The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2.a. Transportation PlanCITY OF ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR DISCUSSION COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE DATE: March 13, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Transportation Plan PREPARED BY: Andrew J. Brotzler, P.E., City Engineer AGENDA NO. ITEM l ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum APPROVE BY: As Council is aware, Staff and WSB & Associates, Inc. are currently working on the completion of a Transportation Plan for the City of Rosemount. As the Plan is anticipated to be complete in April or May of this year, we would like to update Council on the status of the work completed to date, remaining work to be completed, and anticipated schedule for completion of the Plan. As shown in the attached memorandum, there are a number of public meetings that have been conducted and additional public meetings that will be conducted prior to the completion of the plan. RECOMMENDED ACTION NOTES: For discussion only. From: Chuck Rickart, P.E. Ron Bray, P.E. Date: March S, 2003 Re: Transportation Plan Status Update WSB Project No. 1005 -57 Memorandum In June 2002 City Council authorized WSB & Associates, Inc. to work with Staff in preparation of an update to cities transportation element of the comprehensive plan. Since that time WSB & Associates, Inc. has worked with City Staff and other stakeholders in preparation of the plan. Currently WSB & Associates, Inc. continues to work on the plan development phase of the project including the final development of the transportation model using the Dakota County model information as a base. Two Stakeholder Meetings have been held with a third scheduled for later in March 2003. The stakeholders include representatives from the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Dakota County, surrounding communities, Flint Hills Research, and the University of Minnesota. The purpose of these meetings has been to receive input and direction from these representatives on transportation issues as they relate to the Cities transportation plan development. In addition a public information meeting was held in the fall of 2002 to receive public input on the transportation issued in the City. The current schedule for the completion of the Transportation Plan Update is attached for your information. As indicated previously we are currently in the plan development stage of the project. The third and final stakeholders meetings will be held later in March and- public information meeting will be held in April of 2003. It is anticipated that a final report will be presented to City Council and Planning Commission in late April early May 2003. WSB &Associates, Inc. 4150 150 Olson Memorial Highway, #300 Minneapolis, MN 55422 &Associates, Inc. (763) 5414800 (763) 541 -1700 (fax) To: Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Rosemount Cc: Gary Kalstabakken City Administrator Andy Brotzler, P.E. City Engineer From: Chuck Rickart, P.E. Ron Bray, P.E. Date: March S, 2003 Re: Transportation Plan Status Update WSB Project No. 1005 -57 Memorandum In June 2002 City Council authorized WSB & Associates, Inc. to work with Staff in preparation of an update to cities transportation element of the comprehensive plan. Since that time WSB & Associates, Inc. has worked with City Staff and other stakeholders in preparation of the plan. Currently WSB & Associates, Inc. continues to work on the plan development phase of the project including the final development of the transportation model using the Dakota County model information as a base. Two Stakeholder Meetings have been held with a third scheduled for later in March 2003. The stakeholders include representatives from the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Dakota County, surrounding communities, Flint Hills Research, and the University of Minnesota. The purpose of these meetings has been to receive input and direction from these representatives on transportation issues as they relate to the Cities transportation plan development. In addition a public information meeting was held in the fall of 2002 to receive public input on the transportation issued in the City. The current schedule for the completion of the Transportation Plan Update is attached for your information. As indicated previously we are currently in the plan development stage of the project. The third and final stakeholders meetings will be held later in March and- public information meeting will be held in April of 2003. It is anticipated that a final report will be presented to City Council and Planning Commission in late April early May 2003. Attached to this memo you will find additional information with respect to the transportation plan update. WSB & Associates, Inc. will be at the City Council workshop to review this information and to receive any questions and/or comments from City Council. If you have any questions prior to the meeting please feel free to contact Ron Bray or Chuck Rickart at WSB & Associates, Inc. Attachments TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT SCHEDULE • Authorization to Proceed June 2002 • Data Collection June — August 2002 • Plan Development July 2002 — April 2003 • Public Involvement o Stakeholders Meeting No.l July 10 th , 2002 o Public Meeting No. 1 August 29 2002 .o Stakeholder Meeting No. 2 December 4 th 2002 • Stakeholder Meeting No. 3 March 2003 • Public Meeting No. 2 April 2003 • Agency / Team Meetings Monthly as Needed • City Council / Planning Commission Updates Bi Monthly as Needed • Final Report / Council Presentation April / May 2003 STAKEHOLDERS ISSUES Rosemount Transportation Plan CITY OF ROSEMOUNT From July 10, and December 7, 2002 Meetings Mn/DOT • 117 Street Interchange • 138 Street/139 Street Interchange • TH 52 Corridor Study • TH 52 /CSAH 42 Plan • Old TH 55 Turnback • TH 3 Preservation Corridor / Management Corridor Dakota County • CSAH 71 Paving • CR 38 Extension to TH 52 • CSAH 32 Extension to Future 117 Interchange ■ New Interchange at TH 52 /CSAH 42 • TH 3 Access Management • Intermodal Facility Near Flint Hills • Realignment of TH 55 to CSAH 42 to TH 52 Inver Grove Heights • TH 52 Frontage Road on Eastside with 117 Street Interchange • Rich Valley Boulevard (CASH 71) — 2007 County CIP • CR 73 Gravel Road — 2005 County CIP • Southwest Future Development • East/West Connection to TH 3 ARRle Valley • Diamond Path/CR 38 /CSAH 42 — 2004/05 • 160 Street (CSAH 46) • Access between Cities Rosemount ■ Evermore Development ■ 140 Street ■ 145' Street ■ Dodd Boulevard (153 Street) ■ 147 Street ■ Diamond Path ■ Connemara Trail/TH 3 ■ CSAH 71 ■ TH 3 / CR 46 Signal ■ 120' Street Flint Hills • Access to Facility • Future Development • Rail Issues University of Minnesota ■ Future Development Other • Minnesota Valley Transit • Heavy Rail Study • Merts Site • Mississippi River Crossing Study RFP 2003 • Park in Pool, (TH 52 /CSAH 42) • High Speed Rail Study PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING ROSEMOUNT TRANSPORTATION PLAN East Side Residents / Businesses August 29, 2002 5:00 PM to 7:00 PM ATTENDANCESHEET Name Address Representing Phone John Reese P.O. Box 222 Goodhue, MN 55027 - 0222 Self 651- 923 -5572 Myron Napper 3381 145`' Street East Planning Commission 651 437 -5159 Otto Ped 4992 E. 145``' 651- 437 -4600 Casey Willschlager 3886 154``' Street Self 651- 423 -9570 Beth Bergacken 13080 Akron Avenue Self 651 -423 -1893 Conny Mahoney 13075 Bacardi & 3000 145' Street W. Vic's 651 -423 -2317 Lauren Howard 3615 145' St. Rosemount, MN Solberg Agg. 651- 437 -6672 Kathy Boudreau 15325 Babcock Avenue, Rosemount U of M 651 -423 -1118 Robert Yates 3385 Upper 143 W. Self 651- 423 -2344 Carol Schmitz 14050 Courthouse Blvd. Self 651- 437 -8291 Elaine Sandberg 11802 Akron Avenue IGH 55077 Self 651 -455 -4899 Dan & Mary Kehoe 13100 So. Robert Trail Self , 651-423-5452 John McMenomy 1283 135' St. West Self 651- 423 -1770 Harry Willcox 14674 Danville Avenue West Self 651 -423 -1606 Chuck Terry 14635 So. Robert Trail Terry's Ace Hardware 651- 423 -3455 PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING ROSEMOUNT TRANSPORTATION PLAN West Side Residents / Businesses August 29, 2002 7:00 PM to 9:00 PM Name: Dan Kehoe, 651 - 423 -5452 Address: 13100 South Robert Trail, Rosemount, MN 55068 1. What are your Issues /Concerns with the City's Transportation System? Hwy. 3 north of Rosemount — Heavy traffic especially at the peak morning and afternoon times. 2. General Comments: I live right on Hwy. 3. Over the years, I've noticed a heavy increase in traffic due to the residential growth south and east of Rosemount. Turning into my driveway is very dangerous. Getting out onto the highway is just as dangerous especially in the winter. Lower speeds and a center -turn lane would be an improvement. Name: Conny Mahoney & Vic's Crane & Heavy Haul, vicscranes @aol.com Work: 651-423-2317 Home: 651- 423 -1577 Address: 13075 Bacardi Avenue & 3000 145 Street East, Rosemount, MN 55068 1. What are your Issues /Concerns with the City's Transportation System? Future access to Co. Rd. 42 and Hwy. 52 from my business located at 3000 145' Street East. We do not want to be forgotten when a safe access is discussed. Thanks. 2. General Comments: I feel you are doing a good job in planning the transportation for Rosemount. I look forward to watching it develop. PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING ROSEMOUNT TRANSPORTATION PLAN West Side Residents / Businesses August 29, 2002 7:00 PM to 9:00 PM Name: John Reese, 651- 923 -5572 Address: P.O. Box 222, Goodhue, MN 55127 -0222 1. What are your Issues /Concerns with the City's Transportation System? The location of the frontage road south side of 42 and east of 52, (3/4 mile E. of 52), could it be 800 —1,000 feet south of 42? 2. General Comments: Would like to be informed of future meetings, etc. Thanks for your time! Name: Harry R. Willcox, 651423 -1606, hwillcox @nei @dtech.org Address: 14674 Danville Avenue West, Rosemount, MN 55068 1. What are your Issues /Concerns with the City's Transportation System? Stop signs needed at old Dodd Road & Shannon Parkway. Left -turn signal needed at Diamond Path, Shannon Parkway & Chippendale where they meet Co Rd. 42. Stop lights at Highway 3 and Co. Rd. 46 (160 Traffic Sensitive stoplight needed where the egress on to Highway 3 from the Marquie /Gas Supply egress on to Highway takes place. Left turn signals at Highway 3 and 145' Street. 2. General Comments: N /A. H -�'t, aan6i-I � N Ll O � N � 0 Z�o s N N CD � c7 CD :Z' D � c rn 0 CD Q x n (n x N 0 ] 42, o N N l�AV NO�I C O (hJ 03 O O _ h_ N 03 0 � N rn ` ZS 'OWAMH •S' h =Y- ;U (D c W N o 70 G C 0 R � (D cD 1071 1 07 1 M 1 l(r"I 107, 1 1 i 1� 1059 1029 1 1049 498 51 M5 1 M5 M5 y 1 534 1 .1531 510 1059 MIS 499 j 107 11 - *.,r im i W ray 1059 L%7 107, 1 �icr, i o7 548 46 I � 1 07 1 059 Ms 1059 1049 1OF7 1 1071 550 t ��071 47 5 1 550 5421 574 Z -- ti 107 1 1 -% IT I IT 1 0- I 1049 1022 535 l i - 602 601 X30 — 1069 55-Q 1049 1071 1 54 5.3 10 1071 531 1 aw 1071 1 l k 632 1049 6-7 1101 1104 1 10 4 110 1105 679 682 f 675 673 1105 678 1104 f 1, J1105 1104 — 11041 C4 I 6 - 1 t 105 701 1105 702 1105 674 1107 " �67 700 'r F '031 I,- 4T� 705 1105 No 1105 1105 105 142 1106 1090 46 4 739 795 61 6� 711 648 I to 0 Jr o 1104 .�6E, 764 1104 1184 '. " 1 1 107 - -- ---- 126 1103 7z% llot ilos 793 788 781 89 1105 i 1107 _ 1101 1104 1105 808 1105 F 1104 05 820 853 w 817 790 Ilot llot 8 -26 1 ot 1 105 83r 81 I I 1104 1 126 , '670 26 1104 871 1 lo mu.� MD I 881_ 1 W9 FW 1126 "04 0 1104 92`,.'= 91 1110 113. 112-3 CCI 1104 -09 lo t 110 Ilu 1105 39 1 c 46 T, 2 . 66 9 971 1 9 " . . - .. ._ — . 1147 - 1148 1148 1140 101 . -653— 01 1008 99, 1147 148 148 910 11to 923 1140 1 110 916 9-- 1138 917 1138 91 1031 :0229 �028 1140 loto 1139 102 1 its 1053 IT 4 11-38 : 147 8 054 14 � lis 07, 140 138 1121, 04 oes 036 6 � �: (0) 38 ::00- I 60 � 160 099 IIQO 1160 1102 :: It 60 60 1167 1167 63 1112 1128 1167 ' 60 1160 160 ;:95 150 1160 1159 ' 11 93 , 1194 1 188 4 1187 1191 Dakota C ounty TAZ's 4 . :- r ---- — ---- ----------- 0 0.6 -- Legend _ FVIOD E L_TYP E Centroid Connector �- Roadway I� I _ _ - 41 - - - - - - - - - I I Dakota County Model Network 0 0.5 1 'v 1 i Ilk MIA 4111 1 M I - ! , - -.-. I NMI. -W L 7 rf -- . -lir �I -1 [U Legend Road Classifications Future Roads Collector i%or? Collector MinorArterial ♦ `� Min or Arterial N "Principal Arterial Principal Arterial /�V Local Roads 0.5 0 0.5 Miles /\ City boundaries s%drtnnpcp.aprYoad cbsslYmllor Road Classifications 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update City of Rosemount I Functio Thorou ghfare Classification System Principal Minor Collector Local Arterial Arterial Street Street Spacing 3-6 miles 1 -2 miles 0.5 -1 mile 1 block -urban Examples in Rosemount Highway 52 County Road 42 County Road 46 State Highway 3 145 Shannon Parkway, Biscayne 1 mile -rural Location On edges of On edges of On edges Within neighborhoods Service development and development and or within and other homogenous Performed neighborhoods nei hborhoods neighborhoods land use areas Intersection Grade separated or Traffic signals and 4-way stops and As required. Characteristics at -grade crossings. cross street stops. some signals. principal arterial road. Local street stops. Volumes Urban 15,000 - 100,000 5,000 - 30,000 1,000 - 15,000 Less than 1,000 Carried Rural 2,500 - 25,000 1,000 - 10,000 250-2,500 Less than 1,000 Posted Speed Legal limit. 50 35-45 Maximum 30 Parking None Restricted as Restricted as Restricted if MSA. necessary. necessary. Management Ramp metering Signal timing with Number of lanes. Intersection control. Tools with preferential preferential Signal timing. Cul -de -sacs. treatment for transit. treatment for transit. Access control. Diverters. System Access To interstate To interstate To minor arterials, To collectors and freeways, freeways, other other collectors. other locals. other arterials. arterials and collectors. Jurisdiction MNDOT and Rosemount, Dakota Rosemount Rosemount Dakota County County, MNDOT Examples in Rosemount Highway 52 County Road 42 County Road 46 State Highway 3 145 Shannon Parkway, Biscayne Danbury Ave., Cameo Ave., 144" Trip - making Trips greater than Medium to short trips Short trips Short trips at Service 8 total miles at (2 -6 miles) at moderate (1-4 miles) low speeds. Performed moderately high speed speeds. at low speeds. occuring on at least Local transit trips. Local transit trips. 5 continuous miles of principal arterial road. Express transit trips. Fiaurn 4.1 -C Thoroughfare Standards Principal Minor Collector Local Design Element Arterial Arterial Street Street Number of traffic lanes 4 -6 2 -4 2 -4 2 Traffic lane width (ft.) 12 -14 12 -14 12 10 -12 Curb parking or shoulder width (ft.) No parking No parking 8 -10 8 Minimum pavement width (ft.) 52 4452 36 32 Minimum R-O -W width (ft.) 300 100 -120 80 60 1 , Design speed (mph) 55 45 30 -40 30 ' For environmental reasons, the pavement width and R -O -W width may be reduced to 28 feet and 50 feet respectively. Figure 4.1 -D IJ Chart x -3 Access Control Guidelines Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Street Local Street General Type of Access Control Rural Minimum Limited access carefully planned. Access carefully planned. Entrances combined where possible. Entrances combined where possible. Desirable Access only at Principal and Minor. Access only at Principal, Minor, and Collector Access carefully planned. Urban Minimum Access only at at Principal and Minor. Some access at major generators Access carefully planned. Desirable No access between interchanges No access between public streets No access between public streets Desirable Spacing of Intersections Crossing Public Roads Rural Principal 6 miles --- --- - -- Minor 3 miles 3 miles - -- - -- Collector 1 mile 2 miles 2 miles --- Local None 1 mile 1 mile Carefully planned Urban Principal 3 miles - -- - -- --- Minor 1 mile 1 mile - - -- Collector None .5 mile .5 mile --- Local None None .25 mile Carefully planned Non- public Entrance Spacing Rural Minimum 1,250 feet 500 feet 300 feet 100 feet Desirable None 1,250 feet 1,000 feet 300 feet Urban Minimum 1 mile 200 feet 100 feet 50 feet Desirable None 500 feet 300 feet 100 feet Corner Clearance to Non- public Entrance Rural Minimum 300 feet, if any 50 feet 50 feet 50 feet Desirable No access permitted. 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet Urban Minimum No access permitted. 50 feet 30 feet 30 feet Desirable No access permitted. 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet