Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.c. Minutes of September 16, 2003 Special Joint Meeting9EM ROSEMOUNT iV 6 CITY PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 16, 2003 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special joint meeting of the Rosemount City Council, Planning Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission was duly held on Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 2875 145` Street West. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the development review process. Mayor Droste called the meeting to order with Council Members Shoe - Corrigan, DeBettignies, and Strayton present. Commissioners present from the Planning Commission and Parks & Recreation Commission were: Myron Napper, Terry Zuun, Jason Messner, David Anderson, Jeffery Weisensel (Planning) and Phillip Sterner, Steve Wilson, (P &R). City Staff present were City Administrator Verbrugge, City Planner Pearson, City Engineer Brotzler and Parks & Recreation Director Schultz. Mayor Droste thanked everyone for their hard work and continued efforts to serve the citizens of Rosemount. Droste had received a letter from residents Jack and Marge Ryan stating they watch Rosemount City Council and Planning Commission on cable television. They reported that the City maintains a very professional quality to the meetings and that they are doing a good job. Droste encouraged Council, Commissioners, and staff to keep up the good work. City Administrator Verbrugge started the discussion reviewing the present development review process and presenting ways to streamline the process. Verbrugge said it is important to keep the process user friendly and allow staff time to review the best information. City Planner Pearson noted that the schedule is built around the 60 -day law which requires the request to be processed within the sixty days or be automatically approved. Planning Commission has had several long meetings because of public hearings. This new schedule should improve that by combining all development reviews to the second Planning meeting and holding all resident variance requests to the first monthly Planning meeting. This will also send a message to the developers that it would take longer to do any plan revisions. Staff will also gain more time to do thorough design standard reviews. Verbrugge said that staff sometimes has only 24 hours to turn- around revisions that would go to City Council and sometimes they are not complete. It is a fear of staff that they might potentially miss an engineering design flaw. This will also keep items off the agenda if they are not ready to be acted on. The Planning meeting could start earlier to accommodate more items but Staff suggested this be considered after a trial period. Staff would like to implement this schedule starting this month. There will be a transition period. This is a policy change, but staff will check into if it needs to be accepted by City Council in the form of a resolution or not. The floor was opened to informal discussion and updates by Staff and City Council. Weekly Updates are now distributed to all commissioners. The commissioners liked the e -mail up -dates because of less paper to handle. The commissioners were advised to forward reporter inquires to City Hall for responses. If you do respond to a reporter's question qualify it with "I am just one person, you should also talk with city staff." Remember to respect developers who are in the planning stages and don't want their company's name divulged. Planning Commissioner Messner requested that older neighborhoods have their zoning requirements modified to prevent so many residential variances. 1 ROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 16, 2003 Mayor Droste unanimously adjourned the special meeting at 7:21 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Linda Jentink, City Clerk Recording Secretary The City Council Agenda Packet is Clerk's File 2003 -34. 2