HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.a Minutes of September 2, 2003 Regular City Council Meetingrf EM # 6 A ROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDINGS
REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 2, 2003
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the Rosemount City Council was
duly held on Tuesday, August 19, 2003, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 2875
145 Street West.
LeFevere, City Engineer Brotzler, City Planner Pearson, Parks & Recreation Director Schultz,
Police Chief Kalstabakken, and Finance Director May. The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
Mayor Droste called the meeting to order with Council Members Shoe - Corrigan, DeBettignies,
Riley, and Strayton present. Also present were City Administrator Verbrugge, City Attorney
Mayor Droste called for any changes to the agenda. Staff reported that Item 8.a. Residential
Planned Unit Development and Rezoning for Centex Homes received additional information
from the developer which City Planner Pearson made comment in a memorandum. A letter was
received from Centex Homes regarding Item 7.a. Minea EAW, City Project 351. City
Administrator Verbrugge requested a Closed Executive Session to discuss pending litigation
related to special assessment appeals. Mayor Droste placed that at the end of the meeting. Staff
also requested that Item 6.f. Receive Bids /Award Contract for Biscayne Pointe 5 Addition
Street & Utility Improvements, City Project 367 be removed from the agenda for future
consideration. Mayor Droste moved to accept the agenda as amended. Second by Strayton. Ayes:
Five. Nays: None. The agenda was set.
Response to Public Comment: Asbury Glen Pond
Mayor Droste noted that City Council would like to examine the information staff provided
about the Asbury Glen Pond at a work session. Council will respond at a future meeting.
Consent Agenda
Council Member DeBettignies noted the removal of Item 6.f. Receive Bids /Award Contract for
Biscayne Pointe 5 th Addition Street & Utility Improvements, City Project 367.
MOTION by DeBettignies to approve the Consent Agenda Items a. through n. with the removal
of Item 6.f. Second by Riley. Ayes: DeBettignies, Shoe - Corrigan, Droste, Riley, Strayton.
Nays: None. Motion carried.
a. Minutes of August 19, 2003 Regular City Council Meeting
b. Minutes of August 9, 2003 Special Meeting
C. Minutes of August 19, 2003 Special Meeting
d. Bills Listing
e. Expenditure Approval from Donation Account for Parks & Recreation Department
h „,.,,.> Cit n, - 4367
icixpi ,
g. Change Order 41 — Bloomfield Vineyards, City Project #368
h. Change Order #1 — Evermoor Roundstone, City Project #361
i. Payment #9 & Final — Evermoor Glendalough Street & Utility Improvements, City
Project #347
j. Authorize Agreement for Chippendale /CSAH 42 Improvements with Dakota County
k. Joint Powers Agreement for Dakota County Domestic Preparedness
ROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDINGS
REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 2, 2003
1. Memorandum of Agreement to Study Public Safety Communication Services in Dakota
County
m. Metro Classic Homes Conditional Use Permit
n. Receive Bids /Award Contract — Chippendale /CSAH 42 Improvements, City Project #344
Minea EAW, City Project 351
City Engineer Brotzler noted that this item had been continued from the August 19, 2003 regular
City Council meeting. Staff has obtained additional information on the greenway corridor
designation by Dakota County, Department of Natural Resources (DNR) comments, and the
results of diggings for a dump site on the property. Braun Intertec conducted the testing which
included fifteen ten foot deep pits dug with a backhoe. No soil staining was identified and no
odors were detected. Developer Steve Ach noted that the testing was not done on the railroad
right -of -way. Dakota County staff explained that the greenway corridor does not exist on this
property, but the County noted that this is an opportunity for the development of a greenway
corridor between UMore Park property and northern Rosemount. There is a protected wetland on
the property that has a 150 foot buffer area. The proposed construction of a path and dock within
the protected wetland does require a permit. City Council was satisfied with these responses
combined with the information received at the August 19 meeting.
MOTION by Shoe - Corrigan to adopt A RESOLUTION ISSUING A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION OF NEED. Second by Riley. Ayes: Shoe - Corrigan, Droste, Riley, Strayton,
DeBettignies. Nays: None. Motion carried.
Residential Planned Unit Development and Rezoning - Centex Homes
City Planner Pearson reviewed the proposal for a Residential Mixed -Use Planned Unit
Development by Centex Homes on the property of Craig Minea and Patricia Kavorius. This
would include four housing types with a total of 385 units. There would be 155 single- family
homes, 60 row - houses, 58 "Carriage" houses, and 112 "Georgetown" homes. Private / public
open space of about fifty acres is proposed and a public park of eight acres. Staff presented a
resolution with sixteen conditions. The Planning Commission found the variance requests
acceptable except for the smaller sized garages. Discussion was held regarding the variances for
ponding setbacks and the high water mark around the DNR protected wetland. Three lots would
be affected, but there was additional open space left on the west side of the wetland that would
off -set that variance. The DNR reported they would not contest the variance. Discussion was
held on having lot lines extend back through the wetland with monumentation (markers) placed
at the 75 -foot conservation easement. Residents would have to be educated about not being able
to erect out buildings or playground equipment past that line. The process of averaging the
setbacks was used because of the preserved open space behind lots 45, 46, 47 and 48. Council
Member Shoe - Corrigan was not comfortable with averaging the setbacks. Shoe - Corrigan asked
of the developer what the City would gain by this concession of averaging setbacks. Discussion
followed if the conservation easement should begin at 75 feet or 150 feet. Council felt that a
work session was needed to reexamine the information. Council Member Strayton asked for the
percentage of housing mix and how this development affects that. Pearson noted that this would
bring Rosemount's housing mix to 65% for single - family housing and 35% for multi- family
2
ROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDINGS
REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 2, 2003
housing. The City's goal is 65% single - family housing. The City has sixty days to examine the
PUD. The sixty days begins when the EAW is approved, which was done this evening. The
Developer was directed to provide additional detail of housing elevations.
MOTION by Shoe - Corrigan to table the preliminary plat for the Centex Homes Planned Unit
Development and Rezoning to be revisited at the September 16, 2003, regular City Council
meeting. Second by Riley. Ayes: Droste, Riley, Strayton, DeBettignies, Shoe - Corrigan. Nays:
None. Motion carried.
Resolution Setting 2004 Preliminary Levy and Budget Hearing Dates
Finance Director May reviewed the process used to adopt a levy for 2004 and set the hearing
dates required under truth in taxation laws. The State has cut funding to Rosemount in the
amount of $752,000 for this year and also for next year. The City can recoup none of this in 2003
and about $460,000 of this loss in 2004. The City's projected general operating budget for 2004
has the lowest increase ever of 1.88 %. This should not impact any city services. The levy will
increase 7.63 %. Because of our growth, the City's share of the property tax rate is expected to
decrease by about 8.35 %. These city issues affect only a portion of the resident's property taxes,
because the school district and county property taxes may also change. Residents will receive
their taxation notices in early November from Dakota County.
City Administrator Verbrugge noted that the City carries excess funds to continue a positive cash
flow and to maintain a healthy credit rating (currently an A -1), and for unexpected expenditures.
The proposed 2004 levy and budget should keep the City in a good financial position. Staff will
continue to prioritize spending and keep building for the future. Finance Director May noted that
the proposed levy, due to State regulations, could only be decreased from this requested amount
and not increased before the final levy goes to Dakota County. DeBettignies pointed out that the
City has three employee bargaining units left to settle with by December 31.
The Public Hearing dates being proposed are Monday, December 1 2003, at 6:30 p.m. and if
there is not enough time to respond to all those attending, it can be continued to Monday,
December 8 2003, at 6:30 p.m. Following public comment, the City Council and staff have
time to adjust the budget and levy for the final draft to be; presented to Dakota County no later
than December 31 St
MOTION by DeBettignies to adopt A RESOLUTION SETTING THE PRELIMINARY
2004 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET, THE PRELIMINARY 2004 C.I.P.
BUDGETS, THE PRELIMINARY 2004 INSURANCE BUDGET AND THE
PRELIMINARY 2004 LEVY AND BUDGET HEARING DATES REQUIRED BY THE
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT. Second by Shoe - Corrigan. Ayes: Riley, Strayton, DeBettignies,
Shoe - Corrigan, Droste. Nays: None. Motion carried.
Hiring of Community Development Director
City Administrator Verbrugge reviewed the selection process used for the Community
Development Director. Thirteen people were interviewed the first round and then three
applicants were asked to return for a second interview. Kim Lindquist, currently at the City of
9
ROSEMOUNT CITY PROCEEDINGS
REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 2, 2003
Cottage Grove, was selected for the Community Development Director position. Kim has a
master's degree in urban and regional planning from the University of Wisconsin - Madison and
was the Principal Planner for seven years at the City of Minnetonka. Staff requests that Lindquist
receive pay at the top of the scale based on her experience and qualifications. Lindquist is able to
begin her employment on Monday, September 29, 2003.
MOTION by Riley to adjust the salary range for the Community Development Director position
and approve the hiring of Kim Lindquist as Community Development Director. Second by
DeBettignies. Ayes: Strayton, DeBettignies, Shoe - Corrigan, Droste, Riley. Nays: None. Motion
carried.
Announcements
Mayor Droste reviewed the up coming meetings.
City Administrator Verbrugge suggested that the regular Port Authority meeting on September
16 be replaced with a special City Council meeting to jointly meet with the Parks & Recreation
Commission and Planning Commission about the development review process.
MOTION by Mayor Droste to adjourn the meeting. Second by Strayton. Ayes: Five. Nays:
None.
City Attorney LeFevere requested that Council adjourn to Executive Session to discuss pending
litigation for law suites for special assessment appeals for the "coming soon site" and the Taco
John site. This is closed due to attorney - client privilege and exempt from the open meeting law.
MOTION by Droste to rescind the adjourning motion. Second by DeBettignies. Ayes: Five.
Nays: None. Motion carried.
MOTION by Droste to adjourn to the Closed Executive Session. Second by DeBettignies. Ayes:
Five. Nays: None. Motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda Jentink, City Clerk
Recording Secretary
The City Council Agenda Packet is Clerk's File 2003 -32.
4