HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.m. Bloomfield Fourth Addition Final PlatCITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
City Council Meeting Date: October 16, 2001
AGENDA ITEM: Bloomfield Fourth Addition Final Plat
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent
PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson, City Planner
AGEND' ,�.�
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution, Final Plat reduction,
APPROVED BY:
Location map, PC Minutes (10 -9), Dakota
County Correspondence Draft PUD Agreement
V
Applicant & Property Owner: Centex Homes
Location: Bloomfield north of CSAH 42 & 145 Street, east of Minnesota Northern
Natural Gas pipeline
Number of Lots: 76 Single Family, 19 multiple family (4 each for 76 Carriage Homes), 4
Outlots
Comp. Guide Plan Desig: Urban Residential
Current Zoning: R -1, Low Density Residential
Planning Commission Action: Unanimous Recommendation of Approval
SUMMARY
This final plat represents the next phase of single family lots and the 76 Carriage Homes (quads) in Bloomfield,
east of the pipeline and north of CSAH 42. The plat consists of 76 single family lots and 19 (4 -unit each) lots
which are consistent with the requirements of the Planned Unit Development and the Preliminary Plat. The lots
have been checked for conformance with R -1, Low Density Residential lot dimensional standards. One lot has
been found to be non - conforming with the standards:
Lot & Block Required Dimension Scaled Dimension Deficiency
Lot 5, Block 2 80 ft. lot width 75 ft. 5 ft.
The lot width problem can probably be eliminated with adjustments to other lots along Bayberry Trail. eliminate
the non - conforming issues with minor adjustments of the right -of -way geometry. Adjacent lot 4 appears to have
excess area to absorb the adjustment.
Final plats are the last step in the planning process, prior to home construction. No public hearings are required.
PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION
On September 25, 2001 the Planning Commission reviewed the final plat and identified no concerns.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to adopt a resolution approving the final plat for Bloomfield 4th Addition subject to:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2001-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
FINAL PLAT FOR BLOOMFIELD 4 TH ADDITION
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an
application for final plat approval submitted by Centex Homes for Bloomfield 4' Addition, as
required by ordinance, pertaining to land legally described as:
That part of Outlot B and Outlot C, Bloomfield, according to the recorded plat thereof,
Dakota County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the following described line: Commencing at
the southeast corner of said Outlot B; thence South 89 degrees 31 minutes 28 seconds West
assumed bearing, along the south line of said Outlot B, a distance of 1141.19 feet to the
actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 00 degrees 28 minutes 32
seconds West, a distance of 177.54 feet; thence northwesterly, along a tangential curve,
concave to the southwest, having a radius of 3 10. 00 feet, a central angle of 35 degrees 05
minutes 23 seconds, for an arc length of 189.85 feet; thence North 35 degrees 33 minutes 55
seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 252.60 feet; thence northerly, along a
tangential curve, concave to the east, having a radius of 321.79 feet, a central angle of 42
degrees 20 minutes 59 seconds, for an arc length of 237.85 feet; thence northeasterly, along
a tangential compound curve, concave to the southeast, having a radius of 873.13 feet, a
central angel of 23 degrees 06 minutes 42 seconds, for an arc length of 352.20 feet; thence
North 54 degrees 09 minutes 25 seconds West, not tangent to said curve, a distance of 70.35
feet; thence northeasterly, along a non - tangential curve, concave to the southeast, having a
radius of 943.13 feet, a central angle of 08 degrees 23 minutes 41 seconds, for an arc length
of 138.19 feet, the chord of said curve bears North 34 degrees 32 minutes 12 seconds East;
thence North 51 degrees 15 minutes 58 seconds West, not tangent to said curve, a distance
of 547.58 feet; thence North 23 degrees 09 minutes 53 seconds West, a distance of 552.31
feet to a north line of said Outlot C and said line there terminating. EXCEPTING therefrom,
Bloomfield 3' Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed the final plat
application for Bloomfield 4"' Addition at their regular meeting on September 25, 2001; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend approval of the final
plat to the City Council as required by the Subdivision Ordinance, subject to conditions; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the final plat application as
required by the Subdivision Ordinance on October 16, 2001.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the final plat for Bloomfield 4"' Addition, subject to:
Resolution 2001-
1) Plat revisions as necessary to eliminate the non - conforming lot dimension identified in Lot 5,
Block 2.
2) Execution of a subdivision agreement to secure public infrastructure including streets and
utilities.
3) Execution of the PUD agreement for Bloomfield (Phase 2).
4) Incorporation of recommendations of the Interim City Engineer relative to drainage,
easements, grading, public streets and utilities.
5) Payment of all platting, G.I.S., Park Dedication, applicable City Review and trunk/area fees
as specified in the current fee schedule.
6) Plantings shall be consistent with the preliminary plat landscape plan including revisions in
accordance with the conditional approval of the preliminary plat.
ADOPTED this 16' day of October, 2001, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
Cathy Busho, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda J. Jentink, City Clerk
Motion by: Seconded by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Member absent:
m
4M 4`1 on: RIM-'aY3'�,tig��o e` pia
3 �o ii ¢ g Y gyy o a ap O
' 3 g d3 �` 3 a v PO 5 �3oi a g: 3� ° o Y
Ef Q '
tot : m ao £g tot m
21
oil r x
; Iss a
Y
o z oI 3 n_4=HdBE'3,�gpm F 9
3> o sI ; p$ N 3 ggS'go'gBw�
e � 'a gfl2 1! 4 1,1 o a
i k
i n
O
$1
Sal
t
d
g 3 0
�O
O
i
i
0
ml
1+ E
1 �It
r' 1 I €; Jig ' §•. I
Y T � 1 P � �� \ ; r • � I e
to ° =
q 5
\ ------------ x °a
` h N \ \. �'n \ v. � \\ cs•pz°O .f • ''' oeas•u• � ,— — — 8 _d`
, _ O L3,137W 79 1 I :GAY
J
d
vl \ a \
`y' y � . �,,.; jdd r� zsr° �a'°i'e �' 1 � 1'•° �� �S$S
id
�o �� Za ___ `• °° y 1 Is I 1 :n / � P Nt
m go O
z°zn___ I / g & B
E •°S a 3 � &'i ��: = I° rp -- s.,4cc.so� 1 i F/ ¢_�
1 1 ula d=.
a Y � r � • '' =a1 w ° %�' -_ - 1 •uc9 .G �. � �` 6e}� zY�
�+�' � — 1 uTai -- -A• '�c' :L:__— '_ugr_ — 1 � / "/
ar•
ca
Ilk
Ir _
� „�,, -;, \�f,, - 11 _ ��; ' � aid i � i _ c �
-
'
C � Sic � II la V $ \`; �� •y c,`�', ,?,Y /°` � > ` �' a: �� , I �\ r"`&
S EiB.P 81 I ' \ \\ s ° •x c .,,e'f n�` X �\ O
a ,a
;1, _ I �aa ry �.0rf -tl _ a _ \ $rte \♦ r
• F ' ' �.tLDr° � .v ° Y.s.` \ \s 11 l of pcJ.
a 8 I k sy owe \� \ , '4 8 . � `\ \�� � � \�� ` \ I � �p '•� ys � O
zl b
56 I'0 a.
�I EI I� \\ \ �_.: ys'aa _� r 91 � r ♦p 'Y \ 8pry��p
q'
�--- rsxri - -- JI i _ � \ \- - �' fo yy,yo.rz x i I C i - \`5\ �' � • ■
, r 3 s1a ✓vw
I 1 Iz i _I
W
✓: °' I I I Iz 1 i I I I I I p $ c / /roF4 '\
gl I: i I i I
I L
I I 1 - - - - sv J I e b a�°'.� / /A• \\ �\ �p
_ 1.—____J L:
' � k � 1 k az�_ � — k z � 1 8 �i u 1'� _ _� a?•:n�°a- w_ _ � � $1 P
' to sear , '1At
cs oe - I I �— I I I I 0s � Y � I •� r� ,osFaA I __ _ _____
� B.OFAO i f �a� �a �•1 �— —, f_ I I I I wa I I R oog�., a <o f� I
`� 1 I I , 1 1 j j 1 1 I I ti 1 1 � c� .z iwR ^ � \ ^j I
\ 1 2
4� 1
4 i8 �i i8 °i
8
�' x � I I I j l I I I I I I I I I \`� ♦ 1 1• � € n E
I I I ^ ♦\ 1 m
II I� II II II II m m
P
ro _ ro \ `
R,: -
eea.ar
J
E�k�$
�• 1 s,p ° i p ,
X S I- 10 u
S
g
C i
! G °i
ly ar � is A °`� \ (� I. r.d4e� �i
p
P -l i l 33 if '
oc
Oct rl"
S li ^ �e -t;> ,_`� l ,! /4 ♦ ..' � �i 's Sri Q $>'i
Lam— � ji°C.fl N 90 i 5 • s.° \• .S Ye.N°(� (v — — '!
,L - sssa__--_ - -� m 1 : 4 V ,! N NQB°fe"1?2• 6
- - -_ --. rlK•/ON- am xi»
or
L J ` - }� / _ISIS
° L _
Y .d
I y C n- x•%x.rox 11 ` 4 / B �� l•` r
- a s •s e e• c J E I 4� Y I of � � / ��1 \ q Y�
I- •___- __`tine,_-- - -__-7 r v CIS C° Ik 1 \ p� + , C v `� �i \ \ \$ � 1 �
of I. 1 l �j a \° D/ -- t •,
.I DI Ig - L_ x w 1 � /� -(o .$, / ` \~3�� a /tia v\ \5, dP ro_ i -
- 41w 1 r- - -ri>Ty -_- r_� - - Sja° � !ice /i � A' \ \� �.
�! j '_- �-�_'- -- al :Io z 1 �,�i �2 al.J :`� yr • � \\ ,z°+o-DJB d.
.I >w >:� -_ -.__ `I - �I.X o f 1 e1 $x'. /IS'• b `� °°/- "`.`,f+vy ° �\: ° oisa� '�
j ��'-- ;�'- ° ' ='°• Iti I `•:3. �ae� -� , n + " - -- -- '-J .fn' .r, x b8 J'
1 - -_ I x yl °3'6• l , 1 rzne, - ---� '�_ W �18 kl �qe 8°( F fn la
�- I `� l,•�`= J,i°•e I L_ Hw_. jr , sv.eo -- - R� I a I : D D
f �•s,oz. , I wl '•'°m - ��' 1 !-- c al Id 81 l n° _ -Ids S
, .n.es - -
d
la °I a ` - "?.wa• iv r, - -_ ?x •z_ tP� s+ =In =�
�• �lro duly 8i -- ; °, I 1 I� I +aaa�o. - - -� 1 !. ft ~ E EI %m
0
- _ Y k iu ee _- ✓O 1 8 1 VI l
- �oi•ee� q� § .m �_: w_.ox � i� essn
5
o
oe
• �\ di
Lhe A 4')
si•� rpK
'k
- - etn•so x e'
J
ii rb i ♦ ti$/ //sy. i 3
ij .j •b♦ //3 /
CJ
WESTWOOD
r= ,
nafrrrmtt s..s+aa its \ \ � tr � eJA]s w
sweet . a . moor. I
BL OOMFIEL D 4TH
ADDITION
\ ��' ,p
RELIMl N
\ N 1 3'x•
_
r � e' / • '� i 8 ,�p 1 F!, -
_•r..
♦ ♦�
/ ry;��_ I f '�- N11� i
60 0 60 I20 Ie0
i '
!
rl l % g \° '6ID
Scale h foot
9 .'gyp° ''1 eororx
-
fi r- -- ��� °ar• l / �f i i -� `J l / k�y ° 'ej
OUILOT B - - -- 1 r - 1 •/ ' ° S
73
- i
0 Denotm 111 hch by It kt Yon mmummf
oof m0 -wk" by [k°n» Na IM43
J / _
1 1`, b _
b t
• by f e I/j mmumrn
by II inM km t
I 4 0 moha0 DY Lk:nm No. IO262
I r
'�
lr s n^ ` I^ �__ "- `"- '.DU•e J ° 3 °
}�t ml er-
tw
l 1;
L �.
No mmumwit
�`
- - S I
' �^
lmbd anon of anY afotuN nWFW
/°rotbn InOkotoo o plof monument that •N be ref,
. Z
& I ii -- _�
L
_ 7• wlrn le YI i O
v' $
Id
day o /%qurf200 ?. pace m w ba/on M. JOth
\ �n
`I
V
� 1
it ,
o
\ �- e. fn
��o
yi • I 5 !u
• yM1
H D _I� 1 1 nir�te• •
Ig L / I/ / •W _ J• �.
�F "_J'��
g
\ �j
M1y i �I
M '1
H . = -'\\ u e�` /
vl x t J L ,C
A £ t° rw• W - -� $
. 'b•b � w � an �
1
fo bow S 89 °J71B'rly' N BGOAVFIELD, b oraume0
L D \( o
C)
5 -
• �
\
d n \ --�-•_ _' � p -�
\ 1
Dr itegr aM Uf fiy E rnfr Dm o,_ thuar
\ '- --
"v
\°`., , 9tt _JE. oa - °4m z
I
I
J)
\ p
'1
\ \
\.) s \\ 3 ��, \ ♦ °y° b l
L.
Data s r a . mlrrr ar i dka
\ e ., d b I /
d adN^/+q of 7hri f 1 . r aM
foot A
"W-f—, lima or oh.- X
fns Mot
ii rb i ♦ ti$/ //sy. i 3
ij .j •b♦ //3 /
CJ
WESTWOOD
r= ,
nafrrrmtt s..s+aa its \ \ � tr � eJA]s w
sweet . a . moor. I
Concept Master Plan
Date: 3/23/01
SITE DATA
TOTAL SITE AREA:
226.47 + /- Ac.
Previously Platted Area:
53.20 + /- Ac.
(Includes Park)
Proposed P.U.D. Area:
173.27 + /- Ac.
TOTAL UNITS:
533
Previously Platted:
177
S.F.
27
Twin Homes
30
6 Unit T.H.
120
Proposed P.U.D:
355
S.F.
280
Carriage Homes
76
TOTAL GROSS DENSITY:
2.35 + /- Un. /Ac.
Proposed P.U.D:
2.05 + /- Un. /Ac.
PARK AREA:
Proposed P.U.D:
5.01 - / -Ac.
1
dN
No Scale
CENTEX
HOMES
16,7L00MF1EL-D
)f;7 FouRT4 ADO 1Ti oN
T -C
CSAH 42
FCak L DC T/ . R e fr e f �Er� C. Cant`
BLOOMFIELD
Rosemount, MN
! ! I
�Yj M ile
4. aKga"
priv
Survey and Land Information
September 11, 2001
Gary H. Stevenson, P.L.S.
County Surveyor
City of Rosemount
Land Information Director
2875 145 Street West
Dakota County
Rosemount MN 55063
Western Service Center
14955 Galaxie Avenue
Attention: John Parsons, Community Development
Apple Valley, MN 55124 -8579
Re: BLOOMFIELD 4TH ADDITION
952.891.7087
The Dakota County Plat Commission met on September 10, 2001, to consider the
fax 952.891.7097
final plat of BLOOMFIELD 4TH ADDITION. Said plat is adjacent to CSAH 42, and
www.co.dakota.mn.us
is therefore, subject to the Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance.
The plat meets the County's Right of Way and Access Spacing Guidelines for a four -
lane divided highway. Restricted access must be dedicated on the plat along CSAH
42.
The Plat Commission will recommend approval to the Board of Commissioners when
the plat is submitted in its final form.
No work shall commence in the County right of way until a permit is obtained from
the County Highway Department and no permit will be issued until the plat has been
filed with the County Recorder's Office. The Plat Commission does not review or
approve actual engineering design of proposed accesses or other improvements to be
made in the right of way. The Plat Commission highly recommends early contact
with the Highway Department to discuss design features of any construction in public
right of way. The County Highway Department permit process reviews the design
and may require construction of highway improvements, including, but not limited
to, turn lanes, drainage features, limitations on intersecting street widths, allowance
and size of medians, etc.
Traffic volumes on CSAH 42 are 14,000 and are anticipated to be 24,000 ADT by the
year 2020. These traffic volumes indicate that current Minnesota noise standards for
residential units could be exceeded for the proposed plat. Residential developments
along County highways commonly result in noise complaints. In order for noise levels
from the highway to meet acceptable levels for adjacent residential units, substantial
building setbacks, buffer areas, and other noise mitigation elements should be
incorporated into this development.
Sincer y,
ary H. Levenson
Secretary, Plat Commission
c: Westwood Professional Services
0
Printed an recycled paper
with 30% pos m—nner waste.
M EQUAL OPPORTIRJ TY P9toTFA
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting Minutes
September 25, 2001
Page 3
New Business: Bloomfield Fourth Addition Final Plat
Mr. Pearson presented the application by Centex Homes for the final plat of Bloomfield
Fourth Addition. This plat includes 76 single family homes and 76 carriage homes. The
westerly outlot includes five acres for park. The easterly outlot includes mitigated
wetlands. The developer will correct one lot width deficiency and eliminate the need for
a variance. The developer will have to conform to the revised landscaping plan requiring
enhanced landscaping along CSAH 42.
MOTION by Weisensel to recommend that the City Council approve the final plat for
Bloomfield 4th Addition subject to: 1) Plat revisions as necessary to eliminate the non-
conforming lot dimension identified in Lot 5, Block 2; 2) Execution of a subdivision
agreement to secure public infrastructure including streets and utilities; 3) Execution of
the PUD agreement for Bloomfield (Phase 2); 4) Incorporation of recommendations of
the Interim City Engineer relative to drainage, easements, grading, public streets and
utilities; 5) Payment of all platting, G.I.S., Park Dedication, applicable City Review and
trunk/area fees as specified in the current fee schedule; and 6) Plantings shall be
consistent with the preliminary plat landscape plan including revisions in accordance
with the conditional approval of the preliminary plat. Seconded by Napper. Ayes: Carr,
Weisensel, Arveson, Napper, and Caspar. Nays: 0. Motion carried.
Dir or's Report:
Chairpe on Caspar announced he would b signing from the Planning Commission,
following t October 9 meeting. He accepted a position with Chaska High School.
Councilmember K en req ed that Commissioner Weisensel take the Chair position
following Chair Caspa signation until such time as the City Council appoints a
permanent Chair.
There bein o further business to ome before this Commission, upon MOTION by
Caspar ,, Wd upon unanimous decision,N41Ze meeting was adjourned at 8:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Dianne G. Quinnell
Recording Secretary
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BLOOMFIELD ADDITION
THIS AGREEMENT dated this day of , 2001, by and
between the CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, a Minnesota municipal corporation, ( "City "),
and CENTEX HOMES, 12400 Whitewater Drive, Suite 120, Minnetonka, MN 55343,
(the "Developer ").
WHEREAS, the Developer is the owner of the real property legally described as Outlot
B and Outlot C, Bloomfield, except those parts platted as Bloomfield 3` Addition,
Dakota County, Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property"; and,
WHEREAS, in connection with the development of the Subject Property, the Developer
has applied to the City for approval of a Residential Planned Unit Development
(hereinafter referred to as "the PUD ") for the Subject Property pursuant to the ordinances
of the City; and,
WHEREAS, the City has approved the PUD on the basis of a determination by the City
Council that such PUD is acceptable only by reason of details of the Developer's
development proposal as described herein and the unique characteristics of the
combination of land uses proposed for the subject property; and but for such details of the
development proposal and unique land use combinations proposed for the property, the
PUD would not have been approved; and,
WHEREAS, as a condition of approval of such PUD, the City has required the execution
and filing of this document by the Developer; and,
WHEREAS, to secure the benefits and advantages of such approval, the Developer
desires to subject the Subject Property to the terms hereof;
NOW THEREFORE, the Developer declares that the real property described above is,
and shall be, held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the covenants,
conditions and restrictions set forth herein and agrees as follows
I. Residential Planned Unit Development All development of the Subject
Property shall comply with the development plan prepared by Westwood Professional
Services and approved by the City and with conditions specified below. Where a
specific condition is not addressed herein, the conditions of Resolution 2001 -63 adopted
by the City Council on June 18, 2001 shall apply. Otherwise, the regulations of the City
Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance B "Zoning Regulations ") shall apply. The term
"Development Plan" used herein shall refer to the approved building elevations, together
with the Preliminary Plat/Existing Conditions, Grading and Erosion Control Plan, Utility
Plan, and Planting Plan, certified on May 18, 2001, submitted by the Developer and
prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., approved by the City Council on June
18, 2001.
The Development Plan consists of the following documents, original copies of which are
on file with the City of Rosemount Community Development Department, and of which
photo reduced copies are attached as Exhibits 1 -5:
Paize # Title Dated
1 of 5 Preliminary Plat/Existing Conditions by Westwood 4/18/01
2 of 5 Preliminary Grading & Erosion Control by Westwood. 5/08/01
3 of 5 Preliminary Utility Plan by Westwood 5/08/01
4 of 5 Preliminary Planting Plan 4/18/01
5 of 5 Exterior Elevations
II. Conditions of Planned Unit Development Approval The development and
use of the Subject Property shall be consistent with the following requirements:
A. Conformance with requirements for final plat for each phase and execution of a
subdivision agreement for each final plat.
B. Plan revisions as necessary to eliminate the 10 lot dimension variances and
allow Lots 13 and 20, Block 3 variances.
C. Plan revisions as necessary to incorporate recommendations by the Interim City
Engineer specified in his correspondence, dated May 31, 2001 and attached as
Exhibit 6, relative to easements, grading, plat issues, sanitary & storm sewer,
watermain and ponds, street design, rights -of -way and utilities.
D. Approval of the Dakota County Plat Commission in accordance with the
contiguous plat ordinance.
E. Approvals as needed from applicable agencies and pipeline companies for
public and private use of easement areas.
F. Park dedication in a form as recommended by the Parks and Recreation
Committee.
G. Sidewalks and trails installed by the Developer as identified by Staff.
H. Enhancement of landscaping along CSAH 42 within areas not screened by 6ft.
high (along rear yards) berms.
I. Lot lines extended into ponding areas, requiring maintenance by the individual
property owners or homeowners' association, subject to an easement in favor of
the city.
Page 2
J. Additional sidewalk installed on Street L between Block 8 and Block 9.
K. Additional sidewalks along both sides of Street C and the north side of Street B
in Blocks 12 and 13, the carriage home area and a sidewalk located along the
west side of street "D" between Blocks 7 and 8.
L. Concrete curb and gutter is required along the perimeter of all paved surfaces for
shared driveways and common parking areas as specified in Ordinance B, the
zoning ordinance.
III. Administrative Provisions
A. The PUD Development Plan represents the shared expectations between
the City and the Developer regarding the ultimate scope of the Evermoor
development on the Subject Property. The City hereby agrees to approve
final plats with each phase of the development that are substantially
consistent with the approved planned unit development. Amendments to
the PUD shall be processed in accordance with Section 12.6 of the zoning
Ordinance. The City Council will have the discretion to determine if a
major amendment process with public hearings is warranted. Any
amendments to this agreement shall be in writing and executed by both
parties:
B. Each phase of the development will require final plat approval. At the
time of final plat, a development or subdivision agreement will be required
to be executed between the City and the Developer in order to secure
public improvements and park dedication. Minor amendments to the PUD
may be included. As a condition of approval for any subdivision or re-
subdivision of the Subject Property, the City may require the execution
and filing of such covenants or agreements as the City Council of the City
deems necessary or expedient to assure the performance of the
Developer's obligations under this or any other related agreement with the
City including, but not limited to, the planting and maintenance of
landscaping, preservation of wetlands, maintenance of trails or sidewalks,
maintenance of private streets, restrictions on accessory structures and
outside parking or storage, maintenance of outlots and common areas.
C. The Developer represents to the City that to the best of its knowledge, the
PUD development complies with all City, county, metropolitan, state and
federal laws and regulations, zoning ordinances, and environmental
regulations. If the City determines that the PUD development does not
comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or
development work in the PUD development until the Developer does
comply.
Page 3
D. Breach of the terms of this agreement by the Developer, or any successor
or interest, shall be grounds for denial of building permits.
E. If any portion, section, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase of this
agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement.
F. This agreement may be enforced by the City acting through its City
Council. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or
amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding,
amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by both parties and
approved by the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal
action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release.
G. If building permits are issued prior to the completion and acceptance of
public improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs
resulting from delays in completion of public improvements and damage
to public improvements cause by the City, Developer, its contracts,
subcontractors, materialmen, employees, agents, or third parties.
H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City or the
Developer, respectively, as the case may be, is cumulative and in addition
to every other right, power, or remedy, express or implied, now or
hereafter arising, available to the City or the Developer, at law, or in
equity, or under any other Agreement, and each and every right, power,
and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised
from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient
by the City or the Developer and shall not be a waiver of the right to
exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy.
I. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the written
permission of the City Council except that the Developer may assign this
Agreement and the obligations under it to any subsequent owner or
successor of any part of the Subject Property. This Agreement will run
with the land and bind the successors, heirs and assigns of Developer.
J. Required notices to the Developer shall be made in writing, and shall be
either hand - delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed
to the Developer by registered mail at the following address:
Centex Homes
12400 Whitewater Drive, Suite 120
Minnetonka, MN 55343
Page 4
Notices to the City shall be in writing and either hand delivered to the City
Administrator or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City
Administrator at the following address:
City Administrator
Rosemount City Hall
2875 145` Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
K. Descriptions of streets, trails, sidewalks, public parks and other public
facilities, improvements and infrastructures and of the use thereof are intended to guide,
limit and restrict the Developer in the development of the Subject Property. The terms
hereof do not restrict the future exercise by the City of its governmental powers with
respect to such facilities, improvements and infrastructure.
L. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the day and year
first above written.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
By:
Cathy Busho, Mayor
By:
Linda Jentink, City Clerk
CENTEX HOMES, Developer
By:
Its:
Page 5
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
SS
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this day of , 2001, by Cathy Busho, Mayor, and Linda Jentink, City
Clerk, of the City of Rosemount, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the
corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
SS
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this day of , 2001, by the
of Centex Homes, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
Drafted by:
City of Rosemount
2875145` Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Page 6
Development Data Proposed Legal
Description
Typi-I L
Lmtion Map
r�. \� I ' may / \..♦ � -� / �� / \\ � - r/ � I �L J � .. J•
J.
wpF�T E
- N
v
// �.i 1 I/ \\ // / I $:_ �s.0 d ., L_ r j / /l -•�.S /« / � �' ',° -�I3 r .^' r'��
��� \� � ' I � � t
L
32
4 t-
3
n I I � , .. ';./ „ V `� `. J 1 `� .� t( sex I n •� m'� `
/��•` .•' J i, �/ ("\ C� t--1 r� �Ir ` t r >' J " T _ " - Ir r �' zs I � �\ � "` �\— ��'-S��I '_ .
J
r lir
s ir 1 S�s.J i. °:�• ���i/ - -�'r �r Ir I � � \ :: i \- t .... � X ..
A
L
- -- - -- - -- - --
- - -- - -- - -- - - -- - -- - -- - --
I ---------- - --- --- - L - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Bloomfield
loo ield
Centex Hoes Add ition ftaw put/
RAI" CandJdam
m
,rt
a
E r
f F:14
tip
is
,1
Ili
IIII
III
t Ii�
as
f
px
'•Qa
^SS '
.F'
y19 A �(1
-
Ell \.
7M
�'_.— K.l —� ` / `�' �/ ' \ �/'� O ` o af' - \ � \ p �C •1 ` �
C fa' -i I I II i - ---- - -• - -- - '' / \ � , O 1 f _I rnl \ . w 'a �`/ / - aj
,
,
Z 1181HX3
�[' I `fi •� I L 1 \� - \3 \\ sY E Aix KB at ° x' 7 5 fix
I I 1 � • - )' I 1 fi \ i 1 % d�� � �fG : AQ �� s�t�i�F � r '�
n
�4
+ *lip ' " - • \•�_`� \„ ` v A� J �l - r � �a f /° [ f s '
3 V a
f keE
X
F I i - x° � tT: \'At tx° .l \ 1 .�� ,w \ 4 .
x •a I s �iC. 7 `. - a__ f7 r r f? r - :_g
ca
er
I Y
°
x I �\ \�nc x °3�� - e ice.• {� � ' � \\ a \ `31 _ eeT ° � \
_ ° :xK .s ,i ' ..� - � X �L: �• =i x ` = . \ "\ � y \- Y _ � '
•� � x ;x/ --Tr\ •..° � /n 7, R� �.- 11 1 /'�!' 31 � . LTY \`\ f sTf f j , \.�
7 ,
CIIOIHX3
`I �.t,� I ,� -. ' \ , � . -`\ . \C // i ' , 'I r ( t ±�� € ( ij !� �€ €3 r tlt� }; fir! ,EIEii
i
1 1 h I I!
i j
I I -r`•' + 1 -'� " v E. txl l � i r € E 1 xi ,
r i %f �r� I `l' j L I � � � �� I_! � I l � .1 J '� ' � f' � I � I �� ' it y
j i� ( i
,•ti j I � ,.,, _ '''+ Ill � � �-.,,, I l�� '! / � '' �� Q 3
T'
, 7
tj
00
.71/11,11
if Il
l ' I � '' + 4 If ', 111 r � .., . i,.,... {, -1 \ � ., E ( � , !i E • I �'' ,x
� �_� l ') �� i��l�l;' 1 fil f L Irl�.� 'd tt dr \� i . ''j. \,�:,�/ i - �' Ii 111L1,!.'l
n, ( I I' � �� t • r r �" , c rl l 1 1 1, �E 1, ! i
J I i I !h r s �\ � �!� �I�� � � ��JL E
I 1u } y t It � i l �,1 Ill y � ; / \\ \--- = ;` "\ . ��" p •�/�
O. '-w x.
O.W
V 1191HX3
The Carri Collection
This product line is designed to empha_iz: a neighborhood setting through architectural
enhancements on all sides of the home s: -: ;; tre. Configured as "back to back" town homes
the Carriage Homes present "front eleva:ia " looks on all four sides of the building.
The exterior character of these designs i+ ar::ieved by using front porches /covered entries with
architectural columns, and distinctive ex or detailing (appropriate use of brick accents,
gable treatments, window grilles, window crossheads, shutters, etc).
The interior character of these designs is informal, open and Value- driven, focusing on the
lifestyle needs of our selected customers. Nan elements include 2 -3 bedrooms, I %, - 2'%
baths, living room open to kitchen and dining areas, kitchens with snack bars, loft areas,
convenient laundry areas, and optional architectural fireplace'media niches.
Floor Plans Sizes: 1455 -1532 SF
Price Range: $130K -$139K
Key Customers Demographics
Dominant age Group: 25 -34
Household Size: 1 -2
Household Income: Avg. $48K
Group: Young Midscale Suburban
Singles & Couples
ELEVATION STYLE: Eclectic
ROOF STRUCTURE:
Front to Back Roof: 5:12 pitch with P -0" overhang & 6" rake
Side to Side Roof: 8:12 pitch with 1 -0" overhang & 6 rake
ENTRY /PORCH:
Covered entry porch
Porch Columns: 8" Architectural column wrapped with fiber cement siding
EXTERIOR MATERIALS:
Siding: Wolverine Restoration Collection premium, Double 4" Clapboard,
low -gloss wood grain finish, vinyl. The Restoration Collection is approved
by many preservation commissions.
Masonry Veneer. Main level wainscot at front and side elevations
WINDOWS:
Type: Single hung vinyl
Window Grilles: Colonial grille pattern all windows
EXTERIOR TRIM:
Corner Boards: Wide 3 %" outside comer post, vinyl
Window Trim: Wide 3 %" vinyl window and door surrounds reflect
architectural tradition; Crown molding per front & side elevations, found on
many historic homes
Fascia: Wide 4" aluminum clad
Shutters: Paneled Shutters, vinyl
Specialty Trim: Decorative louvered vents in gables, vinyl per elevation .
C E NTEX
HOMES
r
M
x
x
KEY EXTERIOR ELEMENTS
BLOOMFIELD
Rosemount, MN
EXHIBIT 6
CITY OF ROSEMOU NT
rverytning's Coming Up Rosemount!!
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Bret A. Weiss, P. E.
Interim City Engineer
Re. Bloomfield Preliminary Plat Comments
WSB Project No. 1005 -391
CITY HALL
2875 — 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN
55068.4997
Phone: 651. 423.4411
Hearing Impaired 65.1.423 -6219
Fax: 651.423 -5203
Memorandum
Date. May 31, 2001
We have reviewed the preliminary plat submittal dated May 8, 2001, which is a
completely revised submittal from the original application. We have attempted to
address the major issues with this memo and reserve the right to make additional
comments as necessary. Our comments are as follows'
Plat Issues
1. The town home lots located north of Bloomfield Path should be platted as
individual lots, not combined as shown.
2. Street D should be shown on the plans as Auburn Avenue.
3. The right -of -ways for Bloomfield Path and Auburn Ave should be increased
to accommodate a 42' wide street and the proposed pathway /sidewalk
sections, including 8 -foot boulevards.
4. The street for Block 13 should be revised to match up with Street B.
5. This plat includes numerous 90° corners, which cannot accommodate the
typical 30 mph curves. The City has allowed these in the past, but would
prefer to maximize the radii on these types of curves.
6. Street L has less than a 90° corner, which should be revised to a minimum 90
curve.
7. The City is in the process of evaluating the overpass location and the location
as shown is subject to modification.
C. iwindowsiTEW1oS3101- hm -ccdoc
8. All drainage swales must be contained within easements.
9. The eyebrow cul -de -sac in Block 7 should be eliminated.
10. The street widths throughout the plat are shown narrower than the current City
standards: The City standards are 32 feet face -to -face for most streets, 28 feet
face -to -face for private streets and larger for collector streets. Bloomfield
Path and Auburn Ave should be a minimum 42' face -to -face width, as they
will serve a collector function. If Bloomfield Path, adjacent to the park is
anticipated to include on street parking, the width should be expanded to a
minimum 44' width.
11. An expanded easement will be necessary along portions of the MCES sanitary
sewer line where the pipe is outside the street.
12. Streets F and L could serve as future minor collectors, depending on how the
plats to the east are developed and should be held to the minimum City
standard 32' face -to -face width.
Grading plan
1. The grading plan should include lot pad elevations and lot types..
2. The pond in the southeast corner of the site should be self - contained within
the site so that it does not spill onto the adjoining site.
3. The erosion control measures and plan should be put on a separate page. The
erosion control plan as shown does not currently address the City
requirements.
4. The grading plan does not show the proposed sidewalk and pathway locations.
5. The park area should be graded as required by the Parks Department.
6. Provide an earthwork analysis for the proposed grading plan to verify the site
balance: All streets shall include only sand sub grade and pathway /sidewalks
should include a 1' sand sub base.
7. The large stockpile located north of Bloomfield Path in the Park area should
be removed and graded to the Parks Department satisfaction.
8. The proposed berms at the intersection of Auburn Ave and CSAH 42 should
be evaluated for site distance issues.
9. The berm along CSAH 42 is lowered from the original grading plan.
C. IwindowjIM p1O53101 hw_ doc
Sanitary Sewer and Watermain•
1. The plan identifies the installation of a sanitary sewer lift station. We would
prefer to utilitize gravity systems if possible. It appears that this can be
accomplished by revising the housing styles. Additional justification will be
required to justify the proposed lift station.
2. A portion of Block 11 can be connected to the gravity sewer, but is proposed
to connect to the proposed lift station.. This should be revised.
3. A 16" watermain needs to extend along Bloomfield Path to the east edge of
the plat and a 16" watermain will be extended along Auburn Ave from CSAH
42 to the north plat boundary.
4. There are many locations where the watermain dead ends should be looped to
another watermain and be adjusted accordingly.
Storm sewer /ponds
1. The proposed storm sewer system is not sized on the plan and does not
include invert elevations. The storm sewer design and calculations should be
provided for review and elevations on sizes shown on the plan.
2. The future publicly designed storm sewer system will not include catch basin
MHs or allow cutting across property lines.
3. Several of the proposed ponding areas do not include the required
maintenance bench.
4. The City has made it a practice to avoid rear yard catch basins. This plan has
utilized a substantial number of these rear yard catch basins, which should be
reevaluated for need. We would prefer to utilize 2% positive drainage swales.
Any catch basin that is deemed necessary to remain will need to be analyzed
to verify easement requirements.
5. Show the existing storm sewer that discharges into the site from the north.
6. Some adjustments to the pond elevation will be required, however the storage
does appear to be in place. Both ponds are very deep and may be in conflict
with future City standards with regard to infiltration and oversizing.
Please call me at (763) 287 -7190 if you have any questions or comments.
C:!windo— ;TEWP;053101 -hm-cc doc
w ,
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
CITY HALL
2875 — 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN
55068 -4997
Phone: 651 - 423 -4411
Hearing Impaired 651 - 423 -6219
Fax: 651 - 423 -5203
Everything's Coming Up Rosemount!!
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILED AND POSTED HEARING NOTICE
FOR
NOTICE OF HEARING ON ASSESSMENTS
ROSEMOUNT BUSINESS PARK, PHASE 2 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT #308
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )ss.
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT )
Linda Jentink, being first duly sworn, deposes and says:
I am a United States Citizen and the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of
Rosemount, Minnesota.
On September 20, 2001, acting on behalf of the said City, I posted at the City Hall,
2875 145th Street West, and on September 21, 2001 deposited in the United States
Post Office of Rosemount, Minnesota, copies of the attached notice of public hearing
regarding the proposed Rosemount Business Park, Phase 2 Street and Utility
Improvements and appurtenant work for City Project #308, enclosed in sealed
envelopes, with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to the persons listed on the
attached listings at the addresses listed with their names.
There is delivery service by United States Mail between the place of mailing and the
places so addressed.
Linda JentirV, 6ity Clerk
City of Rosemount
Dakota County, Minnesota
Subscribed and sworn to before me this �-� 5" day of September, 2001.
CINDY DORNIDEN
. MININESO
My Commission uU.
11
r
0
Notary Public
ROSEMOUNT
Everything's Coming Up Rosemount!!
CITY WALL
2875 — 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN
55068 -4997
Phone: 651 - 423 -4411
Hearing Impaired 651 - 423 -6219
Fax: 651- 423 -5203
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF HEARING ON ASSESSMENTS
FOR ROSEMOUNT BUSINESS PARK, PHASE 2
STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NO. 308
TO:
TIME AND PLACE
GENERAL NATURE OF
IMPROVEMENTS:
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the
City of Rosemount, Minnesota, will meet in the
Banquet Hall in the Rosemount Community Center,
13885 South Robert Trail, Rosemount, Minnesota, on
the 16 day of October, 2001 at 7:30 p.m., or as soon
thereafter as possible, to consider objections to the
proposed assessments for sanitary sewer, watermain,
storm drain facilities, streets, sidewalks, sewer and
water services and appurtenant work for the
Rosemount Business Park, Phase 2 Street and Utility
Improvements, City Project #308, heretofore ordered
by the City Council.
ASSESSMENT ROLL The proposed assessment roll is on file with the City
OPEN TO INSPECTION: Clerk and open to public inspection.
AREA PROPOSED The area proposed to be assessed consists of every
TO BE ASSESSED: lot, piece or parcel of land benefited by said
improvements, which has been ordered made and is as
follows: all that area generally described as Outlots A
& B; Lot 1, Block 1; Lots 1 -5, Block 2 Rosemount
Business Park Second Addition; and, 34- 03210 -010-
15 and 34- 03310 - 010 -01 in Rosemount, Minnesota, as
on file and of record in the office of the County
Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota.
TOTAL AMOUNT The total amount proposed to be assessed
OF PROPOSED: is $1,627,763.
WRITTEN OR ORAL Written or oral objections will be considered at the
OBJECTIONS: hearing.
RIGHT OF APPEAL: An owner of property to be assessed may appeal the
assessment to the district court of Dakota County
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.081 by
serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of
the City within 30 days after the adoption of the
assessment and filing such notice with the district
court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or
Clerk.
LIMITATION ON No appeal may be taken as to the amount of any
APPEAL: assessment adopted by the City Council unless a written
objection signed by the affected property owner is filed
with the Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or
presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. All
objections to the assessments not received at the
assessment hearing in the manner prescribed by
Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061 are waived,
unless the failure to object at the assessment hearing
is.due`to a reasonable cause.
DEFERMENT OF Under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
ASSESSMENTS: Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the City may, at its
discretion, defer the payment of assessments for any
homestead property owned by a person 65 years of
age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make
the payments. However, the City has elected not to
establish any deferment procedure pursuant to those
Sections.
SPECIFIC AMOUNT TO The amount to be specifically assessed against your
BE ASSESSED: particular lot, piece of parcel of land is shown on Exhibit
A.
PREPAYMENT: You may prepay the entire assessment to the Treasurer
of the City until the assessment roll is certified to the
County Auditor; after certification to the County
Auditor, prepayments of the entire amount remaining
due may be made to the County Auditor at any time.
NO PARTIAL: The City Council has not authorized the partial
prepayment of assessments prior to certification of the
K
PREPAYMENT WITHOUT
INTEREST, OR WITH
INTEREST TO END OF
YEAR:
INTEREST RATE:
assessment: or the first installment thereof to the
County Auditor.
No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment
is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the
assessment roll. If the property owner pays the entire
amount at any time after 30 days, but before any
certification to the County Auditor, he or she needs to
pay only the amount of interest accrued as of the date
of payment. At any time after the certification, the
property owner may still pay the entire amount
remaining unpaid to the County Treasurer. In this
case, however, prior to November 15 of any year the
property owner must pay all interest which would have
accrued to December 31 of the year in which the
person makes the payment.
If the assessment is not prepaid within 30 days from the
adoption of the assessment roll, interest will accrue on
the assessment at the rate of 6.8642 %. Interest
accrues from the date to be specified in the resolution
levying the assessment, but not earlier than the date of
such resolution. Assessments shall be payable in equal
annual installments extending over a period of up to 10
years, the first of the installments to be payable with
general taxes for the year 2001, collectible with such
taxes during the year 2002.
Dated this 18 day of September, 2001.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
Maziffim"MW41110jal
Linda Jentink V "
City Clerk
City of Rosemount
Dakota County, MN
Auxiliary aids and services are available - Please contact City Clerk at (612)322 -2003, or TDD No.
(612)423 -6219, no later than October 10, 2001 to make a request. Examples of auxiliary aids or
services may include: sign language interpreter, assistive listening kit, accessible meeting location,
etc.
3
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
ASSESSMENT ROLL /MAILING LIST
PROJECT NAME ROSEMOUNT BUSINESS PARK, PHASE 2 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 308
ASSESSMENT HEARING DATE OCTOBER 16, 2001
ASSESSMENT DUE BEFORE NOVEMBER 15, 2001
ASSESSMENT TERM (YEAR) Ten (10)
EXHIBIT "Al
PARCEL NO
LAST NAME
FIRST NAME
MAILING
ADDRESS
CITY
STATE ZIP
TOTAL
ASSESSMENTS
CC
PLAT NO
LOT
BLOCK
34
64552
010
00
Authority
Rosemount Port
2875 145 St W
Rosemount
MN
55068
$61,494
34
64552
020
00
Authority
Rosemount Port
2875 145 St W
Rosemount
MN
55068
$207,389
34
64552
010
01
Webb Companies
Webb Property
LLC
12700 Zenith Ave S
Burnsville
MN
55337
$60,288
34
64552
010
02
Geometrix Co
Brekken
Enterprises LLP
15124 Business Pkwy
Rosemount
MN
55068
$40,996
34
64552
020
02
Components, Inc.
Precision
915 Blue Gentian Rd
Suite 1
Eagan
MN
55121
$177,245
34
64552
030
02
Ptnrshp
Gruett - Labriola
9601 Humboldt Ave S
Bloomington
MN
55431
1 $172,422
34
64552
040
02
Properties
Kayser
4847 Shevlin Ct
Eagan
MN
55122
$56,670
34
64552
050
02
Authority
Rosemount Port
2875 145 St W
Rosemount
MN
55068
$231,504
34
34
03210
03310
010
010
15
01
Wachter
Regents of
Donald & Carol
U of M
15247 Biscayne Ave
335 Morrill Hall
100 Church St SE
Rosemount
Minneapolis
MN
MN
55068
55455
$282,145
$337,610