HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.b. AnnexationDetachment Petition for 1.94 Acres at Dodd Road and 120th Street WEXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Council Work Session: February 13, 2017
AGENDA ITEM: Annexation/Detachment Petition for 1.94
Acres at Dodd Road and 120th Street W
AGENDA SECTION:
Discussion
PREPARED BY: Kyle Klatt, Senior Planner AGENDA NO. 2.b.
ATTACHMENTS: Letter from Developer’s Attorney,
Property Owner Petition for Concurrent Detachment and
Annexation, Location Map, Aerial Image, Proposed
Subdivision: Existing Conditions and Plat Map
APPROVED BY: LJM
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Provide Staff Direction on Issues of Concern to
Rosemount
SUMMARY
The City Council is being asked to review a petition from the Lincoln Group for concurrent detachment and
annexation of a 1.94 acre parcel of land immediately north of 120th Street West and east of Dodd Road that
is located within the City of Rosemount (adjacent to the Rosemount VFW site). The Lincoln Group has
entered into an agreement to purchase the property in conjunction with a larger 6.45 acre parcel across
Rosemount’s municipal border, within the City of Eagan, with the intent of developing a small residential
subdivision on the combined parcels. The detachment and annexation would allow the subdivision to be
platted in a manner that does not cross municipal boundaries and to maximize the usable space north of
120th Street West. In addition to the petition and supporting information, staff has attached a preliminary
layout of the proposed subdivision to this memorandum.
Under Minnesota State Statutes, the least complex manner to move forward with the proposed detachment
and annexation is if both Cities agree to the action and adopt resolutions in support of the property owner’s
petition. Staff would like to receive some preliminary feedback from the Council concerning the request
before an official resolution is brought forward for action. Some of the issues that should be considered
include the following:
•Dodd Road/Boulevard. A little over 16 years ago the City of Eagan terminated Dodd Road north of
120th Street West by adding a cul-de-sac approximately 500 feet north of the previous intersection.
The subject parcel currently receives access from the remnant stub of Dodd Road. The proposed
subdivision would not reconnect the road, and would vacate the existing right-of-way (making any
future connection difficult, if not impossible). The request is a good opportunity to raise the issue of
reinstating Dodd Road as a through street, unless the Council is not inclined.
•As part of previous conversations with the City of Eagan regarding the potential extension of public
services into Rosemount, Eagan agreed to enter into a joint powers agreement with Rosemount
concerning such improvements provided they were done in concurrence with an extension of 120th
Street to the west of South Robert Trail (TH3). If the proposed project moves forward, there are
2
some questions about how the subdivision may or may not impact plans to improve 120th Street.
Further, the concept of detailing out the development related issues along 120th both east and west
of Hwy 3 makes sense. Clarity of expectations for “border” development would be helpful.
• The Rosemount VFW building is located on a parcel located immediately east of the proposed
annexation site. Staff would not recommend any further extension of the detachment area to
include this parcel since the building is entirely located within the City of Rosemount. Discussions
with Eagan and clarifying expectations about the VFW parcel would also be helpful. They are in the
same position as the proposed development site, having a property that is cut by the municipal
boundary.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the petition and supporting information and provide direction to staff. The City will need to
respond to the petition at an upcoming meeting.
Netzell Legal Services, PLLC
7900 lnternational Drive, Suite 300
Bloomington, MN 55425
Telephone 9 52-85 I -7 87 7
Fax952-513-4632
tim@netzell.com
January 25,2077
Mr. Kyle Klatt
City of Rosemount
2875 t45th St W.
Rosemount MN 55068
VIA E-MAIL ONLY
Re.The Lincoln Group, Inc.
Detachment and annexation
Parcel ID #: 34-00800-14-012
Dear Mr. Klatt,
As we briefly discussed, I represent The Lincoln Group, Inc. in the development of
certain property which is currently located in both the City of Rosemount and the City of Eagan.
The parcel located in Rosemount is referenced above, and the parcel located in Eagan is tax
parcel # 10-03600-55-013. They are both now under contract by my client and the subject ofa
residential development proposal. To accomplish the development of the property, my client is
requesting that the entire property be located within the City of Eagan so that no municipal
boundaries are crossed by the proposed new plat. Please consider this letter the request ofThe
Lincoln Group, Inc. for a resolution of the City of Rosemount to approve the detachment of the
parcel in question, and its annexation into the City of Eagan.
I have enclosed for your review a copy of a boundary exhibit prepared by Kaskaskia
Engineering Group, LLC which shows the entire parcel, along with the location of the current
municipal boundary. (The parcel located in the City of Rosemount is highlighted.) Also attached
is a copy of the aerial map from the Dakota County records which shows the visual perspective
of the property.
I have spoken with the Municipal Boundary Adjustment Unit of the Office of
Administrative Hearing, and discussed the process they would like to have followed to complete
this matter. Their request is to have both cities approve, by resolution, the detachment and
annexation of the property, and upon their receipt of those resolutions and the petition of the land
owner, they will approve that matter. I have also attached for your review the draft petition
which we would intend to file with them upon approval by both cities.
Minnesata Statc llar .Aiisrxiatiun
l-i,rt i {i.,.1 r Sp*ri:r lirt
Rea I Property L6w
Mr. Kyle Klatt
City of Rosemount
January 25,20L7
Page2
Thank-you for your time and consideration of this matter. If you have any questions,
please feel free to contact me with any questions that may arise. I would also appreciate your
contacting me with what you believe may be a reasonable time frame for review and approval of
this process.
Enclosures
Cc: Mr. Daniel P. Lincoln,via e-mail. il enclosures
L{ilrncsutu Surtu l}ar Assr.rciution
l.-'r*tili"'J r Sp*iralirt
Real Property Law
Sincerely,
PROPERTY OWNER PETITION FOR CONCURRENT
DETACHMENT AND ANNEXATION
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION BY ALL OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS FOR THE
DETACHMENT OF CERTAIN LAND FROM THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA
AND CONCURRENT ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA
PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES § 414.061, SUBD. 5
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
TO: Office of Administrative Hearings
Municipal Boundary Adjustment Unit
P. O. Box 64620
St. Paul, MN 55164-0620
We, the undersigned, being all of the property owners of the following described land,
hereby request the Municipal Boundary Adjustment Unit of the Office of Administrative
Hearings to detach said property from the City of Rosemount and annex it to the City of Eagan,
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 414.061, Subd. 5:
INSERT THE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION.
DO NOT USE DESCRIPTIONS FROM PROPERTY TAX STATEMENTS.
In bringing forward this petition, the petitioners state that:
1. There is one (1) property owner of the area proposed for
detachment/annexation. (All of the property owners are required to sign a petition under
Minnesota Statutes § 414.061, Subd. 5, to commence the proceeding. If the land is
owned by both husband and wife, both must sign the petition to represent all owners.)
2. The property is presently within the City of Rosemount and abuts the City
of Eagan, in the County of D.
3. The property proposed for detachment/annexation is 84,396 sq. ft. or approximately 1.94
acres).
4. This boundary adjustment is being requested because: The entire parcel owned by the
owner is the site of a proposed single family residential development. Approximately
294,970 sq. ft., or approximately 6.77 acres, are located within the City of Eagan, and the
balance of 84,396 sq. ft. (approximately 1.94 acres), is located in the City of Rosemount.
The orderly development of the entire parcel is not possible with the municipal boundary
of the property bisecting the owners site.
Date:_____________________________ ______________________________
Property Owner
______________________________
Property Owner
NOTE: Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 414.061, Subd. 5, the petition must be accompanied
by a resolutio n of at least one of the affected municipalities.
Municipal Boundary Adjustment Unit Contacts
Star Holman star.holman@state.mn.us 651-361-7909
Katie Lin katie.lin@state.mn.us 651-361-7911
(September 2011)
-" " 0
~
"' 0
"' "O
" 0
" 0
"' 0
~ ...
0 -i
"' ~
"' " ·;;
i:
0
0
0 < ~
0 < ~
0
~
" -0 -"' w
" "O ·;;;
~
0
(L
...
0 -
f2)
~-
M-123.43 City of Eagan
D-123.31 --t l--!_ __ _J_----;S,;;8;.:8.4409~'oCY'o"ww~ 820.31 City Of RO s em Ou n
--------
50 100
I
"' ;;
a:
HORIZONTAL: 1"=50'
w
...J
c;: LAST PLOTTED: 1/25/2017 8:54 AM
X X X
+ __ -...L ___ -.JL )(
---
I ,_-I '1 ' ' " ~ I/ " V I L-', ,, I I , -I " ,.,
,\ ·-d L. V ....,
" -,--:; I I " L. V
X X X
x __ _
x _......_ ____ -.J
120th St. West
Roadwa 27' W
\
\
EXCEPTION
a
I
S88°26' 30"W 687.67
X X X
\ ~Government
-/ Lot 1 !$.
2ptic tank/ ,.._
cover
/ 103°24'30"
N89°34 28 E 410.36
\
~~
ll'. "
o~.~ ~ ~
\
X
co
fv)
o·
fv)
L{)
,ki
fv)
_L{) >< 0
0
(\J ,.._
<
><
J
septic tank
cover
X
I
X
< 0
{::::
8 ()
cJ
I
I
I
I
)( )( X X
400.00'
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
esterly right of way line of State
Trunk Highway No. 3 and south
· e of Government Lot 1
0
0 -~
REV. DATE
DRAWN
BY: SCA
CHECKED RPA
BY:
DESCRIP
01
SHEET NO. _Ql_ OF __fil_ SHEETS
PROJECT NUMBER 16-1104
PARKSIDE SUBDIVISION
PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA
VICINITY MAP
COVER SHEETPARKSIDE SUBDIVISIONCITY OF EAGANDAKOTA COUNTY, MN01/18/2016
00/00/20XX
XX
16-1104
00/00/20XX
SMS
TJH
DWK