HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.h. Receive Feasibility Report/Set Public Hearing, 2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Improvements, City Project 376CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 20, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: Receive Feasibility Report/Set Public Hearing —
AGENDA
2004 Street & Utility Reconstruction Improvements, City Project #376
SECTION:
Consent
PREPARED BY: Andrew J. Brotzler, P.E., City Engineer �(
A. Aderhold, Project Engineer
N O
Anthony
ATTACHMENTS: Location Map, Feasibility Report, Resolution
APPROVED BY:
LOCATION: This project is located on Dahomey Avenue West,
Dallara Avenue West, Damask Avenue West, Danbury Avenue West,
Upper 145t Street West and 147" Street West between Dodd Boulevard
and 145 Street.
Attached please find a project location map and copy of the feasibility report for the 2004 Street
and Utility Reconstruction Improvements, City Project #376. This report addresses the
reconstruction of streets, storm sewer improvements, sanitary sewer repairs and watermain
replacements within the proposed project area, along with the estimated costs and proposed
funding.
At this time, Staff is requesting that Council receive the feasibility report and schedule a public
hearing for February 17, 2004.
I
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2004 -
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE FEASIBILITY REPORT
AND SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING
FOR THE 2004 STREET AND UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT #376
WHEREAS, the City Council deemed it necessary and expedient that the City of Rosemount, Minnesota,
construct certain improvements, to -wit: City Project #376, 2004 Street & Utility Reconstruction
Improvements, in the City as described in and in accordance with the feasibility report prepared by the City
Engineer; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has been advised by the City Engineer that said utility and street
improvements, City Project #376 is feasible, and should best be made as proposed, and the City Engineer's
report to this effect has heretofore been received by Council, and filed with the City Clerk on January 20,
2004; and
WHEREAS, the statute provided that no such improvements shall be made until the Council has held a
public hearing on such improvements following mailed notice and two publications thereof in the official
newspaper stating time and place of the hearing, the general nature of the improvement, the estimated costs
thereof, and the area proposed to be assessed, in accordance with the law.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount accepts the
feasibility report for City Project #376 and places it on file.
NOW THEREFORE IT BE FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount that
the public hearing be scheduled to consider City Project #376, 2004 Street & Utility Reconstruction
Improvements to be held on Tuesday, February 17, 2004 at 7:30 o'clock p.m. or as soon thereafter as
possible, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall.
ADOPTED this 20th day of January, 2004.
William H. Droste, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda Jentink, City Clerk
Motion by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Seconded by:
I
January 20, 2004
2004 Street and Utility
Reconstruction Project
Prepared for:
City Project Number: 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
Prepared by:
A
WS B
4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55422 (763) 541 -4800 & Associates, Inc.
FEASIBILITY REPORT
2004 STREET AND UTILITY
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
CITY PROJECT NO. 376
January 20, 2004
Prepared By:
WSB & Associates, Inc.
4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55422
(763) 541 -4800
(763) 541 -1700 (Fax)
City of Rosemount — Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
January 20, 2004
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Rosemount
2875 —145 Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068 -4997
RE: Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members:
Transmitted herewith for your review is a feasibility report which addresses the street and
utility improvements of the following streets:
• Dahomey Avenue West
• Dallara Avenue West
• Damask Avenue West
• Danbury Avenue West
Upper 145 Street West
• 147 Street West
We would be happy to discuss this report with you at your convenience. Please don't
hesitate to contact me at (763) 287 -7195 if you have any questions regarding this report.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associate Inc.
David E. Hutton, P.E.
Vice President
Attachment
sb
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Date: January 20, 2004 Lic. No. 19133
Quality Control Review Completed By:
A�% d &'-�
Mark Erichson, P.E.
Date: January 20, 2004 Lic. No. 40886
City of Rosemount — Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE SHEET
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
CERTIFICATION SHEET
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................... ..............................1
2 . INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... ..............................2
2.1. AUTHORIZATION ..................... ............................... .............................. ..............................2
2.2. SCOPE .................................................................................................... ..............................2
2.3. DATA AVAILABLE ................................................................................. ..............................2
3 . GENERAL BACKGROUD ...................................................................... ..............................3
3.1. PROJECT LOCATION ..................................................:............................ ..............................3
' 3.2. PROJECT ZONING ........ ............................... ............................................ ..............................3
3.3. PROJECT HISTORY ................................................................................. ..............................3
3.4. EXISTING CONDTIONS ............................................................................ ..............................4
3.4.1. STREETS ............................................................................. ..............................4
3.4.2. SANITARY SEWER ............................................................... ..............................4
' 3.4.3. WATER MAIN ...................................................................... ..............................
3.4.4. STORM SEWER ................................................................... ...............................
' 4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................. ..............................6
4.1. ROADWAY ........................................................................... ......................... . . . . .. ........... . . . . .
' 4.2. SANITARY SEWER ............................ ...............................
4.3. WATER MAIN ........................................................................................ ...............................
4.4. STORM SEWER ....................................................................................... ..............................7
' 4.5. RIGHT -OF -WAY / EASMENTS ................................................................. ..............................7
4.6. PERMITS / APPROVALS .......................................................................... ..............................8
4.7. CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC ....................................................................... ..............................8
' 5. FINANCING .............................................................................................. ..............................9
5 .1. OPINION OF COST .................................................................................. ..............................9
' 5.2. FUNDING ............................................................................................... .............................10
6 . PROJECT SCEHDULE ........................................................................... .............................11
7. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMENDATION ........................................... .............................12
n
0
City of Rosemount — Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
' City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
' APPENDIX A
PROJECT LOCATION MAPS
' APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
APPENDIX C
PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN.
APPENDIX D
OPINION OF COST
' APPENDIX E
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
0
u
r
G
City of Rosemount — Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
' City Project No. 3 76
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
' City Project No. 376 provides for the street reconstruction of Dahomey Avenue West,
Dallara Avenue West, Damask Avenue West, Danbury Avenue West, Upper 145 Street
West, and 147 Street West, between Dodd Avenue and 145 Street West.
The project includes the reconstruction of approximately 4380 feet of 28 -foot urban
section streets and 620 feet of 30 -foot urban section streets complete with bituminous
paving, B -618 curb and gutter, and storm sewer. The project will also include sanitary
sewer and watermain improvements in several necessary locations throughout the project.
The total estimated project cost is $1,661,200, which includes a 5% contingency and 30%
g y
indirect costs. Funding for the project will consist of special assessments, 2004 Capital
' Improvement Plan (CIP) funds, and utility funds as necessary. The assessment hearing
will be held in the fall of 2004
The proposed assessment rate is $2400 per lot in accordance with the City's policy and
current fee schedule. This will generate approximately $247,200 or 15% of the total
project costs.
' It is proposed that construction would take place in 2004. The project reconstruction will
be completed, including all restoration items in 2004.
' This project is feasible, necessary, and cost effective from an engineering standpoint and
should be constructed as proposed herein.
L City of Rosemount — Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
Page 1
2. INTRODUCTION
' 2.1 Authorization
' On September 16, 2003, the Rosemount City Council authorized the preparation of an
engineering Feasibility Report for the 2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project.
This project has been designated as City Project No. 376.
2.2 Scope
This project primarily provides for the reconstruction of existing Dahomey Avenue West,
Dallara Avenue West, Damask Avenue West, Danbury Avenue West, Upper 145 Street
West, and 147 Street West.
The aforementioned streets will be completely reconstructed, with the installation of new
concrete curb and gutter and bituminous pavement. Storm sewer improvements are
proposed to collect stormwater runoff necessary to facilitate improvements outlined in
' the Rosemount Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. The existing 4 -inch
watermain in the Danbury Avenue Cul -de -sac will be upgraded to a 6 -inch line. Sanitary
sewer repairs will be performed in the spot locations shown in figure 4, these locations
' were determined by televising the sanitary sewer lines.
2.3 Data Available
' Information and materials used in the preparation of this report include the following:
City of Rosemount Utility Plans
City of Rosemount Record Plans
• City of Rosemount Topography Maps
' City of Rosemount Pavement Management Program Field Rating
Field Observations of the Area
• Rosemount Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan
Field Survey
Sanitary Sewer Televising
Soil Borings
C'
City of Rosemount — Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
' City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
Page 2
3. GENERAL BACKGROUND
1 3.1 Project Location
The project is located in the southwest portion of the City of Rosemount and includes the
following streets:
' Dahomey Avenue West
Dallara Avenue. West
• Damask Avenue West
' Danbury Avenue West
Upper 145 Street West
• 147 Street West
The project area is identified on Figure 1 in Appendix A of this report.
n
City of Rosemount — Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
Page 3
3.2 Project Zoning
Generally, the project area is zoned residential.
3.3 Project History
This project was initiated through the recognition of continually deteriorating street
conditions and the need for storm sewer facilities in the project area. The streets
proposed for reconstruction are typically 25 -30 years old. The average life expectancy of
a street in Minnesota is 25 years. City staff has also implemented a pavement
management program. The pavement management program consists of field rating
streets by determining the percentage of area to longitudinal cracks, alligator cracks,
heaving, etc. When all the data is collected, the information is combined to give a street
rating of 0 -100, with 100 being a newly paved street. The streets m the area of the
proposed 2004 Street Reconstruction Project were last rated in 1997 and 2002. The
rating in 1997 ranged from 41 -57 and in 2002, the rating ranged from 35 -40. The
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) located in the Pavement Management Program states
the following:
'
0 -39 Total Reconstruct
• 40 -60 Overlay
61 -90 Seal Coat
91 -100 Do Nothing
An individual break down of each streets rating, construction year, and seal coating year
is as follows:
'
Street Year Constructed Seal Coat 1997 Rating 2002 Rating
Dahomey Ave 1968 79 & 86 41 38
Dallara Ave 1968 78 & 86 55 37
'
Damask Ave 1968 79 & 86 52 40
Danbury Ave 1968 79 & 86 57 38
U. 145" St 1968 79 & 86 42 35
1
147 St 1968 79 & 86 52 39
n
City of Rosemount — Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
Page 3
Based on the Pavement Condition Index and the large amount of utility work, namely
storm sewer construction, it is recommended that a total reconstruction be performed.
The proposed storm sewer construction will require that the existing roadway and curb be
removed throughout a large majority of the project, making a total reconstruction
necessary.
Additionally, the current watermain system within the project limits has substandard
"sizing" in some areas. The upgrade in size of the water system will provide the area
with increased water pressure, system reliability, and increased fire flow volume.
' Generally, record drawings for street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and watenmain are
available.
3.4 Existing Conditions
3.4.1 Streets
Dahomey Avenue West, Damask Avenue West, Danbury Avenue West, Upper
145 Street West, and 147 Street West are 28 -foot wide streets, with concrete
curb and gutter. Dallara Avenue West is a 30 -foot wide street, with concrete curb
and gutter. The Danbury Avenue Cul -de -sac is 100 feet in diameter also with
concrete curb and gutter. Borings taken throughout the proposed project area
indicate approximately 4- inches of bituminous over mostly fine to medium
grained sandy gravel, with three of the borings indicating clay as a base. There
are 104 residential driveways within the project area. All driveways will be
reconstructed to meet the City of Rosemount standards up to the right -of -way line
or as needed to match the new street grades.
3.4.2 Sanitary Sewer
The majority of existing sanitary sewers within the project area consist of an fl-
inch sanitary sewer line. The existing sanitary sewer within Dallara Avenue West
consists of an 18 -inch RCP sewer line from Dodd Boulevard to 147 Street West,
which then flows to the west within 147 Street West to Danbury Avenue West.
3.4.3 Watermain
The existing watermain network consists of a 6 -inch cast iron watermain line with
the exception of an 8 -inch line within Dallara Avenue West and a 4 -inch line
within the Danbury Avenue Cul -de -sac.
City of Rosemount— Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
Page 4
3.4.4 Storm Sewer
The proposed project is located in the Watcher Lake Drainage District (WA) and
the Hawkins Pond Drainage District (HP) as noted in the Rosemount
Comprehensive Stormwater Plan. The existing storm sewer system for the project
area is limited to collection at the following locations:
A concrete Swale leading to a holding pond located at the northeast corner of
Upper 145 Street West and Dahomey Avenue West.
• A 15 -inch storm sewer system located at the southwest corner of 147 Street
West and Danbury Avenue West, which flows to Twin Puddles Park.
• A concrete Swale leading to a 30 -inch storm sewer system located at the end
of the Danbury Avenue Cul -de -sac.
Currently, all local runoff within the project area is collected in the roadway's
curb and gutters. The curb and gutters then flow to one of the aforementioned
locations.
City of Rosemount — Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
Page 5
4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
' 4.1 Roadway
' The reconstruction of the existing streets is intended to improve the design strength of the
pavement system and provide a street surface with an extended life for the City of
Rosemount. The existing street widths will be maintained to minimize the impacts on the
existing driveways, boulevards, and landscaping. The reconstruction will consist of
removing the street surface, existing curb, and poor sub grade soils. The proposed street
sections will consist of new B -618 concrete curb, 6- inches of Class 5 aggregate base, 3.5-
' inches of bituminous pavement, and select granular material as needed. This was based
on an R -value of 60 and a typical street section used by the City of Rosemount.
u
The proposed roadway improvements are shown on Figure 2 in Appendix A.
4.2 Sanitary Sewer
The existing sanitary sewer systems within the project have been televised to determine
their condition. The televising videos indicate that the sanitary sewers within the project
area are generally in good condition with the exception of some minor deficiencies such
as a damaged pipe gasket and sags at spot locations within the main lines. These
deficiencies will be corrected by replacing the sanitary sewer in the locations where the
problems exist. Approximately 109 lineal feet if 8 -inch sewer pipe will be replaced.
The proposed sanitary sewer improvements are shown on Figure 4 in Appendix A.
4.3 Watermain
n
0
The existing watermain within the project limits range from 4- inches to 8- inches in
diameter. The pipe is mostly cast iron material, with the exception of some newer pipes
being ductile iron material. The proposed watermain improvements consist of replacing
approximately 178 lineal feet of the existing 4 -inch main, located within the Danbury
Avenue Cul -de -sac, with new 6 -inch ductile iron pipe mains. The services on Danbury
Avenue Cul -de -sac will also need to be replaced up to the curb stop; a temporary water
bypass may be necessary for the residents living along the Cul -de -sac. These
improvements will enhance the delivery of potable water and fire flow volume at
reasonable pressure and head loss. Additionally, all of the fire hydrants within the project
area, which are outdated, will be replaced with new current fire hydrants per city
standards. It will be necessary to relocate three of the fire hydrants do to conflicts with
the proposed storm sewer improvements.
The proposed watermain improvements are shown on Figure 4 in Appendix A.
0
City of Rosemount — Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
Page 6
4.4 Storm Sewer
Currently there are very few storm sewers in the project area; this contributes to the
deterioration of streets because water gets into the sub base and the freeze /thaw affect
impacts the pavement life. One of the major benefits of this project is the proposed storm
sewer improvement, which includes the construction of a storm sewer system to serve the
project area in accordance with the City of Rosemount standards. The storm sewer
system will be designed to carry the storm water runoff from a 10 -year rainfall event,
which is the industry standard design. The proposed storm water collection facilities can
generally be separated into the three drainage areas as follows:
East Area — The eastern portion of the project area will generally drain into a
proposed storm sewer system that discharges into the storm water detention pond
' located at the northeast corner of Upper 145 th Street West and Dahomey Avenue.
Additional grading of the existing detention pond is necessary to allow for added
stormwater treatment and storage. An overflow structure will be constructed in
the detention pond that will connect to an existing 30 -inch storm sewer system
located on Shannon Parkway. The existing 30 -inch storm sewer system
eventually discharges into Hawkins pond.
Northwest Area — The northwest portion of the project area will generally drain
into a proposed storm sewer system, which will connect, to an existing 30 -inch
' storm sewer system on 145 th Street West located to the northwest of the Danbury
Avenue Cul -de -sac. The existing 30 -inch storm sewer eventually discharges into
Hawkins pond.
' Southwest Area — The southwest portion of the ro'ect area will generally drain
p J g Y
into a proposed storm sewer system, which will connect to an existing 15 -inch
1 storm sewer system located at Danbury Avenue and 10 Street West. The
existing 15 -inch storm sewer eventually discharges into the Twin Puddles_ Park
pond.
The ro osed storm sewer improvements are shown on Figure 3 in Appendix A.
p p p g PP
4.5 Right -of -Way / Easements
The acquisition of temporary easements will be required for construction of the proposed
storm sewer line, which exits the Danbury Avenue Cul -de -sac between house number
14527 and house number 14539. According to the title work, a permanent 10 -foot
' drainage easement exists between the two homes aforementioned. Since the existing
easement is written as a drainage easement, a utility easement must be acquired in place
of the drainage easement. An additional 10 -foot temporary easement on each side of the
permanent easement will also need to be acquired for construction purposes. City staff
will work with the property owners to acquire the easement.
' The proposed temporary easements are shown on Figure S in Appendix A.
City of Rosemount — Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
' City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00 Page 7
4.6 Permits / Approvals
The following permits will be necessary as part of this project.
• Minnesota Department of Health permit for the watermain construction
• Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for the sanitary sewer construction.
• MPCA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit.
4.7 Construction Traffic
This project will require significant excavation and disposal of unacceptable material
from the existing street area and a supply of significant volumes of granular base,
aggregate base, and bituminous pavement materials. This effort will increase loaded
truck traffic on the streets adjacent to the construction area. All residents will have
access during construction, however some inconvenience is expected. Construction will
be phased to minimize inconveniences to the residents.
City of Rosemount — Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
Page 8
5. FINANCING
5.1 Opinion of Cost
Detailed opinions of cost can be found in Appendix B of this report. The opinions
incorporate estimated 2004 construction costs and include a 5% contingency factor and
all related administrative costs. The administrative costs are estimated at 30% and
include legal, engineering, financing, and other administrative items. The cost does not
include any easement acquisition costs. A summary of the project costs is a follows
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction
Summary of Costs
SEGMENT /DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
1. Street Construction
$1,269,200
2. Sanitary
$ 33,600
3. Watermain
$ 94,800
4. Storm Sewer
$ 263,600
TOTAL
$ 1,661,200
City of Rosemount— Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
Page 9
5.2 Funding
Funding for the project will consist of a combination of Special Assessments, Street CIP
funds, Storm Sewer funds, and Sanitary Sewer /Water Core funds.
' A breakdown of the funding for the project is a follows:
' The proposed 2004 Reconstruction Project is located within a residential area. Most
existing homes have driveways off the streets proposed for reconstruction. Therefore,
city policy states that the benefiting property owners be assessed $2400 per lot, as
identified in the City of Rosemount's Assessment Policy. Based on this rate and the fact
that there are 103 parcels to be assessed, the total estimated assessments are $247,200 or
15% of the project cost. The City's Street Capital development fund is proposed to fund
all remaining costs of the project, with the exception of contributions from the utility
funds.
The City's Storm Sewer Core Fund and Utility Fund is available to fund any major storm
sewer improvements. It is proposed that all storm sewer improvements associated with
the 2004 Reconstruction Project be funded by the City's Storm Sewer Core Fund and
' Utility Fund.
The City's Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund is available to fund any sanitary sewer
' improvements. It is proposed that all sanitary sewer improvements associated with the
2004 Reconstruction Project be funded by the City's Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund.
The City's Water Utility Fund is available to fund any watermain improvements. It is
proposed that all watermain improvements associated with the 2004 Reconstruction
Project be funded by the City's Water Utility Fund.
A summary of the proposed funding for this project is in the following table:
Proposed Project Funding Cost % of project
Special Assessments $ 247,200 15%
Street CIP $ 780,700 47%
Storm Sewer Core and Utility Fund $425,800 26%
Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund $54,300 3%
Water Utility Fund $153,200 9%
Total $1,661,200 100%
tsaseu on a/,4vu per im, per [ne %,ny of icvsemoum s current t,uu4 rate scneatue.
City of Rosemount — Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
Page 10
6. PROJECT SCHEDULE
The proposed project schedule for these improvements is as follows:
Authorized Preparation of Feasibility Report .................... ............................... September 16, 2003
Public Information Meeting ..................... ............................... ............................... January 8, 2004
Receive Feasibility Report & Order Public Hearing .............. ............................... January 20, 2004
Public Hearing / Authorize Preparation of Plans & Specs ... ............................... February 17, 2004
Receive Plans & Specs / Authorize Ad for Bid ........................ ............................... March 16, 2004
Receive Bids / Award Contract ................................................... ............................... April 20, 2004
Begin Construction ...................................................................... ............................... May 15, 2004
Assessment Hearing ........................................................................... ............................... Fall, 2004
City of Rosemount — Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
Page 11
7. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION
The project costs are estimated at $1,661,200. This cost includes utility improvements
and the total reconstruction of Dahomey Avenue West, Dallara Avenue West, Damask
Avenue West, Danbury Avenue West, Upper 145 Street West, and 147 Street West.
Due to the deteriorating condition of the existing streets and utilities and a need for
improving the local drainage system, this project is both feasible and necessary from an
engineering standpoint. We recommend the reconstruction of the streets and utility
improvements as outlined in this report.
City of Rosemount — Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
Page 12
I
L
APPENDIX A
' Project Location Maps
n
City of Rosemount — Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
i
x
a
z
0
14511-1 STREET NI
M
Z V
S
Q
N
C.S.A.H. N0.42
PROJECT LOCATION
X
0 1000 2000
AL sulks Obw MNngIW�
mknmvwR w
FAcTSSarnoo
a as . -
2004 S t and � j�
Reconstruct on IP'u°®ject
Cly Repot No ol6eoao o.� d..,.y. 20. 2004
Cdr N06 976
Figure Number
Rosemomt, esot LL
I a
�0
F2 �� �1� � (� [ 1
o ❑ ❑ o o ,
❑ ❑
O
a
DANBURY A� UE
Ll
0 � n
\ L�
I
❑ O i
\i
O � I
o n�
0 AMA I AVENU
T
m ®
0
0 ❑
0
z�
O El El j - m
❑ ij 4
c ; � O ❑
�f
tl
I_ - - -
,
® -
❑
0
a
I
0
0 �
P ARKWAY
I�
'�F
p 7A A
71
� f
A A
D I' WO m 7 O
(Arn NN D
AO O J .�
q G^FC T T o °
z u,zf 0111 N Q N
m � qq A -- � T C T
Y•1 n.- I�InN�
N C N D ,
mmm ~ 5
- u O
AK
N W < J N N
O O g W m
cn < Cf) "A mo
AA c
G) D C ° o
s
m C Z C/ z aQ p Q
m "' Co -
oz O m O A O m
� A 'p .A ."1C1 A z P � > P Am A
® Z X z0 F FZ z F
O o0 oz ° - v ° z
rn m � m
D .O O Z
°0 0
NIVA�M`dM CIN`d
213MIS �, I]ViINdS
� *ON 3UMI—A
0 s NVA,
ly V1.1
�a
Go
V 1083 N I VII I omso ICJ
133PO2id NO11WHlSNO33b
Alnu ®NIM 133HIS VOOZ
WVA 3iV9 „9 GNd
iNV�10J,H M3N HlIM 013b
39 Ol S1NV�10J,H ONIlSIX3 Tld
:3ION
�13M]S J,�]ViINVS IIO`d
1N`d J(D,H 3iV30TRJ •
NI`dW?MVM 13b
d3M3S J,�]VlIN`dS ONIISIXI
NIV N�13iVM ONUSIX I
OOZ
oo t 0
0ma-mia WA
-
OOfNPWL
mm Nw'+pap-M
009 qm
Awaft PPDW@n W810 09W
WVA 3iV9 „9 GNd
iNV�10J,H M3N HlIM 013b
39 Ol S1NV�10J,H ONIlSIX3 Tld
:3ION
�13M]S J,�]ViINVS IIO`d
1N`d J(D,H 3iV30TRJ •
NI`dW?MVM 13b
d3M3S J,�]VlIN`dS ONIISIXI
NIV N�13iVM ONUSIX I
OOZ
oo t 0
x
^y
aaquanN aan61j
L `iunowasoN
ZZ NW'sllodeauul
t
�aafoid uoi�anz�suoaa�
Simla Puy laazlS b00Z
6emgBI Seuowaw uosIO OSLO
9L£'ON )oafwd AII�
b00Z'OZ'tienuef :ele0 00 'aNl�Ioid 8SM
' == m
�O Y
9 1 0 1
1N3W3Sb3 ),2MJ0 W31,0 L
\ \\ 1N3W3SV3 Qdb OdN31,0 L
NI 101 \�
1N3W3Sd3 30VNidd(l 1N3N W�J3d
ONIISIX3 ?J3n0 a3?JInOb 9 Ol
1N3W3SV3 )\iniln N3N NH3d
- bLL6S2 h' *000 2J3d
1N3W3S`d3 3OVNIV J(l ,S OMIISIX3 -
iN3W3Sd3 3OVNld�la iN3N` VI213d
ONIISIX3 �13no a3?JInOd 38 Ol
1N3W3Sb3 )dniln N3NMJ3d
9Z-Z-692 # •000 �13d
1N3W3Sd3 30VNI`d J(l 9 ONIISIX3
1 0 1 C->
M 133N1S H1Sbl
r
APPENDIX B
Opinion of Cost
City of Rosemount — Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
' City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
2004 STREET AND UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT PROJECT NO. 376
January 20, 2004
CALCULATED BY: JGM
CHECKED BY: JH
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
SCHEDULE A - STREET CONSTRUCTION
LINE NO.
MN/DOT ITEM NO.
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
UNIT
COST
TOTAL PROJECT
TOTAL
QUANTITY
TOTAL
COST
1
2021.501
MOBILIZATION
LUMP SUM
$23,800.00
1
$23,800.00
2
2101.502
CLEARING
TREE
$250.00
13
$3,250.00
3
2101.507
GRUBBING
TREE
$250.00
13
$3,250.00
4
2104.501
REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER
LIN FT
$5.00
12205
$61,025.00
5
2104.503
REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK
SQ FT
$5.00
276
$1,380.00
6
2104.505
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
SQ YD
$3.50
19600
$68,600.00
7
2104.505
REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
SQ YD
$7.50
$19,650.00
8
2104.511
SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)
LIN FT
$4.50
$6,408.00
9
2104.513
SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)
LIN FT
$3.50
$826.00
9
2104.521
SALVAGE WOOD FENCE
LIN FT
$3.00
h1424
$90.00
10
2104.521
SALVAGE CHAIN LINK FENCE
LIN FT
$3.00
$90.00
I 1
2104.521
SALVAGE AND REPLACE LANDSCAPE BLOCK
LIN FT
$25.00
$3,625.00
12
2104.521
SALVAGE SPRINKLER SYSTEM
LIN FT
$3.00
100
$300.00
13
2104.521
SALVAGE AND REPLACE GRANITE SIDEWALK
SQ FT
$5.00
30
$150.00
14
2105.501
COMMON EXCAVATION
CU YD
$12.00
7150
$85,800.00
15
2105.507
SUBGRADE EXCAVATION
CUYD
$12.00
1555
$18,660.00
16
2105.522
SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (LV)
CU YD
$15.00
3959
$59,385.00
17
2211.501
AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED)
TON
$11.50
8358
$96,117.00
18
2350.501
TYPE LV 3 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE
TON
$34.00
1782
$60,588.00
19
2350.502
TYPE LV 3 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE
TON
$33.00
2376
$78,408.00
20
2357.502
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT
GALLON
$2.00
975
$1,950.00
21
2521.501
4" CONCRETE WALK
SQ FT
$6.00
276
$1,656.00
22
2531.501
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B618
LIN FT
$8.00
12205
$97,640.00
23
2531.507
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
SQ YD
$50.00
2620
$131,000.00
24
2540.602
PROVIDE AND INSTALL NEW MAILBOX
EACH
$200.00
103
$20,600.00
25
2563.601
TRAFFIC CONTROL
LUMP SUM
$6,500.00
1
$6,500.00
26
- --
TEMPORARY MAILBOX
LUMP SUM
$3,000.00
1
$3,000.00
27
2564.531
FURNISH AND INSTALL SIGN PANELS
EACH
$260.00
21
$5,460.00
28
2571.501
CONIFEROUS TREE 6' HT B &B
TREE
$450.00
3
$1,350.00
29
2571.502
DECIDUOUS TREE 2.5" CAL B &B
TREE
$500.00
10
$5,000.00
30
2573.502
SILT FENCE, TYPE MACHINE SLICED
LIN FT
$5.00
500
$2,500.00
31
2573.505
SODDING TYPE LAWN (W /4" TOPSOIL & FERTILIZER)
SQ YD
$3.00
20342
$61,038.00
32
2575.501
SEEDING (W /4" TOPSOIL, FERTILIZER & MULCH)
ACRE
$1,200.00
0.3
$360.00
33
2575.502
SEED MIXTURE 25B
LB
$32.00
9
$288.00
SUBTOTAL OF STREET CONSTRUCTION
$929,750.00
5% CONTINGENCIES
$46,490.00
SUBTOTAL
$976,240.00
30% ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
$292,880.00
TOTAL OF STREET CONSTRUCTION
$1,269,200.00
Page 1 of 3 114:101560- 001ExcellOpinion of Probable Cost,Cost Worksheet
2004 STREET AND UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT PROJECT NO. 376
UNTT I UNIT
COST
ULE B - SANITARY SEWER
LINE NO.
MN/DOT ITEM NO.
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
UNIT
COST
TOTAL PROJECT
TOTAL
QUANTITY
TOTAL
COST
34
2104.501
REMOVE SANITAR S EWER PIPE
LIN FT
$7.00
109
$763.00
35
2503.523
SALVAGE CASTING ASSEMBLY
EACH
$100.00
28
$2,800.00
36
2503.602
CONNECT TO EXIST SANITARY SEWER
EACH
$1,100.00
8
$8,800.00
37
2503.602
RECONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
EACH
$150.00
1 3
$450.00
38
2506.522
ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING
EACH
$325.00
28
$9,100.00
39
2621.511
4" PVC SEWER PIPE - SDR 26
LIN FT
$10.50
30
$315.00
40
2621.511
8" PVC SEWER PIPE - SDR 35
LIN FT
$20.00
109
$2,180.00
41
2621.602
8" x 4" PVC WYE
EACH
$65.00
3
$195.00
SUBTOTAL OF STREET CONSTRUCTION
$24,600.00
5% CONTINGENCIES
51,230.00
SUBTOTAL
$25,830.00
30% ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
57,750.00
TOTAL OF STREET CONSTRUCTION
533,600.00
Si2.
LINE NO. I MN/DOT ITEM NO. I DESCRIPTION
42
2104.501
REMOVE WATER MAIN
43
2104.501
REMOVE WATER SERVICE AND CURB BOX
44
2104.509
REMOVE HYDRA
45
2104.509
REMOVE GATE VALVE
46
2504.601
TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE
47
2504.602
RECONNECT WATE SERVICE
48
2504.602
ADJUST GATE VALVE AND BOX
49
2504.602
6" GATE VALVE AND BOX
50
2504.602
8" GATE VALVE AND BOX
51
2504.602
CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN
52
2504.602
1" CORPORATION STOP
53
2504.602
1" CURB STOP AND BOX
54
2504.602
FURNISH & INSTALL HYDRANT
55
2504.602
DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS
56
2504.603
6" WATER MAIN - DUCT IRON CL 52
57
2504.603
8" WATER MAI - DUCT IRON CL 52
58
2504.603
1" TYPE K COPPER PIPE
59
2504.604
4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION
LIN FT
$15.00
EACH
$100.00
EACH
$350.00
EACH
$150.00
LUMP SUM
$5,000.00
EACH
$300.00
EACH
$125.00
EACH
$550.00
EACH
$750.00
EACH
$1,000.00
EACH
$60.00
EACH
$150.00
EACH
$1,750.00
LB
$2.00
LIN FT
$17.50
LIN FT
$20.00
LIN FT
$14.00
SQ YD
$10.00
15
$150.00
SUBTOTAL OF
STREET Cc
January 20, 2004
TOTAL PROJECT
TOTAL
UANTITY
TOTAL
COST
268
$4,020.00
6
$600.00
10
$3,500.00
1
$150.00
1
$5,000.00
6
$1,800.00
14
$1,750.00
10
$5,500.00
1
$750.00
12
$12,000.00
6
$360.00
6
$900.00
10
$17,500.00
2190
$4,380.00
398
$6,965.00
20
$400.00
265
$3,710.00
15
$150.00
SUBTOTAL
30% ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
TOTAL OF STREET CONSTRUCTION
$69,440.00
S3,480.00
572,920.00
$21,880.00
$94,800.00
Page 2 of 3 M.101560- 001Exce/IOpinion of Probable Cost, Cost Worksheet
' 2004 STREET AND UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT January 20, 2004
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT PROJECT NO. 376
L
k
r_
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
SCHEDULE D - STORM SEWER
LINE NO.
MN/DOT ITEM NO.
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
UNIT
COST
TOTAL PROJECT
TOTAL
QUANTITY
TOTAL
COST
59
2104.501
REMOVE CONCRETE FLUME
LIN FT
$15.00
30
$450.00
60
2104.501
R EMOVE STORM M ANHOLE
EACH
$400.00
1
$400.00
61
2104.501
REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE
LIN FT
$7.00
48
$336.00
62
2104.523
SALVAGE CASTING
EACH
$100.00
4
$400.00
63
2501.515
12" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD
EACH
$600.00
1
$600.00
64
2501.515
27" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD
EACH
$1,100.00
1
$1,100.00
65
2501.602
SKIMMER
EACH
$3,000.00
1
$3,000.00
66
2503.521
36" SPAN RC PIPE - ARCH SEWER CLIIA
IN FT
$73.00
78
$5,694.00
67
2503.541
12" RC PIPE DESIGN 3006 CL V
LIN FT
$22.00
600
$13,200.00
68
2503.541
15" RC PIPE DESIGN 3006 CL V
LIN FT
$23.50
1079
$25,357.00
69
2503.541
18" RC PIPE DES 3006 CL I II
LIN FT
$26.00
863
$22,438.00
70
2503.541
21" RC PIPE DESIGN 3006 CL III
LIN FT
$31.00
692
$21,452.00
71
2503.541
24" RC PIPE DESIGN 3006 CL III
LIN FT
$32.00
615
$19,680.00
72
2503.602
CONNECT TO EXI STING STORM MANHOLE
EACH
$550.00
6
$3,300.00
73
2503.602
CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER
EACH
$500.00
0
$0.00
74
2506.501
COST. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES. 48 -4020
LIN FT
$175.00
164.18
$28,732.00
75
2506.501
COST. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES. 604020
LIN FT
$225.00
4.11
$925.00
76 '
2506.501
COST. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES. 664020
LIN FT
$275.00
4.02
$1,106.00
77
2506.501
COST. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES. SPEC. 1 (2'x 3' CB)
EACH
$1,100.00
17
$18,700.00
78
2506.602
CASTING ASSEMBLY (CATCH BASIN)
EACH
$450.00
48
$21,600.00
79
2506.602
CASTING ASSEMBLY (MANHOLE)
EACH
$375.00
11
$4,125.00
80
2511.501
RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III
CU YD
$65.00
6.9
$449.00
81
2511.515
GEOTEXTILE FABRI TYPE IV
SQ YD
$3.50
15
$53.00
SUBTOTAL OF STREET CONSTRUCTION
$ 193,100.00
.5% CONTINGENCIES
59,660.00
SUBTOTAL
$202,760.00
30'0 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
$60,830.00
TOTAL OF STREET CONSTRUCTION
$263,600.00
SUBTOTAL
$1,216,890.00
5% CONTINGENCIES
$60,860.00
SUBTOTAL
$1,277,750.00
30% ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
$383 340.00
$1,661
Page 3 of 3 114:101560- 00kExce/10pinion of Probable Cost, Cost Worksheet
0
n
APPENDIX C
Preliminary Assessment Roll
City of Rosemount — Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
0
u
n
0
0
I I
fl
n
0
L
n
0
Preliminary Assessments
WSB Project: 2004 Street Reconstruction Project Date: January 20, 2004
Project Location: Rosemount, MN
WSB Project No: 1560 -00
PID
Fee Owner
Fee Owner Address
City /State
Zip Code
Proposed
Assessment
341520001002
DANIEL P TUTEW
14680 DALLA AVE S
ROS EMOUNT MN
55068
$ 2,400
34152000
MARK A & KATHY A ANNIS
14678 DAHOME AVE W
ROSEMOU MN
55068 -4161
$ 2 ,400
341520001004
DOU GLAS W JR FA RONE
4168 147 ST W
ROSE MN
55068 -4521
$ 2,400
341520002002
WESLEY F HASBR
14685 DAHOM AVE W
ROSEMOUNT MN
55 068
$ 2,400
341520002003
JEANNE M BA
14 DAHO MEY ST
RO SEMOUNT MN
55068
$ 2,400
3415 20002004
GENE T & REBE D A
4146 147TH S W
ROS EMOUNT MN
550 -4521
$ 2,40
341520003002
RON ALD J & DAR V LEE
14699 DAHOMEY
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4160
$ 2,400
341520003003
JUDIT A DYS
14692 DAHOM AVE
R OSEMO U NT MN
55068 -416
$ 2, 400
341520003
JERRY L & SANDRA K HEIDMAN
14755 DAL AVE
ROSEM MN
55 068 -4556
$ 2,400
341520004003
RO NALD L & D K OTTERDAHL
146 DAHOM AVE W
R OSEMOU NT MN
55068 -4
$ 2,400
341 520004004
MICHAEL J & JULIE A KING
14 767 DALL AVE W
ROSEMO MN
55068 -4556
$ 2,400
341520 005003
CALVIN G & CONST DRAKE
14698 D AHOMEY A VE W
ROSE- MOUNT MN
55068 -4 161
$ 2,400
34152 0005004
JOHN P TSTE BRO BACK
14378 EM BREY CT
APPLE VALLEY MN
5512 -6988
$ 2,400
341520006003
ROSE M & ELAINE R ATZLAFF
4076 147TH ST W
ROSEMOUNT MN
55 -4 536
$ 2,400
341520006004
TIEN V AN & THU NGOC HUYNH
14789 DALLARA AVE
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4556
$ 2,40
341520007003
DA WN L MEYER
4098 147TH ST W
ROSEM MN
55068 -4536
$ 2,400
3 4152000 7004
GARY W & PAM J MILLER
14795 DALLA A VE W
ROSEMOU MN
55068 -4556
$ 2,400
34 1520008003
STAN & MARIAN LITTLEFIELD
4124 147TH ST W
R OSEMOUN T MN
55068 -4522
$ 2,4
34152 0009003
B RYAN W SCHL
14770 DALLARA AVE W
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4 502
$ 2,400
341520010003
WILLIAM C SMITH
14782 D AVE
ROSEMOUNT MN
550 -4502
$ 2,400
341520011103
B RADLE Y W BARLA
14 790 DALLARA AVE W
R OSEMOUNT M
55068 -45
$ 2,400
3 4152010 1001
STEVEN R & TRACI L CHA MBERLIN
4185 UPPER 145T ST W
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4138
$ 2,4 00
341520101002
CYNTHIA A STEG
4126 145TH ST W
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4121
$ 2,400
3415201010
JOHN L & PATRICIA L DOUGHERTY
4184 UPPER 14 ST
R OSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4139
$ 2,400
341520101004
KAR NELSON
14560 DALLARA AVE W
ROSEMOUN MN
5506 -4131
$ 2,400
341520102001
ROLAND & PATRI BENOIT
4169 UPPER 145TH S W
ROSE MN
550 -41 38
$ 2,400
34 152010200 3
MICHAE E PINARD
4168 UPPER 145TH ST W
ROSEMOUNT MN
55 -4 139
$ 2,400
341520102
SUSAN M JOH
145 D AV W
RO SEMOUNT MN
55068 -4 131
$ 2,400
341520102005
BR ADLEY D & SHEL J MCCLELLAN
1457 DA HOMEY A VE W
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4101
$ 2,400
341 5201030 01
BERNICE E O NEILL
4145 UPPER 145TH ST W
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4138
$ 2,400
341520103002
C ARROLL T & HEL M HOVE
4097 UPPER 145T ST W
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4135
$ 2,400
341520103003
BRIAN P & REBECCA L JO HNSO N
4146 UPPER 145TH ST W
RO SEMOUNT MN
55068 -4139
$ 2,400
341 520103004
J OHN F & LI H BYRNE
145 DALLAR AVE W
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4131
$ 2,400
3415 20103005
RONALD JAC
14584 DOHOMEY AVE E
ROSEMOUN MN
55068
$ 2
341520104002
LA RRY W & BARBARA HELLAND
4125 14 5TH ST W
ROSEMOUNT M
55068 -4107
$ 2,400
341520104003
ROG F & MARY ANN R EESE
14557 DALLARA AVE
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4129
$ 2,400
341520 104004
WESLE M & HELEN JOS EPHSON
14590 DALL A VE W
ROSE MOUNT MN
55068 -4131
$ 2,400
341520104005
3 4152010 5003
LAURA & JESSE STYGAR
RIC HARD & SANDR EM ERSON
14598 DAHOMEY AVE W
14569 DALLARA AVE W
ROSEMOU M N
55 -4101
$ 2,400
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -41
$ 2,400
34 1520105004
JA MES D & KRISTINE M JACOBSO
14620 DALLARA AV W
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4158
$ 2,400
3415 20105005
CHRIST J SCHOTTLE
14620 DAHOMEY AVE W
R OSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4161
$ 2, 400
341520106003
JACK W & KATHLEEN E ALT
1457 DALLARA AVE W
ROS EMOUNT MN
55068 -4129
$ 2,400
Page 1 of Page 3 M:1 1560 - 001 &cellPreliminary Assessment Role
C
n
0
n
C
n
fl
0
fl
u
fl
Preliminary Assessments
WSB Project: 2004 Street Reconstruction Project Date: January 20, 2004
Project Location: Rosemount, MN
WSB Project No: 1560 -00
PID
Fee Owner
Fee Owner Address
City/State
Zip Code
Proposed
Assessment
341520106004
MARY L CLARK
14640 DA AVE W
RO SEMOUNT M
55068 -4158
$ 2,400
341520106005
JAMES C JR & S ALLY OMAN
14646 DA HOMEY AVE W
ROS EMOUNT M
550 -4161
$ 2,400
341520107003
L OUIS C & EVEL G ANDERSON
14589 DALLARA
R OSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4129
$ 2,400
341520107004
DA A & G M LUNDGREN
14660 DALLARA AVE W
ROSEM MN
55068 -4158
$ 2,400
3415201070
MICHELLE L BU RGER KISTNER
14660 DAH AVE W
ROS MN
55068 -4 161
$ 2,400
341520108003
ALA W J
146 DAL AVE W
ROSEMO MN
55 -4 157
$ 2,400
341520108004
JAM E & LYNETTE J PATWELL
14675 DAH A VE W
ROS EMOUNT MN
55068 -4160
$ 2,400
341520109003
STEVEN & JACQUELINE SWIFT
14639 DA AVE W
RO MN
55 068 -4157
$ 2,400
341520109004
RUTH E W ENZE L
1 4655 DAHOMEY AVE
ROSEMO MN
55 068 -416
$ 2,400
341520110004
CURTIS A & JOAN WA
14625 DAH A VE W
ROSE MN
55068 -4160
$ 2,400
341520111004
GERALD R & CA RRIE HELGESON
14589 DAHOME AVE W
RO MN
55 068 -4162
$ 2,400
341520112004
MICHA J TREN
145 D AVE W
ROSEM MN
55068 -4162
$ 2,40
341520113004
BARBARA JEAN DAY
14569 D AHOM E Y AV W
ROSEMOUN MN
550 -4162
$ 2,4
341520114004
P ATRIC K D & ANNA M D OMEIER
14557 D AVE W
ROSEM MN
55068 -4 162
$ 2, 400
341520201001
JUD ANN JOHN
4199 U PPER 145 TH ST W
ROS EMOUNT MN
55068 -4138
$ 2,400
3415202010
EUGENE M & S ANDRA L PITTMAN
14629 DANBURN AVE W
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4152
$ 2,400
341520201003
JENNIFER L CAROTHERS
1454 DANBU AVE WE
ROS MN
55 068 -4108
$ 2,400
34152020
BRIA S & DORIS L ODELL
14560 DA MASK A VE W
R OSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4105
$ 2,400
3 41520202001
MICHAEL F & CYNTHIA HES
1 4505 DANBURY A W
ROSEMOUNT M
5 5068 -4 154
$ 2,400
341520202002
DAVID T BAUER
146 DANBURY AVE W
RO SEMOUN T MN
55068 -4152
$ 2,400
34152 0202003
ANTHONY J & T HERESA KULLA
14550 DA NBURY W
ROSE MN
55068 -4108
$ 2,400
341 520202004
WILL IAM & ROCHELLE HAGE
14570 DAMASK A W
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4105
$ 2,4 00
3415 20203001
MARK A HOSTUTLER
14515 D ANBURY AVE W
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4154
$ 2,400
341520203002
JEAN WESTLIE DUDLEY
14669 DANBURY AVE W
ROSEMOUNT M
55068 -4
$ 2,400
3 415202030 03
RICHARD J & EMMY L GILLES
14560 DANBU AVE W
ROSEMOU MN
5 5068 -410
$ 2,400
341520203004
BRUCE A & JULIE A Y ATES
14580 DA MASK AVE
ROSE 40UNT MN
55 -4 105
$ 2,400
341520204001
JE FFREY E & THERESA FOLEY
14521 DANBURY AVE W
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4154
$ 2,400
341520204002
TOD D ANDERSON
4290 147TH S W
ROS EMOUNT MN
55068 -4518
$ 2,400
34152020
ROBERT T & M A B ARFKNE CHT
14570 DAN
R OSEMOU NT MN
55068 -4108
$ 2,400
341520204004
DAV M K EILEN
14590 DAMASK AVE W
ROSE MOUNT MN
550 -4105
$ 2,400
341520205001
VICTOR H & MAR GARET DERICHS
14 DAN BURY AVE W
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -41
$ 2,400
341520205002
JO T G UILLEMETTE
4278 14 ST W
R OSEMOUN T MN
55068 -451
$ 2,400
3415 20205003
RUSSELL L & JOAN M LOCKHART
14580 DA NBURY AV E W
ROSEMOUNT MN
550 -4108
$ 2,400
341520205004
RONALD J VIELLIEUX
14 D AMASK AVE W
ROSEMOU MN
55068 -4156
$ 2,400
341520206001
MARK & ARLEEN L INKERT
14539 DANBURY AVE
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4154
$ 2,400
3 415202060 02
ALVIN M & B ARBAR A A SPRUTE
4256 147TH ST W
ROSEMOUN MN
55068 -4518
$ '2,400
3 4152020 6003
D EAN E DOT
14590 D ANBURY AVE W
ROSEMOU M N
55068 -4108
$ 2
34
MICHAEL D & BRIAN J HAEG
14640 D AMAS K AV
RO MN
55068 -4156
$ 2 ,400
3415202070
MATTHEW ROGE
14549 DA NBURY A VE W
ROS MN
55 068 -41
$ 2,400
341520207002
TODD J & MAUREEN R TANGEN
4248 147 ST W
RO MN
55068 -4518
$ 2,400
34152 0207003
DALE S & TERESA A JOH NSON
14620 DA NBURY AVE W
ROSEM M N
550 -4153
$ 2,400
341520208001
THOMA C & JEANETT P RIN CE
14557 D ANBURY AV W
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4154
$ 2,400
Page 2 of Page 3 M. 11560- 001&cellPreliminary Assessment Role
u
I I
G
n
1
Preliminary Assessments
WSB Project: 2004 Street Reconstruction Project Date: January 20, 2004
Project Location: Rosemount, MN
WSB Project No: 1560 -00
PID
Fee Owner
Fee Owner Address
City /State
Zip Code
Proposed
Assessment
3415202
DENNIS B & CH ERYLE COUGHLIN
4230 147TH S W
ROSEMOU MN
550 -4518
$ 2,400
341520208003
WILLARD & MARC HUDYMA
14640 D AVE W
R OSEMOUN T MN
55068 -4153
$ 2
341520209001
ANDREW A SHEFC
14569 DANBURY AVE W
ROSEMO MN
55068 -4154
$ 2,400
341520209002
JULIE K KER
4 212 147TH ST W
ROSEMOUN MN
55068 -4518
$ 2,400
341520209003
JEFFREY G & JANET WACHTER
14660 DANBU AVE W
RO SEMOUN T MN
5506 -4153
$ 2,400
341520210001
WIL LIAM E & JOAN R SCHWOCH
1 4575 DANBURY AVE W
ROSEMOUN M N
55068 -4154
$ 2,400
341520210002
MAEWIN E HAEGE
4198 147TH ST W
RO SEMOUNT MN
55 068 -4521
$ 2,400
3 41520210003
SE KAR HANSON
4249 1 47TH ST W
ROSEMOUN MN
55 -4 517
$ 2,400
341520211001
DENNIS L & MARLENE HEINZEN
_
14587 DANBURY AVE W
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4154
$ 2,400
341520211002
KEVIN M K
4184 147TH S W
ROSEMOUNT MN
55 068 -4521
$ 2,400
341520211003
DO NALD S BRENDALEN
14695 DAMASK AVE W
RO SEMOUN T MN
55068 -4155
$ 2,400
341520212003
RANDOLPH A & KATHRYN ENGEL
14675 DAMASK AVE
ROSEMO MN
5506 -4155
$ 2,400
341520213003
SANDRA M SPAETH
1465 DAMA AVE W
ROSEMOUN MN
5 5068 -4 155
$ 2,400
341520214003
JA CK H & ANN M BR ACKETT
1462 DAMASK AV W
ROSEMOUNT MN
5506 -4155
$ 2,400
341520215003
JOHN D & R A FOWLER
14589 D AVE
RO SEMOUNT MN
550 -4106
$ 2,400
341520216003
THOMAS E & KATH RA SCHKE
14573 DAMASK AVE W
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4106
$ 2,400
341520217003
ROBERT F JONES
14569 DAMASK AVE
ROSEMOUN MN
550 -410
$ 2,400
342490002001
DENNIS J & IRENE REBISCHKE
4027 UPPER 145TH ST
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -41
$ 2,400
342490003001
DUANE FISH
4065 UPPER 145TH ST
ROSEMOUNT MN
55068 -4135
$ 2,400
TOTAL $ 247,200
Page 3 of Page 3 M: 11560- 001ExceAPreliminary Assessment Role
APPENDIX D
Preliminary Pavement Design
' City of Rosemount — Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
' City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
1
CUMULATIVE ESALS WORKSHEET
--------------- - - - - --
AADT
SEGMENT A
COUNT:
0
2004
SP #: 0
1090
'
2024
FORECAST:
1090
' DESIGN LANE FACTOR:
' ROUTE:
0
LOCATION:
# LANES:
2004 Rosemount Reconstruction
2
DATE:
12/23/03
2AX -6TIRE SU
VCL SITE #: 0
2.4%
3AX+ SU
1.6%
1.6%
3AX TST
0.0%
0.0%
YEAR
AADT
INIT CALC
HCADT
CONSTRN
HCADT
INIT CALC
5AX TST
0.5%
VEH.CLASS YR.:
0.0%
0.0%
0
0.0%
- --
TR TR, BUSES
YEAR:
2004
1090
60
0.0%
5
' BASE
FORECAST YEAR:
2024
1090
60
5
1 BASE YEAR PROPORTIONS
' 2AX -6TIRE SU
3AX+ SU
3AX TST
' 4AX TST
5AX+ TST
(5AX+ TST MAX)
' (5AX+ TST OTH)
TR TR, BUSES
TWIN TRAILERS
1 0.1% 1
1 1.0% 1
-------------------- - - - - --
SUM MARI ES:
-------------- - - - - --
--------------- - - - - --
AADT
0
COUNT:
0
2004
FORECAST:
1090
'
2024
FORECAST:
1090
' DESIGN LANE FACTOR:
0.5
ADDITIONAL OUTPUTS:
1
5
BASE %
FORECAST %
2AX -6TIRE SU
2.4%
2.4%
3AX+ SU
1.6%
1.6%
3AX TST
0.0%
0.0%
'
4AX TST
0.1%
0.1%
5AX+ TST
0.5%
0.5%
(5AX+ TST MAX)
0.0%
0.0%
' (5AX+ TST OTH)
0.0%
0.0%
TR TR, BUSES
0.9%
0.9%
TWIN TRAILERS
0.0%
0.0%
Notes:
60
CONSTRAIN 5AX
TST
BASE YR.
VOLUME % TREND FUTURE % FUTURE VOL.
26
1
2.6%
26
17
1
1.7%
17
0
1
0.0%
0
1
1
0.1%
1
5
1
0.5%
5
0
1
0.0%
0
0
1
0.0%
0
10
1
1.0%
10
0
-----------------•
1
------------
0.0%
0
HCADT
- - - - -•
HCADT %
------------ - - - - -• ----------------------------
20
YR DESIGN
0
#DIV /0!
LANE CUMULATIVE
ESAL
60
5.5%
60
5.5%
* * * * * * * * * * * **
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
FLEXIBLE
RIGID
124,000
167,000
ESAL FACTORS
FLEXIBLE
RIGID
0.25
0.24
0.58
0.85
0.39
0.37
0.51
0.53
1.13
1.89
2.40
4.07
0.87
1.44
0.57
0.74
2.40
2.33
Z
■ M ra. M. ■. ra... ra.. ra.... ■.... ra.... ra.... ■
■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ /SEES■■ /SEES■■ /■ /SEES■■ /� ■ ■ ■ ■■
111111111111111111111111111111 � 1111 �
.-..... M.. W.. .ra.WW...A.rari.rar.ra.rj..r
1111111 /11111 � .1.111.111.11. /1 /111
■■■■
loss
1111
11111 1::
ENO; . l o w
■■■■■■■■■N
■■ ■E■■■■EI
1111111111
T i �iiiliiiiif."):�..■1' /! / ■■1 !-■
I1 / %�i��;l�i�7: /��i� /i�1 •111
����II /,�II�II .clllll . /1111 71
.�11 /�11�11 ►.�IF111��1111�11111
■..-.►i..�......- .....
■- /.II.I.�t.. ■. IL ■w■■. ■.■.■
I■ ■II■/%■■■■■Fi ■L■■■■■ ■■■■■
/ ■I. ■ ■I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■�� ■L ■ ■ ■ ■■ SEMEN
It %��i��1��� ���E�1��■ milli
I/II/�11111/1111�11111 11111
1 ■■ SEES ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■�' ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■■■■
1 ■M ■ ■ ■N ■M ■ ■M ■ ■r ■ ■MM■ ■E■■■
11slisiIloollill III milli
11111111111111111111 ; a - 11111
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DESIGN
STREET:
Dallara
Date:
23- Dec -03
PROJECT:
LOCATION
City of Rosemount 2004 Reconstruction WSB Project No.:
1560 -00
SP No.:
ESAL = 124,000
R =60 Granular Equivalent Required:
10.00
Granular Equivalence
Calculation
G.E.
Granular
Inches
Material Factor
Equivalence
1.5
2350/2360 Bituminous Wear 2.25
3.38
2
23 50/23 60 Bituminous Non -Wear 2.00
4.00
6
Cl. 5, Cl. 6 Aggregate Base 1.00
6.00
0
Select Granular Material 0.50
0.00
Total G.E.:
13.38
The Total G.E. Meets or Exceeds The Required G.E.
t
City of Rosemount — Feasibility Report
2004 Street and Utility Reconstruction Project
City Project No. 376
WSB Project No. 1560 -00
APPENDIX E
Geotechnical Report
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
ROSEMOUNT 2004
RECONSTRUCTION
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA
MBI #N4145/N3559
NOVEMBER 2003
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
ROSEMO UNT 2004 RECONSTR UCTION
ROSEMO UNT, MINNESOTA
Prepared For:
WSB & Associates
Mr. Anthony Aderhold
4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55422
Prepared by:
McGhie & Betts, Inc.
1604 Riverview Lane
Northfield, MN 55057
(507) 645 -0964
MBI #N4145/N3559
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under
my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Name: Mark W. Osborn Signature.
Date: License #: 41362
November 18, 2003
Mr. Anthony Aderhold
o r t h f i e 1 d WSB & Associates, Inc.
i n n e S o t a 4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55422
Re: Geotechnical Report
Land Surveying Rosemount 2004 Reconstruction Project
Rosemount, Minnesota
Civil Engineering MBI #N4145/N3559
Geotechnical Engineering
onstruction Material Testing Dear Mr. Aderhold;
Environmental Services In accordance with your authorization, McGhie & Betts, Inc. has conducted a
geotechnical subsurface exploration program for the referenced project. We are
sending two copies of the report to you as requested.
If you have any questions concerning this report or our recommendations, or if
you need construction materials testing for this project, please call us at
507- 645 -0964.
Very truly
rY Y yours,
McGHIE & BETTS, INC.
Mark W. Osborn, P.E.
MWO /mo
'
e-mail. mlc @mbi- nf.com
i
Established 1995
1604 Riverview Lane
Northfield, MN 55057
' T
Tel. 507.645.0964
Fax. 507.645.2842
e-mail. mlc @mbi- nf.com
i
Established 1995
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... ..............................1
PURPOSE ............................................................................................................. ..............................1
SCOPE SERVICES ............................................................................................ ............................... I
SITECONDITIONS ..................................................................................... ..............................2
SURFACECONDITIONS ........................................................................................ ..............................2
SUBSURFACECONDmoNS ................................................................................. ..............................3
GROUNDWATER................................................................................................... ..............................4
PROJECT INFORMATION .................................................................... ..............................5
ENGINEERING REVIEW ........................................................................ ..............................5
DISCUSSION ......................................................................................................... ..............................5
SOILPROPERTIES ..................................................................................... ..............................6
FROST SUSCEPTIBILITY ....................................................................................... ..............................6
DRAINAGEPROPERTIES ....................................................................................... ..............................6
CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS ................................. ..............................7
EARTHWORK ............................... ...............................
...... ............................... 8
CONSTRUCTION ......................................................................................... ..............................9
SITE OBSERVATIONS ........................................................................................... ..............................9
TESTING .............................................................................................................. .............................10
PLANREVIEW ..................................................................................................... .............................10
EXPLORATION LIMITATIONS .................................................... .............................11
APPENDIX .................................................................................................... .............................12
LOGS OF PENETRATION TEST BORINGS ................................................ .............................12
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
ROSEMOUNT 2004 RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA
MBI #N4145/N3559
INTRODUCTION
Purnose
It is McGhie & Betts' understanding that this report is to be used in connection
with the reconstruction of Danbury Avenue, Damask Avenue, Dallara Avenue, and
Dahomey Avenue from Upper 145 Street to 147 Street, and the reconstruction
of Upper 145 Street and 147 Street from Danbury Avenue to Dahomey Avenue
in Rosemount, Minnesota. This stated purpose was a significant factor in
determining the scope and level of service provided. Should the report's purpose
change the report immediately ceases to be valid and use of it without McGhie &
Betts' prior review and written authorization shall be at the user's sole risk.
The observations and conclusions described in this report are based solely on the
scope of service described in this report. McGhie & Betts has not performed any
observations, investigations, studies or testing that is not specifically listed in the
scope of service. McGhie & Betts shall not be liable for failing to discover any
condition whose discovery required the performance of services not authorized by
the Agreement.
Scope of Services
In accordance with the authorization of Mr. Anthony Aderhold of WSB &
Associates, we have completed a subsurface exploration and prepared a
N4145/N3559 Page 2
geotechnical report for the referenced site. Our authorized scope of work has
been limited to:
1. Putting down thirteen (13) flight auger borings to a 6 -foot depth.
2. Review of available project information.
2. Providing a data report containing a review of the subsurface
conditions including preparation of our conclusions and opinions
regarding:
A. Site Soil Properties
B. Pavement Design
C. Earthwork
Our work program for accomplishment of the above objectives included putting
down thirteen (13) test borings, reviewing the project information, and observing
the recovered soil samples. This report will describe our field observations,
present the results of the field tests, and provide you with our engineering
recommendations.
SITE CONDITIONS
Surface Conditions
Our exploration was completed along the existing roads of Danbury Avenue,
Damask Avenue, Dallara Avenue, and Dahomey Avenue from Upper 145' Street
to 147''' Street, and the reconstruction of Upper 145' Street and 147 Street from
Danbury Avenue to Dahomey Avenue in Rosemount, Minnesota.
At the time borings were conducted, surface elevations had not been ascertained.
It is our understanding that WSB & Associates will elevate and locate the borings.
N4145/N3559 Page 3
At the time the borings were put down, the site consisted of existing bituminous
pavement roadways in a residential district.
Subsurface Conditions
The subsurface conditions encountered by the test borings are illustrated on the
attached boring logs. The depths and thickness of the subsurface strata indicated
on the boring logs were generalized from the drilling results. The transition
between materials is approximate and is usually far more gradual than shown.
Information on actual subsurface conditions exists only at the specific locations
indicated and is relevant only to the time exploration was performed. Subsurface
conditions and groundwater levels at other locations may differ from conditions
found at the indicated locations. Note, too, that these conditions may change over
time. These stratification lines were used for our analytical purposes and, unless
specifically stated otherwise, should not be used as a basis of design or
construction cost estimates.
Results of the test borings put down at this site indicate a general subsurface
profile of bituminous asphalt pavement overlying sands with gravel. In certain
areas we encountered lean clay fills beneath the pavement, these fills were
underlain by the native sands with gravel. The bituminous asphalt pavement
ranged from 3V2" to 7%2" in thickness. No aggregate base was encountered
beneath the bituminous pavement. The sands with gravel encountered were
generally brown in color. The borings were terminated within the sands at depths
of 7 or 8 feet below grade.
The boring logs and related information included in this report are indicators of the
N4145/N3559 Page 4_
subsurface conditions only at the specific locations and times noted. The
subsurface conditions, including groundwater levels, at other locations on the site
may differ significantly from conditions that, in the opinion of McGhie & Betts,
exist at the sampling locations.
The test borings were put down by McGhie & Betts solely to obtain indications of
subsurface conditions as part of a geotechnical exploration program. No services
were performed to evaluate subsurface environmental conditions.
Groundwater
McGhie & Betts took groundwater level readings in the exploratory borings,
reviewed the data obtained, and discussed its interpretation of the data in the text
of the report. Note that groundwater levels may fluctuate due to seasonal
variations, i.e. precipitation, snowmelt and rainfall, and/or other factors not evident
at the time of measurement.
As noted on the logs, no subsurface water was encountered in the borings during
the drilling operation.
The elevation of the groundwater table can be a major factor in design and
construction at this site. If more accurate subsurface water levels are needed, we
recommend piezometers be installed to properly determine the groundwater level.
Monitoring of the groundwater table elevation could occur throughout the winter
and spring months up to the time of construction. This work was outside our
scope of services.
N4145/N3559 Page 5
PROJECT INFORMATION
McGhie & Betts has developed preliminary recommendations for this project in
consideration of the proposed layout as understood at this time. McGhie & Betts
must be made aware of the revised or additional information in order to evaluate
the preliminary recommendations for continued applicability.
We understand the proposed work at this site consists of reconstruction of
Danbury Avenue, Damask Avenue, Dallara Avenue, and Dahomey Avenue from
Upper 145' Street to 147'' Street, and the reconstruction of Upper 145' Street
and 147 Street from Danbury Avenue to Dahomey Avenue in Rosemount,
Minnesota.
The existing roadways are comprised of a bituminous asphalt pavement overlying
sands with gravel or clay fills. The bituminous asphalt thickness ranges from 3 /z"
to 7%Z" in thickness. No aggregate base was encountered in the existing roadways.
It is our understanding that no infrastructure improvements will be made to the
utilities at this time. It is also our understanding that this roadway is to be
designed for light residential traffic use.
ENGINEERING REVIEW
Discussion
The following sections of this report include comments related to issues such as
excavation, de- watering, lateral support, foundation construction, earthwork, and
related geotechnical aspects of the proposed construction. The recommendations
contained herein are not intended to dictate construction methods or sequences.
N4145/N3559 Page 6
Instead, they are furnished solely to help designers identify potential problems
related to foundation and earthwork construction plans and specifications, based
upon findings derived from sampling.
The results of our subsurface exploration indicate the presence of bituminous
asphalt overlying sand with gravel or lean clay fills underlain by sands with gravel.
The recommended pavement sections are based upon placing the new pavement
materials over the existing subgrade. Removal and reuse of the bituminous asphalt
in recycled class 5 would be acceptable at this site. An estimated R -value was
used to determine the recommended pavement thicknesses.
SOIL PROPERTIES
Frost Susceptibility
The lean clay fills encountered at this site have moderate frost susceptibility. If
these soils become saturated, then moderate to large amounts of frost heaving may
occur. The sands with gravel encountered at most of the borings would have low
frost susceptibility. Pavement sections should be designed accordingly.
Drainage Properties
The lean clays encountered at this site would generally be considered to have poor
drainage properties. These soil types tend to collect and retain surface water.
N4145/N3559 Page 7
The sands with gravel encountered at most of the soil borings would be considered
to have good to excellent drainage properties.
CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS
Pavement Recommendations
The results of our subsurface explorations at this site indicate the presence of frost
susceptible clayey fills within a few of the borings at the normal pavement
subgrade level. Complete replacement of these frost susceptible soils to reduce
pavement distress is often cost prohibitive. Our recommendations are provided
with the understanding that periodic maintenance will be required to maintain
pavement serviceability and that frost action within the underlying soils will cause
pavement movement. One option to reduce this risk requires excavating all of the
existing clayey soils and replacing with a granular fill material. We are available to
provide recommendations for this procedure should you wish to pursue this
option, however it is normally cost prohibitive.
It is our recommendation that the existing bituminous asphalt be milled and used as
a base fill beneath the new pavement. Where sands with gravel are encountered
beneath the roadways, we would estimate the "R- value" to be approximately 60.
Where clayey fills were encountered, placement of a select granular fill is
recommended. Removal of the clayey fill and replacement with a granular fill
would allow for a subgrade R -value of 60.
It is our understanding that the roadway is to be a 9 -ton design with a minimum of
a 20 -year design life, and that the expected traffic will be typical for a light
residential neighborhood. Based upon this information, the following
recommended minimum pavement sections are presented:
N4145/N3559 Pa eg_8
Pavement Section
Thickness
G.E.
Factor
Granular
Equivalent
Bituminous Wear Course, Mn/DOT 2350 LV
1' /2"
2.0
3
Bituminous Base Course, Mn/DOT 2350 LV
2
2.0
4
Aggregate Base, Mn/DOT Class 5
4"
1.0
4
Select Granular Material (clayey soils only)
12"
0.5
6 (clays)
Total Granular Equivalent
11(sands)/
17 (clays)
* Less than 40% passing the #40 sieve & less than 5% passing the #200 sieve.
Soil proof - rolling tests of the subgrade are recommended to determine any soft or
loose regions that will need to be excavated and replaced with a granular fill or
recompacted. We also recommend a qualified soils engineer or technician be
available on -site to observe the roll- tests.
We recommend that the Class 5 Aggregate Base be compacted to a minimum of
100% of ASTM D698, the Standard Proctor. All materials used in the pavement
construction should meet current Minnesota Department of Transportation
requirements. Placement of the materials should also be as outlined in the
Mn/DOT specifications.
Earthwork
The owner and the contractor should make themselves aware of and become
familiar with applicable local, state and federal safety regulations, including current
OSHA excavation and trench safety standards. Construction site safety generally
is the sole responsibility of the contractor. The contractor shall also be solely
responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and operations of
construction operations. McGhie & Betts is providing the following information
N4145/N3559 Paee 9
solely as a service to our Client. Under no circumstance should McGhie & Betts'
provision of the following information be construed to mean that McGhie & Betts
is assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's activities;
such responsibility is not implied or should not be inferred.
Many geologic materials deteriorate rapidly upon exposure to air or water after
excavation. Unless otherwise specifically indicated in this report, walls and floors
of excavations must be protected from rain, water, and freezing temperatures
throughout the course of construction.
Where compaction is critical, such as under the roadway, careful selection of the
backfill material will also be required. In most cases, the option would be to use a
free draining granular soil. We suggest backfill materials comply with current
Mn/DOT granular backfill standards.
If any fill is placed below the normal water level or on saturated soils, we
recommend that a clean free - draining sand with less than 40% passing the #40
sieve and 5% passing the 4200 sieve should be used for fill. We also suggest the
initial lift of fill be of sufficient depth to minimiz disturbance of the natural soils
during compaction.
CONSTRUCTION
Site Observations
The soil conditions illustrated on the attached boring logs are indicative of the
conditions only at the boring locations: For this reason, we recommend that all
completed excavations at this site be observed by a soils engineer prior to fill
placement or construction of any foundation elements. These observations would
N4145/N3559 Page 10
be necessary to judge if all unsuitable materials have been removed from within the
planned construction area.
We recommend that the owner, architect, engineer, and contractor be notified
immediately if the subsurface conditions encountered during construction differ
from those logged in the geotechnical report. We are available to review our
recommendations or complete further testing should a changed condition be
encountered. We request we be notified of any suspected changed conditions.
Testing
We also suggest a representative number of field density tests be taken in all
engineered fill placed to aid in judging its suitability. We suggest that at least one
density test be performed for every 2,500 square feet of engineered fill placed, for
every 2 feet of fill depth. Any proposed fill material should be submitted to the
laboratory for testing to verify compliance with our recommendations and project
specifications.
Performance of the engineered fill and backfill at this site is dependent upon all
unsuitable soils being removed prior to fill placement and that adequate
compaction is maintained as the fill is placed. We suggest that a qualified soil
engineer or technician observe all excavations prior to fill placement and that
density testing be performed within the fill material.
Plan Review
We recommend the owner retain McGhie & Betts to perform a review of final
design drawings and specifications to help assure that the geotechnical engineering
N4145/N3559 Page 11
report has not been misinterpreted.
EXPLORATION LIMITATIONS
All reports, logs, field data, notes, laboratory test data, calculations, estimates and
other documents prepared by McGhie & Betts are instruments of service and as
such shall remain the property of McGhie & Betts.
McGhie & Betts has endeavored to conduct the services identified herein in a
manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members
of the profession currently practicing in the same locality and under similar
conditions as this project. No other representation, express or implied, is included
or intended in this document.
N4145/N3559 Paee 12
APPENDIX I
LOGS OF PENETRATION TEST BORINGS
2004 Reconstruction Project
"IX %
w
0.2 0 0.2 0.4 Miles
Streets :
Danbury Avenue
Damask Avenue
Dallara Avenue
Dahomey Avenue
Upper 145th Street
147th Street
�
i
r.
1-
•
I
l
a
Vil Ir8
a
r
. -�rT��
•
kf
/- po
a
r
Mal
mu
Vil Ir8
a
r
. -�rT��
•
kf
r
I
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT: Rosemount 2004 Reconstruction Project CLIENTYMBI #: N4145/N3559
LOCATION: Rosemount MN BORING NUMBER: PB-I
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
GEOLOGIC
N
SAMPLE
LABORATORY
TESTS
No.
TYPE
MC
DD
LL
PL
Q,/RQD
(FEET)
SURFACE
ELEVATION:
USCS
ORIGIN
or
CR
3
0
3 1/2" Bituminous
Pavement
Sand with Gravel, Fine to Medium Grained,
SP
Coarse Aggregate
Brown, Moist
—2
—3
—4
—5
—6
7
END OF BORING
—8
—9
—10
11
—12
—13
—14
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
START:
11114/03
END: 11/14/03
DATE
TIME
SAMPLED
CASING
CAVE-IN
WATER
BAILED DEPTHS
METHOD
CREW CHIEF
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTHI
11/14/03
8:30 am
7'
None
8" Flight Auger
R. Smith
T
McGhie rr- Betts, Inc.
r1l
r
7
7
1
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT: Rosemount 2004 Reconstruction Project CLIENT/MBI #: N4145/N3559
LOCATION: Rosemount MN BORING NUMBER: PB -2
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
GEOLOGIC
o
SAMPLE
LABORATORY
TESTS
No.
TYPE
MC
DD
LL
PL
Qu/RQD
(FEET)
SURFACE
ELEVATION:
USCS
ORIGIN
CR
0
4" Bituminous
Pavement
Sand with Gravel, Fine to Medium Grained,
SP
Coarse Alluvium
Brown, Moist
1
2
3
4
5
6
END OF BORING
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
START:
11/14/03
END: 11/14/03
DATE
TIME
SAMPLED
CASING
CAVE -IN
WATER
BAILED DEPTHS
METHOD
CREW CHIEF
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
11/14/03
8:50 am
T
-
-
None
-
8" Flight Auger
R. Smith
McGhie Betts, Inc.
-
'
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT: Rosemount 2004 Reconstruction Project CLIENT/MBI #: N4145/N3559
LOCATION: Rosemount, NIN BORING NUMBER: PB-3
DEPTH
(FEET)
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
ACE ELEVATION:
USCS
GEOLOGIC
ORIGIN
N
or
CR
SAI�QLE
LABORATORY ESTS I
No.
TYPE
MC
DD
LL
PL
Qu/RQD
0
7 1/2" Bituminous
Pavement
Sand with Gravel, Fine to Medium Grained,
SP
Coarse Alluvium
Brown, Moist
Sand with a Little Gravel, Fine to Medium
Grained, Light Brown
7
END OF BORING
WATER LEVEL MEASUREIvENTS
START:
11/14/03
END: 11/14/03
DATE
TIME
SAMPLED
DEPTH
CASING
DEPTH
CAVE-IN
DEPTH
WATER
DEPTH
BAILED DEPTHS
METHOD
CREW CHIEF
11/14/03
9:10 am
7'
None
8 " Flight Auger
R. Smith
McGhie r �� Betts, Inc.
H
1
1
I
1
F
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT: Rosemount 2004 Reconstruction Project CLIENT/NMI #: N4145/N3559
LOCATION: Rosemount, MN BORING NUMBER: P134
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAI,
GEOLOGIC
N
SAMPLE
LABORATORY
TESTS
N o.
TYPE
M C
DD
LL
PL
Qu/RQ D
(FEET)
SURFACE
ELEVATION:
USCS
ORIGIN
or
CR
0
4" Bituminous
Pavement
Sand with Gravel, Fine to Medium Grained,
SP
Coarse Alluvium
Brown, Moist
—2
3
—4
—5
Sand with a Little Gravel, Fine to Medium
Grained, Light Brown, Moist
—6
—7
END OF BORING
—8
—9
—10
—11
—12
—13
—14
I
L
J
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
START: 11/14/03
END. 11/14/03
DATE
TIME
SAMPLED
CASING
CAVE-IN
WATER
BAILED DEPTHS
METHOD
CREW CHIEF
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
11/14/03
9:30 am
T
None
8" Flight Auger
R. Smith
McGhie E Betts, Inc.
n
1
r
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT: Rosemount 2004 Reconstruction Project CLIENT/MBI #: N4145/N3559
LOCATION: Rosemount MN BORING NUMBER: P13-5
DEPTH DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
GEOLOGIC
N
a
SAMPLE
LABORATORY
TESTS
No.
TYPE
MC
DD
LL
PL
Q./RQD
(FEET) SURFACE ELEVATION:
USCS
'ORIGIN
C R
3
0 3 1/2" Bituminous
Pavement
t Sand with a Little Gravel, Fine to Medium
SP
Coarse Alluvium
Grained, Light Brown, Moist
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 END OF BORING
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
START:
11/14/03
END: 11/14/03
DATE
TIME
SAMPLED
CASING
CAVE -IN
WATER
BAILED DEPTHS
METHOD"
CREW CHIEF
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
11/14/03
9:50 am
7
-
-
None
-
8" Flight Auger
R. Smith
McGhie �2 Betts, Inc.
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT: Rosemount 2004 Reconstruction Project CLIENT/IvMI #: N4145/N3559
LOCATION: Rosemount. MN BORING NUMBER: PB -6
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
GEOLOGIC
N
a
SAMPLE
LABORATORY
TESTS
(FEET)
SURFACE
ELEVATION:
USCS
ORIGIN
CR
3
No.
TYRE
MC
DD
LL
PL
Qu/RQD
0
3 1/2" Bituminou
Pavement
Sand with Gravel, Fine to Medium Grained,
SP
Coarse Alluvium
Brown, Moist
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
END OF BORING
9
10
11
12
13
14
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
START: 11/14/03
END: 11/14/03
DATE
TIME
SAMPLED
CASING
CAVE -IN
WATER
BAILED DEPTHS
METHOD
CREW CHIEF
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
11/14/03
10:10 am
8'
-
-
None
-
8" Flight Auger
R. Smith
McGhie Betts, Inc.
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT: Rosemount 2004 Reconstruction Project CLIENTNMI #: N4145/N3559
LOCATION: Rosemount MN BORING NUMBER: PB -7
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
GEOLOGIC
N
SAMPLE
LABORATORY
TESTS
(FEET)
SURFACE
ELEVATION:
USCS
ORIGIN
CR
3
No.
TYPE
Mc
DD
LL
PL
Qu/RQD
0
4" Bituminous
Pavement
Sand with Gravel, Fine to Medium Grained,
SP
Coarse Alluvium
Brown, Moist
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
END OF BORING
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
START:
11/14/03
END: 11/14/03
DATE
TIME
SAMPLED
CASING
CAVE -IN
WATER
BAILED DEPTHS
METHOD
CREW CHIEF
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
11/14/03
10:30 am
T
-
-
None
-
8" Flight Auger
R. Smith
McGhie ® Betts, Inc.
I
I
i
I
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT: Rosemount 2004 Reconstruction Project CLIENT/MBI #: N4145/N3559
LOCATION: Rosemount, MN BORING NUMBER: P13-8
DEPTH DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
GEOLOGIC
N
SAMPLE
LABORATORY
TESTS
No.
TYPE
MC
DD
LL
PL
Qu/RQD
(FEET) SURFACE ELEVATION:
USCS
ORIGIN
or
CR
0 W - 3" Bituminous
Pavement —
Sand with Gravel, Fine to Medium Grained,
SP
Coarse Alluvium
Brown, Moist
—2
—3
—4
—5
6
—7
8 END OF BORING
—9
—10
—11
—12
—13
—14
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
START:
11/14/03
END: 11/14/03
DATE
TIME
SAMPLED
CASING
CAVE-IN
WATER
BAILED DEPTHS
METHOD
CREW CHIEF
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
11/14/03
10:50 am
8'
None
8" Flight Auger
R. Smith
McGhie rr Betts, Inc.
C-11
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT: Rosemount 2004 Reconstruction Project CLIENT/MBI #: N4145/N3559
LOCATION: Rosemount_ MN BORING NUMBER: PB -9
DEPTH DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
GEOLOGIC
o
a
SAMPLE
LABORATORY
TESTS
i`o.
TYPE
Mc
DD
LL
PL
Qu/RQD
(FEET) SURFACE ELEVATION: -
USCS
ORIGIN
CR
3
0 11W3 1/2" Bituminous
Pavement
Sand with Gravel, Fine to Medium Grained,
SP
Coarse Alluvium
Brown, Moist
1
2
3
4
5
6
END OF BORING
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
START:
11/14/03
END: 11/14/03
DATE
TIME
SAMPLED
CASING
CAVE -IN
WATER
BAILED DEPTHS
METHOD
CREW CHIEF
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
11/14/03
11:10 am
7'
-
-
None
-
8" Flight Auger
R. Smith
McGhie � Betts, Inc.
I
i
I
1
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT: Rosemount 2004 Reconstruction Project CLIENT/NMI #: N4145/N3559
LOCATION: Rosemoun MN BORING NUMBER: PB-10
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
GEOLOGIC
N
.4
SAMPLE
LABORATORY
T ESTS
No.
TYPE
MC
DD
LL
PL
QufRQD
(FEET)
SURFACE
ELEVATION:
USCS
ORIGIN
or
CR
>
0
4" Bituminous
Pavement
Sand with Gravel, Fine to Medium Grained,
SP
Coarse Alluvium
Brown, Moist
—2
..........
3
—4
5
—6
—7
.... ....
END OF BORING
—8
—9
—10
—11
—12
—13
—14
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
START:
11/14/03
END: 11/14/03
DATE
TIME
SAMPLED
CASING
CAVE-IN
WATER
BAILED DEPTHS
METHOD
CREW CHIEF
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
11/14/03
11:30 am
7
None
8" Flight Auger
R. Smith
McGhie 77_ Betts, Inc.
Ul
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT: Rosemount 2004 Reconstruction Project CLIENT/MBI #: N4145/N3559
LOCATION: Rosemount MN BORING NUMBER: PB- I I
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
GEOLOGIC
N
.a
SAMPLE
LABORATORY
TESTS
No.
TYPE
MC
DD
LL
PL
Qu/RQD
(FEET)
SURFACE
ELEVATION:
USCS
ORIGIN-
C R
3
0
4" Bituminous
Pavement
Fill, Mostly Lean Clay with a Little Sand, Green
Fill
Fill
1
2
'.
Sand with a Little Silt and a Little Gravel, Fine to
SP
Coarse Allu�ium
-'
Medium Grained, Brown
3
4
5
Sand with a Little Gravel, Fine to Medium
Grained, Brown, Moist
6
7
END OF BORING
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
START:
11/14/03
END: 11/14/03
DATE
TIME
SAMPLED
CASING
CAVE -IN
WATER
BAILED DEPTHS
METHOD
CREW CHIEF
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
11/14/03
11:50 am
7'
-
-
None
-
8" Flight Auger
R. Smith
McGhie � Betts, Inc.
n
n
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT: Rosemount 2004 Reconstruction Project CLIENTANMI #: N4145/N3559
LOCATION: Rosemount MN BORINGNUMBER: PB -12
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
GEOLOGIC
N
SAMPLE
LABORATORY
TESTS
No.
TYPE
MC
- DD
LL
PL
Qu/RQD
(FEET)
SURF
ELEVATION:
USCS
ORIGIN
or
CR
3
0
4" Bi tuminous
Pavement
Fill, Mostly Lean Clay with Sand and Sand with
Fill
Fill
Gravel, Dark Brown to Green
i
2
3
4
Sand with Gravel, Fine to Medium Grained,
SP
Coarse Alluvium -
Brown, Moist
5
6
7
END OF BORING
8
—9
40
11
12
13
14
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
START:
11/14/03
END: 11/14/03
DATE
TIME
SAMPLED
CASING
CAVE -IN
WATER
BAILED DEPTHS
METHOD
CREW CHIEF
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
DEPTH
11/14/03
12:20 pm
7'
-
-
None
-
8" Flight Auger
R. Smith
McGhie � Betts, Inc.
LOG OF TEST BORING
PROJECT: Rosemount 2004 Reconstruction Project CLIENT/I #: N4145/N3559
LOCATION: Rosemount MN BORING NUMBER: PB -13
DEPTH
(FEET)
SURFACE
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
ELEVATION:
USCS
GEOLOGIC
ORIGIN
N
CR
3
SAMPLE
LABORATORY
TESTS
No.
TYPE
MC
DD
LL
PL
Qu/RQD
0
4" Bituminous
Pavement
Fill, Mostly Lean Clay, Brown
Fill
Fill
Sand with Gravel, Fine to Medium Grained,
SP
Coarse Alluvium
1
:•
Brown, Moist
2
3
4
s
6
7
END OF BORING
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
START:
11/14/03
END: 11/14/03
DATE
TIME
SAMPLED
DEPTH
CASING
DEPTH
CAVE -IN
DEPTH
WATER
DEPTH
BAILED DEPTHS
METHOD
CREW CHIEF
11/14/03
12:50 pm
7'
-
-
None
-
8" Flight Auger
R. Smith
McGhie a Betts, Inc.
NOTICE TO REPORT USERS
BORING LOG INFORMATION
Subsurface Profiles
The subsurface stratification lines on the graphic representation of the test borings shows an approximate
boundary between soil types or rock. The transition between materials is approximate and is usually far more
gradual than shown. Estimating excavation depths, soil volumes and other computations relying on the subsurface
strata may not be possible to any degree of accuracy.
Water Level
McOhie & Betts took groundwater level readings in the exploratory borings, reviewed the data obtained, and
discussed its interpretation of the data in the text of this report. The groundwater level may fluctuate due to
seasonal variations caused by precipitation, snowmelt, rainfalls, construction or remediation activities, and/or other
factors not evident at the time of measurement.
The actual determination of the subsurface water level is an interpretative process. Subsurface water level may not
be accurately depicted by the levels indicated on the boring logs. I\iormally, a subsurface exploration obtains
general information regarding subsurface features for design purposes. An accurate determination of subsurface
water levels in not possible with a typical scope of work. The use of the subsurface water level information
provided for estimating purposes or other site review can present a moderate to high risk of error.
The following information is obtained in the field and noted under "Water Level Measurements" at the bottom of
the log.
Sampled Depth - The lowest depth of soil sampling at the time a water level measurement is taken.
Casing Depth - The depth to the bottom of the casing or hollow -stem auger at the time of water
level measurement.
Cave -In Depth - The depth at which the measuring tape slopes in the bore hole.
Water Level - The point in the bore hole at which free - standing water is encountered by a
measuring tape dropped from the surface inside the casing.
Drilling Fluid Level - Similar to the water level, except the liquid in the bore hole is a drilling fluid.
Obstruction Depths
Obstructions and/or obstruction depths may be noted on the boring logs. Obstruction indicates the sampling
equipment encountered resistance to penetration. It must be realized that continuation of drilling, the use of other
drilling equipment, or further exploration may provide information other than that depicted on the logs. The
correlation of obstruction depths on the log with construction features such as rock excavation, foundation depths,
or buried debris cannot normally be determined with any degree of accuracy. For example, penetration of
weathered rock by soil sampling equipment may not correlate with removal by certain types of construction
equipment. Using this information for estimating purposes often results in a high degree of misinterpretation.
Accurately identifying the obstruction or estimating depths where hard rock is present over the site requires a scope
of service beyond the normal geotechnical exploration- program. The risk of using the information noted on the
boring logs for estimating purposes must be understood. .
SYMBOLS AND TERMINOLOGOY ON TEST BORING LOG
SYMBOLS
Particle Sizes
Drilling and Sampling
Soil layering and Moisture
Laboratory Testin
Symbol
Description
Symbol
Descrintion
HSA
3 -1/4" LD. Hollow stem auger
W
Water content, % (ASTM ** D2216)
3" —12"
4 ", 6" or 10" diameter flight auger
D
Dry density, pcf
_FA
HA
2 ", 4 ", or 6" hand auger
LL
Liquid limit (ASTM D4318)
Lenses
2 -1/2 ", 4 ", 5 ", or 6" steel drive casing
PL
Plastic limit (ASTM D4318)
_DC
Size A, B or N rotary, casing
Medium sand # 10440 sieve
Layer
_RC
PD
Pipe drill or cleanout tube
#404200 sieve
- Inserts in last column (Qu or RQD)-
CS
Continuous split barrel sampling
100 passing #200 sieve and > 0.005mm
Moist
DM
Drilling mud
Qu
Unconfined compressive strength, psf(ASTM D2166)
JW
Jetting water
Pq
Penetrometer reading, tsf (ASTM D1558)
SB
2" O.D. split barrel sampling
Ts
Torvane reading, tsf
Resistance
2 -1R" or 3 -1/2" O.D. SB liner sampler
G
Specific gravity (ASTM D854)
_L
2" or 3" thin walled tube sample
SL
Shrinkage limits (ASTM D427)
_T
3TP
3" thin walled tube using pitcher sampler
OC
Organic content - combustion method (ASTM D2974)
TO
2" or 3" thin walled tube using Osterberg
SP
Swell pressure, tsf (ASTM D4546)
0 -4 Very soft
sampler
PS
Percent swell under pressure (ASTM D4546)
W
Wash sample
FS
Free swell, % (ASTM D4546)
B
Bag sample
SS
Shrink swell, % (ASTM D4546)
P
Test pit sample
pH
Hydrogen ion content -Meter Method (ASTM D4972)
_Q
BQ, NQ, or PQ wire line system
SC
Sulfate content, parts/million or mg/i
AX, BY, or NX double tube barrel
CC
Chloride content, parts/million or mg/(
_X
N
Standard penetration test, blows per foot
C*
One dimensional consolidation (ASTM D2435)
CR
Core recovery, percent
Qc*
Triaxial compression (ASSTM D2850 and D4767)
WL
Water level
D.S.*
Direct Shear (ASTM D3080)
Water level
K*
Coefficient of permeability, cm/sec (ASTM D2434)
NMR
No measurement recorded, primarily due
P*
Pinhole test (ASTM D4647)
to presence of drilling or coring fluid
DH*
Double hydrometer (ASTM D4221)
MA*
Particle size analysis (ASTM D422)
R
Laboratory electrical resistivity, ohm -cm (ASTM G57)
E*
Pressuremeter deformation modulus, tsf (ASTM D4719)
PM*
Pressuremeter test (ASTM D4719)
VS*
Field vane shear (ASTM D2573)
IR*
Infiltrometer test (ASTM D3385)
RQD
Rock quality designation, percent
*Results
shown on attached data sheet or graph
* *ASTM designates American Society for Testing and Materials
TERMINOLOGY
Particle Sizes
Soil layering and Moisture
Type
Size Ranee
Term
Visual Observation
Boulders
> 12"
Lamination
Up to 1/4" thick stratum
Cobbles
3" —12"
Varved
Altering laminations of any combination of
Coarse gravel 3/4" — T'
clay, silt, fine sand, or colors
Fine gravel
#4 sieve — 3/4"
Lenses
Small pockets of different soils in a soil mass
Coarse sand
#4 - #10 sieve
Stratified
Altering layers of varying materials or colors
Medium sand # 10440 sieve
Layer
1/4" to 12" thick stratum
Fine sand
#404200 sieve
Dry
Powdery no noticeable water
Silt
100 passing #200 sieve and > 0.005mm
Moist
Damp, below saturation
Clay
100 passing #200 sieve and < 0.005mm
Waterbearing Pervious soil below water
Wet
Saturated, above liquid limit
Gravel Content
Standard Penetration
Resistance
Coarse - Grained Soils
Fine - Grained Soils
Cohesionless Soils
Cohesive Soils
%Gravel
Desc ription
% Gravel Description
N -Value
Relative Density
N -Value Consistency
2 -15
A little gravel
<5 Trace of gravel
0-4
Very loose
0 -4 Very soft
16 -49
With gravel
5 -15 A little gravel
5 -10
Loose
5 -8 Soft
16 -30 With gravel
11 -30
Medium dense
9 -15 Firm
31-49 Gravelly
31 -50
Dense
16 -30 Hard
>50
Very dense
>30 Very hard