dirt and debris that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. The City will inspect the site on a weekly basis and determine whether it is necessary to take additional measures to clean dirt and debris from the streets. After 24 hours verbal notice to the Developer, the City will complete or contract to complete the clean up at the Developer's expense in accordance with the procedures specified in Paragraph 13. The Developer shall inspect and. if necessary , clean all catch basins, sumps, and ponding areas of erosion/siltation and restore to the original condition at the end of home construction within this development. All silt fence and other erosion control should be removed following the establishment of turf. These items are to be secured through the letter of credit as is noted in Exhibit A. 16. Ownership of Improvements Upon completion and City acceptance of the work and construction required by this Agreement, the public improvements lying within public rights -of- way and easements shall become City property without further notice or action unless the improvements are slated as private infrastructure. 5 Uitdenbogerd Addition 12/30/03 17. Warranty The Developer warrants all work required to be performed by it against poor material and faulty workmanship for a period of two (2) years after its completion and acceptance by the City. All trees, grass and sod shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality and disease free for twelve (12) months after planting. 18. Responsibility for Costs A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the Subject Property including, but not limited to, Soil and Water Conservation District charges, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the subdivision and the plat, the preparation of this Agreement and any amendments hereto, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the Subject Property. B. The Developer-shall holdthe„City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat or subdivision approval and development of the Subject Property. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorney's fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the preparation and enforcement of this Agreement, including actual cost for engineering and attorney's fees. The estimated City fees of $13,000, less the $6,000 already deposited fora total of $7,000 shall be deposited witlf the City at the time this Agreement is signed, and represent the following estimates: $10,000 Engineering. Fees $ 500 Attorney Fees $ 2,500 5 % City Fees $13,000 If the City fees exceed this estimate, the Developer shall pay the additional costs to the City within 10 days of the request. No interest will be paid or credited to Developer on funds held by the City in the deposit. When the project is accepted by the City and the fund can be closed, the City will return any unused funds in the deposit to the Developer. D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt development work and construction including, but not limited to, the issuance of building permits for lots which the Developer may or may not have sold, until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of nine percent (9 %) per year. 19. Developer agrees to pay fees, charges and assessments set forth in this Section prior to, or at the time of, execution of any plat by the City: 6 Uitdenbogerd Addition 12/30/03 0 A. Park dedication fees in the amount of $7,200. B. Geographic Information System (GIS) fees in the amount of $220. C. Storm Sewer Trunk Area Charges in the amount of $4,020. D. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Area Charges in the amount of $1,280. E. Watermain Trunk Area Charges in the amount of $4,966. Or such other amounts for such fees as in effect at the time of plat approval. 20. Developer understands that builders will be required to pay for the Subject Property the fees, charges and assessments in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. The rates for each of these items will be set according to the current rate structure at the time the building permit is received. The fees, charges, and assessments in effect as of this agreement are: A. Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Availability Charges per SAC unit (current rate is $1,350). B. Storm Sewer Connection Charges per single family unit and per multiple family unit (currently at $510). C. Sanitary Sewer Availability Charges per SAC unit (currently at $1,125 /SAC unit). D. Water Availability Charges per SAC unit (currently at $1,340 /SAC unit for single family residential and multi - family residential). 21. Buildina Permits No occupancy permits shall be issued until: A. The site grading is completed and approved by the City. B. All public utilities are tested, approved by the City Engineer, and in service. rD C. All curbing is installed and backfilled. ` D. The first lift of bituminous is in place and approved by the City. E. All building permit fees are paid in full. F. No early building permits will be issued. The Developer, in executing this Agreement, assumes all liability and costs for damage or delays, incurred by the City, in the construction of public improvements, caused by the Developer, its employees, contractors, subcontractors, materialmen or agents. No occupancy permits shall be issued until the public streets and utilities referred to in paragraph 6 and 8 are in and approved by the City, unless otherwise authorized in writing by the City Public Works Director. 7 Uitdenbogerd Addition 12/30/03 22. Developer's Default In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than 48 hours in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, levy the cost in whole or in part as a special assessment against the Subject Property. Developer waives its rights to notice of hearing and hearing on such assessments and its right to appeal such assessments pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.081. 23. Miscellaneous A. The Developer represents to the City that the development of the Subject Property, the subdivision and the plat comply with all city, county, metropolitan, state and federal laws and regulations including, but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the subdivision or the plat or the development of the Subject Property does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work on the Subject Property until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement. C. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of . building permits, including lots sold to third parties. D. Many portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalids such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. E. If building permits are issued prior to the completion and acceptance of public improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, employees, agents or third parties. F. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. G. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. The Developer shall take such steps, including execution of amendments to this Agreement, as are necessary to effect the recording hereof. After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Contract, at the Developer's request, the City will execute and deliver to the Developer a release. Uitdenbogerd Addition 12/30/03 f H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to the City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so exciting may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at anytime thereafter any other right, power or remedy. I. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the written permission of the City Council. 24. Notices Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: Basic Builders, Inc. 14550 South Robert Trail Rosemount, MN 55068 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: City Administrator, Rosemount City Hall, 2875 145' Street West, Rosemount, Minnesota 55068. 9 Uitdenbogerd Addition 12/30/03 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the day and year first above written. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT BY: William H. Droste, Mayor BY: Linda Jentink, City Clerk BY: Its / BY: V I Its STATE OF MINNESOTA I ) SS COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2004, by William H. Droste, Mayor, and Linda Jentink, City Clerk, of the City of Rosemount, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) iSS COUNTY OF DAKOTA The foreg,�,i}�g i strument was acknowled ed be ore me this �� day of P 2004 by / 7c , , ate _ r -a,�c , on behalf id Notary Public Drafted By: ^AAAAM City of Rosemount REID J. H ° '•` 2875145th Street West NOTARY PUBLIC r i y::.s a Rosemount, MN � a + 55068 Y My Comm. F-xF m-s JP «os 0 10 Uitdenbogerd Addition 12/30/03 M": _ The following clarifies the various portions of the letter of credit for Developer Improvements that are outlined in the Subdivision Agreement: Grading & Erosion Control — A restoration and erosion control bond to ensure revegetation and erosion control ($3,500 /acre). Pond Restoration/Erosion Removal — A security to allow for cleaning of sedimentation ponds prior to City acceptance and removing any installed erosion control measures such as silt fence and woodfiber blanket following development of 75 percent of adjoining lots (estimated Lump Sum). Survey Monumentation — An amount equal to 110% of the cost to monument all lots within the development. Landscapin — An amount equal to 110 %0 of the cost to complete the minimum required landscaping. If additional landscaping is planned, a bond for that cost is not required. Retaining Walls — An amount equal to 110% of the cost to complete the retaining wall construction. Street Lighting — An atnourt equal to 110 %c of the cost to complete the minimum required lighting. If additional lighting is planned, a bond for that cost is not required ($4,000 per light s been used to calculate this cost). Buffer Monumentation — An amount equal to 110% of the cost to. manufacture and install the necessary buffer monumentation signs around all ponds and wetlands ($50 per sign has been used to calculate this cost). ' Park Equipment — An amount equal to 110% of the cost of improvements agreed upon.to be completed in the park areas. Wetland Monitoring — An amount equal to 110% of the cost to hire a wetland specialist to monitor the mitigation areas for 5 years to ensure their proper creation. This wetland specialist will be hired by the City. Wetland Restoration/Mitigation — An amount equal to 110% of the cost to develop new wetlands should the mitigation not be effective ($20,000 per acre of mitigation). 11 Uitdenbogerd Addition 12/30/03 ATTACHMENT ONE (Legal Description) 12 Uitdenbogerd Addition 12/30/03 i MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor, Council members FROM: Rick Pearson, City Planner DATE: January 6, 2004 RE: Item 9a. Brockway Site Redevelopment — Revised Resolution Attached is a revised resolution for the recommended conditions of approval. On page 3, paragraphs 1 & in have been changed to reflect the final Park'and Recreation Commission recommendations. The resolution included in the packet included an earlier version of the language. I apologize for the inconvenience.