HomeMy WebLinkAbout10.b. Town Office Concept Planned Unit Development by McMenomy & Associatese
• _ ,. a ! i. a :. ! ► .. � Pi W / 4.11 ! 1 /..: 4 4'"_" ..', „
i ►i 1 ! 4 _ 4 4 ' ' � :. ! ` � ^..� ! ' ' � 4 :: s a .. t ' 4 1 4 ' 4 4 i ! 'I _ w ;.
>. 4 Y t
a
a 1 8. t "fit+! 4 `# �! 4 3.# E A _1 11 !
1 ! ♦ i
3^'.. /"'t 1 1 4 �..IS; 1 - ± e 1 4 _! .: .: >t v is i LI b
1 4 c l _ r _ ! /! 44 4 "' � _ i a i s 1 4 1 9 i 4 •t i" M1
1! R i _ 1 - 4 1 ` 4 ! ! _ 1 ! - ! � 4"` 4 1 t.i ...! t i - "; 1� ! ! 4 ! 1 4 ;... H
i 4`
# 4 .. t �� 4
M ! M ! 0 4# 4 ! 1 .. 1 ! l... i #. .. - .. ti ! i 9 f' l... / ! �: si 'i.: _ 4 - 1 "... ii;l ! .
e '`
! is M ! 4I...t ♦..� 1.# 4 1110 fJ, �
Yi r . 1. ! 4 1 4.
:� -.1 � ? ..� S.'� i 411 Y
�.� ±' � ! 4 t i 4 t 4
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2004-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING
A CONCEPT FOR A TOWNOFFICE PARK
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the Planning Department received an application for concept approval of a
Business Park Town Office Park planned unit development for four office buildings located on
three parcels legally described as follows:
Parcel 1: Outlot D, Geronime Pond, Section 31, Township 115, Range 19, Dakota
County, Minnesota.
Parcel 2: The North 25 feet of the South 175 feet of the East 325 feet of the
Southeast Quarter of the Southeast except easements for roads in Section
31, Township 115, Range 19, Dakota County, Minnesota.
Parcel 3: The South 150 feet of the East 325 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter except easements for roads in Section 31, Township
115, Range 19, Dakota County, Minnesota; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount conducted a public hearing as
required by ordinance for the purpose of receiving public comment regarding the proposed Town
Office Concept on December 23, 2003; and,
WHEREAS, the Dakota County Plat Commission reviewed the concept on January 26, 2004 in
accordance with the Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance, and provided documentation of
conditional approval; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend approval of the concept
on January 27, 2004 with conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, The Council of the City of Rosemount does
hereby approve the Concept for a Town Office Park requested by McMenomy & Associates
subject to the following conditions:
1. Rezoning the property to BP -3, Business Park.
2. Platting the combined parcels in conformance with the subdivision ordinance.
3. Consolidation of the Chippendale Ave. driveways into one in accordance with the
recommendations of the City Engineer.
4. Approval of the Dakota County Plat Commission for the driveway proposed to 160
Street West (County Road 46).
5. Site Plan refinements to create vehicle stacking space in front of the overhead doors to
reduce circulation conflicts and allow for turning movements.
6. Architectural and Plan revisions consistent with BP District standards.
7. Conformance with the requirements for Conditional Use Permits Section 12.7
8. Concept approval does not bind the City or County to vacate easements or right -of -way.
Final Development Plans may have to be revised if drainage and utility easements are not
vacated.
ADOPTED this 17"' day of February, 2004 by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
William H. Droste, Mayor
Resolution 2004-
ATTEST:
Linda Jentink, City Clerk
Motion by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Seconded by:
Member absent:
i
�o
z/
n
D
:Agdei6ologd leuay y00ZIgl/L :pelepdn slaved 400Z '6Z tienuep:ale(] deyy
, luawpedaO uogewjoluj pue pue AanmS AlunoO elo> ep loeluoo aseald 'punol
aie swouedajosip 11 'poweluoo upjaq saiminooew Aue jol alglsuodsai lou si AjunoO elojeO Aluo
sasodind aouaialai jol pasn aq of sl pue 'umogs eaje aql 6ugoa4e 'saomos jaglo pue saoglo alels
pue 'llunoo'Apo snouen ui paleool elep pue uogewjolw 'spiooai to uogelidwoo a st 6ulmeip s!qi
auo se pasn aq of papualui lou si pue 6anms a jou dew papiooaj 6ge6al a jagpau si 6uimeip slyl
- AlunoO elo)leO '4002 lg61jAdoO
Tool lsajeau of papunoi suoisuawid :31ON
-au
0
b
dvN :� 11S
CITY OF ROSEMOU NT
CITY HALL
2875 - 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN
55068 -4997
Phone: 651 - 423 -4411
Hearing Impaired: 651- 423 -6219
MEMORANDUM Fax: 651- 423 -5203
TO: Honorable mayor, City Council members
FROM: Rick Pearson, City Planner
DATE: February 12, 2004
RE: McMenomy Office Condominiums
BACKGROUND
The parcels assembled for this request were affected by the relocation of Chippendale
Avenue. Previously, they were designated for Urban Residential use in the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The 2020 Rosemount Comprehensive Plan update process resulted
in a land use designation of Business Park. The zoning has remained Agriculture, in the
absence of any development scenarios. Therefore, the property will have to be rezoned
Business Park to bring it into compliance with the land use designation. Either Business
Park -3 (BP -3) or Business Park- 4 (BP- 4) would be appropriate. Office use is permitted
in both districts.
CONCEPT REQUEST
The Applicant is requesting concept approval for four office buildings that would each
have three office suites. The Business Park District standards require a conditional use
permit for multiple uses, buildings and / or parcels. The CUP process gives the City a
framework for assessing the demands and the effects of the multiple buildings and uses
on the site versus the benefits associated with the project. Because this is a concept
application, this review is focused on the proposed land use(s) and identification of site
plan issues. The next step will include processing of a rezoning and CUP application,
which will accomplish site plan review objectives. The CUP will examine grading,
dimensions, setbacks, parking and landscaping.
Dakota County has review authority given that the site is adjacent to County Road 46
(160 Street West). A separate driveway access is also proposed to County Road 46,
requiring comment from the Dakota County Plat Commission.
Surrounding land uses include:
Residential to the west and north (twin homes in Geronime Pond) across
Chippendale Avenue.
Business Park northeast (Secure Mini - storage) with vacant land immediately east.
Agricultural — Residential to the south in Empire Township (south of 160 Street
West).
2
Upon review of the Business Park Section, Staff recommends consideration of the BP -3
zone for the site development. The reasons for this recommendation:
• The parcel(s) are in a transition zone between residential and General Industrial
uses (east of the railroad tracks).
• The parcel(s) do not contain natural amenities or natural features.
• The parcel(s) does not appear to be an appropriate location for residential uses
(permitted in BP -4 via CUP or PUD).
ACCESS & CIRCULATION
The site plan provides three access driveways to Chippendale Avenue and one to 160
Street (County Road 46). Two of the Chippendale driveways provide automobile access
to the site for parking and the main pedestrian entrances to the four buildings. A separate
driveway parallel to the old Chippendale street right -of -way provides vehicular access to
the rear of the two northerly buildings only. This driveway also connects Chippendale
directly to 160 Street, and would potentially act as a "cut -off', allowing drivers to
bypass the street intersection in favor of cutting through the site.
Staff concerns
• Chippendale Avenue is classified as a collector street with intersection spacing
standards. The standard is a minimum spacing interval of 660 feet. The
Chippendale Avenue frontage is the longest side of the site with about 680 feet of
frontage. Therefore, the best solution would be a consolidated access that
optimizes visibility sightlines.
• 160 Street West / County Road 46 is under the jurisdiction of Dakota County
also has access limitations. Staff expects that the proposed driveway connection
to 160 Street (approx. 330 feet on center) is inconsistent with County standards.
• The third driveway to Chippendale is also inconsistent with standards because it is
not at a perpendicular to Chippendale. Additionally the connection occurs at a
curve, which is a poor location.
• The two northerly buildings (type B) are designed to have garage doors facing
east, opening up on the through driveway. The driveway scales approximately 25
feet wide, consistent with two -way circulation. The concern is that the overhead
doors are only five feet from the driveway, which would result in a very tight
turning radius for southbound vehicles and no stacking space in front of the
overhead doors. Thus, vehicles waiting to enter or unload would block other
traffic.
• Business Park standards require five percent of parking lots exceeding ten spaces
to be islands. A larger center island is possible by shifting the eleven spaces in
the middle to align with the outer -edge parking. The result would be an island
large enough for several trees.
BUILDING CHARACTERISTICS
Two building types are shown on the site plan. The attached architectural drawings
provide a plan view (floor plan) for the `B type" (although it is labeled building Q.
These buildings have the garage doors facing old Chippendale Ave. The building
M
elevations are for the two "A" buildings that are along 160 Street, and do not feature
garage doors.
All four buildings contain three separate office suites of about 1,500 sq. ft. with separate
entrances. The center suite includes a loft with stairs. The end suites are single story
with dormers and presumably loft ceilings.
Building materials consist primarily of lap siding above 2.5 feet of brick wainscoting.
The roof is gabled with dormers a centered gabled over the entrance. Pillars frame the
center entrance.
Overall, the character of the buildings as smaller, (4,500 sq. ft.) 1.5 story structures with
gabled roofs create a pleasing design given the location as a transition to residential uses.
Staff concerns
• The Business Park building materials requirements include brick, decorative
block, glass, stucco, stone, architectural concrete cast in place or precast
concrete panels on either 50% or 100% of all wall surfaces depending on
BP -3 or BP -4 zoning. Wood is only permitted as an accent. The lap siding
either metal or vinyl would only be permitted on 50% of wall surfaces not
facing a right -of -way or residential uses in BP -3 zoning. Since the entire site
is surrounded by right -of -way, the lap siding would not be permitted.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
The next step of the process will provide detailed information regarding site drainage &
grading, landscaping, and more building detail. The Engineering and Parks Departments
have provided separate comments, some already touched on, and some applicable to later
stages in the review process. However, although this review is primarily focused on land
use, Staff feels it is important to provide as much information as is possible based upon
the level of information provided with the Concept.
It should also be noted in light of the Dakota County expectation of additional right -of-
way requirements that the site plan will have to be revised. Additional right -of -way will
impact the southern edge of the site, and BP setbacks will also have to conform. There is
an increased setback for building and parking lots adjacent to streets and highways with
Collector and Arterial designations. Chippendale Ave. is a collector street and 160
Street (County Road 46) is classified as a minor arterial.
RECOMMENDATION
Motion to adopt the draft resolution approving the concept for the McMenomy Office
Condominiums subject to:
1. Rezoning the property to BP -3 Business Park.
2. Platting the combined parcels in conformance with the Subdivision Ordinance.
3. Consolidation of the Chippendale Ave. driveways into one in accordance with the
recommendations of the City Engineer.
4
4. Approval of the Dakota County Plat Commission for the driveway proposed to
160 Street West (County Road 46).
5. Site Plan refinements to create vehicle stacking space in front of the overhead
doors to reduce circulation conflicts and allow for turning movements.
6. Architectural and Plan revisions consistent with BP district standards.
7. Conformance with the requirements for Conditional Use Permits Section 12.7.
8. Concept approval does not bind the City or County to vacate easements or right -
of -way. Final Development Plans may have to be revised if drainage and utility
easements are not vacated.
4
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 12, 2004
TO: Kim Lindquist — Community Development Director
Jamie Verbrugge — City Administrator
Andrew Brotzler — City Engineer
Dan Schultz — Parks and Recreation Director
Rick Pearson — City Planner
CC: Ed McMenomy — ERA McMenomy Associates, Inc.
FROM: Anthony Aderhold - Project Engineer
RE: Rosemount Town Office Park
Upon review of the Rosemount Town Office Park preliminary site plan for the conceptual
submittal dated December 23, 2003 and received on December 31, 2003 the Engineering
Department offers the following comments. A redlined plan and as -built plans are included for
your reference.
• The access points shall be consolidated to one access opening into the project site. It is
recommended to eliminate the alleyway access, the access farthest south on Chippendale
Avenue and the access to CSAH 46 (160 Street). Dakota County spacing requirements
for CSAH 46 are 1/8 of a mile for right - in/right -out entrances. Also, access management
in the City of Rosemount requires a spacing of 660 ft on collector roads which
Chippendale Avenue is.
The site distance at the intersections of Chippendale Avenue and the north driveway
entrance and CSAH 46 and Chippendale Avenue should be verified to show they meet
the minimum requirements. The minimum site distance for the Chippendale
Avenue /north driveway entrance intersection is 660 feet and the minimum site distance
for the CSAH 46 /Chippendale Avenue intersection is 1200 feet. These site distance
requirements will need to be met with the final site plans.
There is a sanitary sewer service and storm sewer stub located off of new Chippendale
Avenue for on -site use. The water service will be from the existing 12 -inch watermain
located along the old Chippendale Avenue alignment. There will not be on -site ponding
requirements as this site's drainage can be handled by off -site ponding.
The concept plan should be forwarded to Todd Tollefson, the acting County Surveyor,
with Dakota County.
GA2004\Planning Cases \04- 04 -PUDCP McMenomy Townoffice Park\RosemountTownOfficePark eng comments 1- 12- 04.doc
• Estimated City Fees at time of final plat are as follows:
a) Trunk Area Sewer Charges, 2.79 ac x $1.015 /ac = $2,831.85
b) Trunk Area Water Charges, 2.79 ac x $4,010 /ac = $11,187.90
c) Trunk Area Storm Sewer Charges, 2.79 ac x $4,575/ac = $12,764.25
d) Storm Water Ponding Fee, 2.79 ac x $6,098/ac = $17, 013.42
e) MCES SAC (Sewer Access Charge) _ $1,350 per SAC unit
f) City SAC = $1,125 per SAC unit
g) City WAC (Water Access Charge) _ $12,155 for a 2 -inch meter
h) City STAC (Storm Access Charge), 2.79 ac x $1,525/ac = $4,254.75
If you have any questions or comments regarding the items listed above, please contact me at
651- 322 -2022.
G:\2004\Planning Cases \04- 04 -PUDCP McMenomy Townoffice Park\RosemountTownOfficePark eng comments M 2- 04.doc
'�2�$3►2115 - J1'113s ONE/ v�2 �� I V 3+59'?t/ Wl 0 5W 9 -0 U13s 7rUird
' J,b2Y1-,�O- 1�9 - �l'oo[L�0 4d �-v »�J 1, bh' l�- Z NY7CJ� (�.La�l-HQ 3LoN
Ss3M _13ai[5 tU0 91
1
1
1
i
v - 81.i �� dx1
hNin�►n¢. �r�ta�in� I
i I
1
.La'1 91v VJ1?Jbr,� 1
n I
�
1
rtl
gNt 10 + \aw7 wo w I
tit
-,aa
1
SQms lld DO
/ '
/- o3s Qjw 511roc
Q Q 3� 11
1
' r Ow 1 ( sn lr6 (S)
/ �s L4�'Sl � Y3�lb 5 rnanA
t 3 Nt 3 .
/ ds441`ib �3 �AOJ 1Gt �o� 7- CL . xvw
/ LLb` �'9 SA /Vat3dlyl
lob
41L'IZt
AC M'97ltY
i
cw��Eava�
f AVE
I
� I
� f
1 SITE P LAN
i
i
P.
S
v
20'
1
1
I
I
1 b 0TA SfrEt WEST
m S F ml,71b
64,411
'
MAX .73'4 pr UT CDVEp(E 1 11,2ZISF
VuL➢lN6i A LMA
(s) yraus J I MO ufa
12.16 REdD
/
105 5TA LLS PR.d f M
• gjMCX NYOK -/,
30' — DoILD1N A LL /
20' TU NT � -
Is` 410E b fE.[K • /
i
cw��Eava�
f AVE
I
� I
� f
1 SITE P LAN
i
i
P.
S
v
20'
1
1
I
I
1 b 0TA SfrEt WEST
to
t�
b
a
r
H
0
z
It
II
u- -
II
II
,, II
i , II
II
II
II
it
II
II
-
II II
,I II
I I �-
II
,I
11
II
II
ii
tl
it
,I
I I �-
il II
it II
7
m
r
b
47
z °
H
r�
a
H
0
z
r
I�
I�
u
n
II
II
LI-
n-
II
II
(I-
ll
II
U
II
II
L.I- -
m
b
on
con
b
t'n
tz7
r
[z7
C
a
0
z
rL _
II
II
II
,I
II
,I
it
II
II
II
II
II
it
,I
II
II
,I
,t
II
II
It
II
II
II
II
it
II
,I
II
II
it
tl
II
U- -
n--
I,
�I
i,
I,
II
I,
I,
I,
I,
I,
I,
I,
�I
I,
II
�I
II
it
ii
II
it
i,
�I
I,
I,
I,
i(
,
Ii
, I
1,
I,
I,
w
o
t=7
r
r�
0
z
�I II
,I II
-
II
II
I�
11
II
II
II
II
I�
II II
II II
it
II
,I
,I
' II
ii II
II
II
,I
1
II
II
II
,, II
�, II
II
I�
I�
II
II
,I
II
I�
I I �-
il II
II II
I I u--
II
II
II
�
II
II
II
Li
V - id 100 (
- dD j ONICI-ME Z
7 -A
;I � � R � I �� `; E ,�, Vk it R :� � is I
rL
LIM
O
----------------- L L
\-e;s
1' 21000 'R10aNllTl
21O:1 I'SIV LaaHs 339
&,[ -.2/1 (•
InOAV'I'IVDIdA.L - Nvid iaAHI NrVW.3,0mIG-nnv, I �
U ,
m
MIN
RM
loss
I
...........
U ,
A4.1 Key Notes
4 4
C
D
3 BUILDING'C' UPPER LEVEL PLAN - TYPICAL LAYOUT
A4.1 tn• - r.o•
ATTIC SPACE VENTILATION 5CNED.
t.aT
WT
vORnlTIOi
TOTAL ARM,
MCIAR MB
~ILATION
7
rot.)
1�
VD1T0.A
vER+TLA
ra VA-OR
RoanED
AREA &U
reL
DANSaIERV
raFJal.)
MKdVLOY
ww"teW
W i C.l
IA741
7
eAlnsr
)SVneo'
31�mTS'
taAT C -7
1a7GF
3
VSOw
EE
€
4R• /4R•
•OO'/a7e'
WA
.7
kf
VleO
Ai /4T'
74•Q4•
M4'AI4•
D -]
pMI
yM
AA/M•
7]
OC//ea•
HUM
i
t
3 BUILDING'C' UPPER LEVEL PLAN - TYPICAL LAYOUT
A4.1 tn• - r.o•
ATTIC SPACE VENTILATION 5CNED.
t.aT
WT
vORnlTIOi
TOTAL ARM,
MCIAR MB
~ILATION
rot.)
RATIO
VD1T0.A
vER+TLA
ra VA-OR
RoanED
AREA &U
reL
DANSaIERV
raFJal.)
MKdVLOY
ww"teW
W i C.l
IA741
VleO
eAlnsr
)SVneo'
31�mTS'
taAT C -7
1a7GF
1,T7Lr
VSOw
0.1IL►]4
4R• /4R•
•OO'/a7e'
WA
.7
kf
VleO
Ai /4T'
74•Q4•
M4'AI4•
D -]
pMI
yM
AA/M•
7]
OC//ea•
Roof Plan Key Notes For 2/A4.1
key notes change per page
pl OASMED LINES INDICATES L"ITS OF ICE
WATER SHIELD. fWRAP UP U!• OVER ALL
VERTICAL WALLS AT ROOF RRERSECTIONSI
O COJTM10t15 RIDGE VENT flSOVIDED NOT
LESS THAN O Sl OF VENTILATION PER LIK FT.
O PRE. FINISHED MET. C4jTTERe 1 DOUNiSP01R. EXTEND
DC1WDf°01lTS TO l]mEli'sIVOIiD DRAINAGE
O PRE -F51 Ml- FULLY VENTED eCR*IT SYSTEM
PROVIDING NOT LESS THAN 17.5 S.I. PER LMlAL
FOOT
nO SLOPED BOX . PROVIDING NOT LESS THAN
•O SQ IN PER VENT. MOT RECUIRED TNIS DLDG
SEE ATTIC SPACE VENTLATION SCMEDtLE BELOWI
® PROVIDE MIN. 7- R'Xtl' VENT OPENING IN ROOF
SMEATM BELOW FOR DORCTER VENTS I•MK.M I I -LOW
T. EA
TI D -T DOR" R.
ke — change t# pop
tO NOT USED
O 5'-4• X 5' -4• GONG STOOP UY e• CM1
FONt W ALL (SEE STRICT)
O 5' -4 W X 1' -4• DP. e' Cm PER a
CGNG FTG. (SEE STM=.)
O NOT WED
O MOP 51w
O 5'.4 1 X 5' - A' CCMC. STOOP
O OP1 . 10NAL D -S
O O' - MRGM CERLMi AREA
O 42 • MIGW WALL
® OPTIONAL W-]
P/
W ,
N. 0.6 ca
m
889'28'5 "W
w 80.00
LO
V, o OUTLOT D Z 80.00
// / •• J "
589'28' 8
��L p DRAINAGE 6 UTILTY .EASEMENT
/ PER DOC.. NO. 978993
/ LL U
C) 1.25 ` 290.76 -• S89' 28' 58 " --
I 325. _ 0 ! -
I z ' �� c.
LL1 °
ulj.
Lo
V a-1
H 1 '
al
m
W I m 3 S89 "W
160TH ° - -STR E�
3 .
SOUTH LINE OF SE1 14 SEC.31- T1.15N -R19W
3 2003
50
1
i
P/
W ,
N. 0.6 ca
m
889'28'5 "W
w 80.00
LO
V, o OUTLOT D Z 80.00
// / •• J "
589'28' 8
��L p DRAINAGE 6 UTILTY .EASEMENT
/ PER DOC.. NO. 978993
/ LL U
C) 1.25 ` 290.76 -• S89' 28' 58 " --
I 325. _ 0 ! -
I z ' �� c.
LL1 °
ulj.
Lo
V a-1
H 1 '
al
m
W I m 3 S89 "W
160TH ° - -STR E�
3 .
SOUTH LINE OF SE1 14 SEC.31- T1.15N -R19W
3 2003
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 12, 2004
TO: Rick Pearson, City Planner
Kim Lindquist, Community Development Director
Andy Brotzler, City Engineer
Anthony Aderhold, Project Engineer
Jason Lindahl, Assistant City Planner
Jamie Verbrugge, City Administrator
FROM: Dan Schultz, Director of Parks and Recreation
RE: McMenomy Office Park - PUD Concept Plan
Based on the concept plan submitted and not having any knowledge of parks dedication having
already been paid, the developer would be required to dedicate 10% of the total lot area for parks
dedication. Staff would recommend accepting the dedication in the form of cash. The amount
would be $24,300 (.27 acres x $90,000). I would also recommend internal sidewalks be installed
to connect the buildings to the trail along Chippendale Avenue.
If you have any further questions, please let me know.
Excerpt from the approved minutes of the 01 -27 -04 PLANNING COMMISSION
Public Hearing: McMenomy Associates Planned Unit Development Concept Plan —
Geronime Pond, Outlot D
City Planner Pearson reviewed the application from McMenomy Associates for the
construction of four buildings consisting of twelve townoffices to be located at the
northeast corner of Chippendale Avenue and 160 Street. The property is currently
zoned AG and would require rezoing to BP3 or BP4. Access to the site would be along
Chippendale Avenue.
Mr. McMenomy was present in the audience to answer questions regarding this proposal
and stated the reason for the submittal of the concept plan is to confirm the Planning
Commission's support for this type of project. With the support of the Planning
Commission, Mr. McMenomy will see if there is a market for this type of use.
Chairperson Weisensel opened the public hearing.
John Henchem, 15779 Cicerone Path, questioned the setback from 160 Street, the
zoning south of 160 Street, and the height of the proposed buildings.
Mr. Pearson responded that the residential setbacks are larger for busy streets like CR46.
The larger setbacks are meant for berming and landscaping. The setbacks for this
particular project will be dealt with during the site plan review process. Additional
public hearings will be held as this project progresses. The land south of 160 Street is in
Empire Township and is not in Rosemount jurisdiction. Mr. Pearson understands that
this property will be mined into the distant future. The height of the proposed buildings
is consistant with business park standards.
MOTION by Weisensel to close the public hearing. Second by Napper. Ayes:
Messner, Zurn, Napper, and Weisensel. Nays: None. Motion carried.
MOTION by Zurn to recommend that the City Council approve the concept for the
McMenomy Office Townhouses subject to:
1. Rezoning the property to BP -3 Business Park.
2. Platting the combined parcels in conformance with the Subdivision
Ordinance.
3. Consolidation of the Chippendale Ave. driveways into one in accordance
with the recommendations of the City Engineer.
4. Approval of the Dakota County Plat Commission for the driveway
proposed to 160 Street West (County Road 46)
5. Site Plan refinements to create vehicle stacking space in front of the
overhead doors to reduce circulation conflicts and allow for turning
movements.
6. Architectural revisions consistent with BP District standards.
7. Conformance with the requirements for Conditional Use Permits Section
12.7
Second by Messner. Ayes: Zurn, Napper, Weisensel, and Messner. Nays:
None. Motion carried.
6.15: BP BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT:
A. Purpose and Intent: This district is intended to accommodate new, modern, high
performance, limited industrial uses, business /office /warehouse and accessory retail and
service uses which are planned as a unit and include an internal circulation system. This
district is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and is intended to
be served by the public utility systems. Overlay zones with locational criteria
specifically enumerate permitted uses by zone which are complimented by enhanced
building and site performance standards that will assure high quality development and
provide an effective transition to residential uses. Uses shall be conducted completely
within structures excepted as provided for herein:
BP -1 This zone provides for planned industrial, accessory commercial, and
office uses. This zone is adjacent to General Industrial uses, railroad
rights -of -way, or significantly separated from major or minor arterial
streets. Outdoor storage is allowed in accordance with the standards as set
forth in this Ordinance.
13P -2 This zone provides for business and professional office, limited
manufacturing and planned industrial uses. The zone is adjacent to
General Commercial uses or has proximity to major or minor arterial
streets. Outdoor storage may be permitted by Planned Unit Development
in accordance with the standards as set forth in this ordinance.
13P -3 This zone provides for office and planned industrial uses. This zone is a
transition area adjacent to residential uses, or separated from residential
uses by a collector or local street. No outdoor storage is allowed.
BP -4 This zone provides for a variety of less intensive business activities, such
as offices, banks and health care uses as well as medium density
residential uses. The zone is adjacent to residential uses, or contains
natural amenities or features that may provide opportunities for multiple
family or attached housing with high standards of architectural and site
design. No outdoor storage is allowed.
(Ord. B -63, 6- 14 -96)
1
2
3
R1
Permitted Uses:
Business and Professional Offices
Manufacturing, Custom
Manufacturing, Limited and Accessory Uses, but
excluding lumber yards and construction material
sales as a principal use
Warehousing and Distribution
Wholesaling and Accessory Uses but,
excluding livestock and raw farm product materials
Small Appliance and Business Services & Repair
Shops including: electronics, office supplies &
BP -1 BP -2 13P -3 BP -4
X X X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
C. Uses Permitted by Planned Unit Development (PUD): Commercial and Industrial
developments involving multiple parcels and phasing, or multiple uses shall be required
to use the PUD procedure. In the BP -4 Overlay Zone, multiple family and attached
single family developments shall be required to use the PUD procedure. (Ord. B -53, 4-
18 -95)
D. Accessory Uses Permitted by Right: Indoor limited retail or direct sales of goods and
products to customers may be permitted as accessory to
office / warehouse /manufacturing /wholesale /service uses, subject to the following
standards:
1. Location
a. All sales are conducted in a clearly defined area inside the principal building
reserved exclusively for this purpose. The sales area must be physically
segregated from other principal activities in the building.
b. The sales area shall comply with all other applicable zoning, building and fire
codes for the City of Rosemount.
2. Sales Area. The accessory use sales activity shall not occupy more than fifteen
(15 %) percent of the gross floor area of the building.
equipment, and power products, but excluding
outdoor display
X
7.
Testing and Research & Development
X X X
8.
Business, Trade & Vocational Schools
X X X X
9.
Commercial Indoor Recreation, including:
health & fitness clubs, racquetball and tennis
courts, spas, pools, and gymnasiums
X X X X
10.
Motion Picture & Recording Production Studios and
Radio & Television Broadcasting Stations, but
excluding towers and antennas
X X X
11.
Transit Stations and Park & Ride Facilities
X X X X
12.
Financial Institutions and Banks
X X
13.
Health Care Facilities including: hospitals, clinics,
doctor's offices, diagnostic or treatment centers; but
excluding long -term or intermediate care facilities such
as nursing homes, sanitariums, or institutional uses
X X
14.
Printing and Duplicating Shops, but excluding retail
self or express service businesses as a principal use
X X X
15.
Day Care Centers, Nursery and Montessori Schools
X X
16.
General Building and Special Trade Contractor
Shops and Offices
X
17.
Commercial Bakeries
X X X
18.
Self- service Storage Facility, subject to the
requirements of the C -3 District in
Section 6.12(B.8.)
X
(Ord.
B -63, 6- 14 -96)
(Ord.
B -72, 11 -5 -96)
C. Uses Permitted by Planned Unit Development (PUD): Commercial and Industrial
developments involving multiple parcels and phasing, or multiple uses shall be required
to use the PUD procedure. In the BP -4 Overlay Zone, multiple family and attached
single family developments shall be required to use the PUD procedure. (Ord. B -53, 4-
18 -95)
D. Accessory Uses Permitted by Right: Indoor limited retail or direct sales of goods and
products to customers may be permitted as accessory to
office / warehouse /manufacturing /wholesale /service uses, subject to the following
standards:
1. Location
a. All sales are conducted in a clearly defined area inside the principal building
reserved exclusively for this purpose. The sales area must be physically
segregated from other principal activities in the building.
b. The sales area shall comply with all other applicable zoning, building and fire
codes for the City of Rosemount.
2. Sales Area. The accessory use sales activity shall not occupy more than fifteen
(15 %) percent of the gross floor area of the building.
3. Access. Parking and access for the building /sales area will be from a local or
collector commercial street and shall not be accessed by a local street adjacent to
or entering a residential neighborhood.
4. Hours. Hours of operation shall be limited to 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
E. The following site design and building standards shall apply to all uses permitted in
the BP 1 -4 Overlay Zones:
Outdoor Storage: Outdoor storage of materials, equipment or products, where
allowed, may only be permitted in this district where it is incidental or accessory
to a principal use contained within a building. Outdoor storage areas, where
feasible, shall be located in the rear of the building and not on a portion of the site
with direct frontage upon a public street. All outdoor storage areas accessible by
vehicles or heavy equipment shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete to
minimize dust and control erosion. The perimeter views of all outdoor storage
areas shall be completely screened from ground level views on all sides, except at
required access points. Particular emphasis shall be placed upon maximizing full
opacity from ground level views upon adjacent or nearby streets, all existing or
potential residential uses and any other public use or areas. Such screening can be
accomplished through one or more of the following measures:
a. The placement of the building on the lot.
b. Through the use of a combination of berming and a variety of landscaping.
Berming should consist of slopes not exceeding a 4:1 ratio. Plantings used
to specifically screen views shall, at a minimum, consist of a six (6) feet
high evergreen species spaced on twelve to fifteen (12 -15) feet centers. A
greater minimum height may be required where more than three (3)
growing seasons are anticipated to accomplish required screening levels.
These plantings shall be augmented by other varieties of landscaping off-
set along the berm. All plantings shall be installed according to the City
of Rosemount's Landscaping Standards. Required landscaping
maintenance security for planting screening shall be for an additional two
(2) years.
c. Screening walls may only be used when the above options are not deemed
to be an effective method. They shall consist of durable materials
consistent with the color and appearance of the principal structure.
Screening walls shall be augmented by landscaping to reduce the visual
impact and massing of the structure.
2. Landscaping:
a. General: All areas of land other than that occupied by building or hardcover
shall be landscaped with sod and/or rock and /or mulch. Other understory
trees, shrubs, flowers and ground cover needed to complete landscaping
treatments in these areas, shall be included in addition to the minimum
number of overstory trees and foundation plantings required by the City of
Rosemount's Landscaping Standards. These areas shall include the proper
installation of an underground irrigation system. Portions of the site may be
exempt from these requirements where future development or planned
expansion is anticipated or where other unique conditions exist, such as large
open space area, which make it impractical to landscape in accordance with
these standards. In all such instances, these areas shall be:
(1) Graded and seeded or planted with prairie grass in accordance with
the City of Rosemount Grading Requirements.
(2) Remain as undisturbed natural areas containing existing viable
natural vegetation that can be maintained free of foreign and
noxious plant material and will not produce soil erosion due to
potential increases in storm - water runoff.
3. Parking Lots: Parking lots containing parking for ten (10) or more spaces are
required to be landscaped in the amount of five (5 %) percent of the parking lot
surface area interior to the parking lot perimeter. The landscaped area shall be in
the form of islands or indentations at the perimeter. Landscape islands shall be a
minimum width of eight and one -half (8.5') feet and contain a minimum surface
area of one hundred forty -five (145 sq. ft.) square feet. All parking lots shall be
screened from public right -of -way in order to minimize the impacts of large
expanses of paved surfaces. Screening should be accomplished by the use of a
combination of berming and landscaping. The surface of all parking lots and
paved circulation lanes shall be defined at all edges by curb and gutter with a
design as required by City Standards.
4. Set Backs: The following increased minimum yard set backs shall apply:
PARKING &
CIRCULATION STRUCTURE
ADJACENT USE SET BACK SET BACK
Principal Arterial ROW ................... 40............. ............................... 75
Minor Arterial ROW ....................... 35............. ............................... 60
CollectorROW . ............................... 30............. ............................... 40
Railroad, Primary ............................. 10............. ............................... 30
Electrical Transmission or
Pipeline ROW /Easements
Accessory Structures: All accessory structures shall include exterior building
materials of the same type, quality and appearance as that of the principal
structure. The height of the accessory structure shall not exceed that of the
principal structure.
6. Trash Handling: All trash, recycling and related handling equipment shall be
stored within the principal structure or within an attached or detached accessory
structure. Where an accessory structure is used it shall provide for walls on three
sides at a minimum height of seven (7') feet; and include exterior building
materials of the same type, quality and appearance as that of the principal
structure. A gate or door shall be provided on the fourth side of durable material
which is compatible in color with the principal structure.
7. Signage: Only wall and freestanding ground monument signs shall be permitted
in the district in accordance with the City of Rosemount's Sign Regulations and
these additional standards as follows:
a. Freestanding Ground Monument Signs: A freestanding ground monument
sign shall be designed with a base structure of the same exterior decorative
materials as the principal structure on the site; and which extends from the
sign copy area fully to the ground, except for architectural relief
treatments. All freestanding ground monument signs, if illuminated, shall
be only indirect with the light source fully diffused. These signs shall be
appropriately landscaped and subject to the same requirements for all
landscaping on the property.
b. Wall signs: Wall signs shall consist of permanent high quality materials
with finished edges. No wood signs shall be permitted. Where more than
one (1) wall sign is requested per building frontage (i.e., a multi - tenant
center), a uniform sign criteria shall be prescribed by the building owner,
subject to review and approval by the City. The sign criteria shall, among
other things, describe the uniform type of sign to be allowed, limitations of
placement on the building, the method of fastening, and the procedure for
tenant sign approval.
Lighting: All exterior lighting shall be designed and arranged to direct
illumination away from adjacent or nearby residential uses and districts. No
exterior lighting shall be arranged and designed to create direct viewing angles of
the illumination source by adjacent properties, pedestrians or vehicular traffic in
the public right -of -way. Designs for all lighting, including but not limited to,
building "wallpack" fixtures, shall incorporate lenses, deflectors, shields, louvers
and/or prismatic control devices to eliminate any direct viewing angles. Site
lighting shall be designed so as to limit the illumination intensity created by all
fixtures to a level not exceeding 0.5 lumens at the property line. A site lighting
plan may be required to insure compliance with these standards and shall be
prepared where one or more freestanding lighting fixtures exceeding thirty (30)
feet in height are planned for the site.
9. Rooftop Utilities: The ground level view of all rooftop equipment, including but
not limited to rooftop structures related to elevators and other mechanical utilities,
shall be screened from public right -of -way and adjacent or nearby residential uses
and districts. Screening should be accomplished by incorporating architectural
building design features such as a parapet wall or sloping roof structures. Wood
fencing shall not be permitted. If due to factors unique to the property or the
project, it is physically impossible or impractical to screen these utilities; the
City's Planning Commission may approve alternative solutions that renders them
aesthetically compatible with the building.
10. Underground Electrical Services: No building or structure located in the district
shall be served other than by underground electric, telephone and cable
distribution facilities. Poles, wires or other above -ground distribution facilities
may only be temporarily installed during site construction or repair of the
underground system. No changes in the grade or contours of land above or
adjacent to these facilities, once installed, shall be made without the approved
written consent of the City Engineer and the utility company providing such
services. (Ord. B -53, 4- 18 -95)