The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10.a. Concept Residential Planned Unit Development Kelley Trust; Contractor: Property Developers Co. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT � EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION City Council Meeting Date: May 18, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Concept Residential Planned Unit AGENDA SECTION: Development-Kelley Trust; Contractor New Business Property Developers Co. PREPARED BY: Dan Rogness, Community Development Dir. AGEND � ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution,Reductions; Density APPROVED BY: summary; PC minutes;Review memos; Correspondence. � Applicant: Homer Tompkins of Contractor Property Developers Company Location: Kelley Trust property between Diamond Path, Shannon Parkway and Dodd Road Property Owner(s): Hampton K.O'Neill representing Cynthia Kelley O'Neill Trust No. 1 and Margaret H. Kelley 1953 Trust Area in Acres: 536 including previous park dedication(Shannon Park)but excluding the water tower site. Overall Density: 2.29 dwelling units per acre(net)based upon 1,153 dwelling units and: (1) 13 acres of wetlands are excluded; (2)4.5 acres of 20% slopes are excluded; (3) 15 acres for pond; and, (4) 24.2 acres of park dedicarion. Guide Plan Desig: Planned Development,Residential Current Zoning: R-1,Low Density Residential(about 2/3)and Agriculture (about 1/3) Requested Zoning: Planned Unit Development. Planning Com. Action: Recommendation of Approval (Unanimous) SUMMARY On Apri127, 1999,the Planning Commission closed the public hearing for the Concept Planned Unit Development for the Kelley Trust property proposed by Contractor Properties Development Company. The complexity of the PUD and extent of the public comments resulted in the lengthy public hearing. The developer made revisions to the plan as a result of the public comments and also acknowledged the applicable policy revisions of the pending Comprehensive Guide Plan for 2020. The Planning Commission expanded upon the recommendations provided by staf£Essentially,the Commissioners expressed a preference for additional clustering to preserve more open space;back-up previous statements relative to assisting the city with improvements beyond the development to Connemara Ave., Shannon Parkway and the Commercial Center enhancements. In addition,Commissioners hoped that the developer would bring back the recreational and non-commercial amenities of the community center. Lastly,the Commissioners recommended that the Council direct staff to pursue other public and private agencies for acquisition and management of proposed corridors, buffers, open space and even parkland. The attached memo details the revised concept plan. New information providing specifics of the various housing types has been included separately. Ultimately,the PUD agreement which would be executed as part of the preliminary plat approval will include a section for housing with the intention of securing the desirable aspects of each neighborhood. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a resolution approving the concept plan for the Kelley Trust Planned Unit Development. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY,NIINNESOTA b. RESOLUTION 1999- �� A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONCEPT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED U1vIT DEVELOPMENT FOR CONTRACTOR PROPERTY DEVELOPERS COMPANY Kelley Trust Properry WHEREAS,the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an application from Contractor Property Developers Company for approval of a concept residential planned unit development for the Kelley Trust property located north of Country Hills,between Diamond Path, either side of Shannon Parkway, and west of Dodd Road in Rosemount, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on Apri127, 1999,the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Concept Residential Planned Unit Development for Contractor Property Developers Company and adopted a motion to recommend approval, subject to conditions, to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on May 18, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Concept Residential Planned Unit Development for Contractor Property Developers Company. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the Concept Residential Planned Unit Development for Contractor Property Developers Company, subject to: 1. The development consists of 536.3 acres including land previously dedicated for Shannon Park. Considering undevelopable land for slopes and wetlands, staff is using 460 acres as a net developable acreage. Therefore, 920 units are allowable based upon the pending Comp. Guide Plan policy. Of the 1,153 proposed units, 233 (20% of the total)would be considered a density bonus for the overall high quality of the proposed development, and the use of clustering or other techniques to aggressively preserve natural features, open space, ridges, slopes and woodlands. Lastly, 100 units are included in the number for senior housing which should also support the density due to its specific niche for life- cycle housing. Senior housing would require rezoning to R-3. Multi-family housing represents 27% of all units. 2. Housing types and neighborhood clusters shall be utilized to reinforce a pattern of transition from urban to rural. The proposed estate housing adjacent to the rural residential district shall have a net density of one dwelling unit per acre over an area consisting of all lots adjacent to rural residential uses. This may be accomplished with large lots or clustering of dwelling units. Clustering techniques shall be applied to housing appropriately to adapt the development to the natural forms instead of significantly altering them. Consideration should be given to increasing the use of cluster techniques,particularly on the northem tier to preserve additional open space or natural features. Resolution 1999- �� 3. Housing types adjacent to existing urban single family residential uses shall be similar to the established housing types and densities. In the case of dissimilar housing types or attached housing,bufferyards utilizing preserved stands of trees and/or extensive landscaping shall be required to preserve homogeneous neighborhoods. The developer shall provide additional detail on all housing types,to be incorporated into the PUD Agreement. 4. The environmental review process will help determine the ultimate locations of streets, housing and infrastructure. The city supports the Alternative Urban Area wide Review (AUAR)process. This concept approval shall not waive the requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991,the Tree Preservation Ordinance, and the Surface Water Management Ordinance.. 5. The east-west parkway street shall intersect Shannon Parkway at a perpendicular in a location causing least impact on trees,wetlands, and natural features. City engineering standards will also be used to determine the most acceptable location and design. 6. Existing local streets terminating at the edge of the development with temporary cul-de- sacs and barriers shall be designed as through-streets ultimately connecting to Connemara Trail, Shannon Parkway or the east-west parkway. Traffic calming techniques should be considered for Shannon Parkway and Connemara Trail. In addition,modifications to the city street design standards should be considered with the review of the traditional homes portion of the concept plan. 7. Concept approval shall incorporate recommendations regarding street design and connections included in the attached City Engineer/Public Works Director memo dated Apri122, 1999. 8. Concept approval shall incorporate recommendations regarding park, sidewalk and trail improvements made by the Parks and Recreation Committee. 9. The developer shall work with the City to attain a connection to the downtown, including streetscape features(utilization of similar lighting) and cooperative development of Central Park. 10. The developer should revisit the Village Center concept that includes a swimming pool and tennis court facilities and address whether such facilities are for public or private use. Additionally,non-intrusive retail amenities, such as a coffee or ice cream shop, should be considered in this center. 11. Strong consideration should be given to offering a higher density bonus for additional open space. 12. The City Council should give direction to city staff to contact and work with outside resources,primarily 1000 Friends of Minnesota and Minnesota Land Trust,to acquire and/or manage open space for proposed corridors,buffers, open space and parkland. The � ��RAF � Resolution 1999- ADOPTED this 18"'day of May, 1999,by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. Cathy Busho,Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk Motion by: Seconded by: Voted in favor: Voted against: Member absent: I i i � F I � z , . N Q � I I . I .N � � I I 4. I I � v$� � � € , L , ._ , . �-, , � _ ' --L � °��\' `-!` � -- �I ' ° �I __= - - � ------------ �-------==-;,r -- —" �� ' � � � �. �. .- I � III - -� N i `t` N� s lil � �� _ �� i III ' / m �L o Q ; �\\ --! i III f 'i`- $ u,,i 11, � �� J�� ` I�� '� � `' � � ;;�,, o ,� - �� !,� , . ;; ,, � + _i„ . � . � .- �. , ,, , a • --------------I U v r ( ) �--------- Itl"--��y`-.-� - .. � cv �- � u _../ i i '� �f I\ I�i- ;� Ji � �''j. � r , o IR. N^S�o �� z� _N N � F � � I(= (� S ' 3� � � � a III�N N ' S o� , I � � m �;� 6 Q-� � =�� ' �<"� � � I �Q vr$ c ;/' ;` � =�" '% . �� I I � � y' v �� J ��,� r ''�i��`� ♦ .;� i ,-,, � r�. a , �-`�1 i` � . � �� ,,tt_ !li_T_ �,r � _ 1 _�, � l, i � -\- ,,�, '' �\\ ',.., ` �"� ;5N � N � � � ,�'/ rT .� a S �� ,R4 r�1' � � � �� a�� r� ��a� � y�,�� r� '�i� � �l � �� I�' _ � � �i � �� f�tr�• _ l�< < ''��S t - � � � a . � '.,�. i '� �� C' .i?� �. ^ r�f �` �..� � # '� � � —'. � 3 � ", ' i( � 01 � 1 + � - � f � `k: �1/ R I . ��1� d 6 i . 0 � � j � Q "\ � \ ll- 1' " t� /'1� 6 N � ' ��. � i� r. C� 1 � ��:�,r ♦` '` .i�� '� + � �, ,�:�, , � �=s Y p- _ ll" � � Vl >` �� 0 c � t, % - „�� 1� � � �'n-a' V$� _ -�;-, - --'�- `� , , -� e f_ �'"��trf- ��I'. -� - i_ • .�� ; � r i � �`�� . j _i' - _'_� �� = . . , O 1 � / .:. . � ` .:. . � � � �_ �� ) 1�� ^1 p�� ' 7((�� Sj �'� �� °o , � r ;i��" � ��` s � ,�'n _ = � � � . ,��.��;� :�' a u / � ,1 ; ;�� . i(Nti U ` �� 1._._. - •.r� t � r � , r---, � f �\ti�rl�1) `o i + I �i.c �. �� . - c�ho^��L pa.k..,a �� . � � 6 0 /�' `•�� 1.. 1 �� I I F �,I ! t > �� ; U u�; a { 0/0� i � , . . .�. . _ /�i � � Q) � � � ' f V i�l �')6 � --- ------�-'----------- 6 � ------- i ; �i�� - -- - -- �at � �r-O-�-v-—-- —`�',, ,�j � J � ��y� � ��(� �'' � ' II I I h ,` . �.. �.; H. � ��. n�?�( . a '_r' * � i � ) ' F �'� I I � � � I �� 12..� �.'�.J �. � . U_:Vls 0 , j � � ,�� , 91l t . r �� ;� � ', ' `� p\� ` �.;�.' '�� f r` �j��`;- � ,I i� I ! I ; � � U$ � ` � i � i �l� � . ` t� f i % �N � `� ;\p � j`! � l� 1 I ' �� , � t, y�"�� c\ �-'--�-� � --�-- ---------� �1�� Ifl � �� _ '�i,�l., � �� f�� 1/r, li 1_—" n �, � �F f o. �-� �'�--- � V�$ m 'do` i� �, ' J ",�� '��H � �y n I m �� ( �' ' � `� S� ' � �� \ �'` � � � � �l,/)� , � � �,�i � 1, �o�m m o�� co a o �o o� � % ��+� �l',j��L� ,., (�^er�\ IaD N C! C! � d a0 c0 a1 �� - � / �/�/� ��'`k� �. /^ .. , N Y� � � ' I � �Ji �, 1 �v ' � d ,':�,y�(� I j l� �� '� ' + � .".. �� '�.. ' m m 11 I �C �, ;�� 0 � ;��;,;�,s �� u d � . � =�6"� ■ ��'.�� +_� ,�';� c` � I ; W o :f� � �o � � � _� , , „�„��,,;,,, � . i�: N �'s �"�' �------ � $--�--� u -- �;' t , �,; � � ` , �.—_ 7 ' �_- � u � °' 3 0 0 ��i I -� �� y�� CIJ ( °' Q}-� �' '° � W�° F °z c a r; i1� � �'�� - �, � � f ' �� y � �� T <fi�';.�" .�� ' ,� �.'� � o a �a� u o o� o� !! f � �,��> r W, C - " I;it�` �V $ a � + N F-� u�� T'" � -��Y ` I `�" ._�r`-�,�� !+ 0 p `— C t d S .x. �� _ � � N o �� ,� ' � �t�,/"�� i �e °s a a o �_ °0 4- .�i� ° '� Y S �I�.�'' °: a �`_ , .w v u N V A> v.� �; N 3 � z=�-,-�,��;�. �j ��' � , ��:�: - �.� � �aooaao�� 3�:,� . ,:-=:�_--_______ . , T _�_____________+____________+_____________ � ,.� .,�. ___ � } �.r� � � � . � _ z � - . N p u H "F s i � � w � � i 6 p a � i �� V � ,� 4.:� �` dr' �CaQ �-�,�'�- _PN9 PPoO i:);�-z � ��1 A,; V1 ; .`� L. '�.` �tr.�r�- ' 3 S _ \ i' R" r — _- ��,,�C, • � `' � \. � % ' )�" �� /' � ` � .� � .' �� "` ri i��/ .-�,- 1� 6N1�..- \J�• (< % e��;. ,N � j - . _ f i.yi �. �� £� �� \��` �`� '� a � �j..Y.l iT •p „ .i�� p �f m — ; I'�1t f� � �.$ a 1.. �� /�. ..� 1�ii��i�4. � � V�i.£�- � ��'�f r�1� ' Q �� ',� � ( � � � �� t ,� / }�,i' o �l � ` �►�. �`.'.:� z�� 6 � � � � �'�1' � � t �•� � �., \ R. ��, � { , '1:�� "II � ,� .� � � �/� � f ,�. �' ��r ��.., ' ��. i�y=. ��;� . � �� "��,.��.�� + '�-, � S `!G,\:.�i �"�. �� S i'S � O � � m � f` , ,` \� �` ?r �; ;b �i\; � q�' ��`; 6� "t � � � o t S ^ _ �� ; o V. i "'� d . � � �� . U 3 U� � + - J��'�[� �'� `\ ` �� ti � 7� �� i `L 7 ��! f it �� d .`` { „ ,y!� il " � � ��%t ,,� �\�'� = U.t u, uI� a _. , � \� r �!, a� —,�-�'�`�'�` `" � N _ £ N �I � � . . ✓f, . ' ' .\ �. 71�'`\ \ � �J ;�t-4 _ U � "'� � n T � y_�..�,,dT�•)� ..i � �' f �(.' � ; t V �.✓`�" � E a m �. 9 " �/. b i( y: ` ' I � '< � + �� V �v �� /!/��,/''� - ;�\• ' ( ��\ �_} ��.9 �7� ��r' i�n i J� 7 ,, + m U�� s ,L�„ f r; �- , �,,� � >� � �- � �''� ''��. Q r :�� '�� - � . �.+_.__��r<i - � ==-'�- �� x4 ��r . . � � �- + 1 +- v1 1 <_ � J � � � w � l't� i: N � �. � n > i- c �_ � ,�� }�y�� , � h � ,: �; 4^ �k�- �_\ t � c � , Y \ a:�tl'� � ��" y� — 1 � a �� ^1'� .',.' . rj�� +r�. �� 01 � . k7 � Y ;� � _ � .. `� .'� // ' 0) 0 � � ' / �; < 'f,\ :�l' i- \ i i ve J �,,. ��' :� . il"� � C s C- �' , ' ' � /i � .t= �-'i �+ o t _ w . �� I t l, f e y� �L: � �I' I � � �� , `� i,.i, Y _ - � � �� u , ) 3 ;� ; _ �� i�l��1 � � o � � � "� � �� }, :. .. �. L �:;. .�i� � ' �� /,/ `��(,� I y� 7 U-� � ` �'. �� ,� ' �4 Q f,d �ll� � VWea�.�� FR [ , r _ �r� � 'S. //;/ i � i. ��r �� ,i p (� �- ; � n � r �i. I . I �. .I�r "� J � p � � Y}-I.. a 27�11 . N � � '�1 { , . te. �� l . y � N �'�� i ''a n I` _ (-' y _ / ,/ : ll .-.� . � � p l�:`�'1� -�1 '.y . ,'I I��` ) � r � _ ` .., � ''� . . � i 1��..� � .�� ( � �r�� + i ,.. .� -' � t ��+ ��'i � L - ; �`;� + � Y -� � �. ., �-,-� ��Y.` 0 m ,�-`; 1\\ �r -- 11� N - � � � � �.' �. _ � � � cl)1�� t .ai. � � . �� + z �\� l � `� . .�� V � 6 a � � s. � ` � k't �+ �i: �� . U sH E �t I�, N , �� ,.� � ,l� o � � � ,� ' y, �� - � l J��. ��' o � ' I if �i- ` 3 " � �` , ' ti�G, a �o o �� ` � � r � �. d • ,� c To � � � u U m �� . � 0.0 `I� t.. 1 I 6• Q �� V + [ " �� " N .. 7 �� `�� i VI � � �`# t �C,' F�, � �,' �� /i. �`r � �1-.i r �`"i `l. i i�i r 1 i ��;�,,i�t`,�.: , � ��S; � m '.(�t �.. � 3 t., �� Y � \ � � ! �) � C �4 I� � , p�rkwsY r .�.�1%�� {,�_..'.n �;;�r'y< <� '! a. . • � � i,: �r? a 0 �a�, :y; � ' , � �l>((9'.t A�� r.- � �id �� +N � ¢ l .� �,�y,. `•, I i �Y t > .. � .�� i o N c:° ,A,.�; � �q �l�Q I f ,k/ :;):� �_^ ` � � �l'� �/� �� ,r"F`, H�,t.��t Y�, � C . / � ;..! (1 " ' �`,< ,l. u � s , i. .` � „ . : s :` ;• 'N � u°, `� ) ' St �� `i �; Q a ;�� Fr � � � \ � Y (, Y�� 1 � {L� .. L i`1 v ��.� 4 Ml,` . �'�� 1� 6� Y��,/ ti��l�, Ul�� ;/ )�� ... �.t ij.'Q m �f( ��.� �``� �( ��J . �� A r • u �_- � i '1�'\ �.'.(� ��... ., i`•�� - ..,_ ,„1\ �'K, - �i� 1 ��.��+' ii �—� � � �� \L ,�I1.�' - • / I ,�— J;,i � S��.1� :i ' R� �'� \� -.x � ;�.: - A 4�� 5�� r(��Y " J-, ). ��/ -11/11�l� � � ;! k � �,� - —��--�t 4 � .�.`-�`\� /�� ,^ H d ,�i /,•,( �;/ �-:E ��_ `.',i \ `�d; S i� � �;:t �' �tj � it t:�, "./ v� a-1 �l / .-, � y��, / , �" �<- ^,'A� -,c;4� �.:�/ �� . ',fi -'�.. q � } �, � `�f � � I ��„(' ��. �,� . �,;� i '� . )��C ��\'` - � � ' ' i 1 � � �/ � � l�� . -��7 k � ? � r�I �7.� A A � � O ,, �� + � w u �t! � ['' I,�; '• /.'' ',� r � li,• � t t�� 1 � �./� • w —,1 6. ' JJ�,� + ��a �` . r�k� � 3 ''t I �`� ( l � ' f �' � i � �• �� m a t � A F-, j�� r �, „ i_� } � a ! `;,� l :� � -��,, �, �� - <<� , � , � � i �. ": � y 1 � , 4-•. �,,,�.,-" ��'=� .� i �:, �- �? a... 'a� �f � ,, =;�L :-�_ �'" �� i� ° , Qs�,�-t-� � „�;i ,o� t r' �,'' �;�ae^'°`��¢� , +� �� :� � '4� , 3 � � _�' S� �:.,, � �` �� ',�,, m�i� i r.+,�� f��i`:=i�y ; `'Q�ti�� ..r' ��!!� � �:''� /.-,-,..�--� Iri/� � � � 1 � Z � � . O }- � o J , . , o � d �tl � • �- � -'?', � � T � v � `,r a- . �N � �--- _.__... . ..�.. _._.. S�. . 1�1 . �--� �l c� �� , �- �� - � -�� ' � �� o � � , o �- t!� � _ � Q� Q � �r' a-- � � . T � .� _�_- - -- - --�— � �n °� � � �� . � � � � �� }--� ' �. �" � � � ' z � '� � �1 � .� ''� � ci... �-� `� `� � }- �- o � �`� '` °� . �� N , � � � � � � � � � `': � � � � u�� . �, � � � � � � . � . .�. � ; , . �- _.. .. .. ..�..__ � . � z '�� .� o ��-- . � �- � ! � o -�� ' . � fl �': � , N Q � � �-- � 6- 3 � , � � N � � � . l � �z u , � £� � . , L �N � 0 � uk �V � I n�, Y"J 1r'PN9�PP�'� 6� `i �- c� ( � V vl , �� _ - --- -- � ) � - ��,c� e �;�*_......� -- — -�,� _. � � -- . o m � � ' � � �_�� E� � r rS ,�j�N�� _��' .� �„ ~ � \,,,y l � O o ;� � - �� r E �/�--�\� " /(( 1$ a��/��,i �� V o ..�~E �f � �� ~f 6lL �Q ,•. F- J �s � -1 , t t0 �� / � � � �� a � � -� �c..i � �, o� _ m 6 //� � .1 '�-�'^ �F� ��\ �- - _ a. .� �. �� o � � a � J _ � ( � i d-- - � � F� �� a. � e, . r.r�, u �� ;. �a�w4��:. N � � � o -.-"a'r'� �1�� b� f u �� E m. �m.�p ��;.. 6 � O �"^! �\\ � -� ✓�U� �+ m r O V V� �N � II� " Z s '�, ; �.� � l\� � .,� ",F \�j a� � r �5 � � ,(� r ?�� vN � � � .ii�� U . ' J,� .��rl! � ,�x F' � �� o }� F - ';3 ( \ � = ��5�. _ d �. ''� �' c � V 1J �" :� �,r�--' �^• ' „ � � � g J / v ��'� N� .�.. ' 0 z � �� \`�Y /�/� � C�� %�/ f'�ji ��f 1/ f 5 \� ' . �,��,\ '��f � �� a��/�r,��as -;s r/ cj) o \ �c .�...r�._:�� , ,.,� � � " + � � ,� o t ` � � � w- �'_ ��t � � -a :� � ��5 J V 3 �' � 01 � ' (�r( �`;p/ L. �' � + -i ,f . t t � � fi� . � ° i ��):,/ _ oV �\� . � / �� N F�' `a� u N�� )�/�� 1'm '�€a��E�� 1 �( �:N3 `U� i��\. 1 fa 1� �C�� l� �_^ `�,��- �� 5 r �', � a1� � � Q o;_` ° -: �� ` � , �\ } . /0![ m � L� �l ��li, i�ih � ��>'�-� i7�� U10.�j _- � V' � 1�(h x�` z i � u � �. �� C a � U�.�..�`' � / � �;K"�mv f,�f r ��_ v o! F r-`�v � � l 1 � �>U� `nu°.2`�j _ .�-'`� i N ��,� y��;�S � �>� � o /,«� �� ._ �,��:. ?��. b 'L�. \71�� \ 0 7� � 6 f� � �` Q. "Tx�/'- � � f� ` � � � s � < �f� �-=° f�� 4,� ��,',o��f� — ° � � F. ` �-�, . r S i ' � �4 1 �~ � S) y � ` f/?j R. � ; ��,� a / '� � �x � 7�' � ti Y ad i�l, 41 �� i u- � s� `"` � �, i)� �Q a r � � �� `� �� t�l ) � a1 � �� 1�� lj�� a1 ti ��'((�� fl� ti� _ �b t � � � ).� ) �A' ` � �� . � o � , _ su . _ �� /6 a��. � t �' d�,� i �� ;� �� 1 f-.��J .. � 6 S )��R,"={ i � � �. i+ e I� //� Y �d4 .� � , 1l. �'� s - � 7' l 0 Ul t�il I !s 0`' �c '�� _+r .r >+ �.�� .� �'�� > o �i `'_�� _ ��w)��U (1(��'sl� y-c��,�� `�,: � ' ' ''�'° �a ��'�-' l�C a ' ),� /� , �l� � � s-�� t�: �: "`� ))I � v i � �� i�., �.,- � . tio.' j(\ �� lt � �r,> ��+ c�m c � � )� i J y G. i-- \ � �� r" � �� i -. �o c�� F , t�c � �W �'� � � �• � )�L�I i ��r.� ��V��a V' � ��L� •_, v . :� �- ��' i o �\ � �, / �� ,yc6Vl� �o \ a 0= ��r �11;11'�� ` +��a ��\�� \r � �..' � ��J�-��U� d) �} f / - �. + � Q Q V c�/� ✓ �� H.. \�l•_� �,._- -_�� 4 �n �i r � �'� ! . • 4Y r��1 �� ' �r�� "� a 0 i ..y � .'��m y�. pll ' �x 1�H�_1, t- . ��:-i .�L.,JR��\. - ( "II n m + y �`�P � " �`>� � 'Ei Y � i � � l�(�j S ,(em � 'uouiiey��- ., ._ i c a_ o F='ct ��.v�o. ��(_ �ce ,ii...-�-.1 �`�a1�1Y=,.�'� �I d ��r �,�i :�, oV�A Q o a �:. �m�Tl� ,\�$� �, �g�' g �� om _ � �'o_ ��A � ' ,Q �Lc C .. �N: \ . � d '�y�� v�l!1� �'� - �6J : �Q 1y O 1 �� C � B �� < i , L v ��'�r o � e = ,.,. � Y� y�� 1�� ' `�� ; � �m m�� - �� a �; � U-�.�.�r F�ir�'�1 � v��J��)�j�Fi ' rn E E �e �.", '°F g ' � �C� 7 '�U� � '° o > � ��'� �- C"� � m�, �,��} y = r. �\. �� : � �=o�F��j%J/� i �o •w•°� �; ,�l!' �j �' .�_ e � � �� a� p ° � rl- z� ( � �� :� ,U��`^sj l� � ��,l� ��`�,� �� ` ` `` �� 5 � �� a �r� -,c- e � �.�\, ��.' N�,: ��" ��;_ � �. e � � v_ � � �� ,�... . �; e � �! 4� Q yi w III�� . � / (L N � 9��8 a o��l� t --�!�'/��M1' � - �.:,, e ' � �";�� vy�oa� U�I aA)�; _ ) , , hJ �a � r ��°�.� •� � � - � q � � i� � � w`� i � �cti� 'j � �11�� C,6'� m ��i�% Cl N�1/ . � ' \�� .. � � :�,. N �1 I��; r�� V'�v �� U �� \� °a �il� Sr�'..�?;� .��°1 � � ,� d � � �_ �v a ( I ��` $k' �'1u' I%� l�� .� � N� >�)�� Q1if yLL O r'� U LL� (� � � mO� V m l� �` �'� � �m �-�� i ,W / �� $ a' �. �'.��((�i O wy �� \� W y �. ., � � �' . �_� �` 1 � ��i' +`� Gz �µ �l� , � � h0 � C+ u;i /b K��vj� �p\� v� � � ��n4 1�1�11 ��A�� oM v � �m`� � � � � \,� �� ` �r..��,r � ,� ,•�£, 1 '` _ �l�� O 0 .!� I �/�i i � i i�. � .�US: � �� d 1,� �w� . . ..� :: � � �t �� ._ °; ' _� f�Y �� - - �m � � � � � 1 � . � , l�, lu r�� +'�`�ij H a �� m _ �, a�� z ;��' � � � �it --'�>C 3� .�%}',�p�bx ; � /`�h:p`o >+��A�' . \t(...�It�� _m _�_�j�l � .m;� 0� j�� I ) � i+�I J f� '. r// T,� .. ,�: M�� rr , E �� yilri /(�� p y� ,�'+`L Q�� :. ., y . � /��;L 1 �-''� .(t ��ll /� � �1�� . . �j c C � �!,� � - ✓a � a .z�.l�„-�,�� 1� ��-�.�arj'. � ;o' :l�� J b �.�.�. -:...__ ��'_ � . / .. . _ah"� 'O� ;� � �� ' !��n �I �+GY'-�-Y , ��"J/ 1 ... � O� a � �' .''"^��.y i e ) � f �,r M�.y;,,' `amo�LP%;� '�� .,�-) :�� l�� t`: ��,� , � vy' �� `\ $ �V� �,�y"`�, �l�� j %�,�,��/,i � � `Y ,� � �.._ a 3�l�! x��,; _ �------ -�---� �;;��3;_, di �� 13 d. g �► � ,..�� ,,. �s �' i . I . . �z � � � � 4 ' f , , I � � � . -- -- - -��--- ------ -------- a �= ��b ' m s a � d ?v� -v p. i �p Q N I �� O V ...� � f y� 5 + S QHV Q � � _,�— E - ...- u � .�� a Q o � � - � .�"`��.�,�r��, U � I ��,��h��z��.�� :`� '�.�t �,d' S ��t�l`, ' I I '}�j �� :�> t'l.a..�:;��`7%. T�`j��.. y ��E��-�-y�K�,,,�� 7�.,�' ��t�"--� �� ' �. , r- -- -- -- -------- ---------�-��`'r��. „�. t'}'n �S � ��t?�o e , .� i \ I �3 0. T�-�.-�.,� ��' e'�. .� �1 � I y� �`a'< yl1 Y ��<,J�m�E� � '�"' ` . � � ��a.. u o v � i ,� �. V��'�X ��"��w `, � 3�S b ry � t .: r ��.��i�`�'�"�`e�-, � � ��y �,�. �. _ �'�,��"�'C',g�� } hs r Q � , `�."$a".'�`y��!i`i�,g� t5'��'�+��{�� " Q) 1 i -- - , _ Y ,��: Y�- _ � � I 'p �'��.��}' � m I I ;;�„��A ` ° �j N ; �- � �.,�,y��-,� ; ' �� o,,,ua ��- � � {� (, .�2.'�a-'NS�t"S'� � I ,". #°�L .tT.t,y y �' O) ,T _ � z��} �� rix� � ��,�� 0 I . � F�,�`��,r .. ' I�'�"•`,�+ �� 1 0 i - � ,�n � . --- --- � �� ------ ---- --- QU , � � �, � �- � � � , �� o � _,� � ,,�,��I ' + d v�roa,�,�v,�,�'� *ac u n. , _F,y �' � Q o � S ';-�wr�g' +U �V Q �p� - - - - s�� I : , �Q � ., � ., I �Q ' . : ' � � ----------�----- � -- m Z, . _�� \�� I :i� : � d i iJY110 �J00 '-'' 7 �� z '_ _ ' � ` � .1�� A ��ddd ;: /�- A3�1b�A ��1ddV � i � - ' , , � � � -. ' I � 1� I . ' $��-�—'� �� .- I °�I a� ,� � I , {;I � � � i � �� -�-- �� -------- ---------I '�� I i I ,. >.> � � � �1' ; , ; �s , , � !�I ! ' � � � 9, o! 0 ' 3�'�� 3�ii! ' I � � � � - I . ' �z � ! • I � , � -- _ . . .._ � ___-- . J _ �a .n:t:� (" ": • �_'—��_ __ __�� NS� � � i ' �� <� .I � � , �� '��;; � .. � ��_ �� -: , ip � I � `r�� rr�„` OY� � �:i .. � L � � �z�, �'a ,, �.3 � �.� t ;' t x n�\�;�' � � o ,.t�c�i ;� � i + '— ��Jk,.�.� :� •.� � . > tll �� . ' "_—" "_"'__' _"� '_" _" __—} –r-" "._"�'_'� � u 6 . ', � �� ;'t ��: Q� � $g�� , :' �� : �r � I 4 8� �� C �� —+ � �, � �3 r ,,r�,t � � S�a� { 0 .a ��,� � ts � �s'' 3�s �� r ' -� y k P '�.�� w.�r_�L �_� _ Y:': �� I � �� y��I � a I �- ��} s A� i � �p� �� 9! + 1a jti e� \ ii �' I �_�.�.`[!lI �� le .� � i � .� w, � � w1 /W� \ \�^ ./'��. / � /!J �� I W 3L� _ , � . � \:l;i e , ,'.�.� i �, O g / I � i � ¢ i °M Y� . , � ; , � � T-:t'� i.�� 6 I �qy� (� "'�� / � �_ _�___ �_ __ � � _ __—___________ y � . M- . � — _ � - . • \�'1�•`�` ��•� L � e � u �/.;"�.;� � � i 0 ,��'7' 8� I �� Q l� �� ,� �� o i + v a v i� � o �, '�� j + u - -- - - �UA c.� � i �� i i ::� �f? � �` i ..�i' n �� .:.; �.,,.�..i =J� � �.��i '��-s��--------�----- -- - — �g�� , . � :'� � �, ., _ ��. .,, � � , . � � ) $ °�,�,�, i � -, x 1 . ; ; _ . :� �------------ ------ ---- � � �� —t— • + -- _ j�' i � '� H � { � b � /�%—- , ��t/A ��ddd +�i �— ;� f , ' �. I / j � ��i I :'�' ��Y� '-J-.. %// � a � a �j � - �� :� � , s ii � �� I � y pY !�:1 `� � -" P�� '� � i� 3 I ��' /�iT' I I ��I � oi � ' � / 3o O� �, - �� j � � _ N�� i� )\�'� ' �� 3�ii! � � ; � � '-'------------ --}----------------�-- ------------ ------ ) `�,, ; -�-- , -- ^��. � � � � �z � � . � _ � r � � � � ��„��-,, .,.,� ,� ._:�� ' � ��,�-� -,�-, � r��-�:��.� ,,; 6� ^'P�49 P ,� _ �a- �',�•�rj•S( '�; ,�1 • \ < .//J/� � ,� -.� '+ j�j,- / ��:i ) ._ ��' � ��` i � ��ti /�/✓�� i' � --/ i�j�);' . 1", � \ , �^St �„ /%�%/�1�� , ��) �i��J �j �� , � �«y ,\�a; ��r //��i��c L�� ' � i Sr J�r�� \��J��y �� (� � �('/,�,.� ,�J��. >v�l i� �.�� \� � \\�, "11F � I I � �� ,r— �J / / � /��' ��i�, \C ��l, �-, v� );(� O` �-.,, , � � . ( 11�� li�rl': /a°11��4 . � �� \.�_ .. r-� �'� l'�, f��\I I�..�.�til't j� 1 1%% �i�.� p ��i ��,�'3. � � �j� � � .�ir �._ \\�\c �� ' ( � >1,�� i�aU(r'a1� � $� , i��,�_` �� \\� i�`\\;�`l1. '�.. I(+i�1��, ,��,�i /. y, \ /!/�,� �� !It .. ,Ji ��> s�p.�1 t� ��;, l��-�`T��\`��f�``._� � ii�''� � � �i l � ; 1 -% �i l ��- i � �� i \ r � � : �.!'�. ,L /�(� •\�i�� ;� :!�\t� �� - ��\�� !r� °�ji�- � N ` �(;` i \�\� ' � `�� /�J /. --- I��1',��,�.- - ��\\. _ ��,:\f�� r, i i \• /�l�i��!,� i `�-- ) �1�%�—�!`� - � 1�v � '1/ i� �i��`',I�`� 'Q. /��,,,/�� , 1�,��\;��f/� `�•>>�.�1 � � = ,) ; � �\v� �:� __', o � �= r�.`` % .li� �:j� �� ;`�`-✓ <�_.�.�� a� i��d�.` _ � - � �� i�i; `� `, `�� \3 •: f -.. \F .�yU��, � � � �� ;� �� / .I�/ ��4 m �,� 1 �./1�'��`� -�l��,��i/'�-�1 --� -r/�-�� •,` h �J \ � . ��/'�i� -'-1 (lg — / '� \ i i// �/ - �4 '� �d � /\ � : �� i/ St i \ / � \ � �` a i o�\l� _ ��i( l' ';'��"�#i�a '/i/= - � � � �L ( t t z / �. ,� � �� l`._ J \_ /^\\�� F '� � /.:., ��_ .a-` �! � i�-. . �p{ /�/.��1� �� -i � -i�))(1�� f�']k.. ^a -V:� ` � .. � �� « l ) � rl( ' � ��1�� .�.0 il \��'�(1��lJ�ti�/�"�t��1 � .. ��— ��= ,�,1� � �� "� � q\�� 1111 l�,i ��l - J �� r`� s ;� �� .. �'�� ,"l�e�\��r�� -` �� \� I �t`� �\' �( �� ; �r� ,'`,�/�= '�l(� ' � �' �1 ?i ., k �1�� ..��i��Q`' i� �j � l\� l_ � _ \ ,� �� i i � 1 ..., � r/ �. j� } o / � U i 5,0 �[ -,/tt7 iGir-. .i ��`� �:., �I��i`i'� �r , 1 i, � �' . � 1 : �S' `�� i y\�_ �� 1� 1�.�` i b /1" �� >� " l' �)LY' �`��- ,�ii��y%� /� �'1 � g� �'p �)�v �� Zvl �� .` ' � i � � � �i..i S�� 5 I� r/(` � �.. 11 i\ � � �3 ..a� > l�l � ,�' =�}--".l;r �1 � !� s � �. ��`n , � ,�1� � � :o � � \ .( ��U�l};..�r ..5�� L�b � �' ��t�a , .I '� F�� \„[�. ��- r}u f -� ? '\l' � i : ..,J� f�'. `.:�� \�.i�`i�l��i(r/- ,� 1 �� V l;'' �:.:i�'�( :(J �`,�D�� (�I141n ..ib ��B\��. 5�1. S T— ` /A / � � �/'l v� �� i J� � ' ./ /'� t f , JI�, �� 1�»� ii� _/ ��/ . I�r y Y. i ,,1�/, � - �� ... ._.._ ,�� J��t�"" h' � l(� ��!`�`1/j''� . � _ � � i . � �� '.� � ? �.i�� 1`��. � - � .,'�{� N ;: � Y\,�.3 ��\ lt - �, � / r ) � ir)��i �� G ��l � i /_�� ic )��.�•,y f �ll` � lt: " f i � i ��j, � � i�ii/� ��.) �I,� "�;1 al u c , �.> t � �• r ��y�� i •y „/ � �c.- � �`f�� . �h��ii�� 1�� \` ..: � S_:�J lI �� . S i ;- i O '�,I � ��'l' � � � /!� �„�.� � \- � . L .i;l /.:�/"��) .:ii' / % �Y RU ' � ,_\'_� �r i C�� :/`.. �� \ � ��' i ,�� .-' � F f�� 1 �1�_L TI �`.�• L �/H t . ' ,+ O '� (t�7�=��+1. .� F'�� Aas�ad uouusy�CS,,�� ! - ,� ��-r�� ... �.'u�� `�� 'i � �� 1 ,D> � ..Fr, ��.��:'.r� .�;rv.j.�i�.�` ' d;{L.'.�'.,71 . _ .1�'£ Q p � � �r y (-.��,�� j ��r � � +V ` �\, i �, y f � z > ��3 �' �`� 1` "� - r 1 ;��i4 ;��C��OA 1��-i ��J �ji \J�.l ,�C � .„C F VA . �j �� i i � I� �Y•_ ��-,�i;E, a�- t�;� t �� '�`` ,�� C ,,�. � ��,e�-�i/�� pWa�F.� i �l1'i/ �'- 'T�i ��;�� 1 �ti �%��r�c� !i �`��i i ' � ��'�''�l'f,,;� 111��g - ��,P,`�. � ,:, � j � irY 1',�!A�`>r`f ��L1� �� ,71 � . 7� � � �ii ii�a11� l� t�_; � � ��%'�� ` >,�l s '� � �ta�ti �.,,ei�'—;� -�. ',!�? � ':��:g��lUe'U�� lli�r. � �1 �r C'.,, �� S ��cS1� �"� �� C '��' � L_.� . .� �# J o� � � i )li��i S , I'p �('I L� � y�'� i �I I � `"7 I!��Yq� �` "b p�:�15�ati ��'C�"' '� -__�F � a� � Spr � � ,�, �� A � � -J% �i�\.�� f'r+ l%%��LII��N��` ��' �, ��\\i��; N � /i_ ,� �� Q� � i�� \ I�j� �, W � I � te�?;� / i � S i �; �� %� � �� (;' ��. ( � � �''r��'�� 1 � i� i� / wp� / � � v�r� \ ��I� '1 \� � � ��1 N� � C .1!._ L � �r� /�� -�y ��/l I' (� �\) N'a `��1 ( � � � ' I k�`, ��i�; , 1 �'� ��`,��.; cd ; � ' �r _ �',,� A , ti�' �l��o ''-�""��- ---- i . (�1 � �., �� . �>> f4 � � � = R ;; (� �� I .i � � a, �� + � ��t �. �' `r5,, :,\�!�J . , j�Y,; , � ��F� I � � r Q ��, ��✓��n'��Y`�\�•. , 1 .— ,H rc o ��! f -, �X9/ =,. �, , �:= . � � � = � J��i � � �'.�` � � ! + r�r � >.. � �L � � �� pgth,� , 1 ,- 1 ` , �r-;r`' G ,, �� j_ � i � 1 9 t . ` � - .� - � �� , � Od ��': G O i �.r� . �-.�� i I � � , ��\ �/ � M�j�� `� ` � �� ' m f� � �.� ��= -�'__ � L_ ��;_ �- 31�,, � z� ... �;�- ---�-;�--- - - ,;,- � : � z . , �� , ��`'�.�'� �� ( i((_,., :� "� ,'�'� ,� S ` �V" � �c� . �� ` � -� � �� l ��` '� r � ' , � S, r /'��-�— \ � � �� L� 1 ��: _�� t � � _ --_, _� r _;: � - , ;�. ' �_.. - . '- . . , _.. f . \' ' � \� ,� �--� �,I ��%� � � ,, � �=�� /r�i-.'��. �� i\ .��_ F :� � \\ � u� L _ i ! _ i� i � . '... r-..�_ 1' F �,�� -�' `�,'- - i t, �� %- ��<��j�;�� ' ` . ; _ ,;, r, � x r,�...: �{ , � _ J Q _ / //r jJ.,�1 �� , �r ) � �f� l �"�j ^,�l—� �� ( � �� (��/1��''\ /\ � �1 // `( �� l :- , �� j<<��y��—�. � '_�� 'l�r�l� .� �� , e . / �� :�i�:. � � =� ��' l'�- I �� 1(r� ;L� ��/r ��..�� . !/� � � � � � ��.�� .� R �� (�i-�� ///� �� _ � �-�� , \ / ;l � ;�� I ��, ��1Zflr� �(1J `_ , -`'��' 1�� ; % �;;�/'(�i,' �( l 11;� w�';�.�}��.:: ��e� ��f (�;��!��` � -- —� �' �`��-_- M ` -�`f S {r lI an�� I`nC I1�j1�� 1\�%:. \�- ��.��1\1\�i, ��L:_H, __:.---- '�� / + } - � ,-S "t , `�� ,p� \ l`\ � � F '�J\" � Q � , �� ;' �--'�,!. l,1 l� i��I� �+,1,, I(� 1 �� ``.�,1` - `: , �� t j ,� f, t S %� ./✓;r(to�\ .r r'I �I ��``� V / ��O }�� GMII�ri�� _ � �'��\ � •� GS �J ,^ � . �` � 1 i � i J: ( �� r tr /� �: ,�! )� > \ �- ��iJl`;\� _: 1 '� � I � � ,Ji��;�� ` U �.� } y / w. ��-- _�_i_ ��:'' __/J�� ,i�(��.� � �i %f/��1��11i C `L � ))�� 01 u. I �.` ?� ;1_� /� J�'r i-� � �,'i,1t1� ))( / (ii,jri ',j;�l' �� A ° �� 1�ll,�\�., � / � i -"�. l -�D ..�-,.�'��.� , 1 p`�\ a ..�- -.: u � �\1.; \ , �\�� ^.�/1` � � � 1i� � � ti)`.�j�s'S�\�\'� — � -- Ul� �__ (/�� `�. `--')� L`.: � 1 / ��, I � �l�� - � , ;� �� y ,;, -� ji ,� �-��, �. -� � - ,Y � ��•)� , ��t, -.—� ,� � � 4 / ��/ /— ' � y 1?\�V �� ' I � - \�. \�<� .�� :;� � . \\ �r i i�j� l� . , �� (� i�`l}�� '�./,�� - i�";'"s ;:. � � � - ai x a-�= ��.: . �� .. � .. � �1ie.; .r pn �i'f.v"�-}��'� = x,- ��i\t�i/� l� F ` �I �� i- � ' + � (F � � � � �1 � �%!�r-'�v �''1 N �1'�.�� (/�{ %� `��L�I G� �I ll '��i� S_ � ' +" f �,1�.'�)�t �� i \I ��J�l _ \ l� ,�, i `, il�i 4 .��Itr��t I) } �_\� ,�.j<<�r'-�� C}. � ��. ' � �D /I_�1.' �� dl� - '�' � , 9� ':�: L� /'� �_;((; ��lf r�.-:`�r•�'�.» :;i, ..�i �;.;u �—�� ; '��.._ \ i ._',•-� l � ''i_. I/I<( M �� '�� . j�i T— + �; � k 1 ,r� =� � �, ��i�� . � , l i r ��.�,, 1 ��.il, �_ / \. �i � _ a � i��t 7 I � / � �j� A� �. �� ' � n� � � l\� � f 1 .�. '� \ - . .. 1 d�� I �� r.�� L �� l' - \�� .� '.�R {�� h < �` . 1L' h 'Y , C� � .�'� �.� ( ",✓ _ A\ ` `�fL LL I � ,� �f � � � 4�� f �� , C,J �O � ';l��/,� � � 1('�lll 1. '}�� ' ,'�p� �1�r� 7/ � .� i /�� ;n ��..�!s'�� ,'�/�- ` /1 ��"` � li.'23 I��{�li l�/ �� l�'.` p D' y `�°U� ��',.,%��ii�1!✓ C'`� _�_ �� ,�� C1i��fi ,$, '��, .i F1- a � "i ;`ti.��;. , -' .Y r,'��<'�'�� ` ' '`yl�--�'z � f � i�- "Y - .u' =„:�c,;� F - ,. �. � ;� �� ' �IJ��II� ��d � i � �� i'"�i� � ii ��' r � ��-e � i 3� . +( i r , r 1�;u I(i 1� � �`� ��"` �)�� ` ��11(r r� 'l� (� ' � �� `i �;� `__- „ i.� f� . ' �S i� i �•� 'r � .:�, � (� x � ;) a - r �� l�,I(\ ��. ..' � � . � �i��'4�� >.� �� . ��.�, �� .,�� . � .5�� i 0 r ! � ,�», , � � � ; F av J,/z� �� ,,�,� � ,, , ��_,� �,�� ;, �,�� c= � � il! . j��yf' ,�` -` ��r �y �i :J r �� + i \'<'n �\ � � 1• i� ,x�, � � � � ,tl ; _ � � �� ! ' � i i �i' .�'�� 1 . t ' �� •, C � �� k' ; Y .,\ i � ' . 4 +11 � � tl r�C� ` �- �'� , \�:" (/�'��I ��y( . r\ �� .��' » � i - f� � `. �s. `..i' _I t > \ s,�z� �1 �_ - ' ' . �'y =— �� UA G �);.. r � '✓�� —� � 7`. I t ��.. . .., I � � ,� '� l 1� '� , � �'• Llt ' I ... 1 , . �y�. .1 �� 1�I�� ( �m�� I� /i � Y �-� �� k � � ��,;�� )� ��, � �'� ,y�� ; - - � i It i � y�� / / � 7l� � ' �i ; �, � �t �J�' � d , `�., i +' �� I �:�'�7�� Cr. . �r-�.r.�", i �r�� :�.. .:. �:�' � � I� ��,,I;,'1 �� /1� �Il�� t�l(E��I��C,/ � � . � ,� - '' l i i�� .,i ��Ji, ,1/� `, /�tl��r �'u�� d� ,� � .-Y �;` � )�� r , � �� r!',1a �< � �� i �`fr �� \i� 1` �'1 � ` � �� d�� ,� l � _ ,� � �j��„i ��I�M _ ...�' ` - � � i �� ,J./ ,.�-� .:,k � \ �l , 1 /, � ^r �r I i�� . '` �� `✓ ��% i� l 11?Y,��,'1��;� � �� 1 :l.�,:4:� i i�� 1 r) _.1.:' � � ` - �� t �_ �-� h� .,1"" „� r � ' � / - ^S - '"t't''- ��„ � � ! 1��, �\' !�, ��" , � r il i � 1 ��J�. �-.:Il�( '� � ` -` �j ,. , t�ir°)�`1 `p„ `��, r� �� .I'¢ Q 'i'� � �ti � ` ` ..� ' �3 .. �;V _ i . I �� 7:/-- L 7f l� ;�� )r�f1 '�l� �s i� �.0� 0. � 1 1�. �"� ' �° , ��a �� l 1��;�� q�, �.11 X (�� e � � i ^ � '�`�� 'Cr-'��"�.,:r� ��F.I�� .�II{ .•/ 11\ .h�..� �� .�� 1� a I ��,l''"""`�-�_"l y { _l'r r��l� j ��l,t G� � i�� i �� _� \�'� � �.;� { ` 2 Y /,'r/-� y� �� ,.. R I W .� �tl�S t . ,i"- " � "� _�� .:' i �� :,c-y ,� ii� q � 1 ` � G i / kn � .� � � ,�f - i � �. t � �f7�'{� ' �y ��I�r, �i � ,��,�, ��i�. , ,j � � 7� .'; F ��q � � � ' A' �+" ��w��ti :��i'/��`�l ,l �i '\� 1r ., Y.-� ' _�' ��1 - �, �� .- tr� �i�pi�l� �� 4fl�� ,� � �� '�"�!�t�� E�i , �: �� / �:� i� � � �,,� � _ - _= t � � �1��.I+!\e 'k''��'' �IIt� q _ J�_ 4�J F-1 S.�_ ��i i� '�r .�`�a""`� I � ' i i� � o , ..i�: i ��.1,�'a' ?r .�r�� .., r � �, �' l� i �,i��.. Y, \ ��\- +i ( i�� I 47 � Q Y �.'♦ �)r`'Il�j l � /,� �� 3�G'�``I �i� � _ r r-Z '-\ � i 1` � t.E.�i r - � ,� �� „ ' `�"�' '�' � � l � � _� ` � j '� '�" i. �. � �\. �` G, �.;.:�,�at,._. � , �, � ' } � ; ^;3 �� , � I � ol -- �` ., �;%' j , � j � ��I; �� //�,% ' � ' � 3�iit - - - - - - - - �, , - -- -- -- -- -�-- -- -- ----i---}--------------- --------------� I � I . . �z � � � , t t i � � ,; � ; � � i I � ' ,, �t� j � �~� -- _ ------ ��r�- '' ---- — � N c� �.._ - - C=' , �' ` <_ . - r�' '"` ,� � �., � �� Q 's "� _+; •.1r � ��,� ��i/r �rj . �^.�h � , f",- '- a t 'X. :� � ' � }�� \� t ^' �/(/ 1 ��' n, �i�' � '1�;� '�� ' �� '�`�� j \ F "i`' \�r �.� I ��_� _ N � � �J' i � 1 .�. � ' ; ` ��`' � • '� ' �' -� , `�� ' y � 4`� ` � s �. ' \\ a; �i � � , ' . � � C ~ — � S Y --�- � !j --� ) � . � � ; �\. � � i , � i- �+/ i �'�. . �' � �. �` 71 i .� .`�.I�� t, ��2�"r�'� � �i / i� »�, �� . �A . �� y 1�� (n �1` � - ; '/. � "(- (� r,._i Qi'u+f'r � � .--� , �I - / / f �' ��/ � �C� �,x� .:� y ,. . i � = � {�� >� ��.: . ��,, y-- ; a� t /� _� ,/' � II ��p ' �fi� __ -. �. - � � ` � ��{� ' �� ' — � , - i `� � t i -1� >i� � ��y � �� 1� - 1\��-: � � . ,. \) � ry'-1, iU 1i ii � .� J � "� � ,��i�. � ;��, -I-- � } r�`f-rtk rl ,1 � � };�-� Y��,y�� -.— — `i' ---- -- N 7, � .. �� i ��` �� '�� :/ - . i�..,t� �\ � .�i a i 1. �` �� r J �� ( � Li� ` �.r�- � , "r� ` i � J nl1it � l`�.��. , d� , � � fu��'� � 1` �` t.._\ I— + �' % ' � �� I ��i � f ' � �" � i ` j � t� \ l v ��*�-�,j�� '�� '�'��`"��ia�4` �l �J 4) , u , ,�� _ � � �'x�i j ' \ J�i� -�- r � �j� � � -. l 4 •yi ..-3 v 1�'. :� �...- � O� � � ti ; � �l,f�L� i�-��,�Af1� �_�. ,lili �i � �r�r��L ��f��i � i � . � � <y�..,,�1�' �� y � � - ---� : i'I'(�',Y ..k. y # �� +... Y¢ ' ��'ti��ij�'`Q�°L� t ��i.1i �d��Y� ��r.L i /+ �{'�� n �, a' i ,y l _. ' r(R. ��`�� .,±;�.E �,t�.:.' - �-a � ,��f � 7 ( � _.'��..�� . �_�--- _� J✓'a'k V�. 4-,� 't - � � i � � 71 . �� _•,: y � \ — � rt, - - \ `� t�.� r� v-``�� 'F� �`!' ?�F��' + � �� ,' �' �Y l v t q . � � "L �rv,�`r '7� ` ��, . � ¢� y i;! � � � i �� i 1�.. ` '� r.,r-�.,5.7i��'�AI ��' j" ii�l�' j ,� r �-'?�1��__� ,��.�•' 4r��:S.'I _ r,. Y; �f F)�_ ��1l+ � �� f�� ,c"'� ��:. �':;`� ° 6 ,i��/',�' �Z:- � *Ea -. ;�,I , �� 45 i��F,,P'c�:�� -'-�.��7 a.-�r i +'" p-V '��.� � � ��'��l : - . i i l� L��"t�l��l �. 1�'� ;��C i;, 0 i a (1 ��'L� �" �i �i� r '+�"� ��E i �.''2 �� y} � X� - � � `t . s�l� �'`� : .G � y'-,. � i3�� ) '+s�. Y ;,� 6 0 y tl r,.`�`4y��{�� . �. � � _, � � ) t > `-��{ t a�r `��;ri��7�``` , '� � ;. ,�: , }U A { �� ^ r ��:��•�k c ' '�:. - - � �`; �� ., ty ;4-� � . �, � ,� .� , _ — k '' �r i�t�� !� �� T � ;7 . :� _ - '4r \�_,..i k.✓i� t !� .! (` ��'.`"h+�t';`� ��t .. � �/ �� „ h _ � � � ,��/ �r� r fi( r,{.} f " t t - - —_� , '/ k`� ��K, 1 �G � � �t� ',�e� ; � � ,, s � ,� {�( � T7 :� 1 1� k*��'\��; ��R(t s��r " � . �� ,(t �.�r .,..4 J� r,ft , �e ' Y-� . ..L� A'' ' ' r ' a� - _ � f� Z kr,`�, i t }��,tif� �c .� . .. . � . '� 'X.i� �j� yLy r�F�`_'.r� � ,� J . + � - ` '� �� - �7 �r ,.' C ��-1^t � �N ��,1 \'" / �� l+ F�� -� � � ` —_ �' � l.y �i�� 'ir�" y \ �.,;j� f��it[�i'K�,'� t�� t't5� r � . �.. �-.- � ;�� 'j`l�r�� }�s � '� � �;;� r ��.:; , ,r . .�,. � � - .�, , _� �.�: �:� r�rti y � �'��+ �� , � .� � � ,� �ft�0 + .`�'d�'Fi;.F"�,`r � � ' ��i',a$ � s _ �� - � r � ;� : ._:'�-.J �� n r��d��.� � �.,�' r �`- � �= �� en :��dde. ,,-= ,� F ,� � ��:-�r � �. �� i , ��.��>��/ t t� � �f � `-� '� � �� y\�� /.Aa l,C-Q�`� ..-y °�`-,,� � �,. I� � ;r,�"",,�.;,,_. �.-t�*-�`'-;�„y i� ' �,j �� I {� � ;a , , s , �,� � ,r � i°"°`A�- ; ,�,;��` :�c=; ' i;; l '�`'��"�� v� ;��: �j �� t � y_� ��--- ---�--------- 'i` I r •� LLI� �. \a ' °� '.� �;;--—- , � , �� p� � � ' ' �� l�l ! ' � a �' 9' �' $�� ;�� 31„� � � ��'d 1N101 � Q ��O�oD cd j N �D p� O c�j �r a? � t0 � N cri a0 �� Q N a �" �i I <- r� � �' � � ` � a � � � M a ; , � ' � � c� o� cn r- cri'r�'t� ch c*, cD ^y � � C N tQ r N 1�I�� '�OD N I M N OD 4� N � � . � � � N ch cD;e- � m' � CV CV c'� '�t �a .��i'Q�► � '�7� I �y � " . y� ; � � C O�i � I C�V '�' � � N � L •� � � � _') I � � � � � � 2 , � ; � _� a a � �I� � -- ' � � �';"e ;ea� o a� � t�.t QI � Q�Q{� c�.�� ' O NIC�i, M � .N- a�4 � Y� � � � tn��C CQ� O O r- � C M t0 � � y � � a ; . _ m ..r e0 n i W O o� � °� N �; � c�i N � '_'{tJ � � 3 � q �j � � � C p � � �' V � � G � � � y e e.\ \ �,: I o e� o � � `eP. `oQ. � LN t� �O r"iQ`t� �i N N � CD d N � (� � @ 0► � r:Q� CC � 1� r � !+ ''� � r [1{ �a 'att� �D'ad NI tiN �-- � b' t''> � 2 a � ; ^ � d � �n � d � i � N a o I I .... c . ....__ _ — ��Wi�� M. � N N N � � � � � � � C a ! I �� ' i � ? r , I 4 ; � « ap'�ep�e'e � � �j�'�e a' ;� a° � - 61 � (� ta��lr I��,) 1+ M O M CO O N N �O CV C�i�O�W M�, h- C G "t c'� O f0 C � ��r� B!i N N �- CO � '� f a ° 1 < < C. ... �� NIO �� :Q�O � O ll7 -- " M . !6 '•" T'�^ �� N � � � � C a I � � I , � � f � � I -I--- I � ( = a � m a°� � � � .Q � 1 � �I � � g E Ol Cj'o m c� e U' E U TA � m � � fn C � ti7 fR � � H C .►. Z � F_ �! � C � � ❑ � � � � � 0� m � .r = a' a� o 0 o I —�o � � � � y O=� o � _ > F. S�2 �:y t� C� � m m .a w � .. co . e i o C! O � � ��, O � Lj.,I� �N N sa �J y {� �"' _ � 11.i'� b O`m � �I y @ � � O `� y � C ��;0 ��Ulcn �� LL1 V U F- U � � b � -�,�ra°�� orora ��c �To '50��3 ?a3?I?H1S 6�:9� 666I-�I-2jJt� Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes April 27, 1999 Page 2 Public Hearin�: Kellev Trust Concept PUD (Cont'd from 4-13-99) Mr.Pearson summarized staff recommendations to the City Council for approval of the concept plan. Additional recommendations from the Parks &Rec Committee, the Utility Commission, Public Works, and Public Safety will also be included. Staff recommends 2 du/ac net density with opportunities for density bonus. Mr. Pearson reviewed the wetland designations and the effect intersection locations may have upon the wetlands. He made assurances that the Wetland Conservation Act will be taken very seriously. Chairperson Droste opened the floor to the applicant. Tim Erkkila summarized the developer's responses to public comments and concerns. He reviewed grade changes, open spaces and street alignment, and he identified density in specific areas. Chairperson Droste opened the public hearing. Bob Miller, 12930 Shannon Parkway, expressed concems regarding the northern route of the main road and any impact on the existing holding pond located north of the property. He also had concerns with speed on Shannon Parkway and the water level of Birger Pond. Mr. Litterer explained that Public Works has been gauging the water level for four years and it is presently one foot lower than the recorded high. A new lift station is planned. Richard Eastwood, 14018 Clover Lane, discussed issues related to the effect of townhomes on property values, concentration of townhomes along the southern boundary, changing Clover Lane to a thoroughfare,higher density trade offs, and discrepancies in the open space calculations. Mr. Pearson explained the open space calculations. Mr. Erkkila indicated that parks/open space total 117 acres, or 23% of the property. Chairperson Droste opened the floor to the Commissioners. Discussions continued concerning bonus density, concentration of density to preserve open space, and density comparisons. Mr. Rogness responded to questions regarding the environmental review options and compared the EIS and AUAR processes. Discussions continued concerning revisions to the proposed recommendations. Commissioner Klassen requested the city council be made aware that the townhouse density is 27%and senior housing will require rezoning to R-3 density. Commissioner Weisensel noted open space and the neighborhood community center missing Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes Apri127, 1999 Page 3 from the initial concept plan. He suggested consideration be given to increasing density to allow additional open space and that the village square be reconsidered. Commissioner Shoe-Corrigan raised concerns regarding ridge-line development along the northern boundary. The benefits of cluster development were discussed. Chairperson Droste read into the record correspondence received from Dennis &Nancy Randall, Lora Lee Pedersen-Thusholt dated Apri18, 1999,Martin&Jeanne Van Orsow dated Apri127, 1999,Melissa Mazcotte dated Apri126, 1999, Shannon Oaks Residents dated Apri126, 1999, and James W. Johnston dated Apri19, 1999. Bob Sanders, 13480 Dodd Blvd., inquired as to buffering along the eastern side of the development. Bob McCarthv, 14026 Clover Lane, commented the townhomes are located too close to his home and will affect its value. Mr. Pearson explained the townhome is located approximately 500' from his home. Homer Tompkins provided information on the estimated value of the homes and townhomes. MOTION by Droste to close the public hearing. Seconded by Tentinger. Ayes: Tentinger, Droste, Shoe-Corrigan,Weisensel, and Klassen. Nays: 0. Motion carried. MOTION by Shoe-Corrigan,to recommend that the City Council approve the Concept Plan for the Kelley Trust Planned Unit Development subject to: 1. The development consists of 5363 acres including land previously dedicated for Shannon Park. Considering undevelopable land for slopes and wetlands, staff is using 460 acres as a net developable acreage. Therefore, 920 units are allowable based upon the pending Comp. Guide Plan policy. Of the 1,153 proposed units, 233 (20% of the total)would be considered a density bonus at the discretion of the City Council for the overall high quality of the proposed development, and using clustering or other techniques to aggressively preserve natural features,open space,ridges, slopes and woodlands. Lastly, 100 units are included in the number for senior housing which should also support the density due to its specific niche for life-cycle housing. Senior housing would require rezoning to R-3. Multi-family housing represents 27%of all units. 2. Housing types and neighborhood clusters shall be utilized to reinforce a pattern of transition from urban to rural. The proposed estate housing adjacent to the rural residential district shall have a net density of one dwelling unit per acre over an area consisting of all lots adjacent to rural residential uses. This may be accomplished with Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes Apri127, 1999 Page 4 large lots or clustering of dwelling units. Clustering techniques shall be applied to housing appropriately to adapt the development to the natural forms instead of significantly altering them. Consideration should be given to increase use of cluster techniques particularly on the northern tier to preserve additional open space or natural features. 3. Housing types adjacent to existing urban single family residential uses shall be similar to the established housing types and densities. In the case of dissimilar housing types or attached housing,bufferyards utilizing preserved stands of trees and/or extensive landscaping shall be required to preserve homogeneous neighborhoods. The developer shall provide additional detail on all housing types. 4. The environmental review process will help determine the ultimate locations of streets, housing and infrastructure. The city supports the Alternative Urban Area wide Review (AUAR)process. The concept approval shall not waive the requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991, the Tree Preservation Ordinance, and the Surface Water Management Ordinance.. 5. The east-west parkway street shall intersect Shannon Parkway at a perpendicular in a location causing least impact on trees,wetlands, and natural features. City engineering standards will also be used to determine the most acceptable location and design. 6. Existing local streets terminating at the edge of the development with temporary cul-de- sacs and barriers shall be designed as through-streets ultimately connecting to Connemara Trail, Shannon Parkway or the east-west parkway. Traffic calming techniques should be considered for Shannon Parkway and Connemaza Trail. In addition, modifications to the � city street design standards should be considered with the review of the traditional homes portion of the concept plan. 7. Incorporation of recommendations regazding street design and connections included in the attached City Engineer/Public Works Director memo dated Apri122, 1999. 8. Incorporation of recommendations regarding park, sidewalk and trail improvements made by the Parks and Recreation Committee. 9. The developer shall work with the City to attain a connection to the downtown, including streetscape features (utilization of similaz lighting) and cooperative development of Central Park. 10. The developer should revisit the Village Center concept that includes a swimming pool Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes Apri127, 1999 Page 5 and tennis court facilities and address whether such facilities are for public or private use. Additionally,non-intrusive retail amenities, such as a coffee or ice cream shop, should be considered in this center. 11. Strong consideration should be given to offering a density bonus for additional open space. 12. The City Council should give direction to city staff to contact and work with outside resources,primarily 1000 Friends of Minnesota and Minnesota Land Trust, to acquire and/or manage open space for proposed corridors,buffers,open space and parkland. The developer would not be penalized in housing units. Seconded by Tentinger. Ayes: Droste, Shoe-Comgan, Weisensel,Klassen, and Tentinger. Nays: 0. Motion carried. blic Hearin : M.W. Johnson - Prelimina Plat & Rezoni for Oa id e Estates Chairper n Droste opened the public hearing on the application by M . Johnson for the Preliminary lat and Rezoning for Oakridge Estates. The recordin ecretary has placed the Affidavit of P lication and Affidavit of Mailing and Posting o a Public Hearing Notice on file with the City. Mr. Pearson presented e preliminary plat for the ru residential development of the Coffee property located on Mc ews Road. Rezonin om Agriculture to Rural Residential is consistent with the Compreh sive Guide Pl and is recommended by staff. Because of the street connection to McAndrews oad,th ounty has approval authority. The County objected to the proposed street connection at ocation of the existing driveway because it does not meet the access spacing guidelines County requested the street align with Danbury Way. The developer is unwilling to e this c ge. Due to the objection by the County, a recommendation for approv cannot be given staff. The remaining option is for the city to pursue a variance from County,if directed by City Council. Discussions conti ed concerning road alignment options connect to 120th Street and connecting th ul-de-sac to the northem property line. Mr. P son explained his preference for alignment the street with Danbury Way,indicating the develop 's proposal for location creates lind intersection. Variances are required for street right-of- width reduction and cul- -sac length. � hairperson Droste opened the floor to the applicant. Steve Grohoski,representin .W. ��x.�� ,.�.- ��- �� C I TY O F RO S E M O U N T 2875 C145th St eet West �` � Rosemount,MN � a,+ ��., 55068-4997 �, Everything's Coming Up Rosemount!! Phone:651•423-4411 `�=r-. _� "��-;,y:cr� Hearing Impaired 651-423-6219 '��=-• -�N Fax:651-423-5203 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes April 13, 1999 Pur " ant to due call and notice thereof,the Regular Meeting of the Planning Co � ion was duly he on Tuesday, April 13, 1999. Chairperson Bill Droste called the m�to order at 6:30 p.m. w' members Sheila Klassen, Jay Tentinger, Jeffery Weise and Kim Shoe- Corrigan presen . lso in attendance were City Planner Rick P on, Community Development Director Dan Rognes , d Civil Engineer poug Litterer. There were no additions or co tions to the a da. MOTION by Tentinger to approve ch 9, 1999 Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. Seconded by Klasse yes: Klas , Tentinger,Droste, Shoe-Comjan and Weisensel. Nays: 0. Mo ' carried. MOTION by tinger to approve the March 23, 1999 Re Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. conded by Klassen. Ayes: Tentinger, Droste, Shoe- 'gan, Weisensel, and Kl en. Nays: 0. Motion carried. artment Announcements Commi ' ners noted the actions taken by the City Coun ' Apri16, 1999. Chairperson Droste indica two-da session addressing the downtown,Hwy. 52, mining, and affordable housin ' cheduled for sometime in May for city council, staff, and the planning co ' 'on. Commissioner asked to contact staff with available dates. MO by Droste to recess the meeting unti17:00 p.m. Motion c � animously. Public Hearing,: Kelley Trust Concept PUD (Cont'd from 3-23-991 Mr. Pearson indicated the revised concept plan was not delivered in time for staff to sufficiently review and prepare a recommendation. The developer was present to explain the changes. Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes Apri113, 1999 Page 2 Jim Johnston with Contractor Property Developers Company summarized changes to the concept plan. Changes include a reduction of 77 in housing counts, a reduction in the percentage of townhomes from 33%to less than 27%, increased buffering and lot sizes along the northern perimeter resulting in a 25%increased setback from the northern boundary,realigned roads, shifting of townhomes away from the school and existing neighborhoods, and elimination of the community center. Tim Erkkila further explained the changes. The blend between townhomes and single family homes was changed from 2/3-1/3 to 3/4-1/4. The parkway road now has a series of curves to slow traffic and avoid wetlands. The community center was replaced by residential construction. Townhomes were pulled back from Clover Lane. There are no townhomes within 350 feet of e�cisting single family homes. Dodd Road now ends with a cul-de-sac. The open space percentage has changed from 28% (including the Apple Valley side) to 23% (not including Apple Valley),resulting in approximately 114 acres in open space. The previous"back-yard" system for open space and trails now includes a"front-yard"system with sidewalks. Mr. Erkkila reviewed the trail connections and park system. Mark Putnam explained the traditional design scheme,including road designs, sidewalks, neighborhood gathering places, and the blend of housing styles. Mr. 7ohnston introduced the builders who are interested in building in this development, including Leonard Pratt of Pratt Homes,Rick Katt of R.A. Katt Homes,Ron Peterson of Peterson Homes, and Tim Maurer of George Maurer Construction. Each builder described their company, their product, and current projects they aze involved in. Chairperson Droste opened the floor to the public. H ,arr W� ilcox, 14674 Danville Ave: W., emphasized the importance of providing housing which meets the needs of an aging population,providing independence and mobility. He feels the plans for this development support such needs. Mr. Wilcox provided a history of the Kelley Trust property, specifically addressing issues with Birger Pond and storm water management. He indicated the size of the pond has increased from 11 acres in 1990 to 33 acres today. Mr. Wilcox expressed concerns with the reduction in the number of housing units from 1153 to 900 and summarized the cost to the residents of Rosemount due to the underutilization of facilities. Mr. Wilcox provided figures detailing the loss in taxes resulting from the reduction in housing units. Tom Gurnev, 13800 Shannon Parkway, addressed concerns with traffic and speed on Shannon Parkway. He indicated that if the state determines the speed limit, it is set at 85%of the speed Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes April 13, 1999 Page 3 cars are currently traveling. He requested that,prior to the start of construction, the city set a 30 mph speed limit. Cliff Carlson, 13540 Diamond Path, indicated the developer has done a very nice job. He expressed concerns with the water level of Birger Pond. Trees and vegetation around Birger Pond have been killed due to the increased water level. Mr. Carlson wants the water level to be maintained at its present depth to avoid a muddy mess which would result if it was lowered. Mr. Carlson also noted the city never acquired an easement for the two storm sewers which were installed. Mr. Litterer indicated the Engineering Department has been studing Birger Pond for some time. Faye Marcotte, 12931 Shannon Parkway, expressed her concern about the wetlands. She wants density to be kept down so the wetlands are not altered. She prefers a traditional neighborhood design with homes closer together and lower density to protect wildlife and wetlands. Ms. Marcotte believes that 900 housing units is too much. Dennis Randall, 14034 Clover Lane, referenced the petition for a cul-de-sac on Clover Lane. He met with the Police Chief and Fire Marshal to discuss safety concerns and indicated there aze advantages to a cul-de-sac if it backs up to another housing area. He feels the benefits of a cul- de-sac outweigh any drawbacks. The change from townhomes to classic homes in this azea of the development does not change the desire for a cul-de-sac. Lee Bottom, 13890 Shannon Parkway,raised safety concems with the design of Connemara Trail and suggested curves and stop signs to reduce speeds. Mr. Johnston indicated the developer will be working with the city in traffic planning and street details. There was continued discussion concerning trail extensions. Marvin Skinner,4455 Upper 135th St. W., expressed concerns with drainage into Birger Pond and requested information on the costs assessed to residents for storm water management as a result of development. Mr. Litterer indicated that engineering estimates were not yet available because of the conceptual nature of the current review. The preliminary plat review would furnish the necessary details. Gary Johnson, 14042 Clover Lane,noted the estate homes with a 100'buffer and inquired as to buffering on the north side of Carroll's Woods. Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes Apri113, 1999 Page 4 Chairperson Droste indicated the public hearing will be continued to Apri127. He opened the floor to the Commissioners for comment. Commissioner Klassen feels the developer is moving in the right direction. She noted reduction in townhomes to 27%, and indicated city council's desire for a 75/25 percent ratio. She addressed sidewalk and trail connections, and Mr. Erkkila showed options for such connections. Commissioner Klassen indicated the Master Park Plan must be reviewed with the Parks &Rec Committee. Commissioner Tentinger is pleased with the developer's approach and wants to move forward with the plan. Grading plans will address concerns with water runoff and costs. The developer has cooperated with the city and has addressed concems regarding buffering and traffic. The development is a positive for the city and will contribute to development of the Business Park. Chairperson Droste complimented the developer on the plans. He preferred the i.nitial location of the main street intersection rather than the present location on the north side of the cluster of trees. He feels a blind intersection is created by the current location. Chairperson Droste also supported the community center which has now been removed. The community center fulfilled the need for a connecting point and would eliminate the need for residents to travel elsewhere for amenities,thereby decreasing traffic. Chairperson Droste also addressed the density issue and feels that success is determined by the number of acres left untouched. This is accomplished by clustering rather than large open lots. Commissioner Tentinger also expressed concem with the blind intersection as a result of moving the main street further north. Commissioner Shoe-Corrigan has concems that streets do not impact any wetlands or go through the Oak Savanna. She pointed out issues related to housing types, densities, Birger Pond, and traffic/safety concems. Commissioner Shoe-Corrigan indicated she wishes to see 40%-50% open space. She does support 20,000-15,000 sq.ft. lots along the northem boundary and encourages cluster development, creating more open space. She is happy with the project and expects her concerns to be addressed at the preliminary plat stage. Discussions continued concerning the Master Park Plan and the review process. Chairperson Droste noted for the record a letter dated March 23, 1999 from Janet Rohlf Larson and a Memorandum, dated April 6, 1999 from George A. Lundy,Fire Marshal. Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes Apri113, 1999 Page 5 MOTION by Droste to continue the public hearing until April 27, 1999. Seconded by Weisensel. Ayes: Droste, Shoe-Corrigan, Weisensel,Klassen, and Tentinger. Nays: 0. Motion carried. Chairperson Droste recessed the meeting at 9:15 p.m. for 10 minutes. ublic I3earin : Construction 70 Preliminar Plat and Final PUD airperson Droste opened the public hearing on Construction 70 Preliminary P t and Final P The recording secretary has placed the Affidavit of Publication and A davit of Mailing and Po ' g of a Public Hearing Notice on file with the City. Mr.Pearson lained changes to the Construction-70 PUD. Solber will no longer acquire the adjoining parce , d the parcel will be described as an outlot. T ponding area south of Fleet Development has b n shifted to Rich Valley Golf Course, lea ng the remnant as an outlot. Fleet Development is quired to add 1600 sq.ft. greenspac n the northern portion of its site to meet the 25%required nspace. Mr. Pearson review the landscaping plan. Chairperson Droste opened the oor to the Applic t. Joe Eschenbacher of Wayne Transports responded to questions concernin eenspace, dscaping and screening. Chairperson Droste opened the floor to public. Marlin Rechtzi�el, 14727 Clayton e., aske bout plans for the waterway crossing the property and inquired fizrther abo the Conley A nue alignment. MOTION by Droste to clo the public hearing. Secon ed by Klassen. Ayes: Shoe-Corrigan, Weisensel,Klassen, Ten ' ger, and Droste. Nays: 0. Moti carried. MOTION by Tent' ger to recommend that the City Council app ve the Preliminary Plat and Final PUD for C struction 70 (Wayne Transports &Fleet Develop nt) subject to: 1) Conformance ith the requirements of the concept resolution; 2)Payme of Park Dedication fees as dete 'ned by the City Council; 3)Payment of Storm Water Trunk ea Charges as establish by the current fee resolution; 4)Payment of GIS Fees as establishe the current fee res ution; 5)Remnant parcels shall be platted as outlots; 6) Approval by the ota County Plat ommission; 7)A minimum of 1600 square feet of green space added to the no west c er of the Fleet Development site. Seconded by Droste. Ayes: Weisensel,Klassen, entinger,Droste, and Shoe-Corrigan. Nays: 0. Motion carried. Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes March 23, 1999 Page 2 Chairperson Droste opened the floor to the applicant. Bob Wiegert was available to answer q tions. Commissio discussed issues related to lot layout,building modificatio ariances, and parking spaces. MOTION by Droste to recomm that the City Counc' prove the final plat for Rosemount Commons subject to: 1)Execution of a divisi greement to secure public infrastructure; 2) Conformance with the conditions of Res 998-87 (Preliminary Plat approval). Seconded . by Klassen. Ayes: Tentinger,D , Weisensel, an assen. Nays: Shoe-Corrigan. Motion carried. MO y Droste to recess the meeting unti17:00 p.m. Motion carrie 'mously. Public Hearin�• Kellev Trust Concept PUD (Cont'd from 3-9-991 Chairperson Droste referenced a letter from the developer requesting the public hearing be continued to April 13. The developer is working on a revised concept plan responding to identified issues relating to building types and density. The plan revisions and presentations by selected builders will not be ready until that time. Chairperson Droste noted for the record a letter received from Steve Hurderle, a petition from residents on Clover Lane and Cobbler Avenue, and a list of birds and mammals which inhabit the area forwazded by Dennis &Nancy Randall. Chairperson Droste encouraged the residents to review the marketing plan available at the front desk and to put any concerns in writing to the Planning Commission. Chairperson Droste opened the floor to the public. Gar�Johnson, 14042 Clover Lane,referenced the petition to stop the extension of Clover Lane into the development. Mr. 7ohnson received feedback from the Police Department and requested clarification on the decision making process. Laura Rosario, 3956 133rd Ct. W., does not feel townhomes should be located next to single family homes. She also expressed concerns regarding drainage into the pond behind her home. Mr. Litterer explained the pond is designed to take some runoff from the Kelley Trust development. Staff will look closely at drainage and ponding throughout the development. Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes March 23, 1999 Page 3 Dennis Randall, 14034 Clover Lane, indicated that Clover Lane should be made into a cul-de-sac and inquired about future plans for this road. Mr. Litterer responded that staff will be revie�ving issues related to police/fire safety and traffic volumes in deciding whether Clover Lane will be extended. Dotv Russell, 12930 Shannon Parkway, had questions concerning density and whether the PUD process would specify where the density is located. Discussion continued concerning the density issue and comparisons between the existing comprehensive plan and the 2020 comprehensive plan. Also discussed was the substance of an environmental assessment evaluation, along with requirements of the tree ordinance and the safeguards in place concerning the wetlands. MOTION by Droste to continue the public hearing until Apri113, 1999. Seconded by Tentinger. Ayes: Droste, Shoe-Corrigan,Weisensel,Klassen, and Tentinger. Nays: 0. Motion carried. 'c Hearin : Construction 70 Inc. Prelimina Plat and ' UD Mr. Pearson sted the public hearing be postponed until April 13 to w changes to the grading plan and to fo roval of the concept plan by the c' ouncil. Mazlin Rechtzigel raised concerns regardm ey Avenue alignment,resulting in a portion of his property being landlocked. Chai on Dros ' rmed Mr. Rechtzigel that his concerns will be addressed at the April 1 ublic hearing. There being no er business to come before this Commission, upon MOTIO roste and u o ous decision,the meeting was adjourned at 8:17 p.m. Respectfully submitted, 1 Dianne G. Quinnell Recording Secretary Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes March 9, 1999 Page 2 MOTION by Dros s the meeting unti17:00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Public Hearin�: Kellev Trust Conce�t PUD (Cont'd from 2-23-991 Mr.Pearson reviewed the stages in the development process. Chairperson Droste opened the floor to the applicant. Jim Johnston,Vice President of Contractor Property Developers Company, addressed issues related to urban sprawl, schools, and traffic on Shannon Parkway and the Connemara Trail extension. Tim Erkkila presented data on traffic volumes. Mr. Erkkila explained proposed road designs and the effect the designs have on other roadways and upon the wetlands. The intersection of Shannon Parkway with the internal road was reviewed, along with issues related to the wetlands. The developer will no longer show a connection to 131 st St. unless requested by the city. Discussions continued conceming plans for Connemara Trail to continue east to Hwy. 42 and the connection of the internal road to Diamond Path, along with issues related to speed limits and linkage to the downtown. Commissioner Shoe-Comgan expressed her concern that the proposed Shannon Parkway intersection will impact the trio of wetlands in the area and decrease their functions. Ms. Shoe-Comgan advised the developer that this would not be acceptable and that other options for this intersection need to be examined. Mr. Erkkila provided an analysis of the existing Connemara Trail between Diamond Path and Shannon Parkway and suggested improvements for enhancements to create open spaces. Mr. Erkkila addressed issues related to the community center planned for the development, indicating they have no intention to compete with facilities in downtown Rosemount and will not duplicate facilities. Mr. Erkkila indicated a desire to strengthen the linkage to the downtown with an extensive trail system. The developer is looking for continuity from the development to downtown and suggested that linkage opportunities be documented. Mr. Johnston stated the downtown is a fabulous amenity and expressed the desire to provide an opportunity for residents to have easy access to the downtown. Because of the distance between the Kelley property line and downtown,Mr. Johnston encouraged the city to work with the developer to make ties to adjacent areas. In response to concerns that the market study positioned the project as a suburb of Rosemount and to not identify with Rosemount,Mr. Johnston explained the mazket study is the opinion of Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes March 9, 1999 Page 3 just one individual. Mr. Johnston disagrees with the market study opinion on the importance of access to the downtown area and ties to the historic downtown and to other trail systems of the city. The Irish theme has not yet been addressed,but Mr. Johnston thought other builders may have worn the theme thin. Mr. Johnston disagreed with the Pennsylvania Dutch theme suggested by the mazket study. Mr. Erkkila further addressed issues related to the northern perimeter of the development, showing examples of larger lots with rear yard depths increased from 100'to 175' and yard widths increased approximately 50'. He showed how the increased lots affect open space. Chairperson Droste referenced a residents' petition in opposition to the extension of 131 st Street, and letters from Martin&Jeanne Van Orsow,Harry Wilcox,Donna Bergsgaard, and Lea& Jeni Bottem. Chairperson Droste opened the floor to the public. Dotv Russell, 12930 Shannon Parkway,requested additional information concerning transition. Tom Gurnev, 13800 Shannon Parkway, raised issues concerning traffic on Shannon Parkway, especially if the Connemara connection to Diamond Path is not completed before development starts. Development phasing plans were discussed. Bruce Endler, 13828 Currant Circle, expressed concems regarding the density of this development and its effect on schools. He is also concemed about the developer's commitment to Rosemount and the schools. He noted factual enors in the market study concerning the high school and objected to comments in the market study which give a general negative perception of the school. Mr. Endler indicated there is no commitment to market the development as a part of Rosemount,but rather as Apple Valley East. In response to NIr. Endler's density concerns, Chairperson Droste pointed out that consideration must be given to the increase of the diversity of housing in Apple Valley&Eagan and its impact on the school system and not to focus on this one development as solely contributing to the burden on the schools. The school district and all of the cities stay in contact with each other to identify changes in growth pattems, and the school district needs to have flexibility to react to those changes. Mr. Johnston indicated he has been communicating with school staff and that the project will not be marketed as Apple Valley East. Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes March 9, 1999 Page 4 Commissioner Klassen referenced a letter from the developer, dated February 8, 1999, indicating that development of the property would be consistent with the new amended comprehensive plan update. Dennis Randall, 14034 Clover Ln., expressed concerns regarding density in the townhome section north of Carroll's Woods, and had questions about wildlife corridors,protecting grassland areas, and landscaping in boulevards. Jeanne Van Orsow, 12861 Shannon Parkway, expressed concerns regarding drainage in the northern area of the development. Mr. Litterer responded the city is currently working on a drainage plan. Ms. Orsow further expressed concerns about the need for a new school. Mr. Johnston explained school officials indicated that growth will be facilited, as it has been done in Apple Valley and Eagan. In determining school needs,the school district indicated they are looking at more areas than just the Kelley Trust property. Jennv McCarthy, 14026 Clover Lane, is concerned about the townhomes north of Clover Lane. The only outlet for these townhomes is onto Clover Lane. She would like to see a cul-de-sac at the end of Clover Lane and have the townhomes outlet onto Connemara Trail. She is also concerned that because townhomes do not maintain their value, it may compromise the value of the existing homes. She also inquired about the nature of the community center. Mr. Johnston addressed townhome values. As concerns the community center, it will be an amenity for the Kelley Trust residents, unless the city wishes to participate in providing this amenity. Bob McCarthy, 14026 Clover Lane, feels the marketing study is biased and suggested another study be performed by an outside source. Martin Van Orsow, 12861 Shannon Parkway, asked whether it would be possible to get a projection of the traffic count. Mr. Johnston indicated a traffic study would be done in the environment assessment. MOTION by Droste to continue the public hearing until Mazch 23, 1999. Seconded by Shoe- Corrigan. Ayes: Droste, Shoe-Corrigan, Weisensel,Klassen, and Tentinger. Nays: 0. Motion carried. C I TY O F RO S E M O U N T 2875 C145tHSt eet West Rosemount,MN ��r 55068-4997 ��,f; � Everything's Coming Up Rosemount!! ,� �� Phone:651-423-4411 ��°-;��. _ Hearing Impaired 651-423-6219 Fax:651-423-5203 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes February 23, 1999 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof,the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, February 23, 1999. Chairperson Bill Droste called the meeting to der at 6:3 .m. with members Sheila Klassen, Jay Tentinger, Kim Shoe-Corrigan, and Jef Weisen 1 present. Also in attendance were Community Development Directo an Rogness, City Plann Rick Pearson, Public Works Director/City Engineer Bud Osm son, and Civil Engineer pou Litterer. There were no addit ns or conections to the agenda. MOTION by Droste to a ove the February 9, 1999 ual Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. Seconded by Klass . Ayes: Klassen, T tinger,Droste, Shoe-Comgan and Weisensel. Nays: 0. Motion c 'ed. De artment Announcement Commissioners noted the actions en by t City Council on February 16, 1999. Mr. Rogness summarized e partial moratorium o 'nance adopted by the City Council. The moratorium, in effect f 12 months,prohibits any ne esidential development , excluding previous prelimin plat approvals,rural residential deve ment, and individual lot development. ojects presently in the concept plan process allowed to move forward, but no approvals w' be granted beyond the concept stage. MO ON by Droste to recess the meeting unti17:00 p.m. Seconded by ntinger. Motion 'ed unanimously. Public Hearing: Kelley Trust Concept PUD Chairperson Droste opened the public hearing on the Kelley Trust Concept PUD. The recording secretary has placed the Affidavit of Publication and Affidavit of Mailing and Posting of a Public , Hearing Notice on file with the City. Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes February 23, 1999 Page 2 Mr Pearson presented the application by Contractor Property Developers Company for the Concept PUD for development of the Kelley Trust property. Mr Pearson explained the steps in the process which a development must go through for approval. The 1980 and 1993 Comprehensive Plans were reviewed, showing historical plans for this property to be developed as a transition/cluster area. Urban cluster developments are encouraged to create greenspace for buffering and to preserve natural features. Chairperson Droste opened the floor to the Applicant. Homer Tompkins of Contractor Property Developers Company was present and referenced the recent neighborhood meeting. Tim Erkkila described the plans for development. He summarized the neighborhood meeting, indicating the topics addressed included the PUD process,urban sprawl,project density, traffic issues, schools, townhouse development, and transition for rural residential on the northern boundary. Mark Putnam presented a slide demonstration showing examples of neighborhood designs, street designs, and amenities. Chairperson Droste opened the floor to the public. A gentleman asked the developer if he was awaze of what appeared to be a gravestone on the property. Mr. Erkkila confirmed it was a gravesite for a family dog. Sara Trachet, 4635 129th St., Apple Valley,had questions concerning cluster housing, a smooth transition, communications between Rosemount and the City of Apple Valley concerning open spaces and whether the open spaces would be available to all residents, and the assessed values of homes in the Country Hills area. Mr. Erkkila explained the concept of open spaces, buffering along the northern boundary and placement of the homesites. The development plans are compatible with plans for the Apple Valley portion. Public access to open spaces is not yet determined, depending upon whether the city accepts the burden or if such spaces will remain privately owned. Staff was instructed to perform density comparisons with Country Hills and Shannon Hills developments. Dotv Russell, 12930 Shannon Parkway, has concerns regarding traffic,transitional zoning, and Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes February 23, 1999 Page 3 preservation of wetlands. There was a discussion regarding the wetlands. Wetland issues will be addressed in the next phase of the development. Mr. Pearson reviewed a map showing an inventory of the wetlands on the subject property. The city will follow all state laws protecting and mitigating wetlands, in addition to city standards which are in place. Mr. Osmundson addressed the traffic issues on Shannon Parkway and Connemara Trail. Mr. Erkkila indicated the developer will prepare a traffic analysis. Jim Frisbee, 4690 129th St., Apple Valley, had concerns regarding the watershed and dumping water into Birger Pond and feels a pumping station is necessary. He also expressed concern about increased traffic on Diamond Path between Connemara and Pilot Knob. Mr. Osmundson explained that Apple Valley and Rosemount are working together on a pumping station, which will be done regardless of the progress of the Kelley property development. Mr. Osmundson also responded to concerns regarding Diamond Path. Richard Eastwood, 14018 Clover Lane, had questions regarding the city council,planning commission, schools, and any other entities working together, architectural standards, and protection of Carroll's Woods. Discussion continued concerning communications with the school district and conditions for approval in meeting architectural standards. Mr. Erkkila explained the to�vnhomes abutting Carroll's Woods are positioned to create an open space area with increased setback. Mark Fonfara, 13927 Dallas Court, expressed concerns with the extension of Connemara Trail and that people would have to cross the street for access to the park. Mr.Fonfara recommended making Connemara a parkway. Mike Thompson, 13587 Dellwood Way, noted safety concerns with the trail underpass and felt there are too many townhomes which do not hold their value. He would prefer more traditional style single family homes. Ann Loch, 13411 Diamond Path,Apple Valley, offered her support of the development plan. She expressed concerns with flooding and indicated the pumping station on the Apple Valley side is not large enough. Ms. Loch serves on the school site council and stated the school is presently looking at boundaries for this development. Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes February 23, 1999 Page 4 � Lee Bottem, 13890 Shannon Parkway,was concerned with notification to residents of the plans for Connemara Avenue. He suggested stop signs on Connemara to slow down traffic. Discussion continued regarding the incorporation of recommended changes into the concept plan and trail connections to the downtown area. MOTION by Tentinger to continue the public hearing on the Kelley Trust Concept PUD until March 9, 1999. Seconded by Droste. Ayes: Tentinger, Droste, Shoe-Comgan, Weisensel, and Klassen. Nays: 0. Motion carried. Chairperson Droste recessed the meeting at 9:10 p.m. for five minutes. ublic Hearin : Rosemount Market S uare PUD Amendment C 'rperson Droste opened the public hearing for the Rosemount Market Square Ame ent. The recording secretary has placed the Affidavit of Publication d Affidavit of Mailing d Posting of a Public Hearing Notice on file with the City. Mr. Pearson pr ented the application by Peter Linder of Linder's reenhouses to locate a temporary flower art in the parking lot at Knowlan's. Suffic' t parking spaces would remain to support the shoppi center. Knowlan's supports the fl er mart and expects it to generate increased traffic and bus' ess to the shopping center. e flower mart is a permitted use in the C-4, General Commercial ' trict. The amendme o the PUD would define the area and set standards for temporary sales. dditional lang ge would specify that no other outdoor retail sales or display may occur concu tly in parking lot. Chairperson Droste opened the floo o th pplicant. Peter Linder described the nature of his family business. It is not a disc nt facility will be staffed with employees from this area. - The business does not sell c owers and will no compete with local flower shops that do. Discussions continu concerning building materials, se 'ty issues, and inventory. Chairperson oste opened the floor to the public. There were comments. MO N by Tentinger to close the public hearing. Seconded by We' ensel. Ayes: Droste, S e-Corrigan, Weisensel,Klassen, and Tentinger. Nays: 0. Motion c ' d. ::�n� �� -. `� CITY HALL -�, C I TY O F RO S E M O U N T 2875–145th Street West — � n`�� Rosemount,MN � '` Everything's Coming Up Rosemount!! 55068-4997 Phone:651-423-4411 Hearing Impaired 651-423•6219 ._ Fax:651-423-5203 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Rick Pearson, City Planner DATE: Apri122, 1999 RE: Kelley Trust Concept Planned Unit Development Revision Apri127, 1999 Planning Commission Reviews PROCESS The Public Hearing for the Concept Review has been ongoing since February 23, 1999. During that time, the developer has revised the concept in response to the many issues resulting form public comments. Because this is only the concept stage, many issues of a complex or technical nature may not be resolved until the anticipated environmental review or preliminary plat process. REVISED CONCEPT The Concept is still based upon a variety of housing types ananged in neighborhood groupings for each style of housing. There are now six detached housing types and four attached housing types. Major aspects of the concept are: 1. Individual neighborhoods with specific housing types have densities based upon each housing type. Average single family net densities range from 1.81 dwelling units per acre for Estate Homes to 4.53 du/ac for Lifestyle Villas. The numbers exclude preserved open space as well as undevelopable land. Appropriate zoning strategies include RL, Very Low Density Single Family Housing and R-1, Low Density Residential. 2. Attached housing neighborhoods are limited to an area south of the extended Connemara Trail with one exception. Distinctive Town homes are proposed for the north side of Birger Pond. Densities range from 2.24 du/ac for the Distinctive Town homes to 6.12 du/ac for Coach Homes. The appropriate zoning strategy would be R-2,Moderate Density Residential. 3. The Senior Housing is proposed at 11.29 dwelling units per acre. The appropriate zoning strategy would be R-3,Medium Density Residential. 4. The Community Center/Club House component has been dropped. While this idea generated some interest, it was not thoroughly refined. Also, the lower density expectations have forced the developer to create more developable land while maintaining significant amounts of open space. � Staff will make several recommendations which may affect the revised concept: Apri127, 1999 P. C. Reviews-Kelley Trust Revised Concept PUD Review Page 2. 1. The concept approval will not set the stage for wetland mitigation, or determine which wetlands will be mitigated and which ones will be preserved. Conformance with the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 is still state law. Procedures for reviewing the development and mitigation will follow a more elaborate process, starting with the environmental review period. 2. The east-west parkway street locations will be influenced by wetland considerations and city engineering standards. Much of this detail will be examined in the preliminary plat review process when the project goes through the engineering design. The heavy line used on the concept drawing over dramatizes the width and impact of the street. 3. The preferred location of the intersection of the east-west street with Shannon Parkway may be closer to the original concept proposal. This decision will be based upon weighing the pros and cons of both altematives. Wetland impact/mitigation is the primary(and perhaps only) downside of the original location. Intersection geometry, visual sight lines,housing cluster potential and tree preservation appear to be enhanced with the original configuration. 4. The through connections with existing local streets including Clover&Danube Lanes and 131 st Street are supported by city public safety officials as well as providing traffic management to more effectively distribute traffic throughout the system. 5. The Park and Recreation Committee will be providing a separate recommendation concerning the Park dedication and sidewalk/trail expectations for this development. DENSITY The Concept Plan will be subject to existing city rules and policies as well as pending policies directed by the City Council. This means that the Comprehensive Guide Plan of 1993, the zoning ordinance and the pending 2020 Guide Plan will all be used for discussions of compliance with policies and standards. While ordinances are the strongest measure of compliance with standards, all planned unit developments are required to comply with the intent of the Comprehensive Guide Plan. Therefore, the new policies expect an average net density of 2.0 dwelling units per acre with a maximum of 2.4 allowed for single family and 5.8 for attached housing. Cleazly, the developer is proposing higher densities than allowed in the pending Comprehensive Guide Plan. The City Council may decide to award the developer with a"density bonus"if the development offers an aggressive approach towards preserving open space and natural features. This density bonus is referred to in the `93 Comp. Guide Plan,but was anticipated to be used on vacant land with few amenities. Incentives for extraordinary landscaping and site amenities was the original intent. The configuration of the proposed neighborhood clusters does transfer density from the northern edge of the Estate Homes to the eastern area south of Connemara Trail in the form of typical R-2 Moderate Density land uses in a manner similaz to early discussions regarding the property. The Traditional Homes planned for the area north of Connemara Trail is actually of a lower density than originally suggested by staff. Apri127, 1999 P. C. Reviews- Kelley Trust Revised Concept PUD Review Page 3. RECOMMENDATION Motion to recommend that the City Council approve the Concept Plan for the Kelley Trust Planned Unit Development subject to: l. The development consists of 536.3 acres including land previously dedicated for Shannon Park. Considering undevelopable land for slopes and wetlands, staff is using 460 acres as a net developable acreage. Therefore, 920 units are allowable based upon the pending Comp. Guide Plan policy. Of the 1,153 proposed units, 233 (20% of the total) would be considered a density bonus at the discretion of the City Council for the overall high quality of the proposed development, and using clustering or other techniques to aggressively preserve natural features, open space, ridges, slopes and woodlands. Lastly, 100 units aze included in the number for senior housing which should also support the density due to its specific niche for life-cycle housing. 2. Housing types and neighborhood clusters shall be utilized to reinforce a pattern of transition from urban to rural. The proposed estate housing adjacent to the rural residential district shall have a net density of one dwelling unit per acre over an area consisting of all lots adjacent to rural residential uses. This may be accomplished with large lots or clustering of dwelling units. Clustering techniques shall be applied to housing appropriately to adapt the development to the natural forms instead of significantly altering them. 3. Housing types adjacent to existing urban single family residential uses shall be similar to the established housing types and densities. In the case of dissimilar housing types or attached housing,bufferyards utilizing preserved stands of trees and/or extensive landscaping shall be required to preserve homogeneous neighborhoods. 4. The environmental review process will help determine the ultimate locations of streets, housing and infrastructure. The city supports the Alternative Urban Area wide Review (AUAR)process . The Concept approval shall not waive the requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991. 5. The east-west parkway street shall intersect with Shannon Parkway at a perpendicular in a location causing least impact on trees and natural features. City engineering standards will also be used to determine the most acceptable location and design. Based upon available information, the preferred location is approximately 950 feet north of 133rd Court. 6. Existing local streets terminating at the edge of the development with temporary cul-de- sacs and barriers shall be designed as through streets ultimately connecting to Connemara Trail, Shannon Parkway or the east-west parkway. 7. Incorporation of recommendations regarding street design and connections included in the attached City Enginer/Public Works Director memo dated Apri122, 1999. 8. Incorporation of recommendations regarding park, sidewalk and trail improvements made by the Parks and Recreation Committee. MEMO CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA TO: Mayor and City Council Planning Commission FROM: Dan Rogness, Community Development Director DATE: April 1, 1999 RE: Kelley Trust Property--- Environmental Review Process Not much attention has yet been given to the environmental review process that will be required for the 500+ acre Kelley Trust property. Therefore, I will provide you a review of the process as described by the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) in its Guide to Minnesota Environmental Review Rules dated April 1998: 1. Three types of environmental review procedures (or documents) are established for actions or projects that involve the physical manipulation of the environment, directly or indirectly: • Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) ---this review procedure screens projects that may have the potential for significant environmental impacts. • Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) ---this review procedure results in a thorough study of a projecYs environmental impacts and a comparative analysis of its economic and sociological effects. • Alternative Urban Areawide Review(AUAR) ---this process reviews incremental impacts accumulating from a series of sequential projects rather than one distinct project or action, and it is viewed as somewhere between an EAW and EIS document. 2. State law identifies mandatory thresholds for the EAW and EIS process with some exemption categories. For residential development, the thresholds are as follows: • EAW---at least 250 unattached or 375 attached units with public sewer/water services. • EIS --- at least 1,000 unattached or 1,500 attached units with seweNwater services. • AUAR---substitutes for either the EAW or EIS thresholds. 3. For mixed housing types in one planned residential area, a formula has been established to determine whether an EAW or EIS is required. Two examples are shown below for the Kelley Trust property development (a score of 1.0 or greater requires an EIS): 750 detached units = .75 850 detached units = .85 250 attached units = .17 300 attached units = .20 1000 total units = .92 1150 total units = 1.05 Environmental Review Process Kelley Trust Property Page 2 Two examples of a mix of housing units that achieve exactly the 1.0 threshold would be: (A) 850 detached units + 225 attached units = 1,075 total units (B) 800 detached units + 300 attached units = 1,100 total units 4. The local unit of government (City of Rosemount) is required to be the "Responsible Governmental Unit" (RGU) under the rules of the EQB. The city will conduct all phases of the public review process, which is outlined and standardized by the EQB. The city will also prepare the EAW, EIS or AUAR document with information provided by the project proposer(s). These documents are typically completed by a consulting firm that is selected by the RGU and paid for by the project proposer(s). 5. The timeline for an AUAR process includes the following (120-day maximum w/o objections): (A) AUAR is ordered and prepared by the RGU... 30-60 days (B) Draft document is distributed for comments ... 30-45 days (C) RGU revises and distributes final document ... 15 days (D) Objections filed with RGU, if any ... 30 days (E) RGU adopts AUAR document and mitigation plan 6. The type of information typically reviewed as part of EIS or AUAR includes the following categories: (A) fish, wildlife, and ecologically sensitive resources, (B)water quality and resources, (C) erosion and sedimentation, (D) ground water protection, (E)traffic impacts, (F) air emissions, (G) dust, odors and noise, (H) visual impacts, (I) infrastructure and public services, (J) soils, and (K) compatibility with adopted plans. 7. City staff is assuming that the AUAR process best fits the phased residential PUD for the Kelley Trust property. I discussed the timing of the AUAR with EQB staff in order to determine whether the Concept PUD review process currently underway is in conflict with a proposed AUAR process. EQB staff(John Larson) responded that the city's action to approve the concept plan sufficiently fits the environmental review process as long as that approval is not reversible or changeable. In other words, an approved concept plan could easily be reviewed as one of two or three development scenarios for this property, one being the maximum allowed under the city's approved Comprehensive Plan. MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: Bud Osmundson, City Engineer/Public Works Director DATE: April 22, 1999 RE: Transportation/Traffic Issues - Kelley Trust Property The following is a review regarding the transportation and traffic issues for the Contractor Property Developers Company concept plan for the Kelley Trust property received by the City on April 9, 1999. 1 . The property is spread out over one and a half miles wide, and a mile north and south and does not contain a significant single traffic generating point, such as a shopping center, so it does not have a significant effect on the City's transportation system. The new traffic generated will be disseminated over many streets. Connemara Trail, Shannon Parkway and Diamond Path are the major Collectors which will serve this development and were all designed estimating a higher density than what is being proposed. The table below shows the existing and projected traffic on different segments on Shannon Parkway and Connemara Trail. STREET EXISTING ADT PROJECTED ADT SHANNON PARKWAY @ McAndrews 2,000 2,500 @ Connemara Trail 2,300 4,000 @ South of Connemara Trail 3,500 5,000 CONNEMARA TRAIL @ Diamond Path 3,500 12,000 @ Shannon Parkway 2,000 12,000 @Trunk Highway 3 NA 12,000 ADT - Average Daily Traffic or Number of Vehicles per Day 1 As shown, Connemara Trail and Shannon Parkway were designed for more traffic than presently exists. Both roadways are designated Municipal State Aid streets and their design is reviewed by Minnesota Department of Transportation personnel. As a comparison for Shannon Parkway, segments of 145th Street West, a two-lane roadway, carry over 7,000 vehicles per day. In addition, in the design of the reconstruction of 145th Street, it was always intended that Connemara Trail be continued to Trunk Highway 3 from its present terminus and in the 4-lane configuration. The City's 1993 Traffic Study and Analysis concluded that Connemara Trail should be connected to State Trunk Highway 3 and concurred with the current design. 2. The proposed neighborhood Collector between Diamond Path to Shannon Parkway and then continuing to Connemara Trail acts as a reliever to Shannon Parkway and Connemara Trail by taking traffic off of these roadways. The Public Works Department is not expecting this roadway to be significantly larger than a standard residentiaf street which is thirty-two feet wide, possibly it should be thirty-six or thirty-eight feet wide and have driveway accesses. With its meandering route it will not be a main Collector roadway and the meandering performs as a traffic calming device. The Public Works Department requests that the intersection with Shannon Parkway be moved to the south which we realize will require more detailed analysis in accordance with wetland regulations. However, we believe that it is possible to locate this roadway to the south without having a significant impact on the wetland complex. 3. There has been considerable discussion about roadway connections to Clover Lane, Danube Lane and 131 st Street. The Public Works Department requests that these connections be made for a number of reasons. The existing cul-de-sacs at Danube and Clover Lane were constructed as only � temporary cul-de-sacs not constructed to City standards. Furthermore, if the City would allow them to remain in their present locations, it would require a variance for setbacks to the roadways for the affected houses. In addition, the City Council has requested neighborhood connectivity. The existing neighborhoods may benefit more from the connections than will any new homes or residents within the Kelley Trust property. For example, many northbound travelers from the Country Hills area will utilize Danube Lane and the new neighborhood Collector to access Diamond Path. These connections also make it easier for emergency vehicles to reach existing neighborhoods and residents. 4. There are at least twenty-three cul-de-sacs proposed in the Rosemount portion of the development. The Public Works Department would request 2 that the number of cui-de-sacs be reduced for a number of reasons. It is a detriment to finding addresses for both emergency vehicles and regular citizens. Also, the cost of snow removal is approximately double for cul-de- sacs than regular thru streets. 5. The proposed plan shows a type of "round-about" design on Connemara Trail which the Public Works Department suggests is completely unnecessary. This attempt at traffic calming on such a major Collector is not suggested nor desired. 6. Dodd Boulevard should be connected to the proposed neighborhoods in the concept by some means, but should not have a straight line connection to Connemara Trail. 7. There have been some traffic calming ideas brought forward for the existing segments of Connemara Trail and Shannon Parkway. Stop signs are not a traffic calming device, but can actually build frustration in motorists. Trees in the boulevard are a wonderful amenity and, when substantially grown, can provide traffic calming. They are however, expensive to install and maintain. A median in Connemara Trail is probably not feasible due to right-of-way width. It may be possible in the future to construct flashing lights, alerting motorists to pedestrians, at the school on Shannon Parkway, and the park area on Connemara Trail which may provide some calming on these roadways. 8. Public Works supports constructing an underpass on Connemara Trail for the pedestrian/bicyclist trail connection to Schwarz Park. 3 DATE: 4-23-99 PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REVIEW FOR: PROJECT NAME: _Kelley Trust CITY PROJECT NO. Proposed By: Contractor Property Developers Compan� Phone No._(612)627-0823 9110 83rd Ave. North Fax No. (612)627-0838 Brooklyn Park. MN 55445 Type of Request: Concept PUD review The Foilowing Conditions must be considered for Approval of the Final Plat: 1. Execution of a subdivision agreementto secure public infrastructureand including recommendations relative to grading, utilities, easements, right-of-ways, ponding, streets and public infrastructure requirements as recommended by the Public Works Department; 2. Developer making payment to the City at the time of final plat for the following items: a. Storm Water"Trunk Area Charges" *at$2,960 per acre(1999 rate); b. 1999 Geographic Information System(GIS)fees at$50 per unit(1999 rate); and 3. Developer making payment to the City at the time of building permit application for the following items: a. Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Availability Charge (Metro SAC) at$1,050 per SAC unit*'(1999 rate); b. City Sanitary Sewer Access Charge (City SAC) at$1,375 per SAC unit(1999 rate); c. City Water Access Charge (City WAC) at$1,375 per SAC unit(1999 rate); d. Storm Water"Connection Charge" (STAC) at$735 per Single Family lot(1999 rate); e. Storm Water"Connection Charge" (STAC) at$525 per attached townhome unit(1999 rate). "The Trunk Area Charge calculation is based on gross area of developable property minus pond acreage at HWL. ''*The number of SAC units could be assumed to be the same as the number of units. The Metropolitan Council makes the final determination on the number of SAC units. The following is a review by the Public Works/Engineering Department of the Concept PUD received by the Public Works/Engineering Department on April 9, 1999. The public street & utilities will have to be done as a public improvement. The Developer can also petition for private streets to be done as a public improvement. Grading/Drainage Facilities/VUater Resources Site ponding and drainage will be reviewed closer during the preliminary platting process when a preliminary grading plan will be submitted. The Developer is incorporating ponding as noted in the City's SWMP into this Concept Plan. The Developer has delineated the wetlands on the property and City staff has reviewed the delineation and found it acceptable. The Developer'swetland map is accurate with the exception of two relatively small wetlands. These two wetlands are shown with a wetland category different than the City's wetland category. However, the buffers shown for the finro wetlands agrees with the City's wetland category. Kelley Property g:\....\kelyrl.wpd Page 1 of 2 Sanitary Sewer " Generally, the westerly two-thirds of the development wiil be serviced by extending sanitary sewers from Shannon Parkway,Danube Lane,Connemara Trail and Clover Lane. The easterly one-third will be serviced by extending the 27"trunk sanitary sewer that currently ends at the intersection of Connemara Traii and South Robert Trail (TH 3). The entire development will drain to the MCES Rosemount Waste Water Treatment Plant. Watermain Trunk watermains(12"and 16"diameters)will be looped through this property from watermains at Shannon Parkway, Danube Lane, Connemara Trail, Clover Lane and South Robert Trail (TH 3). The northwest part of the property will have to be looked at closer because of its high elevation so that sufficientwater pressures can be supplied to the area. Streets See attached memo from the Public Works Department. Walks �Trails See parks and planning comments. Easements 8� Right-of-Ways Private Utilities This area will be provided phone service by Frontier Communications,gas service by Peoples Natural Gas,and cable television by Marcus Cable. This area will be provided electrical power by Dakota Electric Association for areas north of Connemara Trail and by NSP for areas south of Connemara Trail. Construction The City has adopted a policy for the public construction of all future publicly owned facilities. The Developer has the choice of City financing or private financing of these improvements per the adopted policy. A petition can be obtained from the Public Works Department and submitted after preliminary plat approval. Fees 8 Assessments Kelley Property g:\....\kelyrl.wpd Page 2 of 2 MEMORANDUM To: Rick Pearson, Rosemount City Planner cc: Dan Rogness, Community Development Director Rosemount Planning Commission Scott Aker, Fire Chief From: George A. Lundy, Fire Marshall�" Date: April 6, 1999 Subject: Kelley Trust Property Over the past couple of weeks I have been reviewing the street alignment of the above mention project. During this time I have received comments from concerned citizens about how their streets will be affected. I have taken this information into consideration with the needs of the neighborhood and the Fire Department. It is my opnion that Clover Lane, and 131 St Street should remain as through streets. As Fire Marshal for City of Rosemount it is my responsibility to insure public safety, and part of that is to make sure that access is provided to all areas of the City. By having dead-ends or cul-de-sacs on these streets could delay Fire Department response times. Also, by having two ways to enter a fire scene provides a greater flexibility to the Incident Commander for placing fire equipment. I know that this will upset more than a few residents on these streets, however, in the best interest of the community,this is the right decision. If you would have any questions, or if you would like me to attend a Planning Commission meeting to explain my decision, please feel free to ask. �� C I TY O F RO S E M O U N T ROSEMOU AND A ENA��ENTER 13885 South Robert Trail -=�1 Rcsemount,MN 55068-3438 � �� .� �� PARKS £s RECREATION ti�a;�: 65�-3zz-6000 w�� "The Benefits Are Endless" Fax: 651-322•6080 r� ��.�'� TDD: 651-423•6219 Information Line:612-891-9�331 MEMO TO: Rick Pearson, City Planner FROM: Dan Schultz, Interim Parks and Recreation Director DATE: Apri122, 1999 RE: Kelley Trust Concept Plan Recommendations The Parks and Recreation Department staff recommends the Kelley Trust Property be pursued with regards to parkland and trails as follows: l. Develop Birger Pond area for a passive use Community Park (13 acres). 2. Land dedicated on the North edge of Shannon Park for expansion of current park or land for new a neighborhood park in the Northeast quadrant (4 acres). 3. Land dedicated for one main trail conidor (3 acres). 4. Remaining acreage payment would come as cash dedication (7 acres = cash dedication). Please note that the Parks and Recreation Committee has not yet met to discuss the updated concept plan, but will do so at the Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting on Monday, April 26, 1999. Prin;eC cn rx)'ded paper on�ai^;^�3U`b post-cc��mer marerials. MEMO CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA TO: Parks and Recreation Committee FROM: Dan Rogness, Community Development Director DATE: April 21, 1999 RE: Kelley Trust Property --- Parks and Open Space Issues A new revised Concept Plan has been submitted by the developer, which is currently under review by the Planning Commission. The plan is summarized as follows: Land Use Category Acres Percent Units Percent Net Density --------------------------------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- ---------------- Single Family Houses 325 61% 840 73% 2.6 units/ac Multi-family Units 65 12% 310 27% 4.8 units/ac Park Pre-dedicated 20 4% Park to be Dedicated* 20 4% Private Open Space 100 19% -------- ---------- -------- ---------- ----------------- TOTAL (rounded) 530 100% 1150 100% 2.5 units/ac** (2.2 gross) *Note: The parkland to be dedicated is estimated below. ** Note: The total net density is based on 70 acres of non-buildable property. Additional land on the north side of Birger Pond = 13 acres Land for a new mini-park or land added to Shannon Park on the north side = 4 acres Land dedicated for one main trail corridor = 3 acres -------------- TOTAL ESTIMATED PARK DEDICATION = 20 acres The total park dedication requirement for the 525-acre development is as follows: (1,150 units) x (0.04 acres per unit) = 46 acres Shannon Park pre-dedicated with school project = 19 acres --------------- Balance required for new park dedication = 27 acres Estimated land added on Birger Pond site = 13 acres Estimated land for new mini-park or park addition = 4 acres Estimated land for public trail corridor = 3 acres -------------- Balance remaining for cash-in-lieu payment = 7 acres Cash payment is $25,000 x 7 acres = $175,000 Kelley Trust Property Park Issues Page 2 The questions that ultimately need to be answered by the Park and Recreation Committee include the following: • How much additional parkland should be dedicated around Birger Pond based on the proposed uses within that park area? (Note: the Comprehensive Park Plan identifies 23 total acres for a community park with approximately 10 acres already dedicated on the southeast side of the pond) • Should Shannon Park be expanded? (Note: the Comprehensive Park Plan identifies 23 total acres for a community park with approximately 19 acres already dedicated when the school was constructed) • Should a public (mini-) park be required within the northeastern portion of the property identified for 300 "traditional" single family homes? • Should Carrolls Woods be expanded with additional public property near the "triangle" site? (Note: the Comprehensive Plark Plan supports this, but a previous unsuccessful grant application has led to more emphasis given to the Birger Pond site) • Should a publicly owned park corridor be defined for one major trail connection from Carrolls Woods to Shannon Park to Diamond Path? (Note: the alternative is to have that tail be within private open space) � • ► � � �� ''�� ''� i'� I `�� _��µ� i,f"'j::.• '''r'�� `��`;, '°' _- ��..� �'�� µ� � ?� �., _ �_,� i�� i�'� �� , � ''y � 1 Creating Neighborhoods of hlerit Apri19,1998 Mr. William Droste,Chair,and Members of the Planning Commission City of Rosemount 2875 145`�St. W. Rosemount,MN 55068 RE: Kelley Trust Property PUD Concept Plan Dear Chairman Droste and Planning Commission Members, Contractor Property Developers Company is pleased to submit herewith our amended PUD Concept Plan for the Kelley Trust property.This plan is the result of an extensive amount of study and plannin;by our staff and a?roup of highly-respected design professionals.This design is responsive to the input and comment we have received from the public through a neighbors' meeting,the previous three Planning Commission meetings and from City planning staff.This Concept Plan is further reflective of the needs and realities inherent with the site.That is,our plan demonstrates the compatible juxtaposition of an overall housing density demanded by the property's value and designation as a true infill property with a sensitivity for the environmental features of the site.The following is a narrative description of our amended PUD Concept Plan with discussion of prominent features therein. We,of course,will be present at your meetin�of April 13'�to discuss any elements of the plan with you in detail. _l. Obiectives of the PUD Concept Plan The objectives of the plan are manifold.However,primary in our ob�ectrves is our goal to bring a series of very high quality and distinctive nei?hborhoods to the City of Rosemount,neighborhoods which offer the elements of both innovative and timeless land planning elements,quafity housing and a financial valuation which provides substantial long term tax generation benefits to the City of Rosemount. We expect that upon completion the total assessed valuation of the Kelley Trust property will be in the range of $325,000,000.Our goal and pledge of premium quality for the Kelley Trust site will be founded on these principles:quality of housing through highly recognized quality home designers and builders, the creation of an open space network which preserves environmental features normally lost in conventional platting and the implementation of a cohesive community design which connects and relates to its own neighborhoods,to the historic downtown and to adjacent nei�hborhoods and public facilities.In summary,we are offering a plan which artfully mixes densities,saves natural features,respects adjacent development and which will generate a perpetual and significant taY revenue stream for the City of Rosemount. 2. Maior Revisions From Februarv PUD Concept Plan As noted above,our planners and we have made numerous ad�ustments in the February plan.A brief synopsis of our adjustments follows. *Reduced density,increased lot sizes and increased spacing/buffer setbacks to existing homes North of Kelley from Diamond Path to East of Shannon. *Deleted the 133`d Street connection to Shannon. *Removed townhomes from Northerly perimeter of Shannon Park School. *Eliminated the home owner's association-owned"community center". *By addin'single family detached lots,and eliminating townhomes,reduced the ration of to�vnhomes to total housing from above 33%to less than 27%. *Adjusted major road alignment to avoid the Class 1 wetlands Northeast of the school. *Increased trail penetrations opportunities toward the South to strengthen ties to historic Rosemount. *Eliminated housing directly fronting on Dodd Road and added cul-de-sac on Dodd South of 1;3`a CPDC Corporate 0�cest� The Quadrant Building - 7100 Northland Circle - Suite 108 - Minneapolis, MN 55428 phone: (612)971-0477 - fax: (612)971-0576 - email: cpdcG�schererbros.com 3.Revised Concent Plan Comuonents.As mentioned above,we have increased the scope and range of s�ngle family detached housing and decreased the number of townhomes.This has been accomplished in part by integrating a strong Traditional Housing component into the Easterly portion of the site lying Northerly of proposed Connemara Trail and by substituting a traditional-oriented Lifestyle (maintenance free)detached single family homes for townhomes South of Connemara.'The following is a summary of proposed housing styles and types included in the revised plan.A narrative description of each also follows. Multi-familv Attached Tvnical Width Number in Plan 1.)Distmctive Twmhomes (p° 48 2). Village Townhomes 28°_;�� 82 3.)Coach Townhomes 24°_32� 80 4.)Senior Housin� N A 100 Totals 310 Sinele Familv Detached Lots Twical Width Number in Plan 1).Estate 95'-125' 89 2).Classic Suburban 80'-90' 232 3).Classic Custom Graded 80'-90' 23 4).Traditional 6p>_g�� 29� 5).Cottage Home Cluster 75' 166 6).Lifestvle Villa Maintenance Free �5' 36 Totals 843 Grand Totals 1153 As we have discussed at a prior Plannin�Commission meeting and in some of our past correspondence, we have stated our strong belief that the Kelley property should not be planned by the assignment of an artificial and arbitrary unit count. It is our opinion that the Kelley PUD Concept Plan,as revised incorporates the proposed unit count in a realistic,sensitive and feasible manner. We encourage the Commission s review of this amended concept plan from a perspective�r•hich eliminates unit count as the primary parameter. 4. Housin�/Homesite Descriations Sinele Familv Detached Estate Homes. These homesites remain the largest in the concept plan and are generally located from east of Shannon to Diamond Path along the northerly perimeter of the site.Lot sizes range to in excess of one acre with a general density of one per acre. The Estate Homes�i•ill provide the requested transition by both overall size and their home setback distances from the acrea�e homesteads north of the property and the balance of the Kelley property.All housin�constructed on the Estate Lots will be custom designs in both one and two story styles by a select group of custom home builders.Estate Home prices will range from approximately$350,000 to$700,000=. Classic Suburban.These homesites are configured in the more typical suburban patterns common in the area. Their larger sizes will allow for a housing price ran�e of$250,000 to$350,000+.Classic Homes will be constructed by a number of selected builders,each in their o�vn designated Classic sub- neighborhood,with each home bein�essentially custom in nature and featuring one and two story designs. Ctassic Custom Graded.These Classic homesites are similar to the above Classic description.Their distinction is that their location is in the proximity of natural features which require that the homes be sited and custom graded on a one at a time basis by the builder to ensure maximum sensitivity to the surrounding features. Traditional.The Traditional homesites are situated in a wide range of sub-neighborhoods in the easterly portion of the property which offer the amenities,design and features that harken back to the timeless neiahborhood desijns of the 19'�to early 20`"centuries.That is,homes are oriented more toward the street with less emphasis on the garage as a prominent architectural feature.Amenities are brought to the street side of the homes. For example,back yard trails become boulevard sidewalks and streetscapes focus on squares and other gathering places.Lot widths are typically narrower than the Classic Suburban lots to allow for floor plans which more orient from front to back.Homes are typically two storied with full basements.Prices are expected to ran�e from the low$200's to the mid $3 00's. Lifestyle Villas.The villas are a housing product designed for empty nesters who desire a lifestyle in ' which a home owners association provides the exterior and lawn maintenance for a single family detached home.The Lifestyle homes are typically one story with full basements.Prices will ranoe from the low$200's to the$300's. b Cottage Home Clusters.These typically two story homes are oriented in clusters of four detached homes on a shared private driveway.All exterior maintenance is through a homeowners association.The expected price range is from the$180's to the mid$200's. Multi-familv Attached Distinctive Townhomes. These attached twin townhomes are typically one level with full walkout basements and designed for empty nesters.Their locations near Birger Pond reflect their value and size as the premier luxury townhome in the Rosemount area.The builder will essentially customize each home to meet the buyer's needs.Their price range is expected to run from$250,000 to$375,000. Village Townhomes. These homes will be costructed in a"row"style of two,three and four unit buildings. Wherever topography allows,Village townhomes will have full basements.Each home will have a rivo stall attached garage.The homes are typically rivo storied and designed for empty nesters and singles.The anticipated price range is from the$150's to$225,000. Coach Homes. These homes will likely be the most moderately priced homes in the plan.Their style and design is typically two stories in a back-to-back configuration in four,six,and eight home buildings. The traditional buyer profile is single professionals,young married couples,and younger seniors. The anticipated price range is$125,000 to$150,000. Senior Housing. As a component of our goal of creating the widest range of housing,we have reserved a site for senior housing along the southern perimeter of the property.These homes would likely be rental .At this point in time,we have not determined a design or style of the homes,nor has a rent range been determined. 5.Summarv.Contractor Property Developers Company has made its goal to bring a community of the hi?hest possible quality with a broad demographic appeal to the City of Rosemount: We believe our concept plan is responsive to both the site's natural features and to much of the public comment received over the past months. We believe in this plan, its quality and its deserved density. We encourage your support for the plan as a vehicle to bring thoughtful and sensitive site planning to the Kelley property and the City of Rosemount. We are prepared to meet and discuss the plan with you on an individual basis, if requested,and look forward to presenting the plan in detail to the Commission on the 13`h.Thank you for the courtesies shown us in the past and for your positive consideration of this plan. _ / � J s W nston ��' resident Cc:City Staff KELLEY TRUST DEVELOPMENT List of Corres�ondence • Letter from Donna Bergsgaard • Petition dated February 20, 1999, from Rosemount Hills 3`d Addition concerning extension of 1315`St. W. . • Letter from Martin&Jeanne VonOrsow, dated February 23, 1999 • Letter from Harry Wilcox, dated March 3, 1999 • Letter from Lea&Jeni Bottem, dated March 9, 1999 • Letter from Steve Hurderle, dated March 23, 1999 • Petition from residents on Clover Lane & Cobbler Ave. objecting to connection of Clover Lane to Connemaza Trail • Letter from Dennis&Nancy Randall listing birds and mammals inhabiting area • Letter from Janet Rohlf Larson, dated March 23, 1999 • Memorandum from George Lundy,Fire Marshal,dated Apri16, 1999 recommending extensions of Clover Lane and 1315L St. W. • Lora Lee Pedersen-Thusholt, dated Apri18, 1999 • James W. Johnston, dated Apri19, 1998 • Shannon Oaks Residents, dated Apri126, 1999 • Melissa Marcotte, dated Apri126, 1999 • Martin&Jeanne Van Orsow, dated Apri127, 1999 • Dennis &Nancy Randall N�.mhPr of Residents Commenti�g at Public Hearings February 23, 1999—9 March 9, 1999 - 8 March 23, 1999 -4 April 13, 1999 - 8 Apri127, 1999 -4 e ' � � � P1311I11II$COIriri11SS10II . 2875 145th St.West Rosemount,MN 55068 � '� Re: Kelley Trust Development � • - � . Dear Planning Commission: . � I am unable to attend the meeting on Tuesday,February 23 but I appreciate the � opportunity to submit written comments on the proposed development. . The Kelley land seems to be shrouded in mystery. When my husband and I purchased our property on Shannon Parkway in 1992,my husband talked to the city planners. They � assured him that the Kelley land would not be developed for a very long time,if at all. During the last few weeks, several other landowners have told me that they were told the same thing by the city. Others were told that the Kelley family lived on the land. This �- week, a landowner said that the city told her that townhouses and apartments would not be built on the Kelley land. I was quite amazed to learn that the Kelley land was purchased in 1986 expressly for development purposes. I am hearing that it was zoned for urban residential. If this is the case;the city or the Kelley Trust misled the people who inquired about this land in order to encourage development. This misrepresentation,whether intendonal or unintentional,is very d.isturbinB• Certainly,north Shannon Parkway would not have been developed as it was if the ownership and plans of the Ke�ley Trust were fully lrnown. : The city should have had l�owledge(unless it was misled by the trust)of the Kelley development when it paved Shannon Pazkway in 1990. However,the road was designed as a beautiful winding countrY road designed for very light traffia This reinforced the notion that the rural area would be preserved. The citY(or Kelley Trust)should have been forthcoming to potential huyers. - The Kelley Trust was irresPons�'ble in purchasing a haphazard area of land and waiting until the land prices are at their highest before coming forward with their plans.TheY should have been worlQng with the city from the time of the purchase to ensure that the infrastructure would be in place when they wanted to develop. The landowners � � � surrouncii.ng the land are responsible for creating the community that the Kelley devetopment will now benefit from. However, these very same landowners will pay a very high price. Our home values will decrease,the wildlife will disappear,the traffic will increase and the safety of our neighborhood w�l disappeaz'•The schools are at capacity which can only mean additional schools and redistricting• This is very hard on children. � We did not choose this,we were misled.While the Kelley Trust may not have had a legal obligation tell a.nyone their development plans,they l�ow that their strategy to make money in this way affects families and the quality of life for those fam�ies.It is not easy to pack up a family and relocate• The Kelley Trust has a moral and human responsi'bility to . develop the land with the least amount of impact to the surrounding neighborhood and environment. � I think the only fair resolution at this point is for the Kelley land to bear the infrastruc�ture to support the development.At least their clients w�l be fully aware of the traffic patterns • before they purchase the lots. It is not acceptable for the developers to create wonderfiil, private low traffic roads exclusively for their clients while send.inS all of the traffic to the . surraunding landowners. �t is not acceptable for the developers to say`�ve have to use the roads that the city built" The Kelley Trust certainly knew of their money making strategy when they bought the rather odd piece of land. They needed to work with the citY to build the infrastructure•Because they neglected to do so,it is only fau'to have the developers creaxe new roads that will bear the increased traffic.In addibe ownhome north of o be carefully considered along with road access. There canno Shannon Park School. It is not acceptable for the developers to put offthe question of � traffic and density until the concept is approved. At that point, it is too Iate. . . I urge the Planning Commission to get straight and detailed answers before approving the project. These facts must be fully disclosed to the landowners prior to approval. Thank you. � Sincerely, . Donna Bergsgaard 12620 Shannon Pkwy. � Rosemount,Iv�nn• 55068 � � ` � . � � �n , iq4q �. . . � . , To the Rosemount Planning Commission and City Council: � � We the ople of Rosemount Hills 3"�addition oppose the extension of l 31 Y` street west Pe � into the new development on the Kelley Trust Property. 131�`street is less than'�=mile long with no curbs or gutters.The access to 131'`street is o ff Dodd Trail,a north-south gravel road. 131� runs west and dea d t be cut down. large oak treessTo exten d t he s s�to�be an access route into the new development is of no . Extending 131 150-250 ft. we benefit to us in Rosemount Hills n F be17`h,held byethe Cont ac or1Property Developers ; At the neighborhaod meeting o �,; Company,at the Rosemount Community Center,the development team made it very � �r, art of their development plan, and � clear several times this access was NOT needed as p �, � it's strictly up to the City of Rosemount if 1315`street is extended or not extended. ' � y., With this petirion signed by the residences of Rosemount Hills 3`�Addition,�ve are y�`� kin the Rosemount Planning Commission and the City Council NOT to e�ctend 131 S` � ti � � g .�;�� street into the Kelley Trust Property. . �j - NAME . ADDRESS 3 � 5 T�, �1�3 - 5�755 �� 3 �� . V iLi�� )D'y�L Y i i I, � ,��,, 7s `.�/ 3��T• t� 322 ! 3�� .0 ��`"�'-� � � 3� �. � K � � � �� 3 �a �/ 2 - ��Q96 c�4��sia,z �L�4y 2 , . , � � �' ' %��'� � � ` �' 31 s' �in�l� 1�� 3 So97- , 3 3Gd � � ��,. �j/,u;,�� l�� S � `L�'Z �- ,••� • ,, � �.. 131 _ 3� � � `. t� , z...• �- - i s � � 1 ��~ y l_ �(1 � --�" � �i t �� ' � ' 6< � � �,�t,,c%� 3 U � Z 3 —�l �f . -� �;,r� `' .�,,,-,--- 3 o Zs �3� S 5� - � � � � � j 3 � 5�" �fz � S3 � � ' /w� _ � 3 C,��, � � � � � �� ,�� 3��. ��f� �: i�� '� .� �� a�6� ?'kK�Lr��d . ��'3-3 s03 �, /2�i� C'1r��Lc-�o�, �'� 4�z3-372./ / __ . , �- - .y, �- �: . .; \ ' � �� 2ESS .. _ �IAMk � � A . - 3/3�-�3�,�-% w3 � �`. � -�- - 31� .5�- � ��l'k°�-� r- . . V �� . �� 3� ( . . . � - � _ �o�o - «� -st `�' . . . . ;� lU�� 7f't,/JG� 2�% �t � � . �/ �t r�J��"�'� - .-�1��, . �)�'(:f'. `I�YL . � � 3 I c� _? � �5� ,L. �,�-�.-j �,�` - ! .� 5�� _ :� — s7. �ti �.,�,,,_;� z1 ti SS , . f � ._3�5 0 1 �-I ( ' ��' � .�� ;�-(�, 3Z�� f 3 �s�— cv . �' +�� .-� so6 S � 3�� . 5 �a� � � ,� . �� a�o� ) .. I�3�S �!' w� � 'L U� // 1 3�� ./^- 5 _ .f `��G��',��J �' `�►�`S�a..�� („1�C 1�''t'f.�CJ�-�"' � �_( l � ^' W�� , t 3� �� S rJ S.S Q ��`._•1> >C, __ !�g a ��/�9�'CS�4� l�yt S � ` - (,tJ � �5„a`- �SCi4 f3o£s � � � � ��`L".' ��-�' � ��- -sS�g . - 130��1 � �r CL�'. 4G I�'��.t.Qc-�' . �1,�'� ��`� �, . ; �. � � . c��•-�� :; � ,�� , �.\ �� •t`,` �` v,�.. \�� ) G•=;/ G .)f�s� �� /. i�. � � ,J l �� V - � �,_ i s �.�,.n.,��:.. � �' `� �-� ` ,�S{� � �2j Gi'( 5�� ,� Z C ��c V � � f r � 3 . `� ss , � `� � � a0l- l 31 s� �T W' �� n��n �� . _ � �'�� _ �� o.�..�� Z3 �S 31 Z. 1305� ��' `� v�� - <w�` s.�t� , -r o E � 2`iY� C�4%� S1� CT Ra 4 ( M N S �e E � �EN ce ��,c./�i�,zc� 1 �30�� c.��'o� w�j �a��►a��r,. titf> J�a` � U,l,u, _ M' ss �- . , �, f�o�� .�`-�� . 4 0 - . �, � 4 � ��,� °�'o� MINNESOTA FRIESIANS, INC. � FHANA Registered Fries�an Carriage and Dr�e Horses � � -�� Martin&Jeanne Yan Orsow �" �� .� 12861 Shannon ParkwaY,Rosemount,MN 55068,U.SA j��E S� Phone 612-322-44�42-Fax 612-322-1764 �crr�.c. 0�3, 1999 � . `p��- �� (�v�•�ci/ �e� �Prs - . I '��: �c �l�J �as7 ��'✓2.�op �'1 evJ� . / / . (�� G�r2 t.J r��%v, �h s'1 p P° �r 7" O f -�� e 1 . . re o S'o.X T� I AC e GL O�G — �/ f'.��r'� G+n-c)� I O Y"� t^�'"1 O►'� - PP P /, / ' �e�c,�.� � e�- 0'� � Ke.�( �c..r� ��p�r��/ � � / / WC l�ve � t7e��( �a�'' �� /ac.� .' � C�v��iss��►� lMce �'ti a�o� � �te��op ers � �+ �Oar� / � Gv�ee Ti 1,� _ �--�- iJ o� G+r►�e-�i k �' YXIG L.1 GYe, �'�►"(.�c �I /, � � Gwt O� � 7�e �eve lo eF� ra o s'a.� � �� P � , �eir- (,t�i �� Q�+Swer, S'Trai f� -��prl�A� l� � � I . p{i�'�c � � InPs'��ovt.s� ]v, av� etlasi ✓2. Gt.�,.c�l F-,a�,;� �� (./ ' l �o�S�n�o� , �e � �s� ��e � �7`� �a�ce !�w �Ps � p� -�►e, 1 S's c� s. Gto�c�r e-r'1'c�_ � (,��. -{=ee! �"�°� ��►s � s . 4�-tev►s��e. � . Ci�i Z e�► 4-� �vse r�ot�vv� . �e. a re li.o-t cz'.�-#� - C�e u�� t,•�,c►�.�- er S'2. lo wT" G,�rs G� �.-f' � �° e r .�- - � �o v�cl �..c�e.� 1� Gt Y'cs aHs� �O/e Ce�^^'�^k'^ ; � � - P �n�a vtc t t� -�s�i o �1. • � S'ee 4� C�e,tc��t w��,t� l�1��. � ___ .. .___�_,►....._.�.,n,;.,:,,,�c„�;o+.�ra,-�;aeP Ac�aation of America � `^ . � � ` . � °�so � MINNESOTA FRIESIANS, INC. �� t � � t � FHANA Registered Friesian Carria$e and Dressage Horses ,� �� --' Martin dz Jeanne Van Orsow _ ti� 12861 Shannon Parkway,Rosemount,MN 55068,U.SA j�N E S� Phone 612-322-4442 Fax 612-322 1764 ' � � -�'�.2, oI e v c�!0 w�e�.►�t l'. i a � o`� ; �,ti � ��4 s�� a r � . � n - (� �,e e-�-�'cc,� o� ��e rc�.ro�-l' ��s�cr�e w�r'aQ S w►� - —�O l�v1 CM� 1'�c�f'�.�^ Ot I�S� bv�p in vti,� . a/ t �a� ovt ��a -t'�,�C G� [7 @ r 1�f' 4-� !�./�s7'% � t-a a�L►s as � ��c �c c��e G�o,-�-�-G� � S o�.�,, � �o �►.� � �� it t.,)a J' C.�i�'Li 0. � ' � � as/v ��,cr�se i� �0 SC.Vs�O G�� u t.v( c�'f Q 1� C� ��U'0 �W'G.�a�CQ� . ) � � � 3/ r �� 4-�' ro c,,��L, �p,,� -�,e, Sc�.o o�s c��..o'� -�� n � � � (jVC�'O�t -f-� i..a�,. Cr��/ � AG� p� �"�iR. �� / � � �(��Si �i�e -�iP1C eUe (0p L+�evi� • / � . n e �J h e ec�s � �. ��Q �e �O r�, ra ceec�i �, � ��,.r-�+e r �OS�t�►�v t�w!'- !S 0. f.�ti i ` tn e l.ovh w► a K�� , f, + � � �I L�cj-� Qv�o-Y��r S'�-b �.f�a v� �e CarV�� pc�" O; Go rv��'e.�c.�S� . �i � fC a r�o . i � � !�� 2 .Q�l/�v+-st- V Q/'" � i� , - - — . . _.. . . .,------ �-----�_..,.cer„e.;ra � i o:Sue Waisn(0�1�123�203) �rom: 1 oic /oG /�2� or�� uo.co.o�a r�5= . _ s To: Sue Walsh From: Harry Wiilcox NEI City of Rosemount NEI Fax: 651-4235203 Fax:612-782-7329 . Number of pages {including coversheet): 3 Date: 3/4/99 8:2� Mayor Buscho and Rosemount City Council. I am respectfully requesting thal attached letter be put on the agenda for your next council meeting. I want to h: this letter as a matter of record and recorded in the councii minutes. Thanks you for your help with this matter CC To; Rosemount Planning Commission Rosemount Port Authority � . 1 O.JUc'V�Vai�i��OJ14LJ�GVJ) i fJn�. � U�G IJG�JLJ J��JJ �+0.L7.LUa rcyc c ui,i • 3/3/99 The citizens and taxpayers of Rosemount should be concemed about the Special Meating held Feb. 23, 7999. The purpose of the meeting was for a partial moratorium on the Kelly Trust properiy. Tha conccrns are as foliows; 1. Councii mem6er Kavin Carroll questioned tf�e need for a special maeting duo to tha faot that it affected the poople of Roserr�ount and should be noticed, to give tt�a eitizens of Rosemount a chanoe to attend. 2. Council memberJohn Edwards openly criticized Kevin for his concern. Due to tha fact that John wanted to cotnplete the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The fact is that either tha City or tho doveloper could request an extension to the Comp Guide Plan and the Met Couneii would have granted it, without penalizing the City. The question that begs to ba answared is. Why was John in such a hurry to have tha tnoratorium? Another and just as important question needs to answered is why Sheila Klassen, current Planning Commission and former council rnars�ber wants to hold the development to 250 to 300 Homes which she said the eleeted officiais wanted. This brings into question Couneil member Dennis Wipperman's position on the issue. Dennis wants to keep the Kelly trust an open area and not be developed. Shefla and Dennis have held these positions for at least 5 years. When 1 servad on the council with them and wo wero finishing up the Comp Guide Plan in 1993, they both took the same position. 1 tried to change their minds to no avail. The question that needs to be asked is their position due to the faet that Dennis's development abuts tha Kelly Trust on the north end and Sheila lives in the same generai area,just north of Co Rd 38? What is rnore disturbing about the whole situation is that Dennis oame on tho eouncil in 1988.Wehad the flood of tt�e eentury in 4987 and the pond along Diamond Patt� Road north of 140`d St had flooded out the area and part of the Apple Valley side to the north. . . In 1988 the Council started Hawkins Pond and attempted to assess property owners to the south, who did not benefit frotn tha projecti 1 tried in vain to reason with him and the council to no avail. Their actions resultod 1n a lawsuit against the city filed by tho residonts affeoted. It eost the City in exoess of $100,000.00 to fight it and thay losti When 1 took office in 1990 thare was stifl a problam with the Country Hiils Addition's holding pond not handling the water. In 1991 or 1992 we agreed to pipe the water to tha north into Berger Pond (Kelly Trust) property.At that •T,o:Sue Walsh(651423�203) From:1 612 782 7329 3�4�53 �o:3u:34a raga�or� time the water in the pond took up approxirr�ately �1 Acres. 1 also at that time wanted to pursue talks with tho City of Apple Valley to take the water from Burger Pond to the Vermillon River. 1 could not get any support from the council. Today the amount of water that Rosemount has diverted into tha Burger Pond has increased ti�e pond to 33 acros. This action amounts to an illegal taking of the Ketiy Trust Land. The Kelly Trust is willing to work with the eity on this matter if the eity will allow them to davelop their land in a eost-effective tnanner. The question that needs to be answered by the eouncil is this: Are they going to work with the Kelly Trust in a prudent manner? Or are tf�ey going to continue doing their own thing and gat the eity into a legal battle that can be avoided? � Every member of tha presant Council and Sheila are aware of the Hawkins Pond Lawsuit and what the Judge told the City in ruting for the eitizens. For your information the Citizans Committee raised 510,000-12,000 for the lawsuit and we won. Tha Kelly Trust does not have a money problem such as we had and their racourses are for the most part unlitt�ited. Therefore tha Citizens and Taxpayers of Rosemount stand to lose a lot, if this nonsense does not qui� 1 am presenting a copy of this letter to be read at the next Council Meeting and recorded in the rr�inutes for futura reference. 1 sincerely hope that each and every one of you that reads this letter tells a neighbor and then calls each and evary eouneil member. Respectfully Yours . � � � Harry R. 1MIIcox Rosemount MN March 9, 1999 To: Rosemount Planning Commission From: Lea and Jeni Bottem 13890 Shannon Pkwy 423-5764 Re: Kelly Trust Development ' This letter represents a consensual opinion of a lazge group of residents living in a family neighborhood directly affected by the proposed Kelly trust development. We would like to strongly express our opposition to any plan that would extend Connemaza Trail as a four-lane "collector"street. We feel that this plan would cause an intolerable increase in the amount of traf�ic to a road that runs directly throu�a family neighborhood. The most crucial issue is the safety of our children. Our children's safety would be jeopazdized just trying to cross Connemara to go to a friend's house or to Connemara park. Connemara is already in dire need of stop si�ns, which have been denied by city officials,and by increasing the amount of traffic would increase the inherent danger to our children. We do not believe that any road is important enough to compromise the well-being of our most precious possessions. Another issue is the speed limit of Connemara Trail. The current speed limit is 35 mph, although it is much more common for cars to go at least 45 mph instead of the posted speed limit. We feel that even by keeping the speed limit at 35mph(we definitely would oppose anything highet),ttus is not enough to ensure cazs will travel at a safe speed. A long stretch of road(especially if it is four lanes)without any stop signs to slow the speed of traffic will only encourage speeding through a family neighborhood. We need to stress the fact that this neighborhood is a family neighborhood with a very large number of children. It should also be pointed out that the plans for the new development call for a tunnel undemeath Connemaza be built to ensure the safety of the children in the new development. This proves that there is consensus among all involved that Connemara will be a potentially dangerous road. Please do not forget that our children are just as important and deserve considerarion for their safety also. A tivrd issue is the fact that many homes along Connemara are not set back like they are along County Road 42 and McAndrews. The extension of Connemara to Hwy.3 would run an extremely busy road through our backyazds and cause an increase in noise levels and a decline in property values. We would like to propose that the Connemara extension be a two-lane pazkway with stop signs. A tree-lined median would give it aesthetic value and help it appear that you aze traveling faster than you are. We would also like a speed limit of 30 mph which is a safe speed in our opinion. ff the limit is higher,than people will drive even faster than the posted speed. Stop signs posted at various points will keep the speed of cars from accelerating ai an . unreasonable rate. This development is only in the beginninS stages. If changes are needed,they can easily be accommodated now,instead of trying to change somethi.ng after it is completed. Please realize that we aze acrive members of this communitY and concerned citizens who would like to see the development of Rosemount be as beneficial and non-inhusive to everyone involved. We value our families and the community in which we live and feel we have the right to preserve our quality of life. Sincerely, Lea and Jeni Bottem . 3-23-99 _ � City Council Members City of Rosemount 2875- I45� W. Rosemount, Mn. 55068 Dear City of Rosemount Planning Committee: My name is Steve Huderle and I live at 13895 Shannon Parkway, which is on the comer of Shannon Parkway and Connemara Trail. I'am writing this letter because I'am very concemed for my family and neighbors about the proposed new extension of Connemara Trail. I have lived at my present home for 3 years and . I have seen the major firaffic problems on both Shannon Parkway and Connemara. I have spoke many times to Bud Osmundson, � Rick Pearson, Kathy Busho, and the Rosemount Police Department about the road design of both of these roads and what can be done � to help residents in this area. I have got no cooperation from any city officals on solutions to the questions I have asked. The design and layout of these roads are a joke and nobody on the City Council seems to be coricerned about the high volume traffic and speeding that takes place on these roads daily. There are many � small children in our neighborhood along Shannon Parkway and that use Connemara Trail to get to the park. Now with the proposed development of the Kelly Trust Property that is leading to the extension of Connemara Trail, My question to the � Committee is: What are you going to do for the exsisting residents of this area, that is goi.ng to see triple the amount of traffic on roads that are akeady freeways to begin with? I fear for not only the children in the area, but also the adults. I feel that you as a Council should be considering these .issues that the residents of this area � have. I believe that the speed limits of both Shannon Parkway and Connerriara Trial should be reduced from 35 m.p.h. to 30 m.p.h. My house sits 30 feet from both streets and it is very annoying when cars are going by non-stop at 45-50 m.p.h. This obviously would change dramatically for the worse with Connemara � extending to Highway 3. � I have listened to the development company make the pitch at meetings in January and February about the Kelly Trust � Property. I was very stern about my concerns as were numerous neighbors of mine. At the last meeting on Maxch 9� , I was somewhat encouraged to see that Mr. Eralet had taken the feedback he had gotten from us at the previous � meetings and had several prposals on how to make Connemara a more user friendly street. The City Council members should take note of this type of response to resident concerns. Mr. Eralet proposed making Conemara more � appealing with additional trees, bushes, plants, etc. He also � proposed making the street more user friendly with adding an additional sidewalk. At present Conemara and Shannon Parkway only have one sidewalk on each side. There abain is an example of terrible road design by the city of Rosemount. How you can have streets of this nature and not have sidewalks on both sides of the street is absolutely ridiculous. In closing, I want to state I'am against the extension of Conemara to Highway 3. But if the road does go through, I believe as a current homeowner livi.ng in this area and a family that will be greatly effected by the new development, we should be entitled to some concessions ( I.E.: Privacy Fence, Sidewalks, Trees, Bushes, etc.) from the city and the developer. I would greatly appreciate a response from the City Council on this matter. My phone number is (651) 322-5862. � Sincerely, Steve Huderle Chairman of the Planning Commission � City of Rosemount �� City Hall �� 2875 145�'Street W. , �" Rosemount _ � N1N 55068 Re :Kelley Trust PUD Application Deaz Sir, The undersigned are owners of residential properties on Clover Lane and Cobbler Avenue, Rosemount, and wish to register objection to the current development proposal that will link Clover Lane to the extended Connemara Trail throughway. Clover Lane is currently a "dead end" road and, while evidenfly planned to become a through road at some future date, the extension of the road appears to serve no purpose other than to potentially divert existing tr�c loads within the Shannon Hills development away from Shannon Parkway (the e�sting feeder road) to give tr�c the potential of a shorter route to the extended Connemara Trail feeder road through an existing residential azea and thence to Highway#3. The below listed residents petition the City of Rosemount to confirm the current status of Clover Lane as being a "Dead End" and to carry out the minor works required to complete road and curb works formalizing Clover Lane as cul-de-sac on the basis of the following : . 1) At the Public Hearing meeting 3/9/99,the Developers' representative stated that the through linkage of Clover Lane to Connemara Trail was not a requirement of their concept plan but more an expectation of a City requirement to complete a planned linkage. 2) The properties on Clover Lane are home to several pre-school and elementary school children who have grown up in an environment free of through tr�a While as pazents we strive to educate children as to the dangers of traff c, we fear that the relative absence of through traffic may have caused a lowering of awazeness in our children and that accidents may occur in consequence of increased and faster traffia 3) The City and the potential developers of the property have stated a desue to maintain the current topographical features of the land. An inevitable consequence of the extension of Clover Lane will be a requirement to make significant landfilUembankments to achieve completion of the road to its current line and level. That construction need destroys the natural lie of the land, significantly interferes with natural drainage to an adjacent pond, interferes with the landscaping of the most adjacent properties, and renders the down slope side (west) of the road as very difficult to develop without cleaz overlook of existing residences. . ° . ` . 4) There appear to be no overridi.ng factors in respect of emergency service vehicle routing as a consequence of not making Clover Lane a throughway. While such a route may be marginally shorter in distance from existing emergency stations to the extreme south east of the planned development,it would in fact require slower speeds and more positive road turns than required by following Shannon Pazkway and Connemara Trail. 5) The Public Hearing meetings have indicated a perception that existing property values might be adversely affected in the particular location of Clover Lane due to the planned adjacent townhome development. Such perceptions would potentially be eased by not havi.ng a positive linkage between the two different development types and characteristics. We trust that our objections, concems and suggestions will be given due consideration and merit under any approvals made in respect of the Kelley Trust development. Yours truly, � ' ed Printed Name Address � t �g C�.�.� i�v L�/ylc�rJ�i< D / ` �'�-f-- ��I ,-�1 >yoL ./ ' c�hc a��.�C�( � 1 �l v 3 4 L(n v�e�. �1L.J E.�JN i 5 /- e�� l 0.3 Cs}N� � � 1� � �� . ,� � �e f-E ��ers'e - � (�/d � �� 21s?�AiV�l1S��C •��lolo �-�rru.e, �� ..�, ,� ��a � ' � f�r� £r�l�'t'� _ (� �-`U�Z Cc7��.i.�L_ r�� 7 '�- s-�1 C � . � �, �..�' � ��..� �.�.—��t c �1�� `'�L�� r'c�`�!�`�� -�, � c� � Gv C �� ' �� ! 1��'r :13` ' , -t_ Signed Printed Name Address � �i�� 7 Cl��.� �uh e �� ' . �-�D�f� C_o ��=c-��v� , . . � ��f�c {e��ti 1� s ��tX-�✓ �`�O�C' C�bbte r �� . , ,' ` � • � �yoz /er Av , � I ��}ozz C,��ob l�' A� � , ��1. �, ;�-�j� �o�� : , ' �%� / �� , �. � ; .. ��.� ,� �'' c � �. C � � �k � _ -� �r�c�� I �007 Cv�P� �� 1� ll�.. �� `�6is ��. 'U.c�IJ w2.cX– �Mc:� �' c:s-44- << �`J��'— I ' � �,/ !f �y�T j -�3 �'`J,� , ��. .� , . ��r� � ��- �y o IS C lo�er L.r1 c;,.�, .,I �� tsc> I�o� i C��i��i�r' �---- ��4�n ��.1��;� t �-� i C� l��lz� � �i ' ��G�ti-� S�Gl�1 �. ! �'t�� 7� G�,E,j��/,%U�' t � , . . . + The following is a partial list of birds and mammals which inhabit the Kelly Trust Property and the sutrounding natural azeas. This list does not � include many of the other amphibians,reptiles,insects and plants native to this area. A lazge number of the aaimals which live here depend on the , variety of habitats (i.e.woodlands, grasslands,wetlands/ponds,brush � lands)and the ability to move between them to exist{i.e. for food,nesting, � � and cover). There aze also over a hundred other species of birds which use this area in migration to theu nesting sites farther north. 1. Ring-necked Pheasant 2. Mourning Dove 3. Great Homed Owl � 4. Common Nighthawk 5. Ruby Throated H»mmingbird 6. Northem Flicker 7. Red-bellied Woodpecker 8. Downy Woodpecker - 9. Hairy Woodpecker 10. Pileated Woodpecker 11. Least Flycatcher 12. White Breasted Nuthatch � 13. House Wren I4. Black-capped Chickadee ' 15. Blue-gray Gnatcatcher 16. Eastem Bluebird 17. Wood Thrush 18. Veery 19. Catbird 20. Brown Thrasher 21. Warbling Vireo 22. Red-eyed Vireo 23. Yellow Warbler 24. Rose-breasted Grosbeak 25. Cazdinal 26. American Robin 27. Loggerhead Shrike 28. Brown Thrasher 29. Cedar Waxwing 30. Black and White Warbler � 31. Ovenbird � 32. Common Yellowthroat 33. Redstart • 34. Indigo Bunting 35. Grasshopper Sparrow 36. Henslows Sparrow 37. Savannah Sparrow e � _ ' 38. Song Sparrow � 39.Field Sparrow 40. Chipping Sparrow 41. Clay colored Spazrow 42. Dark-eyed Junco 43. Swamp Sparrow . 44. Dickcissel 45. Eastem Meadowlark 46. Westem Meadowlark � 47. Red Winged Blackbird 48. Yellow-headed Blackbird 49. Brown-headed Cowbird 50. Brewers Blackbird � 51. Common Grackle 52. Baltimore Oriole � 53. Orchazd Oriole 54. Goldfinch � 55. Redpoll 56. House Finch 57. Bluejay 58. Tree Swallow 59. Eastern Phoebe 60. Easter Wood Pewee 61. Great Crested Flycatcher 62. Eastern Kingbird 63. Kingfisher 64. Chimney Swift 65. Eastem Screech Owl 66. Barred Owl 67. Long eared Owl 68. Mouming Dove 69. Coopers Hawk 70. Sharp-shinned Hawk 71. American Kestrel 72. Broad-winged Hawk 73.Northem Hamer . 74.Turkey Vulture 75. Common Snipe 76. American Woodcock , 77. Spotted Sandpiper � 78. Killdeer 79. American Coot � 80. Sora Rail 81.Mallard 82. Wood Duck 83. Blue-winged Teal . * 84.Ring-necked Duck 85. Lesser Scaup 86. Canada Goose 87. Great Blue Heron � 88. Great Egret 89. Green-backed Heron 90. Pied-billed Grebe 91. White tailed Deer 92.Red Fox 93. Coyote 94. Marmot (Woodchuck) 95. Grey Squirrel 96. Eastem Chipmunk 97. Jack Rabbit� 98. Thirteen-lined Ground Squirrel 99.Pocket Gopher 100. Mice 101.Voles 102. Eastern Cottontail 103. Moles 104. Muskrat 105. Yellow bellied Sapsucker 106. Red bellied Woodpecker . 107. Red headed Woodpecker 108. Ruffed Grouse Respectfully submitted by: Dennis and Nancy Randall and the other families of Clover Lane 14190 Cobbler Avenue Rosemount,MN 55068 � March 23, 1999 Mr.Tim Erkkila,Principal Planner � Westwood Professional Services,Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie,MN 55344 Dear Mr.Erkkila, I have a few concerns about the concept plan for the Kelly Trust property that I am addressing in this letter. I am a homeowner fiving within one-quarter mi7e ot the KeIIy'I'rust property and a member o�the Rosemount Parks and Recreation Commission. My concems relate to the part of the Kelly property closest to wh�re i iive as wet�as to tire gcvposc�parks arn�trai�s witiva the i{e}iy propzcty. I am pleased with the developets concerns to preserve the more environmentally sensitive and unique azeas on the property,and I hope that this progerty can be developed in a way that allows Rosemount's citizens to � still have visual and physical access to the wonderful features within the Kelly property. I am particularly urterested in the trail system throughout the Kelly property. As you l�ow,our park plan re�-entty adopted the caoacept of creating a regionat trait throug�h Rosem�unt st�ng afth�west�oa Diamond Path through the Kelly property east to the Mississippi River connecting Shannon Park Elementary School,Carroll's Woods,Schwartz Pond park,the hiah schoollmiddle school area,do�mtovm Rosemount and the U of M property. I personally hope that this trail can also connect to many natural and scenic features as well. Ideally this regional trail needs to be off-road and as far away from heavily traveled roads as possible. In the Kelly property,the trail needs to cotmect many of its wonderful natural features such as the wooded slopes,Birger Pond,the high point(the view is great-you can see seven water towers),and weftand azeas. It appears thai tlus is being addressed in the concept a7though it atso seems tbat it may in some areas become more of a sidewalk along the side of a busy road. This would definitely take �Y��xPP�- I am also concerned about the area bounding Carroll's Woods and Schwartz Pond Park I hope that a large buffer area in the Kelly property along this property line will allow for a smooth transition between natural and residential. Pm not sure that you have addressed this in your plan. The Carroll's Woods Master Plan completed in October 1991,recommends that two parcels of land within the ICe}ly pmp�cty�be acquired t�'expand the existing park. One par�el iucludes a fifteen-acre area north of the existing Carcoll's Woods property and south of the gas-line easement. The other seven-acre parcel is immediately west of the Schwartz Pond property. Ideally,it would be best ifthese pieces of•land could he acquired by pazk dedication. However,it is also important that land be set aside by Birger Pond for park dedication as well. If these parcels cannot become park properiy,the next best thing would be for as much of this land as possible remain as open space. The rolling hills adjacent to Carroll's WoodslSchwartz Pond Pazk and the prairie remnants growing along these hills need to remain to protect the integrity of two of our city's�inest par7cs. Another factor that may seriously harm the quality of Carroll's Woods and Schwartz Pond Park as well as my own neighborhood is the connection of Clover Lane to the proposed extension of Connemara Road. Should Clover Lane in Shannon Fiills subdivision connect to Connemara,the traffic in our subdivision and adjacent to the parks w�I increase dramaticalIy as peopie commuting via H`ighway 3 sbortcut tlirough our subdivision to Connemara. A bicycleJpedesirian trail connecting Clover to Connemara would be an e�cc�llent substitute fur a road. _ . I also strongly feel that a townhomelsenior citizen/community center development very near to the park's borders is not ideal. A better transition between the Shannon Hills single family residential subdivision and the natural area within Carroll's Woods and Schwartz Pond Park is single family residential type housing. Wouldn`t this type of dense development be more appropriate closer to Rosemount's existing high density areas along Highway 37 I am including with this letter an overlay thai I have made of the Kelly property that I feel ail�ws for the same proportion of townhonies to single family hocues as tlie existing Kelly plan but with more appropriate transitions. Please refer to it. Thank you for allowing me the opportunity to respond to the concept plan. Although I am sad to see the open space that we now see along Shannon Parkway and Diamond Pathway will soon be filling up with more development,I am also hopeful that the development will not seriously harm the beautiful natural features within the property. Sincerely, Janet Rohlf Larson � Cc: Planning Commissioq City of Rosemount MEMORA.NDUM � To: Rick Peazson,Rosemount City Planner . cc: Dan Rogness, Community Development Director Rosemount Planning Commission Scott Aker,Fire Chief From: George A. Lundy, Fire Marsha�a� Date: Apri16, 1999 Subject: Kelley Trust Properry Over the past couple of weeks I have been reviewing the street alignment of the above mention project. During this time I have received comments from concerned citizens about how their streets will be affected. I have taken this information into consideration with the needs of the neighborhood and the Fire Department. It is my opnion that Clover Lane, and 131�`Street should remain as through streets.As Fire Marshal for City of Rosemount it is my responsibility to insure public safety, and part of that is to make sure that access is provided to all azeas of the City.By having dead-ends or cul-de-sacs on these streets could delay Fire Department response times. Also,by having two ways to enter a fire scene provides a greater flexibility to the Incident Commander for placing fire equipment. I know that this will upset more than a few residents on these streets,however,in the best interest of the community,this is the right decision. If you would have any questions, or if you would like me to attend a Planning Commission meeting to explain my decision,please feel free to ask. Apri18, 1999 Planning Commission City of Rosemount Rosemount, Minnesota 55068 RE: Kelley Trust Development Greetings: I am writing to state concerns of the development and the effects on my property. Currently the plan is for Village Townhomes to be built on the southern border that connects Clover Lane to the new development. After talking to a family friend who is a realtor and whose husband has been a builder in the Apple Valley/Eagan area for over 20 years, I am concerned what townhomes built next to my properiy will do to the value of my home. From information from my friend, townhomes do have a negative effect on existing property values unless they are priced from $175,000 to $200,000 and up. She states that if they are not in the upper price range they often become someone's rental property. And that will have an effect on who lived in them and how the value is maintained. Those of us who border the southern end of the Kelley Trust property have home values equal to those on the northern end of the development and �vish to maintain that value. It seems that a lot of attention is being placed on maintaining values, land buffers, etc., on the northem boarders and I would like to see that same consideration to those who have property bordering the southern boundaries. The townhomes could be placed in a central area where those buying single family homes will know that they will be buying property next to townhomes. What Rosemount needs in terms of townhomes are homes that are high quality and value for those people who want to move from a , $250,000 home to a townhome after families aze grown, etc. This group of buyers will be interested in good quality and �vould be willing to pay the price for these homes (from $185,000 and up). This would also be a way to keep empty nesters in the Rosemount area. Another concern is the use of open space land around the clusters of �� homes. Will this be maintained as public properly, maintained by the city of Rosemount or will it become privately maintained so that it becomes private property more or less? At one time I heard about the property north of Planning Commission Apri18, 1999 Page Two Carroll's Woods becoming part of the park area because of the unique and rare prairie there. Is this still in the plan? It would seem that with the � higher density of homes being on the�southern end of the Kelly property that adding park land to the Carroll's Woods area rather than Birger Pond area where the lot areas are larger and there will be fewer homes is a wiser use of land. I would also be interested in seeing Clover Lane becoming a closed road so that the Shannon Hills development does not become a throughway for the new development. I want to thank you for all your consideration shown to the people who have concerns regarding this development. Sincerely, �� ,� ut�z..,_ L(c. Lora Lee Pedersen-Thusholt 14010 Clover Lane Rosemount, Minnesota 55068 ,\ ` � � ! � 1� �, M 'p 'r �� +. ._.� �':��;;t�:,� ", .,.. i��' �� e�. "�:��; � �� ; �� Creatina Nei;hborhoods of Merit Apri19,1998 � Mr.William Droste,Chair,and Members of the Planning Commission City of Rosemount 2875 145`�St.W. Rosemount,MN 55068 � RE:Kelley Ttust Property PUD Concept Plan Dear Chairman Droste and Planning Commission Members, Contractor Property Developers Company is pleased to submit herewith our amended PUD Concept Pian for the Kelley Trust property.This plan is the result of an extensive amount of study and plannin�by our staff and a group of highly-respected desi�n professionals.This design is responsive to the input and comment we have received from the public throu�h a neighbors'meeting,the previous three Planning Commission meetings and from City plannin�staff:This Concept Plan is further reflective of the needs and realities inherent with the site.That is,our plan demonstrates the compatible juxtaposition of an overall housina density demanded by the property's value and designation as a true infill property with a sensitivity for the environmental features of the site.The following is a narrative description of our amended PUD Concept Plan with discussion of prominent features therein. We,of course,will be present at your meeting of April 13`�to discuss any elements of the plan with you in detail. 1. Obiectives of the PUD Concent Plan The objectives of the plan are manifold.However,primary in our ob�ectives is our goal to brina a series of very high quality and distinctive neighborhoods to the City of Rosemount,neighborhoods which offer the elements of both innovative and timeless land planning elements,quality housina and a financial valuation which provides substantial long term tax generation � benefits to the City of Rosemount.We expect that upon completion the total assessed valuation of the � � Kelley Trust properry will be in the ran�e of $325,000,000.Our goal and pledge of premium quality for • � the Kelley Trust site will be founded on these principles:quality of housing through hishly recognized quality home designers and builders, the creation of an open space network which preserves . environmental features normally lost in conventional platting and the implementation of a cohesive • community design which connects and relates to its own neighborhoods,to the historic downtown and to � � adjacent neighborhoods and public facilities.In summary,we aze offerina a plan which artfully mixes densities,saves natural features,respects adjacent development and which will generate a perpetual and • sign ificant tax revenue stream for the Ciry of Rosemount. . _ 2. Maior Revisions From Februarv PUD Conceat Plan As noted above,our planners and we have �. made numerous adjustments in the February plan.A brief synopsis of our adjustments follows. � *Reduced densiry,increased lot sizes and increased spacing/buffer setbacks to existin�homes North of Kelley from Diamond Path to East of Shannon. *Deleted the 133rd Street connection to Shannon. *Removed townhomes from Northerly perimeter of Shannon Park School. . *Eliminated the home owner's associarion-owned"community center". *By adding single family detached lots.and elttninating townhomes,reduced the ration oftownhomes to total housing from above 33%to less than 27%. - *Adjusted major road alignment to avoid the Class 1 wetlands Northeast of the school. *Increased trail penetrations opportuniries toward the South to strengthen ties to historic Rosemount. *Eliminated housing directly fronting on Dodd Road and added cul-de-sac on Dodd South of 133rd CPDC Corporate O�icest' The Quadrant Building - 7100 Northland Circle- Suite 108 - Minneapolis, MN 55428 phone: (612)971-0477 -fax: (612)971-0576 - email: cpdcQschererbros.com 3.Revised Concent Plan Components.As mentioned above,we have increased the scope and range of smgle family detached housing and decreased the number of townhomes.This has been accomplished in part by integratina a strong Traditional Housing component into the Easterly portion of the site lying Northerly of proposed Connemara Trail and by substitutin�a traditional-oriented Lifestyle (maintenance free)detached single family homes for townhomes South of Connemara.The following is a summary of proposed housing sryles and types included in the revised plan.A narrative description of each also follows. � . Multi-familv Attached Tvnical Width Number in Plan � 1.)Distinctive Twmhomes (p' 48 2).Villaae Townhomes 2g�_32� g2 3.)Coach Townhomes 24�_32� gQ 4.)Senior Housin� N A 100 � Totals 310 Sinele_Familv Detached Lots Tvnical Width Number in Plan 1).Estate 95'-125' g9 2).Classic Suburban 80'-90' 232 � 3). Classic Custom Graded 80'-90' 23 4).Traditional 60'-85' 297 5).Cottaae Home Cluster 75' 166 6�. LifesNle Villa Maintenance Free 55' 36 Totals 843 Grand Totals 1153 As we have discussed at a prior Planning Commission meetin� and in some of our past correspondence, we have stated our stron�belief that the Kelley properly should not be planned by the assi�nment of an artificial and arbitrary unit count. It is our opinion that the Kelley PUD Concept Plan,as revised incorporates the proposed unit count in a realistic,sensitive and feasible manner. We encoura�e the Commission s review of this amended concept plan from a perspective which eliminates unit count as the primary parameter. - 4.Housine/Homesite Descrintions Sinele Familv Detached Estate Homes. These homesites remain the targest in the concept plan and are generally located from east of Shannon to Diamond Path alona the northerly perimeter of the site.Lot sizes range to in excess of one acre with a general densiry of one per acre.The Estate Homes will provide the requested transition .' • . by both overall size and their home setback distances from the acreage homesteads north of the • . property and the balance of the Kelley property.All housin�constructed on the Estate Lots will be ' custom designs in both one and two story sryles by a select group of custom home builders.Estate Home prices will range from approximately$350,000 to S700,000+. � Classic Suburban.These homesites are confi�ured in the more typical suburban patterns common in the � area.Their larger sizes will allow for a housina price ran�e of$250,000 to$350,000+.Classic Homes will be constructed by a number of selected builders,eac6 in their own designated Classic sub- nei'hborhood,with each home bein�essentially custom in nature and featuring one and two story � designs. � . Classic Custom Graded.7hese Classic homesites are similar to the above Classic description.Their � distinction is that their location is in the proximity of natunl features which require that the homes be � • sited and custom graded on a one at a time basis by the builder to ensure maximum sensitivity to the surrounding features. Traditional.'The Traditional homesites are situated in a wide range of sub-neighborhoods in the easterly � portion of the property which offer the amenities,desi�and features that harken back to the timeless nei�hborhood desi?ns of the 19�'to early 20�'centuries.That is,homes are oriented more toward the � street with less emphasis on the gara�e as a prominent architectural feature.Amenities are brou�ht to the street side of the homes. For example,back yard trails become boulevard sidewalks and streetscapes focus on squares and other gathering places.Lot widths are typically narrower than the Classic Suburban lots to allow for floor plans which more orient from front to back.Homes aze typically rivo storied with full basements.Prices are expected to ran;e from the low$200's to the mid �300's. Lifestyle Villas.The villas are a housing product desi�ned for empry nesters who desire a lifestyle in ' which a home owners association provides the exterior and la�m maintenance for a single family detached home.The Lifestyle homes are typically one story with full basements.Prices will ran�e from the low$200's to the$300's. Cottage Home Clusters.These typically two story homes ue oriented in clusters of four detached homes on a shared private driveway.All exterior maintenance is throu�h a homeowners association.The expected price range is from the$180's to the mid$200's. Multi-familv Attached Distinctive Townhoines. These attached twin townhomes are typically one level with full walkout basements and designed for empty nesters.Their locations near Birger Pond reflect their value and size as the premier luxury townhome in the Rosemount azea.The builder will essentially customize each home to meet the buyer's needs.Their price ran�e is expected to run from$250,000 to$375,000. Village Townhomes. These homes will be costructed in a"ro«•"style of rivo,three and four unit buildings.Wherever topography allows,Villa�e townhomes will have full basements.Each home will have a two stall attached gara�e.The homes are rypically rn•o storied and designed for empty nesters and singles.The anticipated price range is from the$150's to$225,000. Coach Homes. These homes will likely be the most moderately priced homes in the plan.Their style and design is typically two stories in a back-to-back confiaurarion in four,six,and eight home buildings. The traditional buyer profile is single professionals,youn�married couples,and younger seniors. The anticipated price range is$125,000 to$150,000. Senior Housing. As a component of our goal of creating the�ridest range of housing,we have reserved a site for senior housing along the southern perimeter of the property.'I'hese homes would likely be rental .At this point in time,we have not determined a desi�or style of the homes,nor has a rent range been determined. . 5.Summarv.Contractor Properry Developers Company has made iu goal to bring a community of the hi�hest possible quality with a broad demographic appeal to the City of Rosemount:We belieye our concept plan is responsive to both the site's natural features and to much of the public comment received over the past months. We believe in this plan,its quality and iU deserved density.We encoura�e your support for the plan as a vehicle to bring thoughtful and sensitive site plannin�to the Kelley property and � the City of Rosemount.We are prepared to meet and discuss the plan with you on an individual basis,if requested,and look forward to presenting the plan in detail to the Commission on the 13th.Thank you for the courtesies shown us in the past and for your positive consideration of this plan. �i / .' • . s�W nston �^ ' resident Cc:City Staff ' . AFR.27.1999 1�30F'M N0.�56 P.2i� To; Planning Commissioners From: Shann.on Oa1ts R�sidents By Mr. and Mrs, Russel�, Mr. and Mrs. Bergsgaard Re: Kelly Tnts1;Prop�rty Date: April 26, 1999 Than]: you for�ie opporhuzity to express our belie£s about the Kelly Trust Property Development South of Shannon Uaks, Our neighborl�ood af Shan.noz� Qal�s has been in Rosemou.nt collect�ively for greater tlian 120 years. We value our Ru�a.I Residential homesteads and want the best planni.ng possible to preserve tJ�e i.ntegrity of Shannon Oal�s and all of the neigliUorhoods adjacent to the Kell� Trust Property. When Shannon �aks was developed, the ciiy assured many of us who inquired that the Rural Resi�ential nature of our homesteads �c�ould not be effected by a�ay deve�opment in the Kelly Trust land. V�e built our homes in good faith Uased on tlie assurance by the city. Colleetively our d�velopment would be valued at more tlian 6 million dollars, Tlie future value of otur propei-ty depends on how caz�fully the Kelly Trust propezty interacts with aur development. As you are fully awa�e, commw�.�ity planning�s guided by several prineiples wllich will maximize community resources so members of the community wiJl live and share in produchve ha,ppy lifestyles. The principles of land use are guided by density, �u�7.dlife/wetland preservation, topography, transition �on�s and traffic/access to and fxom and within the area. Iv Slta�ui�n Oalcs, tliere are 12 families liviug on S 1.27 acres which follow covenants registered wi.th Dakota, County. On averagc we have one fa.mily per 4.27 acres wlaile tlae Kelly Trust propefiy proposal has one famiIy per .277 acr�. Given tlus significant discrepancy we believ� that a transi�ional green/wildlife corridor/bord�r be plannEd beriveen t1�e Shannon Oaks praperty and the Kelly Tn.ist property. The p�roposed 100 foot border is inad.equa.te. We request tl�at t11e vaiue of the homes tbat border Shannon Oaks be of comparable value, We request that the densii�►graduate from low to high to a greater de�ree than is currently proposed. We also urge that homes not be bualt on t1iE lugl�.ridge �at adjoins our developrn�ents. That ridge is tU.e highest point in Rosemount and would certainly bloek our vistas. We respect�ul�y asl� t�.e�'larmin,g�omm.ission to c�nsider the following �recomzne�nda�ions: APR.27.1999 1�31PM N0.�56 P.J�j . 1) Negotiate overall density to lower than 1153. Ideally the neigliborl�ood wQuld like fio see i.t afi 900 tmits. 2) �xpand the border between the properiies to include a wildli�'e corridor a.nd open space. Perl�aps about 200 to 254 feet. 'T'his would be an amenity for the new de�relopme�t. � 3) T�ncrease tlte numUer of�state Homes on tha Nortliern Border withi.n t1.ie market value of the homes in Shannon Oaks. 4) Preserve the Savannah of Oaks aiong tite nortl�ern end of Shannon Parkway and move the crossroad south of the current plan. Better yet, would be not to llave a cross road bu� only one side of the developmen� dumping onto Shannon Park-way. TJse cul�de-sacs and internal road�ways to move cars through to Diamond Patti an,d Conemarra. A tra.il could go under tlie Paxl�way to cor�n.ect botl� sides. 5) Tra�c �low s1lould be earefully studied to minirni�E �ii� tra�e on Shannon Parkway north o�Conemarra. 6) Build houses below the lugh ridge to preserve open space and vistas. 7)Make an strong x�eco�aunendation tbat tlie c�ty not exrtend city water and sewer to the developnaents nortli of Kelly Trust. This eff�cts many people who have �xpressed concern that they would be forced to scll. WE do not believe t]iat the neigh.borl�oods sucrounciing the Kelly Trust development should have to bear the burden of its development. We would like to eommend the planning commission for all of its hard work on this development. We would also like to thauk the developers for addressing the major concerns and modifying the original plan witli the neighborhood in mind, �nce tb.e open space, wildlife and wetiands are gone, we can never get tliem Uack. '�'herefore, if the city could apply for state �noney to purchase 5ome of the wetland areas,perhaps some land could Ue preserved in the FLTD subject to fluther invesfiiga�.on by the city. P � , �r � 12931 Shannon Parkway Rosemount,MN 55068 April 26, 1999 William Droste, Chairman City of Rosemount Planning Commission 2875 145`�St. W. Rosemount,MN 55068 Dear Mr. Droste: I am concerned that their is no clear commitment to preserve the trees and wetlands in the Kelley Trust Property. The developers plan to destroy some of these areas to maximize the space for housing areas,but we need to preserve all of these trees and wetlands. � An early plan had a road system going directly through a wetland and Oak Savanna. After commissioners expressed concern about protecting this area,the developers came up with a new plan that would move the road to another location, slightly north. However,this location is also unacceptable,because it would destroy a large number of trees. As a planning commission member,you are responsible for what gets protected. The developers will try to tell you that some of the wetlands and trees aren't very important and that they don't all need to be preserved,but that is false. The wildlife depend on this environment for their survival. These wetlands play a crucial role in our ecosystem. They provide food and habitat for wildlife, specifically the shallow depths are needed by ducks to reach the bottom and find food. Cattails,which are only found in wetlands, provide protection for waterfowl who are raising young. Frogs assist with mosquito control, etc. ' _' ' _ , The planning commission needs to tell the developers that they cannot alter any of the � wetlands, no matter how big or small. The developers have three methods that could . . destroy the wetlands. One is simply draining them. Another is filling them in with dirt. ' The final is overflovving them by poorly designed run-off systems. None of these three . ways are acceptable. The only option is preserving them completely. This is not an issue that should be compromised. I have had the privilege of living in a forested area with a protected wetland directly behind my house, and have seen all the wildlife that depend on it. I too have depended on this environment for my own benefits. When I get too caught up and stressed with my fast paced life, I try to escape to my land to feel a sense of serenity again. As Aldo Leopold said in A Sand County Almanac, "It is inconceivable to me than an ethical relation to land . can exist without love, respect, and admiration for the land, and a high regard for its value. By value, I of course mean something far broader than mere economic value;I mean value in the philosophical sense." We need to have this ethical relationship with the land by protecting it. We cannot try to evaluate it on its economic value. The builders stated that they have watched this amazing property for years and have been anxious for it to be developed. They have recognized the true beauty and value this land has to offer. Obviously they want to maximize profits by building as many units as possible. However, great care needs to be taken so that the original beauty of the land is preserved. Sincerely, '�Q�M�- �"l��Z�G� Melissa Marcotte . , ' � oR o �e-'r so� MINNESOTA FRIESIANS, INC. • � � FHANA Registered Friesian Carriage and Dressage Horses '�, t► "'�� Martin&Jeanne Van Orsow 1'� � Oti 12861 Shannon Parkway,Rosemount,MN 55468,U.SA 1�l E S Phone 612-322-4442 -Fax 612-322-1764 a �'' �i /9g� / � �•��-t- � a �.v,; ; ,H•, � � ss' o►-� ew�lO ers , �"C GJ>"��U i h S'�P o r �`' � / n . � / � � l,J i�at � t e Ca rr� p�0 r ��W Ce►.� 7l..a. �^�raX //'PS� c�e c�,�� rap e r �I�eS' CC��,( -�a: t�.c� r-{�, e r�, c�1 e v e,�o �, e� � J � �/ � �. F-� �lJ {r�i1'� �/� �'r w �-!i�,j` f.J O_ f � �, ,e,`� � � w�.oi �RX�LV �� -� w� /�l /, �'e � Q� �,,�, l P Pa..s� CJ U / / � � / / � ��,�� !n�� n�ts a� �l ,� v,• a(,E , / /� � lu r �� Ps�t� � , � C �a�s►��G `'1 _ / /. /� � �h I^�.r� i''e.f 1��%! P�r.��c�.f' J�c�C►r �.. � ��r��ts � � � .� ,. e�,s, / � � es e G�a ti-,P� � ' t� �J /O � ber � a sea( � �'�e a ��,-�a� 3a� t /� S' � • / %s GL � ��Sd In G�,t`(.� CO lf'r'�C�t�r'' i� / �� W G(J�L� / (�� so !%�e ��- � ' n C�r� 7'�Cw7'/G✓�► / 7� -t1st. r es7�� / , , . !�t'rl�.S' a�'�' 1 �//E'Caf �vl O�. Q C�� arc� °� (a"b'' l7`' ,p 7'p C/ ��/ �•?' �J� /fSS T�Gt�.. ^�,,i J' O i.. � �l.d J`T l'-�C� �^'1 G� c�►'1a�/�/1 7� C�cti r �/lv /� �►�2/. �l e s7`� G/ �t e� -1�^� c � ;r- � l S�'C �c,.,� ' S�7`�� Member Friesian Horse Association of North America:American Driving Society:Carriage Association of America e� �Rso � MINNESOTA FRIESIANS, INC. � t � • � � FHANA Registered Friesian Carriage and Dre,ssage Horses '�„ �►. --''� Martin&Jeanne Van Orsow r� � O� 12861 Shannon Parkway,Rosemount,MN 55068,U.SA 1�T E S Phone 612-322-4442-Fax 612-322-1764 O�^ � tn�r'fZ.er i,, �a v-�e i^ Gtt..r,� Gt_ W i��f //�e / 7�r�.t�� i'o„� C3 C.✓� S �C�. GJc,w�cf `"�+�- -7 [2. r�-t�r✓'�tX ►'��e � � / � �21�C�n Lv�Piv��• 1 G.J� �3t rC (fGS�a' 7� S't'G -7�^�.� �`"� � p � r�.-T CJ�� ! �C��p �P�l / cPJ�IM l.�ti,-TZ �e,y..�P✓" �as !O G'�Y� / a�a�a� � � Q�..d1 �� - ol��e,�,a w,e� �'s � �e�� y�e cwTcat �v o t�. o(P�I e�P �►^ . � / � G.J e (.� ►' � cJ� 7v re�e��r 7� Qci(ol � L � r� / �tS S 1 S G+18 r e LJ G�Gv. G�vt Si dl"Gf� ti p��.f'i']� � 1 SS U P S Q�,.,�( 7�v lc Pe� es-�� e �cQ a�,.dl T� / O(� � '�Pr w� r0 er-7` (�a�f ti �S' � C2 U' ��0 'v"� P.� l � � � � � P � �, �,�►��. (,.� ,� � �� Member Friesian Horse Association of North America:American Driving Society:Carriage Association of America • . William Droste Chairman, Planning Commission � City of Rosemount City Hall 2875 145�' Street W. Rosemount, MN 55068 Re: Kelly Trust PUD Application Dear Mr. Droste: I�rould like io comment about the proposed concept plan/devei_opment_of the Ke11_y Trus+ property. I grew up in Richfield and attended Richfield Sr. High School. One of the highlights of my education there was the opportunity of my 10�'grade biology class to - walk to a small lake near the school,which at that time was undeveloped. Our instructor valued the opportunity and had the wisdom to provide us with first-hand experience in regards to observing wildlife and their interactions. He provided us with a learning experience that could not be obtained from a book. The city had a choice to develop that area as a golf course, residential development or leave it essentially natural. That piece of property is now Woodlake Nature Center. Since 1971, an estimated 70,000 children, teens, and adults visit this area every year. Of that 70,000, 24,600 visitors aze there each year for scheduled programs. The facility is open 18 hours a day, 365 days a year for both educational and recreational use and enjoyed also because it provides an isolated natural area in a sea of development. I am not against development, as long as its conducted in a responsible manner which protects some of our precious remaining natural resources and open space. This is critical in our urban environment! I would put it to anyone who may have any input into the development of the Kelly Trust property that its real value is the land/soil with its trees, grasslands,ponds, wetlands and in particular the wildlife (i.e. mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles, and insects including butterflies)that inhabit it. Will this property be left undeveloped as a natural area? Sadly, it probably won't be. To proceed with developing the Kelly Trust property and not leave enough undeveloped natural area to maintain the diversity of wildlife,would be an inevocable loss to all present and futare residents. The wetlands are protected by law,but unless enough natural azea is left around them (i.e. 100 foot buffer) you will end up with a sterile development. You will have some houses with ponds and some manicured green space, but what value is that without the diversity and richness of wildlife to inhabit it and for us to enjoy. Connecting corridors of a sufficient size(i.e.300 foot width),between wetlands,ponds, wooded areas, other natural azeas would also help to maintain this diversity. The distances cited above for a wetland buffer and for wildlife corridors were provided by the Department of Natural Resources—Ecological Services unit. . � If you want to make a wonderful contribution to our community,the families and children who live here, and anyone who might visit or consider our community for their residence in the future, leaving enough area undeveloped far outweighs any loss of some additional housing units. We already have the benefit of this property being adjacent to both Shannon Park Elementary and the Rosemount High School. This proximity provides a wonderful opportunity for walking access for educational purposes (i.e. learning about ecology,conservation of our natural resources,plant and tree identification, leaming about wildlife and their living habits etc.). A cluster type housing development will allow the same density of homes as a development with larger lots. The advantage is that you will be able to protect much more of this valuable property and its resources. Cluster type housing costs less to develop and will cost the city less to provide the required utility service (i.e. less sewer and water pipes)along with other services the city provides (i.e. fewer streets require fewer police and fire personnel and less ongoing maintenance etc.). - History and experience are great teachers. If you protect and develop this area in a manner which will retain much of its current diversity of plants and animals, it will be valued and appreciated for generations to come. This is one of the major reasons people have moved to this area. In closing, you cannot put a price on seeing a child's eyes light up when they hear the hoot of a Great Horned Owl,the spring symphony of chorus frogs and spring peepers, or seeing a White-tailed deer with her fawns, all from their own backyard! Whether children in the future will be able to experience that same sense of awe or not, will depend on the decisions that aze being made today! .Respectfully submitted by_ �fl"'r�^ � 1 a..ti?�'•� Y l�j"i' !��-1' U ` Dennis and Nancy Randall 14034 Clover Lane Rosemount, MN 5068 Cc to Kim Shoe-Corrigan Sheila Klassen � Jay Tentinger Jeffery Weisensel