Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.b. 2001 CDBG AllocationCITY OF ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: MARCH 6, 2001 � ikdde� AGENDA ITEM: 2001 CDBG ALLOCATION AGENDA SECT ON: NEW US ESS PREPARED BY: JIM PARSONS, COMMUNITY DEV. DIR. AGENDA ADD -ON ATTACHMENTS: DRAFT RESOLUTION APPROV D J Background The allocation of federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for Rosemount this year is $68,281. The funds are administered by the Dakota County Community Development Agency. The Port Authority will discuss a staff proposal to apply for that allocation to be used for property acquisition downtown. As such the allocation would assist the City and Port Authority in on -going efforts to acquire property for future re- development. The Port Authority has in the past acquired non - conforming, functionally obsolete, residential properties in the downtown commercial district with the intent to re- develop them. Recommendation The Port Authority recommended application for the CDBG funds available. RECOMMENDED ACTION: MOTION to approve A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING. COUNCIL ACTION: CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2001- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rosemount as follows: 1. The City Administrator is authorized to submit the attached application to Dakota County for a Community Development Block Grant in Fiscal Year 2001. 2. The application is approved by the City Council and the Mayor and City Administrator are authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Rosemount. ADOPTED this day of Rosemount. ATTEST: Linda J. Jentink, City Clerk Motion by: Voted in favor: Voted against:_ Member absent: 2001, by the City Council of the City of Cathy Busho, Mayor Seconded by: IV M etropolitan Council ID A. V Improve regional competitiveness in a global economy February 22, 2001 Thomas Burt, City Administrator City of Rosemount 2875 145` Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 -4997 Re: Dakota County Highway Facility Dear Mr. Burt: I am writing to outline the thinking of the Metropolitan Council staff concerning the proposed Dakota County highway facility to be located adjacent to your southern border across 160 Street. On February 14` the Council approved an Empire Township Plan Amendment that will permit the county project. A copy of the staff report on the project is enclosed. From a land use perspective, our concern was the conversion of farmland to urban purposes. The Council's Regional Blueprint provides that urban uses should not be permitted on agricultural lands unless there is strong evidence that the proposed urban use cannot be located elsewhere. In light of the county's location requirements for a central county facility and its extensive efforts to locate the facility in Rosemount, as described in Attachment 2 to our report, staff has concluded that the project is consistent with the Regional Blueprint. We are concerned about the provision of public services for the project. As noted in our report, new EPA regulations prohibit the discharge of waste from floor drains or the vehicle wash process to ground waters. Without public services, it will be difficult and expensive to take the appropriate environmental precautions. The site is in the Vermillion River watershed and tributary to the Vermillion River trout stream. For these reasons, we believe it would be very desirable for the facility to be served with public sewer and water service. We strongly recommend that any service extensions be sized to serve this facility only in order to discourage unplanned growth into the agricultural area south of 160 Street. We strongly encourage the city of Rosemount to provide public water and sewer service in a manner consistent with applicable rules. We are also concerned that the project be developed in a way that recognizes the current capacity limitations at the Empire wastewater treatment plant. That may mean that the truck wash water discharges into the sewer system might need to be carefully limited until additional treatment capacity comes on line. If you have any questions about this matter, my staff is ready to assist the city in this important matter. Sincerely, d Caren Dewar Community Development Director Attachment cc: John Conzemius, Metropolitan Council District 16 Susan Hoyt, Director, Physical Development Division, Dakota County Lynn Moratzka, Director, Office of Planning, Dakota County Donald Theisen, County Engineer, Dakota County Gerald Stelzel, Chair, Empire Town Board. { , Z I_�3 Dean Johnson, Research Strategies Corporation Eli Cooper, MCCD Director, Planning and Growth Management Michael King, Sector Representative Judy Sventek, Watershed Coordinator VALIBRARY \C0MMUNDV\2001\Emp PI Amed. Dk. Cty. Hway ltr to Rose. 2.22.0l.doc ' www.metrocouncil.org Metro Info Line 602 -1888 230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1626 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax 602 -1550 • TTY 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer L Executive Summary Livable Communities Committee Agenda Item: SW- 2001 -26 Meetinq date: February 5. 2001 Date: January 24, 2001 Subject: Empire Township Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Referral File No. 18440 -1 District(s), Member(s): Metropolitan Council District 16 (John Conzemius) 507- 263 -2545) Policy /Legal Reference: Minn. Stat. § 473.864, Subd. 2 and § 473.175, Subd. 1 Staff Prepared/Presented: Michael R. King AICP, Principal Reviewer (651- 602 - 1438); Eli Cooper, Director, Planning and Growth Management Department (651- 602 - 1521); Caren Dewar, Director, Community Development Division (651- 602 -1306) Divisi Community D and Growth Management Proposed Action/Motion That the Metropolitan Council adopt the following recommendation: That Empire Township may place the revised plan amendment into effect. Issues Should the Council permit Empire Township to place the revised comprehensive plan amendment into effect? Overview The Township fi a plan amendment to change the land use designation of 80 acres from Long -Term Agriculture to Public / Institutional to accommodate a new Dakota County highway maintenance facility. The site is located in the northwest section of the township on the south side of County Highway 46 (160` street) and adjacent to the southerly border of the city of Rosemount. The Regional Growth Strategy map designates the site as "Permanent Agricultural Area." The site is across County Highway 46 from the 2000 MUSA boundary and lands designated "Urban Area, "(see attachment 1). The discussion of the Permanent Agricultural Area in the Blueprint says that urban uses should not be permitted on agricultural lands unless there is a strong showing that the use cannot be located elsewhere. Council staff believes that Dakota County has met that test. The county has been unsuccessful in finding an urban site despite its extensive efforts as described in its December 6, 2000, letter and attachments (see attachment 2). After reviewing the proposed amendment, Council staff suggested that a land use change of 40 acres would meet the county's long -term operational requirements and be more consistent with the county, township and Council agricultural preservation policies. The county and township have concurred with the smaller 40 -acre land use change, (see attachments 4 and 5). H Infrastructure: The new facility will assist in the efficient maintenance of Dakota County roads. There is no water or sewer system impact, as wells and a septic system will serve the facility. 0 Quality of life: The services provided by the new facility will contribute to the quality of life enjoyed by Dakota County residents. E1 Communication/constituency building: The proposed amendment results from County and Township public review processes. 0 Alignment: This project requires the Council to balance service and quality of life concerns with the potential impact on agricultural preservation Dolicies. EMPIRE TOWNSHIP PLAN AMENDMENT BACKGROUND The County proposes to construct an 80,000 square foot highway facility and operating yard (8 acres paved) on 34 acres. The southern 40 acres will remain in agricultural use. Six acres are dedicated for road right -of -way. Private wells and a septic system will serve the facility. The site is well located to serve the entire county and maintain over 400 miles of county roads. A preliminary site plan for the project provides a great deal of room for building and yard expansion. The County has not been able to find an urban site that meets its location requirements for a central county location with excellent east/west and north/south highway access. The County tried for a year to purchase land adjacent to its existing site in Rosemount, but failed. The County was turned down by the city of Rosemount and the city of Farmington, the Koch Refinery, the University of Minnesota, and a number of other property owners as outlined in more detail in its letter, (see attachment 2). REGIONAL BLUEPRINT This parcel of land is designated in the Regional Growth Strategy as Permanent Agricultural Area. The Blueprint states, "the Council will support agriculture as the primary long -term land use in the permanent agricultural area.' The Blueprint goes on to say that, "Urban facilities should not be located in this area (lands which are certified but not presently in agricultural preserves), unless there is strong evidence that a proposed urban use cannot be located in the general rural use area." Notably, there are no lands in central Dakota County guided for Permanent Rural. REGIONAL SYSTEMS The plan amendment is in conformance with the policy plans for Aviation, Recreation Open Space, Transportation and Water Resources Management. However, the Council offers the following water resources management technical comments. There are two environmental matters, which will need to be resolved prior to construction. One concern is the disposition of stormwater (rate, volume and treatment). Another concern is how and where floor drains and vehicle wash water will be treated. These wastes will not be able to be discharged into groundwater, as they are a prohibited waste in a class V injection well, under rules administered by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. The site is in the Vermillion River watershed and tributary to the Vermillion River trout stream. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 1. Given the Blueprint language concerning the location of urban uses in the Permanent Agricultural Area, and the county's extensive efforts to find an urban site, the requested land use change is consistent with the Blueprint. 2. The Council finds that the revised 40 -acre comprehensive plan amendment is in conformity with metropolitan system plans, and has no impact on the plans of other units of local government. RECOMMENDATION That the Metropolitan Council adopt the Executive Summary and attached review with the following recommendation. • That Empire Township may place the revised plan amendment into effect, and no modifications are necessary. ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Regional Growth Strategy Map / Land Use Change Location Attachment 2: December 6, 2000 Letter from Dakota County with attachments Attachment 3: Aerial photograph / Land Use Change Location Attachment 4: January 12, 2001 Letter from Dakota County Attachment 5: January 24, 2001 Letter from Empire Township V: \LIBRARY\COMMUNDV\REFERRAL\Emp. Tship Plan Amend 1.24.01 18430 -1.doc attachment 1 Regional Growth Strategy Policy Areas ?roposed Dakota County Highway Facility Location 1 Rosemot 1 1 � University of N innesota tosemount Research. Station /A Growth Strategy Policy Areas Urban Area 2000 MUSA (as of 1998) Illustrative 2020 MU SA 2000 Street Centerlines (TLG) E Q Urban Reserve r7 University of Minnesota Permanent Agricultural Area Rosemount Research Station S ` NO r e * ' ! 1 ! l ! ! i i 11 l 1 r ' a� 1 1 Empire Twp. 1 1 1 1 AN KA 0.5 1 1.5 2 Miles n (�•� I G7 N Growth Strategy Policy Areas Urban Area 2000 MUSA (as of 1998) Illustrative 2020 MU SA 2000 Street Centerlines (TLG) E Q Urban Reserve r7 University of Minnesota Permanent Agricultural Area Rosemount Research Station S ` NO r e V KiOn v. 1'tivi!Cd1 Devolopnic Susan L. Hoyt Director Dakota coungt Mr. Ted Mondale, Chair W estern Service Center Metropolitan Council 11 Q" c,1ax e Q e ::e 230 East 5 Street A`'r` .:1`y.' ?� '' St. Paul, MN 55101 952.99i.700-0 Fax 952.891.7031 Dear Mr. Mondale and Council Members: wwwco.dakota.mn.us Q� -1 December 6, 2000 This letter is to provide you with additional background information for the current Comprehensive Plan Amendment requested by Empire Township. This amendment will revise 80 acres of agricultural zoning to Public/Institutional- This revision will allow construction of the new Dakota County Transportation Department Facility. Siting the County Transportation Facility posed several unique challenges for Dakota County. To be an efficient and responsive facility, the site needs to be centrally located. Our space needs analysis showed that a minimum of 30 acres was needed. The existing facility is located on 8 acres in Rosemount. This size provides room for consolidation of operations, expansion, and buffering from adjacent land uses. During our siting process, we found no industrial park property available or acceptable to local units for this facility in the central part of Dakota County. In addition, no landowners were willing to consider offers for their undeveloped land that was within the projected 20 -year urban service area. Dakota County made an extraordinary effort to find a site that meets our needs, provides for expansion, is cost - effective for taxpayers, and is consistent and compatible with adjacent land uses; current and planned. We believe that this has been accomplished with this site. A chronological history of the efforts we have made to site this facility is attached. We appreciate the time and assistance your staff members Mike King. Sector . representative. and Kris! a Snliiit:n. Rfvt COfrldor Planner, have provide j in reviewing this amendment request. Your support and approval of the Empire Township Plan amendment 1s appreciated. erely, n . Hoyt, irector Physical Development Division cc: Dakota County Board of Commissioners Brandt Richardson, County Administrator Empire Township Board CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITY SITING PROCESS ♦ In 1997 a feasibility study projected future space and site requirements. It became clear that the County needed additional land both for shop operations and as a buffer from encroaching residential development. The study determined that the County needed a minimum of 30 acres. ♦ For nearly a year, the County tried to buy property adjacent to the existing site. A copy of the rejection letter from the developer is enclosed. (A copy is attached.) ♦ While it is highly desirable to centralize operations in one location, the County considered a split facility with buildings in close proximity. We explored purchasing property across the street from the current facility from the National Guard and 2 landowners. The National Guard and the owners of the first site were not interested in selling nor leasing any of their property. The owners of the second site wanted $70,000 an acre which is significantly above market value. ♦ By March 1998, the County Board made the decision to relocate all functions of the highway operations facility to a new site and to sell the existing site. The reasons for the decision were 1. It is more efficient and effective to centralize the highway operations function in one location. 2. More land is needed for a larger building(s) and to store the equipment and materials. 3. The current 30 year old facility is too small and in poor condition. 4. The facility is now surrounded by non - compatible (residential) uses. ♦ Based on the response time criteria, staff identified an area between County Road 58 (south) and County State Aid Highway 38 (north) and County State Aid Highway 31 (west) and Trunk Highway 52 (east) as the target search area. ♦ The County explored sites in the Rosemount Business Park. The City of Rosemount was not receptive to this facility being located in this Business Park. ♦ The search area was expanded to include the Koch buffer land, the University of Minnesota, the Dakota County Vocational Technical College, property adjacent to the County's Farmington site and a variety of other sites. - Koch indicated that for risk management reasons that they did not want to sell or lease any corporation land. They referred us to property directly adjacent to their buffer. This owner (corner of Akron and Hwy 42) wanted $30,000 and acre for agricultural land. The University replied that a highway shop is not consistent with their vision for the use of their property and were not interested in selling or leasing. We have contacted the University on three occasions in the last two years and received the same response. The VoTech College has a master plan that utilizes all of its property and therefore declined the County's offer. Farmington, like Rosemount, indicated that they do not want a highway shop in their business park. (A copy of the letter is attached.) ♦ In the fall 1999, the County contracted with a local real estate agent in hopes that he would be able to identify a willing seller in the Rosemount area. No additional land with city utilities was identified. ♦ The relocation of the Trunk Highway 3 and County State Aid Highway 46 (160th Street) intersection and the construction of CSAH 46 provided an opportunity for the County to negotiate for a compatible site south of CSAH 46. North of CSAH 46 is the Rosemount Business Park; south of CSAH 46 is Empire Township. The land in Empire Township is not served by city utilities. ♦ The County made three offers - two in Empire Township at the intersection of Trunk Highway 3 and CSAH 46 and one at Akron Avenue and CSAH 42. Only one of the owners (Mullery et.al.) accepted the offer. At a subsequent meeting in the City of Rosemount, the City Council denied the County the opportunity to connect to City utilities siting concerns about opening this area to additional development. ♦ After considering the implications of building with well and septic, the County again searched for a site looking east of Trunk Highway 52, and in northern Lakeville to the west. No site with city utilities, in a non - residential area was for sale for less than $25,000 per acre. ♦ The County Board approved a Purchase Agreement with the landowners on October 3, 2000. (A copy of the Agreement is attached.) The agreement is conditional upon approval of the land use revision. FIA October 3, 2000 Motion by Cor missioner Krause Second by Commissioner Harris AuthorlUtlon 10 Execute Purchase Agreement for Property for Now Highway OPOratiarw Facility WHEREAS, Resclutlon No, 89-700, adopted on December 21��1959 agreement with the Owners Site 2 , eutharized staff to negotiate a final Purchase to Mal approval by the County Board; and to be useo for the refocstion of ttte County Highway stop, subject WHEREAS, the owners have secured the signature of all parties and are now prepped firtallze a agreement; and purchase WHEREAS, the Purch"o agreement Is for $ for 80 acraa on 1 @0th Sheet h Empire Township; and WHEREAS, the Purtfiase a9l'eement is contingent on the County reoelvtn 9 8 1 3 ProPrlats local zoning approvaL NOW, THEREFOJ.F, BI; IT RESOLVED 71tiat the Dakota Coup g ctfty Board Chair to execute a ty raid of Cortunts9bners hereby authorizes the with Sweeney and Mary Agnes Hansen or th pu, of op Mildred R Mutlery. Joseph J. Mullery. Eft, M Fed ity In the &Tmnt of 51,000,000.00, su 'ect to Arty t!Sne 2 - Mutlof t+ar the new Highway Operations bJ approval by ilia County Attomeys OMOO as to form, STATE OF MINNESOTA county of Dakcu YES Harris _x Hanu Maher --�_ Maher Bataylia sch - eUer _x ac}pr�v�eltsr Turnar —�_ Turner trauma - -�._ Knnxe 9ranNng —�x at'annlnp BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONLRS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA Resolution No, 00-.529 1, M-Y $. Scheidt, Cork to fhe Bwrd of flee County of D akotm. S tatB No of Mknnaeooa do hereby comfy that 11" ca Ma.*d the fonQOLng 8p off MGOP *n with ttte ori*W R*X983 of the procated ng3 of the tw(d 3' Dolor County, h0ftnWte, of their ""I" ""I" �dmI" hold `t°r Of �t�er 2000, now on me in N County �Owr 7=t end haw found the acme lo be a tn,o and s cc n*d COPY ti'ttlrwf d er Sao aw a&cL4 seal of orb cc,x* ,tam s' day of Cf4* to the board Attachment 3 Proposed Dakota County Highway Facility Location 4 0 -Acre Land Use Redesignation, Long -Term Agri t o P ublic/ In stitutional NO a Y w I � 'an � Y j sl � • � ' + `^ ON O � iu W t e ti 179MS1rWW Y OWN Pm y q _ E 1 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Feet Y�� Q 2000 MUSA (as of 1998) xwniseY University of Minnesota Rosemount Research Station a Background photo: 2000 digital ortho quadrangles Tr °TA a . Division of Physical Development Susan L. Hoyt Director Dakota County Western Service Center 14955 Qlaxie Avenue Apple Valley. MN 55124 -8S79 952.891.7000 Fax 952.891.7031 wwwco.dakota.mn.us Mr. Mike King, Sector Representative Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre Building 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 c Ktett+ 9 January 12, 2001 Re: Empire Township Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment r Dakot� GoS ty Transportation Facility Dear M Empire ownship has requested a Comprehensive Plan amendment to facilitate the construction of our new County Transportation Facility. The current amendment request will revise 80 acres of agricultural zoning to Public /Institutional. After reviewing the Township's request in the context of the County's plans for the site, the County would prefer that the comprehensive plan be amended to include only the north 40 acres for the public facility site. The revision in the amendment would leave the remaining southerly 40 acres in agriculturally zoning. This alternative is consistent with our current planned use of the property. Dakota County would accept this altemative amendment. By copy of this letter, we are asking Empire Township to modify their request to include only the north 40 acres of the subject property. Your assistance with the Metropolitan Council approval of this Comprehensive Plan Amendment us truly appreciated. nce ly, Susan L. Hoyt, Director Physical Development Division cc: Dakota County Board of Commissioners Brandt Richardson, County Administrator Empire Township Board RESOURCE STRATEGIES CORPORATION 14001 RIDGEDALE DRIVE SUITE 300 MINNETONKA, MN 55305 612/513 -9548 FAX 612/513 -9549 January 24, 2001 Mr. Mike King, Sector Representative Metropolitan Council 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 cd4- it-ue-��,5_ RE: Empire Comprehensive Plan Amendment- Dakota County Facility Dear Mike: The Empire Township Planning Commission and Town Board have reviewed the alternative land use redesignation for the Dakota County Highway Maintenance Facility, per the request by Dakota County. Accordingly, the Township is willing to revise the land use redesignation, from Long Term Agriculture to PublicAnstitutional, to the north half of the County's 80 -acre property. The amended revision to the Empire Growth Management Plan graphic will be made, subject to final plan review by the Metropolitan Council. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions or require any additional information. Sincerely, Dean R. Johnson, Empire Township Planner CC: Empire Town Board Susan Hoyt, Physical Development Director Don Theisen, Highway Engineer Q) MEMORANDUM DATE: March 6, 2001 TO: Mayor Busho, City Councilmembers FROM: Thomas D. Burt, City Administrator SUBJECT: City Council March 6, 2001 Add- On/Additional Information Add -On 1. 2001 CDBG Allocation This will be added to tonight's meeting dependent on the review of the Port Authority. Additional Information 2. Re: Item 10.a. Dakota County Shop Update The background supporting this project being consistent with the Regional Blueprint of Metropolitan Council is attached. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: MARCH 6, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: 2001 CDBG ALLOCATION AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS PREPARED BY: JIM PARSONS, COMMUNITY DEV. DIR. AGENDA NO. ADD -ON ATTACHMENTS: DRAFT RESOLUTION APPROVED . Background The allocation of federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for Rosemount this year is $68,281. The funds are administered by the Dakota County Community Development Agency. The Port Authority will discuss a staff proposal to apply for that allocation to be used for property acquisition downtown. As such the allocation would assist the City and Port Authority in on -going efforts to acquire property for fixture re- development. The Port Authority has in the past acquired non - conforming, functionally obsolete, residential properties in the downtown commercial district with the intent to re- develop them. Recommendation The Port Authority recommended application for the CDBG funds available. RECOMMENDED ACTION: MOTION to approve A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING. COUNCIL ACTION: h CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2001- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rosemount as follows: 1. The City Administrator is authorized to submit the attached application to Dakota County for a Community Development Block Grant in Fiscal Year 2001. 2. The application is approved by the City Council and the Mayor and City Administrator are authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Rosemount. ADOPTED this day of Rosemount. ATTEST: Linda J. Jentink, City Clerk Motion by: Voted in favor: Voted against:_ Member absent: 2001, by the City Council of the City of Cathy Busho, Mayor Seconded by: JJA Metro politan Council V Improve regional competitiveness in a global economy February 22, 2001 Thomas Burt, City Administrator City of Rosemount 2875 145` Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 -4997 Re: Dakota County Highway Facility Dear Mr. Burt: I am writing to outline the thinking of the Metropolitan Council staff concerning the proposed Dakota County highway facility to be located adjacent to your southern border across 160`' Street. On February 14 the Council approved an Empire Township Plan Amendment that will permit the county project. A copy of the staff report on the project is enclosed. From a land use perspective, our concern was the conversion of farmland to urban purposes. The Council's Regional Blueprint provides that urban uses should not be permitted on agricultural lands unless there is strong evidence that the proposed urban use cannot be located elsewhere. In light of the county's location requirements for a central county facility and its extensive efforts to locate the facility in Rosemount, as described in Attachment 2 to our report, staff has concluded that the project is consistent with the Regional Blueprint. We are concerned about the provision of public services for the project. As noted in our report, new EPA regulations prohibit the discharge of waste from floor drains or the vehicle wash process to ground waters. Without public services, it will be difficult and expensive to take the appropriate environmental precautions. The site is in the Vermillion River watershed and tributary to the Vermillion River trout stream. For these reasons, we believe it would be very desirable for the facility to be served with public sewer and water service. We strongly recommend that any service extensions be sized to serve this facility only in order to discourage unplanned growth into the agricultural area south of 160 Street. We strongly encourage the city of Rosemount to provide public water and sewer service in a manner consistent with applicable rules. We are also concerned that the project be developed in a way that recognizes the current capacity limitations at the Empire wastewater treatment plant. That may mean that the truck wash water discharges into the sewer system might need to be carefully limited until additional treatment capacity comes on line. If you have any questions about this matter, my staff is ready to assist the city in this important matter. Sincerely, �z Caren Dewar Community Development Director Attachment cc: John Conzemius, Metropolitan Council District 16 Susan Hoyt, Director, Physical Development Division, Dakota County Lynn Moratzka, Director, Office of Planning, Dakota County Donald Theisen, County Engineer, Dakota County Gerald Stelzel, Chair, Empire Town Board Dean Johnson, Research Strategies Corporation Eli Cooper, MCCD Director, Planning and Growth Management Michael King, Sector Representative E.� 17 L — Lil�� Judy Sventek, Watershed Coordinator VALI13RARY \C0MMUNDV\2001\Emp PI Amed. Dk. Cty. Hway ltr to Rose. 2.22.01.doc www.metrocouncil.org Metro Info Line 602 -1888 230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1626 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax 602 -1550 • TTY 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer 1 Executive Summary Livable Communities Committee Agenda Item: SW- 2001 -26 Meeting date: February 5, 2001 Date: January 24, 2001 Subject: Empire Township Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Referral File No. 18440 -1 District(s), Member(s): Metropolitan Council District 16 (John Conzemius) 507- 263 -2545) Policy /Legal Reference: Minn. Stat. § 473.864, Subd. 2 and § 473.175, Subd. 1 Staff Prepared/Presented: Michael R. King AICP, Principal Reviewer (651- 602 - 1438); Eli Cooper, Director, Planning and Growth Management Department (651- 602 - 1521); Caren Dewar, Director, Community Development Division (651- 602 -1306) Division/Department: Community Development/Pla and Gro wth M Proposed Action/Motion That the Metropolitan Council adopt the following recommendation: • That Empire Township may place the revised plan amendment into effect. Issues Should the Council permit Empire Township to place the revised comprehensive plan amendment into effect? Overview The Township filed a plan amendment to change the land use designation of 80 acres from Long -Term Agriculture to Public / Institutional to accommodate a new Dakota County highway maintenance facility. The site is located in the northwest section of the township on the south side of County Highway 46 (160` street) and adjacent to the southerly border of the city of Rosemount. The Regional Growth Strategy map designates the site as "Permanent Agricultural Area." The site is across County Highway 46 from the 2000 MUSA boundary and lands designated "Urban Area, "(see attachment 1). The discussion of the Permanent Agricultural Area in the Blueprint says that urban uses should not be permitted on agricultural lands unless there is a strong showing that the use cannot be located elsewhere. Council staff believes that Dakota County has met that test. The county has been unsuccessful in finding an urban site despite its extensive efforts as described in its December 6, 2000, letter and attachments (see attachment 2). After reviewing the proposed amendment, Council staff suggested that a land use change of 40 acres would meet the county's long -term operational requirements and be more consistent with the county, township and Council agricultural preservation policies. The county and township have concurred with the smaller 40 -acre land use change, (see attachments 4 and 5). H Infrastructure: The new facility will assist in the efficient maintenance of Dakota County roads. There is no water or sewer system impact, as wells and a septic system will serve the facility. H Quality of life: The services provided by the new facility will contribute to the quality of life enjoyed by Dakota County residents. H Communication/constituency building: The proposed amendment results from County and Township public review processes. 0 Alignment: This project requires the Council to balance service and quality of life concerns with the potential impact on agricultural preservation policies. r EMPIRE TOWNSHIP PLAN AMENDMENT BACKGROUND The County proposes to construct an 80,000 square foot highway facility and operating yard (8 acres paved) on 34 acres. The southern 40 acres will remain in agricultural use. Six acres are dedicated for road right -of -way. Private wells and a septic system will serve the facility. The site is well located to serve the entire county and maintain over 400 miles of county roads. A preliminary site plan for the project provides a great deal of room for building and yard expansion. The County has not been able to find an urban site that meets its location requirements for a central county location with excellent east/west and north/south highway access. The County tried for a year to purchase land adjacent to its existing site in Rosemount, but failed. The County was turned down by the city of Rosemount and the city of Farmington, the Koch Refinery, the University of Minnesota, and a number of other property owners as outlined in more detail in its letter, (see attachment 2). REGIONAL BLUEPRINT This parcel of land is designated in the Regional Growth Strategy as Permanent Agricultural Area. The Blueprint states, "the Council will support agriculture as the primary long -term land use in the permanent agricultural area.' The Blueprint goes on to say that, "Urban facilities should not be located in this area (lands which are certified but not presently in agricultural preserves), unless there is strong evidence that a proposed urban use cannot be located in the general rural use area." Notably, there are no lands in central Dakota County guided for Permanent Rural. REGIONAL SYSTEMS The plan amendment is in conformance with the policy plans for Aviation, Recreation Open Space, Transportation and Water Resources Management. However, the Council offers the following water resources management technical comments. There are two environmental matters, which will need to be resolved prior to construction. One concern is the disposition of stormwater (rate, volume and treatment). Another concern is how and where floor drains and vehicle wash water will be treated. These wastes will not be able to be discharged into groundwater, as they are a prohibited waste in a class V injection well, under rules administered by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. The site is in the Vermillion River watershed and tributary to the Vermillion River trout stream. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 1. Given the Blueprint language concerning the location of urban uses in the Permanent Agricultural Area, and the county's extensive efforts to find an urban site, the requested land use change is consistent with the Blueprint. 2. The Council finds that the revised 40 -acre comprehensive plan amendment is in conformity with metropolitan system plans, and has no impact on the plans of other units of local government. RECOMMENDATION That the Metropolitan Council adopt the Executive Summary and attached review with the following recommendation. • That Empire Township may place the revised plan amendment into effect, and no modifications are necessary. ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Regional Growth Strategy Map / Land Use Change Location Attachment 2: December 6, 2000 Letter from Dakota County with attachments Attachment 3: Aerial photograph / Land Use Change Location Attachment 4: January 12, 2001 Letter from Dakota County Attachment 5: January 24, 2001 Letter from Empire Township V: \LIBRARY\COMMUNDV\REFERRAL\Emp. Tship Plan Amend 1.24.01 18430 -1.doe Attachment 1 Regional Growth Strategy Policy Areas Proposed Dakota County Highway Facility Location Rosemount t - -- 1 1 - 0.5 1 1.5 2 Miles N , :;rowth Strategy Policy Areas Urban Area 2000 MUSA (as of 1998) Illustrative 2020 MUSA 2000 Street Centerlines (TLG) Urban Reserve University of Minnesota Permanent Agricultural Area Rosemount Research Station s ` ° O1A r. .i�rVtSrOn J; 1'l1v5;C1! �Cvt'iU�li l7i Susan L. Hoyt Dwector- Dakota County Mr. Ted Mondale, Chair W estern Service Center Metropolitan Council I z�CS C-1 1•'•t e Aver -e 230 East 5'" Street A"pl, '` .y� MN' ''' ` -57` St. Paul, MN 55101 952.891.700? Fax 952.891.7031 Dear Mr. Mondale and Council Members: wwwco.dakota.nnn.us V` ittti r ?;Vr " u f �� December 6. 2000 This letter is to provide you with additional background information for the current Comprehensive Plan Amendment requested by Empire Township. This amendment will revise 80 acres of agricultural zoning to Public/Institutional. This revision will allow construction of the new Dakota County Transportation Department Facility. Siting the County Transportation Facility posed several unique challenges for Dakota County. To be an efficient and responsive facility, the site needs to be centrally located. Our space needs analysis showed that a minimum of 30 acres was needed. The existing facility is located on 8 acres in Rosemount. This size provides room for consolidation of operations, expansion, and buffering from adjacent land uses. During our siting process, we found no industrial park property available or acceptable to local units for this facility in the central part of Dakota County. In addition, no landowners were willing to consider offers for their undeveloped land that was within the projected 20 -year urban service area. Dakota County made an extraordinary effort to find a site that meets our needs, provides for expansion, is cost - effective for taxpayers, and is consistent and compatible with adjacent land uses; current and planned. We believe that this has been accomplished with this site. A chronological history of the efforts we have made to site this facility is attached. We appreciate the time and assistance your staff members Mike King. Sector ^:epreseniatl, and Krisll;IJ SflliiiCfl. K vef Cof'ridor Planner, (lave proviaeu 1�l reviewing this amendment request. Your support and approval of the Empire Township Plan amendment 1s appreciated. erely, n . Hoyt, irector Physical Development Division cc Dakota County Board of Commissioners Brandt Richardson, County Administrator Empire Township Board Allowip Apadoid o} sn panalaj Aeql •puel uo!jejod.loo Aue aseal jo lies 01 jueM }ou p!p Aaqj jegj suoseaa juawa6euew � su jol 1eq} pajeo!pu! gooy{ - •sa }!s aaglo ;o Ajauen e pue aj!s u016u!wae j s,AjunoO eqj of }ueoefpe AIiadOd `9601100 leo!ugoal leuo!jeoon Ajuno0 ejo� ea aql `ejosauulW }o AI!sJan!u f1 aql `puel je,4nq qoo}{ aqj apnloui o} popuedxe seen ease gojeas eql '�Jed ssauisn8 s!q} ui pa}eool bu!aq Aj!I!oej s!ql 01 an!}daoaa }ou seM junowaso�j 10 40 91-11 - �Jed sseu!sn8 }unowaso�j eqj ui sa }!s pajoldx9 Ajuno0 eql •eaje g0-leas }a6Je1 91-11 se (Ise @) Z5 ABmgb!H � unjl pue (}sane) 6E Aenngb'H P!V aleIS Ajuno0 pue (41-10u) g£ AeMg6!H p!y ajejS Ajuno0 pue (glnos) 85 peo�j A4uno0 uaane49q eaae ue pa!l!juap! ijels `eualuo awl} asuodsaj aqj uo pase8 •sasn (leguap!sai) apledwoo -uou !q papunOjns Mou si Aj!l!oej eql •t, •uoll!puoo good ui pue llews ool s! Aj!I!oej plo jean( 0E juaaino aql •slepajew pue juawdlnba eqj aaols of pue (s)bu!ppq aabiel e jo; papaau si puel ajoUV •Z •uoijeool auo ui uoi}ounj suoijejado Aenng6!q aqj az!IeJjuao 01 angoa}}a pue W9!ol - 40 avow s! 11 • I, aiem uo!s!oap aqj Joj suoseaa aqj •a }!s bulls!xe aqj lies of pue ap Mau a o} Al!l!oej suo!jejado AeMg6!q aql jo suo!}ounj Ile ajeoolai of uo!s!oep aqj apew pjeo8 Ajuno0 91-11 `8661, goaeW A8 •enlen 19�Pew anoge Aljueoglu6!s sl go!gM 9-10e ue 000`OL$ PaIueM ails puooas 01-11 Jo sJeunno 91-11 •Aliedoid aiagj 10 Aue bulseal you bullies u! palsaia }u! IOU aaaM a }!s Isili aqj 10 siaunno al-11 Pue paen0 leuolIeN aql sJaunnopuel Z pue pien0 leuolIeN 91-11 wO4 Aj!I!oej juanno aqj woaj jeans aqj ssOoe Aliedoid 6ulsegoind pajoldxa 9M - Al!wlxoad esolo ui s6u!pl!nq qj!M Aj!l!oej I!Ids e paaap!suoo fquno0 aqI `uopool auo ui suoijejado azileilueo of algea!sep Algbiq si j! el!gM (•pagoejje s! Adoo y) •pasoloua si aadolOnap aqj ua0J Jal4al uo!}aafaJ aqj jo Adoo y •a }!s 6u!}s!xa eqj of jueoefpe Aliadoid Anq of pauj Ajuno0 eqj `aeaA e Ali eau jod •sajoe O£ jo wnw!u!w e papaau Ajuno0 eqj jegj pau!wjalap Apnjs aql •}uawdolanap Ie!juap!saJ 6u!goe0oue woe} j@4nq e se pue suo!}ejado dogs ioj gjoq puel Ieuoi ppe papaau Ajuno0 aqj jeg} jealo aweoaq 11 •sluawaa!nbaj @}!s pue coeds ain}nj pajoafOid Apnis Al!I!q!seal e L661. ul SSIOMM ONIlIS,lllgI:DVJ NOUVid :!OdSNV fi d0 MJOlSIH -Id01J0-10N0�:IH0 *uoisinaJ asn puel ay} jo lenaadde uodn leuo!l!puoo si luaweeibe eql ( si luaweaj6y eql jo Adoo y) - 0002 '£ jagolo0 uo saaunnopuel aql q l!M luawaaj6y asegojnd e panoadde pjeo8 Alunoo eql 'aaoe jad 000'SZ$ uegl ssai jol ales joj seM eaje lelluapsaj -uou e u! 'sa!l!l! �4!o ql!M al!s ON 'lsaM 01 -11 0 1 all!naWq waglJOu u! pue 'Z5 AeMg6!H � urul jo lsea 6ui� ool al!s e aol pagojees u!ebe Aluno:D aql `olldas pue l!aM ql!M 6u!pl!nq jo suo!leo!ldwi agl bu!aap!suoo ja}}y •luewdolanap leuo!l!ppe of ease sigl bu!uado lnoge swaouoo 6uq!s sa!l!iiln Al!3 of loauuoo of Al!unlaoddo eql Alunoo eql pa!uap l!ounoo Al!o aql `lunowaso�l jo Al!o agl u! 6u!leaw luanbasgns e lb' - jaio aql paldaooe ( tialinA) siauMo eql ;o auo Alup 'Zb H`dSO pue anuany uO-1W le auo pue 9t H`dSO pue £ AeMg61H � unjl jo uolloasialui eql le d!gsuMol aj!dw�] u! oMl - saajjo aajgl apew Alunoo ayl sa! l!l!ln Alp Aq panuas lou si d!gsuMol aj!dw3 ui puel aql *d!gsuMol aj!dw3 s! 9t H`dS:D 10 glnos `�jed ssau!sn8 lunowaso�l agl s! 9f7 H`dSo 10 WON '9t7 H`dSO 10 glnos al!s alq!ledwoo e jol alego6au of Alunoo agl jol �4!unlJoddo ue pap!noid 9t H`dS:D Jo uo!lorulsuoo agl pue uolloesialu! (hails 8309 [) 9l? A8mg6!H p!d alelS Alunoo pue £ AeMg6!H � unjl eql to uolleoolaj eql - papuep! seM sa!l!I!ln Alp gl!M puel leuolllppe ON - ea- 11 3 - lunowasod aql u! jallas 6u!li!M e Apluap! of alge aq pinoM aq legl sadoq ui lua6e alelse leap leool e ql!M paloeiluoo Aluno:D aql '6661, I1e1 agl ul • ('pagoelle si jallal eql jo Adoo y) - Ted sseuisnq j!agl u! dogs AeMg6!q e lueM lou op Aeql legl paleo!pu! 'lunowaso�l a�!l 'uol6u!wae, 'Ja}lo s,Alunoo eql pau!loop ajoIaaagl pue A:padoid sl! jo lie sez!l!in legl ueld jalsew a seq aballoO yoalon ayl - asuodsai awes aql pan!aoaJ pue sJe@A oMl lSel agl u! SUOIS aaJgl uo AI!sJan!un aql paloeluoo aneq aM - 6uiseal ao bullies ul palsajalul lou aiaM pue Aliadoid magi jo asn agl COI uo!s!n Jiagl ql!M luals!suoo lou s! dogs AeMg6iq e legl paildaj Al!sJan!uN ayl - puel leinlinou6e jol aaoe pue 000`0£$ palueM (Zt7 AMH pue uOM Jo jauwoo) jauMo siyl - ja}}nq j!agl of lueoefpe BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA October 3, 2000 Motion by Comrnlssloner Krause Resolution No. 00-529 Second by Commissioner Harris Authorlution to Execute Purchase Apraement for Pro or New Highway p �� f 4 Y . 21 peratJorw Faculty WHEREAS, Reaofutlon No, W700, adopted on December �r t959 agreement with the Owners` Of Site 2 for property to be use 1 (he 9, a` tifln e e to negotiate a 1711a) Purchase to Mal approval by the County Board; and County Hlgtnvoy Shop, subject WHEREAS, the owners have secured 00 signature of all parties end are notiv prepared to finalize a agreement: and purchase WHEREAS, the purcfiaeo sgreememt Ls for 51,000,000.00 for 80 8 cr06 on 160th Stts.t in Empfre Township; and WHEREAS, the Phase agreement is contingent on the County rece>vh 9 ePproP�ate 1ot:ai toning approval_ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Dakota County Board of Cortuntssfoners h County Board Chair to exscut D a purchase egrssment with Mildred PL Mul �Y , Ethe the Sweeney and Mary Agnes Hansen for the purmme of fir. Joseph J. MuOery, Elizebefft M. Fe4fty In the amount of 51,000,000.00. au 'ect to pity (Sm 2 - Mullery) for the new tit0hway operations bJ approval by the County Aftomeys OMOS as 10 form. STATE OF MINNEsoTA County of Dakota YES Harru x mane Maher —�� Maher BaUQlta X aatuuz 9choux __X 3chauwelt,r Turner --X— Turner Krauna --�� Knnsso 9ranNng - -?� Dranning t M-Y S. Scheidt, Ckvk b trb Boxed of em County of D&kc . State etp of y O tweoea do hMby os(* V I M" C=pm d the ra.QQLV 8 arda� taWWon Nita ft oripinai mkhuts of the procaedr� of Me 5"910n fwid 3"�G *04� �n6y htJnne$ots, at their Adminletlttlatt Dap Y 2000, now on Me kt V - 4 County CDPY tfh mom- t�td hevfa found the acme to be a eu+i and �^ m nV f " and abklal seal of 02k0ts County thk 5" day of Ct4rk to IN Soard A Attachment 3 Proposed Dakota County Highway Facility Location 40 -Acre Land Use Redesignation, Long -Term Agricultura to P ublic/I n stitutional ,r F r 5 sk i r T 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Feet n N Q 2000 MUSA (as of 1998) University of Minnesota Rosemount Research Station Background photo: 2000 digital ortho quadrangles 11 *i 1X III��i a rw 54 .ti Division of Physical Development Susan L. Hoyt Director Dakota County Western Service Center 14955 Galaxie Avenue Apple Valley. MN 5S 124 -8579 952.891.7000 Fax 952.891.7031 wWwco.dakota.mn.us Mr. Mike King, Sector Representative Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre Building 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 a 7"KtutI'q January 12, 2001 Re: Empire Township Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment r Dakot� Got ty Transportation Facility Dear M Empire ownship has requested a Comprehensive Plan amendment to facilitate the construction of our new County Transportation Facility. The current amendment request will revise 80 acres of agricultural zoning to Public /Institutional. After reviewing the Township's request in the context of the County's plans for the site, the County would prefer that the comprehensive plan be amended to include only the north 40 acres for the public facility site. The revision in the amendment would leave the remaining southerly 40 acres in agriculturally zoning. This alternative is consistent with our current planned use of the property. Dakota County would accept this alternative amendment. By copy of this letter, we are asking Empire Township to modify their request to include only the north 40 acres of the subject property. Your assistance with the Metropolitan Council approval of this Comprehensive Plan Amendment us truly appreciated. nce liely, Susan L. Hoyt, Director Physical Development Division cc: Dakota County Board of Commissioners Brandt Richardson, County Administrator Empire Township Board NM O�YIIM• i•'ft4R1, RESOURCE January 24, 2001 u4cv,�Kve t�s STRATEGIES Mr. Mike King, Sector Representative CORPORATION Metropolitan Council 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 14001 RIDGEDALE DRIVE SUITE 300 MINNETONKA, MN 55305 612/513 -9548 FAX 612/513 -9549 RE: Empire Comprehensive Plan Amendment- Dakota County Facility Dear Mike: The Empire Township Planning Commission and Town Board have reviewed the alternative land use redesignation for the Dakota County Highway Maintenance Facility, per the request by Dakota County. Accordingly, the Township is willing to revise the land use redesignation, from Long Term Agriculture to Public/Institutional, to the north half of the County's 80 -acre property. The amended revision to the Empire Growth Management Plan graphic will be made, subject to final plan review by the Metropolitan Council. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions or require any additional information. Sincerely, 0 D Dean R. Johnson, Empire Township Planner CC: Empire Town Board Susan Hoyt, Physical Development Director Don Theisen, Highway Engineer t'5