The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6.h. AAA Automotive Site Plan Review PUD AgreementCITY OF ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION City Council Meeting Date: May 6, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: AAA Automotive Site Plan Review — PUD AGENDA SECTION: Amendment Consent PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson, City Planner 1 4g AGENDA 6 i ATTACHMENTS: Plan reductions, Engineering Memo, Resolution APPROVED BY: Applicant & Property Owner(s): AAA Automotive Location: 2871 160` Street West Area in Acres: 20 Comp. Guide Plan Desig: General Industrial Current Zoning: General Industrial Nature of request: Building permit request for two accessory structures of 6,500 sq. ft. and 3,000 sq. ft. SUMMARY The AAA Auto site is subject to a zoning requirement for PUD whenever multiple sites, buildings or uses are proposed in the General Industrial District. In this case, the site has several uses including Phil's Auto Body and U — Pull R Parts and three buildings. This PUD Amendment would permit two additional buildings that would be setback in excess of 200 feet from 160` Street (County Road 46). The larger building will combine a customer / display area on the south half oriented to the parking lot, and a working area on the north half with overhead doors facing the interior of the salvage yard. BUILDING, PARKING AND LANDSCAPING CHARACTERISTICS Both buildings consist of a combination of concrete block and metal. The 6,500 sq. ft. building will have rock -faced block to a height of ten feet. The front half will have a metal mansard roof extending above, from ten to the overall twenty -foot height of the building, The north half with the overhead doors will have textured metal siding extending from the ten -foot height to the 20 ft. overall height (flat roof). The smaller 3,000 sq. ft. building (setback from 160th Street by about 450 feet) will be for crushing cars. It will have plain concrete block for the first ten feet and textured metal above with overhead doors. The buildings exceed General Industrial District architectural / material Standards. A "sign tower" monument structure is also proposed on the southwest corner of the property. The 10 ft. 8 inch square structure is approximately 23 feet tall overall, including a peaked roof. The signs would be approximately 45 sq. ft. in size, and visible from STH 3. The sign ordinance allows for wall signs of up -to 20% of the area of the elevation of the wall to which it is affixed. If they are reduced in size by about 4 sq. ft. they would be consistent with the sign ordinance. 108 parking spaces are provided, with perimeter curb & gutter and striping. The parking will presumably be more than adequate, although the use is unique and not mentioned in the parking standards. Essentially, customers will be "picking parts" over the entire outdoor storage area, which is extensive. The western edge of the parking is shown with a 20 ft. setback. The plan must be revised to a 25 ft. setback to be consistent with General Industrial standards. The proposed landscaping consists of boulevard trees along 160"' Street and Evergreens along STH 3. Foundation plantings are indicated along the southern elevation of the building. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a resolution approving the PUD Amendment subject to: 1. Incorporating recommendations itemized in the attached memo dated April 30, 2003 by the City Engineer relative to drainage, grading, utilities and connecting to City Sanitary and Water Utilities. 2. Revision of the plan to eliminate the west side five -foot parking lot setback encroachment. 3. Limiting the signs to 20% of each elevation and specifying rock faced block for the sign tower. 4. Conformance with all applicable building and fire codes including fire hydrants as needed. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: AUTO u t � ` ` � ° pom lh "I Vol A R- aa Mk kW kW TART! W NOWN 0,1 arm ' �- Un •`"�_'� 4 d .� .f T T 4 " '"� a _`+ aq 3 . '(� a q t TO Le a _ ti� ,J #-✓ tr -,.s+ tu nk 7 t d ` S �: i" � �G - f " • P� -:t �, � {� � �, jj � dc' (k� 4 e U! r . I. : t n I J k a� ' � F y�•2 z "< 4 � � *' s � �4 a. � "�' ^'Dt s•i�u� � 4V II m {Ir _ �' Y' s it, §; pq,$.. +6hl krt— ea,?, .4 , ' ' tk- in ` ' ' r MEMORANDUM DATE: April 30, 2003 P TO: Rick Pearson — City Planner CC: Jamie Verbrugge — City Administrator Andrew Brotzler — City Engineer FROM: Anthony Aderhold — Project Engineer RE: AAA Auto Salvage After reviewing the AAA Auto Salvage Grading Plan the Engineering Department would like to make the following comments: • The rock construction entrance should be located at the edge of the proposed construction limits • Utility plans showing plan and profile views for sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer shall be submitted. • If sanitary sewer service is to be extended to the proposed buildings, cleanouts on the service line will be needed every 100 -feet. The sanitary sewer being extended as part of the 160' Street Sanitary Sewer Extension has a proposed invert elevation of 936.5 in front of the AAA Auto Salvage site. • All areas of the proposed buildings shall be located within 150 -feet of an approved City fire hydrant and connected to a minimum 6 -inch watermain. • Drainage calculations shall be provided that demonstrate adequate rate control, storage and infiltration per the attached requirements of the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan. • Drainage that flows south towards CR46 will require water quality treatment prior to discharging to the county right -of -way. Areas need to be designated for infiltration; the infiltration criterion is 1/12 of an acre - foot/acre /day. • The proposed grading plan does not clearly demonstrate how the northwest area of the site and proposed buildings will drain to the proposed swale. G:\Anthony\Misc\AAA.doc • The proposed pond on the north side of the property is part of the regional ponding system. The area is classified as a Utilize wetland according to the City of Rosemount wetland management program, which requires a 15 -foot buffer and no pretreatment. There is currently no outlet for the regional pond and temporary pumping will need to be considered until an outlet is constructed. The NWL elevation for the pond is 932.00 and the HWL is 948.5. • Turf restoration requirements for the project shall be noted on the grading plan. • Prior to any City permits being issued for the proposed improvements, the applicant shall provide to the City sufficient documentation demonstrating that proposed work within the pipeline easement has been approved by the pipeline company. • A permit from Dakota County will be required for all work proposed within the County right -of -way. • Concrete curb and gutter is required to be installed along the entire perimeter of all proposed bituminous and concrete surfaces. If you have any questions regarding these comments please contact me immediately. G:\Anthony\Misc\AAA.doc CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2003- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR AAA AUTO SALVAGE WHEREAS, the Planning Department of the City of Rosemount received an application from AAA Auto Salvage. for approval of a minor amendment to the Planned Unit Development to construct two new buildings; and WHEREAS, on May 6, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the application for a minor amendment to the Planned Unit Development for the construction of two new buildings NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves a minor amendment to the Planned Unit Development subject to: 1. Incorporating recommendations itemized in the attached memo dated April 30, 2003 by the City Engineer relative to drainage, grading, utilities and connecting to City Sanitary and Water Utilities. 2. Revision of the plan to eliminate the west side of five -foot parking lot setback encroachment. 3. Limiting the signs to 20 percent of each elevation and specifying rock faced block for the sign tower. 4. Conformance with all applicable building and fire codes including fire hydrants as needed. ADOPTED this 6"' day of May, 2003, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. William H. Droste, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Jentink, City Clerk Motion by: Voted in favor: Voted against:_ Member absent: Seconded by: