The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About9.b. Basic Builders - Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and PUD ConceptCITY OF ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION City Council Meeting Date: April 4, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Basic Builders - Comprehensive Plan AGENDA SECTION: Amendment, Rezoning and PUD Concept New Business PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson, City Planner AGENDA N ATTACHMENTS: Concept Plan; Memo; Public Hearing Notice APPROVED BY: (Location Map); Housing exam les / Applicant: Location: Property Owner(s): Area in Acres: Number of Lots: Overall Density: Comp. Guide Plan Desig: Requested Land Use Desig: Current Zoning: Requested Zoning: Planning Comm. Action: Jeff Nivila of Basic Builders West side of Biscayne Avenue, north of the National Guard maintenance facility. Sam Hertogs et al 17.54 acres 36 2 units per acre Public / Institutional (PI) Urban Residential Agricultural R -1, Low Density Residential (Single Family) 2 -2 Recommendation for Comp Plan Amendment (Motion Failed) 2 -2 Recommendation for Rezoning (Motion Failed) 2 -2 Recommendation for PUD Concept Approval (Motion Failed). SUMMARY This 36 lot single family development proposal depends on three actions: 1. The Comp Plan needs to be amended from Public / Institutional to Urban Residential; 2. The zoning could then be changed from Agriculture to R -1, Low Density Residential; and, 3. The PUD Concept for 36 single family lots and right-of-way would be approved. A brief discussion regarding the specifics of the project are attached in the memo. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING Reid Hanson testified in support of the Comp plan amendment, rezoning and PUD concept. He also provided the Commission with a history of the various development proposals regarding the property. After discussion, the Commission was split on the appropriate land use for the property. The subsequent actions for rezoning and PUD concept were also split. Staff have brought the applications forward for Council action without Planning Commission recommendations. If the Council is in support of the Comp Plan Amendment, then it should be forwarded to the Met Council and implemented prior to rezoning or Concept PUD approval. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to direct staff to prepare an amendment to the 2020 Comprehensive Plan to change the land use designation from Public / Institutional to Urban Residential -or- Motion to deny the amendment to the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ':)NI SHOA3AanS aNV"i P :vuuo%c •u mww nn 11 i /►; FZ, 22'.685 _ � � - ' � � �c / / I o! • / J .r • 17 / 1 / / � i( l jut I i • . . . . . . . . . . . . U L U I `�� ' , r OZ / fir/ / r / // 5f i I • �� 1 (, / for \ /y'l f >- < /_— /•��- - �� t ten'« �►� 1 - (p rri£- £te -is9 »ct 9£ i i 1 �I / 1 1 wst dtpea stro P�� I y f i/il( t t t - c" Un jdoo= AXWP YaM tae Qi0 esaa-'y "11 IT.=a J � / / / /�• 1 I\ ` .\ 114 1 1115\ I n d, 1 �_ \ 6L -010 N i 11 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT Everything's Coming Up Rosemountil TO: Planning Commission FROM: Rick Pearson, City Planner DATE: March 17, 2000 RE: March 28, 2000 Planning Commission Reviews Basic Builders - Biscayne Avenue Residential development Comprehensive Plan Amendment; Rezoning and Concept PUD BACKGROUND CITY HALL 2875 – 145th Street West — Rosemount, MN 55068-4997 Phone: 651 -423 -4411 Hearing Impaired 651.423 -6219 Fax: 651423 -5203 This 36 lot single family development is proposed for 17.54 acres on land west of Biscayne Avenue, approximately 115 of a mile north of the National Guard maintenance facility. The property extends north to the point where Biscayne Avenue lines up with the C.P. Railroad line. The property is currently guided for Public / Institutional use which is the result of a proposal for a cemetery which was intended for the Islamic Community of Minnesota. More recently, the Dakota County HRA proposed a rental townhouse project for the property which was not approved by the City Council. Therefore, the land must be designated for Urban Residential use to permit the single family development proposal. The current zoning is Agriculture. Rezoning to R -1, Low Density Residential will be made possible by the Comp Plan Amendment. CONCEPT PUD The norther edge of the development is a triangle which will become a stormwater ponding area. This area is about 25 -30 feet lower than the balance of the site. Connemara Trail will be extended across the Railroad tracks from the west, contributing to-the collector street system for this area_ One large lot will be north of Connemara and the remaining 35 will be on the south side. The plat is intended to be variance free. ACCESS AND CIRCULATION The 35 lots will be accessed from Biscayne Avenue via two streets connecting to a central ' which is parallel to the railroad tracks. The street plan should be modified to increase the separation of the two streets to 600 feet, or eliminate one coimection to Biscayne. The intent is to reduce the number of intersections along a collector street. Converting the southerly street to a cul-de -sac is one possible solution. March 28, 2000 Planning Commission Reviews - Basic Builders Page 2. LOT DESIGN The lots will have increased depth requirements for buffering along the railroad tracks and the two collector streets. There may be variances where the northerly. cul -de -sac "squeezes" lots 18, 19, 21 -and 22, Block 1. The "eye- brow" located in the south west comer of the plat has the same effect on lots 6, 7, 8 and 9, Block 1. The Engineering Department will likely object to this feature in any event. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION The primary discussion should revolve-around appropriate land use. If low densitysingle family housing is the best use for the site, than the Comp Plan should be amended to reguide the property. The timing of the development of the property will depend on availability of services. Currently, sanitary sewer has been brought to the north edge of Biscayne Third addition. Construction of trunk sanitary sewer across the property east of Biscayne Avenue (the Nelson property) may be needed to serve this development. Dave Simons, the consulting engineer has indicated that the sewer in Biscayne Avenue (which is comparatively shallow) could serve some of the houses proposed for the highest elevations, perhaps as a first phase. But the remaining houses will have to be served by the trunk improvements. Indeed, this subdivision may be considered to be premature based upon the availability of services. Relatively minor changes to the street design and adjustments to the lots should eliminate all of the variance concerns. If the Planning Commission agrees that this property should be developed for urban residential use than the following recommendations should be adopted. Motion to recommend that the City Council: 1. Adopt an amendment to the Rosemount 2020 Comprehensive Plan to redesignate the property for Urban Residential (UR) land use. 2. Rezone the property to R -1, Low Density Residential from Agriculture (AG). 3. Approve th C Residential PUD subject to: a. Availability of urban services; b. Eliminating one street connection to Biscayne Avenue; G. Eliminating all of the variances. CITY OF RO S E M O U N T Strut 2875 -145th west Rosemount, MN Everything's Coming Up Rosemount!! 5506 84997 Phone: 651. 4234411 Hearing Impaired 651 -423 -6219 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Fax: 651423 -5203 City of Rosemount Planning Commission TO: Property Owners within 350' radius APPLICANT: Basic Builders, Inc. PURPOSE: To hear public comment relative to an application for Rezoning, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, and Concept Planned Unit Development for a single family detached residential development, LOCATION OF East of Brazil Avenue, west of Bacardi Avenue, north of the National Guard PROPERTY Maintenance Facility in Rosemount, Minnesota. MEETING: 7:00 p.m., Tuesday, March 14, 2000 PLACE OF City Council Chambers HEARING: 2875 - 145th Street West Rosemount, MN 55068 HOW TO 1. You may attend hearing and comment. PARTICIPATE: 2. You may send a letter before the hearing to the Planning Commission, 2875 145th Street West, Rosemount, MN 55068. ANY QUESTIONS: Please call the Planning Department at (651) 322 -2051. o 135 1 + ST o , ►= �A-ll v - 11 P I P r I v .7=11- • I r, i r. r I PA A �A I r, i r. r I PA FA P. i P. V Ile P, I r. r. •oollou jn0431M suolleoyloads pue sajn*e; 'sueld jelle 0 1 14 943 sanJasaJ iaP6ng •alewlxojdde sic suolsuawld L 1. E-EZt�- L 59 'oul `sraplins uIssa Jai r 160Z* 3SN3011 SUO.LOVa1N00'NW A - JA m •tael Ig6u6doo lvispa; japun uollnoosold Ieoel w linsai pinoo luawa6uplul i4opAdoJ ' -1 leg M pad-d anisnloxe 041 ale suollenala pue sueld jooll 11Y mass S66 ¢ ''oul '1880 uwnn " 11 'jj 'bS "V80L u I 'Ld 'bS V69 307dS �MVtlO S( HITE O — tlnln:i _ L�J 11 Ii3 _ 3OYtlO.LSIH03W w / / II 1 � j II LL x Ul at x of �. i I Woos A11M.4 nowo3s 3tlrllnj t i 3tlrUnj II / II 1 MEN ✓,,; �Illinlll III�11 saas mm Ir r L r r -�- . tetudard Feature Custom designed plans Exterior • Maintenance free vinyl siding, aluminum soffit and facia • insulated steel entrance door with deadlock. • Windsor aluminum clad wood casement windows or Windsor solid vinyl insulated casement windows • Raised panel steel overhead garage door wired for opener. • Asphalt driveway • Two exterior lawn faucets • Full yard sod allowance with one 2' diameter planted tree • Concrete block foundation or poured wall construc- tion • 235# asphalt shingles with 25 year warranty • Concrete steps and sidewalk • Roof pitches 6/12 and above IRterior • Main bath ceramic tub surround • 314 bath acrylic fiberglass shower module with chrome trim and obscure glass bi -pass doors • Ceramic bath accessories • Cultured marble vanity tops • Princeton oak trim or ranch oak trim • Solid oak railings and handrails • Custom built oak cabinets • Custom plastic laminate countertops in kitchen with 4' raised backsplash • Lighting allowance varies with plan •; Floorcovering allowance varies with plan • Electric range, hood fan, dishwasher and disposal • Wood or wire closet shelving • No-wax vinyl floorcovering • Stain-guarded carpet • Stainless steel kitchen sink with spray • Delta single lever chrome faucets • Tub and shower andscald valves Energy Saving Features • Lennox 80% efficient natural gas forced air furnace • Duct work sized for future central air conditioning • 40 gallon fast recovery gas water heater • R-44 ceiling insulation • R-23 exterior 2x6 walls • Foam sealed windows, doors and attic penetrations • Tyvek house wrap • R- t 1 2x4 foundation energy wall insulation Other Features • Basement draintile and sump basket • Range hood, bath fans and dryer vented to outside • Silent floor !-beam floor joists • 3/4' tongue and groove O.S.B. flooring, glued and screwed to joists • Three telephone jacks • Two TV jacks • Ceiling lights in all bedrooms • Smoke detectors • Gas or electric service for range and dryer • Two weatherproof receptacles • Doorbell button and chimes • Full size vanity mirrors • Rough-in 3/4 bath in lower level • 150 amp electrical service • Egress window in basement • interior decorating assistance • 10 Year Residential Warranty RWC r. n J BASIC BUILDERS, INC. CUSTOM DOMES - since 1977 MN Contractor License #2097 04- 04-00 15:44 From-KENNEDY & GRAVEN +6123319310 T-037 P.02/04 F -050 J: e vt, C` . C CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE JAC COMPANY FENCE HEIGHT VARIANCE PETITION WHEREAS, on March 28, 2000, the planning Commission/Board of Appeals and Adjustments of the City of Rosemount (the "Board ") considered a variance application (the ".Application ,) submitted by JAC Company; and WHEREAS, there were procedural issues arising from a fie vote on a motion :wising from The Application; and WHEREAS, there is a need w clarify whether such approval and the conditions imposed upon such approval are lawful, enforceable, and binding on the City and JAC Company; and WHEREAS, the City Code permits review of certain Board decisions if There is an allegation of error in fact, procedure, or finding; and WHEREAS, the City's Zoning Administrator may appeal Board decisions under the City Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to review the Board decision regarding the Application. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rosemount, Minnesota, that the City's Zoning A�ministrator is directed to file with the City's Planning Department an appeal in substantially the form set forth at Exhibit A hereto, such tiling to take place no later than April 10, 2000. ADOPTED this say of , 2000. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk D�ci- r ?85isYt 1 !7 SIMO -t 04 -04 -00 15:44 From- KENNEDY & GRAVEN +6123379310 T-03T P.03/04 F-050 Mouon by Seconded by Voted in Favor. Voted Against: AUSeAt: Dju.17150vl 2 RS230 -1 04 -04-00 15:45 FrovKENNEDY i GRAVEN +6123379310 T -037 P.04/04 F -050 E)UMIT A APPEAL OF BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS DETERMINATION To: Rosemount Planning Deparaneni Date: = 2000 Re: JAC Company Fence Height Variance Request On Much 28,200U, the Rosemount Board of Appeals and Adjustments (the "Board") determined that a variance should be ,granted to JAC Company with regard to the height of a fence on the Company's property. )because there may have been an error in fact, procedure, or finding by the Board with regard to: (i) whether the City Code's criteria for granting variances were met; (ii) the lawfulness and enforceability of the conditions imposed upon the variance; and (iii) whether Mere were procedural irrogulwicies in the approval of the variance, I respectfully request an appeal to the Rosemount City Council of the Board's decision. City Zoning Administrator D1G.178516r1 A-1 RS23ai