The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About7.a. Concept Residential Planned Unit Development Kelley Trust; Contractor: Property Developers Co. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR ACTION City Council Meeting Date: June 1, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Concept Residential Planned Unit AGENDA SECTION: Development-Kelley Trust; Contractor Old Business Property Developers Co. PREPARED BY: Dan Rogness,Community Development Dir. AGENDA � ATTACHMENTS: Revised Draft Resolution with exhibits; APPROVED BY: Correspondence,Reductions; Density summary;PC minutes; Review memos; Correspondence; AUAR information. Applicant: Homer Tompkins of Contractor Property Developers Company Location: Kelley Trust property between Diamond Path, Shannon Parkway and Dodd Road Property Owner(s): Hampton K.O'Neill representing Cynthia Kelley O'Neill Trust No. 1 and Margaret H.Kelley 1953 Trust Area in Acres: 536 including previous park dedication(Shannon Park)but excluding the water tower site. Overall Density: 2.29 dwelling units per acre(net)based upon 1,153 dwelling units and: (1) 13 acres of wetlands are excluded; (2)4.5 acres of 24%slopes are excluded; (3) 15 acres for pond; and, (4)24.2 acres of park dedication. Guide Plan Desig: Planned Development,Residential Current Zoning: R-1,Low Density Residential (about 2/3)and Agriculture(about 1/3) Requested Zoning: RL,R-1,R-2 and R-3 (recommended) Planning Com.Action: Recommendation of Approval (Unanimous) SiTNIlVIARY The developer has responded to several of the questions raised by the City Council on May 18, 1999 in the attached correspondence. All of the department heads will be present to respond to the questions that cannot be answered by the developer,especially those concerning"neighborhood connectivity". A revised resolution has been prepared with the benefit of Council direction to date. This revised resolution contains the housing type distribution concept as the e�chibit relating to the overall concept. This provides a maximum of flexibility relative to future street design. However,it identifies the housing types,locations and unit counts. The developer has also provided exhibits which illustrate the housing types and the design considerations for the neighborhood clusters that will be useful for reviewing future preliminary plats. Any significant deviation from what is presented in the housing exhibits would require a PUD amendment procedure. Furthermore,a one page data summary of the housing types is attached and a sumary of the AUAR guidelines. The original resolution containing the Planning Commission recommendation is attached as well. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt a resolution approving the Concept Residential Planned Unit Development For Contractor Property Developers Company. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ��°Ut`�e� . ,.. �- CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 1999- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONCEPT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR CONTRACTOR PROPERTY DEVELOPERS COMPANY Kelley Trust Property WHEREAS,the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an application from Contractor Property Developers Company for approval of a concept residential planned unit development for the Kelley Trust property located north of Country Hills,between Diamond Path, either side of Shannon Parkway, and west of Dodd Road in Rosemount, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on Apri127, 1999,the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Concept Residential Planned Unit Development for Contractor Property Developers Company and adopted a motion to recommend approval, subject to conditions, to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on May 18 and June 1, 1999,the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Concept Residential Planned Unit Development for Contractor Property Developers Company. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the Concept Residential Planned Unit Development for Contractor Properiy Developers Company, subject to: 1. The development,as identified in Exhibit A. consists of 536.3 acres including land previously dedicated for Shannon Pazk. Considering undevelopable land for slopes and wetlands, staff is using 460 acres as a net developable acreage. Therefore, 920 units are allowable based upon the pending Comprehensive Guide Plan policy. Of the 1,153 proposed units, 233 (20%of the total)would be considered a density bonus based on the followin_g__(�l a mix of ten housin�unit tvn�;�)the use of varied(customl builders or high value%uali�y housin�• (cl a hiQher-than-normal amount of common onen snace: an �dl a nlan that a�pro.�riatelXtransitions from higher to lower densities.� *'��^��"'" '"`�'' , , , , • , xc�6i�-c6�c Z Aii 1�• f' '1..L.,,,,�;., - -.� ''f'7o� „4'.,11 , ,,:�s o r 2. Multi famil,y housine will com�rise 27�ercent 310) of all housing units Future zonin$ designations for the multi fami�y units will be a combination of R-2 an R- an t e �in�e family detached units will be a combination of RL, R-1 and R-2 Senior housin� will be 100 units as either rental coo� or condominium The number and densitv of senior housing cannot be reulaced one for one bv another housing�e without an Resolution 1999- amendment review nrocess for the PUD. 3. Housing types and neighborhood clusters shall be utilized to reinforce a pattem of transition from urban to rural. The proposed estate housing adjacent to the rural residential district shall have a net density of one dwelling unit per acre over an area consisting of all lots adjacent to rural residential uses. This may be accomplished with large lots or clustering of dwelling units. Clustering techniques shall be applied to housing appropriately to adapt the development to the natural forms instead of significantly altering them. Consideration should be given to increasing the use of cluster techniques,particularly on the northern tier to preserve additional open space or natural features. 4. Housing types adjacent to existing urban single family residential uses shall be similar to the established housing types and densities. In the case of dissimilar housing types or attached housing,bufferyards utilizing preserved stands of trees and/or extensive landscaping shall be required to preserve homogeneous neighborhoods. The developer shall com�lete all housing types, as identified in Exhibit B.to be incorporated into the PUD Agreement. Variations to lot dimension and setback standards shall be further evaluated and identified in the PUD A�reement for the Traditional Cottage and Villa housin�ty�?es. 5. The environmental review process will help determine the ultimate locations of streets, housing and infrastructure. The city supports the Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR)process. This concept approval shall not waive the requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991, the Tree Preservation Ordinance, and the Surface Water Management Ordinance.. 6. The east-west parkway street shall intersect Shannon Parkway at a perpendicular in a location causing least impact on trees,wetlands, and natural features. City engineering standards will also be used to determine the most acceptable location and design. 7. All existing local streets terminating at the edge of the development with temporary cul- de-sacs and barriers shall be designed as through-streets ultimately connecting to Connemara Trail, Shannon Parkway or the east-west parkway. Traffic calming techniques should be considered for Shannon Parkway and Connemara Trail: In addition, modifications to the city street design standards should be considered and further evaluat with the review of the traditional homes portion of the concept plan at the nreliminar�nlat stage. 8. Concept approval shall incorporate recommendations regarding street design and connections included in the attached City Engineer/Public Works Director memo dated April 22, 1999. 9. Concept approval shall incorporate recommendations regarding park, sidewalk and trail improvements made by the Parks and Recreation Committee, including but not limited to , the following (�,l a ma.jor east west trail shall be public; (bl sidewalks and/or trails shall be on both sides of all collectors including he new parkwav: (cl nublic narks shoul i Resolution 1999- � include locations at Birger Pond and an expansion of Shannon Park;,�dl all�rivate open �paces shall be preserved and mana�ed through easements or other legal documents; and �e1 a trail underpass at Connemara shall be com�eted for the major east-west trail 10. The developer shall work with the City to attain��hysical connection�to the downtown, including such things as streetscape features and pedestrian/vehicle linkages �"+'� F • •� �� t,�• � a *• .o,to�, � + cr +,..,� �..,.i� �-zr�ncm�--caxa-cvv�v�aCr�o a��=oy�r�irr-oT� � a ` I I V� �n7 � . , � ) ! } °:... �= A,1J-.��f'j� �.�� s.-11 ��sa��1 ` p � . . ,o...� .... .. --,q \ �E. f.J Q` '' 'ti'^.a ( � � �.... ,.__ � 1 _ k" i � _ �.. <.._______..._ —_...�. _—..._..,,- '_... - _ .. _. <,-_ � . � .___ - i� . _' _.._.�_'_ ' � ._ � "� i 4e 3... � ( `�"- _ s�� 3 Vi � � Vl , � � +� '<i ,�7.� 9} ' ,�. , �� '� � ��, � yp z _. ,Q � �t,. ��x� .� ,:a�.r, `. E'�""`� p'f . �3� t ,(t i/� � 4M1.1��'rk ��' �, . `l`' � . . je 1f { , �jjF{�{\' `� �'f ' t (i � .+ af��ij! �� / u ' � i I) � �` �( .r rj��t�� 3 �. T+ O'� � If ,� i. + � � . k.�� .a�f}`" �t- Q Ct} �. � ,,:; j �.. ,:-i- h . ,�,. f� �` . � � " � � __..___--__� _. .______ . � �... �.` .� �� —� �� r . i E�� f�r! E it. � �. �� C�', � r,..�r"1A_. �� r� : c- �-� � � � � ��i_ �_� �_ � r�f x�=� �_� -' � �� ''� z a �,�E �) -(,S ,�r� ;i �`'�;�t €r 7_' ;<-; `-g;�±: T�'-`r '��J;r '� � �:, —'t� F t.. ..�', f 1 �e If��.+.., � � .+i- ��i- r�7'� �...�- �� . �"y : ��{��4� � � [ ; � � _ � y 41, rf' J,'��t�`` '� �,�',�;€'� S 5 t � '� � S13 � ar'>� i;,,r� � �� , ' — 1_" � � � �; � 0 a' � {i p �!: � � '��, r , �' 4 � � t ^�..i � »�} � .� ��}'s �,`J� � W� � � c,�}.t.,� ��.$��,��'�a� ; t� , �� , ,� ,..��r � �, ��`� �i ,� � ;' - > .-� "'�`�""` . ��'4 ` .-. � •� �."-,. � . �.� .' a,+-. a °� � 3'ti��."-�'v".� �c=- ._. ' � •.� ... � . . _.�_. _.,.,: - � � . . . .,.. :; �� .� y� ,�� ,q y.��75� � f .a � {� � }�.. ., �� r-+� � �'" 1 � ��F�4�� „ ��* "'.ti� ,v.� . ��;�� I�irs �,�`R � � }� = �w� �r♦ ; +r ar aG� �''��`'`� !`�t ` �a��=�t��, � �' � f� . � �r f 4 ,� �� °� � �� k �� '� .�.�.rrr�'s �::'�,_ ��r�:*♦ ��` ,� `��, � r t '�'1' � �' 4";, ,-:��f`t,/: �� . f�`:..�tl� C�., �� *' � ��` �j, ��"�� ,�• '�. / �x � �� t ., � { �� ,p <��, �t" �� ,y: ' � r ,��..�'�--- �.:: � � �: �� . � �� ,;��d �r x �1Y � ;� �� r` •(� Y A � � � �� . � ��, � �� ,� � �� .� _ � �.. £ _= � � � '�p,``&� � � !� �.r:.:.�. �.. -.� � � �',,,� � „f �. "+�.: �i .. t r �' �� --�- � 'a -. � ;�'�',� e ..�. '� �+ �tti�t J -'°�'�iY�� ,.�� 4 � , :� �Y. i: . i� � ti �; �g�.4 � '� ! S Q• �S'i `: ' � . r T� '�``_..-.... �� } d r�.�c 'X �� ~ �� ;� V}�� J � .�+�� ' c '� 1 � j� ��; �� .-"� ` � !`. � e � 7'� r y ,� �� . � `�Y 1 �. � "1 i�l .- t r' � � �.� � �U,W-�,,�:, �' f_.d7 ., �, � " � � - �:., . "' �= � � '�r r �ti��. A n u �� ..�. - �` vcAY`' �.. - • ` , � c . 3 �t i i f M �7� �� n°r �� ,i , _ _i�ar.w+�Y � ��= . y i � r`� t . . ( . � � !�. � � t�� I '�� ' � �, � - 4�'x � �i�� 13 �rA;�� '_ :��: q : t �'` Q}� �, ..�. #a _. � �l''� -- --9�j'- 14-„� �� . �r --- _--_ -.�..-- - , .,.. __.�__—__• . � �, �� _ �� ♦ e � � . . _ � s ,� � � � I� � : � � � , .�,.x ; r�` , . T ; ,k. .�,�� y -- � ��._1 - - � ` � �` � ' yy r`---'a, T.�� -� r� '� j ,� �� K lw...,. � .�, �° � ; �,. �, =¢ -�� I I ' � I - �� r �� ic. �, � � t � � +�, 4k, �� F. �� a„"x`�4.°� � �1tf`'�;'' `' � - ' �N� t x'�>� � � �� `�� ' � � ~�` � � i ( .v �V�#` �,' ��s�"� � �� `}��i`,1.- r Ch.p1 'CtiS O. .�q tC al C� `i4 � � 4 a �� ` .�.� �C0;CI Ci C1 t' �fi W �0 �1 cr A .,� � -�i, ��i � „ � ::' � V � � . . . .� . l � !1 i �. � : � ,P � � �/y,� � ....� ��a� }� �_� �y_f'_1 Y . r ` i —_.--.•..,,.. +- .Q�" .�� `�!.». S � .� .�'°'l�`�1 d � � �wj. � � _...._.___.,.�...._'_�..._�....,..__ , k� � 1 � � � ti:=� �� - r .�9�V^�.`'�� `�,q �i i! �1 �. � �� ! "'-.,,�,,� k .� `{ •� �� ,��.?L� � � � � �� * � � �•"� }i`:� °ti��il � O 0 q! 1R �: � � , �a��'� +k '� , i� �� .. ��.` a� # � ��. ��✓��{ i _� '� '�' �1 al �r ,�� a��t �'�` � ��" ' ;`�� u _�.��_�°_3�a m� �,�( �� r:�, �..�� z; r� •�'�' R °� 'a m ° 91 0�� c� r �' ,�` � �t�,�''-ti� � � � F„s s s= �y� ` �� 1�,'} , � � �� ,� �"� � �� `�h�� 6 a a � y O G� 'q�� —{ � � '� I� �' � �; :, � a ��i�� .`�� s �'�� y��• � J +�� $ Q � � � � �� ,,y - ry , � � x. $:to� �y, :t �r" � � I y � aI ;.. � v Ok �" "� sI= '",� - "° « 'Ix--- �,. Q � d r m u m �� ., �✓��,� �� y�'y'� T' �'F �,�� " .� � +i.a.. �-""--—'� I p S 6 a 0 i0 Q � � Al t,3 s„ � t �-�'�.,.. ,kr�� .��r�s �,�� F -` , '-�� tt�tJ t.} 1-} U �7� L7 --� uI�� n��.,}��} �,�,¢"'�``�`�p`�°�'`�� v-f��t �.�� :'� `�",d ..sw��+ � '�g�,� ��:�„, '1� ��ti} £,� �: [/^''\ ,_r�-"q�'�,� � I� � _ ��-�' . ` ;,s>vaa�lt f'„„"".d� . � __ ._SJ^4 ` r . tc.:=��.��A � �XN1T3lT 8- I ��b,� KelleY �wust Gontractor 1�roperty 1�v�o p e r t Y GonceptNal }-lousing �Cype Developers Go. Rosemount,Minnesota Estate �ON1eS (detacl�ecl) Estate Homes are the largest in the Kelley Trust PUD Concept plan. Housing constructed on these homesites will all be custom designed and constructed by a recognized group of true custom home builders. Styles will range the entire spectrum of architecture and will be one leveled and two storied, all with full basements. Many of the homesites will be walkouts. Price range, including lot: $350,000 to $700,000. Average lot size: 20,000+ S.F.; Average frontage: 110 feet; Typical net density: 1.8/ac. . \�\ ''�' . � �- , . � �� .\', \ ��'�� y� / � \ f� ,` J./+� J. -- .�_ �� ; � -� ---��:�� ; t .-.:�.�� , - _ � � . . , . , -:� ,. �:��-� - . . . j __ ;�._-., — ' :: '.: ' .� : ' ffi ,� . ' , � — . :I : : = � , . � : .'_+:_• �� _ _ I : • _ a � r�• . . � . • , , I � • , . -�. F��` :� . � � : :�� .�: :�� - z � ; : � t ,�. ��: � � . : � ' � � �. j �:...-.. � � � 7 . -- ----� � - i-- •� t i— -�--/ c�....�. 'f: . � o- .To^ —� �4;'Y" i 1 •.' �.s p ' - >: .-. , a{�� ,j .'._ti��-r _ --_ � t" � .�*' y` � � �-�s'i��' • `_ Cl. �•/ a ��y. .� r•�•- i `_ _ �'. � `z -.�`. x .T` � '�.*: . . � �� . `� •��T �. � .—¢' tc�r -[�j� ,t� �� i ^I'�'i '4'� .� �.'� �� , ,_Y'� �' '�`,.A, _ ,.��, � . " � ��,�rs�� •' •� ��,�.,.� .� -_ ,.:-� _ _ ..� a ,�, , _-.--- ' _ ; ;� •,s�=:�' �-- - -. � �ec'—zac• _ eur�:.- �ni �C+��3�T 8-2 � I�eIIeY �Nust hprW lon Gontractor Property 1�wopewtY Gonceptual +-lousiny �CYpe Devel opers Go. Rosemount.Minnesota Glassic/GNstom Graded Su6kr6an f-lor�es (detacllecl) Classic Suburban/Custom Graded Classic Suburban Homes are configured in more typical suburban patterns common to the Rosemount area. Classic Homes will range from true custom designed to semi-custom designed, depending on the builder and the sub- neighborhood they build in. Custom Classic lots will be graded on a one at a time basis to fit the footprint of the home to preserve trees in environmentally sensitive areas. Home styles will fill the entire architectural spectrum and will be one leveled and two storied, all with full basements. Many of the homesites will be walkouts. Price range, including lot: $250,000 to $350,000+. Average lot size: 10,000+ S.F.; Average frontage: 85 feet; Typical net density: 2.2-2.4/ac. -""� 'X _� I ..._. . `�' � i� � � �� i :.lvl.r �� . �l� -' `' �.t f .� � • Yi. � ' •� l ` �Q�/� � .� . ii 4, � ' � . � -.1`/%! V % � �jp • . v � . ••Z� � f� '• .. �• ' � I c� ��_ � � i. • I '' ' '^ Y'• ". � � �� `� '� � ; + ��' " ' . . _ `� `�'� �� - I "� + :3; �^ � S . � Yr. � ' � �Ll � - •'K�� f,.,�: _" , .•�'` . �.,,` - ; r` �• ' , ' . •,� •' , • �� .�r• .. . _ . . •� 7a�� YYo.. � . . ./ \•. .. • -• . � . -t' �� .. � . p.J'�-�� , _ I" • � -``s . � a---. i+.a'sy `�. ' _ F� . ' �� - - - , �'.-'' _ ,- _ =�. � -:z.�... - �. �. ,� � - = � _ -= . _�� , - _ _ . =_ -� _ , �. . ,,,, -- . _ _ � t- .��.�_ _' �.�t.�c �r_v � • F------ - - �c+��t-r 13-3 �.�b,� KeIIeY �rust Gontractor Property 1�v�opev�tY Gonceptual �-lotising �Ype 1Jevelopers C�O. Rosemount,Minnesota -C'raditional �-IOiY1e5 (deta�hed) Traditional Homes are proposed to be situated in a variety of sub-neighborhoods in the easterly portion of the Kelley site. Architectural styles will be more American classic ��ith a theme reminiscent of the best of neighborhoods built during the 1920's and 1930's. The focus of the neighborhood design is people�vith a deemphasis on the automobile and reemphasis on architecture. Home design minimizes the impacts of front- facing garage doors, brings the homes closer to the street than typically allowed under R- 1. Street patterns and widths are laid out to calm traffic and encourage pedestrian activity. Homes will typically be two storied with fiill basements. Some lots will be walkouts. Price range: low $200,000 to $350,000+. Average lot size+/- 10,000 S.F.; Average frontage: 70 feet and will range from 60 feet to 85 feet; Typical net density: 2.7/ac. .? v�. � tf� ,�.�- •- "`� � � ;' _ I�`�•• � ,� � • �� ;��, � '� ,, �� - "'�> �� ,i �. �� w,:_ - _ , s� ^•i�•. ti . 7��'.-.: �. ' ':i i^�I;,'�M � .t". `. ..i�� Xx,.,. � h��. 7' F 'C�...'` .n ,y„_ N ' ��. r� \,i � . � : .l.••_. �:'ri i�� . . v -.'�;,� 'b�.�--� ;, '" + � r � c ti � ;., :�a.: �= ,t:; , �-�� ?'�`,'��• '. �' 1.' t - � `-: �+ �.�,� r �"� ` A ,r � : ^�'„ ��? ..: ,��T'' ?'�y �''` r , �''`�- r .�i•, •.1 ` � ,J ,� 1�~ h,.,-=�''� a/ ;.,~.. , + 'i� �:t • j�;�: �,::. .► �, .. � - r �.'� � •� �'h; � � �� , . � ^ � `� `��f..��t .�v -� _ ��'u^t•:`y..- ... . �4n �h"� '6...< '� .s�.�� .ar _ . �.vvp.��.,�. �: P' ~�� -�- � �n.,,' a.`! . •�� -.. � 1:� # � `�• ��. ,.b:v- . l+�y '� . . , ,�/ .w " �j �'t`+. �.�_ � . r� --a -i' � �7' � .e-'kr' _ /�/ � =.t. ' � _ _ _� _ • _ _ ..�_._ ' " _ -- _ v� " s �, �� •K[ �. �� K` N M� `�O� 9r4�, 4Y.1�� a G ++ ' . . . � . • - � • I . - . . . . . � - - . . . . . - - . - . - . � . � • � -� � • • • . • - � -� � • -• • • - - � - . � • - �- • � • •- • • -� •. - • •� - •- � • • - • � - - • � �- • � -• • • �- - •• � - • - - � � - - ' - . •- '� : 1 111 • ', 1 111 • - . � - • - 11 - . � - . . - • - .- : . .� � : ��, �v�:, ,, �'`-'��....��J �� . � �'%/-�'�:��, --�1 x��. t � 1i.�Y��`y71.. �' Sr �� A^„`�• �^�':i'� - �`t�sx��f,Z 2 _- .��, 1'�� -'al1�'= �.�,as`� w�in � � ,z a ��.�ii9"' y°� .rf c x:.. �� •�a_'.._'� 'Y: '�3D cy� .�`y '�� j��( ,X,� -�.)�-it= ' ''i.-' f�� i :.. .. �?. '{��i� �''S=t_' =V� � �ti.•�:.;� ' ��=2. �� vyil�� ..:� . .I-.'1 5�;.f•� �r.Z ��.`' � iY�t �"�'T_� 1 ��`7� .�'�h ' ;\%d�' / �'r.. ;1� ' %"wli':� �.r. .ixa�«.��__i1�%::�-s c .;�::�Y'� ,��r r��P✓�•_as�T�� - � Q.-ro��a�_.7_.i -+� ..;'" � v'. ��` w`-��'+ ��` -:.. �� ' � sel'�!�-�, ' -: ,�x,;, s' �'`.�, �!'_.a��"✓ _ - /.aj� -t.=-e � .a'y� �s�' �d� '��. _\Cl ��.@��I I-y .\lll�• ' K,� � 3 � t* �:~? �"_ •�� •��V ��..� � �f \f�� `� y, i ,- �Y�;�; n! i+.s�a� '�i.:,{?c�l. i��., �i� �a�rw. j �y�','��7 :>.' v�� {�-., �.!t 9 -�'' 7�� $��'�� r T'� '��' ,/y •�.aS� r�. z d::' ��*:,�a' s� � Y� ��.�!' ..s; =,y ," , � ,`r �a s.- � :[r:� � _'' ��)+'�i�.'�� I` ?��j'>•:\ '� '� �,.: � r� ��4e-�5'� '� S( T F��. � �� \'��. A..- � ' � � �A ✓.�,. '►'�� ;��."t� , `�I �� '•a� �N�r .e`�'�^`l,..4 ��^ ,?/�,:� � �..: �� M _ ��,�� Y;. - r' � /•��7'�i`C.�y"Q.��• � � !i i`yl 7- �" ,�� •' °.r�iCc.:J.'t'.�P , . •,��jf�. I '��..,� ,.� �_,`a�'� ��'�`�'"�is'�c��;:':1 y�. �• ��..s'� _�`s:i: ��,p � j'c '� �i�', a�n.: w.u•��a ;i!�i�;� �=�� ,.�`�'.�.�'-__ ' - �i=-� �` r��j._ `'L'i"� �_�_ i :,' �`��; �, � ► :' R•, .:. t , �. �: ,¢ - f:�. I�, .9�IIIII��::� `•=`' ��r�Y'•� � \`,��^ �� ,y(��. '.�I 1 .\,�� :�.� s��^i.`�� -�� F �'�a.:t `�r�� •_.��, �► � �t,.• � �►� _�= �� i �,1 �� z..�" i.'✓ � ,.��_ .,, I� � , . �- . 7 ;�i .:, Q ��,-" T��' ;,�fr R- th��_ .� �,� �;q\;: _ 1� % � .��;.. t�•,_. J a.- ��%� _L �. .r��:t. i ��'�� r. ,.�y� Yy �v�%� � a _ -' ! ' ..r�� e �_ �j� �. r' ��3 �-=-i —+��:i � ��.- _ ��s'� �*''' /��l � / �'y':�j__�i� ! i�'f�+ ll:ti I��' ... ��/��ri -� - �� 7 5.1�� .a a+�.. _--�i� �,Y� 1. - '' �^a!`��i.� Y••�4•= -,"_.�'� �i f.7 �.:: � �� _ .. . ��_. 14 � -.F�'. � lw�is�.�.il ��R�'�r.^'�— .. `s —— '�� Y� '�- _ — - ,.w' �ai! "`-=��'�.,.�� 1 ` _'L—�_._,_ . �� - � -r,., !� ,.H'' _-w..�_C ..''"��._._. 1 �cl+tt�t T 8-S KelleY �v�ust vrwva�on Gontractor 1�ropertY �v�opeµtY Gonceptual �-loNsing �Cype Devel opers `i0. Rosemount,Mnnesota ,L.1 f eS'fY�O V I��QS (deta�hed) Lifestyle Villas are a single family detached homes situated in their own sub- neighborhood. These homes are specifically targeted toward empty nesters and young seniors and are an alternative to townhomes. This product line will likely be costructed by one semi-custom builder.The homes are typically one level with an architectural theme which ties the homes together without repetition. Exterior and grounds maintenance are provided by a homeowners association. Price range: $200,000 to $300,000+. Average lot size: 7,000+ S.F.; Average frontaae: 55 feet; Typical net density: 4.5/ac. / '.��'' ::: .N�'„�•.• . •t� `� - - • - .� _ � �� . x _ .�� ;��'-��z_� •\ �e��' �� ."',�..«t�.,ea. �. � ; : ��„�p..x � '9:f�`� \ �\ �"a. 33�s'�r�r L+�'�,x•...i-'" ..... -�:f. \�, l''+'Ery �`' �.s#' � a.. .-' �i. � c� � { ^t- � �`�h� .�.... �� i / _ � �st� � \' '�.:�"�;j` ,� , ' .--- / \\ ��` , . � . - ��' " � .�� . �� ,, '\:. , ` - � .... ; _ �. • ��:�e " � � ` � _ �+' � �7 \\; \\, � '`:;. s � cvt -1 cD[S \ � �: ,� , ` _ �'� ,.� , 1 �' �, '�`i'J► r,�.j' � : �� _--- _ '.iii:,,�' _ = " �p�. .yr.n'�i. _ :l f,,� �* : � �. / r 7 ypC� �'�d� �� `�'��,/i��1�� . .:� / � y; EJ� �4 4r�6•.3 ,�i� �'�/��l�,�y,,�.�_,.Y/�� L� � w�K; y�T �. ♦ i j �_ � et �+�,a,�f.!r �-��'Htr�ay��rCT.t-(. ti `�'rF'y� "�'�2�G�,a, �,�y t �J �: � �.�"� . � - �' '; ..>�.i�.`°'y�i. �:��,�`! �� _ � �.�`�`Y� I�.�,.�''• � ' •r �-..� ` •��-� ♦... � `' � � :.. �: ,..;_ '�'r� •V. S�)� r.,_\��\ - �1 . �� ' ♦'J • 3 _ �_- . ./: ; .� :_ - }'T��7 �- \� -.� _ � :• �d�i�3�` �� -' -� -_- _ ��t - ..i ' -'�� _ _ �F � = ' ��,�, i.� .: _ �,� .� - • L-.�": _ .: . -��:i� _ - - _ ._� _ �- 1 1 __ _ .-sc�. Q� - _ l-=� ' .--�" -'�+�� - . —P �� _ �_ _ _ -- -- �J ' _t- _ � i y � -- ; _� �' J: � .1Yi .s.r.�.%.~ .�. e.'+.;. - -_ M- �. `.... ��"_': --....er.R'd 1F__.r., a!ftt�s ..�t�. �ct��t3i-r 1�—� KelleY �v�ust hpvW fon Gontractor Property �ropev�tY Gonceptual �F-loNsing �Cype Developers Go. Rosemount.M'innesota Distinctive ZOWYI�OH1eS (at+a�hed) Distinctive Townhomes are the largest of the proposed Kelley Trust attached housing product lines and will likely be built by one custom home builder and will feature maximum floor plan customization. Buildings will be typically twinhomes. The architecture will allow for a theme without repetition. Building style will be one storied with full basements,many of them walkouts. Price range: $250,000 to $400,000. Typical net density: 2.2/ac. - Y( - ' � , i :� � 9 i � , , ' I � _ y� . i I — —FOX�t1IT'��: —' � �`� �i ' , j -'' I _ a � , ,9 � .�1 ` � r I� � �9,`- -:./ I ' �-_�-.-- � f �,�...�. ! , ; �'�_ ,._. �� ` • i � _-_ _ �� -- ---- �-' ; : _. .. _..- --- t' �-,. ,J� . t J� ��' `--� ��'`�� - I. .\/,. ' � `��`lS.� �� I1�� ' � '�. �`.`�\\ - r..i��` �.. ; � �� •�' \\ �?r z �. � 4 1 7-�-LnJ � . � � �. � \ � " �1 a �t �\ Y"'` � r �'��+.'�f'�f�� •9 � �^ City Park i;.?J;; ` �t,�� ,w,.�>f.•::�.r•;�;� • �. � r r��f `_ �"t - =-�•'.':�m�. ,�?. I \, � ' \ \ i � . �� ,•�. \ ;�+w.� � � �� . `�� . =�� f.,: � � r � � �. . 1 � .B r �� l .� \�`'�,�, :� '�Fti- r �.��ti%_:F" r_ � /.� '�.y/ �� ;:�`- �.� ` �'i � .`�t�.'�.'. ,. , � ," j :� ��. � . .; �!/• . � •� `,.., ' }1 ' � \� q}, ,7:r: �� -- •. �+\ 'y" � ;a� � � - - . `�� C`.� .. .�, � .• "\Z�.�:��.e�ov a.�, a� �� ` � ~ P r^Y �' � � ,.� � : , •��- -�,� � '� �� .� 00 ; - � ��,.:.:,,.t.-�:;-�`t� �'��":.� ��. " �� /,�` :.-�.T�� . . � . . - � • • — . - . . . . - � - - . . - . � • - . . - . . � • � � � � �- • -� - • • -� � .� � • • : � • - - �. - • . � � -�- � • • •��• . � � � �- � • -� � • �- • • - � � - • - - - • - • •- 1 111 • 111 • - .- . . :rf' ;t's'.;+�` -�i .�e 'y., >��i -y �. .. y � b r�.� .�.�.eC; �. �j,J r� 1 r Jj .. . -��y ' �� .�'•. � rJ ``r ti 1��• :�� + ] • _ L ,� � } 11� �i�.•�^ i�i .. .'�•S, • 1 � � -��y,#. 1 Z :j� .st� " ` �� 4 . �y�� vi�., � 4�+, �' ' � � '• t��. 's'� '�;£ q :.'y - �� - .+ i� �' � �. 7� �•'P� 3�� : ' X, „� j� : �,,t�r� �. �I '� 'E�9` �f � - o i . �:�. � . � .f. i.. .,' .� 1 ��a-' . �f -�' n� i4c �+. i.,,�a�— 'f•��' 'i� �.. � +��'r�"S.�,�r.�e�+'.��' _ -� � � r�,. A � . . -.,. . . . �'.. �'•,` �r'' '� � � su, ��- ' � _ •♦ ��= = •� .. c` m_ .�7i:�ti �� - i�. �) v- �xS - •.'t �` s e. � �' t'^� � -f��,Ar�'"'�"�%� ,_�° �,,. � ?.. � �r r � �� s,�-��-' � . s-' �.. ,j ' ' _.. `�[� � � v a'= `'1� �* ='�'� �'` _ ��i _ . .� . `' �.� -'� � .+ tii -' �.��y ��"l� • _ � i;'- �-_.yY` . � � �a.3-�sr'_ ' `f.�n'v1'� �.., >� ,,s r;.� -�:�,� •. .. ��_ ac{�� _�s ; • • �� . ��4 ��v� i �"M �. {�„.i/j.t - �i��r�:y °`.;' � ,—�: �! �. '_ ��j >.tif�� 9 :,,"�,� • - � - �..y- � G�. -5.�-�-'� :'�'. Xp {'.4z-'��` rSi � 'S"' � ��y•�--�'y . - � r'� P-51fi� Z. y�� #.•"'� � "y.�'•t, � - i�.�RtA't`'f,� !'f.aQ-.�;•il.,s� �fi'w*e ,�.,i� f6 4.a .� � � �� *� -+"fS' •r � .4`•�' ' _ ' ti��r! _ y }t�i 4�" `' '« �.....,,�__�� '��: -4.:_.:;,�^,- � y.t. � :�_ ;� . � ��,� _ ; ,� y: .�. � � -. --' :� 4-'-iia . . - :�{ � !' _ x . .��.d i ,�„ � � _ �.�� _- .��. ♦ '.i -�-C- `. J.. „�.,�'1.'.r '.V.�,rc,v�'�f.J�'i ��O- 6 y�,� t �''`� � �-iG'�L�. I4 -!„""�'.�u ► ,� � .� . . . � . . - � • • - - . . . . . - � - - . . - . . . . . . - . � . i - • • -. • . . . • . . . . .. • .. • • • • • • � • - • • •- . • - • . - • � •. . - - • •- 1 111 • 1 111 . �- • 1 • � � ./ ��',` _ � �`�5 �:!� �yt'r';;- _t: tj��4"'. c .. a�. � � Y_ =__�., .. - ;,;,.� , :�. ��:: . -.�� '�� ',w;;. � �, 1 / '.�: - __ �.�.: fi, .1l:�: �� :. � i @-" � . / . - \ A�-. ',r �� `�'� r F � ��,Q��.r rR 1� r}4. �n' ! \ e ��- � � /�'� •,�-. � �i�. �.� ��'- ,�' � �q':.• �� . �� r' i�' q.��• / �F4. ilI'IZ�\ ` . �� .� �:._ c +r�j:' .� � , '��, � .:s_ _� '. ��V�II'�• V a' _I.. l:i` f,r_ _ �/�'" _ .., t � 1.� � �. y�"./ : J .4 � �� L�� • �J \ ':M __ /! a 4+1 � �j,�, :. � �� ` �� f� 'tt�' ��.� \�� . . l% ' `�I�i��,� ii�" .��"•a''' tAii. ;�.. -.'am��- ==•Kss: ----i`^�I:. :s : � 3��;�.��_ _. _. -� x;�y ;� ti,�c _ �:: 'i- ��. "/ ".` �i��. %' "'� ;. -=, -�= t-- r�...;Fr�r1� ' �y,/" .�''r � ��l.ty ��.��' , _> ``�''`��.• ,� I �� ` �;,►=:_n,;.�;�'•,i�` ' .��.�=. � ,x�: � .�-; --� ■ ?�`'A .ii_up=; !`o- .�, �a.�t �. . � .. �"_: '�: -,,, ..�= � �;P: ��o �"� ` .�� `�r�+t� � • ' s�� - . 1 � - � �fc = �:.M��:+{i.;,�: � .� � ■ _ s�� _, �� +u'.. _ _ ��r�j,•�'� 1'�'��` :�Y: �� ,��; �:� �• � a,,,. �` : � _� ' WJ'il;� `,Ll�i■ RCi. ,Q .�..�� - �� . 4-. . +F • ' 4�5ify1-. `y_ >� � • .r. �'`� ► !!= 7� �5i ��: �1- Zy .�_ �'_�. '• /.�� L .�� a. �L•�,:- �� .•fy._ �l t�i'►. . y- � _ .:� �-�� .• _ _ �liL� .� �2f .... :' .��i�..��..�-., ` iy.lt'ti;I r �II -% • �� : �'��'.ur.".is- _f �j� +.�P� ..s!. ;'f'��i � `� : �' . Y. ), ��y . . �'��: ��vA,:':� .u'�; � �:� / � ��/ �'I y��9r�Y _ � �iC . _ A _ -�� .s'_ Y' f.s�� .►.L��r��' -� . �� . �� • _� .t� f «.' _ �\E � '� �`s,�� / ' _�-%`��-1 �" v.Y' ' �� ...�•�•I /\ �.��r � �3�� .... ��1 �=�a�_'��1� 11�� i��;<� � 1-;1 :� n� .,�I"� `� �r �� a.��_�'� �� —�� r' �`3:�)� '� �- .i� � �J� � '�, �� t_�;-- -�`.� s � _ ■ ►_ ��'�`.fi ,i ;:� - -- f�� Ilr_:;:�. •• . L�1� ' Vjr` �'�•� � -- ,��I _ :,�;;� � :�:�:t,. _ __��_,�� ... _ . -:�� _ -,_� �:,�L�� '�;�� -_�a.=_ _ _ _ ___-`_ -_. �1�►nsc'�' 1�-9 �.�.�b,�. KelleY ��St Gontractor Property ��`Ope�`fY Gonceptual �-lousing �Cype Developers Go. Rosemount,Minnesota Senior �ICtlS1Y�g (attached) Senior Housing is proposed to be in one or more architecturally distinctive building of likely three stories which can accommodate the social and service functions so important to senior living. The building would be potentially either co-op, condo,or rental depending on market and financing conditions at the time of development.The anticipated net density is 11.3/ac. � ' 1 1 _ 1 . � , ;' 8� :. �� ;�" \ \ �� f� -�: ' � ,@ '"' � '� i ,` � �\ �'N '� r- - ,, � � �� .� , .l •r � ; � ;: 3 � ` - / \ �� \ `1� j�- j' � ' i ��` / �� j � ! \ \� . � � _ x Y / �!aJ .(iC.''. �.� r •,'♦ , � � 1 . �... l .-e!�"� �'�y�...� ; ...�u . ..� �'� � ��- � � �C-� '$ � t �.. �-��- '. �t� -- "`'� _ �,�.,�„•� -r.�.�i . r� A. � . —- —_- � '�',� —� ,— � � �"•d�'`"�- �� „� �� i Ll I' r 7II QId� 0 QIiII ot� � G H�Q g'-' �: ' ��.. t.�'�� ' =�"T;� ` � 0�0 �"� [f7� G7C'1 � ipQ- O - -- " "' L- `'�_--n iit'-= �� n F�;t.. , �` --- - --- — ---- .-._#'�Rk ��, �l��NEN4GA 'I7[AIL —___.�_ _.._ �E^IIC/ N"_<.Ulq. ...—__' ._. _ _ � �v�'g i�a.l CITY OF ROSEMOUNT DAKOTA COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 1999- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONCEPT RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR CONTRACTOR PROPERTY DEVELOPERS COMPANY Kelley Trust Property WHEREAS,the Community Development Department of the City of Rosemount received an application from Contractor Property Developers Company for approval of a concept residential planned unit development for the Kelley Trust property located north of Country Hills,between Diamond Path, either side of Shannon Parkway, and west of Dodd Road in Rosemount, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on April 27, 1999,the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Concept Residential Planned Unit Development for Contractor Property Developers Company and adopted a motion to recommend approval, subj ect to conditions,to the City Council; and WHEREAS,on May 18, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rosemount reviewed the Concept Residential Planned Unit Development for Contractor Property Developers Company. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,the City Council of the City of Rosemount hereby approves the Concept Residential Planned Unit Development for Contractor Property Developers Company, subject to: 1. The development consists of 536.3 acres including land previously dedicated for Shannon Park. Considering undevelopable land for slopes and wetlands, staff is using 460 acres as a net developable acreage. Therefore, 920 units are allowable based upon the pending Comp. Guide Plan policy. Of the 1,153 proposed units, 233 (20%of the total)would be considered a density bonus for the overall high quality of the proposed development, and the use of clustering or other techniques to aggressively preserve natural features, open space, ridges, slopes and woodlands. Lastly, 100 units are included in the number for senior housing which should also support the density due to its specific niche for life- cycle housing. Senior housing would require rezoning to R-3. Multi-family housing represents 27% of all units. 2. Housing types and neighborhood clusters shall be utilized to reinforce a pattern of transition from urban to rural. The proposed estate housing adjacent to the rural residential district shall have a net density of one dwelling unit per acre over an area consisting of all lots adjacent to rural residential uses. This may be accomplished with large lots or clustering of dwelling units. Clustering techniques shall be applied to housing appropriately to adapt the development to the natural forms instead of significantly altering them. Consideration should be given to increasing the use of cluster techniques,particularly on the northern tier to preserve additional open space or natural features. Resolution 1999- 3. Housing types adjacent to existing urban single family residential uses shall be similar to the established housing types and densities. In the case of dissimilar housing types or attached housing,bufferyards utilizing preserved stands of trees and/or extensive landscaping shall be required to preserve homogeneous neighborhoods. The developer shall provide additional detail on all housing types, to be incorporated into the PUD Agreement. 4. The environmental review process will help determine the ultimate locations of streets, housing and infrastructure. The city supports the Alternative Urban Area wide Review (AUAR)process. This concept approval shall not waive the requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991,the Tree Preservation Ordinance, and the Surface Water Management Ordinance.. 5. The east-west parkway street shall intersect Shannon Parkway at a perpendicular in a location causing least impact on trees,wetlands, and natural features. City engineering standards will also be used to determine the most acceptable location and design. 6. Existing local streets terminating at the edge of the development with temporary cul-de- sacs and barriers shall be designed as through-streets ultimately connecting to Connemara Trail, Shannon Parkway or the east-west parkway. Traffic calming techniques should be considered for Shannon Parkway and Connemara Trail. In addition,modifications to the city street design standards should be considered with the review of the traditional homes portion of the concept plan. 7. Concept approval shall incorporate recommendations regarding street design and connections included in the attached City Engineer/Public Works Director memo dated Apri122, 1999. 8. Concept approval shall incorporate recommendations regarding park, sidewalk and trail improvements made by the Parks and Recreation Committee. 9. The developer shall work with the City to attain a connection to the downtown, including streetscape features(utilization of similar lighting) and cooperative development of Central Park. 10. The developer should revisit the Village Center concept that includes a swimming pool and tennis court facilities and address whether such facilities are for public or private use. Additionally,non-intrusive retail amenities, such as a coffee or ice cream shop, should be considered in this center. 11. Strong consideration should be given to offering a higher density bonus for additional open space. 12. The City Council should give direction to city staff to contact and work with outside resources,primarily 1000 Friends of Minnesota and Minnesota Land Trust,to acquire and/or manage open space for proposed corridors,buffers, open space and parkland. The Resolution 1999- developer would not be penalized in the total number of housing units. ADOPTED this 18`�day of May, 1999,by the City Council of the City of Rosemount. Cathy Busho, Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Walsh, City Clerk Motion by: Seconded by: Voted in favor: ' Voted against: Member absent: � C C C O C N Y � � O � C � U U O � V � � f0 j O � C V C ..N+. C � C � � � o � O y O ` - � V � � p � (p � O U C � �C O L U '� � ..+ i.. w. O C +�. ►+ �. y O � V � �p � �p ` f0 � V � L ` O 'o � � V � � tn tn v� � C -� tn o V U � U N '� c � C V (0 C N U O C C c o� p � 0 � E C o � c c v� m ... _ � v � � � v) -o 0 0 � � � � � > > fl' �,°' � ° � c c c c o � � � c'�`9 � � ° c`u N o � o�o � c� o�o <� N � � � � n°, � a° o '� � rn � n. o �' � a a� a � �nc� � y � � � ? � N N V y � y C � N � C O N � II II 11 II d � y � LJ � �. N O N � � p .� f6 � O � '� C � N M 0 � m L — � (C N � >+ C � � y C � (6 • -� � � � � o y � o L o L � rn v�i a�i v � � � � � o � p � � � � � � � co � � N � � � o r- .c o � L .. � N � rn � U ccn � cA � � � � � cn m � � � � tn a�i � 0 3 0 0 'u� L � o o � c o .°�c o U L � L O L U .0 y L U V U L � ` L U L 'p, 'C � 'C 3 � 'p. � a � �Q � 'Q '� 'a O � � � � � z° aiz° �° z° � z° Wz° � Q � z° � � �° c°noZ � , . d + � + r + � + � + � + .c � •3 � � � v � -a � v � � Q Q Q Q N � y �3 � �3 y �3 �, 3 � �3 � o z z z z o � o > o > o � o > o > -� o 0 0 � o � o � o � o � � o � oin oin oin `� in � ir� � N r � 00 � 00 � f� I� 1� 1� LA V NQ O N N M M � �'�' �'�' � N N Z o N � � � � � � � � � O� ♦ ` V N 00 e- M 00 CO N � f� 00 tn t0 � � r.�'+ N M CD �-- et �- N N N M �t N N � � y r ` � C U d � = G N c � � tf') � � � M CO I� O M � 00 O O O M M M � H � r M 0p � � M � O M I� M O O O �O �C � .�. ` N N .-- <O � O � � `N N N M I� � C �- a 'a W °' N � ^ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ � e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e e .p J v �' I� I� � N CO N N N � M ti O N W � � °' � = U � N � 00 N O O O � N M I� CO CD C7 �''1 � •C y � CO o0 O � 00 �,MV N N CO C7 � � �p � �' � C tn � y w N � �' �` � y � O � a °' -o ,� ;- 'o � � N ,� � . � � a. .� � y � f0 � C� Y � � L F- R � � d N � � a � N '� cL c Q 3 .� N c °, �n � o ai u� � � Y c a c > •N �, � a� •y ; a� � ».. � m � m m o a� F- o 0 � ' a� o 0 0 � � > > m 2 > O � a a � � f0 = 2 � � � 2 ? � lL 2 � � o � � J °n � o c � ,J p �� F- i � rn c�i o Q � � 'N �N = co y Q H � _. m c Q Z 0 u.i • � N � o a�i ~ c �v�i cyo m c��o o a? H i � � a� o. F' � a ~O � � > U c� � �j W U U I- U � � a a Q � O � C9 . Z �' r � � � � �� ,;m ��-�� '., • J � � I � — S V �� '� �-9i �vs _ ! ) I I I ��) � � � � � Creating Neighborhoods of Merit May 24, 1999 Mr. Dan Rogness Director, Community Development City of Rosemount 2475 W. 145`� Street Rosemount, NIN 55068 RE: Kelley Trust Concept PUD Dear Dan, We wanted to respond to a question raised at last Tuesday's Council meeting as to why the proposed Kelley Traditional Neighborhood isn't just"small homes on small lots". The traditional neighborhood is an integration of design concepts and philosophies which demonstrate that there is no correlation between large lot sizes and good land planning and neighborhood design. Contractor Property Developers Company has proposed an opportunity in the Kelley PUD Concept Plan to recreate neighborhoods which reflect the best of urban design from the 1920's and 1930's while accommodating the needs and realities of modern day life. We would encourage the City to consider the following items as we proceed together with the final design and layout of the Kelley Traditional Neighborhood. 1. By modern"typical suburban" standards,the proposed Traditional homesites are certainly smaller. However,they reflect a more efficient and respectful use of the land without a loss of value or a cheapening of the neighborhood. 2. Homes in traditional neighborhoods,however, are not necessarily smaller. Rather, there is an increased focus on style and architecture as an integrated part of the total neighborhood design. Home plans and exteriors are created to work with land forms and specific lot sizes. This eliminates the concerns over post construction variances. We believe that creative floor plans, adapted to take advantage of the amenities available to the specific homesite,will drive the prices and home quality in the Kelley Traditional Neighborhood. Our experience at Stillwater has demonstrated the timeless adage that there is no relationship between bulk house volume and design quality. We are confident this will also be the case in Rosemount. 3. The positive offsets to traditional neighborhood lot size concerns will be generated by bringing the neighborhood amenities to the fronts of the homes through heavily landscaped and decoratively lit streetscapes. These tie the neighborhood together with the parks, squares and hardscapes that invite opportunities for neighborhood gatherings and socializing. 4. Although the auto is a necessity of modern life,traditional neighborhood design accommodates the auto without making it the preeminent design criterion in both CPDC Corporate Offices: The Quadrant Building - 7100 Northland Circle - Suite 108 - Minneapolis, MN 55428 phone: (612)971-0477 - fax: (612)971-0576 - emai I: cpdc@schererbros.com street design and housing architecture. To keep homesites in scale with streetscapes and to reduce the impact of the automobile,traditional neighborhood street widths are narrowed to develop a critical interrelationship between the street, its accompanying boulevard sidewalks, lighting and boulevard trees, and the homes on those streets. Garages are typically set back or turned to minimize the effects of garage doors on the streetscape. 5. The proposed Lifestyle Villas(the maintenance free homes) are also proposed for 55- 60 foot wide traditional lots. The Villas will be designed site specific for the Kelley lots and will likely be built by one builder. This should eliminate concerns over future variance requests in this neighborhood. In summary, CPDCo has endeavored during the PUD concept design process to bring to the City of Rosemount a mix of quality housing which meets the needs of a wide demographic spectrum and which can bring sensitivity to the site through land use efficiency and innovative land planning. We look forward to working with the City on its details over the coming months as we proceed with the preliminary plat. Sincerely, James W. Johnston Vice President cc: Homer Tompkins Tim Erkkila Mark Putnam I� � Y � � � � � � �� - �'� - G��Cf a��\�{�° � �1 �__.'�' �� _ � �� - >3 C�`59�, � �� C �� ,, Creating Neighborhoods of Merit May 25, 1999 Mr. Dan Rogness Director, Community Development City of Rosemount 2475 W. 145�' Street Rosemount, NIN 55068 RE: City Council Questions-May 18`� Deax Dan, We wanted to respond to a number of questions raised late at last Tuesday's Council meeting. Question: Who owns the open space? Response: We believe that the preserved open space is a community-wide asset and should be retained by the City to the maximum extent possible. The trail system generally provides public access and connection to both adjacent neighborhoods and the trans- County system. We believe these trail links should also be publicly owned and maintained. As we proceed with more detailed design, open space and amenities which � we jointly determine have specific benefit only to Kelley Trust residents would be retained by the Master Homeowners Association. We do not, at this point in time see open space within the project suitable for donation to a non-profit land trust. Question: How does the City ensure that home values and architecture as proposed by this concept plan actually get built? Response: The final PUD documents will likely set out the specifics of each neighborhood's design and chazacter. In addition, CPDC, as Developer and Declarant under the Master Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of the Master Homeowners Association,will prepare an extensive sef of design and development guidelines for the entire project and administer a rigid architectural review process. For City review, we have enclosed a set of comparable documents for our Stillwater neighborhood,Liberty on the Lake. Question: What are the"connections"to Downtown and Central Park mentioned in Item #9 of the Planning Commission resolution? Response: We have pledged throughout the concept review process to work collaboratively with the City to tie the Kelley site to historic downtown. We believe the pedestrian traiUsidewalk system proposed is reflective of our desire to connect. We likely will incorporate "old fashioned" street lights in the Traditional Neighborhoods which most losely tie to downtown. Beyond these items,we would be looking for some CPDC Corporate O�fices: The Quadrant Building - 7100 Northland Circle - Suite 108 - Minneapolis, MN 55428 phone: (612)971-0477 - fax: (612)971-0576 - emai I: cpdc@schererbros.com additional City direction to make the "tie". Question: Add Clubhouse/Village Center back into the project? Response: These amenities were originally conceived with the higher residential unit counts proposed with earlier concepts. Those counts were critical to economic viability and critical mass and we don't believe we have those components anymore. We certainly are prepare to revisit this issue with the City as we proceed on the preliminary plat process. Lastly,the issue of public v. private was raised. Because of the corporate non- profit status of the HOA, we had always considered such a proposed facility as private, member only usage. Question: How will construction traffic be mitigated? Response: We, at this juncture, have not attempted to put any kind of detailed phasing plan together. As we proceed with the approval process we offer our full cooperation and assistance in jointly working out a traffic plan which impacts existing residents to the minimum realistic extent possible. Question: What are we going to propose on wetland and tree preservation? Response: Both of these areas are also important to us. We have previously pledged to �vork closely with the City as we progress. I would also encourage your review of the Liberty materials submitted today under separate cover for our approach to tree and natural area preservation and stewardship other, not so dissimilar, circumstances. Question: What is CPDC position on road linkages to adjacent neighborhoods? Response: We believe that the Kelley project must integrate with the remainder of the city and adjacent neighborhoods. Although the proposed connections at 131�`, Clover, etc. aze not required for our own internal circulation, we think they help create that community cohesiveness in addition to aiding the life safety issues raised by the Staff. We look forward to the meeting of June 1 S`. In the interim,please call me with any additional questions or co ents. ' cerel e . Vi resi n� cc: . Tompkins Tim Erkkila Mark Pumam „ � TEL �651-296-175� Apr 02 99 9 �40 No .001 P . Ca� v' �� RECOMME1fDED carrrE�rr AND �'ORKAT �:. . ALTI�RNATYVB �RBAN AREAWID� REVIE91 DOCil1�tEN'1'8 •.;: , •�'�''” PrepArsd by� EQB ataf! 6/95 s This gufd�nae ha� bean prepared by the EQS staff to a��sist in the preparation of AUAR docuttten�s. Tt is based on th� diractive of 4410.361d, subp. 4 that "the content and fcrmat jof an AUAR documentj mu�t b� �simil�►r to tihnt of an EAw, but must provide for a level oP analysie� comparable to that of en EIS for impacts typical of urban residentidl and commercial development.'� General �uidance This quidanoe is based on the item� of the standard EAW farm (June 1990 version) ; the numbers listed below ref�r to the it�m r►umbers ot that form. Except where stated otherwie�, the intormation requested here ia intende�d to auginant {ar clarify) the information a�ked for on the EAW form; therefore, the EAW fox�m and thg guidanGe hooklet "EAW Guid�lin�e" mugt be read along with this guidanca, Exo�pt where the regponsss are identical, the information requ��ted mu�t b�a �upplied for anch of the major devalopm�nt acenarias being analyzed, and it ig important to clearly �xplafn the diffor�ttcas in impacts between the various scenarios. � �:E thi.� guid�nae indioatas thet an EAW item �s r�ot appiicable to the AUAR, the S.tem # t�nd i�� title (the tex� in bcld print on the EAW form) ahould bs included with an indication that the EQB guidance fr►diQatee that no response is nec��aary in an AUAR (as opposed to just skipp�nq r4fQrenca .to that item at nll) . one c�eneral rule that �hvuld be kept in mind thrauqhout the preparation of the AUAR dooum�nt i� that whenever a certain impact may or may .not occur, dependinq an the exact dg�ign of futur� develapmente, the AVAR ahould vover the poegible impacts through a � "wor�t aa►�� acanario" ena�lyei� or el�e prevent th� impacts throuqh tha provi4ionA of th• mitigbtion plan. F�ilura to cav�r possible impavt$ by one of these means riske the invalidat�an et �he environmental review exemptfon for �p�cific davelopment pro�ect�. Doaumint tormat. I� the RGU wishes to rearganize the AUAR cor►tent �nto a �ormat oth4r thAn that of the EAw form ft � may do so, �royided that a cross-raterence index t� guppl�ed that informe the z�Ad�r whare the resgonse(s) to each of ths EAW items �r�� be found (id�ntifying the paqe(�) or specific sec�ion(s) ) . � ....r—�-�"'�� ' � � .. , � �.i:.. . . � �c�+I ��` � . . ,,U3��' �a t�rI11M�ENtIt 111111� 11111 161 �E111 �iltfi, _(. �Ill, M16�1�� Itt 2!t-��1� FIX ItZ t!i-�ifl_Ii�EE,:�,��.11LE1 L1 (�I PI�MM MN PLRN TEL �651-296-1754 Rpr 02 99 9 �40 No .001 F . Sa�cifi� Guidan�e by EAW Form It�m 1. Titi�. An a�propriata dascriptive title for tba g�ographical � area of. the AUAR should be cho�en. 2. prdpos�r. It is not necesgary far A�Al2 purposes to identify prop�rty owners within tha AUAR area (although it may be useful ta use such names as identi�iera ot various land pnrcels) . 3. RoO. No changes fram EP,W form. 4. Rat�Ori !or EA� pr�peratioa. Not applicabla to AVAR. 5. Laa�tion and maps. a. Th� aounty map ia not needed tor a� AVA1t. b. The USGS map shou�d ba iricluded. c. Instead o! A �ite plan, include: (1) a map clearly d�piating th� boundaries at the AUAR and any aubdistrict$ used in the Av�t analysie; (2) land use and planning and zoninq maps as requirad in Con�un�tion witb it�mm 9 and 28; �rid (3) a cover type map as required by item 11. Additidnal map� may b� ineiuded throughout the documant wher�ver m�p� are u�aful for displaying relevant information. 6. D�sa�ription. Inste�d of tha information ca11Qd for on the form, the �es�cri�t�.on scectio» oP �►tt AVAIt �chauld inciude the failawing elements for each major dsvelopment �cenaria included: - antfafpatad typas And intenaity �density) of re�idential and commerciai/warahous�/liqht indu$tr�.a1 d�velvpnta��t throughaut tha AUAR area; - in�raetruature p].anned to serve devQlopm�nt (roads, sewers, weter, stormwater sy'stem, atc. ) RaadwAy� intendsd primarily to � �erve th�a adjoininq l�►nd use� within an AUAtt nrea are noz�aally expeoted to be reviewed da pa�rt of an AUAR. More ��arterial" type� �oP roadway� that would arb�$ an AUa1Z area ara an optionr►1 inclusxon in tho Av1� analy�f�; if they to be includad, a more intens�ve lev�l ot review, gen�rally including �n nnalysis ot alternativ� r�utes, ie nace�eary; - intormation about th4 anticipatad staginq o� variau� developmente, to ths axtent kxsown, and of the infrastruatura, and how ths inlrastructuro staqing will int�uenca tha development sohedule. Note: th� RGU muet as�urs that the development described complies with the requiremants of 4410.3610, subpart 3 (and ala�o thati ft properly orders the AUAR and sets the� description in that order as ' requir�d by 4410.3d10, scubpart 3} . 7. �roj�a� taa►quitnd• date. The aumulr�tiv8 totals of the parameters �nll�d for ehould b� giv�n for each major development .saanaria, except tha►t information on ��mnnufacturing, �� Fother induatria�," ninstitutfonal, �� nagri,cul�ur.ml," and "building beighta" is optional. , .,N TEL �651-296-1754 Apr 02 99 9 �41 No .001 P . Cia -3- 8. Para►i�s and approvals r�quir�d. A liatinq of majar approvals likely to be required by the antfcipated types of developm�nt projects shauld ba gi�ven. Thi� list wi11 help orient reviewar� to the idea that �he AUAR proc��s ie only on� piece of the r�gulatory tramewark that wil�, pro�eCt environmental resources. The list cAn also serva as a �tarting p�in� for the develapment of the implamentation espect� of the mitigatian plan �o ba developed n�t part of the AUAtt. s. L+�Ad us�. The A�]AR daes not nsed to fnclude a section aorresponding to item s. The eummary af exfstinq and pnst land use� and di.scussion ot potential land use oonflicts should b� included as part ot the regpanse �o item za. The identification af any existing areas o� soil contaminatian or other hazard� can be inaluflod urider item 20. 10. cov�x tynos. Ths tollowing informa�ion shauld ba provided inBtead: a. a c�ver tvtae ma», �t lea�t et the m�ale o� a USGS topographic map, depia�int�: �- w�tlands - identiti�d by type (Circular 39) - wateraours�s - riv�rg, streams, creeks, ditchas - lakes - identi�y protaat�d Wa�ers �tatua and Bhpr@�Arid m�►»agament cla�sification � - woodlands - br�alsdown by classes where passible - grassland - identify nati,vQ �►nd ald ffeld -- crop�.and - curren� davalopmsnt b. an "overiay" map �hawinq anticipatQd development in ralation to the cover typea; th1� �atAp ahould also depict any "proteation areas, " existing or proposed, th�� wi.11 pressrva se�sitive cover . typas. separate maps �or ea�ch ma�jor clevelopment s�enario should qenerally• be pravid�d. ' � ii. Bish, Nilali��, and •aoloqia��.ly a�n�itiv r��our�os. a. Tha deacriptian ot wildlife and ��sh resaurcod �hould be related to the habitat types de�sicted on the cover type� mapa (o� itam 10) . Ar�y �ittarancee in �.mgdcts between davelopment �cenarfoa �hould be • highliqhted in ths discussian. b. For en aUAR, prior con�nultation �►ith the DNR Natural Heritage program �or intormation About report� of rare plant and anima►1 speciea in tha vicinity is requ��ed. If such consultetion indicates the naed, an on-site ha�bitat ourvey for rare spacies in �he . appropriet� pvrtions of th� AUAR area is required. Araas of on-- eite aurveya should b� depicted on a map, ag �hould �ny "protaction zone�" establi$hed ae� a re�ult. �2. phyrioai imp�ot� on rat�r r�soura�s. The ingormatfon called tor on the EAW torm should be suppllad �Qr any ot the intrastruatu�a associatad with the AUAR dev4lap�aant �cenarios, and for any raa�fdential or commercfa�l devoiopment expected to physically impaot any wAter r�sources. wh�r� it i� uncertain whether Wa�er re�ources wii� be i�mp�ct4d �N FLH�d TEL �b51-2yb-175� Rpr 02 99 9 ��2 No . U01 � -4- dependinq cn the exact design of futurs d�velopments, the AUAR should cover tha poasibla impacts through a "worst case scenario�� or �ise prevent fmpac�g through the provision� of the mftigation plan. 13 . �s��r �a�. With respact to b and c, if the area requires new watar supply �Hlls specific intormation about that apprepriation and its potantia►1 impa�ts on qroundwater ievels shouia ba givett; i� groundwatex leve].s would be ai�ected, sny imp�cts ]r��ultinq o�1 othar resource� shauld be addras�ed. With respeot to possible individual appropr�.ations by future projeots, a qeneral assessment of the like].y need �or euch should be included, t+nd if there ia potential for major t�pproprfations or environmental igsues r��►ulting from indfvidual appropriations, a more dstailed assessment� of thosa should be includad along with a di�cussian Qt mitigation �or potential prob�ems. 14. 11�t�r-r�lat�d Land os� Maaagpm�nt l�ia�riata. such di�trfct� shauld b� d�1ln�atad on appropxiate mApe and the 1�►nd use � reatrictions applicabla in thos� dietricts should be described. �P any veri�►no�� t►r dQviationo from �h��n r��trictfons within �h� AUAR arsn ar� envisionad, �hi� should be discussed. �5. Aat�r surlaa• ur�. Thi� itiem need only be addr�s�ed i� the AUAR area would includa or adjoin recreationn� wbt�r bodfee. 16. 8ai1�. A standaxd eoils map aavering the• area shouid be� included. 17. ErQ�iom �ad ��di�ei��tatio�. Tbs numbar o� acr�� to be qrad�d and numk�er a= aubic yards of soii ta be moved naed not be given; instead, a general discuseion of the iikely earthmovinq needs for develcpment o� the area $hould be qiven, with an emphasis on unusual or problem areas. . In diacussing mitige►tion tae�aurea, both the �tandard requirements o� the loG�l ordinaliC�� nd any specia]. mea$ures that would be added fat� AUAR purposc�sc should b� included. � 18. 1tat�r �u�litp - atorm�rat�r runol�. Far an AuAR the following additioaal quidance should be lollowad in additiQn to that in "EAW Guide].ines": - it !• Axp�ot�d th�►t �►n AUAR will hav� a detailed analysis of stormwatQr iesues; - a map ot the propoaed stormwater management system arld of the water bodies that wi�l reaeive stormwater �hou�.d bs providad; � - the descrip�ion of th� etormwatar sys�tem �hou�� identify an- eit+� and "ragianal" detention panding and algo indicato wh�ther tha v�ri�ous ponda� w111 b� n�w w�►�ar bodie� ar converted exi�ting ponds or watlande. Whare on-�ite ponds will be used but hava not yet btt�n diecignsd, th� dieou�afon Bhould indicate the desiqn atandar�s th�t will be �oliowed. - if present �.n ar adjoining the AUA�t area, the following typ�a ot water bodies muet be given scp�aibl a►naly6�a�►: �N TEL �651-296-175� Apr 02 99 9 �42 No . 001 P .�i�, ..g.. - ��,;_ within th� Twin Citi��s m�tro area a nutrient budgret analysie must be prepared for any "priority lnke�' identi�i.ed by the Hetropoli.tan Coun�il (see Appendix E of ��EAW �uidel�.nes�� (1990)' Ox contaat the Couneil staf�) . outside of the metro aret�, lakes needing a nutr��nt budget analy�is :auet be deterrained by cqnsultat�.on with tht MpCA a�d DNR etaffs; - trou� etreams: it stonawa►ter di�ohargQv will ent+nr or �lffdCt a trout stream bn evaluatfon of the impacts on tha ' chemical compd�ition and temperature reg�m� of the stream a»d the con�equ�nt impacta on the trout popul�tion (and other sp�ci�s� of concern) must be included; 19. Rat�r Quality - Nast�Mati�r. Obe�erve the tollowing points of guidance in an AUAR: - only domastia wastewAtsr �hould b� cansi.dered in an AUAR -- industxial wastewater would b� aoming from indu�trial uss� that are � � excluded �ront review through an AUAR grocess; - wastewater tlaws �houid be estimated by land use subbreas of the AUAR nrea; the basis af flow e8timates should be explained; - the mnjor �ewer system fentures ehould be shown on a map and tha exp+actad flow� �hould be identi�i�d; � - if not explained undar item 6, the expect�d gtaq�nq of the �awer Bystem conetruat�on ahould bA de�cribed; - th• relationghip of tihe sewer system extenaion ta the �tGU�s comprehensive �ewer pldn and (�or metro area AUARe) to Metropoli�an Councii r�gional sy�t�me pla�ns, including rsvsA expansion�, should be: discu��ad. For non-m�txo �rea AUARs, the AUAR must di�cusa the capacity of the RGU�s was�swat�r treatment system ccmpz�red to tho flowa trom tha AUAR mxea►; any nocsssary improvem�nt� ehcu�.d ba described; - if on-sits sysfi�Qms wiil �erve part Qf the AUAR the guidanc� in "EAW Guid�linesN (p�qes 16-17) shcu�� ba followed. 20. Arouadratar - po��A�ial !dr oontaninatioA. A map should be included to ehow any +grou�dwAter h'azards fder,tified undar b. Under b includa any relsvant intorspr►tion ot1 soi2 contaminA�ion due to pn�t lmnd usea within th• araa, a� menti,oned undor item 9. 2i. eolid ra�t��f ha�a�dous wa�t�s; storaq• tanks. For a, g�nerally only the e$timated tot�tl quantitiy of municipal svlid waste g�nern�ad and information ebout e►ny reoycling or sourca separation proqrams o= th� RGv n�e� ba included. For b, patentiial locatior►� c�P etorage tanka ase�ooisted with commercial usea in the AUAR �hould ba identitied (e.g. , gasolin� tank• at eerviae atmt3on�) . • 22. Tr�►tlio. For most AUAR r�viewa a ralativ�ly datailod traffic analysis wili be needed, esp�cially if there is to be much comnasrcial davelopm�nt in th4 AUAR area or if there �re major �ongegted roadways in th� vicinity. The results of the traffio analy�ie must be used in th� rQsponses to item a3 and to th� noi�� aspact of item 25. Instead of resporiding �o the intormatfon called for i.n iten► 22, tha �oliowing inParma►tion ahoulG b� provided= � h�IJ PLAN TEL �651-?96-175� Apr 02 99 9 � 43 No .001 r � -6- - b �e�cr�ptian and map of the existinq and proposed roadway , system, including state, reqional, and lacal roada to be �ffected by the d�velapment of th� AUAR area. This inPormatian should include existing and proposed roadway capacities and exi�tinq and pro�eatad backqround (i.e. , withau� �ha AUAR developmant) tra�gic volumesf - trip generdtion data -� trip qenexation rate� and trip tot�ls -� for t�nch mA�cr develcpmant scenaria brok�n down by land us� �ones andJor ath�r ralevnnt �ubdiv�eians of the area. Th� pro�eated distributions ont� ths raadway syatem must be included; - analys3s of impacts of tha trat�ic generated by the AUAR area on the raadway systam, including: compmrison of penk pericd total flawa to capa�ities and Analysie o;� Levels af service anc� delay times at crit�,cal pa�nts (if dny) ; - a diacuasion of atructiurai and non--structurai improvQmants and txAffic �►anagement m�egure� that are proposad to mitigate problems; Nota: in the �bave an�►lyse� �hs geographical scopa mu�t extend outwaard as far as the tralfic� to be gen�r�►t�d wau].d have a siqni�i:ce►nt e�fsct on the roadway �yatem and traff ic mea;sur�mants and pro�eatior►� ffihould inalude psak da�ys and peak hours, or other appropriats m�asuros r�lated tc identifying cong�gtion problam�, �� we11 as ADTs. 2�. vohiai�-r�lat�d air �iss�ons. Tha quidanc� provided in ��EAW Guidalines�+ should also b• �ollowed for an AVAR. Mitigation � proposed to QliminatQ any potontiml prohlems mny b� presented undor �tem �2 and msr�ly rafer�nced here. The MPCA staff should be cor,�uxtod r�agardir►g �a,a�ibiQ �sP requ�.rem�nt� for certain propoeed davalopmonta; although the RGU may r►�t �rant ta a►summe rvcponaibility Por npplying t'or An ISP for �peaif ic dav�lopments, it m�►y ba desireAble to caordinate tihe AVAR and YSp Anely�es closely. z4. 8t�tian��ry► soures air �►issions. This item i� not applfcable to a►n A�7AR. • Any atationary �l�r emissi,on rource large enaugh to merit envi�rcnm�n�a►i r�view raquires indi.vidual rsvfew. 23. Dust, adors, aois�. Dust, odor:, and conatruatian noi�a need not be Addressed in an AUAR, unless there f a som� unusual renson to do so. Th� RGU �tight want to d�ecuss as part of the m�tiqation p1an, how�var, any du�t aantral cr con�tructior, noise ordinancee in affeat. . . I! th� area wiil �.nclude or ad�oin me�or noise sourca� a noise �nalysis is ngedeQ ta d�t�rmina i! any noi�� levels in sxcoes ot ��ndt►rd� would occur, �t»� f f so, to iti�ntily t�ppropriata mitigatfon measures. with reapect to tr�ffic-generatad noise, tha noise analy��' ghould be based on ths tra�f�iC analysis o� it�m x2. 26. 8�nritiv�'r�soura�s: Arahealoq��,, �i�,�toric, and architea�ural resources. For an AUAR, Contaot with thn. 6tiatn Historic Pree�rv�tian �ffice is rer�uirma to determine whe�her there are araaa of potential ,�� TEL �651-296-1754 Rpr 02 99 9 � 44 Na . 001 P . G�; -7- impacts to �h�sa resources. I� any exi�t, an appropriate site eurv�y of hiqh probnbil�ty are�s is neaded to address the . issua in more detafl. The mitiqation pldn rauet �nclude mitigt►tion for any imp�C�a iddntitiad. Prime or uni�us farmle�nds. The extent oP aonv�rsion ot existinq farmland� �►nticipAted in th� AUAR �thould be �described. If any f�mlt�»C� will be prseerved by special proteation proqramg, this shoald be d�scussed. D�gianated �arka. YeCr. ation area►e� or trails. If development of thR A[JAR will interfare or ch�►nga the use o� any existing suah reeourca, this should be described in the AUAR. The RGU mAy a].ao want to discuss und�r thim item �►ny propas�d parks, recreatfon areas, or trailg to be developed in conjunvtion with development ot th� AUAR area. Scenic y��W� �h� vista�. Any impacts on such r4aouroe� present in the AVAR ghould ba addxe�sed. Thi� would include bath dir�ct physicdl impr►ata and impacts on visual quality or integrity. "EAW Guidslin�s" contains a liat o� po��ib14 scenia r�sources (pag� 20) . � 27. ]►dv�ra• visusl in►paotw. I! any nonroutine visua� impact� would accur trom the antiCipatsd development covered by the MUSA review, this �hould be discv�aed herm along with apprapriate mitigation. 28. Coa�pa�ibili�p with pians. �he AVAR muB� inciude a statament of �ertific+±f•iett fro� �he RGU that it■ comorQhan�ivQ olan oomalies The AUAR doc�Lman� �hould discues tha proposed AUAR area davelopa►ent in the context o!' th� comprshvnsive pla�n. x� this has nat been s�one� a�e part o� th� ra�pona4� to itams b, 9, 19, 22�, and others, it muat b� addresaad heref �► brief synopsis should ba pr4�ented here i� th� mnt�rial hAa been presanted in dotail und�r dther items. Nac�ssAry amendm�nts to compr�hansiva plan elementa to allow for any of the developmsnt sc�narios should be noted. � If there ara any mane►qement pl�na of any otY,�r local, stat�, or feder�l �tgenciee applic�►bla to the AVAR area, the document must discuoa th• compattbility oP the plan with tha variou� develapment gcenarioe studied, witi.h emphdsig on any inaompatibl� element�. 29. x�paat on iatrastruotiur• and public s�rvio�s. ThiB item ahould �ir�t o� all summariao ir►farmation an phyaiasl infrastructure . prasanted undez othar itom� (such 6, 18. 19, dnd �2} . O�har major inirastructure or publi� �4rV�C44 not covered under oth�r items shouid be di�ou��Afl as well -- this inciudes ma�ar �ocim� s�rvicea such as schools, poliCs, fire, etc. As natad abov� and ir► the ��EAw �uidalinag, �� thv� RGU muet b�e cereful to includo pro�act-associated intrastructure as an �xplicit pdrt o� tha AUAR review if' it is to b� exQmpt �from projec��-spea�fic x�vfew in the �uture. h�i�� PLAN TEL �651-296-1754 Apr 02 99 9 �44 No .001 r , -8- �p. R�1�t�d d�vilopm�nts; cu=aul�tiv� impaats. This item does not r�qufre a r��ponsa for an AUAR since th� antiro AU�t prace�s daal� with �umulativ� impact$ �rom related developmenta within the AVAR area. 3�. ot��r pot�atiai •A9��O13�t�ntwl impaotr. =f applf�able, this item should be anscwered na r�que$ted by the EAW fona. 32. St�a�ry a! Is�u�s. The RGU may answer this question aa e►skecl by tbe form, or instead mey chooae to provida an Executive summary � to th$ documerit thAt baeic�tlly �overs the same infarmatiqn. Either way, th� ma�or �mphasis ahould b� an: potentia�lly �igr►iticant impect�, the differenoes� in �3i1pACt� b�tws�n major davelop�nent scenarios, a►nd tha prapoaad mitiigation. 33. C�rtifications bp �hn RaD. In an AUAR document, no certfficationa a� listed at the and at the EAW form are n�c�g�ary. (Tht RGU is legally reaponsilale tor the acauracy �nd camplstenQsg of the dacum�nt and far properly dis�tributing it nanethelae��.) xitiqat�On plili. Th• lin�►1 �vAx documant must inolude an •xplicit mitigmtion plan. At th� RGU�a option, � draft plan may b� includad in th� draft Au1�x documsnt; o� aour�e, wh�ther or not there is a sep�r�tQ item !or a dr�►f� mitigat�.on plan, propas�d mitigation must be addre�sed through tho dooument. It must ba undarstood that the mitfgation plan fn the tinal document �ak�s on the na�ture of � ��itment by tho RGLT to prevent potan�ially signifi�ant impacta from oC�urr�»q ��om �pooi��.� pra�eats. rt is mar� thAn juat a li�t of wa�y� to reduc� irapacte -- it must inalude ir►for�ae►tion �bout how the mitigz►tion will bQ appliad and �►s�urance that it wil],. otherwise, the AUAI� may nct bs � adequats �►»d/or specitic projs�t�t mey lase their exemption from individue��. reviaw. The RGU's fin�l �ction on the AUAR mv�at apeci�ice��.ly adopt the mitigatian pl�n; thar�for�, th4 gla�n ha� a "politicel" as w�ll as a tachnic�l dimens3on. RN�pens• to oomm�nt� Ori th� dx�#t aDA� doawa�nt. Th�a ��nal AUAR � documant muat inaludg a ��ation epacf�icall�y responding to each timely and subatantive commant on tha dr��t tha�� .ndicat�e� the way in which the comm�nt has baon addre��d. Simfiar comiaents mny be combined tor purposao o! r�spondinq.