HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.a. SKB Interim Use Permit ModificationCITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
City Council Meeting Date: November 6, 2001
AGENDA ITEM: SKB Interim Use Permit Modification
AGENDA SECTION:
New Business
PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson City Planner
AGENDA
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution, Draft PC minutes (10- 23 -01),
APPROVED BY:
Correspondence, WM District zoning excerpt,
SKB Environmental Booklets.
_7�
Applicant & Property Owner(s): John C. Domke for SKB Environmental
Location: TH 55 Industrial Waste Containment Facility
Area in Acres: Approx. 235 acres
Comp. Guide Plan Desig: Waste Management
Current Zoning: Waste Management
Nature of Request: Add a construction — demolition cell and increase capacity overall by utilizing the
gaps between the existing cells.
Planning Commission Action: Recommendation of Approval (4 -0)
SUMMARY
The applicant, SKB is requesting an amendment to the Interim Use Permit for the land fill that would add a
construction demolition (C & D) cell. The four currently permitted cells occupy approximately 70.4 acres
amounting to about 30% of the site. The new C & D cell would occupy about 38 acres, bringing the combined
cell area to 108.4 acres or about 45.9 % of the site.
The other half of the request concerns the overall design of the cells. Currently, the four cells are separated with
gaps called "saddles" between them, forming a separate pyramid for each cell. The Interim Use Permit
Amendment would fill in the saddle areas with materials essentially combining the four pyramids into one. The
overall height would be raised about 35 feet, from a permitted finished elevation of 931 to 968 feet above sea
level.
The entire 235 acres is zoned for the waste containment facility. Therefore, the land use question is already
settled. The issue is the impact of the redesign of the facility, the.traffic it will generate, the aesthetics and
conformance with all regulatory requirements. Currently, the Waste Management District limits C & D
volumes in the City to 200,000 cubic yards. The C & D cell is projected to contain at total of 5,750,000 cubic
yards. Therefore, the Waste Management District section of the zoning ordinance will have to be amended.
Lastly, the Interim Use Permit is up for renewal, which is on a five -year cycle. The request includes the
renewal, thus extending the IUP to 2006. Related improvements such as buildings and driveways will be
required to go through the site plan review process.
PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING
On October 23, 2001, the Planning Commission adopted a motion recommending approval of the revisions to
the Interim Use Permit. Comments were received from three area residents. Their concerns included height of
the cells as requested, coordination of different cells and frustration over all of the various changes in ownership
and the IUP itself.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to adopt a resolution amending the Interim Use Permit for SKB.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA pp - p s F-r'
RESOLUTION 2001 -
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE INTERIUM USE PERMIT
FOR SKII
WHEREAS, application was received by the Planning Department on October 5, 2001 for an
amendment to the Interim Use Permit for SKB, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing as required by ordinance on October
23, 2001, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received testimony from several area property owners and
adopted a motion to recommend approval.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council reviewed the Interim Use Permit
Amendment request on November 6, 2001.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rosemount set the conditions for
the approval of the Interim Use Permit Amendment:
1. Obtaining all necessary approvals and permits from applicable State and County
regulatory agencies.
2. Amending the zoning ordinance to allow the increased amount of Construction &
Demolition material cell.
3. Site Plan approval for any new buildings, related site improvements or access &
circulation, and revised landscaping plan with securities for maintenance and replacement
of plant materials and turf.
4. Incorporation of recommendations relative to traffic routing, access & circulation,
drainage, storm water management, grading and erosion control made by the Interim City
Engineer.
ADOPTED this 6t day of November, 2001.
Cathy Busho, Mayor
ATTEST:
Resolution 2001 -
Linda Jentink, City Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by
theCity Council of Rosemount at a duly authorized meeting thereof, held on the 6 th day of November,
2001, as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession.
(SEAL)
Linda J. Jentink, Rosemount City Clerk
Motion by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Seconded by:
2
ROSEMOU NT
CITY HALL
2875 — 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN
55068 -4997
Phone: 651- 423 -4411
Hearing Impaired 651 - 423 -6219
Fax: 651 - 423 -5203
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting Minutes
October 23, 2001
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission
was duly held on Tuesday, October 23, 2001. Chairperson Jeff Weisensel called the
meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. with members Jeff Arveson, Myron Napper, and Jana Carr
present. Also in attendance were City Planner Rick Pearson, and Council member Sheila
Klassen.
Council member Klasssen explained her purpose in attending the Planning Commission
meetings was to act as a liaison between the Planning Commission and the City Council.
Tonight, should a tie vote occur, she would exercise her right to cast a vote to break the
tie.
There were no corrections or additions to the agenda.
Audience Input: None.
MOTION by Carr to approve the October 9, 2001 Regular Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes. Seconded by Arveson. Ayes: Arveson, Napper, Caspar, and Carr.
Nays: 0. Motion carried.
Public Hearing: SKB Environmental — Interim Use Permit
Modification.
Chairperson Weisensel confirmed that the recording secretary has placed on file with the
City the Affidavit of Mailing and Posting of a Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of
Publication concerning the public hearing for SKB Environmental — Interim Use Permit
Modification.
Mr. Pearson summarized the request from SKB to modify the current Interim Use Permit.
This amendment would allow for the filling of saddle areas with waste, therefore
combining the four pyramids into one, increasing the cell area to 108.4 acres and raising
the finished elevation of 931 to 968 feet above sea level Models of the before and after
were on display for viewing.
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting Minutes
October 23, 2001
Page 2
Commissioner Klassen requested clarification regarding the time frame for this
modification versus the renewal of the permit. Mr. Pearson clarified by stating that if the
applicant were not applying for this amendment they would be working on their renewal.
Therefore, if this modification is approved it would count as the five year renewal
requirement.
Mr. Rick O'Gara, President of SKB Environmental, presented a computer enhanced
slideshow of the cells as they would appear if this request was approved. The finished
site would be landscaped to screen the height of the cell and ensure that the site was
esthetically pleasing.
Chairperson Weisensel opened the floor to the audience input.
Frank Knoll, 4322 145 Street East, expressed concern with the amount of construction
debris versus ash that could be disposed of at this site.
Brenda Sugii, 13701 Courthouse Blvd., expressed concern over the number of times this
business has been sold, the new owners continual requests for expansion, and the
allowance of ash.
Mr. Pearson explained the process regarding SKB's application for this amendment. This
facility was sold as a non - hazardous waste facility. It was by MPCA's determination that
ash was not considered to be hazardous waste, which allowed the city to accept ash. The
Planning Commission determines how this facility will impact the City and the State
determines if this facility meets safety standards. It is the responsibility of the MPCA to
determine the impact to the environment
Otto Ped, 4992 145 St. E., expressed concern with the number of times this property has
changed owners — each owner upping the anti, and the height limitations of the cells not
being adhered to.
MOTION by Napper to close the public hearing. Second by Arveson. Ayes: Napper,
Weisensel, Carr, and Arveson. Nays: None. Motion carried
Chairperson Weisensel opened the floor to the commissioner for discussion.
Commissioner Carr requested further information regarding the acceptance of ash.
Mike Fullterton, Facility Manager, stated that ash was at one time considered special
waste and could only be disposed of in special cells with a special design. That
determination was challenged. The EPA tested ash and found it was not hazardous and is
now classified as industrial waste. Mr. Fullerton recapped how the cells were constructed
and indicated they test the leachate regularly.
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting Minutes
October 23, 2001
Page 3
Discussion ensued by the commissioners regarding the Interim Use Permit, trust funds,
and associated fees.
MOTION by Weisensel to recommend that the Interim Use Permit for SKB be amended
to include the construction and demolition cell subject to - 1. Obtaining all necessary
approvals and permits from applicable State and County regulatory agencies, and - 2.
Amending the zoning ordinance to allow the increased amount of Construction and
Demolition material in the new cell. Second by Carr. Ayes: Weisensel, Carr, Arveson,
and Napper. Nays: None. Motion carried.
Old Business: None.
lew Business: Outlots of Evermoor Final Plat
Mr. P son presented the final plat for Evermoor, which is an 1 measure that
subdivi the remaining Kelley Trust property into large pa is of land that will be split
up into sep to neighborhoods based upon housing type
Mr. Jay LiBeracki, ce President of CPDC was sent to introduce himself and answer
questions from the Co issioners. It is his re est that Connemara Trail be constructed
in 2002 and feels that multi points of ac ss to the development are needed.
MOTION by Carr to recommend t the City Council approve the final plat for the
"Outlots of Evermoor" subject t 1. Co emara Trail alignment shall be approved by
the Interim City Engineer. 2. e PUD and ing standards will transfer with the land to
the prospective Builder/ r/ Second by eson. Ayes: Carr, Arveson, Napper
and Weisensel. Nays one. Motion carried:
Director's Repdrt: None.
There ng no further business to come before this Commission, u�qn MOTION by
W ' ensel and upon unanimous decision, the meeting was adjourned A 7:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Maryann Stoffel
Recording Secretary
NOV. 1.2001 7 :26AM DAKOTA FENCE OF MINNESOTA NO.485 P.1 /1
October 31, 2001
Rosemount City Council
% Tom Burt
City of Rosemount
2875 145` St. West
Rosemount Mn. 55068
RE: Modification Plan for the SKB Rosemount Industrial 'Waste Facility
To Whom It May Concern:
We understand SKB is proposing to make some industrial waste facility site
changes in the near future. The facility has benefited Rosemount financially
through their Trust Fund, both to the City (3% of gross revenues) and the
Community (6% of gross revenues) since it opened in November 1992.
They are very involved in Rosemount Community activities and are also
members of the Northern Dakota County Chamber of Commerce.
As a neighbor, we have found them to be good neighbors and we don't
have a problem with their proposed plan, as long as it doesn't have any
environmental problems attached to it They have always operated their
facility within safe environmental guidelines in the past.
It is our understanding that the proposed plan should increase the value and
the final appearance of the facility, which in the long run benefits the
Rosemount Community.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
-.,, 44
aro and Cyril Schmitz
140 0 Courthouse Blvd.
Rosemount, Mn. 55068
4066 -151 Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
November 1. 2001
Rosemount City Council
2875 -145` Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
RE: SKB ROSEMOUNT INDUSTIAL WASTE FACILTY MAJOR
MODIFICATIONS
Dear Council:
I am aware that the Council will be taking action on the SKB proposal. As a former
teacher and current administrator at Rosemount High School, and as a citizen of
Rosemount, I want to encourage approval of this proposal.
As a teacher, I was able to set up field trips at this facility. My students learned a lot
about the precautions of dealing with industrial waste and, in turn, witnessed for
themselves, the many steps taken to avoid any compromise of the environment. I have
followed the project for several years and have never found any information stating that
there has ever been any sort of shortcoming in terms of human or ecological safety. The
fact that this facility has been operating so well for so long is a great indicator that they
will continue to be safe and responsible.
As a school administrator and coach, our students' have been enriched by the myriad of
contributions made to our core as well as cocurricular groups from the trust. I am excited
that the expansion will bring millions of dollars over the next several years particularly
when budgets in the public sector are meager. In addition, L understand that the plan,
when complete, will include environmental enhancements that will provide aesthetic
pleasure.
Again, I encourage you to vote in favor of the proposal.
Sincerely,
7
Tim Conboy
RECEIVED
2001
CITY OF ROSEMOUN T
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 196
October 30, 2001
ROSEMOUNT HIGH SCHOOL
3335 - 142nd Street West • Rosemount, MN 55068
Phone (651) 423 -7507
FAX (651) 423 -7511
Rosemount City Council
2875 — 145 Street W.
Rosemount, Minnesota 55068
Dear Member of the City Council:
■ MICHAEL J. MANNING,
ATHLETIC DIRECTOR
As a recent resident of the city of Rosemount and a long -time worker in the Rosemount
community, I_wanted to take a moment to share my thoughts about an issue that is currently in
front of the City Council. The topic is the SKI) Rosemount Industrial Waste Facility major
modification proposal.
As the athletic director at Rosemount High School, I have worked with this company and the
Trust in the past and have found them to be a great community member and good corporate
citizen. They were a tremendous help to Rosemount High School in helping us raise funds to
adequately equip our weight room facility when it opened three years ago. Their commitment to
the high school and their follow- through was exemplary and I know their long -term plans to help
financially benefit the high school and the city are quite sincere. In looking at and understanding
their request for this modification, I see the benefits to be a tremendous potential asset for our
community. It is my hope that with the increased revenue that this generates that not only the
high school but other community agencies and organizations will benefit dramatically from the
funds that could be available.
When we originally moved to the City of Rosemount in the Centex Development east of
Highway 3, I would never have considered moving into this area without completely feeling
secure about this waste facilities' safe and environmental practices of the past. From my
understanding of this project, I think it not only will improve the final appearance of the facility,
but the overall value to our community that this facility can bring far outweighs any negatives
associated with the modification.
I would ask that you give full consideration to approving this request. Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
J. Mann
Director
int City
Educating our students to reach their full potential
nine! 1 — 2001
C;iiyOFP Q.; :Y0 z;q
NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION
3385 143RD. ST. WEST
ROSEMOUNT,MN. 55068
NOV. 1, 2001
ROSEMOUNT CITY COUNCIL
2875 145TH ST.WEST
ROSEMOUNT,MN. 55068
RE: SKB ROSEMOUNT WASTE FACILITY MAJOR MODIFICATIONS
DEAR COUNCIL MEMBERS:
I AM AWARE THAT THE COUNCIL WILL BE TAKING ACTION ON THE SKB PROPOSAL. AS A CITIZEN
AND BUSINESSMAN IN ROSEMOUNT AND ALSO AS A COMMUNITY TRUST BOARD MEMBER I WOULD LIKE
TO ENCOURAGE APPROVAL OF THIS.PROPOSAL.
AS A FORMER PLANNING COMMISSIONER THAT SPEND 11 YEARS HELPING'THE.CITY WITH MANY AND
VARIED ITEMS I WAS FORTUNATE TO BE ABLE TO TOUR THE THE ORIGINAL USPCI FACILITY IN
OKLAHOMA AND WE SPENT A LOT OF TIME RESEACHING THE METHODS THAT WOULD BE USED AT THIS
FACILITY. I DO NOT CLAIM TO BE AN EXPERT IN THIS FIELD, HOWEVER I FEEL THE MODIFICATIONS
THAT ARE BEING REQUESTED ARE VERY APPROPRATE.
IN CLOSING I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT THIS FACILITY HAS BEEN AND I'M SURE CONTINUE TO
BE GOOD NEIGHBORS IN OUR COMMUNITY.
SINCERELY,
STEVEN B. TOOMBS
x ..
"!n' 1- 2001
1TY OF ROSEMOUN E
3 4 4 t
October 31, 2001
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Mr. William P. Keegan, P.E.
Environmental Engineer
SKB Environmental
251 Starkey Street
PO Box 7216
St. Paul, MN 55107
RE: Construction Certification Report for Cell 2C at the SKB Rosemount Industrial Facility,
Permit SW -383
Dear Mr. Keegan:
With a letter of transmittal dated October 11, 2 00 1, SKB Environmental (SK13) submitted for
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) review, a report entitled, "Cell 2C Liner
Construction Documentation" (Report), to enable SKB to begin filling in the new industrial cell.
The Report, on page 15 deems the cell operational, and lists on its preceding page, minor
deviations from the approved plans. The Report also contains appendices A -L and as -built plans
dated October 2001, as prepared by your engineering consultant Foth and Van Dyke. The built
cell, Cell 2C, is the third of four planned phases in Cell 2, and is permitted for industrial wastes.
The completed cell as inspected by the MPCA on October 10, was found substantially complete,
except for installation of the sand drainage layer.
The Report describes how the new cell was constructed, and the quality assurance activities
supporting the cell's construction to ensure its integrity. Construction activities include the
placement of sub -base and structural fill materials, compacted clay liner, geosynthetic liner,
geomembrane (both textured 60 and 80 mil), gecomposite and geonet, and a sand drainage layer.
Construction also includes the positioning of a leachate sump (both primary and secondary) area
with a withdrawal pipe trench leading directly therefrom. The quality of the construction is
advocated through analysis of test results on these same features including the structural fill, sub -
base material, clay and geomembrane liner, sand drainage layer, and the pipe bedding materials.
The MPCA has reviewed the Report against the July 2, 1998, permit and its approved plans. The
Report is hereby approved. SKB may immediately begin operations in the new cell pursuant to a
verbal approval given on October 25, 2001. As a reminder, and as mentioned in the
October 11, 2001, letter of transmittal, SKB is required to demonstrate adequate frost protection
as required by Minn. R. 7035.2815 subp. 13, subitem U. To meet this requirement, the MPCA
recommends SKB cease placement of waste material against the sideslope separating Cell 213
from Cell 2C.
520 Lafayette Rd. N.; St. Paul, MN 55155 -4194; (651) 296 -6300 (Voice); (651) 282 -5332 (TTY)
St. Paul • Brainerd • Detroit Lakes • Duluth • Mankato • Marshall • Rochester • Willmar; www.pca.state.mn.us
Equal Opportunity Employer • Printed cn recycled paper containing at least 20 1 6 fibers from paper recycled by consumers.
Mr. William P. Keegan
Page 2
If there are any questions on this approval, please call the undersigned at (615) 296 -8584.
Sincerely, `
ike
. y .
Senior Engineer
Waste Management and Wastewater Sector Unit
Regular Facilities Section
Metro District
MLL:ry
cc: Mr. Richard O'Gara, SKB
Mr. John Domke, SKB
Mr. Mike Fullerton, SKB
Mr. Terry Muller, Dakota County
Mr. Thomas Burt, City of Rosemount
EIYYIROAMENTAL
October 31, 2001
City of Rosemount
2875 West 145` Street
Rosemount, MN 55068
RE: SKB Rosemount Industrial Waste Facility Major Modification
Permit No. SW -383
To interested persons:
SKB Environmental Inc. (SKB) is proposing a major modification for the SKB
Rosemount Industrial Waste Facility (Facility) permit number SW -383. A proposal
describing this modification was submitted by SKB to the City of Rosemount on October
4, 2001. Subsequently, two main issues have been raised regarding specifics of this
proposal. The intent of this letter and the attached drawings is to address and clarify
these issues.
One of the issues related to access to the Facility and the associated traffic patterns. The
current access and exit is through our main entrance on State Highway 55. According to
MNDOT, the capacity of this highway is 20,000 vehicles per day (vpd) and it is currently
operating at approximately 12,000 vpd. We feel that there are two periods during the day
when the traffic is congested. The morning rush hour from 7:00 -8:30 AM and the
evening rush hour from 4:00 -5:30 PM. On average, SKB is proposing an additional 185
loads per day to the Facility. SKB would propose to have all trucks enter through our
main gate and exit through our proposed exit onto 140th Street East during the peak
hours, or as needed to help ease the congestion on State Highway 55. The main entrance
has an existing right turn lane to handle the traffic entering the Facility. SKB has had
conversations with the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) and Dakota
County to evaluate the proposed traffic patterns for the Facility and adjacent roadways.
There is a general consensus that this proposed traffic pattern mentioned above is the
most favorable means of easing the congestion on State Highway 55.
The other issue related to the Recycling/Transfer Facility building and the specifics of its
construction. To address this issue, SKB has developed a drawing of the proposed
Recycling/Transfer Facility based on assumed traffic patterns and a typical design for the
251 Starkey St. - P.O. Box 7216 - St. Paul, MN 55107
651 - 224 -6329 - FAX 651 - 223 -5053 % Printed on Recycled Paper.
Facility (Figure 20). The general concept (i.e. building size, placement, exterior
aesthetics, etc.) of the Recycling/Transfer Facility will remain basically the same, with
the specifics (i.e. number and location of doors, push walls, etc.) likely being modified, in
accordance with City ordinances, to accommodate the agreed upon traffic patterns.
As mentioned previously, SKB believes that this modification will continue to allow
SKB to be a significant part of the State of Minnesota's integrated solid waste system. In
addition, the modification will allow for the creation of the most aesthetically pleasing
end use of the Facility. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the proposed
modification please do not hesitate to call John Domke or myself at 651- 224 -6329.
Sincerely,
William P. Keegan, P.E.
Senior Environmental Engineer
John Domke
Vice President
: qtr
i::
m
Z
F P`
=.e .
j�` � m
S4
� g
PER"l ORAWINGS FOR THE
MAJOR M001FIC.T", AT THE
SKB- ROSEMOUNT INDUSTRIAL WASTE FACLITY
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA
PROPOSED TRAFFIC FLOW
ln0
m•
w m
A
N
O
Z
m – z
�EhRFhf"IEhRE1tFRI",aS
a�
a. REVISIONS / REMARKS
V Foth &Van Dyke ,. G Q R
- .W.�.- ..r.v...
RECORD M. KS 0 CO.PEETEO CONSIR—ON
ONEORUmG TO C— AICTORS .x0/dl OWNERS
RECORDS.
a�
A.
4 _ —
A
1'
0.n
Q
7
1
_t
—
_ fs
AS 3 A
— V _
l'
p
z� P
s
Cl
N
e m
O
p
A
n
Q
o n
c)
n
r
K
m
K
C)
z
a -r,
_ n
e �
x
m K
A
,
a
z
I ,
I i
n` 8
A • T
8 j M
MAJOR MOpiFIEA i1 OH AT THE
A
Y A A
�O
$ e
g
e
A g
I I I
s$
I t
n` 8
RERMIT DRdwwDS FOR THE
8 j M
MAJOR MOpiFIEA i1 OH AT THE
PECOPO OPAW— W CO —EiEO COHST"I.l
CWOPAw10 TO CI- PACTOAS AA ,. o,KA,
RECOPOS.
1:
ENVIROAMENTAL
October 4, 2001
City of Rosemount
2875 West 145 Street
Rosemount, MN 55068
RE: SKB Rosemount Industrial Waste Facility- Major Modification
Permit No. SW -383
To interested persons:
SKB Environmental. Inc. (SKB) is proposing a major modification for the SKB
Rosemount Industrial Waste Facility (Facility) permit number SW -383. This Facility,
which is located in Rosemount, Minnesota, currently accepts non - hazardous Industrial
Waste and Municipal Solid Waste Combustor Ash (Ash). As part of this modification
request, SKB is proposing to add a Construction and Demolition (C &D) cell along with a
C &D recycling/transfer station to the Facility, which will allow for processing of the
waste prior to disposal. In addition, SKB is proposing to fill the "saddle" areas between
the currently permitted cells. The three saddle areas, Industrial Waste, C &D waste, and
Ash, will be filled to enhance the end use and aesthetics of the Facility. Currently, the
Facility would be completed and closed with four large "pyramids" (Figure 3), which
would greatly reduce the end use capabilities of the Facility.
The C &D cell, Cell 5, will be located in the southeast corner of the Facility (Figure 4)
and will contain approximately 5,763,000 yd of debris (including saddle area). The cell
will be progressively filled in five phases, 5A -5E, with an anticipated completion date of
June 2019 (Figures 4, 5, and Table 1). The bottom liner system of the cell will consist of
a two -foot layer of clay (or equivalent synthetic or geosynthetic liner) overlain by a three -
foot layer of protective /drainage sand. Upon closure, the cell will be capped with a 40-
mil LLDPE synthetic liner overlain by two feet of cover soils. The C &D saddle area will
be located between Cell 5 and Cell 3, and Cell 5 and Cell 2, forming a linear shaped
saddle (Figures 4, 6, 8). The interface area of the C &D saddle, which overlies the
Industrial Waste Cell 3, will have an 80 -mil HDPE liner (Figures 6 & 8). In addition, a
new landfill entrance and waste acceptance area for C &D will be built in the northeast
corner of the property. This C &D recycling/transfer station will be used for additional
processing and waste acceptance screening prior to final disposal.
251 Starkey St. - P.O. Box 7216 - St Paul, MN 55107
651 - 224 -6329 - FAX 651 - 223 -5053 40 Printed on Recycled Paper.
The Ash Saddle area encompasses the areas between Cell 4 and Cell 1 and between Cell
4 and Cell 3 forming an "L" shaped saddle (Figures 4, 6, 8). The total volume of this
saddle is approximately 788,000 yd with an anticipated closure date of February 2021.
The Ash Saddle would have a bottom liner consisting of a 2 -foot clay liner overlain by an
80 -mil HDPE liner (Figures 6 & 8). This bottom liner system would be in addition to the
Industrial Waste liner system consisting of two foot of clay, a 60 -mil HDPE liner, an 80-
mil HDPE liner, and two feet of drainage /protective sand, which is below the Ash Saddle.
Upon closure, the Ash cell and saddle area would be capped with a 40 -mil LLDPE
synthetic liner overlain by two feet of cover soils (Figure 6 & 8).
The Industrial Saddle will be located between Cell 2 and Cell 1, Cell 2 and Cell 3, and
Cell 1 and Cell 3, forming a "T" shaped saddle (Figures 4 & 7). The total volume of the
Industrial Saddle is approximately 962,000 yd with an anticipated closure date of
December 2025. The Industrial Saddle would have the same bottom liner system as
described above for the currently permitted Industrial Waste cells (Figure 7). After
reaching closure, the Industrial saddle would be capped with a 40 -mil LLDPE liner and
the two feet of cover soils, which would tie into the liner over the other areas of the
Facility (Figure 7).
After the cells and saddle areas have reached their final elevations (Figure 2), a final soil
cover system consisting of up to 10 -feet of soil will be placed over the entire fill area
(Figure 1). This additional soil layer will be placed with rolling swales and undulations
to better simulate a naturally occurring hill and limit the erosion effects associated with
the steeper geometric slopes of a traditional landfill. The depth of this soil will also allow
larger trees and vegetation to be planted over the fill areas creating a more natural shaped
hill blending more appropriately into the surrounding areas.
We believe that this modification will continue to allow SKB to be a significant part of
the State of Minnesota's integrated solid waste system. In addition, the modification will
allow for the creation of the most aesthetically pleasing end use of the Facility. If you
have any questions or concerns regarding the proposed modification please do not
hesitate to call John Domke or myself at 651- 224 -6329.
Sincerely,
O
William P. eegan, P.E.
Senior Environmental Engineer
. , , f), I je-
John Domke
Vice President
TABLE 1
ESTIMATED CLOSURE DATES
.:.:.:.:.:.
... .. ... . ::::::.:::....:......:..
A1flli= . itiil _(
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
. ......;..$F�4R7:#]ATE:x:COIVIPi
Ti4N:: DAVE *:::::;iJLOS
:::::::::::::::::::::::::: :: :::
:: *...
IR .DAY- rit:;:
Cell 1
Cell 1
338,442
Dec. '92
Sept. '01
Sept. '01
Total:
338,442
Cell 2
Cell 2A
Cell 2B
245,884
Feb. '99
May'02
May'03
Cell 2C
231,487
Aug. '00
May'02
May'03
Celt 2D
567,505
377,323
May'02
Oct. '03
Oct. '03
'04
Oct. '04
Total:
1,422,199
Nov.
Nov. '05
ll 3
r3C
825,000
Nov. '04
Aug. '07
Aug. '08
g
825,000
Aug. '07
Ma 10
y �
M ay'10
Cell 3D
825,000
May'10
Feb. '13
Feb. '14
Cell 3E
825,000
Feb. '13
Nov. '15
Nov. '15
Industrial Saddle
841,635
962,000
Nov. '15
Aug. '18
Aug. '18
'21
Aug. '18
Total:
5,103,635
Oct.
Cell 4
Cell 4A
Cell 413
148,209
Sep. '99
Jun. '05
Jun. '06
Cell 4C
281,967
Sep. '01
Jun. '05
Jun. '06
Ash Saddle
412,487
788,000
Jun. '05
Dec. '10
Dec. '10
'20
Dec. '11
Dec.
Total:
1,630,663
ll 5
Cell
F5C
1,000,000
Jun. '02
May'05
May'06
1,600,000
May'05
Mar. '10
Mar. '11
Cell 5D
1,100,000
Mar.'10
Jun. '13
Jun. '14
Cell 5E
800,000
Jun. '13
Oct. '15
Oct. '16
1,250,000
Oct. '15
Jun. '19
Jun. '2Q
Total:
5,750,000
at: Ash:::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
41::::.:::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
; :....:.........•....•
, :............ .
a#:liiid istrii31:: �11 ....... .::::::::::::::::::::....
rite ....................7,.,8Zf,
[Fz�l
:..... • • .:......:::::::::::;:.:.:.:::::=:::::::::::::::::::::::::::
276..........
: :: ::
: ; : :•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•::•::•:::•::•:::::::::::•::::::::::::::.:.:.:.;.;.
:: :: :::::::::::::•::::::.; : ;. :............•...•....
.
:.:.:.;.;.;.;.;:::::::;:::::.:.
.... . D:::::: ::: :::::::........::::::::::::::::
•.
i1it ::f tat ::::::: :::::::::: :::::::;:;:::::::::;:
. 4_ .
159. , �J39 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::•:::::.:•:.
Dates were estimated based on 77,000 cy/yr of Ash; 300,000 cy /yr of Industrial Waste; and 350,000 cy /yr of C & D.
Note: All incoming -waste volume estimates are subject to market conditions
♦ Saddle volume will be filled simultaneously with adjacent cells
OCT.15.2001 3:06PM SKH
NO. 592 P.2 /2
Here are definitions for Construction and Demotion debris. These definitions were
synthesized from language contained in city, county, state, federal, and governing
bureau/agency definitions of construction and demolition debris,
Construction Debris is defined as building materials, packaging, and rubble resulting
from construction, remodeling, and repair of buildings, roads, and other man -made
structures including but not limited to earth, blacktop, concrete, brick, lumber, sheetrock,
plaster, glass, insulation, and packaging,
Demolition Debris is defined as solid waste resulting from the demolition of buildings,
roads, and other man-made structures, including concrete, brick, bituminous concrete,
untreated wood, masonry, glass, trees, rock, and plastic building parts.
DdIniaons wrimmi by Ry-an O'Gara. SKB L�nvironmental, Inc.
93 Acv*Z
Ce \\ 2
C e\\ y
( C a 0) Le t\ 5 =
5•
ACr es
/acres
1 2,
A�
3'3.
/-sc s
'70'. _ -, . , O la
� w :�. ��•�Ga�, �„� �� it ����'\\ ��P�„�" �o�l�
.,
o
�M
Y
Q
O X A
� O N O
N 0
r� z °
Ul
m
to
o m o
tz)
m
Ln
a y °
o
c
to
a
s `r
v y
P.; K
+ +
F
v �
LEGEN
_)P of
EXISTING SITE CONTOURS
CROSS - SECTION LOCATIONS
j
� s
t
} s
r _ J
+ + {�
I
I <�
�" ,%t "• �� _„i .�.. �c����� Grp!'
i
LEGEND
�\ TOP OF CELL CONTOURS
i I XIIIIIIJG 1 1 - CONIOURS
CROSS- SECTION LOCATIONS
f
LEGEND
t / �t .t ° <�, l� APPROXIMATE PHASE LIMITS
v �
f� L ��i TOP OF CELL CONTOURS
\\ EXISTING SITE CONTOURS
'CA
Ef
\4
S SKB ROSE MOUNT INDUSTRIAL W ASTE FAC ILITY
FIGURE 4
► t f PROPOSED SITE PLAN
--
ote: 09/05/0I By:WpK
Elevation
C�2
� I
?j
I
In
D V
--i
D
m
A
U
n
A
A
O
O
N
x
In
I
>I
In
m
m
n
A
O
z
1- 9
m
r
7
r
—
m
<n
1
to
C�2
� I
?j
REVISIONS / REMARKS
ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA v Br A—
a
0 CELL 5 PHASING PLAN
Elevation
D V
V, S
SKB ROSEMOUNT INDUSTRIAL WASTE FACILITY R
Elevation
SECTION C
7DU ADDITIONAL SOIL FILL 950
940 pROPOSED INDUSTRIAL WASTE AREA . ' .. ; ' 940
930 'PROPOSED ASH SADDLE AREA RR000$ED 930
920 �C & D SADDLE AREA .. 920
910 �� A��` • _ _
q 900 \� _:: 910
0 \\ ORIGINAL CELL 3 900 0
890 \ 'PROPOSED C & D CELL
_INDUSTRIAL WASTE AREA ggp
v 880 ORIGINAL CELL 4 880 y
w 870 ASH. AREA _'_.�� - 870 w
860 - _ -- - 860
850
—_— . 850
840 9 -27 -2000 AERIAL FLIGHT
830 - OE - EXISTING CONDITIONS. 840
820 830
820
8 . 1 0 o d1 810
u
Q
3N z
=z O
F� U
w
zo �
U)
�o U)
=z O
y �
U
c
Y
ownr+c r+orro scua
DRAWING NO.
6
d
LINER LEGEND
as
o
9Y
�b
3 -FT OF SAND
Y
2 -FT OF CLAY
3
fi
o
G
gop
2 -FT OF SAND
80 -MIL HOPE LINER
S
DRAINAGE LAYER
60 -MIL HOPE LINER
2 -FT OF CLAY
z
a
a
d
3
2 4T OF SAND
80 -MIL HOPE LINER
DRAINAGE LAYER
o d
a
d
60 -MIL HDPE LINER
3 -FT OF CLAY
80 -MIL HOPE LINER
2 -FT CLAY LINER .
40 -MIL LLDPE LINER
X7 x 3 REVISIONS / REMARK3
> = SKB ROSEMOUNT INDUSTRIAL WASTE FACILITY
n ROSEN! UNT. MINNESOTA Dr DATE
�z s 1 1 0 0
D
o z � CROSS— SECTION MAP a o
DanY S W C—LETED CGi11a 1IDH
iuc .D couTaacTDas nuDiro Dvxcas
8w OnTF
Elevation
m-
N
m m m m m m m LD c0 i0 FO iD c0 t0
W A N OI V m D O
0+ 00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1
1 +00
Z
2 +00
C
' L
r
SZ
3 +00
r
Nm
4 +00
�
5 +00
/
j
6 +00
.
Z
A
Z Z
7 +00
A A
8 +00
9 +00
O D
!
I v
10 +00
� % °j
Z5
11+00
c
O jA j/
12 +00
N °
D D >j
73 +00.
�D
m jam/
14 +00
A u. j
o
17 +00
- -
18 +00
19+00
zo +oo
z1 +00
22 +00
23 +00
m
N
m m m m m m m° m co co m m m co
W N O) m
a
oo ° 0 o
°oo °
0
Elevation
X7 x 3 REVISIONS / REMARK3
> = SKB ROSEMOUNT INDUSTRIAL WASTE FACILITY
n ROSEN! UNT. MINNESOTA Dr DATE
�z s 1 1 0 0
D
o z � CROSS— SECTION MAP a o
DanY S W C—LETED CGi11a 1IDH
iuc .D couTaacTDas nuDiro Dvxcas
8w OnTF
r
z
°
m O CO
r
I D �
r
Z F
— —
�
O O
m
= 2
4 <
S Z
.
Z
A
Z Z
A A
X7 x 3 REVISIONS / REMARK3
> = SKB ROSEMOUNT INDUSTRIAL WASTE FACILITY
n ROSEN! UNT. MINNESOTA Dr DATE
�z s 1 1 0 0
D
o z � CROSS— SECTION MAP a o
DanY S W C—LETED CGi11a 1IDH
iuc .D couTaacTDas nuDiro Dvxcas
8w OnTF
Elev
m a m m a m a m w
0+00
1 +00
2 +00
r
3 +00
a +00
5 +00
6+0
7 +00
8a00
9 +00
10 +0
11 +00
12
13 +0
14100
15,00
16 +0
17,0
£
`.
i
21 +00
\ ��
23x0
2 - 00
25 +00
26 +00
27+00
'•�
I
z
28 +00
29
31
32+00,
33 +00
'�;: • -•..
•'. f •`.' p
34 +0
35
36+0
37
t
I
I
I
I
I
39 +00
�
1
rb
o 0 0 o o ElevationS
0
F
0 °
o
.n
i
�
7
a A - -
- -
C7
D
-
SKR ROSEMOUNT INDUSTRIAL WASTE FACILITY
REVISIONS /REMARKS
� DD vrta cone:
ur-, ,a,...,
DMxN B
wRVCxeD Br:
M,Y, 2000
Dore:
Z ROSEMOU
NT. MINNESOTA
o By DPIi
Q . Br DPIE
��, fl, D.rP:
0
o
RECORD ORPVINGS
CDNrDPNIr✓G to CDNTPP
[B CONPLClCD CONSIRUCSIDN
TM PN —EPS
z
CROSS- SECTION MAP
RECDRDS.
Br
OPIE
v
o
D. Uses Pe itted by Interim Use rmit:
1. Spent bauxite i sal facility as an accessory use only. (Ord. B -13, 9-17 -
91)
2 -Per unercial outdoor recreation -(Ord. B -32, 9- 21 -93)
6.16: WM WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT:
A. Purpose and Intent: This District is intended to accommodate waste industries
and the inherent environmental problems associated with waste management.
B. Uses Permitted by Interim Use Permit:
1. Nonhazardous industrial waste containment facility. (Ord. B, 9- 19 -89)
2. Construction Demolition Waste Facility subject to the following
restrictions:
a. Facility construction debris do not exceed 200,000 cubic yards of
total permitted waste volume within the Rosemount Corporate Limits.
b. The facility is developed, operated and maintained in accordance
with an approved Interim Use Permit by the City of Rosemount and
all other applicable local, state and federal laws.
c. Permits for the facility by the State of Minnesota and Dakota
County are pending or have received approval. (Ord. B -64, 6- 18 -96)
6.17:\ p PUBLIC AND INSTITUTICAL DISTRICT:
A. Purpose d Intent: This Distric ' primarily intended to accommodate major
public and titutional u sofa governmental, educational, cultural,
recreational, pub ' se a and health care nature that serve the entire
community. Wher lable, structures shall be serviced by the public
sewer and wate ystems.
B. Uses P itted by Right: All publi d institutional uses, facilities and
St res. (Ord. B, 9- 19 -89)
City of Rosemount
Page 87
,sue
E/YY /R01YME/YTAL
October 4, 2001
City of Rosemount
2875 West 145 Street
Rosemount, MN 55068
RE: SKB Rosemount Industrial Waste Facility Major Modification
Permit No. SW -383
To interested persons:
SKB Environmental Inc. (SKB) is proposing a major modification for the SKB
Rosemount Industrial Waste Facility (Facility) permit number SW -383. This Facility,
which is located in Rosemount, Minnesota, currently accepts non - hazardous Industrial
Waste and Municipal Solid Waste Combustor Ash (Ash). As part of this modification
request, SKB is proposing to add a Construction and Demolition (C &D) cell along with a
C &D recycling/transfer station to the Facility, which will allow for processing of the
waste prior to disposal. In addition, SKB is proposing to fill the "saddle" areas between
the currently permitted cells. The three saddle areas, Industrial Waste, C &D waste, and
Ash, will be filled to enhance the end use and aesthetics of the Facility. Currently, the
Facility would be completed and closed with four large "pyramids" (Figure 3), which
would greatly reduce the end use capabilities of the Facility.
The C &D cell, Cell 5, will be located in the southeast corner of the Facility (Figure 4)
and will contain approximately 5,763,000 yd of debris (including saddle area). The cell
will be progressively filled in five phases, 5A -5E, with an anticipated completion date of
June 2019 (Figures 4, 5, and Table 1). The bottom liner system of the cell will consist of
a two -foot layer of clay (or equivalent synthetic or geosynthetic liner) overlain by a three -
foot layer of protective /drainage sand. Upon closure, the cell will be capped with a 40-
mil LLDPE synthetic liner overlain by two feet of cover soils. The C &D saddle area will
be located between Cell 5 and Cell 3, and Cell 5 and Cell 2, forming a linear shaped
saddle (Figures 4, 6, 8). The interface area of the C &D saddle, which overlies the
Industrial Waste Cell 3, will have an 80 -mil HDPE liner (Figures 6 & 8). In addition, a
new landfill entrance and waste acceptance area for C &D will be built in the northeast
corner of the property. This C &D recycling/transfer station will be used for additional
processing and waste acceptance screening prior to final disposal.
251 Starkey St. - P.O. Box 7216 - St. Paul, MN 55107
651 - 224 -6329 - FAX 651 - 223 -5053 %1 Printed on Recycled Paper.
The Ash Saddle area encompasses the areas between Cell 4 and Cell l and between Cell
4 and Cell 3 forming an "L" shaped saddle (Figures 4, 6, 8). The total volume of this
saddle is approximately 788,000 yd with an anticipated closure date of February 2021.
The Ash Saddle would have a bottom liner consisting of a 2 -foot clay liner overlain by an
80 -mil HDPE liner (Figures 6 & 8). This bottom liner system would be in addition to the
Industrial Waste liner system consisting of two foot of clay, a 60 -mil HDPE liner, an 80-
mil HDPE liner, and two feet of drainage /protective sand, which is below the Ash Saddle.
Upon closure, the Ash cell and saddle area would be capped with a 40 -mil LLDPE
synthetic liner overlain by two feet of cover soils (Figure 6 & 8).
The Industrial Saddle will be located between Cell 2 and Cell 1, Cell 2 and Cell 3, and
Cell 1 and Cell 3, forming a "T" shaped saddle (Figures 4 & 7). The total volume of the
Industrial Saddle is approximately 962,000 yd with an anticipated closure date of
December 2025. The Industrial Saddle would have the same bottom liner system as
described above for the currently permitted Industrial Waste cells (Figure 7). After
reaching closure, the Industrial saddle would be capped with a 40 -mil LLDPE liner and
the two feet of cover soils, which would tie into the liner over the other areas of the
Facility (Figure 7).
After the cells and saddle areas have reached their final elevations (Figure 2), a final soil
cover system consisting of up to 10 -feet of soil will be placed over the entire fill area
(Figure 1). This additional soil layer will be placed with rolling swales and undulations
to better simulate a naturally occurring hill and limit the erosion effects associated with
the steeper geometric slopes of a traditional landfill. The depth of this soil will also allow
larger trees and 'vegetation to be planted over the fill areas creating a more natural shaped
hill blending more appropriately into the surrounding areas.
We believe that this modification will continue to allow SKB to be a significant part of
the State of Minnesota's integrated solid waste system. In addition, the modification will
allow for the creation of the most aesthetically pleasing end use of the Facility. If you
have any questions or concerns regarding the proposed modification please do not
hesitate to call John Domke or myself at 651- 224 -6329.
Sincerely,
4
William P. eegan, P.E.
Senior Environmental Engineer
Z �� i)lje
John Domke
Vice President
Elevation
�
-�
0 +00
w 00
N CA
0 0
00 DO 00 cc DO OD l0 CD CD CD c0 (D (D
41 cn Cr �1 00 (D (D — ND W -P UT m
0 O O O O O O O O O O O O
1 +00
2 +00
3 +00
4 +00
5 +00
6 +00
7 +00
8 +00
9 +00
10
+00
11+00
12
+00
13
+00
14
+00
15
+00
16
+00
17
+00
18
+00
19
+00
r
m
>
0
20 +00
r
O
Ln
O
K
r
21+00-
r r
U)
rT�
D
r
a
22
+00
O
Z
D
Ln
F
23+00
r
z
m
24 +00
cf)
25 +00
26 +0@
on
CD m
to w1p,
00 w w CD N co m cfl co c0 co co
0 m-2 w 0 0- m w� C> M
0
0 o a
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Elevation
a
::55
d
s
SKB ROSEMOUNT INDUSTRIAL WASTE FACILITY
REVISIONS / REMARKS
CADD PRO] CODE:
ICA FI N AME :
DRAWN BY:
DATE: MAY. 2000
SURVEYED BY:
DATE:
O BY
DATE
BY
I DATE
Q.
Z
Z
o
ROSEMOUNT.
MINNESOTA
SURVEY DATA:
RECORD DRAWING S OF
COMPLETED CONSTRUCTION
o
CONFORMING TO CONTRACTORS
AND /OR OWNERS
z
>E �
CELL 5
PHASING PLAN
RECORDS.
o
o
"'
BY
DATE
Elevation
IV
W � U]
CP
�I CO Lo O
— ND W �
(j
0)
0 +00
O
O O O
O
0 0 O O
O O O O
O
O
1 +00
i
2 +00
O
3 +00
n
F
>n
D
4 +00
;
A
O
5 +00
m
6 +00
0
D
=
>
C CD
/
/m
7 +00
/D
A
8 +00
m
` D
9 +00
LO
v
10 +00
�j
M
x N
z
C
C O
O
m
11+00--
zo
G7
�o
D
z
A
n m
D
r
D
C
12 +00
z n
n
r
L/� r
A
M r
r
13 +00
r
_
� W
D
D
f
m
p
/
14 +00
m
o
A
D
/
r
15 +00
/
N
O —
16 +00
' '
_T,
r
r
17 +00
•�
cn o
D M
18 +00
m:o `
D
19 +00
20 +00
°•
P O'
'
C:)"
21 +00:.
.."'
22 +00'
m
23 +00
24 +00
25 +00
2 6+0 0
O
N
W
0
00 00
W CD co
o,
CD Cfl
Q0 co CO Cfl
CO
ro
w
D Co
N
N M
O
M N
N
W
L
iV
w A CD
m
-2 07 Co O
iN w A
UT
m
F
O O
O 0 0
O
O O O O
O O O O
O
O
r
n
Z
m
Elevation
n
=
o
r>
F o
o
r
0
0
0
0
C7
-�
=
m =
m =
m
= m
m
7
z
m
O
D r
m D
m
D
F
m
r
D
m
< m
z D
m
<
m z
D
z
Z
A
r
� r
O
{ r
m
r O
O
F9
z
z
z
z
m
m
m
m
d
REVISIONS
/ REMARKS
CADD PROD CODE:
C FILE NAME
cen si eplm.tlsg
DRAWN BY:
DATE: MAY. 2000
e�
>
SKB ROSEMOUNT
INDUSTRIAL
WASTE FACILITY
0. BY
DATE
0. BY
DATE
SURVEYED BY:
DATE:
z
ROSEMOUNT.
MINNESOTA
'
°
°
SURVEY DATA:
Z
o
RECORD DRAWINGS OF
COMPLETED CONSTRUCTION
°
°
o
CONFORMING
TO CONTRACTORS
AND /OR OWNERS
z
CROSS—
SECTION
MAP
RECORDS
BY
DATE
OD Co W W Co
N W CJ� O
Elevation
W 00 00 CO CD co CD N) co cD c.0
J 00 O � N W UT
m co
O� J
O +QQ
-P
O O O O
-P
O O O O O O O O O
O O
1
1 +00
z
b
2 +00
o
Dz
3 +00
n�
� m
Mr /
M F-
4+00-
> /
5 +00
m
D
6 +00
/
7 +00
of
� N
J
8+00-
X N
� O
� O
Z O
"m
9 +00
/O
10 +00
o D
�r
jo/
_
1 1+00-
12
o j
+00
;:u
%>
> c�
m
13+00-
> m
r m
m r
14+00--
/
�D
U /
m
n
15 +00
j
16 +00
D
° o
0
17 +OQ
D
r
/
GO
O
18 +00
r
r
19 +00
20 +00
21+00
22 +00
23 +00
03 co G7 m
\
rn w o cfl co co co co
m co
Iv
Ca cn o
__2 co co o N co P Cr
o
Elevation
41
N
O
IV
L�
>
r
p
m
r
= m
r
=
O
m
n
b r
� D
b
M
N
z
r_
Z
m
r
Z
F7
Z
m
m
�
C7
REVISIONS
/ REMARKS
CADD PROD CODE:
cen_viaa.n.a g
DRAWN BY:
DATE: MAY, 2000
9
z
SKB ROSEMOUNT
INDUSTRIAL WASTE FACILITY
O. By
DATE
0 . By
DATE
SURVEYED BY:
DACE:
SURVEY DATA:
z
ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA
'
Z
o
RECORD GS NF COMPLETED CONSTRUC
Q
Q
z
0
CROSS—
SECTION MAP
CONFORMING TO CONTRACTORS AND /DR OWNE
ING TO
RECORDS.
o
a
Q
BY DATE
Elevation
OJ
Lo W
0 co OJ 0 W W CO W 0 O O V7 u) V
00 00 00
-•
O +OOO
N W m 00 0 O -+ N N
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
m �
O J
O O
^y /l
1+00.
�.'
6
2 +00
3 +0
4 +00
5 +00
Dz
�1
xy
6 +00
v r
A
Dr
7 +00
8 +00
9 +00
I, �
10 +00
°
J
11 +00
X N
ti O
z o
47 D
n m /
12 +00
o a
a
A
oT o
13 +00
z
z o
z p
14 +00
o Z
In ° o
A c
N
m
A G1
D Z A
D
15 +00
p
g r
m D
16+00
D w m
A D
D A
17 +00
D
18 +00
r
19 +00
pz
20 +00
21 +00
0;
22 +00
c '
23 +00
"
24 +00
25 +00
,•
26 +00
_u
27 +00
m
•A p
28 +00
30 +00
�.;
o
0
31+00
:•
n
1 '
32 +00
33 +00
34 +00
,
35 +00
(/
r' 7
/
36 +00
37 +00
38 +00
r
I--I
39 +00
40 +000
0
N Du
O
0 0 0 0 OJ 0 CO OJ O O D c6 6 6
CO O
�_
ti
W O
Tp
N
O
N
O N N
A O
W L
N W L. CP M 0 O O N W -A CT
O O O
W 2
O O
�_
I
I
O O O O O O O O O O O O
Elevation
r
o
n r
o
o
Z
m
3
o
o
3 Z
m o c
�•-•�
o L 1
A
x
x
= x
m
<
Z
m
r
D
Z
m - Z D
I
�••/
A
A
Z
m
z
m
z z
m m
A
A
A A
d
REVISIONS
/ REMARKS
CADD PROD CODE:
cw suapN.n a.e
DRAWN BY:
DATE: MAY, 2000
r�
a
z
SKB ROSEMOUNT INDUSTRIAL WASTE FACILITY
D. BY
DATE
O.
BY
DATE
SURVEYED BY:
DATE:
:
z
ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA
�
�
SURVEY DATA
Z
o
RECORD DRAWINGS OF
COMPLETED CONS7RUC71ON
Q
Q
o
CONFORMING TO CONTRACTORS
AND /OR OWNERS
CROSS-
SECTION MAP
RECORDS.
0
0
o
By
DATE
s�
ENVIRONMENTAL
October 31, 2001
City of Rosemount
2875 West 145 Street
Rosemount, MN 55068
RE: SKB Rosemount Industrial Waste Facility Major Modification
Permit No. SW -383
To interested persons:
SKB Environmental Inc. (SKB) is proposing a major modification for the SKB
Rosemount Industrial Waste Facility (Facility) permit number SW -383. A proposal
describing this modification was submitted by SKB to the City of Rosemount on October
4, 2001. Subsequently, two main issues have been raised regarding specifics of this
proposal. The intent of this letter and the attached drawings is to address and clarify
these issues.
One of the issues related to access to the Facility and the associated traffic patterns. The
current access and exit is through our main entrance on State Highway 55. According to
MNDOT, the capacity of this highway is 20,000 vehicles per day (vpd) and it is currently
operating at approximately 12,000 vpd. We feel that there are two periods during the day
when the traffic is congested. The morning rush hour from 7:00 -8:30 AM and the
evening rush hour from 4:00 -5 :30 PM. On average, SKB is proposing an additional 185
loads per day to the Facility. SKB would propose to have all trucks enter through our
main gate and exit through our proposed exit onto 140th Street East during the peak
hours, or as needed to help ease the congestion on State Highway 55. The main entrance
has an existing right turn lane to handle the traffic entering the Facility. SKB has had
conversations with the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) and Dakota
County to evaluate the proposed traffic patterns for the Facility and adjacent roadways.
There is a general consensus that this proposed traffic pattern mentioned above is the
most favorable means of easing the congestion on State Highway 55.
The other issue related to the Recycling/Transfer Facility building and the specifics of its
construction. To address this issue, SKB has developed a drawing of the proposed
Recycling/Transfer Facility based on assumed traffic patterns and a typical design for the
251 Starkey St. - P.O. Box 7216 - St. Paul, MN 55107
651 - 224 -6329 - FAX 651 - 223 -5053 % Printed on Recycled Paper.
Facility (Figure 20). The general concept (i.e. building size, placement, exterior
aesthetics, etc) of the Recycling/Transfer Facility will remain basically the same, with
the specifics (i.e. number and location of doors, push walls, etc.) likely being modified, in
accordance with City ordinances, to accommodate the agreed upon traffic patterns.
As mentioned previously, SKB believes that this modification will continue to allow
SKB to be a significant part of the State of Minnesota's integrated solid waste system. In
addition, the modification will allow for the creation of the most aesthetically pleasing
end use of the Facility. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the proposed
modification please do not hesitate to call John Domke or myself at 651- 224 -6329.
Sincerely, /
William P. Keegan, P.E.
Senior Environmental Engineer
John Domke
Vice President
'SONOJ321
S83NMO 40 /ONV S8013tl81N00 01 ONM803NOO
NOU:)nN1SNOO 03131d"OJ 30 SONIMVUO 080338
:viva A3A8nS
1 31v0 'AS a3A3ANn5
IOOZ'8300100 :31 VO ZBtlr :AS NMY80
reousismo of co—.,0% 610510 1 3003 rOHd OOVJ
S)MY43H / SNOISIA3H
A 3Sn 03AOtlddYNn 'S3IYODSSV B- 3VAO NVA V NlC
JO IVAONddY WhiPJM 3H1 IrONLIA 03sn 30 LON AV
it 3NOd3N3HL '3sn 3YON30 NDd LON ONY NOIL"I&
3IA33d$ V LOA 03d013A30 N339 SVH LOW= SA
S1N3nn000 AD 3Sn3V
4y4IyU4I.. - 4J4 4UI6Ua - 4jUO.jp�4... A&
a� uRAV tpq j
Y
J
W F F
x x x W x x x x x x W x x rc
W W W W W W W W W W W W
0.
G 3
Z
O
Ln
2
W
o �>
W
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
W
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
a
Nz� N
N
O 16
m P Oa LL
W dU
l2 y�
W� a
W M � -
_-
W
~ O
Z N h
MOIJ OIJJVNI a3SOdo8d
N
° Z
0
Z
V10S3NNIYV' MOMS08
AlllloVd 31SVM jvj8jSnoNi 1WOMS08 -6 )IS
s
�:
3H1 I v NoI1VoiAoon 8orm
3H1 803 SJNIMVUG I rAb 3d
0--
N.
N
CD
Z
W
mmi
z z Z CL z
LJ
0 o m � o
N W - W N
- .-- - - - - -r - N '>
959.000 E
LEGEND
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
N
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING DEPRESSION
EXISTING TREES
EXISTING BUILDING I I 1 F
EXISTING ROAD
EXISTING FENCE
EXISTING CULVERT
0-4S -0� EXISTING MONITORING WELL
- - - - __- - - APPROXIMATE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PROPOSED FACILITY FOOTPRINT
VEHICLE DIRECTION FLOW
N
IN
LOADING
---------- ------ --------
------ -------------
TI FF
--
=2
L)
92
0
A
I OSLE)�.
LOADI NG FROO
I I
Q.
L L - - - - - - -
3::
- - - - --
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
'
1 --
L
4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
tT
1 991-01,
21'-0"
.11
12 0' 0 "
<,Oz
M
li
RECYCLING FACILITY (FLOOR PLAN)
NOT TO SCALE
... . .............
. 1 pll �II�I� �tlll � � � o� �� s� ; Iltl� 111111
WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION
T WT 10
O
'w a
93 7 -vt?
c - H
'-
t:
=2
L)
Z
<
Q.
3::
'
V'&
K<V)
3c y :3-
t.
<,Oz
M
Ld
Z
Of 125 0
W-'�mcr
0. <8
8
w
ct:
c6
V)
O
6
SCALE
AS SHOWN
SCOPE 10 OISO19
DRAWING
NO.
20
EXISTING SITE FOR RECYCLING FACILITY
0 too 200'
ii
Nd
R
O
6
EXISTING SITE FOR RECYCLING FACILITY
0 too 200'
ii