HomeMy WebLinkAbout9.a. Receive Feasibility Report/Set Public Hearing-County Road 46/TH3 Street & Utility Improvements, City Project #284} 1
i
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 6, 2000
AGENDA ITEM: Receive Feasibility Report /Set Public
AGENDA SECTION:
Hearing- County Road 46 /TH 3 Street & Utility Improvements,
Old Business
City Project #284
PREPARED BY: Dave Simons, Consulting Engineer
SEH, Inc.
AGEN, e
ATTACHMENTS: Feasibility Report, Resolution
APPROVED BY:
This item is a request for Council to receive the Feasibility Report and order a Public , Hearing for
the County Road 46 /TH 3 Street & Utility Improvements, City Project #284. Staff has recently
received the final plans and cost estimates from the County, and has incorporated them into
the Feasibility Report.
The larger County project consists of the construction of Co. Rd. 46 from Pilot Knob Road in
Apple Valley to the east side of Coates. The work within Rosemount includes the segment
between Diamond Path and Biscayne Avenue, and also includes the relocation of T.H. 3 to the
east. The project consists of street, trail, storm drain and watermain construction.
The total estimated cost to the City of Rosemount is approximately $ 1,021,000.
Approximately 30% of the project cost is proposed to be recovered through assessments to the
benefiting properties, and the remainder is proposed to be recovered from City funds. City
funds include the Water and Storm Drain Core Funds, the Water Operating Fund and C.I.P.
funds, which have previously been encumbered for this project.
Along with the Cities of Apple Valley and Lakeville, the City of Rosemount has already entered
into a cost sharing agreement with Dakota County for construction of the project. The plans
and specifications have been completed by the County, and the project is scheduled to be bid
in late March or April. Rosemount's segment of the project is scheduled to be constructed in
2000, and the remainder of the County's project is scheduled to be constructed in 2001. An
open house /public informational meeting has been scheduled for March 15, 2000 from 5:00
p.m. to 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
Although the County's work within Rosemount will not include sanitary sewer, Staff will be
analyzing the possibility of constructing some sanitary sewer segments within the project area
under a separate City project. The installation of some sewer pipe concurrent with the
County's project could reduce the future cost for sewer construction /restoration in the project
area
RECOMMENDED ACTION: MOTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE
FEASIBILITY REPORT AND SET A PUBLIC HEARING FOR COUNTY ROAD 46 /TRUNK
HIGHWAY 3 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS, CITY PROJECT #284.
COUNCIL ACTION:
CITY OF ROSEMOUNT
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2000 -
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE FEASIBILITY REPORT AND SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING
FOR THE COUNTY ROAD 46/TRUNK HIGHWAY 3 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT #284
WHEREAS, the City Council deemed it necessary and expedient that the City of Rosemount, Minnesota, construct
certain improvements, to -wit: City Project #284, County Road 4617runk Highway 3 Street and Utility Improvements,
in the City as described in and in accordance with the feasibility report prepared by the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has been advised by the City Engineer that said utility and street improvements, City
Project #284 is feasible, and should best be made as proposed, and the City Engineer's report to this effect has
heretofore been received by Council, and filed with the City Clerk on March 6, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the statute provided that no such improvements shall be made until the Council has held a public hearing
on such improvements following mailed notice and two publications thereof in the official newspaper stating time and
place of the hearing, the general nature of the improvement, the estimated costs thereof, and the area proposed to be
assessed, in accordance with the law.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount accepts the feasibility reportfor City
Project #284 and places it on file.
NOW THEREFORE IT BE FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount that the public hearing
be scheduled to consider City Project #284, County Road 46/Trunk Highway 3 Street & Utility Improvements to be held
on Tuesday, March 21, 2000 at 8:00 o'clock p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible, in the Council Chambers of the City
Hall.
ADOPTED this 6th day of March, 2000.
ATTEST:
Linda Jentink, City Clerk
Motion by:
Voted in favor:
Cathy Busho, Mayor
Seconded by:
Voted against:
1
it I
a
9
r
1
D
County Road 46/
Trunk Highway 3
Street and Utility Improvements
City of Rosemount, Minnesota
City Project No. 284
SEH No. A- ROSEM0001.00
March 6, 2000
=5Ef1
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC
Multidisciplined.
Single Source.
e
t
r
r
r
a
1
1
1
County Road 46/Trunk Highway 3
Street and Utility Improvements
Preliminary Report
City of Rosemount, Minnesota
City Project No. 284
SEH No. A- ROSEM0001.00
March 6, 2000
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the
laws of the State of MAesota. A
Date: March 6, 2000 Reg. No. 19699
Reviewed by: March 6 2000
Date
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.
200 SEH Center
3535 Vadnais Center Drive
St. Paul, MN 55110-5118
(651) 490 -2000
1.lQVlu 1'. J1111V11J, 1 .Li.
!I
=SEtI
I March 6, 2000
1
Mr. Tom Burt
City Administrator
City of Rosemount
2875 145th Street West
Rosemount, MN 55068
RE: Rosemount, Minnesota
Preliminary Report
County Road 46/Trunk Highway 3
Street and Utility Improvements
City Project No. 284
SEH No. A- ROSEM0001.00
Dear Tom:
In accordance with the City's authorization, we have prepared the attached preliminary report for
street and utility improvements associated with the County Road 46/Trunk Highway 3. This
report discusses water main, storm drain and street improvements, and provides cost estimates
for each.
We find this improvement to be feasible and recommend that it be constructed in general
compliance with the provisions of this report.
We would be pleased to review this report with you in detail.
Sincerely,
avid F. Simons, P.E.
laf
Bpi oiects \rs \rosem \(XN) I \r \project284..doc
1
�
�
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, 200 SEH CENTER, ST PAUL, MN 55110 651490-2000 800325-2055
ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC. MINNEAPOLIS, MN ST CLOUD, MN CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI MADISON, WI LAKE COUNTY, IN
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
t
V Table of Contents
1
1
SEH is a registered trademark of Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc
County Road 46/Trunk Highway 3 A- RQSEIVIO001.00
Street and Utility Improvements :< Page i
Certification Page
Letter of Transmittal
Table
of Contents
Page
1.0
Executive Summary ...................................................... ..............................1
+
2.0
Introduction ................................................................... ..............................2
2 .1 Authorization ........................................................... ..............................2
2.2 Scope ..................................................................... ...............................
2
2 .3 Data Available ........................................................ ...............................
2
3.0
General Background ...
3 .1 Location ................................................................... ..............................3
3 .2 Site Conditions ....................................................... ...............................
3
4.0
Proposed Improvements .............................................. ..............................3
4.1 Water Main ............................................................. ...............................
3
4.2 Storm Drainage ....................................................... ..............................4
4.3 Street Construction .................................................. ..............................4
4.4 Easements and Permits .......................................... ...............................
5
4.5 Sanitary Sewer ........................................................ ..............................5
5.0
Financing ................................................ ............................... .......5
...............
5 .1 Cost Estimates ....................................................... ...............................
5 .2 Assessment Area ................................................... ...............................
5
6
5 .3 Cost Recovery ......................................................... ..............................7
i 5.3.1
Assessments ............................................................ ...............................
7
■
5.3.2 Summary .................................................................. ..............................8
6.0
Project Schedule
1
1
SEH is a registered trademark of Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc
County Road 46/Trunk Highway 3 A- RQSEIVIO001.00
Street and Utility Improvements :< Page i
1
I Table of Contents (Continued)
I List of Tables
List of Appendices
Appendix A Detailed Cost Estimates
Appendix B Standard Assessment Rates
Appendix C Drawings
r
County Road 46/Trunk Highway 3
Street and Utility Improvements
A- ROSEM0001.00
Page ii
Table 1
Table 2
Summary of Cost Estimates ...................... ............................... 6
Assessment Area ........................................ ..............................7
Table 3
Cost Recovery Summary ........................... ............................... 9
List of Appendices
Appendix A Detailed Cost Estimates
Appendix B Standard Assessment Rates
Appendix C Drawings
r
County Road 46/Trunk Highway 3
Street and Utility Improvements
A- ROSEM0001.00
Page ii
I March 6, 2000
Preliminary Report
County Road 46/Trunk Highway 3
Street and utility Improvements
,
Prepared for City of Rosemount, Minnesota
1.0 Executive Summary
City Project No. 284 provides for the construction of water main,
storm drain and street improvements for County Road 46 (Co. Rd. 46)
between Diamond Path and Biscayne Avenue, and for Trunk Highway
3 (T.H. 3) between the C.P. Railroad trestle and Co. Rd. 46.
This project is being designed, bid and administered by Dakota
County. The overall County project consists of the construction of Co.
Rd. 46 from Pilot Knob Road in Apple Valley to the east side of
Coates where Co. Rd. 46 will connect with the existing Co. Rd. 48.
The City has agreed to assist with the project funding between
Diamond Path and Biscayne Avenue. The segment between Diamond
Path and Biscayne Avenue also includes the relocation of T.H. 3 south
of the C.P. Railroad trestle.
Rosemount's share of the project includes approximately 1,920 in
(6,300 ft.) of water main, 1,510 in (5,000 ft.) of storm drain, and 2,540
in (8,300 ft.) of curb and gutter construction.
Although the County's work within Rosemount will not include
sanitary sewer, Staff will be analyzing the possibility of constructing
some sanitary sewer segments within the project area under a separate
City project. The installation of some sewer pipe concurrent with the
County's project could reduce the future cost for sewer
construction/restoration in the project area.
Rosemount's total estimated project cost is $1,021,000. Of this total,
$27,700 will be assessed to properties benefiting from water main
improvements, and $256,300 will be assessed to properties benefiting
from street and storm drain improvements. Of the remaining water
A- ROSEM0001.00
Page 1
t
main cost, $250,000 will be obtained from the Water Main Core
Facility Fund and $18,300 will come from the Water Main Operating
Fund. Encumbered CIP funds will be used to pay for a portion of the
street and storm drain costs, as well as the right -of -way costs. This
includes $267,000 for street and storm drain, and $133,000 for right -
1 of -way. The remaining street and storm drain cost of $68,700 will be
obtained from the Storm Drain Core Facility Fund.
This improvement is necessary to provide the adjacent properties with
new or upgraded municipal services. These municipal services include
water service, storm drain accommodations and street access. The
improvement is cost - effective and feasible from an engineering
standpoint. Due to the size of the project and the nature of the
construction, the City's component of the project would best be bid
and constructed by the County along with the larger County project.
Project construction is scheduled to begin in the Spring of 2000.
Substantial completion of Rosemount's segment is scheduled for the
fall of 2000, and final completion of the County's overall project is
scheduled for the fall of 2001.
2.0
Introduction
2.1
Authorization
On January 19, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rosemount
authorized the preparation of a preliminary report for construction of
streets and utilities along Co. Rd. 46 and T.H. 3. This improvement
I
has been designated as City Project No. 284. Dakota County is
designing, bidding and administering the project.
2.2
Scope
The
purpose of this report is to determine the engineering feasibility of
the project based on a review of the data available, and to make
recommendations and provide cost estimates for the construction of
water main, storm drain and street facilities.
2.3
Data Available
Information and materials used in the preparation of this report
include:
■ Dakota County Construction Plans for Co. Rd. 46/T.H. 3
(November 1999)
■ Dakota County Cost Estimates for Co. Rd. 46/T.H. 3
(November 1999)
■ City of Rosemount Construction Record Drawings
■ City of Rosemount Storm Water Management Plan
(February 1998)
County Road 46/Trunk Highway 3
A- ROSEM0001.00
Street and Utility Improvements
Page 2
■ City of Rosemount Water Supply and Distribution Plan
(September 1997)
■ City of Rosemount Special Assessment Policy (January 1997)
3.0 General Background
3.1 Location
The project location is shown on Drawings 1 and 2. The overall
County project consists of the construction of Co. Rd. 46 from just east
of Pilot Knob Road in Apple Valley to the east side of Coates where
Co. Rd. 46 will connect with the existing Co. Rd. 48. The City has
agreed to assist with partial funding of the project between Diamond
Path and Biscayne Avenue. The segment between Diamond Path and
Biscayne Avenue also includes the relocation of T.H. 3 south of the
,. C.P. Railroad trestle.
3.2 Site Conditions
The new Co. Rd. 46 is proposed to roughly follow the old 160 Street
W. alignment. Currently, 160 Street W. is a two -lane rural road with
shoulders and ditches. Existing 160th Street W. is paved between
Diamond Path and the existing T.H. 3. At T.H. 3, 160 Street W. turns
to a gravel surface, and it is gravel between T.H. 3 and Biscayne
Avenue.
The condition of 160th Street W. between Diamond Path and existing
T.H. 3 is poor. The bituminous pavement is heavily patched and
requires significant maintenance on an annual basis. The gravel
surface of 160th Street W. between T.H. 3 and Biscayne Avenue also
requires significant maintenance. Routine grading is necessary in
order to keep the surface from rutting and pot - holing. In addition, the
roadway is dusty during dry conditions, and requires frequent watering
and/or applications of calcium chloride to control the dust.
The present average daily traffic on 160th Street W. between Diamond
Path and Biscayne Avenue is approximately 2,000 vehicles per day. A
high percentage of the present traffic is heavy commercial truck
traffic. This segment of 160 Street W. is functionally classified as a
minor arterial on the county's roadway classification system.
4.0 Proposed Improvements
4.1 Water Main
Proposed water main facilities are shown on Drawing No. 3. These
facilities include the closure of several water main loops located West
of existing T.H. 3. The first loop closure is a proposed 300 mm (12 ")
water main along the north side of Co. Rd. 46 between Dakota Lane
and Shannon Parkway. The second loop closure is a proposed 200 mm
(8 ") water main along the north side of Co. Rd. 46, in front of the
multi - family residential property located at 3785 160th Street W..
County Road 46lrrunk Highway 3 A- ROSEM0001.00
Street and Utility Improvements Page 3
J
n
1
The project also includes a 300 mm (12 ") water main along the new
T.H. 3 alignment between the C.P. Railroad trestle and Co. Rd. 46 as
well as a 300 mm (12 ") loop along Conn Road between the new T.H. 3
alignment and Co. Rd. 46.
Several sub - surface water main crossings will need to be installed
under the new T.H. 3 alignment and under the railroad spur which
connects MAPCO Inc. to the C.P. Railroad. The proposed facilities
include hydrants for fire protection.
4.2 Storm Drainage
Proposed storm drainage facilities are shown on Drawings 4, 5 and 6.
Storm drain piping varies in size from 300 mm (12 ") to 1,200 mm
(48 ") in diameter. The storm drains located west of Danville Avenue
will drain westerly into Lakeville /Apple Valley. The storm drains
located between Danville Avenue and existing T.H. 3 will drain into
Shannon Pond located near Shannon Parkway. The storm drains
located on Conn Road and the new T.H. 3 alignment will drain north
into a proposed storm water detention area located east of the railroad
trestle. Storm drains located on Co. Rd. 46 east of existing T.H. 3 will
drain south into Empire Township.
4.3 Street Construction
Rosemount has agreed to participate in the financing of Co. Rd. 46
between Diamond Path and Biscayne Avenue as well as North
Frontage Road, Conn Road and the new T.H. 3 alignment between the
C.P. Railroad trestle and Co. Rd. 46. These roadways are shown in
Drawings 7, 8 and 9.
1
t
11
1
County Road 46/Trunk Highway 3
Street and Utility Improvements
Co. Rd. 46 is proposed to be constructed as a 4 -lane divided highway
between Diamond Path and the new T.H. 3 alignment. This segment
of Co. Rd. 46 will be an urban section (concrete curb and gutter with
storm drain) and dedicated left and right turn lanes will be provided at
street intersections. The projected 20 -year average daily traffic is
7,500 vehicles per day on this segment. The roadway will be posted
for no parking.
East of the new T.H. 3 alignment, Co. Rd. 46 will transition into a 2-
lane road with a center left turn lane and dedicated turn lanes at
intersections. The projected 20 -year average daily traffic for this
segment is approximately 3,350 vehicles per day, and no parking will
be allowed. North Frontage Road will be constructed north of Co.
Rd. 46 between the new T.H. 3 alignment and Biscayne Avenue. This
frontage road will provide local access to the businesses along the
north side of Co. Rd. 46.
A 3.0 in (10 ft.) bituminous path will be constructed on the north side
of Co. Rd. 46 between Diamond Path and Biscayne Avenue.
A- ROSEM0001.00
Page 4
F
1
a
1
Detailed cost estimates for Rosemount's part of the project are
included in Appendix A of this report. The cost estimates in
Appendix A only include those costs which pertain to Rosemount's
financial share of the project. Cost estimates were provided to the City
by Dakota County, and they are based on anticipated bid prices for the
2000 construction season. Allowances for contingencies (10%) and
anticipated legal, administrative, engineering and fiscal costs (30%)
have been added to the County's estimates. The estimated right -of-
way costs are based on appraisals performed by the County, and
include contingencies and overhead costs.
County Road 46/Trunk Highway 3 A- ROSEM0001.00
Street and Utility Improvements Page 5
The T.H. 3
proposed and Conn Road will both be 2 -lane roadways
with an urban section and dedicated turn lanes at intersections. Street
parking will not be allowed on these roadways. The current average
daily traffic is 9,500 vehicles per day on T.H. 3, and this number is
expected to increase to 19,700 vehicles per day by 2020.
4.4 Easements and Permits
Dakota County is in the process of obtaining all rights -of -way,
easements and permits needed to construct the project. The County
has prepared right -of -way maps showing all required right -of -way and
easements acquisitions. In addition, the County has applied for all
permits necessary to complete the project. Since the County is
administering the project, right -of -way and easement acquisition will
be done by the County.
4.5 Sanitary Sewer
Although the County's work within Rosemount will not include
sanitary sewer, Staff will be analyzing the possibility of constructing
some sanitary sewer segments within the project area under a separate
City project. The installation of some sewer pipe concurrent with the
County's project could reduce the future cost for sewer
construction/restoration in the project area.
5.0 Financing
5.1 Cost Estimates
F
1
a
1
Detailed cost estimates for Rosemount's part of the project are
included in Appendix A of this report. The cost estimates in
Appendix A only include those costs which pertain to Rosemount's
financial share of the project. Cost estimates were provided to the City
by Dakota County, and they are based on anticipated bid prices for the
2000 construction season. Allowances for contingencies (10%) and
anticipated legal, administrative, engineering and fiscal costs (30%)
have been added to the County's estimates. The estimated right -of-
way costs are based on appraisals performed by the County, and
include contingencies and overhead costs.
County Road 46/Trunk Highway 3 A- ROSEM0001.00
Street and Utility Improvements Page 5
1
w
1
1
1-1
The total cost for Rosemount is estimated to be approximately
$1,021,000. A summary of these costs is presented in Table 1.
Table 1
Summary of Cost Estimates
Rncpmniint'c Churn of
Description
Total
Water Main on Co. Rd. 46 and T.H. 3
$296,000
Storm Drain on T.H. 3
$398,000
Curb and Gutter on T.H. 3
$ 95,000
Co. Rd. 46 Roadway Costs
$ 99,000
Right -of -Way Costs on Co. Rd. 46
$133,000
Total Estimated Cost
$1,021,000
5.2 Assessment Area
Properties adjacent to the project area will benefit from the proposed
improvements. According to Minnesota State Statutes, these parcels
are subject to assessments for the purpose of recovering the project
costs.
County Hoad 46[Trunk Highway 3 A- ROSEM0001.00
Street and Utility Improvements Page 6
1-i
1
w
t
1
I
Table 2 lists the properties that are located adjacent to the project
which are subject to assessments to recover the project costs.
Table 2
Assessment Area
Owner
Parcel I.D.
Number
Assessment Length
Water Main
Street
William's Energy
340321001273
N /A
Car Nav Five
340321001970
120m (394 ft.)'
N /A
Murgic's Auto
Body
340321001470
120m (394 ft.)'
N /A
Leo G. Stern and
Dottie S. Hammel
340321001165
131m (430 ft.)'
N /A
Car Nav Five
340321002370
72m (236 ft.)'
N /A
Car Nav Five
340321002370
198m (649 ft.)
Highstone Ltd.
Partnership
343280001001
300m (982 ft.)
Donfranco
340321001585
100m (328 ft.)
Metro Mosquito
Control
340321001985
100m (328 ft.)
RCD Real Estate
Pt.
340321002085
101m (331 ft.)
Thomas
Engelmeier and
Charles
En elmeier
340321003085
96m (315 ft.)'
Brett J. Debates
340311001096
50m (164 ft.)
'Assessments are based on the shortest lot line length for the parcel.
2 Street assessments for parcels along Conn Road are calculated on a unit basis
rather than on a front -foot basis.
3 The assessment length listed is one -half of the frontage length because of the
corner lot status.
5.3 Cost Recovery
5.3.1 Assessments
The assessments to recover the water main costs will be calculated
using the City's standard assessment rates as described in
Section III.B.3.a of the City's Special Assessment Policy
(Appendix B). The water main assessment rate for a commercial area
is $18.99 per front foot, which is one -half of the estimated cost to
install a 12 —inch water main. The assessments for water main are
based on the shortest lot line length for each parcel so that odd parcel
shares are not penalized.
County Road 46/Trunk Highway 3 A- ROSEM0001.00
Street and Utility Improvements Page 7
1
I LJ
The assessments to recover the costs for street and storm drain
improvements on Conn Road will be calculated as described in
Section III.C.2.b of the City's Special Assessment Policy. Each of the
commercial /industrial properties that benefit from the street and storm
drain improvements will be assessed $5,000 plus 50% of the cost for
the new improvements. The new improvements consist of curb and
gutter and storm drain.
The total estimated cost of improvements (curb and gutter and storm
drain) for Conn Road is $122,000. Spreading the $122,000 over the
five benefiting commercial properties yields a cost per lot of $24,400.
In accordance with the Special Assessment Policy, the assessment per
lot will be a minimum of $5,000 plus 50% of the cost for the
improvements. Therefore, the assessment per lot will be
approximately $17,200.
The assessments to recover the costs for street and storm drain
improvements on North Frontage Road will be calculated as described
in Section HI.B.3.d of the City's Special Assessment Policy. Since
North Frontage Road is approximately 38 feet wide, the benefiting
commercial /industrial properties will be assessed at a rate of $55.00
per front foot. This assessment rate is the estimated cost per linear
foot for one -half of a 38 -foot wide street.
The Engelmeier parcel on the corner of Co. Rd. 46 and Biscayne
Avenue is a corner lot that could also be assessed for improvements to
Biscayne Avenue in the future. Therefore, the assessment for this
1 parcel is based on one -half of the frontage length along Co. Rd. 46,
because of the corner lot status.
Assessments for the Debates property are calculated as described in
Section III.B.3.d of the City's Special Assessment Policy. The
benefiting multi - family property will be assessed at a rate of $55.00
per front foot which is the estimated cost for one -half of a 38 -foot
wide street.
5.3.2 Summary
The total estimated project cost is $1,021,000. Of this total,
approximately $27,700 will be assessed to properties benefiting from
water main improvements, and $256,300 will be assessed to properties
benefiting from street and storm drain improvements. Of the
remaining water main cost, $250,000 will be obtained from the Water
Main Core Facility Fund and $18,300 will come from the Water Main
Operating Fund. Encumbered CIP funds will be used to pay for
$267,000 of street and storm drain costs and $133,000 of right —of —way
cost. The remaining $68,700 for street and storm drain construction
will be obtained from the Storm Sewer Core Facility Fund.
County Road 46/Trunk Highway 3 A- ROSEM0001.00
Street and Utility Improvements Page 8
1
1
1
I
1
1
The summary of the cost recovery is presented in Table 3.
Table 3
Cnst Raenvary Cnmmnry
6.0 Project Schedule
The proposed schedule for this improvement is listed below. This
schedule is based on the provisions of Chapter 429 of the Minnesota
State Statues. The schedule assumes that all elements of the
improvement, including County obligations and easement acquisitions,
are completed in a timely manner.
• Order Feasibility Report ................ ........................January 19, 1999
• Receive Feasibility Report/Order
Public Hearing .. ............................... ..........................March 6, 2000
• Hold Public Informational Meeting ........................March 15, 2000
• Hold Public Hearing/
Order and Receive Plans & Specs/
Order Ad for Bid ........................... ..........................March 21, 2000
• Award Contract ............................... ............................... April 2000
• Begin Construction ........................ ............................... Spring 2000
• Complete Construction ..........:................ ...........................Fall 2001
• Assessment Hearing .................... ............................... October 2002
County Road 46/Trunk Highway 3 A- ROSEM0001.00
Street and Utility Improvements Page 0
Street
and
Water
Storm
Right -of-
Main
Drain
Way
Total
Assessments
$ 27,700
$256,300
$ 0
$284,000
Water Main Core
Facility Fund
$250,000
$ 0
$ 0
$250,000
Water Main
Operating Fund
$ 18,300
$ 0
$ 0
$ 18,300
Encumbered
CIP Funds
$ 0
$267,000
$133,000
$400,000
Storm Drain Core
Facility Fund
$ 0
$ 68,700
$ 0
$ 68,700
Total
$2969000 i
$5923000
i $133,000
$1,021,000
6.0 Project Schedule
The proposed schedule for this improvement is listed below. This
schedule is based on the provisions of Chapter 429 of the Minnesota
State Statues. The schedule assumes that all elements of the
improvement, including County obligations and easement acquisitions,
are completed in a timely manner.
• Order Feasibility Report ................ ........................January 19, 1999
• Receive Feasibility Report/Order
Public Hearing .. ............................... ..........................March 6, 2000
• Hold Public Informational Meeting ........................March 15, 2000
• Hold Public Hearing/
Order and Receive Plans & Specs/
Order Ad for Bid ........................... ..........................March 21, 2000
• Award Contract ............................... ............................... April 2000
• Begin Construction ........................ ............................... Spring 2000
• Complete Construction ..........:................ ...........................Fall 2001
• Assessment Hearing .................... ............................... October 2002
County Road 46/Trunk Highway 3 A- ROSEM0001.00
Street and Utility Improvements Page 0
Appendix A
Detailed Cost Estimates
fJ
L�
1
a
1
r l
1
t
I�
Plus 10% Contingencies $20,640.00
Estimated Construction Cost $227,036.00
Plus 30% Administrative, Legal, Fiscal and Engineering $68,964.00
Total Estimated Cost $296,000.00
I
t
ESTIMATE OF COST
Street
Co. Rd. 46 / T. H. 3
and Utility Improvements
City Project No. 284
SEH No. A- ROSEM0001.00
Water Main Construction
on Co. Rd.
46 and T. H. 3
Rosemount's Share of Cost
Description
Unit Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Salvage Gate Valve
Each
0.5
$200.00
$100.00
Salvage Hydrant
Each
1
$445.00
$445.00
150 mm Megalug
Each
20
$40.00
$800.00
200 mm Megalug
Each
160
$40.00
$6,400.00
300 mm Megalug
Each
160
$42.00
$6,720.00
200 mm x 200 mm Wet Tap Tee & GV
Each
1
$350.00
$350.00
300 mm x 300 mm Wet Tap Tee & GV
Each
1
$400.00
$400.00
Connect to Existing Water Main
Each
4
$250.00
$1,000.00
Install Gate Valve and Box
Each
1
$500.00
$500.00
Install Hydrant
Each
1
$950.00
$950.00
'
Adjust Valve Box
Each
2
$255.00
$510.00
150 mm Gate Valve and Box
Each
4
$590.00
$2,360.00
200 mm Gate Valve and Box
Each
3
$755.00
$2,265.00
300 mm Gate Valve and Box
Each
3
$1,035.00
$3,105.00
Hydrant
Each
4
$1,575.00
$6,300.00
460 mm Steel Casing Pipe
m
50
$315.00
$15,750.00
460 mm Steel Casing Pipe (Jacked)
m
25
$450.00
$11,250.00
150 mm Water Main Duct Iron Cl 51
200 mm Water Main Duct Iron Cl 51
m
m
21
74
$125.00
$70.00
$2,625.00
$5,180.00
300 mm Water Main Duct Iron Cl 51
m 1,826
$75.00
$136,950.00
Water Main Fittings
kg
870
$2.80
$2,436.00
Subtotal Water Main Construction
$206,396.00
Plus 10% Contingencies $20,640.00
Estimated Construction Cost $227,036.00
Plus 30% Administrative, Legal, Fiscal and Engineering $68,964.00
Total Estimated Cost $296,000.00
I
t
f
1
t
a
ESTIMATE OF COST
Co. Rd. 46 / T. H. 3
Street and Utility Improvements
City Project No. 284
SEH No. A- ROSEM0001.00
Storm Drain Construction on T. H. 3
Rosemount's Share of Cost
Description
Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount
Install Culvert Marker
Each
1
$14.50
$14.50
Trash Guard for 1200 mm Apron
Each
1
$1,050.00
$1,050.00
1200 mm Safety Apron
Each
1
$800.00
$800.00
75 mm Perf P.E. Pipe Drain
m
120
$11.85
$1,422.00
375 mm RC Pipe Sewer Des 3006 Cl. V
m
582
$75.00
$43,650.00
450 mm RC Pipe Sewer Des 3006 Cl. II
m
203.6
$80.00
$16,288.00
525 mm RC Pipe Sewer Des 3006 Cl. II
m
55.5
$90.50
$5,022.75
600 mm RC Pipe Sewer Des 3006 Cl. III
m
24.1
$95.00
$2,289.50
750 mm RC Pipe Sewer Des 3006 Cl. II
m
102.1
$115.00
$11,741.50
750 mm RC Pipe Sewer Des 3006 Cl. III
m
17.1
$120.00
$2,052.00
900 mm RC Pipe Sewer Des 3006 Cl. III
m
74.7
$160.00
$11,952.00
1200 mm RC Pipe Sewer Des 3006 Cl. II
m
217.7
$279.00
$60,738.30
1200 mm RC Pipe Sewer Des 3006 Cl. II
m
115.5
$388.00
$44,814.00
Construct Drain Struct. SD -1
m
9.78
$590.00
$5,770.20
Construct Drain Struct. SD -2 -1220
m
11.62
$620.00
$7,204.40
Construct Drain Struct. SD -2 -1372
m
2.36
$840.00
$1,982.40
Construct Drain Struct. SD -2 -1524
m
2.68
$880.00
$2,358.40
Construct Drain Struct. M4003B
m
9.82
$590.00
$5,793.80
Construct Drain Struct. 1200 -4020
m
3.28
$620.00
$2,033.60
Construct Drain Struct. 1350 -4020
m
7.20
$840.00
$6,048.00
Construct Drain Struct. 1650 -4020
m
2.58
$985.00
$2,541.30
Construct Drain Struct. 1800 -4020
m
2.95
$1,275.00
$3,761.25
Construct Drain Struct. 1950 -4020
m
5.21
$1,250.00
$6,512.50
Construct Drain Struct. 2250 -4020
m
4.55
$1,765.00
$8,030.75
Construct Drain Struct. 3000 -4020
m
4.77
$2,400.00
$11,448.00
Casting Assemblies
Each
31
$400.00
$12,400.00
Subtotal Storm Sewer Drain Construction $277,719.15
Plus 10% Contingencies $27,772.00
Estimated Construction Cost $305,491.15
Plus 30% Administrative, Legal, Fiscal and Engineering $92,508.85
Total Estimated Cost $398,000.00
r J
ESTIMATE OF COST
Co. Rd. 46 / T. H. 3
Street and Utility Improvements
City Project No. 284
SEH No. A- ROSEM0001.00
Curb and Gutter Construction on T. H. 3
Rosemount's Share of Cost
Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount
Concrete Curb & Gutter Des B618 m 860 $24.75 $21,285.00
Concrete Curb & Gutter Des B424 m 1,680 $26.75 $44,940.00
Subtotal Street Construction
Plus 10% Contingencies
Estimated Construction Cost
Plus 30% Administrative, Legal, Fiscal and Engineering
Total Estimated Cost
1
t
$66,225.00
$6,623.00
$72,845.00
$22,155.00
$95,000.00
A
1
1
i
n
ESTIMATE OF COST
Co. Rd. 46 / T. H. 3
Street and Utility Improvements
City Project No. 284
SEH No. A- ROSEM0001.00
Co. Rd. 46 Construction
Rosemount's Share of Cost
Description Amount
County Road 46 - Street Construction $599,737.00
County Road 46 - Storm Drain Construction $170,048.00
Subtotal, County Road 46
Less 80% Federal Funding
Subtotal, 20% Local Funding
Less 55% County Funding
Subtotal, Rosemount Share
Plus 10% Contingencies
Estimated Construction Cost
Plus 30% Administrative, Legal, Fiscal and Engineering
Total Estimated Cost
$769,785.00
($615,828.00)
$153,957.00
($84,676.00)
$69,281.00
$6,928.00
$76,209.00
$22,791.00
$99,000.00
1
1
a
1
11
Appendix B
Standard Assessment Rates
Approximate Assessments
Notes:
Assessment rate for commercial / industrial water main construction is $18.99 /front foot. (Half of a 12" water main)
Assessment rate for North Conn Rd.: ($122,000 x 0.5 / 5 parcels) +$5,000 = $17,200
Assessment rate for street construction on Co. Rd. 46 and North Frontage Rd. is $55.00 /front foot (Half of a 38' wide street)
P I D. W K4 03/02/2000
Water Main
Street
Owner
Parcel I.D. No.
Frontage
Assessment
Fro nta a
Assessment
TOTAL
m)
ft
m
(ft
William's Energy
340321001273
$17,200
$17,200
Car Nav Five
340321001970
120
394
$7,500
$17,200
$24,700
Mur ic's Auto Body
340321001470
120
394
$7,500
$17,200
$24,700
Leo G. Stern and Dottie S. Hammel
340321001165
131
430
$8,200
$17,200
$25,400
Car Nav Five
340321002370
72
236
$4,500
$17,200
$21,700
Car Nav Five
340321002370
198
649
$35,700
$35,700
Hi hstone Lmtd. Ptnshp.
343280001001
300
984
$54,100
$54,100
Donfranco
340321001585
100
328
$18,000
$18,000
Metro Mosquito Control Dist.
340321001985
100
328
$18,000
$18,000
RCD Real Estate Pt.
340321002085
101
331
$18,200
$18,200
Thomas En elmeier and Charles En elmeier
340321003085
96
315
$17,300
$17,300
Brett J. Debates
340311001096
50
164
$9,000
$9,000
TOTAL
$27,700
$256,300
$284,000
Notes:
Assessment rate for commercial / industrial water main construction is $18.99 /front foot. (Half of a 12" water main)
Assessment rate for North Conn Rd.: ($122,000 x 0.5 / 5 parcels) +$5,000 = $17,200
Assessment rate for street construction on Co. Rd. 46 and North Frontage Rd. is $55.00 /front foot (Half of a 38' wide street)
P I D. W K4 03/02/2000
IM9T8 1 1MDMEft . lJT S?REFT ASSE8%IUIMT'LSTflffA"IT r
Item
Quantity
Units
Project #275
Unit Price
Project #277
Unit Price
Project # 280
Unit Price
Project #283
Unit Price
Project #285
Unit Price
Average
Price
1. Common Excavation
2
C.Y.
1.20
2.50
0.00
2.00
0.83
1.31
2. Granular Borrow
2,375
C.Y.
3.95
3.63
5.15
4.90
.3.24
4.17
3. 6" Class 5
713
Ton
7.30
7.50
7.10
7.25
7.30
7.29
4. 1 1 /2" 31 Bit. Base
160
Ton
20.00
22.00
19.50
21.25
24.00
21.35
5. 1 1/2" 41 Bit. Wear
160
Ton
22.50
24.00
21.00
19.50
25.00
22.40
6. Concrete C & G
1,000
L. F.
5.30
7.00
5.70
6.00
5.80
5.96
7. Sodding
723
S.Y.
1.30
1.40
1.45
2.25
1.50
1.58
8. Street Light
1
Each
1,165.00
1,165.00
1,165.00
1,165.00
1,165.00
1,165.00
9. Catch Basins
2
Each
656.00
740.00
575.00
782.00
490.80
648.76
10. Manhole
1
Each
1,176.00
1,220.00
845.00
946.00
932.76
1,023.95
11. 15" RCP
250
L. F.
16.75
17.00
17.00
21.20
17.99
17.99
TOTAL
$ 38,312.90
$ 43,389.70
$ 37,928.35
$ 44,674.88
$ 37,168.86
Average ConstructionTotal
$ 40,294.94
5% Contingency
$ 2,014.75
Subtotal $ 42,309.68
30% Administration $ 12,692.91
Total $ 55,002.59
Total /500 L.F. $ 110.01
/ 2 Sides $ 55.00
Equivalent Residential Street Assessment
*Based on Construction Year 1997* Street Only $ 43.62
Storm Drain Only $ 9.20
Street Light Only $ 1.57
0838RDESYLSShcot1112 /981
1
1
1
1
f
11
1
C.
POLICY NO. E -3
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY AD OPTED- BY- CIT -.c wvc�
ON Jan uary 7, 1997--
\----
PURPOSE
A. The purpose of this policy is to clarify and provide an equitable
assessment approach for assessments which properties will pay for
public improvements such as streets, sanitary sewer, water, storm
drainage facilities, sidewalks, street lights, and appurtenant facilities.
GENERAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
A. Within this document it should be emphasized that the following
summarization is general in nature and that certain circumstances may
justify deviations from stated policy as determined by the City Council.
B. In general, Minnesota Statues Chapter 429 regulates the procedure for
the construction and financing of local improvement projects when at
least part of the cost is defrayed by special assessments. Special
assessments are collected from the property owner along with real
estate taxes. When an improvement is of benefit to certain properties
it is the intent of the Council that special assessments be levied against
those properties.
C. Special assessments for improvements will not be offset or credited by
Municipal State Aid Funding, Federal Funding, County Funding,
Minnesota Department of Transportation funding, Tax Increment
Financing, City Core Funding, or other similar funding the City has the
ability to obtain. It is the goal of this policy that each property pay an
equitable assessment on each project no matter what other funding
sources are available.
D. It is the intent of this policy that new developments generally bear the
cost of all the improvements within such properties so that no
additional burden is placed on the general taxpayers. In many instances
a development contract for new construction will include a petition and
waiver agreement which will identify costs which the developer will be
required to pay for improvements for projects identified in the City's Ten
Year Capitol Improvement Plan adjacent or within the developing
property.
E. In reconstruction projects, the City utilizes a number of funding sources
to insure that the improvement benefit to each property is an appropriate
amount. Reconstruction projects include total reconstruction of streets
I�
and utilities and /or structural overlays for street life extension.
F. Projects may be petitioned or initiated by the City Council at any -time
during the year, but projects which are initiated after February 1 may
not be scheduled for construction until the construction season of the
following year due to City bonding concerns. This scheduling is at the
total discretion of the City Council.
I III. SPECIFIC POLICIES
f
t
a
1
A. All construction shall follow the minimum design standards set forth by
"The City of Rosemount Construction and Engineering Guidelines" and
"The City of Rosemount General Specifications for Street and Utility
Construction" which will be periodically produced and published by the
City Engineering Department.
Generally all sanitary sewer and potable water facilities will be designed
and constructed per the most recently adopted standards of the Great
Lakes -Upper Mississippi River Board of State Public Health and
Environmental Managers. Generally these are know as the "Ten State
Standards" and are published under the titles: "Recommended Standards
for Water Works" and the "Recommended Standards for Waste Water
Facilities ". The City Construction Specifications reference both the
Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for
Construction and the City Engineers Association of Minnesota Standard
Utilities Specifications.
B. NEW CONSTRUCTION
1. All new construction shall be designed and constructed per the
City's adopted policy for "Public Infrastructure Installation ". All
new developments shall have verbiage within the development
contract which outlines any fees to be paid for by the developer
such as trunk area charges and any trunk costs to be paid by the
City. Many development contracts will also include a petition and
waiver agreement whereby the developer agrees to pay for
improvements which benefit the property, but may not be
constructed with the initial phase of development. The amount
payed is based on the property use and the average cost of the
identified width of street based on the previous two year average
of public improvement costs.
2. The development contract may provide details on construction
and timing of local or lateral improvements of various nature for
2
P _J
11
'F j
1
� I
LJ
s
the benefit and improvement of the individual properties as
required by the City Subdivision Ordinance or Code.
3. In new developments there may be core funding which is the
responsibility of the City where the utility in question has benefit
or provides service to properties outside of the specific
development. The appropriate City core fund will be responsible
for the costs of oversizing above and beyond the minimum sizing
as described below. The developer will be responsible for all
other costs within the development.
a. Water Main - The minimum size will be 8" throughout all
single family or multi - family properties. The minimum size
will be 12" throughout all other zoning districts.
b. Sanitary Sewer - The core fund will be responsible for the
oversizing or over depth cost only where the sewer can
serve other properties and is greater than 8" in diameter or
deeper than 20' in depth as measured over the top of the
alignment of the sewer.
C. Storm Drainage - The developer will be responsible for all
storm water run off from the development to other
properties. The developer is responsible for all run off
between the pre - development and post - development and
for both a 10 year and 100 year event. The minimum pipe
size is 15" for core funding purposes.
In this policy developers may not be eligible for oversizing
costs for pond outlets due to the requirement that each
developer is responsible for that area's run off and the
corresponding pond outlet.
d. Streets - Generally oversizing for collector streets is paid
by the City only if funding is available and identified in the
10 year Capitol Improvement Plan. If the developer is
required to complete a collector street as part of the
development and the City does not have funding available
the project may have to be delayed until such funding is
available.
aa. In single family, rural residential, or agricultural
zoned areas the minimum street design width is 32
feet measured face of curb to face of the curb.
3
[l
u
u
1
is
bb. In multi - family and public areas (as determined by
the city) the minimum size is 38 feet wide.
CC. In all other zoning districts including commercial,
industrial, business park the minimum size of street
is 48' to 52' wide as determined by the city.
Sidewalks will be installed in existing developments conditioned
on two items:
a. That a petition signed by 100% of the property owners
whose property the sidewalk would cross has been
submitted to the City. The petition shall state that the
petitioners shall be responsible for 50% of the cost of
sidewalk installation.
b. The sidewalk location must be approved by the City
Council.
C. RECONSTRUCTION, STRUCTURE OVERLAYS AND MAINTENANCE
1. Normally the City shall utilize residential equivalent unit costs for
reconstruction projects, but the City Council reserves the right to
change the methodology of calculating those assessments when
it feels it is appropriate. The properties assessed for
reconstructions project are those properties which benefit by
access (driveways) to that reconstruction project.
2. Total reconstruction projects:
a. All single family residential houses in R -1 Zoning areas shall
be assessed amounts as described and set forth in the
annual fee resolution as determined by the City Council.
The amount is based on the 1996 basis of $2000 per
residential household for a street being reconstructed to
City guidelines, including replacement of concrete curb and
gutter. In certain instances, additions to this base amount
at 50% of the cost of any new improvements such as
concrete curb and gutter, street lights, or appurtenant work
shall be added to the base amount.
b. In properties consisting of commercial, industrial, and
business park, the minimum amount of assessments shall
0
C�'
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
t
1
1
-be $5,000 for a minimum sized lot, plus 50% of the cost
of any new improvements such as curb and gutter to the
street, as mentioned above in 2a.
C. All totally reconstructed utilities will be payed for by the
appropriate City operating funds for laterals and core funds
for oversizing.
d. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner to pay
the entire cost of the replacement of services from the
right of way line to the structure.
3. Structural overlays shall be assessed at 35% of the total project
cost to the benefiting property owners.
4. Preventative maintenance items such as cracksealing, patching,
and sealcoating will be paid for in their entirety by City operating
funds. -
5
1
Appendix C
Drawings
L�
1
1
r
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
PATH
z
ST. Q
a ¢ ° a
¢ Q
o 1 S' ST.
>
¢ ST. W.
147th
ST.
ST. p
73. J
7
TO Z
P o w
z w w
° a a a 147
¢ J a D Q
a
t
h ST.
v het 147th
SS' z
t r o >
ST.¢
T.
o w
u " Q
UPPER 1471
7q, ti
v
q
148th
W w N
R A J 9 �6
UPPER $
V ,
q1 148th
1 (Y
W Q <°
x
u 148th ST.
a
>
w Q
a
PATH 4 �
PP��
�a
CT.
148th a p0�
6 P
w UppER
c
ST. 149th
z
3. 64. 149th
IPPER P
w
CT.
ST. a
33
1 0th ST.
8
W,
6 ° > �149Tt
°z a
v u UPP ER
U
ER
R
149th LOVE
S T
..
f� u
150th
ST.
v
CSAH 42
9
EI£R LEIGH 119. QTY CI,P w 42 ¢
Q
W
DE EM BeR
u 41. DECEMBER CT. W
151st ST a
y Y 29 8
DAR
, Q
a W r j TR...
a L l > ?¢ 151st ST. W
42 . DARTMOOR CT. > a
Q=
Q
N, L 32 33 �FR
9
O 52nd
$ 8 Q
ST.w a \2 0 J vi
152nd
p
a W
3 0 152th ST. Ww
CARK
f.7115N R19V
Q-
rr P ST.
u w x
Ja�P
j 9 OR
S9EN3 z
O��z' q e 153rd
w
g
3 f�� a 154th
W
154th ST. ¢ W. 0
3
O
d,F G
DRESV-
S A m r
c.
A! VE
a CT. W. 3
ST. W.
1 55th SL W. u
Z
> WAY
155 th u x
a
w
> -
a 0>
7
Q
COL
��NG PATH
U IA CORNELLTR.
u BISCPP
w
1 $
$ 156th rn 1
156th $T. (
(L
80. 152nd CT. °
ST. p
p y
LpRNELL TR.
y
,S f
u " Q
Q l� Q
Q
CL V
V ,
CAD �'" a u PAS W
W
0 P
PATH 4 �
0 z CRYS�,t.
Q 15 th CT, 158th ST. W. z PPZ
159th DAKOTA DR.
\ \\ \ \\ \\
iamffmiw
CO. RD. 46 (160TH ST. W.)
EMPIRE TOWNSHIP
R20W R19W 2
T114N H
1 16
1217
GD 1/1 U
N
NORTH FRONTAGE RD. 0]
PROJECT
LOCATION
170th ST. W.
5 4
8 9
T114N R19W
0
N
500 0 500
r250 SCALE 1:25000
SCALE IN METERS
A FILE N o. A- ROSEM001 CO. RD. 46 / T. H. 3 PROJECT DR
CITY PROJECT NO. 284 NO.
PHONE: (651) 490 -2000 DATE: LOCATION
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. ROSEMOUNT MINNESOTA
ST. PAUL, MN 55110 3 -6 -00
m m = w = m m m m m " m m m m m m m m
E z
E in
o
oo
cr
z Su- 0
Ln
.
En =Z E - Lu
E
0
CO 0
E
0 Lq
rnN cr
E z
(f) w
tO D 0- 300 mm
C-4 cn 0
OS
............. ....
CL
z 70
z
E ir
0
. ............. ..
X z j 8
OD
E 411
E m ir
0
E
C) : z P
C4 cn!,
In
z
E cx
n
•
.. . ............... ............. .......... . ... ..... . --------
3AV 31VO
o
WW
z
Lj
N
(D
z
3:0 to
<Z
0
O Oo 0
Z Lj 0
W
w U)
-j 0
L,
C) z
LLJ
(I)m
0 cc
CL LLj
0
a:
0-
v
MN
0
Z
W
r j 0
cr.
a: fL
PTIM, F. I
3NVI ViONVO
Z O
............ ....... . . .
Z
cr
z
0.
D
X
W
I N
U E
z w E
Z 0
oo
L) W)
III
z z
. .... .....
b"
0 -
ij
\
.......... .
00
3NVI 30V
dC
w
z
z. 3
V) 0-
.......................
o to
(D w E
00
z
0
Z 0
oo
(D 0 04
Z <
0
z o
z z
PTIM, F. I
3NVI ViONVO
Z O
............ ....... . . .
Z
cr
z
0.
D
X
W
I N
U E
z w E
Z 0
oo
L) W)
III
/<
cl: ........ ..
0
. . . ............
3NVI ViOAvo
&
z N x
! E
E
3' ................. -
z z
E
In
Ld E Ch 00
CM
2 < Lo
0
E.
.... . ..... ...
..... . . ........ ..
co
W
v Q co
a) m m
E
ix
CL
FF
co
c; >
.............. CO f-�
co
.................
g,
0 . . ... ......
. ............
............ ...
3AV 3TMNVO
HiVd 3QVOtVO
. .. . ......
. ...... . .......
0 J
E
z
0
iy
-4
...................
0 0
Ld W
.......... ..
...........
U)
on
0
............ . .... . . . .. V) 'Co.
..........
o
t°
z E
T i 5
?
00
0
E
E
E.
E:
UR
.
10 ,
................
00
............................................................
HIV,d ONONVIG I .........
...... .. . . ....
S
AMAd NONNVH
. . ..........
a
0 e Ni Cc
iH918 3AOGV 33S
m m = m m r== m = m i = =_ m = = =
IJ31 M0138 33S
..............
133HS 33S
3�:
<Z 0
............
...........
O
UJ 0
M Ad NON
HS
..........
Ln
UJ
.. ............... . . ...........
. . ......... .....................
o l
uj U)
0
<
al
. ..
p�
.............
.....
C-4
U 4,
-
z
E I
w
Tt
in
........ . .
os jcq
... .......
v.
E
. ................ . . . ........
E
V0N3ddlH3
CL 2
.
�C,
0 Y.
... ......
cr. 0
CO)
/<
cl: ........ ..
0
. . . ............
3NVI ViOAvo
&
z N x
! E
E
3' ................. -
z z
E
In
Ld E Ch 00
CM
2 < Lo
0
E.
.... . ..... ...
..... . . ........ ..
co
W
v Q co
a) m m
E
ix
CL
FF
co
c; >
.............. CO f-�
co
.................
g,
0 . . ... ......
. ............
............ ...
3AV 3TMNVO
HiVd 3QVOtVO
. .. . ......
. ...... . .......
0 J
E
z
0
iy
-4
...................
0 0
Ld W
.......... ..
...........
U)
on
0
............ . .... . . . .. V) 'Co.
..........
o
t°
z E
T i 5
?
00
0
E
E
E.
E:
UR
.
10 ,
................
00
............................................................
HIV,d ONONVIG I .........
...... .. . . ....
S
AMAd NONNVH
. . ..........
a
0 e Ni Cc
iH918 3AOGV 33S
m m = m m r== m = m i = =_ m = = =
I t
M N
= O
�Z
�U
d' w
r i O
Im o
Ut
U
Z
�O
�w
0
cr
j )I
r �r � � r � � � � r err r � � � r rr r■r r
1331 M0138 33S
z
....
3: Lr)
— .._......
Qz
—
#
................ _WVOSlB...
___
I
N ._
:...:n.. m..a.»..._.....
O
O O
OW
'
�O
,.. .__.... s.. ...._. -.. __.___:...
v�
n
t
Q
N
co
K
F
Y
Z
u
W�
N
C O)
N
RM
a0
W M
Z N .._
J � LLI
O
of
04 f
PO
Z O
W�
v
j N
U
U
I t
M N
= O
�Z
�U
d' w
r i O
Im o
Ut
U
Z
�O
�w
0
cr
j )I
r �r � � r � � � � r err r � � � r rr r■r r
z
3: Lr)
Qz
O
O O
OW
'
�O
J O Q t0
to
N
J
Q
N
K
F
Y
Z
u
W�
N
C O)
RM
a0
C
I t
M N
= O
�Z
�U
d' w
r i O
Im o
Ut
U
Z
�O
�w
0
cr
j )I
r �r � � r � � � � r err r � � � r rr r■r r
c�
z
O rn
<Z
n
0
00 0
0
,
z��
j
LLJ
N N
0
......_ _........... f , ; W
f
s U..
0
m 1 � Li o
o
F m Z
' o
Q
m
Ww
`) a
._.._.._... o z
Z o
M 00
N MO
N
m W
✓ / m a.
U s a
/!
V
/ o E U
WO
/ 0 t
450 mm
525 m n
G
E5 ° U N
...._ / N
r
O
0
r o �M
Sf O W W
f w ° m ¢ ° Cl) Z
fx. o
rf9° m n
.•
On r
ff o p G
F n
' M
tf ,
dr ,
fir:
TA
to
b.
� 8
t
i
- _.... .. . . - - .. .... _._ _ ....... .. ..... .. ..._ T _
g
U U
_
LO CB..5.t47 _. __....._.- _ ....... . _____...CB- 5151. .__..__.._ ...... .. .. .... ...
68._.5155 ... ....CB_5159 ._....__..:__ .... ... ..... ... . .._.... C9- 5163 CB 5167 _ ...._ ..........CB "51'70 LO
8 5148
CB 5150 8 5'54 CB 5158 CB 5162 CB 5166 CB 5169 4!
to CB 5165 W
W CB 5145 CB 5149 CB 5157 CB 5161 8 5168
N CB 5144 CB 5148 �8 5152 CB 5156 CO 5160 CB. 5164 W
5148A
`:, ('M '1S HIM) 9i - ON '00 5168A 1n
I331 M0138 33S
. . . . ..... . ....... . ........
(03SOdO8d)
. .... . ....
..... .....
...l
lu
. ............................
1
yz
E
S"
. ................
..........
L F-
LLJ W < CD
.............. . . ^_ . . . . .......
........... .......
0
<
ZN
J
U
L)
0
W
J.33HS 33S
x
. ............. .
0 w
w
a.
(03SOdO8d)
. .... . ....
..... .....
...l
lu
. ............................
1� s
Oil
� 0 00
yz
E
S"
. ................
..........
L F-
LLJ W < CD
.............. . . ^_ . . . . .......
........... .......
. ........... .
ZN
J
U
80
0
W
J.33HS 33S
0 w
w
a.
x
ol--
cr.
a.
1� s
Oil
� 0 00
yz
E
S"
. ................
..........
L F-
LLJ W < CD
.............. . . ^_ . . . . .......
........... .......
. ........... .
0
ti M
J
U
<
0
W
J.33HS 33S
W
C)�
W
0,
ZO
W,
Ks
911
It
CO) 00
CM
O
z
C)
w
et
0
x
CL
UH
'3
ci
x
0
C.)
0 0
m
� i
0
jr 2
'�I
IHOIN 3AOSV 33S
� 0 00
< 7
0�
ci C) 0
Z �. LJ
L F-
LLJ W < CD
in
w
0
ti M
J
U
<
0
W
U
0 w
w
a.
x
ol--
cr.
a.
It
CO) 00
CM
O
z
C)
w
et
0
x
CL
UH
'3
ci
x
0
C.)
0 0
m
� i
0
jr 2
'�I
IHOIN 3AOSV 33S
pN
WM
O
1 K O
NM
O
11 /A,)
00
Ld
LLJ
(1)
0,
00
wo
Oo
Z6
W oo
N
CI
L O
..... ...... . . . . ........ . .
..... . ..... >0
as
>0
< �2
Z
O
UM
CM IS H109 9* '08 '00
N
x
Li
u
�!p
O
>
Z
CD
z
3:0 M
< 7
ry
C 5 0
z LLJ
uj UJ <
-j ( n
0
a
' W 'A co
0
0.
0
cr. Cl)
IL
It
cv) OD
CM
3: ( j
LL
Z
C)
(0 ui
j \
t —2
c i 0
cc
c r. a.
U
Z
00
Cl)
W
co
0
a:
1331 M0138 33S
V
M N
= 0
Fz
co W
et --,)
00
�a
U H
U
I--
O CO
CO
CO
im
0 m
1HO18 3NOeV 33S
n
0
z
�o
Qz
ry
8 A3HS 33S
0
.........
O
_ . ;i
a
p O
Z � HO
_ ,'
w
_.
N
1
W U) Q(O
\ \
Q
!1
tj
Q
x
c
N
W
N
C
\\\
t0
W CO
Q
co
CO
O
3�`dON3ddIH0
_,
aa:
d
i I
�
1 i
ii.
V
M N
= 0
Fz
co W
et --,)
00
�a
U H
U
I--
O CO
CO
CO
im
0 m
1HO18 3NOeV 33S
n
0 o
a
............ _. _.__.... ,_..
N
O
t0
HiVd 30VOS`d�
co
d
i I
�
1 i
W
0!
Oi
d
2i
�
LLJ ✓''
m
f �
ca E.
� M
`d
Cs
E
z
V
M N
= 0
Fz
co W
et --,)
00
�a
U H
U
I--
O CO
CO
CO
im
0 m
1HO18 3NOeV 33S