HomeMy WebLinkAbout9.a. KTJ Limited Partnership (Cub Foods) Planned Unit Development Amendment & Final PlatCITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
Citv Council Meeting Date: Animist 15. 2000
AGENDA ITEM: KTJ Limited Partnership (CUB Foods) Planned
AGENDA SECTION:
Unit Development Amendment and Final Plat
New Business
PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson, City Planner
AGEND 19 A 1
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolutions; Reductions, Delivery restrictions
APPROVED BY:
survey; Traffic Study Review &Draft PC Minutes;
Memo; Chippendale 42 Partnership PUD Agreement;
Correspondence
/
Applicant: Paul Tucci of Oppidan (Developer) U
Location: Outlot B, McNamara Addition between CSAH 42 and 151 n Street West; and between Crestone and Claret
Avenues.
Property Owner(s): Chippendale 42 Partnership
Area in Acres: 9.67 acres
Number of Lots: 1
Comp. Guide Plan Desig: Commercial
Current Zoning: C -4, General Commercial
Nature of Request: PUD Amendment for 100,000 sq. ft. total space in 3 buildings
Planning Comm. Action: Recommendation of approval (3 -0)
SUMMARY
The proposed Cub Foods development has been revised as a result of public comment and additional market
examination. In summary:
_1 . The store will be 68,018 sq. ft. with a potential for a 11,000 sq. ft. expansion area.
2. The amount of brick will be increased with the objective of 50% overall. The southern Cub elevation will still be
rock -faced block, screened from view by landscaping.
3. ' The berm along 151 st Street West will be augmented with an eight foot high masonry wall located on the outer
edge of the loading dock paved area, resulting in a combination of berm, landscaping and the wall blended with
the berm.
4. Signage will be a total of 270 sq. ft. instead of 300 and the 151st Street sign will be turned off at 11:30 pm.
5. Outdoor pedestrian furnishings for eating and resting will be oriented towards the likely eating establishments,
particularly infront of the small retail building located at the north west comer of the site.
PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC BEARING
Extensive comments were received by the Planning Commission, of which many were opposed to the project. Staff
explained the PUD process and previous comp plan and zoning decisions which led up to the application. Several people
questioned the basis for the PUD amendment and process. Staff explained that the amendment process is the appropriate
review procedure no matter if the deviation from the original PUD is slight or extensive.
The Planning Commission discussed the development at length and added several recommendations to that of staff:
1. Elimination of the driveway to 151St Street, so that truck traffic access occurs at Crestone and Claret Avenues.
2. Any building expansion requires Site Plan review public hearing.
3. Signage will be limited to 275 sq. ft. and the southerly sign illumination shall be turned off after 11:30 pm.
4. 50% brick shall be required.
zxvisions to the plan win ne avanabie at the meeting it they are not received in time for the packet assembly.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Motion to adopt a resolution approving the PUD Amendment for KTI Limited Partnership; and,
Motion to adopt a resolution approving the final plat for Outlot B, McNamara Addition.
I CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2000 -
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT FOR
KTJ LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Cub Foods)
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an
application for final plat approval submitted by KTJ Limited Partnership, as required by
ordinance for the purpose of a commercial development on land legally described as:
Outlot B, McNamara Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County,
Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed the final plat
application for Outlot B, McNamara Addition at their regular meeting on August 8, 2000; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend approval of the final
plat to the City Council as required by the Subdivision Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the final plat application as
required by the Subdivision Ordinance on August 15, 2000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the final plat for Outlot B, McNamara Addition subject to: ,
1. Payment of Park Dedication and GIS fees in accordance wit0he current fee schedule.
2. Execution of a subdivision agreement to secure public and private improvements.
3. Approval of the Dakota County Plat Commission.
ADOPTED this 15 day of August, 2000, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
Cathy Busho, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda J. Jentink, City Clerk
Motion by: Seconded by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Member absent:
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2000-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING
THE AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT WITH CHIPPENDALE 42 PARTNERSHIP
ON OUTLOT B, McNAMARA ADDITION
TO SECURE IMPROVEMENTS BY KTJ LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Cub Foods)
WHEREAS, the Planning Department of the City of Rosemount received an application for
approval of an amendment to the Planned Unit Development Agreement with Chippendale 42
Partnership; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount conducted a public hearing on
August 8, 2000, as required by the zoning ordinance and PUD Agreement for the purpose of
receiving testimony regarding the requested amendment; and
WHEREAS, on August 8, 2000, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend
approval of the amendment to the Planned Unit Development Agreement with Chippendale 42
Partnership with conditions; and,
WHEREAS, on August 15, 2000, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the
recommendation forwarded by the Planning Commission;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby
approves the amendment to the Planned Unit Development Agreement with Chippendale 42
Partnership on Outlot B, McNamara Addition to secure improvements by KTJ Limited
Partnership, subject to:
1. Execution of an amendment to the PUD Agreement.
2. Revision of Grading, Parking and Utility plans as necessary in accordance with
recommendations by the Consulting Engineer.
3. Additional landscaping for screening along 151 Street West to buffer the loading docks.
4. Installation of sidewalks along Crestone Avenue and provide pedestrian links to all of the
buildings.
5. Provision of "Acorn" lights along Crestone Avenue and reducing the height of the light
standards to 30 feet and that lighting intensity and color shall be consistent with existing
General Commercial development.
6. Compliance with all applicable building and fire codes.
7. Modification to traffic flow from Crestone Avenue and Claret Avenue by closing the
driveway access to 151` Street, subject to approval by the Consulting Engineer and Fire
Marshal.
Resolution 2000 -
8. Requiring that any future expansions will require a public hearing.
9. Signage shall consist of two signs totaling 270 sq.ft., with the lighted sign at the corner of
Crestone Avenue and 151" Street to be turned off at 11:30 p.m.
10. Compliance with the 50% brick requirement.
ADOPTED this 15th day of August, 2000, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount.
ATTEST: Cathy Busho, Mayor
Linda Jentink, City Clerk
Motion by:
Voted in favor:
Voted against:
Member absent:
Seconded by:
HUV. v7 Lvvv 11 ;is 7:+467flv1:.1 vrr tLituii 1}tl.Je r. vv6 /vvG
3G CRI - STUNF A 146NUC
Vv
•� «\a M ,y
O S
! � V)
L 71 O
! j .
LN m
• to Qo
o (n D
ITPT
a \Y�
`\ \,
N a� ' Al
7 .
let
AUG.03'2000 06:55 9522940151
d
f
OPPIDAN #4346 P.002/003
IZ605e -a 5rcT-- PcA F=
all
N ■
•
•
K
qw
i
C4
T
p �
G
AtIV1a
If W- --W -____ _
--------- - ff _
1
3nN3AV 3NOiS380
C
Q
¢ VV
d
o il
!
0
Imp TAY Tf0T n iIPnn '-7ncs- - eo I o nnn7 it io no! C_r-%O[� / 7To %- .410"
r
V
BE - - - -- g _
+�
b
l�
- J
COOIC00'a 9Y£t# Nvaiaao iSZOWZ96 99:90 o00Z WOnY
I '�II� _ !ii �I
r 11 PH",
flH �il�j "' : � j � ��j'I
a
1 =c�1
ii
in
go
An
f"Olicli
.114111--
MIl
lw
AUG.03'2000 11:58 9522940151 OPPIDAN
C '
I IH ,
0000000
�OO000o0
I
i
I
i
O i
t
I
L
#4365 P.003/006
kD
jp
N
ss.
v
1
0
.ova
4w. II
RJ
h
n
A
0
z
p�
N
V
N A-
� f
- -- -- -- - - -- .- •.••�.. ..r. vvziv 16L exit
Ito
n e�
r =�
CA
N
N
d
}
O
4
u
A � � 1•
CA
cr
ire r ,
900 1fi00'd 99M NKQIddO TGTOWZ96 WIT 000Z,£0'OnY
F
$Nor
w
NORTH ELEVATION (FRONT) - Cub Foods
Scale. 3/32" = l'-0"
SOMI ELEVATION (REAR) - Cub Foods
0 1
Scale: 3/32* = 1 0 4 b 32
� tdis- �+ 1 , O
sw
_.... - p
-----------
M W
ai
WEST ELEVATION (Side) - Cub Foods Retail Shops A M
Scale- 3/32"= l-W N 32
rr
r-r T a
TF
9:4 --N�X*
L
EAST ELEVATION (Side) - Cub Foods
Scale: 3/32" = 1 . . a w 37
C2 elevations McNamara Addition City Presentation
M S Rosemount, MN I jdy 5, 2000
OPPIDAN
1
r
i
i
` L
T
4
TRASH f.l
ENCLO&!RE Y
c
PLAN - Retail Shops
Scale: s /32" = r -o"
m s w
u
r er
-
9
• �6. Vrt
WEST ELEVATIO (Side) -
NORTH ELEVATION (Front) -
Retail Shops
Retail Shops
Scalc 3/32" = P -0"
m`
" Scale: 3/32" = P -0"
m 4 a u
l
"A�Aff'
19
SOUTH ELEVATION (Rear) -
Retail Shops
Scale: 3/32"= 1' -0"
o e r
®
C S 2. 1 Plan +
McNamara Addition
Rosemount, MN I
city submittal
5, 2000
a
elevations
July
,
OPPIDAN
..rte.., r.. ..
................
L_
,I_J
III �z
I
'A'
PLAN - Retail
Scale. 8/32" = 1' -0" 6 4 0
w ,
_N
G
"r
p t`
. a0000Ara:.
w"Aas . .
Im
SOUTH ELEVATION (Side) - Retail 'A'
EAST ELEVATION (Front) - Retail 'A'
Scale: 8/32" = 1' -0" e . w
n
Scale: 3/32" = 1' -0" ° 4
�11161A
—•� •'�- $'
H ,
M.
w t 9�ktlAtl�.
a9®NAfOL'
aaDOeArmd
610LNBAOBC
'.1p00AA0L
u. •
NORTH ELEVATION (Side) - Retail 'A'
WEST ELEVATION (Rear) - Re ail Shops
SCAk: 3/32" = !' -0" . � • w
e�
Scale: 3/32" = I' -0"
M
C S 2.2
Plan +
McNamara Addition city Submittal
Rosemount, MN I
elevations
lily s, 5000
Of"DAN
..r ..,. r...
- ..
s
Nil I
o a
a
Sc
a�
a
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
1
r
r
i
r `
/y
r�
CO
I
z =, fill'!,,
----------------------- - - - - -- d
Q
4
O �
O QQy
G�
r
! • • "1' 1111
a
m
�>
YD
Mm
I
B
a ImS
fJ4 ±1�
N
•
e�i
C
�3
n
is
s
m
IIRu 1-
Q
4
a
i�
am
� a
3: —
6 �Q
.i
's
I
� I
Q
I q
0 Af r H N � � � � 1111 1 1 �
Jilt - -' - _i I
�� 3
P i a8�i.«.as
i
► ►
► 1
► 1
►
a c a
a
►
a4417
1
i
1
I '
j
1
I
Ida
a
t
s
3: —
6 �Q
.i
's
I
� I
Q
I q
0 Af r H N � � � � 1111 1 1 �
Jilt - -' - _i I
�� 3
;il
i
W "ll
i-6100o d3a•
to
,
I
fill
,
�'
fil
,
f it
,
,
11 ' •
i
� 1
2 i
i � � � �
c
M
t
r w
_ ncE
Z 1
� 1
i
E
i
1
I
i
1
X
�
g
I !
t
a
s
m
t
m
y
A
W "ll
Oil,
1
i-6100o d3a•
to
,
I
fill
,
�'
fil
,
f it
,
,
11 ' •
i
� 1
2 i
i � � � �
c
M
t
r w
_ ncE
Z 1
� 1
i
i
1
I
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
�
1
1
1
A 1
1
s
� �
Oil,
1
i-6100o d3a•
t
fill
n
�'
fil
,
f it
`"
11 ' •
E ■ ■ i j
a
Y f l
i � � � �
c
M
Oil,
1
i-6100o d3a•
�
fill
�'
fil
,
f it
`"
11 ' •
E ■ ■ i j
a
Y f l
i � � � �
9
• Mr« •i�1i
�lif
-
�
N
N
t
Illuminated Pylon
Construction Specifications
1y -1 weer
tenant tenant
m
tenant. tenant
2"
SPECIFICATIONS:
TOP CABINET FABRICATED WITH AA EXTRUSION AND PANAFLEX FACES
DECORATED WITH VINYL AS SHOWN. RETAINER & FILLER PAINTED
DARK BRONZE.
BOTTOM CABINET FABRICATED WITH 2° X 2" ALUMINUM TUBE FRAME
CUB COLOR LEGEND:
%J
WITH .100" ALUMINUM FILLERS. CABINET, F- RETAINERS & T BARS ARE
OK BRONZE. TENANT COPY 15 3M TRANSLUCENT VINYL
0 #3630 -m ivory
APPLIED SECOND SURFACE ON 3/16" CLEAR POLYCAR13ONATE PANELS
. #VT4 -4221 Cub Foods Red
AS SHOWN. T BARS SEPARATE ALL TENANT PANELS, SEE COLOR
■ #313 Dark Bronze
LEGEND ON LEFT.
MASONRY
BASE BY OTHERS.
tenant tenant
m
tenant. tenant
2"
SPECIFICATIONS:
TOP CABINET FABRICATED WITH AA EXTRUSION AND PANAFLEX FACES
DECORATED WITH VINYL AS SHOWN. RETAINER & FILLER PAINTED
DARK BRONZE.
BOTTOM CABINET FABRICATED WITH 2° X 2" ALUMINUM TUBE FRAME
CUB COLOR LEGEND:
'r
'
WITH .100" ALUMINUM FILLERS. CABINET, F- RETAINERS & T BARS ARE
OK BRONZE. TENANT COPY 15 3M TRANSLUCENT VINYL
0 #3630 -m ivory
APPLIED SECOND SURFACE ON 3/16" CLEAR POLYCAR13ONATE PANELS
. #VT4 -4221 Cub Foods Red
AS SHOWN. T BARS SEPARATE ALL TENANT PANELS, SEE COLOR
■ #313 Dark Bronze
LEGEND ON LEFT.
MASONRY
BASE BY OTHERS.
ci*
Location.
PRINT NO .
E . .nrflnc,
LO CATION :
BllrE: 316/01)
Mo MN. naarNr wnneurrwn wnon,r�ia7r
is «.,.r.ur,wn,nww�nrtnnrnn.nna.
Mankato, MN.
B41165A
IL EA. _CHI 001n
ECCL CER Brow(ow n CE{ICCE{: MAK rrw +",w rt"wnnxnnrnumr«ro ,�
{Eru,a {s �CIunC�naacolw AtAE iit{roo IF 11111�
OPTION A
I�wrwr
r J
�• 7322Chglhln {a. {NM,pb �. SUMMIT
Q. . tMCCLit 114614711 ti1E p241461 -EE{B
www.ldolco.com
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
Everything's Coming Up Rosemount.►!
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Julie Hoium, Intern
CITY HALL
2875 — 145th Street West
_ Rosemount, MN
55068 -4997
Phone: 651 - 423 -4411
Hearing Impaired 651- 423 -6219
Fax: 651- 423 -5203
DATE: August 11, 2000
RE: KTJ (CUB Foods) Delivery Hours Survey.
This past week, I conducted a survey in an effort to determine if cities in the metropolitan
area restrict hours of delivery or operation for commercial businesses, specifically for
CUB Foods. The results are listed below.
BLAINE
• Blaine does not limit or restrict delivery hours in their ordinance.
• CUB Foods; No restrictions were placed on condition of approval to restrict
delivery or operation.
• Blaine does have requirements which restrict hours of refuse pick -up.
BLOOMINGTON
• Bloomington does regulate where delivery docks are located on commercial
buildings but not hours of delivery or operation, in general
• Bloomington's planner is researching the CUB files to see if any restrictions
were added as a condition of approval. They will be in contact on Monday,
August 14, 2000.
CRYSTAL
• In general, Crystal does not regulate hours of delivery or operation. Itwould
have to be done as a condition of site plan approval or a conditional use
permit.
• Crystal does regulate hours of refuse pick up (not before 6 am). They stated
that they usually have voluntary compliance from businesses. They even had
a commercial business agree not to have deliveries come before 6am, however
there are no actual requirements for this.
• Regarding CUB Foods: The planner stated that there is intensive screening,
i.e. berm, fence, & plantings on south side to screen single family residence.
The planner also said that restriction of delivery may have been discussed but
the site was so well buffered it did not present itself as an issue.
EDINA
Edina does not address deliveries in their ordinance and have not added
restrictions of deliveries as conditions of approval for any businesses.
• Edina ordinance does restrict hours of refuse collection. Refuse cannot be
collected within 250 feet of a residential area between 1 Opm and 7am.
PLYMOUTH
• One of Plymouth's latest PUD's (Rainbow Foods) limited the use of loading
docks through its noise ordinance. No use from IOpm to lam.
• The noise ordinance restricts levels of noise and hours of the day when it is
prohibited per zoning districts.
SAVAGE
• Savage does not have CUB Foods.
• They also do not limit hours of delivery or operation for commercial
businesses.
SHAKOPEE
• Shakopee's Ordinance does not specify restrictions of delivery or operation in
general. It may restrict hours for restaurants or liquor stores, business that
have a liquor license.
• Concerning CUB Foods. Shakopee did not require as a condition of approval,
restrictions for delivery or operation. This has been an issue and has been
discussed with planning commission because neighboring residence have
complained about the hours of delivery. The planner stated that usually, CUB
representatives have worked with the delivery individuals to.insure deliveries
do not take place too early in the morning.
WOODBURY
• Woodbury does not regulate hours of operation.
• They do regulate delivery loading and unloading through their ordinance. The
Off- street loading and unloading Section of the ordinance states that if noise is
audible to surrounding residential areas it must be terminated, between 7pm
and lam.
WSB
& Associates, Inc.
8441 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 350
Minneapolis, MN 55426
tel: 763 - 541 -4800
fax: 763 - 541 -1700
To: Mr. Rick Pearson, City Planner
City of Rosemount
From: Charles T. Rickart, P.E.
Transportation Engineer
Date: August 3, 2000
Re: Chippendale 42 Partners PUD
Traff a Review
WSB Project No. 1005-180
B.A. Mittelsteadt, P.E.
Bret A. Weiss, P.E.
Peter R. Willenbring, P.E.
Donald W. Sterna, P.E.
Ronald B. Bray, P.E.
Memorandum
INTRODUCTION
A traffic impact study was completed for the McNamara Addition (Chippendale -42 Partners) PUD
located south of CSAH 42 between Shannon Parkway and Chippendale Avenue in May of 1996.
At that time, the traffic impact study was based on a development concept including retail, office and
residential uses within the PUD. The traffic impact study completed in May of 1996 included
assumptions with respect to traffic generations and conducted an analysis of the impacts traffic had
on the adjacent roadway systems. The results of this study included both short- term (2001) and
long -term (2016) recommended improvements to the roadway system to accommodate the expected
traffic growth.
As requested, in light of recent development proposals, (i.e. Oppedam proposal for Block 2 and the
retail development proposed for Block 1) we have reviewed the assumptions and analysis outlined
in the 1996 traffic study to determine its validity and to draw any additional conclusions and/or
recommendations with respect to these proposed developments. The following sections of this
memorandum outline the study review conclusions and recommendations.
TRAFFIC STUDYREVIEW
Traffic Generation Comparison
Table 1 in 1996 traffic study outlined a variety of land use assumptions for the PUD area. These
land use assumptions were based on the concept plan provided by Chippendale -42 Partners. The
traffic generation was based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Traffic Generation
Manual.- Currently, two development proposals are being considered by the City for this the area.
The first is the addition of a liquor store, a fast food restaurant and future retail space in Block 1
Minneapolis St. Cloud
Infrastructure Engineers Planners F.I "HM "5- 181 M03M-rA wpd
EQUAL OPPORTUMTY EMPLOYER
Mr. Rick Pearson, City Planner
City of Rosemount
August 3, 2000
Page 2
adjacent to the existing Walgreen's and daycare center. The second proposal is for a Cub foods and
an additional 20,000 square feet of associated retail space located on Block 2 of the PUD. In
addition, a Goodyear Service Station has been approved and is currently under construction in Block
4. Based on the current proposal, including all ofthe revised building sizes, a comparison was made
to the 1996 study with respect to the amount of daily traffic being generated by the overall PUD.
The attached table shows a trip comparison between the 1996 study and 2000 proposal. The primary
change in land use occurred in Blocks 1 and 2. Block 1 increased in total generation and Block 2
decreased in total generation. The traffic generation based on the 2000 proposal increases the total
site - generated traffic by approximately 1,400 trips from the PUD. This represents about a 5.8%
increase in trips from the area. A general rule of thumb in estimating traffic generation is that the
actual traffic generated from a proposed site can be plus or minus 10% of the estimated traffic.
Therefore, this additional 5.8% is well within the tolerance of additional traffic.
Tra c Impact Analysis
The traffic impact study provided an analysis for two build years. The first year of 2001 assumed
that the PUD would be 100% developed. The short-teen recommendations were based on this
assumption. The 2016 year included additional traffic growth from adjacent areas which would
impact the roadway system. The long -term (2016) improvement recommendations were based on
this year.
The additional 1,400 trips per day translates into approximately 120 trips during the PM peak hour.
Distributing 120 trips over the site roadway system would have an insignificant impact on the
roadways and intersection operations. Therefore, no additional analysis was conducted based on this
minor change in the PUD land uses.
May. 1996 Recommendations
The May, 1996 traffic study included several recommendations for short-term (2001) and long -term
(2016) improvements. Each of these improvements is discussed below:
Short -Term (2001):
1. Provide for roadway improvements as outlined in the developer's proposal. These
improvements as outlined in the 1996 proposal, have all been made.
2. Construct a median on Chippendale Avenue which eliminates a left turn from the service
roadlbank entrance to the northbound Chippendale Avenue and the left turn from
northbound Chippendale Avenue to the service roa&bank entrance: This improvement has
not yet been completed, however, an agreement has been made with the affected uses in the
F. I WP#7MZWS- ZJW#3N,rp. wpd
I
Mr. Rick Pearson, City Planner
City of Rosemount
August 3, 2000
Page 3
area that, when traffic operations dictate, this improvement would be made. This
improvement is currently listed in the City's Capital Improvement Program for the year 2001
or 2002.
3. Develop right -turn lanes on CSAH 42 at Chippendale Avenue for both eastbound and
westbound traffic: The eastbound right -turn lane has been completed. However, the
westbound left -turn lane has not yet been constructed. This issue should be addressed with
Dakota County.
4. Revise the signal timing at CSAH 42 and Chippendale to provide for protected left -turn
phasing for Chippendale Avenue: This improvement would be made in conjunction with
Dakota County when the median is installed on Chippendale Avenue (Recommendation No.
2).
Long -Term (2016
1. Provide a dual left -turn lane for northbound Chippendale Avenue to westbound CSAH 42:
As traffic dictates along Chippendale Avenue, this improvement should be considered. The
improvement will require a roadway widening and major traffic signal revisions. This
improvement would ndwe coordination with Dakota County.
2. Develop protected left turn phasing for CSAH 42 at Shannon Parkway: This improvement
should be considered as traffic on Shannon Parkway increases. This would be a project that
would require coordination with Dakota County.
3. Monitor traffic volumes on CSAH 42, Chippendale Avenue, Shannon Parkway, and 151'
Street: This recommendation should be and is being implemented in this area. The review
of this traffic study and its assumption is an example of this recommendation. This should
continue to occur as additional development to the area south of 151` Street in this area
occurs.
CONCLUSIONS /RECOMMENDATIONS
Conclusions
Based on the review of the May 1996 traffic impact study, the following conclusions can be made:
• The traffic generation assumptions found in the traffic study are still valid with the current
proposals. Even though, the land use types have changed from the original proposal, the
total traffic generation from the PUD has an insignificant increase.
F:1WPW,G M5 -JFMW #-rµwpd
Mn Rick Pearson, City Planner
City of Rosemount
August 3, 2000
Page 4
• The traffic analysis conducted as part of the 1996 traffic study is still valid with today's
proposal. In fact, the original proposal assumed that the site would be 100% developed by
the year 2001, which has not occurred.
• The recommendations as outlined in the 1996 traffic study are still valid and should continue
to be implemented. Some of these improvements have already been implemented and
provisions for implementing the others are in place.
Recommendations
Based on the review of the traffic study and the conclusions as stated above, it is recommended that
no additional improvements be required as a result of the change in land use associated with the
proposed development and PUD.
nm
F.IWPW MIW5- 181"V3W -rAwpr
Chippendale 42 Partners PUD
Traffic Generation
an
Public Hearing: KTJ Limited Partnership (Cub Foods ) PUD
Amendment and Final Plat (Continued from 7- 25 -00)
This matter was before the Planning Commission on July 25, 2000 for a public hearing.
The public hearing was continued for further discussion.
Mr. Pearson highlighted changes to the site plan. The Cub building has been reduced
from 80,000 sq.ft. to 68,018 sq.ft. An 8 foot masonry wall is included along the southern
edge. There. is an increased proportion of brick on the smaller retail buildings. The signs
have been reduced from 300 sq.ft. to two signs totaling 270 sq.ft. The sign at 151 St.
will be turned off at 11:30 p.m. Outdoor pedestrian furnishings for eating and resting are
added, along with increased plantings. The developer agreed to installation of sidewalks
and additional acorn lights. Mr. Pearson displayed pictures of existing Cub stores.
Approximately 50 % of the Cub stores are located adjacent to or across from residential
neighborhoods. Mr. Pearson illustrated commercial areas in the city and reviewed land
use east of Highway 3, explaining why that area is not available for this type of
commercial development. The Cub proposal meets city standards and is consistent with
the planned development for the area. After working with the developer for the
Shenanigans development to the west, the developer for Cub shifted the driveway on
Creston further north to align with Shenanigans driveway.
Discussions continued concerning the amount of brick, hours of operation, and
architectural standards. Mr.. Pearson explained there is 47 % brick overall. Hours of
operation are limited by the PUD only for those businesses fronting Shannon Parkway.
Commissioner Napper responded that the amount of brick is not the issue and that the
audience is not interested in such discussions. He feels the reduction in size to 68,000
sq.ft. is not enough and that it will still knock out local businesses.
Chairperson Droste opened the floor to the applicant. Paul Tucci of Oppidan was present
and reviewed the changes made to the site plan. He indicated a willingness to work with
the city on the two exceptions to the PUD, namely, signage and brick enhancements.
Chuck Rickart Engineer with WSB & Associates, prepared the initial traffic study in
1996 and reviewed the results with present day plans. In 1996, traffic generation was
24,000 trips per day. Based upon the present development plans, Mr. Rickart estimates
traffic generation at 25,600 trips per day. This is considered an insignificant change. The
recommendations in the 1996 study assumed 100% development by 2001.
Recommended improvements are well in excess of what Cub needs. There are
significant access roads to disburse traffic. Mr. Rickart reviewed the traffic patterns for
the Cub and Shenanigans parcels.
Chairperson Droste opened the floor to the public.
Monika Oeltjen doesn't feel that Cub fits in and residents do not want it in their back
yards. She brought pictures of Cub stores in Apple Valley and Shakopee, along with the
wall behind Wal Mart. She does not like the "Low Price Leader" sign displayed in the
front of Cub. She thought there would be soft retail at this location.
Tom McCarty, 14037 Dartmouth Path, noted that if Rosemount limited businesses to just
one, there would be just one pharmacy, one auto parts store, etc. Price shopping is
difficult when you have to travel out of the area.
Ray Connelly, Connelly Realty, 12904 Nicollet Avenue, Burnsville, addressed concerns
with devaluation of property as a result of Cub. He met with the Scott County Assessor
to discuss the effect on land values as a result of the Cub store in Shakopee and Rainbow
store in Savage. Scott County showed an increase of 6 -8% in housing value. A study
performed by Dakota County on townhouses surrounding the Cub store in Eagan showed
a rise in valuation of 8% per year, compared to Eagan's overall rate of 9.2 %.
John Mills. 15130 Crestview Circle, raised issues with property values, indicating a 15-
20 %o property loss could be expected as a result of Cub. It was his understanding that the
site was to be developed as a strip mall with specialty shops and restaurants. He has
concerns with 151 Street bearing a great deal of the traffic. He wants to see the plan
changed to keep the traffic flow off 151 St. He also expressed concerns with ponding
and asked who would be responsible if their homes flood.
Mr. Pearson addressed concerns with infrastructure and ponding.- Mr. Rickart added that
151 St. was constructed as a reliever to traffic on CSAH 42.
Bernie Strohsu£ is concerned with traffic and inquired about the number of trucks
estimated per day and the route they will follow. Mr. Tucci responded to Mr. Strohsuf's
questions, indicating that approximately 20 trucks could be expected each day. He
summarized the anticipated routes. Mr. Strohsuf wants to see access to 151 St. closed.
Bill Day, 14955 Crestview Ave., has concerns with traffic congestion on. 42 and
traffic injuries. He is opposed to the big box retail.
Karen Danay 14655 Cimarron Ave., expressed support for the Cub store and explained it
will provide job opportunities. She finds the local businesses are limited and prices are
much higher. She would rather not have to go to other towns for shopping.
Steve Kobel, 12757 Danbury Path, also offered support for the Cub store. He felt that if
the store meets the PUD requirements it should be allowed to move forward. He further
indicated that competition is good and a free enterprise system will help keep prices
down. Cub will provide a good tax base and will fit well into the growing community.
Steve Casey, 15455 Danville Ave., referred to the PUD and architectural design
standards. He does not believe the Cub proposal meets the requirements of sensitivity to
the surrounding neighborhood and achievement of a neighborhood center, look and feel.
He is opposed to the 24 hours of operation and larger signs. He also asked that the hours
for deliveries be limited as he found in Shakopee and Bloomington. He wants a retail
development closer to the concept plan.
Kellev McGivern, 15173 Claret Ave., does not feel the PUD requirements have been met.
He believes a new traffic study must be done. He is concerned with noise and light
pollution. Mr. McGivern provided photographs of surrounding retail developments.
MOTION by Droste to close the public hearing. Seconded by Weisensel. Ayes:
Weisensel, Napper, and Droste. Nays: 0. Motion carried.
Commissioner Napper addressed concerns with truck traffic flow and suggested
eliminating the corner greenspace on 151 St. to allow traffic off Crestone Ave. and take
traffic off 151 st St. He feels that additional downsizing would have less impact on
existing businesses.
Chairperson Droste inquired about greenspace and clarified that outside storage of
garbage is not allowed. He prefers two 270' signs rather than three signs. He suggested
that any recommendations concerning traffic flow be subject to appropriate engineering
approvals. He also recommended that the 50% brick requirement be met.
Commissioner Weisensel liked the buffering in the back. He also prefers two signs and
the time restriction for sign lighting in the southwest corner. He clarified for residents
that by closing the driveway access to 151 St. and eliminating the comer greenspace on
151 to allow access off Crestone Ave., buffering in that area would be significantly
reduced.
Discussions continued concerning future expansion and the threshold for a public
hearing. Commissioners requested that any amount of expansion require a public
hearing.
MOTION by Droste to recommend that the City Council approve the PUD Amendment
for KTJ Limited Partnership on Outlot B, McNamara Addition subject to: 1) Execution
of an amendment to the PUD Agreement; 2) Revision of Grading, Parking and Utility
plans as necessary in accordance with recommendations by the Consulting Engineer; 3)
Additional landscaping for screening along 151 st Street West to buffer the loading docks;
4) Installation of sidewalks along Crestone Avenue and provide pedestrian links to all of
the buildings; 5) Provision of "Acorn" lights along Crestone Avenue and reducing the
height of the light standards to 30 feet and that lighting intensity and color shall be
consistent with existing General Commercial development; 6) Compliance with all
applicable building and fire codes; 7) Modification to traffic flow from Crestone Avenue
and Claret Avenue by closing the driveway access to 151 Street, subject to approval by
the Consulting Engineer and Fire Marshal; 8) Requiring that any fixture expansions will
require a public hearing; 9) Signage shall consist of two signs totaling 270 sq.ft., with the
lighted sign at the comer of Crestone Avenue and 151 Street to be turned off at 11:30
p.m.; 10) Compliance with the 50 %brick requirement. Seconded by Weisensel. Ayes:
Napper, Droste, and Weisensel. Nays: 0. Motion carried.
` Planning Commission
Regular Meeting Minutes
July 25, 2000
Page 2
M ON by Shoe - Corrigan to recommend that the City cil approve the PUD
Amen t for the hmisfree and Crosscroft neighb oods subject to: l) Provision of
additional °tectural renderings for the Acf enior neighborhood in order to
guarantee diversi of housing styles; 2 dating the planting plan legend to include the
48 10' -12' Colorado a Spruce 1 other previously stated conditions of approval
remain in effect; and 4) Ex 'on of an amended PUD Agreement. Seconded by
Weisensel. Ayes: Sh orrig Weisensel, Napper, and Droste. Nays:0. Motion
carried.
Ch ' rson Droste recessed the meeting until m.
Public Hearing: KTJ Limited Partnership (Cub Foods) PUD
Amendment and Final Plat
Chairperson Droste opened the public hearing on the PUD Amendment and Final Plat for
Cub Foods. The recording secretary has placed the Affidavit of Publication and Affidavit
of Mailing and Posting of a Public Hearing Notice on file with the City.
Mr. Pearson presented an overview of the Cub Foods project. This development is
located between Creston and Claret Avenues, south of CSAH 42 and north of 151 St.
The development proposal consists of an 80,000 sq.ft Cub Foods store, 13,000 sq.ft.
attached retail bays, and a separate 7,000 sq.ft. retail building. An amendment to the
PUD is necessary because of the proposal to have less than the required 50% brick and
for a modification of the sign expectations. Three 100 sq.ft signs are Permitted, but the
developer is proposing two 150 sq.ft. signs. Mr. Pearson reviewed access to the site,
parking, and traffic circulation. Parking requirements have been met, however, staff has
requested the parking stalls located in front of the retail area attached to the Cub facility
be eliminated. Building elevations were reviewed, together with the landscaping and
lighting plans. A 6 -7 foot berm plus landscaping is provided for screening along 151 St.
The store is 60 feet from the property line, 175 feet to the south edge of the 151 St.
right -of -way, and 200 feet to the nearest building. Staff recommends additional
sidewalks along Creston Avenue. The developer has agreed to lower the light poles to
30 feet.
Commissioners reviewed the sign designs. A monument -style sign is proposed in the
southwest corner of the site on 151 St.
Chairperson Droste opened the floor to the applicant. Paul Tucci of Oppidan was
present. Mr. Tucci indicated the developer has revised its plans to incorporate staff
recommendations. Additional sidewalks and connections have been included. Mr. Tucci
summarized plans for landscaping, berming, elevations, and signage. Canvas awnings
are planned on the retail bays.
Chairperson Droste opened the public hearing.
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting Minutes
July 25, 2000
Page 3
Richard Barnes, 3586 149 St. W., stated his preference for a restaurant on the site. He is
concerned about this location for the Cub store and feels it should be located further east.
Residents were led to believe there would be smaller businesses at this site. He raised
issues related to increased traffic, storage of waste products, and 24 -hour lighted signs.
Kelly McGivem 15173 Claret Avenue, pointed out there is a Cub store located only 4
miles away. He feels the city is moving too fast on this application. Mr. McGivem
referenced a Petition signed by residents, which shows a majority of residents are .
opposed to the Cub store. He prefers to see a unique business at this site which would
compliment existing businesses. He feels a store like Cub belongs in an Industrial
setting. He pointed out that previous traffic studies pertained to a 40,000 sq.ft. building.
Those studies must be redone because of the 80,000 sq.ft. size of Cub. He raised
concerns about traffic, lighting, water runoff, home values, the 24 hours of operation, and
noise from air conditioners, compressors, and trucks.
Brian Howard, 3748 Upper 149 St. W., requested screening for residents on the north
side of Co. Rd. 42. He inquired about lighting and the estimated traffic flow off Claret
Avenue.
Craig Schalliol, 3669154 St. W., built in Rosemount for the small city atmosphere. He
supports the local businesses and believes the big 7/24 stores should be in a larger city.
He feels that a large store like Cub would result in increased traffic, noise pollution, and
crime. He suggested that night deliveries not be allowed and that the park be relocated.
Steve Casey, 15455 Danville Ave., presented a Petition generated by the Rosemount
Residents for Responsible Development. He asked whether the speed limited on CSAH
42 will be reduced.
Chairperson Droste entered into record a letter, dated July 25, 2000, from Mr. & Mrs.
Greg Zippel, and a letter from Paul Wright.
Michael Palmer, 2682 Upper 138 St. W., is the owner of Pizza Man. Mr. Palmer is
concerned about additional competition, including the Cub deli and possibly another
pizza retailer in the strip mall, which may put him out of business. A substantial increase
in traffic would delay delivery service. He is also concerned about large open spaces if
businesses are forced to close. He believes the Cub store is too close to residential.
Monika Oeltien, 1 5772 Cicerone Court, indicated the traffic generation report is not
based on an 80,000 sq.ft. business. She questioned whether it is accurate. Ms. Oeltjen
inquired about delivery truck traffic.
Mr. Tucci summarized the anticipated Cub truck deliveries. In addition to the Cub
deliveries, numerous outside vendors would deliver items.
Ms. Oelt en asked where the support is for the three residential areas surrounding this
site. She requested that a new traffic study be performed.
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting Minutes
July 25, 2000
Page 4
Mr. Pearson explained the traffic study took into account over 200,000 sq.ft. of
commercial space. The county reviewed access to CSAH 42 and approved the plans.
Recommendations of the traffic study have been implemented. The consulting engineer
is reviewing the traffic plan and will give recommendations to the City Council
In response to concerns about garbage storage, Mr. Tucci indicated a compactor is
located at the rear side and is loaded from the inside of the building. Mr. Pearson added
that city ordinance does not allow the storage of garbage outside, and the city will ensure
that garbage collection containers are enclosed.
Discussions continued concerning parking lot elevations along CSAH 42
Thomas Gelich_ 15176 December Trail, felt the building is too large in proportion to the
lot. Mr. Pearson responded that the building meets the greenspace, parking, and setback
requirements. Mr. Pearson showed where the ponding is located and indicated the
consulting engineer is looking at stormwater drainage and utility design.
Margaret Capra, 4091 152 Ct. W., noted that the Apple Valley Cub has become run
down over the years. She feels the Cub store will be an eyesore on CSAH 42. She
indicated this small -town charming community is inviting huge, corporate America to
dump on its neighborhoods.
Jim EngelhM 15461 Darling Path, believes the city shouldn't rush into -this until all
issues have been addressed. His concerns relate to the residential neighborhood, park,
drainage, traffic, and location.
Lola Mills, 15130 Crestview Circle, feels the Cub store will be an eyesore. She has
concerns regarding traffic, noise, crime, pollution, truck deliveries, reduction in property
values, and its effect on existing businesses.
Brian Howard, explained that the concerns he raised earlier about car lights affecting the
north side residents pertained to cars exiting on Claret Avenue.
Bernie Strohsu£ raised concerns about truck traffic, garbage, and idling diesel trucks. He
suggested 6:00 a.m. — 9:00 p.m. delivery times. He inquired about the route trucks will
follow and indicated that Cub should pay for semaphores to be installed at certain
intersections.
Jeff Fadden- _ 12231 Biscayne Ave., inquired if a marketing study was performed and if
the population is sufficient to support a Cub store at this location. Mr. Tucci responded
that Cub has performed marketing studies.
Aimee Freebere 3840 153` St. W., indicated she could not see any benefit from this Cub
store. She has concerns regarding traffic and safety for the children at the park and at the
f
STATE OF MbMOTA }
)
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
�h
W eek The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of _
ty� eek , 1997 by Michael J. McNamara, a general partner of CHMPErmAL.E/42
PARTNERSHIP, a Minnesota general Partnership, on behalf of the Partnership.
WTMY W &otary Public .
Drafted By:
City of Rosemount
2875 -145th Street West
P.O. Box 510
Rosemount, W55068
ChW=dW* /42 ParmuiWp
PtSe 12 of 12
439, Rosemount, Minnesota 55068. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be
either hand delivered to the City Administrator or mailed to the City by registered mail in
care of the City Administrator at the following address: Rosemount City Hall, 2875 145th
Street West, Box 510, Rosemount, MN 55068, Attn: City Administrator.
J. Any amendments to this Agreement shall be in writing and executed by both parties.
K. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota.
IN W ITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the day and year first
above written.
CrrY of Rom ouw
By:
Cathy Busho, yor
B
S M.301sh, City Clerk
CHIPPENDALE 42 P ARTNERSHIP
By:
Michael J. McN , a general partner
STATE OF MaVNESOTA )
) SS
CO UNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of _
�t Q t" C w 1997 by Cathy Busho, Mayor, and Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk, of the
CrrY of ROSEMOUNT, a Minnesota fnunicipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and
pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council
t
Notary Public
EC= i=:Excpi :fJ i Chippe -We/42 Paruwship
Page I I of 12
LI
comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in
the Plat until the Developer does comply.
B. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer, or any successor or interest, shall
be grounds for denial of building permits.
C. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase of this
Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portion of this Agreement-
D. If building permits are issued prior to the completion and acceptance of public
improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting.in delays in
completion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the
City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, employees, agents, or third
parties.
E. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the
provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing,
signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's
failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or
release.
F. This Agreement shall run with the land and bind the Developer and aall future owners of
land within the Plat, and shall be recorded by the Developer against the title to the
property. After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this
Agreement, at the Developer's request, the City will execute and deliver to the Developer
an appropriate partial release from this Agreement.
G. Each right, power, or remedy herein conferred upon the City or the Developer,
respectively, as the case may be, is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power,
or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to the City or the
Developer, at law or in equity, or under any other Agreement, and each and every right,
power, and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to
time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City or the Developer
and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right,
power, or remedy.
H. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the written permission of the City
Council except that the Developer may assign this agreement and the obligations under it to
any subsequent owner or successor of any part of the plat.
I. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand - delivered to
the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at
the following address: Chippendale 42 Partnership, 15055 Chippendale Avenue South, Box
Chippendale/42 Parmenhip
Page 10 of 12
easements. The rights -of -way to be dedicated shall include Shannon Parkway, CSAH 42,
151st Street, Claret Avenue, Creston Avenue, Cimmaron Avenue and Chippendale
Avenue. The easements to be dedicated include the O'L,eary's Hills pond (in the southwest
corner of the site). The final plat should also include any other easements necessary for
public improvements required to serve the WalgreensI site.
B. Proposed Streets.
151st Street will be built at the Developer's expense from Shannon Parkway to the east to a
point just east of the Walgreens and daycare center site's driveway with the public
improvements necessary for the Walgreens site. It is anticipated that the first townhome
area to develop will be the southwest comer of the site. When that is constructed, 151st
Street will be constructed from its terminus easterly to just east of Claret Avenue (the south
leg) and Claret Avenue will be constructed to the south to connect to the existing roadway.
When the easterly townhome area develops, 151st Street will be required to be constructed
to Chippendale Avenue. Any trails or sidewalks are to be constructed with the streets. Any
commercial development will require the construction of adjacent streets and connections
to CSAH 42 and 151st Street. If 151st Street is not yet constructed, it will be constructed
simultaneously. Turn lanes on CSAH 42 will be constructed concurrently with the
construction of Creston, Claret and Cimmaron Avenues, including all trails and/or
sidewalks and appurtenant work necessary for the elimination of the ditch on the south side
of CSAH 42, and also including the turn lanes and elimination of the center median on
CSAH 42. The names of all public streets will be reviewed and assigned by the City. All
public and private streets will be constructed at the Developer's expense.
C. Agreement and Amendments.
1. Major changes to the Concept Plan and/or the above- stated criteria will be reviewed
by the Planning Commission with approval by the City Council as PUD
amendments, including such items as the public street locations, building location
changes beyond 60 *feet, building size changes of twenty percent (20 %) or more, a
reduction of total green space, ponding and park configurations, and housing
density.
2. The Developer is responsible for disclosure and must provide a copy of this
Agreement to all purchasers of lots or buildings within the Mixed Use Planned Unit
Development:
V. Administrative Provisions
A. The Developer represents to the City that to the best of its knowledge, the Plat complies
with all City, county, metropolitan, state and federal laws and regulations, zoning
ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the Plat does not
Chippendale/42 Partnership
Page 9 of 12
1 Claret Avenue south of 151st Street, 60 -feet wide right -of -way, 32 -feet wide street.
2. 151st Street, 80 -feet wide right -of -way, 40 -feet wide street.
3. Private street width to be determined at time of site plan review.
F. Setbacks, Lot Dimensions, Height, Lot Coverage and Density.
1. Minimum setbacks:
a.. 30 feet from 151st Street, Shannon Parkway and Chippendale Avenue for all
structures.
b. 30 feet from Claret Avenue for all structures.
C. Setbacks for structures from private streets shall be determined at time of site
plan review.
2. Height shall be limited to 35 feet for all structures.
3. Maximum gross density. = 6.0 dwelling units per acre, based on the total land area
of Outlot E and Outlot F, McNamara Addition, minus any future commercial lot
area within Outlot F.
G. Permitted Uses.
Uses permitted in the residential areas shall be those identified in zoning district R-2,
Single Family Attached, Section 6.7 of Ordinance B.
H. Public Park.
The proposed public park, as identified in the Concept Plan, shall be platted and graded on
or before the platting and grading has been completed for townhome residential
development either west or east of Claret Avenue, whichever occurs first.
IV. Conditions for Overall Planners Unit Develop t�
A. Final Platting.
The first final plat shall include the complete PUD area showing all public streets, utility
easements, and the remaining properties shown as oudots. The area to be final platted with
the PUD will include the Walgreens lot, the 'daycare lot (immediately south of the
Walgreens lot) and the Rosemount National Bank lot plus all right -of -way and utility
ChippeoWe/42 Partnership
Page 3 of 12
42 to 151st Street. Private internal streets shall follow a lighting plan for the PUD
as approved by the City. All lighting will be installed at the Developer's expense.
III. Residential Planned Use Development:
All residential development shall meet the following performance standards. Where a specific
standard is not addressed herein, the land use regulation applicable to the R -2 zone of the City
Code shall apply.
A. Vehicle Access.
1. One future north -south public Street (Claret Avenue) and one future east -west public
Street (151st Street) shall be and constructed at the Developer's expense to
serve this residential development. All other residential streets may be private.
2. All additional future private street accesses to the two (2) public streets shall be
designed and approved as part of further site plan reviews in accordance with the
Concept Plan, including alignments with public streets where feasible.
3. Claret Avenue shall maintain a minimum 250 feet spacing from centerline to
centerline along 151st Street.
B. Pedestrian Access.
Sidewalks (5 -feet concrete) shall be installed at the Developer's expense along the east side
of Claret Avenue, the south side of 151st Street, and along one side of the main private
streets within the residential areas. The City may require the construction of a bituminous
path (8 -feet) at the Developer's expense from the public park path to Chippendale Avenue.
C. Parking.
Parking shall meet the corresponding parking standards as identified in Section 8 of the
Zoning Code to be reviewed at the time of site plan review.
D. Landscaping.
Street and project landscaping shall meet the minimum standards as prepared by Damon
Farber Associates dated June 18, 1996. However, future residential projects will be
reviewed in more detail under the site plan review process.
E. Street Design.
Street rights -of -way and curb -to -curb widths shall be based on the following standards:
Chippendale/42 Partnership
Pate 7 of 12
Uses permitted shall be those identified in zoning district C -4, General Commercial,
Section 6.13 of Ordinance B; provided that no auto - oriented sales/service establishments or
outdoor display of merchandise shall be permitted west of Crestone Avenue. Hours of
operations shall be limited to 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. for businesses operating in the
commercial lots adjacent to Shannon Parkway. Amendments to the C-4 zoning district
regulations within two (2) years of this Agreement shall not apply to this Plat.
J. Public Utilities.
1. Storm Drainage: The Walgreens site will require catch basins and appropriate
piping from 151st Street to its parking lot. From that point the area will drain to the
O'Leary's Hills pond south of this site. The Rosemount National Bank site (the most
northeasterly lot in the Plat) will be temporarily allowed to drain to the wetland to
the west with appropriate easements submitted and will be required to connect to
storm drain in the 151st Street when that is constructed. A drainage easement from
CSAH 42 to the detention pond in the southwest comer of the Plat shall be vacated
once public storm water utilities are constructed to replace said easement. All storm
water detention ponds shall be constructed according to a schedule to be determined
by the City Public Works Director, and all storm drainage improvements shall be
constructed at the Developer's expense. The designated wetland shall be evaluated
for replacement according to a completed WCA Wetland Replacement Form.
2. Sanitary Sewer:. The sanitary sewer to serve the Walgreens site will be as on the
revised plan from Engineer Jim Johnson of Bolton & Menk dated June 18, 1996, a
copy of which is on file with the Rosemount Public Works This sanitary
sewer will be constructed at the Developer's expense and will provide service to all
properties west of the proposed Crestone Avenue and to the southwest townhome
development area (the area south of 151st Street and west of Claret Avenue
extended). This area will eventually flow to the Empire Treatment Plant. The
remainder of this site described as east of Creston Avenue and east of the south leg
of Claret Avenue will be provided sanitary service at the Developer's expense to
flow to the Rosemount Treatment Plant.
3. Watermain: A 12 -inch watermain shall by contructed in the 151st Street alignment
from Shannon Parkway to Chippendale Avenue. The City will participate in one-
half (1/2) of the cost of oversizing it from an 8 -inch to a 12 -inch line. An
additional 12 -inch watermain shall be constructed from 151st Street north to the
proposed Walgreens along the north -south private drive, then east to Cimmaron
Avenue and south to 151st Street. All required watermains will be constructed at
the Developer's expense with the exception of oversizing as identified.
4. Lighting:. All public streets will include typical lighting required by the City except
where the NSP decorative lighting ( "acorn" style) previously chosen by the City will
be required on both sides of Claret, Crestone and Cimmaron Avenues from CSAH
Chippendale/42 Partnership
Page 6 of 12
C. Creston Avenue and Cimmaron Avenue, 66 -feet wide right -of -way, 36 -feet
wide street.
d. 151st Street, 80 -feet wide right -of -way, 40 -feet wide street.
e. Shannon Parkway, 100 -feet right- of-way north of 151st Street and 85 -feet
right -of -way south of 151st tappering to 80 -feet at the point of curve
approximately 200 -feet south of 151st Street; future street design plans may
require additional right -of -way north of 151st Street.
H. .Setbacks, Lot Dimensions, Height and Lot Coverage.
L Minimum setbacks:
a. 30 feet from Shannon Parkway and CSAH 42 for structures. 30 feet from
Shannon Parkway for parking lots and driveways. 20 feet minimum with a
25 feet average setback for parking lots and driveways along CSAH 42.
b. 30 feet from 151 Street for structures; 20 feet for parking lots and
driveways.
C. 30 feet from Creston, Claret and Cimmaron Avenues for structures, 15 feet
for parking lots and driveways.
d. 15 feet from other properties within the PUD for structures; 0 feet for
parking lots and driveways.
e. All other structures, parking lots and driveways shall be no less than the
minimum setback criteria specified in Section 7.1 of Ordinance B.
2: Lot dimensions:
a. Minimum lot area = 1 acre, subject to future site plan reviews
3. Maximum building height:
a. Principal structures = 35 feet
b. Accessory structures = 30 feet
4. Maximum lot coverage = 75 %, which includes structures, paved parking areas and
other impervious surfaces, subject to further site plan reviews in accordance with the
Concept Plan.
I. Permitted Uses.
Chippendale/42 FattnenWp
Page 5-of 12
d. A minimum of thirty (30) feet shall be maintained for landscaping/berming
between perimeter parking and the rights -of -way of Shannon Parkway; a
minimum of twenty (20) feet shall be maintained along CSAH 42; and
additional width shall be required in areas without perimeter parking,
e. All landscaped areas shall include underground irrigation.
L Landscape material quantities shall be provided in an amount equaling one
hundred twenty -five percent (125 %) of the minimum requirements specified
in Section 8 of Ordinance B.
E. Screening.
1. A minimum four (4) feet screen with ninety percent (90 %) opacity year round shall
be provided along Shannon Parkway north of 151st Street and along CSAH 42 by
using a combination of landscaping and berming; berming slopes shall not exceed a
3:1 ratio. Exceptions to this screen may be permitted for certain features, including
but not limited to, site triangles, sidewalks and drainage.
2. All waste containment areas shall be fully screened with a wall material the same as
the commercial building. A solid gate shall also be used for access to the waste
area. Landscaping should enhance the screening measures at appropriate locations.
F. Architecture, Lighting and Signage.
Individual project architecture shall meet the guidelines as identified in the Architectural
Guidelines by CNH Architects dated June 7, 1996, a copy of which is on file with the
Rosemount Community Development Director, with the exception that lap siding is not
permitted. Fifty percent (50 %) of the unglazed portion of each facade shall be faced with
brick. Lighting and signage plans shall be approved for each project after considering
coiresponding plans for the Plat.
G. Street Des*gn.
1. Streets rights -of -way and curb -to -curb widths shall be based on the standards as
follows:
a. Claret Avenue, north of 151st Street, 80 -feet wide right -of -way, 24 -feet wide
street each way, or as approved by Dakota County, with center landscaped
median (16 -feet wide), no parking both sides.
b. Claret Avenue south of 151st Street, 60 -feet wide right -of -way, 32 -feet wide
street, parking both sides.
MhTenUe/42 Partnership
Page 4 of 12
2. Future development projects shall incorporate sidewalks from the buildings to the
adjacent pedestrian system identified in No. 1 above; connections from one building
to another shall also be incorporated into designs.
C. Parking.
1. Each development project shall meet the corresponding parking standards as
identified in Section 8 of Ordinance B, City of Rosemount Zoning Regulations.
Consideration of parking requirement reductions will be made by the City based on
provisions for shared parking among multiple tenants and/or other related factors
that impact parking demand, with reciprocal enhancements made to green space
above minimum requirements.
2. Landscaped islands at the end of parking aisle shall be designed and approved as
part of future site plan reviews in accordance with the Concept Plana
3. Perimeter parking adjacent to the setback along all existing /future street rights -of-
way shall be limited; the Concept Plan shall be used as a guide for future
development proposals in meeting this objective_ Areas without perimeter parking
shall include increased setbacks for green space.
D. Landscaping.
1, Street and project landscaping shall meet the minimum standards as prepared by
Damon Farber Associates dated June 18, 1996, a copy of which is on file with the
Rosemount Community Development Director. In addition, the conditions
are incorporated:
a. A minimum of twenty -five percent (25 %) of the total commercial PUD area
shall be landscaped. Variations for lesser amounts may be permitted for
individual site development, provided that adequate assurances are provided
that at least 25 % of the total commercial PUD area will be landscaped.
b. Parking lot landscaped islands shall be a minim width of eight (8) feet,
except that islands along the main internal east -west street shall be a
minimum width of twelve (12) feet.
C. A minimum of fifty percent (50 %) of the lineal foot total of all building
perimeters shall be landscaped with a minim Meet wide planting area.
Variations for lesser amounts may be permitted for individual site
development, provided adequate assurances are provided that at least fifty
percent (50%) of the total building perimeters will be landscaped.
Chippendale/42 Partnership
Page 3 of 12
A. Vehicle Access.
1 One private unrestricted access will initially be allowed on Shannon Parkway at least
295 feet from the southerly edge of the ROW of CSAH 42. No further cross access
shall be permitted between the west and east halves of the most western block (west
of Crestone Avenue) other than access for delivery vehicles to the rear of buildings.
However, changes may be approved by the City to this internal access and the full
access on Shannon Parkway once final development plans are reviewed for other
property in this block, and access to Shannon Parkway may be restricted or closed
by the City for documented traffic circulation or safety reasons at a future date.
2. Three (3) future north -south public streets and one (1) future east -west public street
shall be platted and constructed at the Developer's expense to serve this commercial
area. One (1) additional private east -west drive will be constructed in the middle of
the commercial area.'
3. Access to /from CSAH 42 shall be limited as follows: Claret Avenue (right- in/right-
out, left turn), and Creston and Cimmaron Avenues (right- in/right -out) as approved
by Dakota County.
4. All future private accesses to local streets shall be designed and approved as part of
future site plan reviews in accordance with the Concept Plan.
5. Claret Avenue shall maintain a minimum 250 -feet, spacing from centerline to
centerline along 151st Street.
6. Appropriate easements shall be recorded for the Walgreens and daycare lots south of
the Walgreens site providing for permanent access for the Walgreens site to 151st
Street. These easements shall be recorded with the final plat.
13. Pedestrian Access.
1. Sidewalks (5- feet concrete) shall be installed at the Developer's expense along
public streets as follows: (a) both sides of Claret Avenue north of 151st Street and
the east side of Claret Avenue south of 151st Street; (b) the west side of Crestone
Avenue; (c) the east side of Cimmaron Avenue; and (d) the north and south sides of
151st Street. Bituminous paths (8 -feet) shall be retained on the east side of Shannon
Parkway and the west side of Chippendale Avenue, and shall be installed on the
south side of CSAH 42. The option of a concrete sidewalk on the south side of
CSAH 42 will be further analyzed by the City in relationship to cost, revenues and
desirability; the City will pay any cost differential for concrete versus bituminous
material:
Chippeadald42 Partnership
Page 2 of 12
• xZcu.I Cep y
Final
Planned Unit Development Agreement
CMPPENDALE 42 PARTNERSHW
THIS AGxmmvT dated this 4th day of March 1997, by and between the CrrY
OF RosuvtouN , a Minnesota municipal corporation, ( "City "), and CmPENmALE 42
PART, a Minnesota general partnership, having the address of 15055 Chippendale Avenue
South, P.O. Box 439, Rosemount, Minnesota 55068, (the "Developer ").
Request for Planned Unit Development Approval The Developer has asked the City to
approve a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (PUD) to be known as McNAMARA
ADDITION (also referred to in this agreement as the "Plat "). The land is legally described as
follows:
The North One Half of the Northeast One Quarter of Section 31, Township 115, Range 19
W, Dakota County, Minnesota.
The City, through this Agreement, approves the Mixed Use Planned Unit Development upon the
following conditions.
I. Concept Plan:
The term "Concept Plan" used herein shall refer to the Concept Plan drawing by Damon Faber
Associates dated August 16, 1996, a copy of which is on file with the Rosemount Community
Development Director.
The Concept Plan is intended to be a sketch depicting the overall "look" of the complete PUD
area. To the greatest extent possible, future development proposals within the PUD shall conform
to the design framework of the Concept Plan. This framework relates primarily to such features
as the public street system and private accesses, landscaping areas, pedestrian walkways, corner
enhancements, parking configurations and building locations. The City of Rosemount will review
each future development project's detailed site plan and final plats within the framework of the
Concept Plan and the following Criteria as a guide to final design decisions. Since specific
projects are not being proposed within this PUD (with the exception of the Walgreen's site at the
most northwesterly corner of the plat), future site plans will be reviewed in accordance with
Section 14.4 of Ordinance B, City of Rosemount Zoning Regulations; future site plans and plats
will be reviewed for conformance with the Concept Plan and this Agreement.
H. Commercial Planned Use Development:
All commercial development shall comply` with the Concept Plan and meet the following
performance standards. Where a specific standard is not addressed herein, the land use
regulations of the City Code for the C -4 Zoning District shall apply.
®PPIDA --
A lderof w*m Creator of value. _y '
5125.COUNTY Rona 101. • #100 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 PHONE: 612/294 -0353 Fax: 612/294 -0151 WEB: www.oppidan.com _ ti ~
We have identified two monument signs on the sight. One is located along County Road 42 in
. the middle of the sight and the second is located at corner of 151 s` Street and Claret- Avenue. Per
the city ordinance, we are allowed three signs on sight, each limited to, 100 square feet of sign
urea, for a total of 300 square feet of signs on the site. We are proposing to limit the site to two
signs, each containing 150 square feet of sign - area for total of 300 square feet. `
We do feel that the proposed development - is consistent with the guidelines set forth in the
originl PUD Agreement. We have indicated the changes to that agreement and feel that this
application retains the integrity of the original PUD. We are excited about this opportunity and
look forward to working with the City of Rosemount to develop a quality center that we can all be
proud of
Sincerely,
Paul J. ucci _. r
CC: Joe Ryan
Dennis Crowe
Builder of towns Creator of value.
5125 COUNTY Roan 101 • ;aOQ • MINNETONKA, MN 55345 •PHONE: 612/294 -0353 Fax: 612/294 -0151 WEB: wwwoppidanxom
July 5, 2000
Mr. Richard Pearson, City Planner _ Y
City of Rosemount
2875 145` Street West
Rosemount, MN 550684997
RE: Proposed Retail Center
Outlot `B" McNamara Addition
Rosemount, Minnesota:
Dear Rick: .
Enclosed are the applications for the Final Plat and Site Plan Review for the proposed retail - _
center as listed above. The following is a summary the prominent facts of the site:
• Total Site Area of 9.67 acres or 421,184 square feet.
• Total building area of 100,000 square feet.
• Total green area of 23.12 %.
• Grocery Operation of 80,000 square feet -
• Additional Retail of 20,000 square feet. -
The site is currently part of a Planned Unit Development (PUD)-which was set in place to
accommodate retail users in the city. The original PUD had anticipate a combination of smaller
retail users and larger "big box' users throughout the site. The uses anticipated - included service _
retail, grocery, liquor, restaurants, auto users (no dealerships) and other ancillary uses. The PUD
also indicated proposed areas for the users and building sizes and locations.
We have located the grocery user on this.lot to minimize the need for parking in the rear of the
site and to allow for better circulation in the area. Also, the landscaping plan was designed to -
incorporate berms and planting of spruce trees on tighter than normal spacing in the rear of the - -
site. In addition, the topography of the site also provides screening in the rear to the buildings -
and in the front to the parking areas. - - -
The grocery store is designed incorporating block on the first two feet - and brick-to an elevation
of ten feet on the front and east sides. These' elevations are the two that are most directly
exposed. The balance of those two elevations incorporated EFIS for the sign areas. The rear and
west elevations, which are screened, incorporate block materials that carry the color pattern
throughout the building. -
The remaining retail space is designed using brick on the first ten feet ofthe elevation and then
using EFIS on the balance. In addition, canvas canopies are anticipated over the entry areas to
- the spaces. — _
July 25, 2000 PC Reviews — Cub PUD Amendment
Page 3.
CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION
The 100,000 sq. ft. of commercial uses proposed for the largest outlot of the Chippendale 42
PUD seems to fit with the original expectations of a "big box" in the development. In fact, street
improvements have been made in accordance with recommendations of the traffic study prepared
by WSB Consultants. The development meets all of the standards foe Commercial Development
and the PUD requirements except for the amount of brick and the proposed sign substitution.
Therefore, staff recommends:
A motion to recommend that the City Council approve the PUD Amendment for KTI Limited
Partnership on Outlot B, McNamara Addition subject to:
1. Execution of an amendment to the PUD Agreement.
2. Revision of Grading, Parking and Utility plans as necessary in accordance with
recommendations by the City Engineer. -
3. Additional landscaping for screening along 151s Street West to buffer the loading docks.
4. Installation of sidewalks along Crestone Avenue and provision of pedestrian links to all
of the buildings.
5. Provision of "Acorn Lights" along Crestone Avenue and reducing the height of the light
standards to thirty feet, and that lighting intensity and color shall be consistent with
existing General Commercial development.
6. Compliance with all applicable building and fire codes.
A motion to approve the final plat for Outlot B, McNamara Addition subjeet to:
i. Payment of Park Dedication fees in accordance with the current fee schedule.
2. Payment of G.I.S. fees.
3. Approval of the Dakota County Plat Commission.
July 25, 2000 PC Reviews — Cub PUD Amendment
Page 2.
Wall / Elevation Surface Brick Percentage
North (front) — Cub Foods 27 %°
Retail Shops (next to Cub) 24%
Retail 'W' 42%
South (rear) — Cub Foods No Brick (all concrete)
Retail Shops (next to Cub) 52%
Retail 'W' 42%
West Retail Shops (next to Cub) 48%
Retail 'W' 56%
East Cub Pharmacy Drive- through28%
Retail «A„ 25.4%
One of the reasons for the variable brick amount relates to the amount of glass on the store
fronts. The elevations facing Crestone Avenue to the west have close to or more than the
required amount of brick. It seems appropriate to encourage as close as possible the required
amount of brick on the exterior walls of the block. The Developer feels that the southerly
elevation will be thoroughly screened with bemiing and landscaping, so the brick is not justified.
LANDSCAPING
The plan is consistent with the PUD requirement for 125% of the minimum landscaping
requirements. Plantings ring the site, but with visible gaps at the comers along CSAH 42 for
visibility. The intent is to partially screen the views from the north side of CS_M 42, but allow
glimpses of the site to traffic along '42. The 151` Street setback yard is heavily landscaped to
screen the loading docks from the residential development to the south. Staff has suggested that
more landscaping be provided to fill gaps in the screening of the loading docks.
SIDEWALKS
Sidewalks were installed along CSAH 42, Claret and 151` Street. The Developer has agreed to
install a sidewalk along Crestone Avenue and pedestrian connections into the site from the outer
sidewalks.
LIGHTING AND OTHER ISSUES
Light standards were originally proposed at 40 ft. heights. The Developer has agreed to lower
the fixtures to 30 feet. Cub will be open 24 hours, but the night traffic is expected to be quite
light (that is when the shelves are stocked).
There have been many questions regarding traffic. The original PUD included a traffic study by
WSB, the Cities' consulting engineer (see attached). Most of the recommended improvements
have already been made. The PUD anticipated an additional (approximate) 160,000 sq. ft. of
commercial/retail space beyond the Walgreens', Kindercare and Goodyear developments.
CITY OF ROSEMOU NT
Everything's Coming Up Rosemount!!
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Pearson, City Planner
DATE: July 20, 2000
RE: KTJ Limited Partnership PUD Amendment for Cub Foods
July 25, 2000 Regular Meeting Reviews
CITY HALL
2875 - 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN
55068 -4997
Phone: 651- 423 -4411
Hearing Impaired 651- 423 -6219
Fax: 651. 423 - 5203
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT
This proposal concerns a total of 100,000 sq. ft. of retail Commercial development on the block
east of Walgreens', which includes 80,000 sq. ft. for a grocery anchor, Cub Foods. This is the
"big box" anticipated by the Chippendale 42 Partnership Planned Unit Development. The PUD
amendment is requires because the proposal requests relief from the 50% brick requirement. In
addition, two 150 sq. ft. monument signs are proposed in trade for three 100 sq. ft. pylon signs
that would otherwise be permitted.
ACCESS, CIRCULATION & PARKING
Primary customer access occurs at Crestone and Claret Avenue, connecting across the middle of
the site in front of the main building. 473 parking spaces are located on the north side of the Cub
and associated retail building relative to these access points. No additional access is proposed at
CSAH 42. A second connection to Crestone Avenue allows access to the 31 parking spaces
behind the 13,000 sq. ft. retail shops west of Cub. This area will be primarily for employees.
Lastly, an access from 151' Street West will be intended for semi -truck traffic for the five
loading docks. An exit for the loading docks occurs at Claret Avenue, which also includes the
entrance for drive -up window for the pharmacy.
In total, there are 504 parking spaces provided which is sufficient to meet ordinance parking
requirements for shopping centers. Staff does have a concern about the 17 spaces in front of the
retail shops. A potential conflict occurs with cars backing into a primary traffic lane. It may be
possible to redistribute the spaces among the stalls to the north and south of the building.
BUILDING CHARACTERISTICS
Both buildings have a base course of rock faced concrete block in the first two feet from ground
level. Then, brick alternating with glass up to a height of ten feet. A two foot wide accent band
of glazed block provides "trim" above the brick. The remaining elevations above the twelve foot
height are EFIS (stucco appearance) for the wall sign areas. The west and south walls of the Cub
building are treated with rock - faced concrete block with accent bands.
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting Minutes
July 25, 2000
Page 6
MOTION by Droste to continue the public hearing on the KTJ Limited Partnership (Cub
Foods) Planned Unit Development Amendment and Final Plat to August 8, 2000, at 7:00
p.m. Seconded by Shoe - Corrigan. Ayes: Weisensel, Napper, Droste, and Shoe-
Corrigan. Nays: 0. Motion carried.
Chairperson Droste recessed the meeting for five minutes. The meeting reconvened at
10:05 p.m.
Chairperson Droste recessed the regular Planning Commission meeting and convened the
Board of Appeals & Adjustments.
Public Hearing: Vermillion State Bank — Variance to Setbacks
Cha' erson Droste opened the public hearing on the application by Ve ' ion State
Bank a variance to setback requirements. The recording secre ary .placed the
Affidavit Publication and Affidavit of Mailing and Posting of a P c Hearing Notice
on file with City.
Mr. Pearson indica d that Vermillion State Bank wishes to r ocate to the former Tom
Thumb site. The b as requested a variance to setbac or three sides of the building
in order to construct a ' e-through lane. Mr. Pearson ummarized the setback
encroachments and possibl esolutions. Lack of sno storage space and traffic
circulation present concerns.
Chairperson Droste opened the floo o the a icant. -
Kevin Pedelty appeared on behalf of the rmillion State Bank. Mr. Pedelty summarized
improvements planned for the site. indic ed that approximately 70% of the bank's
business is drive - through. The v ' ce on the uth side is not required as initially
anticipated. Snow storage woul of be a problem ecause the bank has the snow hauled
away.
Commissioners discusse a possibility of a drive - through ane in the front of the
building. Stacking pr ems and the turning radius present afe conditions. Mr.
Pedelty indicated th option of constructing a new building on site was cost
prohibitive.
Mr. Pearson plained that at the time the building was constructed, the azce
combined esulting in a property line which bisects the building. This wo d
correct if a variance is granted.
Co 'ssioner Napper indicated he would rather see a bank in this location.
erson Droste opened the floor to the public. There were no comments.
i was never
have to be
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting Minutes
July 25, 2000
Page 5
daycare center. She feels the Cub store will affect the existing businesses and wondered
how they could make it.
Mr. Pearson reviewed the Comprehensive Plan and located the commercial districts
within the city.
Dwayne Folger 14932 Crestview Ave., wondered why the change from the initial plan of
a 40,000 sq.ft. building. Such a large store limits other businesses that could locate to
this site. He inquired about plans for roads to handle the growth and traffic.
Mr. Pearson summarized anticipated street improvements in the city.
Mr. Folger felt the traffic study is not accurate. Smaller retail units would not generate as
much traffic. He requested a new traffic study based on Cub's presence.
Jean Prichard, 3868 Upper 149 St. W., felt the concerns of the residents living north of
CSAH 42 have not been sufficiently addressed and that their property values will
decrease. She wants to maintain the small town atmosphere. She indicated that Cub is
not - taking the risk, but the small town community.
Michael Palmer inquired about traffic flow and road improvements.
Sandra Pedersen voiced her opposition to the Cub store.
Jim En eg lhart suggested that Cub be placed east of Hwy 3.
Mr. Pearson summarized activity in the Business Park.
Tracy Doherty 12375 Blacha Ave., prefers a smaller grocery store. She wants another
choice for shopping and something that fits into the residential area.
Chairperson Droste ended the public comment and turned to Commissioners for
comments.
Commissioner Napper indicated his opposition to the Cub store and suggested it be
downsized or moved.
Commissioners listed unresolved issues for the developer to address, including, the
number of truck deliveries, sight lines to the north, hours of operation, outdoor storage,
screening on 151 St., pedestrian lighting, planters, roof enhancements, examples of other
Cub store loading docks, and traffic projections. Commissioner Weisensel, considering
the 50% brick requirement, suggested brick fencing along the backside or breaking up the
backside of the building with brick. Chairperson Droste requested that the actual
percentage of glass be determined.
s
61A. Con*ucdon of Cub Foods
Date: 7!24/0!? 10:49:30 AM Certra! Daylight Time
From; MATrhW I.com (Holly TrhW)
To: mcbusho(Ded.com ('mcbusho&d.com)
good morning!
My name is Holly Tdved and I am a new resident to the Rosemourt area. My
husband ON moved to 152nd Street - right hind the area in motion tr
construction of the new Cub Foods. I'm emailing to share my concerns Wth
the proposal.
I vvas approached on this subject by a neighbor !ate last week. I vas told
of the intent 1br a new Cub Fools in the area next to my new home, Of
course this was of great concem to my husband and 1, as vve just mo%ed from
the tow tares (on Cedar Avenue) directly accross from Cub Foods. One of our
biggest reasons for relocating mes to escape the traffic, noise and over-all
hustle and bustle of this location.
While I'm sure that some people fleel that this verture wnuld benefit the
City of Rosemount, I personally feel that it is a mistake. I cwt inWne
that with all of the land in the Rosemount area, that there isn't a more
suttabtf Place to put such a huge complex.
I'm strOVY against this proposal. I knowthat I don't just speak for
myself when I Say that nobody in this area wishes to look out their Wndom
and see a lit up parking lot f0ed with cars 24 hours a day! Not to
mention what it does for the safety of our children!
I know that you cannot solely make the decision to mild or riot build, but
please think about the true effiocts this Wil haw on the comrrvarity, and the
people vitro reside in it.
Please feet free to share my comments with other Council members. Thank you
for your time.
Holly Trim
AdmirNstradvs Assistant
PCL Oonstrw icn SeNces, Inc:
Minneapolis District
Headers
Return -Path: <.HATrivedi@pd.cortv
Received: from dy- yd02rnx.ad.com (fly- yd02maii.ad.com [77218,150.21) by air -yd04.nidl.ad.com (v75 b1.4) with ESMiP;
Mon, 24 Jul 20M 11:49:29 -0400
Received: from grapes. pcl.com ([207.229.58.36]) by dY ydO2- m-ad•corn (v75.18) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Ad 200011 :4819 -
0400
Received: *am edmexchO2pcl.ca (edmexch02pci.ca [206.75117.531)
by grapes.pcl.c om (8.9.318.9.3) with ESMTP id F AA17302
for <. mcbusho@aol.com >; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 07.05:19 -0000
Received: by edmexchMpcl.ca with Internet Mail Serdce (55.2448.0)
old <30Rfi4FV1 >; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 09:50:58 -0600
Message4D: <25C D @DENEXO}I01.PCt..CA>
From: Holly Trivad <.HATd%ed @pd.com>
V
r
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members of City of Rosemount, that we are opposed to the construction of a
Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the area located south of County Road 42 and between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
Parkway.
We believe that the construction of such'a store would have the following undesirable effects on the area:
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes.
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the city.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Valley ring route.)
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all consideration of a Cub Food Store or any construction of this type
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as this located within it.
Name (Print)
M"
It
*0 0
M ,,! / 9MWOM
WNWAAAWMI AMR.
M IM
1
a �k,,e,r- a l� �� �r 1 u � - Sd W �os�eS�,.t-
J)a)&Y I/ T `L lq 3a 66�s7V 60 4 A ® r-
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members of
Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the area locate City of Rosemount, that we are Oppose
Parkway. d south of County Road 42 and between Chi ends d to the construction of a
We believe that he construction of such a store would have the f Pp dale Avenue and Shannon
I.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding home undesirable ef on the area:
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in t he surrounding neighborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located with
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding Brea. (Similar 4n the city,
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently sus end an to the Apple Valley ring route,)
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is A rno;Ao...:., ____p Y and all consideration of C„h Fnn.l
(Over -0
2 S?
3°
P 3�
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members of City of Rosemount, that we are opposed to the construction of a
Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the area located south of County Road 42 and between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
Parkway.
We believe that the construction of such a store would have the following undesirable effects on the area:
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes.
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the city.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Valley ring route.)
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all consideration of a Cub Food Store or any construction of this type
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as this located within it.
�, V
Name Print
A
r rr�ri
,
I / w it / ,
:. i 1_
!:� J ./ ♦ �.
�11071003/ AM
,
_
�- �-
W
M. L �i��
r7A r' ter
.�
f A
s.
ANOMMEME
�, V
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council
Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain area located south of
cil members of City of Rosemount, that. we are
n store, in the opposed to the construction of
Parkway. County Road 42 and between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
We believe that the construction of such a store would have the f
nnon
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homesUndesirable effects on the area:
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and '
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses locate!n the surrounding neighborhood.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar tothelA le the Valley
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend a
in the above mentioned area. We feel that thic ;a A rne:A- -&!.., _ _ pp alley ring route.)
P an and all consideration of C11h Rn...i e+,.....
(Over - >)
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members of City of Rosemount, that we are opposed to the construction of a
Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the area located south of County Road 42 and between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
Parkway.
We believe that the construction of such a store would have the following undesirable effects on the area:
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes.
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the city.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Valley ring route.)
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all consideration of a Cub Food Store or any construction of this type
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as this located within it.
(Over -+)
Name ( Print)
WITSe
WA IM i
/.�✓ A _.s
/ /��t✓
(Over -+)
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor an
Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store,
Y d council members of City of Rosemount. opposed to the construction of
Parkway, in the area to , that we are
sated south of County Road 42 and between Chippendale Avenue and Sh a
We believe that the construction of such a store would have the followin annon
g undesirable effects on the area:
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and i
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located withi
n the surrounding neighborho od..
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the A n 1 he city.
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend an pp truction of this type
a Valley ring route.)
y and all consideration of a Cub Food Store or any con
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not h
ave businesses such as this located within it .
-
M
(Over —+)
We, the ;undersigned; do hereby give notice to.the: mayor and'council members of City of Rosemount, ;that; we are opposed - itho, constructiou 4, # :)w
Cub Foods)storC.dri any! major retail-chain`store,•in.the located south;of County,Road.42 and between Chippendale Ayenuo,pd
Parkway. v M.. d I I. i
We believe that the construction of such'a store would have the following undesirable effects on the area: ;, t
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes.
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller. businesses located within the city.; ;
4,) Add unwanted light pollution to the ,surrounding area, (Similar to the Apple Valley ring route.)
We therefore .petition the City of Rosemount to `permanently suspend any and all 'consideration of a Cub Food Store or any construction of this type
in the above mentioned area. We feel, that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as,this located within it.
(OveYK )
Name (Print)
ro.
�
..:�/..iN
���,.
. � '
r. i ' �, .. M �,►
�,& ANOM a iii ��►
�'1�� � �� Ir�®
� tea. • _ r
,
(OveYK )
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and cou
Cub Foods store;*or any major retail chain store, in the area located south of CountyrRoad 42 ount, that we are opposed pposed to�the construction.ofa
We believe that the construction of such a store would have d between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes. undesirable effects on the area:
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surroundin
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within g neighborhood.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Vale rin
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any 1 and al considerati Y g route.)
on of a Cub Food Store or any constrict ion of this type.
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as this located within it.
Name I —r
(Over - +)
f �
,�1
We the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members of City of Rosemount, that we are opposed to the nd Shannon of a
Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the area located south of County Road 42 and between Chippendale Avenue
Parkway.
We believe that the construction of such a store would have the following undesirable effects on the area;
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes.
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the city.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Valley ring route.)
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all consideration of a Cub Food Store or any construction of this type
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as this located within it.
Name Name Print Address
1 �
`yam 7 J
� l
A �/ M!�lt
G t!
Y a 0 ld M
Is
�G.,�. --. �1 t PAC Y -ate r`' "l 7 C c. AK Q",ov E. ?qr (off
G �b n M rV `n / SI ? G 74
re 5o r 1* 1
-7 I
N C� ALL
i�
(Over ->)
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the
y and council members of City of Rosemount, that we are opposes to the
Parkway. area located south of County Road 42 and between Chi construction of a
ar
We believe that the construction of such a store would hav ppendale Avenue and Shannon
l .) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding
r
e the following undesirable effects on the area:
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding rea.. within the city..
We therefore petition
the City of Rosemount to permanently g (Similar to the Apple Valley ring. route.)
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential
t y suspend any and all conideration of a Cub Food Store or an construction
area and should no�hay bu sinesses such as this located within it. of this type
Name
�r Name Print
(Over -4
Wa, fihe in ersigpid, do hereby ' give notice •to the mayor and council members of City of Rosemount, that we are opposed to the construction,of a , , ;
Cub Food'i'Wdre, or'anj lftfijor retail• chain store, in the'area located'south of County Road 42 and between' Chi' endale AvenueIand Shannon, ��,, { ��,'.a
Parkway. ; ^
We believe that the construction of such a store would have the following undesirable effects on the , area::
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes.
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood. •' + .:.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the city.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Valley ring route.) '
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all consideration of a Cub Food Store or any construction of this type
in the above mentioned area' We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as this located within it.
/ _ lvver__111)
Name (Print)
MIM_
MEN
� /L i1 �''���
��
I ►
i
Erg sir', .._ .
'
/ IF
P M
Wj
OMMY W.
me MM
/ _ lvver__111)
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members of Cit
Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the area located south of County Road 42 and betw that Ch are opposed to the construction of a
Parkway, between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
We believe that the construction of such a store would have the following undesirable effects on th
I .) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes, a area:
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in tho suMoundin nei hborho
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the cit B 8 od.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Valley g )
ring route '
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all consideration of a Cub Food Store r
,
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as this any construction of this type
s located within it.
Name Print
CJav r' l� _ w _ � AddrPte
.15 �f - x t . •. _ .�
�.�
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members of City of Rosemount, that we are opposed to the construction of a
Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the area located south of County Road 42 and between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
Parkway.
We believe that the construction of such a store would have the following undesirable effects on the area:
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes.
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the city.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Valley ring route.)
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all consideration of a Cub Food Store or any construction of this type
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as this located within it.
(Over —�)
Name .
Address
ON
-,_.
�����.., .:•
�, ' ,r
MOMM
��I� %� I i /���
Own- ,,,
_ IS. I
oi
- y
Rom MUMATIM
w apm
�.
(Over —�)
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members of City of Ros
Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the area located south of County Road 42 and emount, we are opposed to the construction of a
Parkway. between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
We believe that the construction of such- a store would have the following undesirable effects on the are
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes. a '
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding nei hborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the city. g
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Valley ring route.
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all consideration of a Cub Food
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as thi Store or any construction of this type
this located within it.
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members of City of Rosemount, that we are opposed to the construction of a
Cub Foods store, 'or any major retail chain store, in the area located south of County Road 42 and between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
Parkway.
We believe that the construction of sucha store would have the following undesirable effects on the area.
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes.
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the city.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Valley ring route.)
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all consideration of a Cub Food Store or any construction of this type
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as this located within it.
e Name (Print) Address
;r
(Over -),)
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members of City f
Cub. Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the area located south of Count Road
y Rosemount, that we are opposed to the construction of a
Parkway, y 42 and between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
We believe that the construction of such a store would have the following undesir 1
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding home ab a effects on the area:
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the city
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple V 1
We therefore petition. the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend an and all consideration a ley ring route.)
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses s s Cub Food Store or any construction of this type
s nesse such as this located within it.
Name AT - - - -
G
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members of City of Rosemount, that we are opposed to the construction of a
Cub Foods store, or any, major retail chain store, in the area located south of County Road 42 and between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
Parkway.
We believe that the construction of such a store would have the following undesirable effects on the area:
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes.
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the city.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Valley ring route.)
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all consideration of a Cub Food Store or any construction of this type
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as this located within it.
(4ver—�)
Name (Print)
Address
VIM
Ah
Maw
(4ver—�)
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members of Ci
Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the area located south of County Road 42
of Rosemount, that we are opposed to the construction of a
Parkway, tY and between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
We believe that the construction of such a store would have the following undesirabl
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes. a effects on the area:
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding nei hborh
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the city. g °Oa
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Valle ri
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all considers ' y g e.)
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a resident;al .,...-A -L-1, __ tion of Cub Food Store or an cen
(Over --�)
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members of City of Rosemount, that we are opposed to the construction of a
Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the area located south of County Road 42 and between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
Parkway.
We believe that the construction of such a• store would have the following undesirable effects on the area:
L) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes.
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the city.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the App ;e Valley ring route.)
We therefore petition the. City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all consideration of a Cub Food Store or any construction of this type
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as this located within it.
J
(uver —>)
i
0110
Name (Print)
„
Address
M
ow
�1' i/1 i ®�
/ / �J /f1
run
. l
J
(uver —>)
i
0110
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the area located south b b er s of City of Rosemount, that we are opposed to the construction of a
Pa County Road 42 and between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon .
We believe that the construction of such a store would have the following undesirable
L) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes. effects on the area:
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood..
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within, the city.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding �
area, g g orhood..
We therefore: petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend an �1 Apple Valley ring route.)
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses
Y consideration of s Cub Food Store or any construction of this type
such as this located within it.
Name Name Tint)
(Over4)
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the City of Rosemount; its mayor and council members, that we are opposed to the construction of a
Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the area located south of County Road 42 and between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
Parkway.
We believe that the construction of such-a store would have the following undesirable effects on the area:
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes.
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the city.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Valley ring route.) We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all consideration of a Cub Food Store or any construction of this type
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as this located within it.
Name '
Add ress
I
UUM
T
rl� pi
0: �, , MMI
MAM 2 VL'Url
at1 WA�
f - O /L _ 11
We, the undersigned, do hereby give n otice to the mayor and council members of City of Rosemount, that we are opposed to the construction of a
Cub Foods store, or any, major retail chain store, in the area located south of County Road 42 and between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
Parkway.
We believe that the construction of such a•store would have the following undesirable effects on the area:
1.) Substantially. lower the resale value of the surrounding homes.
2.) Increase tragic and noise levels on already busy-side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the city.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Valley ring route.)
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all consideration of a Cub Food Store or any construction of this type
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as this located within it.
Name Pri
A
!.�
MUM M.JMWI
S ao
ILL al'
W311 ,
t
r ►W's� " , .,� ��,A
f
,r
r
We, the undersigned; do hereby give notice to the mayor and council membeprof City of Rosemount, that we are opposed to the construction of a.
Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the area located south c County Road 42 and between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
Parkway.
We believe that the construction of such it store would have the following undesirable effects on the area:
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes. .
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy-side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the city.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Valley ring route.)
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all consideration of a Cub Food Store or any construction of this type
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as this located within it.
(Over -3)
�...
FMM
��+ � A► r... �
��►���' `��..,
� • a � �
%,
'lam
•
�®
mum
M .aJ
�AdffirL
/,
�.
(Over -3)
�...
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members of City of Rosemount, that we are opposed to the construction of a
Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the area located south of County Road 42 and between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
Parkway.
We believe that the construction of such a store would have the following undesirable effects on the area:
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes.
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the city.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Valley ring route.) .
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all consideration of a Cub Food Store or any construction of this type
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as this located within it.
Name Name Print Address
L
7
�.
i ct (,l,rba. 3 l n c,_,
cJ r e
Jig
V�
(Over -+)
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members of City of Rosemount, that we are opposed to the construction of a
Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the area located south of County Road 42 and between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
Parkway.
We believe that the construction of such a store would have the following undesirable effects on the area:
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes.
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the city.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to theApole Valley ring route.)
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all Consideration of a Cub Food Store or any construction of this type
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as this located within it.
`v •ws i�
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members of City of Rosemount, that we are opposed to the construction of a
Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the area located south of County Road 42 and between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
Parkway.
We believe that the construction of such a store would have the following undesirable effects on the area:
l.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes.
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the city.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Valley ring route.)
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all consideration of a Cub Food Store or any construction of this type
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as this located within it.
Name Name (Print Address
aw
Wet the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members of City of Rosemount, that we are opposed to the construction of a
Cub Foods store, or any mayor retail chain store, in the area located south of County Road 42 and between Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
Parkway.
We believe that the construction of such a store would have the following undesirable effects on the area:
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes.
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within ^the city.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Valley ring route.)
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all consideration of a Cub Food Store or any construction of this type
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as this located within it.
r
P!
+V
P � '
(Oven)
Name - ( t)
Address
L
�
1 /, a
dP
1. Y .. . 7n'U.1
Air 40
���
a
�• • l�C. Wes.. �
P!
+V
P � '
(Oven)
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members of City of R
Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the area located sou of County Road 42 and between Ch are opposed a the construction of a
Parkway. south Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
We believe that the construction of such a store would have the following undesirable effects on
L) .) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes. the area:
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding nee hborho
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the city g od.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Valley ring route.
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all consideration of a Cub Food Store or
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as this 1 any construction of this type
ocated within it.
Name I %,* - -- - ,— .
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members of City of Rosemount, that we are opposed to the
Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the area located south of County Road 42 and between Chippendale Avenue a n Shann on of a
Parkway.
PP and co
We believe that the construction of such a store would have the following undesirable effects on the area;
1.) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes.
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding neighborhood.
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses. located within the city.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Valley ring route.)
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all consideration of a Cub Food Store or any construction of this t e
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such AQ t hie t„rA +o,� .,,: +w:., :.& yp
We, the undersigned, do hereby give notice to the mayor and council members of City of Ros
Cub Foods store, or any major retail chain store, in the area located south of County Road 42 and b nt, that we are opposed to the construction of a
Parkway, etween Chippendale Avenue and Shannon
We believe that the construction of such a store would have the following undesirable effects
I .) Substantially lower the resale value of the surrounding homes. on the area:
2.) Increase traffic and noise levels on already busy side streets and in the surrounding nei hborh
3.) Take much needed business away from smaller businesses located within the cit . g ood.
4.) Add unwanted light pollution to the surrounding area. (Similar to the Apple Valley ring route.
We therefore petition the City of Rosemount to permanently suspend any and all consideration of a Cub Food Store or
in the above mentioned area. We feel that this is a residential area and should not have businesses such as this locat any construction of this type
ei within it.
Congratulations l"
- ._You' re Getting a New.- NNeighbor!
f
It's.0ib_Toods!
Yes, that's :right, Cub�is planning to build a new store right nett to Walgreens!
It will add so much to our` neighborhood: = �'
1.) Increased traffic on Shannon Parkway, County Road 42 and the other streets surrounding it.
2.) Increased noise.
3.) More light pollution, similar to the Apple Valley ring route. -
4.) Substantially decreased property values for the homes surrounding it.
5.) It will also take business away from the already struggling small business e's mi Downtown f
Rosemount, such as the florists and the drug store.
The City of Rosemount says in its development plan that it will "maximize land use compatibility
between commercial and residential uses by proper design, land use transitions, extraordinary
buffering, landscaping, and screening at neighborhood edges.".
We've all seen how that works around Walgreens! -
Let's do something now to stop the construction of Cub Foods in our area.
Several options include:
1.) Write or call the mayor and council members.
2.) Sign our petition.
3.) Attend the Planning Commission meeting on July 25, 2000.
4.) Go to the next city council meeting and voice your opinion. (1' and 3' Tuesdays of each month)
All these things will help. Please spread the word to all your
neighbors.
The following are names and contact information for the mayor and city council members.
Thank you for your support.
Cathy Busho, Mayor Ena Ciwwsld John Edwards Sheila Klassen Jeff Caspar
(651) 423 -4646 (651) 423 -5678 (651) 423 -5426 (651) 423 -4391 322 -5330
mcbusho@aoLcom
The address for correspondence with all of the above is:
Rosemount City Hall
2875 -145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Thank
Steve Casey
423 -5318
*UT owoo
OlOtf aAeq ILOM
W *SQIJOATIO . p , OIR p qol - SpUnoS OW 01 UOIS
- aptp qnD olp pu 3100 v a3p Pug Xa
IRA ajddV ol ojD 441 OAO pop liq
S
iunowas
i116
•j ,. j � - �, - .- -' , Oua4slxajo ino poojoj sossotqsnq leo
o ('01
u * 0 ' - 6
lujodo -lnO VZ
�oj gu!lqs.q i4xo
J S IO I I (8
-sags OBJVI
pjumj guumP 101 2uqmd aqj more j
ouni oRnH (9
OOM p RUN (
2to '`OIQ P7* - 01 Rqla c ptb4.16 . *SolqelaOA
Wm paffg 31ouq ui siowl4uoo ads qju O. ( . V
u Y, I-- I. 60
.
OUWi OT 0 spnmol Pug tob -
Pug
qp "I S401 C C
•-'I!s orp punam spuo., o ulq
Z OIR Pus Zt Peo uo
* sXBP Joi RuTf org opisstjoig 3 1 00 M lad Sno 000 (-
d ssa � .,, (In qsm pus , q looqos
-g!jnp lqg!j) -W- p uaq
u
oq sn
v 11 w0ji ISO" 01 1 9 - 01 lqam
pm mog a
S-11 9io %gz *S:Ion4
POOJ TOM pug do4_$vwq pt , - - r%,� aan bd tjon.4 001 (.1
V
J:
j 5-
:Iunowaso OuRupq sp'
lool -IJM 0 Og'AiOU R Upft Sa U.R p jo pU.0 MM
2997-UZ IS9
�
'lilmmy jsow
'nod Mi. 'rt Pow 'o) uo SQOOd wv fo jwwdoj A;
NJ volq of 2Aaw pun 17nssl 2s2lfl np,s m 1rnmo_l k.0 ap pun nob pip , doy I •w t)gly.7
so fo Bp fvs np l plvhj 9171 puv ssnusn Bum JO f p lv #2l 21 9t1 yj1M 1MO16 0 1 smmAl junouu
AwY fi11m1 nw q purr •sossmsng Win' pi nP w l AvI111"i umm;p ..Yaooi gro., v pvdun
IV" 71 7M S 'uoljsmb man nW Ilsv pinom ooj n junoum fo lo&W s jvyj Jdoy pploM 1
„ jUss2ulsnq ;dlvJ 'n ffvlj yhy v wolf j»ljs np mm jlvd Mnt v nwjd jvip 'slyj sl dnol6 hquuvld
fo . PWI jvyM„ jnoydnolyj p;npuoM pun jsvl hgpnu uolsslwwoI " d -,y1 p ; pwjjv 1
• oui;soN fo jwdoj;A;
pun yjmolb IV) Jof buluuvld lnljo y.m pmp fo jno sums agbrl Fw ;sloe ').gvll 2tUnjOA
yely kzjmn ��lvd mm v wolf j 7)ljs nlj ssoDv p)sodold si vo SQOOd on) v +1VYJ ulvJ1 0-L
•svmmvjs)l �snuv2j hlp 'sloj-,oplgslpup
'snl f fo Iklwnuwi" nyj fo jsm nlj gjiM j1 f p1noM jvyl „ s2ss;w n q )J VW. ploj SUM I 'rj, O-S
o, 6uo1v sjol ; yj ojul od p1noM "ssnusnq fo pub jvgM jnogv F21sv 1 naoy Mau Aw p . I sd
'"w' pun junuu�vjnlw '�tm
yjlmy 'goof -"72-U Fijjvp lo�'fi��lrgvltvAv pooh druddogs 2solJ VUUVIR „uti+oj11vws 'sloops
p000 •suosml pooh fo ngwme v to f -mloyJ jsn f fiw nuv» junoun •ul IA9 0 1 �ilnuv f hw lof
snlop >nM lvyj pp. wwwo.) &WW Mp lnjmgvry I 'D00Z hM=f ru vjosJUWW 01 p2aow 6tnav14
'oysng lolivW 1ma
890SS vjOMWW 7tmow 29011
ry 14.0 pmow?sox
oysng Aym Jobw
VO9p 'OWWW. `
4 % W"Mmwr
<AIO%>:dsqu$ <AIa>
<A1 y> !dsqugMWo noA Jo; GJOA 01 uossei s an give egged
!dquit-Aples 9,U3Jppys Jflb '6l84i L Ifloge s! SNI PUG 041 y<AK3>
<AIa/ > .' dsquj? <Ap>
<AIQ j> `seniaaiiaip;c; yi 46q Iiijuvid *a "w "i k
'suaaVa sI JO Aa ;es a41 eg APO4 uJeouoa euo Jegwnu Jno (1 mauves% 10 Won
O SVd*iu` *MO a F PUB 14 OM LUGS G'dsqu`$A!I SJduu Jo lea G J81el
Jo imoos 1e4; e19gAeu sr 1 pus eseejou NpeJe ll m allsj; to lunows
0 4; qno 8!dstu'Slo uo.qppe sta 4" !dsqug•RA% uouumn pus & Jo jauloo eta
uo sJegq &W4 sa[a4en JOPu &gJyonul sluePlaas oM1 peSWgM Rgeuosled
sne414vuau Pq eta 4 !dsqug °degs pus Auld usipl4a Jno eJe4M WOj j eauepp
PO49 is eJop loo; eJenbs Oppp9 'Jno4 yZ a ene4 lou op em sins eq uJ o; noA
uo po GM !dsguqualMs !sat poi ut nod lol pGyon!dqqujVM <M>
<AIO/ > .' dsqul?<Alp>
<A10[>114gJ Pu a 6 t41 !dsquW'eursflo4
epJUJd of esga se ;snt pus J;red Ala a w04 its Me splsX 001 pInq of spool qrp
6uMOP Aq J iGW s1 ;o iro „lunawesam PIO.;nd NImm.I of 6reoS s1 Ala ma
sJeedds I MaN !dsqug saJo;s oegn pus sluoine ;seJ pool lsel'sloLu ciJ1s 41M
WOW uGGq 984 I !d$qug•heMe P&P 98 4 BUIGGJ P41 Amgq !dsquf psj umol
sews e4l'uosow tjau euo Jol eJe4 panow eM !dsquig to ualeauegjn
9q1 !dsquT•eleJaleaas pus lies Pusil eu gjruslp Aj9A a uses ene4 eM Guul
1e41 y • RsA % Viol VJnowascU u Pang s84 fiuel!dsqugJnp<AIC3>
<AK1/ >!dsgUIP<AId>
<AIO/ >`o4 0 sng JOAWV <A K3>
<(3d3H/>
<31AIS / > <31A.LS>
<I!015'N3N3VmGweu - 000VK£Z'00'S IVtLHSVY,AW34o3 V13W3
<adAjL }w;wO=Anba -d:44 4 =3 SMW) 'ILUILW93., =IWIwO t/ —LBW>
<ObBH>
<..N3 /APJO4. o "IWw! HL/rj€M/ / onand IVWA 3dJl-LDc00f>
%N1 'iS 4 "6 Damn um
uosjellol OR4 pus 4OVN
'Ala.laoUiS
ue6e noA -q ap% o; uoseaJ is sn an>6 aseald AWs suaJPl!4o ='&J!41 I. vioge sl s14; pug a4; ui
'smlaswaLA -K4 MNOOI IOUMO P43 saw a43 AIIs!oadsa 'suazWo S}! jo ApIN a43 aq p1no4s LuaOWO OW Jagwnu mA
Prxxuasod jo JoAeVy 04; sy 'P114o s IIN Pus 314 Illnn !was a A19N!I OJOW Jo reo a JaWl Jo Jauoos }e4; aige ;haul s! ;! pus aSeajoul
J(I#eaJ6 ll?A oglw3lO Bowe a43 qn0 s)O uOl3!PPe a43 43!N1 'fit qd uouue4S Pura Ztr)O JMoo oql uo tjaXIq BU133!4 90101 an
JOIMU BuNMJ! s;uap!--,e awl pessau ;w► JfilewwW eAe4143uow ;sei e4; ui 'daals pue hald uaJpinlo Jno aJg4+w uJOaj ague ;sP
goys a aJO ;s M aJenbs 00009 'JnO4 bZ s Me4 ;ou Op am aJns aNew q noA uo III sM 'vo!3aIs 3ss1041 ut note q paw aM
i;46u tau sl S14L - SUP 14
OMO 01060p se ;snf Pus died /31 a LW4 Aam spieA 60L pig d3 sp qr0 6Ui Its Aq tias a s31 3 „31 wasoa
p10., VA AlleU4 of 6uioa sl A ;la e4; s>oadde 11 MoN •saJo ;s oapn pue s,"e ;saJ poo13sq `slleLu du ;s 4 ;w► paoeldgJ uaaq se4
;i 'Afts Pa!P Se4 6 u!!sN 3941 AWIS 'IaOl "411OLus aL4'uoOM ulS1u aw JOI WN PaAM GM 'JUnbeiiaOON jo U01 1J 1!Mgjn
a4L 'a3 is pus 3Ms t i3 Ou!gJn3s!p AxA s ueas eney ann auJ4 1 841 u ' % Ja1 lunouaasoN uI pa y s'e4 Aliwr Jno
'04oanS WeW
w05'Pe0049ngow :0j,
(MWNOSd31101) tW*'USw'I!OWQ@MINNOSd3 '1101. :UXU.4
aw134i30801e P* Wd £6:£0:9 00/9/9 _:9WO
ano :fgns
Subj: cub store
Date: 4:21:53 PM Central Daylight Time
From: KgEfh117
To: MCBUSf-O
Please vote against letting cub into Rosemount. Kris Gifibrd,resident
Sub
j:
Date: 8.2/0011:08:17 PM Central Daylight Time
From jmrtzn@jwv,com (Johannes Mauritzen)
T O: mcbusho@aol.com
Dear Mayor Bush4
My name is Johannes Mauritzert, I met you earlier this year at the
Shamrock Awards Ceremony,
The reason I vanted to send you this.E -Mail is that our family recently
moved into one of the duplex town homes that are directly opposite
(across 151st) of the site for the proposed Cub Foods. Our whole family
would like to encourage you and the rest of the city council to riot allow
Cub to build in this location.
Since we are directly on the comer of the circle, we would get U1
exposure to all the unfavprable sights and noise that the store would
bring. This is not the only reason that we do not want Cab to build here
however. When my mother decided to [rove from our old home (also in
Rosemount) we looked all over the southern suburbs. We decided to stay
in Rosernou t however because we had grown very favorable to its unique
character. Rosemount has a center and a heart with such lanrks as Big
Daddy's diner and all the other small shops as well as the history that
goes along with these places. A huge monopolising store such as the
Proposed Cub would take away from this unique small-town character. Both
directly, by taking business away from the many small businesses. as well
as indirectly, by clashing with the small town feel of Rosemount.
I main want to encourage you and the rest of the city council to not
allow Cub to bind in Rosemount. Thank you for your time.
Johannes Matritzen �-
YOURS PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now oifers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
httoWdl.wmv. iurio cominetfhaQa
Headers
Return -Path: <.Pmtzn@juno.com>
Received: from try zcO3.mx.aol.com (rly zcO3.'nidl.acl.com [ 17231.33.3]) by air- zc0l.rrrail.ad.com (v76 b3.11) with ESMTP;
Thu, 03 Aug 2000 00:08:17 -0400
Received: from m26.boston.juno.com (m26.boston.juno.com [63.211.172.891) by dy-zcO3.mx.ad.com (v75 b3.9)with
ESMTP; Thu, 03 Aug 2000 00 :07:5 -0400
Received: from cookie.juno.com by cookde.juno.com for
< "1vxkMxBT6rrruct7cxhL gA9N98n7i8eYEGj iv7e9zu75MLepNMkM8t3A = =">
Received (from jry tr uno.com)
by mXbostomjuno.com (queuemail) id FEH5WSE; Thu, 03 Aug 2000 00:07.44 EDT
To: nrd:busho@od.com
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 22:59:33 4)500
Message -ID: X 225934 .- 316321.1.JMdzn @juno.com>
Mailer. Juno 4.0 9
MIME Version: 1.0
Content Type: text/plain
Cub Isn't Out Yet!
We need YOU to call the MAYOR and CITY COUNCIL
members and voice YOUR opinion!
Let them know how you feel about
Cub Foods coming to Rosemount!
Some quick facts about the proposed Cub:
1. Cub Foods wants to be open 24 hours. Walgreen's is open from
6 A.M. to 10 P.M., as limited by the Planned Unit Development
agreement. We can tell the city to require Cub Foods to follow the
same rules regarding hours of operation.
2. Cub proposes to build an 80,000- square -foot store. In Eagan, a city
with about 4 times the population of Rosemount, Cub Foods store is
only 55,000 square feet. Let the city know that the proposed store is
too large.
3. Cub wants to put a 150-square-foot sign near the southwest corner of
the store. The sign would be located right in the front .of the existing
townhome development. Why is this necessary? Shoppers are
already aware of the location due to the sign in the front of the store.
Please call or e-mail the mayor and city council and voice your
Opinion. It's important to do it and it will only take a few minutes.
Mayor Councilor Councilor Councilor
Councilor
Cathy Busho Ena Cisewski John Edwards Sheila Massen
Jeff Caspar
(651) 4234646 (651) 423 -5 (651) 423 -5426 (651) 423 -4391.
(651) 322 -5330
mcbusho@aoLcom
Paid for by the Rosemount Residents for Responsible Development
We are currently accepting donations to help defray the cost of printing
and other related
expenses. Please send any donations to:
Rosemount Residents for Responsible Development
Vermillion State Bank of Rosemount
3410 -151 St W.
Rosemount, MN 55068
Acct # 314986
Christopher Gamlin
14084 Dearborn Path
Rosemount, MN 55068
August 5, 2000
Mayor Busho
2875145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068 -4997
Dear Mayor,
am writing to tell you my thoughts on Cub Foods moving to Rosemount.
do not think Cub Foods should come because it might put Knowlans out of
business and people out of work, it might cause traffic problems, and last of all
Rosemount will loose its small town community feeling.
First, with Cub Foods' low prices, it will attract more customers. Knowlans
will not have enough money to run. the store.
Second, there will be increased traffic, in and around the proposed
location. More traffic means the likelihood of more motor vehicle and pedestrian
accidents.
Third, Rosemount will loose its small town community feeling. With the
increase of traffic and people corning to Rosemount, the roads and businesses
will be crowded.
Please let me know your thoughts on the above issues. Thank you for
taking your time to respond.
Sincerely,
Christopher Gamlin
From BOY SCOUT Troop 295
August 2, 2000
To: W athy Bush
�i ay of emount, Minnesota
From: Bill and Jan Matulka
13431 Daffodil Path
Rosemount, Minnesota
RE: Cub Foods Proposal
Dear Ms. Busho,
Jan and I moved to Minnesota in July of 1992. The reason we chose Rosemount was because of
its small town environment
We realize that growth and development are necessary in any community. We currently have the
Evermoor housing development underway adjacent to our lot.
Our chief concern is the purposed location of the Cub Foods store on County Road 42 between
Creston and Claret Avenues.- This is not a viable location for an 80,000 square feet grocery
store that is open 24 hours a day. You have one main arterial road, namely County Road 42, that
is fast becoming another Cedar Avenue. You have a residential neighborhood to the south, with
all of the delivery trucks and customer cars going in and out of the store. This will present a real
danger to the neighborhood children.
Another concern is the businesses that will be affected. Knowlans, Horizon Pharmacy, etc.. If
they fail will there be a new business to take over their location? It would appear that the city
government leaders are wooing the corporate food giant Cub Foods at the expense of many
established small businesses that have made Rosemount the great little civ. that it is.
As concerned citizens we request that all the issues (both for and against) regarding the Cub
Foods purposal be weighed and a determination made - `Is this a good fit o r all the citizens of
Rosemount ?'
Respecti
Rick Pearson - City Planner
Thomas Burt - City Administrator
Council Member - Ena Cisewski
Council Member - John Edwards
Council Member - Sheila Klassen
PLANNING C
OMMIS'SIONMEETIIVG AT CIT YHALL TUES, JULY25 @ 7pM,
THE CITY OF ROSEMOUNT IS PLANNING TO BUILD A CUB FOODS SOUTH OF
42 IN BETWEEN CLARET AVE AND THE WALGREENS.... DO YOU WANT THIS
IN YOUR BACKYARD ? ? ? ?? THE STORE SIZE WILL BE 80,000 SQ. FT WITH AN
ADDITIONAL 20,000 SQ. FT OF OTHER RETAIL, AND WILL BE LOCATED
APPROXIMATELY 100 YARDS FROM OUR NEW PARK! t THE CITY HAS SAID
IN PREVIOUS MEETINGS THAT THIS AREA IS GOING TO BE THE EYE TO
ROSEMOUNT WITH UNIQUE SHOPS AND BUSINESSES THAT COMPLIlVlENT
THE EXISTING BUSINESSES IN ROSEMOUNT. CUBS BIG CHAIN APPROACH
WILL DRAMATICALLY IMPACT KNOWLANS, NOT TO MENTION PULLING
BUSINESS FROM DAKOTA FLORAL, MAIL BOXES ETC, ROSEMOUNT
TOBACCO, AND VIDEO UPDATE. THE CURRENT CUB IN APPLE VALLEY,
WHICH IS ONLY 4 MILES AWAY, IS PERFECTLY SITUATED IN AN
INDUSTRIAL PARK. WE WILL BECOME THE OVERFLOW FOR THAT STORE
AND WILL INHERIT ALL OF THE PROBLEMS: 24 HRS/DAY OF SERVICE
TRUCKS, SEMIS, GARBAGE TRUCKS, NOISE, LIGHTS, INCREASED TRAFFIC
ALONG CHIPPENDALE, SHANNON PKWY, CLARET AVE, AND AL,.ONG 151 ST.
IS THIS WHY WE BOUGHT HOMES IN THIS AREA ? ? ? ?? WE WILL NOT BE A
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ANY LONGER. WITH A CUB ONLY 4 MILES
AWAY, WE DO NOT NEED THIS STORE HERE!!!! CUB WAS RECENTLY
REJECIED IN LAKEVIILLE... WHY ? ?? THIS IS JUST TOO SMALL A SPACE FOR
A STORE OF THIS SIZE... HOW WILL TRAFFIC MOVE ON 42? WILL IT STACK
UP EASTBOUND; WILL WESTBOUND NEED A LIGHT ? ?? PLEASE VOICE
YOUR OPINIONS AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT CITY HALL
TUESDAY, JULY 25M @ 7PM. YOU CAN ALSO CALL AMY SHI~aUvfAN WITH
THE ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS @ 612- 606 -0921 TO TELL HER YOUR
CONCERNS.., , .. HEY! WHY NOT DROP THE MAYOR, CATHY BUSHO A
MESSAGE @ 651- 423 -4411 TO LET HER KNOW HOW YOU FEEL.
P TO
SO-
G
0? -25 -2000 04:09PM FROM KOCH PETROLEUMOP 1 TO 94235203 P.01
FAX
To: DIANNE QUINNEL ROSEMOUNT PLANNING
RE: PLANNING SESSION 7/25!00 ON CUB FOODS STORE
Please enter my comments into the record of this meeting.
My wife and I wish to be on record in opposition to this new store for the following reasons:
1) A number of local businesses such as Knowlan's, Horizon Pharmacy, the local Florist shop will
likely be driven out of business. What are you planning to do with the vacant buildings when
these businesses vacate their existing facilities?
2) Rosemount should be seeking its own identity and not just become "me too" extension of Apple
Valley. Why did Lakeville turn down Cub's application? I believe that Cub is trying for a
monopoly of the grocery business in the Twin Cities. Other grocery companies need to be
encouraged to complete to avoid Cub becoming the sole source of groceries in the Metro area.
Rosemount has an asset that Apple Valley has never possessed i.e. a downtown shopping area
that is worth preserving.
3) Why do we need another Cub when the one in Apple Valley is only 4 miles away?
4) Rosemount does not nerd another grocery store, but we could certainly use a local library so the
kids and adults don't have to go to Apple Valley. What is the planning commission doing about
bringing a library to Rosemount?
Sincerely,
Paul Wright
14340 Blaine Ct.
Rosemount, MN 55068
July 22, 2000
Honorable Cathy Busho, Mayor
City of Rosemount
2875 145' Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Dear Ms. Busho,
Roger & Cathi Hackbarth
3891 153` Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Recently it came to our attention Cub Foods has plans to build an 80,000 square foot
store on the south -side of County Highway 42 adjacent to Walgreen's. We must admit
we do not know if permits have been issued or to which stage plans have been made.
Although we have only recently heard this news we have several concerns we hope you
will bring before the city planners prior to any final decision.
My wife Cathi and I moved to Rosemount from Iowa in November of 1997. We chose to r
move to the Twin Cities as the result of a wonderful job opportunity. We chose to live in
Rosemount for its quality of life. In other words we prefer small to medium sized
communities with peace, quiet and small businesses whose owners know their
customers and value their business.
We have enjoyed living in Rosemount. We frequent local businesses such as
Evergreen Gardens, Video Update, Subway, Loch Pharmacy, Big Daddy's Diner,
McDivot's, TOPS Pizza, Knowlan's and Walgreen's. Our neighborhood is quiet and we
have a lovely view of the newly redone pond in our backyard as the result of
Wensman's development near Walgreen's.
We must admit we do not shop at Cub primarily because of its overwhelming size and
lack of what we call a "shopper friendly" environment. Having a Cub closer to us will not
cause us to shop there. We find it absurd that Cub wants to locate only a few minutes
away from an existing store.
Cub's choice to locate in Rosemount is not my primary concern. Our concern lies with
the location of the store in a residential area. furthermore Cub will be one of the first
things a newcomer will see when entering Rosemount from the West. We would hardly
call the sight of a Cub Foods a warm welcome. We would much rather see a group of
small specialty shops and restaurants in a small clustered environment than the
overwhelming presence of Cub Foods.
Although we live a couple of blocks away we have concerns traffic will increase as
heavier traffic flows cause people to take alternate routes which ultimately will cause
traffic flow to increase on our street. Truck traffic will also impact the area with 24/7
service to Cub to say nothing of the increased risk to children in the area. New
development this past year created a park on 151 Street less than a block from the
proposed Cub location. In addition Kindercare is less than a block. We can think of no
other Cub Foods in the South Metro area with this set of circumstances.
We encourage the City of Rosemount to take steps to attract new business to locate in
Rosemount. While we do not object to Cub Foods coming to Rosemount we do object
to the proposed location. It seems more logical for them to locate East of Highway 3,
South of County 42. Obviously there are other considerations as well. We will admit
there are positive aspects to a Cub in Rosemount, most notably their ability to draw
larger numbers of people which could increase customer traffic for some Rosemount
business'. However Knowlan's, Dakota Floral, Video Update, Walgreen's and Loch
Pharmacy stand to lose a great deal. To risk the loss of these small businesses is not
prudent in our opinion. Rather the City should encourage business' which compliment
existing business and add to the quality of life Rosemount offers.
We would like to attend the planning commission meeting on Tuesday, July 25
Unfortunately we have long standing prior commitments. We trust you will consider our
views prior to a final decision.
Sincerely,
I
Roger & Cathi Hackb rth
Cc: Richard Pearson, City Planner
City of Rosemount
3563 153rd Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
651 -423 -6108
July 17, 2000
The Honorable Mayor Cathy Busho
City of Rosemount
2875 145th Street
Rosemount, MN 55068
Dear Mayor Busho:
A little over two years ago, we moved to Rosemount from St. Paul after searching for a
community that offered the conveniences of the Twin Cities, a highly reputable school district and
the aura of a small town community. Rosemount, even with its growth, offered the qualities
which we sought and hoped to enjoy for many years to come. We fear that the very qualities that
we searched for our family in which to grow and for which the city states to strive are being
threatened by the proposed construction of a Cub Foods.
Such a proposal seems to contradict the city's mission as stated on its web site's home page:
"...while maintaining its unique historical background and continuing to enhance its small town
character through neighborhoods, parks, downtown, schools and community activities."
Furthermore, it concerns us that the city's policies regarding highway /mixed use areas will be
disregarded particularly with respect to safety and compatible land use between retail and
neighborhood areas.
Within a block of the proposed Cub Food site, a wonderful park was recently bunt. Many families
and especially children frequent the park. The resulting increase in traffic due to such a large store
will create safety concerns for those who walk and rice bikes to and from the'park and will
increase the amount of traffic noise. Also, the transition from retail to neighborhood will be
extreme. What kind of "landscaping, buffering and screening" will be done to make the land uses
compatible between the park and neighborhood with such a large retail structure? To us, the
compatibility along with maintaining the historical context of the city would be done better with
smaller businesses and stores that enhance and even replicate the downtown area. Cub Foods
would never pass to be a neighborhood grocery store as seen in the old days. The Cedar and
County Road 42 retail area in Apple Valley is more than convenient for Rosemount residents in
need of warehouse type businesses.
As appealing as some of the tax potential may be with a Cub Foods, please consider the impact on
the neighboring blocks and the city's heritage. Please keep Rosemount different from the
sprawling warehouse shopping so common in the suburbs. Please maintain the quaintness of
Rosemount which our family sought and which a Cub Foods would diminish.
We appreciate your consideration and representation of our concerns.
M \- o o� st sincerely
c
Jeff and Kathy Smith
cc: Councilmembers Ena. Cisewski, John Edwards, Jeff Casper, Sheila Klassen
Thomas Burt, City Administrator
1 ?eCelv eo
Alt 2 6
Cljy ®8
2440
E4f1OUArr
$ aw oeUM -no wW—W d - u Awr'Amp—w.M
L-8S88 3s�'4o
.u!eldAmi :edAj o
(LZ'OS9Z'S'S) aO"s lien P-uaiul uMos 'jC
OOZO+ tiZ:iW: LZ OOOZ Fr L L 'enl :epa
(noA *jB4i) Wd Puowe!Q / ai!sgaM woo qumujoo loofgnS
< wo-pe@ isngow'> ,.woo•peDo4sngow„ :o.L
<u= NII!S 'sumlo. :wo q
< 6 L X Na d sn o- 3Smt9L80- 3e8OS=esLLwo.gaLa=vLLdS> :O aemw
OOZO+ SZ:iW: LZ OOM r L L ' en.L = <=AMVjS> pl
(LZ'099Z'9'9) SOMS i!an PUNJul 43!M Z!L sP Aq :pa+ "U
(LSO .L3n) OOZO+ £Z:BY: LZ OOOZ rr 1L 'enl = <ww j%
££LLZVVA P! dlWS3 WA (9'8'8/9'8'8) op'Be -des Aq
t4. (I££L'Jr'9S'990 aP *ft<Ws Aw'Z!Lx1P mp) ep'Be -des jpm u Q4 :pOA!aOGU
(ZS3W) OOZA+ £h:W Z OOOZ NAP L L 'anl -'<uaoo•loeDNwq*w jq
Z88ZOWA P! d1WS3 431++1(F*) sp Aq
(I£ 'L£L'6£'t+6L D OP u*4 -i an!aosu
OOVO- LZ:BV:SL OOOZ 1nr LL `anl
'd1WS3 4 }IM (8L *W) uw'lm *xw SOoz Ap Aq (I£S'L£L'6£'"L) ep'Be•des7,papd}ws) opte- des'Zoapd;ws uJQ1:PaA!aDab
OOM)-£t►:iW:SL OOOZ rP LL 'anl
dJ.YVS3 43!M (8L'SLn) u 'I�'I!a<u ZO Aq (IS'££'L£•ZLLI WW *fm•'i!su+'SOoz AP) uioo•pe cpoz Ali u O4 :pallaoaN
<woa - > :43sd
eJaPsaH
901110 'sldn - 00091M (Zl9)
wlinsuoo Iw.uLpal d`dS
swejo W1 ilia
uoos eA iaaw oes of edo4 pus umBe s
•Aisles aujos 4iw► w944 oppaJd PFxYA s!yi Pus sm.14saped
jot joioau D jaivao a s! PuZSL ie uO4oasiaiul jno d
pue A911eA elddy uawAM sauJ1 Nlwssao ayi area OW, :s! P41 ...... 4isd
puowela Boole sJo94B!au pjaws Aq PeNse Bu!aq si ie4i uol}sanb auo wO4 1
•onssi dolS
IMM, 841 jailer We of Pappop 'alai sem i! aauis Tq Bugaaw 1pur o
syluow Iml puaiis of elge sEm I ixau sR8 Jc1 Wsoq-uo joloa4uc o
aMua1 0 44 woo Alluatno pus Arauaos uaajB a4i BulAofue aje aM - auldolaaap
Buldeospuel eLa Buois Burrow uo poddns 943 - s)ius43 Aes of aN!l pPm I
'ALM 14
CuJOO•loe@NsN3wJ wo3 :ol
(1149 'sweJo) u*q:desaswwB•aai'ilq :uJa
awLL 14 RipaJ Wd £tp:81 OO/LL /L :alep
(noA )Iue4t) 43ed PuouJS!0 / ai!sgaM ujo4quawuo3 :fqnS
Subj: Dear Mayor Cathy Busho,
Date: 7/11/007:56:23 AM Central Daylight Time
From: Lda.Mil)s@toro.com (Lola Mills)
To: mcbusho@f&d.com
Dear Mayor Cathy Busho,
We looked of homes and communities for a year and a half before we decided to build our new home in Rosemount away
from the hustle" bustle of the city. I commute to Bloomington every day for work. But it is Korth it when I return home to a
quiet peaceful neighborhood in a small town setting. I moved into my new home on Crestview Circle in Rosemount in
November, 1999' The neighborhood is perfect. Quiet and beaublU. The new City park, the ponds, the walling paths, (all
perfect) I asked the builder at that ti me if they new what would be built across the street an the %acant property. They said
they believed it would be a strip mall and that there would probably be a fence to separate this area from us. I had no problem
with a strip mall of shops. Typically strip malls close at 9 :00 P.M. or so. Progress is good in moderation and when it
considers the citizens first..
I have recently heard of the plan to consider a Cub Foods between Creston and Clark. This bothers me in'that the traffic
and noise will be twenty four hours a day and our beautiful neighborhood will be imeded. I am not sire if 1 would hays built my
home where it is had I known that Cub would be across the street. I doubt that I would have. My other great concern is for the
tra
children that play at the wonderful new park across the street. The ffic and a Kill put those children at risk. We
shop at Cub foods people P g
every week and know traffic aid that this kind of a business brings. Please protect the
commirtity from this happening. I do believe that there is plenty of property east of Rosemount to build a cx� foods. Let home
Owners and families choose to live around the traffic and people that this would bring.
Please vote no to this project.
Thank You,
Lola Mills
15130 Crestview Orcle
Rosenxxint, Mn. 55068
651- 423-3311
Headers
Return-Path: <. Lola. Mills @toro. com>
Received: from riy zb03- Mx.ad.com (dy zb03.mail.aol.com 117231.41.3]) by air- zb0l.mail.aol.com (V75.18) with ESMTP;
Tue, 11 Jul 2000 08:56:23 -0400
Received: from 1yu112toro.com Q170.9261.207]) by dy zb03.mx.ad.com (V75.18) with ES ;T Tue, 11 JU 2000 08:5612 -
0400
Received: from SMTP (Iynnt707.toro.com 1170.9Z 16.2331)
by 1yu112.toro.com (8.9.3(pro. 8.9.3) with SMTP id HAA16036
for <. mcbusho@ad. corn>; Tue, I I JU 2000 07:54:43 -0500
Received: from lyrgvu63 ([170. 9Z 16.2131) by 170. 9Z 16.233
(Norton Antivirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0) ;
Tue, 11 Jul 200012:53 :15 0000 (GMT)
Received: from Remote - Message Sever by lyrrgw63
with Novell GroupWse; Tice, 11 Jul 2000 07:53:45
Message4d: <.s96ad289.054 @lyrVw63>
X#Aailer. Novell GraoupWse Internet Agent 5.5.3.1
Date. Tue, 11 Jul 2000 07.53:39 -0500
From: "Lola Mille <.Lda.Mflls@to%com>
To: <.mcbusho@ad.coM>
Subject: Dear Mayor Cathy Busho,
Mime- Version: 1.0
July 11, 2000
3669 154' Street
Rosemount, MN 55068
Rick Pearson, City Planner
Rosemount City Hall
2875 —145 Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Dear Rick Person,
Yesterday I emailed Mayor Cathy Busho regarding Cub Food's desire to build a
store along CR 42 between Crestone and Claret. Again, I must disagree with
Thomas Burt.that the citizens of Rosemount will positively receive this new
business. I moved to Rosemount to AVOID big business. 1 can drive the 4.5
miles to Apple Valley. Granted these stores are a necessary evil, we spend lots
of money at Cub in Apple Valley, but let's keep them at "arm's length ". I truly
believe they bring with them more "baggage" that what they are worth. A retail
store of this size and nature brings; increased traffic congestion, noise pollution,
teenage magnet, visual eyesore, unwanted solicitation, etc. Why is there usually
a police car at the Apple Valley Cub on a Friday or Saturday evening? It is my
understanding that the property in question would need to be re- zoned. Is it fair
to change the rules on your homeowners during the middle of the game? We
have too much invested in our home to gamble with future real estate values.
Please vote no to re- zoning for Cub along CR 42 & Crestone /Claret If
Rosemount needs a Cub Foods, move it East of the railroad in "undeveloped"
land. That way new Rosemount residents can decide if they want to build their
dream home next to a Cub store or not!
Thank You,
Craig, Susan, Jack, and Megan Schalliol
3669154th Street
651- 423 -5209
CC:
Mayor Cathy Busho — (651) 423 -4646
Building Official: Mick Kaehler (651) 322 -2027
Thomas Burt - City Administrator
Council Member: Ena Cisewski (651) 423 -5678
Council Member John Edwards (651) 423 -5426
Council Member Sheila Klassen (651) 423 -4391
Subj: Just Say No to Cub Foods!
Date:. 7/11/00 7.01:02 AM Central Daylight Time
From: Craig. Schalliol@tor5.com (Craig Schalliol)
To: mcbusho@aol.com
Dear Cathy Busho, Mayor
This weekend I -read about Cub Food's desire to build a store along CR 42 I must disagree with Thomas Burt that the citizens
of Rosemount will positively receive this new business. 1 moved to Rosemount to AVOID big business. I can drive the 4.5
miles to Apple Valley. Granted these stores are a necessary WI, we spend lots's of money at Cub in Apple Valley, but let's
keep them at "arm's length ". 1 truly believe they bring with them more "baggage" that what they are worth. A retail store of
this size and mature brings; increased bWlc congestion, noise pollution, teenage magnet, Visual eye-sore, unwanted
solicitation, etc. Why is there usually a police car at the Apple Valley Cub on a Friday or Saturday eve rig? It is my
understanding that the property in question would need to be re- zoned. Is it fair to change the rules on your homers
during the middle of the game? We have too much invested in our home to gamble with fuhre reds estate values.
Please vote no to re- zoning for Cub along -CR 42 & Crestone/Claret. If Rosemount needs a Cub Foods, move it East of the
railroad in "undeveloped" land. That way new Rosemount residents can decide if they want to build their dream home next to
a Cub store or not!
Please forward on to:
Community Development Director Jim Parsons (651) 322 -2020
City Planner. Pock Pearson (651) 322 -2052
Building Official: Mick Kaehler (651) 322-2027
Thomas But - City administrator
Ena asewski (651) 423.5678
John Edwards (651) 4235426
Sheila Klassen (651) 423-4391
Thank You,
Craig &. Susan Schaliol
3669154th Street
651- 423.6209
Headers
Return -Path: <.Craig.SchallidQtdxo.corry
Received: from dy- yh02.mx.aol.com (rly- ytW_mail.aoI.com [17218.147.341) by air- yh0l.mail.aol.com (V75.18) with ESMTP;
Tue, 11 Jul 2000 08:01:02 -0400
Received: from Iyu112toro.com al70.9261.207]) by dy- yh02mx.acI.com (V75.18) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 08:00:54 -
0400
Received: from SMTP (Iyrrnt707.toro.com 17709216.233])
by 1yu112.toro.com (8.9.3/ N".9.3) with SMTP id HAA17458
for <. mcbushhoeaol.com >; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 07:00:53.0500
Received!: from lyrVvM Q170.92.16.213]) by 170.92.16.233
(Norton AntiVirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0)
Tue. 11 Jul 200011:59:25 0000 (GMT)
Received: from Remote - Message Server by lyrgw63
with Noveil_GnoupWlse; Tue, 11 Jul 200D 06:59:55 -0500
Messagead: <.s96ac5eb.064@ly�
XMa er. Novell GroupWse Internet Agent 5 .5.3.1
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 06:59:21-0'500
Wdir§dry JUW W_ W W Mrr6w OrJkm ICWJftO ►ft� ,
Subj: Dear Mayor Cathy Busho,
Date: 7/11/00:7:56:23 AM Central Daylight Time
From: LolaMills@toro.con (Lda Mills)
To: mcbusho@aoi.com
Dear Mayor Cathy Busho,
We looked of homes and communiti es fora year and a half before we decided to build our new home in Rosemount away
from the hustle � bustle of the city. I commute to Bloomington every day for work But it is worth it when I return home to a
quiet peacefui neighborhood in a small town setting. I moved into my new home on Creshiew Circle in Rosemount in
November, 1999r The neighborhood is perfect. Quiet and beautifui. The new City park, the ponds, the walking paths, (all
Perfect) I asked the builder at that time if they new what would be built across the street on the vacant property. They said
they believed it would be a strip mail and that there would probably be a fence to separate this area from us. I had no probiem
with a strip mail of shops, Typically strip malls close at 9:00 P.M. or so. Progress is good in moderation and when it
considers the citizens first..
I have recently heard of the plan to consider a Cub Foods between Creston and pare#. This bothers me in that the traffic
and noise will be twenty-four hours a day and our beaortiful neighborhood will be invaded. I am not sure if I would have built my
home where it is had I known that Cub wouid be across the street. I doubt that I would have. My other great concern is for the
children that play at the wanderfui new park across the street. The traffic and people will put those children at great risk. We
shop at Cub foods every week and know the traffic and people that this kind of a business brings. Please protect the
community from this happening. I do believe that there is plenty of property east of Rosemount to build a Cub foods. Let home
owners and families choose to line around the traffic and people that this would bring.
Please vote no to this project.
Thank You,
Lola Mills
15130 Crestview Circle
Rosemount, Mn. 55068
651- 423 -3311
Headers
Return -Path: <.Lda.Mills @to o.com>
Received: from dy- zb03.mx.aoi.com (dy zb03.mail.ad.com [17231.41.31) by air- zb01.mail.ad.com (V75.18) with ESMTP;
Tue, 11 Jul 2000 08:56 :23 -0400
Received: from 1yul12.toro.com Q170.9261.207j) by dy- zb03.rnc.aoI.com (V75.18) Wth ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 08:5612-
0400
Received: firm SMTP (Iyrmt707.toro.com [170.9zl6.2331)
by lyu112-toro.com (8.9.3/Pro- 8.9.3) with SMTP id HAA16036
for <, mcbusho@aol.corn>; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 07:54:43 4500
Received: from► IyngWW Q170.92.16.2131) by 170.9216.233
(Norton AntiVIrus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0)
Tue, 11 Jul 200012:53.15 0000 (GMT)
Received: from Remote- Message Samar by lyrgw63
with No7+e11 GroupVlAse; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 07 :53:45 4500
Message4d: <.s9Sad289.054 @lyngw63>
X-Mailer. Novell GroupWse Internet Agent 5.5.3.1
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 07 -0500
From: "Lola Mills" <.Lda.Mills@toro.com>
To. <.rncbusho@W.com>
Subject; Dear Mayor Cathy Busho,
Mime- Version: 1.0
Wakwdw.July m S AMHM OnmM MCA w,ON
July 11, 2000
3669 154 Street
Rosemount, MN 55068
Rick Pearson, City Planner
Rosemount City Hall
2875 —145 Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
Dear Rick Person,
Yesterday I emailed Mayor Cathy Busho regarding Cub Food's desire to build a
store along CR 42 between Crestone and Claret. Again, I must disagree with .
Thomas Burt that the citizens of Rosemount will positively receive this
business. I moved to Rosemount to AVOID big business. 1 can drive the 4.5
miles to Apple Valley. Granted these stores are a necessary evil, we spend lots
of money at Cub in Apple Valley, but let's keep them at "arm's length ". I truly
believe they bring with them more "baggage" that what they are worth. A retail
store of this size and nature brings; increased traffic congestion, noise pollution,
teenage magnet, visual eyesore, unwanted solicitation, etc. Why is there usually
a police car at the Apple Valley Cub on a Friday or Saturday evening? It is my
understanding that the property in question would need to be re- zoned. Is it fair
to change the rules on your homeowners during the middle of the game? We
have too much invested in our home to gamble with future real estate values.
Please vote no to for Cub along CR 42 & Crestone /Claret If
Rosemount needs a Cub Foods, move it East of the railroad in "undeveloped"
land. That way new Rosemount residents can decide if they want to build their
dream home next to a Cub store or not!
Thank You,
�s
Craig, Susan, Jack, and Megan Schalliol
3669154th Street
651 -423 -5209
CC:
Mayor Cathy Busho — (651) 423 -4646
Building Official: Mick Kaehler (651) 322 -2027
Thomas Burt - City Administrator
Council Member Ena Cisewski (651) 423 -5678
Council Member John Edwards (651) 423 -5426
Council Member Sheila Klassen (651) 423 -4391
► � a�aw��o•w••r ooasz►wr•��►
0090• LZ:WW OOOZ Fr L L 'anl :atep
L'£'9'9 WOBV Pm" asWOxuD II4N :Ai1BV#-X
�E9MBu �soe96s'> :PtaBe�aW
0090 s9 :6s :90 0002 rr L I 'an.L •asIM J ppAcN 4WA
WnnBA kI mms eBeswr&pwH uJO1 :Pa1!aOOH
um) 0000 SZ:6s:l i 000Z !M L L 'mu
" (0'L sAeMapo 11etu3 tul joi sru!A4ud uotj*o
££Z'91Z6'OLL Aq (1MZ'91'Z6'OLLD wOai way :Pmpoom
0090 - £s-00 :L0 OOOZ Fr -L L 'ant = <uJw'loB90o4w gDLu'> .q
95*LMN IN dLWS tOm (£'6'B u='ojot'ZLLnAj Aq
(I££Z'91 Z6 olLl u w'ojo t'LOltuuAo d1WS um4 :PMROaII
0060
- $ S:O0 :80 000Z yr L L `snl 'd MS314m (81'sLA) uw'lm'xLum4A LN A9 ((LOZ'L9Z6'OLLD u='OJ LnAl. uJl :paa!aaaU .
OOVO- Z040 :90 O00Z rr LL `an.L
:dJ.WS3 4W (8LIN u�'Pe'I!tu'104 -j!s At (1K*LJrV%ZL0 u='I AU) uw'Ie')Mu'Z04+- LU ujo} :peAlaoaa
<u= *OJot @pllle4aS'BmJ3'> :4Pd -tmPU
SOPeaN
• 60Z9-£Z1r199
PQ-4s Lp% 699C
P11 LwwS Ig B!eq
'noA *jmM
MP 499) uassepl aMS
9Zt+S£Zti (m) sPiemP3 um
8L9ms (LSD) hlswraso eu3
JOr- 4s!u!wpb Apo - 3m9 sewo4L
LZOZ-ZZ£ (699) Jai4aO1 Mom :! pgJO BuPire
Z90Z:ZZ£ 499) uossad )law :- , Qtmld An
OZOZ:Z7£ (199) mmmd wr :jot =A viouldopwa f4w wwoo
:04 uo pieHUOJ emold
Itou Jo a mis qno s
01 wGu aw04 umJp J' Plini 04 faun A94m opr ap ueo stu�P.im tunowasoa mau Xea► mu puel ,,pedopwpun. u powlp
a4t jo P83 t! avow 'spool qno a speou �ow p/auo
asoN A - pistsa.n '8 & No Bwp qn0 -q Buuoz -ai o} ou aya. esmid
'sanpx 9te49a less am14tw► alqumB of awo4 mo u! patsm! 4onw ON W84 aM OMB alg jo alpp!w eLp Buunp
smuvOM04 xrod uo sap'u 941 OW040 of ne13! sl 'pauoz -ai aq of peou pp m uogsenb u � padox! ate W4; BupLolenpun
�(w s! to LWILn AWJn eS Jo AsPPJ a uo qno � elleA alddd a4t to mo aa!lod a �tllensn eja4l s! A4M 'op luo
papran 'ejo"As Iensn 'teuBew eBeuaai lmgnlpd asau 'uogsa&m ayeg paseajou! :sW.Li am u pue ails sly}
Jo 9 ao3 9 I.'Llw H '4VOm aJs A041 W-M W41 „aBeMeq. am wa4t L4M Buuq A wa!laq Anil I '„ 40ml sw.ie„ w unng daa)i
s tat Vq 'AaileA elddy u! qro to Aauow )o s stoi puads aN `Ina A=saoeu a ejz swots esa4t paw �ta11eA alddy a; saiau
gtr allt anup ueo F ssauisnq B q pIOAM of pmmcu of p mow I •ssau!snq mau snag waoej Xpmg_isod II!M Anowasoa O
suaz4!o 0 44 P44 tine SewoLLL La 4► aaABesip mw I Zp a3 Bwp mots a Plat of w!sap spool qnJ tioqa peal I pug s><LL
joAeW 'amS A4186 Jwa
woo'pe@4sngqu :ol
(1 B.FJO) u='QmOp! re4aS'B!eq :waj
aw134B9A IeJviaJ Wv ZO: LO :L 00 /L L/L " :atsp
Ispooi qno o; o N Aug Isnr .qnS
-- -
lo -&\iog- of
Comment
Prom: wesjosephson@webtv.net
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 8:30 PM
To: comment @a.rosemount.mn.us
Subject: Comments from Web Site
To the City Council. we would like to have you number us among the
supporters of the proposed CUB store and hope you will vote it in. as
retirees, we feel it is a good thing to have competitive shopping nearby
and also feel it is a good thing to have the extra jobs available in
Rosemount. read Steve Caseys letter in the Roseount Pages and am
questioning one thing. was Walgreens limited to dosing at 10 by the
council or is it just store policy. I am a former employee of that
store. several customers asked why we were not open 24 hrs. the
manager would always explain that since the Apple Valley store was
already open 24 hrs, Rosemounts store would not be. the company does
not want to have stores that are close together open 24 hrs. there is
not enough business and also there are problems with staffing a
pharmacist plus salespeople. after Cub is able to come to town,
wouldnt it be nice if we could get a NICE restuarant in town, not just
fast food places. many people talk about this. thanks. Helen
Josephson
VIO
SIGNED'
win FORM 3
MADE W tJ� A
x
1
{
Subj: cub-foods
Date; $/10!0010:03:31 PM Central Daylight Time
From: Ksmkmc
To: MCBUSHO
Dear Mayor,
You krnW by now what happened at the planning meeting. I was very dsapointed to say the least. The question is not wether
or not a cub belongs here, its a question of how cub fits into the the P.U.D. This docaunent was developed for a reason , to
guide the use of this property. Mayor, you told me you wanted this to be the "eye of rosemount ". Does a 68,000. 80,000 sq. ft.
store It into this plan? Many of the P.U.D.
agreements, have been violated , right from the P.U.D. are:
foster our small town ambiance .... (I think not....)
preserve and enharnce the downtowns identity ... (it may close some stores there...)
support existing viable businesses .... (ask knowlans, dakota floral.....)
to minirnize commercial trAc impacts on residential streets.4 151 will be a freeway)
the architectural plan is to create a "neighborhood" look and fed... (ask the residents to the south and east...)
signage.., each freestanding building is allowed ONE sign...(not three...)
vallgreens set a precident for restricted hours because of the residents to the west.... (cub has had no restrictions applied..)
dumpsters must be internal ...(cubs are outside... just look at the back of a cub sometime...)
use pitched hip roofs on accent roofs ... (cub has none...)
if a building changes more than 20 % or is moved more than 60 feet from the orig. P.U.D. it requires an ammendment and the
process has to start from the beginning....( changing from 40,000 retail to 68,300 supermarket applies dontyou think ?)
"extrodirmy bu(fetirtg" to the residents to the south ... (vary,very little if any...)
a traftc study that was done in 1996 with 40,000 retail as a model ... (hey, were talking about 68,000 to 80,000 supermarket
here.. we need a new study,,,)
Kathy, Look at the P. U. D. that you signed and tell me that they have met the conditions of the P. U. D. Some of the
commissioners had probably not read the complete P.U.D. or the architectural guidelines.... .make sure the council hays -read
them please... then You can !make a informed decision, l have learned aloe fromm, this process, and alot of people are waiting for
a good decision ton council. You said no to Town and country homes when they threatened to sue... Lets not be afraid of
cub.... Lets let therrt abi de by the terms of the P,U. D. please fQd free to show this to the other council members. I will wait
Your reply.
Thanks, Kelly Mcgivem
Sunday.AmuMU-2= Am-10 On§i YCOMWO Are 1
Subj: Proposed Cub Foods
Date: $19/00 3:11:35 PM Central Daylight Time
From: dkconneily @fbodsys.com (Diana Connelly)
To: mcbushoQbaol.com (mcbusho@aol.com')
Dear Cathy,
I, have lived in Rosemount for the last 7. years. We built our house in 1993,
when our backyard was bordered by a cornfield.
lam concerned about the n ew Cub Foods that is proposed for the location on
Claret. I live behind the proposed Cub on 152nd Street West. I am
concerned about the added traffic and noise of a business that is open 24
hours a day.
l have heard several reasons v fur we should welcome a Cub Foods in Rosemount:
Convenience: A guy went to get ice cream for his kids. It was 9:30 at right
and Knowians was clQsed. He had to ddve all the way to Apple Valley.
Wall, Apple Valley is only 4 miles. They also seem to sell ice cream at the
Dairy Queen, Holiday, SA, KWk Trip, etc.
Revenue: With a large businesslike this one coming here, we will attract
other businesses and will grow. That is probably rxrt true, Krrowlans will
either go out of business and the building there will be abarxToned or Cub
will realize that they aren't making the money they should and will abandon
their building. Either way the town suffers. Remember, Super Value and
Kno fans, combined were too much for Rosemount and one of them went out of
business. Wouldn't we just be killing another business that has
served us so well?
The building won't be as large as proposed. I know of several people that
live in Eagan and Burnsville that don't go to their Cub in town and opt to
drive several miles to shop the Apple Valley store because of the larger
building and more selections. Flow can this store thrive with another one so
close, not to mention larger than the proposed one?
We are going to see about having the Cub only open until midnight. Well it
sounds like the planning commission already okayed this to be a 24 hour /day
store. Will we be able to ever open our Wndaws at right in the summer?
The tmffip won't be any worse than it already is. I would think there
would be some kind of a bottle neck with people slowing to tun into and out
of the store. VMI1 there also be an additional stop light added?
There will be a lovely buffer between the store and the homes. Is this the
same buffer that was put around IQndercare mid Wdgreens? This really needs
to be discussed before the okay is ever given. There is a park within a few
feet of the land proposed, there are people that would fake to keep a quiet
neighborhood. This buffer should not only be rice looking, but a buffer that
actually blocks the view of the store to our homes to reduce the sound and
lights of the store and traffic, such as a large fence.
Two years ago we had to go through this same thing when we found out that
there would be hundreds of townhouses put behind us. As an added bonus to
our neighborhood, we were promised a rice park where our children could
play. That at the ti me sounded rice but as of today, almost all the
gp, . Au=Wt 13.7000 - Ardr O.Now YCBMWO - P� 1
townhouses are complete and the park sits there unfinished. The park
consists of a tennis court and a jungle gym. The lot is still dirt - void of
any grass, trees, or shrubs. I would like to know when this is to be
completed? What are the finial plans for this park?
Please try to answer my concems about the park.
Thank you,
Dianna Connelly
3769152nd St. W
Rosemount, MN 55068
Headers
Return -Path: <.dkcornelly@foodsys.c om>
Received: from rly- yg01.rroc.aol.com (lily ygO1.mail.ad.corn [17218.147.1]) by air- ygO1. mail. ad:com (v75 b3.11) with
ESMTP; Wed, 09 Aug 200016:11:35 -0400
Received: torn spiro.isd.net (spiro.isd.net [ 208. 159.192.26)) by rly- r901.mx.ad.com (v75 b3.9) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Aug
200016:11:09 -0400
Received: from miuskie.isd.riet (mail.toodsys.com [198.144.6.170])
by spiro.isd.net (8.9.318.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA16077
for <. mcbusho@aol. com >; Wed, 9 Aug 200015:10:58 =
Received: by MUSKIE with Internet Mail Sertice (5.5.2660.21)
id <.QQM7V66V >; Wed, 9 Aug 200015 :06:56 -0500
Message-ID: < 614263367595D311AF7B00600891A48E02E605 @MUSKIE>
From: Dana Connelly <.dkconnelly@foodsys.com>
To: '"mcbusho@aoi.com " <.mcbusho@ad.com>
Subject: Proposed Cub Foods
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 200015:06.55 -0500
Return- Receipt To: Diana Connelly <.dkconneiiy@faodsys.com>
MIME Version: 1.0
X- Mailer. Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Conterd Type: text/plain
Subj: Cub Foods
Rate: 6/8(001;21:56 PM Central Daylight Time
From: Merecith.Johnson @ westgroup.com (Johnson, Meredith)
To; mcbusho@aol.com ('mcbusho@aol.com')
Hello Mayor Cathy Busho -
You have VPbably heard an earful regarding Cub Foods, but I have a few
questions that I would like addressed:
Any Biggest concern is for the saW of the children that live in the area.
If Cub does go through, are there any plans for painting crosswalks across
151st & Shannon Parkway? If Shannon Parkway has increased traffic it may
become unsafe for children to cross Shannon Parkway to get to the Park/Ice
(ink. Step- lights might be necessary - is this in the plan?
- What amount of light pollution will there be with the W lights
constantly being on? Will the homes located in the back and front of Cub
constantly be lit up?
- \AAI1 the prptected Wetland between 151st & 153rd be affected? When we
first purchased our house, we were shown great bluepdrts of a pond with a
wal" wound it. After we bought the house we were told that Rosemount
declared that area a wetland and no changes could be made to that area If
all of the extra run -of( is directed to that area, the wetland will be
flooded more often - does this affect the plant/animal life?
I drove around to other area Cub Foods - none of which were located in such
a predominately residential area - and at each location Cub had rusted
semi trailers used for storage located around the outskirts of the building
- is this addressed in their contract?
I have lived in Rosemount my entire life (27 Years). I chose to purchase a
house in Rosemount so I could raise my family in a small town atmosphere.
It appears #* the money generated from Cub Foods moving into Rosemount
talks louder than the %ices of Rosemount Citizens.
Thank you for your time -
Meredith Johnson
Headers
Return -Path: <.Meredth.Johnsor4westgroup.com>
Received: from dy- yh03.mx.ad.com (rly- yh03.mail.aol.com [17218.147.351) by air yha3.rridi.ad.com (v75 b3.11) with
ESMTP; Tice, 08 Aug 200014:21:56 -0400
Received: from articuno.westgroup.com (articuno.westgroup.com [163.231.254.981) by dY yh03.mx.aoI -com (v75 b3.9) with
ESMTP; Tue, 08 Aug 200014:21:29 40400
Received: from artieuno.wwestgroW.com Qoealhost.loealdomain 1127.0.0.1])
by articuno.westgroup.drom (8.9.318.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA02819
for <. mcbustx@aol.com >; Tue, 8 Aug 200013:21:28 -t}500
Received: from elk. int.westgroup.com ([163.231.101.863)
by articuno.westgroup.com (8.9.3(8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA02811
for <. mcbusho@aol. com >; Tue, 8 Aug 200013:21 :28 -0500
Received: by elk.int.westgroup.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
id <.Q /LWW76R>; Tue, 8 Aug 200013:21 :28 -0500
ap"w_AUMMu zM AMrieftOeRm M
Subj: CUB FOODS
Efate: 8/8/00 12:06:02 PM Central Daylight Time
From: Wemplecm @DO.ISD196.k12.mn.us (Wemple, Charlotte)
Te: MQ8USHO@AOLCOM (7NCBUSHO@AOL.COM')
I would just like to voice my concern on this issue. I don't believe that
this store is going to suit the needs of this corrmmurgty. There are several
stores already standing empty around town and when someone tries to come in
the city council raises all these issues and eventually these businesses are
turned away.
T" store is going up in a highly residential area. You have a brand new
park and tennis court were there is constant traffic from bicycles and
v alKers. Since there is no off -street parking, those that wish to use the
park must park on the street, right in the path of Cub and their delivery
V ks. Why not put this store out somewhere where the houses haven't been
developed yet. What is wrong with something out east on Cty Rd 42 or south
Qn where there is ample room and little worry of n v ing over a Idd
riding his/her bike to the park.
I won't shop in the Cub in Apple Valley, because it is way to big and takes
forever to go through. If this is what the new Cub is to look like, you
wil(see me going to Rainbow or Knowfan's. When I do my shopping I am
usually running several errands at that time. There is no Target, K'mart or
V%W- Mart in the area so l will have to spend my money in Apple Valley
anyway. -1 feel the people who moved to this area in the last 4-5 years
wanted the small town feel. 1 am sure they didrPt mind the drive into Apple
Valley or Eagan to pick up something that Rosemount couldn`t offer. Wret I
would really like to see is a family restaurant, but I guess that is riot on
your plans since one was turned away already. Please listen to the people
of the area, I am sure they know what is best for them and not just what the
City feels is best for it.
C. Wemple
153rd St. Resident
Headers
Return-Path: <.Wemplecm@D0.ISD196.k12.mn.us>
Received: from dy za02.mx.aol.c om (rly za02.mail.aol.com [17231.36.96]) by air- za05.mail.ad.com (v75 b3.11) with
ESMTP; Tue, 08 Aug 200013:06:01 -0400
Received: f m do mail01.isd196.k12.mn.us (maii.isd196.k12.mn.us [204.72.81.64]) by dy za02.mx.ad.com (v75_b3.9) with
ESM1TP; Tue, 08 Aug 200013:05:36 -0400
Received: by mail.isd196.k12.mn.us with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
id <.PD4GZVRS >; Tue, 8 Aug 200012 :13:45 -0500
Message-ID: <. DA3100244E5BD411A09600508BC81C4D06513E @do- mai102.isd196.k12.mn.uus>
From: ' Wemple, Cheriatte" <.Wemplecm@DO.ISD196 kl2.mrLus>
To: '"MCBUSHO@AOL OONr <.MCBUSHO ,AOLCOM>
Subject: CUB FOODS
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 200012:13:37 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X- Mailer Internet Mail Service (5.52650.21)
Content -Type: text/pkdn;
charset= "iso49l69 -1"
sunaw. Aua�pt +a• anm. N".de. p.n.,K Mcauswo �,.� t
SuN: Opposition to Cab Foods in Rosemount
Rate: 4140 11;44,57 AM Central Daylight Time
From: Ulahy26
To: MCBUSHO
PlVaqe DO WT let Cub Foods put in a 8p,000 It gto fe Wth two 150 it signs. There must be some sort of compromise if we
have to have a Cub Foods store in Rosemont. The store couid be considerably smaller and the large signs are not
necessary and do not comply with the getielWneni agregm" as it is now. (arp againgt a sto fe going in at all but wWd like
the above taken into account if a store does go in.
Thank you for your consideration,
Laura Fahy
3581 153rd Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
aWWW. AvnW . moo 4n w I R , o.nnw MCRWHQ, , P. ,
Subj: Cub Foods in Rosemountit
Dater 8!7/00 8;49 :50 AM Central Daylight Time
From: therese.r.sweitzer@mco.com (Sweitzer, Therese R) -
To: mcbusho@aoi.com ('mcbusho@aol.com')
Dear Mayor Cathy Busho,
l heard there is a possibility of a CUB Food store to be built in Rosemount.
Why would ld we went such a thing7 Isn't there enough grocery stores??? We
certainly don`t need another CUBH Is this already set in concrete? If it
is, can we keep the hours under control? I don't know about you, but I
really don't want to look across the street and see a CUB Foods store nor do
I want to listen to the traffic all right long. There is enough traffic
noise from 42 and 151st Street. Now 1 have to listen to more noise from
CUB?? I work 12 hour days and look forward to going home and relaxing. Now
( get to look forward to more traffic noise? I really don't look forward to
that after busy work day. How would you like a CUB Foods across the
street from where you live???
Why such a large stare7n I heard 80,000 square feet. We don't need the
store to begin with, so why would we need that big of a store??? Eagan has
4 times the population and a much smaller store.
i nyNed into Rosemount because it offered a small, quaint aid more people
oriented susrourxing. It didn't have the big retail chain stores on every
corner (Wal Mart, Target, Menards, Home Depot, etc.). It's a neat city. I
certainly hope it doesn't change.
Therese Sw6tzer
Rosemount Resident
Headers
Ret=4 <.therese.r.sw6tzer @Imco.com>
Received: from dy- yb05.rrx.ad.con (rly- yb05.mail.ad.corn [17218.146.5]) by air -yb05.mail.ad.com (V75 b3.11) with
ESMTP; Man, 07 Aug 2000 09 :49:50 -0400
Received: from mailgw2a.imco.com (maiigw2a.1mco.com [ 192.91.147.7]) by dy -ybO5.rruc.ad.com (V75 b3.9) WthESMTP;
Mon, 07 Aug 2000 09:49:36 -0400
Received: from emss03gO1.ems.imco.corn (emssO3gO1.ems.imco.com [141.240.4.144])
by malgw2a.1mco.com (8.8.818.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA14372
for <.mcbusho@aol.com >; Mon, 7 Aug 2000 09:49:35 -0400 (EDT)
Returrxeceipt4o: therese csweitzeramco.com
Received: from C OWERSION- DAEMON by imco.com (PMDF V5.2 -32 #38888) id <OFYA)OE01CYKF9@lmco com> for
mcbusho@aol.com; Mon,
7 Aug 2000 09:48:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from emss09io0.ems.imco.com x156.183.24.10]) by Imco.com (PMDF V5.2 -32 MINIM)
with ESMTP id <OFY)O MSCYMSH@mco.com> for mcbusho@ad.com; Mon, 07 Aug 2000 09:47:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by emssOGllOO.ems.Imco.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <.QJS8WL6hh; Mon, 07 Aug 2000
09:46:36 -0400
Content -ret m. allowed
Die: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 09:47:06 -0400
From: "Sw dtzer, Therese R' <.#umme.r.sw#eitzer@Imco.com>
Subject: Cub Foods in RosemountN
To: '"mcbusho@ad.crom" <.mcbusho@aoi.con>
Message4d: <393829FB82FCD011BA6AO000F81E .ems.lmco.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
8u.W-.Au"ust'12_2= AM-4-4,0- dk- 18=0200 Pa r-1
Subj: Cub Foods
Date. 81710(Y T1,33:54 AM Central Daylight Time
From: geniofthelamp@yahoo.com (Shaun laden)
To: nx;busho@aol.com
Mayor
I am a citizen of Rosemount who is excited and
beheind the new renovations planned for downtown
Rosemouunt. i disagree with a poorly written article
in the Pioneer Press that says we have nothing to
gffer. Rosemount is a great place to live.
The newest plan for Cub Foods is unacceptable as it
stands. A. Z4 hour Cub is not needed and unfair. If
the studs are to be lowered for Cub they should be
loweredfi r Vftreens and anyone else who wants into
that club, and l don't think that is what Rosemount
wants.
An 80,000 foot eye sore along the main road in
Rosemount is both excessive and in bad taste, just not
classy.
l am, mailing you today as a concerned resident who
wants to stay in Rosemount and raise my children here.
Its the small tcwn,community feeling that makes this
an attractive place to live. It is not the
cortience of being able to wake up at 3a.m. and go
grocery shopping that is attractive. Rosemount with
all of her charm is being threatened.
Mayor Bustin the city of Rosemount needs someone to
champ'ioRour cause. We need someone who is able to
stand up to big business and not let them throw
Rosemount into the waste bin of bad cities, like Apple
Valley for instance. We elected you to represent us
and the best interest of our community. It is now
your tum to do your job. We will keep fighting the
good fight but we need you to be there leading us.
Keep Rosemount charming, keep Rosemount decent, keep
Rosemount a place where people want to liva.
Sincerely
Shaun Laden
(651) 322 -4788
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick pff Your party with Yahoo! Invites.
http:Jlr nvites. yahoo. com/
Headers
Ran -Path: <.gerrcfthelamp@ yahoo com
Received: from dy- za0l.mx.ad.corn (dy za0tmaii.ad.com [172.31.36.871) by air- za04.rr4l.ad.com (v7S b311) with
ESMTP; Mon, 07 Aug 200012:38:54 -0400
Received: from web106.yahoornail.com (vueb106.yahoomail.corn [205.180.60 73]) by dy- za01.rmc.ad.com (v75_b&% with
-Asw&W IM OW Cniki MCMAW peer 1
..... .... ...... ..... .... ......
08/09/2000 10:24 6514523220 VALLEY BLACKTOPPING PAGE 01
a
15125 CRESTONE CIRCLE
R06EMOUNTX N 55068
August 9, 2000
City of Rosemount
City Hall
2875 145th Street W
Rosemount, 10 55068
RE: Cub Foods -
Attrt: l' lanning Commission & City - Council
After hearing. the • presentation for Cub Foods and hearing
the comments from the audience, I really wonder if it will
really make a difference to stop - the building of Cub Foods;
that we will look at directly out of our kitchen window.
We just left a very busy street and city to move to a more
quint surrounding and were under the understanding that a
small strip mall was to be built at this location.and not a
Cub Foods. The next thing we know a Walmart will S-8: built.
Why can't this' Cub Food store be built in the Industrial
park area and keep it out of site of all the residential
owners. We have just spent over $200,000.00 a new home.
You should stay with the original plan to keep this - proposed
cub area out and design a mall with some class. I really
hope that Rosemount planning commission will look at the
homeowners views on this. I realize that Cub Foods are
a lame limited partnership and that money talks. Again,
Please listen to what the homeowners near this location
are saying. Please, NO Cub Foods.
Russ & Marcia Johnson
15125 Creston Drive
Rosemotnt, 55068