The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10.b. Carlson Properties of Rosemount: Lot Split in South Rose ParkCITY OF ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION City Council Meeting Date: October 5, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Carlson Properties of Rosemount: Lot Split in AGENDA SECTION: South Rose Park New Business PREPARED BY: Rick Pearson, City Planner AGENDA ATTACHMENTS: Map, Draft Resolution, Draft P.C. minutes (9- APPROVED BY: 12 -00), Correspondence — Applicant & Property Owner: Ronald Carlson of Carlson Properties of Rosemount Location: Northeast corner of Chippendale Ave. and Carrousel Way Area in Acres: 2.18 Number of Lots: 2 – resulting from split of Lot 1, Block 1 South Rose Park 3' Addition Comp. Guide Plan Desig: Commercial Current Zoning: C -4, General Commercial Nature of Request The split will create two parcels of 37,801.4 (0.86 acre) and 57,253.6 (1.31 acres), respectively. Planning Commission Action: Recommendation of Approval (4 -1) SUMMARY Carlson properties is requesting a simple lot split of their property on the northeast corner of Chippendale Ave. and Carrousel Way. The property is a platted lot, which will be split into two parcels that will have a common boundary line, aligning with the lots to the east. The subdivision ordinance allows splits of platted lots that have simple legal descriptions as a result. The resulting lots meet the minimum standards for the General Commercial zoning district. Staff is concerned, however, about the proliferation of driveways to Chippendale Ave., which is a collector street. Therefore, the recommendation of approval will include provisions for a shared driveway access between the two lots to limit driveway connections to Chippendale Ave. to one. The southerly corner lot would still be able to have a second driveway to Carrousel Way. Lastly, subdivision is an appropriate time to secure needed public improvements. A sidewalk or trail is needed along both Chippendale Ave. and Carrousel Way. Street lights should also be installed. A subdivision agreement would be executed to secure the improvements. An alternative is to ask the applicant to execute a Petition Waiver Agreement so that future assessments will not be appealed. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING No one participated in the public hearing other than Mr. Carlson. Mr. Carlson indicated that he found the shared driveway acceptable. He was against paying park dedication. He may be willing to cooperate with the City regarding the future improvements as future assessments that would be passed on to the purchaser of the property. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a resolution approving the simple lot split for Lot 1, Block 1, South Rose Park 3' Addition. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: SITE MAP 15150 15154 1515$ 15162 I II I ( - / r 151 151 0 I I( I I \ — MIT5 — — I _ J / 151 4 ) 1 If UJ 151 II I�I ._ f(toftsfus / I�I LOT SPUT UNE I , 353 17 I I T CARRouSEc, kl _ I i 230 Ii I I I 11 I I I i N NOTE: Dimensions rounded to nebrest foot. Copyright 2000, Dakota County This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a rvey and is not intended to be used as one. Zs This drawing is a compilation of records, information and data located In various city, county, and offices and o0mer sou rces, affecting the area shown, and Is to be used for reference purposes only Dakota Caunty is not for any inacowracies herein contained. If discrepancies are found, please contact Dakota ( Survey and land Irdamation Department. Map Date: August 11, 2000 Aerial Photography: Parcels Updated: 2/24100 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LOT SPLIT FOR CARLSON PROPERTIES OF ROSEMOUNT WHEREAS, the Planning Department of the City of Rosemount received an application from Carlson Properties -of Rosemount for approval of a division of property, said property legally described as: Lot 1, Block 1, South Rose Park 3`' Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount conducted a public hearing on September 12, 2000, as required by the subdivision ordinance for the purpose of receiving testimony regarding the requested lot division; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend approval of the lot division to the City Council with conditions; and, WHEREAS, on October 3, 2000, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the recommendation forwarded by the Planning Commission; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the division of the above referenced parcel resulting in the following described parcels: Parcel A The North 140 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, South Rose Park 3' Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. Parcel B All of Lot 1, Block I, South Rose Park Yd Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, except the North 140 feet thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the approval of this lot split is subject to: 1. Payment of fees required according to the current fee schedule including G.I.S. and Park Dedication; 2. Incorporation of recommendations by the Consulting Engineer concerning access, easements, utilities and public improvements/nfrastructure; 3. Provision of one driveway access to Chippendale Avenue serving both lots and recording of cross- access easements and maintenance agreements for both parcels relative to the use, construction and maintenance of the driveway in a form acceptable to the City Attorney; and 4. Execution of a subdivision agreement to secure sidewalks (or trails) along Chippendale Ave. and Carrousel Way and "acorn" style street lights as needed. Resolution 2000- ADOPTED this 3' day, of October, 2000; by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. Cathy Busho, Mayor ATTEST: Linda J. Jentink, City Clerk Motion by: Seconded by: Voted in favor: Voted against: Member absent: 4"+ 'Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes. September 12 Pursuant to call and notice thereof, the Regular Meet' of the Planning Commission was duly held on sday, September 12, 2000. Ch ' erson Bill Droste called the meeting to order at 8:0 with members M n Napper, Kim Shoe- Corrigan, and Jeffery Weisensel present. attend was City Planner Rick Pearson. There were no additions or corr ns a agenda. MOTION by Droste to rove the August 22, 0 Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. S onded by Weisensel. Ayes: er, Droste, Shoe- Corrigan and Weisensel. Na . 0. Motion carried. C on Droste moved the New Business agenda items to fo the scheduled p c hearings. Public Hearing: Carlson Properties of Rosemount Lot S�lit Chairperson Droste opened the public hearing on the application by Carlson Properties of Rosemount for a Lot Split. The recording secretary has placed the Affidavit of Publication and Affidavit of Mailing and Posting of a Public Hearing Notice on file with the City. Mr. Pearson presented the request by Carlson Properties of Rosemount to divide a 2.18 acre commercial lot. The parcel is located in the northeast corner of Chippendale Ave. and Carrousel Way. An office building is anticipated for the northern parcel. The split will create two parcels, which meet the minimum standards in the Commercial District. Staff recommends that the two lots share a driveway onto Chippendale Avenue with cross- access easements. Additionally, staff recommends that public improvements be secured, including sidewalks /trails and streetlights. Chairperson Droste opened the floor to the applicant. Cliff Carlson was present. on behalf of Carlson Properties of Rosemount. Mr. Carlson indicated the shared driveway is acceptable. Mr. Carlson requested that the recommended public improvements be put in when the property is developed and assessed to the new property owner. Mr. Carlson explained that Park Dedication fees were previously paid on the original South Rose plat. He did not feel that additional fees are warranted at this time. Mr. Pearson responded that the applicant could request relief from the City Council for payment of the fees. Chairperson Droste opened the public hearing. There were no comments. MOTION by Droste to close the public hearing. Seconded by Weisensel. Ayes: Droste, Shoe- Corrigan, Weisensel, and Napper. Nays: 0. Motion carried. Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes September l2, 2000 Page 2 MOTION by Droste to recommend that the City Council approve the simple lot split for Lot 1, Block 1, South Rose Park 3`d Addition subject to: 1) Payment of fees required according to the current fee schedule including G.I.S. and Park Dedication; 2) Incorporation of recommendations by the Consulting Engineer concerning access, easements, utilities and public improvements /infrastructure; 3) Provision of one driveway access to Chippendale Avenue serving both lots and recording of cross - access easements and maintenance agreements for both parcels relative to the use, construction and maintenance of the driveway in a form acceptable to the City Attorney; 4) Execution of a subdivision agreement to secure sidewalks (or trails) along Chippendale Ave. and Carrousel Way and "acorn" style streetlights as needed. Seconded by Weisensel. Ayes: Shoe- Corrigan, Weisensel, Napper, and Droste. Nays: 0. Motion carried. ublic Hearing: Comp Plan Implementation Business ark R'ezonimrs Ch ' rson Droste opened the public hearing on Business Park re gs in impleme ation of the Comprehensive Plan. The recording seer has placed the Affidavit o ublication and Affidavit of Mailing and Postin f a Public Hearing Notice on file with th City. ; Mr. Pearson indicat that state law requires that a c' 's zoning be in conformance with its adopted Compreh ive Plan. In implementat' n of the Comprehensive Plan, staff is proposing that land desi ated for Business P use be rezoned accordingly. The rezoning pertains to appro ' ately 245 acre south of the Rosemount Business Park, east of Hwy. 3 and west of Bisca e Ave. Mr earson reviewed the permitted uses and building standards in the BP -1 BP- zoning districts. Mr. Pearson explained that the BP -2 designation is suggested for s with higher profile, resulting in a higher expectation for architectural mate 'al along with no outside storage. Chairperson Droste opened public he ' g. Leo Stem 206 Central e., Minneapolis, is p owner of the parcel designated for BP -2 zoning. The BP -2 de gnation is based upon the p eel's potential access and exposure to Hwy. 3 after it is r cated. Mr. Stern opposed the -2 zoning for his parcel, which would impose hi er architectural standards based upo otential access to Hwy. 3 that does not exist this time. `Mr. Stem feels the City shoul ase a zoning decision on facts as they now xist, not upon a conceptual plan. Mr. Pe on responded that, based upon conversations with MnD T, he feels an inters tion on Hwy. 3 at the location of the Stem parcel is almost a ty. This wo d be a key intersection with high visibility, requiring the same ds as Port thority property on CSAH 42. Rezonings can be requested as the prop is ubdivided and developed. RICHARD K. HOCKING, P.A. LAW OFFICES A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 7570 WEST 147 "' STREET APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 TELEPHONE (952) 432 -8129 FAX (952) 432 -8011 August 8, 2000 Dianne Quinnell City of Rosemount 2875 145 Street W Rosemount MN 55068 Re: My client, Carlson Properties of Rosemount Lot Split Application Dear Ms. Quinnell: Enclosed herein and submitted to you please find the Lot Split Application for Lot 1 Block 1 South Rose Park 3rd Addition. I also enclose this firm's check in the amount of $330.00 for the fee. Further, I understand that a survey may not be required, as this is platted property, and the split is a definitive.amount of property (that being the North 140 feet) of the platted lot. Please advise me as to when this matter is going to be placed on the calendar, and whether it will be on the consent agenda, or whether the appearance of a representative of Carlson Properties will be necessary. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly ours, Richard K. Hocki RKH.cks Enclosure cc Cliff .Carlson- Ron Carlson